_Journey from Detroit to New York—Western Lakes which form the River
St Lawrence—Cleveland—Erie Canal—Cold Weather—Canal Packets—Sabbath
School Children at Rochester—Black Children—Slavery in the United
States—Agricultural Notices—Washington Hotel—Transition
from Rudeness to Refinement—Travelling—Cheap Land—State
Election—Inhabitants Consulted in Political Matters—Arrival at
Liverpool._
After spending five days in Upper Canada, it became necessary to wend my
way to New York. The weather for weeks past had been tempestuous. The
trips of the steam-boats on the lakes had been interrupted, and the
ferry-boat at Detroit had, on more than one occasion, ceased to ply from
the violence of the wind. Had there been a stage through Upper Canada,
from Sandwich to Niagara, I would have preferred travelling to New York
by land, but dreading the state of the roads, and length of journey in
passing round the west end of Lake Erie, I decided in going from Detroit
to Buffalo by steam. Vessels were still leaving Detroit for the Western
Lakes, notwithstanding the advanced period of the season, and I saw the
Michigan steamer sail for Green Bay, with troops on board.
Lake Superior is the most Westerly and largest of the lakes which divide
Upper Canada from the United States, and the accumulated waters of which
form the river St Lawrence. Its length is about 360 miles, and its
average breadth 109 miles. The outlet of the lake is the river St Marie,
through which the waters flow, and are not navigable for sailing vessels
from the strength of current.
Lake Michigan is stated to be 300 miles long, and 50 wide, branching off
from the east end of Lake Superior, and their united waters pass into
Lake Huron. On the west side of Lake Michigan, is situated the village
of Green Bay and Chicago, to which steam-vessels ply occasionally from
Detroit.
Lake Huron is 218 miles long, by 180 broad, and has several large
branches running into Michigan and Canada. Michilimackinac, or Mackinaw,
is an island on which there is a village of the same name, at the
entrance of the lake, and Goderich is on the east shore.
The waters of the three-mentioned lakes flow through the river St Clair,
and form a lake of the same name, which is about ninety miles in
circumference.
From Lake St Clair issues the river Detroit, which falls into Lake Erie,
having the villages of Detroit, Sandwich, and Amherstburgh, on its
banks. Lake Erie is stated at 290 miles long, and about 50 broad, and
from the many thriving villages on its margins, has a most extensive and
increasing trade. Its waters are much shallower than those of any of the
other lakes, and more easily agitated, which renders the navigation
dangerous in boisterous weather. From Lake Erie, flows the Niagara, in
the channel of which are the celebrated falls of the same name, and
empties itself into Lake Ontario, which is 171 miles in length, and 40
wide. The depth of water is said to be very great. On issuing from Lake
Ontario, the waters assume the title of the river St Lawrence.
I sailed from Detroit on the morning of the 25th October, with moderate
wind, which increased towards noon, and the vessel anchored under the
lee of an island in Lake Erie during the night. Next day we put into
Cleveland for an hour or two, and reached Buffalo towards the close of
the third day.
Cleveland is in the state of Ohio, on the banks of Lake Erie, and at the
mouth of the Ohio and Erie canal, which connects the waters of the lake
with the river Ohio. It is a place of considerable trade, and rising
with rapidity.
On reaching the Eagle hotel at Buffalo, I found three or four gentlemen
who were known to me, and whose conversation on European matters I
greatly enjoyed after my western tour. Next day, after breakfast, I took
a canal-boat for Schenectady.
In passing down the canal, on the banks of the Niagara, several new
houses were erecting on the Canada side, and as they were of large size,
I considered the circumstance evidence of improvement.
The Erie canal connects the waters of the river Hudson with that of Lake
Erie. It commences at Albany, and terminates at Buffalo, the length
being 363 miles. Besides the main cut, there are lateral branches
intersecting the country in all directions. One branch communicates with
Lake Ontario at the village of Oswego, and I believe another branch is
in progress to communicate with one of the tributary streams of the
river Ohio. The height of Lake Erie above the Hudson is 568 feet, and
the lockage of the canal 688 feet. The breadth of the canal is forty
feet at the top, twenty-eight at the bottom, and the depth of water four
feet.
The Erie canal was formed by the State of New York, the operations
commencing in 1817, and ending in 1825. The revenues of the canal are so
ample, that the rates of charge were greatly reduced in 1833, and it is
expected the whole debt will be discharged in 1838; after which, the
charges will be diminished, so as the sum collected may be just
sufficient to keep the works in repair. The canal is therefore like a
public highway, from which no revenue will be exacted from the
inhabitants, and is an instance of the advantages they enjoy from the
wisdom with which public matters are conducted.
The traffic on the canal is already so extensive, that the barges are
sometimes detained a long time in passing the locks. In all probability
it will be quite unable to convey the traffic in two years hence,
although a double set of locks were to be constructed throughout the
whole length of the canal. The enterprise of the inhabitants of this
State is adequate to any emergency, and relief to the crowded canal will
be found in a railway. There is already a railway from Albany to
Schenectady, and in 1833 a railway was contracted for to proceed from
the latter place to Utica, all of which are situated on the banks of the
canal. A railway may therefore be said to be already formed on the banks
of the canal one-third of its length; and there is little doubt of its
being speedily extended all the way to Buffalo, and ultimately along
Lake Erie into Illinois. However advantageous canals may have hitherto
been found in the United States, such a conveyance is incompatible with
the order of things that is arising. The population is advancing so
rapidly towards the west, that the intercourse between the Eastern and
Western States must enormously encrease, while canals are shut by ice
for nearly five months in the year. In this view railways, which afford
communication during the whole season, will be had recourse to, and are
admirably adapted to the country and climate. There is abundance of iron
and coal in the United States, and the substitution of railways for
canals will be aided by the rapidity of conveyance, the application of
steam power, and unobstruction from frost.
While passing down the canal, the temperature of the atmosphere became
cold; on the third morning, snow covered the ground to the depth of
three inches, which did not entirely melt by the influence of the sun;
and although the canal was not frozen, in consequence of its waters
being kept in motion by the incessant traffic, the pools on the banks
were covered with ice several inches thick. On reaching Albany, I
learned Fahrenheit’s thermometer had stood twelve degrees below the
freezing point on the 29th October, and at New York ten degrees.
The canal packets were crowded with passengers all the way from Buffalo
to Schenectady, who made themselves agreeable to each other, and time
passed as pleasantly as the nature of things would admit. Two of the
gentlemen on board seemed to be clergymen, with whom I conversed a great
deal, and was invited to spend some days with one of them. Few things in
America seem more extraordinary than the sleeping accommodation of the
packets. The seats on which the passengers sit during day, around the
sides of the vessel, open out by means of hinges, and having the outer
extremities supported by small ropes from the roof, form beds. A second
tier of beds is formed by frames hooking to the sides of the vessel, and
supported from the roof by ropes. The sleeping place for the ladies is
separated from the gentlemen’s by a curtain, and the two rows of beds
around the sides of the packet have a close resemblance to shelves in a
British shop. The passengers are sent on the roof of the packet while
the cabin is altering from sitting to sleeping-trim, which does not
occupy more than ten minutes, and the passengers, suspended in rows when
in bed, look like strings of onions in a green-grocer’s shop. The eating
department was tolerably well managed.
There was a changing of packets three times in the length of the canal,
and a delay of twelve hours at Rochester; during which I stopt at the
Eagle hotel. When standing at the door of the hotel, after breakfast, my
attention was attracted to a number of children walking in pairs along
the pavement, attended by a few grown-up people, and on enquiry I
learned they were proceeding to church, to the anniversary meeting of
the Sabbath schools. After many hundreds of both sexes had passed,
attended by their teachers, I observed four black children forming the
rear of a school division; and being anxious to see so interesting a
sight as the assembled children, I followed the little blackamoors.
Knowing the prejudice which white people have to the coloured race in
almost every part of the world, I was disappointed at seeing the four
black children separate from the others, and instead of entering the
church they were conducted round the corner of a street into a building
within a court. I still followed the blacks, but seeing none of the
people entering the place where they were, I walked to and fro on the
outside. At the end of two minutes, about twenty black children came out
of the building, attended by five or six white men, and walked into the
church amongst the rest of the children. I occupied a place in the
gallery, and listened to a very commonplace address to the children, and
the meeting separated without religious exercises of any kind.
The want of religious exercise appeared to me to arise from a desire of
preventing any feeling of jealousy amongst sects regarding minute
differences in forms of worship and creeds of faith; and if such was the
case, the inhabitants of other countries would do well to imitate this
conciliatory proceeding. I did not observe, after getting into church,
if the black children were kept separate from the white; but the fact of
this hitherto despised race attending Sabbath schools with white
children, and being taught by white people, in the town of Rochester,
was placed beyond doubt, and gave rise to pleasing anticipations for the
improvement of their condition.
Slavery excites much interest in America, as well as in Britain, and is
so repugnant to my feelings, that before setting out on my Transatlantic
tour, I determined not to penetrate into the slave-holding states.
During my short excursion into Missouri, extending to about fifty miles,
and stay at St Charles, St Louis, and Louisville, occupying four days, I
had little opportunity of judging of the effects of slavery on the white
population, or of the state of the slaves themselves. I must, however,
say, no instance of cruelty or harshness towards the black population
came under my notice, and all of them appeared to be well clothed and
fed. Slavery, as existing in the United States, seems not to be well
understood in Britain; and I regret it is not in my power to communicate
more information on the subject.
The United States were originally English colonies, and they inherited
slavery from the mother country. This foul stain on their character may
in fairness be attributed to Britain, and accounted one of the curses
with which her misguided rulers have afflicted mankind. In 1703, the
colony of Massachusetts endeavoured to restrain the introduction of
slaves, by the imposition of a tax, and to prevent it altogether in
1767. The colony of Virginia, in 1772, petitioned the Parliament of
Great Britain on the subject, without obtaining redress, and other
colonies remonstrated at different times. In 1780, the state of
Pennsylvania, while engaged in struggling for independence, passed an
act for gradually emancipating the slaves; and since that time, eight
out of the thirteen original colonies have abolished slavery.
The United States are composed of twenty-four distinct countries, each
having a different republican form of government, and the power of
managing its own affairs—the general government legislating only in
matters connected with defence, commerce, and taxation. At the time of
the United States rising into existence, slavery engaged the attention
of the legislature, but the evil had already spread thickly over the
Southern States, and the feelings and habits of the white population in
this part of the territory being strongly in its favour, a separation
and weakening of the Union would have resulted from then pressing the
subject. It is a disputed point whether the general government can
interfere with slavery—the Northern and Southern States taking different
views. A law was passed prohibiting slavery in the district north of the
river Ohio, and east of the Mississippi, before the territory was
organized into states; but since that time, the state of Missouri, with
all the evils of slavery, has been admitted into the bosom of the Union,
which seems to determine the noninterference of the general government
in the slave question.
Slavery is felt and acknowledged to be an appalling evil throughout the
Union, and the most intelligent inhabitants of the Northern States are
also aware of its sinfulness. Here the prejudice against the sooty race
is becoming less strong; and in one instance, at least, they have been
invested with the rights of freemen. In the state of New York, men of
colour exercise suffrage when twenty-one years of age, and the census of
1825 showed 298 of them qualified to vote.[4] This act of wisdom and
liberality on the part of the legislature, cannot fail of producing a
good effect throughout the Union, and in all probability led to the
teaching of the little children at Rochester already mentioned. I hail
these advances of the coloured population with unmingled pleasure, as
sure indications of improvement in the people of both complexions.
Slavery exists by the cupidity of the white population; and in most
cases it will terminate only by their moral enlightenment. However slow
the progress of abolition may be in the United States, it cannot stand
still. Justice, humanity, and religion are already enlisted on the side
of the slave; and before the lapse of many years, his manacles will
assuredly be loosened throughout the whole territory.
Footnote 4:
Description of United States; published at New York, 1831.
The world does not perhaps afford a more striking instance of human
frailty, than the existence of slavery in the Southern States of the
Union, where the white population, after having avowedly established
governments in opposition to tyranny, and on the principle that all men
are equal, continue to exercise the most inhuman oppression towards
their coloured fellow-creatures, who are treated like the brute
creation. This anomaly illustrates how much man is the creature of
circumstances; and that with all his boasted powers of intellect, he is
unable to conquer the habits and prejudices of his youth, even when his
conduct is at variance with reason, and the principles of the religion
he professes to follow. Whether the slave-owner, who has been instructed
amidst slavery, and whose moral perception has been blunted by
education, be answerable for all the enormities which result from the
system, may be left for casuists to determine; but those who have been
more fortunately situated may well commiserate his fate, and judge
charitably of his errors.
However instrumental, under Providence, the people of Britain may have
been in obtaining freedom for the West Indian slave, they would do well
to reflect on the slow progress the question made amongst themselves,
and that many of their own countrymen connected with the colonies were
opposed to the measure of relief. If, having lived apart from slavery,
and its demoralizing effects, they claim merit for their exertions in
behalf of the slave, let them not withhold what is due to the
inhabitants of the States, who, while living amidst slaves, set an
example of emancipation which has not yet been carried to the same
extent in any British possession.
Some recent British travellers in America, in pandering to the depraved
taste of a portion of their countrymen, will not allow merit to the
states who have emancipated their slaves, on the ground that they did so
only when slave labour ceased to be profitable, and that the step
involved no sacrifice, as the able-bodied slaves were sold to the
inhabitants of other states—the aged and infirm being alone set free.
This is a most uncharitable judgment. I have not the means of
ascertaining the number of slaves that were emancipated, but contend
that other motives than selfishness must pervade some of the inhabitants
of New York state, where the coloured population are invested with
suffrages, and taught at Sabbath schools with white children. It is
true, however, the negro race is the subject of deep-rooted prejudice,
and the slave of opinion; but in what portion of the globe, inhabited by
white people, is not this the case?
There are many pretended philanthropists in Britain, who feel keenly for
the sufferings of the coloured people in distant countries, and do not
sympathize with the unfortunate beings of their own complexion at home,
who proclaim to the world the sinfulness of slavery, and yet strain
every nerve to retain the unjust fetters of their own countrymen, and
who lament the negro being an object of prejudice in the United States,
while they regard most of the white people around them with the same
feeling. In America, the inhabitants of the Southern States talk of the
tyranny of Europe and the degraded population of Ireland, while the
sound of the lash, and the moanings of their own suffering slaves, ring
in their ears; and in Britain, the cruelty of the American slaveholder,
and the injuries of his oppressed slave, are descanted on by people who
actively engage in withholding just rights from the lower orders of
their own countrymen, and remain insensible to their base condition.
Such is the shortsightedness and inconsistency of man over the world. At
a distance, he sees oppression in others, and sympathizes with its
victim, while insensible to his own tyranny and its effects at home.
Almost all the evils which afflict humanity, originate from the passions
of man. Slavery in the United States, and the degradation of the Irish
peasantry, sprung from the same source—the aristocratic feeling of the
people of England.
On the packet reaching Shenectady, a stage-coach was on the banks of the
canal waiting our arrival, into which I stepped, and soon afterwards
found myself in Albany. My first proceeding was to obtain a new hat, and
after dinner I waited on Mr Buel.
From some paragraphs I had read in newspapers while in Ohio, I learned
an agricultural exhibition was to have taken place about this time at
Albany, at which I was anxious to be present. It had, however, been held
two days before my arrival, and I learned from Mr Buel it had not
altogether come up to his expectation. A certain time must elapse before
the public acquire a taste for such things, and I have no doubt Albany
will, in this respect, set an example to other places in the States. I
had carried from Britain a few copies of the Agricultural Exhibition at
Stirling, by Messrs Drummonds, which I left with some of my friends in
the United States, and doubt not they will find them useful.
From Buffalo to Albany, by way of the canal, there is a good deal of
fine land, and much of the foliage having dropt from the trees, afforded
an opportunity of seeing the country. Indian corn was frequently seen on
the ground, though in some instances the ears had been plucked from the
standing stalks, and I was particularly struck with the puny appearance
of the crops, compared with those of Illinois. Pumpkins seemed to have
been frequently grown amongst Indian corn, and farmers generally engaged
in carrying them home. This vegetable is given to oxen and cows. In most
instances the wheat crop was above ground. Before reaching Utica, I
observed a drain forming, at no great distance from the canal, which was
the only attempt of the kind I saw executing on the American territory.
On the morning after my arrival at Albany, I set out for New York, and
the day being particularly fine, I enjoyed the sail down the river. The
trees presented a diversity of appearance, some being without a leaf,
and others in all the freshness of spring. The blue rocks were seen
behind the fading foliage, a bright sun added to the brilliancy of the
autumnal tints, and rendered the scenery more beautiful than I thought
it when seen before in the early part of June.
On reaching New York, about eight in the evening, I bent my steps
towards the Washington hotel in Broadway, and found my trunks and keys
were in the possession of the landlord, Mr Ward. After having seen some
of the most celebrated hotels in the States, such as the Tremont at
Boston, and Mr Head’s at Philadelphia, none of them pleased me so much
as the Washington hotel. No individual could be more civil,
accommodating, and attentive, than Mr Ward, and all the arrangements of
the house seemed to me extremely judicious. The tables were at all times
served with the best of fare; the hours were kept with punctuality, and
the waiters numerous and active. I cannot speak of the accommodation for
people who have private parlours. Ladies never appear at the public
table of the Washington hotel, although many of them have private rooms
in it. The traveller who dislikes the Washington hotel is more likely to
find the cause of his dissatisfaction in himself than in the
establishment.
As soon as I ascertained my trunks were in possession of Mr Ward, I
proceeded to call on Captain Smith of the Napoleon, who was to sail in a
few days for Liverpool, and from whom I secured a berth. I was still in
my travelling garb, my tattered garments being concealed by “Mrs
Trollope.” Captain Smith, in the warmth of his greeting, hurried me into
his parlour before I had time to explain my situation; and never shall I
forget my feelings on again finding myself seated on a luxurious sofa in
a fashionable room. Since leaving Montreal on the 18th August, I had not
seen a sofa, or a chair with a stuffed bottom, except one at York, nor a
window-curtain, or carpet. The walls of the rooms did not support a
painting or print of any description, and in all domestic arrangements
there was a total absence of the elegances of life. I had become so much
habituated to the state of things around me, that for the remainder of
my days I would have been satisfied with bare walls and wooden-bottomed
chairs, and regarded the gewgaws of refined society with contempt. It is
not likely the impressions of my Backwood tour will be altogether
effaced while the pulse of life beats true. I confess, however, the
facility with which I adopted the refinements of New York, and the
enjoyment they afforded, seemed to arise from something else than mere
novelty. The venison at the table of the Washington hotel, served on
plates with a flaming spirit-lamp underneath, appeared more palatable
than the coagulating fried pork of Canada, and my head seemed higher
than it had been for ten weeks before, from being surrounded with a
collar of velvet instead of rags. Man may often learn humility from his
own inconsistency and folly. I felt ashamed of my weakness.
Soon after my arrival at New York, I retired to bed. Next morning my
trunks were ransacked, and I was mortified at finding I had outgrown my
wearing apparel. Travelling may at all times be regarded as conducive to
health, by affording mental and bodily exercise, apart from worldly
cares, and more especially under the circumstances I was situated,
having had choice of time, route, and distance, without incumbrance of
any kind.
For weeks together I seldom entered a house which was not the scene of
human suffering. Associating with disease and pestilence, I conversed at
the bedside of the fever patient, and rubbed the muscles of the victim
of cholera. I had been exposed to the effects of solar heat, night-damp,
rain, cold, hunger, and fatigue. Few people perhaps ever enjoyed so
large a measure of health as fell to my lot during my wanderings in the
western parts of inhabited America, and at no period of life did I
possess so much mental and bodily vigour. While I gratefully acknowledge
my health and strength to have emanated from divine agency, I may state
my habits were strictly temperate, having denied myself every liquid but
water and tea. The trammels of society prevented me trying the effects
of absolute temperance at an earlier period. They exceeded my
expectations, and from experience, I recommend temperance to all who
wish to enjoy life.
On the second day after my arrival at New York, I attended a sale of
land by auction, which I had observed advertised. An estate fifty miles
from Albany, sold at about 7s. 6d. sterling per acre. Another, situated
in St Lawrence county, state of New York, consisting of 25,000 acres,
was knocked down, in one lot, at 1s. 1½d. sterling per acre.
On the same day, there was an election of members of Senate for the
state. The legislature of the state of New York consists of a Senate and
Assembly. The Senate contains thirty-two members, who are elected for
four years, and vacate their seats by rotation, one-fourth yearly. The
right of suffrage belongs to every white male citizen, who has attained
21 years of age, and who has resided six months in the state, and paid
taxes. Men of colour are allowed to vote if they are 21 years of age,
and have been citizens of the state three years, and possess a clear
freehold of $250.
On getting into the street after breakfast, I did not see any thing
indicating an election, the people seemed going about in their ordinary
way. There was not a crowd, or idler of any kind on the outside of the
ballot-rooms, and on entering one of them, I found nine or ten people
inside. There were two printed ballot tickets, containing a different
list of candidates, and which were supplied by individuals near the
door. The voters, on entering the room, were offered tickets, which they
handed to people on the opposite side of a counter, appointed to receive
them, and who dropt them into a box. The voter was asked his name and
place of residence, and immediately retired. The business excited little
interest, the voters almost never reading any part of the ticket handed
them, and the secretaries seldom referring to the lists for the identity
of the voter. I also entered a ballot-room in the suburbs. Here a good
many vehicles were standing around the door, and the interior, which
seemed the bar-room of a hotel, was filled with men who had evidently
been drinking spirits. Printed tickets were also here received and
delivered, as already described. Individuals may prepare tickets for
themselves.
Independent of the election of members of Senate, there was a ballot for
reducing the duty on salt, which the following circular, copied from a
newspaper of the day, will explain. “_To the Public._ After a most
thorough examination of the subject, and a full conviction of the
injustice and partial operation of the existing tax on salt of domestic
manufacture, the Legislature of this State, at their three last
sessions, successively passed resolutions for an amendment of the
Constitution, by which they would be enabled to reduce that tax or duty
from twelve-and-a-half to six cents per bushel. Those resolutions are
now submitted to the people for their approval, and are dependent for
ultimate success on the votes that may be given in their favour at the
approaching annual election.
“The words of the amendment are, ‘That the duties on the manufacture of
salt, as established by the act of the fifteenth of April, one thousand
eight hundred and seventeen, and by the section of the seventh article
of the Constitution of the State, may at any time hereafter be reduced,
by act of the Legislature of this State, but shall not, while the same
is appropriated and pledged by said section, be reduced below the sum of
six cents upon each and every bushel, and the said duties shall remain
inviolably appropriated and applied as is provided by the said tenth
section; and that so much of said tenth section of the seventh article
of the constitution of this state, as is inconsistent with this
amendment, be destroyed.’
“At a meeting, called for the purpose of considering and deciding upon
such measures as might be deemed most proper for the occasion, the
undersigned were appointed as a committee to correspond with their
fellow-citizens in the different parts of the States and to take such
steps to secure a favourable result in regard to the proposed amendment,
as in their opinion circumstances should require. They, accordingly, ask
permission to state some of the many important considerations which have
a bearing on the question, and which, they trust, will satisfy every
person, as they have the Legislature, of the propriety and obvious
necessity of the intended alteration.
“The present duty, or more properly excise, is excessively
disproportioned to the value of the salt at the works, varying from 100
to 200 per cent, and obliging the purchaser, when he sells at retail to
the consumer, to charge an advance of profit on _this_ as well as on the
net cost. And the consequence is, that a bushel of salt, at the present
time worth about twelve and a half cents at the works, must have the
duty of twelve and a half cents and the profit of the dealer added, and
altogether make the cost to the distant consumer, (independent of bills
and transportation,) from twelve to fifteen shillings per barrel,
one-half of which, and sometimes three-fourths, arising from the duty
exclusively, will be in a ratio corresponding with any reduction that
may be made in the duty. Now, the reduction anticipated by the amendment
will make a saving to the consumer of six to ten cents on the bushel, or
30 to 50 cents on the barrel, and to the state at large, exclusive of
the extra price for foreign salt, an aggregate of $200,000 per annum;
and farther, both the manufacturer and the dealer will be relieved in
part, from an onerous and troublesome exaction.
“As a source of revenue, the following brief _exposé_ will exhibit the
glaring impolicy and sinister effect of the duty. Suppose that the
quantity manufactured this year is 2,000,000 bushels.
“The duty at 12½ cents would be $250,000
————————
“Less—interest on the amount expended for the pumps, with
their necessary repairs and engineer’s salary, over and
above the sum received for pumping, say 5,000
“Superintendents’, commissioners’, inspectors’ fees, and the
office, with other charges, 10,000
————————
15,000
————————
“Balance to be paid into canal fund, $235,000
========
“Suppose, again, that 1,500,000 bushels are annually consumed
within this state, the duty would be $187,500
“The dealer’s profit (to cover losses, &c.) will be 25 per
cent, 46,875
————————
“Amount paid on _domestic salt_ by the consumers within the
state, 234,375
“The consumers of _foreign salt_ within the state owing to
this duty, are compelled annually to pay an extra price for
that article, in the above proportion, and on 1,000,000
bushels, of 56 lb. each (the lowest quantity at which it can
be estimated) is 156,250
————————
$390,625
“Thus the $234,375 paid into the canal fund, costs the people, and they
are principally the farmers and the labouring classes, $390,625, or, in
other words, they pay directly and indirectly more than two dollars for
every _one_ dollar that that fund receives from the duty—a fund, too,
that does not need it, as may be seen by the report of Mr Stilwell to
the Assembly in 1833, No. 268. If, instead of an insidious impost, the
sum received into that fund were even paid by a _direct tax_, the cost
to the consumers would not be one-fourth the amount that is now drawn
from them.
“It can be satisfactorily shown, should the object in view be attained,
that the immediate extension of the markets to vast districts of
country, in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, the Canadas, and
some of the Eastern States, which have hitherto drawn their supplies
from other sources, and the consequent enlargement of the manufacture,
upon which about one-half of the duty would continue to be paid, with a
great and certain increase of canal tolls, will preserve the canal fund
undiminished, and probably exceed at once the sum that would be obtained
by a continuance of the duty at its present high rate.
“The salt-springs, judging from the consumption of brine for the last
two years, each of which require from ninety to one hundred millions of
gallons, and produced about 2,000,000 bushels of salt, without any
perceptible diminution, appear as inexhaustible as the Onondaga lake
itself. And we may, of course, confidently assume, as the state
possesses unlimited control, that there can be no monopoly, and that an
increase in the quantity made will establish a steady supply at the
lowest prices, and be a security against any sudden and extravagant
rise, which would otherwise certainly happen in the event of a war, or
interruption of our intercourse with other nations.
“The subscribers would present herewith other statements and
calculations, but for their great length, and a desire to avoid
prolixity, which have appeared upon this question in the several reports
to the Legislature, especially that of Mr Throop, made to the senate in
1831, No 56, and which most fully sustain these representations. The
committee rely on the aid of the people at large for the accomplishment
of the object in view; and in order that you may be prepared to
cooperate with them, send a quantity of ballots, to the distribution of
which at the polls, to be held in November next, they solicit your
attention.
“The following is the form of the ballot which the law prescribes for
those in favour of the proposed amendment. ‘For authorizing the
Legislature to reduce the duties on salt.’”
I rode with a gentleman in his gig to a ballot-room in the suburbs of
New York, and saw him vote for continuing the duties on salt. An immense
majority, however, of the inhabitants were in favour of reducing the
duties.
To the people of Britain it may appear somewhat strange, that the
inhabitants of a country should be consulted on a political question,
its supporters and opponents being ascertained by ballot, and the
circumstance of universal suffrage and annual parliaments prevailing in
the state of New York, will heighten the feeling. The followers of
aristocracy may denounce the proceeding, and proclaim the people
incapable of judging political matters, which are alone comprehensible
to nobility. But whatever peculiarities may exist in Britain, experience
in America has demonstrated that the powers of human intellect do not,
in any degree, depend on hereditary title, texture of garment, or weight
of purse; and that all matters connected with the domestic policy of a
state, may be made comprehensible, and intrusted to its inhabitants. The
intricacy of legislation has long been a favourite theme with the _few_
who rule the _many_. But whatever may be the state of enlightenment
regarding legislation, the people of every civilized country must be as
competent to understand it as their rulers are, both parties having the
same common sense, and against the dictates of which law-making should
not even be attempted. Whatever is clearly understood by men in power,
may be made manifest to the people, and safely left to their decision;
and when such men wish to adopt measures without seeing their way, the
people ought also to be consulted, both with a view of obtaining
instruction and lessening the responsibility and odium of failure. These
remarks are borne out by the proceedings of the state of New York
regarding the salt question.
Nobility and mobility, or by whatever names the aristocracy and people
can be distinguished, may each have their advocates; but the propriety
of placing political power in either, must be decided by the effects
produced. In measures connected with public interest, the state of New
York is not surpassed, and perhaps not equalled, by any district on
earth, and all of them originated from, and exist by, the power and
consent of the people. How different is the state of things in Britain,
where the people have hitherto had almost no voice in political matters.
If the legislation of Britain was to be regulated by collecting the
opinions of the people by ballot, many important changes would soon take
place. There is, however, much difference between the people of America
and those of Britain. In the latter, a considerable portion of the
population has been so debased by the effects of aristocracy, that they
are ill qualified for discharging political duties. This is not,
however, a just reason for withholding rights from any portion of the
community entitled to them; and should excess arise amongst the people
in obtaining or exercising their rights, the aristocracy who have
neglected and degraded them, may be considered its real authors.
Before leaving New York, it became necessary to change my American money
into that of England, which was easily effected. The chief currency of
the United States is paper, and consists of one dollar bills and
upwards. The currency passing at par in one state, is often at a
discount in the adjoining one; and as the value of almost the whole
paper currency is published weekly in the newspapers, little loss need
arise. Travellers often complain of loss sustained on paper money in
passing from one part of the country to another. I supplied myself with
large dollar bills of the United States Bank, which passes current
throughout the Union, and on changing which, the hotel keepers and
coach-office keepers asked me the direction I meant to travel, and gave
me silver coin, or such provincial bills as they knew would pass at par.
Throughout my whole tour, I did not lose a cent by depreciated paper
currency.
Notwithstanding the coldness of the weather in the end of October,
November commenced most favourably, being calm, with bright sunshine.
The ladies thronged the streets of New York in summer attire; and in
some cases fires were dispensed with. In several little excursions made
in the vicinity of the town, I remarked the graceful weeping willow
still in fresh and full leaf on the 7th November, although the
thermometer a week before had stood at ten degrees below the freezing
point; and a branch of considerable length which I pulled and brought to
Scotland, still retains the leaves.
I left New York in the Napoleon on the 8th November. The vessel was
towed by a steamer until reaching the Narrows; the day was delightful,
and looked and felt like what has often been described as Indian summer.
On the second day of the voyage the wind blew strong, and sometimes
afterwards tempestuously. The passengers were most agreeable people, but
sea-sickness prevented my enjoying their company; and we arrived at
Liverpool in sixteen days from the time of leaving New York.
A VIEW
OF THE
CANADAS AND UNITED STATES,
AS
ADAPTED FOR AGRICULTURAL EMIGRATION.
TO
CHARLES HAGART SHIRREFF,
THE
FOLLOWING VIEW OF THE CANADAS AND UNITED STATES
IS INSCRIBED
BY
HIS BROTHER,
THE AUTHOR.
CHAPTER I.
_System of Nature Reproductive and Progressive, when aided by Man—Soil
is a Workshop—Nature and Man manufacturing Produce—East Lothian
Agriculture—Corn Laws—Leases—Competition for Land—Situation of
Tenants—Situation of Hinds—Prospects of the People connected with
Land._
From whatever sources arise the materials which compose and sustain
organized bodies, no symptoms of decline can be discovered in them.
Nature seems to be a system of continued reproduction, and, when aided
by man, of progressive increase.
The quantity of matter which has been organized since the beginning of
time must be immense. But whether the world is viewed in whole or in
portions, nature has no appearance of decay, but seems a manufactory
producing new fabrics, which are again reduced to their elements, in
endless succession. Generation succeeds generation, and year after year
furnishes sustenance. In the operations of nature there is no loss of
materials—and when they are aided by human industry, she generously
rewards man with an increase of her returns, and continues to reproduce
the increase. The bounties of nature seem inexhaustible, and, in some
measure, proportioned to man’s industry.
The system of nature, such as I have ventured to describe, may be
illustrated by the details of the farm. Pastures which have continued
under the influence of nature, annually yield herbage without decrease.
When they are stocked with sheep, man is rewarded with the increase of
the animals, and the herbage is reproduced as before. If the pasturage
is improved by draining and top-dressing, there will be an increase in
the returns from sheep, and the improvement in the pasturage continues
from year to year. When an improvement in the sheep is effected, there
will be an additional return from them, which, by continued attention,
becomes permanent.
When pasturage is superseded by grains and roots, their increased
returns above pasturage is the reward of cultivation; and drainage,
manures, and labours greatly increase the returns. In such a system of
farming man acts a prominent part with nature, and skilful industry is
required to continue the increase. Without skill and industry the
returns from cultivation yearly diminish, and ultimately fall short of
those from pasturage or undisturbed nature. In this case it is not
nature but man which fails to do his part, and the decrease may be
considered a just retribution.
A reflecting mind will discover much evidence of nature’s economy
throughout the universe—and the farm supplies familiar illustrations.
Cows and sheep by consuming grass, yield butcher meat, milk, butter,
cheese, and leather. These varied fabrics emanate from the same source,
and when reduced to their elements, may again enter into the composition
of grass. The straw of grain crops and other vegetable matter, after
being eaten by or trampled under the feet of animals, decomposes and
enters into wheat, barley, and turnip, or any other plant. In this
manner the vegetable and animal kingdoms assist each other, and so
perfect is the economy of nature, that none of her materials are lost in
the intercourse.
By judicious management the fertility of a farm may be maintained, or
its productions reproduced year after year; the produce usually disposed
of being the reward of cultivation. If such produce was to be consumed
on the farm, its fertility would be augmented, and the reproductive and
progressive increase of nature, when assisted by man, exemplified. But
the progression in fertility is checked by excessive luxuriance, which
diminishes the returns. Thus lavish and niggardly cultivation are both
punished, and illustrative of the maxim, to use the things of this life
without abusing them.
Man seems to have been endowed with rational powers for supplying
himself with the means of subsistence, which he accomplishes chiefly
through the vegetable and animal kingdoms. Vegetables directly minister
to his wants in various ways, and indirectly through domestic animals,
which are altogether dependent on them. The farm illustrates the direct
supply in the production of wheat, potatoes, and flax, the indirect
supply, in butcher meat and wool. In farm economy, vegetables and
animals may be viewed as manufacturing machines, assisting man and each
other, and the united results of which are necessary to the formation of
certain fabrics, such as milk. From this source man is supplied with
many of the luxuries as well as the necessaries of life. The results of
the mulberry-tree, silk-worm, and cochineal insect, are united in some
of the lustrous clothing of the fair sex.
The materials entering into organized life may be varied, and partly
unknown to man. The most important elements of them, however, are to be
found in air and water, and may, therefore, be said to pervade the
universe. Should a difference of opinion exist regarding them, it is
encouraging for the farmer to know that they abound every where within
the sphere of his operations.
The localities for manufacturing sustenance are almost as varied as the
machinery or plants. The sea, air, and exterior of every organized body
are stations, but the surface of the earth or soil is the chief. The
localities may be considered workshops, differing in merit, without
generally contributing materials towards the manufactures. Sustenance
manufactured in the sea and on the surface of the earth, equally sustain
human life, and contain the same elements.
Soil is not often regarded simply as a workshop, although no other view
of it accords with the operations of nature and of man. It does not in
any case appear to contribute materially to the formation of plants, and
is only useful to them by affording support to their roots, and holding
their sustenance, being a receptacle of air, water, decomposing
organized bodies, and mineral substances. Soil may be rendered fertile
or unfertile by imparting or withdrawing whatever promotes vegetation.
In the preparation of human sustenance, then, soil is a workshop; air,
moisture, light, heat, and decomposing organized bodies, raw materials;
plants and animals, machinery; certain minerals and labours, oil for the
machinery. In manufacturing produce, nature supplies air, light, heat,
and moisture; man furnishes organized bodies, machinery, and oil, which
may generally all be obtained by capital. The parts performed by nature
and man vary according to the fabric produced. In the case of pasturage,
nature contributes the greatest share; in cultivation the capital skill
and industry of man is conspicuous. The neglected farm, incapable of
producing turnip with a visible bulb, yields a full crop with a
judicious application of labour and manure. The united exertions of
nature and man ensure success. She accomplishes much when unaided by
man, but he cannot obtain any thing without the assistance of nature.
When she withholds heat or moisture, the manufacture is suspended, and
she possesses the power of arresting or altogether destroying the
machinery. Farmers combine nature’s agency under the term climate, and
they are familiar with the general effects of heat, frost, drought, and
moisture. If given quantities of manure and labour were bestowed on
equal portions of soil, similar in quality, situated in Scotland, on a
level with the ocean, and the top of a mountain, the difference of
produce would be the effect of climate.
Man has been doomed to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow.
Experience confirms that the industry of an individual, closely applied
to the cultivation of the soil in the temperate climes of the world, is
more than adequate to supply sustenance to himself. It is a beautiful
feature in farming, that agricultural improvements furnish additional
food, increase almost every comfort, and ameliorate climate. The
goodness of God to man is thus manifested, in providing him with the
means of subsistence, and a reward according to his industry.
A person who intends emigrating ought to consider well what his
prospects are likely to be in the country of his birth, and in the
district to which he is to move, and be guided by a balance of their
advantages and disadvantages. You have chosen the profession of farmer,
and I shall, in connexion with America, direct your attention to a few
particulars affecting East Lothian agriculture, the district in which
you reside, and its state is perhaps not widely different from the
agriculture of other parts of Britain.
The results of nature, capital, and labour, forming farm produce, it
becomes desirable to ascertain the proportions which they contribute. It
is impossible, perhaps, to fix on them with accuracy in any particular
case, and their combinations are variable. Endeavour, however, to obtain
a clear comprehension of the separate parts they perform in the
manufacture of human sustenance. They deeply affect the question of
emigration from Britain, the choice of locality elsewhere, and the
employment of capital and cultivation generally. Farm economy is
altogether depending on them, and the success or failure of operations
intimately connected with their combinations.
The soil of East Lothian is owned in large masses by landholders, who
seldom contribute much towards farming except building accommodation.
The properties being secured to them and their heirs by laws of entail,
their own imprudence cannot deprive them of the land, and not possessing
the power of disposing of it, they have little inducement to improve it.
Being, many of them, unacquainted with agriculture, they are incapable
of managing their properties, which are, consequently, placed under the
charge of agents, who are generally lawyers, residing in towns, without
knowledge of farming. Landholders too often only interest themselves in
land as shelter for game, and agents as the source of rent; the
interests of both parties being temporary, they pursue their hobby,
regardless of ultimate consequences, and occasionally without sympathy
for their fellow-creatures residing on the soil. There is sometimes a
person under the agent, called Factor, who, from being the medium of
communicating with the tenantry, possesses much influence, which is
generally used, for good or evil, to please his employer.
Land is generally occupied on a lease, which endures nineteen years; and
it is by the skill and capital of tenant-farmers that the soil is
cultivated, and that almost all agricultural improvements have been
introduced. The farmers employ yearly servants called hinds, a highly
deserving class of operatives.
As the population and wealth of Britain increase, there is employment
for a proportionate number of individuals in most professions—such, for
example, as bakers and shoemakers. It is otherwise with farmers, because
the soil has long been entirely occupied, and it does not expand with an
increase of population. Indeed an opposite rule seems to apply to this
profession, skill and capital enabling an individual to manage a greater
extent of land. These circumstances, joined to the natural desire
mankind have to till the soil, have created much competition for renting
land.
The corn-laws have been denominated a bread-tax, but they ought to be
named rent laws, as their practical effect has been to raise the rent of
land without benefiting any one engaged in agriculture, except a few
farmers during an existing lease. They are a tax on the community for
the benefit of landholders, so admirably devised, that it is levied
without expense, farmers acting as gratis collectors, and paying the
proceeds in the name of rent. Corn-laws have long given a fictitious
value to farm produce, and created delusive hopes in farmers which led
to their own ruin. At present they are injurious to the agricultural
labourer and farmer, because while they continue and are subject to
change, rational data for renting land and investing capital in its
cultivation cannot exist, and their abrogation will sooner or later be
effected by public opinion.
The present defective leases of farms continuing fixed for nineteen
years, are injurious, by giving rise to an improving mode of agriculture
at the commencement, a stationary mode in the middle, and a
deteriorating system at the termination of the lease. Thus, the
fertility of a farm fluctuates, instead of progressing unchecked till
the end of time. A nineteen years’ lease is often hurtful to a farmer,
by binding him to a bad bargain for such a length of time, and involving
his heirs in the difficulty which, in case of a young family, is a more
serious step than binding himself. Leases have also tended to lessen the
landlord’s interest in his property, and estrange him from the tenantry.
So much is this the case, that at the present time many landlords are
altogether unacquainted with their tenantry, and a good feeling does not
always exist between them. Were land occupied on proper terms, with a
proper lease, the case would be different. The landlord would then have
a direct interest in the cultivation of his property, in the management
of his tenant, and in the welfare of every being residing on the soil. A
worthless character, or bad farmer, would be got rid of, and the farm of
a tyrannical or illiberal landlord soon abandoned. In short it would be
in the option of the parties to separate at short periods, which would
prevent jarring, and a community of interests would ensure the
progressive productiveness of the farm. The idea of a copartnership of
every individual engaged in cultivating the soil, would, in some
measure, be realized, and good feeling maintained amongst them. In some
parts of England where annual leases prevail, I have witnessed as good
farming as I ever saw in Scotland, and perfect harmony existed between
landlords and tenants, and the latter seemed to enjoy more of the
comforts and luxuries of life than Scottish farmers. However
advantageous leases may have proved in former times, when the tenantry
were bowed down by oppression and poverty, their effects, of late years,
when competition for renting land has been so great, and the value of
farm produce retrograding, have been injurious to the tenantry and the
advancement of agriculture. The terms of lease seem only calculated for
progressive prices of farm produce, and have proved ruinous during
declining ones. It would be easy to remedy the defects of the present
lease, but, under existing circumstances, visionary to expect their
removal.
On the termination of a lease the farm is generally advertised to be let
by receiving written offers on a mentioned day. The landlord and his
agent knowing little about its value, a tenant is accepted after every
attempt has been made to obtain rent above the written offers, by
operating on the feelings and local attachments of the former tenant,
which seldom fail to ripen during a lease. From all parts of the country
candidates of different descriptions appear. Men of sanguine
temperament, without calculation, unacquainted with the peculiarities of
the district, and looking forward to the prices of produce returning to
what they were upwards of twenty years ago. Adventurers, trusting to get
a reduction of rent after obtaining possession, and reckless of the
consequence of the step they have taken, having perhaps little capital
to lose, and content to live, year after year, dependents on the
property, and with arrears of rent accumulating. People merely wishing a
place of residence, and not calculating on profit from the farm, having
the means of living from other sources.
Such is the state of East Lothian farmers, that during the last twenty
years perhaps three-fourths of them have not fulfilled their original
contracts, and the funds that have been lost in cultivating the soil is
incalculable. I have known a tenant rent a farm with a capital of seven
thousand pounds sterling, consisting of about 400 acres, and remove from
it before the expiry of his lease, with only five hundred pounds in his
pocket, and in arrears of rent to his landlord the sum of three thousand
pounds. Mr ——, of our acquaintance, on a farm under 100 acres, incurred
twelve hundred pounds of arrears, and got off by paying only two hundred
of them. With such competitors, a young man who must live by his
profession, can hardly wish to be successful. The obtaining of a lease
at the present time may often be considered little better than the first
chance of being ruined, and many tenants, after leading anxious lives,
and exposed to the insults of rent exactors, may think themselves
fortunate if they escape with a remnant of their fortunes.
The feeling that landholders, agents, and factors sometimes evince
towards the tenantry is so hostile, that a small portion of the farmers
originally connected with East Lothian obtain leases of late years, the
new tenants generally coming from other countries. So much is this the
case, that I have sometimes regarded such tenants as a proscribed race,
and thought that the sooner most of them put their house in order for
removal the better for themselves. It is of no consequence how
respectable the old tenant may be in private life, or high in his
profession. A promise of rent, although not likely to be fulfilled, is a
never-failing recommendation to a stranger, when joined to subserviency,
without which it is very difficult to obtain a farm on any terms. If a
tenant has opinions, they must agree with those of agents or factors on
the estate, or warfare ensues; and if he is an individual of talent or
independent feeling, he is hunted with more zeal as a dangerous person,
and every species of annoyance and persecution is hurled against him. A
tenant of great enterprise, who had obtained a conventional reduction of
rent some years ago, in consequence of a _fall_ in prices, was lately
called before an agent and questioned about his management. The tenant
maintained his innovation on the common system to be an improvement, but
was told by the agent that if it was found he had injured the land,
damages must be paid, and if, as was alleged, a discovery had been made,
it was fair the landholder should participate in the discovery, and no
reduction of rent would be made in future, although prices had _fallen_
thirty per cent since the conventional reduction was granted. About
fifteen years ago, eleven tenants resided on a certain estate, and since
then the effects of ten of them have been sequestrated and sold at the
instance of the landholder, and in all probability the remaining tenant
will remove elsewhere in a few months. On a division of another estate,
the tenants have all been twice changed in twelve years, and one of the
farms in the same time has had four tenants, three of whom became
bankrupts. With such examples before their eyes, tenants eagerly seek
after farms at rents which cannot be realized from its disposable
produce. Their case soon becomes hopeless, but, being bound for nineteen
years, they are generally held until their funds are exhausted, when
they are sacrificed, according to the partial laws of the country, to
make room for a new victim. The original tenants of East Lothian have
been accounted fine gentlemen—extravagant fellows, devouring so much of
the produce of the soil that they scarcely leave any of it for the
landholder—an allegation which is unfounded, and which has hitherto
served as a pretext for harshness. It has been suggested that the
managers of great estates are fond of power and adulation, and cannot
brook the idea of farmers approaching themselves in the refinements of
life; hence the harsh treatment of the tenantry and the success of
subserviency.
There is a prevalent idea that small farms occupied by hard working men
afford more rent than possessions of larger size, and on some estates
small farms are forming. The effects of a division of labour, skill, and
capital must be nearly the same in farming as in most other
manufactories, and a very short trial of tenants without capital,
however they may live, will prove this position by the altered fertility
of the soil, which is illustrated by the state of Irish agriculture. In
Ireland farm produce is the result of nature and imperfect labour; but
in East Lothian the results of capital, skill, and improved labour enter
into the combination; and in the latter the produce of land is much
greater than in the former. But the landholders of Ireland are perhaps
more wealthy than those of East Lothian, compared with the people of the
respective countries. A crowded and agricultural population will pay
rent in proportion to its degradation, or, at least, afford in such a
ratio influence and rank to landholders. This rule is not, however,
applicable to Britain, where commerce and manufactures flourish, whose
profits of stock and wages of labour ultimately affect those of
agriculture, and the selfish attempts at degrading the farmers of East
Lothian will recoil on their authors. For a time tenants without capital
can pay high rents, by extracting from the soil the means of fertility
imparted to it by others; but the deteriorated condition of the farm is
ultimately a loss to the landholder and the community.
The capital which is required to put the operations of an East Lothian
farm in full motion, the tenant maintaining himself and reaping a crop
without the aid of credit, may be stated at seven pounds sterling, or
nearly thirty-five dollars per imperial acre. The rent which is
stipulated to be paid, and the capital expended in fertilizing the soil,
renders the step which he takes a serious speculation. If a bad crop or
two occurs at the commencement of the lease, the tenant will be unable
to pay the rent, and he is then deprived of the lease, or allowed to
continue a dependent on the estate. Being bound for nineteen years, he
has not the option of removing from the farm, and is very seldom
permitted to do so while a tangible farthing of his funds remain. At all
times he leads an anxious life without bodily toil, and is seldom
remunerated for his exertions and risk of capital. Industry and
enterprise may enable him to struggle to the end of his lease. Should he
die and leave a wife and young family, the unexpired years of the lease
would in all probability ruin them, his funds being liable for the rent,
and they would be incapable of managing the farm without incurring great
loss. Two thousand pounds may be stated as an ordinary capital to
commence farming with; and it is hopeless for a person without
considerable funds to think of farming at all.
The hinds, or farm-servants of East Lothian, are, perhaps, the steadiest
and most praiseworthy race of men in the world, and indifferently
rewarded for the important part which they act in farm economy, living
on poor fare, and in bad cottages. Up to the present time, the best
feeling has existed between them and the tenantry; and there are
thousands of instances of men having died of old age in the service of
their first employers, without an abatement of income having been made
during sickness or infirmity. But a change is taking place in their
condition, by the pressure on the tenantry weakening attachments, and
forbidding an indulgence of generosity towards their faithful and
proficient operatives. Mutual confidence and assistance, in the
different classes engaged in farming, forms the strength of the East
Lothian system of agriculture, and the true source of happiness of all
interested in it. Kindness and attention, on the part of landholders
towards the tenantry, commonly radiates to farm-servants, from them to
the animals under their charge, and the happiness of all is thereby
promoted. On the other hand, harshness and neglect shown by landholders
to the tenantry, descends to servants and animals, and general
uneasiness is the result. Some of the recently introduced tenantry bring
all their operatives from other districts, and have commenced the
_Bothie_ system, which is highly demoralizing in its effects on the men
who are subjected to it, although it is somewhat cheaper than the
customary mode of treating the ploughmen. The prospect of this class
bettering their condition is hopeless, and there is reason to apprehend
their comforts will be curtailed.
The rural population of East Lothian appears to be undergoing an unhappy
change. The management of landed property is almost entirely intrusted
to agents, who, like the middlemen of Ireland, have no permanent
interest in the soil, nor sympathy with its cultivators; and, like that
country, East Lothian now suffers from the effects of absenteeism, so
far as the interests and feelings of the rural inhabitants are
concerned. The landholders and tenantry are unknown to each other, and
dislike may sometimes be traced in both parties. The tie of farmer and
ploughman is waxing weak, and instead of the quietness of conduct which
now pervades all classes, a very few years may develope the troubles of
Ireland, and the south of England.
It has already been stated, that nature contributes much towards the
manufacture of farm produce; but the fruits of her exertion do not
benefit the tenant nor operative. The landholders receive as rent all
that results from nature, and also a considerable portion flowing from
the tenant’s capital and the operative’s labour. The tax which the
corn-laws impose on the unagricultural portion of the population, for
the benefit of landholders, is collected free of expense by the
tenantry. The ragged and half-starved peasant of Ireland labours
amongst, and begs from, the people of Britain, and, on reaching home,
gives his earnings to the owner of the soil, that he may be permitted to
exist only on the potato he himself cultivates. The East Lothian tenant
of the present day is often not more happily situated, gradually paying
the landholder the earnings of early life, or inherited wealth, for the
privilege of occupying the soil, and returning its produce. It is
fortunate landholders do not possess the power of preventing the
population removing to other countries, and there growing produce for
themselves.
There seems but little in the present constitution and state of
agricultural relations to brighten futurity. An abrogation of the
corn-laws would ensure an extended application of capital to the soil,
and create employment for operatives. Annulling the law of entail would
produce landholders interested in agriculture and the people who follow
it. But however beneficial might be the effects of such measures, the
evil of a limited surface with a numerous population would remain. The
landholder would perhaps be reduced to the necessity of superintending
the cultivation of a part of his own soil, and generally interest
himself in his estate. The situation of tenants and operatives would
only be improved for a short while, as they would soon compete with each
other as before. Neither of them are at present adequately remunerated
for their exertions. To expect much improvement in their condition while
population is so numerous, seems hopeless; and individuals will require
to exert themselves to maintain their present position.
I have treated generally of East Lothian agriculture, and the classes
immediately connected with it, without noticing examples of wisdom and
generosity on the part of landholders, or of folly and worthlessness
amongst tenants and operatives. My object has been to bring the unsound
parts of the system under notice, in order that an estimate of future
prospects might be formed. But all classes may be regarded as the
victims of circumstances which have not perhaps been of their own
creating, and they are more deserving of sympathy than censure. While
what appeared to me to be the true state of things has been freely
described, I disclaim feelings of bitterness or reproach towards man or
things.
CHAPTER II.
_Persons engaged in American Agriculture—American and
British Agriculture—Application of Capital and Labour to
Cultivation—Rent—Price of Land—Proportions of Nature—Capital and
Labour in the Production of Farm Produce, and their distribution in
Britain and America—Capital required to stock a Farm in both
Countries—Unhealthiness of America—Climate—State of
Society—Situation of young Men without Capital—Choosing America or
Britain._
In North America, extensive landholders are not common in any of the
districts which I visited; and where they do exist, a great part of
their possessions are unproductive. The soil is chiefly cultivated by
its owners, who, in sundry respects, resemble the tenants of Scotland;
and they often perform a great portion of the manual labour of the farm.
In many parts of the country, which has been long settled, the farmers
are opulent, participating in all the conveniences of life; and, without
passing their time in absolute idleness, hire a good deal of labour. In
the more recently settled parts, farmers have few of the elegancies and
conveniences of life, with an ample share of its necessaries. They do
not labour hard after the first three or four years of settlement, and
seem to live without much care. Land does not invest its owner with any
privilege or status in society.
Renters of land, or tenants, are common in many parts, and in all
respects rank as landholders. The terms of rent are variable. Near
towns, and in thickly-peopled districts, a small rent is paid in money,
and a lease of several years taken. In remote situations, land is
commonly let on shares from year to year. If the owner of the soil
furnishes seed and labouring animals, he gets two-thirds of the produce,
when on the field, and removed from the earth. If the tenant supplies
animals and seed, the landowner gets one-third. But terms may vary
according to situation, soil, and crop.
Farm-hired men, or by whatever other name they may be distinguished, are
to be had in all old settled districts, and also in many of the new
ones. In most cases their reward is ample, and their treatment good,
living on the same kind of fare and often associating with their
employers. A great deal of farm labour is performed by piece-work.
The agriculture of a country is affected by local circumstances, and
farming in Britain and in the remote parts of America may be considered
the extremes of the art. In the one country the farmer aims to assist,
and in the other to rob nature. When the results of capital and labour
are low, compared with the hire of them, they are sparingly applied to
the cultivation of the soil, in which case nature is oppressed and
neglected, if I may be allowed to use such terms; and when they are
high, compared with their hire, she is aided and caressed. Both systems
are proper in the respective countries; and, by assuming a fixed result
for nature, they admit of arithmetical demonstration. Along the eastern
shores of America, manures and a considerable portion of hired labour
are applied to the cultivation of the soil; but in remote districts
manures are not used, and the smallest indispensable quantity of labour
bestowed. In the eastern parts, the results of capital and labour enter
into the productions of the soil; in remote districts the aid of capital
can scarcely be said to have been called into action, and in both
situations nature is the chief agent.
The circumstances affecting the application of capital and labour to the
cultivation of the soil in Britain and America are as opposite as their
systems of farming. In Britain, with her limited surface and dense
population, nature’s contribution towards the production of farm produce
is given to the landholder as rent, and the rural inhabitants living
near the starvation point, the price of provisions regulates in a great
measure the hire of labour. Accordingly, the wages of agricultural
labour in the different parts of the country are proportionate to the
value of their produce; being lowest in the remote and inclement
situations, and highest in the most favoured districts. In America, the
extent of soil and thin population has not distorted effects, and
nature’s portion of farm produce is not absorbed by rent. The results of
capital and labour being represented in quantities of produce, and their
hire paid in money, it follows, that the cash-value of the former must
generally exceed the latter, and that an additional application of
capital and labour to cultivation is a consequence of produce being high
priced compared with their hire. Accordingly, in all parts of the
country where produce is high, labour is low, and where produce is low,
labour is high.
In Britain, the hire of agricultural labour has been affected, and in
all probability will continue to be regulated, by the wages of the
unagricultural part of the population. Without manufactures and
commerce, the condition of her rural inhabitants would have approached
the present state of the Irish people. In America, the returns of the
agriculturist appear to regulate the wages of other classes. When they
are high, other classes are attracted to farming; when low, farmers
change their profession;—Americans generally being able to exercise two
or three professions.
The origin and progress of rent seem to admit of easy solution. In the
western prairies of America, where cheap and good cleared land is almost
as abundant as air, rent is unknown, except in the neighbourhood of
towns. In the eastern districts, where good cleared land is of limited
extent, compared with the inhabitants, rent is paid. Thus, population is
the origin of rent, which is the value of produce above what it hath
cost in raising and carrying to market. At first, it consists of a small
portion of the produce furnished by nature; with an increase of
population the whole is absorbed, and ultimately also, parts of the
results of capital and labour. Rent is also affected by the condition as
well as by the number of the people; and, under a parity of
circumstances, will be found to augment in the ratio of the number and
misery of the agricultural inhabitants.
Until land yields rent, it is not worth purchase-money, and in
proportion to a rise of rent its price will increase. Lands, therefore,
sell at a considerable sum on the eastern side of America, and diminish
in price to the westward, unless enhanced by localities of situation. As
population increases in the west, and labour falls, land will rise in
value, cheap land and cheap labour being incompatible with each other.
But the investment of capital in the purchase and cultivation of land
depends also on the profits of stock, or rate of interest in the
country, the tangibility of the investment, and many other things.
From the high price of produce, and comparatively cheap labour and
manure in the eastern parts, capital, judiciously employed in
cultivation, yields an ample return. But the low produce and high labour
in the west renders it unprofitable to employ much capital in
cultivation at present in that situation. From the great advantages
which the western districts possess over the eastern ones in cheapness
and fertility of soil, and consequent reward of labour, population will
flow into them, and render a rise in the value of land more probable
there than in the eastern parts.
Having frequently alluded to the results of nature, capital, and labour,
in the production of farm produce and their distribution, I shall
endeavour to illustrate the subject hypothetically, for the purpose of
assisting in forming an opinion of their general bearings. The results
of capital and labour employed in cultivation cannot always be
separated, and perhaps they ought to be classed together. The assumed
data does not include capital invested in the purchase of land, and I do
not wish the accuracy of the statement to be relied on, although I think
it approaches to correctness.
In East Lothian produce, let nature be represented by 3
Capital, 1
Labour, 3
—
Total, 7
Nature’s share being given as rent, and also part of the results of
capital and labour, the landholder perhaps gets a portion, expressed by
3½, leaving 3½ for the tenant, labourers, and all other expenses of
cultivation. But the expenses of cultivation and rent must be paid under
all circumstances, and frequently nothing remains for the tenant. This
is particularly obvious in unproductive seasons when the diminished crop
may be represented by 4, leaving the tenant, after discharging taxes and
some other things, without a farthing to pay rent. I myself have been so
situated, and human means cannot prevent such visitations. Hence the
speculative nature of farming, and the results which have flowed from
it.
In American produce, let nature be represented by 3
Capital, 0¼
Labour, 1¼
——
Total, 4½
In the eastern parts where rent is paid, the landholder’s portion may be
1, leaving 3½ for the tenant and expenses of cultivation. In remote
districts where capital is scarcely employed, the whole produce falls to
be divided between the landholder and labourers, and the landholder
enjoys it without division, when the labour is performed by his own
hands. Although the divisible portion appears the same in both
countries, the labour and capital employed in cultivation is perhaps
five times greater in Britain than in western America. On a given
surface the produce is greater in Britain, but in America the produce is
greater in proportion to the labour employed in cultivation.
In East Lothian the farmer gives the fruits of nature and part of the
results of capital and labour to the landholder as rent. In western
America the farmer shares nature’s bounty with the labourer, or enjoys
it himself by labouring with his own hands. In East Lothian the farmer
of the present time is in some degree the servant of the landholder. In
western America the farmer has nature for his servant, or at least
enjoys her labours. With such an assistant what industrious man can be
poor?
In the event of death or old age, nature still continues her services to
the American farmer, by furnishing grass and other commodities. A widow
or young family, almost under any circumstances, could milk cows and
plant potatoes. Bountiful nature would provide grass for the animals and
mature the potatoes, on the produce of which the family might live. In
East Lothian a widow or young family, after being ruined, would be
turned adrift on the world.
In the eastern parts of America land may be purchased and stocked for
nearly the sum an East Lothian farmer expends in stocking and improving
a farm, namely L.7 per acre. But if the land has great local advantages,
the price will be considerably higher. In the western parts of the
United States, prairie land of the best quality, without the least
obstacle to cultivation, and to any extent, may be had. For the sum of
three hundred pounds sterling a farm of 200 acres could be bought and
stocked in the prairies of western America. In East Lothian farming is a
hazardous calling; in America there is no risk attending it. In East
Lothian L.2000 is required to stock a farm; in the Western States L.300
will purchase and stock one nearly of equal size. In East Lothian a
farmer has mental annoyance with bodily ease; in America he has mental
ease with personal labour. In East Lothian a young farmer commences his
career in affluence, and at middle age finds himself in poverty; in
America he begins with toil, and is in easy circumstances by middle age.
But however favourable American farming may appear when simply viewing
the quantity of produce, the country has many disadvantages deserving of
consideration, and one of the most important is its unhealthiness. The
whole of North America is liable to ague and fevers of various kinds,
and the chief difference of situation in these respects seems to be
owing to cultivation. The more cultivation is extended, the healthier
the climate becomes, but occasionally ague and fever prevails in all
situations. I found fever and ague at Hyde Park, on the banks of the
Hudson, at Niagara, Whitby, and Chatham, in Upper Canada. The
inhabitants on the prairies of Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, and
Missouri, were suffering much from fever when I was amongst them. Almost
every person you meet with in America tells you of the healthiness of
his situation, and the unhealthiness of other parts of the country. The
cause of fever and ague in America does not appear connected with
marshes or stagnant waters, as the inhabitants residing on the dry open
prairie of 100 miles in extent are not exempt from its attacks, but is
thought to arise from the miasms of decaying vegetation; and the rich
bottoms, covered with rank vegetation, on the banks of rivers are the
most unhealthy situations. While journeying over the prairies of
Illinois after nightfall in autumn, when vegetation was decaying, the
smell of fermenting grasses was unpleasantly strong, and reminded me of
the odour of a sweating hay-stack in Scotland. In almost every part of
the world where the earth’s surface is uncultivated and well clothed
with vegetation, fever and ague prevails, and is found to abate as
cultivation is introduced. Thus bountiful nature at once rewards the
enterprising farmer with her fruits and a more salubrious atmosphere.
What incentives to industry!
The climate of North America is remarkable for variations of
temperature, and most situations seem alike in this respect. But the
duration of winter increases, and length of summer decreases, with the
latitude of the situation. The region of North America is not so
congenial to human life as Britain, but far more so than the East and
West Indies and many other parts of the world. In such a vast continent
cultivation is alone wanting to render it healthy.
The state of society in America is very different from what it is in
Britain, there being less refinement and fewer of the elegancies of life
enjoyed. I am satisfied, however, from experience, that much of what is
known by, and appreciated as, the comforts of life, arises from fashion
and force of habit, and that a few weeks’ residence will reconcile a
reasonable person to the change. Throughout the greater part of the
country, fashion has not established her empire, and there is little
vieing amongst the inhabitants. The handsome bound volumes which adorn
the drawingrooms of Britain, are not more instructive or amusing in
consequence of their showy exterior; and the meagre furnishings of
American log-houses, in the remote districts, meet the wishes of the
inhabitants, and are found as useful as the most gaudy. Plain furniture
is not despised where fine is never met with. In taverns, luxuries and
refinements are common, and wealth may obtain them almost any where. Of
the state of domestic society I am not qualified to speak from personal
observation, farther than that the manners and customs of the people
differ from those of Britain. In the eastern parts the distinctions of
classes in society and elegancies of life approximate those of Britain,
and both gradually diminish on proceeding to the westward. But in any
part of America, where an emigrant may settle himself, he must lay his
account with a change in the social intercourse of life. Some people
are, however, incapable of altering their manners and customs, and such
characters may live without society.
In the eastern parts of America the luxuries and conveniences of life
are cheaper, and the necessaries dearer, than in remote districts. The
east should therefore be the abode of the wealthy, refined, and
luxurious; the west, of the persons who value the necessaries of life,
and such as are not of fastidious habits. But in no part of the country
will the fastidious find themselves happy.
The want of good assistants, servants, or helps, is ranked amongst
American privations. In the east assistance can at all times be had,
which is not the case in the west; but in most situations high wages and
good treatment will obtain assistance. Female servants are very scarce,
and said not to be good. To the wealthy and refined, who have resided in
Britain, this state of things at first appears insupportable. They soon,
however, learn to assist themselves in many things, and find their
happiness increased by doing so.
The difficulty of obtaining servants arises from the ease with which
individuals obtain a livelihood, every industrious and sober character
having the means of purchasing a good estate in the west with the
accumulated savings of three years’ service. However much certain
classes may feel and regret the want of servants, the extraordinary
reward which they receive ought in fairness to be accounted the
country’s greatest blessing. In no other part of the world is industry,
sobriety, and worth, so richly rewarded.
The influence which wealth has attained in Britain merits the
consideration of all young men without capital. Personal exertion is
often considered degrading, and visited with the contumely of former
associates. To lose rank in society must be particularly galling to
young men of spirit, and few in the middle walks of life can keep their
place without capital. This is one of the many inconveniences attending
a refined state of society, and is more likely to increase than diminish
in Britain. In the remote parts of America wealth is not idolized. The
industrious youth may there follow any occupation without being looked
down upon or sustain loss of rank, and may rationally anticipate raising
himself. The plain style of buildings and household furnishings of such
places are favourable to young people, and in almost every particular
their situation may be said to be the reverse of what it is in Britain.
A young man without capital and of good character, is almost sure to
gain but cannot lose rank by emigrating to America, and will rarely
maintain his rank by remaining in Britain.
In judging then of the step of becoming an American agriculturist, all
may lay their account to undergo considerable privations at first
settlement, and lead a different life from the farmers of East Lothian.
The bountiful reward which industry receives soon enables good men to
purchase land; and it is therefore often the unsteady and idle which
hire themselves to farmers. On this account, it will be necessary to
work personally, by way of example and active superintendence. Right
thinking people consider it no disgrace to labour in any part of the
world, and it is thought quite disreputable to be idle in America. East
Lothian farmers often toil mentally without remuneration; and the
assurance that, while in America, all the fruits of a person’s own
labour, assisted by generous nature, accrues to himself, will nerve his
arm and sweeten his toil. The division of labour so beautifully effected
in some of the operations of East Lothian agriculture, and which I may
be permitted to call professional luxuries, cannot be practised at
present in America. The wooden dwelling-house and barns will at first
perhaps appear revolting, and may induce some people to think, that,
with the same privations and sacrifices, they would have been enabled to
have lived in East Lothian. Such is not, however, the case; because the
pressure on farmers arises from a competition of numbers, which would be
increased by lowering the standard of living; and the only result of
such policy would be to raise the rent of land, and degrade all engaged
in farming. Let no one, however, from my representations of American
farming, entertain too sanguine hopes of success. Farming, in most parts
of the world, ranks low in the scale of professional remuneration; and
without virtue, persevering industry, and sobriety of character, people
will not likely either become wealthy or happy. In nine cases out of
ten, a man’s success in life depends on his own exertions. America
presents a fertile and extensive field, and whoever does not reap an
abundant harvest, will, in all probability, find the cause of failure in
his own character. I cannot hold out an immediate or ultimate prospect
of great wealth, as the low price of produce and high labour renders
this improbable. Every person may, however, obtain all the necessaries
and most of the true comforts of life in the fullest abundance,
unharassed by the cares of the present, or apprehensions of the future.
The pleasures of society are not likely to be so much enjoyed in America
as in Britain; but, on the other hand, its mortifications are escaped.
In every part of the world, man ought to look to his family and himself,
and not to society, for true happiness. If abundance of the necessaries
of life do not ensure society in America, the want of abundance is
almost sure to lose society in Britain.
CHAPTER III.
_Lower Canada—Inhabitants—Climate—Soil—Mode of Selling
Land—Productions and Prices—Farming near Montreal—Climate affecting
Agriculture and Farmers._
Canada originally consisted of one country, and was divided into two
provinces, Upper and Lower Canada, in 1791. It was discovered by Jacques
Cartier, a Frenchman, in 1535, and continued under dominion of the
French until 1759, with exception of a year or two, when it was ceded to
the English.
The descendants of the French, after the conquest by the English, were
allowed to retain their laws and religion, which so attached them to the
British government, that their fidelity remained unshaken during the war
with the colonies to the south, which now form part of the United
States. In the late war between Great Britain and the United States the
population again continued faithful; and their antipathy to the
inhabitants of the States seems to be unconquerable.
About two-thirds of the inhabitants of Lower Canada are descendants of
the French, who speak the French language, and retain most of their old
manners and customs. The rest of the inhabitants consist of all nations,
and are chiefly descended from British subjects. The French Canadians
profess the Catholic religion; and lands held by Catholics pay one
twenty-sixth of the grain produce to the clergy. The exaction, however,
seldom extends beyond the wheat crop; and the people of all religions
represent the Catholic clergy of Lower Canada as the best disposed and
most inoffensive class of men in the province.
The French Canadians are chiefly engaged in agriculture, and are a most
unenterprising race of individuals, and lead the same kind of life which
their forefathers did upwards of two hundred years ago. They appear to
be poor, indolent, and a mirthful loving people. The commerce of the
province is carried on chiefly by British subjects. In politics, there
is a French and British party. At present the French interest is the
most numerous; it will, however, ultimately dwindle away.
The province of Lower Canada lies between forty-five and fifty-two
degrees of north latitude, and sixty-three and eighty-one of west
longitude, from Greenwich. The climate of America is very different from
places of the same latitude in Europe, the degrees of heat and cold
being much greater. Although lying considerably farther south than
England, Fahrenheit’s thermometer ranges between ninety and one hundred
degrees in summer. In winter, the thermometer occasionally indicates
thirty degrees below zero, and for six months the surface of the earth
is covered with snow. The St Lawrence, which divides the province, runs
in a north-easterly direction, and the climate becomes mild as the river
is ascended. In the western part of the province, spring commences a
month earlier than it does at Quebec, the capital of the district, and
the climate is in all respects superior for agriculture.
The climate of Lower Canada is perhaps as healthy as any in America,
which may be owing to the length of time the banks of the St Lawrence,
where the population chiefly reside, have been cultivated. In newly
settled districts, fever and ague, the scourge of America, is frequently
known.
The soil, which has been surveyed, is estimated by Bouchette at about
16,000,000 acres, and is said to be inferior sand in the eastern parts,
and to improve to the westward. This gradation of soil seems to be
pretty general in most parts of North America; but soils of the most
opposite character are to be found in all situations, and America is as
variable in texture and quality of surface as Britain.
The greater part of the cleared land is occupied by the descendants of
the French in narrow stripes, seldom exceeding 100 acres, and often
extending miles in length. The tenures are of French origin, and it is
difficult to get a good title to land, without it has been disposed of
at a sheriff’s sale. A considerable part of the land is held by English
tenure, and to such there is no difficulty in obtaining good
title-deeds.
A considerable extent of crown lands is still undisposed of, and they
are sold by public sale on the first day of every month, in every
township where an agent resides. The upset price of the lands varies
from 2s. 6d. to 10s. Halifax currency, by which all land in the Canadas
are sold. The following are the conditions of sale for 1834:—
“1st, The lands will be put up for sale in lots or parcels of from 100
(or a half surveyed lot) to 1200 acres (or six surveyed lots), as may
suit the convenience of parties disposed to bid for the same.
“2d, The lots will be offered at the upset price, as quoted above.
“3d, The lots are to be taken at the contents marked in the public
documents, without guarantee as to the actual quantity contained in
them.
“4th, The biddings to be made in currency upon the upset price per acre.
“5th, The lots will be sold to the highest bidder.
“6th, The purchase-money to be paid by four annual instalments, without
interest. The first instalment or deposit-money of twenty-five per cent
at the time of sale, and the second, third, and fourth instalments at
intervals of a year.
“7th, The instalments to be paid into the office of crown lands at
Quebec, or the treasurer or receiver of rents on his half-yearly tour
for the collection of rents.
“8th, If the instalments are not regularly paid, the deposit-money will
be forfeited, and the land again referred to sale.”
The chief productions of Lower Canada are wheat, barley, and oats, of
inferior quality, which may be partly owing to the climate and the
management which the soil is under. For nearly half a century, manure
has not been applied to the greater part of the cultivated land, which,
after being what is considered exhausted, is allowed to produce a
natural sward of grass, on which animals browse during one summer, and
it is again ploughed in autumn. Notwithstanding the natural goodness of
much of the soil, the crops are of the worst description; and when all
things are taken into consideration, it is surprising to find them so
good.
Much of the land in the neighbourhood of Montreal, unconnected with the
island of that name, is of excellent quality, and, if properly drained
and manured, might produce almost any description of crop.
The island of Montreal contains some good soil, of light texture, well
adapted for market gardening, a department of husbandry at present
highly remunerating. The French Canadians being unwilling to dispose of
their lands in the neighbourhood of the town of Montreal, and not likely
soon to change their present system of agriculture, the growing of
vegetables will, in all probability, long continue profitable, even
should high prices induce settlers up the St Lawrence to transmit
produce when the communication with Montreal becomes improved, as it
unquestionably will in progress of time.
Agriculture produce of all kinds fetches a high price in Lower Canada,
which does not seem to afford sufficient food for the inhabitants, and
more especially butcher meat. The following inland imports to Montreal
are taken from the Commercial List.
_Up to the 6th July_, 1832 . 1833.
————— —————
Pork from Upper Canada, 3978 1149
Lower Canada, 526 1860
United States, 6108 17805
————— —————
Total Barrels, 10612 20814
————— —————
Exports by sea from Canada, 1832. 1833.
————— —————
Pork to the West Indies, 2285 1694
to other places, 1177 2586
————— —————
Total barrels, 3462 4280
These lists, containing only the imports to Montreal and the exports of
the whole province, show a considerable balance against the country,
which would be greatly increased if the imports of the whole province
were included. It is probable other articles would also show an
unfavourable balance.
The difficulty of raising produce is unquestionably the cause of its
high price, which is not likely to be lowered by other means than
importing supplies. The French Canadians, having few wants and strong
local attachments, labour cheaply rather than remove to a distance,
which, joined to the influx of destitute emigrants from Britain and
Ireland, renders wages lower perhaps than in any other part of the
American continent. High prices and cheap labour are favourable to
investing capital in cultivation; and a skilful and prudent farmer
cannot fail of being successful in the immediate neighbourhood of
Montreal. Here he will feel the change from Britain less than in any
other part of America, with exception of climate, and even the length
and severity of winter are said to be agreeable. A considerable extent
of capital is required to purchase land in a good situation, which costs
from L.10 to L.20 per acre. Land is also occasionally to be had on
lease; and when a sufficient number of years, and proper terms are
obtained, an outlay of capital in improving the soil would be
profitable.
If soil is the workshop of the farmer, and animals and plants his
machinery, the climate of Lower Canada is an impediment, seriously
affecting plants, animals, and man, which cannot be removed. With six
months of winter, the machinery of the farm is suspended half the year.
Few plants can be properly matured, and crops, in all seasons, are
liable to be injured by frost. Animals require a large supply of dry
fodder, as succulent food cannot be provided, and the intense cold
reduces them in condition. Man is so long prevented by winter from
labouring the soil, and so hurried by the shortness of spring and
autumn, that he has not time to prepare it suitably for the reception of
crops. To these causes may be ascribed the leanness of animals, the high
price of produce, the poverty of the people, and the cheapness of
labour.
The climate is too cold for the cultivation of Indian corn, which only
occasionally comes to maturity in the most favoured spots. Autumnal sown
wheat is similarly situated, and the wheat of the country sown in spring
is of the most inferior quality. Fahrenheit’s thermometer having stood
twelve degrees below the freezing point at Albany, in the state of New
York, on the 29th October, 1833, the cold, in all probability, must have
been greater in Lower Canada, which is several degrees of latitude
farther north. Accordingly, a gentleman of my acquaintance, who settled
in the township of Leeds, stated in a letter, “that misery and famine
stared farmers in the face; frost having set in early, all their turnips
and potatoes had been destroyed, and, in some cases, also their grain
crops.” The condition of the animals is also evidence of the severity of
the climate. Sheep and oxen, as seen by me in the months of summer, were
mere skin and bone compared with those of Britain, which I attributed,
in a great measure, to the cold of winter; and sheep of the Leicester
breed, sent from East Lothian, sunk under its effects in the most
southerly part of the province.
However much the man of pleasure may extol the winter of Lower Canada
for the glorious sleighing it affords—and its boasted advantages seem to
be confined to this mode of travelling—the industrious farmer must
regard it as an evil, by suspending his operations, and injuring his
live-stock. Nature here assists him more sparingly than in warmer
latitudes, and he will not live comfortably on cleared land by his own
labour, except in the most southerly parts of the province. To clear
forest land in most parts by his own exertions, would not reward him for
five or six years afterwards, if land was to be had for nothing, and its
inferior produce cannot afford good wages to labourers. For the farmer
of capital, the neighbourhood of Montreal holds out many advantages. The
province is not, however, favourable to farmers who are in search of
food and clothing for themselves and families, and still less so for
labourers of any description. Both classes must, of necessity, be idle
during a considerable portion of the year, and they are not likely to
improve their condition by emigrating from Britain to Lower Canada.
CHAPTER IV.
_Upper Canada—Inhabitants—Climate—Soil—Mode of Selling Land, and
Prices—Bad Effects of Selling on Credit—Situation of Settlers
without Capital—Price of Land in Upper Canada and the Western United
States—Price of Land, and Mode of Settlement Injurious to the
Province—Suggestions for Improving the State of the Country._
Upper Canada became a separate province in 1791. It is bounded on the
east by Lower Canada, and on the south by the river St Lawrence, and the
chain of rivers and lakes to the west, the waters of which form the St
Lawrence. The boundaries in the north, and in the extreme west towards
the Pacific Ocean, are perhaps not accurately defined, and the surface
of the province cannot be estimated.
About the time of settling the mouth of the St Lawrence, the French
penetrated into Upper Canada, and planted a colony on the river Detroit,
where their descendants still reside. At the close of the war, in 1793,
when the colonies of North America became independent of Britain, many
inhabitants of the United States, who adhered to the government of the
mother-country, moved into Upper Canada, where they obtained grants of
land. At the same time many disbanded soldiers also received land. In
this way parts of the shores of lake Ontario, and lake Erie, and the
banks of the Niagara, Detroit, and Thames, were first settled. More
recently, many people of Dutch and German extraction have settled in the
provinces, as well as subjects of the United States; and there has been
a constant stream of emigration from Britain. The population, chiefly
found on the lakes and rivers, may amount to about 400,000, the greater
part being of British descent.
Upper Canada differs from the lower province in climate, by having a
longer summer and a shorter winter; while the extremes of heat and cold,
as indicated by the thermometer, are nearly the same in both provinces.
The waters of the St Lawrence and lakes, forming the southern boundary
of the district, inclining north-east, the climate improves in ascending
the waters, till reaching Amherstburgh, in about 42 degrees of latitude.
The province, as far as it is accurately known, has not an eminence of
sufficient height to affect temperature, and the climate of the
different situations may be estimated according to their latitudes. In
the most southerly parts, near the head of lake Erie, the length of
winter varies from two to three months. Ploughing commences about the
first of April; and cattle and horses are allowed to roam in the woods
during winter,—a practice which marks the mildness of climate, and also,
perhaps, the laziness of the inhabitants.
The climate of Upper Canada is as healthy as the lower province,
although the inhabitants are more liable to sickness from the surface
not being so well cleared of forest. On my first entry to the country, I
thought to judge of the healthiness of situations by the countenances of
the inhabitants, and if all of them had been born in the country, this
might have been a just criterion. There is something in the climate of
America which seems to impart a sallow and seared complexion to the
people. It is, however, many years before some natives of Britain lose
their florid colour; and I have seen several people retaining their
complexion after having resided twenty years in the province, while
their children had the general hue of the country. Being unable to judge
whether the people had been born in the country, or were lately arrived
from Britain, I abandoned the idea of taking the appearance of the
inhabitants as an index to healthiness of situation. As I proceeded
westward, towards Chatham and Amherstburgh, the complexion of the people
became less florid, which I attributed to most of them being natives of
the country. I found people afflicted with ague in many places, after
having resided years in the district; and from information which I
received, deserving of credit, I was led to believe almost every
European has a seasoning, or an attack of the ague. The rapidity and
severity of the attack, however, depends in a great measure on the
situation of individuals being aggravated by fatigue, imperfect
clothing, bad food, and a damp house.[5]
Footnote 5:
The following extracts are from the correspondence of my brother
Charles, dated Detroit, 7th August, 1834:—
“Through how many exciting scenes have I passed since we parted! For
two months tossed upon a stormy sea, with a disagreeable captain, in a
crazy vessel!—seen the most sublime of nature’s works, a stormy sea,
and such a storm!—stood on deck when not a soul, from the captain to
the cabin-boy, expected to live ten minutes! I have experienced
delight consequent on deliverance; leaped with joy at the sight of
land; admired the fairy scenery of Long Island and the Hudson when the
orchards were in full blossom,—and it is a sight of indescribable
beauty! I have travelled up the North river, at the rate of fifteen
miles an hour, in the finest steam-boats in the world—shot along the
railroads—crawled on the canals—been shaken in stage-coaches—and
crossed lakes Erie and Ontario, which for magnitude deserve the names
of inland seas. I have walked since the 7th of June 210 miles in Upper
Canada, 200 in Ohio, 50 in Pennsylvania, 160 in Illinois, and 150 in
Indiana and Michigan; in all nearly 800 miles. Some say, the
thermometer stood from 95 to 101 degrees in the shade. Often were my
clothes as wet with perspiration as if I had waded a river; still I
never experienced that lazy, listless feeling I have done during warm
weather in Scotland. My appetite was always keen, and it still
continues so.”
After residing in Upper Canada, on a second visit, for the space of
about 20 days, he writes from Cleveland,—“Do not be astonished at
learning I have got the ague. I have had three shaking days,—my
appetite is entirely gone. One day I feel quite well, and the next as
helpless as a child; and, altogether, the ague is not a pleasant
companion. I shall endeavour to bear it patiently.”
From Cincinnati he writes,—“When I wrote about fourteen days ago, I
was suffering from fever and ague, and had made up my mind to have it
for a companion for some months; but it only stayed with me a week. By
medicine and care I succeeded in banishing it, and now feel quite
well. It was brought on by carelessness and a desire to travel
cheaply. I have no doubt it will have a good effect in making me more
careful in future.”
The surface of Upper Canada is remarkable for want of hills, but much of
it is considerably undulating; and where this formation prevailed, I
generally found the soil of inferior quality. The soil is variable in
all districts; much of it is very bad; and it may generally be termed of
medium quality. I could only judge of the soil by its natural
appearance, which would be improved by cultivation. In all parts of the
country, I found sandy soils the least productive; those composed of
clay and heavy loam bearing the best crops of every description.
Almost all the writers who have treated of the soil of Upper Canada have
represented the kinds of trees which grow on it an index of its quality;
but, after extensive observation, I was unable to trace the connexion
generally. From the number of mouldering trees with which the forest is
strewed, I was led to imagine, generation hath succeeded generation
since the beginning of time; and it is an admitted fact, that one
description of tree hath frequently been succeeded by a different
species over a considerable extent of surface. Under these
circumstances, the kinds of trees have often more connexion with
preceding events and species than the soil; and I regretted time did not
admit of my attempting to investigate the longevity of the trees, and
the kinds which succeed each other, or continue without change of
species. It is, however, quite certain, that the oak is found occupying
exclusively the best and the worst soils of the province, being that of
sand, clay, and loam. Were it necessary, I could point out tracts of
country in support of what I have advanced, and districts where a change
of species of tree takes place without any apparent difference of soil.
If the kind of tree is not a criterion of soil, neither is the size of
the trees, which often depends on the number of them on a given space.
The quality of soil can only be ascertained by examination with a spade
or some such instrument, and which ought also to embrace the subsoil. By
such a mode of proceeding a judge of land cannot be deceived. It is as
easy to learn to discriminate soils as trees, and both may be examined
with the same facility.
The whole surveyed land of Upper Canada is held by English tenure, with
exception, perhaps, of some patches on the banks of the Detroit,
occupied by people of French descent. There is a register in every
township, in which money mortgaged on land must be entered before it is
recoverable, and by consulting which every purchaser may ascertain if
good titles to an estate can be obtained.
The lands are in possession of the crown, the Canada Company, and
private individuals, and may be had at all times to a reasonable extent.
The crown lands are disposed of according to the following document:—
“GOVERNMENT LANDS.
“In conformity to instructions recently received from his Majesty’s
Secretary of State for the Colonies, the following arrangements for
disposing of the waste lands of the crown in Upper Canada, are made
known for the information of emigrants and others.
“Except in the case of U. E. Loyalists, and other persons entitled by
the existing regulations of the government to free grants, no person
can obtain any of the waste lands of the crown otherwise than by
purchasing at the public sales, made from time to time under the
direction of the commissioner of crown lands.
“These sales will be made on the first and third Tuesday of each
month, and will either be continued through the following day or not,
as circumstances may appear to the agent to require.
“They will be held at the following places:—
“At Bytown, for the district of Bathurst.
“At Belleville, for the midland district.
“At Peterborough, for the district of Newcastle.
“At York, for the home district.
“At Hamilton, for the district of Gore.
“At London, for the district of London.
“At Chatham, for the western district.
“Besides these general periodical sales, there may be occasional sales
by auction in other districts, of such town lots, or other lots of
land as may remain to be disposed of; and of these sales ample notice
will be given.
“The conditions of every sale by public auction will be as
follows:—One fourth of the purchase money to be paid down, and the
remainder in three equal annual instalments, with interest at six per
cent on each instalment, payable with the instalment.
“The lands will be put up at an upset price, of which notice will be
given at the time of sale, and in the previous advertisements which
will be published of the lands intended to be put up at each sale; and
in case no offer shall be made at the upset price, the land will be
reserved for future sale in a similar manner by auction.
“A patent for the lands will be issued free of charge upon the payment
in full of the purchase money and interest.
“The regular periodical sales will be held for the first time as
follows:—In Peterborough, York, and Hamilton, on the third Tuesday in
June next; and in Bytown, Belleville, London, and Chatham, on the
first Tuesday in July next; and they will continue to be held at all
those places on the first and third Tuesdays in each month, until
after the first Tuesday in November next; when such other arrangements
as may be made by the government will be announced.
“Information can be obtained respecting the lands to be disposed of in
the several districts, by applying to the following gentlemen, agents
for the commissioners of crown lands, viz.:
“In the Bathurst district, Mr John M‘Naughton, D.S. Bytown.
“In the eastern district, James Pringle, Esquire, Cornwall.
“In the Newcastle district, Alexander M^cDonell, Esquire,
Peterborough.
“In the London district, Roswell Mount, Esquire, Delaware.
“In the western district, Henry John Jones, Esquire, Chatham.
“The commissioner for crown lands, acting also as agent for the sale
of clergy reserves, requests it to be noticed, that such clergy
reserves as have not been hitherto occupied by authority, or leased by
the government, will be disposed of, by public auction only, either at
the periodical sales of crown lands or at occasional sales, to be duly
advertised; and that the terms of payment for clergy reserves will
continue to be as follows:—Ten per cent to be paid at the time of
sale, and the remainder in nine annual instalments of ten per cent
each, with interest on each instalment, to be paid with the instalment
“Such clergy reserves as have been leased, or occupied by the
authority of the government, must be applied for by letter to the
Commissioner of Crown Lands, and when disposed of, will be sold by
private sale on the same terms of payment as those disposed of by
public auction.
“All applications from emigrants, or respecting emigration, not
immediately connected with the sale of public lands, are to be
addressed to ANTHONY B. HAWKE, Esquire, at York, he being specially
appointed by the government to act in that department.
“PETER ROBINSON.
“_Commissioner of Crown Lands’ Office_,
“_York, 27th May, 1833._”
By an advertisement dated Taronto, (late York,) 10th April, 1834, the
upset price of lands in the Newcastle district is fixed at 10s., and the
land surrendered by the Six Nations at 15s. per acre. The same
advertisement announces clergy reserves, on condition of actual
settlement, ten per cent of the price paid at the time of sale, and the
remainder at nine annual instalments, with interest of six per cent on
each instalment.
East of Bear Creek—17s. 6d. and the remainder 10s. The township of
Chatham, 15s.; Madoc, 7s. 6d.; London, 15s. per acre, Halifax currency.
The mode of disposing of crown lands has been subject of frequent
complaint by newly arrived emigrants, and the whole system merits
censure. I met individuals who had travelled more than one hundred miles
from York to examine lands in the west, and returned again to York to
petition and make interest with the authorities to get certain lots put
up for sale. When they succeeded, they had to live in idleness for a
month until the day of sale arrived, and again travel to the place of
sale. Sometimes applications to have lands put up for sale are
frustrated, and rather than suffer delay and dance attendance on men of
influence, many people have passed into the United States, where a
person can go to the land-office of the district and fix on any lot
which pleases him. There cash is the only interest that can be employed,
and its non-payment the only delay to settlement.
Paying the purchase-money by instalments induces people without capital
to become purchasers, who, for the interest of themselves and the
community, ought to have assisted others in clearing and cultivating
land, until they had accumulated sufficient capital, by saving, to
purchase without credit. To the system of disposing of land by credit,
much of the wretchedness and poverty of the present Canadian landholders
may be justly attributed. The experience of the United States government
demonstrated this, and a law was passed to abolish credit on the price
of land. How difficult it seems to be for Britain to adopt legislation
to the existing age of the world!
The Canada Company possess immense tracts of country, and sell land on
terms similar to government, giving credit and drawbacks to induce
people to purchase. The price of the company’s land at Goderich is 7s.
6d. per acre, and equal to the price of crown lands in other parts.
Much land is held by absentee proprietors, or the members of the party
who sway the councils of the province. It is commonly in the hands of
agents empowered to sell. The prices are generally higher than crown
lands, and credit unlimited.