She gave me a small newspaper cutting

“Lost, a handbag containing private letters, car-tickets, etc. Liberal

reward paid for its return. Please write to A 31, the Daily News.”

I sat with it on my palm. It was so simple, so direct. And I, a lawyer,

and presumably reasonably acute, had not thought of it!

“You are wasted on us, Mrs. Dane,” I acknowledged. “Well? I see

something has come of it.”

“Yes, but I’m not ready for it.”

She dived again into the bag, and brought up another clipping.

“On the day that I had that inserted,” she said impressively, “this also

appeared. They were in the same column.” She read the second clipping

aloud, slowly, that I might gain all its significance:

“Lost on the night of Monday, November the second, between State Avenue

and Park Avenue, possibly on an Eastern Line street car, a black handbag

containing keys, car-tickets, private letters, and a small sum of money.

Reward and no questions asked if returned to Daily News office.”

She passed the clipping to me and I compared the two. It looked strange,

and I confess to a tingling feeling that coincidence, that element so

much to be feared in any investigation, was not the solution here. But

there was such a chance, and I spoke of it.

“Coincidence rubbish!” she retorted. “I am not through, my friend.”

She went down into the bag again, and I expected nothing less than the

pocketbook, letters and all, to appear. But she dragged up, among a

miscellany of handkerchiefs, a bottle of smelling-salts, and a few

almonds, of which she was inordinately fond, an envelope.

“Yesterday,” she said, “I took a taxicab ride. You know my chair gets

tiresome, occasionally. I stopped at the newspaper office, and found the

bag had not been turned in, but that there was a letter for A 31.” She

held out the envelope to me.

“Read it,” she observed. “It is a curious human document. You’ll

probably be no wiser for reading it, but it shows one thing: We are on

the track of something.”

I have the letter before me now. It is written on glazed paper, ruled

with blue lines. The writing is of the flowing style we used to call

Spencerian, and if it lacks character I am inclined to believe that its

weakness is merely the result of infrequent use of a pen.

You know who this is from. I have the bag and the letters. In a safe

place. If you would treat me like a human being, you could have them. I

know where the walking-stick is, also. I will tell you this. I have no

wish to do her any harm. She will have to pay up in the next world, even

if she gets off in this. The way I reason is this: As long as I have the

things, I’ve got the whiphand. I’ve got you, too, although you may think

I haven’t.

About the other matter I was innocent. I swear it again. I never did it.

You are the only one in all the world. I would rather be dead than go on

like this.

It is unsigned.

I stared from the letter to Mrs. Dane. She was watching me, her face

grave and rather sad.

“You and I, Horace,” she said, “live our orderly lives. We eat, and

sleep, and talk, and even labor. We think we are living. But for the

last day or two I have been seeing visions--you and I and the rest of

us, living on the surface, and underneath, carefully kept down so

it will not make us uncomfortable, a world of passion and crime and

violence and suffering. That letter is a tragedy.”

But if she had any suspicion then as to the writer, and I think she had

not, she said nothing, and soon after I started for home. I knew that

one of two things would have happened there: either my wife would have

put away the fire-tongs, which would indicate a truce, or they would

remain as they had been, which would indicate that she still waited

for the explanation I could not give. It was with a certain tension,

therefore, that I opened my front door.

The fire-tongs still stood in the stand.

In one way, however, Mrs. Johnson’s refusal to speak to me that evening

had a certain value, for it enabled me to leave the house without

explanation, and thus to discover that, if an overcoat had been left in

place of my own, it had been taken away. It also gave me an opportunity

to return the fire-tongs, a proceeding which I had considered would

assist in a return of the entente cordiale at home, but which most

unjustly appeared to have exactly the opposite effect. It has been

my experience that the most innocent action may, under certain

circumstances, assume an appearance of extreme guilt.

By Saturday the condition of affairs between my wife and myself remained

in statu quo, and I had decided on a bold step. This was to call a

special meeting of the Neighborhood Club, without Miss Jeremy, and

put before them the situation as it stood at that time, with a view to

formulating a future course of action, and also of publicly vindicating

myself before my wife.

In deference to Herbert Robinson’s recent attack of influenza, we met

at the Robinson house. Sperry himself wheeled Mrs. Dane over, and made a

speech.

“We have called this meeting,” he said, “because a rather singular

situation has developed. What was commenced purely as an interesting

experiment has gone beyond that stage. We find ourselves in the curious

position of taking what comes very close to being a part in a domestic

tragedy. The affair is made more delicate by the fact that this tragedy

involves people who, if not our friends, at least are very well known

to us. The purpose of this meeting, to be brief, is to determine

whether the Neighborhood Club, as a body, wishes to go on with the

investigation, or to stop where we are.”

He paused, but, as no one spoke, he went on again. “It is really not

as simple as that,” he said. “To stop now, in view of the evidence we

intend to place before the Club, is to leave in all our minds certain

suspicions that may be entirely unjust. On the other hand, to go on is

very possible to place us all in a position where to keep silent is to

be an accessory after a crime.”

He then proceeded, in orderly fashion, to review the first sitting and

its results. He read from notes, elaborating them as he went along, for

the benefit of the women, who had not been fully informed. As all the

data of the Club is now in my possession, I copy these notes.

“I shall review briefly the first sitting, and what followed it.” He

read the notes of the sitting first. “You will notice that I have made

no comment on the physical phenomena which occurred early in the seance.

This is for two reasons: first, it has no bearing on the question at

issue. Second, it has no quality of novelty. Certain people, under

certain conditions, are able to exert powers that we can not explain.

I have no belief whatever in their spiritistic quality. They are purely

physical, the exercise of powers we have either not yet risen high

enough in our scale of development to recognize generally, or which

have survived from some early period when our natural gifts had not been

smothered by civilization.”

And, to make our position clear, that is today the attitude of the

Neighborhood Club. The supernormal, as I said at the beginning, not the

supernatural, is our explanation.

Sperry’s notes were alphabetical.

(a) At 9:15, or somewhat earlier, on Monday night a week ago Arthur

Wells killed himself, or was killed. At 9:30 on that same evening by Mr.

Johnson’s watch, consulted at the time, Miss Jeremy had described such a

crime. (Here he elaborated, repeating the medium’s account.)

(b) At midnight, Sperry, reaching home, had found a message summoning

him to the Wells house. The message had been left at 9:35. He had

telephoned me, and we had gone together, arriving at approximately

12:30.

(c) We had been unable to enter, and, recalling the medium’s description

of a key on a nail among the vines, had searched for and found such a

key, and had admitted ourselves. Mrs. Wells, a governess, a doctor, and

two policemen were in the house. The dead man lay in the room in which

he had died. (Here he went at length into the condition of the room,

the revolver with one chamber empty, and the blood-stained sponge and

razorstrop behind the bathtub. We had made a hasty examination of the

ceiling, but had found no trace of a second shot.)

(d) The governess had come in at just after the death. Mr. Horace

Johnson had had a talk with her. She had left the front door unfastened

when she went out at eight o’clock. She said she had gone out to

telephone about another position, as she was dissatisfied. She had

phoned from, Elliott’s pharmacy on State Avenue. Later that night Mr.

Johnson had gone to Elliott’s. She had lied about the message. She

had really telephoned to a number which the pharmacy clerk had already

discovered was that of the Ellingham house. The message was that Mr.

Ellingham was not to come, as Mr. and Mrs. Wells were going out. It was

not the first time she had telephoned to that number.

There was a stir in the room. Something which we had tacitly avoided had

come suddenly into the open. Sperry raised his hand.

“It is necessary to be explicit,” he said, “that the Club may see where

it stands. It is, of course, not necessary to remind ourselves that this

evening’s disclosures are of the most secret nature. I urge that

the Club jump to no hasty conclusions, and that there shall be no

interruptions until we have finished with our records.”

(e) At a private seance, which Mr. Johnson and I decided was excusable

under the circumstances, the medium was unable to give us anything. This

in spite of the fact that we had taken with us a walking-stick belonging

to the dead man.

(f) The second sitting of the Club. I need only refresh your minds as

to one or two things; the medium spoke of a lost pocketbook, and of

letters. While the point is at least capable of doubt, apparently the

letters were in the pocketbook. Also, she said that a curtain would have

been better, that Hawkins was a nuisance, and that everything was all

right unless the bullet had made a hole in the floor above. You will

also recall the mention of a box of cartridges in a table drawer in

Arthur Wells’s room.

“I will now ask Mr. Horace Johnson to tell what occurred on the night

before last, Thursday evening.”

“I do not think Horace has a very clear recollection of last Thursday

night,” my wife said, coldly. “And I wish to go on record at once that

if he claims that spirits broke his hat, stole his overcoat, bumped his

head and sent him home with a pair of fire-tongs for a walking-stick, I

don’t believe him.”

Which attitude Herbert, I regret to say, did not help when he said:

“Don’t worry, Horace will soon be too old for the gay life. Remember

your arteries, Horace.”

I have quoted this interruption to show how little, outside of Sperry,

Mrs. Dane and myself, the Neighborhood Club appreciated the seriousness

of the situation. Herbert, for instance, had been greatly amused when

Sperry spoke of my finding the razorstrop and had almost chuckled over

our investigation of the ceiling.

But they were very serious when I had finished my statement.

“Great Scott!” Herbert said. “Then she was right, after all! I say, I

guess I’ve been no end of an ass.”

I was inclined to agree with him. But the real effect of my brief speech

was on my wife.

It was a real compensation for that night of terror and for the

uncomfortable time since to find her gaze no longer cold, but

sympathetic, and--if I may be allowed to say so--admiring. When at last

I sat down beside her, she put her hand on my arm in a way that I had

missed since the unfortunate affair of the pharmacy whiskey.

Mrs. Dane then read and explained the two clippings and the letter, and

the situation, so far as it had developed, was before the Club.

Were we to go on, or to stop?

Put to a vote, the women were for going on. The men were more doubtful,

and Herbert voiced what I think we all felt.

“We’re getting in pretty deep,” he said. “We have no right to step in

where the law has stepped out--no legal right, that is. As to moral

right, it depends on what we are holding these sittings for. If we

are making what we started out to make, an investigation into psychic

matters, then we can go on. But with this proviso, I think: Whatever may

come of it, the result is of psychic interest only. We are not trailing

a criminal.”

“Crime is the affair of every decent-minded citizen,” his sister put in

concisely.

But the general view was that Herbert was right. I am not defending our

course. I am recording it. It is, I admit, open to argument.

Having decided on what to do, or not to do, we broke into animated

discussion. The letter to A 31 was the rock on which all our theories

foundered, that and the message the governess had sent to Charlie

Ellingham not to come to the Wells house that night. By no stretch of

rather excited imaginations could we imagine Ellingham writing such a

letter. Who had written the letter, then, and for whom was it meant?

As to the telephone message, it seemed to preclude the possibility of

Ellingham’s having gone to the house that night. But the fact remained

that a man, as yet unidentified, was undoubtedly concerned in the case,

had written the letter, and had probably been in the Wells house the

night I went there alone.

In the end, we decided to hold one more seance, and then, unless the

further developments were such that we must go on, to let the affair

drop.

It is typical of the strained nervous tension which had developed in

all of us during the past twelve days, that that night when, having

forgotten to let the dog in, my wife and I were roused from a sound

sleep by his howling, she would not allow me to go down and admit him.

Sight Unseen · 第 16 / 21 题