GENTLEMEN OF THE CONGRESS:

The session upon which you are now entering will be the closing session

of the Sixty-third Congress, a Congress, I venture to say, which will

long be remembered for the great body of thoughtful and constructive

work which it has done, in loyal response to the thought and needs of

the country. I should like in this address to review the notable record

and try to make adequate assessment of it; but no doubt we stand too

near the work that has been done and are ourselves too much part of it

to play the part of historians toward it.

Our program of legislation with regard to the regulation of business is

now virtually complete. It has been put forth, as we intended, as a

whole, and leaves no conjecture as to what is to follow. The road at

last lies clear and firm before business. It is a road which it can

travel without fear or embarrassment. It is the road to ungrudged,

unclouded success. In it every honest man, every man who believes that

the public interest is part of his own interest, may walk with perfect

confidence.

Moreover, our thoughts are now more of the future than of the past.

While we have worked at our tasks of peace the circumstances of the

whole age have been altered by war. What we have done for our own land

and our own people we did with the best that was in us, whether of

character or of intelligence, with sober enthusiasm and a confidence in

the principles upon which we were acting which sustained us at every

step of the difficult undertaking; but it is done. It has passed from

our hands. It is now an established part of the legislation of the

country. Its usefulness, its effects will disclose themselves in

experience. What chiefly strikes us now, as we look about us during

these closing days of a year which will be forever memorable in the

history of the world, is that we face new tasks, have been facing them

these six months, must face them in the months to come,--face them

without partisan feeling, like men who have forgotten everything but a

common duty and the fact that we are representatives of a great people

whose thought is not of us but of what America owes to herself and to

all mankind in such circumstances as these upon which we look amazed and

anxious.

War has interrupted the means of trade not only but also the processes

of production. In Europe it is destroying men and resources wholesale

and upon a scale unprecedented and appalling. There is reason to fear

that the time is near, if it be not already at hand, when several of the

countries of Europe will find it difficult to do for their people what

they have hitherto been always easily able to do,--many essential and

fundamental things. At any rate, they will need our help and our

manifold services as they have never needed them before; and we should

be ready, more fit and ready than we have ever been.

It is of equal consequence that the nations whom Europe has usually

supplied with innumerable articles of manufacture and commerce of which

they are in constant need and without which their economic development

halts and stands still can now get only a small part of what they

formerly imported and eagerly look to us to supply their all but empty

markets. This is particularly true of our own neighbors, the States,

great and small, of Central and South America. Their lines of trade have

hitherto run chiefly athwart the seas, not to our ports but to the

ports of Great Britain and of the older continent of Europe. I do not

stop to inquire why, or to make any comment on probable causes. What

interests us just now is not the explanation but the fact, and our duty

and opportunity in the presence of it. Here are markets which we must

supply, and we must find the means of action. The United States, this

great people for whom we speak and act, should be ready, as never

before, to serve itself and to serve mankind; ready with its resources,

its energies, its forces of production, and its means of distribution.

It is a very practical matter, a matter of ways and means. We have the

resources, but are we fully ready to use them? And, if we can make ready

what we have, have we the means at hand to distribute it? We are not

fully ready; neither have we the means of distribution. We are willing,

but we are not fully able. We have the wish to serve and to serve

greatly, generously; but we are not prepared as we should be. We are not

ready to mobilize our resources at once. We are not prepared to use them

immediately and at their best, without delay and without waste.

To speak plainly, we have grossly erred in the way in which we have

stunted and hindered the development of our merchant marine. And now,

when we need ships, we have not got them. We have year after year

debated, without end or conclusion, the best policy to pursue with

regard to the use of the ores and forests and water powers of our

national domain in the rich States of the West, when we should have

acted; and they are still locked up. The key is still turned upon them,

the door shut fast at which thousands of vigorous men, full of

initiative, knock clamorously for admittance. The water power of our

navigable streams outside the national domain also, even in the eastern

States, where we have worked and planned for generations, is still not

used as it might be, because we will and we won't; because the laws we

have made do not intelligently balance encouragement against restraint.

We withhold by regulation.

I have come to ask you to remedy and correct these mistakes and

omissions, even at this short session of a Congress which would

certainly seem to have done all the work that could reasonably be

expected of it. The time and the circumstances are extraordinary, and so

must our efforts be also.

Fortunately, two great measures, finely conceived, the one to unlock,

with proper safeguards, the resources of the national domain, the other

to encourage the use of the navigable waters outside that domain for the

generation of power, have already passed the House of Representatives

and are ready for immediate consideration and action by the Senate. With

the deepest earnestness I urge their prompt passage. In them both we

turn our backs upon hesitation and makeshift and formulate a genuine

policy of use and conservation, in the best sense of those words. We owe

the one measure not only to the people of that great western country for

whose free and systematic development, as it seems to me, our

legislation has done so little, but also to the people of the Nation as

a whole; and we as clearly owe the other in fulfillment of our repeated

promises that the water power of the country should in fact as well as

in name be put at the disposal of great industries which can make

economical and profitable use of it, the rights of the public being

adequately guarded the while, and monopoly in the use prevented. To have

begun such measures and not completed them would indeed mar the record

of this great Congress very seriously. I hope and confidently believe

that they will be completed.

And there is another great piece of legislation which awaits and should

receive the sanction of the Senate: I mean the bill which gives a larger

measure of self-government to the people of the Philippines. How better,

in this time of anxious questioning and perplexed policy, could we show

our confidence in the principles of liberty, as the source as well as

the expression of life, how better could we demonstrate our own

self-possession and steadfastness in the courses of justice and

disinterestedness than by thus going calmly forward to fulfill our

promises to a dependent people, who will now look more anxiously than

ever to see whether we have indeed the liberality, the unselfishness,

the courage, the faith we have boasted and professed. I cannot believe

that the Senate will let this great measure of constructive justice

await the action of another Congress. Its passage would nobly crown the

record of these two years of memorable labor.

But I think that you will agree with me that this does not complete the

toll of our duty. How are we to carry our goods to the empty markets of

which I have spoken if we have not the ships? How are we to build up a

great trade if we have not the certain and constant means of

transportation upon which all profitable and useful commerce depends?

And how are we to get the ships if we wait for the trade to develop

without them? To correct the many mistakes by which we have discouraged

and all but destroyed the merchant marine of the country, to retrace the

steps by which we have, it seems almost deliberately, withdrawn our flag

from the seas, except where, here and there, a ship of war is bidden

carry it or some wandering yacht displays it, would take a long time and

involve many detailed items of legislation, and the trade which we ought

immediately to handle would disappear or find other channels while we

debated the items.

The case is not unlike that which confronted us when our own continent

was to be opened up to settlement and industry, and we needed long lines

of railway, extended means of transportation prepared beforehand, if

development was not to lag intolerably and wait interminably. We

lavishly subsidized the building of transcontinental railroads. We look

back upon that with regret now, because the subsidies led to many

scandals of which we are ashamed; but we know that the railroads had to

be built, and if we had it to do over again we should of course build

them, but in another way. Therefore I propose another way of providing

the means of transportation, which must precede, not tardily follow, the

development of our trade with our neighbor states of America. It may

seem a reversal of the natural order of things, but it is true, that the

routes of trade must be actually opened--by many ships and regular

sailings and moderate charges--before streams of merchandise will flow

freely and profitably through them.

Hence the pending shipping bill, discussed at the last session but as

yet passed by neither House. In my judgment such legislation is

imperatively needed and cannot wisely be postponed. The Government must

open these gates of trade, and open them wide; open them before it is

altogether profitable to open them, or altogether reasonable to ask

private capital to open them at a venture. It is not a question of the

Government monopolizing the field. It should take action to make it

certain that transportation at reasonable rates will be promptly

provided, even where the carriage is not at first profitable; and then,

when the carriage has become sufficiently profitable to attract and

engage private capital, and engage it in abundance, the Government ought

to withdraw. I very earnestly hope that the Congress will be of this

opinion, and that both Houses will adopt this exceedingly important

bill.

The great subject of rural credits still remains to be dealt with, and

it is a matter of deep regret that the difficulties of the subject have

seemed to render it impossible to complete a bill for passage at this

session. But it cannot be perfected yet, and therefore there are no

other constructive measures the necessity for which I will at this time

call your attention to; but I would be negligent of a very manifest duty

were I not to call the attention of the Senate to the fact that the

proposed convention for safety at sea awaits its confirmation and that

the limit fixed in the convention itself for its acceptance is the last

day of the present month. The conference in which this 15 convention

originated was called by the United States; the representatives of the

United States played a very influential part indeed in framing the

provisions of the proposed convention; and those provisions are in

themselves for the most part admirable. It would hardly be consistent

with the part we have played in the whole matter to let it drop and go

by the board as if forgotten and neglected. It was ratified in May last

by the German Government and in August by the Parliament of Great

Britain. It marks a most hopeful and decided advance in international

civilization. We should show our earnest good faith in a great matter by

adding our own acceptance of it.

There is another matter of which I must make special mention, if I am to

discharge my conscience, lest it should escape your attention. It may

seem a very small thing. It affects only a single item of appropriation.

But many human lives and many great enterprises hang upon it. It is the

matter of making adequate provision for the survey and charting of our

coasts. It is immediately pressing and exigent in connection with the

immense coast line of Alaska, a coast line greater than that of the

United States themselves, though it is also very important indeed with

regard to the older coasts of the continent. We cannot use our great

Alaskan domain, ships will not ply thither, if those coasts and their

many hidden dangers are not thoroughly surveyed and charted. The work is

incomplete at almost every point. Ships and lives have been lost in

threading what were supposed to be well-known main channels. We have not

provided adequate vessels or adequate machinery for the survey and

charting. We have used old vessels that were not big enough or strong

enough and which were so nearly unseaworthy that our inspectors would

not have allowed private owners to send them to sea. This is a matter

which, as I have said, seems small, but is in reality very great. Its

importance has only to be looked into to be appreciated.

Before I close may I say a few words upon two topics, much discussed out

of doors, upon which it is highly important that our judgments should be

clear, definite, and steadfast?

One of these is economy in government expenditures. The duty of economy

is not debatable. It is manifest and imperative. In the appropriations

we pass we are spending the money of the great people whose servants we

are,--not our own. We are trustees and responsible stewards in the

spending. The only thing debatable and upon which we should be careful

to make our thought and purpose clear is the kind of economy demanded of

us. I assert with the greatest confidence that the people of the United

States are not jealous of the amount their Government costs if they are

sure that they get what they need and desire for the outlay, that the

money is being spent for objects of which they approve, and that it is

being applied with good business sense and management.

Governments grow, piecemeal, both in their tasks and in the means by

which those tasks are to be performed, and very few Governments are

organized, I venture to say, as wise and experienced business men would

organize them if they had a clean sheet of paper to write upon.

Certainly the Government of the United States is not. I think that it is

generally agreed that there should be a systematic reorganization and

reassembling of its parts so as to secure greater efficiency and effect

considerable savings in expense. But the amount of money saved in that

way would, I believe, though no doubt considerable in itself, running,

it may be, into the millions, be relatively small,--small, I mean, in

proportion to the total necessary outlays of the Government. It would be

thoroughly worth effecting, as every saving would, great or small. Our

duty is not altered by the scale of the saving. But my point is that the

people of the United States do not wish to curtail the activities of

this Government; they wish, rather, to enlarge them; and with every

enlargement, with the mere growth, indeed, of the country itself, there

must come, of course, the inevitable increase of expense. The sort of

economy we ought to practice may be effected, and ought to be effected,

by a careful study and assessment of the tasks to be performed; and the

money spent ought to be made to yield the best possible returns in

efficiency and achievement. And, like good stewards, we should so

account for every dollar of our appropriations as to make it perfectly

evident what it was spent for and in what way it was spent.

It is not expenditure but extravagance that we should fear being

criticized for; not paying for the legitimate enterprises and

undertakings of a great Government whose people command what it should

do, but adding what will benefit only a few or pouring money out for

what need not have been undertaken at all or might have been postponed

or better and more economically conceived and carried out. The Nation is

not niggardly; it is very generous. It will chide us only if we forget

for whom we pay money out and whose money it is we pay. These are large

and general standards, but they are not very difficult of application to

particular cases.

The other topic I shall take leave to mention goes deeper into the

principles of our national life and policy. It is the subject of

national defense.

It cannot be discussed without first answering some very searching

questions. It is said in some quarters that we are not prepared for war.

What is meant by being prepared? Is it meant that we are not ready upon

brief notice to put a nation in the field, a nation of men trained to

arms? Of course we are not ready to do that; and we shall never be in

time of peace so long as we retain our present political principles and

institutions. And what is it that it is suggested we should be prepared

to do? To defend ourselves against attack? We have always found means to

do that, and shall find them whenever it is necessary without calling

our people away from their necessary tasks to render compulsory military

service in times of peace.

Allow me to speak with great plainness and directness upon this great

matter and to avow my convictions with deep earnestness. I have tried to

know what America is, what her people think, what they are, what they

most cherish and hold dear. I hope that some of their finer passions are

in my own heart,--some of the great conceptions and desires which gave

birth to this Government and which have made the voice of this people a

voice of peace and hope and liberty among the peoples of the world, and

that, speaking my own thoughts, I shall, at least in part, speak theirs

also, however faintly and inadequately, upon this vital matter.

We are at peace with all the world. No one who speaks counsel based on

fact or drawn from a just and candid interpretation of realities can say

that there is reason to fear that from any quarter our independence or

the integrity of our territory is threatened. Dread of the power of any

other nation we are incapable of. We are not jealous of rivalry in the

fields of commerce or of any other peaceful achievement. We mean to live

our own lives as we will; but we mean also to let live. We are, indeed,

a true friend to all the nations of the world, because we threaten none,

covet the possessions of none, desire the overthrow of none. Our

friendship can be accepted and is accepted without reservation, because

it is offered in a spirit and for a purpose which no one need ever

question or suspect. Therein lies our greatness. We are the champions of

peace and of concord. And we should be very jealous of this distinction

which we have sought to earn. Just now we should be particularly jealous

of it, because it is our dearest present hope that this character and

reputation may presently, in God's providence, bring us an opportunity

such as has seldom been vouchsafed any nation, the opportunity to

counsel and obtain peace in the world and reconciliation and a healing

settlement of many a matter that has cooled and interrupted the

friendship of nations. This is the time above all others when we should

wish and resolve to keep our strength by self-possession, our influence

by preserving our ancient principles of action.

From the first we have had a clear and settled policy with regard to

military establishments. We never have had, and while we retain our

present principles and ideals we never shall have, a large standing

army. If asked, Are you ready to defend yourselves? we reply, Most

assuredly, to the utmost; and yet we shall not turn America into a

military camp. We will not ask our young men to spend the best years of

their lives making soldiers of themselves. There is another sort of

energy in us. It will know how to declare itself and make itself

effective should occasion arise. And especially when half the world is

on fire we shall be careful to make our moral insurance against the

spread of the conflagration very definite and certain and adequate

indeed.

Let us remind ourselves, therefore, of the only thing we can do or will

do. We must depend in every time of national peril, in the future as in

the past, not upon a standing army, nor yet upon a reserve army, but

upon a citizenry trained and accustomed to arms. It will be right

enough, right American policy, based upon our accustomed principles and

practices, to provide a system by which every citizen who will volunteer

for the training may be made familiar with the use of modern arms, the

rudiments or drill and maneuver, and the maintenance and sanitation of

camps. We should encourage such training and make it a means of

discipline which our young men will learn to value. It is right that we

should provide it not only, but that we should make it as attractive as

possible, and so induce our young men to undergo it at such times as

they can command a little freedom and can seek the physical development

they need, for mere health's sake, if for nothing more. Every means by

which such things can be stimulated is legitimate, and such a method

smacks of true American ideas. It is right, too, that the National Guard

of the States should be developed and strengthened by every means which

is not inconsistent with our obligations to our own people or with the

established policy of our Government. And this, also, not because the

time or occasion specially calls for such measures, but because it

should be our constant policy to make these provisions for our national

peace and safety.

More than this carries with it a reversal of the whole history and

character of our polity. More than this, proposed at this time, permit

me to say, would mean merely that we had lost our self-possession, that

we had been thrown off our balance by a war with which we have nothing

to do, whose causes cannot touch us, whose very existence affords us

opportunities of friendship and disinterested service which should make

us ashamed of any thought of hostility or fearful preparation for

trouble. This is assuredly the opportunity for which a people and a

government like ours were raised up, the opportunity not only to speak

but actually to embody and exemplify the counsels of peace and amity and

the lasting concord which is based on justice and fair and generous

dealing.

A powerful navy we have always regarded as our proper and natural means

of defense; and it has always been of defense that we have thought,

never of aggression or of conquest. But who shall tell us now what sort

of a navy to build? We shall take leave to be strong upon the seas, in

the future as in the past; and there will be no thought of offense or of

provocation in that. Our ships are our natural bulwarks. When will the

experts tell us just what kind we should construct--and when will they

be right for ten years together, if the relative efficiency of craft of

different kinds and uses continues to change as we have seen it change

under our very eyes in these last few months?

But I turn away from the subject. It is not new. There is no new need to

discuss it. We shall not alter our attitude toward it because some

amongst us are nervous and excited. We shall easily and sensibly agree

upon a policy of defense. The question has not changed its aspect

because the times are not normal. Our policy will not be for an

occasion. It will be conceived as a permanent and settled thing, which

we will pursue at all seasons, without haste and after a fashion

perfectly consistent with the peace of the world, the abiding friendship

of states, and the unhampered freedom of all with whom we deal. Let

there be no misconception. The country has been misinformed. We have not

been negligent of national defense. We are not unmindful of the great

responsibility resting upon us. We shall learn and profit by the lesson

of every experience and every new circumstance; and what is needed will

be adequately done.

I close, as I began, by reminding you of the great tasks and duties of

peace which challenge our best powers and invite us to build what will

last, the tasks to which we can address ourselves now and at all times

with free-hearted zest and with all the finest gifts of constructive

wisdom we possess. To develop our life and our resources; to supply our

own people, and the people of the world as their need arises, from the

abundant plenty of our fields and our marts of trade; to enrich the

commerce of our own States and of the world with the products of our

mines, our farms, and our factories, with the creations of our thought

and the fruits of our character,--this is what will hold our attention

and our enthusiasm steadily, now and in the years to come, as we strive

to show in our life as a nation what liberty and the inspirations of an

emancipated spirit may do for men and for societies, for individuals,

for states, and for mankind.

President Wilson's Addresses · 第 56 / 114 题