Notes and Queries.[13]

THE DOSE OF ATROPIA FOR SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION.—I wish to answer the

query of Dr. Sisson in the _Practitioner_ of last month with every

caution, but I have formed a strong opinion on the subject in question.

A “Country Practitioner,” who wrote to this journal in February, states

that he used to give hypodermic injections of more than ⅕ grain of

atropia daily, to the same patient, for years. Now I stated in my paper

in this journal (July 1868), that such doses as these are utterly

unsafe, and I retain that opinion. Supposing that the sulphate of

atropia was good, which it is very possible it was not in the “Country

Practitioner’s” case, I can affirm, from my own knowledge, that there

are many patients to whom such a dose would be dangerous and probably

fatal, if it were really fairly introduced into the subcutaneous tissue.

_I have seen uncomfortable atropism from the injection of less than

1/100 grain_: a case occurred to me only a week or two since. It is

therefore unadvisable to begin, at any rate, with large doses. With a

large experience of subcutaneous injection, I am enabled to say with

confidence that 1/60 or 1/50 grain doses are what are best borne by the

majority of persons; that sometimes, but not often, it is necessary to

go as far as 1/30 grain; and that not unfrequently patients will not

bear as much as the 1/60 without uncomfortable atropism. Hence my

recommendation to practitioners to commence, experimentally, with such a

small quantity as the 1/120 grain.—F. E. ANSTIE.

STRYCHNIA AS A REMEDY IN A SEVERE CASE OF NERVOUS HYPERÆSTHESIA.—Mr. H.

A. Allbutt, of Leeds, writes to us:—“The following case may be of some

interest to the readers of the _Practitioner_, as in some of its

symptoms it presented some curious phenomena. Mrs. A——, a married lady,

about thirty-six years of age, consulted me in last November for

lameness, and great pain and difficulty in walking, with obscure pains

in her back and sides, severe palpitation, restless nights, loss of

appetite, and great nervousness. She often, too, complained of dimness

of vision, and the thumb was at times flexed across the palm of the hand

in a spasmodic manner. In addition to these symptoms, she suffered from

prolapsus uteri and menorrhagia. The difficulty and pain in walking

were, however, the most prominent features of the case. She could not

raise her feet the height of a step, and her locomotion was most

curious, consisting of a sort of corkscrew motion, or twisting of the

foot and thigh each step that was taken. This had been going on for

three years, sometimes better and sometimes worse, but on the whole she

was gradually getting worse. I learned from her that when younger she

had been of a strong, healthy nature, and suffered from little illness

till her marriage. She seems to have suffered severely during her

various confinements from floodings, &c., and from the time of her last

confinement she has been affected more or less in the manner described.

In regard to the cause of this condition, I am of opinion that her

nervous system had been much weakened, and thrown into an excitable

condition by the shocks of labour and by the floodings at those times.

In this opinion I was borne out by Dr. Allbutt, of Leeds, who saw the

case with me. The treatment at first consisted of the various

preparations of steel, of which I found the ferri ammon. cit., combined

with bromide of potassium, to be the best. Tannic acid pessaries were

also ordered to be introduced into the vagina for the relief of the

prolapsus uteri, and a hypodermic injection of morphia was given every

night for three weeks. Under the influence of these remedies she

improved in her general health, and the lameness was improved in a

slight degree; in fact, she seemed to arrive at a certain standard of

health and to advance no further. I was now induced to try strychnia, in

the form of pills, combined with carbonate of iron. The dose was 1/20

gr. twice a day. The effects were marvellous. The lameness is fast

disappearing, and she is able to walk out of doors, which she has not

done for fifteen months. I firmly believe she will be quite cured if the

treatment is persevered in.”

MURIATE OF AMMONIA AS A REMEDY.—Dr. Cholmeley has kindly sent us a note,

the manuscript of which, by an unfortunate accident, has been mislaid.

The substance of his remarks is as follows:—He confirms the observations

of Dr. Anstie, in a paper in the December number of the _Practitioner_,

as to the great efficacy of the muriate of ammonia as a remedy for

neuralgic and myalgic pain. But Dr. Cholmeley goes on to say, that with

regard to a matter on which Dr. Anstie spoke more doubtfully,—the

efficacy, namely, which certain authors have ascribed to this drug as an

emmenagogue,—he has formed from a large experience a decided opinion in

favour of the utility of this medicine. He is convinced that in a very

large number of cases of absent or suppressed menstruation, muriate of

ammonia acts in a very direct and powerful manner in establishing or

restoring the flux. Dr. Cholmeley has now experimented with the muriate,

in doses of 10 to 20 grains, in so large a number of hospital and

dispensary patients, that he cannot suppose there is any room for

fallacy in this conclusion.

[Since the date at which the paper referred to by Dr. Cholmeley was

written, we have had occasion to employ the muriate of ammonia in two

cases of amenorrhœa, with apparently very striking and direct results of

a curative kind. As yet, however, we must confess ourselves unable to

lay down any definite rule as to the class of cases to which it is

applicable with the best chance of success, beyond a general idea that

it acts best in persons not anæmic, but possessing a weak and mobile

nervous system.—EDS. PRACT.]

ETHER SPRAY IN OPERATIONS ABOUT THE ANUS.—Dr. John Barclay, of Banff,

writes to us as follows:—“I write to corroborate what was written by Mr.

Alexander Bruce, in the _Practitioner_ for last month, concerning the

employment of ether spray in operations about the verge of the anus. I

have experience of it in two cases. The first was the slitting up of a

hæmorrhoid containing a clot, and when the ether spray was directed on

the part the patient screamed in intense agony, comparing it to nothing

else than the introduction of a red-hot iron. The pile was opened

without it, and the patient said the cutting was as nothing compared

with the spray. The second case was very similar to this, and the result

here was the same. So that I never dream now of recommending the

freezing by ether in operations in that region. I may remark that it is

a curious thing ice never seems to give pain when so employed.”

TREATMENT OF HÆMORRHOIDS.—Mr. J. Christophers, of Wadebridge, Cornwall,

sends us the following note:—“The pain and risk attending operations for

the removal of hæmorrhoids, whether by knife, ligature, cautery, or

caustic, render valuable any less heroic mode of treatment, whereby the

necessity for using the means alluded to may be dispensed with, or even

rendered less frequent. The term hæmorrhoid or pile being used to

signify a tumour caused by enlarged or varicose veins at the lower part

of the rectum, the definition of the disease would seem to indicate its

treatment—pressure and support. The benefit resulting from pressure on

tumours, and from pressure and support applied to varicose veins

situated on the surface of the body, is manifold and manifest. The same

good results often attended pressure internally applied in cases of

hæmorrhoids, and frequently in cases of prolapsus also. Occasionally

after having introduced the finger into the rectum, in cases of

hæmorrhoids, for the purpose of exploration, I have heard with surprise

the patient affirm that the examination had temporarily relieved the

severity of his pain. Continuous pressure exercised by means of the

rectum plug, of a size, form, and material suited to these cases, in

many instances, affords immediate relief, and often effects ultimate

cure; the rectum plug being nothing more than a simple cone or peg,

terminating in a short stem or disk, having a hole bored through its

long diameter formed of metal, ivory, wood, membrane, or of other

material capable of inflation. Any of these substances answer the

purpose, some being suited to one kind of case, some to another. Those

formed of wood have in my hands answered well, and have often achieved a

success that has exceeded my expectations. The shape and size best

suited to individual cases experience soon teaches. A not unfrequent

obstacle in treating cases by the rectum plug will be found to consist

in the intolerance by the rectum in some patients at first of its

presence; perseverance in its use gradually and surely overcomes this

difficulty. After a short probation all discomfort ceases, and the plug

can be worn by day and by night, sitting, riding, walking, or standing,

with the best results, and that not only in cases of hæmorrhoids, but in

bad cases of prolapsus also. So much is this the case that many who have

worn a rectum plug, though with difficulty at the beginning, give up its

use, even when the malady that demanded its application is cured, with

reluctance and regret, saying that they derive comfort and support from

its presence. These circumstances induce me to think that this safe and

simple means of treating hæmorrhoids has been too much neglected, and

for this reason I venture to bring it under the notice of the

_Practitioner_.”

The Practitioner. May, 1869. A Monthly Journal of Therapeutics · 第 13 / 15 题