These matters are touched upon with perfect candour, and becoming

consideration, in the volumes of Dr. Bence Jones; but in 'society'

they are not always so handled. Here a name of noble intellectual

associations is surrounded by injurious rumours which I would

willingly scatter for ever. The pupil's magnitude, and the splendour

of his position, are too great and absolute to need as a foil the

humiliation of his master. Brothers in intellect, Davy and Faraday,

however, could never have become brothers in feeling; their characters

were too unlike. Davy loved the pomp and circumstance of fame;

Faraday the inner consciousness that he had fairly won renown. They

were both proud men. But with Davy pride projected itself into the

outer world; while with Faraday it became a steadying and dignifying

inward force. In one great particular they agreed. Each of them

could have turned his science to immense commercial profit, but

neither of them did so. The noble excitement of research, and the

delight of discovery, constituted their reward. I commend them to the

reverence which great gifts greatly exercised ought to inspire. They

were both ours; and through the coming centuries England will be able

to point with just pride to the possession of such men.

====================

The first volume of the 'Life and Letters' reveals to us the youth who

was to be father to the man. Skilful, aspiring, resolute, he grew

steadily in knowledge and in power. Consciously or unconsciously, the

relation of Action to Reaction was ever present to Faraday's mind. It

had been fostered by his discovery of Magnetic Rotations, and it

planted in him more daring ideas of a similar kind. Magnetism he knew

could be evoked by electricity, and he thought that electricity, in

its turn, ought to be capable of evolution by magnetism. On August

29, 1831, his experiments on this subject began. He had been

fortified by previous trials, which, though failures, had begotten

instincts directing him towards the truth. He, like every strong

worker, might at times miss the outward object, but he always gained

the inner light, education, and expansion. Of this Faraday's life was

a constant illustration. By November he had discovered and colligated

a multitude of the most wonderful and unexpected phenomena. He had

generated currents by currents; currents by magnets, permanent and

transitory; and he afterwards generated currents by the earth itself.

Arago's 'Magnetism of Rotation,' which had for years offered itself

as a challenge to the best scientific intellects of Europe, now fell

into his hands. It proved to be a beautiful, but still special,

illustration of the great principle of Magneto-electric Induction.

Nothing equal to this latter, in the way of pure experimental enquiry,

had previously been achieved.

Electricities from various sources were next examined, and their

differences and resemblances revealed. He thus assured himself of

their substantial identity. He then took up Conduction, and gave many

striking illustrations of the influence of Fusion on Conducting Power.

Renouncing professional work, from which at this time he might have

derived an income of many thousands a year, he poured his whole

momentum into his researches. He was long entangled in

Electrochemistry. The light of law was for a time obscured by the

thick umbrage of novel facts; but he finally emerged from his

researches with the great principle of Definite Electro-chemical

Decomposition in his hands. If his discovery of Magneto-electricity

may be ranked with that of the pile by Volta, this new discovery, may

almost stand beside that of Definite Combining Proportions in

Chemistry. He passed on to Static Electricity--its Conduction,

Induction, and Mode of Propagation. He discovered and illustrated the

principle of Inductive Capacity; and, turning to theory, he asked

himself how electrical attractions and repulsions are transmitted. Are

they, like gravity, actions at a distance, or do they require a

medium? If the former, then, like gravity, they will act in straight

lines; if the latter, then, like sound or light, they may turn a

corner. Faraday held--and his views are gaining ground--that his

experiments proved the fact of curvilinear propagation, and hence the

operation of a medium. Others denied this; but none can deny the

profound and philosophic character of his leading thought. [Footnote:

In a very remarkable paper published in Poggendorff's 'Annalen' for

1857, Werner Siemens accepts and develops Faraday's theory of

Molecular Induction.] The first volume of the Researches contains all

the papers here referred to.

Faraday had heard it stated that henceforth physical discoveries would

be made solely by the aid of mathematics; that we had our data, and

needed only to work deductively. Statements of a similar character

crop out from time to time in our day. They arise from an imperfect

acquaintance with the nature, present condition, and prospective

vastness of the field of physical enquiry. The tendency of natural

science doubtless is to bring all physical phenomena under the

dominion of mechanical laws; to give them, in other words,

mathematical expression. But our approach to this result is

asymptotic; and for ages to come--possibly for all the ages of the

human race--Nature will find room for both the philosophical

experimenter and the mathematician. Faraday entered his protest

against the foregoing statement by labelling his investigations

'Experimental Researches in Electricity.' They were completed in 1854,

and three volumes of them have been published. For the sake of

reference, he numbered every paragraph, the last number being 3362. In

1859 he collected and published a fourth volume of papers, under the

title, 'Experimental Researches in Chemistry and Physics.' Thus did

this apostle of experiment illustrate its power, and magnify his

office.

The second volume of the Researches embraces memoirs on the

Electricity of the Gymnotus; on the Source of Power in the Voltaic

Pile; on the Electricity evolved by the Friction of Water and Steam,

in which the phenomena and principles of Sir William Armstrong's

Hydro-electric machine are described and developed; a paper on

Magnetic Rotations, and Faraday's letters in relation to the

controversy it aroused. The contribution of most permanent value

here, is that on the Source of Power in the Voltaic Pile. By it the

Contact Theory, pure and simple, was totally overthrown, and the

necessity of chemical action to the maintenance of the current

demonstrated.

The third volume of the Researches opens with a memoir entitled 'The

Magnetisation of Light,' and the Illumination of Magnetic Lines of

Force.' It is difficult even now to affix a definite meaning to this

title; but the discovery of the rotation of the plane of polarisation,

which it announced, seems pregnant with great results. The writings

of William Thomson on the theoretic aspects of the discovery; the

excellent electrodynamic measurements of Wilhelm Weber, which are

models of experimental completeness and skill; Weber's labours in

conjunction with his lamented friend Kohlrausch--above all, the

researches of Clerk Maxwell on the Electro-magnetic Theory of

Light--point to that wonderful and mysterious medium, which is the

vehicle of light and radiant heat, as the probable basis also of

magnetic and electric phenomena. The hope of such a connection was

first raised by the discovery here referred to. [Footnote: A letter

addressed to me by Professor Weber on March 18 last contains the

following reference to the connection here mentioned: 'Die Hoffnung

einer solchen Combination ist durch Faraday's Entdeckung der

Drehung er Polarisationsebene durch magnetische Directionskraft

zuerst, und sodann durch die Uebereinstimmung derjenigen

Geschwindigkeit, welche das Verhaeltniss der electro-dynamischen

Einheit zur lectro-statischen ausdrueckt, mit der Geschwindigkeit

des Lichts angeregt worden; und mir scheint von allen Versuchen,

welche zur erwirklichung dieser Hoffnung gemacht worden sind, das von

Herrn Maxwell gemachte am erfolgreichsten.'] Faraday himself seemed to

cling with particular affection to this discovery. He felt that there

was more in it than he was able to unfold. He predicted that it would

grow in meaning with the growth of science. This it has done; this it

is doing now. Its right interpretation will probably mark an epoch in

scientific history.

Rapidly following it is the discovery of Diamagnetism, or the

repulsion of matter by a magnet. Brugmans had shown that bismuth

repelled a magnetic needle. Here he stopped. Le Bailliff proved that

antimony did the same. Here he stopped. Seebeck, Becquerel, and

others, also touched the discovery. These fragmentary gleams excited

a momentary curiosity and were almost forgotten, when Faraday

independently alighted on the same facts; and, instead of stopping,

made them the inlets to a new and vast region of research. The value

of a discovery is to be measured by the intellectual action it calls

forth; and it was Faraday's good fortune to strike such lodes of

scientific truth as give occupation to some of the best intellects of

our age.

The salient quality of Faraday's scientific character reveals itself

from beginning to end of these volumes; a union of ardour and

patience--the one prompting the attack, the other holding him on to

it, till defeat was final or victory assured. Certainty in one sense

or the other was necessary to his peace of mind. The right method of

investigation is perhaps incommunicable; it depends on the individual

rather than on the system, and the mark is missed when Faraday's

researches are pointed to as merely illustrative of the power of the

inductive philosophy. The brain may be filled with that philosophy;

but without the energy and insight which this man possessed, and which

with him were personal and distinctive, we should never rise to the

level of his achievements. His power is that of individual genius,

rather than of philosophic method; the energy of a strong soul

expressing itself after its own fashion, and acknowledging no mediator

between it and Nature.

The second volume of the 'Life and Letters,' like the first, is a

historic treasury as regards Faraday's work and character, and his

scientific and social relations. It contains letters from Humboldt,

Herschel, Hachette, De la Rive, Dumas, Liebig, Melloni, Becquerel,

Oersted, Plucker, Du Bois Reymond, Lord Melbourne, Prince Louis

Napoleon, and many other distinguished men. I notice with particular

pleasure a letter from Sir John Herschel, in reply to a sealed packet

addressed to him by Faraday, but which he had permission to open if he

pleased. The packet referred to one of the many unfulfilled hopes

which spring up in the minds of fertile investigators:

'Go on and prosper, "from strength to strength," like a victor

marching with assured step to further conquests; and be certain that

no voice will join more heartily in the peans that already begin to

rise, and will speedily swell into a shout of triumph, astounding even

to yourself, than that of J. F. W. Herschel.'

Faraday's behaviour to Melloni in 1835 merits a word of notice. The

young man was a political exile in Paris. He had newly fashioned and

applied the thermo-electric pile, and had obtained with it results of

the greatest importance. But they were not appreciated. With the

sickness of disappointed hope Melloni waited for the report of the

Commissioners, appointed by the Academy of Sciences to examine the

Primier. At length he published his researches in the 'Annales de

Chimie.' They thus fell into the hands of Faraday, who, discerning at

once their extraordinary merit, obtained for their author the Rumford

Medal of the Royal Society. A sum of money always accompanies this

medal; and the pecuniary help was, at this time, even more essential

than the mark of honour to the young refugee. Melloni's gratitude was

boundless:

'Et vous, monsieur,' he writes to Faraday, 'qui appartenez à une

société à laquelle je n'avais rien offert, vous qui me connaissiez à

peine de nom; vous n'avez pas demandé si j'avais des ennemis faibles

ou puissants, ni calculé quel en était le nombre; mais vous avez parlé

pour l'opprimé étranger, pour celui qui n'avait pas le moindre droit à

tant de bienveillance, et vos paroles ont été accueillies

favorablement par des collègues consciencieux! Je reconnais bien là

des hommes dignes de leur noble mission, les véritable représentants

de la science d'un pays libre et généreux.'

Within the prescribed limits of this article it would be impossible to

give even the slenderest summary of Faraday's correspondence, or to

carve from it more than the merest fragments of his character. His

letters, written to Lord Melbourne and others in 1836, regarding his

pension, illustrate his uncompromising independence. The Prime

Minister had offended him, but assuredly the apology demanded and

given was complete. I think 'it certain that, notwithstanding the

very full account of this transaction given by Dr. Bence Jones,

motives and influences were at work which even now are not entirely

revealed. The minister was bitterly attacked, but he bore the censure

of the press with great dignity. Faraday, while he disavowed having

either directly or indirectly furnished the matter of those attacks,

did not publicly exonerate the Premier. The Hon. Caroline Fox had

proved herself Faraday's ardent friend, and it was she who had healed

the breach between the philosopher and the minister. She manifestly

thought that Faraday ought to have come forward in Lord Melbourne's

defence, and there is a flavour of resentment in one of her letters to

him on the subject. No doubt Faraday had good grounds for his

reticence, but they are to me unknown.

In 1841 his health broke down utterly, and he went to Switzerland with

his wife and brother-in-law. His bodily vigour soon revived, and he

accomplished feats of walking respectable even for a trained

mountaineer. The published extracts from his Swiss journal contain

many beautiful and touching allusions. Amid references to the tints

of the Jungfrau, the blue rifts of the glaciers, and the noble Niesen

towering over the Lake of Thun, we come upon the charming little scrap

which I have elsewhere quoted: 'Clout-nail making goes on here rather

considerably, and is a very neat and pretty operation to observe. I

love a smith's shop and anything relating to smithery. My father was

a smith.' This is from his journal; but he is unconsciously speaking

to somebody--perhaps to the world.

His description of the Staubbach, Giessbach, and of the scenic effects

of sky and mountain, are all fine and sympathetic. But amid it all,

and in reference to it all, he tells his sister that 'true enjoyment

is from within, not from without.' In those days Agassiz was living

under a slab of gneiss on the glacier of the Aar. Faraday met Forbes

at the Grimsel, and arranged with him an excursion to the 'Hôtel des

Neufchâtelois'; but indisposition put the project out.

From the Fort of Ham, in 1843, Faraday received a letter addressed to

him by Prince Louis Napoleon Bonaparte. He read this letter to me

many years ago, and the desire, shown in various ways by the French

Emperor, to turn modern science to account, has often reminded me of

it since. At the age of thirty-five the prisoner of Ham speaks of

'rendering his captivity less sad by studying the great discoveries'

which science owes to Faraday; and he asks a question which reveals

his cast of thought at the time: 'What is the most simple combination

to give to a voltaic battery, in order to produce a spark capable of

setting fire to powder under water or under ground?' Should the

necessity arise, the French Emperor will not lack at the outset the

best appliances of modern science; while we, I fear, shall have to

learn the magnitude of the resources we are now neglecting amid the

pangs of actual war.' [Footnote: The 'science' has since been applied,

with astonishing effect, by those who had studied it far more

thoroughly than the Emperor of the French. We also, I am happy to

think, have improved the time since the above words were written

[1878].]

One turns with renewed pleasure to Faraday's letters to his wife,

published in the second volume. Here surely the loving essence of the

man appears more distinctly than anywhere else. From the house of Dr.

Percy, in Birmingham, he writes thus:

'Here--even here the moment I leave the table, I wish I were with you

IN QUIET. Oh, what happiness is ours! My runs into the world in this

way only serve to make me esteem that happiness the more.'

And again:

'We have been to a grand conversazione in the town-hall, and I have

now returned to my room to talk with you, as the pleasantest and

happiest thing that I can do. Nothing rests me so much as communion

with you. I feel it even now as I write, and catch myself saying the

words aloud as I write them.'

Take this, moreover, as indicative of his love for Nature:

'After writing, I walk out in the evening hand in hand with my dear

wife to enjoy the sunset; for to me who love scenery, of all that I

have seen or can see, there is none surpasses that of heaven. A

glorious sunset brings with it a thousand thoughts that delight me.'

Of the numberless lights thrown upon him by the Life and Letters,'

some fall upon his religion. In a letter to Lady Lovelace, he

describes himself as belonging to 'a very small and despised sect of

Christians, known, if known at all, as _Sandemanians_, and our hope is

founded on the faith that is in Christ.' He adds: 'I do not think it

at all necessary to tie the study of the natural sciences and religion

together, and in my intercourse with my fellow-creatures, that which

is religious, and that which is philosophical, have ever been two

distinct things.' He saw clearly the danger of quitting his moorings,

and his science acted indirectly as the safeguard of his faith. For

his investigations so filled his mind as to leave no room for

sceptical questionings, thus shielding from the assaults of

philosophy, the creed of his youth. His religion was constitutional

and hereditary. It was implied in the eddies of his blood and in the

tremors of his brain; and, however its outward and visible form might

have changed, Faraday would still have possessed its elemental

constituents--awe, reverence, truth, and love.

It is worth enquiring how so profoundly religious a mind, and so great

a teacher, would be likely to regard our present discussions on the

subject of education. Faraday would be a 'secularist' were he now

alive. He had no sympathy with those who contemn knowledge unless it

be accompanied by dogma. A lecture delivered before the City

Philosophical Society in 1818, when he was twenty-six years of age,

expresses the views regarding education which he entertained to the

end of his life. 'First, then,' he says, 'all theological

considerations are banished from the society, and of course from my

remarks; and whatever I may say has no reference to a future state, or

to the means which are to be adopted in this world in anticipation of

it. Next, I have no intention of substituting anything for religion,

but I wish to take that part of human nature which is independent of

it. Morality, philosophy, commerce, the various institutions and

habits of society, are independent of religion, and may exist either

with or without it. They are always the same, and can dwell alike in

the breasts of those who, from opinion, are entirely opposed in the

set of principles they include in the term religion, or in those who

have none.

'To discriminate more closely, if possible, I will observe that we

have no right to judge religious opinions; but the human nature of

this evening is that part of man which we have a right to judge. And

I think it will be found on examination, that this humanity--as it may

perhaps be called--will accord with what I have before described as

being in our own hands so improvable and perfectible.'

In an old journal I find the following remarks on one of my earliest

dinners with Faraday: 'At two o'clock he came down for me. He, his

niece, and myself, formed the party, "I never give dinners," he said.

"I don't know how to give dinners, and I never dine out. But I should

not like my friends to attribute this to a wrong cause. I act thus

for the sake of securing time for work, and not through religious

motives, as some imagine." He said grace. I am almost ashamed to

call his prayer a "saying Of grace." In the language of Scripture, it

might be described as the petition of a son, into whose heart God had

sent the Spirit of His Son, and who with absolute trust asked a

blessing from his father. We dined on roast beef, Yorkshire pudding,

and potatoes; drank sherry, talked of research and its requirements,

and of his habit of keeping himself free from the distractions of

society. He was bright and joyful--boy-like, in fact, though he is

now sixty-two. His work excites admiration, but contact with him

warms and elevates the heart. Here, surely, is a strong man. I love

strength; but let me not forget the example of its union with modesty,

tenderness, and sweetness, in the character of Faraday.'

Faraday's progress in discovery, and the salient points of his

character, are well brought out by the wise choice of letters and

extracts published in the volumes before us. I will not call the

labours of the biographer final. So great a character will challenge

reconstruction. In the coming time some sympathetic spirit, with the

requisite strength, knowledge, and solvent power, will, I doubt not,

render these materials plastic, give them more perfect organic form,

and send through them, with less of interruption, the currents of

Faraday's life. 'He was too good a man,' writes his present

biographer, 'for me to estimate rightly, and too great a philosopher

for me to understand thoroughly.' That may be: but the reverent

affection to which we owe the discovery, selection, and arrangement of

the materials here placed before us, is probably a surer guide than

mere literary skill. The task of the artist who may wish in future

times to reproduce the real though unobtrusive grandeur, the purity,

beauty, and childlike simplicity of him whom we have lost, will find

his chief treasury already provided for him by Dr. Bence Jones's

labour of love.

********************

XIX. THE COPLEY MEDALIST OF 1870.

THIRTY years ago Electro-magnetism was looked to as a motive power,

which might possibly compete with steam. In centres of industry, such

as Manchester, attempts to investigate and apply this power were

numerous. This is shown by the scientific literature of the time.

Among others Mr. James Prescot Joule, a resident of Manchester, took

up the subject, and, in a series of papers published in Sturgeon's

'Annals of Electricity' between 1839 and 1841, described various

attempts at the construction and perfection of electro-magnetic

engines. The spirit in which Mr. Joule pursued these enquiries is

revealed in the following extract: 'I am particularly anxious,' he

says, 'to communicate any new arrangement in order, if possible, to

forestall the monopolising designs of those who seem to regard this

most interesting subject merely in the light of pecuniary

speculation.' He was naturally led to investigate the laws of

electro-magnetic attractions, and in 1840 he announced the important

principle that the attractive force exerted by two electromagnets, or

by an electro-magnet and a mass of annealed iron, is directly

proportional to the square of the strength of the magnetising current;

while the attraction exerted between, an electro-magnet and the pole

of a permanent steel magnet, varies simply as the strength of the

current. These investigations were conducted independently of, though

a little subsequently to, the celebrated enquiries of Henry, Jacobi,

and Lenz and Jacobi, on the same subject.

Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2 · 第 33 / 69 段