To account for the second or middle road of Glen Roy, Sir Thomas

Dick-Lauder invoked a new agency. He supposed that at a certain point

in the breaking down or waste of his dam, a halt occurred, the barrier

holding its ground at a particular level sufficiently long to dam a

lake rising to the height of, and forming the second road. This point

of weakness was at once detected by Mr. Darwin, and adduced by him as

proving that the levels of the cols did not constitute an essential

feature in the phenomena of the parallel roads. Though not destroyed,

Sir Thomas Dick-Lauder's theory was seriously shaken by this argument,

and it became a point of capital importance, if the facts permitted,

to remove such source of weakness. This was done in 1847 by Mr. David

Milne, now Mr. Milne-Home. On walking up Glen Roy from Roy Bridge, we

pass the mouth of a lateral glen, called Glen Glaster, running

eastward from Glen Roy. There is nothing in this lateral glen to

attract attention, or to suggest that it could have any conspicuous

influence in the production of the parallel roads. Hence, probably,

the failure of Sir Thomas Dick-Lauder to notice it. But Mr.

Milne-Home entered this glen, on the northern side of which the middle

and lowest roads are fairly shown. The principal stream running

through the glen turns at a certain point northwards and loses itself

among hills too high to offer any outlet. But another branch of the

glen turns to the south-east; and, following up this branch, Mr.

Milne-Home reached a col, or watershed, of the precise level of the

second Glen Roy road. When the barrier blocking the glens had been so

far removed as to open this col, the water in Glen Roy would sink to

the level of the second road. A new lake of diminished depth would be

thus formed, the surplus water of which would escape over the Glen

Glaster col into Glen Spean. The margin of this new lake, acting upon

the detrital matter, would form the second road. The theory of Sir

Thomas Dick-Lauder, as regards the part played by the cols, was

re-riveted by this new and unexpected discovery.

I have referred to Mr. Darwin, whose powerful mind swayed for a time

the convictions of the scientific world in relation to this question.

His notion was--and it is a notion which very naturally presents

itself--that the parallel roads were formed by the sea; that this

whole region was once submerged and subsequently upheaved; that there

were pauses in the process of upheaval, during which these glens

constituted so many fiords, on the sides of which the parallel

terraces were formed. This theory will not bear close criticism; nor

is it now maintained by Mr. Darwin himself. It would not account for

the sea being 20 feet higher in Glen Gluoy than in Glen Roy. It would

not account for the absence of the second and third Glen Roy roads

from Glen Gluoy, where the mountain flanks are quite as impressionable

as in Glen Roy. It would not account for the absence of the shelves

from the other mountains in the neighbourhood, all of which 'would

have been clasped by the sea had the sea been there. Here then, and

no doubt elsewhere, Mr. Darwin has shown himself to be fallible; but

here, as elsewhere, he has shown himself equal to that discipline of

surrender to evidence which girds his intellect with such unassailable

moral strength.

But, granting the significance of Sir Thomas Dick-Lauder's facts, and

the reasonableness, on the whole, of the views which he has founded on

them, they will not bear examination in detail. No such barriers of

detritus as he assumed could have existed without leaving traces

behind them; but there is no trace left. There is detritus enough in

Glen Spean, but not where it is wanted. The two highest parallel

roads stop abruptly at different points near the mouth of Glen Roy,

but no remnant of the barrier against which they abutted is to be

seen. It might be urged that the subsequent invasion of the valley by

glaciers has swept the detritus away; but there have been no glaciers

in these valleys since the disappearance of the lakes. Professor

Geikie has favoured me with a drawing of the Glen Spean 'road' near

the entrance to Glen Trieg. The road forms a shelf round a great

mound of detritus which, had a glacier followed the formation of the

shelf, must have been cleared away. Taking all the circumstances into

account, you may, I think, with safety dismiss the detrital barrier as

incompetent to account for the present condition of Glen Gluoy and

Glen Roy.

Hypotheses in science, though apparently transcending experience, are

in reality experience modified by scientific thought and pushed into

an ultra experiential region. At the time that he wrote, Sir Thomas

Dick-Lauder could not possibly have discerned the cause subsequently

assigned for the blockage of these glens. A knowledge of the action

of ancient glaciers was the necessary antecedent to the new

explanation, and experience of this nature was not possessed by the

distinguished writer just mentioned. The extension of Swiss glaciers

far beyond their present limits, was first made known by a Swiss

engineer named Venetz, who established, by the marks they had left

behind them, their former existence in places which they had long

forsaken. The subject of glacier extension was subsequently followed

up with distinguished success by Charpentier, Studer, and others. With

characteristic vigour Agassiz grappled with it, extending his

observations far beyond the domain of Switzerland. He came to this

country in 1840, and found in various places indubitable marks of

ancient glacier action. England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland he

proved to have once given birth to glaciers. He visited Glen Roy,

surveyed the surrounding neighbourhood, and pronounced, as a

consequence of his investigation, the barriers which stopped the glens

and produced the parallel roads to have been barriers of ice. To Mr.

Jamieson, above all others, we are indebted for the thorough testing

and confirmation of this theory.

And let me here say that Agassiz is only too likely to be misrated and

misjudged by those who, though accurate within a limited sphere, fail

to grasp in their totality the motive powers invoked in scientific

investigation. True he lacked mechanical precision, but he abounded

in that force and freshness of the scientific imagination which in

some sciences, and probably in some stages of all sciences, are

essential to the creator of knowledge. To Agassiz was given, not the

art of the refiner, but the instinct of the discoverer, and the

strength of the delver who brings ore from the recesses of the mine.

That ore may contain its share of dross, but it also contains the

precious metal which gives employment to the refiner, and without

which his occupation would depart.

Let us dwell for a moment upon this subject of ancient glaciers. Under

a flask containing water, in which a thermometer is immersed, is

placed a Bunsen's lamp. The water is heated, reaches a temperature of

212°, and then begins to boil. The rise of the thermometer then

ceases, although heat continues to be poured by the lamp into the

water. What becomes of that heat? We know that it is consumed in the

molecular work of vaporization. In the experiment here arranged, the

steam passes from the flask through a tube into a second vessel kept

at a low temperature. Here it is condensed, and indeed congealed to

ice, the second vessel being plunged in a mixture cold enough to

freeze the water. As a result of the process we obtain a mass of ice.

That ice has an origin very antithetical to its own character. Though

cold, it is the child of heat. If we removed the lamp, there would be

no steam, and if there were no steam there would be no ice. The mere

cold of the mixture surrounding the second vessel would not produce

ice. The cold must have the proper material to work upon; and this

material--aqueous vapour--is, as we here see, the direct product of

heat.

It is now, I suppose, fifteen or sixteen years since I found myself

conversing with an illustrious philosopher regarding that glacial

epoch which the researches of Agassiz and others had revealed. This

profoundly thoughtful man maintained the fixed opinion that, at a

certain stage in the history of the solar system, the sun's radiation

had suffered diminution, the glacial epoch being a consequence of this

solar chill. The celebrated French mathematician Poisson had another

theory. Astronomers have shown that the solar system moves through

space, and 'the temperature of space' is a familiar expression with

scientific men. It was considered probable by Poisson that our

system, during its motion, had traversed portions of space of

different temperatures; and that, during its passage through one of

the colder regions of the universe, the glacial epoch occurred.

Notions such as these were more or less current everywhere not many

years ago, and I therefore thought it worth while to show how

incomplete they were. Suppose the temperature of our planet to be

reduced, by the subsidence of solar heat, the cold of space, or any

other cause, say one hundred degrees. Four-and-twenty hours of such a

chill would bring down as, snow nearly all the moisture of our

atmosphere. But this would not produce a glacial epoch. Such an

epoch would require the long-continued generation of the material from

which the ice of glaciers is derived. Mountain snow, the nutriment of

glaciers, is derived from aqueous vapour raised mainly from the

tropical ocean by the sun. The solar fire is as necessary a factor in

the process as our lamp in the experiment referred to a moment ago.

Nothing is easier than to calculate the exact amount of heat expended

by the sun in the production of a glacier. It would, as I have

elsewhere shown, [Footnote: 'Heat a Mode of Motion,' fifth edition,

chap. vi: Forms of Water, sections 55 and 56.] raise a quantity of

cast iron five times the weight of the glacier not only to a white

heat, but to its point of fusion. If, as I have already urged,

instead of being filled with ice, the valleys of the Alps were filled

with white-hot metal, of quintuple the mass of the present glaciers,

it is the heat, and not the cold, that would arrest our attention and

solicit our explanation. The process of glacier making is obviously

one of distillation, in which the fire of the sun, which generates the

vapour, plays as essential a part as the cold of the mountains which

condenses it. [Footnote: In Lyell's excellent 'Principles of Geology,'

the remark occurs that 'several writers have fallen into the strange

error of supposing that the glacial period must have been one of

higher mean temperature than usual.' The really strange error was the

forgetfulness of the fact that without the heat the substance

necessary to the production of glaciers would be wanting.]

It was their ascription to glacier action that first gave the parallel

roads of Glen Roy an interest in my eyes; and in 1867, with a view to

self-instruction, I made a solitary pilgrimage to the place, and

explored pretty thoroughly the roads of the principal glen. I traced

the highest road to the col dividing Glen Roy from Glen Spey, and,

thanks to the civility of an Ordnance surveyor, I was enabled to

inspect some of the roads with a theodolite, and to satisfy myself

regarding the common level of the shelves at opposite sides of the

valley. As stated by Pennant, the width of the roads amounts

sometimes to more than twenty yards; but near the head of Glen Roy the

highest road ceases to have any width, for it runs along the face of a

rock, the effect of the lapping of the water on the more friable

portions of the rock being perfectly distinct to this hour. My

knowledge of the region was, however, far from complete, and nine

years had dimmed the memory even of the portion which had been

thoroughly examined. Hence my desire to see the roads once more

before venturing to talk to you about them. The Easter holidays of

1876 were to be devoted to this purpose; but at the last moment a

telegram from Roy Bridge informed me that the roads were snowed up.

Finding books and memories poor substitutes for the flavour of facts,

I resolved subsequently to make another effort to see the roads.

Accordingly last Thursday fortnight, after lecturing here, I packed

up, and started (not this time alone) for the North. Next day at noon

my wife and I found ourselves at Dalwhinnie, whence a drive of some

five-and-thirty miles brought us to the excellent hostelry of Mr.

Macintosh, at the mouth of Glen Roy.

We might have found the hills covered with mist, which would have

wholly defeated us; but Nature was good-natured, and we had two

successful working days among the hills. Guided by the excellent

ordnance map of the region, on the Saturday morning we went up the

glen, and on reaching the stream called Allt Bhreac Achaidh faced the

hills to the west. At the watershed between Glen Roy and Glen Fintaig

we bore northwards, struck the ridge above Glen Gluoy, came in view of

its road, which we persistently followed as long as it continued

visible. It is a feature of all the roads that they vanish before

reaching the cola over which fell the waters of the lakes which formed

them. One reason doubtless is that at their upper ends the lakes were

shallow, and incompetent on this account to raise wavelets of any

strength to act upon the mountain drift. A second reason is that they

were land-locked in the higher portions and protected from the

south-westerly winds, the stillness of their waters causing them to

produce but a feeble impression upon the mountain sides. From Glen

Gluoy we passed down Glen Turrit to Glen Roy, and through it

homewards, thus accomplishing two or three and twenty miles of rough

and honest work.

Next day we thoroughly explored Glen Glaster, following its two roads

as far as they were visible. We reached the col discovered by Mr.

Milne-Home, which stands at the level of the middle road of Glen Roy.

Thence we crossed southwards over the mountain _Creag Dhubh_, and

examined the erratic blocks upon its sides, and the ridges and mounds

of moraine matter which cumber the lower flanks of the mountain. The

observations of Mr. Jamieson upon this region, including the mouth of

Glen Trieg, are in the highest degree interesting. We entered Glen

Spean, and continued a search begun on the evening of our arrival at

Roy Bridge--the search, namely, for glacier polishings and markings.

We did not find them copious, but they are indubitable.

One of the proofs most convenient for reference, is a great rounded

rock by the roadside, 1,000 yards east of the milestone marked

three-quarters of a mile from Roy Bridge. Farther east other cases

occur, and they leave no doubt upon the mind that Glen Spean was at

one time filled by a great glacier. To the disciplined eye the aspect

of the mountains is perfectly conclusive on this point; and in no

position can the observer more readily and thoroughly convince himself

of this than at the head of Glen Glaster. The dominant hills here are

all intensely glaciated.

But the great collecting ground of the glaciers which dammed the glens

and produced the parallel roads, were the mountains south and west of

Glen Spean. The monarch of these is Ben Nevis, 4,370 feet high. The

position of Ben Nevis and his colleagues, in reference to the

vapour-laden winds of the Atlantic, is a point of the first

importance. It is exactly similar to that of Carrantual and the

Macgillicuddy Reeks in the south-west of Ireland. These mountains

are, and were, the first to encounter the south-western Atlantic

winds, and the precipitation, even at present, in the neighbourhood of

Killarney, is enormous. The winds, robbed of their vapour, and

charged with the heat set free by its precipitation, pursue their

direction obliquely across Ireland; and the effect of the drying

process may be understood by comparing the rainfall at Cahirciveen

with that at Portarlington. As found by Dr. Lloyd, the ratio is as 59

to 21--fifty-nine inches annually at Cahirciveen to twenty-one at

Portarlington. During the glacial epoch this vapour fell as snow, and

the consequence was a system of glaciers which have left traces and

evidences of the most impressive character in the region of the

Killarney Lakes. I have referred in other places to the great glacier

which, descending from the Reeks, moved through the Black Valley, took

possession of the lake-basins, and left its traces on every rock and

island emergent from the waters of the upper lake. They are all

conspicuously glaciated. Not in Switzerland itself do we find clearer

traces of ancient glacier action.

What the Macgillicuddy Reeks did in Ireland, Ben Nevis and the

adjacent mountains did, and continue to do, in Scotland. We had an

example of this on the morning we quitted Roy Bridge. From the bridge

westward rain fell copiously, and the roads were wet; but the

precipitation ceased near Loch Laggan, whence eastward the roads were

dry. Measured by the gauge, the rainfall Fort William is 86 inches,

while at Laggan it is only 46 inches annually. The difference between

west and east is forcibly brought out by observations at the two ends

of the Caledonian Canal. Fort William at the south-western end has,

as just stated, 86 inches, while Culloden, at its north-eastern end,

has only 24. To the researches of that able and accomplished

meteorologist, Mr. Buchan, we are indebted for these and other data of

the most interesting and valuable kind.

Adhering to the facts now presented to us, it is not difficult to

restore in idea the process by which the glaciers of Lochaber were

produced and the glens dammed by ice. When the cold of the glacial

epoch began to invade the Scottish hills, the sun at the same time

acting with sufficient power upon the tropical ocean, the vapours

raised and drifted on to these 'northern mountains were more and more

converted into snow. This slid down the slopes, and from every

valley, strath, and corry, south of Glen Spean, glaciers were poured

into that glen. The two great factors here brought into play are the

nutrition of the glaciers by the frozen material above, and their

consumption in the milder air below. For a period supply exceeded

consumption, and the ice extended, filling Glen Spean to an

ever-increasing height, and abutting against the mountains to the

north of that glen. But why, it may be asked, should the valleys

south of Glen Spean be receptacles of ice at a time when those north

of it were receptacles of water? The answer is to be found in the

position and the greater elevation of the mountains south of Glen

Spean. They first received the loads of moisture carried by the

Atlantic winds, and not until they had been in part dried, and also

warmed by the liberation of their latent heat, did these winds touch

the hills north of the Glen.

An instructive observation bearing upon this point is here to be

noted. Had our visit been in the winter we should have found all the

mountains covered; had it been in the summer we should have found the

snow all gone. But happily it was at a season when the aspect of the

mountains north and south of Glen Spean exhibited their relative

powers as snow collectors. Scanning the former hills from many points

of view, we were hardly able to detect a fleck of snow, while heavy

swaths and patches loaded the latter. Were the glacial epoch to

return, the relation indicated by this observation would cause Glen

Spean to be filled with glaciers from the south, while the hills and

valleys on the north, visited by warmer and drier winds, would remain

comparatively free from ice. This flow from the south would be

reinforced from the west, and as long as the supply was in excess of

the consumption the glaciers would extend, the dams which closed the

glens increasing in height. By-and-by supply and consumption becoming

approximately equal, the height of the glacier barriers would remain

constant. Then, as milder weather set in, consumption would be in

excess, a lowering of the barriers and a retreat of the ice being the

consequence. But for a long time the conflict between supply and

consumption would continue, retarding indefinitely the disappearance

of the barriers, and keeping the imprisoned lakes in the northern

glens. But however slow its retreat, the ice in the long run would be

forced to yield. The dam at the mouth of Glen Roy, which probably

entered the glen sufficiently far to block up Glen Glaster, would

gradually retreat. Glen Glaster and its col being opened, the

subsidence of the lake eighty feet, from the level of the highest to

that of the second parallel road, would follow as a consequence. I

think this the most probable course of things, but it is also possible

that Glen Glaster may have been blocked by a glacier from Glen Trieg.

The ice dam continuing to retreat, at length permitted Glen Roy to

connect itself with upper Glen Spean. A continuous lake then filled

both glens, the level of which, as already explained, was determined

by the col at Makul, above the head of Loch Laggan. The last to yield

was the portion of the glacier which derived nutrition from Ben Nevis,

and probably also from the mountains north and south of Loch Arkaig.

But it at length yielded, and the waters in the glens resumed the

courses which they pursue to-day.

For the removal of the ice barriers no cataclysm is to be invoked; the

gradual melting of the dam would produce the entire series of

phenomena. In sinking from col to col the water would flow over a

gradually melting barrier, the surface of the imprisoned lake not

remaining sufficiently long at any particular level to produce a shelf

comparable to the parallel roads. By temporary halts in the process

of melting due to atmospheric conditions or to the character of the

dam itself, or through local softness in the drift, small

pseudo-terraces would be formed, which, to the perplexity of some

observers, are seen upon the flanks of the glens to-day.

In presence then of the fact that the barriers which stopped these

glens to a height, it may be, of 1,500 feet above the bottom of Glen

Spean, have dissolved and left not a wreck behind; in presence of the

fact, insisted on by Professor Geikie, that barriers of detritus would

undoubtedly have been able to maintain themselves had they ever been

there; in presence of the fact that great glaciers once most certainly

filled these valleys--that the whole region, as proved by Mr.

Jamieson, is filled with the traces of their action; the theory which

ascribes the parallel roads to lakes dammed by barriers of ice has, in

my opinion, a degree of probability on its side which amounts to a

practical demonstration of its truth.

Into the details of the terrace formation I do not enter. Mr. Darwin

and Mr. Jamieson on the one side, and Sir John Lubbock on the other,

deal with true causes. The terraces, no doubt, are due in part to the

descending drift arrested by the water, and in part to the fretting of

the wavelets, and the rearrangement of the stirred detritus, along the

belts of contact of lake and bill. The descent of matter must have

been frequent when the drift was unbound by the rootlets which hold it

together now. In some cases, it may be remarked, the visibility of

the roads is materially augmented by differences of vegetation. The

grass upon the terraces is not always of the same character as that

above and below them, while on heather-covered hills the absence of

the dark shrub from the roads greatly enhances their conspicuousness.

The annexed sketch of a model will enable the reader to grasp the

essential features of the problem and its solution. Glen Gluoy and

Glen Roy are lateral valleys which open into Glen Spean. Let us

suppose Glen Spean filled from v to w with ice of a uniform elevation

of 1,500 feet above the sea, the ice not filling the upper part of

that glen. The ice would thrust itself for some distance up the

lateral valleys, closing all their mouths. The streams from the

mountains right and left of Glen Gluoy would pour their waters into

that glen, forming a lake, the level of which would be determined by

the height of the col at A, 1170 feet above the sea. Over this col

the water would flow into Glen Roy. But in Glen Roy it could not rise

higher than 1150 feet, the height of the col at B, over which it would

flow into Glen Spey.

Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2 · 第 19 / 69 段