THE SCHOOL OF FONTAINEBLEAU

The death of Perréal and Bourdichon a few years after the accession

of François I. had left France without any artists of note, save

the few foreign portrait painters employed by the Court. François

I., an enthusiastic art lover, who had seen and admired the great

Italian masters in their own country, spared no effort to attract the

leading masters to France. We have seen that he actually succeeded

in securing the services of the aged Leonardo da Vinci, and that

for a brief span Andrea del Sarto worked at his Court. When, about

1530, that art-loving king turned his attention to the decoration

of his palace at Fontainebleau, there was not a single painter of

French nationality, or artist living in France, who could have been

entrusted with so formidable a task, and François I. was again forced

to enlist the best Italian painters available for the purpose. Having

first engaged Pellegrino and other third-rate artists, he succeeded,

in 1531, in inducing the Florentine Rosso to undertake the execution

and supervision of the decorative work at Fontainebleau; and in the

following year the Bolognese Primaticcio entered his service. Both

belong to the Italian eclectic schools, and only concern us here in so

far as their example led to the founding of what has been called the

“School of Fontainebleau,” which was really an offshoot of the Italian

eclectic school.

In the early years of Rosso’s and Primaticcio’s activity at

Fontainebleau practically all the work was done by these two painters

and their Italian assistants, whose band was joined by Niccolò dell’

Abbate. It was only after the death of François I. that the teaching

of the Italian eclectics at Fontainebleau produced a generation of

French artists capable of doing justice to the decorative tasks

for which an ever-increasing demand had meanwhile arisen. That the

Louvre is singularly poor in works by these painters may partly be

accounted for by the comparative scarcity of easel pictures painted by

artists who were chiefly employed for interior decoration. There is

no reason for crediting any Frenchmen with the three anonymous school

of Fontainebleau pictures in Gallery XI.: _Diana_ (No. 1013), _The

Chastity of Scipio_ (No. 1014), and _The Toilet of Venus_ (No. 1014A).

_The Chastity of Scipio_ in particular would appear to be the work of

Niccolò dell’ Abbate.

The Louvre: Fifty Plates in Colour · 第 289 / 399 题