EVIDENCE.

Let us consider two bits of practical evidence which refute the

hideous assumptions of Buckle, Malthus, and even the latter-day gloomy

philosophers.

The examples are but echoes of the information from all directions

where intelligent effort at character-building has been put forth. No

one will deny the universality of the application and corroboration of

this evidence without confessing inefficiency behind the effort that

has failed of its purpose.

The following is an extract from a letter written by the Hon. William

J. Van Patten, President of the Kurn Hattin Homes Farm School at

Westminster, Vermont, to the author, in answer to a question as to the

results of the New England experiment. The Kurn Hattin institution

cares for children from all over New England, but receives most of its

charges from the congested districts of the city of Boston.

President Van Patten writes: "It has been a surprise to me ever since

we started this work to find that the boys who were taken from the

worst homes, and who had, until they were rescued, been under

deplorable conditions, were readily changed to thoroughly good lads,

with no trace of the evils that came from their former environment.

This certainly carries out your thought in respect to social

quarantine, and shows that, properly done, it can be made very

effective."

The other evidence chosen is that of Chief of Police Crowley of San

Francisco, whom the author knows to be a careful observer and

conservative judge of his observations. General Brinkerhoff, of the

National Conference of Charities and Correction of Canada and the

United States, is authority for the statement of Chief Crowley, which

was in effect as follows: "I have not known of the arrest of a single

person who has had the advantage of a good kindergarten training, and

I believe that it is perfect protection against criminal

tendencies."[1]

[1] See corroborative testimony page 221.

Now here is the evidence of a distinguished philanthropist and also of

an honored and successful officer of the corrective branch of

government from widely separated communities, one of them the most

mixed in its constituent parts of any city of America, and where

frontier development has offered extreme temptation for criminal

tendencies, coupled with the fever of speculation.

In the "Report of Committee on History of Child-Saving," now

unfortunately out of print, which was published in 1893 by the

National Conference of Charities and Correction, we find a

contribution, based on the San Francisco character-building work, by

the revered, the late Sarah B. Cooper.

We esteem the paper of Mrs. Cooper so highly, as being a most

convincing argument for social quarantine, that we have begged

permission to print it as a chapter of this brief. It carries words of

burning truth that should not be "out of print," but on the contrary

should be graven deep in the memory of all citizens for whose common

good Mrs. Cooper labored in the field of practical Christian

experiment.

Mr. Hastings H. Hart, general secretary of the National Conference of

Charities and Correction, who is in close communication with six

hundred correspondents who are especially interested in child-saving

work, assures us that if there is no obstruction offered to the free

choice of children, and facilities are available for proper training,

practically all can be made useful citizens, and that by coöperation

to attain that aim, social quarantine is possible. The present

headquarters of the National Conference of Charities and Correction is

in Chicago, in the Montauk Building, 115 Monroe Street. The Conference

is doing a great work in stimulating and organizing reforms. The

annual subscription--$2.50--entitles members to the published

proceedings of the Conference, which are an epitome of the history of

progress towards social quarantine. There is no more profitable

coöperation than by means of membership in this association.

We wish to say further with reference to the comprehensiveness of Mr.

Van Patten's evidence, that his range of observation is, like that of

Mr. Hart, as wide as the country. His activities include both the

church and the political fields. He has twice been mayor of

Burlington, was the first president of the United Society of Christian

Endeavor, and is still a director; is president of the Congregational

Club of Western Vermont, as well as of the Kurn Hattin Farm School. He

was instrumental in establishing kindergarten work in his home city,

and also a Social Mission, where he and other Christians meet the

laboring people of the community on the basis of friendly and citizen

equality. But Mr. Van Patten's evidence and Mr. Hart's is the same as

that of all who have entered personally into the sympathies of

unfortunates, especially by the way of giving their children the means

of proper training, and they are as one in the belief that thorough

measures, which would effect a Perfect Social Quarantine, would rid

society entirely of the "hopelessly submerged" class, and sift out of

its present mass the diseased and incompetent, who should have the

care of an asylum instead of the curse of a prison.

One evil that follows in the wake of such a wicked assumption as that

carried in the idea of a Have-To-Be-Bad class is that it is not only a

loop-hole for willing indifference, but is a blinding influence cast

about those who are not willingly indifferent.

Under such a general assumption an earnest philanthropist or a

would-be altruist may pass expressions of deplorable misery, want or

neglect with doubt, if not with calm unconcern, under the belief that

they are of the Have-To-Bes, whereas, if there were even an attempt at

Perfect Social Quarantine no case of distress nor neglect could show

itself in a community without its becoming the business of everybody

to enquire why the social quarantine officers had not attended to

their business.

In this manner the professional beggar, the tramp, the Need-Not-Be,

and all that tribe of parasite humanity who prey upon the credulity of

unorganized charity would be discovered in their true light, and would

shrink out of sight or would be forced to seek useful occupation, if

it were to be had, or would then hold just title to public assistance

if no occupation were available.

It is well to bear in mind when considering the question of the

Have-To-Be or Need-Not-Be classes that concrete society has to care

for them in one form or another anyhow, whether they work or whether

they are idle or steal. They bring nothing with them and must live off

the land. If they do not work they live off the workers. In infancy,

the cost of caring for them in a manner supplementary only to home

care is very little, but the profit of that care increases in value in

geometrical ratio as does also the cost of the neglect of right

training.

And also, in answer to a question often asked by those who are not

informed about kindergarten efficiency, relative to securing the

willingness of parents to accept outside care for their children: The

question of voluntary or compulsory compliance on the part of parents

or children need not be feared during the earliest character-forming

age, for until the child is old enough to earn money no selfish

objection can be offered, and the greater the need, as stated

elsewhere, the more easy is the compliance accorded. As this is the

period of present neglect, as well as the time when all students of

child-life agree that the character of the adult is moulded, the

vexing question of parental control need not be raised.

The duty of social quarantine is to seek out the children of the

greatest need first and work back through the strata of misfortune to

those of fortune, in the same way that a process of cleansing should

first use a shovel, then a broom, and finally a wash rag and a

polishing cloth.

The habit-of-thought of a community aiming at quarantine efficiency

will become impregnated with the idea that there _Must-Not-Be_

unwholesome units in their midst as soon as it has been delivered of

the evil suggestion of the necessity of a Have-To-Be-Bad class, for it

is wonderful what the mere change of a point of view will effect.

On the question of the virtue, or merit, of Strict Social Quarantine,

there seems to be no difference of opinion about the desirability of

the aim, and the efficacy of available means to accomplish it has

already been established.

We have heard it said that the kindergarten method is splendidly

adapted to the children of the poor but not to the children of the

rich in America, because rich children are petted beyond endurance,

and have toys in such lavish abundance, that even instructive

amusements and wholesome care are but a burden when added to home

superfluities. This may easily be so, as there is a point of surfeit

in everything, even in the best of nourishment, but it is proof of the

wisdom of a wider distribution of the effort so as to really nourish

instead of causing a surfeit of care.

It is not the rich and the strong and the healthy that need the direct

care of social quarantine, but its rescues from among the presently

neglected and warped defenseless ones would create a wave of average

improvement of ideals that would be felt in the most luxurious homes

to the benefit of the pampered possessors of fortune's birth prizes.

At the present moment, the summer of 1898, there rests in the custody

of the mayor of Chicago, Hon. Carter H. Harrison, 2nd, a report of a

special commission appointed by him to recommend changes in the

educational methods of the city of Chicago and the county of Cook,

that are intended to bring them up to the level of the highest ideals.

Among the recommendations it is advised that an ample kindergarten

shall be attached to every school, and that there shall always be

school facilities so that every child of school age shall have a seat

at his disposal. The recommendations relative to the higher branches

of education do not concern our present argument, but the suggestion

relative to extending kindergarten facilities is of the greatest

importance.

The mayor and a majority of the aldermen are believed to hold the

welfare of the community they govern in earnest care, so that it is a

good time to strengthen their hands to do the best and completest

thing in the way of reform while changes are being made, and to insist

on nothing less than Strict Social Quarantine to protect all the

children of tender ages in order that the work of reform may begin

_now_, at the root, and insure a generation of eager students and

workers to use the splendid facilities, already supplied, when they

arrive at school age.

It is not necessary to wait for the construction of fine buildings,

and there will be ready for any need a competent army, if required, to

take up the work of training.[2]

[2] In the city of Saint Louis, at the end of the 1896

school-year, there were seventy-one volunteer

kindergartners, and the length of the waiting list of the

training schools precluded promise of even volunteer

appointments for three years to come. This is but an

illustration of the trend of interest in the direction of

character-building school employment.

Many young women are beginning to learn that _true happiness is the

evidence and fruit of conscious usefulness_, and that the work of

the kindergarten and industrial schools, in producing conscious good

results, creates much happiness and enthusiasm in their devotees, and

they are being drawn to appreciate, and will eagerly participate in,

so pleasurable an occupation,--the only one that quite satisfies the

mother impulse within them.

It is also a recognized fact, as an outgrowth of the development of

character-school training, that no other preliminary experience is so

good in fitting a young woman for the duties of married life as a

course of kindergarten study; and, furthermore, there is no part of

the kindergarten work that is not useful, in its simple

suggestiveness, to anyone, of no matter what sex or age.

This is not, however, a plea for any particular system of pedagogy,

although the method of Froebel seems to merit all praise, but for the

recognition of the fact that Character-Building and Habit-Forming

schools should be appreciated as the _most important branches of

government_ and not as minor branches of education, and that _they

should be supported as becoming the nurseries of good citizenship_.

Don't wait for fine buildings; any habitable room in the deepest part

of a slum, cleaned and whitened to suggest Godliness, such as have

already been used effectively for mission kindergartens is better than

nothing, and sometimes better than the best, for the initial work of

redemption.

That Last Waif; or, Social Quarantine · 第 40 / 96 题