CHAPTER III.

THE REBELLION LARGELY THE WORK OF A SECRET ORGANIZATION.

Secret societies, and, above all, that great guild known as

Freemasonry, are certainly foremost, if not controlling, factors in

the warfare made upon throne and altar during the last one hundred

and fifty years.

In saying this we do not intend to express any opinion for or against

the sentiments of Protestant Freemasons in England and the United

States, numbers of whom, no doubt, reprobate the anti-Christian spirit

this association shows on the Continent and in Spanish America. They

have been brought up to regard it as a perfectly harmless and

beneficent institution, and cannot understand the attitude taken with

regard to it by the Catholic Church.

It is quite true that Freemasonry may have in these countries kept to

its original constitution, which, we may admit, was of a beneficent

nature. But what Catholic writers on the subject urgently insist

upon is, that on the Continent it very soon assumed a political and

dangerous character. For a long time it was not condemned by the

Church, and many good Catholics of rank and position gave their names

to it. It was only when its dangerous tendencies came to light that it

received solemn ecclesiastical condemnation, and that Catholics were

forbidden to join it. For more than a century this secret guild has

been at the bottom of the revolutions that have desolated the modern

world. Some years previous to the French Revolution, German envoys

of the Society of the Illuminati advised the French Masons to form a

political committee in each lodge; and in time, as Robison remarks,

these committees led to the formation of the Jacobin Club. "Thus were

the lodges of France," says this writer, "converted in a very short

time into a set of affiliated secret societies, corresponding with

the mother lodges of Paris, receiving from thence their principles

and instructions, and ready to rise up at once when called upon to

carry on the great work of overturning the State. Hence it arose

that the French aimed, in the very beginning, at subverting the

whole world. Hence, too, may be explained how the revolution took

place almost in a moment in every part of France. The revolutionary

societies were early formed, and were working in secret before the

opening of the National Assembly; and the whole nation changed,

and changed again and again, as if by beat of drum."

In Spain, since its introduction it assumed a sanguinary and virulent

character; it brought about revolutions and civil wars, embittered

classes against one another, wronged and starved the clergy, robbed,

turned adrift, and banished the religious Orders.

There is, indeed, a good deal of difficulty in tracing all these evils

to the action of the Freemasons; for on the Continent, especially in

Spain, the society has been always of a more secret nature than in

these countries. Members of the Craft in England and the United States

are generally well known to belong to it; their halls and lodges in the

larger towns are imposing and conspicuous; their emblems and badges

are often seen in the light of day. But on the Continent we see very

little of all this; it is a thoroughly secret society; the members and

their movements are carefully veiled from sight. As we said before,

Freemasonry, on its introduction to the Continent, at once assumed a

political character. The Deists and free-thinkers of the last century

utilized it as a potent means of combining against the Church, and of

carrying on their evil propaganda. In this way they were aided by the

Jansenists, with different motives it is true, but still, when it was

a question of opposing the religious Orders, with a whole heart. The

working of the society in Spain in this century has necessarily been

more stealthy and insidious than in France, for there it was face to

face with a truly Catholic population devotedly attached to the Church.

By means of atheistical French literature, the works of Voltaire and

other unbelievers, translated into Spanish, brought across the border

in large bales, and disseminated through the Peninsula, the Freemasons

had already indoctrinated a large number of active and restless spirits

with revolutionary and anti-Christian ideas, when the troubles and

civil war of 1834 gave them the opportunity they desired of making an

onslaught on the religious Orders. At such times the minds of men are

in a ferment, and the most incredible reports may be spread abroad,

and will be implicitly believed by the populace. Accordingly, on the

awful visitation of cholera, which swept over Europe at that time,

desolating cities and towns, and leaving thousands upon thousands of

families in mourning, in Madrid the report was industriously spread by

the Masons that the Monks and Friars had poisoned the wells, and were

the cause of the sickness among the people. In a mad fit of rage the

populace rose on all sides, rushed to the convents and monasteries,

and murdered all the inmates they could lay their hands upon. This

awful event is referred to in the Memorial.

Such a state of things may seem hardly possible in the nineteenth

century; and yet a similar catastrophe nearly happened in Lisbon a

few years ago, the circumstances of which were related to the writer

by one of the Dominicans who was living there at the time. It appears

that the Dominican nuns had opened a dispensary for the relief of the

poor. Strange to say, the frightful report soon went abroad that the

nuns were stealing children, and killing and boiling them down to make

a healing ointment out of their remains. The city was in an uproar;

it was unsafe for priests and nuns to be seen in the streets; and

the populace who really believed the absurd story, being in a furious

state of excitement, were on the point of burning down the convent,

and maltreating the nuns.

To return to Spain, the popular rising in Madrid was utilized by

the revolutionary party in carrying out, the following year, the

suppression of all the convents and monasteries in the country. The

religious were driven out into the world; and their lands, goods,

libraries, and art-treasures were sold for the benefit of the public

debt, and to supply means to carry on the civil war. The bishops

and secular clergy as well were also robbed, numerous episcopal

sees were suppressed, and the goods of the Church declared to be

national property. The Freemason Government promised to look after the

interests of the Church by paying salaries to all ecclesiastics. As

a result, Spain was filled, in a few years, with a poverty-stricken

and starving clergy, and ruined churches and mouldering abbeys were

to be seen on all sides. The effects of that great spoliation are

still felt in the Peninsula; for though the religious Orders have

revived in the meantime, and numerous convents and monasteries have

been built, the priests are not in sufficient numbers for the needs

of the population, which thereby, in many places, is suffering great

spiritual destitution.

The policy of robbery and confiscation was boldly advocated for

the Philippines, just before the late war, in one of the leading

reviews of Madrid. Juan Ferrando Gomez, in a series of articles

[3] bitterly hostile to the Philippine Friars, proposed their

entire suppression. They should be turned out of their convents and

missionary houses by a secret decree, of which they were to be kept

in ignorance till the execution actually took place. Their convents

in Manila would be useful as barracks and Government offices, their

country estates could be divided amongst their tenants, and the rents

formerly paid to the Friars could be commuted into a tax to be paid

to the State. Moreover, the Archbishop of Manila, and any others of

the bishops belonging to the religious Orders, should be forced out

of the country. Besides that, the schools and university belonging

to the Friars should also be either suppressed, or taken out of their

hands. Reading these flagrantly unjust proposals in the light of recent

Spanish history, and with the help of the Memorial, we are inclined

to believe that, without much further pressure from the Freemasons,

the Spanish Ministry would have carried them out. Fortunately for

the Friars, as well as the natives, they have no voice in the matter

now. Under the American flag the religious will be treated as citizens,

having the common right of citizens, neither to be molested in their

persons nor robbed of their property. The President of the United

States has declared this in clear terms to the Holy See.

With regard to Freemasonry in Spanish or Latin America, the Rev. Reuben

Parsons has recently written on the subject (see Appendix III.),

substantiating all his assertions by quotations from Masonic organs

or other unprejudiced sources, and clearly exposing the systematic war

which the lodges in South and Central America have carried on against

religion. He shows how it has started revolutions, assassinated the

leaders of the people, exiled the clergy, and persecuted the Church

in other ways.

We will now endeavor to trace the history of Freemasonry in the

Philippines and its connection with the insurrection there. In the

Philippines Freemasonry found itself face to face with a simple

native population, mostly Christian, and an active body of Spanish

missionaries belonging to various religious Orders, loyal to their

native country, possessing unbounded influence over their flocks, and

rapidly bringing under the yoke of Christ the tribes who were still

Pagan. The religious were a power that they could not hope to cope with

for a long time; and so at first they were left unmolested, while the

members of the Craft were gathering converts, and strengthening their

position, among a class more suitable to their nefarious designs, viz.,

the mestizos, or half-breeds; the Filipinos, or those who, though born

in the country, consider themselves the pure-blooded descendants of

the early colonists; and the Spanish officials, numbers of whom were

already Masons before they went to the Archipelago.

That the Freemasonry in the Philippines has shown itself of

a distinctly sanguinary nature is not to be wondered at when we

consider its close connection with Spain. The Lodge of Action, or

Red Lodge, composed of determined revolutionists ready to use the

dagger, and prepared to wade through a sea of blood to accomplish

their designs, represented by Mazzini and the Carbonari in Italy, has

a large following in Spain, and was presided over, a few years ago,

by Zorilla, the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Spain.

The following account of the growth of Freemasonry in the Philippines,

taken from the Rosario, an organ published in Rome, the editor of

which has access to special information, and is in close touch with

friars who have been living for many years in the archipelago as

missionaries, will be of profound interest. In or about 1860 many

of the strangers who frequented the Philippines were Freemasons, and

members of the lodges of Singapore, Hongkong, Java, Macao, and the open

ports of China. This was at a period when England, Holland, France,

the United States, for colonial reasons of their own, showed hostility

to Spain. It was therefore quite natural that, in those lodges,

an anti-Spanish spirit gradually arose in the Philippines. Seeing

this spirit arising, two officials of the Spanish navy, Malcampo and

Mendez Nunez, Freemasons themselves, determined to oppose Freemasonry

to Freemasonry, by founding lodges that would uphold the Spanish

interests; they therefore established, at Cavite, the Lodge Primera

Luz Filippina, placing it under the Grand Orient of Lusitania, and

a little afterwards another lodge at Zamboanga, for the officials,

seamen, and civil functionaries who held positions in Mindanao.

In opposition to these, the strangers residing in the Philippines

established at Manila itself a lodge of the Scottish rite, as a

point d'appui for the enemies of Spain. They thus moved the centre

of conspiracy against Spain to the islands themselves, and tried to

draw the natives into their nets by giving them important positions

in the Craft. The two opposing factions of Freemasonry also increased

their numbers largely by taking in the political exiles who were

sent to the Philippines as a result of the part taken by them in the

various civil wars in the Peninsula, most of whom gave their names

and services to one or the other. It is remarkable that these two

bodies, guided by opposite political principles, one depending on

a Spanish centre and directed principally by Spaniards, the other

directed principally by Germans, English, and Americans, and opposed

to Spanish interests, found, at least in one direction, a point of

concord, namely, in opposition to the religious Orders. Although

the Spanish Masons were actuated by a love for their mother-country,

still the well-known anti-clericalism of Freemasonry prevailed over

every other consideration, blinding them to the fact that the best and

most influential representatives of Spain in the Philippines were to be

found in the religious Orders, who were the only civilizing force able

to deal with the natives. They thus indirectly paved the way for the

insurrection; for it is well known that from the ranks of the opposing

factions, and principally by reason of their anti-clerical tendencies,

arose the sanguinary society of the "Katipunan," which made it its

direct aim to expel the friars, and overturn the Spanish government

in the islands. The Grand Orient, the organ of this society, declared

that one of the first articles of its programme was the extermination

of the religious. And here it may be noticed that the ninth term

of the proposals made by the insurgents to America was as follows:

"There shall be a general religious toleration; but measures shall be

adopted for the abolition and expulsion of the religious communities,

who, with an iron hand, have hitherto demoralized the actual civil

administration."

In the meantime the lodges increased in number, so much so that two

years ago there were at Manila sixteen lodges affiliated to the Grand

Orient of Spain, and one at least in every pueblo in the province

of Luzon, and also lodges in Zamboanga and the Visaya Islands; an

Anglo-German club-lodge, on the books of which were inscribed the

names of a great part of the Government officials; also the German

Union, affiliated to the Grand Orient of Berlin; the society of

S. Giovanni del Monte, a centre common to Swiss, French, Belgian,

and Dutch Masons. In all, according to reliable statistics, there

were a hundred lodges and 25,000 initiates. When the Freemasonry

of the Philippines had gathered these numbers under its banner, the

insurrection broke out; and of its 25,000 members, at least 20,000

were to be found in the ranks of the rebels. Could any clearer proof

than this be found that the insurrection in the Philippines is the

direct work of Freemasonry?

We will here call the attention of our readers to two of the

illustrations. The first is a collection of various seals and stamps,

forty-one in number, in use by the various branches of the Katipunan,

the sanguinary secret society of the natives. Masonic emblems, the

compass and rule, the triangle, the keys, etc., are to be found on

almost all of them, proving beyond doubt the Masonic direction and

constitution of the society. Turn now to the other illustration,--a

Masonic apron, worn at secret meetings and also in battle, which was

found on the body of an insurgent after an engagement. No concealment

here of methods to be used,--the head dripping with blood, one

hand grasping the bleeding head, and the other holding the dagger,

sufficiently attest to all beholders the work of the Red Lodge.

The position of the religious Orders in the Philippines, just before

the war broke out between Spain and America, had become so perilous

and unbearable, that they addressed a long Memorial to the Spanish

Government, exposing their grievances, explaining the cause of the

rebellion, and suggesting remedies suitable for the situation.

This Memorial is more than a mere appeal to the Spanish Government. It

is a challenge to the civilized world, made by men whose dignity and

honor have been outraged by awful and unjust charges levelled at them

by their foes, and spread far and near by the press. The Memorial has

been put into print by the Friars, and scattered through Spain; it

has been translated into French, and now it appears (in a condensed

form) in an English dress. Up to the present, at any rate, it has

not drawn forth an answer from those whose calumnies were the cause

of its appearance. From another point of view it is of interest,

giving us valuable information as to the causes of the rebellion,

and incidentally throwing a lurid light upon the dark places and dark

workings of Freemasonry. Its importance as an authoritative exposition

lies in the fact that it emanates from the combined heads of all the

religious Orders in the Philippines, men having under their spiritual

care more than five out of the six millions of Christians in the

country. It is signed by Father Manuel Gutierrez, Provincial of the

Augustinians; Father Gilberto Martin, Commissary-Provincial of the

Franciscans; Father Francisco Ajarro, Provincial of the Recollects;

Father Candido Garcia Valles, Vicar-Provincial of the Dominicans;

Pio Pi, S. J., Superior of the Missions of the Society of Jesus.

We doubt whether any official notice was taken of the document by the

Spanish Government. It was on its way to Spain when, on the declaration

of war by America, Admiral Dewey stole into Manila Bay by night,

shattered the Spanish fleet the next morning at Cavite, and laid siege

to Manila. In the meantime, too, the Spanish Ministry had resigned;

and when the documents arrived at its destination, a new Ministry was

in office, under Senor Sagasta, with a new colonial minister. Facing

bravely, but ineffectually, one of the greatest powers in the world,

the new Ministry was entirely taken up with cares and interests on

which depended the existence of Spain as a nation.

A striking characteristic of the memorial is its outspoken insistence

upon Freemasonry as the principal cause of the Rebellion, a position

not unwarranted in view of the evidence presented on previous pages. So

much has been heard from the opponents of the religious Orders, that

a word from themselves, in their own defence, will have all the air

of novelty. We reprint the memorial, quite confident that it will

not suffer by comparison with what has appeared from the other side.

The Memorial of the Philippine Friars to the Spanish Government,

April, 1898.

TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE COLONIAL MINISTER.

In addition to the telegram sent to His Excellency, the

Governor-General and Viceroy, on the first of this month, that

he might bring it officially under your Excellency's notice,

which the said authority informs us has been done, we, the

Superiors of the Congregations of the Augustinians, Franciscans,

Recollects, Dominicans, and Jesuits, have the honor of presenting

this Statement to his Majesty, King Alfonso XIII., and, in his

royal name, to Her Majesty the Queen Regent, Dona Maria Christina,

to the President and Members of the Crown Ministerial Council,

and more especially to your Excellency as Colonial Minister. We

address this Statement directly to your Excellency, according to

law and custom, that you may deign to bring it under the notice of

the exalted personages already mentioned, and even if it appears

desirable before the nation, duly assembled in the Cortes of

the kingdom.

The time has come for us faithful and constant upholders of Spanish

rule in the Philippines to break our traditional silence. The hour

has also come to defend our honor, which has been so much assailed,

and our holy and patriotic ministry, which has been the object

of the most terrible and unjustifiable accusations and calumnies.

We have borne patiently with the Freemasons and insurgents,

known and unknown, who in their newspapers, clubs, and public

meetings, have for the last eighteen months insulted and vilified

us, accusing us, among other things, of having fostered the

rebellion. We have discovered to our sorrow that a number of

Spaniards, having resided in these islands for a longer or shorter

period as the case might be, on their return to the Peninsula have

spoken of us in terms which they would not have dared to employ

if in place of being priests and friars we had been laymen, or

if instead of being ecclesiastical congregations we had belonged

to civil or military bodies.

The religious of the Philippines, far away from Europe, alone

in their ministry, scattered to the furthermost corners of the

Archipelago, and without any other companions and witnesses

of their labors than their own dear and simple parishioners,

have no other defence save right and reason. Conscious that we

have always been loyal and patriotic subjects, and have always

fulfilled our duties and the obligations to our holy ministry,

we have borne patiently and silently, according to the advice

of the Apostle, insults and calumnies from the very persons to

whom we had offered our services in all Christian sincerity. We

have kept silence under insults from persons calling themselves

forsooth Catholics, but who are infected with the practical

Jansenism of certain latter-day reformers. We even suffered

in silence certain false information, most dishonoring to the

religious Orders, to be brought before the Cortes last year. It

was asserted, not only in private, but in important, centres,

that the prestige of the religious Orders in the Philippines was

so shaken that it would be necessary to drive them out by armed

force. It was also declared, as most dishonoring to a great nation

like Spain, to have commissioned friars to furnish information

about the Philippines, and to have asked their advice in the form

of a memorial presented to the Senate. In addition to all this,

the gravest accusations, some directed against a worthy prelate,

were brought against us, veiled, however, under the guise of

impartiality and gentle correction. Before long the clamors will

be renewed in a different tone; and we shall see the reproduction

in the Archipelago, with more or less cruelty, of that historical

period in the Peninsula of 1834-1840.

REASONS FOR OUR SILENCE TILL THE PRESENT TIME.

We believed that a wise and prolonged silence, added to that

prudence and magnanimity which should always distinguish religious

orders, would have sufficed for good and discreet persons,

and that they would have repelled the accusations, and formed a

judgment that would be proof against these repeated attacks. But,

instead of calming down, the storm appears to increase daily. The

Treaty of Biac-na-Bato has furnished to many the opportunity of

renewing the crafty insinuation, nay, bold affirmation, already

made by the rebel chiefs, that the religious institutes were

the sole cause of the insurrection. One of the chiefs of the

"Katipunan" secret society has declared in his paper, The Grand

Orient, which, like a plague, is still scattered over the islands,

that one of the first articles in his programme is the expulsion

of the religious Orders. In the Peninsula as well as here, the

Freemasons and others who second their efforts have recommenced

the war against us. They have published manifestoes at Madrid,

in which, misusing the name of the Philippine natives, they demand

vexatious and disgraceful measures against the clergy.

If under these circumstances we still remained silent, our silence

would be attributed, and rightly so, to fear or to guilt. Our

patience would be called weakness; and even sensible and solid

Catholics, who recognize the injustice of the attacks made against

us, might be led to believe that we were really stained with guilt,

or that we had fallen into such a state of moral prostration,

that we could be ill-treated with impunity.

THE RELIGIOUS ORDERS PERSECUTED BECAUSE THEY UPHOLD RELIGION.

On what grounds are the religious bodies persecuted? Simply because

they uphold true and sound doctrine, and have never shown a weak

front to the enemies of God and of their country. If we had shown

ourselves pusillanimous in sight of the works of Masonic lodges,

and in presence of the propagation of the politico-religious errors

imported from Europe; if we had given the faintest mark, not of

sympathy, but even of toleration, to the men who were scattering

broadcast false notions of liberty condemned by the Church;

if patriotism had cooled in our hearts, or if the innovators

had not found in each Philippine religious an intractable and

terrible adversary to their plans,--the religious congregations

would never have been disturbed. On the contrary, we should have

been extolled to the skies, the more so because our enemies do not

ignore the fact that, were we to help them in the Archipelago,

were we to give them our support, or at least were we to remain

silent, we should thereby give them an undisputed victory.

But they know well that our standard is no other than the Syllabus

of the great Pontiff, Pius IX., so frequently confirmed by Leo

XIII., wherein all rebellion against the powers is so energetically

condemned. Yea! truly they hate us, and under different names

and on divers pretexts they are making such a cruel war upon us

that it would seem as if the Freemasons and Revolutionists had

no other enemies in the Philippines than the religious bodies.

THE RELIGIOUS PERSECUTED AS LOYAL SPANIARDS.

Apart from their essentially religious character, the regular

clergy of the Archipelago are the sole Spanish institution,

permanent and deeply-rooted, which exists in the islands--a

vigorous organization well adapted to these regions. While the

civil and military officials on the one hand, who come from Spain,

live here only for a time, fulfilling their duties more or less

wisely according as it is for or against their private interests,

and yet are ignorant of the languages of the country, and have only

a superficial intercourse with the Islanders, we, the religious,

come over here to sacrifice our whole existences, dispersed often

one by one amongst the remotest tribes. When we bid an eternal

farewell to our native shores, we voluntarily condemn ourselves,

by virtue of our vows, to live forever devoted to the moral,

religious, and civil education of the natives; and we have waged

many conflicts in their behalf.

CRAFTINESS OF THE INSURGENT CHIEFS.

Seeing that we were the most deeply rooted, influential, and

best-respected Spaniards in the country, and that we would come to

no terms with them or their projects, the rebel chiefs determined

to demand our expulsion from the Government. They were aware that

they would be backed up in their demand by many among the Spanish

residents in the Archipelago, who, led by passion and ignorance,

lend a willing ear to all who declaim against the religious Orders,

especially when the watchwords used are "Free Thought," "Liberty

of the Press," "Secularization of Education," "Ecclesiastical

Liquidation," "Suppression of the Privileges of the Clergy."

Thus the password among the rebels became, especially since the

Treaty of Biac-na-Bato, the emancipation of their country. They

declared they had no dislike to Spanish administration, nor

any intention of separation from Spain; what made them rise in

rebellion were the abuses of the clergy, and their only demand

was the expulsion of the religious Orders. But these were lying

declarations, as numerous judicial and non-judicial documents

containing the plans of the conspirators have proved. They

made these false professions because they knew that if they

declared that the insurrection was brought about by the numerous

abuses of power which have been committed by civil and military

functionaries, they would have all the Spanish element in the

Archipelago leagued against them, and would have the door closed

to all their means of propaganda.

ACCUSATIONS AGAINST THE RELIGIOUS ORDERS.

We ask, in the first place, where are these abuses which are always

the subject of their declamations in the clubs and lodges? We

preach the Gospel, and not only do we draw to a civilized life

the barbarous tribes of the Archipelago, whom we have preserved

peaceful and happy for three centuries, as the whole world knows,

but we have always been the defenders of the natives, who are

subjected to a thousand vexations on the part of the Spanish

lay residents. At all times we have watched over the purity of

the Faith and the preservation of good morals, showing ourselves

inflexible against illegal exactions, immoral games, and those who

lead scandalous lives. After all that has been written against

us for so many years, we defy our calumniators, and do not fear

an honest and impartial examination of our lives and works. Let

those who murmur and speak against us, prove by exact dates and

authentic documents that their accusations are well founded.

They say we are enemies of education and of the diffusion of

knowledge; if by education they mean the teaching of doctrine

condemned by the Church, we are at one with them; but there is no

education in the ordinary sense of the term, primary, secondary,

or superior, in the islands that has not been founded, encouraged,

and sustained by the clergy. It is well known that very few of the

native officials who went through their course in our schools have

taken part in the rebellion; and the proclaimers of "Free-thought"

are, for the most part, individuals who failed in their career,

and were the refuse of our classes.

As to the accusations of immorality which are recklessly levelled

against us, all we have to say is that everyone can see our

monasteries and convents and ourselves, and can form a judgment

on our lives; the parish priests and missionaries are alone,

surrounded by a multitude of natives; everyone can see what we

are doing, and hear what we are saying; our European figures

and sacerdotal character bring us into such prominence before

the people that it would be stupid to imagine that we could hide

our doings.

We consider, as not worthy of reply, the impudent assertion that

in the country parts we are despots; that in a thousand ways

we suck the blood of our tenants; charges often before refuted

by the most explicit documentary evidence. Neither is it worth

while speaking of the abominable calumny of attributing to us the

passage through the country with armed force, and the imprisoning

and torturing of those implicated in the first revolt. All this

is part of the absurd fable that we are absolute masters, not

only of the consciences of the people, but of the Archipelago

itself; statements contradicted by the very men who make them,

when they declare in the Cortes that we have lost all influence

and all prestige in the islands.

CAUSE OF THE REBELLION.

The utter want of religion to be found among a great number of

the Spanish residents, the facility with which the ancient laws

of the Archipelago were changed, the instability of the public

functionaries, a fruitful source of abuses, contributed for several

years to discredit the Spanish name. But Freemasonry, as the world

knows, has been the principal cause of the social disorganization

of the Philippines. The Hispano-Philippine Association of Madrid

was Masonic; the Masons were almost alone in the work of urging on

the natives to make war on the clergy and the Spanish residents;

they authorized the founding of lodges in the Archipelago. It

was the Masons, too, who formed the "Katipunan" society, so

essentially Masonic that in the terrible "compact of blood"

they make, they are actually imitating the Carbonari of Italy.

In consequence of the teaching of the Freemasons, the voice of

the parish priest has no longer any effect on numbers of the

natives, especially at Manila and in the neighboring provinces,

where they are accustomed to give themselves airs of importance

and independence; and the prestige of the Spanish name has grown

considerably less, and disappeared entirely in many places. What

wonder, then, if the powerful instincts of race awoke, and that,

pondering on the fact that they had a language and climate and

territory of their own, the rebels should try to build a wall of

separation between the Spaniards and the Malays? Is it not natural

that having been brought to believe that the friar is neither

their father nor the pastor of their souls, nor their friend and

enthusiastic defender, but, on the contrary, a spoiler, and that

the Spanish resident is only a money-grubber, having more or less

power and authority, they should have desired to free themselves

from the Spanish authority?

Six months ago the "Katipunan" society was limited to the mountains

of Langua and Bulacan, where the rebel chiefs had taken refuge,

and also counted some adherents among certain tribes in touch with

the insurgents. But now the plague is widespread; the insurgents

violating the promise made to the gallant Marquis of Estella,

and at the call of a secret signal, have scattered themselves over

the central provinces, and by means of cruelty and terrorism have

succeeded in enrolling in their ranks a great number of natives

who after the submission at Biac-na-Bato gave pledges of fidelity

to Spain. They have also succeeded in intrenching themselves at

Capiz and in other parts of the Viscayas. The rising in Zambaies,

Pagasinan, Iloco, and Cebu are all of recent origin; and the same

may be said of the "Katipunans" discovered at Manila.

However, the greater part of the country is not yet perverted; a

wave of hallucination and fanaticism has passed over it, but the

heart of the people is still sound, and with careful management

they will return to their usual habits of peace and submission. The

move wealthy classes are also sound, and are against the rebellion.

We frankly tell the Government that if it does not aid the

Church, the revolutionary movement will increase every day, and

it will be morally impossible for the religious to remain here

any longer. What good is it for us to do our duty to the people

when others are allowed to undo our work at the same time? Of

what use is it for us to teach the people to be docile and

submissive when their worst passions are excited by others, who

tell them to make nothing of our teaching? What professor could

teach successfully if his pupils were met outside the classroom

by respectable persons who told them to despise his lessons? The

civil authority, according to the teaching of the Church, ought

as far as possible to be a bulwark to religion and morality. If

the Government, therefore, does not protect us from the avalanche

of insults hurled against us; if it does not root out the secret

societies; if it allows our sacerdotal character to be trodden

under foot while our enemies destroy the fruit of our labors,--we

regret to say that we cannot continue our ministry in the islands.

Spain has bound herself very stringently to obligations of

this nature. One of the laws of the Code of the Indies says

expressly on this point: "We command the Viceroys, the Presidents,

the Auditors, the Governors, and the other functionaries of the

Indies, to favor, and aid, and encourage the religions orders who

are occupying themselves in the conversion of the natives to our

entire satisfaction."

The spirit that moved Philip II. was seen in the answer he made

to those who advised him to abandon the Archipelago, in view

of the little revenue they brought to the Crown. He said: "For

the conversion of only one of the souls that are there I would

willingly give all the treasures of the Indies, and if they were

not enough I would add those of Spain. Nothing in the world would

make me consent to cease sending preachers and ministers of the

Gospel to all the provinces that have been discovered, even if they

are barren and sterile, for the Holy Apostolic See has given to us

and our heirs the apostolic commission of publishing and preaching

the Gospel. The Gospel can be spread through these islands, and the

natives can be drawn from the worship of the demon by making known

to them the true God, in a spirit alien to that of temporal greed."

UNJUST CONTEMPT SHOWN TOWARDS THE RELIGIOUS ORDERS IN THE

PHILIPPINES.

An idea has spread since the Revolution in Spain of 1868 that the

Philippine Friars are a necessary evil, an out-of-date institution

which has to be kept up for reasons of state. This unworthy idea,

manifested sometimes with frankness, sometimes with a certain

reticence, and which wounds us to the quick, has been constantly

brought forward by our enemies. The natives who have been to Spain

are fully aware of it; without leaving the Philippines, a great

number of natives have observed it, and are at present trying to

propagate it in the Archipelago. Very numerous, too are the Spanish

residents who are hostile to us, owing to an anti-clerical spirit

or to jealousy; in fact, we have enemies in all classes of society.

Many people, in consequence, think that our very existence in

the country is simply owing to pity and condescension on the

part of the Government; that we are merely tolerated, and are of

less value in the eyes of the civil authorities than the members

of any lay profession. With a marvellous facility all the evils

that affect the country are laid at our door; and every time a

governor makes a gross blunder in dealing with the natives, the

evil consequences which flow from it are put down to us. Now,

every class of society has a right to ordinary respect and fair

treatment; we receive neither one nor the other, but are treated

with absolute contempt. This humiliating situation, as individuals

obliged to greater perfection than other Christians, we patiently

bear with; but as religious orders we cannot put up with it any

longer, for we see only too well how this treatment injures our

ministry, and destroys our influence with the people committed

to our care.

If the Government through an error to which we cannot give

unqualified respect, since it is contrary to the real interests

of religion and of our country, believes that the mission of the

Orders in the islands has come to an end, we nevertheless say

to them: "We await your dispositions with sincerity, but do not

flatter yourselves that in adopting measures against our religious

professions you can burn a light both before Christ and before

Belial." If, on the contrary, we are to remain in the islands,

no one can deny that it is necessary to protect our persons,

our prestige, and our ministry; our country must show that she

is pleased with us, and treat us as her children; we must not be

abandoned to our enemies as a thing of no value, and made victims

of the resentment of the Freemasons. We do not fear martyrdom,

which is an honor we do not feel ourselves worthy of; on the

other hand, we do not wish to die as criminals abandoned by their

friends and protectors, and deprived of all honor.

It is incredible that religious men placed in our position could

be the cause of the woes of the Archipelago. We prefer to resign

our ministry, and see ourselves expelled, rather than continue

our mission in the islands, if the situation does not better

itself before long. We have done our work well in these islands,

and we feel sure that we shall be able to do our duty quite as

well elsewhere with the grace of God.

The Friars in the Philippines · 第 3 / 5 章