CHAPTER XII

IN THE WASTES OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC

THE STORY OF A BATTLE--THE _HORNET_ AND THE _PENGUIN_ IN THE

SHADOWS OF TRISTAN D’ACUNHA--AS FAIR A MATCH AS IS KNOWN TO

NAVAL ANNALS--IT TOOK THE YANKEES TEN MINUTES TO DISMANTLE THE

ENEMY AND FIVE MORE TO RIDDLE HIS HULL--THE BRITISH CAPTAIN’S

FORCEFUL DESCRIPTION OF THE YANKEE FIRE--A MARVELLOUS ESCAPE FROM

A LINER--THE _PEACOCK_ IN THE STRAITS OF SUNDA--WHEN THE LONELY

SITUATION OF THIS SLOOP IS CONSIDERED DID WARRINGTON SHOW A LACK OF

HUMANITY?--IF HE DID, WHAT DID THE BRITISH CAPTAIN BARTHOLOMEW SHOW?

An echo to the prolonged salute which the ships of Sir George Collier

fired, in the harbor of Porto Praya, to the honor of Yankee pluck and

seamanship, comes from a giant mountain rising in the lonely wastes of

the South Atlantic--from the island of Tristan d’Acunha. On a line from

the Cape of Good Hope to Cape Horn, and 1,500 miles west of the Cape

of Good Hope, can be found three rugged islands, which, though small

in diameter, rise at one point to a height of no less than 8,300 feet

above the rollers that crash against their precipitous walls. No more

lonely and no more impressive rocks than these are found in all the

world.

But, though far away from civilized habitations, the group was itself

inhabited by sealers and whalers even as early as 1791, when a Yankee,

one Jonathan Lambert, “by a curious and singular edict declared himself

sovereign proprietor” of the group. For it was a breeding resort for

seals and sea lions, and it had also a climate and some soil fit

for a comfortable human habitation, and this enterprising Yankee had

settled there with associates and had “cleared about fifty acres of

land, and planted various kinds of seed, some of which, as well as the

coffee-tree and sugar-cane, were furnished by the American Minister at

Rio Janeiro.”

At the time of the War of 1812 it was a very well-known group to

Yankee seamen, and seemingly out of the way as it looked when glancing

at a chart of that sea, it was nevertheless but a little to one side

of what was counted the best route from New York to the East Indies.

Accordingly, when Decatur was ordered to take the _President_, the

_Hornet_, the new _Peacock_, and the store-ship _Tom Bowline_ for a

voyage against British commerce in the East Indies, he appointed the

Tristan d’Acunha group as the rendezvous where all the ships should

meet, replenish their water, stretch the legs of the seamen in a chase

after wild goats and hogs on shore, and then sail away in search of

English men-of-war to conquer.

As has been told, Decatur, when leaving New York, took the natural

course along the Long Island coast, instead of the bolder and therefore

safer course down the Jersey beach, and “was fairly mobbed” by the

British fleet. His consorts, the _Hornet_, the _Peacock_, and the _Tom

Bowline_, sailed a few days later (January 22d), without having learned

that the _President_ was captured, and having escaped the blockaders,

they sailed away to the meeting-point.

When a few days out, the _Hornet_ separated from her consorts and

thereafter proceeded without incident worth mention until, on March

23, 1815, she arrived at the group of Tristan d’Acunha. An action

which followed on the day she arrived was the next to the last one of

the war. Allen, in beginning his description of the two last, says:

“Two actions of a disgraceful character to the Americans remain to be

recorded.” He then tells that Captain Biddle, commanding the _Hornet_,

spoke to a neutral ship on March 20th, when the neutral captain said he

had heard that peace had been declared. “Information coming in this

questionable shape was not binding,” says Allen, but “it was Captain

Biddle’s duty to have acted cautiously before setting it at defiance.”

He did not act as cautiously as Allen thinks he should, and so the

action was “of a disgraceful character to the Americans.” As to the

facts, there is no dispute, save in the minor matters of the number of

each crew and the size of a couple of guns, so the reader is able to

decide for himself how far the action disgraced the American flag.

Having reached the anchorage off the tiny settlement on the main island

of the group at about 11 o’clock in the morning of March 23, 1815, the

sheets of the head-sails on the _Hornet_ were let go preparatory to

swinging her up into the wind and dropping her anchor. But no sooner

had the sails begun to flap than the lookout announced a sail in sight,

and hauling aft the sheets once more the _Hornet_ stood out to sea for

a look at the stranger.

As it happened, the strange vessel was the British brig sloop

_Penguin_, Captain James Dickenson, a new vessel on her first cruise.

She had sailed from England to the Cape of Good Hope. When there, news

arrived that a heavy Yankee privateer called the _Young Wasp_ had

been making prizes of British Indiamen, using Tristan d’Acunha as a

retreat when water and fresh meat were needed. Accordingly, Admiral

Tyler, commanding the squadron, sent the _Penguin_ to the lonely group

to capture the venturesome privateer, placing on board of her twelve

marines from his own ship, the _Medway_, to make sure that she had

enough men.

[Illustration: The _Hornet_ and _Penguin_.

_From an old wood-cut_.]

So it happened that when the _Penguin_ reached the island and saw

a sail there, Captain Dickenson thought he had had the good luck

to alight on the saucy privateer. Being fearful that the supposed

privateer would run away, the _Penguin_ was handled very carefully.

Captain Dickenson did not want the Yankee to see how many guns the

_Penguin_ carried and so kept her end on to the _Hornet_ as he came

down wind to capture her--came down wind because he was fortunate

enough to come into the fight with the wind in his favor.

The _Hornet_, as the _Penguin_ approached, kept wearing first one way

and then the other to keep from getting raked until 1.40 P.M., when the

_Penguin_ had arrived within musket-shot. At that the _Penguin_ hauled

to the wind with the breeze coming in over her starboard bow, when she

“hoisted her colors and fired a gun; whereupon the _Hornet_ hauled up

on the starboard tack and discharged a broadside.” The quotation is

from Allen. It is a small matter, but the first gun of this “action of

a disgraceful character to the Americans” was fired by the British.

The battle that followed was another remarkable exhibit of the

superiority of the Yankee gunners. For ten minutes they hurled bar-shot

and other missiles at the rigging of the ill-fated _Penguin_. “In a

very short time” these projectiles “had done their work.” And then the

Yankee gunners began to load with solid shot, loading swiftly as the

gunners had done in the _Hornet’s_ action with the British _Peacock_,

but aiming with deliberation. And so, “notwithstanding a heavy swell

prevailed,” every broadside “was taking effect.” The quotations are

from Allen. “Taking effect” expressed the result of the Yankee fire but

mildly. Captain Dickenson, of the _Penguin_, described the work much

more forcibly. He said to First Lieutenant McDonald: “The fellows are

giving it to us like hell.”

They had thought to encounter one of the sea-militia, but they found a

well-trained Yankee man-of-war crew instead.

The _Penguin_ having the weather-gage, in spite of her crippled

rigging, was steadily drawing down on the Yankee. It was plain that the

British gunners were no match for the Yankees, and Captain Dickenson

determined to try boarding. Putting up his helm he sent his ship

straight at the _Hornet_. Just then a bullet stretched him dead on the

deck, but First Lieutenant James McDonald took his place and bravely

called on the men to follow him. The British bow came crashing against

the _Hornet’s_ side just abaft the main rigging. The Yankees flocked to

the quarter-deck to repel boarders. The blunt cutwater of the British

bow sawed up and down on the black waist of the _Hornet_, rasping the

thick planks as if to break them in; but the boarders never came over

to the bow.

“We tried,” said McDonald, afterward, “but found the men rather

backward--and so, you know, we concluded to give it up.”

The Yankee crew wanted, then, to board the _Penguin_ but Captain Biddle

stopped them, because it was “evident from the beginning that our fire

was greatly superior both in quickness and effect.”

[Illustration: The _Hornet_ and _Penguin_.

_From a wood-cut in the “Naval Monument.”_]

Moreover, there was no need for that movement. The _Hornet_ forged

ahead over the heavy sea, and the bowsprit of the _Penguin_ caught

her mizzen rigging and carried it away, and then the boat davits

and spanker-boom as well. The broken boom dropped on a marine who had

already had his leg broken by a musket-ball and it broke the leg again,

yet the eager fellow wriggled around and strove to point his musket

at the British in the foretop of the _Penguin_. The _Penguin’s_ chief

officer shouted that he had surrendered, and Captain Biddle, after

ordering his men to cease firing, climbed up on the _Hornet’s_ rail.

At that two of the British marines, who, very likely, had not heard

their chief officer surrender, fired at Biddle and at the man at the

_Hornet’s_ wheel. Biddle was severely wounded, and the two marines were

instantly killed by a return fire from the Americans.

Then the _Penguin_ drifted clear. Her bowsprit fell into the sea,

broken short off above the figure-head, and her foremast fell over the

lee rail. Her bow came up into the wind, and with such canvas as was

spread on her mainmast flat aback, she drifted stern on, a helpless

wreck.

The _Hornet_ wore around before the wind and came back with a fresh

broadside ready, but McDonald hauled down the _Penguin’s_ flag and once

more shouted that she had surrendered. The first of the two “actions of

a disgraceful character to the Americans” was ended. It had lasted but

twenty minutes from the first gun.

The comparison between the ships, their armament and their crews, is

exceedingly pleasing to an American. Rarely have two vessels so nearly

equal met in deadly conflict. Under the arbitrary rule of measuring

ships the Yankee was three tons larger than the Englishman, but the

Englishman had “a slightly greater breadth of beam, stouter sides, and

higher bulwarks.” That is to say, the British sailors were protected

better than the Americans were. The Yankee carried eighteen short

thirty-twos and two long twelves, making an actual-weight broadside of

two hundred and seventy-nine pounds of metal. The _Penguin_, according

to Captain Biddle, carried sixteen short thirty-twos, one short twelve

on the forecastle, and two long twelves arranged so that both could be

fired on one side, but James says she had long sixes instead of long

twelves. It is certain that before this war the British vessels of the

class of the _Penguin_ did usually carry long sixes for bow-chasers,

but the _Penguin_, was a new vessel, built after the effectiveness

of the larger guns carried by the Yankees had been abundantly

demonstrated. The new British frigates carried long twenty-fours

instead of long eighteens, as the older frigates had carried, so it is

entirely reasonable to believe that Captain Biddle told the truth when

he reported on the size of the _Penguin’s_ guns. Moreover, Biddle was a

careful man. He put a tape-line on the _Penguin’s_ hull to get at her

dimensions, and no one disputes the measurements he made there.

However, the later American writers have not been disposed to insist

on this point. They can afford to be generous. They allow the figures

of James to go into their tables of comparison, for even with but

one long six on the engaged side, the _Penguin_ threw two hundred

and seventy-four pounds of metal to the Yankee’s two hundred and

seventy-nine.

[Illustration: Medal Awarded to James Biddle for the Capture of the

_Penguin_ by the _Hornet_.]

But to a student of history at the end of the nineteenth century there

never was a sea-duel where the comparison of the weights of metal in

the two broadsides was more ridiculous than in this one between the

_Hornet_ and the _Penguin_. For not one solid shot from the _Penguin_

struck the Yankee--not one; and what is worse still, not one solid shot

struck the Yankee’s spars. Moreover, the storm of British projectiles

was hurled so high that the injury to the Yankee’s rigging was worse

above the top-sails than below them. On the other hand, the Yankees,

in ten minutes’ firing, in spite of the heavy swell, had destroyed the

sail-power of the British boat (by Allen’s own account), and in five

minutes more (not including the time after the ships drifted apart,

when no great guns were fired) the Yankees had riddled her hull until

she was not worth saving. It is not the weight of metal carried, nor

the weight of metal thrown; _it is the weight of metal driven home into

the enemy that wins the battle_.

This, although not the last encounter, was the last real battle of the

War of 1812; like the first of the war (_Constitution_-_Guerrière_),

and like every other in which the Americans won, and like that between

the _Shannon_ and the _Chesapeake_, where the British were victorious,

it proved, beyond dispute, that the most important art known to a naval

ship is the art of aiming guns accurately.

The _Hornet_ lost two killed and nine wounded; the British lost

fourteen killed and twenty-eight wounded--nearly one-third of her crew.

The numbers of the crews cannot be stated beyond dispute. It is

admitted that the _Penguin_ had twelve marines beyond her full

complement--she had more men than she needed to work her guns. The

Yankees admit that they had enough in spite of the fact that eight

had been sent away on a prize, and that nine were too sick to leave

their beds. By showing the utmost generosity toward British writers,

we find that the _Penguin_ had one hundred and thirty-two in her crew,

including “seventeen boys.” The Yankee had at most one hundred and

forty-two on board, of whom nine were sick in their hammocks. There

were one hundred and thirty-three Yankees at the quarters.

A few days after the battle the Yankee _Peacock_ and the store-ship

_Tom Bowline_ arrived. The store-ship was sent to Rio Janeiro with the

prisoners, and then, after waiting until April 13th for the _President_

to come, the two sloops sailed away to continue the war in the East

Indies. On April 27th a sail was seen and both vessels went in chase,

and the next morning the _Peacock_ drew rapidly ahead of her older

consort. Eventually, when the _Peacock_ was about six miles ahead,

she suddenly hauled her wind and signalled that the stranger was a

line-of-battle ship. This was at 2 P.M. of April 28, 1815.

So both sloops took to their heels. The swift _Peacock_ had no trouble

in getting out of the way, but the _Hornet_ was slow, and the liner

chose to follow her. About the time the liner made the choice (she was

the seventy-four _Cornwallis_, Admiral Sir George Burleton, K.C.B.)

she lost a man overboard, and stopped to pick him up, but she soon

made up the time so lost, and at 9 o’clock, seven hours after learning

the character of the enemy, the _Hornet’s_ crew began to lighten ship.

At 2 o’clock on the morning of the 29th the enemy was forward of the

_Hornet’s_ lee beam and outfooting the Yankee rapidly, so the Yankee

went about. The enemy followed, and at daylight, though still to

leeward, was within gunshot, and her bow-chasers gave tongue.

[Illustration: The _Hornet’s_ Escape from the _Cornwallis_.

_From a wood-cut in the “Naval Monument.”_]

That set the Yankees working for life. The anchors and cables, the

spare spars, the ship’s launch, and the six cannon and some hundreds of

round shot were tumbled into the sea. The _Hornet_ drew out of range

then, but the wind hauled to the east, favoring the enemy, and once

more the crew went at the work of lightening ship. They were sure they

would be captured, but they would not give up. Three of the enemy’s

shot had come on board, but these had done no injury. All the guns

but one were now dumped into the sea, and so was everything else that

could be spared. “Many of our men had been impressed and imprisoned for

years in their horrible service, and hated them and their nation with

the most deadly animosity, while the rest of the crew, horror-struck

with the narration of the sufferings of their shipmates who had been

in the power of the English, and now equally flushed with rage, joined

heartily in execrating the present authors of our misfortune.” So wrote

one of the _Hornet’s_ officers. This letter shows not only why the crew

made every endeavor to escape; it shows why the fire of the _Hornet_

had been more effective than that of the _Penguin_. Their work,

however, would have been vain but for another shift of wind. It came in

a freshening gale from the west, and the _Hornet_ drew ahead. By sunset

of the 29th the enemy was four miles astern. By sunrise of the 30th,

after a squally night, the liner was twelve miles astern, and at 9.30

she abandoned the chase. The _Hornet_ reached home on June 9th. She

escaped because her commander was not one of the kind to give up until

he had not a plank that would swim.

The _Peacock_ continued on the original cruise. Four rich Indiamen,

with crews aggregating two hundred and ninety-one men, were captured,

and then on June 30th she fell in with the East India Company’s cruiser

_Nautilus_, Lieutenant Charles Boyce, a brig of less than half the size

of the _Peacock_, and carrying four long nines and ten short eighteens.

The _Nautilus_ was at anchor off Fort Anjers, in the Straits of Sunda.

A boat from the _Nautilus_ took her purser on board the _Peacock_ to

announce, according to Allen, that peace had been declared. Allen says

that the purser “was instantly sent below, without being suffered to

ask a question.” The _Peacock_ continued approaching the _Nautilus_,

and the British captain “hailed and asked if the captain (of the

_Peacock_) knew that peace had been declared.”

Captain Warrington fully believed this hail was a ruse to enable the

brig to escape to the protection of the fort, and ordered the brig to

surrender. Captain Boyce refused, and one or two broadsides (accounts

differ) were exchanged, when the brig, having lost seven men killed

and eight wounded, and having been badly cut up as well, while the

_Peacock_ was not even scratched, the British flag was lowered.

The gallantry of the British captain was as praiseworthy as the

marksmanship of his gunners was execrable.

Allen says that Captain Warrington, in firing on the British brig,

after Boyce’s hail, exhibited a “savage barbarity unworthy of a Red

Indian.”

Roosevelt says: “I regret to say that it is difficult to believe

he (Warrington) acted with proper humanity.” Cooper says it was an

“unfortunate mistake.” No writer on this subject seems to have asked

himself seriously what he would have done had he been in command of a

little sloop in the Straits of Sunda, with all the fleets of the mighty

British Empire between him and a home-port--what he would have done

had he found a legitimate prize just beyond the guns of a powerful

fort of the enemy. Did a legitimate desire for self-preservation in

that situation warrant the Yankee in taking every advantage possible

of the enemy, and in doubting what the enemy, apparently caught at a

disadvantage, might say?

But if Warrington, the Yankee, showed “savage barbarity,” what shall be

said of the act of Captain Bartholomew, of the British ship _Erebus_,

in firing a broadside at the Yankee gun-boat Number 168, commanded

by Sailing-master Hurlburt, after learning _officially_ that peace

had been declared? “Peace having been declared and having been known

to exist for over three weeks,” the gun-boat, en route to deliver

despatches to the British admiral off Tybee Bar, Georgia, did not heave

to when ordered to do so as he was passing the _Erebus_. Instead,

he told the British his errand. Captain Bartholomew, cursing like a

pirate, said he would sink the gun-boat if a boat from her were not

sent on board the _Erebus_ instantly, and when Mr. Hurlburt began to

reply the British marines opened fire with muskets, and he was ordered

to haul down his flag. He refused and the big ship fired a broadside.

Hurlburt returned the fire as best he could and then surrendered. He

was soon allowed to proceed.

Perhaps it is worth noting that although the gun-boat was within easy

musket range, the gunners of the _Erebus_ did not hit her with even one

shot save in the rigging.

The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4) · 第 12 / 20 章