But these illustrious women of the Middle Ages who performed such feats

of gallantry and courage belonged to the noble class; they were

identified with aristocratic institutions; they lived in castles; they

were the wives and daughters of feudal princes and nobles whose business

was war, and who were rough and turbulent warriors, and sometimes no

better than robbers, but who had the virtues of chivalry, which was at

its height during the wars of Edward III. And yet neither the proud

feudal nobles nor their courageous wives and daughters took any notice

of the plebeian people, except to oppress and grind them down. No

virtues were developed by feudalism among the people but submission,

patience, and loyalty.

And thus it is extraordinary that such a person should appear in that

chivalric age as Joan of Arc, who rose from the humblest class, who

could neither read nor write,--a peasant girl without friends or

influence, living among the Vosges mountains on the borders of Champagne

and Lorraine. She was born in 1412, in the little obscure village of

Domremy on the Meuse, on land belonging to the French crown. She lived

in a fair and fertile valley on the line of the river, on the other side

of which were the Burgundian territories. The Lorraine of the Vosges was

a mountainous district covered with forests, which served for royal

hunting parties. The village of Domremy itself was once a dependency of

the abbey of St. Remy at Rheims. This district had suffered cruelly

from the wars between the Burgundians and the adherents of the

Armagnacs, one of the great feudal families of France in the

Middle Ages.

Joan, or Jeanne, was the third daughter of one of the peasant laborers

of Domremy. She was employed by her mother in spinning and sewing, while

her sisters and brothers were set to watch cattle. Her mother could

teach her neither to read nor write, but early imbued her mind with the

sense of duty. Joan was naturally devout, and faultless in her morals;

simple, natural, gentle, fond of attending the village church; devoting

herself, when not wanted at home, to nursing the sick,--the best girl in

the village; strong, healthy, and beautiful; a spirit lowly but poetic,

superstitious but humane, and fond of romantic adventures. But her piety

was one of her most marked peculiarities, and somehow or other she knew

more than we can explain of Scripture heroes and heroines.

One of the legends of that age and place was that the marches of

Lorraine were to give birth to a maid who was to save the

realm,--founded on an old prophecy of Merlin. It seems that when only

thirteen years old Joan saw visions, and heard celestial voices bidding

her to be good and to trust in God; and as virginity was supposed to be

a supernal virtue, she vowed to remain a virgin, but told no one of her

vow or her visions. She seems to have been a girl of extraordinary good

sense, which was as marked as her religious enthusiasm.

The most remarkable thing about this young peasant girl is that she

claimed to have had visions and heard voices which are difficult to be

distinguished from supernatural,--something like the daemon of Socrates.

She affirmed that Saint Michael the Archangel appeared to her in glory,

also Saint Catherine and Saint Margaret, encouraging her in virtue, and

indicating to her that a great mission was before her, that she was to

deliver her king and country. Such claims have not been treated with

incredulity or contempt by French historians, especially Barante and

Michelet, in view of the wonderful work she was instrumental in

accomplishing.

At this period France was afflicted with that cruel war which had at

intervals been carried on for nearly a century between the English and

French kings, and which had arisen from the claims of Edward I to the

throne of France. The whole country was distracted, forlorn, and

miserable; it was impoverished, overrun, and drained of fighting men.

The war had exhausted the resources of England as well as those of

France. The population of England at the close of this long series of

wars was less than it was under Henry II. Those wars were more

disastrous to the interests of both the rival kingdoms than even those

of the Crusades, and they were marked by great changes and great

calamities. The victories of Crécy, Poictiers, and Agincourt--which shed

such lustre on the English nation--were followed by reverses, miseries,

and defeats, which more than balanced the glories of Edward the Black

Prince and Henry V. Provinces were gained and lost, yet no decisive

results followed either victory or defeat. The French kings, driven

hither and thither, with a decimated people, and with the loss of some

of their finest provinces, still retained their sovereignty.

At one time, about the year 1347, Edward III. had seemed to have

attained the supreme object of his ambition. France lay bleeding at his

feet; he had won the greatest victory of his age; Normandy already

belonged to him, Guienne was recovered, Aquitaine was ceded to him,

Flanders was on his side, and the possession of Brittany seemed to open

his way to Paris. But in fourteen years these conquests were lost; the

plague scourged England, and popular discontents added to the

perplexities of the once fortunate monarch. Moreover, the House of

Commons had come to be a power and a check on royal ambition. The death

of the Black Prince consummated his grief and distraction, and the

heroic king gave himself up in his old age to a disgraceful profligacy,

and died in the arms of Alice Pierce, in the year 1377.

Fifty years pass by, and Henry V. is king of England, and renews his

claim to the French throne. The battle of Agincourt (1415) gives to

Henry V. the same _éclat_ that the victory of Crécy had bestowed on

Edward III. Again the French realm is devastated by triumphant

Englishmen. The King of France is a captive; his Queen is devoted to the

cause of Henry, the Duke of Burgundy is his ally, and he only needs the

formal recognition of the Estates to take possession of the French

throne. But in the year 1422, in the midst of his successes, he died of

a disease which baffled the skill of all his physicians, leaving his

kingdom to a child only nine years old, and the prosecution of the

French war to his brother the Duke of Bedford, who was scarcely inferior

to himself in military genius.

At this time, when Charles VI. of France was insane, and his oldest son

Louis dead, his second son Charles declared himself King of France, as

Charles VII. But only southern France acknowledged Charles, who at this

time was a boy of fifteen years. All the northern provinces, even

Guienne and Gascony, acknowledged Henry VI., the infant son of Henry V.

of England. Charles's affairs, therefore, were in a bad way, and there

was every prospect of the complete conquest of France. Even Paris was

the prey alternately of the Burgundians and the Armagnacs, the last of

whom were the adherents of Charles the Dauphin,--the legitimate heir to

the throne. He held his little court at Bourges, where he lived as gaily

as he could, sometimes in want of the necessaries of life. His troops

were chiefly Gascons, Lombards, and Scotch, who got no pay, and who

lived by pillage. He was so hard pressed by the Duke of Bedford that he

meditated a retreat into Dauphiné. It would seem that he was given to

pleasures, and was unworthy of his kingdom, which he nearly lost by

negligence and folly.

The Duke of Bedford, in order to drive Charles out of the central

provinces, resolved to take Orleans, which was the key to the south,--a

city on the north bank of the Loire, strongly fortified and well

provisioned. This was in 1428. The probabilities were that this city

would fall, for it was already besieged, and was beginning to

suffer famine.

In this critical period for France, Joan of Arc appeared on the stage,

being then a girl of sixteen (some say eighteen) years of age. Although

Joan, as we have said, was uneducated, she yet clearly comprehended the

critical condition of her country, and with the same confidence that

David had in himself and in his God when he armed himself with a sling

and a few pebbles to confront the full-armed giant of the Philistines,

inspired by her heavenly visions she resolved to deliver France. She

knew nothing of war; she had not been accustomed to equestrian

exercises, like a woman of chivalry; she had no friends; she had never

seen great people; she was poor and unimportant. To the eye of worldly

wisdom her resolution was perfectly absurd.

It was with the greatest difficulty that Joan finally obtained an

interview with Boudricourt, the governor of Vaucouleurs; and he laughed

at her, and bade her uncle take her home and chastise her for her

presumption. She returned to her humble home, but with resolutions

unabated. The voices encouraged her, and the common people believed in

her. Again, in the red coarse dress of a peasant girl, she sought the

governor, claiming that God had sent her. There was something so

strange, so persistent, so honest about her that he reported her case to

the King. Meanwhile, the Duke of Lorraine heard of her, and sent her a

safe-conduct, and the people of Vaucouleurs came forward and helped her.

They gave her a horse and the dress of a soldier; and the governor,

yielding to her urgency, furnished her with a sword and a letter to the

King. She left without seeing her parents,--which was one of the

subsequent charges against her,--and prosecuted her journey amid great

perils and fatigues, travelling by night with her four armed attendants.

After twelve days Joan reached Chinon, where the King was tarrying. But

here new difficulties arose: she could not get an interview with the

King; it was opposed by his most influential ministers and courtiers.

"Why waste precious time," said they, "when Orleans is in the utmost

peril, to give attention to a mad peasant-girl, who, if not mad, must be

possessed with a devil: a sorceress to be avoided; what can she do for

France?" The Archbishop of Rheims, the prime-minister of Charles,

especially was against her. The learned doctors of the schools derided

her claims. It would seem that her greatest enemies were in the Church

and the universities. "Not many wise, not many mighty are called." The

deliverers of nations in great exigencies rarely have the favor of the

great. But the women of the court spoke warmly in Joan's favor, for her

conduct was modest and irreproachable; and after two days she was

admitted to the royal castle, the Count of Vendôme leading her to the

royal presence. Charles stood among a crowd of nobles, all richly

dressed; but in her visions this pure enthusiast had seen more glories

than an earthly court, and she was undismayed. To the King she repeated

the words which had thus far acted liked a charm: "I am Joan the Maid,

sent by God to save France;" and she demanded troops. But the King was

cautious; he sent two monks to her native village to inquire all about

her, while nobles and ecclesiastics cross-questioned her. She was,

however, treated courteously, and given in charge to the King's

lieutenant, whose wife was a woman of virtue and piety. Many

distinguished people visited her in the castle to which she was

assigned, on whom she made a good impression by her modesty, good sense,

and sublime enthusiasm. It was long debated in the royal council whether

she should be received or rejected; but as affairs were in an

exceedingly critical condition, and Orleans was on the point of

surrender, it was concluded to listen to her voice.

It must be borne in mind that the age was exceedingly superstitious, and

the statesmen of the distracted and apparently ruined country probably

decided to make use of this girl, not from any cordial belief in her

mission, but from her influence on the people. She might stimulate them

to renewed efforts. She was an obscure and ignorant peasant-girl, it was

true, but God might have chosen her as an instrument. In this way very

humble people, with great claims, have often got the ear and the

approval of the wise and powerful, as instruments of Almighty

Providence. When Moody and Sankey first preached in London, it was the

Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief-Justice--who happened to be religious

men--that, amid the cynicism of ordinary men of rank, gave them the most

encouragement, and frequently attended their meetings.

And the voices which inspired the Maid of Orleans herself,--what were

these? Who can tell? Who can explain such mysteries? I would not

assert, nor would I deny, that they were the voices of inspiration. What

is inspiration? It has often been communicated to men. Who can deny that

the daemon of Socrates was something more than a fancied voice? When did

supernatural voices first begin to utter the power of God? When will the

voices of inspiration cease to be heard on earth? In view of the fact

that _she did_ accomplish her mission, the voices which inspired this

illiterate peasant to deliver France are not to be derided. Who can sit

in judgment on the ways in which Providence is seen to act? May He not

choose such instruments as He pleases? Are not all His ways mysterious,

never to be explained by the reason of man? Did not the occasion seem to

warrant something extraordinary? Here was a great country apparently on

the verge of ruin. To the eye of reason and experience it seemed that

France was to be henceforth ruled, as a subjugated country, by a foreign

power. Royal armies had failed to deliver her. Loyalty had failed to

arouse the people. Feudal envies and enmities had converted vassals into

foes. The Duke of Burgundy, the most powerful vassal of France, was in

arms against his liege lord. The whole land was rent with divisions and

treasons. And the legitimate king, who ought to have been a power, was

himself feeble, frivolous, and pleasure-seeking amid all his perils.

_He_ could not save the country. Who could save it? There were no great

generals. Universal despair hung over the land. The people were

depressed. Military resources were insufficient. If France was to be

preserved as an independent and powerful monarchy, something

extraordinary must happen to save it. The hope in feudal armies had

fled. In fact, only God could rescue the country in such perils and

under such forlorn circumstances.

Joan of Arc believed in God,--that He could do what He pleased, that He

was a power to be supplicated; and she prayed to Him to save France,

since princes could not save the land, divided by their rivalries and

jealousies and ambitions. And the conviction, after much prayer and

fasting, was impressed upon her mind--no matter how, but it _was_

impressed upon her--that God had chosen _her_ as His instrument, that it

was her mission to raise the siege of Orleans, and cause the young

Dauphin to be crowned king at Rheims. This conviction gave her courage

and faith and intrepidity. How could she, unacquainted with wars and

sieges, show the necessary military skill and genius? She did not

pretend to it. She claimed no other wisdom than that which was

communicated to her by celestial voices. If she could direct a military

movement in opposition to leaders of experience, it was only because

this movement was what was indicated by an archangel. And so decided

and imperative was she, that royal orders were given to obey her. One

thing was probable, whether a supernatural wisdom and power were given

her or not,--she yet might animate the courage of others, she might

stimulate them to heroic action, and revive their hopes; for if God was

with them, who could be against them? What she had to do was simply

this,--to persuade princes and nobles that the Lord would deliver the

nation. Let the conviction be planted in the minds of a religious people

that God is with them, and in some way will come to their aid if they

themselves will put forth their own energies, and they will be almost

sure to rally. And here was an inspired woman, as they supposed, ready

to lead them on to victory, not by her military skill, but by indicating

to them the way as an interpreter of the Divine will. This was not more

extraordinary than the repeated deliverances of the Hebrew nation under

religious leaders.

The signal deliverance of the French at that gloomy period from the

hands of the English, by Joan of Arc, was a religious movement. The Maid

is to be viewed as a religious phenomenon; she rested her whole power

and mission on the supposition that she was inspired to point out the

way of deliverance. She claimed nothing for herself, was utterly without

vanity, ambition, or pride, and had no worldly ends to gain. Her

character was without a flaw. She was as near perfection as any mortal

ever was: religious, fervent, unselfish, gentle, modest, chaste,

patriotic, bent on one thing only,--to be of service to her country,

without reward; and to be of service only by way of encouragement, and

pointing out what seemed to her to be the direction of God.

So Joan fearlessly stood before kings and nobles and generals, yet in

the modest gentleness of conscious virtue, to direct them what to do, as

a sort of messenger of Heaven. What was rank or learning to her? If she

was sent by a voice that spoke to her soul, and that voice was from God,

what was human greatness to her? It paled before the greatness which

commissioned her. In the discharge of her mission all men were alike in

her eyes; the distinctions of rank faded away in the mighty issues which

she wished to bring about, even the rescue of France from foreign

enemies, and which she fully believed she could effect with God's aid,

and in the way that He should indicate.

Whether the ruling powers fully believed in her or not, they at last

complied with her wishes and prayers, though not until she had been

subjected to many insults from learned priests and powerful nobles, whom

she finally won by her modest and wise replies. Said one of them

mockingly: "If it be God's will that the English shall quit France,

there is no need for men-at-arms." To whom she replied: "The

men-at-arms must fight, and God shall give the victory." She saw no

other deliverance than through fighting, and fighting bravely, and

heroically, as the means of success. She was commissioned, she said, to

stimulate the men to fight,--not to pray, but to fight. She promised no

rescue by supernatural means, but only through natural forces. France

was not to despond, but to take courage, and fight. There was no

imposture about her, only zeal and good sense, to impress upon the

country the necessity of bravery and renewed exertions.

The Maid set out for the deliverance of the besieged city in a man's

attire, deeming it more modest under her circumstances, and exposing her

to fewer annoyances. She was arrayed in a suit of beautiful armor, with

a banner after her own device,--white, embroidered with lilies,--and a

sword which had been long buried behind the altar of a church. Under her

inspiring influence an army of six thousand men was soon collected,

commanded by the ablest and most faithful generals who remained to the

King, and accompanied by the Archbishop of Rheims, who, though he had no

great faith in her claims, yet saw in her a fitting instrument to arouse

the people from despair. Before setting out from Blois she dictated a

letter to the English captains before the besieged city, which to them

must have seemed arrogant, insulting, and absurd, in which she

commanded them in God's name to return to their own country, assuring

them that they fought not merely against the French, but against Him,

and hence would be defeated.

The French captains had orders to obey their youthful leader, but not

seeing the wisdom of her directions to march to Orleans on the north

side of the Loire, they preferred to keep the river between them and the

forts of the English. Not daring to disobey her, they misled her as to

the position of Orleans, and advanced by the south bank, which proved a

mistake, and called forth her indignation, since she did not profess to

be governed by military rules, but by divine direction. The city had

been defended by a series of forts and other fortifications of great

strength, all of which had fallen into the hands of the besiegers; only

the walls of the city remained. Joan succeeded in effecting an entrance

for herself on a white charger through one of the gates, and the people

thronged to meet her as an angel of deliverance, with the wildest

demonstrations of joy. Her first act was to repair to the cathedral and

offer up thanks to God; her next was to summon the enemy to retire. In

the course of a few days the French troops entered the city with

supplies. They then issued from the gates to retake the fortifications,

which were well defended, cheered and encouraged by the heroic Maid, who

stimulated them to daring deeds. The French were successful in their

first assault, which seemed a miracle to the English yeomen, who now

felt that they were attacked by unseen forces. Then other forts were

assailed with equal success, Joan seeming like an inspired heroine, with

her eyes flashing, and her charmed standard waving on to victory. The

feats of valor which the French performed were almost incredible. Joan

herself did not fight, but stimulated the heroism of her troops. The

captains led the assault; the Maid directed their movements. After most

of the forts were retaken, the troops wished to rest. Joan knew no rest,

nor fear, nor sense of danger. She would hear of no cessation from

bloody strife until all the fortifications were regained. At the assault

on the last fort she herself was wounded; but she was as insensible to

pain as she was to fear. As soon as her wound was dressed she hurried to

the ramparts, and encouraged the troops, who were disposed to retire. By

evening the last fort or bastile was taken, and the English retired,

baffled and full of vengeance. The city was delivered. The siege was

raised. Not an Englishman survived south of the Loire.

But only part of the mission of this heroic woman was fulfilled. She had

delivered Orleans and saved the southern provinces. She had now the more

difficult work to perform of crowning the King in the consecrated city,

which was in the hands of the enemy, as well as the whole country

between Orleans and Rheims. This task seemed to the King and his court

to be absolutely impossible. So was the raising of the siege of Orleans,

according to all rules of war. Although priests, nobles, and scholars

had praised the courage and intrepidity of Joan, and exhorted the nation

to trust her, since God seemed to help her, yet to capture a series of

fortified cities which were in possession of superior forces seemed an

absurdity. Only the common people had full faith in her, for as she was

supposed to be specially aided by God, nothing seemed to them an

impossibility. They looked upon her as raised up to do most wonderful

things,--as one directly inspired. This faith in a girl of eighteen

would not have been possible but for her exalted character. Amid the

most searching cross-examinations from the learned, she commanded

respect by the wisdom of her replies. Every inquiry had been made as to

her rural life and character, and nothing could be said against her, but

much in her favor; especially her absorbing piety, gentleness, deeds of

benevolence, and utter unselfishness.

Beacon Lights of History, Volume 07: Great Women · 第 3 / 20 段