The Duchess of Marlborough was now the richest woman in England.

Whatever influence proceeds from rank and riches she still possessed,

though the titles and honors of the dukedom descended by act of

Parliament, in 1706, to the Countess of Godolphin, with whom she was at

war. The Duchess was now sixty-two, with unbroken health and

inextinguishable ambition. She resided chiefly at Windsor Lodge, for she

held for life the office of ranger of the forest. It was then that she

was so severely castigated by Pope in his satirical lines on "Atossa,"

that she is said to have sent £1000 to the poet, to suppress the

libel,--her avarice and wrath giving way to her policy and pride. For

twenty years after the death of her husband she continued an intriguing

politician, but on ill-terms with Sir Robert Walpole, the prime

minister, whom she cordially hated, more because of money transactions

than political disagreement. She was a very disagreeable old woman, yet

not without influence, if she was without friends. She had at least the

merit of frankness, for she concealed none of her opinions of the King,

nor of his ministers, nor of distinguished nobles. She was querulous,

and full of complaints and exactions. One of her bitterest complaints

was that she was compelled to pay taxes on her house in Windsor Park.

She would even utter her complaints before servants. Litigation was not

disagreeable to her if she had reason on her side, whether she had

law or not.

It was not the good fortune of this strong-minded but unhappy woman to

assemble around her in her declining years children and grandchildren

who were attached to her. She had alienated even them. She had no

intimate friends. "A woman not beloved by her own children can have but

little claim to the affections of others." As we have already said, the

Duchess was at open variance with her oldest daughter Henrietta, the

Countess of Godolphin, to whom she was never reconciled. Her quarrels

with her granddaughter Lady Anne Egerton, afterwards Duchess of Bedford,

were violent and incessant. She lived in perpetual altercation with her

youngest daughter, the Duchess of Montague. She never was beloved by any

of her children at any time, since they were in childhood and youth

intrusted to the care of servants and teachers, while the mother was

absorbed in political cabals at court. She consulted their interest

merely in making for them grand alliances, to gratify her family pride.

Her whole life was absorbed in pride and ambition. Nor did the

mortification of a dishonored old age improve her temper. She sought

neither the consolation of religion nor the intellectual stimulus of

history and philosophy. To the last she was as worldly as she was

morose. To the last she was a dissatisfied politician. She reviled the

Whig administration of Walpole as fiercely as she did the Tory

administration of Oxford. She haughtily refused the Order of the Bath

for her grandson the Duke of Marlborough, which Walpole offered,

contented with nothing less than the Garter. "Madam," replied Walpole,

"they who take the Bath will sooner have the Garter." In her old age her

ruling passion was hatred of Walpole. "I think," she wrote, "'tis

thought wrong to wish anybody dead, but I hope 'tis none to wish he may

be hanged." Her wishes were partly gratified, for she lived long enough

to see this great statesman--so long supreme--driven to the very

threshold of the Tower. For his son Horace she had equal dislike, and he

returned her hatred with malignant satire. "Old Marlborough is dying,"

said the wit; "but who can tell? Last year she had lain a great while

ill, without speaking, and her physician told her that she must be

blistered, or she would die. She cried out, 'I won't be blistered, and I

won't die,'"

She did indeed last some time longer; but with increasing infirmities,

her amusements and pleasures became yearly more circumscribed. In former

years she had sometimes occupied her mind with the purchase of land; for

she was shrewd, and rarely made a bad bargain. Even at the age of eighty

she went to the city to bid in person for the estate of Lord Yarmouth.

But as her darkened day approached its melancholy close, she amused

herself by dictating in bed her "Vindication," After spending thus six

hours daily with her secretary, she had recourse to her chamber organ,

the eight tunes of which she thought much better to hear than going to

the Italian opera. Even society, in which she once shone,--for her

intellect was bright and her person beautiful,--at last wearied her and

gave her no pleasure. Like many lonely, discontented women, she became

attached to animals; she petted three dogs, in which she saw virtues

that neither men nor women possessed. In her disquiet she often changed

her residence. She went from Marlborough House to Windsor Lodge, and

from Windsor Lodge to Wimbledon, only to discover that each place was

damp and unhealthy. Wrapt up in flannels, and wheeled up and down her

room in a chair, she discovered that wealth can only mitigate the evils

of humanity, and realized how wretched is any person with a soul filled

with discontent and bitterness, when animal spirits are destroyed by the

infirmities of old age. All the views of this spoiled favorite of

fortune were bounded by the scenes immediately before her. While she was

not sceptical, she was far from being religious; and hence she was

deprived of the highest consolations given to people in disappointment

and sorrow and neglect. The older she grew, the more tenaciously did she

cling to temporal possessions, and the more keenly did she feel

occasional losses. Her intellect remained unclouded, but her feelings

became callous. While she had no reverence for the dead, she felt

increasing contempt for the living,--forgetting that no one, however

exalted, can live at peace in an atmosphere of disdain.

At last she died, in 1744, unlamented and unloved, in the eighty-fourth

year of her age, and was interred by the side of her husband, in the

tomb in the chapel of Blenheim. She left £30,000 a year to her

grandson, Lord John Spencer, provided he would never accept any civil

or military office from the Government. She left also £20,000 to Lord

Chesterfield, together with her most valuable diamond; but only small

sums to most of her relatives or to charities. The residue of her

property she left to that other grandson who inherited the title and

estates of her husband. £60,000 a year, her estimated income, besides a

costly collection of jewels,--one of the most valuable in Europe,--were

a great property, when few noblemen at that time had over £30,000

a year.

The life of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, is a sad one to contemplate,

with all her riches and honors. Let those who envy wealth or rank learn

from her history how little worldly prosperity can secure happiness or

esteem, without the solid virtues of the heart. The richest and most

prosperous woman of her times was the object of blended derision,

contempt, and hatred throughout the land which she might have adorned.

Why, then, it may be asked, should I single out such a woman for a

lecture,--a woman who added neither to human happiness, national

prosperity, nor the civilization of her age? Why have I chosen her as

one of the Beacon Lights of history? Because I know of no woman who has

filled so exalted a position in society, and is so prominent a figure in

history, whose career is a more impressive warning of the dangers to be

shunned by those who embark on the perilous and troubled seas of mere

worldly ambition. God gave her that to which she aspired, and which so

many envy; but "He sent leanness into her soul."

AUTHORITIES.

Private Correspondence of the Duchess of Marlborough; Mrs. Thompson's

Life of the Duchess of Marlborough; "Conduct," by the Duchess of

Marlborough, Life of Dr. Tillotson, by Dr. Birch; Coxe's Life of the

Duke of Marlborough; Evelyn's Diary; Lord Mahon's History of England;

Macaulay's History of England; Lewis Jenkin's Memoirs of the Duke of

Gloucester; Burnet's History of his own Times; Lamberty's Memoirs;

Swift's Journal to Stella; Liddiard's Life of the Duke of Marlborough;

Boyer's Annals of Queen Anne; Swift's Memoir of the Queen's Ministry;

Cunningham's History of Great Britain; Walpole's Correspondence, edited

by Coxe; Sir Walter Scott's Life of Swift; Agnes Strickland's Queens of

England; Marlborough and the Times of Queen Anne; Westminster Review,

lvi. 26; Dublin University Review, lxxiv. 469; Temple Bar Magazine, lii.

333; Burton's Reign of Queen Anne; Stanhope's Queen Anne.

MADAME RÉCAMIER.

* * * * *

A. D. 1777-1849.

THE WOMAN OF SOCIETY.

I know of no woman who by the force of beauty and social fascinations,

without extraordinary intellectual gifts or high birth, has occupied so

proud a position as a queen of society as Madame Récamier. So I select

her as the representative of her class.

It was in Italy that women first drew to their _salons_ the

distinguished men of their age, and exercised over them a commanding

influence. More than three hundred years ago Olympia Fulvia Morata was

the pride of Ferrara,--eloquent with the music of Homer and Virgil, a

miracle to all who heard her, giving public lectures to nobles and

professors when only a girl of sixteen; and Vittoria Colonna was the

ornament of the Court of Naples, and afterwards drew around her at Rome

the choicest society of that elegant capital,--bishops, princes, and

artists,--equally the friend of Cardinal Pole and of Michael Angelo, and

reigning in her retired apartments in the Benedictine convent of St.

Anne, even as the Duchesse de Longueville shone at the Hôtel de

Rambouillet, with De Retz and La Rochefoucauld at her feet. This was at

a period when the Italian cities were the centre of the new civilization

which the Renaissance created, when ancient learning and art were

cultivated with an enthusiasm never since surpassed.

The new position which women seem to have occupied in the sixteenth

century in Italy, was in part owing to the wealth and culture of

cities--ever the paradise of ambitious women--and the influence of

poetry and chivalry, of which the Italians were the earliest admirers.

Provençal poetry was studied in Italy as early as the time of Dante; and

veneration for woman was carried to a romantic excess when the rest of

Europe was comparatively rude. Even in the eleventh century we see in

the southern part of Europe a respectful enthusiasm for woman coeval

with the birth of chivalry. The gay troubadours expounded and explained

the subtile metaphysics of love in every possible way: a peerless lady

was supposed to unite every possible moral virtue with beauty and rank;

and hence chivalric love was based on sentiment alone. Provence gave

birth both to chivalry and poetry, and they were singularly blended

together. Of about five hundred troubadours whose names have descended

to us, more than half were noble, for chivalry took cognizance only of

noble birth. From Provence chivalry spread to Italy and to the north of

France, and Normandy became pre-eminently a country of noble deeds,

though not the land of song. It was in Italy that the poetical

development was greatest.

After chivalry as an institution had passed away, it still left its

spirit on society. There was not, however, much society in Europe

anywhere until cities arose and became centres of culture and art. In

the feudal castle there were chivalric sentiments but not society, where

men and women of cultivation meet to give expression and scope to their

ideas and sentiments. Nor can there be a high society without the aid of

letters. Society did not arise until scholars and poets mingled with

nobles as companions. This sort of society gained celebrity first in

Paris, when women of rank invited to their _salons_ literary men as well

as nobles.

The first person who gave a marked impulse to what we call society was

the Marquise de Rambouillet, in the seventeenth century. She was the

first to set the fashion in France of that long series of social

gatherings which were a sort of institution for more than two hundred

years. Her father was a devoted friend of Henry IV., belonged to one of

the first families of France, and had been ambassador to Rome. She was

married in the year 1600, at the age of fifteen. When twenty-two, she

had acquired a distaste for the dissipations of the court and everything

like crowded assemblies. She was among the first to discover that a

crowd of men and women does not constitute society. Nothing is more

foreign to the genius of the highest cultivated life than a crowded

_salon_, where conversation on any interesting topic is impossible;

where social life is gilded, but frivolous and empty; where especially

the loftiest sentiments of the soul are suppressed. From an early period

such crowds gathered at courts; but it was not till the seventeenth

century that the _salon_ arose, in which woman was a queen and an

institution.

The famous queens of society in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries

do not seem to have mixed much in miscellaneous assemblies, however

brilliant in dress and ornament. They were more exclusive. They reserved

their remarkable talents for social reunions, perhaps in modest

_salons_, where among distinguished men and women they could pour out

the treasures of the soul and mind; where they could inspire and draw

out the sentiments of those who were gifted and distinguished. Madame du

Deffand lived quietly in the convent of St. Joseph, but she gathered

around her an elegant and famous circle, until she was eighty and blind.

The Saturday assemblies of Mademoiselle de Scudéry, frequented by the

most distinguished people of Paris, were given in a modest apartment,

for she was only a novelist. The same may be said of the receptions of

Madame de la Sablière, who was a childless widow, of moderate means. The

Duchesse de Longueville--another of those famous queens--saw her best

days in the abbey of Port Royal. Madame Récamier reigned in a small

apartment in the Abbaye-au-Bois. All these carried out in their _salons_

the rules and customs which had been established by Madame de

Rambouillet, It was in her _salon_ that the French Academy originated,

and its first members were regular visitants at her hotel. Her

conversation was the chief amusement. We hear of neither cards nor

music; but there were frequent parties to the country, walks in the

woods,--a perpetual animation, where ceremony was banished. The

brilliancy of her parties excited the jealousy of Richelieu. Hither

resorted those who did not wish to be bound by the stiffness of the

court. At that period this famous hotel had its pedantries, but it was

severely intellectual. Hither came Mademoiselle de Scudéri; Mademoiselle

de Montpensier, granddaughter of Henry IV.; Vaugelas, and others of the

poets; also Balzac, Voiture, Racan, the Duc de Montausier, Madame de

Sévigné, Madame de la Fayette, and others. The most marked thing about

this hotel was the patronage extended to men of letters. Those great

French ladies welcomed poets and scholars, and encouraged them, and did

not allow them to starve, like the literary men of Grub Street. Had the

English aristocracy extended the same helping hand to authors, the

condition of English men of letters in the eighteenth century would have

been far less unfortunate. Authors in France have never been excluded

from high society; and this was owing in part to the influence of the

Hôtel de Rambouillet, which sought an alliance between genius and rank.

It is this blending of genius with rank which gave to society in France

its chief attraction, and made it so brilliant.

Mademoiselle de Scudéry, Madame de la Sablière, and Madame de

Longueville followed the precedents established by Madame de Rambouillet

and Madame de Maintenon, and successively reigned as queens of

society,--that is, of chosen circles of those who were most celebrated

in France,--raising the intellectual tone of society, and inspiring

increased veneration for woman herself.

But the most celebrated of all these queens of society was Madame

Récamier, who was the friend and contemporary of Madame de Staël. She

was born at Lyons, in 1777, not of high rank, her father, M. Bernard,

being only a prosperous notary. Through the influence of Calonne,

minister of Louis XVI., he obtained the lucrative place of Receiver of

the Finances, and removed to Paris, while his only daughter Juliette was

sent to a convent, near Lyons, to be educated, where she remained until

she was ten years of age, when she rejoined her family. Juliette's

education was continued at home, under her mother's superintendence; but

she excelled in nothing especially except music and dancing, and was

only marked for grace, beauty, and good-nature.

Among the visitors to her father's house was Jacques Rose Récamier, a

rich banker, born in Lyons, 1751,--kind-hearted, hospitable,

fine-looking, and cultivated, but of frivolous tastes. In 1793, during

the Reign of Terror, being forty-two, he married the beautiful daughter

of his friend, she being but fifteen. This marriage seems to have been

one of convenience and vanity, with no ties of love on either

side,--scarcely friendship, or even sentiment. For a few years Madame

Récamier led a secluded life, on account of the troubles and dangers

incident to the times, but when she did emerge from retirement she had

developed into the most beautiful woman in France, and was devoted to a

life of pleasure. Her figure was flexible and elegant, her head

well-poised, her complexion brilliant, with a little rosy mouth, pearly

teeth, black curling hair, and soft expressive eyes, with a carriage

indicative of indolence and pride, yet with a face beaming with

good-nature and sympathy.

Such was Madame Récamier at eighteen, so remarkable for beauty that she

called forth murmurs of admiration wherever she appeared. As it had

long been a custom in Paris, and still is, to select the most beautiful

and winning woman to hand round the purse in churches for all charities,

she was selected by the Church of St. Roche, the most fashionable church

of that day; and so great was the enthusiasm to see this beautiful and

bewitching creature, that the people crowded the church, and even

mounted on the chairs, and, though assisted by two gentlemen, she could

scarcely penetrate the crowd. The collection on one occasion amounted to

twenty thousand francs,--equal, perhaps, to ten thousand dollars to-day.

This adaptation of means to an end has never been disdained by the

Catholic clergy. What would be thought in Philadelphia or New York, in

an austere and solemn Presbyterian church, to see the most noted beauty

of the day handing round the plate? But such is one of the forms which

French levity takes, even in the consecrated precincts of the church.

The fashionable drive and promenade in Paris was Longchamps, now the

Champs Élysées, and it was Madame Récamier's delight to drive in an open

carriage on this beautiful avenue, especially on what are called the

holy days,--Wednesdays and Fridays,--when her beauty extorted

salutations from the crowd. Of course, such a woman excited equal

admiration in the _salons_, and was soon invited to the fêtes and

parties of the Directory, through Barras, one of her admirers. There

she saw Bonaparte, but did not personally know him at that time. At one

of these fêtes, rising at full length from her seat to gaze at the

General, sharing in the admiration for the hero, she at once attracted

the notice of the crowd, who all turned to look at her; which so annoyed

Bonaparte that he gave her one of his dreadful and withering frowns,

which caused her to sink into her seat with terror.

In 1798 M. Récamier bought the house which had Récamier belonged to

Necker, in what is now the Chaussée d'Antin. This led to an acquaintance

between Madame Récamier and Madame de Staël, which soon ripened into

friendship. In the following year M. Récamier, now very rich,

established himself in a fine chateau at Clichy, a short distance from

Paris, where he kept open house. Thither came Lucien Bonaparte, at that

time twenty-four years of age, bombastic and consequential, and fell in

love with his beautiful hostess, as everybody else did. But Madame

Récamier, with all her fascinations, was not a woman of passion; nor did

she like the brother of the powerful First Consul, and politely rejected

his addresses. He continued, however, to persecute her with his absurd

love-letters for a year, when, finding it was hopeless to win so refined

and virtuous a lady as Madame Récamier doubtless was,--partly because

she was a woman of high principles, and partly because she had no great

temptations,--the pompous lover, then Home Minister, ceased his

addresses.

But Napoleon, who knew everything that was going on, had a curiosity to

see this woman who charmed everybody, yet whom nobody could win, and she

was invited to one of his banquets. Although she obeyed his summons, she

was very modest and timid, and did not try to make any conquest of him.

She was afraid of him, as Madame de Staël was, and most ladies of rank

and refinement. He was a hero to men rather than to women,--at least to

those women who happened to know him or serve him. That cold and cutting

irony of which he was master, that haughty carriage and air which he

assumed, that selfish and unsympathetic nature, that exacting slavery to

his will, must have been intolerable to well-bred women who believed in

affection and friendship, of which he was incapable, and which he did

not even comprehend. It was his intention that the most famous beauty of

the day should sit next to him at this banquet, and he left the seat

vacant for her; but she was too modest to take it unless specially

directed to do so by the Consul, which either pride or etiquette

prevented. This modesty he did not appreciate, and he was offended, and

she never saw him again in private; but after he became Emperor, he made

every effort to secure her services as maid-of-honor to one of the

princesses, through his minister Fouché, in order to ornament his court.

It was a flattering honor, since she was only the wife of a banker,

without title; but she refused it, which stung Napoleon with vexation,

since it indicated to him that the fashionable and high-born women of

the day stood aloof from him. Many a woman was banished because she

would not pay court to him,--Madame de Staël, the Duchesse de Chevreuse,

and others. Madame Récamier was now at the height of fashion, admired by

Frenchmen and foreigners alike; not merely by such men as the

Montmorencys, Narbonne, Jordan, Barrère, Moreau, Bernadotte, La Harpe,

but also by Metternich, then secretary of the Austrian embassy, who

carried on a flirtation with her all winter. All this was displeasing to

Napoleon, more from wounded pride than fear of treason. In the midst of

her social triumphs, after having on one occasion received uncommon

honor, Napoleon, now emperor, bitterly exclaimed that more honor could

not be shown to the wife of a marshal of France,--a remark very

indicative of his character, showing that in his estimation there was no

possible rank or fame to be compared with the laurels of a military

hero. A great literary genius, or woman of transcendent beauty, was no

more to him than a great scholar or philosopher is to a vulgar rich man

in making up his parties.

Beacon Lights of History, Volume 07: Great Women · 第 11 / 20 段