CHAPTER VI

THE PROMISES

We have now, I hope, laid a sufficiently broad foundation of the

relation between the Law and the Word. The Law cannot be changed, and

the Word can. We have two factors, one variable, and the other

invariable; so that from this combination any variety of resultants may

be expected. The Law cannot be altered, but it can be specialized, just

as iron can be made to float by the same law by which it sinks. Now let

us try to figure out in our imagination an ideal of the sort of results

we should want to bring out from these two factors.

In the first place I think we should like to be free from all worry and

anxiety; for a life of continual worry is not worth living. And in the

second we should like always to have something to look forward to and

feel an interest in; for a life entirely devoid of all interest is also

not worth living. But, granted that these two conditions be fulfilled,

I think we should all be well pleased to go on living _ad infinitum_.

Now can we conceive any combination of the Law and the Word which would

produce such results? that is the question before us. The first step is

to generalize our principle as widely as possible, for the wider the

generalization, the larger becomes the scope for specialization. The

invariable factor we already know. It is the Law, always creating in

accordance with the Word that sets it in motion, whether constructive or

destructive; so what we really have to consider is the sort of Word

(i.e. Thought or Desire) which will set the Law working in the right

direction. It must be a Word of confidence in its own power; otherwise

by the hypothesis of the case it would be giving contradictory

directions to the Law, or to borrow a simile from what we have learnt

about waves in ether, it would be sending out vibrations that would

cancel one another and so produce no effect. Then it must be a Word that

does not compromise itself by antagonizing the Law of unity, and so

producing disruptive forces instead of constructive ones. And finally,

we must be quite sure that it really is the right Word, and that we have

been making no mistake about it. If these conditions be fulfilled the

logical result will be entire freedom from anxiety. Similarly with

regard to maintaining a continued interest in life. We must have a

continued succession of ideals, whether great or small, that will carry

us on with something always just ahead of us; and we must work the

ideals out, and not let them evaporate in dreams. If these conditions be

fulfilled we have before us a life of never-ending interest and

activity, and therefore a life worth living. Where then are we to find

the Word which will produce these conditions: perfect freedom from

anxiety and continual, happy interest? I do not think it is to be found

in any way but by identifying our own Word with the Word which brings

all creation into existence, and keeps it always moving onward in that

continuous forward movement which we call Evolution. We must come back

to the old teaching, that the Macrocosm is reproduced in the Microcosm,

with the further perception that this identity of principle can only be

produced by identity of cause. Law cannot be other than eternal and

self-demonstrating, just as 2 × 2 must eternally = 4; but it remains

only an abstract conception until the Creative Word affords it a field

of operation, just as twice two is four remains only a mathematical

abstraction until there is something for you to count; and accordingly,

as we have already seen, all our reasoning concerning the origin of

Creation, whether based on metaphysical or scientific grounds, brings us

to the conception of a Universal and Eternal Living Spirit localizing

itself in particular areas of cosmic activity by the power of the Word.

Then, if a similar Creative Power is to be reproduced in ourselves, it

must be by the same method: the localizing of the same Spirit in

ourselves by the power of the same "Word." Then our Word, or Thought,

will no longer be that of separate personality, but that of the Eternal

Spirit finding a fresh centre from which to specialize the working of

the Law, and so produce still further results than that of the First or

simply Cosmic and Generic Creation, according to the two maxims that

"Nature unaided fails," and that "Principle is not limited by

Precedent."

I want to make this sequence clear to the student before proceeding

further:

1. Localization of the Spirit in specific areas of Creative Activity.

2. Cosmic or Generic Creation, including ourselves as a race resulting

from this, and providing both the material and the instruments for

carrying the work further by _specializing the Original Creative Power_

through individual Thought, just as in all cases of scientific

discovery.

3. Then, since what is to be specialized through our individual Thought

is the Word of the Originating Power itself, in order to do this we must

think in terms of the Originating Word, on the general principle, that

any power must always exhibit itself in terms of the instrument through

which it works.

This, it appears to me, is a clear logical sequence, just as a tree

cannot make itself into a box, unless there be first the idea of a box

which does not exist in the tree itself, and also the tools with which

to fashion the wood into a box; while on the other hand there could

never be any box unless there be first a tree. Now it is just such a

sequence as this that is set before us in the Bible, and I do not find

it adequately set forth in any other teaching, either philosophical or

religious, with which I am acquainted. Some of these systems contain a

great deal of truth, and are therefore helpful as far as they go; but

they do not go the whole way, and for the most part stop short at the

first or simply Cosmic Creation; or, if they attempt to pass beyond

this, it is on the line of making unaided power of the individual the

sole means by which to do so, and thus in fact always keeping us at the

merely generic level. Such a mode of Thought as this, fails to meet the

requirements of our conception of a happy life as one entirely exempt

from fear and anxiety. In like manner also it fails to meet the first

requirements of the whole series, viz.: the Word should be certain of

itself; and if it be not certain of itself we have no assurance that it

may not eventually disappoint our hopes. In short, this mode of thought

leaves us to bear the whole burden from which we want to escape. So it

is not good enough; we must look for something better.

Now this something better I find in the _Promises_ contained in the

Bible, and it is this that to my mind distinguishes our own Scriptures

from the sacred books of all other nations, and from all systems of

philosophy. I do not at all ignore the current objections to the

possibility of Divine Promises, but I think that on examination they

will be found to be superficial and resulting from want of careful

enquiry into the true nature of the Promises themselves. How is it

possible for the Laws of the Universe to make exceptions? How can God

act by individual favouritism unless it be either through sheer caprice,

or by the individual managing to get round Him in some way, either by

supplying some need which He cannot supply for Himself, in which case

God is of limited power, or else by flattering Him, in which case He is

the apotheosis of absurd vanity. The two are really the same question

put in different ways--the question of individual exceptions to the

general Law.

The answer is that there are no individual exceptions to the general

Law; but there are very various degrees of realization of the Principle

of the Law, and the more a man works with the Principle the more the Law

will work for him; so that the finer his perception of the Principle

becomes, the more he will appear to be an exception to the Law as

commonly recognized.

Edison and Marconi are not capriciously favoured by the laws of Nature,

but they know more about them than most of us.

Now it is just the same with the Bible Promises. They are Promises

according to Law. They are based upon the widest generalization and

hence lead to the highest specialization through the combined action of

the Law and the Word--Jachin and Boaz, the Two Pillars of the Universe.

These Promises comprise all sorts of desirable things: health of body,

peace of mind, earthly prosperity, prolongation of life, and, finally,

even the conquest of death itself; but always on one condition: perfect

"Confidence in the power of the All-Originating Spirit in response to

our reliance on the Word." This is what the Bible calls Faith; and it is

perfectly logical when we understand the principle of it, for every

Thought of doubt is, in effect, the utterance of a Word which produces

negative results by the very same law by which the Word of Faith

produces positive ones. This is the only condition which the Bible

imposes for the fulfilment of its Promises, and this is because it is

inherent in the nature of the Law by which their fulfilment is to be

brought about.

A few texts will suffice as examples of the Bible Promises, and no doubt

most of my readers are familiar with many others; but it would be worth

while to read the Bible through, marking all such texts, and classifying

them according to the sort of promises they contain.

Read, for instance, Job xxii, 21, etc. This is a most remarkable passage

containing among other things the promise of earthly wealth; or again

Job v, 19, etc., where we find promises of protection in time of danger,

power over material nature, and prolonged life. While in Job xxxiii, 23,

etc., there is promise of return to youth, a promise which is repeated

in Psalm ciii, 5. Again in Isaiah lxi, 20, etc., there is the promise of

immensely extended physical life, death at the age of one hundred being

counted so premature as to resemble that of an infant, and the normal

standard of age being compared to a tree which lives for centuries; and

the same passage also promises immediate answer to prayers. The Psalms

are full of such promises, and they are scattered throughout the Bible.

Now there is an unfortunate tendency among people who read their Bible

with reverence, to what they call "spiritualize" such passages as these,

which means that they do not believe them. They say such things are

impossible; and therefore they must have some other meaning, and

accordingly they interpret the words metaphorically, as referring to

something to be experienced in another life, but quite impossible in

this one.

Of course there are spiritual equivalents to these things, and the

teaching of the Bible is, that they are the outward correspondences of

inward spiritual states; but to "spiritualize" them in the way I am

speaking of, is nothing but unbelief in the power of God to work on the

plane of Nature. How such readers square their opinion with the fact

that God has created Nature, I do not know. Even in the animal world we

find wonderful instances of longevity. If an elephant be not overworked

before he is twenty, he is in full working power up to eighty, and will

then be capable of light work for another twenty years, after which he

may yet enjoy another twenty years of quiet old age as the reward of his

labours, while crocodiles and tortoises have been known to live for

centuries. If then such things be possible in the ordinary course of

Nature in the animal world, why need we doubt the specializing power of

the Word to produce far greater results in the case of man? It is

because we will not accept the maxim, that "Principle is not limited by

Precedent" in regard to ourselves, though we see it demonstrated by

every new scientific discovery. We rely more on the past experience of

the race, than on the Creative Power of God. We call Him Almighty, and

then say that in His Book He promises things which He is not able to

perform. But the fault is with ourselves. We limit "the Holy ONE of

Israel," and as a consequence get only so much as by our mental attitude

we are able to receive--again the old maxim that "Power can only work in

terms of the instrument it works through." I do not say that it is at

all easy for us to completely rid ourselves of negative race-thought

ingrained into us from childhood, and subtly playing upon that generic

impersonal self in us of which I have spoken, and which readily responds

to those thought-currents to which we are habitually attuned. It is a

matter of individual growth. But the promises themselves contain no

inherent impossibility, and are logical deductions from the principles

of the Creative Law.

If the power of the Spirit over things of the material plane be an

impossibility, then by what power did Jesus perform his miracles? Either

you must deny his miracles, or you must admit the power of the Spirit

to work on the material plane--there is no way out of the dilemma.

Perhaps you may say: "Oh, but He was God in person!" Well, all the

promises affirm that it is God who does these things; so what it is

possible for God to do at one time, it is equally possible for Him to do

at all times. Or perhaps you hold other theological views, and will say

that Jesus was an exception to the rest of the race; but, on the

contrary, the whole Bible sets Him forth as the Example--an exception

certainly to men as we now know them, but the Example of what we all

have it in us to become--otherwise what use is He to us? But apart from

all argument on the subject we have his own words, telling us that those

who believe in Him, i.e., believe what He said about Himself--shall be

able to do works as great as His own, and even greater (John xiv, 12).

For these reasons it appears to me that on the authority of the Bible

itself, and also on metaphysical and scientific grounds we are justified

in taking such promises as those I have quoted in a perfectly literal

sense.

Then there are promises of the power that will attend our utterance of

the Word. "Thou shalt also decree a thing and it shall be established

unto thee" (Job xxii, 28). "All things are possible unto you" (Mark ix,

23). "Whosoever ... shall believe that what he sayeth cometh to pass, he

shall have whatsover he sayeth" (Mark xi, 23), and so on.

Other passages again promise peace of mind. "Thou wilt keep him in

perfect peace whose mind is staid on Thee, because he trusteth in Thee"

(Isaiah xxvi, 3). "Let him take hold of my strength that he may make

peace with me" (Isaiah xxvii, 5). St. Paul speaks of "The God of Peace"

in many passages, e.g., Rom. xv, 33; 2 Cor. xiii, 11; 1 Thess. v, 23,

and Hebr. xiii, 20; and Jesus, in his final discourse recorded in the

fourteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth chapters of St. John's Gospel, lays

peculiar stress on the gift of Peace.

And lastly there are many passages which promise the overcoming of death

itself; as for instance Job xix, 25-27; John viii, 51, and x, 28, and

xi, 25 and 26; Hebr. ii, 14 and 15; 1 Cor. xv, 50-57; 2 Tim. i, 10; Rom.

vi, 23 ("The gift of God is eternal life in Jesus Christ, our Lord").

"God commanded the blessing, even Life for evermore" (Ps. cxxxiii, 3).

Now I hope the reader will take the trouble to look up the texts to

which I have referred, and not be lazy. I am sure he would do so if he

were promised a ten pound note or a fifty dollar bill for his pains, and

if these promises are not all bosh, there is something worth a good deal

more to be got by studying them. Just run through the list: health,

wealth, peace of mind, safety, creative power, and eternal life. You

would be willing to pay a good premium to an Insurance Office that could

guarantee you all these. Well, there is a Company that does this without

paying any premium, and its name is "God and Co., Unlimited"; the only

condition, is that you yourself have to take the part of "Co." and it is

not a sleeping partnership, but a wide-awake one!

So I hope you will take the trouble to look up the texts; but at the

same time you must remember that the reading of single texts is not

sufficient. If you take any isolated phrase you choose, without

reference to the rest of the Book, there is no nonsense you cannot make

out of the Bible. You would not be allowed to do that sort of thing in a

Court of Law. When a document is produced in evidence, the meaning of

the words used in it are very carefully construed, not only in

reference to the particular clause in which they occur, but also with

reference to the intention of the document as a whole, and to the

circumstances under which they were written. The same word may mean very

different things in different connections; for instance I remember two

reported cases in one of which the word "Spanish" meant a certain sort

of leather, and in the other a kind of material used in brewing; and in

like manner particular texts are to be interpreted in accordance with

the gist of the Bible as a whole.

This is just the mistake the Jews made, of building up theories on

particular texts, and which Jesus corrected when he said: "Search the

Scriptures, for in them ye think ye have eternal life, and these are

they which testify of me" (John v, 39), or, as the Revised Version puts

it: "Ye search the Scriptures because ye think that in them ye have

eternal life; and these are they which bear witness of me," which

appears to be the better rendering. The words "ye think" is the key to

the whole passage. He says in effect: "You fancy that eternal life is to

be found in the book. It is not to be found in the book, but in what the

book tells you about, and here I am as a living example of it." It is

just the same with everything else. No book can do more than tell you

about a thing; it cannot produce it. You may study the cookery book from

morning till night, but that will not give you your dinner.

What Jesus meant was, that we should read the Scriptures in the same way

we should read any other book of practical instruction. First think what

it is all about; then look at the nature of the general principles

involved, and then see what instruction the book gives you for their

practical application. _Then go and do it_. And remember also a further

difference between reading about a thing and doing it. A book is for

everybody, and can therefore, only give general instruction; but when

you come to do the thing you will always find it works with some

personal modifications,--not departures from the general principles you

have read about, but specializations of them--and in this way you will

learn much that is not to be got out of books, even the best.

I remember many years ago, when I was much younger, asking one of our

leading water-colour artists,[3] how he would recommend me to study

landscape painting, and he said: "Practise continually from Nature, and

you will learn more than any one can teach you; that is how I have

learnt, myself." On the subject, then in question, he said just what

Jesus did: "Here I am as a practical example of what I tell you." And

another thing is, that the more you think principles out for yourself

and try to observe them in practice, the clearer the meaning of your

book will become to you. I have a few excellent books on painting, but I

had no idea how excellent they were when I first got them; practical

experience has taught me to find much more in them than I did at first,

for now I understand better what they are talking about. Well, that is

the way to read the Bible, neither despising it as worthless tradition,

nor treating the mere letter of it with superstitious veneration; both

extremes are to be equally avoided. In fact the Bible tells us so

itself: "The letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life" (2 Cor. iii, 6);

this, of course, does not mean that the letter can be tampered with, any

more than a judge can alter the wording of a document put in evidence;

it must be interpreted in the general sense of the document as a whole;

and when the letter is thus vivified by the Spirit, it will be found

fully to express it. But we require to enter into the Spirit of it

first.

Now it appears to me, that taken in this way, the Bible is an

exceedingly practical book, and that is why I want the reader to get at

some general principles which he will find, _mutatis mutandis_, equally

applicable all round, whether to electricity, or to life, and whatever

may be the subject-matter, it will always be found to resolve itself

into a question of the relation between Law and Personality. If now we

read the Bible Promises in the light of the general principles we have

considered in the earlier pages, we shall find that they are all

Promises according to Law. They are statements of the results to be

obtained by a truer realization of the principles of Law and Personality

than we have hitherto apprehended.

We must always bear in mind that the Law is set in motion by the Word.

The Word does not _make_ the Law, but gives it something to work upon,

so that without the Word there could be no manifestation of the Law, a

truth embodied in the maxim, that "Every Creation carries its own

mathematics along with it." If the reader remembers what I have said in

the chapter of "The Soul of the Subject," he will see that the

principle involved, is that of the susceptibility of the Impersonal to

suggestions from the Personal. This follows of course from the very

Conception of Impersonality; it is that which has no power of selection

and volition, and which is therefore without any power of taking an

initiative on its own account.

In a previous chapter I have pointed out that the only possible

conception of the inauguration of a world-system, resolves itself into

the recognition of one original and universal Substantive Life, out of

which proceeds a corresponding Verb, or active energy, reproducing in

action what the Substantive is in essence. On the other hand there must

be something for this active principle to work in; and since there can

be nothing anterior to the Universal Life or Energy, both these factors

must be potentially contained in it. If, then, we represent this Eternal

Substantive Life by a circle with a dot in the centre, we may represent

these two principles as emerging from it by placing two circles at equal

distance below it, one on either side, and placing the sign "+" (plus)

in one, and the sign "-" (minus) in the other. This is how students of

these subjects usually map out the relation of the _prima principia_,

or first abstract principles. The sign "+" (plus) indicates the Active

principle, and the sign "-" (minus) the Passive principle. If the reader

will draw a little diagram as described, it will help to make what

follows clearer.

Necessarily the initiative must be taken by the Active principle; and

the taking of initiative implies selection and volition, that is to say,

the essential qualities of personality; and Passivity implies the

converse of all this, and therefore is Impersonality. The two principles

in no way conflict with one another, but are polar opposites, like the

positive and negative plates of a battery, or the two ends of a magnet.

They are complementary to one another, and neither can work without the

other. A little consideration will show that this is not a mere fancy,

but a self-obvious generalization, the contrary to which it is

impossible to conceive. It is simply the case of the box which cannot

come into existence without the activity of the carpenter and the

passivity of the wood.

From such considerations as this the deep thinkers of old times posited

the generating of a world-system by the interaction of what they named

Animus Dei, the Active principle, and Anima Mundi, or Soul of the

Universe, the Passive principle--the one Personal, and the other

Impersonal; and by the hypothesis of the case the only mode of activity

possible to Anima Mundi is response to Animus Dei. But the same

impersonal passivity must also make Anima Mundi receptive likewise to

lesser and more individualized modes of Personality, and it becomes, so

to say, fecundated by the ideas thus impressed upon it. In every case

"the word is the seed." We may picture this planting of an idea or

"word" in the Cosmic soul as acting very much like the initial impulse

that starts a train of waves in ether, and these thought-waves are

reproduced in corresponding forms; or, to recur to the simile of seed,

the cosmic soul acts like the soil and gives it nourishment. Looking at

it in this way the old exponents of these things regarded the Active

principle as Masculine, and the Passive as Feminine, the one generating

and the other nutritive, corresponding to the words _rouah_ and

_hoshech_, the expansion and compression principles in the Hebrew text

of the opening verses of Genesis.

If then we posit this impersonal Soul of the Universe as the living

principle dwelling in the substance of the etheric Universal Medium it

will account for a good many things. If it be asked why we should assume

the presence of a living principle in the Universal Substance the answer

is in the maxim "Quod ex Vivo Vivum," what proceeds from Life is living.

Then as we see by our diagram, Anima Mundi equally with Animus Dei

proceeds from the original Substantive of Life, and therefore, on the

principle of the above maxim, that like produces like, Anima Mundi must

also be a living thing whose vehicle is the Universal Substance.

We may picture then, the response of the indwelling Soul of the

Universal Medium to our Thought, as starting corresponding vibrations in

the Substance of the Medium, just as our own thought, acting through the

vibratory system of our nerves, causes our body to make the movement we

intend. But perhaps you will say: How can this be, seeing that by the

hypothesis the Soul of the Universe is Impersonal, and therefore

unintelligent? Well, it is just this fact of having no thought of its

own, that enables us to impress our thought upon it and cause it, so to

say, to "take on" an intelligence relatively to the subject of our

thought, much in the same way that the impersonal soul in the human

subject "takes on" or reflects the thought of the hypnotist, and not

infrequently develops it to a far greater extent than the original

thought of the operator expressed. Such a hypothesis--and I think some

such hypothesis is needed to account for any creation at all--throws

light on the _modus operandi_ of the Bible Promises. We plant the Word

of the Promise in the womb of Anima Mundi, and if we do not uproot it by

using the same power adversely, it is bound to come to fruition in due

course, by the same Law by which the world-systems are formed; and if we

are to believe that the Word of the Promise is not our own word, but the

Word of God, then our Thought of it is imbued with a corresponding power

as we hand it over to Anima Mundi. Thus the Promises fulfil themselves

automatically, in accordance with the principles of the relations

between Law and Personality, and they do so, _not in our own power_, but

by the Power of the Word of God.

This, then, gives us at least an intelligible working hypothesis of the

rationale of the Bible Promises. The measurement of their fulfilment is

exactly proportional to our belief in them, not from any unintelligible

cause, and still less from any unreasoning feat of a capricious Deity,

but by the working of an intelligible Law. If any of my readers happens

to be an electrician, he will find an exact parallel in what is known as

Ohm's Law. Such readers will be familiar with the formula C = E/R, but

for the benefit of those to whom this formula may be unintelligible, I

will give a few words of explanation. C means the current of electricity

which is to be delivered for any work that is to be done. E stands for

the Electro-motive force which generates the current; and R is the

Resistance offered to the current by the conductor, such as the wires

through which it flows. If there be no resistance, the full amount of

current generated would be delivered. But without any conductor no

current could be delivered, and therefore there must be _some_

resistance, and so the full power of the Electro-motive force can never

be delivered by the Current. The amount that will be delivered is the

original power of the Electro-motive force divided by the Resistance.

The Resistance therefore acts as a restricting force, limiting the

extent to which the power of the original Electro-motive force shall be

delivered at the point where the work is to be done, but at the same

time no delivery at that point could be effected without it; so the

Resistance also has a necessary part to play in the working of the

circuit. Now if we want to translate the formula C = E/R into terms of

spiritual force we may put it thus: E stands for the limitless Potential

of the Eternal Spirit; C stands for the current flowing from it; and R

stands for the localizing quality of our thought. We cannot entirely

dispense with this localizing quality, for our whole purpose is to

transmute the _unlimited_, undifferentiated power, which subsists in the

Eternal Substantive of Spirit, into a particular differentiated mode of

action, which therefore implies a corresponding centralization. This is

the proper function of our thought. It is this compressing power which,

as I said above, the Hebrew renders by the word "_hoshech_" in the

opening verses of Genesis, and which is the necessary complementary to

the converse expanding power or "_rouah_." It takes the co-operation of

the two to produce any results.

Restricted, then, to its proper function our R or condensing quality is

an essential factor in the work. But if it be allowed to take the form

of doubt or unbelief, then it renders the flow of the current from the

Spirit ineffective to the extent to which the doubt is entertained; and

if doubt be allowed to degenerate into total unbelief and denial of the

Power of the Spirit, we thereby cancel the originating force altogether.

To put it in terms of the electrical formula, we make R greater than E,

in which case no current can flow. We thus find that the words

"According to your faith be it unto you" are actually the statement of a

Mathematical Law, having nothing vague about them. This may be a

somewhat original application of Ohm's Law, but the parallel is so

exact, that I cannot help thinking it will appeal to some of my readers

who may be conversant with Electrical Science. For those who are not, a

simpler simile may be, that you cannot deliver a more powerful stream of

water than the bore of the pipe through which it flows will admit of;

or, to employ a legal truism, delivery on the part of the donor must be

met by acceptance on the part of the donee before a deed of gift can

become operative; or, in still simpler language, "you may take a horse

to the water but you can't make him drink."

We see, then, that there is a Law of Faith, and that Faith is not a

denial of the universal reign of Law, but the perception of its widest

generalization, and therefore giving scope to its highest

specialization. The opposition between Faith and Law, of which St. Paul

so often speaks, is the opposition between this broad view of the

ultimate Principle of the Creative Law and that narrower view of

restriction by particular laws, which prevents us from grasping the Law

of Faith; but that he does not deny the _Principle_ of Law, that is the

relation between C and E, is clear from his own statement in Rom. viii,

where he says: "The Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus sets me

free from the law of Sin and Death;" in other words: the Law of the Good

sets us free from the Law of Evil; and for the same reason St. James

says, that the perfect law is the law, of Liberty (Jas. i, 25).

Of course if we suppose that faith is something contrary to the law of

the Universe we at once import into our thought the negative quality

which entirely vitiates our action. We rightly perceive that the laws of

the Universe can never be altered, and if our notion of Faith be, that

it is an attempt to work in contradiction to these laws, the best

definition we can give it is that given by the little girl in the

Sunday school, who said that "Faith is trying to make yourself believe

what you know is not true." The reason for such a misconception is, that

it entirely omits one of the factors in the calculation. It considers,

only the Law, and gives no place to the Word in the scheme of things.

Yet we do not carry this misconception into the sciences of chemistry

and electricity. We take the immutability of the Law as the basis of

these sciences, but we do not expect the immutable Law to produce a

photographic apparatus, or an electric train, without the intervention

of a reasoning and selective power which specializes the fundamental

general Law into particular uses. We do not look to the Law for those

powers of reasoning and selection, through which we make it work in all

the highly complex ways of our ordinary commercial applications of

it--we know better than that. We look to Personality for this. In our

every-day pursuits we always act on the maxim that "Nature unaided

fails," and that the infinite possibilities stored up in the Law, can

only be brought to light by a power of reasoning and selection working

through the Law. This co-operation of the Personal with the Impersonal

is the Law _of_ the Law; and since the Law is unchangeable, this Law

_of_ the Law must also be unchangeable, and must therefore apply on all

planes, and through all time--the Law, that without co-operation of the

Law and the Word nothing can be brought into existence, from a solar

system to a pin; while on the other hand there is no limit to what can

be got out of the Law by the operation of the Word.

If the student will look at the Bible Promises in the light of the

general principles, he will find that they are perfectly logical,

whether from the metaphysical or from the scientific standpoint, and

that their working is only from the same Law through which all

scientific developments are made. If this be apprehended it will be

clear that the Word of Faith is not "trying to make ourselves believe

what we know is not true," but, as St. Paul puts it, it is "giving

substance to things not yet seen" (Heb. xi, 1, R.V.).

The Law and the Word · 第 6 / 8 章