ROBERT BURNS

MR. PRESIDENT, AND GENTLEMEN: I do not know by what untoward accident

it has chanced, and I forbear to inquire, that, in this accomplished

circle, it should fall to me, the worst Scotsman of all, to receive your

commands, and at the latest hour too, to respond to the sentiment just

offered, and which indeed makes the occasion. But I am told there is

no appeal, and I must trust to the inspirations of the theme to make a

fitness which does not otherwise exist. Yet, Sir, I heartily feel the

singular claims of the occasion. At the first announcement, from I know

not whence, that the 25th of January was the hundredth anniversary of the

birth of Robert Burns, a sudden consent warmed the great English race, in

all its kingdoms, colonies and states, all over the world, to keep the

festival. We are here to hold our parliament with love and poesy, as men

were wont to do in the Middle Ages. Those famous parliaments might or

might not have had more stateliness and better singers than we,—though

that is yet to be known,—but they could not have better reason. I can

only explain this singular unanimity in a race which rarely acts

together, but rather after their watch-word, Each for himself,—by the

fact that Robert Burns, the poet of the middle class, represents in the

mind of men to-day that great uprising of the middle class against the

armed and privileged minorities, that uprising which worked politically

in the American and French Revolutions, and which, not in governments so

much as in education and social order, has changed the face of the world.

In order for this destiny, his birth, breeding and fortunes were

low. His organic sentiment was absolute independence, and resting as

it should on a life of labor. No man existed who could look down on

him. They that looked into his eyes saw that they might look down the

sky as easily.[210] His muse and teaching was common sense, joyful,

aggressive, irresistible. Not Latimer, nor Luther struck more telling

blows against false theology than did this brave singer. The Confession

of Augsburg, the Declaration of Independence, the French Rights of Man,

and the Marseillaise, are not more weighty documents in the history of

freedom than the songs of Burns. His satire has lost none of its edge.

His musical arrows yet sing through the air. He is so substantially

a reformer that I find his grand plain sense in close chain with the

greatest masters,—Rabelais, Shakspeare in comedy, Cervantes, Butler,

and Burns. If I should add another name, I find it only in a living

countryman of Burns.[211]

He is an exceptional genius. The people who care nothing for literature

and poetry care for Burns. It was indifferent—they thought who saw

him—whether he wrote verse or not: he could have done anything else as

well. Yet how true a poet is he! And the poet, too, of poor men, of

gray hodden and the guernsey coat and the blouse. He has given voice

to all the experiences of common life; he has endeared the farmhouse

and cottage, patches and poverty, beans and barley; ale, the poor man’s

wine; hardship; the fear of debt; the dear society of weans and wife, of

brothers and sisters, proud of each other, knowing so few and finding

amends for want and obscurity in books and thoughts.[212] What a love of

Nature, and, shall I say it? of middle-class Nature. Not like Goethe, in

the stars, or like Byron, in the ocean, or Moore, in the luxurious East,

but in the homely landscape which the poor see around them,—bleak leagues

of pasture and stubble, ice and sleet and rain and snow-choked brooks;

birds, hares, field-mice, thistles and heather, which he daily knew. How

many “Bonny Doons” and “John Anderson my jo’s” and “Auld lang synes” all

around the earth have his verses been applied to! And his love-songs

still woo and melt the youths and maids; the farm-work, the country

holiday, the fishing-cobble are still his debtors to-day.

And as he was thus the poet of the poor, anxious, cheerful, working

humanity, so had he the language of low life. He grew up in a rural

district, speaking a _patois_ unintelligible to all but natives, and

he has made the Lowland Scotch a Doric dialect of fame. It is the only

example in history of a language made classic by the genius of a single

man. But more than this. He had that secret of genius to draw from the

bottom of society the strength of its speech, and astonish the ears of

the polite with these artless words, better than art, and filtered of all

offence through his beauty. It seemed odious to Luther that the devil

should have all the best tunes; he would bring them into the churches;

and Burns knew how to take from fairs and gypsies, blacksmiths and

drovers, the speech of the market and street, and clothe it with melody.

But I am detaining you too long. The memory of Burns,—I am afraid heaven

and earth have taken too good care of it to leave us anything to say. The

west winds are murmuring it. Open the windows behind you, and hearken for

the incoming tide, what the waves say of it. The doves perching always

on the eaves of the Stone Chapel opposite, may know something about

it. Every name in broad Scotland keeps his fame bright. The memory of

Burns,—every man’s, every boy’s and girl’s head carries snatches of his

songs, and they say them by heart, and, what is strangest of all, never

learned them from a book, but from mouth to mouth. The wind whispers

them, the birds whistle them, the corn, barley, and bulrushes hoarsely

rustle them, nay, the music-boxes at Geneva are framed and toothed to

play them; the hand-organs of the Savoyards in all cities repeat them,

and the chimes of bells ring them in the spires. They are the property

and the solace of mankind.[213]

Miscellanies(#71812) · 第 127 / 201 题