AT THE OPENING OF THE CONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY

The people of Massachusetts prize the simple political arrangement

of towns, each independent in its local government, electing its own

officers, assessing its taxes, caring for its schools, its charities,

its highways. That town is attractive to its native citizens and to

immigrants which has a healthy site, good land, good roads, good

sidewalks, a good hotel; still more, if it have an adequate town hall,

good churches, good preachers, good schools, and if it avail itself

of the Act of the Legislature authorizing towns to tax themselves for

the establishment of a public library. Happier, if it contain citizens

who cannot wait for the slow growth of the population to make these

advantages adequate to the desires of the people, but make costly gifts

to education, civility and culture, as in the act we are met to witness

and acknowledge to-day.

I think we cannot easily overestimate the benefit conferred. In the

details of this munificence, we may all anticipate a sudden and lasting

prosperity to this ancient town, in the benefit of a noble library, which

adds by the beauty of the building, and its skilful arrangement, a quite

new attraction,—making readers of those who are not readers,—making

scholars of those who only read newspapers or novels until now; and

whilst it secures a new and needed culture to our citizens, offering a

strong attraction to strangers who are seeking a country home to sit down

here. And I am not sure that when Boston learns the good deed of Mr.

Munroe, it will not be a little envious, nor rest until it has annexed

Concord to the city. Our founder has found the many admirable examples

which have lately honored the country, of benefactors who have not waited

to bequeath colleges and hospitals, but have themselves built them,

reminding us of Sir Isaac Newton’s saying, “that they who give nothing

before their death, never in fact give at all.”

I think it is not easy to exaggerate the utility of the beneficence which

takes this form. If you consider what has befallen you when reading

a poem, or a history, or a tragedy, or a novel, even, that deeply

interested you,—how you forgot the time of day, the persons sitting in

the room, and the engagements for the evening, you will easily admit the

wonderful property of books to make all towns equal: that Concord Library

makes Concord as good as Rome, Paris or London, for the hour;—has the

best of each of those cities in itself. Robinson Crusoe, could he have

had a shelf of our books, could almost have done without his man Friday,

or even the arriving ship.

Every faculty casts itself into an art, and memory into the art of

writing, that is, the book. The sedge _Papyrus_, which gave its name to

our word paper, is of more importance to history than cotton, or silver,

or gold. Its first use for writing is between three and four thousand

years old, and though it hardly grows now in Egypt, where I lately looked

for it in vain, I always remember with satisfaction that I saw that

venerable plant in 1833, growing wild at Syracuse, in Sicily, near the

fountain of Arethusa.

The chairman of Mr. Munroe’s trustees has told you how old is the

foundation of our village library, and we think we can trace in our

modest records a correspondent effect of culture amidst our citizens. A

deep religious sentiment is, in all times, an inspirer of the intellect,

and that was not wanting here. The town was settled by a pious company

of non-conformists from England, and the printed books of their pastor

and leader, Rev. Peter Bulkeley, sometime fellow of Saint John’s College

in Cambridge, England, testify the ardent sentiment which they shared.

“There is no people,” said he to his little flock of exiles, “but will

strive to excel in something. What can we excel in if not in holiness?

If we look to number, we are the fewest; if to strength, we are the

weakest; if to wealth and riches, we are the poorest of all the people

of God through the whole world. We cannot excel, nor so much as equal

other people in these things, and if we come short in grace and holiness

too, we are the most despicable people under heaven. Strive we therefore

herein to excel, and suffer not this crown to be taken away from us.”[222]

The religious bias of our founders had its usual effect to secure an

education to read their Bible and hymn-book, and thence the step was easy

for active minds to an acquaintance with history and with poetry. Peter

Bulkeley sent his son John to the first class that graduated at Harvard

College in 1642, and two sons to later classes. Major Simon Willard’s son

Samuel graduated at Harvard in 1659, and was for six years, from 1701 to

1707, vice-president of the college; and his son Joseph was president of

the college from 1781 to 1804; and Concord counted fourteen graduates of

Harvard in its first century, and its representation there increased with

its gross population.[223]

I possess the manuscript journal of a lady, native of this town (and

descended from three of its clergymen), who removed into Maine, where she

possessed a farm and a modest income. She was much addicted to journeying

and not less to reading, and whenever she arrived in a town where was a

good minister who had a library, she would persuade him to receive her

as a boarder, and would stay until she had looked over all his volumes

which were to her taste. On a very cold day, she writes in her diary,

“Life truly resembles a river—ever the same—never the same; and perhaps

a greater variety of internal emotions would be felt by remaining with

books in one place than pursuing the waves which are ever the same. Is

the melancholy bird of night, covered with the dark foliage of the willow

and cypress, less gratified than the gay lark amid the flowers and suns?

I think that you never enjoy so much as in solitude with a book that

meets the feelings,” and in reference to her favorite authors, she adds,

“The delight in others’ superiority is my best gift from God.”[224]

Lemuel Shattuck, by his history of the town, has made all of us grateful

to his memory as a careful student and chronicler; but events so

important have occurred in the forty years since that book was published,

that it now needs a second volume.

Henry Thoreau we all remember as a man of genius, and of marked

character, known to our farmers as the most skilful of surveyors, and

indeed better acquainted with their forests and meadows and trees than

themselves, but more widely known as the writer of some of the best books

which have been written in this country, and which, I am persuaded, have

not yet gathered half their fame. He, too, was an excellent reader.

No man would have rejoiced more than he in the event of this day. In

a private letter to a lady, he writes, “Do you read any noble verses?

For my part, they have been the only things I remembered,—or that which

occasioned them,—when all things else were blurred and defaced.[225]

All things have put on mourning but they: for the elegy itself is some

victorious melody in you, escaping from the wreck. It is a relief to read

some true books wherein all are equally dead, equally alive. I think the

best parts of Shakspeare would only be enhanced by the most thrilling and

affecting events. I have found it so: and all the more, that they are not

intended for consolation.”

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s residence in the Manse gave new interest to that

house whose windows overlooked the retreat of the British soldiers in

1775, and his careful studies of Concord life and history are known

wherever the English language is spoken.[226]

I know the word literature has in many ears a hollow sound. It is thought

to be the harmless entertainment of a few fanciful persons, and not at

all to be the interest of the multitude. To these objections, which

proceed on the cheap notion that nothing but what grinds corn, roasts

mutton and weaves cotton, is anything worth, I have little to say.

There are utilitarians who prefer that Jesus should have wrought as a

carpenter, and Saint Paul as a tent-maker. But literature is the record

of the best thoughts. Every attainment and discipline which increases a

man’s acquaintance with the invisible world lifts his being. Everything

that gives him a new perception of beauty multiplies his pure enjoyments.

A river of thought is always running out of the invisible world into

the mind of man. Shall not they who received the largest streams spread

abroad the healing waters?

It was the symbolical custom of the ancient Mexican priests, after the

annual extinction of the household fires of their land, to procure in

the temple fire from the sun, and thence distribute it as a sacred gift

to every hearth in the nation. It is a just type of the service rendered

to mankind by wise men. Homer and Plato and Pindar and Shakspeare serve

many more than have heard their names. Thought is the most volatile of

all things. It cannot be contained in any cup, though you shut the lid

never so tight. Once brought into the world, it runs over the vessel

which received it into all minds that love it. The very language we speak

thinks for us by the subtle distinctions which already are marked for us

by its words, and every one of these is the contribution of the wit of

one and another sagacious man in all the centuries of time.

Consider that it is our own state of mind at any time that makes our

estimate of life and the world. If you sprain your foot, you will

presently come to think that Nature has sprained hers. Everything begins

to look so slow and inaccessible. And when you sprain your mind, by

gloomy reflection on your failures and vexations, you come to have a bad

opinion of life. Think how indigent Nature must appear to the blind,

the deaf, and the idiot. Now if you can kindle the imagination by a

new thought, by heroic histories, by uplifting poetry, instantly you

expand,—are cheered, inspired, and become wise, and even prophetic. Music

works this miracle for those who have a good ear; what omniscience has

music! so absolutely impersonal, and yet every sufferer feels his secret

sorrow reached. Yet to a scholar the book is as good or better. There is

no hour of vexation which on a little reflection will not find diversion

and relief in the library. His companions are few: at the moment, he has

none: but, year by year, these silent friends supply their place. Many

times the reading of a book has made the fortune of the man,—has decided

his way of life. It makes friends. ’Tis a tie between men to have been

delighted with the same book. Every one of us is always in search of his

friend, and when unexpectedly he finds a stranger enjoying the rare poet

or thinker who is dear to his own solitude,—it is like finding a brother.

Dr. Johnson hearing that Adam Smith, whom he had once met, relished

rhyme, said, “If I had known that, I should have hugged him.”

We expect a great man to be a good reader, or in proportion to the

spontaneous power should be the assimilating power. There is a wonderful

agreement among eminent men of all varieties of character and condition

in their estimate of books. Julius Cæsar, when shipwrecked, and forced

to swim for life, did not gather his gold, but took his Commentaries

between his teeth and swam for the shore. Even the wild and warlike

Arab Mahomet said, “Men are either learned or learning: the rest are

blockheads.” The great Duke of Marlborough could not encamp without his

Shakspeare. The Duchess d’Abrantes, wife of Marshal Junot, tells us that

Bonaparte, in hastening out of France to join his army in Germany, tossed

his journals and books out of his travelling carriage as fast as he had

read them, and strewed the highway with pamphlets. Napoleon’s reading

could not be large, but his criticism is sometimes admirable, as reported

by Las Casas; and Napoleon was an excellent writer. Montesquieu, one of

the greatest minds that France has produced, writes: “The love of study

is in us almost the only eternal passion. All the others quit us in

proportion as this miserable machine which gives them to us approaches

its ruin. Study has been for me the sovereign remedy against the disgusts

of life, never having had a chagrin which an hour of reading has not put

to flight.” Hear the testimony of Seldon, the oracle of the English House

of Commons in Cromwell’s time. “Patience is the chiefest fruit of study.

A man, that strives to make himself a different thing from other men

by much reading gains this chiefest good, that in all fortunes he hath

something to entertain and comfort himself withal.”

I have found several humble men and women who gave as affectionate, if

not as judicious testimony to their readings. One curious witness was

that of a Shaker who, when showing me the houses of the Brotherhood, and

a very modest bookshelf, said there was Milton’s Paradise Lost, and some

other books in the house, and added “that he knew where they were, but he

took up a sound cross in not reading them.”

In 1618 (8th March) John Kepler came upon the discovery of the law

connecting the mean distances of the planets with the periods of their

revolution about the sun, that the squares of the times vary as the cubes

of the distances. And he writes, “It is now eighteen months since I got

the first glimpse of light,—three months since the dawn,—very few days

since the unveiled sun, most admirable to gaze on, burst out upon me.

Nothing holds me. I will indulge in my sacred fury. I will triumph over

mankind by the honest confession that I have stolen the golden vases of

the Egyptians[227] to build up a tabernacle for my God far away from the

confines of Egypt. If you forgive me, I rejoice; if you are angry, I can

bear it: the die is cast; the book is written; to be read either now or

by posterity. I care not which. It may well wait a century for a reader,

since God has waited six thousand years for an observer like myself.”

In books I have the history or the energy of the past. Angels they are to

us of entertainment, sympathy and provocation. With them many of us spend

the most of our life,—these silent guides,—these tractable prophets,

historians, and singers, whose embalmed life is the highest feat of

art; who now cast their moonlight illumination over solitude, weariness

and fallen fortunes. You say, ’tis a languid pleasure. Yes, but its

tractableness, coming and going like a dog at our bidding, compensates

the quietness, and contrasts with the slowness of fortune and the

inaccessibleness of persons.

You meet with a man of science, a good thinker or good wit,—but you do

not know how to draw out of him that which he knows. But the book is a

sure friend, always ready at your first leisure,—opens to the very page

you desire, and shuts at your first fatigue,—as possibly your professor

might not.

It is a tie between men to have read the same book, and it is a

disadvantage not to have read the book your mates have read, or not to

have read it at the same time, so that it may take the place in your

culture it does in theirs, and you shall understand their allusions to

it, and not give it more or less emphasis than they do. Yet the strong

character does not need this sameness of culture. The imagination knows

its own food in every pasture, and if it has not had the Arabian Nights,

Prince Le Boo, or Homer or Scott, has drawn equal delight and terror from

haunts and passages which you will hear of with envy.

In saying these things for books, I do not for a moment forget that they

are secondary, mere means, and only used in the off-hours, only in the

pause, and, as it were, the sleep, or passive state of the mind. The

intellect reserves all its rights. Instantly, when the mind itself wakes,

all books, all past acts are forgotten, huddled aside as impertinent

in the august presence of the creator. Their costliest benefit is that

they set us free from themselves; for they wake the imagination and the

sentiment,—and in their inspirations we dispense with books. Let me add

then,—read proudly; put the duty of being read invariably on the author.

If he is not read, whose fault is it? I am quite ready to be charmed,—but

I shall not make believe I am charmed.

But there is no end to the praise of books, to the value of the

library. Who shall estimate their influence on our population where

all the millions read and write? It is the joy of nations that man can

communicate all his thoughts, discoveries and virtues to records that may

last for centuries.

But I am pleading a cause which in the event of this day has already won:

and I am happy in the assurance that the whole assembly to whom I speak

entirely sympathize in the feeling of this town in regard to the new

Library, and its honored Founder.

Miscellanies(#71812) · 第 154 / 201 题