MONDAY, 19.

One values his chosen place of residence, whether he be a native or

not, less for its natural history and advantages than for its civil and

social privileges.

"The hills were reared, the rivers scooped in vain,

If learning's altars vanish from the plain."

And all the more, if, while retaining the ancient manners, it cherish

the family sentiment against the straggling habits which separate

members so widely in our times that intercourse is had seldomer than of

old; names of kindred hardly surviving save in the fresh recollections

of childhood by the dwellers apart; far more of life than we know being

planted fast in ancestral homes, the best of it associated with these,

as if there were a geography of the affections that nothing could

uproot.

A people can hardly have attained to nationality till it knows its

ancestor and is not ashamed of its antecedents. If such studies were

once deemed beneath the dignity of an American, they are no longer.

We are not the less national for honoring our forefathers. Blood

is a history. Blood is a destiny. How persistent it is, let the

institutions of England, Old and New, bear testimony, since on this

prerogative--call it race, rank, family, nature, culture, nationality,

what you will--both peoples stand and pride themselves, lion and eagle,

an impregnable Saxondom, a common speech, blazoning their descent.

"Ours is the tongue the bards sang in of old,

And Druids their dark knowledge did unfold;

Merlin in this his prophesies did vent,

Which through the world of fame bear such extent.

Thus spake the son of Mars, and Britain bold,

Who first 'mongst Christian worthies is enrolled;

And many thousand more, whom but to name

Were but to syllable great Shakespeare's fame."

A strong race, the blood flows boldly in its veins, truculent, if need

be, aggressive, and holding its own, as pronounced in the women as in

the men, here in New England as in Old, the dragon couchant and ready

to spring in defence of privileges and titles; magnanimous none the

less, and merciful, as in the times of St. George and Bonduca. One

needs but read Tacitus on the Manners of the Ancient Germans, to find

the parentage of traits which still constitute the Englishmen, Old and

New, showing how persistent, under every variety of geographical and

political conditions, is the genius of races.

'Tis due to every name that some one or more inheriting it should

search out its traits and titles, as these descend along the stream

of generations and reappear in individuals. And we best study the

fortunes of families, of races and peoples, here at their sources. Even

heraldries have their significance. And it is accounted the rule that

names are entitled to the better qualities of their emblazonries, each

having something admirable and to be honored in its origin.[2]

[Footnote 2: Verstegan, in his Restitution of Decayed Intelligence,

in Antiquities concerning the most Noble and Renowned English Nation,

1634, treating of the origin of names, says:--

"For a general rule, the reader may please to note, that our surnames

of families, be they of one or more syllables, that have either a _k_

or a _w_, are all of them of the ancient English race, so that neither

the _k_ or _w_ are used in Latin, nor in any of the three languages

thereon depending, which sometimes causes confusion in the writing our

names (originally coming from the Teutonic) in Latin, Italian, French,

and Spanish languages. Neither the _k_ nor _w_ being in the Latin

nor in the French, they could not be with the Normans in use, whose

language was French, as also their surnames. As for the surnames in our

Norman catalogue which have in them the letters _k_ and _w_, which the

French do not use, these are not to be thought to have been Norman, but

of those gentlemen of Flanders which Baldwin, the Earl of that country

and father-in-law unto the Conquerer, did send to aid him. Besides

these, sundry other surnames do appear to have been in the Netherlands

and not in Normandy; albeit they are without doubt set in the list of

the Normans. And whereas in searching for such as may remain in England

of the race of the Danes, they are not such as, according to the vulgar

opinion, have their surnames ending in _son_. In the Netherlands,

it is often found that very many surnames end in _son_, as Johnson,

Williamson, Phillipson, and the like; _i. e._ sons of that name of

John, etc.

"Then some have their surnames according to the color of hair or

complexion, as white, black, brown, gray, and reddish; and those in

whom these names from such causes begin, do thereby lose their former

denomination. Some again for their surnames have the names of beasts;

and it should seem for one thing or another wherein they represented

some property of theirs; as lion, wolf, fox, bull, buck, hare, hart,

lamb, and the like. Others of birds; as cock, peacock, swan, crane,

heron, partridge, dove, sparrow, and the like. Others of fish; as

salmon, herring, rock, pilchard, and the like. And albeit the ancestors

of the bearers of these had in other times other surnames, yet because

almost all these and other like names do belong to our English tongue,

I do think him to be of the ancient English, and if not all, yet the

most part. And here by occasion of these names, I must note, and that

as it were for a general rule, _that what family soever has their first

and chief coat of arms correspondent unto their surname, it is evident

sign that it had that surname before it had those arms_."]

Thus the Cock is alike the herald of the dawn and sentinel of the

night; the emblem of watchfulness and of wisdom; of vigilance and of

perseverance, and _Semper Vigilans_, the appropriate motto of family

arms bearing the name with its variations.

Concord Days · 第 30 / 143 题