FORM FOR DISPENSATION OF THE "HOLY" VOWS--MY SUIT AND SETTLEMENT WITH
THE SISTERS OF CHARITY.
I was informed by Mrs. Kearney that Mother Nazareth had given her fifty
dollars so she could purchase some clothes for me. This was a princely
sum, after all the years of service I had given them. I have never been
able to figure in my own mind, whether this was supposed to be a
settlement or whether it was some of the charity the sisters were
supposed to do.
Yes, they are called "Sisters of Charity," but with all my experience
with them I now have to rack my brain to find the charity done by the
Roman Catholic system, through them. If some person died at the hospital
and left some clothes that were not claimed by anyone, they would be
given to some poor person and call it "charity." If some patient could
not or would not pay all of their bill, it would be entered in the books
as "charity." But, God forbid that I should blame the poor sisters for
what they do _not do_. It is the sisters who do the charity--not for the
poor people--but for the church, by giving their life's service. It is
their bounden duty to do as they are told, and their troubles are great
enough without me adding to their heavy load. On the other hand, may
God speed the day when the system, which holds these poor women, as it
had me for thirty-one years, will be investigated by the proper
authorities; and when this comes to pass, we need have no fear of the
outcome.
After Mother Nazareth's last visit to me, and when she was convinced
that I would do generally as I saw fit in regard to the dispensation
from my vows, I received the following in due time:
St. Vincent's Hospital,
Portland, Oregon, May 10, 1912.
Miss Elizabeth Schoffen,
Spokane, Washington.
Dear Miss Schoffen:
Enclosed you will find form to guide you in petitioning for the
dispensation of your holy vows. Copy it upon paper found herein, and
fill out No. 2 according to your desire.
Please return as soon as possible, as it has to be signed by the
Superiors before going to Rome.
Most sincerely yours,
SR. M. NAZARETH.
The form to guide me in petitioning "His Holiness" was:
To His Holiness Pius X:
Most Holy Father:
I, the undersigned, a sister of the Institute of the Daughters of
Charity, Servants of the Poor, of Montreal, Canada, respectfully submit
to your Holiness the following:
1.--I am fifty-one years of age and professed (vocal)
twenty-nine years.
2.--Here sister may give her reasons herself, to suit
her own disposition. She is perfectly free...........
.....................................................
.....................................................
.....................................................
3.--In consequence I humbly suplicate Your Holiness
to give me dispensation from my vows of poverty, chastity
and obedience, and to grant me permission to live in the
world in secular habit.
Spokane, Washington, this ........ (date) ........ 1912.
(Sign) Sister Lucretia, nee Elizabeth Schoffen.
Notice it says, "She is perfectly free." Yes, I was "perfectly free"
after the agents of "His Holiness" found out in plain words spoken by me
that I was through answering to their demands. I was "perfectly free,"
and yet in the next breath, according to the Roman Catholic idea, I
_had_ to have permission from an Italian Pope even to wear the common
clothes of an American citizen. Think of it, dear reader, I was an
American born citizen, under the protection of the laws of this country;
but because I had been born and raised a Roman Catholic, and then
induced to take the vows of the Roman Catholic sisterhood, I _had_ no
rights as an American citizen, and had to have the permission of this
self-styled "infallible" pope before I could live like other people
live. I might say right here, that I have never applied for, and
consequently have never received the dispensation from my vows as a
sister in the Roman Catholic Church, as I soon learned after I left that
organization that the Church of Rome had no right in the first place to
deprive me of the liberties guaranteed every citizen of this country.
The authorities of the Roman Catholic system will tell the civil
authorities and the Protestants that the adherents of the Roman Catholic
Church are citizens first and Roman Catholics second. But that is not
according to the inner teaching of that system. Read what one of their
own representatives, the late "Father" D. S. Phelan, has said, when
speaking from his own "throne":
"They tell us that we think more of the church than we do of the United
States; of course we do. Why, if the government of the United States
were at war with the church, we would say tomorrow, to hell with the
government of the United States; and if the church and all the
governments of the world were at war, we would say, to hell with all the
governments of the world. They say we are Catholics first and Americans
decidedly afterwards. There is no doubt about it.... The Catholics of
the world are Catholics first and always; they are Americans, they are
Germans, they are French, or they are English afterwards." (The Patriots
Manual, as copied from the Western Watchman, issue of June 27, 1912.)
Think on these points, my dear American friend! Use the brain which God
has given you, and decide for yourself if an institution such as the
Roman Catholic system is an American institution. Have we room within
our borders for any other than that which will uphold our laws, and
fight, if need be, for the protection of the principles upon which this
great democracy is builded?
As I have previously stated, I told the community that I would give them
until May 1st to settle with me for two thousand dollars. This they
refused to do, so my attorney wrote as follows:
Spokane, Wash., May 2, 1912.
Mother M. Nazareth, Prov. Sup.,
St. Vincent's Hospital, Portland, Oregon.
Dear Madam:
We have placed in our hands for settlement the matter of Sister
Lucretia, which we are informed you are familiar with. If this
matter can be settled for twenty thousand dollars, we are in a
position to settle it, and if not attended to at once, we will
take such steps as may become necessary to enforce settlement
at once.
Yours very truly,
SCOTT & CAMPBELL.
The community made no favorable reply to the above communication, so it
was decided that I, with my attorney, Mr. Scott, would go to Portland,
to look into the matter of filing suit against them for salary due me
for my services at St. Vincent's Hospital.
In the Spokesman Review (a Spokane daily) there appeared two articles
about the case, issue of June 9, 1912. The first article was a lengthy
one, discussing in general the case, and containing a statement obtained
from me. The second, a dispatch from Portland, I will reprint. It will
explain itself:
_SUPERIOR SURPRISED AT SUIT._
_Hospital Head Gives Sister Lucretia High Testimonial._
Portland, Ore., June 8.--Sister Alexander, superior at St.
Vincent's Hospital, was surprised to learn from Spokane
tonight that Sister Lucretia threatened proceedings against the
order, and gave Sister Lucretia a high testimonial for her work
while at the hospital.
"Sister Lucretia severed her connections with the hospital and
with the Sisters of Charity last April," said Sister Alexander.
"She was dissatisfied at having been assigned to another field
of labor, that at St. Eugene's Hospital at Cranbrook, B. C.,
after having served in Portland so long.
"There was nothing improper in her leaving, as she was free to
leave the order if she choose. She did not express any hostile
feelings toward the sisters, however, and seemed to have been
perfectly satisfied with her treatment. I have been in touch
with her up to a few weeks ago and have received no intimation
of her intention to bring suit.
"I cannot imagine on what grounds she bases her contention. She
was an excellent nurse while at the hospital and was well and
favorably known about the city."
Before entering the order, Sister Lucretia's home was near
Spokane, and she has been at St. Vincent's Hospital here almost
the entire time of her sisterhood.
On June 10th I donned my sisterhood garb, and in company with Mr. Scott,
went to Portland. The reason for my wearing the garb again, was that I
had a clerical half-fare railroad book, which had been given to me by
the community for my use, and as I had not received my dispensation, I
was still a sister and was entitled to wear the garb of the Roman
Catholic sisterhood, if I so choose.
During my entire sisterhood I had always traveled either half-fare, or
on a pass which would generally be made out for the superior and her
companion. The sisters were trained to imitate the hand-writing of the
sisters in whose names the passes or half-fare books were issued, so
they could sign the name appearing on these passes or half-fare books.
At retreat time these passes and books were kept busy, carrying sisters
one way, and then returned by mail for others to travel on.
I remember once when I was traveling on Mother Theresa's pass, and after
I had signed her name, the conductor who knew both Mother Theresa and
myself, came to me in a good-natured, smiling manner and said that I was
a rather young-looking Mother Theresa.
I returned to Spokane, June 18th, again using the half-fare book. The
authorities of the Roman Hierarchy may deny that I had this clergy
half-fare book, but I might say right here, let them deny! I still have
the book with forty-two tickets in it, good only in the year 1912, and
with the stamp of the Trans-Continental Clergy Bureau, January 27, 1912,
and even the Roman Catholic Hierarchy cannot deny that I was a sister in
good standing in January, 1912.
On July 21st I bade adieu to Spokane. I had just boarded the train when
a priest, whom I had never seen before, came to me and began to question
me as to where I was going, who I was, etc. This was the first time I
had been alone since I had been out of the sisterhood, and whether this
was an accidental meeting or whether he was sent purposely I am unable
to say. I answered his questions, and then asked him his name. He told
me "Father Cronin." While he did not annoy me on the journey to
Portland, I was very suspicious, and was very careful that he did not
have a chance to get any of my few belongings, as I had some very
valuable papers in my suitcase.
Mrs. Kearney had come to Portland before and had made arrangements for
hotel accommodations.
The law firm of Kollock and Zollinger were my representatives in
Portland, arrangements having been previously made by Mr. Scott with
them.
My complaint against the Sisters of Charity having been completed, I
signed it on the twenty-fourth day of July, 1912, and it was duly filed
in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County.
_COPY OF COMPLAINT._
_In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah
County._
Elizabeth Schoffen, Plaintiff, )
vs. )
Sisters of Charity of Providence, St. ) COMPLAINT
Vincent's Hospital, a corporation, )
Defendant.)
Comes now the plaintiff herein and for cause of action against
defendant alleges:
I.
That defendant is a corporation, incorporated, organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of
Oregon;
II.
That at the special instance and request of the defendant the
plaintiff performed work and labor for the defendant as a
nurse at, in and about the hospital owned and operated by the
defendant in the City of Portland, County of Multnomah and
State of Oregon, known and described as St. Vincent's Hospital,
from and about July 7, 1893, to and including the first day of
July, 1899;
III.
That from and after the 1st day of July, 1899, to and including
July 26, 1911, the plaintiff performed work and labor for the
defendant as nurse and manager and superintendent of a floor in
the hospital owned and operated by the defendant in the City of
Portland, County of Multnomah and State of Oregon;
IV.
That during all of said period of the time the account between
plaintiff and defendant was an open, mutual and current
account, and that plaintiff continuously performed work and
labor during said period for the defendant, and defendant
during said period furnished and gave to the plaintiff clothing
and board and lodging;
V.
That the reasonable value of the services rendered by plaintiff
to defendant as a nurse, between July 7, 1893, and the 1st day
of July, 1899, over and above and in addition to the clothing
and board and lodging furnished by defendant to plaintiff, was
and is the sum of $100.00 per month; that the reasonable value
of the services rendered and work and labor performed by
plaintiff for defendant as nurse and manager or superintendent
of the floor in the hospital owned and operated by the
defendant, from the 1st day of July, 1899, to and including
July 26, 1911, over and above and in addition to the clothing
and board and lodging furnished and given by the defendant to
the plaintiff during the said period, was and is the sum of
$150.00 per month;
VI.
That the plaintiff has demanded of defendant payment of said
sums, but the defendant has wholly failed, refused and
neglected to pay same or any part thereof, and that there is
now due and owing from defendant to plaintiff on account
thereof the sum of $28,800.00.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant
in the sum of $28,800.00, together with the costs and
disbursements herein.
SCOTT & COMPBELL,
KOLLOCK & ZOLLINGER,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
STATE OF OREGON,
County of Multnomah--ss.
I, Elizabeth Schoffen, being first duly sworn, depose and say
that I am the plaintiff in the above action; and the foregoing
complaint is true as I verily believe.
(Signed) ELIZABETH SCHOFFEN.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 24th day of July, 1912.
(Signed) JOHN K. KOLLOCK,
(Seal) Notary Public for the State of Oregon.
The summons was served on the Sisters of Charity and on Sister Alexander
personally, on July 28, 1912, according to the record of the sheriff's
office. Soon after this, and several other times before the answer to
the complaint was filed, which was nearly four months later, the
attorneys for the defendants endeavored to settle for various amounts up
to $1,500.00. The answer to the complaint was as follows:
_In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah
County._
Elizabeth Schoffen, Plaintiff, )
vs. )
Sisters of Charity of Providence, St. ) ANSWER
Vincent's Hospital, a corporation, )
Defendant. )
Now comes the defendant and answers the complaint herein as
follows:
Admits that it is a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oregon.
Save as herein admitted, defendant denies each and every
allegation of the complaint.
Further answering, defendant alleges that its incorporation was
effected by and on behalf of members of a charitable and
religious organization known as "Sisters of Charity of the
House of Providence in the Territory of Washington," and that
its affairs during all the time stated in the complaint have
been managed and are still managed by and through the said
religious organization acting through the medium of the
corporation. Said organization has been engaged during all the
time stated in the complaint and is still engaged in charitable
and religious work, conducting, among other institutions, a
hospital in the City of Portland, State of Oregon.
Prior to the 7th day of July, 1893, plaintiff applied to the
members of said religious organization to be admitted as a
member thereof, for the purpose of gaining the spiritual
advantages accruing to the members thereof, and for the purpose
of engaging in religious and charitable work with the members
of said religious organization. On some day prior to said 7th
day of July, 1893, the plaintiff, upon such application, was
admitted to membership in said religious organization and has
been engaged since that time and up to the 26th day of July,
1911, in religious and charitable work with the members of said
organization, including work in and about the care of the sick
at the said St. Vincent's Hospital in the City of Portland,
Oregon.
At the time when plaintiff applied for membership in said
religious community, and at the time she was admitted as a
member thereof, and during all of the time plaintiff continued
to be a member thereof, and during all the time plaintiff was
engaged in such religious and charitable work aforesaid, it was
distinctly understood by plaintiff and her acceptance into said
religious community and the permission to engage in charitable
and religious work, with the members of said religious
community, through the medium of the corporation defendant
herein, and otherwise was based upon the distinct and expressed
understanding that no pecuniary reward or financial return of
any kind whatsoever was to be paid to plaintiff for any work
done at the instance of the members of said religious
community, or at the instance of the corporation defendant
herein, or for any services of any kind in any manner connected
with the work of said religious organization and of the
corporation, the defendant, herein.
Wherefore, defendant demands that plaintiff take nothing by
this action, and that it has judgment for costs and its
disbursements.
M. M. CONNOR,
CAREY & KERR,
Attorneys for Defendant.
STATE OF OREGON,
County of Multnomah--ss.
I, Sister Alexander, being first duly sworn, depose and say
that I am an officer, to wit., Superioress of the defendant in
the above entitled action; that I have read the foregoing
answer, know the contents thereof, and believe the same to be
true.
SISTER ALEXANDER.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th day of November,
1912.
(Seal) M. M. CONNOR,
Notary Public for Oregon.
I have explained throughout this book the kind of "religious and
charitable" work I was engaged in. Very true, as stated in the above
document, when I entered, I believed, as I was taught by the priest and
sisters, that the most certain way to save my soul was by entering the
convent and living a good, pure, "holy" life as a "virgin spouse of the
church and Christ," and, if possible, to become a great "saint" so that
I might secure a high place in Heaven among the "saints" and near our
Lord. But, the spiritual benefits I derived were that I was compelled by
the teachings and practices of the Roman Catholic convent system to be
an unwilling hypocrite, and in the end had to seek religion and
consolation out of the convent and the Roman Catholic Church.
My suit against the community was evidently causing them much
discomfort, as the attorneys for the defendant, several times during the
winter offered to settle, but for such small amounts that I could not
accept. By spring they had reached the sum of three thousand dollars,
and asked me to pay my attorneys from that amount. This I refused, as I
believed I could force them to pay more than that if the case would come
to court. I knew at least that I could cause them very much uneasiness.
By March, I was offered three thousand dollars, and the Sisters of
Charity promised to pay my attorneys' fee. My attorneys and myself
conferred in this matter, and as I was nearly destitute, I thought it
best to take what I could get and have the strain off my mind, and I
authorized Mr. Scott and Mr. Kollock to notify the defendant's attorneys
that I would accept their offer. So, on March 15, 1913, I received from
the Sisters of Charity of Providence, through their representatives, the
sum of three thousand dollars for thirty-one years of service to them.
My attorneys' fee was fifteen hundred dollars, which was promptly paid.
So it cost the Roman Catholic Hierarchy the sum of four thousand five
hundred dollars ($4,500.00) for the service I had given them, and to
keep the case out of court and the publicity of the same, which would
have been a bankruptcy producer for St. Vincent's Hospital.
A great deal has been said by the Roman Catholics about the _large_ sum
of money the church paid me after I left the sisterhood. I will agree
with my Roman Catholic friends that the amount I received from the
community was a magnificent sum, when seen in _silver dollar pieces_.
But, if they will consider the thirty-one years' service I gave them,
they will very readily see that I received just about one dollar and
eighty-six cents ($1.86) a week, most of the time nursing and managing
one of the floors of St. Vincent's Hospital. A nurse in the world
ordinarily is paid twenty-five dollars a week; now my good Roman
Catholic "knocker," compare that with the "large" sum I received. If the
service of a nurse is worth that amount, why is a sister-nurse not worth
just as much, if she does the work required or more?
I am not complaining about the pay I received. I feel that I am repaid,
_not in dollars and cents_, but in experience. I am only too thankful to
think that I saw the folly of the whole system in time to be free before
I would be called upon to face my Maker, and I trust and pray that in
His great judgment, He may give me strength and health and wisdom for
many years to come that I may be able to tell my story to those in
darkness and indifference.
[Illustration: _Fac-simile of Check I Received from Attorneys for
Sisters of Charity, as Payment for Thirty-one Years' Service Rendered to
Them._]