A hundred years later, in a day of great spiritual darkness, Whitefield

and the Wesleys appeared as light-bearers for God. Under the rule of the

established church, the people of England had lapsed into a state of

religious declension hardly to be distinguished from heathenism. Natural

religion was the favorite study of the clergy, and included most of their

theology. The higher classes sneered at piety, and prided themselves on

being above what they called its fanaticism. The lower classes were

grossly ignorant, and abandoned to vice, while the church had no courage

or faith any longer to support the downfallen cause of truth.

The great doctrine of justification by faith, so clearly taught by Luther,

had been almost wholly lost sight of; and the Romish principle of trusting

to good works for salvation, had taken its place. Whitefield and the

Wesleys, who were members of the established church, were sincere seekers

for the favor of God, and this they had been taught was to be secured by a

virtuous life and an observance of the ordinances of religion.

When Charles Wesley at one time fell ill, and anticipated that death was

approaching, he was asked upon what he rested his hope of eternal life.

His answer was, “I have used my best endeavors to serve God.” As the

friend who had put the question seemed not to be fully satisfied with his

answer, Wesley thought, “What! are not my endeavors a sufficient ground of

hope? Would he rob me of my endeavors? I have nothing else to trust

to.”(369) Such was the dense darkness that had settled down on the church,

hiding the atonement, robbing Christ of His glory, and turning the minds

of men from their only hope of salvation,—the blood of the crucified

Redeemer.

Wesley and his associates were led to see that true religion is seated in

the heart, and that God’s law extends to the thoughts as well as to the

words and actions. Convinced of the necessity of holiness of heart, as

well as correctness of outward deportment, they set out in earnest upon a

new life. By the most diligent and prayerful efforts they endeavored to

subdue the evils of the natural heart. They lived a life of self-denial,

charity, and humiliation, observing with great rigor and exactness every

measure which they thought could be helpful to them in obtaining what they

most desired,—that holiness which could secure the favor of God. But they

did not obtain the object which they sought. In vain were their endeavors

to free themselves from the condemnation of sin or to break its power. It

was the same struggle which Luther had experienced in his cell at Erfurt.

It was the same question which had tortured his soul,—“How should man be

just before God?”(370)

The fires of divine truth, well-nigh extinguished upon the altars of

Protestantism, were to be rekindled from the ancient torch handed down the

ages by the Bohemian Christians. After the Reformation, Protestantism in

Bohemia had been trampled out by the hordes of Rome. All who refused to

renounce the truth were forced to flee. Some of these, finding refuge in

Saxony, there maintained the ancient faith. It was from the descendants of

these Christians that light came to Wesley and his associates.

John and Charles Wesley, after being ordained to the ministry, were sent

on a mission to America. On board the ship was a company of Moravians.

Violent storms were encountered on the passage, and John Wesley, brought

face to face with death, felt that he had not the assurance of peace with

God. The Germans, on the contrary, manifested a calmness and trust to

which he was a stranger.

“I had long before,” he says, “observed the great seriousness of their

behavior. Of their humility they had given a continual proof, by

performing those servile offices for the other passengers which none of

the English would undertake; for which they desired and would receive no

pay, saying it was good for their proud hearts, and their loving Saviour

had done more for them. And every day had given them occasion of showing a

meekness which no injury could move. If they were pushed, struck, or

thrown down, they rose again and went away; but no complaint was found in

their mouth. There was now an opportunity of trying whether they were

delivered from the spirit of fear, as well as from that of pride, anger,

and revenge. In the midst of the psalm wherewith their service began, the

sea broke over, split the mainsail in pieces, covered the ship, and poured

in between the decks as if the great deep had already swallowed us up. A

terrible screaming began among the English. The Germans calmly sung on. I

asked one of them afterward, ‘Were you not afraid?’ He answered, ‘I thank

God, no,’ I asked, ‘But were not your women and children afraid?’ He

replied mildly, ‘No; our women and children are not afraid to die.’ ”(371)

Upon arriving in Savannah, Wesley for a short time abode with the

Moravians, and was deeply impressed with their Christian deportment. Of

one of their religious services, in striking contrast to the lifeless

formalism of the Church of England, he wrote: “The great simplicity as

well as solemnity of the whole almost made me forget the seventeen hundred

years between, and imagine myself in one of those assemblies where form

and state were not; but Paul, the tent-maker, or Peter, the fisherman,

presided; yet with the demonstration of the Spirit and of power.”(372)

On his return to England, Wesley, under the instruction of a Moravian

preacher, arrived at a clearer understanding of Bible faith. He was

convinced that he must renounce all dependence upon his own works for

salvation, and must trust wholly to the “Lamb of God that taketh away the

sin of the world.” At a meeting of the Moravian society in London, a

statement was read from Luther, describing the change which the Spirit of

God works in the heart of the believer. As Wesley listened, faith was

kindled in his soul. “I felt my heart strangely warmed,” he says. “I felt

I did trust in Christ, Christ alone, for salvation: and an assurance was

given me, that He had taken away _my_ sins, even _mine_, and saved _me_

from the law of sin and death.”(373)

Through long years of wearisome and comfortless striving,—years of

rigorous self-denial, of reproach and humiliation,—Wesley had steadfastly

adhered to his one purpose of seeking God. Now he had found Him; and he

found that the grace which he had toiled to win by prayers and fasts, by

almsdeeds and self-abnegation, was a gift, “without money, and without

price.”

Once established in the faith of Christ, his whole soul burned with the

desire to spread everywhere a knowledge of the glorious gospel of God’s

free grace. “I look upon all the world as my parish,” he said; “in

whatever part of it I am, I judge it meet, right, and my bounden duty, to

declare unto all that are willing to hear, the glad tidings of

salvation.”(374)

He continued his strict and self-denying life, not now as the _ground_,

but the _result_ of faith; not the _root_, but the _fruit_ of holiness.

The grace of God in Christ is the foundation of the Christian’s hope, and

that grace will be manifested in obedience. Wesley’s life was devoted to

the preaching of the great truths which he had received,—justification

through faith in the atoning blood of Christ, and the renewing power of

the Holy Spirit upon the heart, bringing forth fruit in a life conformed

to the example of Christ.

Whitefield and the Wesleys had been prepared for their work by long and

sharp personal convictions of their own lost condition; and that they

might be able to endure hardness as good soldiers of Christ, they had been

subjected to the fiery ordeal of scorn, derision, and persecution, both in

the university and as they were entering the ministry. They and a few

others who sympathized with them were contemptuously called Methodists by

their ungodly fellow-students,—a name which is at the present time

regarded as honorable by one of the largest denominations in England and

America.

As members of the Church of England, they were strongly attached to her

forms of worship, but the Lord had presented before them in His word a

higher standard. The Holy Spirit urged them to preach Christ and Him

crucified. The power of the Highest attended their labors. Thousands were

convicted and truly converted. It was necessary that these sheep be

protected from ravening wolves. Wesley had no thought of forming a new

denomination, but he organized them under what was called the Methodist

Connection.

Mysterious and trying was the opposition which these preachers encountered

from the established church; yet God, in His wisdom, had overruled events

to cause the reform to begin within the church itself. Had it come wholly

from without, it would not have penetrated where it was so much needed.

But as the revival preachers were churchmen, and labored within the pale

of the church wherever they could find opportunity, the truth had an

entrance where the doors would otherwise have remained closed. Some of the

clergy were roused from their moral stupor, and became zealous preachers

in their own parishes. Churches that had been petrified by formalism were

quickened into life.

In Wesley’s time, as in all ages of the church’s history, men of different

gifts performed their appointed work. They did not harmonize upon every

point of doctrine, but all were moved by the Spirit of God, and united in

the absorbing aim to win souls to Christ. The differences between

Whitefield and the Wesleys threatened at one time to create alienation;

but as they learned meekness in the school of Christ, mutual forbearance

and charity reconciled them. They had no time to dispute, while error and

iniquity were teeming everywhere, and sinners were going down to ruin.

The servants of God trod a rugged path. Men of influence and learning

employed their powers against them. After a time many of the clergy

manifested determined hostility, and the doors of the churches were closed

against a pure faith and those who proclaimed it. The course of the clergy

in denouncing them from the pulpit, aroused the elements of darkness,

ignorance, and iniquity. Again and again did John Wesley escape death by a

miracle of God’s mercy. When the rage of the mob was excited against him,

and there seemed no way of escape, an angel in human form came to his

side, the mob fell back, and the servant of Christ passed in safety from

the place of danger.

Of his deliverance from the enraged mob on one of these occasions, Wesley

said: “Many endeavored to throw me down while we were going down hill on a

slippery path to the town; as well judging that if I was once on the

ground, I should hardly rise any more. But I made no stumble at all, nor

the least slip, till I was entirely out of their hands.... Although many

strove to lay hold on my collar or clothes, to pull me down, they could

not fasten at all: only one got fast hold of the flap of my waistcoat,

which was soon left in his hand; the other flap, in the pocket of which

was a bank-note, was torn but half off.... A lusty man just behind, struck

at me several times, with a large oaken stick; with which if he had struck

me once on the back part of my head, it would have saved him all further

trouble. But every time the blow was turned aside, I know not how; for I

could not move to the right hand or left.... Another came rushing through

the press, and raising his arm to strike, on a sudden let it drop, and

only stroked my head, saying, ‘What soft hair he has!’ ... The very first

men whose hearts were turned were the heroes of the town, the captains of

the rabble on all occasions, one of them having been a prize-fighter at

the bear-gardens....

“By how gentle degrees does God prepare us for His will! Two years ago, a

piece of brick grazed my shoulders. It was a year after that the stone

struck me between the eyes. Last month I received one blow, and this

evening two, one before we came into the town, and one after we were gone

out; but both were as nothing: for though one man struck me on the breast

with all his might, and the other on the mouth with such a force that the

blood gushed out immediately, I felt no more pain from either of the blows

than if they had touched me with a straw.”(375)

The Methodists of those early days—people as well as preachers—endured

ridicule and persecution, alike from church-members and from the openly

irreligious who were inflamed by their misrepresentations. They were

arraigned before courts of justice—such only in name, for justice was rare

in the courts of that time. Often they suffered violence from their

persecutors. Mobs went from house to house, destroying furniture and

goods, plundering whatever they chose, and brutally abusing men, women,

and children. In some instances, public notices were posted, calling upon

those who desired to assist in breaking the windows and robbing the houses

of the Methodists, to assemble at a given time and place. These open

violations of both human and divine law were allowed to pass without a

reprimand. A systematic persecution was carried on against a people whose

only fault was that of seeking to turn the feet of sinners from the path

of destruction to the path of holiness.

Said John Wesley, referring to the charges against himself and his

associates: “Some allege that the doctrines of these men are false,

erroneous, and enthusiastic; that they are new and unheard-of till of

late; that they are Quakerism, fanaticism, popery. This whole pretense has

been already cut up by the roots, it having been shown at large that every

branch of this doctrine is the plain doctrine of Scripture interpreted by

our own church. Therefore it cannot be either false or erroneous, provided

the Scripture be true.” “Others allege, ‘Their doctrine is too strict;

they make the way to heaven too narrow.’ And this is in truth the original

objection, (as it was almost the only one for some time,) and is secretly

at the bottom of a thousand more, which appear in various forms. But do

they make the way to heaven any narrower than our Lord and His apostles

made it? Is their doctrine stricter than that of the Bible? Consider only

a few plain texts: ‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart,

and with all thy mind, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength.’

‘For every idle word which men shall speak, they shall give an account in

the day of judgment.’ ‘Whether ye eat, or drink, or whatever ye do, do all

to the glory of God.’

“If their doctrine is stricter than this, they are to blame; but you know

in your conscience it is not. And who can be one jot less strict without

corrupting the word of God? Can any steward of the mysteries of God be

found faithful if he change any part of that sacred depositum? No. He can

abate nothing, he can soften nothing; he is constrained to declare to all

men, ‘I may not bring down the Scripture to your taste. You must come up

to it, or perish forever.’ This is the real ground of that other popular

cry concerning ‘the uncharitableness of these men.’ Uncharitable, are

they? In what respect? Do they not feed the hungry and clothe the naked?

‘No; that is not the thing: they are not wanting in this: but they are so

uncharitable in judging! they think none can be saved but those of their

own way.’ ”(376)

The spiritual declension which had been manifest in England just before

the time of Wesley, was in great degree the result of Antinomian teaching.

Many affirmed that Christ had abolished the moral law, and that Christians

are therefore under no obligation to observe it; that a believer is freed

from the “bondage of good works.” Others, though admitting the perpetuity

of the law, declared that it was unnecessary for ministers to exhort the

people to obedience of its precepts, since those whom God had elected to

salvation would, “by the irresistible impulse of divine grace, be led to

the practice of piety and virtue,” while those who were doomed to eternal

reprobation “did not have power to obey the divine law.”

Others, also holding that “the elect cannot fall from grace nor forfeit

the divine favor,” arrived at the still more hideous conclusion that “the

wicked actions they commit are not really sinful, nor to be considered as

instances of their violation of the divine law, and that consequently they

have no occasion either to confess their sins or to break them off by

repentance.”(377) Therefore, they declared that even one of the vilest of

sins, “considered universally an enormous violation of the divine law, is

not a sin in the sight of God,” if committed by one of the elect, “because

it is one of the essential and distinctive characteristics of the elect,

that they cannot do anything that is either displeasing to God or

prohibited by the law.”

These monstrous doctrines are essentially the same as the later teaching

of popular educators and theologians,—that there is no unchangeable divine

law as the standard of right, but that the standard of morality is

indicated by society itself, and has constantly been subject to change.

All these ideas are inspired by the same master-spirit,—by him who, even

among the sinless inhabitants of heaven, began his work of seeking to

break down the righteous restraints of the law of God.

The doctrine of the divine decrees, unalterably fixing the character of

men, had led many to a virtual rejection of the law of God. Wesley

steadfastly opposed the errors of the Antinomian teachers, and showed that

this doctrine which led to Antinomianism was contrary to the Scriptures.

“The grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to _all men_.”

“This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; who will

have _all men_ to be saved; and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ

Jesus; who gave Himself a ransom for _all_.”(378) The Spirit of God is

freely bestowed, to enable every man to lay hold upon the means of

salvation. Thus Christ, “the true Light,” “lighteth every man that cometh

into the world.”(379) Men fail of salvation through their own wilful

refusal of the gift of life.

In answer to the claim that at the death of Christ the precepts of the

decalogue had been abolished with the ceremonial law, Wesley said: “The

moral law, contained in the ten commandments and enforced by the prophets,

He did not take away. It was not the design of His coming to revoke any

part of this. This is a law which never can be broken, which ‘stands fast

as the faithful witness in heaven.’ ... This was from the beginning of the

world, being ‘written not on tables of stone,’ but on the hearts of all

the children of men, when they came out of the hands of the Creator. And

however the letters once wrote by the finger of God are now in a great

measure defaced by sin, yet can they not wholly be blotted out, while we

have any consciousness of good and evil. Every part of this law must

remain in force upon all mankind, and in all ages; as not depending either

on time or place, or any other circumstances liable to change, but on the

nature of God, and the nature of man, and their unchangeable relation to

each other.

“ ‘I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.’... Without question, His

meaning in this place is (consistently with all that goes before and

follows after),—I am come to establish it in its fulness, in spite of all

the glosses of men: I am come to place in a full and clear view whatsoever

was dark or obscure therein: I am come to declare the true and full import

of every part of it; to show the length and breadth, the entire extent, of

every commandment contained therein, and the height and depth, the

inconceivable purity and spirituality of it in all its branches.”(380)

Wesley declared the perfect harmony of the law and the gospel. “There is,

therefore, the closest connection that can be conceived, between the law

and the gospel. On the one hand, the law continually makes way for, and

points us to, the gospel; on the other, the gospel continually leads us to

a more exact fulfilling of the law. The law, for instance, requires us to

love God, to love our neighbor, to be meek, humble, or holy. We feel that

we are not sufficient for these things; yea, that ‘with man this is

impossible:’ but we see a promise of God to give us that love, and to make

us humble, meek, and holy: we lay hold of this gospel, of these glad

tidings; it is done unto us according to our faith; and ‘the righteousness

of the law is fulfilled in us,’ through faith which is in Christ Jesus....

“In the highest rank of the enemies of the gospel of Christ,” said Wesley,

“are they who openly and explicitly ‘judge the law’ itself, and ‘speak

evil of the law;’ who teach men to break (to dissolve, to loose, to untie

the obligation of) not one only, whether of the least or of the greatest,

but all the commandments at a stroke.... The most surprising of all the

circumstances that attend this strong delusion, is that they who are given

up to it, really believe that they honor Christ by overthrowing His law,

and that they are magnifying His office while they are destroying His

doctrine! Yea, they honor Him just as Judas did when he said, ‘Hail,

Master, and kissed Him.’ And He may as justly say to every one of them,

‘Betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?’ It is no other than betraying

Him with a kiss, to talk of His blood, and take away His crown; to set

light by any part of His law, under pretense of advancing His gospel. Nor

indeed can any one escape this charge, who preaches faith in any such a

manner as either directly or indirectly tends to set aside any branch of

obedience: who preaches Christ so as to disannul, or weaken in any wise,

the least of the commandments of God.”(381)

To those who urged that “the preaching of the gospel answers all the ends

of the law,” Wesley replied: “This we utterly deny. It does not answer the

very first end of the law, namely, the convincing men of sin, the

awakening those who are still asleep on the brink of hell.” The apostle

Paul declares that “by the law is the knowledge of sin;” “and not until

man is convicted of sin, will he truly feel his need of the atoning blood

of Christ.... ‘They that be whole,’ as our Lord Himself observes, ‘need

not a physician, but they that are sick.’ It is absurd, therefore, to

offer a physician to them that are whole, or that at least imagine

themselves so to be. You are first to convince them that they are sick;

otherwise they will not thank you for your labor. It is equally absurd to

offer Christ to them whose heart is whole, having never yet been

broken.”(382)

Thus while preaching the gospel of the grace of God, Wesley, like his

Master, sought to “magnify the law, and make it honorable.” Faithfully did

he accomplish the work given him of God, and glorious were the results

which he was permitted to behold. At the close of his long life of more

than fourscore years—above half a century spent in itinerant ministry—his

avowed adherents numbered more than half a million souls. But the

multitude that through his labors had been lifted from the ruin and

degradation of sin to a higher and a purer life, and the number who by his

teaching had attained to a deeper and richer experience, will never be

known till the whole family of the redeemed shall be gathered into the

kingdom of God. His life presents a lesson of priceless worth to every

Christian. Would that the faith and humility, the untiring zeal,

self-sacrifice, and devotion of this servant of Christ, might be reflected

in the churches of to-day!

15. THE BIBLE AND THE FRENCH REVOLUTION.

[Illustration: Chapter header.]

The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan · 第 20 / 60 段