And More writes of Plotinus:--

"Who such things did see,

Even in the tumult that few can arrive

Of all are named from philosophy,

To that high pitch or to such secrets dive."[10]

[Footnote 10: "It would make a most delightful and instructive

essay," says Coleridge, "to draw up a critical, and, where possible,

biographical account of the Latitudinarian party at Cambridge, from the

reign of James I to the latter half of Charles II. The greater number

were Platonists, so called, at least, and such they believed themselves

to be, but more truly Plotinists. Thus Cudworth, Dr. Jackson (chaplain

of Charles I and Vicar of Newcastle upon Tyne), Henry More, John Smith,

and some others (Norris, Glanvil). Jeremy Taylor was a Gassendist, and,

as far as I know, he is the only exception. They were alike admirers

of Grotius, which, in Taylor, was consistent with the tone of all his

philosophy. The whole party, however, and a more amiable never existed,

were scared and disgusted into this by the catachrestic language and

the skeleton half truths of the systematic divines of the synod of

Dort on the one hand, and by the sickly broodings of the Pietists

and Solomon's Song preachers on the other. What they all wanted was

a pre-inquisition into the mind, as part organ, part constituent, of

all knowledge,--an examination of the scales and weights and measures

themselves abstracted from the objects to be weighed or measured by

them; in short, a transcendental æsthetic, logic, and noetic. Lord

Herbert was at the entrance of, nay, already some paces within, the

shaft and adit of the mine; but he turned abruptly back, and the honor

of establishing a complete [Greek: propaideia] (Organon) of philosophy

was reserved for Immanuel Kant, a century or more afterwards."--_Lit.

Remains_, iii. 416.]

Concord Days · 第 83 / 143 题