THE FORTUNE OF THE REPUBLIC

It is a rule that holds in economy as well as in hydraulics that you must

have a source higher than your tap. The mills, the shops, the theatre and

the caucus, the college and the church, have all found out this secret.

The sailors sail by chronometers that do not lose two or three seconds

in a year, ever since Newton explained to Parliament that the way to

improve navigation was to get good watches, and to offer public premiums

for a better time-keeper than any then in use. The manufacturers rely on

turbines of hydraulic perfection; the carpet-mill, on mordants and dyes

which exhaust the skill of the chemist; the calico print, on designers

of genius who draw the wages of artists, not of artisans. Wedgwood,

the eminent potter, bravely took the sculptor Flaxman to counsel, who

said, “Send to Italy, search the museums for the forms of old Etruscan

vases, urns, water-pots, domestic and sacrificial vessels of all kinds.”

They built great works and called their manufacturing village Etruria.

Flaxman, with his Greek taste, selected and combined the loveliest

forms, which were executed in English clay; sent boxes of these as

gifts to every court of Europe, and formed the taste of the world. It

was a renaissance of the breakfast-table and china-closet. The brave

manufacturers made their fortune. The jewellers imitated the revived

models in silver and gold.

The theatre avails itself of the best talent of poet, of painter, and of

amateur of taste, to make the _ensemble_ of dramatic effect. The marine

insurance office has its mathematical counsellor to settle averages; the

life-assurance, its table of annuities. The wine-merchant has his analyst

and taster, the more exquisite the better. He has also, I fear, his debts

to the chemist as well as to the vineyard.

Our modern wealth stands on a few staples, and the interest nations took

in our war was exasperated by the importance of the cotton trade. And

what is cotton? One plant out of some two hundred thousand known to the

botanist, vastly the larger part of which are reckoned weeds. What is a

weed? A plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered,—every one of

the two hundred thousand probably yet to be of utility in the arts. As

Bacchus of the vine, Ceres of the wheat, as Arkwright and Whitney were

the demi-gods of cotton, so prolific Time will yet bring an inventor to

every plant. There is not a property in Nature but a mind is born to

seek and find it. For it is not the plants or the animals, innumerable

as they are, nor the whole magazine of material nature that can give

the sum of power, but the infinite applicability of these things in the

hands of thinking man, every new application being equivalent to a new

material.[228]

Our sleepy civilization, ever since Roger Bacon and Monk Schwartz

invented gunpowder, has built its whole art of war, all fortification by

land and sea, all drill and military education, on that one compound,—all

is an extension of a gun-barrel,—and is very scornful about bows and

arrows, and reckons Greeks and Romans and Middle Ages little better than

Indians and bow-and-arrow times. As if the earth, water, gases, lightning

and caloric had not a million energies, the discovery of any one of

which could change the art of war again, and put an end to war by the

exterminating forces man can apply.

Now, if this is true in all the useful and in the fine arts, that the

direction must be drawn from a superior source or there will be no good

work, does it hold less in our social and civil life?

In our popular politics you may note that each aspirant who rises above

the crowd, however at first making his obedient apprenticeship in party

tactics, if he have sagacity, soon learns that it is by no means by

obeying the vulgar weathercock of his party, the resentments, the fears

and whims of it, that real power is gained, but that he must often face

and resist the party, and abide by his resistance, and put them in

fear; that the only title to their permanent respect, and to a larger

following, is to see for himself what is the real public interest, and

to stand for that;—that is a principle, and all the cheering and hissing

of the crowd must by and by accommodate itself to it. Our times easily

afford you very good examples.

The law of water and all fluids is true of wit. Prince Metternich said,

“Revolutions begin in the best heads and run steadily down to the

populace.” It is a very old observation; not truer because Metternich

said it, and not less true.

There have been revolutions which were not in the interest of feudalism

and barbarism, but in that of society. And these are distinguished not

by the numbers of the combatants nor the numbers of the slain, but by

the motive. No interest now attaches to the wars of York and Lancaster,

to the wars of German, French and Spanish emperors, which were only

dynastic wars, but to those in which a principle was involved. These are

read with passionate interest and never lose their pathos by time. When

the cannon is aimed by ideas, when men with religious convictions are

behind it, when men die for what they live for, and the mainspring that

works daily urges them to hazard all, then the cannon articulates its

explosions with the voice of a man, then the rifle seconds the cannon and

the fowling-piece the rifle, and the women make the cartridges, and all

shoot at one mark; then gods join in the combat; then poets are born, and

the better code of laws at last records the victory.

Now the culmination of these triumphs of humanity—and which did virtually

include the extinction of slavery—is the planting of America.

At every moment some one country more than any other represents the

sentiment and the future of mankind. None will doubt that America

occupies this place in the opinion of nations, as is proved by the fact

of the vast immigration into this country from all the nations of Western

and Central Europe. And when the adventurers have planted themselves and

looked about, they send back all the money they can spare to bring their

friends.

Meantime they find this country just passing through a great crisis in

its history, as necessary as lactation or dentition or puberty to the

human individual. We are in these days settling for ourselves and our

descendants questions which, as they shall be determined in one way or

the other, will make the peace and prosperity or the calamity of the next

ages. The questions of Education, of Society, of Labor, the direction of

talent, of character, the nature and habits of the American, may well

occupy us, and more the question of Religion.

The new conditions of mankind in America are really favorable to

progress, the removal of absurd restrictions and antique inequalities.

The mind is always better the more it is used, and here it is kept

in practice. The humblest is daily challenged to give his opinion on

practical questions, and while civil and social freedom exists, nonsense

even has a favorable effect. Cant is good to provoke common sense....

The trance-mediums, the rebel paradoxes, exasperate the common sense. The

wilder the paradox, the more sure is Punch to put it in the pillory.

The lodging the power in the people, as in republican forms, has the

effect of holding things closer to common sense; for a court or an

aristocracy, which must always be a small minority, can more easily run

into follies than a republic, which has too many observers—each with a

vote in his hand—to allow its head to be turned by any kind of nonsense:

since hunger, thirst, cold, the cries of children and debt are always

holding the masses hard to the essential duties.

One hundred years ago the American people attempted to carry out the bill

of political rights to an almost ideal perfection. They have made great

strides in that direction since. They are now proceeding, instructed by

their success and by their many failures, to carry out, not the bill of

rights, but the bill of human duties.

And look what revolution that attempt involves. Hitherto government has

been that of the single person or of the aristocracy. In this country the

attempt to resist these elements, it is asserted, must throw us into the

government not quite of mobs, but in practice of an inferior class of

professional politicians, who by means of newspapers and caucuses really

thrust their unworthy minority into the place of the old aristocracy on

the one side, and of the good, industrious, well-taught but unambitious

population on the other, win the posts of power and give their direction

to affairs. Hence liberal congresses and legislatures ordain, to the

surprise of the people, equivocal, interested and vicious measures.

The men themselves are suspected and charged with lobbying and being

lobbied. No measure is attempted for itself, but the opinion of the

people is courted in the first place, and the measures are perfunctorily

carried through as secondary. We do not choose our own candidate, no, nor

any other man’s first choice,—but only the available candidate, whom,

perhaps, no man loves. We do not speak what we think, but grope after

the practicable and available. Instead of character, there is a studious

exclusion of character. The people are feared and flattered. They are

not reprimanded. The country is governed in bar-rooms, and in the mind

of bar-rooms. The low can best win the low, and each aspirant for power

vies with his rival which can stoop lowest, and depart widest from

himself.

The partisan on moral, even on religious questions, will choose a proven

rogue who can answer the tests, over an honest, affectionate, noble

gentleman; the partisan ceasing to be a man that he may be a sectarian.

The spirit of our political economy is low and degrading. The precious

metals are not so precious as they are esteemed. Man exists for his own

sake, and not to add a laborer to the state. The spirit of our political

action, for the most part, considers nothing less than the sacredness of

man. Party sacrifices man to the measure.[229]

We have seen the great party of property and education in the country

drivelling and huckstering away, for views of party fear or advantage,

every principle of humanity and the dearest hopes of mankind; the

trustees of power only energetic when mischief could be done, imbecile as

corpses when evil was to be prevented.

Our great men succumb so far to the forms of the day as to peril their

integrity for the sake of adding to the weight of their personal

character the authority of office, or making a real government titular.

Our politics are full of adventurers, who having by education and social

innocence a good repute in the state, break away from the law of honesty

and think they can afford to join the devil’s party. ’Tis odious, these

offenders in high life. You rally to the support of old charities and the

cause of literature, and there, to be sure, are these brazen faces. In

this innocence you are puzzled how to meet them; must shake hands with

them, under protest.[230] We feel toward them as the minister about the

Cape Cod farm,—in the old time when the minister was still invited, in

the spring, to make a prayer for the blessing of a piece of land,—the

good pastor being brought to the spot, stopped short: “No, this land does

not want a prayer, this land wants manure.”

“’Tis virtue which they want, and wanting it,

Honor no garment to their backs can fit.”[231]

Parties keep the old names, but exhibit a surprising fugacity in creeping

out of one snake-skin into another of equal ignominy and lubricity, and

the grasshopper on the turret of Faneuil Hall gives a proper hint of the

men below.

Everything yields. The very glaciers are viscous, or relegate into

conformity, and the stiffest patriots falter and compromise; so that

_will_ cannot be depended on to save us.

How rare are acts of will! We are all living according to custom; we do

as other people do, and shrink from an act of our own. Every such act

makes a man famous, and we can all count the few cases—half a dozen in

our time—when a public man ventured to act as he thought without waiting

for orders or for public opinion. John Quincy Adams was a man of an

audacious independence that always kept the public curiosity alive in

regard to what he might do. None could predict his word, and a whole

congress could not gainsay it when it was spoken. General Jackson was a

man of will, and his phrase on one memorable occasion, “I will take the

responsibility,” is a proverb ever since.[232]

The American marches with a careless swagger to the height of power,

very heedless of his own liberty or of other people’s, in his reckless

confidence that he can have all he wants, risking all the prized charters

of the human race, bought with battles and revolutions and religion,

gambling them all away for a paltry selfish gain.

He sits secure in the possession of his vast domain, rich beyond all

experience in resources, sees its inevitable force unlocking itself in

elemental order day by day, year by year; looks from his coal-fields, his

wheat-bearing prairie, his gold-mines, to his two oceans on either side,

and feels the security that there can be no famine in a country reaching

through so many latitudes, no want that cannot be supplied, no danger

from any excess of importation of art or learning into a country of such

native strength, such immense digestive power.

In proportion to the personal ability of each man, he feels the

invitation and career which the country opens to him. He is easily fed

with wheat and game, with Ohio wine, but his brain is also pampered by

finer draughts, by political power and by the power in the railroad

board, in the mills, or the banks. This elevates his spirits, and

gives, of course, an easy self-reliance that makes him self-willed and

unscrupulous.

I think this levity is a reaction on the people from the extraordinary

advantages and invitations of their condition. When we are most disturbed

by their rash and immoral voting, it is not malignity, but recklessness.

They are careless of politics, because they do not entertain the

possibility of being seriously caught in meshes of legislation. They

feel strong and irresistible. They believe that what they have enacted

they can repeal if they do not like it. But one may run a risk once

too often. They stay away from the polls, saying that one vote can do

no good! Or they take another step, and say ‘One vote can do no harm!’

and vote for something which they do not approve, because their party

or set votes for it. Of course this puts them in the power of any party

having a steady interest to promote which does not conflict manifestly

with the pecuniary interest of the voters. But if they should come to be

interested in themselves and in their career, they would no more stay

away from the election than from their own counting-room or the house of

their friend.

The people are right-minded enough on ethical questions, but they

must pay their debts, and must have the means of living well, and not

pinching. So it is useless to rely on them to go to a meeting, or to

give a vote, if any check from this must-have-the-money side arises.

If a customer looks grave at their newspaper, or damns their member of

Congress, they take another newspaper, and vote for another man. They

must have money, for a certain style of living fast becomes necessary;

they must take wine at the hotel, first, for the look of it, and second,

for the purpose of sending the bottle to two or three gentlemen at the

table; and presently because they have got the taste, and do not feel

that they have dined without it.

The record of the election now and then alarms people by the all but

unanimous choice of a rogue and a brawler. But how was it done? What

lawless mob burst into the polls and threw in these hundreds of ballots

in defiance of the magistrates? This was done by the very men you

know,—the mildest, most sensible, best-natured people. The only account

of this is, that they have been scared or warped into some association in

their mind of the candidate with the interest of their trade or of their

property.

Whilst each cabal urges its candidate, and at last brings, with cheers

and street demonstrations, men whose names are a knell to all hope of

progress, the good and wise are hidden in their active retirements, and

are quite out of question.

“These we must join to wake, for these are of the strain

That justice dare defend, and will the age maintain.”[233]

Yet we know, all over this country, men of integrity, capable of action

and of affairs, with the deepest sympathy in all that concerns the

public, mortified by the national disgrace, and quite capable of any

sacrifice except of their honor.

Faults in the working appear in our system, as in all, but they suggest

their own remedies. After every practical mistake out of which any

disaster grows, the people wake and correct it with energy. And any

disturbances in politics, in civil or foreign wars, sober them, and

instantly show more virtue and conviction in the popular vote. In each

new threat of faction the ballot has been, beyond expectation, right and

decisive.

It is ever an inspiration, God only knows whence; a sudden, undated

perception of eternal right coming into and correcting things that were

wrong; a perception that passes through thousands as readily as through

one.

The gracious lesson taught by science to this country is that the history

of Nature from first to last is incessant advance from less to more, from

rude to finer organization, the globe of matter thus conspiring with

the principle of undying hope in man. Nature works in immense time, and

spends individuals and races prodigally to prepare new individuals and

races. The lower kinds are one after one extinguished; the higher forms

come in.[234] The history of civilization, or the refining of certain

races to wonderful power of performance, is analogous; but the best

civilization yet is only valuable as a ground of hope.

Ours is the country of poor men. Here is practical democracy; here is

the human race poured out over the continent to do itself justice; all

mankind in its shirt-sleeves; not grimacing like poor rich men in cities,

pretending to be rich, but unmistakably taking off its coat to hard work,

when labor is sure to pay.[235] This through all the country. For really,

though you see wealth in the capitals, it is only a sprinkling of rich

men in the cities and at sparse points; the bulk of the population is

poor. In Maine, nearly every man is a lumberer. In Massachusetts, every

twelfth man is a shoemaker, and the rest, millers, farmers, sailors,

fishermen.

Well, the result is, instead of the doleful experience of the European

economist, who tells us, “In almost all countries the condition of the

great body of the people is poor and miserable,” here that same great

body has arrived at a sloven plenty,—ham and corn-cakes, tight roof and

coals enough have been attained; an unbuttoned comfort, not clean, not

thoughtful, far from polished, without dignity in his repose; the man

awkward and restless if he have not something to do, but honest and kind

for the most part, understanding his own rights and stiff to maintain

them, and disposed to give his children a better education than he

received.

The steady improvement of the public schools in the cities and the

country enables the farmer or laborer to secure a precious primary

education. It is rare to find a born American who cannot read and write.

The facility with which clubs are formed by young men for discussion of

social, political and intellectual topics secures the notoriety of the

questions.

Our institutions, of which the town is the unit, are all educational, for

responsibility educates fast. The town-meeting is, after the high-school,

a higher school.[236] The legislature, to which every good farmer goes

once on trial, is a superior academy.

The result appears in the power of invention, the freedom of thinking,

in the readiness for reforms, eagerness for novelty, even for all the

follies of false science; in the antipathy to secret societies, in the

predominance of the democratic party in the politics of the Union, and in

the voice of the public even when irregular and vicious,—the voice of

mobs, the voice of lynch law,—because it is thought to be, on the whole,

the verdict, though badly spoken, of the greatest number.

All this forwardness and self-reliance, cover self-government; proceed

on the belief that as the people have made a government they can make

another; that their union and law are not in their memory, but in their

blood and condition. If they unmake a law, they can easily make a new

one. In Mr. Webster’s imagination the American Union was a huge Prince

Rupert’s drop, which will snap into atoms if so much as the smallest end

be shivered off. Now the fact is quite different from this. The people

are loyal, law-abiding. They prefer order, and have no taste for misrule

and uproar.

America was opened after the feudal mischief was spent, and so the people

made a good start. We began well. No inquisition here, no kings, no

nobles, no dominant church. Here heresy has lost its terrors. We have

eight or ten religions in every large town, and the most that comes of it

is a degree or two on the thermometer of fashion; a pew in a particular

church gives an easier entrance to the subscription ball.

We began with freedom, and are defended from shocks now for a century

by the facility with which through popular assemblies every necessary

measure of reform can instantly be carried. A congress is a standing

insurrection, and escapes the violence of accumulated grievance. As the

globe keeps its identity by perpetual change, so our civil system, by

perpetual appeal to the people and acceptance of its reforms.

The government is acquainted with the opinions of all classes, knows the

leading men in the middle class, knows the leaders of the humblest class.

The President comes near enough to these; if he does not, the caucus

does, the primary ward and town-meeting, and what is important does reach

him.

The men, the women, all over this land shrill their exclamations of

impatience and indignation at what is short-coming or is unbecoming in

the government,—at the want of humanity, of morality,—ever on broad

grounds of general justice, and not on the class-feeling which narrows

the perception of English, French, German people at home.

In this fact, that we are a nation of individuals, that we have a highly

intellectual organization, that we can see and feel moral distinctions,

and that on such an organization sooner or later the moral laws must

tell, to such ears must speak,—in this is our hope. For if the prosperity

of this country has been merely the obedience of man to the guiding of

Nature,—of great rivers and prairies,—yet is there fate above fate, if we

choose to spread this language; or if there is fate in corn and cotton,

so is there fate in thought,—this, namely, that the largest thought and

the widest love are born to victory, and must prevail.

The revolution is the work of no man, but the eternal effervescence of

Nature. It never did not work. And we say that revolutions beat all the

insurgents, be they never so determined and politic; that the great

interests of mankind, being at every moment through ages in favor of

justice and the largest liberty, will always, from time to time, gain on

the adversary and at last win the day. Never country had such a fortune,

as men call fortune, as this, in its geography, its history, and in its

majestic possibilities.

We have much to learn, much to correct,—a great deal of lying vanity.

The spread eagle must fold his foolish wings and be less of a peacock;

must keep his wings to carry the thunderbolt when he is commanded. We

must realize our rhetoric and our rituals. Our national flag is not

affecting, as it should be, because it does not represent the population

of the United States, but some Baltimore or Chicago or Cincinnati or

Philadelphia caucus; not union or justice, but selfishness and cunning.

If we never put on the liberty-cap until we were freemen by love and

self-denial, the liberty-cap would mean something. I wish to see America

not like the old powers of the earth, grasping, exclusive and narrow,

but a benefactor such as no country ever was, hospitable to all nations,

legislating for all nationalities. Nations were made to help each other

as much as families were; and all advancement is by ideas, and not by

brute force or mechanic force.

In this country, with our practical understanding, there is, at present,

a great sensualism, a headlong devotion to trade and to the conquest of

the continent,—to each man as large a share of the same as he can carve

for himself,—an extravagant confidence in our talent and activity, which

becomes, whilst successful, a scornful materialism,—but with the fault,

of course, that it has no depth, no reserved force whereon to fall back

when a reverse comes.

That repose which is the ornament and ripeness of man is not American.

That repose which indicates a faith in the laws of the universe,—a faith

that they will fulfil themselves, and are not to be impeded, transgressed

or accelerated. Our people are too slight and vain. They are easily

elated and easily depressed. See how fast they extend the fleeting

fabric of their trade,—not at all considering the remote reaction and

bankruptcy, but with the same abandonment to the moment and the facts of

the hour as the Esquimau who sells his bed in the morning. Our people act

on the moment, and from external impulse. They all lean on some other,

and this superstitiously, and not from insight of his merit. They follow

a fact; they follow success, and not skill. Therefore, as soon as the

success stops and the admirable man blunders, they quit him; already they

remember that they long ago suspected his judgment, and they transfer

the repute of judgment to the next prosperous person who has not yet

blundered. Of course this levity makes them as easily despond. It seems

as if history gave no account of any society in which despondency came so

readily to heart as we see it and feel it in ours. Young men at thirty

and even earlier lose all spring and vivacity, and if they fail in their

first enterprise throw up the game.

The source of mischief is the extreme difficulty with which men are

roused from the torpor of every day. Blessed is all that agitates the

mass, breaks up this torpor, and begins motion. _Corpora non agunt

nisi soluta_; the chemical rule is true in mind. Contrast, change,

interruption, are necessary to new activity and new combinations.

If a temperate wise man should look over our American society, I think

the first danger that would excite his alarm would be the European

influences on this country. We buy much of Europe that does not make us

better men; and mainly the expensiveness which is ruining that country.

We import trifles, dancers, singers, laces, books of patterns, modes,

gloves and cologne, manuals of Gothic architecture, steam-made ornaments.

America is provincial. It is an immense Halifax. See the secondariness

and aping of foreign and English life, that runs through this country, in

building, in dress, in eating, in books. Every village, every city, has

its architecture, its costume, its hotel, its private house, its church,

from England.

Our politics threaten her. Her manners threaten us. Life is grown and

growing so costly that it threatens to kill us. A man is coming, here

as there, to value himself on what he can buy. Worst of all, his expense

is not his own, but a far-off copy of Osborne House or the Elysée. The

tendency of this is to make all men alike; to extinguish individualism

and choke up all the channels of inspiration from God in man. We lose our

invention and descend into imitation. A man no longer conducts his own

life. It is manufactured for him. The tailor makes your dress; the baker

your bread; the upholsterer, from an imported book of patterns, your

furniture; the Bishop of London your faith.

In the planters of this country, in the seventeenth century, the

conditions of the country, combined with the impatience of arbitrary

power which they brought from England, forced them to a wonderful

personal independence and to a certain heroic planting and trading. Later

this strength appeared in the solitudes of the West, where a man is made

a hero by the varied emergencies of his lonely farm, and neighborhoods

must combine against the Indians, or the horse-thieves, or the river

rowdies, by organizing themselves into committees of vigilance. Thus

the land and sea educate the people, and bring out presence of mind,

self-reliance, and hundred-handed activity. These are the people for

an emergency. They are not to be surprised, and can find a way out of

any peril. This rough and ready force becomes them, and makes them

fit citizens and civilizers. But if we found them clinging to English

traditions, which are graceful enough at home, as the English Church, and

entailed estates, and distrust of popular election, we should feel this

reactionary, and absurdly out of place.

Let the passion for America cast out the passion for Europe. Here

let there be what the earth waits for,—exalted manhood. What this

country longs for is personalities, grand persons, to counteract its

materialities. For it is the rule of the universe that corn shall serve

man, and not man corn.

They who find America insipid—they for whom London and Paris have spoiled

their own homes—can be spared to return to those cities. I not only see a

career at home for more genius than we have, but for more than there is

in the world.

The class of which I speak make themselves merry without duties. They sit

in decorated club-houses in the cities, and burn tobacco and play whist;

in the country they sit idle in stores and bar-rooms, and burn tobacco,

and gossip and sleep. They complain of the flatness of American life;

“America has no illusions, no romance.” They have no perception of its

destiny. They are not Americans.

The felon is the logical extreme of the epicure and coxcomb. Selfish

luxury is the end of both, though in one it is decorated with

refinements, and in the other brutal. But my point now is, that this

spirit is not American.

Our young men lack idealism. A man for success must not be pure idealist,

then he will practically fail; but he must have ideas, must obey ideas,

or he might as well be the horse he rides on. A man does not want to be

sun-dazzled, sun-blind; but every man must have glimmer enough to keep

him from knocking his head against the walls. And it is in the interest

of civilization and good society and friendship, that I dread to hear

of well-born, gifted and amiable men, that they have this indifference,

disposing them to this despair.

Of no use are the men who study to do exactly as was done before, who

can never understand that to-day is a new day. There never was such

a combination as this of ours, and the rules to meet it are not set

down in any history. We want men of original perception and original

action, who can open their eyes wider than to a nationality,—namely, to

considerations of benefit to the human race,—can act in the interest of

civilization; men of elastic, men of moral mind, who can live in the

moment and take a step forward. Columbus was no backward-creeping crab,

nor was Martin Luther, nor John Adams, nor Patrick Henry, nor Thomas

Jefferson; and the Genius or Destiny of America is no log or sluggard,

but a man incessantly advancing, as the shadow on the dial’s face, or the

heavenly body by whose light it is marked.

The flowering of civilization is the finished man, the man of sense, of

grace, of accomplishment, of social power,—the gentleman. What hinders

that he be born here? The new times need a new man, the complemental man,

whom plainly this country must furnish. Freer swing his arms; farther

pierce his eyes; more forward and forthright his whole build and rig than

the Englishman’s, who, we see, is much imprisoned in his backbone.

’Tis certain that our civilization is yet incomplete, it has not

ended nor given sign of ending in a hero. ’Tis a wild democracy; the

riot of mediocrities and dishonesties and fudges. Ours is the age of

the omnibus, of the third person plural, of Tammany Hall. Is it that

Nature has only so much vital force, and must dilute it if it is to be

multiplied into millions? The beautiful is never plentiful. Then Illinois

and Indiana, with their spawning loins, must needs be ordinary.

It is not a question whether we shall be a multitude of people. No, that

has been conspicuously decided already; but whether we shall be the new

nation, the guide and lawgiver of all nations, as having clearly chosen

and firmly held the simplest and best rule of political society.

Now, if the spirit which years ago armed this country against rebellion,

and put forth such gigantic energy in the charity of the Sanitary

Commission, could be waked to the conserving and creating duty of making

the laws just and humane, it were to enroll a great constituency of

religious, self-respecting, brave, tender, faithful obeyers of duty,

lovers of men, filled with loyalty to each other, and with the simple

and sublime purpose of carrying out in private and in public action the

desire and need of mankind.

Here is the post where the patriot should plant himself; here the altar

where virtuous young men, those to whom friendship is the dearest

covenant, should bind each other to loyalty; where genius should kindle

its fires and bring forgotten truth to the eyes of men.

It is not possible to extricate yourself from the questions in which your

age is involved. Let the good citizen perform the duties put on him here

and now. It is not by heads reverted to the dying Demosthenes, or to

Luther, or to Wallace, or to George Fox, or to George Washington, that

you can combat the dangers and dragons that beset the United States at

this time. I believe this cannot be accomplished by dunces or idlers,

but requires docility, sympathy, and religious receiving from higher

principles; for liberty, like religion, is a short and hasty fruit,

and like all power subsists only by new rallyings on the source of

inspiration.

Power can be generous. The very grandeur of the means which offer

themselves to us should suggest grandeur in the direction of our

expenditure. If our mechanic arts are unsurpassed in usefulness, if we

have taught the river to make shoes and nails and carpets, and the bolt

of heaven to write our letters like a Gillot pen, let these wonders work

for honest humanity, for the poor, for justice, genius and the public

good.[237] Let us realize that this country, the last found, is the great

charity of God to the human race.

America should affirm and establish that in no instance shall the guns

go in advance of the present right. We shall not make _coups d’état_

and afterwards explain and pay, but shall proceed like William Penn, or

whatever other Christian or humane person who treats with the Indian or

the foreigner, on principles of honest trade and mutual advantage. We

can see that the Constitution and the law in America must be written

on ethical principles, so that the entire power of the spiritual world

shall hold the citizen loyal, and repel the enemy as by force of nature.

It should be mankind’s bill of rights, or Royal Proclamation of the

Intellect ascending the throne, announcing its good pleasure that now,

once for all, the world shall be governed by common sense and law of

morals.

The end of all political struggle is to establish morality as the basis

of all legislation. ’Tis not free institutions, ’tis not a democracy

that is the end,—no, but only the means. Morality is the object of

government. We want a state of things in which crime will not pay; a

state of things which allows every man the largest liberty compatible

with the liberty of every other man.

Humanity asks that government shall not be ashamed to be tender and

paternal, but that democratic institutions shall be more thoughtful for

the interests of women, for the training of children, and for the welfare

of sick and unable persons, and serious care of criminals, than was ever

any the best government of the Old World.

The genius of the country has marked out our true policy,—opportunity.

Opportunity of civil rights, of education, of personal power, and not

less of wealth; doors wide open. If I could have it,—free trade with all

the world without toll or custom-houses, invitation as we now make to

every nation, to every race and skin, white men, red men, yellow men,

black men; hospitality of fair field and equal laws to all.[238] Let them

compete, and success to the strongest, the wisest and the best. The land

is wide enough, the soil has bread for all.

I hope America will come to have its pride in being a nation of servants,

and not of the served. How can men have any other ambition where the

reason has not suffered a disastrous eclipse? Whilst every man can say I

serve,—to the whole extent of my being I apply my faculty to the service

of mankind in my especial place,—he therein sees and shows a reason for

his being in the world, and is not a moth or incumbrance in it.

The distinction and end of a soundly constituted man is his labor. Use

is inscribed on all his faculties. Use is the end to which he exists. As

the tree exists for its fruit, so a man for his work. A fruitless plant,

an idle animal, does not stand in the universe. They are all toiling,

however secretly or slowly, in the province assigned them, and to a use

in the economy of the world; the higher and more complex organizations to

higher and more catholic service. And man seems to play, by his instincts

and activity, a certain part that even tells on the general face of

the planet, drains swamps, leads rivers into dry countries for their

irrigation, perforates forests and stony mountain chains with roads,

hinders the inroads of the sea on the continent, as if dressing the globe

for happier races.

On the whole, I know that the cosmic results will be the same, whatever

the daily events may be. Happily we are under better guidance than

of statesmen. Pennsylvania coal-mines and New York shipping and free

labor, though not idealists, gravitate in the ideal direction. Nothing

less large than justice can keep them in good temper. Justice satisfies

everybody, and justice alone. No monopoly must be foisted in, no weak

party or nationality sacrificed, no coward compromise conceded to a

strong partner. Every one of these is the seed of vice, war and national

disorganization. It is our part to carry out to the last the ends of

liberty and justice. We shall stand, then, for vast interests; north

and south, east and west will be present to our minds, and our vote

will be as if they voted, and we shall know that our vote secures the

foundations of the state, good will, liberty and security of traffic and

of production, and mutual increase of good will in the great interests.

Our helm is given up to a better guidance than our own; the course of

events is quite too strong for any helmsman, and our little wherry is

taken in tow by the ship of the great Admiral which knows the way, and

has the force to draw men and states and planets to their good.

Such and so potent is this high method by which the Divine Providence

sends the chiefest benefits under the mask of calamities, that I do not

think we shall by any perverse ingenuity prevent the blessing.

In seeing this guidance of events, in seeing this felicity without

example that has rested on the Union thus far, I find new confidence for

the future.

I could heartily wish that our will and endeavor were more active parties

to the work. But I see in all directions the light breaking. Trade and

government will not alone be the favored aims of mankind, but every

useful, every elegant art, every exercise of the imagination, the height

of reason, the noblest affection, the purest religion will find their

home in our institutions, and write our laws for the benefit of men.[239]

Miscellanies(#71812) · 第 157 / 201 题