Smollett, Tobias, 205, 207, 210, 213–14, 289, 342, 350.
Somerville, William, 21, 30, 32, 41, 42, 112–13, 146, 147.
“Song to David” (Smart), 151.
Southcote, Philip, 261.
Southey, Robert, 128, 199.
“Spectator, The,” 82, 252.
Spenser, Edmund, xvii, 83, 121, 136, 142, 264.
Stephen, Leslie, xx.
Sterne, Laurence, 210, 213, 343.
Streater, Robert, 285.
Stubbs, George, 288, 311.
“Studies in Poetry and Philosophy” (Shairp), xx.
Swaine, Francis, 325.
Swift, Jonathan, 35, 92.
Switzer, Stephen, 254, 260.
Sybrecht, John, 284.
Symonds, J. A., xx, 24, 29.
“Symphones, Les” (Laprade), xxi.
Taine, H. A., 56.
“Task, The” (Cowper), 184, 185, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 266,
361.
“Tatler, The,” 251.
Taverner, William, 289–90.
Temple, Sir William, 249–50, 265.
Tennyson, Alfred, 66, 180.
Theocritus, 51, 55.
“Theology in the English Poets” (Brooke), xx.
“Theory of the Earth” (Burnet), 9, 22.
Thompson, William, 112, 129–30.
Thomson, James, xvi, xvii, xviii, xix, xx, 32, 45, 46, 58, 59, 61,
64, 73, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83–101, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 113,
119, 121, 130, 140, 141, 142, 143, 167, 172, 174, 175, 190,
193, 196, 210, 272, 320, 322;
in General Summary _passim_.
“Thomson, James: La vie et ses œuvres” (Morel), 101.
Thornbury, Walter, 315.
Tickell, Thomas, 12, 21, 29, 42, 52, 116.
“Tom Jones” (Fielding), 118, 205–6.
Tours. _See_ under Boswell, Brand, Bray, Brown, Bushe,
Cradock, Gilpin, Gray, Hamilton, Hassell, Houseman, Hutchinson,
Johnson, Macky, Martin, Pennant, Pennecuik, Robertson,
Rudworth, Shaw, Walker, West, Young (Arthur).
“Trees, Thirty-two Species of” (Alex. Cozens), 311.
“Tristram Shandy” (Sterne), 210.
Turner, J. M. W., vi, 304, 318, 320, 327, 328, 343.
“Types of Scenery and Their Influence on Literature” (Geikie), xx.
Unwin, Rev. William, 185, 186.
Van de Velde, the Elder, 284, 286.
Van de Velde, the Younger, 284, 286, 287, 288, 325.
Vandiest, Adrien, 285.
Vandyck, Sir Anthony, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279.
Van Dyke, John, 282.
Van Wyck, Jan, 285.
“Vathek” (Beckford), 215.
Veitch, John, xviii, 11, 18, 55, 81.
Vernet, C. J., 284.
Verzagen, Henry, 284.
“Vicar of Wakefield” (Goldsmith), 212.
“Village, The” (Crabbe), 181, 182.
Virgil, 263.
Vivares, François, 291, 310.
“Voyage en Italie” (Taine), 56.
Wales, 236, 239, 244, 293, 295, 300, 301, 311, 312, 315, 316, 320,
323, 349.
Walker, Mr., 244.
Waller, Edmund, 1, 7, 10, 15, 20, 21, 27, 29, 30, 31, 36, 37, 39,
43, 48, 327.
Walpole, Horace, 212, 250, 254, 255, 256, 259, 260, 262, 265, 274,
275, 277, 278, 284, 306, 310, 322.
Warton, Joseph, 81, 111, 112, 134, 139–43, 146, 147, 199, 200;
in General Summary _passim_.
Warton, Thomas, 112, 143–45, 344, 346, 351.
Watson, Caroline, 280.
Watts, Isaac, 7, 20, 21, 30, 36, 50.
Watts, W., 300.
Webber, John, 322.
West, Mr., 227, 241, 324.
Whately, Thomas, 265.
Whitehead, William, 112, 145–46, 332, 356.
Whitman, Alfred, 280.
“Wilson, Etchings after Richard” (Hastings), 302.
Wilson, Richard, 287, 296–304, 309, 310, 311, 314, 315, 316, 328,
342.
For books on Wilson _see_ under authors: Beaumont, Fletcher,
Ruskin, Wright.
“Wilson, Studies and Designs by,” 302.
“Wilson, Thirty-seven Sketches and Designs by,” 302.
Winchilsea, Lady, vi, 23, 59, 61–64, 83, 117, 249, 271;
in General Summary _passim_.
Wissing, William, 276.
Wolcot, John, 314.
Woollett, William, 301, 302.
Wootten, John, 288, 325.
Wordsworth, William, v, xvii, xviii, xix, xx, 6, 7, 19, 23, 27, 33,
37, 38, 45, 50, 58, 61, 63, 64, 68, 72, 80, 81, 93, 97, 101,
105, 118, 121, 124, 125, 126, 134, 136, 139, 143, 148, 151,
165, 169, 172, 177, 180, 190, 191, 193, 239, 244, 301, 320;
in General Summary _passim_.
Wright, Richard, 313.
Yalden, John, 11, 20, 31, 42.
Young, Arthur, 228–30, 232, 241, 344, 348, 355.
Young, Edward, 5, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 30, 31, 89, 112, 119–21, 147,
359, 361, 363.
“Zeitschrift für Litteraturgeschichte,” xvii.
“Zeluco” (Moore), 216.
Zucarelli, A., 297.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Humboldt was the first to attack Schiller’s view. He said that
after a full reading of Greek and Roman authors he found himself
unable to accept Schiller’s statement without many reservations. Later
Biese spoke of Schiller’s essay as “jener bahnbrechende Aufsatz,” but
showed that the statement of the case was inadequate because it was
based on the poetry of a single period and thus failed to take account
of many phases of Nature presented in the poetry after the brief
“reflexionslose naive homerische Zeit.”
[2] Biese has two earlier important books: “Die Entwickelung des
Naturgefühls bei den Griechen” (1882) and “Die Entwickelung des
Naturgefühls bei den Römern” (1884). In “Zeitschrift für vergleichende
Litteraturgeschichte,” Neue Folge, Siebenter Band (1894), p. 311, is
a valuable annotated summary of recent (since 1882) German studies on
“das antike und das deutsche Naturgefühl.”
[3] (_a_) They express childlike delight in the open-air world.
(_b_) They use Nature as the background or setting for human
action or emotion. (_c_) They see Nature through historic
coloring. (_d_) They make Nature sympathize with their own
feelings. (_e_) They dwell upon the inhuman or infinite side of
Nature. (_f_) They give description for its own sake. (_g_)
They interpret Nature by imaginative sympathy. (_h_) They use
Nature as a symbol of spirit.
[4] For additions to this bibliography see “The Journal of Germanic
Philology,” II, 239 (1898), in which is an article by Mr. Camillo von
Klenze giving a comprehensive résumé of books and articles dealing with
the Nature-sense. To these books should be added “Types of Scenery
and Their Influence on Literature,” the Romanes lecture at Oxford,
1898, by Sir Archibald Geikie, a delightful, sketchy study of Cowper,
Thomson, Burns, Macpherson, Scott, and Wordsworth in relation to
their environment; “The Treatment of Nature in the Works of Nicholas
Lenau” (The University of Chicago Press, 1902), by Mr. von Klenze,
an admirably full and discriminating study of the attitude toward
Nature as shown by one of the most important German contemporaries
of Tennyson and Browning; “The Treatment of Nature in German
Literature from Günther to the Appearance of Goethe’s ‘Werther,’” a
careful presentation of the development of the love of Nature in the
half-century before 1774 (Max Batt, The University of Chicago Press,
1902); “The Feeling for Nature in Old English Poetry,” by Elizabeth
Deering Hanscom (“Journal of English and Germanic Philology,” V, 439).
[5] Gosse, “From Shakespeare to Pope.”
[6] Pope, “Letters,” I, 73.
[7] Pope, “A Farewell to London.”
[8] Hazlitt, “On Londoners and Country People.”
[9] Boswell, “Life of Dr. Johnson,” III, 178 and note.
[10] Pope, “Letters,” IV, 449.
[11] _Ibid._, III, 346.
[12] _Ibid._, I, 67.
[13] Pope, “Works,” III, 226.
[14] Dryden, “Works,” II, 74.
[15] Etherege, “The Man of Mode,” Act III, sc. 1; Act V, sc. 3.
[16] Shadwell, “Epsom Wells,” Act II, sc. 1.
[17] Montagu, “Letters and Works,” I, 72.
[18] _Ibid._, II, 505.
[19] Shenstone, “A Ballad.”
[20] Lyttleton, “Soliloquy of a Beauty in the Country.”
[21] Young, “On Women.”
[22] Aaron Hill, “Dialogue between Damon and Philemon.”
[23] Isaac Hawkins Browne, “From Celia to Chloe.”
[24] Pope, “Letters,” IV, 476; cf. “From Soame Jenyns in the Country to
the Lord Lovelace in Town.”
[25] _Ibid._, IV, 253.
[26] _Ibid._, II, 113.
[27] _Ibid._, II, 133.
[28] Gay, “Fables,” First Series, No. 33.
[29] Gay, “Araminta.”
[30] Watts, “To David Polhill.” Cf. Shenstone, “The Progress of Taste,”
iv, 172; Lyttleton, “To Mr. Poyntz.”
[31] Cowley, “The Country Mouse.”
[32] Denham, “On Mr. Abraham Cowley’s Death,” l. 79.
[33] James Howell, “Epistolae Ho Elianae,” Book I, sec. 1, Letters 23,
43.
[34] John Evelyn, “Diary” (1641–1706), pp. 36, 185–89.
[35] Addison, “Geneva and the Lake,” “Remarks on Italy.”
[36] Evelyn, “Diary,” p. 126; Addison, “Remarks on Italy.”
[37] Thomas Burnet, “Theory of the Earth,” chapter on “Mountains.”
[38] Pennecuik, “Description of Tweeddale,” p. 45.
[39] Thomas Amory, “Life of John Buncle,” I, 291; II, 97.
[40] Dr. Johnson, “Works,” IX, 35. Cf. also Dr. Johnson’s remark
to Boswell, “He said, he would not wish not to be disgusted in the
Highlands; for that would be to lose the power of distinguishing,
and a man might then lie down in the middle of them. He wished only
to conceal his disgust.” See also his answer to the question, “How
do you like the Highlands?” “The question seemed to irritate him,
for he answered, ‘How, Sir, can you ask me what obliges me to speak
unfavorably of a country where I have been hospitably entertained?
Who _can_ like the Highlands? I like the inhabitants very
well.’”--Boswell’s “Life of Johnson,” V, 317, 377.
[41] Hutchinson, “Excursion to the Lakes,” pp. 11, 17.
[42] Waller, “To My Lord Admiral.”
[43] Waller, “Story of Phoebus and Daphne.”
[44] Marvell, “Upon the Hill and Grove at Billbarrow.”
[45] Milton, “A Paraphrase on Psalm CXIV.”
[46] Veitch calls attention to the fact that Shakspere showed little
if any delight in mountains, and that Milton went over Switzerland
without bringing back an image of the Alps which he thought fit to
preserve.--“Nature in Scottish Poetry,” I, 107.
[47] Dryden, “The Indian Emperor.”
[48] Blackmore, “The Creation,” iii, 409.
[49] John Philips, “Cyder,” i, 106.
[50] Yalden, “To Sir Humphrey Mackworth.”
[51] Prior, “Solomon,” i, 52.
[52] Pope, “The Temple of Fame.”
[53] Pope, “On St. Cecilia’s Day.”
[54] Pope, “Windsor Forest,” l. 210.
[55] Tickell, “Oxford,” l. 441.
[56] Parnell, “To Mr. Pope,” l. 83.
[57] Dr. Akenside, “Pleasures of the Imagination,” ii, 274 (first
version).
[58] This indifference to mountains or dislike of them was not a new
thing. For further illustrations see Perry, “English Literature of the
Eighteenth Century,” pp. 144–48. Humboldt, “Kosmos,” Book II, p. 16,
says: “Von dem ewigen Schnee der Alpen, wenn sie sich am Abend oder am
frühen Morgen röthen, von der Schönheit des blauen Gletscher-Eises,
von der grossartigen Natur der schweizerischen Landschaft ist keine
Schilderung aus dem Alterthum auf uns gekommen: und doch gingen
ununterbrochen Staatsmänner, Heerführer, und in ihrem Gefolge
Litteraten durch Helvetien nach Gallien. Alle diese Reisenden wissen
nur über die unfahrbaren scheusslichen Wege zu klagen; das Romantische
der Naturscenen beschäftigte sie nie.... Silius Italicus ... beschreibt
die Alpengegend als eine schrecken-erregende vegetationslose Einöde,
während er mit Liebe alle Felsen-schluchten Italiens und die buschigen
Ufer des Liris (Garigliano) besingt.”
An interesting early exception to this general statement is Petrarch’s
description of his ascent of Mt. Ventoux. In a letter dated April
26, 1335 (Petrarca, “Lettere Famigliari,” I, 481), he tells how this
mountain ever before his eyes, had been from childhood a temptation
to him, and how he was finally stimulated to make the ascent by an
account of the wide view gained by Philip of Macedon from one of the
highest mountains in Thessaly. The most significant passage in this
letter is that in which are strangely mingled Petrarch’s pleasure in
the magnificent prospect and his ascetic fear of a consequent undue
subordination of the soul of man.
“At last I turned to the occasion of my expedition. The sinking sun
and lengthening shadows admonished me that the hour of departure was
at hand, and, as if started from sleep, I turned around and looked
to the west. The Pyrenees--the eye could not reach so far, but I saw
the mountains of Lyonnais distinctly, and the sea by Marseilles; the
Rhone, too, was there before me. Observing these closely, now thinking
on the things of earth, and again, as if I had done with the body,
lifting my mind on high, it occurred to me to take out the copy of St.
Augustine’s Confessions that I always kept with me; a little volume
but of unlimited value and charm. And I call God to witness that the
first words on which I cast mine eyes were these: ‘Men go to wonder
at the heights of mountains, the ocean floods, rivers’ long courses,
ocean’s immensity, the revolutions of the stars--and of themselves they
have no care!’ My brother asked me what was the matter. I bade him
not disturb me. I closed the book, angry with myself for not ceasing
to admire things of earth, instead of remembering that the human soul
is beyond comparison the subject for admiration. Once and again, as I
descended, I gazed back, and the lofty summit of the mountain seemed
to me scarcely a cubit high compared with the sublime dignity of man.”
Translated and commented on by McLaughlin, “The Mediaeval Feeling for
Nature.” See also Biese, “Die Entwickelung des Naturgefühls,” p. 151:
“Und somit eröffnet uns dieser Brief, mit seiner Mischung reinen,
modernen Naturgenusses und dogmatisch-asketischer Rückbesinnung, einen
Blick in ein zwie-spältiges Herz eines an der Wende zweier Zeiten
stehenden Menschen; es reagiert gleichsam der mittelalterliche Geist
wider die aufkeimende moderne Empfindung.”
Another significant utterance comes in 1541 in a letter by Gessner
quoted by Biese, p. 328. It shows a recognition of the greatness and
majesty of the Alps, and has something of the modern feeling: “So lange
mir Gott Leben schenken wird, habe ich beschlossen, jährlich einige
Berge oder doch einen zu besteigen, teils um die Gebirgsflora kennen zu
lernen, teils um den Körper zu kräftigen und den Geist zu erfrischen.
Welchen Genuss gewährt es nicht die ungeheuren Bergmassen zu betrachten
und das Haupt in die Wolken zu erheben! Wie stimmt es zur Andacht, wenn
man umringt ist von den Schneedomen, die der grosse Weltbaumeister
an dem einen langen Schöpfungstage geschaffen hat! Wie leer is doch
das Leben, wie niedrig das Streben derer, die auf dem Erdboden umher
kriechen, nur um zu erwerben und spiessbürgerlich zu geniessen!
Ihnen bleibt das irdische Paradies verschlossen.“ Biese thinks that
Rousseau’s “Nouvelle Héloise” (1761) “die Augen über die Herrlichkeiten
der neuentdeckten Alpenwelt öffnete.” It is interesting to note in this
connection that the beginning of enthusiastic interest in the mountains
of the English Lake District found expression somewhat earlier in
Dalton’s poem (1755), Amory’s novel (1756), and Brown’s “Letter” and
“Rhapsody” (before 1766 and probably before 1760). The earliest of
the Ossian poems belong in 1760. Goethe’s “Briefe aus der Schweiz vom
Jahre 1779” are according to Biese the first full and enthusiastic
recognition by a German poet of the romantic charms of the Alps (“Die
Entwickelung,” etc., p. 393).
[59] Biese, “Die Entwickelung,” etc., pp. 353–55; Lecky, “History of
England,” VI, 180–83.
[60] Biese, “Die Entwickelung,” etc., pp. 324, 328.
[61] Waller, “A Panegyric to My Lord Protector,” st. 11; “Instructions
to a Painter,” l. 228; “On the Danger His Majesty Escaped,” ll. 5, 63,
156.
[62] Dryden under “Similitudes,” p. 31, and “Diction,” p. 43.
[63] Young, “The Merchant,” strain 2, st. 15; strain 3, st. 9; strain
8, sts. 13–17.
[64] For a Tempest take Eurus, Zephyr, Auster and Boreas and cast them
together in one verse; add to these rain and lightning, _quantum
sufficit_: mix your clouds and billows well together till they foam,
and thicken your description here and there with a quicksand. Brew your
tempest well in your head before you set it a blowing. “The Art of
Sinking in Poetry.”
[65] See “Monthly Review,” XXVII, 197, where Falconer’s descriptions
are said to be equal to “anything in the _Aeneid_.”
[66] Falconer, “The Shipwreck,” canto ii, ll. 157, 268, 346.
[67] _Ibid._, ll. 148–66.
[68] These descriptions rouse Dr. Clarke to a climax of admiration.
“Homer has been admired by some for reducing a catalogue of ships
into tolerably flowing verse; but who, except a poetical sailor, the
nursling of Apollo, educated by Neptune, would ever have thought of
versifying his own sea-language? What other poet would even have dreamt
of _reef-tackles_, _haliards_, _clue-garnets_, _buntlines_, _lashings_,
_laniards_, and fifty other terms equally obnoxious to the soft
sing-song of modern poetasters.”--“Monthly Review,” XXVII.
[69] Biese notes the same fact with regard to German poetry (“Die
Entwickelung,” p. 320).
[70] Cf. Veitch, “Feeling for Nature,” I, 117.
[71] Lyttleton, “An Epistle to Mr. Pope.”
[72] Pope, “Letters,” I, 178.
[73] For illustrative passages, see Montagu, “Letters and Works,”
II, 464; Congreve, “Tears of Amaryllis,” l. 50; Broome, “Daphnis and
Lycidas,” l. 47; Shenstone, “Upon a Visit in Winter;” Pitt, “Hymn to
Apollo;” Hughes, “Myra;” Savage, “Wanderer,” i, 42, 52; John Scott,
“Elegy on Winter;” Akenside, “On the Winter Solstice.”
[74] For a similar dislike of winter in mediaeval poetry see
McLaughlin, “Studies in Mediaeval Life and Literature,” p. 20. He
quotes as typical the following from a Latin student song: “The
cold icy harshness of winter, its fierceness, and dull, miserable
inactivity.”
[75] Blackmore, “Creation,” ii, 393. Cf. Wordsworth’s
The chasm of sky above my head
Is heaven’s profoundest azure ... an abyss
In which the everlasting stars abide.--“Excursion,” iii, 94–98.
Cf. also Dryden’s “The abyss of heaven, the court of stars” (“Works,”
IV, 76).
[76] For illustrative passages, see Waller, “Of the Lady;” Cowley,
“Davideis,” ii, 440; “Hymn to Light,” and “Shortness of Life,” st. 11;
Young, “Ocean,” st. 23; Broome, “Paraphrase of Ecclesiastes;” Yalden,
“Hymn to Morning;” John Philips, “Cyder,” ii, 293; Tickell, “Prospect
of Peace;” Gay, “The Espousal;” Rowe, “The Queen’s Success;” Watts,
“Disappointment;” Pitt, “Verses,” etc., etc.
[77] For descriptions of this sort, see Hughes, “Court of Neptune;”
Prior, “Solomon,” iii, 557; Broome, “Poem on Death,” l. 151; Gay,
“Rural Sports,” ii, 323; Gay, “Wine,” l. 141; Beattie, “The Minstrel,”
i, 17; etc., etc.
[78] Cf. Biese, “Die Entwickelung,” etc., p. 307.
[79] The following are illustrative phrases: “Silver Cynthia lights the
world,” Garth, “Claremont,” l. 284; “Pale Cynthia mounts the vaulted
sky,” Shenstone, “Elegy VI;” “Cynthia came, riding on her silver car,”
Beattie, “The Minstrel,” ii, 12; “Cynthia’s silver white,” Hughes, “The
Picture;” “Cynthia, fair regent of the night,” Gay, “Trivia,” iii,
3; “Cynthia’s silver ray,” Addison, “Imitation of Milton;” “Cynthia,
great Queen of Night,” Garth, “Dispensary,” v, 282; “Pale Cynthia’s
melancholy light,” Falconer, “Shipwreck,” i, 311.
[80] The following are illustrative phrases: “Rich spangles,” Waller,
“Of the Queen;” “Spangled nights,” Cowley, “Davideis,” i, 94; “Spangled
sphere,” Cowley, “The Extasy;” “Burning spangles of sidereal gold,”
Broome, “Paraphrase of Eccl.;” “Freezing spangles,” Tickell, “On the
Prospect of Peace;” “The sky spangled with a thousand eyes,” Gay,
“Fables,” i, 11; “Spangled pole,” Pitt, “On the Death of Mr. Stanhope;”
“Heaven’s gilded troops,” Cowley, “Davideis,” i, 183; “Stars that gild
the gloomy night,” Parnell, “Hymn to Contentment;” “Twinkling stars who
gild the skies,” Watts, “Sun, Moon,” etc.; “Shooting star that gilds
the night,” Somerville, “Hobbinol,” iii, 261; “Stars that gild the
northern skies,” Pitt, “Congress of Cambray;” “Meteor that gilds the
night,” Somerville, “Field Sports,” i, 139; “Globes of light in fields
of azure shine,” Watts, “God’s Dominion;” “Orbs of gold in fields of
azure lie,” Parnell, “Queen Anne’s Peace,” l. 38; “Yon blue tract
enriched with orbs of light,” Parnell, “David,” l. 358.
[81] Some of Young’s phrases are “rolling spheres,” “tuneful spheres,”
“revolving spheres,” “unnumbered lustres,” “sparks of night,” “lucid
orbs,” “radiant choir,” “etherial fires,” “mathematic glories,” “aerial
racers,” “midnight counselors,” “nocturnal suns,” “etherial armies,”
“radiant lamps,” “splendours,” “ambient orbs,” “nocturnal sparks,”
“night’s radiant scale,” etc.
[82] Burnet, “Theory of the Earth,” chapter on “Stars.” Cf. Prior,
“Solomon,” i, 502–11.
[83] Wordsworth, “Peter Bell.”
[84] Ruskin (“Modern Painters,” III, 248) comments on Dante’s “intense
detestation of all mist, rack of cloud or dimness of rain.” McLaughlin
says of clouds, moonlight, etc.: “Let any reader of mediaeval poetry
recall how imperceptible a part they play in it, even as plain facts of
description. A line in one of the Latin songs expresses the feeling:
their thought of clouds is how delightful not to see them. Moonlight,
too, is seldom dwelt on as poetical; the most romantic touch that
comes to my mind with it, is in Chrestien de Troyes where it shines
over the reconciliation of estranged lovers. Just as we find little
notice of sunrise, sunset, clouds, and moon, we find little feeling
for the stars. They are mentioned occasionally in a facile way, though
scarcely ever with manifest sentiment.”--“Studies in Mediaeval Life and
Literature,” p. 21. Mr. Symonds says of the same period: “The earth
is felt chiefly through the delightfulness of healthy sensations. The
stars and clouds, and tempests of the heavens, the ever-recurring
miracle of sunrise, the solemn pageant of sunsetting are almost as
though they were not in this literature.”--J. A. Symonds, “Essays
Speculative and Suggestive,” p. 300.
[85] In commenting on mediaeval out-door poetry Vernon Lee says
(“Euphorion,” p. 120): “Spring, spring, endless spring--for three long
centuries throughout the world a dreary green monotony of spring....
Moreover this mediaeval spring is the spring neither of the shepherd,
nor of the farmer, nor of any man to whom spring brings work and
anxiety and hope of gain; it is a mere vague spring of gentlefolk, or
at all events of well-to-do burgesses, taking their pleasure on the
lawns of castle parts.”
[86] Garth, “Dispensary,” iv, 309.
[87] Addison, “Rosamond,” Act I, sc. 1. Cf. a longer description in the
same poem beginning, “O the soft, delicious view” (Act II, sc. 3).
[88] Broome, “On the Seat of War in Flanders.”
[89] Shenstone, “The Progress of Taste,” iii, 7.
[90] Lyttleton, “Eclogue IV.”
[91] Congreve, “The Birth of the Muse.”
[92] Parnell, “Health: An Eclogue.”
[93] Prior, “Solomon,” iii, 158.
[94] Pope, “Winter.”
[95] Marriott, “Rinaldo and Armida.”
[96] Sheridan, “New Simile for the Ladies.” (Dr. Johnson, “Life of
Swift.”)
[97] For an interesting study of the rose in literature from Ausonius
to Waller see Symonds, “Essays,” “The Pathos of the Rose in Poetry,” p.
368.
[98] Gay, “Fables,” i, 45.
[99] Dryden, “Works,” XI, 13; Waller, “To the Queen;” Savage, “To
Bessy.”
[100] Tickell, “To Mr. Addison.”
[101] Cowley, “The Shortness of Life.”
[102] Somerville, “Field Sports.”
[103] Wycherley, “To Mr. Pope.”
[104] Dyer, “The Fleece.”
[105] Dryden, “Works,” IV, 202; IX, 162.
[106] _Ibid._, I, 214; V, 365; Congreve, “On His Taking of Namur;”
st. 2.
[107] See as illustrative of the bee similitudes: Waller, “Battle of
the Summer Islands,” canto iii, l. 24; Cowley, “The Inconstant,” st.
6; Milton, “Paradise Lost,” i, 768; Dryden, “Works,” IX, 145, 172;
II, 463; Hughes, “The Triumph of Peace,” l. 118; Prior, “Alma,” iii,
171; Pope, “Dunciad,” iv, 79; Pope, “Temple of Fame;” Gay, “Trivia,”
ii, 555; Congreve, “Ovid’s Art of Love Imitated,” l. 200; A. Philips,
“To James Craggs,” l. 151; Stepney, “To the Earl of Carlisle,” l. 26;
Buckingham, “Essay on Poetry,” l. 255; Young, “Night Thoughts,” ii,
462; vi, 516; Akenside, “Odes,” i, I, st. 2; Dyer, “Fleece,” ii, 496;
iii, 413; iv, 317; Somerville, “To Allan Ramsay,” l. 24; Watts, “Divine
Songs,” xx, etc.
[108] See as illustrative: Cowley, “Davideis,” iv, 728; “Isaiah, ch.
34,” st. 2; “Plagues of Egypt,” st. 9; Milton, “Paradise Lost,” i, 302;
Dryden, “Works,” III, 354, 422; Prior, “The Turtle and the Sparrow,” l.
206; King, “Art of Love,” l. 1700; Pope, “Essay on Criticism,” ii, 109;
“Temple of Fame,” l. 430; Young, “Night Thoughts,” v, 336; “The Last
Day,” ii, 183; Blair, “The Grave,” l. 469, etc.
[109] See as illustrative: Waller, “On Repairing St. Paul’s,” l. 25;
Cowley, “Davideis,” ii, 58; Milton, “Paradise Lost,” v, 215; Yalden,
“To His Perjured Mistress,” l. 11; Parnell, “The Hermit,” l. 41; Young,
“Satire IV,” l. 1; Dyer, “The Fleece,” ii, 648; Halifax, “On the Death
of Charles II,” l. 77.
[110] See as illustrative Dryden’s use of the sun in “Works,” IV, 276;
II, 148, 185, 215, 454, etc.
[111] See as illustrative: Waller, “To Amoret;” Addison, “An Account
of the Greatest English Poets;” Spratt, “On the Death of the Lord
Protector;” Dryden, “Works,” XI, 132; Cowley, “Clad All in White.”
[112] As illustrative of Dryden’s use of similitudes drawn from water
note the following: Revenge and rage are sudden floods; joys are
torrents that overflow all banks; contending passions are tides that
flow against currents; fame is a swelling current; anger is a dammed
up stream that gets new force by opposition; a ruined life, destroyed
fortunes, are shipwrecks; love is like springtides, full and high, or
like a flood that bursts through all dams, or like a stream that cannot
return to its fountain, or like tides that do turn; the disappointed
lover dies like an unfed stream; the mind of a capricious tyrant is
like a vast sea open to every wind that blows; the army of the enemy
comes like the wind broke loose upon the main; an obdurate foe is as
deaf to supplication as seas and wind to sinking mariners; an open mind
is a crystal brook; grief undermines the soul as banks are sapped away
by streams; the voice of a mob is like winds that roar in pursuit of
flying waves; unspeakable anger is like water choking up the narrow
vent of the vessel from which it is poured; and so on through a long
list.
[113] Prior, “Carmen Seculare,” st. 22.
[114] _Ibid._, st. 4.
[115] Pope, “Dunciad,” ii, 182.
[116] Cowley, “Davideis,” ii, 20.
[117] Halifax, “On the Death of Charles II,” l. 125.
[118] Armstrong, “Benevolence,” l. 152.
[119] Hughes, “Greenwich Park.”
[120] Roscommon, “Essay on Translated Verse,” l. 316.
[121] Somerville, “An Epistle to Allan Ramsay,” l. 5.
[122] Thomson. “To De La Cour.”
[123] Denham, “Cooper’s Hill.” The lines are,
O could I flow like thee, and make thy stream
My great example, as it is my theme!
Though deep, yet clear; though gentle, yet not dull:
Strong without rage, without o’erflowing full!
Pope’s lines (“Dunciad,” iii, 169), beginning,
Flow, Welsted, flow! like thine inspirer, Beer,
Tho’ stale, not ripe; tho’ thin, yet never clear,
* * * * *
Heady, not strong; o’erflowing, tho’ not full,
are a parody rather than an imitation. The same cannot be said of the
line (“Temple of Fame,” l. 374),
So soft, though high, so loud, and yet so clear.
Prior has these lines (“Carmen Seculare,” st. 22),
But her own king she likens to the Thames,
With gentle course devolving fruitful streams;
Serene yet strong, majestic yet sedate,
Swift without violence, without terror great.
Fr. Knapp addresses the sea on the Irish coast in the following lines
(“To Mr. Pope”):
Let me ne’er flow like thee! nor make thy stream
My sad example, or my wretched theme.
Mallet has the lines (cf. “Verbal Criticism,” l. 228):
Great without swelling, without meanness plain;
Serious, not silly; sportive, but not vain;
On trifles slight, on things of use profound,
In quoting sober, and in judging sound.
In Dyer we have a fainter echo (“The Country Walk,” l. 69):
Methinks her lays I hear,
So smooth! so sweet! so deep! so clear!
[124] Parnell, “David,” l. 49.
[125] Stanhope, “Progress of Dullness.”
[126] Addison, “An Account of the Greatest English Poets.”
[127] Dryden, “Works,” XI, 7.
[128] Marvell, “An Epitaph upon ----.”
[129] Cf. Cowley, “Davideis,” iii, 553, and Pope, “Spring,” l. 81.
[130] Dryden, “Works,” XI, 131; III, 390; II, 451.
[131] Butler, “Satire to a Bad Poet.”
[132] Ambrose Philips, “Epistle to a Friend.”
[133] Congreve, “The Mourning Muse of Alexis,” l. 89; cf. also Fenton,
“Florelia.”
[134] Congreve, “The Tears of Amaryllis for Amyntas,” l. 143.
[135] Watts, “A Funeral Poem on Thomas Gunston,” ll. 252, 308. Compare
the indifference of Nature to the death of Lucy whose body is
Rolled round in earth’s diurnal course
With rocks, and stones and trees.--Wordsworth, “Lucy.”
[136] Cowley, “Constantia and Philetus,” sts. 5, 10.
[137] Shenstone, “Roxana.” For an interesting variation of this theme
see Cowley, “The Spring.”
[138] Hughes, “Cupid’s Review,” l. 17.
[139] Marvell, “Upon Appleton House,” l. 661.
[140] Waller, “At Penshurst.”
[141] Marvell, “Upon Appleton House,” l. 689.
[142] Wordsworth, “Lucy.”
[143] Waller, “At Penshurst.”
[144] Virgil, “Eclogues,” iv, 28; Dryden, “Pastoral,” iv, l. 33.
[145] Virgil, “Georgics,” iv, 306; Dryden, “Georgics,” iv, 433.
[146] Virgil, “Georgics,” iii, 156; Dryden, “Georgics,” iii, 250.
[147] Dryden, “Works,” XII, 5; XI, 221.
[148] Percy, “Reliques,” II, 190.
[149] Somerville, “To Anne Coventry,” l. 25.
[150] Cowley, “The Shortness of Life,” st. 11; “The Muse;” “Davideis,”
ii, 29; “The Plagues of Egypt,” st. 17.
[151] Blackmore, “Creation,” vi, 170; v, 101; Yalden, “The Insect.”
[152] Somerville, “Field Sports,” l. 161.
[153] Pitt, “Earl Stanhope;” “Ps. 144.”
[154] Tickell, “Kensington Garden;” Somerville, “Rural Games,” i, 94.
[155] Dyer, “Grongar Hill,” l. 65.
[156] Dryden, “Works,” VI, 228.
[157] Cowley, “Ode 2.”
[158] Many of these words occur in the translations by Dryden but
in none of the instances quoted is there any justification in the
Latin phrase for the adjective “watery.” For instance, “watery way” =
_spumantibus undis_; “watery reign” = _altum_; “watery deep”
= _pelago_, and so on through the list.
[159] Milton, “Paradise Lost,” iv, 239; vii, 302.
[160] Blair, “The Grave.”
[161] Falconer, “The Shipwreck,” i, 359.
[162] Gay, “Rural Sports,” i, 226.
[163] Dyer, “Ruins of Rome,” l. 86.
[164] Armstrong, “Art of Preserving Health,” ii, 7.
[165] Addison, “To the King,” l. 115.
[166] Thomson, “Autumn,” l. 626; cf. also “Summer,” l. 1574; “Autumn,”
l. 628.
[167] Pitt, “Ode to John Pitt,” st. 5; Mallet, “Amyntor and Theodora,”
i, 153; Shenstone, “To a Lady;” “Rural Elegance,” st. 17.
[168] See Thomson, “Spring,” ll. 215, 767; “Summer,” l. 1547.
[169] Parnell, “Hymn to Contentment.”
[170] Wordsworth, “Three Years She Grew.”
[171] Dryden, “Works,” II, 360; IX, 104.
[172] Fenton, “Florelio,” l. 43.
[173] Gray, “Progress of Poetry.”
[174] Thomson, “Autumn,” l. 843.
[175] Garth, “Dispensary,” ii, 3, 14; iv, 260.
[176] Virgil, “Georgics,” i, 329, “quo maxuma motu Terra tremit;”
Dryden, “Georgics,” i, 430, “the mountains nod and earth’s entrails
tremble.” Virgil, “Eclogue 6,” “rigidas motare cacumina quercus;”
Dryden, “Pastoral 6,” “nodding forests to the numbers danced;” cf.
Pope, “Messiah,” “nodding forests on the mountain dance,” and Milton,
“Comus,” l. 38, “nodding horror of the wood.”
[177] Virgil, “Georgics,” iii, 243; “Aeneid,” iv, 525.
[178] Milton, “Paradise Lost,” vii, 434.
[179] Pope, “Windsor Forest,” l. 118; cf. note in Courthope edition.
[180] Shenstone, “Virtuoso.”
[181] Parnell, “Anacreontic.”
[182] Waller, “On a Brede of Divers Colors.”
[183] Hugo Blümner, “Die Farbenbezeichnungen bei den römischen
Dichtern,” pp. 184–98. Blümner shows that πορφύρεος was used by the
Greeks with widely varying meanings, and adds, “Ganz ähnlich ist der
Gebrauch, den die römischen Dichter von _purpureus_ machen nur
zweilfellos in viel weniger ursprünglicher Weise.” He says further that
the Latin poetical use of “purpureus” did not follow the speech of
daily life.
[184] This constant use of Latin and Greek names for English peasants
was frequently satirized. Dryden makes Limberham say to Brainsick, “But
why, of all names, would you choose a Phyllis? There have been so many
Phyllises in song I thought there was not another to be had for love or
money.”--“Works,” VI, 62. Cf. Watts, “Meditation in a Grove”:
No Phyllis shall infect the air
With her unhallow’d name.
[185] Compare Ridley’s characteristic commendation of Christopher
Pitt’s poems,
In every line, in every word you speak
I read the Roman and confess the Greek,
and Pitt’s precept in Vida’s “Art of Poetry,” i, 102,
Explore the ancients with a watchful eye,
Lay all their charms and elegancies by,
Then to their use the precious spoils apply.
[186] Pope, “Discourse on Pastoral Poetry.”
[187] Dryden, “Works,” XV, 231.
[188] Compare especially Gay’s “Monday,” Pope’s “Spring,” and Virgil’s
“Third Eclogue.” Also Gay’s “Thursday,” and Virgil’s “Eighth Eclogue.”
[189] Addison, “Letter from Italy” (1701).
[190] Tickell, “Oxford” (1707).
[191] Pope, “January and May,” l. 454.
[192] Pope, “Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot,” l. 149.
[193] William Thomson, “To the Author of Leonidas.”
[194] Pope, “Essay on Criticism,” i, 350.
[195] Gray, “Ode.”
[196] In this connection see the following passages from Ruskin,
Humboldt, and Veitch on Nature in the poetry of the ancients:
“Thus, as far as I recollect, without a single exception, every Homeric
landscape, intended to be beautiful, is composed of a fountain, a
meadow, and a shady grove. This ideal is very interestingly marked,
as intended for a perfect one, in the fifth book of the Odyssey; when
Mercury himself stops for a moment, though on a message, to look on a
landscape ‘which even an immortal might be gladdened to behold.’...
Now the notable things in this description are, first, the evident
subservience of the whole landscape to human comfort, to the foot, the
taste, or the smell; and, secondly, that throughout the passage there
is not a single figurative word expressive of the things being in any
wise other than plain grass, fruit, or flower.... If we glance through
the references to pleasant landscape which occur in other parts of the
Odyssey, we shall always be struck by this quiet subjection of their
every feature to human service, and by the excessive similarity in the
scenes. Perhaps the spot intended, after this, to be most perfect,
may be the garden of Alcinous, where the principal ideas are, still
more definitely, order, symmetry, and fruitfulness.”--Ruskin, “Modern
Painters,” chapter on “Classical Landscape.”
“Homer looks on nature as it affects man--its power of sustaining life,
its subserviency to our physical wants. Hence the side of nature which
is lovingly regarded by him is not mountain, or rock, or wild sea--all
fruitless and barren--but flat soft meadow-land, diversified, it may
be, with tree and fountain, filled with waving grass--good pasture-land
for nourishing the useful ox, or cow, or sheep.... In Theocritus ... we
do not go beyond the softer side ... the accessories of the shepherd’s
life faithfully noted.... The aspect of nature which Virgil loved was
the soft and pastoral side of Italian scenery. In so far as he has
depicted free nature, it is seen almost wholly from the human side, and
in its relation to man’s works, life and action.”--Veitch, “The Feeling
for Nature in Scottish Poetry,” I, 88–91.
“Es is oftmals ausgesprochen worden, dass die Freude an der Natur, wenn
auch dem Alterthume nicht fremd, doch in ihm als Ausdruck des Gefühls
sparsamer und minder lebhaft gewesen sei denn in der neueren Zeit....
In dem hellenischen Alterthum ... das eigentlich Naturbeschreibende
zeigt sich dann nur als ein Beiwerk, weil in der griechischen
Kunstbildung sich alles gleichsam im Kreise der Menschheit bewegt.
“Beschreibung der Natur in ihrer gestaltenreichen Mannigfaltigkeit
Naturdichtung als ein abgesonderter Zweig der Litteratur, war den
Griechen völlig fremd. Auch die Landschaft erscheint bei ihnen nur
als Hintergrund eines Gemäldes, vor dem menschliche Gestalten sich
bewegen. Leidenschaften in Thaten ausbrechend fesselten fast allein
den Sinn. Ein bewegtes öffentliches Volksleben zog ab von der dumpfen,
schwärmerischen Versenkung in das stille Treiben der Natur; ja den
physischen Erscheinungen wurde immer eine Beziehung auf die Menschheit
beigelegt, sei es in den Verhältnissen der äusseren Gestaltung oder der
inneren anregenden Thatkraft. Fast nur solche Beziehungen machten die
Naturbetrachung würdig, unter der sinnigen Form des Gleichnisses, als
abgesonderte kleine Gemälde voll objectiver Lebendigkeit in das Gebiet
der Dichtung gezogen zu werden.”--“Kosmos,” II, 5, 6.
[197] In this connection compare the following significant passage
from Taine: “Rien ne m’a plus intéressé dans les villas romaines
que leurs anciens maîtres. Les naturalistes le savent, on comprend
trés-bien l’animal d’aprés la coquille. L’endroit où j’ai commencé
à le comprendre est la villa Albani.... Cette villa est un débris,
comme le squellette fossile d’une vie qui a duré deux siècles, et dont
le principal plaisir consistait dans la conversation, dans la belle
représentation, dans les habitudes de salon, et d’antichambre. L’homme
ne s’intéressait pas aux objets inanimés, il ne leur reconnaissait pas
une âme et une beauté propre; ils ne servaient que de fond au tableau,
fond vague et d’importance moins qu’accessoire. Toute l’attention était
occupée par le tableau lui-meme, c’est-à-dire par l’intrigue et le
drame humain. Pour reporter quelque partie de cette attention sur les
arbres, les eaux, le paysage, il fallait les humaniser, leur ôter, leur
forme et leur disposition naturelle, leur air ‘sauvage,’ l’apparence du
désordre et du désert, leur donner autant que possible l’aspect d’un
salon, d’un galerie à colonnades, d’une grande cour de palais.”--Taine,
“Voyage en Italie,” I, 231, 232 (Paris, Librairie Hatchette et Cie,
1893).
[198] Cowley, “Of Agriculture.”
[199] “Cyder,” i, 248.
[200] Shairp, “The Poetic Interpretation of Nature,” p. 199.
[201] “Cyder,” i, 563.
[202] “Cyder,” ii, 65.
[203] “Pastorals,” i, 6; iii, 1, 6; iii, 41–44; iii, 69–74; i, 10; iv,
154; v, 8; i, 27; ii, 59; ii, 125–28; iii, 65–68; iv, 153–60.
[204] Rowe, “An Epistle to Flavia;” Pope, “An Impromptu to Lady
Winchilsea.”
[205] Wordsworth, “Essay, Supplementary to the Preface.”
[206] The estimate of Lady Winchilsea here given was based on the 1713
edition of her poems. In 1903, through the kindness of Mr. Edmund
Gosse and of the Earl of Winchilsea, I was enabled to bring out a
complete edition of her works. In the Introduction to those poems I
have endeavored to indicate Lady Winchilsea’s literary qualities and
affiliations, and to give some idea of her life and personality. So
far as her attitude toward Nature is concerned nothing is to be found
in the scope of her voluminous verse that is of higher significance
than the poems published by Ward. The new fact that does emerge from
a fuller knowledge of her writings is the very interesting relation
between her poetry of Nature and the events of her life. For an
analysis of this relation I must refer to pp. cxxxiii-cxxxiv of the
Introduction to my edition of her poems (“The Poems of Anne, Countess
of Winchilsea,” The University of Chicago Press, 1903).
[207] “Miscellany Poems on Several Occasions,” Written by a Lady, 1713.
[208] In the references to the nightingale by Chaucer, Milton, Cowper,
Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley, Matthew Arnold, and Mrs. Browning, the only
approaches to description of the appearance of the bird are Matthew
Arnold’s “tawny-throated,” Keats’ “full-throated,” and Coleridge’s
“bright, bright eyes, their eyes both bright and full.”
[209] Cf. Milton’s, “sweetest, saddest plight;” or “most musical, most
melancholy;” and Shelley’s, “melodious pain;” and Keats’ “plaintive
anthem;” and Matthew Arnold’s, “Wild, unquenched, deep-sunken,
old-world pain.” Coleridge speaks once of “pity-pleading strains,” but
in another poem contends for the “merry nightingale,” and refuses to
hear anything but “love and joyance” in the song.
[210] Cf. Matthew Arnold’s
“How thick the bursts come crowding through the leaves;”
and Chaucer’s “lusty nightingale” whose voice made a “loud rioting;”
and Shelley’s “storm of sound;” and Wordsworth’s “tumultuous harmony;”
and Keats’ “pouring forth thy soul abroad in such an ecstasy;” and
Coleridge’s
The merry nightingale
That crowds and hurries and precipitates
With fast thick warble his delicious notes.
[211] Cf. Arnold’s “Eternal passion!” Milton’s “amorous power;”
Shelley’s “voluptuous nightingale;” Coleridge’s “wanton song;” and all
of Mrs. Browning’s “Bianca among the Nightingales.”
[212] Cf. Gosse, “Gossip in a Library,” p. 123; “Eighteenth Century,”
p. 35.
[213] Gay, “Rural Sports,” i, 35.
[214] _Ibid._, i, 99.
[215] Gay’s “Chair.”
[216] See “Coquette Mother and Daughter” for a second reference to the
fragrant bean-flower before Thomson.
[217] Compare Tennyson’s “wrinkled sea” in “The Eagle.”
[218] As illustrative of this point compare, Virgil, Eclogue viii, 27,
28, and Gay, Pastoral III, 59–62; Virgil, Eclogue i, 59–63, and Gay,
Pastoral III, 67–72; Virgil, Eclogue v, 36–39, and Gay, Pastoral V,
83–87; Virgil, Eclogue v, 76–78, and Gay, Pastoral V, 153–58; Virgil,
Eclogue iv, 1–3, and Gay, Pastoral VI, 1–3; Virgil, Eclogue vi, and
Gay, Pastoral VI; Virgil, Eclogue viii, and Gay, Pastoral IV.
[219] Pastoral I.
[220] “Night Piece on Death;” “The Hermit.”
[221] “Health.”
[222] “The Flies.”
[223] “The Hermit.”
[224] “Anacreontic.”
[225] “Anacreontic.”
[226] “Health.”
[227] Parnell, “Poetical Works,” p. 77.
[228] Pattison died in 1727, and he was in college during the four
preceding years. The records of his life are scanty, but he probably
wrote this poem before 1723, when he left the region of his dear Ituna,
that being the stream on whose banks he was accustomed to murmur out
his verses.
[229] See Ramsay, “Poems,” I, xxvii.
[230] Cf. “Richy and Sandy,” l. 8; “Robert, Richy, and Sandy,” ll.
31–34; “Gentle Shepherd,” i, 1, 89; i, 1, 148; ii, 2, 17–40; ii, 3,
27–47; v, 1, 19–43.
[231] Cf. “Gentle Shepherd,” i, 2, 190–93, 207; i, 2, 200–204; ii, 1,
76–86; ii, 2, Prologue; ii, 1, Prologue; iii, 3, 111–16; v, 2, Prologue.
[232] Cf. “Gentle Shepherd,” i, 1, 205; i, 2, 1–4.
[233] Cf. “Richy and Sandy,” ll. 49, 50; “Gentle Shepherd,” i, 1, 43,
44, 67–70, 156; i, 2, 131–37; song viii.
[234] “Gentle Shepherd,” i, 2, 138–47; ii, 4, 43–66; iv, 2, 148–58.
[235] In the copious notes to the 1815 edition of Pennecuik’s
“Tweeddale” is a full account of the country about New-Hall,
accompanied by quotations from Ramsay’s poem, to show the accuracy of
his descriptions.
[236] “Answer to the Foregoing” (to Somerville).
In the poems addressed to Allan Ramsay on the publication of his
works in 1721 we find significant critical approval based on Ramsay’s
avoidance of tame Nature, and his turning from the authority of the
schools. The simile of a garden recurs in a poem by “C. T.” He planted
trees in equal rows and arranged flowers in a parterre, but found his
labor in vain. The narrow scene became daily more distasteful to him,
and finally he went back to the fields where “Nature wantoned in her
prime.” Here he found space, variety, surprise, and was content. Ja.
Arbuckle praises Ramsay for roaming over hill and dale and leaving
“carpet-ground” to “tender-footed beasts,” and for choosing to subsist
on his native stock while other poets pilfered fame by picking the
locks of their predecessors.--“Poems of Allan Ramsay,” I, 4–7.
[237] “The Gentle Shepherd,” ii, 4, 62.
[238] _Ibid._, 50.
[239] “The Gentle Shepherd,” ii, 4, 10.
[240] “To Mr. William Starrat,” l. 46.
[241] “The Gentle Shepherd,” iii, 3, 41.
[242] _Ibid._, i, 1, 137.
[243] _Ibid._, Prologue, i, 2.
[244] _Ibid._, Prologue, ii, 3.
[245] _Ibid._, iii, 3, 43.
[246] “The Gentle Shepherd,” i, 2, 7.
[247] “An Ode to the Ph--,” 1721, st. 1.
[248] “Answer to the Foregoing.”
[249] “Prospect of Plenty.”
[250] (_a_) Dr. Armstrong’s “Winter” in “Imitations of Shakespeare,”
written in 1725, though not published till 1770.
(_b_) Riccaltoun’s “A Winter’s Day,” written before 1725,
published in Savage’s “Miscellany” in 1726, and in “Gentleman’s
Magazine,” 1740.
(_c_) Thomson’s “Winter,” written in fragments before 1725, but
fused into one poem at Mallet’s suggestion in 1726.
[251] “The Art of Preserving Health,” i, 64–96.
[252] _Ibid._, i, 97–102; iii, 39–52.
[253] _Ibid._, iii, 71–96.
[254] Pope, “Works,” VI, 36, 37.
[255] Wordsworth, “Essay Supplementary to the Preface,” 1815.
[256] Pope, “Works,” I, 322; Denham, “Cooper’s Hill;” Marvell, “Upon
the Hill and Grove at Billbarrow,” and “Upon Appleton House.”
[257] Veitch in “Feeling for Nature in Scottish Poetry,” II, 52,
credits Thomson with being the first poet to mention purple heather,
but this mention by Pope is more than twenty years earlier.
[258] Pope, “Works,” I, 346, n. 3; but compare “Autumn,” l. 74.
[259] _Ibid._, I, 269, n. 1.
[260] _Ibid._, I, 283, n. 3; 296, n. 9.
[261] _Ibid._, I, 293; cf. Warton, “Essay on Pope,” I, 6.
[262] (_a_) Description of moonshine walk. (This letter, perhaps
a sincere expression when first written (1713), was a favorite of
Pope’s. When he published his “Letters” he made an amusing blunder
by transferring this passage to a letter dated February 10, 1715, at
which time the park where he was supposed to have watched the moonshine
and reflected on mortality, was under water from the great flood of
February 9; see “Letters,” I, 367.)
(_b_) “Pleasure in Birds,” etc., I, 338.
(_c_) “Twickenham in Spring,” IV, 72, 74.
(_d_) “Autumn,” IV, 89.
[263] “Spectator,” June 21, 1712 (No. 411).
[264] _Ibid._, June 23, 1712 (No. 412); June 25, 1712 (No. 414).
[265] _Ibid._, June 23, 1712 (No. 412).
[266] _Ibid._, May 31 (No. 393).
[267] _Ibid._, October 30, 1712 (No. 523).
[268] _Ibid._, October 30, 1712 (No. 523); cf. “Guardian,” Nos.
22, 23, 28, 30, 32, 40.
[269] See further discussion under “Gardening.”
[270] “Liberty,” Part 3, ll. 514–26.
[271] _Ibid._, Part 4, ll. 348–62.
[272] “The Castle of Indolence,” canto ii, st. 3.
[273] “Spring,” ll. 529–55.
[274] “Summer,” ll. 140–59. Suggested probably by Mallet. See Letter,
August 2, 1726: “Your hint of the sapphire, emerald, ruby, strikes my
imagination with a pleasing taste, and shall not be neglected.”
[275] “Spring,” ll. 574–613.
[276] “Summer,” ll. 1116–68.
[277] “Spring,” ll. 614–30.
[278] _Ibid._, ll. 636–60.
[279] _Ibid._, ll. 690–701.
[280] “Winter,” ll. 245–56.
[281] “Spring,” ll. 21–25; “Winter,” ll. 144–47.
[282] “Spring,” ll. 770–85.
[283] “Summer,” ll. 371–422.
[284] “Spring,” ll. 808–20; “Summer,” ll. 506–15.
[285] “Spring,” ll. 362–71; “Summer,” ll. 489–93.
[286] “Spring,” ll. 336–73.
[287] “Autumn,” ll. 360–457; “Winter,” ll. 788–93.
[288] “Spring,” ll. 702–28.
[289] “Autumn,” ll. 1172–1207.
[290] “Spring,” ll. 394–442.
[291] _Ibid._, ll. 189, 388.
[292] “Winter,” ll. 1–14.
[293] “Summer,” ll. 1103–68.
[294] “Autumn,” ll. 311–48.
[295] “Winter,” ll. 72–201.
[296] See as illustrative, “Winter,” ll. 127, 738–41.
[297] “Summer,” l. 1704.
[298] “Autumn,” ll. 1088–1102.
[299] See as illustrative, “Spring,” ll. 30–31, 139–41, 145–51,
398–444; “Winter,” ll. 54–57, 77–80, 195–96, 202–3, etc.
[300] “Autumn,” ll. 710–31; cf. Wordsworth, “Prelude,” viii, 265.
[301] “Autumn,” ll. 151–52; “Summer,” ll. 47–66.
[302] “Spring,” ll. 189–202.
[303] “Summer,” ll. 1647–59.
[304] _Ibid._, ll. 1682–98.
[305] “Spring,” ll. 34–43.
[306] _Ibid._, ll. 44–47.
[307] “Autumn,” ll. 153–69.
[308] “Summer,” ll. 352–70.
[309] _Ibid._, ll. 371–442.
[310] “Spring,” ll. 589–608.
[311] “Spring,” ll. 494–509.
[312] “Spring,” ll. 107–13, 950–62; “Summer,” ll. 1406–41.
[313] W. D. McClintock, unpublished notes.
[314] “Summer,” ll. 819–29; “Autumn,” ll. 781–804; cf. Shairp, “Poetic
Interpretation of Nature,” p. 191, for the geographical use of Nature
in Milton.
[315] “Summer,” ll. 1161–68.
[316] Cf. Wordsworth, “To Joanna,” ll. 54–65.
[317] “Winter,” ll. 714–16; “Spring,” ll. 849–52.
[318] “Autumn,” ll. 773–76.
[319] “Winter,” ll. 116–17.
[320] In 1720 there appeared in the “Edinburgh Miscellany,” a poem
entitled, “On a Country Life by a Student in the University.” The poem
is interesting as being Thomson’s first poetical treatment of the theme
which he was afterward to adopt. The verse is in somewhat stiff and
formal heroic couplets, and the poem is marked by classicisms. But
there are lines and phrases suggestive of Thomson’s later work and the
plan and general tone are, as Sir Harris Nicholas has pointed out,
strongly suggestive of “The Seasons.” The young poet’s love of country
life is quite clearly genuine.
[321] Cf. also remarks in Preface to second, third, and fourth editions
of “Winter”: “I know no subject more elevating, more amusing; more
ready to awake the poetical enthusiasm, the philosophical reflection,
and the moral sentiment, than the works of Nature. Where can we meet
with such variety, such beauty, such magnificence? All that enlarges
and transports the soul? What more inspiring than a calm, wide survey
of them?”
[322] “Spring,” ll. 868–74.
[323] “Autumn,” ll. 670–72. Cf. Wordsworth, “The Tables Turned,” st. 6.
[324] “Summer,” ll. 1380–82.
[325] “Autumn,” l. 1309.
[326] Compare Pope’s rhetorical statement of the same speculative
conception.
[327] Since the publication of this study of Thomson I have read with
much interest Leon Morel’s “James Thomson: Sa vie et ses œuvres,” 1895.
Chaps. iii and iv of Part II deal fully with Thomson’s attitude toward
external Nature and with his technical excellences as a descriptive
poet.
[328] Dyer uses almost as many words ending in “y” as Ambrose Philips.
“Stenchy,” “towery,” “framy,” “sleeky,” “thready,” “cropsy,” “spiry,”
are illustrative.
[329] “The Fleece,” i, 193.
[330] In “Observations on the River Wye,” by William Gilpin, pp. 103–8,
Dyer’s “Grongar Hill” is, however, criticized for not accurately
representing distance. The grove must be distant if it can be
rightfully called purple, but the castle beyond it “is touched with all
the strength of a foreground; you see the very ivy creeping upon the
walls.”
[331] “The Fleece,” i, 577.
[332] _Ibid._, ii, 55.
[333] _Ibid._, 310.
[334] _Ibid._, 518.
[335] _Ibid._, 241.
[336] “The Fleece,” i, 555.
[337] _Ibid._, 59.
[338] _Ibid._, 41.
[339] “The Country Walk,” ll. 86–99; 33–40.
[340] He calls the sun “Phoebus” and “Apollo;” he occasionally uses
such words as “swain,” “bloomy,” “sylvan,” “verdant,” “flowery;” and he
speaks of “the wanton zephyr;” and he refers to a grove as the “haunt
of Phyllis.”
[341] “The Country Walk,” ll. 58–63.
[342] Cf. “Grongar Hill,” l. 137.
[343] Cf. “The Country Walk,” l. 120.
[344] Thomson to Mallet, September, 1726.
[345] Thomson’s letters to Mallet in 1726.
[346] Letter to Mallet, July 10, 1725.
[347] _Ibid._, August 2, 1726.
[348] Letters to Mallet, June 13 and July 10, 1726.
[349] Cf. “The Wanderer,” v, 237, 238 (roads); v, 253–68 (fields
and bushes); v, 230–35 (sunset); v, 363–74 (the rainbow); iv, 59–63
(morning); iii, 15–27 (moonrise); v, 8, 15–20 (foliage and flowers); v,
203–10 (bean fields); i, 195–98 (winter landscape); iv, 85–96 (sunrise).
[350] In 1730 appeared a parody entitled “The Thresher’s Miscellany” by
“Arthur Duck.”
[351] “The Chace,” ii, 79–82.
[352] “To the Right Honorable Lady Anne Coventry.”
[353] An excellent example is “Nancy of the Vale” which takes as its
model,
Nerine Galatea! thymo mihi dulcior Hyblae!
Candidior cygnis! hedera formosior alba,
but compares Nancy to the “wild-duck’s tender young,” to the water-lily
on Avon’s side, her eyes to the azure plume of the halcyon, etc.
[354] “Rural Elegance,” st. 20.
[355] _Ibid._, st. 19.
[356] “Rural Elegance,” sts. 4, 5, 6, 8.
[357] _Ibid._, st. 16.
[358] “The Spleen,” ll. 646–87.
[359] _Ibid._, l. 681.
[360] “The Epistle of the Thistle.”
[361] “Contemplation.”
[362] See Hervey, “Meditations,” ii, 239; Fielding, “Tom Jones,” VII,
chap. i.
[363] “To Thomson on Sophonisba.”
[364] “Night Thoughts,” v, 126–30.
[365] _Ibid._, 176.
[366] _Ibid._, 171.
[367] See “Night Thoughts,” vi, where there is an interesting statement
of the theory afterward expounded in Coleridge’s “Ode to Dejection.”
Compare Young’s,
Objects are but th’ occasion; ours th’ exploit;
Ours is the cloth, the pencil, and the paint,
Which nature’s admirable picture draws (“Night,” vi, 431),
with Coleridge’s,
O Lady! we receive but what we give
And in our life alone does nature live;
Ours is her wedding garment; ours her shroud.
In the same passage by Young is the line concerning the power of our
senses that
Half create the wondrous world they see,
from which Wordsworth took a line in “Tintern Abbey.” In Satire I, 249
there are some lines that sound absurdly like certain stanzas in “Peter
Bell”:
On every thorn delightful wisdom grows;
In every rill a sweet instruction flows.
But some, untaught, o’erhear the whispering rill,
In spite of sacred leisure, blockheads still.
The lines
In distant wilds, by human eyes unseen,
She rears her flowers, and spreads her velvet green;
Pure gurgling rills the lonely desert trace
And waste their music on the savage race (Satire V, 229),
come between the similar passages by Gay and Gray.
Cf. also the simile of the eagle and the serpent (“Vanquished Love,”
Book II, 226), with Shelley’s “Revolt of Islam,” i, sts. 8–10.
[368] “Ode to Fear,” “Ode to Simplicity,” “An Epistle to Sir Thomas
Hanmer,” “Ode to Pity.”
[369] “Ode to Fear,” “On the Poetical Character,” “Popular
Superstitions,” st. 11, “An Epistle to Sir Thomas Hanmer.”
[370] Mason, “Memoirs of Gray,” p. 261.
[371] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book IV, 26 (1770).
[372] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book IV, 38–51 (1770); cf. “Hymn to
the Naiads,” ll. 243–49; cf. Wordsworth, “Prelude,” Book I, 402, and
many other passages concerning the silent power of Nature over him in
his youth.
[373] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book I, 136–40 (1757).
[374] _Ibid._, 120 (1744).
[375] _Ibid._, 150 (1757).
[376] _Ibid._, 153–60 (1757).
[377] _Ibid._, 168–75 (1757); cf. Wordsworth, “Tintern Abbey,” ll.
41–49.
[378] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book III, 591–6O5 (1744). This
“sacred order” of the universe is one of the points on which Wordsworth
dwells, and he refers frequently to the tranquilizing, steadying effect
which the contemplation of this order and harmony will have on the mind
of man. See “Excursion,” Book IV, 1198–1219, 1254–65.
[379] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book III, 615–33 (1744).
[380] “Odes,” Book I, Ode 14, st. 4–6; cf. Wordsworth’s statement that
Nature reveals herself to the heart that “watches and receives.”
[381] “Odes,” Book I, Ode 5, st. 8.
[382] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book I, 670–75 (1757).
[383] “Pleasures of Imagination,” Book III, 484 (1757).
[384] _Ibid._, I, 576–89 (1757).
[385] _Ibid._, 432–37 (1757). Akenside’s presentation of this
doctrine has led Gosse to call him a “sort of frozen Keats,” but
Akenside’s pleasure in Nature was philosophical rather than sensuous.
His scientific delight in the analyzed rainbow (“Pleasures of
Imagination,” Book II, 103–20 [1744]) would have filled Keats with
horror.
[386] “Sickness,” v, 5.
[387] “Hymn to May,” st. 20.
[388] “Sickness,” v, 17.
[389] Phelps, “The Beginnings of the English Romantic Movement.”
[390] Wordsworth, “A Poet’s Epitaph,” st. 10.
[391] “On the Pleasure Arising from Vicissitude.”
[392] “Couplet about Birds.”
[393] “All-beauteous Nature! by thy boundless charms,” “the vast,
various Landscape,” “sight-refreshing green,” “the thousand-colored
tulip,” are typical Thomsonian phrases.
“Liquid lapse of murm’ring waters”
--“Enthusiast,” l. 93, “Paradise Lost,” viii, 263;
“Mountain shagg’d with horrid shapes”
--“Enthusiast,” l. 75; “Comus,” l. 429;
“When young-eyed spring profusely throws
From her green lap the pink and rose.”
--“Ode to Fancy,” l. 106; “Song on May Morning;”
“Then lay me by some haunted stream,
Rapt in some wild poetic dream.”
--“Ode to Fancy,” l. 41; “L’Allegro,” l. 129;
are some of the characteristic instances of the echoes from Milton.
[394] “The Enthusiast.”
[395] _Ibid._
[396] “Ode to Fancy.”
[397] “The Enthusiast.”
[398] “The Enthusiast.” Cf. Thomson, “Liberty,” ii, 1–26, for a similar
eulogy of a past golden age, but without Warton’s modern application.
[399] “An Essay on the Genius and Writings of Pope.”
[400] Note such lines as
Haste thee nymph, and hand in hand,
With thee lead a buxom band;
Bring fantastic-footed joy, etc.,
But ever against restless heat, etc.,
Let not my due feet fail to climb, etc.--“Approach of Summer.”
[401] See under “Travels.”
[402] “Hope.”
[403] “Vision of Fancy,” Elegy 3.
[404] _Ibid._
[405] “Fable IV.”
[406] “The Bee Flower.”
[407] “To the Rev. Lamb.”
[408] “Fable IV.”
[409] “Autumnal Elegy.”
[410] “Fable X.”
[411] “Inscription on the Door of a Study.”
[412] “The Immensity of the Supreme Being.”
[413] _Ibid._, l. 56. Cf. also the similar lines in “Hymn to
the Supreme Being,” st. 16. It was apparently a favorite image. See
Browning’s reference to it in his poem on Smart.
[414] “Almada Hill,” l. 330.
[415] “The Sorceress,” st. 4.
[416] “Elegy,” st. 4.
[417] “Syr Martyn,” ii, 31.
[418] “Pollio,” st. 3.
[419] “Eskdale Braes,” st. 1.
[420] See Bailey Saunders, “Life and Letters of James Macpherson,” p.
14.
[421] “Carric-Thura.”
[422] “Carthon.”
[423] Dr. Blair has a significant comment on the truth in the poems
of Ossian. “The introduction of foreign images betrays a poet copying
not from nature, but from other writers. Hence so many lions and
tigers, and eagles and serpents which we meet with in the similes of
modern poets; as if these animals had acquired some right to a place
in poetical comparisons for ever, because employed by ancient authors.
They employed them with propriety, as objects generally known in their
country; but they are absurdly used for illustration by us, who know
them only at second-hand, or by description.”
[424] Blair’s “Critical Dissertation,” in Tauchnitz ed. of the “Ossian
Poems.”
[425] See “Child of Elle,” “Edom o’ Gordon,” “Hardyknute,” and others.
[426] “Robin and Makyne.”
[427] “Lord Thomas and Fair Annet.”
[428] “Robin Hood and Guy of Gisborne.”
[429] “Adam Bell.”
[430] “Barbara Allan’s Cruelty.”
[431] “The Marriage of Sir Gawaine.”
[432] “Gil Morice.”
[433] “King Edward IV and Tanner of Tamworth.”
[434] “The King and the Miller of Mansfield.”
[435] “Adam Bell.”
[436] “Robin Hood and Guy of Gisborne.”
[437] For the forest in mediaeval poetry see Vernon Lee, “Euphorion,”
p. 122.
[438] “Hardyknute.”
[439] “Young Waters.”
[440] “Young Waters.”
[441] “The Heir of Linne.”
[442] Schiller, “Ueber die Naive und Sentimentale Dichtung.”
[443] The poem is quoted entire by Gosse in his “Eighteenth Century
Literature.”
[444] In this poem about 16 per cent. of the lines have something to do
with Nature. In Wordsworth’s “Descriptive Sketches” over 50 per cent.
of the lines treat of Nature.
[445] “The Minstrel,” Preface.
[446] Wordsworth, “The Excursion,” i, 108–300.
[447] _Ibid._, iv, 466–600.
[448] Wordsworth, “The Prelude,” “Advertisement.”
[449] “The Minstrel,” i, 52.
[450] _Ibid._, 10.
[451] _Ibid._, 9. Of this stanza Gray said in a letter to Beattie,
March, 1771: “But this, of all others, is my favorite stanza. It is
true poetry; it is inspiration; only (to show it is mortal) there is
one blemish; the word garniture suggesting an idea of dress, and, what
is worse, of French dress.” Beattie said he had often wished “to alter
this same word, but had not been able to hit upon a better.”--Dyce,
“Memoir of Beattie,” p. xxxvii.
Gray’s praise of Beattie was faint compared to Beattie’s admiration of
Gray. In 1765 he declared that he had “long and passionately admired”
Gray’s writings. He thought Gray’s poems finer than those of his
contemporaries in any nation. He thought his taste most exact, his
judgment most sound, and his learning most extensive. See Dyce, “Memoir
of Beattie,” pp. xvi, xviii.
[452] Dyce, “Memoir of Beattie,” p. xxxvi.
[453] Cowper, Letter to Rev. William Unwin, April, 1784.
[454] Dyce, “Memoir of Beattie,” p. xxxv.
[455] His chief poems are, “Four Moral Eclogues” (1778); “Four Elegies”
(published 1760 but written earlier); “Amwell, A Descriptive Poem”
(published 1776 but written 1768); and “Odes and Amoebaean Eclogues”
(1782). His “Epistle on the Garden” and “Essay on Painting” will be
spoken of later.
It is interesting to note the spirit of apology with which Scott’s
friends and admirers comment on his choice of subjects. In such poetry
there is little opportunity for genius, for, says Mr. Hoole, “A hill, a
vale, a forest, a rivulet, a cataract, can be described only by general
terms; the hill must swell, the vale sink, the rivulet murmur, and the
cataract foam.” Mr. Hoole recognizes the “slight estimation” in which
descriptive poetry is commonly held, but thinks there are devices to
render it attractive and calls attention to the skill with which Mr.
Scott has made his poems “interesting by the introduction of historical
incidents, apt illusions, and moral reflections.”
[456] At this line Mr. Hoole’s admiration broke down. He could only
regret that Mr. Scott’s desire for novelty had led him to admit such
circumstances as no versification can make poetical.
[457] See “Advertisement” to “Poetical Sketches.”
[458] Introduction to “Songs of Innocence.”
[459] “Night.”
[460] “Contemplation.”
[461] “Book of Thel.”
[462] “Inebriety.”
[463] “The Village.”
[464] “The Choice.”
[465] “The Borough” especially Letters I and IX.
[466] “Tales of the Hall,” Book IV.
[467] In a letter to Newton, November 16, 1791, he wrote: “I would
that I could see some of the mountains which you have seen; especially
because Dr. Johnson has pronounced that no man is qualified to be a
poet who has never seen a mountain. But mountains I shall never see,
unless, perhaps, in a dream, or unless there are such in heaven.”
[468] See “Task,” i, 764; iv, 254–58. The best lines on the moon are in
“Task,” iv, 3,
the wintry flood, in which the moon
Sees her unwrinkled face reflected bright.
[469] “Task,” i, 520; vi, 495.
[470] “Truth,” l. 238.
[471] “Task,” iv, 322.
[472] Illustrative similitudes are those drawn from the thunderstorm
“Truth,” l. 238), deer (“Task,” iii, 108), peacocks and pheasants
(“Truth,” l. 58), elm and vine (“Retirement,” l. 129), moles (“Task,”
i, 276), etc.
[473] In a letter to Rev. William Unwin, October, 1784, Cowper wrote,
“My descriptions are all from nature; not one of them second-handed.”
[474] Letter to Lady Herbert, October 12, 1785.
[475] “Task,” v, 58.
[476] _Ibid._, 27.
[477] _Ibid._, 41.
[478] _Ibid._, i, 161.
[479] _Ibid._, 358.
[480] _Ibid._, vi, 147.
[481] _Ibid._, i, 304.
[482] “Task,” i, 195.
[483] _Ibid._, 185.
[484] _Ibid._, 159.
[485] _Ibid._, 346.
[486] “Task,” vi, 310.
[487] _Ibid._, v, 22.
[488] _Ibid._, vi, 77.
[489] _Ibid._, i, 109, 142.
[490] _Ibid._, iv, 700.
[491] _Ibid._, 695.
[492] See “Hope,” ll. 39–60; “Task,” iii, 721; iv, 780; iii, 301; and
other passages. In the passage from “Hope” compare the line:
She spreads the morning over Eastern hills,
and Wordsworth’s
A boy I loved the sun
... for this cause that I had seen him lay
His beauty on the morning hills.--“Prelude,” ii, 183.
[493] See “Retirement,” ll. 481, 563; “Task,” iii, 314, 306.
[494] “Task,” i, 749.
[495] “Task,” vi, 109; cf. ll. 84–117 of Wordsworth’s “The Tables
Turned”:
Books! ’tis a dull and endless strife,
* * * * *
Come forth into the light of things,
Let Nature be your teacher.
She has a world of ready wealth
Our minds and hearts to bless.
* * * * *
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings;
Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things.
See also, “To My Sister”:
One moment now may give us more
Than years of toiling reason.
[496] “Task,” vi, 121–97.
[497] _Ibid._, i, 369.
[498] “Retirement,” l. 419.
[499] “Task,” vi, 181.
[500] _Ibid._, 59.
[501] Burns, “Works,” V, 185.
[502] _Ibid._, I, 28. Cf. lines in the “Epistle to William Simson”:
Ev’n winter bleak has charms to me
When winds rave thro’ the naked tree;
Or frosts on hills of Ochiltree
Are hoary gray;
Or blinding drifts wild-furious flee
Dark’ning the day!
O Nature! a’ thy shews and forms
To feeling, pensive hearts hae charms,
Whether the summer kindly warms
Wi’ life an’ light;
Or winter howls, in gusty storms,
The lang, dark night.
[503] Burns, “Works,” IV, 272.
[504] “The Vision,” sts. 36, 37.
[505] Burns, “Works,” I, 18. In one poem Burns declares that he prefers
“wild mossy moors” to “Forth’s sunny shores,” but a characteristic
reason,
For there by a lanely sequestered stream
Resides a sweet lassie, my thought and my dream,
forbids the use of the passage as a proof of real enjoyment of the wild
in Nature.
[506] Burns, “Works,” VI, 242.
[507] _Ibid._, p. 241.
[508] _Ibid._, V, 165.
[509] Burns warmly admired Ossian, and this phrase sounds like an echo
from one of the Ossian poems.
[510] Burns, “A Winter Night.”
[511] _Ibid._, “The Brigs of Ayr.”
[512] _Ibid._, “Works,” V, 231.
[513] Burns, “Elegy on Captain Henderson.”
[514] Bowles, “Poetical Works,” II, XII (ed. 1855).
[515] See sonnet by Coleridge.
[516] “After this third edition came out, my friend Mr. Crutwell, the
printer, wrote a letter saying that two young gentlemen, strangers, one
a particularly handsome and pleasing youth, lately from Westminster
School, [Robert Southey] and both literary and intelligent, spoke in
high commendation of my volume.”--Bowles, “Poems” (Introduction to ed.
of 1837).
[517] “Fourteen Sonnets,” 1789. The same with additions, 1790. The same
reproduced with illustrations, 1798.
[518] Bowles, “Poems,” Introduction to edition of 1837.
[519] “Hope.”
[520] “The Tweed Visited.”
[521] “Elegy Written at the Hotwells, Bristol.”
[522] “To the River Itchen.”
[523] “The River Cherwell.”
[524] “Elegy Written at the Hotwells, Bristol.”
[525] “The River Wainsbeck.”
[526] _Ibid._
[527] “At Tynemouth Priory.”
[528] “Absence.”
[529] “The Bells, Ostend.”
[530] “At Malvern.”
[531] Bowles, “Memoir.”
[532] I have been unable to find the exact date of this letter, but
in all probability it antedates “The Life of John Buncle” and the
“Descriptive Poem” by some years. It was probably before 1760, because
at that time occurred the quarrel between Lyttleton and Brown. It seems
also probable that it was before 1756, because at that time Dr. Brown
took the living at Great Horkesley, near Colchester. The most natural
period for the Letter is between 1748 and 1754, for at some time during
that period, and apparently during the early part of it, Dr. Brown
held the living of Morland, Westmoreland. (See “Brown,” “Osbaldiston,”
“Lyttleton” in “Nat. Dict. of Biog.” and memoir of Brown in “British
Poets.”)
[533] Young explains that he cannot find anyone to spell the names for
him so he must spell them as they are pronounced.
[534] Cf. L. Charlanne, “L’influence française en Angleterre au XVII^e
siècle,” p. 115.
[535] Alicia Amherst, “A History of Gardening in England,” p. 206.
[536] Few of these details, except the radiating avenues and the high
jets of water characteristic of Le Nôtre’s gardens, were absolutely
new after 1660. Topiary work was of Roman origin. “It is said to have
been invented by Matius, a friend of the emperor Augustus. The chief
gardener was known as the “topiarius” and it was his none too easy task
to see that the evergreens were artistically shorn” (Nichols, “English
Pleasure Gardens,” p. 39). The cutting of trees and shrubs into quaint
forms was introduced into England in the early Tudor period and became
very popular. The clipped garden at Heslington, near York, is said to
date from about 1560. In 1618 Lawson in his “A New Orchard and Garden”
wrote, “Your Gardiner can frame your lesser wood to the shape of men
armed in the field, ready to give battell; or swift-running Grey Hounds
to chase the Deere, or hunt the Hare.” There was also early protest
against such work. Bacon in his “Essay on Gardens” said, “I, for my
part, do not like images cut out in juniper or other garden stuff; they
be for children.” Of figured and colored knots Bacon said, “They be but
toys; you may see as good sights many times in tarts.” He also objected
to fantastic fountains where the water spouted forth in “feathers,
drinking glasses, canopies, and the like.”
[537] In the Arts and Crafts Museum at Hamburg there is a fine and
perhaps unique historical collection of garden prints, a collection
made by Professor Brinckmann, director of the Museum, and shown at the
great Gardening Exhibition in Hamburg, 1897 (Albert Forbes Sieveking,
“Gardens Ancient and Modern,” 1897).
[538] Sir John Thynne bought Longleat in 1541 and was occupied during
1567–79 in building the mansion. The baron Thynne who made the gardens
became viscount in 1682 and Kip’s plans date sometime after that year.
Lady Winchilsea, who visited often at Longleat, wrote, about 1690, a
poem to Lady Worsley, the only daughter of Viscount Weymouth, in which
she speaks of
Longleate that justly has all praise engross’d,
The strangers wonder and our nations boast.
She comments on the finish in details and on the splendid effect of the
whole. She describes labyrinths, flowery groves, smooth grass terraces,
but she devotes her most eager lines to the fountains. Words are
inadequate to
Paint her Cascades that spread their sheets so wide
And emulate th’ Italian waters pride,
Her Fountains which so high their streames extend
Th’ amazed Clouds now feel the Rains ascend,
Whilst Phoebus as they tow’rds his Mantion flow
Graces th’ attempt and marks them with his Bow.
[539] Horace Walpole says of this description, “Any man might design
and _build_ as sweet a garden, who had been born in, and never
stirred out of Holburn.” In Mason’s “English Garden” is another
scornful description of Temple’s idea of a perfect garden.
[540] This treatise is quoted almost entire in Nichols’ “English
Pleasure Gardens” in the chapter on “French Fashions.”
[541] Mr. Barrington in “On the Progress of Gardening,” 1782
(“Archaeologia,” Vol. V) says that Lord Bathurst, at Ryskins, near
Colebrook, was the first to make a winding stream through a garden.
“So unusual was the effect that his friend, Lord Stafford, could not
believe it had been done on purpose, and supposing it had been for
economy, asked him to own fairly how little more it would have cost to
have made the course of the brook in a straight direction.”
[542] “Paradise Lost,” Book IV, 299.
[543] Letter from Horace Walpole to Sir Horace Mann, June 20, 1760. For
a description of Twickenham see “Famous Parks and Gardens” (Nelson and
Sons, London, 1880), p. 134.
[544] Pope, “Works” (Elwin and Courthope), V, 182.
[545] Blomfield and Thomas, “The Formal Garden in England,” p. 80.
[546] William Mason, “The English Garden” (1772). In the edition
of 1738 Dr. Burgh in his notes calls Bacon the prophet, Milton the
herald, and Addison, Pope, and Kent the champions of the true taste in
gardening.
[547] Horace Walpole, “Essay on Modern Gardening” (written in 1770,
printed in 1785).
[548] William Hazlitt, “Gleanings in Old Garden Literature,” p. 66 (ed.
1882).
[549] Letter to Jervas, December 12, 1718. Pope, “Works” (Elwin and
Courthope), IV, 494.
[550] In the very full bibliography (covering the years 1516–1836)
given by Miss Amherst in “A History of Gardening in England” more
than sixty books or articles are listed between 1700 and 1725. Most
of these seem from the titles to be of purely horticultural interest
and have to do with the kitchen garden or the fruit garden rather than
with ornamental grounds. One popular sort of title in which the word
“Recreation” is the keynote would seem to indicate something more
than a collection of practical precepts, but on investigation “The
Ladies’ Recreation” (1707), “The Clergyman’s Recreation” (1714), “The
Gentleman’s Recreation” (1717), “The Lady’s Recreation” (1718), and the
rest, prove to be severely technical, treating only of the planting and
nurture of gardens.
[551] Quoted by Sieveking in “Gardens Ancient and Modern,” p. 122.
[552] There is a discriminating eulogy of Kent by Francis Coventry in
“The World,” April 12, 1753. But see also Coventry’s “Strictures on the
Absurd Novelties Introduced into Gardening, and a Humorous Description
of Squire Mushroom’s Villa,” “The World,” November 15, 1753.
[553] In Mr. Dallaway’s “Supplementary Anecdotes” to Walpole’s “On
Modern Gardening” (In Walpole’s “Anecdotes of Painting,” III, 819,) is
the statement that Mr. Southcote at Wooburn Farm in Surrey, and the
Hon. C. Hamilton at Pain’s Hill, Surrey, undoubtedly preceded Shenstone
in priority of design.
[554] Sir Walter Scott said of this sketch, “I can trace, even
to childhood, a pleasure derived from Dodsley’s description of
Shenstone’s Leasowes, and I envied the poet much more for the pleasure
of accomplishing the objects detailed in his friend’s sketch of his
grounds, than for the possession of pipe, crook, flock, and Phyllis
to boot.” For another full prose description of Leasowes and the
neighboring place, Hagley, see Hugh Miller’s “Impressions of England
and English People,” pp. 95–132, 147–69. See also “On the Tenants of
the Leasowes,” Essay XXI in “Essays” (1758–65) by Goldsmith, for a
description of Leasowes gone to decay. There is an interesting supposed
conversation between Shenstone and a utilitarian cockney visitor
in “Blackwood’s,” XIV, 262 (1823). Another early description is in
“Letters on the Beauties of Hagley, Envil, and the Leasowes,” by Joseph
Heeley, 1777. There are poetical descriptions in Woodhouse’s “Poems”
and in Giles’ “Miscellanies.” In Shenstone’s “Works,” published by
Dodsley in 1773 are collected nine poetical tributes to the place.
In “The Spiritual Quixote” (1773) one of the noted exploits of Mr.
Geoffry Wildgoose, the quixotic reformer, is an attempted defacement
of the gardens at Leasowes in order thereby to save the soul of his
friend Shenstone from being wedded to idols. The influence and fame of
this garden are indicated by the fact that the Marquis de Giradin at
Ermonville called his own place “The Leasowes of France.” Anderson, in
his Preface to Shenstone’s “Works” says that the planning of pleasure
grounds in the manner of Leasowes “seems to require as great powers of
mind as those which we admire in the descriptive poems of Thomson, or
in the noble landscapes of Salvator Rosa, or the Poussins.” For later
descriptions see “Shenstone and the Leasowes” in “Once a Week,” 1862,
by Edward Jesse.
[555] Downing, in “Landscape Gardening,” p. 20, says that the term
“landscape gardening” was first used in this essay. The essay begins,
“Gardening may be divided into three species ... kitchen-gardening ...
parterre-gardening ... and landskip, or picturesque gardening.”
[556] For a full statement of Mason’s views on this point see the notes
to the first book of “The English Garden.” Switzer had already made a
similar claim in regard to Milton. It is interesting to note in this
connection that Kent often referred his love of Nature in gardens to
his study of Spenser’s “Fairy Queen.”
[557] Mason, “The English Garden,” “General Postscript.”
[558] In “The Garden: As Considered in Literature by Some Polite
Persons,” edited by Walter Howe (“Knickerbocker Nuggets” series, G.
P. Putnam’s Sons), may be found essays by Pliny the Elder, Pliny the
Younger, Lord Bacon, Sir William Temple, Addison, Pope, Lady Mary
Wortley Montagu, Whateley, Goldsmith, Walpole, and Evelyn. A fine
edition of Sir William Temple’s essay, “On the Gardens of Epicurus,”
with illustrations, has been brought out by Chatto and Windus.
[559] Viscount Irwin, “The Rise and Progress of the Present Taste in
Planting,” 1767.
[560] Cowper, “The Task,” Book III, “The Gardens,” l. 764.
[561] Richard Payne Knight, “The Landscape, A Didactic Poem,” 1794.
[562] Uvedale Price, “An Essay on the Picturesque” (1794–98).
[563] William Gilpin, “Observations ... Relative Chiefly to Picturesque
Beauty.” Eleven separate volumes, 1783–1809.
[564] Richard Jago, “Edge Hill, or the Rural Prospect Delineated
and Moralized,” 1767. In this poem Jago describes the country seats
of fifty gentlemen. The most important are Farnborough, Packington,
Shuckburgh, and Leasowes.
[565] There are many indications about the middle of the century of a
widespread interest in all that pertained to China. In about 1750 Mrs.
Montague remodeled her house in Hill Street and made a Chinese room of
which she wrote, “Sick of Grecian elegance and symmetry, or Gothick
grandeur and magnificence, we must all seek the barbarious goût of the
Chinese; and fat-headed pagods and shaking manderins bear the prizes
from the finest works of antiquity.... You will wonder I should condemn
the taste I have complied with but in trifles I shall always conform
to the fashion.” As early as 1750 appeared William Halfpenny’s “New
Designs for Chinese Temples ... Garden Seats,” etc. In 1753 in “The
World” for March, Coventry satirizes the rage for Chinese furniture.
In April there is a protest against the excessive use of Chinese
bridges and buildings in gardens. In February, 1754, and March, 1755,
are pleas for an “anti-Chinese society.” Chippendale’s “Gentleman and
Cabinet-Maker’s Directory” of 1753 and Sir William Chambers’ more
influential “Book on Chinese Buildings,” 1757, did much to establish
the taste for Chinese furnishings and for Chinese garden accessories,
and also to render that taste more correct.
[566] As illustrative see Isaac Oliver’s (1566–1617) portrait of Sir
Philip Sidney who is represented as seated on a turf-covered rock,
leaning against a broad tree-trunk, while in the rear is a formal
arcaded garden with a distant row of trees sending up slender green
spires against a sunset sky. (Reproduced in Gosse and Garnett, “An
Illustrated History of English Literature.”) Compare also Oliver’s
portrait of himself where is seen through the open window a broad river
flowing at the base of castle-crowned crags. (Reproduced in Horace
Walpole, “Anecdotes of Painting,” III, 176.)
[567] Among Vandyck’s contemporaries in England the one who made most
successful use of landscape was Mytens (in England after 1618), another
foreigner, to whom is attributed the interesting portrait of “Sir
Jeffrey Hudson, the Dwarf” at Hampton Court. The diminutive figure
is represented as standing in a full landscape in which there is an
admirable effect of distance and of clear, harmonious coloring.
[568] Now in William III’s State Bedroom at Hampton Court but formerly
in the Queen’s Bedchamber at Windsor Castle.
[569] The ablest of Lely’s pupils was John Greenhill (1649–76). One of
his portraits at the Dulwich Gallery is described by Mr. Cartwright
as “My first wife’s pictur, Like a sheppardess.” It shows a charming
lady in low satin bodice and pearls, her right hand resting on the
head of a sheep, while behind her is a landscape of brown trees and
rough tower-crowned hills under a gray and misty sky. William Wissing
(1656–87), another pupil of Lely, and a rival of Kneller in popular
favor, also made some attractive use of vaguely indicated stretches
of landscape, but usually his portrait accessories were pillars,
heavily draped curtains, stormy skies, with, as the loveliest point, a
flowering rose-bush, an elaborately painted thistle, a vase of flowers,
in the foreground. Two characteristic portraits are those of Mrs. Knott
and Mrs. Lawson at Hampton Court.
[570] Reproduced from engraving by Isaac Becket in Cyril Davenport,
“Mezzotints,” p. 94.
[571] Engraved by J. Smith. Reproduced in Davenport, “Mezzotints,”
p.100.
[572] In William III’s Presence Chamber at Hampton Court. “Lady
Middleton” is No. 54.
[573] Reproduced in Mrs. Oliphant’s “The Reign of Queen Anne.”
[574] Reproduced in Walpole, “Letters,” IX, 484, and II, Frontispiece.
[575] Engraved by J. McArdell, a famous example of his work. Reproduced
in Davenport, “Mezzotints.”
[576] Horace Walpole, “Anecdotes of Painting,” II, 442.
[577] Lord Ronald Sutherland Gower, F.S.A., “Sir Joshua Reynolds,
F.R.A.,” p. 23.
[578] The last four portraits mentioned are in the National Gallery.
[579] Reproduced in Lord Gower’s “Sir Joshua Reynolds.”
[580] These pictures of women and children are for the most part in
private galleries. But no artist has been more fully and adequately
represented in engravings than Reynolds. In the Print Room of the
British Museum there are twelve large albums of prints after his
paintings. There are also numerous reproductions in books such as
Cyril Davenport’s “Mezzotints,” Lord Gower’s “Sir Joshua Reynolds,”
Alfred Whitman’s “The Print Collector’s Handbook,” Gordon Goodwin’s
“British Mezzotinters,” and Julia Frankau’s “Eighteenth-Century
Colour-Prints.” The most important of the engravers of Reynolds’
pictures were James McArdell (1729–65), Valentine Green (1739–1813),
S. W. Reynolds (1773–1835), John Raphael Smith (1752–1812) and
Caroline Watson (1761?–1814). Valentine Green began in 1780 a series
of Reynolds’ “Beauties of the Present Age” on the plan of Lely’s and
Kneller’s “Beauties.” These engravings were originally issued at
fifteen shillings each, but they have increased enormously in value. At
a recent sale a proof of the “Duchess of Rutland” brought a thousand
pounds, nearly five times as much as Reynolds received for the original
picture (Salaman, “Old Engravers of England,” p. 138).
[581] It seems strange that Reynolds did not do more in the way of
pure landscape. In the South Kensington gallery is a pleasing little
brown landscape, “The Entrance to Mrs. Thrale’s Park at Streatham.”
Lord Gower in “Sir Joshua Reynolds, R.A.” reproduces a landscape in the
possession of Lord Northcote and entitled “A Study from Sir Joshua’s
Villa at Richmond Hill.” We find mention, also, of other landscapes,
but they form no significant part of his work.
[582] Sir Walter Armstrong, “Gainsborough and His Place in British
Art,” p. 171
[583] John C. Van Dyke, “Old English Masters,” p. 58.
[584] In the Wallace Gallery, London. Reproduced in Sir Walter
Armstrong’s “Gainsborough,” p. 88.
[585] Owned by the Lord Rothschild. Reproduced in Sir Walter
Armstrong’s “Gainsborough,” p. 124.
[586] These two pictures are in the Dulwich Gallery, London.
[587] Owned by the Lord Rothschild. Reproduced by Braun, Clement & Cie.
[588] Owned by Sir Algernon Neeld. Reproduced in Sir Walter Armstrong’s
“Gainsborough,” p. 140.
[589] For an account of the engravings from Gainsborough’s pictures see
H. P. Horne, “Engraved Works of Gainsborough and Romney,” 1891.
[590] Aside from the works of the Van de Veldes English public
galleries have very few examples of landscape painting in England
during the years 1660–1707. From Walpole’s “Anecdotes of Painting” and
from standard dictionaries of art and biography a partial list of the
foreigners painting in England at this time may be compiled. Chief
among them were Hendrik Danckerts who, after painting landscapes in
Italy, came to England about 1667 and was engaged by Charles II to
paint views; Cornélius Bol who, during the same reign, was painting
views of the Thames; John Looten (d. 1680), whose chosen subjects
were “glades, dark oaken groves, land-storms, and waterfalls;” Henry
Lankrink (1628–92), a successful imitator of Salvator Rosa in the
depiction of rough country, was especially commended for “the beauty
and freedom” of his skies, and employed by Lely to paint some of his
backgrounds; John Sybrecht (1630–1703), a painter of pictures of the
Rhine, who was in England after 1680, and whose “Prospect of Longleat”
was one of the pictures at Newstead Abbey, Lord Byron’s home; Philip
Boul who left a pocketbook of sketches of Derbyshire and the Peak,
“worked out in the Salvator Rosa style;” Henry Verzagen who devoted
himself to “ruins and landscapes;” Adrien Vandiest (1655–1704), who
came to England in 1672 and seven of whose landscapes were in Sir
Peter Lely’s collection; Jan Van Wyck (d. 1702) who painted “excellent
landscapes” from scenes in Scotland and the isle of Jersey; and Jan
Griffier (1645–1718) who painted mixed scenes of river and rich country
in the manner of Ruysdael, and who was so much of an enthusiast that he
bought a yacht and, “embarking with his family and pencils passed his
whole time on the Thames.”
[591] Streater’s “Boscobel House,” one of the pictures in James II’s
collection, is at Hampton Court. At Dulwich a picture described in
Cartwright’s catalogue as “A large Landschift done by Streeker” is now
ascribed to Streater.
[592] Francis Place is noteworthy as one of the first Englishmen, if
not the very first, to practice the newly discovered art of mezzotint
engraving (M. C. Salamon, “The Old Engravers of England,” pp. 52, 66).
[593] There are fourteen sea-pieces by him in the National Gallery;
eight in the Wallace collection at Hertford House; and several at
Hampton Court. At Dulwich are two pictures by him, “A Calm” and “A
Brisk Breeze” that are especially attractive examples of his style.
[594] M. Rouquet was a French enamel painter who came to England in
1725.
[595] Afterward brought together in Buck’s “Antiquities,” published in
1774.
[596] “Humphrey Clinker” was published in 1771 and the supposed time
of Matthew Bramble’s visit to Bath is not much earlier. Taverner was
sixty-eight in 1771.
[597] Cosmo Monkhouse, “The Earlier English Water-Colour Painters.”
[598] Bequeathed by Miss Haines in 1898.
[599] See Print Room, British Museum, for prints from his paintings.
[600] Cosmo Monkhouse, “The Earlier English Water-Colour Painters,” pp.
35, 36.
[601] Cozens had a curious way of getting hints for landscape
composition. He taught his pupils to splash paint on the bottoms of
earthenware plates and to stamp impressions therefrom on sheets of
damp paper. The accidental forms thus struck out were counted a help
to invention. The early exhibitions record many bizarre attempts at
landscapes such as “A landscape done in needlework and human hair”
(1772), “three drawings made upon a board with a hot iron“ (1777),
“flowers cut in cork,” “three small landscapes made in oil with Trees
and Shrubs in sea-weed” (1780). These were apparently exhibited in all
seriousness. In 1770 there was “A landscape in colored wax.”
[602] In the Print Room of the British Museum are sixty-eight small
sketches made by Paul Sandby in the neighborhood of Edinburgh, but most
of these are of figures.
[603] Allan Cunningham, “The Lives of the Most Eminent British
Painters” (1879), II, 210.
[604] Brydall, “Art in Scotland.”
[605] Zucarelli (1701–88) on a first visit to London painted some
landscapes but he was chiefly occupied as scene painter at the opera.
The great vogue of his pictures belongs in his second visit (1752–73).
Jan Griffier’s sons should perhaps be mentioned. Jan (d. 1750) was
especially noted as a copier of Claude’s pictures. Robert, who painted
in his father’s style, died in 1760.
[606] There is in the National Portrait Gallery, one of the more
important of Wilson’s portraits before his Italian visit, entitled,
“The Two Princes and their Tutor,” a stiff, formal, but not
uninteresting picture. The most admirable portrait by Wilson, that of
the artist Mortimer, deserves the high praise it has won from competent
critics, and shows what Wilson could do with a congenial subject
and after the enfranchisement of his art by his work as a landscape
painter. Except for a portrait of himself this portrait of Mortimer is
the only one done by him after his return from Italy. It came into the
possession of Mr. John Britton who, in 1842, wrote a pamphlet about
it and the paintings and merits of Wilson in general (Cunningham’s
“British Painters,” I, 153). The portrait of Mortimer is now in the
Gibson Gallery of the Royal Academy, London. Reproduced in Beaumont
Fletcher’s “Richard Wilson.”
[607] T. Wright, “The Life of Richard Wilson, R.A.,” p. 72.
[608] Beaumont Fletcher, “Richard Wilson, R.A.,” p. 90.
[609] Sir Walter Armstrong, “Gainsborough and His Place in English
Art,” p. 63.
[610] In 1755 there had been an exhibition started by Hogarth for
the benefit of the Foundling Hospital. It was the success of this
enterprise that led to the establishment of public exhibitions in 1760.
[611] Reproduced in Beaumont Fletcher’s “Richard Wilson, R.A.”
[612] Reproduced in “Magazine of Fine Arts,” November, 1805.
[613] Engraved by W. Watts in 1786. Print Room of British Museum.
[614] Engraved by W. Birch in 1779. Print Room of British Museum.
[615] Quoted by Beaumont Fletcher in his “Life of Wilson,” p. 24.
[616] There are several landscapes by Wilson in the public galleries
of London. Two large canvases in the National Gallery, “The Villa of
Maecenas” and “Niobe,” were painted for Sir George Beaumont and by him
presented to the nation in 1726. They are heavy and dark pictures and
do not so satisfactorily represent Wilson’s genius as do some of the
eight smaller landscapes in the same gallery, notably the charming
little picture “On the River Wye.” In the South Kensington Gallery
there are six landscapes by Wilson with several others “by or after”
him. The most effective of these is a “Landscape Composition” in the
Italian style. At Dulwich is a fine Italian picture, “The Cascatella
and Villa of Maecenas near Tivoli.” A more nearly adequate idea of
Wilson’s work may be found in the Manchester Art Gallery where, besides
a fine example of his Italian pictures, a large canvas entitled
“Cicero’s Villa,” are one of Wilson’s most triumphant Welsh pictures,
the “Welsh Valley with Snowdon Hill,” and a magnificent English scene,
a “Landscape with Ruins.” The Art Gallery at Glasgow has one of the
loveliest and most mysteriously suggestive of Wilson’s pictures,
called “The Convent Twilight;” and a delicate little Scotch landscape
(exhibited 1762) entitled “View of Holt Bridge on the River Dee.” It
is apparent that most of Wilson’s pictures are in private galleries.
In 1814 there was an exhibition of his works but they have not been
brought together in any great number since. Some of his sketches
had been published at Oxford in 1811 under the title “Studies and
Designs by Richard Wilson, done at Rome in the Year 1752.” In 1825
appeared a book of forty etchings made by Mr. Thomas Hastings after
the pictures in the Ford collection, a notable collection that came
into the possession of Lady Ford through her brother and her husband
both of whom had been admirers of Wilson’s work. In 1863 there appeared
“Thirty-seven Sketches and Designs in Crayon” by Richard Wilson, R.A.
(London, William Tigg). Probably the best place to study Wilson’s
pictures as a whole is the Print Room of the British Museum where there
are forty-five engravings from his work, several of these engravings
being exceptionally fine reproductions. Wilson has been fortunate in
the fact that his landscapes have appealed to the best engravers and
etchers. Besides the “Six Views in Wales” already spoken of there were
“Twelve Original Views in Italy” published by Boydell in 1776, and
very many single pictures have been reproduced. The prices brought by
Wilson’s pictures have been in modern times fairly large. In 1875 his
“View on the Arno” brought 1,800 guineas. “An Evening Scene in Wales”
brought 380 guineas. Some of the engravings also bring high prices,
especially those of Woollett.
[617] John Ruskin, “The Art of England,” Lecture VI, “George Robson and
Copley Fielding.”
[618] Sir Joshua Reynolds, “The Fourteenth Discourse.”
[619] In the “Magazine of Fine Arts,” November, 1805.
[620] C. R. Leslie, R.A., “Memoirs of the Life of John Constable” (ed.
1845), p. 110.
[621] William Boulton, “Thomas Gainsborough,” p. 47.
[622] George William Fulcher, “The Life of Thomas Gainsborough,” p. 175.
[623] William Boulton, “Thomas Gainsborough,” p. 249.
[624] Sir Walter Armstrong, “Gainsborough and His Place in English Art.”
[625] C. R. Leslie, R.A., “Memoirs of John Constable” (ed. 1845), p.
354.
[626] A letter to Pearce at Bath. William Boulton, “Thomas
Gainsborough,” p. 277.
[627] Sir Walter Armstrong, “Gainsborough and His Place in English
Art,” p. 149.
[628] A. E. Fletcher, “Thomas Gainsborough, R.A.,” p. 161.
[629] William Boulton, “Thomas Gainsborough,” p. 278.
[630] In a letter to William Jackson written about 1768.
[631] Algernon Graves, F. S. A., “The Society of Artists and the Free
Society,” 1907; “The Royal Academy Exhibitors,” 1906.
[632] Thomas Gray in his “Journal” for October 13, 1769, says, “At the
ale-house where I dined in Malham, Vivares, the landscape painter, had
lodged for a week or more; Smith and Bellers had also been there, and
two prints of Gordale have been engraved by them.”
[633] Horace Walpole in “Anecdotes of Painting” (pub. 1762–71), II,
717 (ed. 1826), suggested hop-fields as new picturesque material for
artists. Scott in his “Essay on Painting” reiterated the idea, giving
Walpole credit as its originator. They apparently did not know George
Smith’s picture.
[634] There is a fine collection of Sandby’s drawings in the Print Room
of the British Museum. For particulars of his life see William Sandby,
“Thomas and Paul Sandby: Their Lives and Works.”
[635] Cosmo Monkhouse, “The Earlier English Water-Colour Painters,” p.
24.
[636] It is said that Gilpin’s landscape backgrounds were frequently
put in by other men, notably by Barret.
[637] Wolcot (“Peter Pindar”) in his verse comments on the exhibitions
of 1782, 1783, 1785, 1786, says in an apostrophe to De Loutherbourg:
And Loutherbourg, when Heaven so wills
To make brass skies and golden hills,
With marble bullocks in glass pastures grazing,
Thy reputation too will rise
And people, gaping with surprise,
Cry “Master Loutherbourg is most amazing.”
But thou must wait for that event;
Perhaps the change is never meant;
Till then with me thy pencil will not shine;
Till then old red-nosed Wilson’s art
Will hold its empire o’er my heart,
By Britain left in poverty to pine.
But honest Wilson, never mind,
Immortal praises thou shalt find,
And for a dinner have no cause to fear.
Thou start’st at my prophetic rhymes;
Don’t be impatient for those times,
Wait till thou hast been dead a hundred year.
[638] Walter Thornbury, “The Life of J. M. W. Turner, R.A.,” pp. 113–15.
[639] Cosmo Monkhouse, “The Earlier English Water-Colour Painters,” p.
62.
[640] Edmund Garvey, an inferior painter, had exhibited “Three Views of
the Alps” in 1770, and an artist named Morris had in 1769 exhibited “A
Waterfall in the Alps.”
[641] Cosmo Monkhouse, “The Earlier English Water-Colour Painters,” p.
38.
[642] Walter Thornbury, “The Life of J. M. W. Turner, R.A.,” p. 50.
[643] Of the twenty-seven pictures by Cozens in the South Kensington
Gallery all but one or two are Italian scenes. Even more interesting
for study is the fine collection of drawings by him in the Print Room
of the British Museum.
[644] Cosmo Monkhouse, “The Earlier English Water-Colour Painters,” p.
86.
[645] Many of Girtin’s drawings are in the British Museum.
[646] J. T. Smith, “Nollekins and His Times,” II, 339 (London, 1828).
[647] James A. Manson, “George Morland,” p. 80.
[648] Many of Morland’s pictures have been engraved. There are
numerous reproductions in “George Morland” by J. T. Herbert Baily
(“Connoisseur,” Extra Number, 1906) and in “George Morland” by J. T.
Nettleship (“The Portfolio,” December, 1898).
[649] Biese in “Die Entwickelung des Naturgefühls,” pp. 209–48, gives
a brief résumé of the development of landscape painting in Germany.
He calls Rubens and his school the first to make the painting of
Nature an independent branch of art, while Ruysdael (1681) is the one
in whom “die ganze Poesie der Natur” finds expression. His chapter
closes with these words: “Alle diese grossen Niederländer eilen weit
der Poesie ihrer Zeit voraus; Gebirge und Meer finden im Wort erst
100 Jahre später ihrer begeisterten Schilderer, und ein in sich
stimmungsvoll, abgeschlossenes, lyrisches Landschaftsbild wird erst am
Ende des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts in der deutschen Dichtung geboren.”
In England, it will be observed, the love of Nature finds earlier and
more abundant expression in poetry than in painting, and its completest
expression in Wordsworth’s poetry precedes its complete expression in
the great English landscape painters of the early nineteenth century.
See also for brief résumé of “Landschaftsmalerei” as an indication
mainly of the increasing knowledge of distant lands, new forms of
vegetation, etc., Humboldt, “Kosmos,” II, 47–58.
Transcriber’s Notes:
1. Obvious printers’, punctuation and spelling errors have been
corrected silently.
2. Some hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions of the same words have
been retained as in the original.
3. Italics are shown as _xxx_.