SUNDAY, 4.

And the republic now begins to look sweet and beautiful again, as

if men and patriotic citizens might walk upright without shame or

apologies of any sort. Having managed for a century or more to keep the

black man under foot, provoked a war to this end, and, in our straits,

availed of his life to spare ours, let us cherish the faith that we

are bent honestly now on securing him the rights which his courage and

loyalty have won for him and his while the republic stands. Was this

slaughter of men and expenditure of treasure, with the possible woes to

come, necessary to make us just? And shall we not be careful hereafter

that political parties play not false as before the war; the cry for

union and reconstruction but a specious phrase for reinstating the old

issues under new names? Admitted into the Union, the once rebellious

States may break out into new atrocities for recovering their fallen

fortunes. It behooves the friends of freedom and human rights to know

their friends, and trust those, and only those, who have proved

themselves faithful in the dire struggle,--

"Who faithful in insane sedition keep,

With silver and with ruddy gold may vie."

In democratic times like ours, when Power is stealing the world over

from the few to the many, and with an impetus unprecedented in the

world's history, the rightful depositories of Power, the People,

should make sure that their representatives are fitted alike and

disposed to administer affairs honorably; the rule being that of the

Best by the Best,--an aristocracy in essence as in name; since no

calamity can befall a people like the want of good heads to give it

stability and self-respect in its own, or consideration in the eyes of

foreign beholders. Ideas are the royal Presidents; States and peoples

intelligent and prosperous as they are loyal to these Potentates.

Liberty is the highest of trusts committed to man by his Creator, and

in the enjoyment of which man becomes himself a creator,--a trust at

once the most sacred and most difficult to hold inviolate. "Power is

a fillet that presses so hard the temples that few can take it up

safely." Right is the royal ruler alone, and he who rules with least

restraint comes nearest to empire.

And one of the most hopeful aspects of our national affairs is

the coming into importance and power of plain, sensible men, like

Grant and Boutwell,--men owing their places to their honesty and

useful services,--the one in the field, the other in the state. Our

village, also, is honored by the elevation of one of its distinguished

citizens for his eminent legal attainments and personal integrity.

This change for the better in our politics, it seems, came in with

President Lincoln, himself the plainest of the plain, one of the

most American of American men; is (after his successor's lamentable

career) now reinstated in our present chief magistrate, whose

popularity is scarcely secondary to any of his predecessors in the

Presidential Chair. Our national politics have obviously improved in

these respects upon later administrations, and we may reasonably hope

for the prevalence of peace and prosperity, such as the country has

not enjoyed since the times of Washington and Franklin. The reign of

principle appears to have returned into the administration of affairs,

honorable men taking the lead, softening, in large measure, the

asperities and feuds of parties. Great questions affecting the welfare

of the community, and for the solution of which the ablest heads are

requisite, are coming into discussion, and are to be settled for the

benefit, we trust, of all concerned. Reform in capital and labor,

temperance, woman's social and political condition, popular education,

powers of corporations, international communication,--these and the new

issues which their settlement will effect, must interest and occupy

the active forces of the country to plant the republic, upon stable

foundations.

"An early, good education," says Gray, in his notes on Plato's

Republic, "is the best means of turning the eyes of the mind from the

darkness and uncertainty of popular opinion, to the clear light of

truth. It is the interest of the public neither to suffer unlettered

and unphilosophical minds to meddle with government, nor to allow

men of knowledge to give themselves up for the whole of life to

contemplation; as the first will lack principle to guide them, and

others want practice and inclination to business." One might also

commend to senators and representatives this sentence from Tacitus: "I

speak," he says, "of popular eloquence, the genuine offspring of that

licentiousness to which fools and designing men have given the name of

liberty. I speak of that bold and turbulent oratory, that inflamer of

the people, and constant companion of sedition, that fierce incendiary

that knows no compliance, and scorns to temporize,--busy, rash, and

arrogant, but, in quiet and well-regulated governments, utterly

unknown." Yet I cannot say that I should have written, with my present

notion of political or religious obligation, what follows: "Upon the

whole, since no man can enjoy a state of calm tranquillity, and, at the

same time, raise a great and splendid reputation; to be content with

the benefits of the age in which we live, without detracting from our

ancestors, is the virtue that best becomes us." The sentiment has a

patriotic sound, but conceals the cardinal truth, dear to a patriot,

certainly in our times and republic, that a calm tranquillity is hardly

compatible with a life of heroic action, and that true progress, so

far from detracting from the glory of our ancestors, carries forward

that for which they battled and bled, to clothe them and their

descendants with a fresher and more enduring fame. Not in imitation of

such inflamers of the people, but in the spirit of liberty and loyalty,

have Sumner and Phillips won great and splendid reputations, if not

silenced the fools and designing men whose bold and turbulent oratory,

the genuine offspring of licentiousness, once sounded in our national

halls, and came near the separation of our Union.

Whom did the people trust?

Not those, the false confederates of State,

Who laid their country's fortunes desolate;

Plucked her fair ensigns down to seal the black man's fate;

Not these secured their trust.

But they, the generous and the just,

Who, nobly free and truly great,

Served steadfast still the servant race

As masters in the menial's place;

By their dark brothers strove to stand

Till owners these of mind and hand,

And freedom's banners waved o'er an enfranchised land.

These were the nation's trust,--

The patriots brave and just.

Concord Days · 第 92 / 143 题