APPENDIX

Note on Letter of Mr. Surtees to Mr. Jonathan Oldbuck, p. 64.

NO literary forgeries were ever much better done than the sham ballads

which Surtees of Mainsforth imposed on Sir Walter Scott. The poems were

spirited and good of their kind; and though we wonder now that some of

them could take in an expert, it is by no means assured that we are even

to-day acquainted with the whole of Surtees’ frauds. Why a man otherwise

honourable, kindly, charitable, and learned, exercised his ingenuity so

cruelly upon a trusting correspondent and a staunch friend, it is hardly

possible to guess. The biographers of Surtees maintain that he wanted to

try his skill on Scott, then only known to him by correspondence; and

that, having succeeded, he was afraid to risk Scott’s friendship by a

confession. This is plausible; and if good may come out of evil, we may

remember that two picturesque parts of “Marmion” are due to one confessed

and another certain _supercherie_ of Surtees. It cannot be said in his

defence that he had no conception of the mischief of literary frauds; in

more than one passage of his correspondence he mentions Ritson’s

detestation of these practices. “To literary imposition, as tending to

obscure the path of inquiry, Ritson gave no quarter,” says this arch

literary impostor.

A brief account of Surtees’ labour in the field of sham ballad writing

may be fresh to many people who merely know him as the real author of

“Barthram’s Dirge” and of “The Slaying of Anthony Featherstonhaugh.” In

an undated letter of 1806, Scott, writing from Ashestiel, thanks Surtees

for his “obliging communications.” Surtees manifestly began the

correspondence, being attracted by the “Border Minstrelsy.” Thus it

appears that Surtees did _not_ forge “Hobbie Noble” in the first edition

of the “Minstrelsy”; for he makes some suggestions as to the “Earl of

Whitfield,” dreaded by the hero of that ballad, which Scott had already

published. But he was already deceiving Scott, who writes to him about

“Ralph Eure,” or “Lord Eure,” and about a “Goth, who melted Lord Eure’s

gold chain.” This Lord Eure is doubtless the “Lord Eurie” of the ballad

in the later editions of the “Border Minstrelsy,” a ballad actually

composed by Surtees. That wily person immediately sent Scott a ballad on

“The Feud between the Ridleys and Featherstones,” in which Scott believed

to the day of his death. He introduced it in “Marmion.”

The whiles a Northern harper rude

Chaunted a rhyme of deadly feud,

How the fierce Thirlwalls and Ridleys all, &c.

In his note (“Border Minstrelsy,” second edition, 1808, p. xxi.) Scott

says the ballad was taken down from an old woman’s recitation at the

Alston Moor lead-mines “by the agent there,” and sent by him to Surtees.

Consequently, when Surtees saw “Marmion” in print he had to ask Scott not

to print “_the_ agent,” as he does not know even the name of Colonel

Beaumont’s chief agent there, but “an agent.” Thus he hedged himself

from a not impossible disclaimer by the agent at the mines.

Old Friends: Essays in Epistolary Parody · 第 83 / 85 题