Here is history enough for to-day. [_Same date._]

AWKWARD SPEECH.--Good God! if this ungraceful and disagreeable manner

of speaking had, either by your negligence or mine, become habitual

to you, as in a couple of years more it would have been, what a figure

would you have made in company, or in a public assembly? Who would

have liked you in the one, or have attended to you in the other? Read

what Cicero and Quintilian say of enunciation, and see what a stress

they lay upon the gracefulness of it; nay, Cicero goes further, and

even maintains that a good figure is necessary for an orator; and,

particularly, that he must not be _vastus_; that is, overgrown and

clumsy. He shows by it that he knew mankind well, and knew the powers

of an agreeable figure and a graceful manner. [_June 21, 1748._]

ENUNCIATION--ELOQUENCE.--Your figure is a good one; you have no natural

defect in the organs of speech; your address may be engaging, and your

manner of speaking graceful, if you will; so that, if they are not

so, neither I nor the world can ascribe it to any thing but your want

of parts. What is the constant and just observation as to all actors

upon the stage? Is it not, that those who have the best sense always

speak the best, though they may happen not to have the best voices?

They will speak plainly, distinctly, and with the proper emphasis,

be their voices ever so bad. Had Roscius spoken _quick_, _thick_,

and _ungracefully_, I will answer for it that Cicero would not have

thought him worth the oration which he made in his favor. Words were

given us to communicate our ideas by; and there must be something

inconceivably absurd in uttering them in such a manner as that either

people cannot understand them, or will not desire to understand them. I

tell you truly and sincerely that I shall judge of your parts by your

speaking gracefully or ungracefully. If you have parts, you will never

be at rest till you have brought yourself to a habit of speaking most

gracefully; for I aver that it is in your power. [_Same date._]

ARTICULATION.--You will take care to open your teeth when you speak; to

articulate every word distinctly; and to beg of Mr. Harte, Mr. Eliot,

or whomever you speak to, to remind and stop you, if ever you fall

into the rapid and unintelligible mutter. You will even read aloud to

yourself, and tune your utterance to your own ear; and read at first

much slower than you need to do, in order to correct yourself of that

shameful trick of speaking faster than you ought.

PROPER CARRIAGE.--Next to graceful speaking, a genteel carriage and a

graceful manner of presenting yourself are extremely necessary, for

they are extremely engaging; and carelessness in these points is much

more unpardonable in a young fellow than affectation. It shows an

offensive indifference about pleasing. I am told by one here, who has

seen you lately, that you are awkward in your motions, and negligent

of your person. I am sorry for both; and so will you, when it will be

too late, if you continue so some time longer. Awkwardness of carriage

is very alienating, and a total negligence of dress and air is an

impertinent insult upon custom and fashion. [_Same date._]

DESERT AND REWARD.--Deserve a great deal, and you shall have a great

deal; deserve little, and you shall have but a little; and be good for

nothing at all, and I assure you, you shall have nothing at all.

Solid knowledge, as I have often told you, is the first and great

foundation of your future fortune and character; for I never mention

to you the two much greater points of religion and morality, because I

cannot possibly suspect you as to either of them. [_July 1, 1748._]

NO ONE CONTEMPTIBLE.--Be convinced that there are no persons so

insignificant and inconsiderable, but may some time or other, and in

something or other, have it in their power to be of use to you; which

they certainly will not, if you have once shown them contempt. [_Same

date._]

THE FOLLY OF CONTEMPT.--Wrongs are often given, but contempt never is.

Our pride remembers it forever. It implies a discovery of weaknesses,

which we are much more careful to conceal than crimes. Many a man will

confess his crimes to a common friend, but I never knew a man who would

tell his silly weaknesses to his most intimate one. As many a friend

will tell us our faults without reserve, who will not so much as hint

at our follies; that discovery is too mortifying to our self-love,

either to tell another, or to be told of, one’s self. You must,

therefore, never expect to hear of your weaknesses, or your follies,

from anybody but me; those I will take pains to discover, and whenever

I do, I shall tell you of them. [_Same date._]

GOOD NATURE.--Your school-fellow, Lord Pulteney, set out last week for

Holland, and will, I believe, be at Leipsic soon after this letter.

You will take care to be extremely civil to him, and to do him any

service that you can, while you stay there; let him know that I wrote

you to do so. As being older, he should know more than you; in that

case, take pains to get up to him; but if he does not, take care not

to let him feel his inferiority. He will find it out of himself,

without your endeavors; and that cannot be helped; but nothing is more

insulting, more mortifying, and less forgiven, than avowedly to take

pains to make a man feel a mortifying inferiority in knowledge, rank,

fortune, etc. In the two last articles it is unjust, they not being in

his power; and in the first it is both ill-bred and ill-natured. Good

breeding and good nature do incline us rather to help and raise people

up to ourselves, than to mortify and depress them, and, in truth, our

own private interest concurs in it, as it is making ourselves so many

friends, instead of so many enemies. [_July 6, 1748._]

LES ATTENTIONS.--The constant practice of what the French call _les

attentions_ is a most necessary ingredient in the art of pleasing; they

flatter the self-love of those to whom they are shown; they engage,

they captivate, more than things of much greater importance. The duties

of social life every man is obliged to discharge; but these attentions

are voluntary acts, the free-will offerings of good breeding and good

nature; they are received, remembered, and returned as such. Women,

particularly, have a right to them; and any omission in that respect is

downright ill breeding. [_Same date._]

AN EDUCATIONAL TEST.--Tell me what Greek and Latin books you can now

read with ease. Can you open Demosthenes at a venture, and understand

him? Can you get through an oration of Cicero, or a satire of Horace,

without difficulty? What German book do you read to make yourself

master of that language? And what French books do you read for your

amusement? Pray give me a particular and true account of all this; for

I am not indifferent as to any one thing that relates to you. [_Same

date._]

LAZY MINDS.--There are two sorts of understandings; one of which

hinders a man from ever being considerable, and the other commonly

makes him ridiculous; I mean the lazy mind, and the trifling, frivolous

mind. Yours, I hope, is neither. The lazy mind will not take the

trouble of going to the bottom of anything; but, discouraged by the

difficulties (and everything worth knowing or having is attended with

some), stops short, contents itself with easy and, consequently,

superficial knowledge, and prefers a great degree of ignorance to

a small degree of trouble. These people either think or represent

most things as impossible; whereas few things are so to industry and

activity. [_July 26, 1748._]

RESOLUTION.--But difficulties seem to them (lazy people)

impossibilities, or at least they pretend to think them so, by way of

excuse for their laziness. An hour’s attention to the same object is

too laborious for them; they take everything in the light in which it

first presents itself, never considering it in all its different views;

and, in short, never think it thorough. The consequence of this is,

that when they come to speak upon these subjects before people who have

considered them with attention, they only discover their own ignorance

and laziness, and lay themselves open to answers that put them in

confusion. Do not then be discouraged by the first difficulties, but

_contra audentior ito_; and resolve to go to the bottom of all those

things which every gentleman ought to know well. [_Same date._]

CONVERSATION.--When you are in company, bring the conversation to some

useful subject, but _à portée_ of that company. Points of history,

matters of literature, the customs of particular countries, the several

orders of knighthood, as Teutonic, Maltese, etc., are surely better

subjects of conversation than the weather, dress, or fiddle-faddle

stories, that carry no information along with them. The characters of

kings and great men are only to be learned in conversation; for they

are never fairly written during their lives. [_Same date._]

ALWAYS ASK.--Never be ashamed nor afraid of asking questions; for if

they lead to information, and if you accompany them with some excuse,

you will never be reckoned an impertinent or rude questioner. All those

things, in the common course of life, depend entirely upon the manner;

and in that respect the vulgar saying is true, “That one man may better

steal a horse, than another look over the hedge.” [_Same date._]

TWO HEADS.--I am very glad that Mr. Lyttelton approves of my new house,

and particularly of my _Canonical_[33] pillars. My bust of Cicero is a

very fine one, and well preserved; it will have the best place in my

library, unless, at your return, you bring me over as good a modern

head of your own, which I should like still better. I can tell you that

I shall examine it as attentively as ever antiquary did an old one.

[_Same date._]

A PICTURE.--Duval, the jeweler, is arrived, and was with me three or

four days ago. You will easily imagine that I asked him a few questions

concerning you; and I will give you the satisfaction of knowing that,

upon the whole, I was very well pleased with the account he gave me.

But, though he seemed to be much in your interest, yet he fairly

owned to me that your utterance was rapid, thick, and ungraceful. I

can add nothing to what I have already said upon this subject; but I

can and do repeat the absolute necessity of speaking distinctly and

gracefully.[34] [_Aug. 2, 1748._]

DIET.--He tells me that you are pretty fat for one of your age; this

you should attend to in a proper way; for if, while very young, you

should grow fat, it would be troublesome, unwholesome, and ungraceful;

you should therefore, when you have time, take very strong exercise,

and in your diet avoid fattening things. All malt liquors fatten, or at

least bloat; and I hope you do not deal much in them. [_Same date._]

BE NATURAL.--I have this moment received your letter of the 4th, N.

S., and have only time to tell you, that I can by no means agree to

your cutting off your hair. I am very sure that your headaches cannot

proceed from thence. And as for the pimples upon your head, they are

only owing to the heat of the season; and consequently will not last

long. But your own hair is, at your age, such an ornament, and a wig,

however well made, such a disguise, that I will upon no account

whatsoever have you cut off your hair. Nature did not give it you for

nothing, still less to cause you the headache. Mr. Eliot’s hair grew so

ill and bushy, that he was in the right to cut it off; but you have not

the same reason. [_Same date._]

BUYING BOOKS.--Mr. Harte wrote me word some time ago, and Mr. Eliot

confirms it now, that you employ your pin-money in a very different

manner from that in which pin-money[35] is commonly lavished. Not in

gewgaws and baubles, but in buying good and useful books. This is an

excellent symptom, and gives me very good hopes. Go on thus, my dear

boy, but for these two next years, and I ask no more. You must then

make such a figure, and such a fortune in the world, as I wish you, and

as I have taken all these pains to enable you to do. After that time, I

allow you to be as idle as ever you please; because I am sure that you

will not then please to be so at all. The ignorant and the weak only

are idle; but those, who have once acquired a good stock of knowledge,

always desire to increase it. Knowledge is like power, in this respect,

that those who have the most, are most desirous of having more. It does

not clog, by possession, but increases desires; which is the case of

very few pleasures. [_Aug. 23, 1748._]

GRATITUDE TO A TUTOR.--Upon receiving this congratulatory letter,

and reading your own praises, I am sure that it must naturally occur

to you, how great a share of them you owe to Mr. Harte’s care and

attention; and, consequently, that your regard and affection for him

must increase, if there be room for it, in proportion as you reap,

which you do daily, the fruits of his labors. [_Same date._]

HISTORICAL FAITH.--Take nothing for granted, upon the bare authority of

the author; but weigh and consider, in your own mind, the probability

of the facts, and the justness of the reflections. Consult different

authors upon the same facts, and form your opinion upon the greater or

lesser degree of probability arising from the whole, which, in my mind,

is the utmost stretch of historical faith, certainty (I fear) not being

to be found. [_Aug. 30, 1748._]

GOOD AND BAD MIXED.--The best have something bad, and something little;

the worst have something good, and sometimes something great; for I do

not believe what Valleius Paterculus (for the sake of saying a pretty

thing) says of Scipio, “Qui nihil non laudandum aut fecit, aut dixit,

aut sensit.” [_Same date._]

THE RULING PASSION.--Seek for their particular merit, their predominant

passion, or their prevailing weakness, and you will then know what to

bait your hook with, to catch them. Man is a composition of so many

and such various ingredients, that it requires both time and care to

analyze him: for though we have, all, the same ingredients in our

general composition, as reason, will, passions, and appetites, yet the

different proportions and combinations of them, in each individual,

produce that infinite variety of characters, which, in some particular

or other, distinguishes every individual from another. Reason ought to

direct the whole, but seldom does. [_Sept. 5, 1748._]

BRUYÈRE AND ROCHEFOUCAULT.--I will recommend to your attentive perusal,

now you are going into the world, two books, which will let you as much

into the characters of men as books can do. I mean “Les Réflexions

Morales de Monsieur de la Rochefoucault,” and “Les Caractères de la

Bruyère”: but remember, at the same time, that I only recommend them to

you as the best general maps, to assist you in your journey, and not as

marking out every particular turning and winding that you will meet

with. There, your own sagacity and observation must come to their aid.

La Rochefoucault is, I know, blamed, but I think without reason, for

deriving all our actions from the source of self-love. For my own part,

I see a great deal of truth, and no harm at all, in that opinion.

The reflection which is the most censured in Monsieur de la

Rochefoucault’s book, as a very ill-natured one, is this: “On trouve

dans le malheur de son meilleur ami, quelque chose qui ne déplaît pas.”

And why not? Why may I not feel a very tender and real concern for

the misfortune of my friend, and yet at the same time feel a pleasing

consciousness at having discharged my duty to him, by comforting and

assisting him to the utmost of my power in that misfortune? Give me but

virtuous actions, and I will not quibble and chicane about the motives.

And I will give anybody their choice of these two truths, which amount

to the same thing: He who loves himself best is the honestest man; or,

The honestest man loves himself best. [_Same date._]

WOMAN.--As women are a considerable, or at least a pretty numerous part

of company, and as their suffrages go a great way toward establishing

a man’s character, in the fashionable part of the world (which is of

great importance to the fortune and figure he proposes to make in it),

it is necessary to please them. I will, therefore, upon this subject,

let you into certain _arcana_ that will be very useful for you to know,

but which you must, with the utmost care, conceal; and never seem to

know. Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; they have

an entertaining tattle, and sometimes wit; but for solid, reasoning

good sense, I never in my life knew one that had it, or who reasoned

or acted consequentially for four-and-twenty hours together. Some

little passion or humor always breaks in upon their best resolutions.

Their beauty neglected or controverted, their age increased, or their

supposed understandings depreciated, instantly kindles their little

passions, and overturns any system of consequential conduct, that in

their most reasonable moments they might have been capable of forming.

A man of sense only trifles with them, plays with them, humors and

flatters them, as he does with a sprightly, forward child; but he

neither consults them about, nor trusts them with, serious matters;

though he often makes them believe that he does both, which is the

thing in the world that they are proud of, for they love mightily to be

dabbling in business (which, by the way, they always spoil); and being

justly distrustful, that men in general look upon them in a trifling

light, they almost adore that man who talks more seriously to them, and

who seems to consult and trust them--I say, who seems--for weak men

really do, but wise ones only seem to do it. No flattery is either too

high or too low for them. They will greedily swallow the highest, and

gracefully accept of the lowest; and you may safely flatter any woman,

from her understanding down to the exquisite taste of her fan. Women,

who are either indisputably beautiful or indisputably ugly, are best

flattered upon the score of their understandings; but those who are in

a state of mediocrity are best flattered upon their beauty, or at least

their graces, for every woman who is not absolutely ugly thinks herself

handsome, but not hearing often that she is so, is the more grateful

and the more obliged to the few who tell her so; whereas a decided and

conscious beauty looks upon every tribute paid to her beauty only as

her due, but wants to shine, and to be considered on the side of her

understanding; and a woman, who is ugly enough to know that she is so,

knows that she has nothing left for it but her understanding, which is

consequently, (and probably in more senses than one) her weak side. But

these are secrets which you must keep inviolably, if you would not,

like Orpheus, be torn to pieces by the whole sex. On the contrary, a

man who thinks of living in the great world must be gallant, polite,

and attentive to please the women. They have from the weakness of men,

more or less influence in all courts; they absolutely stamp every man’s

character in the _beau monde_, and make it either current, or cry it

down, and stop it in payments. It is, therefore, absolutely necessary

to manage, please, and flatter them; and never to discover the least

marks of contempt, which is what they never forgive; but in this they

are not singular, for it is the same with men; who will much sooner

forgive an injustice than an insult. [_Same date_.]

CONTEMPT.--Every man is not ambitious, or covetous, or passionate;

but every man has pride enough in his composition to feel and resent

the least slight and contempt. Remember, therefore, most carefully to

conceal your contempt, however just, wherever you would not make an

implacable enemy. Men are much more unwilling to have their weaknesses

and their imperfections known, than their crimes; and, if you hint to

a man that you think him silly, ignorant or even ill-bred or awkward,

he will hate you more and longer than if you tell him, plainly, that

you think him a rogue. Never yield to that temptation, which, to most

young men, is very strong, of exposing other people’s weaknesses

and infirmities, for the sake either of diverting the company, or of

showing your own superiority. You may get the laugh on your side by

it, for the present; but you will make enemies by it for ever; and

even those who laugh with you then, will, upon reflection, fear, and

consequently hate you; besides that, it is ill-natured; and a good

heart desires rather to conceal, than expose, other people’s weaknesses

or misfortunes. If you have wit, use it to please, and not to hurt; you

may shine, like the sun in the temperate zones, without scorching. Here

it is wished for; under the line it is dreaded. [_Same date._]

CALIGULA.--Another very just observation of the Cardinal’s[36] is, that

the things which happen in our own times, and which we see ourselves,

do not surprise us near so much as the things which we read of in times

past, though not in the least more extraordinary; and adds that he is

persuaded that, when Caligula made his horse a consul, the people of

Rome at that time were not greatly surprised at it, having necessarily

been in some degree prepared for it, by an insensible gradation of

extravagancies from the same quarter. [_Sept. 13, 1748._]

ANTIQUITY IS STRANGE.--We read every day, with astonishment, things

which we see every day without surprise. We wonder at the intrepidity

of a Leonidas, a Codrus, and a Curtius; and are not the least surprised

to hear of a sea captain who has blown up his ship, his crew, and

himself, that they might not fall into the hands of the enemies of his

country. I cannot help reading of Porsenna and Regulus with surprise

and reverence; and yet I remember that I saw, without either, the

execution of Shepherd, a boy of eighteen years old, who intended to

shoot the late king, and who would have been pardoned if he would

have expressed the least sorrow for his intended crime; but, on the

contrary, he declared, that, if he was pardoned, he would attempt it

again; that he thought it a duty which he owed his country; and that he

died with pleasure for having endeavored to perform it. Reason equals

Shepherd to Regulus; but prejudice, and the recency of the fact, make

Shepherd a common malefactor, and Regulus a hero. [_Same date._]

SECRETS.--The last observation that I shall now mention of the

Cardinal’s is, “That a secret is more easily kept by a good many people

than one commonly imagines.” By this he means a secret of importance

among people interested in the keeping of it. And it is certain that

people of business know the importance of secrecy, and will observe

it where they are concerned in the event. To go and tell any friend,

wife, or mistress, any secret with which they have nothing to do, is

discovering to them such an unretentive weakness as must convince them

that you will tell it to twenty others, and consequently that they may

reveal it without the risk of being discovered. But a secret properly

communicated only to those who are to be concerned in the thing in

question, will probably be kept by them, though they should be a good

many. Little secrets are commonly told again, but great ones generally

kept. Adieu. [_Same date._]

TRIFLES.--How trifling soever these things may seem, or really be, in

themselves, they are no longer so, when above half the world thinks

them otherwise. And, as I would have you _omnibus ornatum--excellere

rebus_, I think nothing above or below my pointing out to you, or your

excelling in. You have the means of doing it, and time before you to

make use of them. Take my word for it, I ask nothing now but what you

will, twenty years hence, most heartily wish that you had done. [_Sept.

20, 1748._]

THE PEDANT AND THE SCHOLAR.--A gentleman has, probably, read no other

Latin than that of the Augustan age; and therefore can write no

other; whereas the pedant has read much more bad Latin than good; and

consequently writes so too. He looks upon the best classical books

as books for schoolboys, and consequently below him, but pores over

fragments of obscure authors, treasures up the obsolete words which he

meets with there, and uses them upon all occasions, to show his reading

at the expense of his judgment. Plautus is his favorite author, not

for the sake of the wit and the _vis comica_ of his comedies; but upon

account of the many obsolete words and the cant of low characters,

which are to be met with nowhere else. He will rather use _olli_ than

_illi_, _optumè_ than _optimè_, and any bad word, rather than any good

one, provided he can but prove that, strictly speaking, it is Latin;

that is, that it was written by a Roman. [_Sept. 27, 1748._]

A DETESTABLE DOCTRINE.--I must now say something as to the matter of

the lecture; in which I confess there is one doctrine laid down that

surprises me; it is this: “Quum vero hostis sit lenta citave morte

omnia dira nobis minitans quocunque bellantibus negotium est, parum

sane interfuerit quo modo eum obruere et interficere satagamus si

ferociam exuere cunctetur. Ergo veneno quoque uti fas est,” etc.,

whereas I cannot conceive that the use of poison can, upon any

account, come within the lawful means of self-defence. Force may,

without doubt, be justly repelled by force; but not by treachery and

fraud; for I do not call the stratagems of war, such as ambuscades,

masked batteries, false attacks, etc., frauds or treachery; they are

mutually to be expected and guarded against; but poisoned arrows,

poisoned waters, or poison administered to your enemy (which can only

be done by treachery), I have always heard, read, and thought to be

unlawful and infamous means of defence, be your danger ever so great;

but, _si ferociam exuere cunctetur_; must I rather die than poison

this enemy? Yes, certainly, much rather die than do a base or criminal

action; nor can I be sure, beforehand, that this enemy may not in the

last moment _ferociam exuere_. But the public lawyers now seem to me

rather to warp the law, in order to authorize than to check those

unlawful proceedings of princes and states; which, by being become

common, appear less criminal; though custom can never alter the nature

of good and ill.

Pray let no quibbles of lawyers, no refinements of casuists break into

the plain notions of right and wrong which every man’s right reason and

plain common sense suggest to him. To do as you would be done by is

the plain, sure, and undisputed rule of morality and justice. Stick

to that; and be convinced that whatever breaks into it, in any degree,

however speciously it may be turned, and however puzzling it may be to

answer it, is, notwithstanding, false in itself, unjust, and criminal.

I do not know a crime in the world which is not, by the casuists among

the Jesuits (especially the twenty-four collected, I think, by Escobar)

allowed in some, or many cases, not to be criminal. The principles

first laid down by them are often specious, the reasonings plausible;

but the conclusion always a lie; for it is contrary to that evident

and undeniable rule of justice which I have mentioned above, of not

doing to any one what you would not have him do to you. But, however,

these refined pieces of casuistry and sophistry being very convenient

and welcome to people’s passions and appetites, they gladly accept the

indulgence without desiring to detect the fallacy of the reasoning;

and indeed many, I might say most people, are not able to do it; which

makes the publication of such quibblings and refinements the more

pernicious. I am no skilful casuist nor subtle disputant; and yet I

would undertake to justify and qualify the profession of a highwayman

step by step, and so plausibly as to make many ignorant people embrace

the profession as an innocent, if not even a laudable one; and to

puzzle people of some degree of knowledge to answer me point by point.

I have seen a book entitled “Quidlibet ex Quolibet,” or the art of

making any thing out of any thing; which is not so difficult as it

would seem, if once one quits certain plain truths, obvious in growth

to every understanding, in order to run after the ingenious refinements

of warm imaginations and speculative reasonings. Doctor Berkeley,

Bishop of Cloyne, a very worthy, ingenious, and learned man, has

written a book to prove that there is no such thing as matter, and that

nothing exists but in idea; that you and I only fancy ourselves eating,

drinking, and sleeping; you at Leipsic, and I at London; that we think

we have flesh and blood, legs, arms, etc., but that we are only spirit.

His arguments are, strictly speaking, unanswerable; but yet I am so far

from being convinced by them that I am determined to go on to eat and

drink, and walk and ride, in order to keep that _matter_, which I so

mistakenly imagine my body at present to consist of, in as good plight

as possible. Common sense (which, in truth, is very uncommon) is the

best sense I know of; abide by it; it will counsel you best. Read and

hear for your amusement, ingenious systems, nice questions, subtlely

agitated, with all the refinements that warm imaginations suggest; but

consider them only as exercitations for the mind, and return always to

settle with common sense. [_Same date._]

LETTERS.--Your letters, except when upon a given subject, are

exceedingly laconic, and neither answer my desires, nor the purpose

of letters; which should be familiar conversations, between absent

friends. As I desire to live with you upon the footing of an intimate

friend, and not of a parent, I could wish that your letters gave me

more particular accounts of yourself, and of your lesser transactions.

When you write to me, suppose yourself conversing freely with me, by

the fireside. In that case, you would naturally mention the incidents

of the day; as where you had been, whom you had seen, what you thought

of them, etc. Do this in your letters; acquaint me sometimes with your

studies, sometimes with your diversions; tell me of any new persons and

characters that you meet with in company, and add your own observations

upon them; in short, let me see more of you, in your letters. [_Same

date._]

GOOD COMPANY.--To keep good company, especially at your first setting

out, is the way to receive good impressions. If you ask me what I mean

by good company, I will confess to you that it is pretty difficult to

define; but I will endeavor to make you understand it as well as I can.

Good company is not what respective sets of company are pleased

either to call or think themselves; but it is that company which all

the people of the place call, and acknowledge to be good company,

notwithstanding some objections which they may form to some of the

individuals who compose it. It consists chiefly (but by no means

without exception) of people of considerable birth, rank, and

character: for people of neither birth nor rank are frequently and

very justly admitted into it, if distinguished by any peculiar merit,

or eminency in any liberal art or science. Nay, so motley a thing is

good company, that many people without birth, rank, or merit, intrude

into it by their own forwardness; and others slide into it by the

protection of some considerable person; and some even of indifferent

characters and morals make part of it. But, in the main, the good part

preponderates, and people of infamous and blasted characters are never

admitted. In this fashionable good company the best manners and the

best language of the place are most unquestionably to be learnt; for

they establish and give the tone to both, which are therefore called

the language and manners of good company; there being no legal tribunal

to ascertain either.

A company consisting wholly of people of the first quality cannot,

for that reason, be called good company, in the common acceptation of

the phrase, unless they are, into the bargain, the fashionable and

accredited company of the place; for people of the very first quality

can be as silly, as ill-bred, and as worthless, as people of the

meanest degree. On the other hand, a company consisting entirely of

people of very low condition, whatever their merits or parts may be,

can never be called good company; and consequently, should not be much

frequented, though by no means despised.

A company wholly composed of men of learning, though greatly to be

valued and respected, is not meant by the words _good company_: they

cannot have the easy manners and _tournure_ of the world, as they do

not live in it. If you can bear your part well in such a company, it

is extremely right to be in it sometimes, and you will be but more

esteemed, in other companies, for having a place in that. But then do

not let it engross you; for if you do, you will be only considered as

one of the _litterati_ by profession; which is not the way either to

shine or rise in the world.

The company of professed wits and poets is extremely inviting to most

young men; who, if they have wit themselves, are pleased with it, and

if they have none, are sillily proud of being one of it: but it should

be frequented with moderation and judgment, and you should by no means

give yourself up to it. A wit is a very unpopular denomination, as it

carries terror along with it; and people in general are as much afraid

of a live wit, in company, as a woman is of a gun, which she thinks

may go off of itself, and do her a mischief. Their acquaintance is,

however, worth seeking, and their company worth frequenting; but not

exclusively of others, nor to such a degree as to be considered only as

one of that particular set.

But the company, which of all others you should most carefully avoid,

is that low company, which in every sense of the word, is low indeed;

low in rank, low in parts, low in manners, and low in merit [_Oct. 12,

1748._]

ASSOCIATES.--There is good sense in the Spanish saying, “Tell me whom

you live with, and I will tell you who you are.” Make it therefore your

business, wherever you are, to get into that company which everybody

of the place allows to be the best company, next to their own: which

is the best definition that I can give you of good company. But here,

too, one caution is very necessary; for want of which many young men

have been ruined, even in good company. Good company (as I have

before observed) is composed of a great variety of fashionable people,

whose characters and morals are very different, though their manners

are pretty much the same. When a young man, now in the world, first

gets into that company, he very rightly determines to conform to and

imitate it. But then he too often, and fatally, mistakes the objects

of his imitation. He has often heard that absurd term of genteel and

fashionable vices. [_Same date._]

BEHAVIOR.--Imitate, then, with discernment and judgment, the real

perfections of the good company into which you may get; copy their

politeness, their carriage, their address, and the easy and well-bred

turn of their conversation; but remember that, let them shine ever so

bright, their vices, if they have any, are so many spots which you

would no more imitate than you would make an artificial wart upon your

face, because some very handsome man had the misfortune to have a

natural one upon his; but, on the contrary, think how much handsomer he

would have been without it. [_Same date._]

TALKING.--Talk often, but never long; in that case, if you do not

please, at least you are sure not to tire your hearers. Pay your own

reckoning, but do not treat the whole company; this being one of the

very few cases in which people do not care to be treated, every one

being fully convinced that he has wherewithal to pay.

Tell stories seldom, and absolutely never but where they are very apt

and very short. Omit every circumstance that is not material, and

beware of digressions. To have frequent recourse to narrative betrays

great want of imagination.

Never hold anybody by the button or the hand, in order to be heard out;

for if people are not willing to hear you, you had much better hold

your tongue than them.

Most long talkers single out some one unfortunate man in company

(commonly him whom they observe to be the most silent, or their next

neighbor) to whisper, or at least, in a half voice, to convey a

continuity of words to. This is excessively ill-bred, and, in some

degree, a fraud; conversation stock being a joint and common property.

But, on the other hand, if one of these unmerciful talkers lays hold

of you, hear him with patience (and at least seeming attention) if he

is worth obliging; for nothing will oblige him more than a patient

hearing, as nothing would hurt him more than either to leave him in

the midst of his discourse or to discover your impatience under your

affliction.

Take rather than give the tone of the company you are in. If you have

parts you will show them more or less upon every subject; and if you

have not, you had better talk sillily upon a subject of other people’s

than of your own choosing.

Avoid as much as you can in mixed companies, argumentative, polemical

conversations; which, though they should not, yet certainly do,

indispose, for a time, the contending parties towards each other; and

if the controversy grows warm and noisy, endeavor to put an end to it

by some genteel levity or joke. I quieted such a conversation hubbub

once by presenting to them that, though I was persuaded none there

present would repeat out of company what passed in it, yet I could not

answer for the discretion of the passengers in the street, who must

necessarily hear all that was said.

Above all things, and upon all occasions, avoid speaking of yourself if

it be possible. Such is the natural pride and vanity of our hearts that

it perpetually breaks out, even in people of the best parts, in all the

various modes and figures of the egotism. [_Oct. 19, 1748._]

SILLY VANITY.--This principle of vanity and pride is so strong in human

nature that it descends even to the lowest objects; and one often sees

people angling for praise, where, admitting all they say to be true

(which, by the way, it seldom is), no just praise is to be caught.

One man affirms that he has rode post a hundred miles in six hours;

probably it is a lie; but supposing it to be true, what then? Why, he

is a very good postboy, that is all. Another asserts, and probably not

without oaths, that he has drunk six or eight bottles of wine at a

sitting; out of charity I will believe him a liar; for if I do not, I

must think him a beast. [_Same date._]

YOURSELF.--The only sure way of avoiding these evils is never to speak

of yourself at all. But when historically you are obliged to mention

yourself, take care not to drop one single word that can directly or

indirectly be construed as fishing for applause. Be your character

what it will, it will be known; and nobody will take it upon your own

word. Never imagine that anything you can say yourself will varnish

your defects or add lustre to your perfections; but on the contrary,

it may, and nine times in ten will, make the former more glaring and

the latter obscure. If you are silent upon your own subject, neither

envy, indignation, nor ridicule will obstruct or allay the applause

which you may really deserve; but if you publish your own panegyric

upon any occasion or in any shape whatsoever, and however artfully

dressed or disguised, they will all conspire against you, and you will

be disappointed of the very end you aim at. [_Same date._]

SCANDAL--MIMICRY--SWEARING--LAUGHTER.--Neither retail nor receive

scandal willingly; for though the defamation of others may for the

present gratify the malignity of the pride of our hearts, cool

reflection will draw very disadvantageous conclusions from such a

disposition; and in the case of scandal, as in that of robbery, the

receiver is always thought as bad as the thief.

Mimicry, which is the common and favorite amusement of little, low

minds, is in the utmost contempt with great ones. It is the lowest

and most illiberal of all buffoonery. Pray neither practise it

yourself, nor applaud it in others. Besides that, the person mimicked

is insulted; and as I have often observed to you before, an insult is

never forgiven.

I need not (I believe) advise you to adapt your conversation to the

people you are conversing with; for I suppose you would not, without

this caution, have talked upon the same subject and in the same manner

to a minister of state, a bishop, a philosopher, a captain, and a

woman. A man of the world must, like the chameleon (_sic_), be able to

take every different hue; which is by no means a criminal or abject,

but a necessary complaisance, for it relates only to manners, and not

to morals.

One word only as to swearing; and that I hope and believe is more

than is necessary. You may sometimes hear some people in good company

interlard their discourse with oaths by way of embellishment, as they

think; but you must observe, too, that those who do so are never those

who contribute in any degree to give that company the denomination of

good company. They are always subalterns or people of low education;

for that practice, besides that it has no one temptation to plead, is

as silly and as illiberal as it is wicked.

Loud laughter is the mirth of the mob, who are only pleased with silly

things; for true wit or good sense never excited a laugh since the

creation of the world. A man of parts and fashion is therefore only

seen to smile, but never heard to laugh.

But to conclude this long letter; all the above-mentioned rules,

however carefully you may observe them, will lose half their effect

if unaccompanied by the Graces. Whatever you say, if you say it with

a supercilious, cynical face, or an embarrassed countenance, or a

silly, disconcerted grin, will be ill received. If, into the bargain,

_you mutter it, or utter it indistinctly and ungracefully_, it will be

still worse received. If your air and address are vulgar, awkward,

and _gauche_, you may be esteemed indeed, if you have great intrinsic

merit; but you will never please, and, without pleasing, you will rise

but heavily. Venus, among the ancients, was synonymous with the Graces,

who were always supposed to accompany her; and Horace tells us that

even Youth and Mercury, the god of arts and eloquence, would not do

without her.

“--Parùm comis _sine te Juventas,

Mercuriusque_.”

They are not inexorable ladies, and may be had if properly and

diligently pursued. Adieu. [_Same date._]

THE DUTY OF A MENTOR.--I have long since done mentioning your great

religious and moral duties; because I could not make your understanding

so bad a compliment, as to suppose that you wanted, or could receive,

any new instructions upon those two important points. Mr. Harte, I am

sure, has not neglected them; besides, they are so obvious to common

sense and reason, that commentators may (as they often do) perplex, but

cannot make them clearer. My province, therefore, is to supply, by my

experience, your, hitherto, inevitable inexperience in the ways of the

world. People at your age are in a state of natural ebriety; and want

rails, and _gardefous_, wherever they go, to hinder them from breaking

their necks. This drunkenness of youth is not only tolerated, but even

pleases, if kept within certain bounds of discretion and decency. Those

bounds are the point which it is difficult for the drunken man himself

to find out; and there it is that the experience of a friend may not

only serve but save him.

Carry with you, and welcome, into company, all the gaiety and spirits,

but as little of the giddiness, of youth as you can. The former will

charm; but the latter will often, though innocently, implacably offend.

Inform yourself of the characters and situations of the company, before

you give way to what your imagination may prompt you to say. There are,

in all companies, more wrong heads than right ones, and many more who

deserve than who like censure. [_Oct. 29, 1748._]

EGOTISM.--Cautiously avoid talking of either your own or other people’s

domestic affairs.[37] Yours are nothing to them, but tedious; theirs

are nothing to you. The subject is a tender one; and it is odds but

you touch somebody or other’s sore place; for, in this case, there is

no trusting to specious appearances; which may be, and often are, so

contrary to the real situation of things, between men and their wives,

parents and their children, seeming friends, etc., that, with the best

intentions in the world, one often blunders disagreeably.

Remember, that the wit, humor, and jokes of most mixed companies are

local. They thrive in that particular soil, but will not often bear

transplanting. Every company is differently circumstanced, has its

particular cant, and jargon; which may give occasion to wit and mirth,

within that circle, but would seem flat and insipid in any other, and

therefore will not bear repeating. [_Same date._]

GOOD FELLOWS.--You will find, in most good company, some people who

only keep their place there by a contemptible title enough; these

are what we call _very good-natured fellows_, and the French _bons

diables_. The truth is, they are people without any parts or fancy, and

who, having no will of their own, readily assent to, concur in, and

applaud, whatever is said or done in the company; and adopt, with the

same alacrity, the most virtuous or the most criminal, the wisest or

the silliest scheme, that happens to be entertained by the majority of

the company. This foolish, and often criminal, complaisance flows from

a foolish cause; the want of any other merit. I hope you will hold your

place in company by a nobler tenure, and that you will hold it (you

can bear a quibble, I believe, yet) _in capite_. Have a will and an

opinion of your own, and adhere to them steadily; but then do it with

good humor, good breeding, and (if you have it) with urbanity; for you

have not yet beard enough either to preach or censure. [_Same date._]

THE FINE GENTLEMAN.--What the French justly call _les manières

nobles_, are only to be acquired in the very best companies. They

are the distinguishing characteristics of men of fashion: people of

low education never wear them so close, but that some part or other

of the original vulgarism appears. _Les manières nobles_ equally

forbid insolent contempt, or low envy and jealousy. Low people, in

good circumstances, fine clothes, and equipage, will insolently show

contempt for all those who cannot afford as fine clothes, as good an

equipage, and who have not (as they term it) as much money in their

pockets: on the other hand, they are gnawed with envy, and cannot help

discovering it, of those who surpass them in any of these articles;

which are far from being sure criterions of merit. They are, likewise,

jealous of being slighted; and, consequently, suspicious and captious:

they are eager and hot about trifles; because trifles were, at first,

their affairs of consequence. _Les manières nobles_ imply exactly

the reverse of all this. Study them early; you cannot make them too

habitual and familiar to you. [_Same date._]

I like the description of your _pic-nic_;[38] where, I take it for

granted, that your cards are only to break the formality of a circle,

and your symposium intended more to promote conversation than drinking.

Such an _amicable collision_, as Lord Shaftesbury very prettily calls

it, rubs off and smooths those rough corners, which mere nature has

given to the smoothest of us. I hope some part, at least, of the

conversation is in German. [_Same date._]

THE GRACES.--I send you Mr. Locke’s book upon education, in which you

will find the stress he lays upon the graces, which he calls (and very

truly) good breeding. I have marked all the parts of that book which

are worth your attention; for as he begins with the child, almost from

its birth, the parts relative to its infancy would be useless to you.

Germany is, still less than England, the seat of the graces; however

you had as good not to say so while you are there. [_Nov. 18, 1748._]

THE DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH.--Of all the men that ever I knew in my life

(and I knew him extremely well), the late Duke of Marlborough possessed

the graces in the highest degree, not to say engrossed them; and indeed

he got the most by them; for I will venture (contrary to the custom of

profound historians, who always assign deep causes for great events)

to ascribe the better half of the Duke of Marlborough’s greatness and

riches to those graces. He was eminently illiterate; wrote bad English,

and spelled it still worse. He had no share of what is commonly called

_parts_; that is, he had no brightness, nothing shining in his genius.

He had, most undoubtedly, an excellent good plain understanding, with

sound judgment. But these alone would probably have raised him but

something higher than they found him; which was page to King James

the Second’s Queen. There the graces protected and promoted him; for,

while he was an ensign of the Guards, the Duchess of Cleveland, then

favorite mistress to King Charles the Second, struck by those very

graces, gave him five thousand pounds, with which he immediately

bought an annuity for his life, of five hundred pounds a year, of

my grandfather, Halifax, which was the foundation of his subsequent

fortune. His figure was beautiful, but his manner was irresistible,

to either man or woman. It was by this engaging, graceful manner

that he was enabled, during all his war, to connect the various and

jarring powers of the Grand Alliance, and to carry them on to the main

object of the war, notwithstanding their private and separate views,

jealousies, and wrongheadedness. Whatever court he went to (and he

was often obliged to go himself to some testy and refractory ones),

he as constantly prevailed, and brought them into his measures. The

Pensionary Heinsius, a venerable old minister, grown gray in business,

and who had governed the Republic of the United Provinces for more than

forty years, was absolutely governed by the Duke of Marlborough, as

that republic feels to this day. He was always cool; and nobody ever

observed the least variation in his countenance; he could refuse more

gracefully than other people could grant; and those who went away from

him the most dissatisfied, as to the substance of their business, were

yet personally charmed with him, and, in some degree, comforted by his

manner. With all his gentleness and gracefulness, no man living was

more conscious of his situation, nor maintained his dignity better.

[_Same date._]

A FATHER’S ANXIETY.--This subject is inexhaustible, as it extends to

everything that is to be said or done; but I will leave it for the

present, as this letter is already pretty long. Such is my desire, my

anxiety for your perfection, that I never think I have said enough,

though you may possibly think I have said too much; and though, in

truth, if your own good sense is not sufficient to direct you, in many

of these plain points, all that I or anybody else can say will be

insufficient. But, where you are concerned, I am the insatiable man in

Horace, who covets still a little corner more, to complete the figure

of his field. I dread every little corner that may deform mine, in

which I would have (if possible) no one defect. [_Same date._]

MOURNING.--I am at present under very great concern for the loss of a

most affectionate brother, with whom I had always lived in the closest

friendship. My brother John died last Friday night, of a fit of the

gout, which he had had for about a month in his hands and feet, and

which fell at last upon his stomach and head. As he grew, towards the

last, lethargic, his end was not painful to himself. At the distance

which you are from hence, you need not go into mourning upon this

occasion, as the time of your mourning would be near over before you

could put it on. [_Dec. 6, 1748._]

FRIVOLITY.--Little minds mistake little objects for great ones, and

lavish away upon the former that time and attention which only the

latter deserve. To such mistakes we owe the numerous and frivolous

tribe of insect-mongers, shell-mongers, and pursuers and driers of

butterflies, etc. The strong mind distinguishes, not only between

the useful and the useless, but likewise between the useful and the

curious. He applies himself intensely to the former; he only amuses

himself with the latter. Of this little sort of knowledge, which I

have just hinted at, you will find, at least, as much as you need wish

to know, in a superficial but pretty French book, entitled “Spectacle

de la Nature,” which will amuse you while you read it, and give you a

sufficient notion of the various parts of nature; I would advise you to

read it at leisure hours. [_Same date._]

ASTRONOMY.--But that part of nature which, Mr. Harte tells me, you

have begun to study, with the _Rector magnificus_, is of much greater

importance, and deserves much more attention; I mean astronomy.

The vast and immense planetary system, the astonishing order and

regularity of those innumerable worlds, will open a scene to you

which not only deserves your attention as a matter of curiosity, or

rather astonishment; but, still more, as it will give you greater

and consequently juster ideas of that eternal and omnipotent Being,

who contrived, made, and still preserves that universe, than all the

contemplation of this, comparatively, very little orb, which we at

present inhabit, could possibly give you. Upon this subject, Monsieur

Fontenelle’s “Pluralité des Mondes,” which you may read in two hours’

time, will both inform and please you. God bless you! Yours. [_Same

date._]

The whole morning, if diligently and attentively devoted to solid

studies, will go a great way at the year’s end; and the evenings spent

in the pleasures of good company will go as far in teaching you a

knowledge not much less necessary than the other--I mean the knowledge

of the world. Between these two necessary studies, that of books in

the morning, and that of the world in the evening, you see that you

will not have one minute to squander or slattern away. Nobody ever

lent themselves more than I did, when I was young, to the pleasures

and dissipation of good company; I even did it too much. But then,

I can assure you that I always found time for serious studies; and

when I could find it no other way, I took it out of my sleep, for I

resolved always to rise early in the morning, however late I went to

bed at night; and this resolution I have kept so sacred that, unless

when I have been confined to my bed by illness, I have not for more

than forty years ever been in bed at nine o’clock in the morning, but

commonly up before eight. [_Dec. 13, 1748._]

WRITING.--Why do you not form your Roman characters better? for

I maintain that it is in every man’s power to write what hand he

pleases; and consequently that he ought to write a good one. You

form, particularly, your ee and your ll in zigzag, instead of making

them straight, as thus, _ee_, _ll_; a fault very easily mended. You

will not, I believe, be angry with this little criticism, when I tell

you that, by all the accounts I have had of late, from Mr. Harte and

others, this is the only criticism that you give me occasion to make.

[_Dec. 20, 1748._]

A PORTRAIT.--Consider what lustre and _éclat_ it will give you when you

return here, to be allowed to be the best scholar, of a gentleman, in

England; not to mention the real pleasure and solid comfort which such

knowledge will give you throughout your whole life. Mr. Harte tells me

another thing which, I own, I did not expect; it is that, when you read

aloud, or repeat part of plays, you speak very properly and distinctly.

This relieves me from great uneasiness, which I was under upon account

of your former bad enunciation. Go on, and attend most diligently to

this important article. It is, of all the graces (and they are all

necessary), the most necessary one. [_Same date._]

THE DESIRE OF PRAISE.--But here let me, as an old stager upon the

theatre of the world, suggest one consideration to you, which is, to

extend your desire of praise a little beyond the strictly praiseworthy;

or else you may be apt to discover too much contempt for at least

three parts in the five of the world, who will never forgive it you.

In the mass of mankind, I fear, there is too great a majority of fools

and knaves; who, singly from their number, must to a certain degree

be respected, though they are by no means respectable. And a man, who

will show every knave or fool that he thinks him such, will engage in

a most ruinous war, against numbers much superior to those that he and

his allies can bring into the field. Abhor a knave, and pity a fool in

your heart, but let neither of them, unnecessarily, see that you do so.

Some complaisance and attention to fools is prudent, and not mean; as

a silent abhorrence of individual knaves is often necessary, and not

criminal. [_Same date._]

A COMPLIMENT.--Lady Chesterfield bids me tell you that she decides

entirely in your favor,[39] against Mr. Grevenkop, and even against

herself; for she does not think that she could, at this time, write

either so good a character, or so good German. Pray write her a German

letter upon that subject; in which you may tell her that, like the rest

of the world, you approve of her judgment, because it is in your favor;

and that you true Germans cannot allow Danes to be competent judges of

your language, etc. [_Same date._]

AFFECTATION.--Any affectation whatsoever in dress implies, in my

mind, a flaw in the understanding. Most of our young fellows here

display some character or other by their dress: some affect the

tremendous, and wear a great and fiercely cocked hat, an enormous

sword, a short waistcoat, and a black cravat; these I should be almost

tempted to swear the peace against, in my own defence, if I were not

convinced that they are but meek asses in lions’ skins. Others go in

brown frocks, leather breeches, great oaken cudgels in their hands,

their hats uncocked, and their hair unpowdered; and imitate grooms,

stage-coachmen, and country bumpkins, so well in their outsides, that I

do not make the least doubt of their resembling them equally in their

insides. A man of sense carefully avoids any particular character in

his dress; he is accurately clean for his own sake; but all the rest

is for other people’s. He dresses as well, and in the same manner, as

the people of sense and fashion of the place where he is. If he dresses

better, as he thinks, that is, more than they, he is a fop; if he

dresses worse, he is unpardonably negligent; but, of the two, I would

rather have a young fellow too much than too little dressed; the excess

on that side will wear off, with a little age and reflection; but if

he is negligent at twenty, he will be a sloven at forty, and stink at

fifty years old. Dress yourself fine, where others are fine; and plain,

where others are plain; but take care, always, that your clothes are

well made and fit you, for otherwise they will give you a very awkward

air. When you are once well dressed for the day, think no more of it

afterwards; and, without any stiffness for fear of discomposing that

dress, let all your motions be as easy and natural as if you had no

clothes on at all. So much for dress, which I maintain to be a thing of

consequence in the polite world. [_Dec. 30, 1748._]

A HAPPY NEW YEAR.--I send you, my dear child (and you will not doubt),

very sincerely, the wishes of the season. May you deserve a great

number of happy new years; and, if you deserve, may you have them! Many

new years, indeed, you may see, but happy ones you cannot see without

deserving them. These, virtue, honor, and knowledge, alone can merit,

alone can procure. “Dii tibi dent annos de te nam cætera sumes,” was a

pretty piece of poetical flattery, where it was said; I hope that in

time it may be no flattery when said to you. But, I assure you, that,

whenever I cannot apply the latter part of the line to you with truth,

I shall neither say, think, nor wish the former. Adieu. [_Same date._]

RATIONAL PLEASURES.--Now that you are going a little more into the

world, I will take this occasion to explain my intentions as to your

future expenses, that you may know what you have to expect from me,

and make your plan accordingly. I shall neither deny nor grudge you

any money that may be necessary for either your improvement or your

pleasures; I mean, the pleasures of a rational being. Under the head

of improvement, I mean the best books, and the best masters, cost what

they will; I also mean all the expense of lodgings, coach, dress,

servants, etc., which, according to the several places where you may

be, shall be respectively necessary, to enable you to keep the best

company. Under the head of rational pleasures, I comprehend, first,

proper charities, to real and compassionate objects of it; secondly,

proper presents, to those to whom you are obliged, or whom you

desire to oblige; thirdly, a conformity of expense to that of the

company which you keep--as in public spectacles, your share of little

entertainments, a few pistoles at games of mere commerce, and other

incidental calls of good company. The only two articles which I will

never supply, are the profusion of low riot and the idle lavishness

of negligence and laziness. A fool squanders away, without credit or

advantage to himself, more than a man of sense spends with both. The

latter employs his money as he does his time, and neither spends a

shilling of the one, nor a minute of the other, but in something that

is either useful or rationally pleasing to himself or others. The

former buys whatever he does not want, and does not pay for what he

does want. He cannot withstand the charms of a toy-shop; snuff-boxes,

watches, heads of canes, etc., are his destruction. His servants and

tradesmen conspire with his own indolence, to cheat him; and, in a

little time, he is astonished, in the midst of all the ridiculous

superfluities, to find himself in want of all the real comforts and

necessaries of life. Without care and method the largest fortune will

not, and with them, almost the smallest will, supply all necessary

expenses. As far as you can possibly, pay ready money for everything

you buy, and avoid bills. Pay that money too, yourself, and not

through the hands of any servant, who always either stipulates

poundage, or requires a present for his good word, as they call it.

Where you must have bills (as for meat and drink, clothes, etc.) pay

them regularly every month, and with your own hand. Never, from a

mistaken economy, buy a thing you do not want, because it is cheap; or,

from a silly pride, because it is dear. Keep an account, in a book, of

all that you receive, and of all that you pay; for no man, who knows

what he receives, and what he pays, ever runs out. I do not mean that

you should keep an account of the shillings and half-crowns which you

may spend in chair-hire, operas, etc., they are unworthy of the time,

and of the ink, that they would consume; leave such _minutiæ_ to dull,

pennywise fellows; but remember, in economy, as well as in every other

part of life, to have the proper attention to proper objects, and the

proper contempt for little ones. A strong mind sees things in their

true proportions: a weak one views them through a magnifying medium;

which, like the microscope, makes an elephant of a flea; magnifies

all little objects, but cannot receive great ones. I have known many

a man pass for a miser, by saving a penny, and wrangling for two

pence, who was undoing himself, at the same time, by living above his

income, and not attending to essential articles, which were above his

_portée_. The sure characteristic of a sound and strong mind is, to

find, in everything, those certain bounds, _quos ultra citrave nequit

consistere rectum_. These boundaries are marked out by a very fine

line, which only good sense and attention can discover; it is much too

fine for vulgar eyes. In manners, this line is good breeding; beyond

it, is troublesome ceremony; short of it, is unbecoming negligence

and inattention. In morals, it divides ostentatious Puritanism from

criminal relaxation; in religion, superstition from impiety; and, in

short, every virtue from its kindred vice or weakness. I think you have

sense enough to discover the line; keep it always in your eye, and

learn to walk upon it; rest upon Mr. Harte, and he will poise you till

you are able to go alone. By the way, there are fewer people who walk

well upon that line, than upon the slack rope; and therefore a good

performer shines so much the more. [_Jan. 10, 1749._]

DANCING.--Remember to take the best dancing master at Berlin, more to

teach you to sit, stand, and walk gracefully, than to dance finely. The

Graces, the Graces; remember the Graces! Adieu. [_Same date._]

THE CLASSICS--THEIR VALUE.--My first prejudice (for I do not mention

the prejudices of boys and women, such as hobgoblins, ghosts, dreams,

spilling salt, etc.) was my classical enthusiasm, which I received

from the books I read, and the masters who explained them to me. I was

convinced there had been no common sense nor common honesty in the

world for these last fifteen hundred years; but that they were totally

extinguished with the ancient Greek and Roman governments. Homer and

Virgil could have no faults, because they were ancient; Milton and

Tasso could have no merit, because they were modern. And I could almost

have said, with regard to the ancients, what Cicero, very absurdly and

unbecomingly for a philosopher, says with regard to Plato, “Cum quo

errare malim; quam cum aliis rectè sentire.” Whereas now, without any

extraordinary effort of genius, I have discovered that nature was the

same three thousand years ago as it is at present; that men were but

men then as well as now; that modes and customs vary often, but that

human nature is always the same. And I can no more suppose, that men

were better, braver, or wiser, fifteen hundred or three thousand years

ago, than I can suppose that the animals or vegetables were better

then than they are now. I dare assert too, in defiance of the favorers

of the ancients, that Homer’s hero, Achilles, was both a brute and

a scoundrel, and consequently an improper character for the hero of

an epic poem; he had so little regard for his country, that he would

not act in defence of it, because he had quarrelled with Agamemnon

about a w----e; and then afterward, animated by private resentment

only, he went about killing people basely, I will call it, because he

knew himself invulnerable; and yet, invulnerable as he was, he wore

the strongest armor in the world; which I humbly apprehend to be a

blunder; for a horseshoe clapped to his vulnerable heel would have

been sufficient. On the other hand, with submission to the favorers of

the moderns, I assert with Mr. Dryden, that the Devil is in truth the

hero of Milton’s poem: his plan, which he lays, pursues, and at last

executes, being the subject of the poem. From all which considerations,

I impartially conclude, that the ancients had their excellencies and

their defects, their virtues and their vices, just like the moderns:

pedantry and affectation of learning decide clearly in favor of the

former; vanity and ignorance, as peremptorily, in favor of the latter.

Religious prejudices kept pace with my classical ones; and there was a

time when I thought it impossible for the honestest man in the world

to be saved, out of the pale of the Church of England: not considering

that matters of opinion do not depend upon the will; and that it is as

natural, and as allowable, that another man should differ in opinion

from me, as that I should differ from him; and that, if we are both

sincere, we are both blameless: and should consequently have mutual

indulgence for each other. [_Feb. 7, 1749._]

REFLECTION--ITS USE.--Use and assert your own reason; reflect,

examine, and analyze everything, in order to form a sound and mature

judgment; let no ουτος ἔφα impose upon your understanding, mislead

your actions, or dictate your conversation. Be early, what, if you are

not, you will, when too late, wish you had been. Consult your reason

betimes: I do not say that it will always prove an unerring guide; for

human reason is not infallible: but it will prove the least erring

guide that you can follow. Books and conversation may assist it; but

adopt neither, blindly and implicitly; try both by that best rule

which God has given to direct us, Reason. Of all the troubles do not

decline, as many people do, that of thinking. The herd of mankind can

hardly be said to think; their notions are almost all adoptive; and, in

general, I believe it is better that it should be so; as such common

prejudices contribute more to order and quiet, than their own separate

reasonings would do, uncultivated and unimproved as they are. We have

many of those useful prejudices in this country, which I should be very

sorry to see removed. The good Protestant conviction, that the Pope

is both Antichrist, and the Whore of Babylon, is a more effectual

preservative, in this country, against popery, than all the solid and

unanswerable arguments of Chillingworth.

The idle story of the Pretender’s having been introduced in a

warming-pan, into the queen’s bed, though as destitute of all

probability as of all foundation, has been much more prejudicial to

the cause of Jacobitism, than all that Mr. Locke and others have

written, to show the unreasonableness and absurdity of the doctrines

of indefeasible hereditary right and unlimited passive obedience. And

that silly, sanguine notion, which is firmly entertained here, that

one Englishman can beat three Frenchmen, encourages, and has sometimes

enabled one Englishman, in reality, to beat two. [_Same date._]

LIBERTY OF THE PRESS.--Can an author with reason complain that he is

cramped and shackled if he is not at liberty to publish blasphemy,

bawdry, or sedition? all which are equally prohibited in the freest

governments, if they are wise and well regulated ones. This is the

present general complaint of the French authors; but, indeed, chiefly

of the bad ones. No wonder, say they, that England produces so many

great geniuses; people there may think as they please, and publish

what they think. Very true, but who hinders them from thinking as they

please? If, indeed, they think in a manner destructive of all religion,

morality, or good manners, or to the disturbance of the state; an

absolute government will certainly more effectually prohibit them from,

or punish them for publishing such thoughts, than a free one could do.

But how does that cramp the genius of an epic, dramatic, or lyric poet?

Or how does it corrupt the eloquence of an orator, in the pulpit or at

the bar? [_Same date._]

GRACEFUL BEHAVIOR.--There is another object that must keep pace with

and accompany knowledge; I mean, manners, politeness, and the graces;

in which Sir Charles Williams, though very much your friend, owns you

are very deficient. The manners of Leipsic must be shook off; and in

that respect you must put on the new man. No scrambling at your meals,

as at a German ordinary; no awkward overturns of glasses, plates, and

salt-cellars; no horse-play. On the contrary, a gentleness of manners,

a graceful carriage, and an insinuating address, must take their place.

I repeat, and shall never cease repeating to you, _the Graces, the

Graces_. [_April 12, 1749._]

A GENTLEMAN’S PLEASURES.--DEAR BOY: This letter will, I believe, still

find you at Venice, in all the dissipation of masquerades, ridottos,

operas, etc.: with all my heart; they are decent evening amusements,

and very properly succeed that serious application to which I am sure

you devote your mornings. There are liberal and illiberal pleasures,

as well as liberal and illiberal arts. There are some pleasures, that

degrade a gentleman, as much as some trades could do. Sottish drinking,

indiscriminate gluttony, driving coaches, rustic sports, such as

fox-chases, horse-races, etc., are, in my opinion, infinitely below the

honest and industrious professions of a tailor, and a shoemaker, which

are said to _déroger_. [_April 19, 1749._]

MUSIC--FIDDLING.--I cannot help cautioning you against giving into

those (I will call them illiberal) pleasures (though music is commonly

reckoned one of the liberal arts) to the degree that most of your

countrymen do when they travel in Italy. If you love music, hear it;

go to operas, concerts, and pay fiddlers to play to you; but I insist

upon your neither piping nor fiddling yourself. It puts a gentleman in

a very frivolous, contemptible light; brings him into a great deal of

bad company; and takes up a great deal of time, which might be much

better employed. Few things would mortify me more than to see you

bearing a part in a concert, with a fiddle under your chin, or a pipe

in your mouth. [_Same date._]

MANIÈRES.--By _manières_, I do not mean bare common civility; everybody

must have that, who would not be kicked out of company; but I mean

engaging, insinuating, shining manners; a distinguished politeness, an

almost irresistible address; a superior gracefulness in all you say and

do. It is this alone that can give all your other talents their full

lustre and value; and consequently, it is this which should now be the

principal object of your attention. Observe minutely, wherever you go,

the allowed and established morals of good breeding, and form yourself

upon them. Whatever pleases you most, in others, will infallibly please

others, in you. I have often repeated this to you; now is your time of

putting it in practice. [_Same date._]

LITTLE PRINCES.--In general, I believe that little princes are more

likely to be great men than those whose more extensive dominions, and

superior strength, flatter them with security; which commonly produces

negligence and indolence. A little prince, in the neighborhood of

great ones, must be alert, and look out sharp, if he would secure his

own dominions; much more still, if he would enlarge them. He must

watch for conjunctures, or endeavor to make them. No princes have ever

possessed this art better than those of the House of Savoy, who have

enlarged their dominions prodigiously within a century, by profiting of

conjunctures. [_Same date._]

ATTENTIONS.--A young man should never be wanting in these attentions;

they cost little and bring in a great deal, by getting you people’s

good word and affection. They gain the heart, to which I have always

advised you to apply yourself particularly; it guides ten thousand for

one that reason influences.

I cannot end this letter, or (I believe) any other, without repeating

my recommendation of _the Graces_. They are to be met with at Turin;

for God’s sake, sacrifice to them, and they will be propitious. People

mistake grossly, to imagine that the least awkwardness, in either

matter or manner, mind or body, is an indifferent thing, and not worthy

of attention. It may possibly be a weakness in me (but in short we are

all so made). I confess to you fairly, that when you shall come home,

and that I first see you, if I find you ungraceful in your address, and

awkward in your person and dress, it will be impossible for me to love

you half so well as I should otherwise do, let your intrinsic merit and

knowledge be ever so great. [_Same date._]

ENGLISH ABROAD.--I am informed there are now many English at the

Academy at Turin, and I fear those are just so many dangers for you to

encounter. Who they are, I do not know; but I well know the general ill

conduct, the indecent behavior, and the illiberal views of my young

countrymen abroad; especially wherever they are in numbers together.

Ill example is of itself dangerous enough; but those who give it seldom

stop there; they add their infamous exhortations and invitations; and,

if these fail, they have recourse to ridicule, which is harder for one

of your age and inexperience to withstand than either of the former.

Be upon your guard, therefore, against these batteries, which will all

be played upon you. You are not sent abroad to converse with your own

countrymen; among them, in general, you will get little knowledge, no

languages, and, I am sure, no manners. I desire that you will form no

connections, nor (what they impudently call) friendships, with these

people; which are, in truth, only combinations and conspiracies

against good morals and good manners. [_May 15, 1749._]

VICES SHOULD BE ORIGINAL.--If people had no vices but their own, few

would have so many as they have. For my own part, I would sooner wear

other people’s clothes than their vices; and they would sit upon me

just as well. I hope you will have none; but, if ever you have, I beg,

at least, they may be all your own. Vices of adoption are, of all

others, the most disgraceful and unpardonable. There are degrees in

vices, as well as in virtues; and I must do my countrymen the justice

to say, they generally take their vices in the lowest degree. Their

gallantry is the infamous mean debauchery of stews, justly attended and

rewarded by the loss of their health as well as their character. Their

pleasures of the table end in beastly drunkenness, low riot, broken

windows, and very often (as they well deserve) broken bones. They game

for the sake of the vice, not of the amusement; and therefore carry it

to excess; undo, or are undone by, their companions. By such conduct,

and in such company abroad, they come home the unimproved, illiberal,

and ungentlemanlike creatures that one daily sees them; that is, in the

park, and in the streets, for one never meets them in good company;

where they have neither manners to present themselves, nor merit to

be received. But, with the manners of footmen and grooms, they assume

their dress too; for you must have observed them in the streets here,

in dirty blue frocks, with oaken sticks in their hands, and their hair

greasy and unpowdered, tucked up under their hats of an enormous size.

Thus finished and adorned by their travels, they become the disturbers

of playhouses; they break the windows, and commonly the landlords,

of the taverns where they drink; and are at once the support, the

terror, and the victims of the bawdy-houses they frequent. These poor

mistaken people think they shine, and so they do indeed; but it is as

putrefaction shines, in the dark.

I am not now preaching to you, like an old fellow, upon either

religious or moral texts; I am persuaded you do not want the best

instructions of that kind; but I am advising you as a man, as a friend

of the world, as one who would not have you old while you are young,

but would have you take all the pleasures that reason points out, and

that decency warrants. [_Same date._]

FOOLISH SAYINGS.--There are some expressions, both in French and

English, and some characters, both in those two and in other countries,

which have, I dare say, misled many young men to their ruin. _Une

honnête débauche, une jolie débauche: an agreeable rake, a man of

pleasure._ Do not think that this means debauchery and profligacy;

nothing like it. It means, at most, the accidental and unfrequent

irregularities of youth and vivacity, in opposition to dulness,

formality, and want of spirit. [_Same date._]

HOW TO PLEASE.--You must not neglect your dress neither, but take

care to be _bien mis_. Pray send for the best operator for the teeth

at Turin, where I suppose there is some famous one, and let him put

yours in perfect order; and then take care to keep them so afterwards

yourself. You had very good teeth, and I hope they are so still; but

even those who have bad ones should keep them clean; for a dirty

mouth is, to my mind, ill-manners. In short, neglect nothing that can

possibly please. A thousand nameless little things, which nobody can

describe but which everybody feels, conspire to form that _whole_ of

pleasing; as the several pieces of a mosaic work, though separately

of little beauty or value, when properly joined form those beautiful

figures which please everybody. A look, a gesture, an attitude, a tone

of voice, all bear their parts in the great work of pleasing. The art

of pleasing is more particularly necessary in your intended profession

than perhaps in any other; it is, in truth, the first half of your

business; for if you do not please the court you are sent to, you will

be of very little use to the court you are sent from. Please the eyes

and the ears, they will introduce you to the heart; and, nine times in

ten, the heart governs the understanding.

Make your court particularly, and show distinguished attentions, to

such men and women as are best at court, highest in the fashion and in

the opinion of the public; speak advantageously of them behind their

backs, in companies who you have reason to believe will tell them

again. Express your admiration of the many great men that the house of

Savoy has produced; observe, that nature, instead of being exhausted

by those efforts, seems to have redoubled them in the persons of the

present king, and the Duke of Savoy; wonder at this rate where it will

end, and conclude that it will end in the government of all Europe.

Say this, likewise, where it will probably be repeated; but say it

unaffectedly, and the last, especially, with a kind of _enjouement_.

These little arts are very allowable, and must be made use of in the

course of the world; they are pleasing to one party, useful to the

other, and injurious to nobody. [_Same date._]

FLATTERY.--I recommended to you, in my last, an innocent piece of art;

that of flattering people behind their backs, in presence of those who,

to make their own court, much more than for your sake, will not fail to

repeat, and even amplify the praise to the party concerned. This is of

all flattery the most pleasing, and consequently the most effectual.

There are other, and many other inoffensive arts of this kind, which

are necessary in the course of the world, and which he who practises

the earliest, will please the most, and rise the soonest. [_May 22,

1749._]

TEMPER.--The principal of these things, is the mastery of one’s

temper, and that coolness of mind, and serenity of countenance, which

hinders us from discovering, by words, actions, or even looks, those

passions or sentiments, by which we are inwardly moved or agitated; and

the discovery of which, gives cooler and abler people such infinite

advantages over us, not only in business, but in all the most common

occurrences of life. A man who does not possess himself enough to

hear disagreeable things, without visible marks of anger and change

of countenance, or agreeable ones without sudden bursts of joy and

expansion of countenance, is at the mercy of every artful knave, or

pert coxcomb; the former will provoke or please you by design, to

catch unguarded words or looks, by which he will easily decipher the

secrets of your heart, of which you should keep the key yourself, and

trust it with no man living. [_Same date._]

IMMOBILITY.--Determine, too, to keep your countenance as unmoved and

unembarrassed as possible which steadiness you may get a habit of, by

constant attention. I should desire nothing better, in any negotiation,

than to have to do with one of these men of warm, quick passions;

which I would take care to set in motion. By artful provocations, I

would extort rash and unguarded expressions; and, by hinting at all

the several things that I could suspect, infallibly discover the true

one, by the alteration it occasioned in the countenance of the person.

_Vólto sciolto con pensieri stretti_,[40] is a most useful maxim in

business. [_Same date._]

DISSIMULATION.--It may be objected, that I am now recommending

dissimulation to you; I both own and justify it. It has been long

said: _Qui nescit dissimulare nescit regnare_: I go still farther,

and say, that without some dissimulation, no business can be carried

on at all. It is _simulation_ that is false, mean and criminal; that

is the cunning which Lord Bacon calls crooked or left-handed wisdom,

and which is never made use of but by those who have not true wisdom.

And the same great man says, that dissimulation is only to hide our

own cards; whereas simulation is put on in order to look into other

people’s. Lord Bolingbroke in his “Idea of a Patriot King,” which

he has lately published, and which I will send you by the first

opportunity, says, very justly, that simulation is a _stiletto_; not

only an unjust but an unlawful weapon, and the use of it very rarely

to be excused, never justified. Whereas dissimulation is a shield, as

secrecy is armor; and it is no more possible to preserve secrecy in

business, without some degree of dissimulation, than it is to succeed

in business without secrecy. [_Same date._]

THE FACE.--Make yourself absolute master, therefore, of your temper,

and your countenance, so far, at least, as that no visible change

do appear in either, whatever you may feel inwardly. This may be

difficult, but it is by no means impossible; and, as a man of sense

never attempts impossibilities on one hand, on the other he is never

discouraged by difficulties. [_Same date._]

THE EASY MOMENT.--Some people are to be reasoned, some flattered,

some intimidated, and some teased into a thing; but, in general, all

are to be brought into it at last, if skilfully applied to, properly

managed, and indefatigably attacked in their several weak places. The

time should likewise be judiciously chosen: every man has his _mollia

tempora_, but that is far from being all day long; and you would choose

your time very ill, if you applied to a man about one business, when

his head was full of another, or when his heart was full of grief,

anger, or any other disagreeable sentiments. [_Same date._]

JUDGE OF OTHERS BY YOURSELF.--In order to judge of the inside of

others, study your own; for men in general are very much alike; and

though one has one prevailing passion, and another has another, yet

their operations are much the same; and whatever engages or disgusts,

pleases or offends you, in others, will, _mutatis mutandis_, engage,

disgust, please, or offend others, in you. [_Same date._]

SMART SAYINGS.--The temptation of saying a smart and witty thing,

or _bon mot_, and the malicious applause with which it is commonly

received, have made people who can say them, and, still oftener,

people who think they can, but cannot and yet try, more enemies,

and implacable ones too, than any one other thing that I know of.

When such things, then, shall happen to be said at your expense (as

sometimes they certainly will) reflect seriously upon the sentiments

of uneasiness, anger, and resentment, which they excite in you; and

consider whether it can be prudent, by the same means, to excite the

same sentiments in others against you. It is a decided folly to lose

a friend for a jest; but, in my mind, it is not a much less degree of

folly, to make an enemy of an indifferent and neutral person for the

sake of a _bon mot_. When things of this kind happen to be said of you

the most prudent way is to seem not to suppose that they are meant at

you, but to dissemble and conceal whatever degree of anger you may

feel inwardly; and should they be so plain that you cannot be supposed

ignorant of their meaning, to join in the laugh of the company against

yourself; acknowledge the hit to be a fair one, and the jest a good

one, and play off the whole thing in seeming good humor; but by no

means reply in the same way; which only shows that you are hurt, and

publishes the victory which you might have concealed. Should the thing

said, indeed, injure your honor, or moral character, there is but one

proper reply; which I hope you will never have occasion to make. [_Same

date._]

WOMEN OF FASHION.--They are a numerous and loquacious body; their

hatred would be more prejudicial than their friendship can be

advantageous to you. A general complaisance and attention to that

sex is, therefore, established by custom, and certainly necessary.

But where you would particularly please any one, whose situation,

interest, or connections can be of use to you, you must show particular

preference. The least attentions please, the greatest charm them.

The innocent but pleasing flattery of their persons, however gross,

is greedily swallowed, and kindly digested, but a seeming regard for

their understandings, a seeming desire of, and deference for, their

advice, together with a seeming confidence in their moral virtues,

turns their head entirely in your favor. Nothing shocks them so much as

the least appearance of that contempt, which they are apt to suspect

men of entertaining of their capacities; and you may be very sure of

gaining their friendship, if you seem to think it worth gaining. Here

dissimulation is very often necessary, and even simulation sometimes

allowable; which, as it pleases them, may be useful to you and is

injurious to nobody. [_Same date._]

VENETIAN ART.--The time you will probably pass at Venice will allow

you to make yourself master of that intricate and singular form of

government, which few of our travellers know anything of. Read, ask,

and see everything that is relative to it. There are, likewise, many

valuable remains of the remotest antiquity, and many fine pieces of

the _antico moderno_, all which deserve a different sort of attention

from that which your countrymen commonly give them. They go to see

them as they go to see the lions, and kings on horseback, at the Tower

here, only to say that they have seen them. You will, I am sure, view

them in another light; you will consider them as you would a poem, to

which indeed they are akin. You will observe whether the sculptor has

animated his stone, or the painter his canvas, into the just expression

of those sentiments and passions which should characterize and mark

their several figures. [_June 22, 1749._]

SCULPTURE AND PAINTING.--You will examine, likewise, whether, in their

groups there be a unity of action or proper relation; a truth of dress

and manners. Sculpture and painting are very justly called liberal

arts; a lively and strong imagination, together with a just observation

being absolutely necessary to excel in either, which, in my opinion, is

by no means the case of music, though called a liberal art, and now in

Italy placed even above the other two--a proof of the decline of that

country. A taste of sculpture and painting is, in my mind, as becoming

as a taste of fiddling and piping is unbecoming a man of fashion. The

former is connected with history and poetry; the latter, with nothing

that I know of, but bad company. [_Same date._]

AMIABILITY.--There is a certain concurrence of various little

circumstances, which compose what the French call _l’amiable_; and

which, now you are entering into the world, you ought to make it your

particular study to acquire. Without them, your learning will be

pedantry, your conversation often improper, always unpleasant, and

your figure, however good in itself, awkward and unengaging. A diamond

while rough has indeed its intrinsic value; but till polished is of

no use, and would neither be sought for nor worn. Its great lustre,

it is true, proceeds from its solidity and strong cohesion of parts;

but without the last polish, it would remain forever a dirty, rough

mineral in the cabinets of some few curious collectors. You have, I

hope, that solidity and cohesion of parts; take now as much pains to

get the lustre. Good company, if you make the right use of it, will

cut you into shape, and give you the true brilliant polish. _Apropos_

of diamonds, I have sent you, by Sir James Gray, the king’s minister,

who will be at Venice about the middle of September, my own diamond

buckles, which are fitter for your young feet than for my old ones;

they will properly adorn you; they would only expose me. [_Same date._]

TRIFLES.--Great merit or great failings will make you respected or

despised; but trifles, little attentions, mere nothings, either done or

neglected, will make you either liked or disliked, in the general run

of the world. Examine yourself, why you like such and such people, and

dislike such and such others; and you will find that those different

sentiments proceed from very slight causes. Moral virtues are the

foundation of society in general, and of friendship in particular; but

attentions, manners, and graces both adorn and strengthen them. [_July

20, 1749._]

YOUTH ARMED BY EXPERIENCE.--Your youth and talents, armed with my

experience, may go a great way; and that armor is very much at your

service, if you please to wear it. I premise that it is not my

imagination, but my memory, that gives you these rules; I am not

writing pretty, useful reflections. A man of sense soon discovers,

because he carefully observes where and how long he is welcome; and

takes care to leave the company, at least, as soon as he is wished out

of it. Fools never perceive whether they are ill-timed or ill-placed.

[_Same date._]

IDLENESS.--But indeed I do not suspect you of one single moment’s

idleness in the whole day. Idleness is only the refuge of weak minds,

and the holiday of fools. I do not call good company and liberal

pleasures idleness; far from it; I recommend to you a good share of

both. [_Same date._]

BATHING.--I am very glad that my letter, with Dr. Shaw’s opinion, has

lessened your bathing; for, since I was born, I never heard of bathing

four hours a day, which would surely be too much, even in Medea’s

kettle, if you wanted (as you do not yet) new boiling. [_July 30,

1749._]

ARCHITECTURE--A SIMILE.--To carry on the metaphor of building, I would

wish you to be a Corinthian edifice, upon a Tuscan foundation; the

latter having the utmost strength and solidity to support, and the

former all possible ornaments to decorate. The Tuscan column is coarse,

clumsy, and unpleasant; nobody looks at it twice: the Corinthian fluted

column is beautiful and attractive; but without a solid foundation,

can hardly be seen twice, because it must soon tumble down. Yours

affectionately. [_Same date._]

EARN YOUR PLEASURES.--No man tastes pleasures truly who does not earn

them by previous business; and few people do business well who do

nothing else. Remember, that when I speak of pleasures I always mean

the elegant pleasures of a rational being, and not the brutal ones of

a swine. I mean _la bonne chere_, short of gluttony; wine, infinitely

short of drunkenness; play, without the least gaming; and gallantry,

without debauchery. There is a line in all these things which men of

sense, for greater security, take care to keep a good deal on the right

side of; for sickness, pain, contempt, and infamy lie immediately on

the other side of it. Men of sense and merit in all other respects may

have had some of these failings; but then those few examples, instead

of inviting us to imitation, should only put us the more upon our guard

against such weaknesses. Whoever thinks them fashionable will not be so

himself. I have often known a fashionable man to have some one vice,

but I never, in my life, knew a vicious man a fashionable man. Vice is

as degrading as it is criminal. God bless you, my dear child! [_Aug. 7,

1749._]

DIGNITY OF MANNERS.--There is a certain dignity of manners absolutely

necessary, to make even the most valuable character either respected

or respectable. Horse-play, romping, frequent and loud fits of

laughter, jokes, waggery, and indiscriminate familiarity, will sink

both merit and knowledge into a degree of contempt. They compose at

most a merry fellow; and a merry fellow was never yet a respectable

man. Indiscriminate familiarity either offends your superiors, or else

dubs you their dependent, and led captain. It gives your inferiors just

but troublesome and improper claims of equality. A joker is near akin

to a buffoon; and neither of them is the least related to wit. Whoever

is admitted or sought for in company upon any account than that of his

merit and manners, is never respected there, but only made use of. We

will have such-a-one, for he sings prettily; we will invite such-a-one

to a ball, for he dances well; we will have such-a-one at supper, for

he is always joking and laughing; we will ask another, because he plays

deep at all games, or because he can drink a great deal. These are

vilifying distinctions, mortifying preferences, and exclude all ideas

of esteem and regard. Whoever _is had_ (as it is called) in company,

for the sake of any one thing singly, is singly that thing, and will

never be considered in any other light, consequently never respected,

let his merits be what they will. [_Aug. 10, 1749._]

FOOLS AND THEIR FLATTERY.--Abject flattery and indiscriminate

assentation degrade, as much as indiscriminate contradiction and noisy

debate disgust. But a modest assertion of one’s own opinion, and a

complaisant acquiescence in other people’s, preserve dignity.

Vulgar, low expressions, awkward motions and address, vilify, as

they imply either a very low turn of mind, or low education, and low

company. [_Same date._]

A TRIFLER.--Cardinal de Retz, very sagaciously marked out Cardinal

Chigi for a little mind, from the moment that he told him he had wrote

(_sic_) three years with the same pen, and that it was an excellent

good one still.

A certain degree of exterior seriousness, in looks and motions, gives

dignity, without excluding wit and decent cheerfulness, which are

always serious themselves. A constant smirk upon the face, and a

whiffling activity of the body, are strong indications of futility.

Whoever is in a hurry shows that the thing he is about is too big for

him. Haste and hurry are very different things. [_Same date._]

THE PRETENDER--POLITICAL CAUTION.--You will, in many parts of Italy,

meet with numbers of the Pretender’s people (English, Scotch, and Irish

fugitives) especially at Rome; and probably the Pretender himself. It

is none of your business to declare war on these people; as little as

it is your interest, or, I hope, your inclination to connect yourself

with them: and therefore I recommend to you a perfect neutrality. Avoid

them as much as you can with decency and good manners; but, when you

cannot avoid any political conversation or debates with them, tell them

that you do not concern yourself with political matters; that you are

neither a maker nor a deposer of kings; that, when you left England,

you left a king in it, and have not since heard either of his death,

or of any revolution that has happened, and that you take kings and

kingdoms as you find them; but enter no farther into matters with them,

which can be of no use, and might bring on heat and quarrels. When you

speak of the old Pretender you will call him only, the Chevalier de

St. George; but mention him as seldom as possible. Should he chance to

speak to you at any assembly (as, I am told, he sometimes does to the

English) be sure that you seem not to know him; and answer him civilly,

but always either in French or in Italian; and give him, in the former,

the appellation of _Monsieur_, and in the latter of _Signore_. Should

you meet with the Cardinal of York, you will be under no difficulty,

for he has, as Cardinal, an undoubted right to _Eminenza_. Upon the

whole, see any of those people as little as possible; when you do

see them be civil to them, upon the footing of strangers; but never

be drawn into any altercations with them about the imaginary right of

their king, as they call him.

It is to no sort of purpose to talk to those people of the natural

rights of mankind and particular constitution of this country. Blinded

by prejudices, soured by misfortunes, and tempted by their necessities,

they are as incapable of reasoning rightly, as they have hitherto been

of acting wisely. The late Lord Pembroke never would know anything

that he had not a mind to know; and, in this case, I advise you to

follow his example. Never know either the father or the two sons, any

otherwise than as foreigners; and so not knowing their pretensions you

have no occasion to dispute them. [_Sept. 5, 1749._]

A FATHER’S ANXIETY.--It seems extraordinary, but it is very true, that

my anxiety for you increases in proportion to the good accounts which I

receive of you from all hands. I promise myself so much from you, that

I dread the least disappointment. You are now so near the port, which I

have so long wished and labored to bring you safe into, that my concern

would be doubled, should you be shipwrecked within sight of it. The

object, therefore, of this letter is (laying aside all the authority

of the parent), to conjure you as a friend, by the affection you have

for me (and surely you have reason to have some), and by the regard you

have for yourself, to go on with assiduity and attention, to complete

that work, which, of late, you have carried on so well, and which is

now so near being finished. My wishes, and my plan, were to make you

shine, and distinguish yourself equally in the learned and the polite

world. Few have been able to do it. [_Sept. 12, 1749._]

THE STUDENT OF LIFE AND THE TRIFLER: A DIALOGUE.--I will suppose you

at Rome, studying six hours uninterruptedly with Mr. Harte, every

morning, and passing your evenings with the best company of Rome,

observing their manners and forming your own; and I will suppose a

number of idle, sauntering, illiterate English, as there commonly is

there, living entirely with one another, supping, drinking, and sitting

up late at each other’s lodgings; commonly in riots and scrapes when

drunk, and never in good company when sober. I will take one of these

pretty fellows, and give you the dialogue between him and yourself;

such as I dare say it will be on his side, and such as I hope it will

be on yours.

_Englishman._ Will you come and breakfast with me to-morrow; there will

be four or five of our countrymen; we have provided chaises, and we

will drive somewhere out of town after breakfast?

_Stanhope._ I am very sorry I cannot; but I am obliged to be at home

all the morning.

_Englishman._ Why then we will come and breakfast with you.

_Stanhope._ I can’t do that neither, I am engaged.

_Englishman._ Well, then, let it be the next day.

_Stanhope._ To tell you the truth, it can be no day in the morning; for

I neither go out, nor see anybody at home before twelve.

_Englishman._ And what the devil do you do with yourself till twelve

o’clock?

_Stanhope._ I am not by myself, I am with Mr. Harte.

_Englishman._ Then what the devil do you do with him?

_Stanhope._ We study different things; we read, we converse.

_Englishman._ Very pretty amusement indeed! Are you to take orders then?

_Stanhope._ Yes, my father’s orders, I believe, I must take.

_Englishman._ Why, hast thou no more spirit than to mind an old fellow

a thousand miles off?

_Stanhope._ If I don’t mind his orders he won’t mind my draughts.

_Englishman._ What, does the old prig threaten, then? Threatened folks

live long; never mind threats.

_Stanhope._ No, I can’t say that he has ever threatened me in his life;

but I believe I had best not provoke him.

_Englishman._ Pooh! you would have one angry letter from the old

fellow, and there would be an end of it.

_Stanhope._ You mistake him mightily; he always does more than he says.

He has never been angry with me yet, that I remember, in his life; but

if I were to provoke him, I am sure he would never forgive me; he would

be coolly immovable, and I might beg and pray, and write my heart out

to no purpose.

_Englishman._ Why then, he is an old dog, that’s all I can say:

and pray, are you to obey your dry-nurse too, this same what’s his

name--Mr. Harte?

_Stanhope._ Yes.

_Englishman._ So he stuffs you all morning with Greek, and Latin, and

logic, and all that. Egad, I have a dry-nurse too, but I never looked

into a book with him in my life; I have not so much as seen the face of

him this week, and don’t care a louse if I never see it again.

_Stanhope._ My dry-nurse never desires anything of me that is not

reasonable, and for my own good; and therefore I like to be with him.

_Englishman._ Very sententious and edifying, upon my word! at this rate

you will be reckoned a very good young man.

_Stanhope._ Why, that will do me no harm.

_Englishman._ Will you be with us to-morrow in the evening, then? We

shall be ten with you; and I have got some excellent good wine; and

we’ll be very merry.

_Stanhope._ I am very much obliged to you but I am engaged for all the

evening, to-morrow; first at Cardinal Albani’s; and then to sup at the

Venetian Embassadress’s.

_Englishman._ How the devil can you like being always with these

foreigners? I never go amongst them, with all their formalities and

ceremonies. I am never easy in company with them, and I don’t know why,

but I am ashamed.

_Stanhope._ I am neither ashamed nor afraid; I am very easy with

them; they are very easy with me; I get the language, and I see their

characters, by conversing with them; and that is what we are sent

abroad for. Is it not?

_Englishman._ I hate your modest women’s company; your women of

fashion, as they call ’em. I don’t know what to say to them, for my

part.

_Stanhope._ Have you ever conversed with them?

_Englishman._ No, I never conversed with them; but I have been

sometimes in their company, though much against my will.

_Stanhope._ But at least they have done you no hurt; which is,

probably, more than you can say of the women you do converse with.

_Englishman._ That’s true, I own; but for all that, I would rather keep

company with my surgeon half the year, than with your women of fashion

the year round.

_Stanhope._ Tastes are different, you know, and every man follows his

own.

_Englishman._ That’s true; but thine’s a devilish odd one, Stanhope.

All morning with thy dry-nurse; all the evening in formal fine company;

and all day long afraid of old Daddy in England. Thou art a queer

fellow, and I am afraid there’s nothing to be made of thee.

_Stanhope._ I am afraid so, too.

_Englishman._ Well, then, good-night to you; you have no objection, I

hope, to my being drunk to-night, which I certainly will be?

_Stanhope._ Not in the least; nor to your being sick to-morrow, which

you as certainly will be; and so good-night too.

You will observe, that I have not put into your mouth those good

arguments, which upon such an occasion would, I am sure, occur to you;

as piety and affection towards me; regard and friendship for Mr. Harte;

respect for your own moral character, and for all the relative duties

of man, son, pupil and citizen. Such solid arguments would be thrown

away upon such shallow puppies. Leave them to their ignorance, and to

their dirty, disgraceful vices. They will severely feel the effects

of them, when it will be too late. Without the comfortable refuge of

learning, and with all the sickness and pains of a ruined stomach,

and a rotten carcass, if they happen to arrive at old age, it is an

uneasy and ignominious one. The ridicule which such fellows endeavor to

throw upon those who are not like them is, in the opinion of all men

of sense, the most authentic panegyric. Go on, then, my dear child,

in the way you are in, only for a year and a half more; that is all I

ask of you. After that, I promise that you shall be your own master,

and that I will pretend to no other title than that of your best and

truest friend. You shall receive advice, but no orders, from me; and in

truth you will want no other advice, but such as youth and inexperience

must necessarily require. You shall certainly want nothing that is

requisite, not only for your conveniency, but also for your pleasures,

which I always desire should be gratified. You will suppose that I mean

the pleasures _d’un honnête homme_. [_Same date._]

A PANEGYRIST.--If I had faith in philters and love potions, I should

suspect that you had given Sir Charles Williams some, by the manner in

which he speaks of you, not only to me, but to everybody else. I will

not repeat to you what he says of the extent and correctness of your

knowledge, as it might either make you vain, or persuade you that you

had already enough of what nobody can have too much. You will easily

imagine how many questions I asked, and how narrowly I sifted him upon

your subject; he answered me, and I dare say with truth, just as I

could have wished. [_Sept. 22, 1749._]

NECESSITY OF ATTENTION.--Sir Charles Williams told me then, that in

company you were frequently most _provokingly_ inattentive, absent,

_and distrait_. That you came into a room and presented yourself very

awkwardly; that at table you constantly threw down knives, forks,

napkins, bread, etc., and that you neglected your person and dress to a

degree unpardonable at any age, and much more so at yours.

Letters, sentences and maxims · 第 15 / 34 题