Roman Soldiers. (From Column of Trajan.)]

ARMA, ARMĀTŪRA (ἔντεα, τεύχεα, Hom.; ὅπλα), arms, armour. Homer

describes in various passages an entire suit of armour, and we

observe that it consisted of the same portions which were used by

the Greek soldiers ever after. Moreover, the order of putting them

on is always the same. The heavy-armed warrior, having already a

tunic around his body, and preparing for combat, puts on--1. his

greaves (κνημῖδες, _ocreae_); 2. his cuirass (θώραξ, _lorica_), to

which belonged the μίτρη underneath, and the zone (ζώνη, ζωστῆρ,

_cingulum_), above; 3. his sword (ξίφος, _ensis_, _gladius_), hung on

the left side of his body by means of a belt which passed over the

right shoulder; 4. the large round shield (σάκος, ἀσπίς, _clipeus_,

_scutum_), supported in the same manner; 5. his helmet (κόρυς, κυνέη,

_cassis_, _galea_); 6. he took his spear (ἔγχος, δόρυ, _hasta_), or

in many cases, two spears. The form and use of these portions are

described in separate articles, under their Latin names. The annexed

cut exhibits them all. Those who were defended in the manner which

has now been represented are called by Homer _aspistae_ (ἀσπισταί),

from their great shield (ἀσπίς); also _angemachi_ (ἀγχεμάχοι),

because they fought hand to hand with their adversaries; but much

more commonly _promachi_ (πρόμαχοι), because they occupied the

front of the army. In later times, the heavy-armed soldiers were

called _hoplitae_ (ὁπλίται), because the term _hopla_ (ὄπλα) more

especially denoted the defensive armour, the shield and thorax. By

wearing these they were distinguished from the light-armed (ψιλοί,

ἄνοπλοι, γυμνοί, γυμνῆται, γυμνῆτες), who, instead of being defended

by the shield and thorax, had a much slighter covering, sometimes

consisting of skins, and sometimes of leather or cloth; and instead

of the sword or lance, they commonly fought with darts, stones, bows

and arrows, or slings. Besides the heavy and light-armed soldiers,

another description of men, the _peltastae_ (πελτασταί), also

formed a part of the Greek army, though we do not hear of them in

early times. Instead of the large round shield, they carried a

smaller one called the _pelté_ (πέλτη), and in other respects their

armour, though heavier and more effective than that of the psili,

was much lighter than that of the hoplites. The weapon on which they

principally depended was the spear. The Roman legions consisted, as

the Greek infantry for the most part did, of heavy and light-armed

troops (_gravis et levis armatura_). The preceding figure represents

two heavy-armed Roman soldiers. All the essential parts of the Roman

heavy armour (_lorica_, _ensis_, _clipeus_, _galea_, _hasta_) are

mentioned together, except the spear, in a well-known passage of St.

Paul (_Eph._ vi. 17).

ARMĀRĬUM, originally a place for keeping arms, afterwards a cupboard,

in which were kept not only arms, but also clothes, books, money, and

other articles of value. The armarium was generally placed in the

atrium of the house.

ARMILLA (ψάλιον, ψέλιον, or ψέλλιον, χλιδών, ἀμφιδέα), a bracelet or

armlet, worn both by men and women. It was a favourite ornament of

the Medes and Persians. Bracelets do not appear to have been worn

among the Greeks by the male sex, but Greek ladies had bracelets of

various materials, shapes, and styles of ornament. They frequently

exhibited the form of snakes, and were in such cases called snakes

(ὄφεις) by the Athenians. According to their length, they went once,

twice, or thrice round the arm, or even a greater number of times.

The Roman generals frequently bestowed armillae upon soldiers for

deeds of extraordinary merit.

[Illustration: Armillae, Bracelets. (Museo Borbonico, vol. ii. tav.

14 vol. vii. tav. 46.)

A Smaller Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities · 第 75 / 846 题