WOMAN'S SPHERE

"What do you think of this Woman's Rights question?" said Bob

Stephens. "From some of your remarks, I apprehend that you think there

is something in it. I may be wrong, but I must confess that I have

looked with disgust on the whole movement. No man reverences women as

I do; but I reverence them _as_ women. I reverence them for those very

things in which their sex differs from ours; but when they come upon

our ground, and begin to work and fight after our manner and with our

weapons, I regard them as fearful anomalies, neither men nor women.

These Woman's Rights Conventions appear to me to have ventilated

crudities, absurdities, and blasphemies. To hear them talk about men,

one would suppose that the two sexes were natural-born enemies, and

wonder whether they ever had fathers and brothers. One would think,

upon their showing, that all men were a set of ruffians, in league

against women,--they seeming, at the same time, to forget how on their

very platforms the most constant and gallant defenders of their rights

are men. Wendell Phillips and Wentworth Higginson have put at the

service of the cause masculine training and manly vehemence, and

complacently accepted the wholesale abuse of their own sex at the

hands of their warrior sisters. One would think, were all they say of

female powers true, that our Joan-of-Arcs ought to have disdained to

fight under male captains."

"I think," said my wife, "that, in all this talk about the rights of

men, and the rights of women, and the rights of children, the world

seems to be forgetting what is quite as important, the _duties_ of men

and women and children. We all hear of our _rights_ till we forget our

_duties_; and even theology is beginning to concern itself more with

what man has a right to expect of his Creator than what the Creator

has a right to expect of man."

"You say the truth," said I; "there is danger of just this overaction;

and yet rights must be discussed; because, in order to understand the

duties we owe to any class, we must understand their rights. To know

our duties to men, women, and children, we must know what the rights

of men, women, and children justly are. As to the 'Woman's Rights

movement,' it is not peculiar to America, it is part of a great wave

in the incoming tide of modern civilization; the swell is felt no less

in Europe, but it combs over and breaks on our American shore, because

our great wide beach affords the best play for its waters; and as the

ocean waves bring with them kelp, seaweed, mud, sand, gravel, and even

putrefying debris, which lie unsightly on the shore, and yet, on the

whole, are healthful and refreshing,--so the Woman's Rights movement,

with its conventions, its speech-makings, its crudities, and

eccentricities, is nevertheless a part of a healthful and necessary

movement of the human race towards progress. This question of Woman

and her Sphere is now, perhaps, the greatest of the age. We have put

Slavery under foot, and with the downfall of Slavery the only obstacle

to the success of our great democratic experiment is overthrown, and

there seems no limit to the splendid possibilities which it may open

before the human race.

"In the reconstruction that is now coming there lies more than the

reconstruction of States and the arrangement of the machinery of

government. We need to know and feel, all of us, that, from the moment

of the death of Slavery, we parted finally from the regime and control

of all the old ideas formed under old oppressive systems of society,

and came upon a new plane of life.

"In this new life we must never forget that we are a peculiar people,

that we have to walk in paths unknown to the Old World,--paths where

its wisdom cannot guide us, where its precedents can be of little use

to us, and its criticisms, in most cases, must be wholly irrelevant.

The history of our war has shown us of how little service to us in any

important crisis the opinions and advice of the Old World can be. We

have been hurt at what seemed to us the want of sympathy, the direct

antagonism, of England. We might have been less hurt if we had

properly understood that Providence had placed us in a position so far

ahead of her ideas or power of comprehension that just judgment or

sympathy was not to be expected from her.

"As we went through our great war with no help but that of God,

obliged to disregard the misconceptions and impertinences which the

foreign press rained down upon us, so, if we are wise, we shall

continue to do. Our object must now be to make the principles on which

our government is founded permeate consistently the mass of society,

and to purge out the leaven of aristocratic and Old World ideas. So

long as there is an illogical working in our actual life, so long as

there is any class denied equal rights with other classes, so long

will there be agitation and trouble."

"Then," said my wife, "you believe that women ought to vote?"

"If the principle on which we founded our government is true, that

taxation must not exist without representation, and if women hold

property and are taxed, it follows that women should be represented in

the State by their votes, or there is an illogical working of our

government."

"But, my dear, don't you think that this will have a bad effect on the

female character?"

"Yes," said Bob, "it will make women caucus holders, political

candidates."

"It may make this of some women, just as of some men," said I. "But

all men do not take any great interest in politics; it is very

difficult to get some of the best of them to do their duty in voting,

and the same will be found true among women."

"But, after all," said Bob, "what do you gain? What will a woman's

vote be but a duplicate of that of her husband or father, or whatever

man happens to be her adviser?"

"That may be true on a variety of questions; but there are subjects

on which the vote of women would, I think, be essentially different

from that of men. On the subjects of temperance, public morals, and

education, I have no doubt that the introduction of the female vote

into legislation, in States, counties, and cities, would produce

results very different from that of men alone. There are thousands of

women who would close grog-shops, and stop the traffic in spirits,

if they had the legislative power; and it would be well for society

if they had. In fact, I think that a State can no more afford to

dispense with the vote of women in its affairs than a family.

Imagine a family where the female has no voice in the housekeeping! A

State is but a larger family, and there are many of its concerns

which, equally with those of a private household, would be bettered

by female supervision."

"But fancy women going to those horrible voting-places! It is more

than I can do myself," said Bob.

"But you forget," said I, "that they are horrible and disgusting

principally because women never go to them. All places where women are

excluded tend downward to barbarism; but the moment she is introduced,

there come in with her courtesy, cleanliness, sobriety, and order.

When a man can walk up to the ballot-box with his wife or his sister

on his arm, voting-places will be far more agreeable than now, and

the polls will not be such bear-gardens that refined men will be

constantly tempted to omit their political duties there.

"If for nothing else, I would have women vote, that the business of

voting may not be so disagreeable and intolerable to men of refinement

as it now is; and I sincerely believe that the cause of good morals,

good order, cleanliness, and public health would be a gainer not

merely by the added feminine vote, but by the added vote of a great

many excellent but too fastidious men, who are now kept from the polls

by the disagreeables they meet there.

"Do you suppose that, if women had equal representation with men in

the municipal laws of New York, its reputation for filth during the

last year would have gone so far beyond that of Cologne, or any other

city renowned for bad smells? I trow not. I believe a lady mayoress

would have brought in a dispensation of brooms and whitewash, and made

a terrible searching into dark holes and vile corners, before now.

Female New York, I have faith to believe, has yet left in her enough

of the primary instincts of womanhood to give us a clean, healthy

city, if female votes had any power to do it."

"But," said Bob, "you forget that voting would bring together all the

women of the lower classes."

"Yes; but, thanks to the instincts of their sex, they would come in

their Sunday clothes; for where is the woman that hasn't her finery,

and will not embrace every chance to show it? Biddy's parasol, and hat

with pink ribbons, would necessitate a clean shirt in Pat as much as

on Sunday. Voting would become a fete, and we should have a population

at the polls as well-dressed as at church. Such is my belief."

"I do not see," said Bob, "but you go to the full extent with our

modern female reformers."

"There are certain neglected truths, which have been held up by these

reformers, that are gradually being accepted and infused into the life

of modern society; and their recognition will help to solidify and

purify democratic institutions. They are:--

"1. The right of every woman to hold independent property.

"2. The right of every woman to receive equal pay with man for work

which she does equally well.

"3. The right of any woman to do any work for which, by her natural

organization and talent, she is peculiarly adapted.

"Under the first head, our energetic sisters have already, by the help

of their gallant male adjutants, reformed the laws of several of our

States, so that a married woman is no longer left the unprotected

legal slave of any unprincipled, drunken spendthrift who may be her

husband,--but, in case of the imbecility or improvidence of the

natural head of the family, the wife, if she have the ability, can

conduct business, make contracts, earn and retain money for the good

of the household; and I am sure no one can say that immense injustice

and cruelty are not thereby prevented.

"It is quite easy for women who have the good fortune to have just and

magnanimous husbands to say that they feel no interest in such

reforms, and that they would willingly trust their property to the man

to whom they give themselves; but they should remember that laws are

not made for the restraint of the generous and just, but of the

dishonest and base. The law which enables a married woman to hold her

own property does not forbid her to give it to the man of her heart,

if she so pleases; and it does protect many women who otherwise would

be reduced to the extremest misery. I once knew an energetic milliner

who had her shop attached four times, and a flourishing business

broken up in four different cities, because she was tracked from city

to city by a worthless spendthrift, who only waited till she had

amassed a little property in a new place to swoop down upon and carry

it off. It is to be hoped that the time is not distant when every

State will give to woman a fair chance to the ownership and use of her

own earnings and her own property.

"Under the head of the right of every woman to do any work for which

by natural organization and talent she is especially adapted, there is

a word or two to be said.

"The talents and tastes of the majority of women are naturally

domestic. The family is evidently their sphere, because in all ways

their organization fits them for that more than for anything else.

"But there are occasionally women who are exceptions to the common

law, gifted with peculiar genius and adaptations. With regard to such

women, there has never seemed to be any doubt in the verdict of

mankind that they ought to follow their nature, and that their

particular sphere was the one to which they are called. Did anybody

ever think that Mrs. Siddons and Mrs. Kemble and Ristori had better

have applied themselves sedulously to keeping house, because they were

women, and 'woman's noblest station is retreat'?

"The world has always shown a fair average of good sense in this

matter, from the days of the fair Hypatia in Alexandria, who, we are

told, gave lectures on philosophy behind a curtain, lest her charms

should distract the attention of too impressible young men, down to

those of Anna Dickinson. Mankind are not, after all, quite fools, and

seem in these cases to have a reasonable idea that exceptional talents

have exceptional laws, and make their own code of proprieties.

"Now there is no doubt that Miss Dickinson, though as relating to her

femininity she is quite as pretty and modest a young woman as any to

be found in the most sheltered circle, has yet a most exceptional

talent for public speaking, which draws crowds to hear her, and makes

lecturing for her a lucrative profession, as well as a means of

advocating just and generous sentiments, and of stimulating her own

sex to nobler purposes; and the same law which relates to Siddons and

Kemble and Ristori relates also to her.

"The doctrine of _vocations_ is a good one and a safe one. If a woman

mistakes her vocation, so much the worse for her; the world does not

suffer, but she does, and the suffering speedily puts her where she

belongs. There is not near so much danger from attempts to imitate

Anna Dickinson as there is from the more common feminine attempts to

rival the _demi-monde_ of Paris in fantastic extravagance and luxury.

"As to how a woman may determine whether she has any such vocation,

there is a story quite in point. A good Methodist elder was listening

to an ardent young mechanic who thought he had a call to throw up his

shop and go to preaching.

"'I feel,' said the young ardent, 'that I have a call to preach.'

"'Hast thou noticed whether people seem to have a call to hear thee?'

said the shrewd old man. 'I have always noticed that a true call of

the Lord may be known by this, that people have a _call_ to hear.'"

"Well," said Bob, "the most interesting question still remains: What

are to be the employments of woman? What ways are there for her to use

her talents, to earn her livelihood and support those who are dear to

her, when Providence throws that necessity upon her? This is becoming

more than ever one of the pressing questions of our age. The war has

deprived so many thousands of women of their natural protectors, that

everything must be thought of that may possibly open a way for their

self-support."

"Well, let us look over the field," said my wife. "What is there for

woman?"

"In the first place," said I, "come the professions requiring natural

genius,--authorship, painting, sculpture, with the subordinate arts of

photographing, coloring, and finishing; but when all is told, these

furnish employment to a very limited number,--almost as nothing to the

whole. Then there is teaching, which is profitable in its higher

branches, and perhaps the very pleasantest of all the callings open to

woman; but teaching is at present an overcrowded profession, the

applicants everywhere outnumbering the places. Architecture and

landscape gardening are arts every way suited to the genius of woman,

and there are enough who have the requisite mechanical skill and

mathematical education; and, though never yet thought of for the sex,

that I know of, I do not despair of seeing those who shall find in

this field a profession at once useful and elegant. When women plan

dwelling-houses, the vast body of tenements to be let in our cities

will wear a more domestic and comfortable air, and will be built more

with reference to the real wants of their inmates."

"I have thought," said Bob, "that agencies of various sorts, as

canvassing the country for the sale of books, maps, and engravings,

might properly employ a great many women. There is a large class whose

health suffers from confinement and sedentary occupations, who might,

I think, be both usefully and agreeably employed in business of this

sort, and be recruiting their health at the same time."

"Then," said my wife, "there is the medical profession."

"Yes," said I. "The world is greatly obliged to Miss Blackwell and

other noble pioneers who faced and overcame the obstacles to the

attainment of a thorough medical education by females. Thanks to them,

a new and lucrative profession is now open to educated women in

relieving the distresses of their own sex; and we may hope that in

time, through their intervention, the care of the sick may also become

the vocation of cultivated, refined, intelligent women, instead of

being left, as heretofore, to the ignorant and vulgar. The experience

of our late war has shown us what women of a high class morally and

intellectually can do in this capacity. Why should not this experience

inaugurate a new and sacred calling for refined and educated women?

Why should not NURSING become a vocation equal in dignity and in

general esteem to the medical profession, of which it is the right

hand? Why should our dearest hopes, in the hour of their greatest

peril, be committed into the hands of Sairey Gamps, when the world has

seen Florence Nightingales?"

"Yes, indeed," said my wife; "I can testify, from my own experience,

that the sufferings and dangers of the sickbed, for the want of

intelligent, educated nursing, have been dreadful. A prejudiced,

pig-headed, snuff-taking old woman, narrow-minded and vulgar, and more

confident in her own way than seven men that can render a reason,

enters your house at just the hour and moment when all your dearest

earthly hopes are brought to a crisis. She becomes absolute dictator

over your delicate, helpless wife and your frail babe,--the absolute

dictator of all in the house. If it be her sovereign will and pleasure

to enact all sorts of physiological absurdities in the premises, who

shall say her nay? 'She knows her business, she hopes!' And if it be

her edict, as it was of one of her class whom I knew, that each of her

babies shall eat four baked beans the day it is four days old, eat

them it must; and if the baby die in convulsions four days after, it

is set down as the mysterious will of an overruling Providence.

"I know and have seen women lying upon laced pillows, under silken

curtains, who have been bullied and dominated over in the hour of

their greatest helplessness by ignorant and vulgar tyrants, in a way

that would scarce be thought possible in civilized society, and

children that have been injured or done to death by the same means. A

celebrated physician told me of a babe whose eyesight was nearly

ruined by its nurse taking a fancy to wash its eyes with camphor,--'to

keep it from catching cold,' she said. I knew another infant that was

poisoned by the nurse giving it laudanum in some of those patent

nostrums which these ignorant creatures carry secretly in their

pockets, to secure quiet in their little charges. I knew one delicate

woman who never recovered from the effects of being left at her first

confinement in the hands of an ill-tempered, drinking nurse, and whose

feeble infant was neglected and abused by this woman in a way to cause

lasting injury. In the first four weeks of infancy the constitution is

peculiarly impressible; and infants of a delicate organization may, if

frightened and ill-treated, be the subjects of just such a shock to

the nervous system as in mature age comes from the sudden stroke of a

great affliction or terror. A bad nurse may affect nerves predisposed

to weakness in a manner they never will recover from. I solemnly

believe that the constitutions of more women are broken up by bad

nursing in their first confinement than by any other cause whatever.

And yet there are at the same time hundreds and thousands of women,

wanting the means of support, whose presence in a sick-room would be a

benediction. I do trust that Miss Blackwell's band of educated nurses

will not be long in coming, and that the number of such may increase

till they effect a complete revolution in this vocation. A class of

cultivated, well-trained, intelligent nurses would soon elevate the

employment of attending on the sick into the noble calling it ought to

be, and secure for it its appropriate rewards."

"There is another opening for woman," said I,--"in the world of

business. The system of commercial colleges now spreading over our

land is a new and most important development of our times. There that

large class of young men who have either no time or no inclination for

an extended classical education can learn what will fit them for that

active material life which in our broad country needs so many workers.

But the most pleasing feature of these institutions is, that the

complete course is open to women no less than to men, and women there

may acquire that knowledge of bookkeeping and accounts, and of the

forms and principles of business transactions, which will qualify them

for some of the lucrative situations hitherto monopolized by the other

sex. And the expenses of the course of instruction are so arranged as

to come within the scope of very moderate means. A fee of fifty

dollars entitles a woman to the benefit of the whole course, and she

has the privilege of attending at any hours that may suit her own

engagements and convenience."

"Then, again," said my wife, "there are the departments of millinery

and dressmaking, and the various branches of needlework, which afford

employment to thousands of women; there is typesetting, by which many

are beginning to get a living; there are the manufactures of cotton,

woolen, silk, and the numberless useful articles which employ female

hands in their fabrication,--all of them opening avenues by which,

with more or less success, a subsistence can be gained."

"Well, really," said Bob, "it would appear, after all, that there are

abundance of openings for women. What is the cause of the outcry and

distress? How is it that we hear of women starving, driven to vice and

crime by want, when so many doors of useful and profitable employment

stand open to them?"

"The question would easily be solved," said my wife, "if you could

once see the kind and class of women who thus suffer and starve.

There may be exceptions, but too large a portion of them are girls

and women who can or will do no earthly thing well,--and, what is

worse, are not willing to take the pains to be taught to do anything

well. I will describe to you one girl, and you will find in every

intelligence-office a hundred of her kind to five thoroughly trained

ones.

"Imprimis: she is rather delicate and genteel-looking, and you may

know from the arrangement of her hair just what the last mode is

of disposing of rats or waterfalls. She has a lace bonnet with

roses, a silk mantilla, a silk dress trimmed with velvet, a white

skirt with sixteen tucks and an embroidered edge, a pair of cloth

gaiters, underneath which are a pair of stockings without feet, the

only pair in her possession. She has no under-linen, and sleeps at

night in the working-clothes she wears in the day. She never seems

to have in her outfit either comb, brush, or tooth-brush of her

own,--neither needles, thread, scissors, nor pins; her money, when she

has any, being spent on more important articles, such as the lace

bonnet or silk mantilla, or the rats and waterfalls that glorify

her head. When she wishes to sew, she borrows what is needful of a

convenient next neighbor; and if she gets a place in a family as

second girl, she expects to subsist in these respects by borrowing of

the better-appointed servants, or helping herself from the family

stores.

"She expects, of course, the very highest wages, if she condescends to

live out; and by help of a trim outside appearance, and the many

vacancies that are continually occurring in households, she gets

places, where her object is to do just as little of any duty assigned

to her as possible, to hurry through her performances, put on her

fine clothes, and go a-gadding. She is on free-and-easy terms with all

the men she meets, and ready at jests and repartee, sometimes far from

seemly. Her time of service in any one place lasts indifferently from

a fortnight to two or three months, when she takes her wages, buys

her a new parasol in the latest style, and goes back to the

intelligence-office. In the different families where she has lived

she has been told a hundred times the proprieties of household

life, how to make beds, arrange rooms, wash china, glass, and

silver, and set tables; but her habitual rule is to try in each place

how small and how poor services will be accepted. When she finds

less will not do, she gives more. When the mistress follows her

constantly, and shows an energetic determination to be well served,

she shows that she can serve well; but the moment such attention

relaxes, she slides back again. She is as destructive to a house as

a fire; the very spirit of wastefulness is in her; she cracks the

china, dents the silver, stops the water-pipes with rubbish, and,

after she is gone, there is generally a sum equal to half her wages

to be expended in repairing the effects of her carelessness. And

yet there is one thing to be said for her: she is quite as careful of

her employer's things as of her own. The full amount of her mischiefs

often does not appear at once, as she is glib of tongue, adroit in

apologies, and lies with as much alertness and as little thought of

conscience as a blackbird chatters. It is difficult for people who

have been trained from childhood in the school of verities,--who

have been lectured for even the shadow of a prevarication, and shut

up in disgrace for a lie, till truth becomes a habit of their

souls,--it is very difficult for people so educated to understand how

to get on with those who never speak the truth except by mere

accident, who assert any and every thing that comes into their heads

with all the assurance and all the energy of perfect verity.

"What becomes of this girl? She finds means, by begging, borrowing,

living out, to keep herself extremely trim and airy for a certain

length of time, till the rats and waterfalls, the lace hat and

parasol, and the glib tongue, have done their work in making a fool of

some honest young mechanic who earns three dollars a day. She marries

him with no higher object than to have somebody to earn money for her

to spend. And what comes of such marriages?

"That is one ending of her career; the other is on the street, in

haunts of vice, in prison, in drunkenness, and death.

"Whence come these girls? They are as numerous as yellow butterflies

in autumn; they flutter up to cities from the country; they grow up

from mothers who ran the same sort of career before them; and the

reason why in the end they fall out of all reputable employment and

starve on poor wages is, that they become physically, mentally, and

morally incapable of rendering any service which society will think

worth paying for."

"I remember," said I, "that the head of the most celebrated

dressmaking establishment in New York, in reply to the appeals of the

needlewomen of the city for sympathy and wages, came out with

published statements to this effect: that the difficulty lay, not in

unwillingness of employers to pay what work was worth, but in finding

any work worth paying for; that she had many applicants, but among

them few who could be of real use to her; that she, in common with

everybody in this country who has any kind of serious responsibilities

to carry, was continually embarrassed for want of skilled work-people

who could take and go on with the labor of her various departments

without her constant supervision; that, out of a hundred girls, there

would not be more than five to whom she could give a dress to be made

and dismiss it from her mind as something certain to be properly

done.

"Let people individually look around their own little sphere, and ask

themselves if they know any woman really excelling in any valuable

calling or accomplishment who is suffering for want of work. All of us

know seamstresses, dressmakers, nurses, and laundresses who have made

themselves such a reputation, and are so beset and overcrowded with

work, that the whole neighborhood is constantly on its knees to them

with uplifted hands. The fine seamstress, who can cut and make

trousseaus and layettes in elegant perfection, is always engaged six

months in advance; the pet dressmaker of a neighborhood must be

engaged in May for September, and in September for May; a laundress

who sends your clothes home in nice order always has all the work that

she can do. Good work in any department is the rarest possible thing

in our American life; and it is a fact that the great majority of

workers, both in the family and out, do only tolerably well,--not so

badly that it actually cannot be borne, yet not so well as to be a

source of real, thorough satisfaction. The exceptional worker in every

neighborhood, who does things really _well_, can always set her own

price, and is always having more offering than she can possibly do.

"The trouble, then, in finding employment for women lies deeper than

the purses or consciences of the employers: it lies in the want of

education in women; the want of _education_, I say,--meaning by

education that which fits a woman for practical and profitable

employment in life, and not mere common-school learning."

"Yes," said my wife; "for it is a fact that the most troublesome and

helpless persons to provide for are often those who have a good medium

education, but no feminine habits, no industry, no practical

calculation, no muscular strength, and no knowledge of any one of

woman's peculiar duties. In the earlier days of New England, women, as

a class, had far fewer opportunities for acquiring learning, yet were

far better educated, physically and morally, than now. The high school

did not exist; at the common school they learned reading, writing, and

arithmetic, and practiced spelling; while at home they did the work of

the household. They were cheerful, bright, and active, ever on the

alert, able to do anything, from the harnessing and driving of a horse

to the finest embroidery. The daughters of New England in those days

looked the world in the face without a fear. They shunned no labor;

they were afraid of none; and they could always find their way to a

living."

"But although less instructed in school learning," said I, "they

showed no deficiency in intellectual acumen. I see no such women,

nowadays, as some I remember of that olden time,--women whose strong

minds and ever-active industry carried on reading and study side by

side with household toils.

"I remember a young lady friend of mine, attending a celebrated

boarding-school, boarded in the family of a woman who had never been

to school longer than was necessary to learn to read and write, yet

who was a perfect cyclopedia of general information. The young scholar

used to take her Chemistry and Natural Philosophy into the kitchen,

where her friend was busy with her household work, and read her

lessons to her, that she might have the benefit of her explanations;

and so, while the good lady scoured her andirons or kneaded her bread,

she lectured to her protegee on mysteries of science far beyond the

limits of the textbook. Many of the graduates of our modern high

schools would find it hard to shine in conversation on the subjects

they had studied, in the searching presence of some of these vigorous

matrons of the olden time, whose only school had been the leisure

hours gained by energy and method from their family cares."

"And in those days," said my wife, "there lived in our families a

class of American domestics, women of good sense and good powers of

reflection, who applied this sense and power of reflection to

household matters. In the early part of my married life, I myself had

American 'help'; and they were not only excellent servants, but trusty

and invaluable friends. But now, all this class of applicants for

domestic service have disappeared, I scarce know why or how. All I

know is, there is no more a Betsey or a Lois, such as used to take

domestic cares off my shoulders so completely."

"Good heavens! where are they?" cried Bob. "Where do they hide? I

would search through the world after such a prodigy!"

"The fact is," said I, "there has been a slow and gradual reaction

against household labor in America. Mothers began to feel that it was

a sort of _curse_, to be spared, if possible, to their daughters;

women began to feel that they were fortunate in proportion as they

were able to be entirely clear of family responsibilities. Then Irish

labor began to come in, simultaneously with a great advance in female

education.

"For a long while nothing was talked of, written of, thought of, in

teachers' meetings, conventions, and assemblies, but the neglected

state of female education; and the whole circle of the arts and

sciences was suddenly introduced into our free-school system, from

which needlework as gradually and quietly was suffered to drop out.

The girl who attended the primary and high school had so much study

imposed on her that she had no time for sewing or housework; and the

delighted mother was only too happy to darn her stockings and do the

housework alone, that her daughter might rise to a higher plane than

she herself had attained to. The daughter, thus educated, had, on

coming to womanhood, no solidity of muscle, no manual dexterity, no

practice or experience in domestic life; and if she were to seek a

livelihood, there remained only teaching, or some feminine trade, or

the factory."

"These factories," said my wife, "have been the ruin of hundreds and

hundreds of our once healthy farmers' daughters and others from the

country. They go there young and unprotected; they live there in great

boarding-houses, and associate with a promiscuous crowd, without even

such restraints of maternal supervision as they would have in great

boarding-schools; their bodies are enfeebled by labor often

necessarily carried on in a foul and heated atmosphere; and at the

hours when off duty, they are exposed to all the dangers of unwatched

intimacy with the other sex.

"Moreover, the factory girl learns and practices but one thing,--some

one mechanical movement, which gives no scope for invention,

ingenuity, or any other of the powers called into play by domestic

labor; so that she is in reality unfitted in every way for family

duties.

"Many times it has been my lot to try, in my family service, girls who

have left factories; and I have found them wholly useless for any of

the things which a woman ought to be good for. They knew nothing of a

house, or what ought to be done in it; they had imbibed a thorough

contempt of household labor, and looked upon it but as a _dernier

ressort_; and it was only the very lightest of its tasks that they

could even begin to think of. I remember I tried to persuade one of

these girls, the pretty daughter of a fisherman, to take some lessons

in washing and ironing. She was at that time engaged to be married to

a young mechanic, who earned something like two or three dollars a

day.

"'My child,' said I, 'you will need to understand all kinds of

housework if you are going to be married.'

"She tossed her little head,--

"'Indeed, she wasn't going to trouble herself about that.'

"'But who will get up your husband's shirts?'

"'Oh, he must put them out. I'm not going to be married to make a

slave of myself!'

"Another young factory girl, who came for table and parlor work, was

so full of airs and fine notions that it seemed as difficult to treat

with her as with a princess. She could not sweep, because it blistered

her hands, which, in fact, were long and delicate; she could not think

of putting them into hot dish-water, and for that reason preferred

washing the dishes in cold water; she required a full hour in the

morning to make her toilet; she was laced so tightly that she could

not stoop without vertigo; and her hoops were of dimensions which

seemed to render it impossible for her to wait upon table; she was

quite exhausted with the effort of ironing the table-napkins and

chamber-towels: yet she could not think of 'living out' under two

dollars a week.

"Both these girls had had a good free-school education, and could read

any amount of novels, write a tolerable letter, but had not learned

anything with sufficient accuracy to fit them for teachers. They were

pretty, and their destiny was to marry and lie a deadweight on the

hands of some honest man, and to increase, in their children, the

number of incapables."

"Well," said Bob, "what would you have? What is to be done?"

"In the first place," said I, "I would have it felt, by those who are

seeking to elevate woman, that the work is to be done, not so much by

creating for her new spheres of action as by elevating her conceptions

of that domestic vocation to which God and Nature have assigned her.

It is all very well to open to her avenues of profit and advancement

in the great outer world; but, after all, _to make and keep a home_

is, and ever must be, a woman's first glory, her highest aim. No work

of art can compare with a perfect home; the training and guiding of a

family must be recognized as the highest work a woman can perform; and

female education ought to be conducted with special reference to

this.

"Men are trained to be lawyers, to be physicians, to be mechanics, by

long and self-denying study and practice. A man cannot even make shoes

merely by going to the high school and learning reading, writing, and

mathematics; he cannot be a bookkeeper or a printer simply from

general education.

"Now women have a sphere and profession of their own,--a profession

for which they are fitted by physical organization, by their own

instincts, and to which they are directed by the pointing and manifest

finger of God,--and that sphere is _family life_. Duties to the state

and to public life they may have; but the public duties of women must

bear to their family ones the same relation that the family duties of

men bear to their public ones. The defect in the late efforts to push

on female education is, that it has been for her merely general, and

that it has left out and excluded all that is professional; and she

undertakes the essential duties of womanhood, when they do devolve on

her, without any adequate preparation."

"But is it possible for a girl to learn at school the things which fit

for her family life?" said Bob.

"Why not?" I replied. "Once it was thought impossible in school to

teach girls geometry or algebra, or the higher mathematics; it was

thought impossible to put them through collegiate courses; but it has

been done, and we see it. Women study treatises on political economy

in schools, and why should not the study of domestic economy form a

part of every school course? A young girl will stand up at the

blackboard, and draw and explain the compound blowpipe, and describe

all the processes of making oxygen and hydrogen. Why should she not

draw and explain a refrigerator as well as an air-pump? Both are to be

explained on philosophical principles. When a schoolgirl, in her

chemistry, studies the reciprocal action of acids and alkalies, what

is there to hinder the teaching her its application to the various

processes of cooking where acids and alkalies are employed? Why should

she not be led to see how effervescence and fermentation can be made

to perform their office in the preparation of light and digestible

bread? Why should she not be taught the chemical substances by which

food is often adulterated, and the test by which such adulterations

are detected? Why should she not understand the processes of

confectionery, and know how to guard against the deleterious or

poisonous elements that are introduced into children's sugar-plums and

candies? Why, when she learns the doctrine of mordants, the substances

by which different colors are set, should she not learn it with some

practical view to future life, so that she may know how to set the

color of a fading calico or restore the color of a spotted one? Why,

in short, when a girl has labored through a profound chemical work,

and listened to courses of chemical lectures, should she come to

domestic life, which presents a constant series of chemical

experiments and changes, and go blindly along as without chart or

compass, unable to tell what will take out a stain, or what will

brighten a metal, what are common poisons and what their antidotes,

and not knowing enough of the laws of caloric to understand how to

warm a house, or of the laws of atmosphere to know how to ventilate

one? Why should the preparation of food, that subtile art on which

life, health, cheerfulness, good temper, and good looks so largely

depend, forever be left in the hands of the illiterate and vulgar?

"A benevolent gentleman has lately left a large fortune for the

founding of a university for women; and the object is stated to be to

give to women who have already acquired a general education the means

of acquiring a professional one, to fit themselves for some employment

by which they may gain a livelihood.

"In this institution the women are to be instructed in bookkeeping,

stenography, telegraphing, photographing, drawing, modeling, and

various other arts; but, so far as I remember, there is no proposal to

teach domestic economy as at least _one_ of woman's professions.

"Why should there not be a professor of domestic economy in every

large female school? Why should not this professor give lectures,

first on house planning and building, illustrated by appropriate

apparatus? Why should not the pupils have presented to their

inspection models of houses planned with reference to economy, to ease

of domestic service, to warmth, to ventilation, and to architectural

appearance? Why should not the professor go on to lecture further on

house-fixtures, with models of the best mangles, washing-machines,

clothes-wringers, ranges, furnaces, and cooking-stoves, together with

drawings and apparatus illustrative of domestic hydraulics, showing

the best contrivances for bathing-rooms and the obvious principles of

plumbing, so that the pupils may have some idea how to work the

machinery of a convenient house when they have it, and to have such

conveniences introduced when wanting? If it is thought worth while to

provide at great expense apparatus for teaching the revolutions of

Saturn's moons and the precession of the equinoxes, why should there

not be some also to teach what it may greatly concern a woman's

earthly happiness to know?

"Why should not the professor lecture on home chemistry, devoting his

first lecture to bread-making? and why might not a batch of bread be

made and baked and exhibited to the class, together with specimens of

morbid anatomy in the bread line,--the sour cotton bread of the baker;

the rough, big-holed bread; the heavy, fossil bread; the bitter bread

of too much yeast,--and the causes of their defects pointed out? And

so with regard to the various articles of food,--why might not

chemical lectures be given on all of them, one after another? In

short, it would be easy to trace out a course of lectures on common

things to occupy a whole year, and for which the pupils, whenever they

come to have homes of their own, will thank the lecturer to the last

day of their life.

"Then there is no impossibility in teaching needlework, the cutting

and fitting of dresses, in female schools. The thing is done very

perfectly in English schools for the working classes. A girl trained

at one of these schools came into a family I once knew. She brought

with her a sewing-book, in which the process of making various

articles was exhibited in miniature. The several parts of a shirt

were first shown, each perfectly made, and fastened to a leaf of

the book by itself, and then the successive steps of uniting the

parts, till finally appeared a miniature model of the whole. The

sewing was done with red thread, so that every stitch might show, and

any imperfections be at once remedied. The same process was pursued

with regard to other garments, and a good general idea of cutting

and fitting them was thus given to an entire class of girls.

"In the same manner the care and nursing of young children and the

tending of the sick might be made the subject of lectures. Every woman

ought to have some general principles to guide her with regard to what

is to be done in case of the various accidents that may befall either

children or grown people, and of their lesser illnesses, and ought to

know how to prepare comforts and nourishment for the sick. Hawthorne's

satirical remarks upon the contrast between the elegant Zenobia's

conversation, and the smoky porridge she made for him when he was an

invalid, might apply to the volunteer cookery of many charming

women."

"I think," said Bob, "that your Professor of Domestic Economy would

find enough to occupy his pupils."

"In fact," said I, "were domestic economy properly honored and

properly taught, in the manner described, it would open a sphere of

employment to so many women in the home life, that we should not be

obliged to send our women out to California or the Pacific to put an

end to an anxious and aimless life.

"When domestic work is sufficiently honored to be taught as an art and

science in our boarding-schools and high-schools, then possibly it may

acquire also dignity in the eyes of our working classes, and young

girls who have to earn their own living may no longer feel degraded

in engaging in domestic service. The place of a domestic in a family

may become as respectable in their eyes as a place in a factory, in a

printing-office, in a dressmaking or millinery establishment, or

behind the counter of a shop.

"In America there is no class which will confess itself the lower

class, and a thing recommended solely for the benefit of any such

class finds no one to receive it.

"If the intelligent and cultivated look down on household work with

disdain; if they consider it as degrading, a thing to be shunned by

every possible device,--they may depend upon it that the influence of

such contempt of woman's noble duties will flow downward, producing a

like contempt in every class in life.

"Our sovereign princesses learn the doctrine of equality very quickly,

and are not going to sacrifice themselves to what is not considered

_de bon ton_ by the upper classes; and the girl with the laced hat and

parasol, without underclothes, who does her best to 'shirk' her duties

as housemaid, and is looking for marriage as an escape from work, is a

fair copy of her mistress, who married for much the same reason, who

hates housekeeping, and would rather board or do anything else than

have the care of a family. The one is about as respectable as the

other.

"When housekeeping becomes an enthusiasm, and its study and practice a

fashion, then we shall have in America that class of persons to rely

on for help in household labors who are now going to factories, to

printing-offices, to every kind of toil, forgetful of the best life

and sphere of woman."

Household Papers and Stories · 第 51 / 78 题