WEDNESDAY, 23.

"As good

Not write as not be understood."

Yet the deepest truths are best read between the lines, and, for the

most part, refuse to be written. Who tells all tells falsely. There are

untold subtleties in things seen as unseen. Only the idealist touches

the core of their secret tenderly, and extracts the mystery; Nature,

like the coy Isis, disclosing these to none else. Most edifying is the

author who suggests, and leaves to his reader the pleasure and profit

of following his thought into its various relations with the whole

of things, thus stimulating him to explore matters to their issues.

The great masters have observed this fine law, and of modern scholars

especially Goethe.

For whether considered as poet or naturalist, he is our finest example

of the reverent faith in nature and tenderness of treatment that

becomes her student and devotees. And hence the rich spoils and prime

suggestions with which he charms and rewards in his books. Wooed

in this spirit, nature vouchsafed him the privilege of reading her

secrets. An eye-witness of the facts, he had the magic pen to portray

them as they rose midway between matter and mind, there caught them

lovingly and held them forth in intertwisted myths and gay marriages to

the sense and sentiment of his reader. Writing faithfully to the form

of things, he yet had a finer moral than these could deliver; the vein

of quiet mysticism in which he delighted, giving a graceful charm to

the writing. How finely his senses symbolized his thought, and his eye

how Olympian! What subtle perception of the contraries in character!

He has treated the strife of the Worst for the Best, the problem of

evil, more cunningly than any; than Moses; than the author of Job of

Uz; than Milton, the Puritan, fitted as he was alike by birth and

culture to deal with this world fable,--his faith in nature being so

entire, his rare gifts at instant command for rendering perfect copies

of what he saw, and loved to represent in its truthfulness to sense

and soul alike. A seer of Spirit, the draughtsman of guile; to him sat

the demons gladly, and he sketched their likenesses,--portraits of the

dualities he knew so well; the same with which most are too familiar;

the drama of the temptation being coeval with man, the catastrophe thus

far repeated disastrously, the striving of the Many against the One,

the world-spirit bribing the will, proffering the present delights

for the future pains. Ah! could he but have found himself in the One,

whom, with such surpassing skill he individualized, but failed to

impersonate. His aloofness from life, his residence in the Many, his

inability to identify himself with the whole of things,--this duplicity

of genius denied him free admittance to unity. Cunning he was, not wise

in the simplicity of wisdom. As the Fates conceived, so they slew him,

yet by subtleties so siren, as to persuade him of an immortality not

theirs to bestow. All he was, his Faust celebrates--admitted to heaven,

as Goethe to glory, without the fee that opens honestly its gates.

Oh, artist of beauty! Couldst thou but have been equal to portray the

Spirit of spirits as cunningly as of Matter! But it was the temper of

that age of transition, and thou wast its priest and poet.

But whatever his deficiencies, he has been one of the world's teachers,

and is to be for some time to come. The spirit and movement of an age

are embodied in his books, and one reads with a growing reverence at

every perusal of the mind that saw and has portrayed the world-spirit

so well. If not the man complete that in our admiration of his genius

we could desire, he yet was faithful to the law of his pen, and

therewith justifies his existence to mankind. Nor do I find any of his

contemporaries who made as much of this human life during his century.

"Light, more light!" With this request he passed behind the clouds into

the fullest radiance.

Concord Days · 第 88 / 143 题