THE LATER SIENESE SCHOOL

We have already sketched the earliest period of the art of Siena, and

seen how for a brief space of time it dominated that of Tuscany. The

greater precision of the Florentine technique, and the wider mental

outlook of its artists in the fifteenth century, placed it in the van

before long.

Sano di Pietro (1406-1481), a pupil of Sassetta, undoubtedly painted

the five small characteristic panels (No. 1128-32), which illustrate

scenes from the _Life of St. Jerome_, and at one time formed the

predella of a large altarpiece. St. Jerome, with others of his order

who run away, kneels under a portico of the monastery he founded at

Bethlehem, and is extracting a thorn from the lion’s paw. According to

the legend, the lion was afterwards placed in charge of an ass which

the monks employed to carry wood; we see here that while the lion was

asleep in the heat of the day under a clump of trees, the ass was

stolen by merchants. St. Jerome naturally believed that the ass had

not been carried off by a passing caravan, but eaten by the lion, who

subsequently saw his old friend the ass in the possession of the same

merchants that chanced to pass that way again. The lion is here seen

(No. 1130) in the act of compelling, one might almost say pushing, the

ass and the other beasts of burden laden with provisions back into the

monastery, while the merchants flee away in terror.

The Louvre does not contain any work by Vecchietta (1412-1480), who

was architect as well as painter. A _Birth of the Virgin_ (No. 1660),

catalogued as being by an unknown Florentine artist, is most probably

from the hand of Matteo di Giovanni (1435?-1495), who was most likely

at one time a pupil of Vecchietta. Another of the latter’s pupils,

Francesco di Giorgio (1439-1502), perhaps executed the panel of the

_Rape of Europa_ (No. 1640A or No. 1640 _Bis_), which the cataloguer

relegates to the lengthy list of unattributed Florentine works.

From these influences spring Girolamo di Benvenuto (1470-1524), whose

_Judgment of Paris_ (No. 1668) passes in the Catalogue as a late

fifteenth century Bolognese picture. Bernardino Fungai (1460-1516), who

trod in the steps of Giovanni di Paolo, Francesco di Giorgio, and the

Umbrian artist Fiorenzo di Lorenzo, and yet evinced no real signs of

development from within, is unrepresented in this collection.

This rapid survey of the School of Siena shows that it is not well

exemplified in the Louvre. The third-rate painters, Pacchiarotto

(1474-1540) and Beccafumi (1486-1551), will not detain us. Another

accomplished late Sienese eclectic, Girolamo del Pacchia (1477-1535?),

has been credited with a _Crucifixion_ (No. 1642), but not by the

official cataloguer. Sodoma (1477-1551) also worked in Siena. Towards

the year 1501 other artists of the various schools of Central Italy,

including Pinturicchio, Signorelli, and Perugino, visited the city,

their advent bringing about an artistic revolution. Before long the

religious fervour, the delicate ornamentation, the gesso-embellishment,

the drawing in the flat, and the miniature-like delicacy of an earlier

age became extinct. The artistic glory of Siena was dimmed, and rapidly

passed into a period of decadence.

Among the last Sienese artists of any distinction were Baldassare

Peruzzi (1481-1536), an architect and painter, and Matteo Balducci (fl.

1509-1553), to whom we may perhaps ascribe the _Judgment of Solomon_

(No. 1571) and the _Judgment of Daniel_ (No. 1572). In any case

these pictures belong to the Umbro-Sienese period of Central Italian

art; they are officially regarded as being by Perugino himself. When

all originality had passed out of Sienese painting, Francesco Vanni

(1563?-1609) produced his _Repose on the Flight into Egypt_ (No. 1561)

and the _Martyrdom of St. Irene_ (No. 1562).

The Louvre: Fifty Plates in Colour · 第 49 / 399 题