Aggressive measures were taken by Selim, Souliman’s successor, who,

after long years of peace between the two powers, summoned Venice, in

1570, to surrender the Island of Cyprus. One hundred and seventy-one

Ottoman galleys supported the demand. Venice had tried to get the

Christian powers to coöperate against the Turks, even calling on the

Persians and the Arab tribes of Yemen to aid her in the defense of the

island. But the arms of the Turkish generals soon prevailed. The chief

fortress of the island, Famagusta, capitulated in 1571; and with its

fall the Turks began the occupation of the island, which only ended

after the war between Turkey and Russia in 1878.

During the progress of the siege an anti-Turkish league had been

completed, composed of Venice and the Papacy, Spain, the Knights of

Malta, and many Italian states. The result was the despatch of a large

fleet under the command of Don John of Austria, at this time a youth

of only twenty-two years. The objective of the armada was Patras,

because, in the Gulf of Lepanto, close at hand, all of the squadrons

of the Turkish navy were assembled. In all, the allies had 208 ships

of war, the Ottomans slightly more, but the weakness of the Turks was

due to the lack of soldiers to defend their fleet. There were but

2500 Janitschars on their galleys, the rest were troops raised from

continental Greece, 22,000 in all, who were either new recruits or

were not trained for naval warfare. Among the Turkish captains were

present many older men who desired to avoid conflict with the Christian

armada. Of a different temper were Hassan Pasha, the son of the famous

Kheir-ed-Din, and Ali-Muezzin-Zade, the new captain pasha of the whole

fleet.

The Christian fleet was in an admirable state of preparation for the

fight. It was composed entirely of armed vessels directed by skilful

rowers; besides the 203 galleys there were six galiasses, great

floating citadels carrying heavy artillery and 500 soldiers. Don

John had also armed the Venetian vessels with contingents of Spanish

infantry. On the side of the Christians there was the additional

advantage of superior equipment in armor and weapons for the individual

warrior. The soldiers wore helmets and breastplates, and were armed

with arquebuses, while the Turks used lances and arrows. There were

also superior numbers on the side of the allies, the fighting men

numbering between 28,000 and 29,000.

The two fleets took up the same position and adopted the same tactics.

In the center on each side were collected the largest ships under the

command of the respective chief admirals. Some initial successes were

won by the Ottomans over the division made up of the Venetian vessels,

but in the center, after desperate fighting, the men under Don John,

owing to their superior weapons, got the better of their enemies, and

the captain pasha was killed. The Algerian vessels showed much tactical

superiority to the Christian right wing, under the command of John

Andrew Doria; but, although they inflicted much damage, they could not

save the day for the Ottomans. The victory cost the Christians dear,

for they lost 12 galleys and 7500 men. But the defeat of the Turks was

overwhelming; 15 galleys were sunk, 177 were captured, and many pashas

and governors of provinces lost their lives; 12,000 to 15,000 of the

galley slaves on the Turkish vessels, Christian captives, were set free.

Such was the remarkable victory of October 7, 1571, remarkable not only

for the heroism displayed, and the sensation caused by the success of

the Christians, who had for so long been incapable of resisting Ottoman

aggression, but also because of the small practical results produced.

The Christian armada returned to Corfu, and from there made for the

coast of Italy, where it disbanded. On the side of the vanquished,

Euldj-Ali, gathering together eighty-seven ships as a nucleus for a

new Ottoman fleet, sailed into the harbor of Constantinople, and was

welcomed as a conqueror by the Sultan and the grand vizier, Sokoli. New

honors were heaped upon him, not altogether undeserved, for during the

winter a new fleet, larger and better armed than the one destroyed, was

made ready for sea.

The recuperative energy of the Ottoman Empire was not lost on the

Venetians, and their agent at Constantinople, Antonio Barbaro, saw that

there was more than an empty boast in the words of the Vizier, who

said to him, “There is a great difference between your loss and ours.

By taking from you the Kingdom of Cyprus we have cut off your arm; by

defeating our fleet you have only shaved our beard. A beard grows out

thicker for being shaven.” This argument appealed to the republic, and

in 1573 peace was made. The conditions were the cession of Cyprus,

the payment of a heavy war indemnity by Venice, and a regulation of

the frontier in Albania and Dalmatia, that secured to the Turks their

ancient possessions there. The Venetians also were required to increase

the annual tribute exacted for the Island of Zante, which was still in

their hands.

Three generations after the taking of Cyprus the long-coveted island

of Crete, or Candia, was annexed to the Ottoman Empire. Hostilities

began between Venice and Sultan Ibrahim I, because of the seizure by

the Knights of Malta of a Turkish vessel carrying high officials of the

court to Egypt. The Maltese ships were received in the friendly harbors

of Crete, where they took refuge. In April, 1645, a great fleet of 302

ships, and a large army of over 100,000 men, commanded by a Dalmatian,

Pasha Joseph Markovitch, set sail for Crete. In June, one of the two

chief fortresses of the island, Canea, was invested. After two months’

siege it surrendered. In 1648 began the first siege of Candia, but this

stronghold proved as hard to capture as Rhodes. During the course of

twenty-one years it was the objective of repeated attacks on the part

of the Turks, and only fell into their hands in 1669.

As has been seen, the Ottoman Empire began to decay from the top. The

Sultan finally became the mere figurehead of palace intrigues, and the

effect of the rottenness in the supreme head of a centralized military

despotism was widespread. Taxation became extravagantly burdensome;

the royal domains were alienated, the coinage was debased, offices

were sold to the highest bidder, and this general venality caused the

disappearance of the military fiefs from which the armies of the empire

had been recruited.

The Janitschars lost their characteristic qualities as warriors when

the custom of recruiting them from the Christian population was

abandoned. They finally degenerated into a mere rabble of turbulent

blackguards, composed of the worst elements of all nationalities,

Christian and Moslem, who disappeared from the ranks during a war,

or fled from the battlefield and lived normally by blackmail or

by illicit trading. The abandonment of this living tithe was due

probably to the jealousy of the Moslem families, who objected to the

monopolizing by men of Christian birth of the lucrative privileges

attached to an élite corps. The last time the tithe was collected

was in 1676, when 3000 youths were brought in as recruits. With the

abolition of the Janitschars dates the rise of the bands of brigands

among both the Slavic and Hellenic populations. The able-bodied members

of the conquered races found in this sphere of activity a chance for

developing their capacities in guerrilla warfare; with the training

and traditions so acquired they were able in later years to act as

the leaders in the national movements which, during the course of the

nineteenth century, ended in the dismemberment of the Ottoman provinces

in Europe.

* * * * *

SPANISH CONQUERORS

I THE SPANIARD AND THE NEW WORLD

In the century which followed the discovery of America, not only was

the lead in initiative taken by Spain never lost, but she practically

had no competitors in the conquest and colonization of the New World.

If the lines of medieval enterprise had been followed in the opening

up of new territories for economic development, it should have fallen

either to Venice or to Genoa to undertake the work of exploration

and exploitation of these unknown regions. But times had changed,

and the Italian republics had changed with them. Under the stress of

the Turkish conquests, which had led to the organization of a great

military and naval power in the East, Venice could follow nothing but

a policy of self-protection that admitted neither of expansion nor of

adventure. Internal changes in the Italian peninsula, indicated by

the overlordship of Milan, had reduced the power of Genoa, which had

already been weakened by her long contest with Venice for the naval

mastery of the Mediterranean.

The rise of Spain was phenomenal; nothing exactly resembling it had

been seen before, except in the case of those great tribal or national

invasions that so often altered the face of Europe. For centuries,

like Italy before the advent of Italian unity, Spain was only a

geographical expression. Only fourteen years before Columbus’ first

voyage, the marriage of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile had

consolidated the royal power on the Iberian peninsula and made these

two Spanish monarchs lords of the whole land south of the Pyrenees,

except in the kingdoms of Granada in the south, of Portugal in the

west, and of Navarre in the north. A steady policy of aggression and

conquest soon brought about the disappearance of the small kingdom of

Granada. Between 1486 and 1489 Loja, Malaga, and Baza had been taken;

Granada alone held out a few years more. Ferdinand, a most astute

monarch of the type of Louis XI of France and Henry VII of England, had

already crushed the Portuguese faction in Castile, who had favored the

alliance of their queen with the King of Portugal. His ideals were for

an absolute monarchy, which, by the elimination of feudal traditions

and by the accumulation of wealth, might become the predominant power

in western Europe.

There was no reason for Spain to become a colonizing power in the

modern sense, since the peninsula was a sparsely populated country,

large tracts of land having been opened up for occupation by the

Christian conquests of Moorish territory. In preceding centuries,

when the Christian princes began to win back, piece by piece, the

lands belonging to the Moslems, a conciliatory policy had been adopted

towards the conquered race; the Moors had kept their personal liberties

and had been encouraged to group themselves in autonomous communities

in the suburbs of Christian cities. Even when Granada was taken,

favorable terms were given to its inhabitants, although in the end the

promises were broken. They were conceded liberty of person, trade,

education, and worship, the protection of Mohammedan law, administered

by Mohammedan judges, and the benefit of mixed tribunals. But here and

elsewhere Ferdinand’s methods were a consistent application of the

principles of an autocrat, and, when the New World fell as a prize to

the Spanish conquerors, the usages of expansion by conquest at home

in the Iberian peninsula were mercilessly applied. When Malaga was

taken, the captive inhabitants were sold as slaves; one-third of the

proceeds of the sale was taken for the redemption of Christian captives

in Africa; another was given to those who had served in the army of

occupation either as mercenaries or as officials, and the remaining

portion was paid into the royal treasury. As to the land, it was laid

out for a colony. The large tracts opened to colonization were offered

on easy conditions to the Christian inhabitants of Spain.

It was not land hunger, therefore, which prompted the Spanish monarchs

to accept Columbus’ scheme of a westward route to the rich empires of

the Orient. Profit-bringing trade by which stores of specie could be

accumulated attracted the founders of Spanish absolutism. The project

itself was not viewed with skepticism; its scientific basis was cogent;

there were besides widely circulated stories of land existing in the

West. But the one practical difficulty in the way of fitting out the

proposed expedition was the war with the Moors of Granada, by which the

Spanish treasury had been exhausted. After the city fell in January,

1492, several months were spent in haggling over terms. Columbus

had made up his mind that if the voyage were sucessful he should be

adequately rewarded for his trouble. Apart from conditions as to

offices and the administration of the newly acquired possessions, it

was agreed that he was to receive one clear tenth of all merchandise,

whether gold, silver, pearls, spices, or whatsoever else was gained

or gotten for the crown in his new jurisdiction. Moreover, there was

a further clause inserted that in case Columbus should choose to

contribute to the equipment of vessels employed in the new trade to

the extent of one-eighth, he was to be at liberty to do so, thereby

entitling himself to one-eighth part of the profits.

The prospects of a great trading adventure seemed altogether alluring.

It must be remembered that the discoverer carried with him a letter

from the Catholic monarchs to the Grand Khan of Tartary; and that

it was this opening up of a direct trade route, with enormous

possibilities for commercial profit, that inspired the Spanish conquest

of America. Even after the configuration of the new continent had

been made out by later voyagers, the fascination of establishing

a connection with the Orient remained a strong inducement. Then

as it faded away as an immediate possibility, the opportunity of

securing large hoards of the precious metals stimulated discovery and

exploration. The lust of territorial conquest remained associated with

the lust of gold. The Spanish adventurer had no ideal aims; he was

not attracted by the American continent because it offered a new home

or because it presented a chance for trying political experiments.

There was the same single-mindedness in the conquistador ideal as is

seen to-day in the trust magnate who is searching for oil wells. The

sordid aims called forth by the success of Columbus’ expedition were

not developed by the contest with the natives occupying the lands whose

possession was coveted.

When the Spanish conquerors arrived in those unknown islands of

the western sea the American continent was held by a number of the

Turanian races which had one time peopled most of the Old World. Only

a few relics of their predominance are seen in the Europe of to-day

in the Basques, the Finns, and the Esthonians. Long before historical

times the process of uniting Asia and Europe with America had begun.

Probably thousands of years before the rise of Caucasian civilization

along the Nile and the Euphrates, Turanian hordes found their way

across the Behring Straits. Little capacity for attaining the arts of

civilized life was shown by the American Turanians; there were, it is

true, differences in social organization, but the general level of

civilization was not far above the savage type, even in the Valley of

Mexico or in Quito and Cuzco in South America.

Those who took part in the overthrow of the Aztec and Inca governments

magnified their own achievements by describing themselves as the

conquerors of great civilized empires. Such fictions were natural in

men who desired to exalt the difficulties of a suddenly achieved fame,

and the exaggeration was the more easily believed because of their

seizure of large stores of those precious metals by which, in the Old

World, progress in civilization was measured. From the point of view

both of the home government and of those who took part in the first

cycle of voyages, there was not much encouragement of profit to be

derived in the islands and shores of the mainland touched by Columbus

and by those who worked under his leadership and inspiration from

1492-1517--that is, during the first twenty-five years of Spanish

conquest.

In the first voyage of Columbus much of the coast of Hayti was explored

because of the stories told as to the existence of gold on the

island. In the second expedition, made the following year, Dominica,

Guadeloupe, Puerto Rico, Jamaica were discovered. The foundation of the

first Spanish city on the island of Hayti was laid; then the explorer

passed along the north coast of Cuba, which especially interested him

because he took it to be the mainland of Cathay and Cipango not far

from Malacca. In 1498, after discovering Trinidad, he reached the

South American continent at the mouth of the Orinoco River, which was

identified by him as one of the streams of the terrestrial paradise.

Then followed complaints of administrative abuses which led to

Columbus’ return to the Spanish peninsula as a prisoner.

There was a fourth voyage in 1502 which extended as far as Honduras.

After showing a piece of gold to the natives Columbus inquired of them

by signs where the metal could be found. They pointed to the east,

and after some further communications Columbus was convinced that the

land of Cathay lay in that direction. He spent many weeks afterward in

tacking along the shore against adverse winds and currents. Finally he

landed at a place called by the natives Veragua, where the signs of

civilized life, indicated by the village communities and the numbers

of temples and sepulchers constructed of stone and lime, and suitably

decorated, and, above all, the abundance of gold demonstrated to him

that he had reached the golden Chersonese of the East. This was the

land, he was sure, that had furnished King Solomon with his famous

treasures. He set out from Veragua certain of discovering after a few

leagues’ journey the straits of Malacca. After that, to reach the mouth

of the Ganges would only be a matter of a few days. When he found the

peninsula larger than he expected, he turned back to Veragua, meaning

to found a permanent settlement there; but the warlike natives forced

him to take refuge on his ships. Disheartened, the explorer withdrew

to Hayti, from whence he returned to Spain, where he died on May 20,

1506.

There was a curious vein of mysticism in Columbus’ character, which

comes out in a quotation made by him in his later years, from the

famous medieval Apocalyptic, Joachim of Calabria. “The Rabbi Joachim,”

he writes, “says that out of Spain shall come he who shall rebuild the

House of Mount Zion.” His discovery, the explorer explained, would

bring about the recovery of the Holy City and of the Sepulcher of

Christ by means of the gold which would be found in the Indies. When he

returned the first time from Hayti to Spain, he wrote that those whom

he left behind would easily collect a ton of gold while he was absent,

and that, therefore, in less than three years the capture of the Holy

Sepulcher and the conquest of Jerusalem could be undertaken. Later on,

he provided that the accumulated income of his property, which was to

be invested in shares of the Bank of St. George in Genoa paying six

per cent., should to the extent of one-half go to aid the expenses of

recovering the holy places in Palestine.

The constant quest for gold that stimulated the voyages of the great

explorer had, therefore, its basis in this extraordinary and fanatical

revival of the spirit which had once inspired the Crusades. It was

almost a mania with Columbus, whose letters contain eulogies on gold:

“Who hath this, hath all that can be desired in the world; gold can

even bring souls into Paradise.” Though the metal could not be found

in great quantities, he discovered nevertheless a way by which the

New World might be made to yield the gold which was wanted. It was

Columbus who started in America the traffic in human beings. The day

after he arrived in the West Indies, he talked of the prospect of

using the Indians for slave traffic, and he promised to send to Europe

a whole shipful of these idolaters. He kept his promise also, for

in 1495 he sent five hundred Indian captives to be sold at Seville.

The next year three hundred more arrived at Cadiz. It has been not

unnaturally supposed that the harsh treatment received later on by the

explorer at the hands of the governor of Hayti had a close connection

with Columbus’ persistent policy of recruiting slave gangs from the

natives of the islands he had visited. It is certain that Isabella

was so outraged by the constant stream of West Indian slaves which

had its source in Columbus’ discoveries that she frequently directed

their repatriation. It is significant also that Bobadilla, the man who

sent Columbus back to Spain in irons, is spoken of by Las Casas as an

upright and humane person.

This willingness to allow the inauguration of a trade in slaves in

lieu of the export from the New World of the precious metal which was

so persistently sought for may be also explained by the strangeness

and uncouthness of the inhabitants of the West Indian islands. Apart

from the Mexicans and Peruvians, the greatest extent of the New World

was inhabited by peoples who had not yet got beyond the hunting stages

of culture. They used, of course, articulate speech, they had the

knowledge of fire, and employed a few rude instruments of stone and

wood, but they were essentially savages, and up to this time man in an

actually savage stage was not known to Europeans--even to travelers.

Marco Polo, indeed, had told of the existence in the East of races who

devoured human flesh, but he was not believed. It was the voyage of

Columbus that revealed the practice to be a literal fact and gave it

such impressive emphasis that the Indian name Carib or Caribbee, in

the modified form of cannibal, came to be used to designate the savage

who feeds on human flesh. The smaller islands of the Antilles were all

occupied by branches of this parent stock, the Carib, all of whom were

distinguished by savage ferocity. The name was given them by a rival

race, the Arawaks, who under various designations lived in the four

larger islands, Cuba, Jamaica, Hayti, and Puerto Rico. Both peoples had

come from the opposite coast of South America, probably drifting to the

islands by the help of the equatorial current. On the mainland there

was constant warfare between the two, with distinct advantages on the

side of the Carib.

When Columbus reached the Antilles, the Arawaks in Cuba and in Hayti

were in process of extermination at the hands of the Caribs. The

work of subjugation commenced by the savage Carib was taken up by

the Spaniard; in a few years the Arawaks of the larger islands were

absolutely destroyed. The vigorous race in the smaller islands was

never dominated by the Spanish conquerors; even when Spanish domination

in the islands gave place to English and French rule, the Carib kept

up the contest for more than a century. But the long years of warfare

caused their numbers to dwindle away. As late as 1773 a military

expedition was ordered to be sent to the island of St. Vincent to

exterminate the Carib population, who refused to be reduced. But in

place of drastic measures it was resolved to deport them. They were

finally removed to the mainland of Honduras, where from this original

small group the increase has been so remarkable that to-day their

settlements extend from Belize to Cape Gracias a Dios.

The world's leading conquerors · 第 25 / 42 段