CHAPTER I

Produced by Clarity, Graeme Mackreth and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

A CANDID HISTORY OF THE JESUITS

A CANDID HISTORY

OF

THE JESUITS

BY

JOSEPH McCABE

AUTHOR OF

"THE DECAY OF THE CHURCH OF ROME" ETC.

LONDON

EVELEIGH NASH

1913

PREFACE

It is the historic custom of the Church of Rome to enlist in its

service monastic or quasi-monastic bodies in addition to the ordinary

clergy. In its hour of greatest need, at the very outbreak of the

Reformation, the Society of Jesus was formed as one of these auxiliary

regiments, and in the war which the Church of Rome has waged since

that date the Jesuits have rendered the most spirited and conspicuous

service. Yet the procedure of this Society has differed in many

important respects from that of the other regiments of the Church, and

a vast and unceasing controversy has gathered about it. It is probable

that a thousand times, or several thousand times, more books and

pamphlets and articles have been written about the Jesuits than about

even the oldest and most powerful or learned of the monastic bodies.

Not a work of history can be opened, in any language, but it will

contain more references to the Jesuits than to all the other religious

orders collectively. But opinions differ as much to-day as they did a

hundred or two hundred years ago about the character of the Jesuits,

and the warmest eulogies are chilled by the most bitter and withering

indictments.

What is a Jesuit? The question is asked still in every civilised

land, and the answer is a confusing mass of contradictions. The most

learned historians read the facts of their career so differently,

that one comes to a verdict expressing deep and criminal guilt, and

another acquits them with honour. Since the foundation of the Society

these drastically opposed views of its action have been taken, and

the praise and homage of admirers have been balanced by the intense

hatred of an equal number of Catholic opponents. It would seem that

some impenetrable veil lies over the history and present life of the

Society, yet on both sides its judges refuse to recognise obscurity.

Catholic monarchs and peoples have, time after time, driven the Jesuits

ignominiously over their frontiers; Popes have sternly condemned them.

But they are as active, and nearly as numerous, in the twentieth

century as in the last days of the old political world.

No marshalling of historical facts will change the feeling of the

pronounced admirers and opponents of the Jesuits, and it would be idle

to suppose that, because the present writer is neither Roman Catholic

nor Protestant, he will be awarded the virtue of impartiality. There

seems, however, some need for an historical study of the Jesuits which

will aim at impartiality and candour. On one side we have large and

important works like Crétineau-Joly's _Histoire religieuse, politique,

et littéraire de la Compagnie de Jésus_, and a number of smaller

works, written by Catholics of England or America, from the material,

and in the spirit, of the French historian's work. Such works as

these cannot for a moment be regarded as serious history. They are

panegyrics or apologies: pleasant reading for the man or woman who

wishes to admire, but mere untruth to the man or woman who wishes to

know. Indeed, the work of M. Crétineau-Joly, written in conjunction

with the Jesuits, which is at times recommended as the classical

authority on the Society, has worse defects than the genial omission

of unedifying episodes. He makes the most inflated general statements

on the scantiest of material, is seriously and frequently inaccurate,

makes a very generous use of the "mental reserve" which his friends

advocate, and sometimes embodies notoriously forged documents without

even intimating that they are questioned.

Such works naturally provoke an antagonistic class of volumes, in

which the unflattering truths only are presented and a false picture

is produced to the prejudice of the Jesuits. An entirely neutral

volume on the Jesuits does not exist, and probably never will exist.

The historian who surveys the whole of the facts of their remarkable

and romantic career cannot remain neutral. Nor is it merely a question

of whether the writer is a Roman Catholic or no. The work of M.

Crétineau-Joly was followed in France by one written by a zealous

priest, the Abbé Guettée, which tore its predecessor to shreds, and

represented the Society of Jesus as fitly condemned by Pope and kings.

It will be found, at least, that the present work contains an

impartial account both of the virtue and heroism that are found in

the chronicles of the Jesuits, and the scandals and misdeeds that may

justly be attributed to them. It is no less based on the original

Jesuit documents, as far as they have been published, and the work of

Crétineau-Joly, than on the antagonistic literature, as the reader

will perceive. Whether or no it seems to some an indictment, it is

a patient endeavour to give all the facts, within the compass of the

volume, and enable the reader to form a balanced judgment on the

Society. It is an attempt to _understand_ the Jesuits: to understand

the enthusiasm and fiery attachment of one half of the Catholic world

no less than the disdain or detestation of the other, to employ the

white and the black, not blended into a monotonous grey but in their

respective places and shades, so as to afford a truthful picture of

the dramatic fortunes of the Society during nearly four centuries, and

some insight into the character of the men who won for it such ardent

devotion and such intense hostility.

J.M.

CONTENTS

CHAP. PAGE

I. The Origin of the Society 1

II. The First Jesuits 27

III. Early Storms 55

IV. General Francis Borgia 80

V. Progress and Decay under Acquaviva 106

VI. The Early Jesuits in England 142

VII. The First Century of Jesuitism 167

VIII. Under the Stuarts 195

IX. The Struggle with the Jansenists 220

X. The Expulsion from Portugal and Spain 253

XI. The Foreign Missions 279

XII. In the Germanic Lands 311

XIII. The Suppression of the Society 334

XIV. The Restoration 364

XV. The New Jesuits 390

XVI. The Last Phase 424

Index 445

A CANDID HISTORY OF THE

JESUITS

CHAPTER I

THE ORIGIN OF THE SOCIETY

In the early summer of the year 1521, some months after Martin Luther

had burned the Pope's bull at Wittenberg and lit the fire of the

Reformation, a young Basque soldier lay abed in his father's castle

at the foot of the Pyrenees, contemplating the wreck of his ambition.

Iñigo of Loyola was the youngest son in a large family of ancient

lineage and little wealth. He had lost his mother at an early date, and

had been placed by a wealthy aunt at court, where he learned to love

the flash of swords, the smile of princes, the softness of silk and of

women's eyes, and all the hard deeds and rich rewards of the knight's

career. From the court he had gone to the camp, and had set himself

sternly to the task of cutting an honourable path back to court.

Fearless in war, skilful in sport and in martial exercises, refined

in person, cheerful in temper, and ardent in love, the young noble

had seen before him a long avenue of knightly adventure and gracious

recompense. He was, in 1521, in his thirtieth year of age, or near

it--his birth-year is variously given as 1491 or 1493; a clean-built,

sinewy little man, with dark lustrous eyes flashing in his olive-tinted

face, and thick black hair crowning his lofty forehead. And a French

ball at the siege of Pampeluna had, at one stroke, broken his leg and

shattered his ambition.

It took some time to realise the ruin of his ambition. The chivalrous

conquerors at Pampeluna had treated their brave opponent with

distinction, and had, after dressing his wounds, sent him to the Loyola

castle in the Basque provinces, where his elder brother had brought the

surgeons to make him fit for the field once more. The bone, they found,

had been badly set; it must be broken again and re-set. He bore their

operations without a moan, and then lay for weeks in pain and fever.

He still trusted to return to the camp and win the favour of a certain

great lady--probably the daughter of the Dowager-Queen of Naples--whose

memory he secretly cherished. Indeed, on the feast of the Apostles

Peter and Paul, he spoke of it with confidence; he told his brother

that the elder apostle had entered the dark chamber and healed him on

the eve of the festival. Unhappily he found, when the fever had gone,

that the second setting of his leg had been so ill done that a piece

of bone projected below the knee, and the right leg was shorter than

the left. Again he summoned the mediæval surgeons and their appalling

armoury, and they sawed off the protruding piece of bone and stretched

his leg on a rack they used for such purposes; and not a cry or curse

came from the tense lips. But the right leg still refused to meet its

fellow, and shades gathered about Iñigo's glorious prospect of life. A

young man who limps can hardly hope to reach a place of honour in the

camp, or the gardens of the palace, or the hearts of women. Talleyrand,

later, would set out on his career with a limp; and Talleyrand would

become a diplomatist.

Iñigo lay in the stout square castle of rugged stone, which is now

reverently enclosed, like a jewel, in a vast home of the Jesuits. It

then stood alone in a beautiful valley, just at the foot of the last

southern slopes of the Pyrenees, about a mile from the little town

of Azpeitia. The mind of the young Basque heaved with confused and

feverish dreams as he lay there, in the summer heat, beside the wreck

of his ambition. He called for books of knight-errantry, to while

away the dreary days, but there were none in the Loyola castle, and

someone--a pious sister, perhaps--brought him a _Life of Christ_ and a

_Flowers of the Saints_. For lack of anything better he read them: at

first fingering the leaves with the nearest approach to disdain that a

Christian soldier dare admit, then starting with interest, at length

flushing with enthusiasm. What was this but another form of chivalry?

Nay, when you reflected, it was the only chivalry worth so fierce a

devotion as his. Here was a way of winning a fair lady, the Queen of

Heaven, whose glances were worth more than the caresses of all the

dames in Castile: here was a monarch to serve, whose court outshone

the courts of France and Spain as the sun outshines the stars: here

were adventures that called for a higher spirit than the bravado of the

soldier.

The young Basque began to look upon a new world from the narrow windows

of the old castle. Down the valley was Azpeitia, and even there one

could find monsters and evil knights to slay in the cause of Mary.

Southward were the broad provinces of Spain, full of half-converted

Moors and Jews and ever-flourishing vices. Across the hills and the

seas were other kingdoms, calling just as loudly for a new champion of

God and Mary. One field, far away at the edge of the world, summoned

him with peremptory voice; after all the Crusades the sites in the Holy

Land were still trodden by the feet of blaspheming Turks. The blood

began to course once more in the veins of the soldier.

During the winter that followed his friends noticed that he was

making a wonderful chronicle of the lives of Christ and His saints.

He was skilled in all courtly accomplishments--they did not include

learning--and could write, and illuminate very prettily, sonnets to

the secret lady of his inner shrine. Now he used his art to make a

pious chronicle, with the words and deeds of Christ in vermilion and

gold, the life of Mary in blue, and the stories of the saints in the

less royal colours of the rainbow, and his dark pale face was lit by a

strange light. There were times when this new light flickered or faded,

and the fleshly queen of his heart seemed to place white arms about

him, and the sunny earth fought with the faint vision of a far-off

heaven. Then he prayed, and scourged himself, and vowed that he would

be the knight of Christ and Mary; and--so he told his followers long

afterwards--the heavy stone castle shook and rumbled with the angry

passing of the demon. He told them also that he had at the time a

notion of burying himself in the Carthusian monastery at Seville, and

sent one to inquire concerning its way of life; but such a design is so

little in accord with his knight-errant mood that we cannot think he

seriously entertained it.

By the spring the struggle had ended and Ignatius--he exchanged his

worldly name for that of a saint-model--set out in quest of spiritual

adventure. The "sudden revolution," as Crétineau-Joly calls his

conversion, had occupied about nine months. Indeed, friends and foes

of the Jesuits have conspired to obscure the development of his

feelings: the friends in order that they may recognise a miracle in

the conversion, the foes in order that they may make it out to have

been no conversion at all, but a transfer of selfish ambition from the

camp to the Church. Whatever be the truth about Iñigo's earlier morals,

he had certainly received a careful religious education in boyhood,

and he would just as certainly not learn scepticism at the court set

up by Ferdinand and Isabella. His belief that he had a vision of St.

Peter, a few weeks after receiving his wound and before he read the

pious books, shows that he had kept a vivid religious faith in the

camp. Some looseness of conduct would not be inconsistent with this,

especially in Spain, but the darker descriptions of his adolescent ways

which some writers give are not justified. "He was prone to quarrels

and amatory folly," is all that the most candid of his biographers

says. Let us grant the hot Basque blood a quick sense of honour and a

few love-affairs. On the whole, Iñigo seems to have been an officer of

the stricter sort, and a thorough Catholic. Hence we can understand

that, as earth grows dark and cheerless for him, and the casual reading

brings before him in vivid colouring the vision of faith, his fervent

imagination is gradually won, and he sincerely devotes his arms to the

service of Christ and Mary.

Piously deceiving his brother as to his destination, he set out on a

mule in the month of March. He would go to the shrine of Our Lady at

Montserrat, to ask a blessing on his enterprise, and then cross the

sea to convert the Mohammedans in Palestine. His temper is seen in an

adventure by the way. He fell in with one of the Moors who had put on a

thin mantle of Christian profession in order that they might be allowed

to remain in Spain, and talked to him of Our Lady of Montserrat. Being

far from the town and the ears of Inquisitors, the Moor spoke lightly

of the Mother of Christ, and, when the convert showed heat, fled at

a gallop. Ignatius wondered, with his hand on his sword, whether or

no his new ideal demanded that he should follow and slay the man. He

left the point to God, or to his mule, and was taken on the road to

Montserrat.

At last he came to the steep mountain, with saw-like peaks, which rises

out of the plain some twenty miles to the north-west of Barcelona, with

the famous shrine of the Virgin on its flank. In the little town of

Iguelada, at the foot of the mountain, he bought the rough outfit of a

pilgrim--a tunic of sackcloth, a rope-girdle, a pair of rough sandals,

a staff, and a gourd--and made his way up the wild slopes, among the

sober cypresses, to the Benedictine monastery which guarded the shrine.

For three days he knelt at the feet of one of the holiest of the monks,

telling, with many tears, the story of his worldly life. Then he went

again to the town, took aside a poor-clad beggar, as Francis of Assisi

had done in his chronicle, and exchanged garments with him, putting the

sackcloth tunic over his rags. It was the eve of the great festival of

Mary, the Annunciation (March 25th), and he spent the night kneeling

before the altar, as he had read of good knights doing before they

took the field. In the morning he hung his sword in the shrine and set

forth. From that moment we shall do well to forget that Ignatius had

been a soldier, and seek some other clue to his conduct.

The next step in his journey toward Rome is described at great length

in lives of the saint, yet it is not wholly intelligible. Instead of

going to Barcelona, where one took ship, he went to Manresa, and his

pilgrimage was postponed for nearly a year. He did not take the high

road to Barcelona, says his biographer, lest he should meet the people

coming to the shrine: a theory which would not only require another

theory to explain it, but which gives no explanation of the year's

delay. Others think that he heard there was plague in the port; though

the plague would not last a year, and one may question if Ignatius

would flee it. The truth seems to be that the idea of spending his

life in the East was already yielding in his mind to another design:

the plan of forming a Society was dimly breaking on him. He had studied

the monastic life in the Benedictine monastery at Montserrat, and had

brought away with him a book, written by one of their abbots, over

which he would brood to some purpose. He had a vague feeling that the

appointed field of adventure might be Europe.

However that may be, he took a road that led away from Barcelona, and

as he limped and suffered, for he had discarded the mule and would

make his pilgrimage afoot, he asked where he could find a hospital (in

those days a mixture of hostel and hospital). He was taken to Manresa,

a picturesque little town in one of the valleys of the district, where

he lodged in the hospital for a few days, and then, instead of going to

Barcelona, found an apartment and became a local celebrity. The beggar

to whom he had given his clothes had, naturally, been arrested, and

Ignatius was forced to tell his strange story, in order to clear the

man and himself. The story grew as it passed from mouth to mouth, and

it was presently understood that the dirty, barefoot, ill-clad beggar,

who asked a little coarse bread at the doors, and retired to pray

and scourge himself, was one of the richest grandees of the eastern

provinces. Children followed "Father Sackcloth" about the streets; men

sneered at his uncut nails and his long, wild black locks and thin

face; women wept, and asked his prayers.

After a few months he found a cavern outside the town, at the foot

of the hills, and entered upon the period of endless prayer and wild

austerity in which he wrote his book, the _Spiritual Exercises_. He

scourged himself, until the blood came, three times a day: he ate so

little, and lived so intense a life, that he was sometimes found

unconscious on the floor of the cave, and had to be removed and nursed;

his deep black eyes seemed to gleam from the face of a corpse. Thus he

lived for six months, and wrote his famous book. I need not analyse

that passionate guide to the spiritual life, or consider the legend of

its miraculous origin. We know from Benedictine writers that Ignatius

had received at Montserrat a copy of the _Exercitatorium_ of their

abbot Cisneros, and anyone familiar with Catholic life will know that

similar series of "meditations" are, and always have been, very common.

There is an original plan in Ignatius's book, and the period during

which the mind must successively brood over sin and hell, virtue and

heaven, Christ and the devil, is boldly extended to four weeks. These

are technicalities;[1] the deeply original thing in the work is its

intensity, and for the source of this we need only regard those six

months of fierce inner life in the cave near Manresa.

In later years Ignatius claimed that the general design of his Society,

and even the chief features of its constitution, were revealed to

him in that cavern. "I saw it thus at Manresa," he used to say when

he was asked why such or such a feature was included. In this he is

clearly wrong. His Society was, in essence and details, a regiment

enlisted to fight Protestantism, and Ignatius certainly knew nothing

of Protestantism as a formidable menace to the Pope's rule in 1522;

one may doubt if he was yet aware of the existence of Luther. We may

conclude again that he had in mind a vague alternative to his mission

to the Mohammedans. Those who are disposed to believe that the Society

of Jesus was in any definite sense projected by him at Manresa will

find it hard to explain why for five years afterwards he still insisted

that his mission was to the Turks.

In January 1523 he set out for Barcelona, trimming his nails, combing

and clipping his hair, and exchanging his sack for clothes of coarse

grey stuff. He did not wish to attract too much attention, he said. He

was detained a few weeks at Barcelona, and begged his bread, and served

the poor and the sick, in the way which was to become characteristic of

the early Jesuits. On Palm Sunday he entered Rome, lost in a crowd of

other pilgrims and beggars, and from there he walked on foot to Venice,

whence he sailed in July. Within six months he was back in Venice. The

Franciscan monks who controlled the Christian colony at Jerusalem had

sent him home very quickly, fearing that his indiscreet fervour would

lead to trouble with the Turks. The whole expedition was Quixotic, if

it was really meant to be more than a pilgrimage, as Ignatius knew not

a word of any language but Basque and Castilian. He returned to Venice

in a thin ragged coat, his legs showing flagrantly through his tattered

trousers, and in this guise he crossed on foot to Genoa, in hard wintry

weather. By the end of February he was again in Barcelona.

For several years yet Ignatius will continue to speak of the conversion

of the Turks as his chief mission, but his actions suggest that the

alternative in his mind was growing larger. The year's experience had

taught him that the knight of the Lord needed education, and he sat

among the boys at Barcelona learning the Latin grammar and startling

them by rising into literal ecstasies over the conjugation of the verb

"to love." He now dressed in neat plain clothes, but begged his bread

on the way to school and took every occasion to preach the gospel.

Once, when he had converted a loose community of nuns, the fast young

men of Barcelona, who were angry at this interference with their

pleasures, sent their servants to waylay him. They nearly killed him

with their staves. Many jeered at him as a hypocrite or a fanatic: many

revered him, and a few youths became his first disciples. With three of

these he went, after two years' study in Barcelona, to the University

of Alcalà, and began his higher studies. But he was so eager to make an

end of this intellectual preparation, and so busy with saving souls and

gaining proselytes, that he tried to take simultaneously the successive

parts of the stately mediæval curriculum, and learned very little.

His first attempt to found a Society also ended in disastrous failure.

Opinion in Alcalà was divided about "the sackcloth men." Some

picturesque figures were known in the religious life of Spain, but no

one had yet seen such a thing as this little band of youths, led by a

pale and worn man of thirty-two, who went barefoot from house to house,

begging their bread, and passed from the schools in the evening to

the hospitals or the homes of the poor, or stood boldly in the public

squares and told sinners to repent. It was an outrage on the dignity

of ecclesiastical life, and so they were denounced to the Inquisition,

and two learned priests were sent from Seville to examine them. Mystics

were hardly less obnoxious to the Inquisition than secret Jews and

Moors, and then there was this new device of Satan which was said to

be spreading in Germany. Ignatius and his grey-coated young preachers

were arrested and brought before the terrible tribunal. Their doctrine

was found to be sound, but they were forbidden to wear a uniform dress

and were ordered to put shoes on their feet. They dyed their coats

different colours, and returned to their work; as Jesuits have often

done since.

Four months afterwards, the officers of the Inquisition fell on them

again and put them in prison. Among the women who sought the spiritual

guidance of Ignatius were some ladies of wealth, who wished to follow

his example. It is said that he did not consent, and they set out,

against his will, to beg their bread and tend the sick. This was too

much for respectable folk in Alcalà, and Ignatius was closely examined

to see whether he was not a secret Jew, since Christians did not do

these things. The inquiry ended in the companions being ordered to

dress as other students did, and to forbear preaching for four years.

It is important to notice how from the first Ignatius, relying on his

inner visions, will not bend to any authority if he can help it. He

and his youths walked to Salamanca, and resumed their ways, but the

eye of the Inquisition was on them, and they were imprisoned again.

The authorities now fastened on them a restriction which may puzzle a

layman: they were forbidden to attempt to distinguish between mortal

and venial sin until their theological studies were completed. It

meant, in practice, that they must not disturb the gay sinners of Spain

with threats of hell, and for the time it entirely destroyed the design

of Ignatius. His disciples fell away, and Ignatius fled to a land where

there were no Inquisitors. He crossed the Pyrenees and went the whole

length of France on foot.

The seven years which he spent at Paris were of the greatest importance

in the life of Ignatius. Of his studies little need be said. He now

took the university courses in proper succession, and won his degree

in 1534. But these studies were only a means to an end, and he never

became a scholar. He discarded books, wrote a very poor Latin, and took

long to master Italian. For secular knowledge he had a pious disdain.

His followers were to be learned just in so far as it was needed to

capture and retain the control of youth and promote the authority of

the Pope. The chief interest of the long stay in Paris is that he there

founded his Society, and the manner of its foundation is of great

importance.

He had not been long at the University before his strange ways set

up the usual conflict of opinion. Was he a hypocrite, or a fool, or

a saint? From the youths who took the more complimentary view of his

ways he picked out a few to form the little band of disciples he was

always eager to have, and put them through the Spiritual Exercises.

They came out of this fiery ordeal in heroic temper, sold their little

possessions, and began to beg their bread; to the extreme indignation

of their friends in the Spanish colony. In order to save time for

study, Ignatius used to go to the Low Countries in the holidays and

beg funds for his "poor students" among the Spanish merchants. One

year--the year before Henry VIII. set up the Church of England--he went

to London, but we know only that the city was very generous to him. On

these alms Ignatius and his disciples maintained their life of prayer,

austerity, and philanthropy, living in one of the colleges among the

other students and angling prudently for souls. The irritation against

Ignatius among the Spaniards became so great that the Rector was

persuaded to inflict on him a public flogging, the last disgrace of an

unpopular student. He was not flogged, however; nor is there anything

really miraculous, as some think, in the Rector's change of mind.

Ignatius feared the effect on his disciples and had a private talk with

the Rector before the appointed hour. He had a marvellous power of

persuasion and penetration.

These earlier followers seem in time to have fallen away, or never

been admitted to his secret designs, and it was not until 1530 that he

began to gather about him the men whose names have been inscribed in

the history of Europe. In 1530 Ignatius shared his room with a gentle

and deeply religious youth from Savoy, Peter Favre, a peasant's son who

had already won the doctor's cap and priestly orders, as pious as he

was clever. He had made a vow of chastity in his thirteenth year, and

was now, in his twenty-fifth year, as eager to keep a clean conscience

as to advance in learning. He acted as philosophical coach to Ignatius.

From Aristotle and Aquinas they passed, in their nightly talk, to other

matters, and Favre presently made the Exercises.

Francis Xavier, a Navarrese youth of high birth, was a friend of Favre,

and, like him, a brilliant student and keen hungerer for knowledge.

He was a young man of great refinement, and his large soft blue eyes

looked with disdain on the eccentricities of Ignatius; he was not a

little vain of his learning, his handsome person, and his skill in

running. Who but Ignatius could have seen the Francis Xavier of a later

day, wearing out his life in the conversion of savages, in this elegant

and self-conscious scholar? Francis Thompson speaks with admiration

of the "holy wiles" by which Ignatius secured this gifted and elusive

pupil. He laid hold of him by his vanity. Xavier taught philosophy and

was ambitious to have his lecture-room full. Ignatius sat at his feet,

brought others to the lectures, and gave them generous praise. After

a time Xavier made the Exercises, and, in a secret conversation with

Ignatius, was won to the plan of devoting his life to the conversion of

the Mohammedans--or to some other religious campaign.

One by one the early Jesuits were captured by the skilful fisher of

men. To the first two were soon added Diego Lainez, a Castilian youth

of great ability and quiet strength of character, a future General of

the Society; Alfonso Salmeron, a fiery and eloquent youth from Toledo,

then in his twentieth year, who would become one of the most learned

opponents of the Protestants; Nicholas Alfonso, from Valladolid,

commonly known, from his native village, as Bobadilla, a fearless and

impetuous fighter; and Simon Rodriguez, a handsome Spanish youth of

noble birth, who would prove an admirable courtier when kings were to

be won. Many others whom Ignatius sought refused to accept his stern

ideal, and many were kept in the outer courts of his temple, as it

were, and not admitted to share his secret design. The features of the

coming Society were singularly foreshadowed. Only these six out of all

the friends and companions of Ignatius knew anything of the great plan

which filled his mind, and not one of the six knew which of the others

were admitted, like himself, to the inner counsels of the master. Each

was initiated in the strictest confidence, and forbidden to speak of it

to his most intimate friend. It was wholly unlike the foundation of any

other religious body.

At last, in July 1534, the six youths were permitted to know each

other as comrades in arms. It was time to discuss what form their

crusade should take, and Ignatius proposed that, after a week or

two of increased austerity and prayer, they should make the vow

of self-dedication and decide upon their future. There is the

characteristic impress of Ignatius on every feature of the enterprise.

The ceremony was not to be in one of the churches of Paris, but

away across the meadows in the quiet little chapel of St. Denis on

Montmartre; in fact, in the crypt underneath the chapel. And on August

15th they went out from the city gates in the early morning for what

proved to be the historic foundation of the Society of Jesus. Paris was

still, at that time, a comparatively narrow strip of town on either

bank of the Seine centring upon the island which bore the cathedral and

the palace. A mile or two of meadows and vineyards lay between it and

the green hill of Montmartre, on the slope of which was the old chapel

of St. Denis. Underneath the choir was a small vault-like chapel, and

in this, on the Feast of the Assumption of the Virgin, the little band

of fervent southerners gathered to hear Peter Favre, the only priest

amongst them, say the Mass of the Virgin. At its close they knelt in

turns before the altar, and each vowed that he would live in poverty

and chastity, and either go out to convert the Turks or go wherever

the Pope should direct. No rumbling of angry devils was heard on this

occasion: the life of Paris flowed on its sparkling way; yet there was

born in that dim vault on that August morning one of the most singular

and formidable forces in the religious life of Europe.

The Society of Jesus was thus formed, though the seven men did not

know it, or adopt any corporate name. They broke their fast and spent

the day on the slope of the hill, elated with the joy of brotherhood

and the promise of mighty enterprise, talking of the adventurous

future. What should be the next step? Again we find the stamp of the

peculiar genius of Ignatius on their decision: the features which would

degenerate into what is called Jesuitry in the hearts and minds of

less sincerely religious men. They were to return to their studies,

their philanthropy, and their secrecy, for two years, and they would

meet at Venice at the beginning of 1537. Ignatius never hurried. He

lived as if he intended to quit the world very speedily; he acted as

if he were assured of long life. He was founding a body whose supreme

and distinctive aim should be to serve the Pope, yet he concealed his

work from the Pope's representatives as carefully as if he were really

forming an auxiliary troop for Martin Luther. Let it be carefully

noted, too, that they vowed either to go to Palestine _or_ to serve

the Pope in some other way appointed by him. It seems clear that, if

Ignatius had not already abandoned the idea of a mission to the Turks,

he held it lightly. In Paris he had learned that the spirit of the

Reformation was spreading over Europe as fire spreads over a parched

prairie. Men talked much of Luther and Calvin, little of Mohammed.

They returned to their colleges and their hospitals for two years,

and were known to their companions only as monks who were too ascetic

to enter a monastery. Ignatius practised fearful austerities, and his

followers fasted and scourged themselves. Xavier looked back with such

contrition on his former fame as a runner that he tied cords round

his legs until they bit into the flesh and caused a dangerous malady.

Probably the long delay was proposed by Ignatius in the hope that he

might add to the number of his followers, but he found no more at Paris

worthy or willing to be initiated; though three--Le Jay, Paschase

Brouet, and Codure--were added after his departure. He had gone to

Spain in the spring of 1535. Those of the youths who had property to

sacrifice had talked of going to Spain to arrange their affairs, but

Ignatius took the work on himself. His health was poor, he said, and

he would try his native air; he was also eager to keep them from their

native air and disapproving families. In March he walked afoot from

Paris to Loyola, begging his bread by the way.

The report of his life had reached the quiet valley at the foot of

the Pyrenees, and he found his brother and many admirers waiting in

the last stage of his journey. He remained three months in Azpeitia,

and, as no one could now interfere with his fiery preaching, he urged

his townsmen to repent and startled the province. His sanctity was now

beyond question, because a woman had recovered the use of a withered

arm by washing his linen. Then he arranged the affairs of his disciples

and went to Venice. Here Hozes and the Eguia brothers were added to the

secret fraternity, and a year was spent in tending the sick and other

work of edification. The year 1537 broke at last, and in its first week

the six disciples, worn and ragged from the long journey, joined their

master. Walking in demure pairs, a staff in one hand and a chaplet in

the other, begging their bread and exhorting all they met to virtue

and repentance, the six learned students of the Paris University had

covered afoot, in the depth of winter, the hundreds of miles that lay

between Paris and Venice; flying before the advances of bold women,

beaming under the abuse of the new heretics, facing the Alps more

bravely than a Hannibal or a Napoleon. Strong efforts had been made to

keep them at Paris. Why abandon their precious work at the University

for an unknown world? They had a secret vow, they said; though they

probably had little more idea than Ignatius of going to Palestine. None

of them learned Arabic or Turkish, or studied the Koran: what they did

learn was the Catholic doctrine assailed by the followers of Luther.

For a month or two the strange missionaries mystified and edified

Venice. It was known that some of them were nobles, and all brilliant

scholars, yet they performed the most repulsive offices for the sick,

and at times put their mouths to festering wounds. Cardinal Caraffa,

a stern Neapolitan reformer, asked Ignatius to join the new Theatine

order which he had just founded, and Ignatius replied that they had

vowed to go to Palestine. They would remember their refusal when

Caraffa became Pope. At last, in the middle of Lent, Ignatius sent his

followers to Rome to ask the Pope's blessing on their mission. He would

not go himself, as he feared the enmity of Caraffa and of the Spanish

envoy Ortiz, who had opposed them at Paris. There was, in fact, little

danger of Ignatius going without the Pope's blessing, as a new war with

the Turk had broken out, and it would not be unjust to conclude that

the real object of Ignatius was to bring his little troop to the notice

of Paul III. Ortiz himself procured them an audience, and they received

the papal blessing to accompany them to Palestine--if they could get

there, the Pope lightly said. It is singular that Ignatius, after

waiting so long, should choose a time for their departure when the seas

were closed against them.

They were ordained priests at Venice, and then they scattered over

Northern Italy, to allow a year's grace to the Palestinian mission

and let other cities see their ways. Bologna, Ferrara, Siena, and

Padua--all university towns--now witnessed the strange labours of the

nameless knights of Christ. The years were not far distant when men

would start with suspicion at the coming of a "Jesuit" and wonder

what dark intrigue brought him amongst them, but in those early days

they seemed the plainest and most guileless of ministers. Two soberly

dressed, barefooted youths, their pale faces warmed by the smile which

the master bade them wear under the eyes of men, would enter the gate

one evening, covered with the dust of long roads, and mount some stone

in the busy street or square; and, when men and women gathered round

to see the tricks of these foreign jugglers or tumblers, they would be

startled to hear such fiery preaching as had not been heard in Italy

since the fresh spring-time of the followers of Francis and Dominic.

Then the preachers would beg a crust of bread and a cup of water, and

ask for the hospital, where they might serve the sick. They had no

name, the inquirer learned, and belonged to no monastic body; they

were simple knights-errant in the cause of Christ and the poor. The

one feature by which they might, to some close observer, have given an

inkling of the future was that they hung about the universities and

impressed youths with their learning; or that, while they served the

poor, they were pleased to direct the consciences of noble and wealthy

women. Yet who would suppose that within twenty years these men would

be intriguing for the control of the universities and shaping the

counsels of kings?

Ignatius, Favre, and Lainez went to Vicenza, and found a lodging in a

ruined monastery near the town. From this they went out daily to beg,

and tend the sick, and startle townsfolk and villagers with explosive

exhortations, in broken Italian, to lay aside their sins. Again the

Inquisition summoned them, and dismissed them. At last, when it was

clear that the road to the East was indefinitely closed, Ignatius

called his followers from their several towns, and a council was held

in the old convent. The events of these early days are known to us

only from Jesuit writers of the next generation, and, discarding only

the miracles with which they unnecessarily adorn the ways of their

founders, we may follow them with little reserve. These men were,

beyond question, in deadly earnest, though we shall see that some of

them sheltered little human frailties under their hair-shirts. But it

is quite plain that, however high and pure their aim was, they formed

and carried their plans with a diplomacy, almost an astuteness, of

which you will not find a trace in the founding of any other monastic

body. One monastic virtue is conspicuously absent from the aureole of

St. Ignatius--holy simplicity.

It was decided that Ignatius, Favre, and Lainez should go to Rome, and

the others should return to work in their university cities until they

were called to Rome. Before they parted, however, they gave themselves

a name, since people demanded one. We are, said Ignatius, the "Compañia

de Jesu," the "Company of Jesus"; although the prose of a later

generation has translated it the "Society of Jesus." Then Xavier and

Bobadilla went to Bologna, Rodriguez and Le Jay to Ferrara, Salmeron

and Brouet to Siena, Codure and Hozes to Padua, to tend the sick, and

instruct the children, and angle for recruits; and Ignatius and his

companions went on foot, in the depth of winter, to Rome.

Paul III. occupied the papal throne in the year 1537, and looked with

troubled eyes to the lands beyond the Alps, where the Reformation was

now in full blast. He was by temperament a Pope of the Renaissance,

a man of genial culture and artistic feeling, a man who owed his

elevation to his sister's intimacy with a predecessor, and who

might, if the age had not turned so sour, have carried even into the

papal apartments the graceful vices of his youth. But there was now

no mistaking the roll of the distant thunder; Rome was sobered and

disposed to put its house in order. Paul, knowing that the appalling

corruption of the Vatican, the clergy, and the monks must cease, or

else the Vatican and clergy and monks would cease, had appointed a

commission of the sterner cardinals to examine Luther's indictment of

his Church, and one of the clearest points of agreement was that the

unquestioned degradation of the monks throughout Christendom must be

severely punished. The general feeling was that most, if not all, of

the monastic orders should be suppressed. It was therefore a peculiarly

inopportune time to propose the establishment of a new order. Was

Ignatius more holy than Benedict, or Bruno, or Francis, or Dominic? And

had not every order that had yet been founded fallen into evil ways

within fifty years?

Ignatius was not more holy than Dominic and Francis, but he was

shrewder and more alert to the circumstances. He did not propose to

rush into the presence of Paul III. He and his companions settled at

the Spanish hospital, and began to tend the sick and instruct the

children. They began also to have influential admirers. "Let us,"

Ignatius had said, as they entered Rome, "avoid all relations with

women, except those of the highest rank." In later years he said

of their early work at Rome: "We sought in this way to gain men of

learning and of position to our side--or, to speak more correctly, to

God's side." This identification of "our" side and God's is the clue

to early Jesuitism. Men who were convinced of it might be intensely

earnest and unworldly, yet act as if they were ambitious. In fact,

they were ambitious to win the wealthy and powerful--Ignatius says it

repeatedly--"for the greater glory of God." And the work went forward

with great speed. They received a poor little house in a vineyard at

the foot of the Pincian Hill, and went out daily to minister and to

edify. One of their first friends was Codacio, a wealthy and important

official of the papal court. The better disposition of Ortiz, the

Spanish envoy, was also encouraged. Ignatius put him through the

Exercises in the old Monte Cassino Abbey, and, when the strain nearly

drove him mad, entertained him by performing some of the old Basque

dances: a subject for a painter, if ever there was. After a time the

Pope received Ignatius very affably, encouraged him to preach, and

found academic chairs for Favre and Lainez. Within a month or two

Ignatius had made so much progress that Roman gossip marked him as an

intriguer for the red hat, which he was not wealthy enough to buy.

Within four months, or at Easter 1538, Ignatius summoned the whole of

his followers to Rome. The poor little house in a vineyard was now

too small, and Codacio gave them a large house in the Piazza Margana.

From this they went out daily to beg and teach and preach, and to

visit "ladies of the highest rank." These eleven eloquent and learned

preachers, these nobles who begged their bread and washed verminous

invalids, soon divided the Roman world into ardent admirers and ardent

critics. An Augustinian friar, in particular, opened fire on them from

his pulpit. Ignatius was "a wolf in sheep's clothing," he insisted; let

people inquire at Alcalà, and Salamanca, and Paris, and Venice, and see

whether he was not wanted by the Inquisition here and there. Friends

at the Vatican were reminded that this sort of thing interfered with

their good work, and the Pope was induced to inquire into the charges;

but even the Pope's acquittal of them did not silence their critics,

and for a time they bore much poverty and anxiety. Half of Rome, if

not half of Catholicism, hated the Jesuits from their first year; and

it would be absurd to think that this was due to their fervour in

denouncing sin. It was due in a very large measure to the diplomatic

character of the work of Ignatius, which we perceive so clearly even in

the discreet narratives of the early Jesuit historians.

The infant Society was delivered from its perils by returning from

the cultivation of the rich and powerful to the service of the weak

and powerless. We shall constantly find the fortunes of the early

Jesuits vacillating according as they practise one or other of these

incongruous activities, and we can quite understand that their critics

came to see an element of calculation even in their philanthropy. By

their brave ministration to the poor they win the favour of the rich:

by the favour of the rich they rise to political and educational work,

and the poor are almost forgotten until some epidemic of criticism

threatens their very existence. It is quite useless to deny that there

was calculation in their humbler ministration when we find Ignatius

admitting it from the outset; yet it would be equally untrue to deny

that they served the poor with a sincere and often heroic humanity, and

that the favour and power they trusted to obtain by doing so were not

sought for their personal profit, but for the better discharge of what

they conceived to be a high mission.

So it was in the winter which closed the year 1538, in which their

project ran some risk of being buried under the stones of their

critics. The terrible cold of that winter led to a famine in Rome,

and the followers of Ignatius spent day and night in relieving the

sufferers and begging alms for them. Their house in the Piazza

Margana was converted into a hospital, and no less than four hundred

destitute men found a home in it. The sympathy of the pious slowly

returned to them. "So happy a diversion had to be put to account," says

Crétineau-Joly, and Ignatius began to draw up the rules of his Society

for presentation to the Pope. Night by night the eleven priests sat

in council to determine the broad features of their association: to

say, especially, if they would add a vow of obedience to their vows of

poverty and chastity and thus become a monastic body. In April they

decided that they would have a Superior and vow obedience to him; in

May they resolved to adopt that masterpiece of the "holy wiles" of

Ignatius, the most distinctive and most serviceable feature of the

Society--the vow to put themselves at the direct disposal of the Pope.

Naturally there was, and is, no religious body in the Catholic Church

whose members would not leap with alacrity to obey any order of the

Pope, and think it an honour to be selected for such a distinction;

indeed, we shall see that no other religious ever ventured to defy or

evade the commands of Popes as Jesuits have done. But we must observe

how happily this parade of obedience fitted the circumstances. The

Pope had entered upon a war against half of Christendom. Heresy was,

like an appalling tide, invading even his southern dominions, and it

was inevitable that he should be attracted by the proposal to put at

his service a body of men of high culture and heroic purpose, who

would be ready, at a word, to fly to a threatened point, to penetrate

in disguise into the lands of the heretics, to whisper in the ears

and fathom the counsels of kings, or to bear the gospel to the new

countries beyond the seas.

This was the beginning of the famous Jesuit Constitutions, which

were not completed and printed until 1558. A short summary of their

proposals was handed by Ignatius, in September, to Cardinal Contarini,

who would present it to the Pope. It was read and approved by one of

the Pope's monk-advisers, and Contarini then read it himself to Paul

III. "The finger of God is here," the Pope is reported to have said,

and he appointed three cardinals to examine the document with care.

Unfortunately for Ignatius, one of the three, Cardinal Guiddiccioni,

was so disgusted with the state of the monastic orders that he would

not even read the document. It seemed to him preposterous to add to

their number at a time when their corruption was ruining the Church.

In that sense he and his colleagues reported to the Pope, and Ignatius

betook himself, by prayer and good works, to a strenuous assault upon

the heavens, that some miracle might open the eyes of the cardinal.

And about a year later, the Jesuit historians say, the hostility of

Guiddiccioni was miraculously removed. He read the document, and was

enchanted with it; and on 27th September 1540 the bull "Regimini

militantis Ecclesiae" placed the Society of Jesus at the service of the

Counter-Reformation.

It need hardly be added that the "miracle" is susceptible of a natural

explanation. There is a curt statement in Orlandini, one of the first

historians of the Society, that during the year 1540 letters came to

Rome from all the towns where the followers of Ignatius had already

worked, telling the marvellous results of their preaching. Ignatius had

done much more than pray. Many a time in the course of the next few

chapters we shall find a shower of testimonial-letters falling upon a

town where there is opposition to the admittance of the Jesuits, and

they were not "unsolicited testimonials." Contarini, too, would not

lightly resign himself to defeat by his brother-cardinal. Codacio,

Ortiz, and many another, would help the work, under the discreet

guidance of Ignatius. Long before the Society was authorised, the Pope

was induced to employ the Jesuits for important missions. He had chosen

Rodriguez and Xavier, at the pressing request of the King of Portugal,

to carry the gospel to the Indies; he had sent Lainez and Favre,

at the prayer of a distinguished cardinal, to fight the growth of

Protestantism in Parma. Other members of the little group had gone to

discharge special missions, and glowing reports of their success came

to Rome. The Pope was won, and, when the Pope willed, it would hardly

need a miracle to induce Cardinal Guiddiccioni to read a document

which it was his office to read. Indeed, the statement that he refused

for twelve months to read a paper which the Pope enjoined him to read

is incredible; it was a good pretext for a change of mind, and for a

miracle. The Society of Jesus was founded on diplomacy.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: A good study of the controversy as to the indebtedness of

Ignatius to the Benedictines, and even the Mohammedans, from the point

of view of an outsider, will be found in H. Müller's _Les origines de

la Compagnie de Jésus_ (1898).]

A Candid History of the Jesuits · 第 1 / 16 章