THE SCHOOL OF MILAN

The painters who practised in Milan in the fourteenth century were

little better than provincial craftsmen who had come within the range

of the Giottesque tradition without grasping the more vital of its

principles. Those who worked in Milanese territory in the first half of

the fifteenth century acquired some of the reflected influences which

passed from the work of Pisanello and Jacopo Bellini in Verona, and

from the more striking achievements of the Paduan and early Venetian

schools, but their work lacked all trace of originality.

A painter of the name of Michelino Molinari da Besozzo (fl. 1394-1442),

or Michele da Pavia, was painting at Milan about 1420. However,

there cannot be said to have been a school of painting, but only an

aggregation of painters in Milanese territory, prior to the arrival at

Pavia and Milan of the Brescian-born master, Vicenzo Foppa, about 1458.

Previous to that important event, if not throughout the whole range of

its activity, Milanese art lacked the higher elements of genius in all

matters æsthetic. As a school it was to the end too inclined to mere

prettiness and superficial sweetness.

The Umbrian-born architect and painter, Bramante (1444-1514), who had

received his education in Florence, painted in Lombardy from 1472-1474,

as his Panigarola frescoes now in the Brera testify. Bramante also

influenced Foppa, whose work is well defined and whose colouring is

subdued.

Side by side with Foppa at the head of the Milanese school comes

Bernardino Butinone (fl. 1450-1507), a great deal of whose work may

still be seen at Milan. A _Madonna and Child_ (No. 1523), which is

doubtfully ascribed in the Catalogue to Gregorio Schiavone, a pupil of

Squarcione at Padua, may possibly be by Butinone, whose art is marked

by an austerity and dryness which are absent from the paintings of

Zenale, who was the partner and perhaps a pupil of Butinone.

The _Circumcision, with the Portrait of the Donor_ (No. 1545), although

catalogued under the name of Bramantino, may be by Zenale (1436-1526).

This panel is inscribed “XL. ANNO 1491. F͞R] I͞A LAPUGNANVS P͞P HVMIL

CAN̄.” Bramantino (1455?-1536?), whose name was Bartolommeo Suardi,

came under the influence of Foppa and Bramante, and from the latter

acquired his _sobriquet_.

The pictures of Borgognone (1455?-1522?) are easily recognised

by the ashen grey pallor of his faces, relieved occasionally by

eyelids reddened by grief. He was a prolific painter of religious

pictures which show simple pathos. With the possible exception of

the _Family Portraits_ in the National Gallery (Nos. 779-780), which

are indeed fragments of a standard, and may have been painted by

Zenale, Borgognone, whose name was Ambrogio da Fossano, is not known

to have painted a secular subject. This typical Milanese painter

was another of the pupils of Foppa. Being an architect as well as a

painter, Borgognone delighted in giving an architectural setting to

his compositions. He also loved to introduce brightly coloured carpets

and draperies, and minutely painted jewellery into his pictures. These

characteristics are seen in his companion pictures of _St. Peter Martyr

and a Donoress_ (No. 1182), and _St. Augustine and a kneeling Donor_

(No. 1182A). The latter of this pair of panels of his early period was

purchased from Lord Aldenham in 1899 for 1000 guineas. They originally

formed part of a dismembered altarpiece, the centre panel of which is

now lost or unidentified. His _Presentation of Christ in the Temple_

(No. 1181), although originally painted on panel, was transferred to

canvas in 1885. Borgognone might almost be termed the Perugino of the

Milanese school.

The Louvre: Fifty Plates in Colour · 第 98 / 399 题