SECTION I.

Produced by Frank van Drogen, Laura Wisewell and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

book was produced from scanned images of public domain

material from the Google Print project.)

THEORY

OF

CIRCULATION BY RESPIRATION.

SYNOPSIS OF ITS PRINCIPLES AND HISTORY.

WRITTEN, BY REQUEST,

FOR THE "U. S. JOURNAL OF HOMOEOPATHY,"

BY EMMA WILLARD.

NEW-YORK:

FRANCIS HART & CO. PRINTERS AND STATIONERS, 63 CORTLANDT STREET.

1861.

THEORY

OF

CIRCULATION BY RESPIRATION.

SECTION I.

First step in the discovery--Animal Heat the product of Respiration.

Second step--Heat evolved in the lungs by Respiration there produces

Expansion. Third step--Expansion; implied motion, which from the

organism must conduct the blood to the left ventricle of the Heart.

Theory imperfect, until the formation of sufficient vapor or steam

in the lungs is perceived and acknowledged.

TO DR. MARCY.--In complying with your request to write for your journal

an article embodying my theory of the motive powers which produce the

circulation of the blood, together with some account of its rise and

progress, I obey what I regard as a call of duty; and thus requested, do

it with pleasure.

But my theory, with its history, cannot thus be written without egotism.

Logicians say, that the way to convince others is to retrace, in order,

the steps by which you yourself became convinced, which is to be

egotistic. But in this case, there is a further reason: the scientific

discoverer must speak of the apparatus by which he experiments, and mine

was often my own physical frame.

Twenty years ago, while yet my mind, laboring with this great subject,

was condemned

"to drudge

Without a second and without a judge,"

you, sir, comprehended the hypothesis which has now become a theory, and

you waited not for others to speak, but you fully acknowledged its

truth; and although, in Hartford, as now in New-York, you were thronged

with practice, (then allopathic), you yet found time to furnish me with

added experiments, made in your office, confirmatory of its truth, which

by your permission were afterwards added in your name to my published

work.

The first step in the theory occurred to my mind in the winter of 1822,

and while I was engaged in founding the Troy Female Seminary. Being in

attendance on a course of lectures on chemistry, and at the same time

teaching to a class Mrs. Marcett's excellent work on that subject, one

cold morning, as I was walking briskly up a hill, I said to myself, Why

do I grow warm? Whence comes this accession of caloric? It cannot be

transmitted to me from any object without, because every thing which

comes in contact with me is cold. Snow is under my feet, and frosty air

surrounds me; and, as to clothing, even the softest furs _impart_ no

warmth--they but keep from escaping that which comes from within. What

other method besides transmission is there of gaining heat? There is the

elimination of caloric, when, in substances chemically combining, weight

is gained and bulk is lost. Is there any such combination going on in

me? Yes; this atmospheric air, when I inspire it, has oxygen combined

with nitrogen; but when I expire, the oxygen has disappeared, and

heavier substances--carbonic acid gas and watery vapor--are returned in

its place. Thus, it must be, animal heat is evolved. It is the product

of respiration; and it is because I breathe faster and deeper, that more

carbon is oxidized or burned, and more heat is set free in my lungs; and

therefore I grow warm as I walk up this hill, though all around me is

cold.

The mind, excited by new and great thoughts, works with unwonted energy;

and mine at once collected so many proofs, that I became perfectly

convinced of the truth of the hypothesis. In searching books, I found

that Lavoisier had taught the same; but he dying, his doctrine was

discarded by English chemists, Dr. Black leading the way, and therefore

it did not then appear in English systems of chemistry. But from that

time, I cherished it with a mother's devotion, watched changes in my own

physical frame relating to it, taught it to my pupils, and held warm

disputes with the medical faculty, who opposed and contemned it.

In the summer of 1832, the Asiatic cholera appeared among us, appalling

every heart. This plague, I said, is a disease of coldness and

obstruction; and these doctors, wrong as they are on the subject of

animal heat, can never understand it--though, if Lavoisier were living,

he might. Let me, then, as best I may, consider anew the problem of heat

as produced by respiration, and see whether I cannot find out something

which has a bearing on the fatal coldness of this fearful disease. It is

into the lungs, and no where else, that breathing introduces atmospheric

air; and it is there that the oxidation of carbon or animal combustion

takes place. Thus must caloric be imparted to the blood in the lungs;

and in them is one-fifth of the blood of the system, of which

seven-eighths is water.

The nature of heat is to expand all fluids. The blood in the lungs must,

therefore, expand; and if it expands, it must move; and if it moves, it

must, from the organism of the parts, move to the left ventricle of the

heart, into which the valvular system opens to give it a free

passage--whereas the valves of the right close against it. "Eureka!" I

mentally exclaimed; "I have found the _primum mobile_ of the circulation

of the blood." I had for years disbelieved that the heart's slight

mechanical impulse was that cause. In teaching Paley's "Natural

Theology," my mind had come in contact with the passage in which he

describes the heart's more than Herculean labors; and I said, "This is

altogether too much--the heart alone cannot perform all this--there must

be some other power," and an abiding desire to know what that power

could be, prepared me for receiving this great idea. But my mind was

agitated by it, as the sea is, when a great rock is thrown into its

waters.

The cholera was then raging around me; and as I prepared to flee from it

to a mountain air, I confided to a scientific friend, Professor Twiss of

West Point, my hypothesis, which I regarded as probably the incipient

germ of an important discovery.

But there was first the former theory to be disproved; and then there

were new points to be investigated and established. In the ensuing

winters of 1833, 4, and 5, I gave much attention to the subject, and

employed professors in my school in the departments of chemistry and

natural philosophy, who assisted me,--particularly by their ingenuity in

the construction of such simple pieces of apparatus as were needed.

Thus we proved that, although the heart's action gives pulsation, it

does not necessarily give circulation. By an endless india-rubber tube,

filled with water, coiled upon a table and struck repeatedly at one

point, a pulsation was produced throughout, but no circulation. By

affixing the tube to a vessel of water, and laying it on an inclined

plane, the water ran through it in an equable current, making

circulation with pulsation. Clasping the hand upon the tube in

successive contractions, the fluid passed on _per saltem_, producing

circulation and pulsation united, but no acceleration of the current.

Now, add valves to the tube on each side of the opening hand, and you

will have the current--which is moving by gravitation, accelerated by

the hand's impulse, as the blood's current, first moved by respiration,

undoubtedly is by the heart's beat.

The heart we regard as the grand regulator of the blood's flow; and it

is admirably situated for measuring out a regular portion of blood at

every contraction. John Bell, believing in the Harveian theory, said,

"It is awful to think of the unfixed position of the heart;" and

Dr. Arnott declared that "the heart, the heart alone, is the ragged

anomaly in the laws of fitness in mechanics." The heart was now seen to

have a right position; for it should swing loose that its moorings be

not endangered; and, as whatever impugns the Creator's unerring wisdom

must be wrong, so the presumption is, that whatever vindicates it must

be right.

My hypothesis assumed the principle, that, if an endless hollow tube be

filled with a liquid, the liquid can be made to circulate perpetually,

if it be heated at one point and cooled before its return. A drawing of

the simple apparatus by which this problem was proved, is given in my

published work on "the Motive Powers, &c." The figure which represents

this apparatus gives the learner the most simple idea possible of the

connection of the respiratory and circulatory systems, and of the

combination of the two motive powers; the first, or chemical, coming

from the lungs, and the second, or mechanical, from the heart.

Suppose the heart divided into right and left hearts by dissection at

the septum: the circulatory system might then be represented by an

endless tube. Let such an one, nine or ten feet in length, and of one

inch bore (to be filled with water) be placed upon a horizontal table.

Let an enlargement of the tube be made by a tin vessel to represent the

lungs, which shall contain about one-fifth part of the water. Let the

tube connected with the right side of the vessel have, at a little

distance from the vessel, a smaller enlargement, composed of

india-rubber, which can be grasped by the hand, to represent the heart's

right ventricle, with a valve on each side opening towards the tin

vessel, the two to represent the tricuspid and semi-lunar valves. Let

the whole be made nearly full of water; then, under the tin vessel

(representing the lungs), let a fire be made. As the water heats, it

will expand; and as the valve closes to the right, it will go off to the

left side of the vessel. But, as no water will come in from the right,

on account of the valves, there will be no current. Now let the hand

grasp the india-rubber, and the fluid between the valves being displaced

by its pressure, all the water will go towards the tin vessel, because,

while the valve representing the tricuspid would close, that

representing the semi-lunar (between the mimic heart and lungs) would

open--and very freely; because the expansion made by the heat under the

tin vessel had created a vacuum, and thus made a suction power to draw

it forward, while there is a driving power behind to force it onward

into the tin vessel. Then relaxing the hand, a vacuum will exist between

the two valves; and the valve in the rear of the current now begun (the

tricuspid) would open, and the water rush in to fill the vacuum in the

india-rubber ventricle, to be again pressed forward by the next grasp of

the hand; and thus--the fire (representing respiration) being kept up,

and the alternate grasping and relaxing of the hand (representing the

heart's regular impulse)--a perpetual circulation might be made to go

on;[1] but not without another condition of the problem.

And it was in performing this experiment that a truth was discovered,

which, had it been known, many who have ignorantly lost their lives

might have preserved them. When the fluid in the apparatus became

equally, or nearly as much, heated at the extreme parts of the

circulating tube as at the heating vessel, then the motive power of

expansion ceased, and (the hand's impulse being too weak of itself to

carry it on) circulation failed; but it was restored by putting snow or

ice around the extreme parts of the tube. How often have we heard of

ladies who, having gone into warm baths, have been found dead by their

friends, or too nearly so, to be restored.[2] Through ignorance of the

cause, no right means would be taken to restore them, such as dashing

cold water upon the exterior, with simultaneous efforts to produce, in

fresh air and in proper position, such artificial respiration as leads

to the natural. Where no internal lesions have occurred, there is every

reason to believe that such measures might produce restoration.

My imperfect machines gave me to see how much might be done for this

important part of physiology by a more perfect apparatus. Mine was

merely horizontal--but one might be made to take as many positions as

are natural to the human frame; and how many facts might such an one

elicit concerning the effects of position on the circulation, by which

lives might every day be saved! But skilful mechanicians, not ordinary

mechanics, are needed, who are men of intellectual capacity, and are

furnished with _carte-blanche_ for time and expense.[3]

The years 1836-'7-'8 witnessed, on my part, several extraordinary and

fruitless efforts to get before the public the theory, of whose truth

and importance I was then fully convinced. In 1839, Dr. C. Smith, then

of Troy, an able medical lecturer, became a convert to the theory; and

showed me, in post mortem dissections, the organs of respiration and

circulation. At the close of that year, having carefully corrected and

made out copies of my manuscript theory, which I had before written, I

sent two to Paris--one to the two brothers, Drs. Edwards, members of the

French Institute, and one to my friend, Madame Belloc. I also sent one

to Edinburgh, to Dr. Abercrombie. Dr. Milne Edwards soon after wrote a

book, in which he made it a point to show that animals could live

several minutes without breathing; and Dr. Frederic Edwards wrote me a

short letter of objections to my theory, and adherence to that of

Harvey. This letter was copied and answered in my work published in

1846.

About this time, Dr. Aikin, of Baltimore, wrote to me on the subject;

and showed, by calculations, that the mere gradual expansion of the

water of the blood was not sufficient, of itself, to produce a current

as rapid as that of the blood was proved to be, even on the lowest

estimate of its velocity. This did not shake my faith in the great fact

that circulation was created by respiration. It must be so; for in life,

such respiration as produces heat is the invariable antecedent of

circulation, and nothing else is. There was something, then, which

remained to be discovered. Again, I placed before me the conditions of

the great problem, and set myself intently to its study; and I soon

found what I thus sought, and then discerned for the first time that the

blood moves, as does the railroad car, by steam. John Bell, my favorite

author, had shown that the lungs work _in vacuo_. A great proportion of

the blood is water, which, in a vacuum, springs into vapor at 67 deg., and

the temperature of the blood in the lungs is 101 deg.. Its expansion, then,

was not merely the gradual increase of bulk by transmitted heat, but

also that of instantaneous expansion, by the vaporization of so much of

it as is needed; and what expanded water could not do, steam certainly

could. At once, a throng of proofs came to my mind. The most apparent of

these was the vapor _expired_ breathing. I recollected how, in former

times, the stage horses, driven rapidly into my native village of a

winter morning, had clouds of vapor wreathing upward from their

nostrils, while the icicles of condensation were hanging below. The

nurse, who stands over the dying, holds a mirror before the mouth and

nose, and considers that life is only extinct when vapor ceases to be

formed. Then came to mind the solution of that great mystery of

physiology, why the arteries are empty at death, which so long hindered

the discovery finally made by Harvey.

In the state in which chemistry was, even as late as the time of John

Bell, the chemical power of the heat produced by respiration at the

lungs could not have been understood.

Theory of circulation by respiration · 第 1 / 4 章