My next axiom is,--

_There can be no true home without liberty._

The very idea of home is of a retreat where we shall be free to act

out personal and individual tastes and peculiarities, as we cannot

do before the wide world. We are to have our meals at what hour we

will, served in what style suits us. Our hours of going and coming

are to be as we please. Our favorite haunts are to be here or there;

our pictures and books so disposed as seems to us good; and our

whole arrangements the expression, so far as our means can compass it,

of our own personal ideas of what is pleasant and desirable in

life. This element of liberty, if we think of it, is the chief

charm of home. "Here I can do as I please," is the thought with

which the tempest-tossed earth-pilgrim blesses himself or herself,

turning inward from the crowded ways of the world. This thought

blesses the man of business, as he turns from his day's care and

crosses the sacred threshold. It is as restful to him as the slippers

and gown and easy-chair by the fireside. Everybody understands him

here. Everybody is well content that he should take his ease in his

own way. Such is the case in the ideal home. That such is not always

the case in the real home comes often from the mistakes in the

house-furnishing. Much house-furnishing is too fine for liberty.

In America there is no such thing as rank and station which impose a

sort of prescriptive style on people of certain income. The

consequence is that all sorts of furniture and belongings, which in

the Old World have a recognized relation to certain possibilities of

income, and which require certain other accessories to make them in

good keeping, are thrown in the way of all sorts of people.

Young people who cannot expect by any reasonable possibility to keep

more than two or three servants, if they happen to have the means in

the outset furnish a house with just such articles as in England would

suit an establishment of sixteen. We have seen houses in England

having two or three housemaids, and tables served by a butler and two

waiters, where the furniture, carpets, china, crystal, and silver were

in one and the same style with some establishments in America where

the family was hard pressed to keep three Irish servants.

This want of servants is the one thing that must modify everything in

American life; it is, and will long continue to be, a leading feature

in the life of a country so rich in openings for man and woman that

domestic service can be only the stepping-stone to something higher.

Nevertheless we Americans are great travelers; we are sensitive,

appreciative, fond of novelty, apt to receive and incorporate into our

own life what seems fair and graceful in that of other people. Our

women's wardrobes are made elaborate with the thousand elegancies of

French toilet,--our houses filled with a thousand knick-knacks of

which our plain ancestors never dreamed. Cleopatra did not set sail on

the Nile in more state and beauty than that in which our young

American bride is often ushered into her new home,--her wardrobe all

gossamer lace and quaint frill and crimp and embroidery, her house a

museum of elegant and costly gewgaws, and, amid the whole collection

of elegancies and fragilities, she, perhaps, the frailest.

Then comes the tug of war. The young wife becomes a mother, and while

she is retired to her chamber, blundering Biddy rusts the elegant

knives, or takes off the ivory handles by soaking in hot water; the

silver is washed in greasy soapsuds, and refreshed now and then with a

thump, which cocks the nose of the teapot awry, or makes the handle

assume an air of drunken defiance. The fragile china is chipped here

and there around its edges with those minute gaps so vexatious to a

woman's soul; the handles fly hither and thither in the wild confusion

of Biddy's washing-day hurry, when cook wants her to help hang out the

clothes. Meanwhile Bridget sweeps the parlor with a hard broom, and

shakes out showers of ashes from the grate, forgetting to cover the

damask lounges, and they directly look as rusty and time-worn as if

they had come from an auction-store; and all together unite in making

such havoc of the delicate ruffles and laces of the bridal outfit and

baby _layette_ that, when the poor young wife comes out of her

chamber after her nurse has left her, and, weakened and embarrassed

with the demands of the newcomer, begins to look once more into the

affairs of her little world, she is ready to sink with vexation and

discouragement. Poor little princess! Her clothes are made as

princesses wear them, her baby's clothes like a young duke's, her

house furnished like a lord's, and only Bridget and Biddy and Polly to

do the work of cook, scullery-maid, butler, footman, laundress,

nursery-maid, housemaid, and lady's maid. Such is the array that in

the Old Country would be deemed necessary to take care of an

establishment got up like hers. Everything in it is too fine,--not too

fine to be pretty, not in bad taste in itself, but too fine for the

situation, too fine for comfort or liberty.

What ensues in a house so furnished? Too often, ceaseless fretting of

the nerves, in the wife's despairing, conscientious efforts to keep

things as they should be. There is no freedom in a house where things

are too expensive and choice to be freely handled and easily replaced.

Life becomes a series of petty embarrassments and restrictions,

something is always going wrong, and the man finds his fireside

oppressive,--the various articles of his parlor and table seem like so

many temper-traps and spring-guns, menacing explosion and disaster.

There may be, indeed, the most perfect home-feeling, the utmost

cosiness and restfulness, in apartments crusted with gilding, carpeted

with velvet, and upholstered with satin. I have seen such, where the

home-like look and air of free use was as genuine as in a Western log

cabin; but this was in a range of princely income that made all these

things as easy to be obtained or replaced as the most ordinary of our

domestic furniture. But so long as articles must be shrouded from use,

or used with fear and trembling, because their cost is above the

general level of our means, we had better be without them, even

though the most lucky of accidents may put their possession in our

power.

But it is not merely by the effort to maintain too much elegance

that the sense of home liberty is banished from a house. It is

sometimes expelled in another way, with all painstaking and

conscientious strictness, by the worthiest and best of human beings,

the blessed followers of Saint Martha. Have we not known them, the

deaf, worthy creatures, up before daylight, causing most scrupulous

lustrations of every pane of glass and inch of paint in our

parlors, in consequence whereof every shutter and blind must be

kept closed for days to come, lest the flies should speck the freshly

washed windows and wainscoting? Dear shade of Aunt Mehitabel,

forgive our boldness! Have we not been driven for days, in our

youth, to read our newspaper in the front veranda, in the kitchen,

out in the barn,--anywhere, in fact, where sunshine could be

found,--because there was not a room in the house that was not

cleaned, shut up, and darkened? Have we not shivered with cold, all

the glowering, gloomy month of May, because, the august front parlor

having undergone the spring cleaning, the andirons were snugly tied

up in the tissue-paper, and an elegant frill of the same material

was trembling before the mouth of the once glowing fireplace? Even so,

dear soul, full of loving-kindness and hospitality as thou wast, yet

ever making our house seem like a tomb! And with what patience

wouldst thou sit sewing by a crack in the shutters an inch wide,

rejoicing in thy immaculate paint and clear glass! But was there

ever a thing of thy spotless and unsullied belongings which a boy

might use? How I trembled to touch thy scoured tins, that hung in

appalling brightness! with what awe I asked for a basket to pick

strawberries! and where in the house could I find a place to eat a

piece of gingerbread? How like a ruffian, a Tartar, a pirate, I

always felt when I entered thy domains! and how, from day to day,

I wondered at the immeasurable depths of depravity which were always

leading me to upset something, or break or tear or derange something,

in thy exquisitely kept premises! Somehow the impression was burned

with overpowering force into my mind that houses and furniture,

scrubbed floors, white curtains, bright tins and brasses, were the

great, awful, permanent facts of existence; and that men and women,

and particularly children, were the meddlesome intruders upon this

divine order, every trace of whose intermeddling must be scrubbed

out and obliterated in the quickest way possible. It seemed evident

to me that houses would be far more perfect if nobody lived in them at

all, but that, as men had really and absurdly taken to living in

them, they must live as little as possible. My only idea of a house

was a place full of traps and pitfalls for boys, a deadly temptation

to sins which beset one every moment; and when I read about a

sailor's free life on the ocean, I felt an untold longing to go forth

and be free in like manner.

But a truce to these fancies, and back again to our essay.

If liberty in a house is a comfort to a husband, it is a necessity to

children. When we say liberty, we do not mean license. We do not mean

that Master Johnny be allowed to handle elegant volumes with

bread-and-butter fingers, or that little Miss be suffered to drum on

the piano, or practice line-drawing with a pin on varnished furniture.

Still it is essential that the family parlors be not too fine for the

family to sit in,--too fine for the ordinary accidents, haps and

mishaps of reasonably well-trained children. The elegance of the

parlor where papa and mamma sit and receive their friends should wear

an inviting, not a hostile and bristling, aspect to little people. Its

beauty and its order gradually form in the little mind a love of

beauty and order, and the insensible carefulness of regard.

Nothing is worse for a child than to shut him up in a room which he

understands is his, _because_ he is disorderly,--where he is expected,

of course, to maintain and keep disorder. We have sometimes pitied the

poor little victims who show their faces longingly at the doors of

elegant parlors, and are forthwith collared by the domestic police and

consigned to some attic apartment, called a playroom, where chaos

continually reigns. It is a mistake to suppose, because children

derange a well-furnished apartment, that they like confusion. Order

and beauty are always pleasant to them as to grown people, and

disorder and defacement are painful; but they know neither how to

create the one nor to prevent the other,--their little lives are a

series of experiments, often making disorder by aiming at some new

form of order. Yet, for all this, I am not one of those who feel that

in a family everything should bend to the sway of these little people.

They are the worst of tyrants in such houses: still, where children

are, though the fact must not appear to them, _nothing must be done

without a wise thought of them_.

Here, as in all high art, the old motto is in force, "_Ars est celare

artem_." Children who are taught too plainly, by every anxious look

and word of their parents, by every family arrangement, by the

impressment of every chance guest into the service, that their parents

consider their education as the one important matter in creation, are

apt to grow up fantastical, artificial, and hopelessly self-conscious.

The stars cannot stop in their courses, even for our personal

improvement, and the sooner children learn this the better. The great

art is to organize a home which shall move on with a strong, wide,

generous movement, where the little people shall act themselves out as

freely and impulsively as can consist with the comfort of the whole,

and where the anxious watching and planning for them shall be kept as

secret from them as possible.

It is well that one of the sunniest and airiest rooms in the house be

the children's nursery. It is good philosophy, too, to furnish it

attractively, even if the sum expended lower the standard of parlor

luxuries. It is well that the children's chamber, which is to act

constantly on their impressible natures for years, should command a

better prospect, a sunnier aspect, than one which serves for a day's

occupancy of the transient guest. It is well that journeys should be

made or put off in view of the interests of the children; that guests

should be invited with a view to their improvement; that some

intimacies should be chosen and some rejected on their account. But it

is not well that all this should, from infancy, be daily talked out

before the child, and he grow up in egotism from moving in a sphere

where everything from first to last is calculated and arranged with

reference to himself. A little appearance of wholesome neglect

combined with real care and never ceasing watchfulness has often

seemed to do wonders in this work of setting human beings on their own

feet for the life journey.

Education is the highest object of home, but education in the widest

sense,--education of the parents no less than of the children. In a

true home the man and the woman receive, through their cares, their

watchings, their hospitality, their charity, the last and highest

finish that earth can put upon them. From that they must pass upward,

for earth can teach them no more.

The home education is incomplete unless it include the idea of

hospitality and charity. Hospitality is a Biblical and apostolic

virtue, and not so often recommended in Holy Writ without reason.

Hospitality is much neglected in America for the very reasons touched

upon above. We have received our ideas of propriety and elegance of

living from old countries, where labor is cheap, where domestic

service is a well-understood, permanent occupation, adopted cheerfully

for life, and where of course there is such a subdivision of labor as

insures great thoroughness in all its branches. We are ashamed or

afraid to conform honestly and hardily to a state of things purely

American. We have not yet accomplished what our friend the Doctor

calls "our weaning," and learned that dinners with circuitous courses

and divers other Continental and English refinements, well enough in

their way, cannot be accomplished in families with two or three

untrained servants, without an expense of care and anxiety which makes

them heart-withering to the delicate wife, and too severe a trial to

occur often. America is the land of subdivided fortunes, of a general

average of wealth and comfort, and there ought to be, therefore, an

understanding in the social basis far more simple than in the Old

World.

Many families of small fortunes know this,--they are quietly living

so,--but they have not the steadiness to share their daily average

living with a friend, a traveler, or guest, just as the Arab shares

his tent and the Indian his bowl of succotash. They cannot have

company, they say. Why? Because it is such a fuss to get out the best

things, and then to put them back again. But why get out the best

things! Why not give your friend what he would like a thousand times

better,--a bit of your average home life, a seat at any time at your

board, a seat at your fire? If he sees that there is a handle off your

teacup, and that there is a crack across one of your plates, he only

thinks, with a sigh of relief, "Well, mine aren't the only things that

meet with accidents," and he feels nearer to you ever after; he will

let you come to his table and see the cracks in his teacups, and you

will condole with each other on the transient nature of earthly

possessions. If it become apparent in these entirely undressed

rehearsals that your children are sometimes disorderly, and that your

cook sometimes overdoes the meat, and that your second girl sometimes

is awkward in waiting, or has forgotten a table propriety, your friend

only feels, "Ah, well, other people have trials as well as I," and he

thinks, if you come to see him, he shall feel easy with you.

"Having company" is an expense that may always be felt; but easy daily

hospitality, the plate always on your table for a friend, is an

expense that appears on no accounts book, and a pleasure that is daily

and constant.

Under this head of hospitality, let us suppose a case. A traveler

comes from England; he comes in good faith and good feeling to see how

Americans live. He merely wants to penetrate into the interior of

domestic life, to see what there is genuinely and peculiarly American

about it. Now here is Smilax, who is living, in a small, neat way, on

his salary from the daily press. He remembers hospitalities received

from our traveler in England, and wants to return them. He remembers,

too, with dismay, a well-kept establishment, the well-served table,

the punctilious, orderly servants. Smilax keeps two, a cook and

chambermaid, who divide the functions of his establishment between

them. What shall he do? Let him say, in a fair, manly way, "My dear

fellow, I'm delighted to see you. I live in a small way, but I'll do

my best for you, and Mrs. Smilax will be delighted. Come and dine with

us, so and so, and we'll bring in one or two friends." So the man

comes, and Mrs. Smilax serves up such a dinner as lies within the

limits of her knowledge and the capacities of her servants. All plain,

good of its kind, unpretending, without an attempt to do anything

English or French,--to do anything more than if she were furnishing a

gala dinner for her father or returned brother. Show him your house

freely, just as it is, talk to him freely of it, just as he in England

showed you his larger house and talked to you of his finer things. If

the man is a true man, he will thank you for such unpretending,

sincere welcome; if he is a man of straw, then he is not worth wasting

Mrs. Smilax's health and spirits for, in unavailing efforts to get up

a foreign dinner-party.

A man who has any heart in him values a genuine, little bit of home

more than anything else you can give him. He can get French cooking

at a restaurant; he can buy expensive wines at first-class hotels, if

he wants them; but the traveler, though ever so rich and ever so

well-served at home, is, after all, nothing but a man as you are, and

he is craving something that doesn't seem like an hotel,--some bit

of real, genuine heart life. Perhaps he would like better than

anything to show you the last photograph of his wife, or to read to

you the great, round-hand letter of his ten-year-old which he has got

to-day. He is ready to cry when he thinks of it. In this mood he goes

to see you, hoping for something like, home, and you first receive

him in a parlor opened only on state occasions, and that has been

circumstantially and exactly furnished, as the upholsterer assures

you, as every other parlor of the kind in the city is furnished.

You treat him to a dinner got up for the occasion, with hired

waiters,--a dinner which it has taken Mrs. Smilax a week to prepare

for, and will take her a week to recover from,--for which the baby has

been snubbed and turned off, to his loud indignation, and your young

four-year-old sent to his aunts. Your traveler eats your dinner, and

finds it inferior, as a work of art, to other dinners,--a poor

imitation. He goes away and criticises; you hear of it, and resolve

never to invite a foreigner again. But if you had given him a little

of your heart, a little home warmth and feeling,--if you had shown

him your baby, and let him romp with your four-year-old, and eat a

genuine dinner with you,--would he have been false to that? Not so

likely. He wanted something real and human,--you gave him a bad

dress rehearsal, and dress rehearsals always provoke criticism.

Besides hospitality, there is, in a true home, a mission of charity.

It is a just law which regulates the possession of great or beautiful

works of art in the Old World, that they shall in some sense be

considered the property of all who can appreciate. Fine grounds have

hours when the public may be admitted; pictures and statues may be

shown to visitors: and this is a noble charity. In the same manner the

fortunate individuals who have achieved the greatest of all human

works of art should employ it as a sacred charity. How many, morally

wearied, wandering, disabled, are healed and comforted by the warmth

of a true home! When a mother has sent her son to the temptations of a

distant city, what news is so glad to her heart as that he has found

some quiet family where he visits often and is made to feel at HOME?

How many young men have good women saved from temptation and shipwreck

by drawing them often to the sheltered corner by the fireside! The

poor artist; the wandering genius who has lost his way in this world,

and stumbles like a child among hard realities; the many men and women

who, while they have houses, have no homes, see from afar, in their

distant, bleak life journey, the light of a true home fire, and, if

made welcome there, warm their stiffened limbs, and go forth stronger

to their pilgrimage. Let those who have accomplished this beautiful

and perfect work of divine art be liberal of its influence. Let them

not seek to bolt the doors and draw the curtains; for they know not,

and will never know till the future life, of the good they may do by

the ministration of this great charity of home.

We have heard much lately of the restricted sphere of woman. We have

been told how many spirits among women are of a wider, stronger, more

heroic mould than befits the mere routine of housekeeping. It may be

true that there are many women far too great, too wise, too high, for

mere housekeeping. But where is the woman in any way too great, or too

high, or too wise, to spend herself in creating a home? What can any

woman make diviner, higher, better? From such homes go forth all

heroisms, all inspirations, all great deeds. Such mothers and such

homes have made the heroes and martyrs, faithful unto death, who have

given their precious lives to us during these three years of our

agony!

Homes are the work of art peculiar to the genius of woman. Man helps

in this work, but woman leads; the hive is always in confusion without

the queen bee. But what a woman must she be who does this work

perfectly! She comprehends all, she balances and arranges all; all

different tastes and temperaments find in her their rest, and she can

unite at one hearthstone the most discordant elements. In her is

order, yet an order ever veiled and concealed by indulgence. None are

checked, reproved, abridged of privileges by her love of system; for

she knows that order was made for the family, and not the family for

order. Quietly she takes on herself what all others refuse or

overlook. What the unwary disarrange she silently rectifies. Everybody

in her sphere breathes easy, feels free; and the driest twig begins in

her sunshine to put out buds and blossoms. So quiet are her operations

and movements that none sees that it is she who holds all things in

harmony; only, alas, when she is gone, how many things suddenly appear

disordered, inharmonious, neglected! All these threads have been

smilingly held in her weak hand. Alas, if that is no longer there!

Can any woman be such a housekeeper without inspiration? No. In the

words of the old church service, "her soul must ever have affiance in

God." The New Jerusalem of a perfect home cometh down from God out of

heaven. But to make such a home is ambition high and worthy enough for

any woman, be she what she may.

One thing more. Right on the threshold of all perfection lies the

cross to be taken up. No one can go over or around that cross in

science or in art. Without labor and self-denial neither Raphael nor

Michel Angelo nor Newton was made perfect. Nor can man or woman

create a true home who is not willing in the outset to embrace life

heroically to encounter labor and sacrifice. Only to such shall this

divinest power be given to create on earth that which is the nearest

image of heaven.

Household Papers and Stories · 第 21 / 78 题