SCENE I

[Illustration]

Sketches and Studies in Italy and Greece

by John Addington Symonds

Contents

VOLUME I.

THE LOVE OF THE ALPS

WINTER NIGHTS AT DAVOS

BACCHUS IN GRAUBÜNDEN

OLD TOWNS OF PROVENCE

THE CORNICE

AJACCIO

MONTE GENEROSO

LOMBARD VIGNETTES

COMO AND IL MEDEGHINO

BERGAMO AND BARTOLOMMEO COLLEONI

CREMA AND THE CRUCIFIX

CHERUBINO AT THE SCALA THEATRE

A VENETIAN MEDLEY

THE GONDOLIER'S WEDDING

A CINQUE CENTO BRUTUS

TWO DRAMATISTS OF THE LAST CENTURY

VOLUME II.

RAVENNA

RIMINI

MAY IN UMBRIA

THE PALACE OF URBINO

VITTORIA ACCORAMBONI

AUTUMN WANDERINGS

PARMA

CANOSSA

FORNOVO

FLORENCE AND THE MEDICI

THE DEBT OF ENGLISH TO ITALIAN LITERATURE

POPULAR SONGS OF TUSCANY

POPULAR ITALIAN POETRY OF THE RENAISSANCE

THE ‘ORFEO’ OF POLIZIANO

EIGHT SONNETS OF PETRARCH

VOLUME III.

FOLGORE DA SAN GEMIGNANO

THOUGHTS IN ITALY ABOUT CHRISTMAS

SIENA

MONTE OLIVETO

MONTEPULCIANO

PERUGIA

ORVIETO

LUCRETIUS

ANTINOUS

SPRING WANDERINGS

AMALFI, PÆSTUM, CAPRI

ETNA

PALERMO

SYRACUSE AND GIRGENTI

ATHENS

INDEX FOR ALL THREE VOLUMES

PREFATORY NOTE

In preparing this new edition of the late J.A. Symonds's three volumes

of travels, 'Sketches in Italy and Greece,' 'Sketches and Studies in

Italy,' and 'Italian Byways,' nothing has been changed except the order

of the Essays. For the convenience of travellers a topographical

arrangement has been adopted. This implied a new title to cover the

contents of all three volumes, and 'Sketches and Studies in Italy and

Greece' has been chosen as departing least from the author's own

phraseology.

HORATIO F. BROWN.

Venice: _June_ 1898.

SKETCHES AND STUDIES

IN

ITALY AND GREECE

VOLUME I.

THE LOVE OF THE ALPS[1]

Of all the joys in life, none is greater than the joy of arriving on

the outskirts of Switzerland at the end of a long dusty day's journey

from Paris. The true epicure in refined pleasures will never travel to

Basle by night. He courts the heat of the sun and the monotony of

French plains,—their sluggish streams and never-ending poplar trees—for

the sake of the evening coolness and the gradual approach to the great

Alps, which await him at the close of the day. It is about Mulhausen

that he begins to feel a change in the landscape. The fields broaden

into rolling downs, watered by clear and running streams; the green

Swiss thistle grows by riverside and cowshed; pines begin to tuft the

slopes of gently rising hills; and now the sun has set, the stars come

2out, first Hesper, then the troop of lesser lights; and he feels—yes,

indeed, there is now no mistake—the well-known, well-loved magical

fresh air, that never fails to blow from snowy mountains and meadows

watered by perennial streams. The last hour is one of exquisite

enjoyment, and when he reaches Basle, he scarcely sleeps all night for

hearing the swift Rhine beneath the balconies, and knowing that the

moon is shining on its waters, through the town, beneath the bridges,

between pasture-lands and copses, up the still mountain-girdled valleys

to the ice-caves where the water springs. There is nothing in all

experience of travelling like this. We may greet the Mediterranean at

Marseilles with enthusiasm; on entering Rome by the Porta del Popolo,

we may reflect with pride that we have reached the goal of our

pilgrimage, and are at last among world-shaking memories. But neither

Rome nor the Riviera wins our hearts like Switzerland. We do not lie

awake in London thinking of them; we do not long so intensely, as the

year comes round, to revisit them. Our affection is less a passion than

that which we cherish for Switzerland.

[1] This Essay was written in 1866, and published in 1867. Reprinting

it in 1879, after eighteen months spent continuously in one high

valley of the Grisons, I feel how slight it is. For some amends, I

take this opportunity of printing at the end of it a description of

Davos in winter.

Why, then, is this? What, after all, is the love of the Alps, and when

and where did it begin? It is easier to ask these questions than to

answer them. The classic nations hated mountains. Greek and Roman poets

talk of them with disgust and dread. Nothing could have been more

depressing to a courtier of Augustus than residence at Aosta, even

though he found his theatres and triumphal arches there. Wherever

classical feeling has predominated, this has been the case. Cellini's

Memoirs, written in the height of pagan Renaissance, well express the

aversion which a Florentine or Roman felt for the inhospitable

wildernesses of Switzerland.[2] Dryden, in his dedication to 'The

Indian 3Emperor,' says, 'High objects, it is true, attract the sight;

but it looks up with pain on craggy rocks and barren mountains, and

continues not intent on any object which is wanting in shades and green

to entertain it.' Addison and Gray had no better epithets than

'rugged,' 'horrid,' and the like for Alpine landscape. The classic

spirit was adverse to enthusiasm for mere nature. Humanity was too

prominent, and city life absorbed all interests,—not to speak of what

perhaps is the weightiest reason—that solitude, indifferent

accommodation, and imperfect means of travelling, rendered mountainous

countries peculiarly disagreeable. It is impossible to enjoy art or

nature while suffering from fatigue and cold, dreading the attacks of

robbers, and wondering whether you will find food and shelter at the

end of your day's journey. Nor was it different in the Middle Ages.

Then individuals had either no leisure from war or strife with the

elements, or else they devoted themselves to the salvation of their

souls. But when the ideas of the Middle Ages had decayed, when improved

arts of life had freed men from servile subjection to daily needs, when

the bondage of religious tyranny had been thrown off and political

liberty allowed the full development of tastes and instincts, when,

moreover, the classical traditions had lost their power, and courts and

coteries became too narrow for the activity of man,—then suddenly it

was discovered that Nature in herself possessed transcendent charms. It

may seem absurd to class them all together; yet there is no doubt that

the French Revolution, the criticism of the Bible, Pantheistic forms of

religious feeling, landscape-painting, Alpine travelling, and the

poetry of Nature, are all signs of the same movement—of a new

Renaissance. Limitations of every sort have been shaken off during the

last century; all forms have been destroyed, all questions asked. The

classical spirit loved to 4arrange, model, preserve traditions, obey

laws. We are intolerant of everything that is not simple, unbiassed by

prescription, liberal as the wind, and natural as the mountain crags.

We go to feed this spirit of freedom among the Alps. What the virgin

forests of America are to the Americans, the Alps are to us. What there

is in these huge blocks and walls of granite crowned with ice that

fascinates us, it is hard to analyse. Why, seeing that we find them so

attractive, they should have repelled our ancestors of the fourth

generation and all the world before them, is another mystery. We cannot

explain what rapport there is between our human souls and these

inequalities in the surface of the earth which we call Alps. Tennyson

speaks of

Some vague emotion of delight

In gazing up an Alpine height,

and its vagueness eludes definition. The interest which physical

science has created for natural objects has something to do with it.

Curiosity and the charm of novelty increase this interest. No towns, no

cultivated tracts of Europe however beautiful, form such a contrast to

our London life as Switzerland. Then there is the health and joy that

comes from exercise in open air; the senses freshened by good sleep;

the blood quickened by a lighter and rarer atmosphere. Our modes of

life, the breaking down of class privileges, the extension of

education, which contribute to make the individual greater and society

less, render the solitude of mountains refreshing. Facilities of

travelling and improved accommodation leave us free to enjoy the

natural beauty which we seek. Our minds, too, are prepared to

sympathise with the inanimate world; we have learned to look on the

universe as a whole, and ourselves as a part of it, related by close

ties of friendship to all its other members 5Shelley's, Wordsworth's,

Goethe's poetry has taught us this; we are all more or less Pantheists,

worshippers of 'God in Nature,' convinced of the omnipresence of the

informing mind.

[2] See, however, what is said about Leo Battista Alberti in the

sketch of Rimini in the second series.

Thus, when we admire the Alps, we are after all but children of the

century. We follow its inspiration blindly; and while we think

ourselves spontaneous in our ecstasy, perform the part for which we

have been trained from childhood by the atmosphere in which we live. It

is this very unconsciousness and universality of the impulse we obey

which makes it hard to analyse. Contemporary history is difficult to

write; to define the spirit of the age in which we live is still more

difficult; to account for 'impressions which owe all their force to

their identity with themselves' is most difficult of all. We must be

content to feel, and not to analyse.

Rousseau has the credit of having invented the love of Nature. Perhaps

he first expressed, in literature, the pleasures of open life among the

mountains, of walking tours, of the '_école buissonnière_,' away from

courts, and schools, and cities, which it is the fashion now to love.

His bourgeois birth and tastes, his peculiar religious and social

views, his intense self-engrossment,—all favoured the development of

Nature-worship. But Rousseau was not alone, nor yet creative, in this

instance. He was but one of the earliest to seize and express a new

idea of growing humanity. For those who seem to be the most original in

their inauguration of periods are only such as have been favourably

placed by birth and education to imbibe the floating creeds of the

whole race. They resemble the first cases of an epidemic, which become

the centres of infection and propagate disease. At the time of

Rousseau's greatness the French people were initiative. In politics, in

literature, in fashions, and in 6philosophy, they had for some time led

the taste of Europe. But the sentiment which first received a clear and

powerful expression in the works of Rousseau, soon declared itself in

the arts and literature of other nations. Goethe, Wordsworth, and the

earlier landscape-painters, proved that Germany and England were not

far behind the French. In England this love of Nature for its own sake

is indigenous, and has at all times been peculiarly characteristic of

our genius. Therefore it is not surprising that our life and literature

and art have been foremost in developing the sentiment of which we are

speaking. Our poets, painters, and prose writers gave the tone to

European thought in this respect. Our travellers in search of the

adventurous and picturesque, our Alpine Club, have made of Switzerland

an English playground.

The greatest period in our history was but a foreshadowing of this. To

return to Nature-worship was but to reassume the habits of the

Elizabethan age, altered indeed by all the changes of religion,

politics, society, and science which the last three centuries have

wrought, yet still, in its original love of free open life among the

fields and woods, and on the sea, the same. Now the French national

genius is classical. It reverts to the age of Louis XIV., and

Rousseauism in their literature is as true an innovation and

parenthesis as Pope-and-Drydenism was in ours. As in the age of the

Reformation, so in this, the German element of the modern character

predominates. During the two centuries from which we have emerged, the

Latin element had the upper hand. Our love of the Alps is a Gothic, a

Teutonic, instinct; sympathetic with all that is vague, infinite, and

insubordinate to rules, at war with all that is defined and systematic

in our genius. This we may perceive in individuals as well as in the

broader aspects of arts and literatures. The classically minded man,

the reader of Latin poets, the lover 7of brilliant conversation, the

frequenter of clubs and drawing-rooms, nice in his personal

requirements, scrupulous in his choice of words, averse to unnecessary

physical exertion, preferring town to country life, _cannot_ deeply

feel the charm of the Alps. Such a man will dislike German art, and

however much he may strive to be Catholic in his tastes, will find as

he grows older that his liking for Gothic architecture and modern

painting diminish almost to aversion before an increasing admiration

for Greek peristyles and the Medicean Venus. If in respect of

speculation all men are either Platonists or Aristotelians, in respect

of taste all men are either Greek or German.

At present the German, the indefinite, the natural, commands; the

Greek, the finite, the cultivated, is in abeyance. We who talk so much

about the feeling of the Alps, are creatures, not creators of our

_cultus_,—a strange reflection, proving how much greater man is than

men, the common reason of the age in which we live than our own

reasons, its constituents and subjects.

Perhaps it is our modern tendency to 'individualism' which makes the

Alps so much to us. Society is there reduced to a vanishing point—no

claims are made on human sympathies—there is no need to toil in

yoke-service with our fellows. We may be alone, dream our own dreams,

and sound the depths of personality without the reproach of

selfishness, without a restless wish to join in action or money-making

or the pursuit of fame. To habitual residents among the Alps this

absence of social duties and advantages may be barbarising, even

brutalising. But to men wearied with too much civilisation, and

deafened by the noise of great cities, it is beyond measure refreshing.

Then, again, among the mountains history finds no place. The Alps have

no past nor present nor future. The human beings who live upon their

sides are at odds 8with nature, clinging on for bare existence to the

soil, sheltering themselves beneath protecting rocks from avalanches,

damming up destructive streams, all but annihilated every spring. Man,

who is paramount in the plain, is nothing here. His arts and sciences,

and dynasties, and modes of life, and mighty works, and conquests and

decays, demand our whole attention in Italy or Egypt. But here the

mountains, immemorially the same, which were, which are, and which are

to be, present a theatre on which the soul breathes freely and feels

herself alone. Around her on all sides is God, and Nature, who is here

the face of God and not the slave of man. The spirit of the world hath

here not yet grown old. She is as young as on the first day; and the

Alps are a symbol of the self-creating, self-sufficing, self-enjoying

universe which lives for its own ends. For why do the slopes gleam with

flowers, and the hillsides deck themselves with grass, and the

inaccessible ledges of black rock bear their tufts of crimson primroses

and flaunting tiger-lilies? Why, morning after morning, does the red

dawn flush the pinnacles of Monte Rosa above cloud and mist unheeded?

Why does the torrent shout, the avalanche reply in thunder to the music

of the sun, the trees and rocks and meadows cry their 'Holy, Holy,

Holy'? Surely not for us. We are an accident here, and even the few men

whose eyes are fixed habitually upon these things are dead to them—the

peasants do not even know the names of their own flowers, and sigh with

envy when you tell them of the plains of Lincolnshire or Russian

steppes.

But indeed there is something awful in the Alpine elevation above human

things. We do not love Switzerland merely because we associate its

thought with recollections of holidays and joyfulness. Some of the most

solemn moments of life are spent high up above among the mountains, on

the barren tops of rocky passes, where the soul has seemed to hear in

solitude 9a low controlling voice. It is almost necessary for the

development of our deepest affections that some sad and sombre moments

should be interchanged with hours of merriment and elasticity. It is

this variety in the woof of daily life which endears our home to us;

and perhaps none have fully loved the Alps who have not spent some days

of meditation, or it may be of sorrow, among their solitudes. Splendid

scenery, like music, has the power to make 'of grief itself a fiery

chariot for mounting above the sources of grief,' to ennoble and refine

our passions, and to teach us that our lives are merely moments in the

years of the eternal Being. There are many, perhaps, who, within sight

of some great scene among the Alps, upon the height of the Stelvio or

the slopes of Mürren, or at night in the valley of Courmayeur, have

felt themselves raised above cares and doubts and miseries by the mere

recognition of unchangeable magnificence; have found a deep peace in

the sense of their own nothingness. It is not granted to us everyday to

stand upon these pinnacles of rest and faith above the world. But

having once stood there, how can we forget the station? How can we

fail, amid the tumult of our common cares, to feel at times the hush of

that far-off tranquillity? When our life is most commonplace, when we

are ill or weary in city streets, we can remember the clouds upon the

mountains we have seen, the sound of innumerable waterfalls, and the

scent of countless flowers. A photograph of Bisson's or of Braun's, the

name of some well-known valley, the picture of some Alpine plant,

rouses the sacred hunger in our souls, and stirs again the faith in

beauty and in rest beyond ourselves which no man can take from us. We

owe a deep debt of gratitude to everything which enables us to rise

above depressing and enslaving circumstances, which brings us nearer in

some way or other to what is eternal in the universe, and which makes

us know 10that, whether we live or die, suffer or enjoy, life and

gladness are still strong in the world. On this account, the proper

attitude of the soul among the Alps is one of silence. It is almost

impossible without a kind of impiety to frame in words the feelings

they inspire. Yet there are some sayings, hallowed by long usage, which

throng the mind through a whole summer's day, and seem in harmony with

its emotions—some portions of the Psalms or lines of greatest poets,

inarticulate hymns of Beethoven and Mendelssohn, waifs and strays not

always apposite, but linked by strong and subtle chains of feeling with

the grandeur of the mountains. This reverential feeling for the Alps is

connected with the Pantheistic form of our religious sentiments to

which I have before alluded. It is a trite remark, that even devout men

of the present generation prefer temples _not_ made with hands to

churches, and worship God in the fields more contentedly than in their

pews. What Mr. Ruskin calls 'the instinctive sense of the divine

presence not formed into distinct belief' lies at the root of our

profound veneration for the nobler aspects of mountain scenery. This

instinctive sense has been very variously expressed by Goethe in

Faust's celebrated confession of faith, by Shelley in the stanzas of

'Adonais,' which begin 'He is made one with nature,' by Wordsworth in

the lines on Tintern Abbey, and lately by Mr. Roden Noel in his noble

poems of Pantheism. It is more or less strongly felt by all who have

recognised the indubitable fact that religious belief is undergoing a

sure process of change from the dogmatic distinctness of the past to

some at present dimly descried creed of the future. Such periods of

transition are of necessity full of discomfort, doubt, and anxiety,

vague, variable, and unsatisfying. The men in whose spirits the

fermentation of the change is felt, who have abandoned their old

moorings, and have not yet 11reached the haven for which they are

steering, cannot but be indistinct and undecided in their faith. The

universe of which they form a part becomes important to them in its

infinite immensity. The principles of beauty, goodness, order and law,

no longer connected in their minds with definite articles of faith,

find symbols in the outer world. They are glad to fly at certain

moments from mankind and its oppressive problems, for which religion no

longer provides a satisfactory solution, to Nature, where they vaguely

localise the spirit that broods over us controlling all our being. To

such men Goethe's hymn is a form of faith, and born of such a mood are

the following far humbler verses:—

At Mürren let the morning lead thee out

To walk upon the cold and cloven hills,

To hear the congregated mountains shout

Their pæan of a thousand foaming rills.

Raimented with intolerable light

The snow-peaks stand above thee, row on row

Arising, each a seraph in his might;

An organ each of varied stop doth blow.

Heaven's azure dome trembles through all her spheres,

Feeling that music vibrate; and the sun

Raises his tenor as he upward steers,

And all the glory-coated mists that run

Below him in the valley, hear his voice,

And cry unto the dewy fields, Rejoice!

There is a profound sympathy between music and fine scenery: they both

affect us in the same way, stirring strong but undefined emotions,

which express themselves in 'idle tears,' or evoking thoughts 'which

lie,' as Wordsworth says, 'too deep for tears,' beyond the reach of any

words. How little we know what multitudes of mingling reminiscences,

held in solution by the mind, and colouring its fancy with the

iridescence of variable hues, go to make up the sentiments 12which

music or which mountains stir! It is the very vagueness, changefulness,

and dreamlike indistinctness of these feelings which cause their charm;

they harmonise with the haziness of our beliefs and seem to make our

very doubts melodious. For this reason it is obvious that unrestrained

indulgence in the pleasures of music or of scenery may tend to destroy

habits of clear thinking, sentimentalise the mind, and render it more

apt to entertain embryonic fancies than to bring ideas to definite

perfection.

If hours of thoughtfulness and seclusion are necessary to the

development of a true love for the Alps, it is no less essential to a

right understanding of their beauty that we should pass some wet and

gloomy days among the mountains. The unclouded sunsets and sunrises

which often follow one another in September in the Alps, have something

terrible. They produce a satiety of splendour, and oppress the mind

with a sense of perpetuity. I remember spending such a season in one of

the Oberland valleys, high up above the pine-trees, in a little châlet.

Morning after morning I awoke to see the sunbeams glittering on the

Eiger and the Jungfrau; noon after noon the snow-fields blazed beneath

a steady fire; evening after evening they shone like beacons in the red

light of the setting sun. Then peak by peak they lost the glow; the

soul passed from them, and they stood pale yet weirdly garish against

the darkened sky. The stars came out, the moon shone, but not a cloud

sailed over the untroubled heavens. Thus day after day for several

weeks there was no change, till I was seized with an overpowering

horror of unbroken calm. I left the valley for a time; and when I

returned to it in wind and rain, I found that the partial veiling of

the mountain heights restored the charm which I had lost and made me

feel once more at home. The landscape takes a graver tone beneath the

mist that hides the higher 13peaks, and comes drifting, creeping,

feeling, through the pines upon their slopes—white, silent, blinding

vapour-wreaths around the sable spires. Sometimes the cloud descends

and blots out everything. Again it lifts a little, showing cottages and

distant Alps beneath its skirts. Then it sweeps over the whole valley

like a veil, just broken here and there above a lonely châlet or a

thread of distant dangling torrent foam. Sounds, too, beneath the mist

are more strange. The torrent seems to have a hoarser voice and grinds

the stones more passionately against its boulders. The cry of shepherds

through the fog suggests the loneliness and danger of the hills. The

bleating of penned sheep or goats, and the tinkling of the cowbells,

are mysteriously distant and yet distinct in the dull dead air. Then,

again, how immeasurably high above our heads appear the domes and peaks

of snow revealed through chasms in the drifting cloud; how desolate the

glaciers and the avalanches in gleams of light that struggle through

the mist! There is a leaden glare peculiar to clouds, which makes the

snow and ice more lurid. Not far from the house where I am writing, the

avalanche that swept away the bridge last winter is lying now, dripping

away, dank and dirty, like a rotting whale. I can see it from my

window, green beech-boughs nodding over it, forlorn larches bending

their tattered branches by its side, splinters of broken pine

protruding from its muddy caves, the boulders on its flank, and the

hoarse hungry torrent tossing up its tongues to lick the ragged edge of

snow. Close by, the meadows, spangled with yellow flowers and red and

blue, look even more brilliant than if the sun were shining on them.

Every cup and blade of grass is drinking. But the scene changes; the

mist has turned into rain-clouds, and the steady rain drips down,

incessant, blotting out the view. Then, too, what a joy it is if the

clouds break towards evening with a north wind, and a rainbow in 14the

valley gives promise of a bright to-morrow! We look up to the cliffs

above our heads, and see that they have just been powdered with the

snow that is a sign of better weather.

Such rainy days ought to be spent in places like Seelisberg and Mürren,

at the edge of precipices, in front of mountains, or above a lake. The

cloud-masses crawl and tumble about the valleys like a brood of

dragons; now creeping along the ledges of the rock with sinuous

self-adjustment to its turns and twists; now launching out into the

deep, repelled by battling winds, or driven onward in a coil of twisted

and contorted serpent curls. In the midst of summer these wet seasons

often end in a heavy fall of snow. You wake some morning to see the

meadows which last night were gay with July flowers huddled up in snow

a foot in depth. But fair weather does not tarry long to reappear. You

put on your thickest boots and sally forth to find the great cups of

the gentians full of snow, and to watch the rising of the cloud-wreaths

under the hot sun. Bad dreams or sickly thoughts, dissipated by

returning daylight or a friend's face, do not fly away more rapidly and

pleasantly than those swift glory-coated mists that lose themselves we

know not where in the blue depths of the sky.

In contrast with these rainy days nothing can be more perfect than

clear moonlight nights. There is a terrace upon the roof of the inn at

Courmayeur where one may spend hours in the silent watches, when all

the world has gone to sleep beneath. The Mont Chétif and the Mont de la

Saxe form a gigantic portal not unworthy of the pile that lies beyond.

For Mont Blanc resembles a vast cathedral; its countless spires are

scattered over a mass like that of the Duomo at Milan, rising into one

tower at the end. By night the glaciers glitter in the steady moon;

domes, pinnacles, and buttresses stand 15clear of clouds. Needles of

every height and most fantastic shapes rise from the central ridge,

some solitary, like sharp arrows shot against the sky, some clustering

into sheaves. On every horn of snow and bank of grassy hill stars

sparkle, rising, setting, rolling round through the long silent night.

Moonlight simplifies and softens the landscape. Colours become scarcely

distinguishable, and forms, deprived of half their detail, gain in

majesty and size. The mountains seem greater far by night than

day—higher heights and deeper depths, more snowy pyramids, more

beetling crags, softer meadows, and darker pines. The whole valley is

hushed, but for the torrent and the chirping grasshopper and the

striking of the village clocks. The black tower and the houses of

Courmayeur in the foreground gleam beneath the moon until she reaches

the edge of the Cramont, and then sinks quietly away, once more to

reappear among the pines, then finally to leave the valley dark beneath

the shadow of the mountain's bulk. Meanwhile the heights of snow still

glitter in the steady light: they, too, will soon be dark, until the

dawn breaks, tinging them with rose.

But it is not fair to dwell exclusively upon the more sombre aspect of

Swiss beauty when there are so many lively scenes of which to speak.

The sunlight and the freshness and the flowers of Alpine meadows form

more than half the charm of Switzerland. The other day we walked to a

pasture called the Col de Checruit, high up the valley of Courmayeur,

where the spring was still in its first freshness. Gradually we

climbed, by dusty roads and through hot fields where the grass had just

been mown, beneath the fierce light of the morning sun. Not a breath of

air was stirring, and the heavy pines hung overhead upon their crags,

as if to fence the gorge from every wandering breeze. There is nothing

more oppressive than these scorching sides of narrow rifts, shut in by

woods 16and precipices. But suddenly the valley broadened, the pines

and larches disappeared, and we found ourselves upon a wide green

semicircle of the softest meadows. Little rills of water went rushing

through them, rippling over pebbles, rustling under dock leaves, and

eddying against their wooden barriers. Far and wide 'you scarce could

see the grass for flowers,' while on every side the tinkling of

cow-bells, and the voices of shepherds calling to one another from the

Alps, or singing at their work, were borne across the fields. As we

climbed we came into still fresher pastures, where the snow had

scarcely melted. There the goats and cattle were collected, and the

shepherds sat among them, fondling the kids and calling them by name.

When they called, the creatures came, expecting salt and bread. It was

pretty to see them lying near their masters, playing and butting at

them with their horns, or bleating for the sweet rye-bread. The women

knitted stockings, laughing among themselves, and singing all the

while. As soon as we reached them, they gathered round to talk. An old

herdsman, who was clearly the patriarch of this Arcadia, asked us many

questions in a slow deliberate voice. We told him who we were, and

tried to interest him in the cattle-plague, which he appeared to regard

as an evil very unreal and far away—like the murrain upon Pharaoh's

herds which one reads about in Exodus. But he was courteous and polite,

doing the honours of his pasture with simplicity and ease. He took us

to his châlet and gave us bowls of pure cold milk. It was a funny

little wooden house, clean and dark. The sky peeped through its tiles,

and if shepherds were not in the habit of sleeping soundly all night

long, they might count the setting and rising stars without lifting

their heads from the pillow. He told us how far pleasanter they found

the summer season than the long cold winter which they have to spend in

gloomy houses in Courmayeur. This, indeed, is 17the true pastoral life

which poets have described—a happy summer holiday among the flowers,

well occupied with simple cares, and harassed by 'no enemy but winter

and rough weather.'

Very much of the charm of Switzerland belongs to simple things—to

greetings from the herdsmen, the 'Guten Morgen,' and 'Guten Abend,'

that are invariably given and taken upon mountain paths; to the tame

creatures, with their large dark eyes, who raise their heads one moment

from the pasture while you pass; and to the plants that grow beneath

your feet. The latter end of May is the time when spring begins in the

high Alps. Wherever sunlight smiles away a patch of snow, the brown

turf soon becomes green velvet, and the velvet stars itself with red

and white and gold and blue. You almost see the grass and lilies grow.

First come pale crocuses and lilac soldanellas. These break the last

dissolving clods of snow, and stand upon an island, with the cold wall

they have thawed all round them. It is the fate of these poor flowers

to spring and flourish on the very skirts of retreating winter; they

soon wither—the frilled chalice of the soldanella shrivels up and the

crocus fades away before the grass has grown; the sun, which is

bringing all the other plants to life, scorches their tender petals.

Often when summer has fairly come, you still may see their pearly cups

and lilac bells by the side of avalanches, between the chill snow and

the fiery sun, blooming and fading hour by hour. They have as it were

but a Pisgah view of the promised land, of the spring which they are

foremost to proclaim. Next come the clumsy gentians and yellow

anemones, covered with soft down like fledgling birds. These are among

the earliest and hardiest blossoms that embroider the high meadows with

a diaper of blue and gold. About the same time primroses and auriculas

begin to tuft the dripping rocks, while frail white fleur-de-lis,

18like flakes of snow forgotten by the sun, and golden-balled

ranunculuses join with forget-me-nots and cranesbill in a never-ending

dance upon the grassy floor. Happy, too, is he who finds the

lilies-of-the-valley clustering about the chestnut boles upon the

Colma, or in the beechwood by the stream at Macugnaga, mixed with

garnet-coloured columbines and fragrant white narcissus, which the

people of the villages call 'Angiolini.' There, too, is Solomon's seal,

with waxen bells and leaves expanded like the wings of hovering

butterflies. But these lists of flowers are tiresome and cold; it would

be better to draw the portrait of one which is particularly

fascinating. I think that botanists have called it _Saxifraga

cotyledon_; yet, in spite of its long name, it is beautiful and poetic.

London-pride is the commonest of all the saxifrages; but the one of

which I speak is as different from London-pride as a Plantagenet upon

his throne from that last Plantagenet who died obscure and penniless

some years ago. It is a great majestic flower, which plumes the granite

rocks of Monte Rosa in the spring. At other times of the year you see a

little tuft of fleshy leaves set like a cushion on cold ledges and dark

places of dripping cliffs. You take it for a stonecrop—one of those

weeds doomed to obscurity, and safe from being picked because they are

so uninviting—and you pass it by incuriously. But about June it puts

forth its power, and from the cushion of pale leaves there springs a

strong pink stem, which rises upward for a while, and then curves down

and breaks into a shower of snow-white blossoms. Far away the splendour

gleams, hanging like a plume of ostrich-feathers from the roof of rock,

waving to the wind, or stooping down to touch the water of the mountain

stream that dashes it with dew. The snow at evening, glowing with a

sunset flush, is not more rosy-pure than this cascade of pendent

blossoms. It loves to be alone—inaccessible ledges, chasms where winds

combat, or 19moist caverns overarched near thundering falls, are the

places that it seeks. I will not compare it to a spirit of the

mountains or to a proud lonely soul, for such comparisons desecrate the

simplicity of nature, and no simile can add a glory to the flower. It

seems to have a conscious life of its own, so large and glorious it is,

so sensitive to every breath of air, so nobly placed upon its bending

stem, so royal in its solitude. I first saw it years ago on the

Simplon, feathering the drizzling crags above Isella. Then we found it

near Baveno, in a crack of sombre cliff beneath the mines. The other

day we cut an armful opposite Varallo, by the Sesia, and then felt like

murderers; it was so sad to hold in our hands the triumph of those many

patient months, the full expansive life of the flower, the splendour

visible from valleys and hillsides, the defenceless creature which had

done its best to make the gloomy places of the Alps most beautiful.

After passing many weeks among the high Alps it is a pleasure to

descend into the plains. The sunset, and sunrise, and the stars of

Lombardy, its level horizons and vague misty distances, are a source of

absolute relief after the narrow skies and embarrassed prospects of a

mountain valley. Nor are the Alps themselves ever more imposing than

when seen from Milan or the church-tower of Chivasso or the terrace of

Novara, with a foreground of Italian cornfields and old city towers and

rice-ground, golden-green beneath a Lombard sun. Half veiled by clouds,

the mountains rise like visionary fortress walls of a celestial

city—unapproachable, beyond the range of mortal feet. But those who

know by old experience what friendly châlets, and cool meadows, and

clear streams are hidden in their folds and valleys, send forth fond

thoughts and messages, like carrier-pigeons, from the marble parapets

of Milan, crying, 'Before another sun has set, I too shall rest beneath

the shadow of their pines!' It is in truth not more 20than a day's

journey from Milan to the brink of snow at Macugnaga. But very sad it

is to _leave_ the Alps, to stand upon the terraces of Berne and waft

ineffectual farewells. The unsympathising Aar rushes beneath; and the

snow-peaks, whom we love like friends, abide untroubled by the coming

and the going of the world. The clouds drift over them—the sunset warms

them with a fiery kiss. Night comes, and we are hurried far away to

wake beside the Seine, remembering, with a pang of jealous passion,

that the flowers on Alpine meadows are still blooming, and the rivulets

still flowing with a ceaseless song, while Paris shops are all we see,

and all we hear is the dull clatter of a Paris crowd.

THE ALPS IN WINTER

The gradual approach of winter is very lovely in the high Alps. The

valley of Davos, where I am writing, more than five thousand feet above

the sea, is not beautiful, as Alpine valleys go, though it has scenery

both picturesque and grand within easy reach. But when summer is

passing into autumn, even the bare slopes of the least romantic glen

are glorified. Golden lights and crimson are cast over the grey-green

world by the fading of innumerable plants. Then the larches begin to

put on sallow tints that deepen into orange, burning against the solid

blue sky like amber. The frosts are severe at night, and the meadow

grass turns dry and wan. The last lilac crocuses die upon the fields.

Icicles, hanging from watercourse or mill-wheel, glitter in the noonday

sunlight. The wind blows keenly from the north, and now the snow begins

to fall and thaw and freeze, and fall and thaw again. The seasons are

confused; wonderful days of flawless purity are 21intermingled with

storm and gloom. At last the time comes when a great snowfall has to be

expected. There is hard frost in the early morning, and at nine o'clock

the thermometer stands at 2°. The sky is clear, but it clouds rapidly

with films of cirrus and of stratus in the south and west. Soon it is

covered over with grey vapour in a level sheet, all the hill-tops

standing hard against the steely heavens. The cold wind from the west

freezes the moustache to one's pipe-stem. By noon the air is thick with

a coagulated mist; the temperature meanwhile has risen, and a little

snow falls at intervals. The valleys are filled with a curious opaque

blue, from which the peaks rise, phantom-like and pallid, into the grey

air, scarcely distinguishable from their background. The pine-forests

on the mountain-sides are of darkest indigo. There is an indescribable

stillness and a sense of incubation. The wind has fallen. Later on, the

snow-flakes flutter silently and sparely through the lifeless air. The

most distant landscape is quite blotted out. After sunset the clouds

have settled down upon the hills, and the snow comes in thick,

impenetrable fleeces. At night our hair crackles and sparkles when we

brush it. Next morning there is a foot and a half of finely powdered

snow, and still the snow is falling. Strangely loom the châlets through

the semi-solid whiteness. Yet the air is now dry and singularly

soothing. The pines are heavy with their wadded coverings; now and

again one shakes himself in silence, and his burden falls in a white

cloud, to leave a black-green patch upon the hillside, whitening again

as the imperturbable fall continues. The stakes by the roadside are

almost buried. No sound is audible. Nothing is seen but the

snow-plough, a long raft of planks with a heavy stone at its stem and a

sharp prow, drawn by four strong horses, and driven by a young man

erect upon the stem.

So we live through two days and nights, and on the third 22a north wind

blows. The snow-clouds break and hang upon the hills in scattered

fleeces; glimpses of blue sky shine through, and sunlight glints along

the heavy masses. The blues of the shadows are everywhere intense. As

the clouds disperse, they form in moulded domes, tawny like sunburned

marble in the distant south lands. Every châlet is a miracle of

fantastic curves, built by the heavy hanging snow. Snow lies mounded on

the roads and fields, writhed into loveliest wreaths, or outspread in

the softest undulations. All the irregularities of the hills are

softened into swelling billows like the mouldings of Titanic statuary.

It happened once or twice last winter that such a clearing after

snowfall took place at full moon. Then the moon rose in a swirl of

fleecy vapour—clouds above, beneath, and all around. The sky was blue

as steel, and infinitely deep with mist-entangled stars. The horn above

which she first appears stood carved of solid black, and through the

valley's length from end to end yawned chasms and clefts of liquid

darkness. As the moon rose, the clouds were conquered, and massed into

rolling waves upon the ridges of the hills. The spaces of open sky grew

still more blue. At last the silver light came flooding over all, and

here and there the fresh snow glistened on the crags. There is

movement, palpitation, life of light through earth and sky. To walk out

on such a night, when the perturbation of storm is over and the heavens

are free, is one of the greatest pleasures offered by this winter life.

It is so light that you can read the smallest print with ease. The

upper sky looks quite black, shading by violet and sapphire into

turquoise upon the horizon. There is the colour of ivory upon the

nearest snow-fields, and the distant peaks sparkle like silver,

crystals glitter in all directions on the surface of the snow, white,

yellow, and pale blue. The stars are exceedingly keen, but only a few

can shine in the intensity of moonlight. 23The air is perfectly still,

and though icicles may be hanging from beard and moustache to the furs

beneath one's chin, there is no sensation of extreme cold.

During the earlier frosts of the season, after the first snows have

fallen, but when there is still plenty of moisture in the ground, the

loveliest fern-fronds of pure rime may be found in myriads on the

meadows. They are fashioned like perfect vegetable structures, opening

fan-shaped upon crystal stems, and catching the sunbeams with the

brilliancy of diamonds. Taken at certain angles, they decompose light

into iridescent colours, appearing now like emeralds, rubies, or

topazes, and now like Labrador spar, blending all hues in a wondrous

sheen. When the lake freezes for the first time, its surface is of

course quite black, and so transparent that it is easy to see the

fishes swimming in the deep beneath; but here and there, where rime has

fallen, there sparkle these fantastic flowers and ferns and mosses made

of purest frost. Nothing, indeed, can be more fascinating than the new

world revealed by frost. In shaded places of the valley you may walk

through larches and leafless alder thickets by silent farms, all

silvered over with hoar spangles—fairy forests, where the flowers and

foliage are rime. The streams are flowing half-frozen over rocks

sheeted with opaque green ice. Here it is strange to watch the swirl of

water freeing itself from these frost-shackles, and to see it eddying

beneath the overhanging eaves of frailest crystal-frosted snow. All is

so silent, still, and weird in this white world, that one marvels when

the spirit of winter will appear, or what shrill voices in the air will

make his unimaginable magic audible. Nothing happens, however, to

disturb the charm, save when a sunbeam cuts the chain of diamonds on an

alder bough, and down they drift in a thin cloud of dust. It may be

also that the air is full of floating crystals, like tiniest most

restless fire-flies 24rising and falling and passing crosswise in the

sun-illumined shade of tree or mountain-side.

It is not easy to describe these beauties of the winter-world; and yet

one word must be said about the sunsets. Let us walk out, therefore,

towards the lake at four o'clock in mid-December. The thermometer is

standing at 3°, and there is neither breath of wind nor cloud. Venus is

just visible in rose and sapphire, and the thin young moon is beside

her. To east and south the snowy ranges burn with yellow fire,

deepening to orange and crimson hues, which die away and leave a

greenish pallor. At last, the higher snows alone are livid with a last

faint tinge of light, and all beneath is quite white. But the tide of

glory turns. While the west grows momently more pale, the eastern

heavens flush with afterglow, suffuse their spaces with pink and

violet. Daffodil and tenderest emerald intermingle; and these colours

spread until the west again has rose and primrose and sapphire

wonderfully blent, and from the burning skies a light is cast upon the

valley—a phantom light, less real, more like the hues of molten gems,

than were the stationary flames of sunset. Venus and the moon meanwhile

are silvery clear. Then the whole illumination fades like magic.

All the charms of which I have been writing are combined in a

sledge-drive. With an arrowy gliding motion one passes through the

snow-world as through a dream. In the sunlight the snow surface

sparkles with its myriad stars of crystals. In the shadow it ceases to

glitter, and assumes a blueness scarcely less blue than the sky. So the

journey is like sailing through alternate tracts of light irradiate

heavens, and interstellar spaces of the clearest and most flawless

ether. The air is like the keen air of the highest glaciers. As we go,

the bells keep up a drowsy tinkling at the horse's head. The whole

landscape is transfigured—lifted high up out of commonplaceness. 25The

little hills are Monte Rosas and Mont Blancs. Scale is annihilated, and

nothing tells but form. There is hardly any colour except the blue of

sky and shadow. Everything is traced in vanishing tints, passing from

the almost amber of the distant sunlight through glowing white into

pale greys and brighter blues and deep ethereal azure. The pines stand

in black platoons upon the hillsides, with a tinge of red or orange on

their sable. Some carry masses of snow. Others have shaken their plumes

free. The châlets are like fairy houses or toys, waist-deep in stores

of winter fuel. With their mellow tones of madder and umber on the

weather-beaten woodwork relieved against the white, with fantastic

icicles and folds of snow depending from their eaves, or curled like

coverlids from roof and window-sill, they are far more picturesque than

in the summer. Colour, wherever it is found, whether in these cottages

or in a block of serpentine by the roadside, or in the golden bulrush

blades by the lake shore, takes more than double value. It is shed upon

the landscape like a spiritual and transparent veil. Most beautiful of

all are the sweeping lines of pure untroubled snow, fold over fold of

undulating softness, billowing along the skirts of the peaked hills.

There is no conveying the charm of immaterial, aë;rial, lucid beauty,

the feeling of purity and aloofness from sordid things, conveyed by the

fine touch on all our senses of light, colour, form, and air, and

motion, and rare tinkling sound. The magic is like a spirit mood of

Shelley's lyric verse. And, what is perhaps most wonderful, this

delicate delight may be enjoyed without fear in the coldest weather. It

does not matter how low the temperature may be, if the sun is shining,

the air dry, and the wind asleep.

Leaving the horse-sledges on the verge of some high hill-road, and

trusting oneself to the little hand-sledge which the 26people of the

Grisons use, and which the English have christened by the Canadian term

'toboggan,' the excitement becomes far greater. The hand-sledge is

about three feet long, fifteen inches wide, and half a foot above the

ground, on runners shod with iron. Seated firmly at the back, and

guiding with the feet in front, the rider skims down precipitous slopes

and round perilous corners with a rapidity that beats a horse's pace.

Winding through sombre pine-forests, where the torrent roars fitfully

among caverns of barbed ice, and the glistening mountains tower above

in their glory of sun-smitten snow, darting round the frozen ledges at

the turnings of the road, silently gliding at a speed that seems

incredible, it is so smooth, he traverses two or three miles without

fatigue, carried onward by the mere momentum of his weight. It is a

strange and great joy. The toboggan, under these conditions, might be

compared to an enchanted boat shooting the rapids of a river; and what

adds to its fascination is the entire loneliness in which the rider

passes through those weird and ever-shifting scenes of winter radiance.

Sometimes, when the snow is drifting up the pass, and the world is

blank behind, before, and all around, it seems like plunging into

chaos. The muffled pines loom fantastically through the drift as we

rush past them, and the wind, ever and anon, detaches great masses of

snow in clouds from their bent branches. Or again at night, when the

moon is shining, and the sky is full of flaming stars, and the snow,

frozen to the hardness of marble, sparkles with innumerable crystals, a

new sense of strangeness and of joy is given to the solitude, the

swiftness, and the silence of the exercise. No other circumstances

invest the poetry of rapid motion with more fascination. Shelley, who

so loved the fancy of a boat inspired with its own instinct of life,

would have delighted in the game, and would probably have pursued it

recklessly. At the same time, 27as practised on a humbler scale nearer

home, in company, and on a run selected for convenience rather than for

picturesqueness, tobogganing is a very Bohemian amusement. No one who

indulges in it can count on avoiding hard blows and violent upsets, nor

will his efforts to maintain his equilibrium at the dangerous corners

be invariably graceful.

Nothing, it might be imagined, could be more monotonous than an Alpine

valley covered up with snow. And yet to one who has passed many months

in that seclusion Nature herself presents no monotony; for the changes

constantly wrought by light and cloud and alternations of weather on

this landscape are infinitely various. The very simplicity of the

conditions seems to assist the supreme artist. One day is wonderful

because of its unsullied purity; not a cloud visible, and the pines

clothed in velvet of rich green beneath a faultless canopy of light.

The next presents a fretwork of fine film, wrought by the south wind

over the whole sky, iridescent with delicate rainbow tints within the

influences of the sun, and ever-changing shape. On another, when the

turbulent Föhn is blowing, streamers of snow may be seen flying from

the higher ridges against a pallid background of slaty cloud, while the

gaunt ribs of the hills glisten below with fitful gleams of lurid

light. At sunrise, one morning, stealthy and mysterious vapours clothe

the mountains from their basement to the waist, while the peaks are

glistening serenely in clear daylight. Another opens with silently

falling snow. A third is rosy through the length and breadth of the

dawn-smitten valley. It is, however, impossible to catalogue the

indescribable variety of those beauties, which those who love nature

may enjoy by simply waiting on the changes of the winter in a single

station of the Alps.

28

WINTER NIGHTS AT DAVOS

I

Light, marvellously soft yet penetrating, everywhere diffused,

everywhere reflected without radiance, poured from the moon high above

our heads in a sky tinted through all shades and modulations of blue,

from turquoise on the horizon to opaque sapphire at the zenith—_dolce

color_. (It is difficult to use the word _colour_ for this scene

without suggesting an exaggeration. The blue is almost indefinable, yet

felt. But if possible, the total effect of the night landscape should

be rendered by careful exclusion of tints from the word-palette. The

art of the etcher is more needed than that of the painter.) Heaven

overhead is set with stars, shooting intensely, smouldering with dull

red in Aldeboran, sparkling diamond-like in Sirius, changing from

orange to crimson and green in the swart fire of yonder double star. On

the snow this moonlight falls tenderly, not in hard white light and

strong black shadow, but in tones of cream and ivory, rounding the

curves of drift. The mountain peaks alone glisten as though they were

built of silver burnished by an agate. Far away they rise diminished in

stature by the all-pervading dimness of bright light, that erases the

distinctions of daytime. On the path before our feet lie crystals of

many hues, the splinters of a thousand gems. In the wood there are

caverns of darkness, alternating with spaces of star-twinkled sky, or

windows opened between russet stems and solid branches for the 29moony

sheen. The green of the pines is felt, although invisible, so soft in

substance that it seems less like velvet than some materialised depth

of dark green shadow.

II

Snow falling noiseless and unseen. One only knows that it is falling by

the blinking of our eyes as the flakes settle on their lids and melt.

The cottage windows shine red, and moving lanterns of belated wayfarers

define the void around them. Yet the night is far from dark. The

forests and the mountain-bulk beyond the valley loom softly large and

just distinguishable through a pearly haze. The path is purest

trackless whiteness, almost dazzling though it has no light. This was

what Dante felt when he reached the lunar sphere:

Parova a me, che nube ne coprisse

Lucida, spessa, solida e pulita.

Walking silent, with insensible footfall, slowly, for the snow is deep

above our ankles, we wonder what the world would be like if this were

all. Could the human race be acclimatised to this monotony (we say)

perhaps emotion would be rarer, yet more poignant, suspended brooding

on itself, and wakening by flashes to a quintessential mood. Then fancy

changes, and the thought occurs that even so must be a planet, not yet

wholly made, nor called to take her place among the sisterhood of light

and song.

III

Sunset was fading out upon the Rhætikon and still reflected from the

Seehorn on the lake, when we entered the gorge of the Fluela—dense

pines on either hand, a mounting drift of snow in front, and faint

peaks, paling from rose to saffron, far above, beyond. There was no

sound but a tinkling stream 30and the continual jingle of our

sledge-bells. We drove at a foot's pace, our horse finding his own

path. When we left the forest, the light had all gone except for some

almost imperceptible touches of primrose on the eastern horns. It was a

moonless night, but the sky was alive with stars, and now and then one

fell. The last house in the valley was soon passed, and we entered

those bleak gorges where the wind, fine, noiseless, penetrating like an

edge of steel, poured slantwise on us from the north. As we rose, the

stars to west seemed far beneath us, and the Great Bear sprawled upon

the ridges of the lower hills outspread. We kept slowly moving onward,

upward, into what seemed like a thin impalpable mist, but was

immeasurable tracts of snow. The last cembras were left behind,

immovable upon dark granite boulders on our right. We entered a

formless and unbillowed sea of greyness, from which there rose dim

mountain-flanks that lost themselves in air. Up, ever up, and still

below us westward sank the stars. We were now 7500 feet above

sea-level, and the December night was rigid with intensity of frost.

The cold, and movement, and solemnity of space, drowsed every sense.

IV

The memory of things seen and done in moonlight is like the memory of

dreams. It is as a dream that I recall the night of our tobogganing to

Klosters, though it was full enough of active energy. The moon was in

her second quarter, slightly filmed with very high thin clouds, that

disappeared as night advanced, leaving the sky and stars in all their

lustre. A sharp frost, sinking to three degrees above zero Fahrenheit,

with a fine pure wind, such wind as here they call 'the mountain

breath.' We drove to Wolfgang in a two-horse sledge, four of us inside,

and our two Christians on the box. Up 31there, where the Alps of Death

descend to join the Lakehorn Alps, above the Wolfswalk, there is a

world of whiteness—frozen ridges, engraved like cameos of aë;rial onyx

upon the dark, star-tremulous sky; sculptured buttresses of snow,

enclosing hollows filled with diaphanous shadow, and sweeping aloft

into the upland fields of pure clear drift. Then came the swift

descent, the plunge into the pines, moon-silvered on their frosted

tops. The battalions of spruce that climb those hills defined the

dazzling snow from which they sprang, like the black tufts upon an

ermine robe. At the proper moment we left our sledge, and the big

Christian took his reins in hand to follow us. Furs and greatcoats were

abandoned. Each stood forth tightly accoutred, with short coat, and

clinging cap, and gaitered legs for the toboggan. Off we started in

line, with but brief interval between, at first slowly, then glidingly,

and when the impetus was gained, with darting, bounding, almost savage

swiftness—sweeping round corners, cutting the hard snow-path with keen

runners, avoiding the deep ruts, trusting to chance, taking advantage

of smooth places, till the rush and swing and downward swoop became

mechanical. Space was devoured. Into the massy shadows of the forest,

where the pines joined overhead, we pierced without a sound, and felt

far more than saw the great rocks with their icicles; and out again,

emerging into moonlight, met the valley spread beneath our feet, the

mighty peaks of the Silvretta and the vast blue sky. On, on, hurrying,

delaying not, the woods and hills rushed by. Crystals upon the

snow-banks glittered to the stars. Our souls would fain have stayed to

drink these marvels of the moon-world, but our limbs refused. The magic

of movement was upon us, and eight minutes swallowed the varying

impressions of two musical miles. The village lights drew near and

nearer, then the sombre village huts, and soon the speed grew less, and

soon we glided to our rest into the sleeping village street.

32

V

It was just past midnight. The moon had fallen to the western horns.

Orion's belt lay bar-like on the opening of the pass, and Sirius shot

flame on the Seehorn. A more crystalline night, more full of fulgent

stars, was never seen, stars everywhere, but mostly scattered in large

sparkles on the snow. Big Christian went in front, tugging toboggans by

their strings, as Gulliver, in some old woodcut, drew the fleets of

Lilliput. Through the brown wood-châlets of Selfrangr, up to the

undulating meadows, where the snow slept pure and crisp, he led us.

There we sat awhile and drank the clear air, cooled to zero, but

innocent and mild as mother Nature's milk. Then in an instant, down,

down through the hamlet, with its châlets, stables, pumps, and logs,

the slumbrous hamlet, where one dog barked, and darkness dwelt upon the

path of ice, down with the tempest of a dreadful speed, that shot each

rider upward in the air, and made the frame of the toboggan

tremble—down over hillocks of hard frozen snow, dashing and bounding,

to the river and the bridge. No bones were broken, though the race was

thrice renewed, and men were spilt upon the roadside by some furious

plunge. This amusement has the charm of peril and the unforeseen. In no

wise else can colder, keener air be drunken at such furious speed. The

joy, too, of the engine-driver and the steeplechaser is upon us. Alas,

that it should be so short! If only roads were better made for the

purpose, there would be no end to it; for the toboggan cannot lose his

wind. But the good thing fails at last, and from the silence of the

moon we pass into the silence of the fields of sleep.

33

VI

The new stable is a huge wooden building, with raftered lofts to stow

the hay, and stalls for many cows and horses. It stands snugly in an

angle of the pine-wood, bordering upon the great horse-meadow. Here at

night the air is warm and tepid with the breath of kine. Returning from

my forest walk, I spy one window yellow in the moonlight with a lamp. I

lift the latch. The hound knows me, and does not bark. I enter the

stable, where six horses are munching their last meal. Upon the

corn-bin sits a knecht. We light our pipes and talk. He tells me of the

valley of Arosa (a hawk's flight westward over yonder hills), how deep

in grass its summer lawns, how crystal-clear its stream, how blue its

little lakes, how pure, without a taint of mist, 'too beautiful to

paint,' its sky in winter! This knecht is an Ardüser, and the valley of

Arosa lifts itself to heaven above his Langwies home. It is his duty

now to harness a sleigh for some night-work. We shake hands and part—I

to sleep, he for the snow.

VII

The lake has frozen late this year, and there are places in it where

the ice is not yet firm. Little snow has fallen since it froze—about

three inches at the deepest, driven by winds and wrinkled like the

ribbed sea-sand. Here and there the ice-floor is quite black and clear,

reflecting stars, and dark as heaven's own depths. Elsewhere it is of a

suspicious whiteness, blurred in surface, with jagged cracks and

chasms, treacherously mended by the hand of frost. Moving slowly, the

snow cries beneath our feet, and the big crystals tinkle. These are

shaped like fern-fronds, growing fan-wise from a point, and set at

various angles, so that the moonlight takes 34them with capricious

touch. They flash, and are quenched, and flash again, light darting to

light along the level surface, while the sailing planets and the stars

look down complacent at this mimicry of heaven. Everything above,

around, beneath, is very beautiful—the slumbrous woods, the snowy

fells, and the far distance painted in faint blue upon the tender

background of the sky. Everything is placid and beautiful; and yet the

place is terrible. For, as we walk, the lake groans, with throttled

sobs, and sudden cracklings of its joints, and sighs that shiver,

undulating from afar, and pass beneath our feet, and die away in

distance when they reach the shore. And now and then an upper crust of

ice gives way; and will the gulfs then drag us down? We are in the very

centre of the lake. There is no use in thinking or in taking heed.

Enjoy the moment, then, and march. Enjoy the contrast between this

circumambient serenity and sweetness, and the dreadful sense of

insecurity beneath. Is not, indeed, our whole life of this nature? A

passage over perilous deeps, roofed by infinity and sempiternal things,

surrounded too with evanescent forms, that like these crystals, trodden

underfoot, or melted by the Föhn-wind into dew, flash, in some lucky

moment, with a light that mimics stars! But to allegorise and sermonise

is out of place here. It is but the expedient of those who cannot etch

sensation by the burin of their art of words.

VIII

It is ten o'clock upon Sylvester Abend, or New Year's Eve. Herr Buol

sits with his wife at the head of his long table. His family and

serving folk are round him. There is his mother, with little Ursula,

his child, upon her knee. The old lady is the mother of four comely

daughters and nine 35stalwart sons, the eldest of whom is now a

grizzled man. Besides our host, four of the brothers are here to-night;

the handsome melancholy Georg, who is so gentle in his speech; Simeon,

with his diplomatic face; Florian, the student of medicine; and my

friend, colossal-breasted Christian. Palmy came a little later, worried

with many cares, but happy to his heart's core. No optimist was ever

more convinced of his 6philosophy than Palmy. After them, below the

salt, were ranged the knechts and porters, the marmiton from the

kitchen, and innumerable maids. The board was tesselated with plates of

birnen-brod and eier-brod, küchli and cheese and butter; and Georg

stirred grampampuli in a mighty metal bowl. For the uninitiated, it may

be needful to explain these Davos delicacies. Birnen-brod is what the

Scotch would call a 'bun,' or massive cake, composed of sliced pears,

almonds, spices, and a little flour. Eier-brod is a saffron-coloured

sweet bread, made with eggs; and küchli is a kind of pastry, crisp and

flimsy, fashioned into various devices of cross, star, and scroll.

Grampampuli is simply brandy burnt with sugar, the most unsophisticated

punch I ever drank from tumblers. The frugal people of Davos, who live

on bread and cheese and dried meat all the year, indulge themselves but

once with these unwonted dainties in the winter.

The occasion was cheerful, and yet a little solemn. The scene was

feudal. For these Buols are the scions of a warrior race:

A race illustrious for heroic deeds;

Humbled, but not degraded.

During the six centuries through which they have lived nobles in Davos,

they have sent forth scores of fighting men to foreign lands,

ambassadors to France and Venice and the Milanese, governors to

Chiavenna and Bregaglia and the much-contested Valtelline. Members of

their house are 36Counts of Buol-Schauenstein in Austria, Freiherrs of

Muhlingen and Berenberg in the now German Empire. They keep the patent

of nobility conferred on them by Henri IV. Their ancient coat—parted

per pale azure and argent, with a dame of the fourteenth century

bearing in her hand a rose, all counterchanged—is carved in wood and

monumental marble on the churches and old houses hereabouts. And from

immemorial antiquity the Buol of Davos has sat thus on Sylvester Abend

with family and folk around him, summoned from alp and snowy field to

drink grampampuli and break the birnen-brod.

These rites performed, the men and maids began to sing—brown arms

lounging on the table, and red hands folded in white aprons—serious at

first in hymn-like cadences, then breaking into wilder measures with a

jodel at the close. There is a measured solemnity in the performance,

which strikes the stranger as somewhat comic. But the singing was good;

the voices strong and clear in tone, no hesitation and no shirking of

the melody. It was clear that the singers enjoyed the music for its own

sake, with half-shut eyes, as they take dancing, solidly, with

deep-drawn breath, sustained and indefatigable. But eleven struck; and

the two Christians, my old friend, and Palmy, said we should be late

for church. They had promised to take me with them to see bell-ringing

in the tower. All the young men of the village meet, and draw lots in

the Stube of the Rathhaus. One party tolls the old year out; the other

rings the new year in. He who comes last is sconced three litres of

Veltliner for the company. This jovial fine was ours to pay to-night.

When we came into the air, we found a bitter frost; the whole sky

clouded over; a north wind whirling snow from alp and forest through

the murky gloom. The benches and 37broad walnut tables of the Bathhaus

were crowded with men, in shaggy homespun of brown and grey frieze. Its

low wooden roof and walls enclosed an atmosphere of smoke, denser than

the external snow-drift. But our welcome was hearty, and we found a

score of friends. Titanic Fopp, whose limbs are Michelangelesque in

length; spectacled Morosani; the little tailor Kramer, with a French

horn on his knees; the puckered forehead of the Baumeister; the

Troll-shaped postman; peasants and woodmen, known on far excursions

upon pass and upland valley. Not one but carried on his face the memory

of winter strife with avalanche and snow-drift, of horses struggling

through Fluela whirlwinds, and wine-casks tugged across Bernina, and

haystacks guided down precipitous gullies at thundering speed 'twixt

pine and pine, and larches felled in distant glens beside the frozen

watercourses. Here we were, all met together for one hour from our

several homes and occupations, to welcome in the year with clinked

glasses and cries of _Prosit Neujahr!_

The tolling bells above us stopped. Our turn had come. Out into the

snowy air we tumbled, beneath the row of wolves' heads that adorn the

pent-house roof. A few steps brought us to the still God's acre, where

the snow lay deep and cold upon high-mounded graves of many

generations. We crossed it silently, bent our heads to the low Gothic

arch, and stood within the tower. It was thick darkness there. But far

above, the bells began again to clash and jangle confusedly, with

volleys of demonic joy. Successive flights of ladders, each ending in a

giddy platform hung across the gloom, climb to the height of some

hundred and fifty feet; and all their rungs were crusted with frozen

snow, deposited by trampling boots. For up and down these stairs,

ascending and descending, moved other than angels—the friezejacketed

38Bürschen, Grisons bears, rejoicing in their exercise, exhilarated

with the tingling noise of beaten metal. We reached the first room

safely, guided by firm-footed Christian, whose one candle just defined

the rough walls and the slippery steps. There we found a band of boys,

pulling ropes that set the bells in motion. But our destination was not

reached. One more aë;rial ladder, perpendicular in darkness, brought us

swiftly to the home of sound. It is a small square chamber, where the

bells are hung, filled with the interlacement of enormous beams, and

pierced to north and south by open windows, from whose parapets I saw

the village and the valley spread beneath. The fierce wind hurried

through it, charged with snow, and its narrow space was thronged with

men. Men on the platform, men on the window-sills, men grappling the

bells with iron arms, men brushing by to reach the stairs, crossing,

recrossing, shouldering their mates, drinking red wine from gigantic

beakers, exploding crackers, firing squibs, shouting and yelling in

corybantic chorus. They yelled and shouted, one could see it by their

open mouths and glittering eyes; but not a sound from human lungs could

reach our ears. The overwhelming incessant thunder of the bells drowned

all. It thrilled the tympanum, ran through the marrow of the spine,

vibrated in the inmost entrails. Yet the brain was only steadied and

excited by this sea of brazen noise. After a few moments I knew the

place and felt at home in it. Then I enjoyed a spectacle which

sculptors might have envied. For they ring the bells in Davos after

this fashion:—The lads below set them going with ropes. The men above

climb in pairs on ladders to the beams from which they are suspended.

Two mighty pine-trees, roughly squared and built into the walls, extend

from side to side across the belfry. Another from which the bells hang,

connects these massive trunks at right 39angles. Just where the central

beam is wedged into the two parallel supports, the ladders reach them

from each side of the belfry, so that, bending from the higher rung of

the ladder, and leaning over, stayed upon the lateral beam, each pair

of men can keep one bell in movement with their hands. Each comrade

plants one leg upon the ladder, and sets the other knee firmly athwart

the horizontal pine. Then round each other's waist they twine left arm

and right. The two have thus become one man. Right arm and left are

free to grasp the bell's horns, sprouting at its crest beneath the

beam. With a grave rhythmic motion, bending sideward in a close

embrace, swaying and returning to their centre from the well-knit

loins, they drive the force of each strong muscle into the vexed bell.

The impact is earnest at first, but soon it becomes frantic. The men

take something from each other of exalted enthusiasm. This efflux of

their combined energies inspires them and exasperates the mighty

resonance of metal which they rule. They are lost in a trance of what

approximates to dervish passion—so thrilling is the surge of sound, so

potent are the rhythms they obey. Men come and tug them by the heels.

One grasps the starting thews upon their calves. Another is impatient

for their place. But they strain still, locked together, and forgetful

of the world. At length they have enough: then slowly, clingingly

unclasp, turn round with gazing eyes, and are resumed, sedately, into

the diurnal round of common life. Another pair is in their room upon

the beam.

The Englishman who saw these things stood looking up, enveloped in his

ulster with the grey cowl thrust upon his forehead, like a monk. One

candle cast a grotesque shadow of him on the plastered wall. And when

his chance came, though he was but a weakling, he too climbed and for

some moments hugged the beam, and felt the madness of the 40swinging

bell. Descending, he wondered long and strangely whether he ascribed

too much of feeling to the men he watched. But no, that was impossible.

There are emotions deeply seated in the joy of exercise, when the body

is brought into play, and masses move in concert, of which the subject

is but half conscious. Music and dance, and the delirium of battle or

the chase, act thus upon spontaneous natures. The mystery of rhythm and

associated energy and blood tingling in sympathy is here. It lies at

the root of man's most tyrannous instinctive impulses.

It was past one when we reached home, and now a meditative man might

well have gone to bed. But no one thinks of sleeping on Sylvester

Abend. So there followed bowls of punch in one friend's room, where

English, French, and Germans blent together in convivial Babel; and

flasks of old Montagner in another. Palmy, at this period, wore an

archdeacon's hat, and smoked a churchwarden's pipe; and neither were

his own, nor did he derive anything ecclesiastical or Anglican from the

association. Late in the morning we must sally forth, they said, and

roam the town. For it is the custom here on New Year's night to greet

acquaintances, and ask for hospitality, and no one may deny these

self-invited guests. We turned out again into the grey snow-swept

gloom, a curious Comus—not at all like Greeks, for we had neither

torches in our hands nor rose-wreaths to suspend upon a lady's

door-posts. And yet I could not refrain, at this supreme moment of

jollity, in the zero temperature, amid my Grisons friends, from humming

to myself verses from the Greek Anthology:—

The die is cast! Nay, light the torch!

I'll take the road! Up, courage, ho!

Why linger pondering in the porch?

Upon Love's revel we will go!

Shake off those fumes of wine! Hang care

And caution! What has Love to do

With prudence? Let the torches flare!

Quick, drown the doubts that hampered you!

Cast weary wisdom to the wind!

One thing, but one alone, I know:

Love bent e'en Jove and made him blind

Upon Love's revel we will go!

41

And then again:—

I've drunk sheer madness! Not with wine,

But old fantastic tales, I'll arm

My heart in heedlessness divine,

And dare the road, nor dream of harm!

I'll join Love's rout! Let thunder break,

Let lightning blast me by the way!

Invulnerable Love shall shake

His ægis o'er my head to-day.

This last epigram was not inappropriate to an invalid about to begin

the fifth act in a roystering night's adventure. And still once more:—

Cold blows the winter wind; 'tis Love,

Whose sweet eyes swim with honeyed tears,

That bears me to thy doors, my love,

Tossed by the storm of hopes and fears.

Cold blows the blast of aching Love;

But be thou for my wandering sail,

Adrift upon these waves of love,

Safe harbour from the whistling gale!

However, upon this occasion, though we had winter-wind enough, and cold

enough, there was not much love in the business. My arm was firmly

clenched in Christian Buol's, and Christian Palmy came behind, trolling

out songs in Italian dialect, with still recurring _canaille_ choruses,

of which the facile rhymes seemed mostly made on a prolonged

42_amu-u-u-r_. It is noticeable that Italian ditties are specially

designed for fellows shouting in the streets at night. They seem in

keeping there, and nowhere else that I could ever see. And these

Davosers took to them naturally when the time for Comus came. It was

between four and five in the morning, and nearly all the houses in the

place were dark. The tall church-tower and spire loomed up above us in

grey twilight. The tireless wind still swept thin snow from fell and

forest. But the frenzied bells had sunk into their twelvemonth's

slumber, which shall be broken only by decorous tollings at less

festive times. I wondered whether they were tingling still with the

heart-throbs and with the pressure of those many arms? Was their old

age warmed, as mine was, with that gust of life—the young men who had

clung to them like bees to lily-bells, and shaken all their locked-up

tone and shrillness into the wild winter air? Alas! how many

generations of the young have handled them; and they are still there,

frozen in their belfry; and the young grow middle-aged, and old, and

die at last; and the bells they grappled in their lust of manhood toll

them to their graves, on which the tireless wind will, winter after

winter, sprinkle snow from alps and forests which they knew.

'There is a light,' cried Christian, 'up in Anna's window!' 'A light! a

light!' the Comus shouted. But how to get at the window, which is

pretty high above the ground, and out of reach of the most ardent

revellers? We search a neighbouring shed, extract a stable-ladder, and

in two seconds Palmy has climbed to the topmost rung, while Christian

and Georg hold it firm upon the snow beneath. Then begins a passage

from some comic opera of Mozart's or Cimarosa's—an escapade familiar to

Spanish or Italian students, which recalls the stage. It is an episode

from 'Don Giovanni,' translated to this dark-etched scene of snowy

hills, and 43Gothic tower, and mullioned windows deep embayed beneath

their eaves and icicles. _Deh vieni alla finestra!_ sings

Palmy-Leporello; the chorus answers: _Deh vieni! Perchè non vieni

ancora?_ pleads Leporello; the chorus shouts: _Perchè? Mio amu-u-u-r_,

sighs Leporello; and Echo cries, _amu-u-u-r!_ All the wooing, be it

noticed, is conducted in Italian. But the actors murmur to each other

in Davoser Deutsch, 'She won't come, Palmy! It is far too late; she is

gone to bed. Come down; you'll wake the village with your

caterwauling!' But Leporello waves his broad archdeacon's hat, and

resumes a flood of flexible Bregaglian. He has a shrewd suspicion that

the girl is peeping from behind the window curtain; and tells us,

bending down from the ladder, in a hoarse stage-whisper, that we must

have patience; 'these girls are kittle cattle, who take long to draw:

but if your lungs last out, they're sure to show.' And Leporello is

right. Faint heart ne'er won fair lady. From the summit of his ladder,

by his eloquent Italian tongue, he brings the shy bird down at last. We

hear the unbarring of the house door, and a comely maiden, in her

Sunday dress, welcomes us politely to her ground-floor sitting-room.

The Comus enters, in grave order, with set speeches, handshakes, and

inevitable _Prosits_! It is a large low chamber, with a huge stone

stove, wide benches fixed along the walls, and a great oval table. We

sit how and where we can. Red wine is produced, and eier-brod and

küchli. 44Fräulein Anna serves us sedately, holding her own with decent

self-respect against the inrush of the revellers. She is quite alone;

but are not her father and mother in bed above, and within earshot?

Besides, the Comus, even at this abnormal hour and after an abnormal

night, is well conducted. Things seem slipping into a decorous

wine-party, when Leporello readjusts the broad-brimmed hat upon his

head, and very cleverly acts a little love-scene for our benefit.

Fräulein Anna takes this as a delicate compliment, and the thing is so

prettily done in truth, that not the sternest taste could be offended.

Meanwhile another party of night-wanderers, attracted by our mirth,

break in. More _Prosits_ and clinked glasses follow; and with a fair

good-morning to our hostess, we retire.

It is too late to think of bed. 'The quincunx of heaven,' as Sir Thomas

Browne phrased it on a dissimilar occasion, 'runs low.... The huntsmen

are up in America; and not in America only, for the huntsmen, if there

are any this night in Graubünden, have long been out upon the snow, and

the stable-lads are dragging the sledges from their sheds to carry down

the mails to Landquart. We meet the porters from the various hotels,

bringing letter-bags and luggage to the post. It is time to turn in and

take a cup of black coffee against the rising sun.

IX

Some nights, even in Davos, are spent, even by an invalid, in bed. A

leaflet, therefore, of 'Sleep-chasings' may not inappropriately be

flung, as envoy to so many wanderings on foot and sledge upon the

winter snows.

The first is a confused medley of things familiar and things strange. I

have been dreaming of far-away old German towns, with gabled houses

deep in snow; dreaming of châlets in forgotten Alpine glens, where

wood-cutters come plunging into sleepy light from gloom, and sinking

down beside the stove to shake the drift from their rough shoulders;

dreaming of vast veils of icicles upon the gaunt black rocks in places

where no foot of man will pass, and where the snow is weaving eyebrows

over the ledges of grey whirlwind-beaten precipices; dreaming of

Venice, forlorn beneath the windy drip of rain, the gas lamps

flickering on the swimming piazzetta, the barche 45idle, the gondolier

wrapped in his thread-bare cloak, alone; dreaming of Apennines, with

world-old cities, brown, above the brown sea of dead chestnut boughs;

dreaming of stormy tides, and watchers aloft in lighthouses when day is

finished; dreaming of dead men and women and dead children in the

earth, far down beneath the snow-drifts, six feet deep. And then I lift

my face, awaking, from my pillow; the pallid moon is on the valley, and

the room is filled with spectral light.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. This is a hospice in an unfrequented

pass, between sad peaks, beside a little black lake, overdrifted with

soft snow. I pass into the house-room, gliding silently. An old man and

an old woman are nodding, bowed in deepest slumber, by the stove. A

young man plays the zither on a table. He lifts his head, still

modulating with his fingers on the strings. He looks right through me

with wide anxious eyes. He does not see me, but sees Italy, I know, and

some one wandering on a sandy shore.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. This is S. Stephen's Church in Wien.

Inside, the lamps are burning dimly in the choir. There is fog in the

aisles; but through the sleepy air and over the red candles flies a

wild soprano's voice, a boy's soul in its singing sent to heaven.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. From the mufflers in which his father,

the mountebank, has wrapped the child, to carry him across the heath, a

little tumbling-boy emerges in soiled tights. He is half asleep. His

father scrapes the fiddle. The boy shortens his red belt, kisses his

fingers to us, and ties himself into a knot among the glasses on the

table.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. I am on the parapet of a huge circular

tower, hollow like a well, and pierced with windows at irregular

intervals. The parapet is broad, and 46slabbed with red Verona marble.

Around me are athletic men, all naked, in the strangest attitudes of

studied rest, down-gazing, as I do, into the depths below. There comes

a confused murmur of voices, and the tower is threaded and rethreaded

with great cables. Up these there climb to us a crowd of young men,

clinging to the ropes and flinging their bodies sideways on aë;rial

trapezes. My heart trembles with keen joy and terror. For nowhere else

could plastic forms be seen more beautiful, and nowhere else is peril

more apparent. Leaning my chin upon the utmost verge, I wait. I watch

one youth, who smiles and soars to me; and when his face is almost

touching mine, he speaks, but what he says I know not.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. The whole world rocks to its

foundations. The mountain summits that I know are shaken. They bow

their bristling crests. They are falling, falling on us, and the earth

is riven. I wake in terror, shouting: INSOLITIS TREMUERUNT MOTIBUS

ALPES! An earthquake, slight but real, has stirred the ever-wakeful

Vesta of the brain to this Virgilian quotation.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. Once more at night I sledge alone upon

the Klosters road. It is the point where the woods close over it and

moonlight may not pierce the boughs. There come shrill cries of many

voices from behind, and rushings that pass by and vanish. Then on their

sledges I behold the phantoms of the dead who died in Davos, longing

for their homes; and each flies past me, shrieking in the still cold

air; and phosphorescent like long meteors, the pageant turns the

windings of the road below and disappears.

I sleep, and change my dreaming. This is the top of some high mountain,

where the crags are cruelly tortured and cast in enormous splinters on

the ledges of cliffs grey with old-world ice. A ravine, opening at my

feet, plunges 47down immeasurably to a dim and distant sea. Above me

soars a precipice embossed with a gigantic ice-bound shape. As I gaze

thereon, I find the lineaments and limbs of a Titanic man chained and

nailed to the rock. His beard has grown for centuries, and flowed this

way and that, adown his breast and over to the stone on either side;

and the whole of him is covered with a greenish ice, ancient beyond the

memory of man. 'This is Prometheus,' I whisper to myself, 'and I am

alone on Caucasus.'

48

BACCHUS IN GRAUBÜNDEN

I

Some years' residence in the Canton of the Grisons made me familiar

with all sorts of Valtelline wine; with masculine but rough _Inferno_,

generous _Forzato_, delicate _Sassella_, harsher _Montagner_, the

raspberry flavour of _Grumello_, the sharp invigorating twang of

_Villa_. The colour, ranging from garnet to almandine or ruby, told me

the age and quality of wine; and I could judge from the crust it forms

upon the bottle, whether it had been left long enough in wood to ripen.

I had furthermore arrived at the conclusion that the best Valtelline

can only be tasted in cellars of the Engadine or Davos, where this

vintage matures slowly in the mountain air, and takes a flavour unknown

at lower levels. In a word, it had amused my leisure to make or think

myself a connoisseur. My literary taste was tickled by the praise

bestowed in the Augustan age on Rhætic grapes by Virgil:

Et quo te carmine dicam,

Rhætica? nec cellis ideo contende Falernis.

I piqued myself on thinking that could the poet but have drank one

bottle at Samaden—where Stilicho, by the way, in his famous recruiting

expedition may perhaps have drank it—he would have been less chary in

his panegyric. For the point of inferiority on which he seems to

insist, namely, that Valtelline wine does not keep well in cellar, is

only proper to this vintage in Italian climate.

49Such meditations led my fancy on the path of history. Is there truth,

then, in the dim tradition that this mountain land was colonised by

Etruscans? Is _Ras_ the root of Rhætia? The Etruscans were accomplished

wine-growers, we know. It was their Montepulciano which drew the Gauls

to Rome, if Livy can be trusted. Perhaps they first planted the vine in

Valtelline. Perhaps its superior culture in that district may be due to

ancient use surviving in a secluded Alpine valley. One thing is

certain, that the peasants of Sondrio and Tirano understand viticulture

better than the Italians of Lombardy.

Then my thoughts ran on to the period of modern history, when the

Grisons seized the Valtelline in lieu of war-pay from the Dukes of

Milan. For some three centuries they held it as a subject province.

From the Rathhaus at Davos or Chur they sent their nobles—Von Salis and

Buol, Planta and Sprecher von Bernegg—across the hills as governors or

podestàs to Poschiavo, Sondrio, Tirano, and Morbegno. In those old days

the Valtelline wines came duly every winter over snow-deep passes to

fill the cellars of the Signori Grigioni. That quaint traveller Tom

Coryat, in his so-called 'Crudities,' notes the custom early in the

seventeenth century. And as that custom then obtained, it still

subsists with little alteration. The wine-carriers—Weinführer, as they

are called—first scaled the Bernina pass, halting then as now, perhaps

at Poschiavo and Pontresina. Afterwards, in order to reach Davos, the

pass of the Scaletta rose before them—a wilderness of untracked

snow-drifts. The country-folk still point to narrow, light

hand-sledges, on which the casks were charged before the last pitch of

the pass. Some wine came, no doubt, on pack-saddles. A meadow in front

of the Dischma-Thal, where the pass ends, still bears the name of the

Ross-Weid, or horse-pasture. It was here that the beasts 50of burden

used for this wine-service, rested after their long labours. In

favourable weather the whole journey from Tirano would have occupied at

least four days, with scanty halts at night.

The Valtelline slipped from the hands of the Grisons early in this

century. It is rumoured that one of the Von Salis family negotiated

matters with Napoleon more for his private benefit than for the

interests of the state. However this may have been, when the Graubünden

became a Swiss Canton, after four centuries of sovereign independence,

the whole Valtelline passed to Austria, and so eventually to Italy.

According to modern and just notions of nationality, this was right. In

their period of power, the Grisons masters had treated their Italian

dependencies with harshness. The Valtelline is an Italian valley,

connected with the rest of the peninsula by ties of race and language.

It is, moreover, geographically linked to Italy by the great stream of

the Adda, which takes its rise upon the Stelvio, and after passing

through the Lake of Como, swells the volume of the Po.

But, though politically severed from the Valtelline, the Engadiners and

Davosers have not dropped their old habit of importing its best

produce. What they formerly levied as masters, they now acquire by

purchase. The Italian revenue derives a large profit from the frontier

dues paid at the gate between Tirano and Poschiavo on the Bernina road.

Much of the same wine enters Switzerland by another route, travelling

from Sondrio to Chiavenna and across the Splügen. But until quite

recently, the wine itself could scarcely be found outside the Canton.

It was indeed quoted upon Lombard wine-lists. Yet no one drank it; and

when I tasted it at Milan, I found it quite unrecognisable. The fact

seems to be that the Graubündeners alone know how to 51deal with it;

and, as I have hinted, the wine requires a mountain climate for its

full development.

II

The district where the wine of Valtellina is grown extends, roughly

speaking, from Tirano to Morbegno, a distance of some fifty-four miles.

The best sorts come from the middle of this region. High up in the

valley, soil and climate are alike less favourable. Low down a coarser,

earthier quality springs from fat land where the valley broadens. The

northern hillsides to a very considerable height above the river are

covered with vineyards. The southern slopes on the left bank of the

Adda, lying more in shade, yield but little. Inferno, Grumello, and

Perla di Sassella are the names of famous vineyards. Sassella is the

general name for a large tract. Buying an Inferno, Grumello, or Perla

di Sassella wine, it would be absurd to suppose that one obtained it

precisely from the eponymous estate. But as each of these vineyards

yields a marked quality of wine, which is taken as standard-giving, the

produce of the whole district may be broadly classified as approaching

more or less nearly to one of these accepted types. The Inferno,

Grumello, and Perla di Sassella of commerce are therefore three sorts

of good Valtelline, ticketed with famous names to indicate certain

differences of quality. Montagner, as the name implies, is a somewhat

lighter wine, grown higher up in the hill-vineyards. And of this class

there are many species, some approximating to Sassella in delicacy of

flavour, others approaching the tart lightness of the Villa vintage.

This last takes its title from a village in the neighbourhood of

Tirano, where a table-wine is chiefly grown.

Forzato is the strongest, dearest, longest-lived of this 52whole family

of wines. It is manufactured chiefly at Tirano; and, as will be

understood from its name, does not profess to belong to any one of the

famous localities. Forzato or Sforzato, forced or enforced, is in fact

a wine which has undergone a more artificial process. In German the

people call it Strohwein, which also points to the method of its

preparation. The finest grapes are selected and dried in the sun (hence

the _Stroh_) for a period of eight or nine weeks. When they have almost

become raisins, they are pressed. The must is heavily charged with

sugar, and ferments powerfully. Wine thus made requires several years

to ripen. Sweet at first, it takes at last a very fine quality and

flavour, and is rough, almost acid, on the tongue. Its colour too turns

from a deep rich crimson to the tone of tawny port, which indeed it

much resembles.

Old Forzato, which has been long in cask, and then perhaps three years

in bottle, will fetch at least six francs, or may rise to even ten

francs a flask. The best Sassella rarely reaches more than five francs.

Good Montagner and Grumello can be had perhaps for four francs; and

Inferno of a special quality for six francs. Thus the average price of

old Valtelline wine may be taken as five francs a bottle. These, I

should observe, are hotel prices.

Valtelline wines bought in the wood vary, of course, according to their

age and year of vintage. I have found that from 2.50 fr. to 3.50 fr.

per litre is a fair price for sorts fit to bottle. The new wine of 1881

sold in the following winter at prices varying from 1.05 fr. to 1.80

fr. per litre.

It is customary for the Graubünden wine-merchants to buy up the whole

produce of a vineyard from the peasants at the end of the vintage. They

go in person or depute their agents to inspect the wine, make their

bargains, and seal the cellars where the wine is stored. Then, when the

snow has 53fallen, their own horses with sleighs and trusted servants

go across the passes to bring it home. Generally they have some local

man of confidence at Tirano, the starting-point for the homeward

journey, who takes the casks up to that place and sees them duly

charged. Merchants of old standing maintain relations with the same

peasants, taking their wine regularly; so that from Lorenz Gredig at

Pontresina or Andreas Gredig at Davos Dörfli, from Fanconi at Samaden,

or from Giacomi at Chiavenna, special qualities of wine, the produce of

certain vineyards, are to be obtained. Up to the present time this wine

trade has been conducted with simplicity and honesty by both the

dealers and the growers. One chief merit of Valtelline wine is that it

is pure. How long so desirable a state of things will survive the slow

but steady development of an export business may be questioned.

III

With so much practical and theoretical interest in the produce of the

Valtelline to stimulate my curiosity, I determined to visit the

district at the season when the wine was leaving it. It was the winter

of 1881-82, a winter of unparalleled beauty in the high Alps. Day

succeeded day without a cloud. Night followed night with steady stars,

gliding across clear mountain ranges and forests of dark pines

unstirred by wind. I could not hope for a more prosperous season; and

indeed I made such use of it, that between the months of January and

March I crossed six passes of the Alps in open sleighs—the Fluela

Bernina, Splügen, Julier, Maloja, and Albula—with less difficulty and

discomfort in mid-winter than the traveller may often find on them in

June.

At the end of January, my friend Christian and I left Davos long before

the sun was up, and ascended for four 54hours through the interminable

snow-drifts of the Fluela in a cold grey shadow. The sun's light seemed

to elude us. It ran along the ravine through which we toiled; dipped

down to touch the topmost pines above our heads; rested in golden calm

upon the Schiahorn at our back; capriciously played here and there

across the Weisshorn on our left, and made the precipices of the

Schwartzhorn glitter on our right. But athwart our path it never fell

until we reached the very summit of the pass. Then we passed quietly

into the full glory of the winter morning—a tranquil flood of sunbeams,

pouring through air of crystalline purity, frozen and motionless. White

peaks and dark brown rocks soared up, cutting a sky of almost purple

blueness. A stillness that might be felt brooded over the whole world;

but in that stillness there was nothing sad, no suggestion of suspended

vitality. It was the stillness rather of untroubled health, of strength

omnipotent but unexerted.

From the Hochspitz of the Fluela the track plunges at one bound into

the valley of the Inn, following a narrow cornice carved from the

smooth bank of snow, and hung, without break or barrier, a thousand

feet or more above the torrent. The summer road is lost in snow-drifts.

The galleries built as a protection from avalanches, which sweep in

rivers from those grim, bare fells above, are blocked with snow. Their

useless arches yawn, as we glide over or outside them, by paths which

instinct in our horse and driver traces. As a fly may creep along a

house-roof, slanting downwards we descend. One whisk from the swinged

tail of an avalanche would hurl us, like a fly, into the ruin of the

gaping gorge. But this season little snow has fallen on the higher

hills; and what still lies there, is hard frozen. Therefore we have no

fear, as we whirl fast and faster from the snow-fields into the black

forests of gnarled cembras and wind-wearied pines. Then 55Süss is

reached, where the Inn hurries its shallow waters clogged with

ice-floes through a sleepy hamlet. The stream is pure and green; for

the fountains of the glaciers are locked by winter frosts; and only

clear rills from perennial sources swell its tide. At Süss we lost the

sun, and toiled in garish gloom and silence, nipped by the

ever-deepening cold of evening, upwards for four hours to Samaden.

The next day was spent in visiting the winter colony at San Moritz,

where the Kulm Hotel, tenanted by some twenty guests, presented in its

vastness the appearance of a country-house. One of the prettiest spots

in the world is the ice-rink, fashioned by the skill of Herr Caspar

Badrutt on a high raised terrace, commanding the valley of the Inn and

the ponderous bulwarks of Bernina. The silhouettes of skaters, defined

against that landscape of pure white, passed to and fro beneath a

cloudless sky. Ladies sat and worked or read on seats upon the ice. Not

a breath of wind was astir, and warm beneficent sunlight flooded the

immeasurable air. Only, as the day declined, some iridescent films

overspread the west; and just above Maloja the apparition of a mock

sun—a well-defined circle of opaline light, broken at regular intervals

by four globes—seemed to portend a change of weather. This forecast

fortunately proved delusive. We drove back to Samaden across the silent

snow, enjoying those delicate tints of rose and violet and saffron

which shed enchantment for one hour over the white monotony of Alpine

winter.

At half-past eight next morning, the sun was rising from behind Pitz

Languard, as we crossed the Inn and drove through Pontresina in the

glorious light, with all its huge hotels quite empty and none but a few

country-folk abroad. Those who only know the Engadine in summer have

little conception of its beauty. Winter softens the hard details of

bare rock, and rounds the melancholy grassless mountain 56flanks,

suspending icicles to every ledge and spangling the curved surfaces of

snow with crystals. The landscape gains in purity, and, what sounds

unbelievable, in tenderness. Nor does it lose in grandeur. Looking up

the valley of the Morteratsch that morning, the glaciers were

distinguishable in hues of green and sapphire through their veil of

snow; and the highest peaks soared in a transparency of amethystine

light beneath a blue sky traced with filaments of windy cloud. Some

storm must have disturbed the atmosphere in Italy, for fan-shaped mists

frothed out around the sun, and curled themselves above the mountains

in fine feathery wreaths, melting imperceptibly into air, until, when

we had risen above the cembras, the sky was one deep solid blue.

All that upland wilderness is lovelier now than in the summer; and on

the morning of which I write, the air itself was far more summery than

I have ever known it in the Engadine in August. We could scarcely bear

to place our hands upon the woodwork of the sleigh because of the

fierce sun's heat. And yet the atmosphere was crystalline with windless

frost. As though to increase the strangeness of these contrasts, the

pavement of beaten snow was stained with red drops spilt from

wine-casks which pass over it.

The chief feature of the Bernina—what makes it a dreary pass enough in

summer, but infinitely beautiful in winter—is its breadth; illimitable

undulations of snow-drifts; immensity of open sky; unbroken lines of

white, descending in smooth curves from glittering ice-peaks.

A glacier hangs in air above the frozen lakes, with all its green-blue

ice-cliffs glistening in intensest light. Pitz Palu shoots aloft like

sculptured marble, delicately veined with soft aë;rial shadows of

translucent blue. At the summit of the pass all Italy seems to burst

upon the eyes in those steep serried ranges, with their craggy crests,

violet-hued in noonday 57sunshine, as though a bloom of plum or grape

had been shed over them, enamelling their jagged precipices.

The top of the Bernina is not always thus in winter. It has a bad

reputation for the fury of invading storms, when falling snow hurtles

together with snow scooped from the drifts in eddies, and the weltering

white sea shifts at the will of whirlwinds. The Hospice then may be

tenanted for days together by weather-bound wayfarers; and a line drawn

close beneath its roof shows how two years ago the whole building was

buried in one snow-shroud. This morning we lounged about the door,

while our horses rested and postillions and carters pledged one another

in cups of new Veltliner.

The road takes an awful and sudden dive downwards, quite irrespective

of the carefully engineered post-track. At this season the path is

badly broken into ruts and chasms by the wine traffic. In some places

it was indubitably perilous: a narrow ledge of mere ice skirting thinly

clad hard-frozen banks of snow, which fell precipitately sideways for

hundreds of sheer feet. We did not slip over this parapet, though we

were often within an inch of doing so. Had our horse stumbled, it is

not probable that I should have been writing this.

When we came to the galleries which defend the road from avalanches, we

saw ahead of us a train of over forty sledges ascending, all charged

with Valtelline wine. Our postillions drew up at the inner side of the

gallery, between massive columns of the purest ice dependent from the

rough-hewn roof and walls of rock. A sort of open _loggia_ on the

farther side framed vignettes of the Valtelline mountains in their hard

cerulean shadows and keen sunlight. Between us and the view defiled the

wine-sledges; and as each went by, the men made us drink out of their

_trinketti_. These are oblong, hexagonal wooden kegs, holding about

fourteen litres, 58which the carter fills with wine before he leaves

the Valtelline, to cheer him on the homeward journey. You raise it in

both hands, and when the bung has been removed, allow the liquor to

flow stream-wise down your throat. It was a most extraordinary Bacchic

procession—a pomp which, though undreamed of on the banks of the

Ilissus, proclaimed the deity of Dionysos in authentic fashion.

Struggling horses, grappling at the ice-bound floor with sharp-spiked

shoes; huge, hoarse drivers, some clad in sheepskins from Italian

valleys, some brown as bears in rough Graubünden homespun; casks,

dropping their spilth of red wine on the snow; greetings, embracings;

patois of Bergamo, Romansch, and German roaring around the low-browed

vaults and tingling ice pillars; pourings forth of libations of the new

strong Valtelline on breasts and beards;—the whole made up a scene of

stalwart jollity and manful labour such as I have nowhere else in such

wild circumstances witnessed. Many Davosers were there, the men of

Andreas Gredig, Valär, and so forth; and all of these, on greeting

Christian, forced us to drain a _Schluck_ from their unmanageable

cruses. Then on they went, crying, creaking, struggling, straining

through the corridor, which echoed deafeningly, the gleaming crystals

of those hard Italian mountains in their winter raiment building a

background of still beauty to the savage Bacchanalian riot of the team.

How little the visitors who drink Valtelline wine at S. Moritz or Davos

reflect by what strange ways it reaches them. A sledge can scarcely be

laden with more than one cask of 300 litres on the ascent; and this

cask, according to the state of the road, has many times to be shifted

from wheels to runners and back again before the journey is

accomplished. One carter will take charge of two horses, and

consequently of two sledges and two casks, driving them both by voice

and gesture rather than by rein. When they leave the Valtelline, 59the

carters endeavour, as far as possible, to take the pass in gangs, lest

bad weather or an accident upon the road should overtake them singly.

At night they hardly rest three hours, and rarely think of sleeping,

but spend the time in drinking and conversation. The horses are fed and

littered; but for them too the night-halt is little better than a

baiting-time. In fair weather the passage of the mountain is not

difficult, though tiring. But woe to men and beasts alike if they

encounter storms! Not a few perish in the passes; and it frequently

happens that their only chance is to unyoke the horses and leave the

sledges in a snow-wreath, seeking for themselves such shelter as may

possibly be gained, frost-bitten, after hours of battling with

impermeable drifts. The wine is frozen into one solid mass of rosy ice

before it reaches Pontresina. This does not hurt the young vintage, but

it is highly injurious to wine of some years' standing. The perils of

the journey are aggravated by the savage temper of the drivers.

Jealousies between the natives of rival districts spring up; and there

are men alive who have fought the whole way down from Fluela Hospice to

Davos Platz with knives and stones, hammers and hatchets, wooden staves

and splintered cart-wheels, staining the snow with blood, and bringing

broken pates, bruised limbs, and senseless comrades home to their women

to be tended.

Bacchus Alpinus shepherded his train away from us to northward, and we

passed forth into noonday from the gallery. It then seemed clear that

both conductor and postillion were sufficiently merry. The plunge they

took us down those frozen parapets, with shriek and _jauchzen_ and

cracked whips, was more than ever dangerous. Yet we reached La Rosa

safely. This is a lovely solitary spot, beside a rushing stream, among

grey granite boulders grown with spruce and rhododendron: a veritable

rose of Sharon 60blooming in the desert. The wastes of the Bernina

stretch above, and round about are leaguered some of the most

forbidding sharp-toothed peaks I ever saw. Onwards, across the silent

snow, we glided in immitigable sunshine, through opening valleys and

pine-woods, past the robber-huts of Pisciadella, until at evenfall we

rested in the roadside inn at Poschiavo.

IV

The snow-path ended at Poschiavo; and when, as usual, we started on our

journey next day at sunrise, it was in a carriage upon wheels. Yet even

here we were in full midwinter. Beyond Le Prese the lake presented one

sheet of smooth black ice, reflecting every peak and chasm of the

mountains, and showing the rocks and water-weeds in the clear green

depths below. The glittering floor stretched away for acres of

untenanted expanse, with not a skater to explore those dark mysterious

coves, or strike across the slanting sunlight poured from clefts in the

impendent hills. Inshore the substance of the ice sparkled here and

there with iridescence like the plumelets of a butterfly's wing under

the microscope, wherever light happened to catch the jagged or oblique

flaws that veined its solid crystal.

From the lake the road descends suddenly for a considerable distance

through a narrow gorge, following a torrent which rushes among granite

boulders. Chestnut trees begin to replace the pines. The sunnier

terraces are planted with tobacco, and at a lower level vines appear at

intervals in patches. One comes at length to a great red gate across

the road, which separates Switzerland from Italy, and where the export

dues on wine are paid. The Italian custom-house is romantically perched

above the torrent. Two courteous and elegant _finanzieri_, mere boys,

were sitting wrapped in 61their military cloaks and reading novels in

the sun as we drove up. Though they made some pretence of examining the

luggage, they excused themselves with sweet smiles and apologetic

eyes—it was a disagreeable duty!

A short time brought us to the first village in the Valtelline, where

the road bifurcates northward to Bormio and the Stelvio pass, southward

to Sondrio and Lombardy. It is a little hamlet, known by the name of La

Madonna di Tirano, having grown up round a pilgrimage church of great

beauty, with tall Lombard bell-tower, pierced with many tiers of

pilastered windows, ending in a whimsical spire, and dominating a

fantastic cupola building of the earlier Renaissance. Taken altogether,

this is a charming bit of architecture, picturesquely set beneath the

granite snow-peaks of the Valtelline. The church, they say, was raised

at Madonna's own command to stay the tide of heresy descending from the

Engadine; and in the year 1620, the bronze statue of S. Michael, which

still spreads wide its wings above the cupola, looked down upon the

massacre of six hundred Protestants and foreigners, commanded by the

patriot Jacopo Robustelli.

From Madonna the road leads up the valley through a narrow avenue of

poplar-trees to the town of Tirano. We were now in the district where

Forzato is made, and every vineyard had a name and history. In Tirano

we betook ourself to the house of an old acquaintance of the Buol

family, Bernardo da Campo, or, as the Graubündeners call him, Bernard

Campbèll. We found him at dinner with his son and grandchildren in a

vast, dark, bare Italian chamber. It would be difficult to find a more

typical old Scotchman of the Lowlands than he looked, with his clean

close-shaven face, bright brown eyes, and snow-white hair escaping from

a broad-brimmed hat. He might have sat to a painter for 62some

Covenanter's portrait, except that there was nothing dour about him, or

for an illustration to Burns's 'Cotter's Saturday Night.' The air of

probity and canniness combined with a twinkle of dry humour was

completely Scotch; and when he tapped his snuff-box, telling stories of

old days, I could not refrain from asking him about his pedigree. It

should be said that there is a considerable family of Campèlls or

Campbèlls in the Graubünden, who are fabled to deduce their stock from

a Scotch Protestant of Zwingli's time; and this made it irresistible to

imagine that in our friend Bernardo I had chanced upon a notable

specimen of atavism. All he knew, however, was, that his first ancestor

had been a foreigner, who came across the mountains to Tirano two

centuries ago.[3]

[3] The Grisons surname Campèll may derive from the Romansch Campo

Bello. The founder of the house was one Kaspar Campèll, who in the

first half of the sixteenth century preached the Reformed religion in

the Engadine.

This old gentleman is a considerable wine-dealer. He sent us with his

son, Giacomo, on a long journey underground through his cellars, where

we tasted several sorts of Valtelline, especially the new Forzato, made

a few weeks since, which singularly combines sweetness with strength,

and both with a slight effervescence. It is certainly the sort of wine

wherewith to tempt a Polyphemus, and not unapt to turn a giant's head.

Leaving Tirano, and once more passing through the poplars by Madonna,

we descended the valley all along the vineyards of Villa and the vast

district of Sassella. Here and there, at wayside inns, we stopped to

drink a glass of some particular vintage; and everywhere it seemed as

though god Bacchus were at home. The whole valley on the right side of

the Adda is one gigantic vineyard, climbing the hills in tiers 63and

terraces, which justify its Italian epithet of _Teatro di Bacco_. The

rock is a greyish granite, assuming sullen brown and orange tints where

exposed to sun and weather. The vines are grown on stakes, not

trellised over trees or carried across boulders, as is the fashion at

Chiavenna or Terlan. Yet every advantage of the mountain is adroitly

used; nooks and crannies being specially preferred, where the sun's

rays are deflected from hanging cliffs. The soil seems deep, and is of

a dull yellow tone. When the vines end, brushwood takes up the growth,

which expires at last in crag and snow. Some alps and chalets, dimly

traced against the sky, are evidences that a pastoral life prevails

above the vineyards. Pan there stretches the pine-thyrsus down to

vine-garlanded Dionysos.

The Adda flows majestically among willows in the midst, and the valley

is nearly straight. The prettiest spot, perhaps, is at Tresenda or S.

Giacomo, where a pass from Edolo and Brescia descends from the southern

hills. But the Valtelline has no great claim to beauty of scenery. Its

chief town, Sondrio, where we supped and drank some special wine called

_il vino de' Signori Grigioni_, has been modernised in dull Italian

fashion.

V

The hotel at Sondrio, La Maddalena, was in carnival uproar of masquers,

topers, and musicians all night through. It was as much as we could do

to rouse the sleepy servants and get a cup of coffee ere we started in

the frozen dawn. 'Verfluchte Maddalena!' grumbled Christian as he

shouldered our portmanteaus and bore them in hot haste to the post.

Long experience only confirms the first impression, that, of all cold,

the cold of an Italian winter is most penetrating. As we lumbered out

of Sondrio in a heavy diligence, I could 64have fancied myself back

once again at Radicofani or among the Ciminian hills. The frost was

penetrating. Fur-coats would not keep it out; and we longed to be once

more in open sledges on Bernina rather than enclosed in that cold

coupé. Now we passed Grumello, the second largest of the renowned vine

districts; and always keeping the white mass of Monte di Disgrazia in

sight, rolled at last into Morbegno. Here the Valtelline vintage

properly ends, though much of the ordinary wine is probably supplied

from the inferior produce of these fields. It was past noon when we

reached Colico, and saw the Lake of Como glittering in sunlight,

dazzling cloaks of snow on all the mountains, which look as dry and

brown as dead beech-leaves at this season. Our Bacchic journey had

reached its close; and it boots not here to tell in detail how we made

our way across the Splügen, piercing its avalanches by low-arched

galleries scooped from the solid snow, and careering in our sledges

down perpendicular snow-fields, which no one who has crossed that pass

from the Italian side in winter will forget. We left the refuge station

at the top together with a train of wine-sledges, and passed them in

the midst of the wild descent. Looking back, I saw two of their horses

stumble in the plunge and roll headlong over. Unluckily in one of these

somersaults a man was injured. Flung ahead into the snow by the first

lurch, the sledge and wine-cask crossed him like a garden-roller. Had

his bed not been of snow, he must have been crushed to death; and as it

was, he presented a woeful appearance when he afterwards arrived at

Splügen.

VI

Though not strictly connected with the subject of this paper, I shall

conclude these notes of winter wanderings in 65the high Alps with an

episode which illustrates their curious vicissitudes.

It was late in the month of March, and nearly all the mountain roads

were open for wheeled vehicles. A carriage and four horses came to meet

us at the termination of a railway journey in Bagalz. We spent one day

in visiting old houses of the Grisons aristocracy at Mayenfeld and

Zizers, rejoicing in the early sunshine, which had spread the fields

with spring flowers—primroses and oxlips, violets, anemones, and bright

blue squills. At Chur we slept, and early next morning started for our

homeward drive to Davos. Bad weather had declared itself in the night.

It blew violently, and the rain soon changed to snow, frozen by a

bitter north blast. Crossing the dreary heath of Lenz was both

magnificent and dreadful. By the time we reached Wiesen, all the

forests were laden with snow, the roads deep in snow-drifts, the whole

scene wintrier than it had been the winter through.

At Wiesen we should have stayed, for evening was fast setting in. But

in ordinary weather it is only a two hours drive from Wiesen to Davos.

Our coachman made no objections to resuming the journey, and our four

horses had but a light load to drag. So we telegraphed for supper to be

prepared, and started between five and six.

A deep gorge has to be traversed, where the torrent cleaves its way

between jaws of limestone precipices. The road is carried along ledges

and through tunnels in the rock. Avalanches, which sweep this passage

annually from the hills above, give it the name of Züge, or the

Snow-Paths. As we entered the gorge darkness fell, the horses dragged

more heavily, and it soon became evident that our Tyrolese driver was

hopelessly drunk. He nearly upset us twice by taking sharp turns in the

road, banged the carriage against telegraph 66posts and jutting rocks,

shaved the very verge of the torrent in places where there was no

parapet, and, what was worst of all, refused to leave his box without a

fight. The darkness by this time was all but total, and a blinding

snow-storm swept howling through the ravine. At length we got the

carriage to a dead-stop, and floundered out in deep wet snow toward

some wooden huts where miners in old days made their habitation. The

place, by a curious, perhaps unconscious irony, is called Hoffnungsau,

or the Meadow of Hope. Indeed, it is not ill named; for many wanderers,

escaping, as we did, from the dreadful gorge of Avalanches on a stormy

night, may have felt, as we now felt, their hope reviving when they

reached this shelter.

There was no light; nothing above, beneath, around, on any side, but

tearing tempest and snow whirled through the ravine. The horses were

taken out of the carriage; on their way to the stable, which

fortunately in these mountain regions will be always found beside the

poorest habitation, one of them fell back across a wall and nearly

broke his spine. Hoffnungsau is inhabited all through the year. In its

dismal dark kitchen we found a knot of workmen gathered together, and

heard there were two horses on the premises besides our own. It then

occurred to us that we might accomplish the rest of the journey with

such sledges as they bring the wood on from the hills in winter, if

coal-boxes or boxes of any sort could be provided. These should be

lashed to the sledges and filled with hay. We were only four persons;

my wife and a friend should go in one, myself and my little girl in the

other. No sooner thought of than put into practice. These original

conveyances were improvised, and after two hours' halt on the Meadow of

Hope, we all set forth again at half-past eight.

I have rarely felt anything more piercing than the grim 67cold of that

journey. We crawled at a foot's pace through changeful snow-drifts. The

road was obliterated, and it was my duty to keep a petroleum

stable-lamp swinging to illuminate the untracked wilderness. My little

girl was snugly nested in the hay, and sound asleep with a deep white

covering of snow above her. Meanwhile, the drift clave in frozen masses

to our faces, lashed by a wind so fierce and keen that it was difficult

to breathe it. My forehead-bone ached, as though with neuralgia, from

the mere mask of icy snow upon it, plastered on with frost. Nothing

could be seen but millions of white specks, whirled at us in eddying

concentric circles. Not far from the entrance to the village we met our

house-folk out with lanterns to look for us. It was past eleven at

night when at last we entered warm rooms and refreshed ourselves for

the tiring day with a jovial champagne supper. Horses, carriage, and

drunken driver reached home next morning.

68

OLD TOWNS OF PROVENCE

Travellers journeying southward from Paris first meet with olive-trees

near Montdragon or Monsélimart—little towns, with old historic names,

upon the road to Orange. It is here that we begin to feel ourselves

within the land of Provence, where the Romans found a second Italy, and

where the autumn of their antique civilisation was followed, almost

without an intermediate winter of barbarism, by the light and delicate

springtime of romance. Orange itself is full of Rome. Indeed, the ghost

of the dead empire seems there to be more real and living than the

actual flesh and blood of modern time, as represented by narrow dirty

streets and mean churches. It is the shell of the huge theatre,

hollowed from the solid hill, and fronted with a wall that seems made

rather to protect a city than to form a sounding-board for a stage,

which first tells us that we have reached the old Arausio. Of all

theatres this is the most impressive, stupendous, indestructible, the

Colosseum hardly excepted; for in Rome herself we are prepared for

something gigantic, while in the insignificant Arausio—a sort of

antique Tewkesbury—to find such magnificence, durability, and vastness,

impresses one with a nightmare sense that the old lioness of Empire can

scarcely yet be dead. Standing before the colossal, towering, amorphous

precipice which formed the background of the scena, we feel as if once

more the 'heart-shaking sound of Consul Romanus' might be heard; as if

Roman knights and deputies, arisen 69from the dead, with faces hard and

stern as those of the warriors carved on Trajan's frieze, might take

their seats beneath us in the orchestra, and, after proclamation made,

the mortmain of imperial Rome be laid upon the comforts, liberties, and

little gracefulnesses of our modern life. Nor is it unpleasant to be

startled from such reverie by the voice of the old guardian upon the

stage beneath, sonorously devolving the vacuous Alexandrines with which

he once welcomed his ephemeral French emperor from Algiers. The little

man is dim with distance, eclipsed and swallowed up by the shadows and

grotesque fragments of the ruin in the midst of which he stands. But

his voice—thanks to the inimitable constructive art of the ancient

architect, which, even in the desolation of at least thirteen

centuries, has not lost its cunning-emerges from the pigmy throat, and

fills the whole vast hollow with its clear, if tiny, sound. Thank

heaven, there is no danger of Roman resurrection here! The illusion is

completely broken, and we turn to gather the first violets of February,

and to wonder at the quaint postures of a praying mantis on the grass

grown tiers and porches fringed with fern.

The sense of Roman greatness which is so oppressive in Orange and in

many other parts of Provence, is not felt at Avignon. Here we exchange

the ghost of Imperial for the phantom of Ecclesiastical Rome. The fixed

epithet of Avignon is Papal; and as the express train rushes over its

bleak and wind-tormented plain, the heavy dungeon-walls and

battlemented towers of its palace fortress seem to warn us off, and bid

us quickly leave the Babylon of exiled impious Antichrist. Avignon

presents the bleakest, barest, greyest scene upon a February morning,

when the incessant mistral is blowing, and far and near, upon desolate

hillside and sandy plain, the scanty trees are bent sideways, the

crumbling castle turrets shivering like bleached skeletons in the dry

ungenial air. Yet 70inside the town, all is not so dreary. The Papal

palace, with its terrible Glacière, its chapel painted by Simone Memmi,

its endless corridors and staircases, its torture-chamber,

funnel-shaped to drown and suffocate—so runs tradition—the shrieks of

wretches on the rack, is now a barrack, filled with lively little

French soldiers, whose politeness, though sorely taxed, is never

ruffled by the introduction of inquisitive visitors into their

dormitories, eating-places, and drill-grounds. And strange, indeed, it

is to see the lines of neat narrow barrack beds, between which the

red-legged little men are shaving, polishing their guns, or mending

their trousers, in those vaulted halls of popes and cardinals, those

vast presence-chambers and audience-galleries, where Urban entertained

S. Catherine, where Rienzi came, a prisoner, to be stared at. Pass by

the Glacière with a shudder, for it has still the reek of blood about

it; and do not long delay in the cheerless dungeon of Rienzi. Time and

regimental whitewash have swept these lurking-places of old crime very

bare; but the parable of the seven devils is true in more senses than

one, and the ghosts that return to haunt a deodorised, disinfected,

garnished sepulchre are almost more ghastly than those which have never

been disturbed from their old habitations.

Little by little the eye becomes accustomed to the bareness and

greyness of this Provençal landscape; and then we find that the scenery

round Avignon is eminently picturesque. The view from Les Doms—which is

a hill above the Pope's palace, the Acropolis, as it were, of

Avignon—embraces a wide stretch of undulating champaign, bordered by

low hills, and intersected by the flashing waters of the majestic

Rhone. Across the stream stands Villeneuve, like a castle of romance,

with its round stone towers fronting the gates and battlemented walls

of the Papal city. A bridge used to connect the two towns, but it is

now broken. The remaining fragment is of 71solid build, resting on

great buttresses, one of which rises fantastically above the bridge

into a little chapel. Such, one might fancy, was the bridge which

Ariosto's Rodomonte kept on horse against the Paladins of Charlemagne,

when angered by the loss of his love. Nor is it difficult to imagine

Bradamante spurring up the slope against him with her magic lance in

rest, and tilting him into the tawny waves beneath.

On a clear October morning, when the vineyards are taking their last

tints of gold and crimson, and the yellow foliage of the poplars by the

river mingles with the sober greys of olive-trees and willows, every

square inch of this landscape, glittering as it does with light and

with colour, the more beautiful for its subtlety and rarity, would make

a picture. Out of many such vignettes let us choose one. We are on the

shore close by the ruined bridge, the rolling muddy Rhone in front;

beyond it, by the towing-path, a tall strong cypress-tree rises beside

a little house, and next to it a crucifix twelve feet or more in

height, the Christ visible afar, stretched upon His red cross; arundo

donax is waving all around, and willows near; behind, far off, soar the

peaked hills, blue and pearled with clouds; past the cypress, on the

Rhone, comes floating a long raft, swift through the stream, its rudder

guided by a score of men: one standing erect upon the prow bends

forward to salute the cross; on flies the raft, the tall reeds rustle,

and the cypress sleeps.

For those who have time to spare in going to or from the south it is

worth while to spend a day or two in the most comfortable and

characteristic of old French inns, the Hôtel de l'Europe, at Avignon.

Should it rain, the museum of the town is worth a visit. It contains

Horace Vernet's not uncelebrated picture of Mazeppa, and another, less

famous, but perhaps more interesting, by swollen-cheeked David, the

72'genius in convulsion,' as Carlyle has christened him. His canvas is

unfinished. Who knows what cry of the Convention made the painter fling

his palette down and leave the masterpiece he might have spoiled? For

in its way the picture is a masterpiece. There lies Jean Barrad,

drummer, aged fourteen, slain in La Vendée, a true patriot, who, while

his life-blood flowed away, pressed the tricolor cockade to his heart,

and murmured 'Liberty!' David has treated his subject classically. The

little drummer-boy, though French enough in feature and in feeling,

lies, Greek-like, naked on the sand—a very Hyacinth of the Republic, La

Vendée's Ilioneus. The tricolor cockade and the sentiment of upturned

patriotic eyes are the only indications of his being a hero in his

teens, a citizen who thought it sweet to die for France.

In fine weather a visit to Vaucluse should by no means be omitted, not

so much, perhaps, for Petrarch's sake as for the interest of the drive,

and for the marvel of the fountain of the Sorgues. For some time after

leaving Avignon you jog along the level country between avenues of

plane-trees; then comes a hilly ridge, on which the olives, mulberries,

and vineyards join their colours and melt subtly into distant purple.

After crossing this we reach L'Isle, an island village girdled by the

gliding Sorgues, overshadowed with gigantic plane-boughs, and echoing

to the plash of water dripped from mossy fern-tufted millwheels. Those

who expect Petrarch's Sorgues to be some trickling poet's rill emerging

from a damp grotto, may well be astounded at the rush and roar of this

azure river so close upon its fountain-head. It has a volume and an

arrow-like rapidity that communicate the feeling of exuberance and

life. In passing, let it not be forgotten that it was somewhere or

other in this 'chiaro fondo di Sorga,' as Carlyle describes, that

Jourdain, the hangman-hero of the Glacière, stuck fast upon his pony

when flying from his foes, 73and had his accursed life, by some

diabolical providence, spared for future butcheries. On we go across

the austere plain, between fields of madder, the red roots of the

'garance' lying in swathes along the furrows. In front rise ash-grey

hills of barren rock, here and there crimsoned with the leaves of the

dwarf sumach. A huge cliff stands up and seems to bar all passage. Yet

the river foams in torrents at our side. Whence can it issue? What pass

or cranny in that precipice is cloven for its escape? These questions

grow in interest as we enter the narrow defile of limestone rocks which

leads to the cliff-barrier, and find ourselves among the figs and

olives of Vaucluse. Here is the village, the little church, the ugly

column to Petrarch's memory, the inn, with its caricatures of Laura,

and its excellent trout, the bridge and the many-flashing, eddying

Sorgues, lashed by millwheels, broken by weirs, divided in its course,

channelled and dyked, yet flowing irresistibly and undefiled. Blue,

purple, greened by moss and water-weeds, silvered by snow-white

pebbles, on its pure smooth bed the river runs like elemental diamond,

so clear and fresh. The rocks on either side are grey or yellow,

terraced into oliveyards, with here and there a cypress, fig, or

mulberry tree. Soon the gardens cease, and lentisk, rosemary, box, and

ilex—shrubs of Provence—with here and there a sumach out of reach,

cling to the hard stone. And so at last we are brought face to face

with the sheer impassable precipice. At its basement sleeps a pool,

perfectly untroubled; a lakelet in which the sheltering rocks and

nestling wild figs are glassed as in a mirror—a mirror of blue-black

water, like amethyst or fluor-spar—so pure, so still, that where it

laps the pebbles you can scarcely say where air begins and water ends.

This, then, is Petrarch's 'grotto;' this is the fountain of Vaucluse.

Up from its deep reservoirs, from the mysterious basements of the

mountain, wells the silent stream; pauseless 74and motionless it fills

its urn, rises unruffled, glides until the brink is reached, then

overflows, and foams, and dashes noisily, a cataract, among the

boulders of the hills. Nothing at Vaucluse is more impressive than the

contrast between the tranquil silence of the fountain and the roar of

the released impetuous river. Here we can realise the calm clear eyes

of sculptured water-gods, their brimming urns, their gushing streams,

the magic of the mountain-born and darkness-cradled flood. Or again,

looking up at the sheer steep cliff, 800 feet in height, and arching

slightly roofwise, so that no rain falls upon the cavern of the pool,

we seem to see the stroke of Neptune's trident, the hoof of Pegasus,

the force of Moses' rod, which cleft rocks and made water gush forth in

the desert. There is a strange fascination in the spot. As our eyes

follow the white pebble which cleaves the surface and falls visibly,

until the veil of azure is too thick for sight to pierce, we feel as if

some glamour were drawing us, like Hylas, to the hidden caves. At

least, we long to yield a prized and precious offering to the spring,

to grace the nymph of Vaucluse with a pearl of price as token of our

reverence and love.

Meanwhile nothing has been said about Petrarch, who himself said much

about the spring, and complained against those very nymphs to whom we

have in wish, at least, been scattering jewels, that they broke his

banks and swallowed up his gardens every winter. At Vaucluse Petrarch

loved, and lived, and sang. He has made Vaucluse famous, and will never

be forgotten there. But for the present the fountain is even more

attractive than the memory of the poet.[4]

[4] I have translated and printed at the end of the second volume some

sonnets of Petrarch as a kind of palinode for this impertinence.

The change from Avignon to Nismes is very trying to the latter place;

for Nismes is not picturesquely or historically 75interesting. It is a

prosperous modern French town with two almost perfect Roman

monuments—Les Arènes and the Maison Carrée. The amphitheatre is a

complete oval, visible at one glance. Its smooth white stone, even

where it has not been restored, seems unimpaired by age; and Charles

Martel's conflagration, when he burned the Saracen hornet's nest inside

it, has only blackened the outer walls and arches venerably. Utility

and perfect adaptation of means to ends form the beauty of Roman

buildings. The science of construction and large intelligence displayed

in them, their strength, simplicity, solidity, and purpose, are their

glory. Perhaps there is only one modern edifice—Palladio's Palazzo

della Ragione at Vicenza—which approaches the dignity and loftiness of

Roman architecture; and this it does because of its absolute freedom

from ornament, the vastness of its design, and the durability of its

material. The temple, called the Maison Carrée, at Nismes, is also very

perfect, and comprehended at one glance. Light, graceful, airy, but

rather thin and narrow, it reminds one of the temple of Fortuna Virilis

at Rome.

But if Nismes itself is not picturesque, its environs contain the

wonderful Pont du Gard. A two or three hours' drive leads through a

desolate country to the valley of the Cardon, where suddenly, at a turn

of the road, one comes upon the aqueduct. It is not within the scope of

words to describe the impression produced by those vast arches, row

above row, cutting the deep blue sky. The domed summer clouds sailing

across them are comprehended in the gigantic span of their perfect

semicircles, which seem rather to have been described by Miltonic

compasses of Deity than by merely human mathematics. Yet, standing

beneath one of the vaults and looking upward, you may read Roman

numerals in order from I. to X., which prove their human origin well

enough. 76Next to their strength, regularity, and magnitude, the most

astonishing point about this triple tier of arches, piled one above the

other to a height of 180 feet above a brawling stream between two

barren hills, is their lightness. The arches are not thick; the

causeway on the top is only just broad enough for three men to walk

abreast. So smooth and perpendicular are the supporting walls that

scarcely a shrub or tuft of grass has grown upon the aqueduct in all

these years. And yet the huge fabric is strengthened by no buttress,

has needed no repair. This lightness of structure, combined with such

prodigious durability, produces the strongest sense of science and

self-reliant power in the men who designed it. None but Romans could

have built such a monument, and have set it in such a place—a

wilderness of rock and rolling hill, scantily covered with low

brushwood, and browsed over by a few sheep—for such a purpose, too, in

order to supply Nemausus with pure water. The modern town does pretty

well without its water; but here subsists the civilisation of eighteen

centuries past intact: the human labour yet remains, the measuring,

contriving mind of man, shrinking from no obstacles, spanning the air,

and in one edifice combining gigantic strength and perfect beauty. It

is impossible not to echo Rousseau's words in such a place, and to say

with him: 'Le retentissement de mes pas dans ces immenses voûtes me

faisait croire entendre la forte voix de ceux qui les avaient bâties.

Je me perdais comme un insecte dans cette immensité. Je sentais, tout

en me faisant petit, je ne sais quoi qui m'élevait l'âme; et je me

disais en soupirant, Que ne suis-je né Romain!'

There is nothing at Arles which produces the same deep and indelible

impression. Yet Arles is a far more interesting town than Nismes,

partly because of the Rhone delta which begins there, partly because of

its ruinous antiquity, and 77partly also because of the strong local

character of its population. The amphitheatre of Arles is vaster and

more sublime in its desolation than the tidy theatre at Nismes; the

crypts, and dens, and subterranean passages suggest all manner of

speculation as to the uses to which they may have been appropriated;

while the broken galleries outside, intricate and black and cavernous,

like Piranesi's etchings of the 'Carceri,' present the wildest pictures

of greatness in decay, fantastic dilapidation. The ruins of the smaller

theatre, again, with their picturesquely grouped fragments and their

standing columns, might be sketched for a frontispiece to some

dilettante work on classical antiquities. For the rest, perhaps the

Aliscamps, or ancient Roman burial-ground, is the most interesting

thing at Arles, not only because of Dante's celebrated lines in the

canto of 'Farinata:'—

Si come ad Arli ove 'l Rodano stagna,

Fanno i sepolcri tutto 'l loco varo;

but also because of the intrinsic picturesqueness of this avenue of

sepulchres beneath green trees upon a long soft grassy field.

But as at Avignon and Nismes, so also at Arles, one of the chief

attractions of the place lies at a distance, and requires a special

expedition. The road to Les Baux crosses a true Provençal desert where

one realises the phrase, 'Vieux comme les rochers de Provence,'—a

wilderness of grey stone, here and there worn into cart-tracks, and

tufted with rosemary, box, lavender, and lentisk. On the way it passes

the Abbaye de Mont Majeur, a ruin of gigantic size, embracing all

periods of architecture; where nothing seems to flourish now but

henbane and the wild cucumber, or to breathe but a mumble-toothed and

terrible old hag. The ruin stands above a desolate marsh, its vast

Italian buildings of Palladian splendour 78looking more forlorn in

their decay than the older and austerer mediæval towers, which rise up

proud and patient and defiantly erect beneath the curse of time. When

at length what used to be the castle town of Les Baux is reached, you

find a naked mountain of yellow sandstone, worn away by nature into

bastions and buttresses and coigns of vantage, sculptured by ancient

art into palaces and chapels, battlements and dungeons. Now art and

nature are confounded in one ruin. Blocks of masonry lie cheek by jowl

with masses of the rough-hewn rock; fallen cavern vaults are heaped

round fragments of fan-shaped spandrel and clustered column-shaft; the

doors and windows of old pleasure-rooms are hung with ivy and wild fig

for tapestry; winding staircases start midway upon the cliff, and lead

to vacancy. High overhead suspended in mid-air hang chambers—lady's

bower or poet's singing-room—now inaccessible, the haunt of hawks and

swallows. Within this rocky honeycomb—'cette ville en monolithe,' as it

has been aptly called, for it is literally scooped out of one mountain

block—live about two hundred poor people, foddering their wretched

goats at carved piscina and stately sideboards, erecting mud

beplastered hovels in the halls of feudal princes. Murray is wrong in

calling the place a mediæval town in its original state, for anything

more purely ruinous, more like a decayed old cheese, cannot possibly be

conceived. The living only inhabit the tombs of the dead. At the end of

the last century, when revolutionary effervescence was beginning to

ferment, the people of Arles swept all its feudality away, defacing the

very arms upon the town gate, and trampling the palace towers to dust.

The castle looks out across a vast extent of plain over Arles, the

stagnant Rhone, the Camargue, and the salt pools of the lingering sea.

In old days it was the eyrie of an eagle race called Seigneurs of Les

Baux; and whether they took their 79title from the rock, or whether, as

genealogists would have it, they gave the name of Oriental

Balthazar—their reputed ancestor, one of the Magi—to the rock itself,

remains a mystery not greatly worth the solving.

Anyhow, here they lived and flourished, these feudal princes, bearing

for their ensign a silver comet of sixteen rays upon a field of

gules—themselves a comet race, baleful to the neighbouring lowlands,

blazing with lurid splendour over wide tracts of country, a burning,

raging, fiery-souled, swift-handed tribe, in whom a flame unquenchable

glowed from son to sire through twice five hundred years until, in the

sixteenth century, they were burned out, and nothing remained but

cinders—these broken ruins of their eyrie, and some outworn and dusty

titles. Very strange are the fate and history of these same titles:

King of Arles, for instance, savouring of troubadour and high romance;

Prince of Tarentum, smacking of old plays and Italian novels; Prince of

Orange, which the Nassaus, through the Châlons, seized in all its

emptiness long after the real principality had passed away, and came

therewith to sit on England's throne.

The Les Baux in their heyday were patterns of feudal nobility. They

warred incessantly with Counts of Provence, archbishops and burghers of

Arles, Queens of Naples, Kings of Aragon. Crusading, pillaging,

betraying, spending their substance on the sword, and buying it again

by deeds of valour or imperial acts of favour, tuning troubadour harps,

presiding at courts of love,—they filled a large page in the history of

Southern France. The Les Baux were very superstitious. In the fulness

of their prosperity they restricted the number of their dependent

towns, or _places baussenques_, to seventy-nine, because these numbers

in combination were thought to be of good omen to their house. Beral

des Baux, Seigneur of Marseilles, was one day starting on a journey

80with his whole force to Avignon. He met an old woman herb-gathering

at daybreak, and said, 'Mother, hast thou seen a crow or other bird?'

'Yea,' answered the crone, 'on the trunk of a dead willow.' Beral

counted upon his fingers the day of the year, and turned bridle. With

troubadours of name and note they had dealings, but not always to their

own advantage, as the following story testifies. When the Baux and

Berengers were struggling for the countship of Provence, Raymond

Berenger, by his wife's counsel, went, attended by troubadours, to meet

the Emperor Frederick at Milan. There he sued for the investiture and

ratification of Provence. His troubadours sang and charmed Frederick;

and the Emperor, for the joy he had in them, wrote his celebrated lines

beginning—

Plas mi cavalier Francez.

And when Berenger made his request he met with no refusal. Hearing

thereof, the lords of Baux came down in wrath with a clangour of armed

men. But music had already gained the day; and where the Phoebus of

Provence had shone, the Æolus of storm-shaken Les Baux was powerless.

Again, when Blacas, a knight of Provence, died, the great Sordello

chanted one of his most fiery hymns, bidding the princes of Christendom

flock round and eat the heart of the dead lord. 'Let Rambaude des

Baux,' cries the bard, with a sarcasm that is clearly meant, but at

this distance almost unintelligible, 'take also a good piece, for she

is fair and good and truly virtuous; let her keep it well who knows so

well to husband her own weal.' But the poets were not always adverse to

the house of Baux. Fouquet, the beautiful and gentle melodist whom

Dante placed in paradise, served Adelaisie, wife of Berald, with long

service of unhappy love, and wrote upon her death 'The Complaint of

Berald des Baux for Adelaisie.' Guillaume de Cabestan loved Berangère

des Baux, and was 81so loved by her that she gave him a philtre to

drink, whereof he sickened and grew mad. Many more troubadours are

cited as having frequented the castle of Les Baux, and among the

members of the princely house were several poets.

Some of them were renowned for beauty. We hear of a Cécile, called

Passe Rose, because of her exceeding loveliness; also of an unhappy

François, who, after passing eighteen years in prison, yet won the

grace and love of Joan of Naples by his charms. But the real temper of

this fierce tribe was not shown among troubadours, or in the courts of

love and beauty. The stern and barren rock from which they sprang, and

the comet of their scutcheon, are the true symbols of their nature.

History records no end of their ravages and slaughters. It is a tedious

catalogue of blood—how one prince put to fire and sword the whole town

of Courthezon; how another was stabbed in prison by his wife; how a

third besieged the castle of his niece, and sought to undermine her

chamber, knowing her the while to be in childbed; how a fourth was

flayed alive outside the walls of Avignon. There is nothing terrible,

splendid, and savage, belonging to feudal history, of which an example

may not be found in the annals of Les Baux, as narrated by their

chronicler, Jules Canonge.

However abrupt may seem the transition from these memories of the

ancient nobles of Les Baux to mere matters of travel and

picturesqueness, it would be impossible to take leave of the old towns

of Provence without glancing at the cathedrals of S. Trophime at Arles,

and of S. Gilles—a village on the border of the dreary flamingo-haunted

Camargue. Both of these buildings have porches splendidly encrusted

with sculptures, half classical, half mediæval, marking the transition

from ancient to modern art. But that of S. Gilles is by far the richer

and more elaborate. The whole façade of 82this church is one mass of

intricate decoration; Norman arches and carved lions, like those of

Lombard architecture, mingling fantastically with Greek scrolls of

fruit and flowers, with elegant Corinthian columns jutting out upon the

church steps, and with the old conventional wave-border that is called

Etruscan in our modern jargon. From the midst of florid fret and

foliage lean mild faces of saints and Madonnas. Symbols of evangelists

with half-human, half-animal eyes and wings, are interwoven with the

leafy bowers of cupids. Grave apostles stand erect beneath acanthus

wreaths that ought to crisp the forehead of a laughing Faun or Bacchus.

And yet so full, exuberant, and deftly chosen are these various

elements, that there remains no sense of incongruity or discord. The

mediæval spirit had much trouble to disentangle itself from classic

reminiscences; and fortunately for the picturesqueness of S. Gilles, it

did not succeed. How strangely different is the result of this

transition in the south from those severe and rigid forms which we call

Romanesque in Germany and Normandy and England!

83

THE CORNICE

It was a dull afternoon in February when we left Nice, and drove across

the mountains to Mentone. Over hill and sea hung a thick mist. Turbia's

Roman tower stood up in cheerless solitude, wreathed round with driving

vapour, and the rocky nest of Esa seemed suspended in a chaos between

sea and sky. Sometimes the fog broke and showed us Villafranca, lying

green and flat in the deep blue below: sometimes a distant view of

higher peaks swam into sight from the shifting cloud. But the whole

scene was desolate. Was it for this that we had left our English home,

and travelled from London day and night? At length we reached the edge

of the cloud, and jingled down by Roccabruna and the olive-groves, till

one by one Mentone's villas came in sight, and at last we found

ourselves at the inn door. That night, and all next day and the next

night, we heard the hoarse sea beat and thunder on the beach. The rain

and wind kept driving from the south, but we consoled ourselves with

thinking that the orange-trees and every kind of flower were drinking

in the moisture and waiting to rejoice in sunlight which would come.

It was a Sunday morning when we woke and found that the rain had gone,

the sun was shining brightly on the sea, and a clear north wind was

blowing cloud and mist away. Out upon the hills we went, not caring

much what path we took; for everything was beautiful, and hill and vale

were 84full of garden walks. Through lemon-groves,—pale, golden-tender

trees,—and olives, stretching their grey boughs against the lonely

cottage tiles, we climbed, until we reached the pines and heath above.

Then I knew the meaning of Theocritus for the first time. We found a

well, broad, deep, and clear, with green herbs growing at the bottom, a

runlet flowing from it down the rocky steps, maidenhair, black

adiantum, and blue violets, hanging from the brink and mirrored in the

water. This was just the well in _Hylas_. Theocritus has been badly

treated. They call him a court poet, dead to Nature, artificial in his

pictures. Yet I recognised this fountain by his verse, just as if he

had showed me the very spot. Violets grow everywhere, of every shade,

from black to lilac. Their stalks are long, and the flowers 'nod' upon

them, so that I see how the Greeks could make them into chaplets—how

Lycidas wore his crown of white violets[5] lying by the fireside

elbow-deep in withered asphodel, watching the chestnuts in the embers,

and softly drinking deep healths to Ageanax far off upon the waves. It

is impossible to go wrong in these valleys. They are cultivated to the

height of about five hundred feet above the sea, in terraces

laboriously built up with walls, earthed and manured, and irrigated by

means of tanks and aqueducts. Above this level, where the virgin soil

has not been yet reclaimed, or where the winds of winter bring down

freezing currents from the mountains through a gap or gully of the

lower hills, a tangled growth of heaths and arbutus, and pines, and

rosemarys, and myrtles, continue the vegetation, till it finally ends

in bare grey rocks and peaks some thousand feet in height. Far above

all signs of cultivation 85on these arid peaks, you still may see

villages and ruined castles, built centuries ago for a protection from

the Moorish pirates. To these mountain fastnesses the people of the

coast retreated when they descried the sails of their foes on the

horizon. In Mentone, not very long ago, old men might be seen who in

their youth were said to have been taken captive by the Moors; and many

Arabic words have found their way into the patois of the people.

[5] This begs the question whether λευκόϊον does not properly mean

snowflake, or some such flower. Violets in Greece, however, were often

used for crowns: ΐοστέφανος is the epithet of Homer for Aphrodite,

and of Aristophanes for Athens.

There is something strangely fascinating in the sight of these ruins on

the burning rocks, with their black sentinel cypresses, immensely tall

and far away. Long years and rain and sunlight have made these

castellated eyries one with their native stone. It is hard to trace in

their foundations where Nature's workmanship ends and where man's

begins. What strange sights the mountain villagers must see! The vast

blue plain of the unfurrowed deep, the fairy range of Corsica hung

midway between the sea and sky at dawn or sunset, the stars so close

above their heads, the deep dew-sprinkled valleys, the green pines! On

penetrating into one of these hill-fortresses, you find that it is a

whole village, with a church and castle and piazza, some few feet

square, huddled together on a narrow platform. We met one day three

magnates of Gorbio taking a morning stroll backwards and forwards, up

and down their tiny square. Vehemently gesticulating, loudly

chattering, they talked as though they had not seen each other for ten

years, and were but just unloading their budgets of accumulated news.

Yet these three men probably had lived, eaten, drunk, and talked

together from the cradle to that hour: so true it is that use and

custom quicken all our powers, especially of 93gossiping and

scandal-mongering. S. Agnese is the highest and most notable of all

these villages. The cold and heat upon its absolutely barren rock must

be alike intolerable. In appearance 86it is not unlike the Etruscan

towns of Central Italy; but there is something, of course, far more

imposing in the immense antiquity and the historical associations of a

Narni, a Fiesole, a Chiusi, or an Orvieto. Sea-life and rusticity

strike a different note from that of those Apennine-girdled seats of

dead civilisation, in which nations, arts, and religions have gone by

and left but few traces,—some wrecks of giant walls, some excavated

tombs, some shrines, where monks still sing and pray above the relics

of the founders of once world-shaking, now almost forgotten, orders.

Here at Mentone there is none of this; the idyllic is the true note,

and Theocritus is still alive.

We do not often scale these altitudes, but keep along the terraced

glades by the side of olive-shaded streams. The violets, instead of

peeping shyly from hedgerows, fall in ripples and cascades over mossy

walls among maidenhair and spleen-worts. They are very sweet, and the

sound of trickling water seems to mingle with their fragrance in a most

delicious harmony. Sound, smell, and hue make up one chord, the sense

of which is pure and perfect peace. The country-people are kind,

letting us pass everywhere, so that we make our way along their

aqueducts and through their gardens, under laden lemon-boughs, the pale

fruit dangling at our ears, and swinging showers of scented dew upon us

as we pass. Far better, however, than lemon or orange trees, are the

olives. Some of these are immensely old, numbering, it is said, five

centuries, so that Petrarch may almost have rested beneath their shade

on his way to Avignon. These veterans are cavernous with age: gnarled,

split, and twisted trunks, throwing out arms that break into a hundred

branches; every branch distinct, and feathered with innumerable sparks

and spikelets of white, wavy, greenish light. These are the leaves, and

the stems are grey with lichens. The sky and sea—two blues, one full

87of sunlight and the other purple—set these fountains of perennial

brightness like gems in lapis-lazuli. At a distance the same olives

look hoary and soft—a veil of woven light or luminous haze. When the

wind blows their branches all one way, they ripple like a sea of

silver. But underneath their covert, in the shade, grey periwinkles

wind among the snowy drift of allium. The narcissus sends its arrowy

fragrance through the air, while, far and wide, red anemones burn like

fire, with interchange of blue and lilac buds, white arums, orchises,

and pink gladiolus. Wandering there, and seeing the pale flowers, stars

white and pink and odorous, we dream of Olivet, or the grave Garden of

the Agony, and the trees seem always whispering of sacred things. How

people can blaspheme against the olives, and call them imitations of

the willow, or complain that they are shabby shrubs, I do not know.[6]

[6] Olive-trees must be studied at Mentone or San Remo, in Corfu, at

Tivoli, on the coast between Syracuse and Catania, or on the lowlands

of Apulia. The stunted but productive trees of the Rhone valley, for

example, are no real measure of the beauty they can exhibit.

This shore would stand for Shelley's Island of Epipsychidion, or the

golden age which Empedocles describes, when the mild nations worshipped

Aphrodite with incense and the images of beasts and yellow honey, and

no blood was spilt upon her altars—when 'the trees flourished with

perennial leaves and fruit, and ample crops adorned their boughs

through all the year.' This even now is literally true of the

lemon-groves, which do not cease to flower and ripen. Everything fits

in to complete the reproduction of Greek pastoral life. The goats eat

cytisus and myrtle on the shore; a whole flock gathered round me as I

sat beneath a tuft of golden green euphorbia the other day, and nibbled

bread from my hands. The frog still croaks by tank and 88fountain,

'whom the Muses have ordained to sing for aye,' in spite of Bion's

death. The narcissus, anemone, and hyacinth still tell their tales of

love and death. Hesper still gazes on the shepherd from the

mountain-head. The slender cypresses still vibrate, the pines murmur.

Pan sleeps in noontide heat, and goat-herds and wayfaring men lie down

to slumber by the roadside, under olive-boughs in which cicadas sing.

The little villages high up are just as white, the mountains just as

grey and shadowy when evening falls. Nothing is changed—except

ourselves. I expect to find a statue of Priapus or pastoral Pan, hung

with wreaths of flowers—the meal cake, honey, and spilt wine upon his

altar, and young boys and maidens dancing round. Surely, in some

far-off glade, by the side of lemon-grove or garden, near the village,

there must be still a pagan remnant of glad Nature-worship. Surely I

shall chance upon some Thyrsis piping in the pine-tree shade, or Daphne

flying from the arms of Phoebus. So I dream until I come upon the

Calvary set on a solitary hillock, with its prayer-steps lending a wide

prospect across the olives and the orange-trees, and the broad valleys,

to immeasurable skies and purple seas. There is the iron cross, the

wounded heart, the spear, the reed, the nails, the crown of thorns, the

cup of sacrificial blood, the title, with its superscription royal and

divine. The other day we crossed a brook and entered a lemon-field,

rich with blossoms and carpeted with red anemones. Everything basked in

sunlight and glittered with exceeding brilliancy of hue. A tiny white

chapel stood in a corner of the enclosure. Two iron-grated windows let

me see inside: it was a bare place, containing nothing but a wooden

praying-desk, black and worm-eaten, an altar with its candles and no

flowers, and above the altar a square picture brown with age. On the

floor were scattered several pence, and in a vase above the holy-water

vessel stood 89some withered hyacinths. As my sight became accustomed

to the gloom, I could see from the darkness of the picture a pale

Christ nailed to the cross with agonising upward eyes and ashy aureole

above the bleeding thorns. Thus I stepped suddenly away from the

outward pomp and bravery of nature to the inward aspirations, agonies,

and martyrdoms of man—from Greek legends of the past to the real

Christian present—and I remembered that an illimitable prospect has

been opened to the world, that in spite of ourselves we must turn our

eyes heavenward, inward, to the infinite unseen beyond us and within

our souls. Nothing can take us back to Phoebus or to Pan. Nothing can

again identify us with the simple natural earth. '_Une immense

espérance a traversé la terre_,' and these chapels, with their deep

significances, lurk in the fair landscape like the cares of real life

among our dreams of art, or like a fear of death and the hereafter in

the midst of opera music. It is a strange contrast. The worship of men

in those old times was symbolised by dances in the evening, banquets,

libations, and mirth-making. 'Euphrosyne' was alike the goddess of the

righteous mind and of the merry heart. Old withered women telling their

rosaries at dusk; belated shepherds crossing themselves beneath the

stars when they pass the chapel; maidens weighed down with Margaret's

anguish of unhappy love; youths vowing their life to contemplation in

secluded cloisters,—these are the human forms which gather round such

chapels; and the motto of the worshippers consists in this, 'Do often

violence to thy desire.' In the Tyrol we have seen whole villages

praying together at daybreak before their day's work, singing their

_Miserere_ and their _Gloria_ and their _Dies Iræ_, to the sound of

crashing organs and jangling bells; appealing in the midst of Nature's

splendour to the Spirit which is above Nature, which dwells in darkness

rather than light, 90and loves the yearnings and contentions of our

soul more than its summer gladness and peace. Even the olives here tell

more to us of Olivet and the Garden than of the oil-press and the

wrestling-ground. The lilies carry us to the Sermon on the Mount, and

teach humility, instead of summoning up some legend of a god's love for

a mortal. The hillside tanks and running streams, and water-brooks

swollen by sudden rain, speak of Palestine. We call the white flowers

stars of Bethlehem. The large sceptre-reed; the fig-tree, lingering in

barrenness when other trees are full of fruit; the locust-beans of the

Caruba:—for one suggestion of Greek idylls there is yet another, of far

deeper, dearer power.

But who can resist the influence of Greek ideas at the Cap S. Martin?

Down to the verge of the sea stretch the tall, twisted stems of Levant

pines, and on the caverned limestone breaks the deep blue water.

Dazzling as marble are these rocks, pointed and honeycombed with

constant dashing of the restless sea, tufted with corallines and grey

and purple seaweeds in the little pools, but hard and dry and rough

above tide level. Nor does the sea always lap them quietly; for the

last few days it has come tumbling in, roaring and raging on the beach

with huge waves crystalline in their transparency, and maned with

fleecy spray. Such were the rocks and such the swell of breakers when

Ulysses grasped the shore after his long swim. Samphire, very salt and

fragrant, grows in the rocky honeycomb; then lentisk and beach-loving

myrtle, both exceeding green and bushy; then rosemary and euphorbia

above the reach of spray. Fishermen, with their long reeds, sit lazily

perched upon black rocks above blue waves, sunning themselves as much

as seeking sport. One distant tip of snow, seen far away behind the

hills, reminds us of an alien, unremembered winter. While dreaming

there, this fancy came into my 91head: Polyphemus was born yonder in

the Gorbio Valley. There he fed his sheep and goats, and on the hills

found scanty pasture for his kine. He and his mother lived in the white

house by the cypress near the stream where tulips grow. Young Galatea,

nursed in the caverns of these rocks, white as the foam, and shy as the

sea fishes, came one morning up the valley to pick mountain hyacinths,

and little Polyphemus led the way. He knew where violets and sweet

narcissus grew, as well as Galatea where pink coralline and spreading

sea-flowers with their waving arms. But Galatea, having filled her lap

with bluebells, quite forgot the leaping kids, and piping Cyclops, and

cool summer caves, and yellow honey, and black ivy, and sweet vine, and

water cold as Alpine snow. Down the swift streamlet she danced

laughingly, and made herself once more bitter with the sea. But

Polyphemus remained,—hungry, sad, gazing on the barren sea, and piping

to the mockery of its waves.

Filled with these Greek fancies, it is strange to come upon a little

sandstone dell furrowed by trickling streams and overgrown with English

primroses; or to enter the village of Roccabruna, with its mediæval

castle and the motto on its walls, _Tempora labuntur tacitisque

senescimus annis_. A true motto for the town, where the butcher comes

but once a week, and where men and boys, and dogs, and palms, and

lemon-trees grow up and flourish and decay in the same hollow of the

sunny mountain-side. Into the hard conglomerate of the hill the town is

built; house walls and precipices mortised into one another, dovetailed

by the art of years gone by, and riveted by age. The same plants grow

from both alike—spurge, cistus, rue, and henbane, constant to the

desolation of abandoned dwellings. From the castle you look down on

roofs, brown tiles and chimney-pots, set one above the other like a big

card-castle. Each house has 92its foot on a neighbour's neck, and its

shoulder set against the native stone. The streets meander in and out,

and up and down, overarched and balconied, but very clean. They swarm

with children, healthy, happy, little monkeys, who grow fat on salt

fish and yellow polenta, with oil and sun _ad libitum_.

At night from Roccabruna you may see the flaring gas-lamps of the

gaming-house at Monaco, that Armida's garden of the nineteenth century.

It is the sunniest and most sheltered spot of all the coast. Long ago

Lucan said of Monaco, '_Non Corus in illum jus habet aut Zephyrus_;'

winter never comes to nip its tangled cactuses, and aloes, and

geraniums. The air swoons with the scent of lemon-groves; tall

palm-trees wave their graceful branches by the shore; music of the

softest and the loudest swells from the palace; cool corridors and

sunny seats stand ready for the noontide heat or evening calm; without,

are olive-gardens, green and fresh and full of flowers. But the witch

herself holds her high court and never-ending festival of sin in the

painted banquet-halls and among the green tables.

Let us leave this scene and turn with the country-folk of Roccabruna to

S. Michael's Church at Mentone. High above the sea it stands, and from

its open doors you look across the mountains with their olive-trees.

Inside the church is a seething mass of country-folk and townspeople,

mostly women, and these almost all old, but picturesque beyond

description; kerchiefs of every colour, wrinkles of every shape and

depth, skins of every tone of brown and yellow, voices of every

gruffness, shrillness, strength, and weakness. Wherever an empty corner

can be found, it is soon filled by tottering babies and mischievous

children. The country-women come with their large dangling earrings of

thin gold, wearing pink tulips or lemon-buds in their black hair. A low

buzz of gossiping and mutual recognition keeps the air alive. The whole

service seems a holiday—a general enjoyment of gala dresses and

friendly greetings, very different from the silence, immobility, and

_noli me tangere_ aspect of an English congregation. Over all drones,

rattles, snores, and shrieks the organ; wailing, querulous, asthmatic,

incomplete, its everlasting nasal chant—always beginning, never ending,

through a range of two or three notes ground into one monotony. The

voices of the congregation rise and sink above it. These southern

people, like the Arabs, the Apulians, and the Spaniards, seem to find

their music in a hurdy-gurdy swell of sound. The other day we met a

little girl, walking and spinning, and singing all the while, whose

song was just another version of this chant. It has a discontented

plaintive wail, as if it came from some vast age, and were a cousin of

primeval winds.

At first sight, by the side of Mentone, San Remo is sadly prosaic. The

valleys seem to sprawl, and the universal olives are monotonously grey

upon their thick clay soil. Yet the wealth of flowers in the fat earth

is wonderful. One might fancy oneself in a weedy farm flower-bed

invaded by stray oats and beans and cabbages and garlic from the

kitchen-garden. The country does not suggest a single Greek idea. It

has no form or outline—no barren peaks, no spare and difficult

vegetation. The beauty is rich but tame—valleys green with oats and

corn, blossoming cherry-trees, and sweet bean-fields, figs coming into

leaf, and arrowy bay-trees by the side of sparkling streams: here and

there a broken aqueduct or rainbow bridge hung with maidenhair and

briar and clematis and sarsaparilla.

In the cathedral church of San Siro on Good Friday they hang the

columns and the windows with black; they cover the pictures and deface

the altar; above the high altar they 94raise a crucifix, and below they

place a catafalque with the effigy of the dead Christ. To this sad

symbol they address their prayers and incense, chant their 'litanies

and lurries,' and clash the rattles, which commemorate their rage

against the traitor Judas. So far have we already passed away from the

Greek feeling of Mentone. As I listened to the hideous din, I could not

but remember the Theocritean burial of Adonis. Two funeral beds

prepared: two feasts recurring in the springtime of the year. What a

difference beneath this superficial similarity—καλος νέκυς οι΅α

καθεύδων—_attritus ægrâ macie_. But the fast of Good Friday is followed

by the festival of Easter. That, after all, is the chief difference.

After leaving the cathedral we saw a pretty picture in a dull old

street of San Remo—three children leaning from a window, blowing

bubbles. The bubbles floated down the street, of every colour, round

and trembling, like the dreams of life which children dream. The town

is certainly most picturesque. It resembles a huge glacier of houses

poured over a wedge of rock, running down the sides and along the

ridge, and spreading itself into a fan between two torrents on the

shore below. House over house, with balcony and staircase, convent

turret and church tower, palm-trees and olives, roof gardens and

clinging creepers—this white cataract of buildings streams downward

from the lazar-house, and sanctuary, and sandstone quarries on the

hill. It is a mass of streets placed close above each other, and linked

together with arms and arches of solid masonry, as a protection from

the earthquakes, which are frequent at San Remo. The walls are tall,

and form a labyrinth of gloomy passages and treacherous blind alleys,

where the Moors of old might meet with a ferocious welcome. Indeed, San

Remo is a fortress as well as a dwelling-place. Over its gateways may

still be traced the pipes for molten lead, and on its walls the

eyeloops for 95arrows, with brackets for the feet of archers. Masses of

building have been shaken down by earthquakes. The ruins of what once

were houses gape with blackened chimneys and dark forlorn cellars;

mazes of fungus and unhealthy weeds among the still secure habitations.

Hardly a ray of light penetrates the streets; one learns the meaning of

the Italian word _uggia_ from their cold and gloom. During the day they

are deserted by every one but babies and witchlike old women—some

gossiping, some sitting vacant at the house door, some spinning or

weaving, or minding little children—ugly and ancient as are their own

homes, yet clean as are the streets. The younger population goes

afield; the men on mules laden for the hills, the women burdened like

mules with heavy and disgusting loads. It is an exceptionally

good-looking race; tall, well-grown, and strong.—But to the streets

again. The shops in the upper town are few, chiefly wine-booths and

stalls for the sale of salt fish, eggs, and bread, or cobblers' and

tinkers' ware. Notwithstanding the darkness of their dwellings, the

people have a love of flowers; azaleas lean from their windows, and

vines, carefully protected by a sheath of brickwork, climb the six

stories, to blossom out into a pergola upon the roof. Look at that mass

of greenery and colours, dimly seen from beneath, with a yellow cat

sunning herself upon the parapet! To reach such a garden and such

sunlight who would not mount six stories and thread a labyrinth of

passages? I should prefer a room upon the east side of the town,

looking southward to the Molo and the sea, with a sound of water

beneath, and a palm soaring up to fan my window with his feathery

leaves.

The shrines are little spots of brightness in the gloomy streets.

Madonna with a sword; Christ holding His pierced and bleeding heart;

l'Eterno Padre pointing to the dead Son stretched upon His knee; some

souls in torment; S. Roch 96reminding us of old plagues by the spot

upon his thigh;—these are the symbols of the shrines. Before them stand

rows of pots filled with gillyflowers, placed there by pious, simple,

praying hands—by maidens come to tell their sorrows to our Lady rich in

sorrow, by old women bent and shrivelled, in hopes of paradise or

gratitude for happy days, when Madonna kept Cecchino faithful to his

home, or saved the baby from the fever.

Lower down, between the sea and the hill, is the municipal,

aristocratic, ecclesiastical quarter of San Remo. There stands the

Palace Borea—a truly princely pile, built in the last Renaissance style

of splendour, with sea-nymphs and dolphins, and satyric heads, half

lips, half leafage, round about its doors and windows. Once it formed

the dwelling of a feudal family, but now it is a roomy anthill of a

hundred houses, shops, and offices, the Boreas of to-day retaining but

a portion of one flat, and making profit of the rest. There, too, are

the barracks and the syndic's hall; the Jesuits' school, crowded with

boys and girls; the shops for clothes, confectionery, and trinkets; the

piazza, with its fountain and tasselled planes, and flowery

chestnut-trees, a mass of greenery. Under these trees the idlers

lounge, boys play at leap-frog, men at bowls. Women in San Remo work

all day, but men and boys play for the most part at bowls or toss-penny

or leap-frog or morra. San Siro, the cathedral, stands at one end of

the square. Do not go inside; it has a sickly smell of immemorial

incense and garlic, undefinable and horrible. Far better looks San Siro

from the parapet above the torrent. There you see its irregular

half-Gothic outline across a tangle of lemon-trees and olives. The

stream rushes by through high walls, covered with creepers, spanned by

ferny bridges, feathered by one or two old tufty palms. And over all

rises the ancient turret of San Siro, like a Spanish giralda, a minaret

of pinnacles and 97pyramids and dome bubbles, with windows showing

heavy bells, old clocks, and sundials painted on the walls, and a

cupola of green and yellow tiles like serpent-scales, to crown the

whole. The sea lies beyond, and the house-roofs break it with grey

horizontal lines. Then there are convents, legions of them, large white

edifices, Jesuitical apparently for the most part, clanging importunate

bells, leaning rose-blossoms and cypress-boughs over their jealous

walls.

Lastly, there is the port—the mole running out into the sea, the quay

planted with plane-trees, and the fishing-boats—by which San Remo is

connected with the naval glory of the past—with the Riviera that gave

birth to Columbus—with the Liguria that the Dorias ruled—with the great

name of Genoa. The port is empty enough now; but from the pier you look

back on San Remo and its circling hills, a jewelled town set in

illimitable olive greyness. The quay seems also to be the

cattle-market. There the small buff cows of North Italy repose after

their long voyage or march, kneeling on the sandy ground or rubbing

their sides against the wooden cross awry with age and shorn of all its

symbols. Lambs frisk among the boats; impudent kids nibble the drooping

ears of patient mules. Hinds in white jackets and knee-breeches made of

skins, lead shaggy rams and fiercely bearded goats, ready to butt at

every barking dog, and always seeking opportunities of flight. Farmers

and parish priests in black petticoats feel the cattle and dispute

about the price, or whet their bargains with a draught of wine.

Meanwhile the nets are brought on shore glittering with the fry of

sardines, which are cooked like whitebait, with cuttlefish—amorphous

objects stretching shiny feelers on the hot dry sand—and prickly purple

eggs of the sea-urchin. Women go about their labour through the throng,

some carrying stones upon their heads, or unloading boats and bearing

planks of wood in single file, two marching 98side by side beneath one

load of lime, others scarcely visible under a stack of oats, another

with her baby in its cradle fast asleep.

San Remo has an elder brother among the hills, which is called San

Romolo, after one of the old bishops of Genoa. Who San Remo was is

buried in remote antiquity; but his town has prospered, while of San

Romolo nothing remains but a ruined hill-convent among pine-trees. The

old convent is worth visiting. Its road carries you into the heart of

the sierra which surrounds San Remo, a hill-country something like the

Jura, undulating and green to the very top with maritime pines and

pinasters. Riding up, you hear all manner of Alpine sounds; brawling

streams, tinkling cowbells, and herdsmen calling to each other on the

slopes. Beneath you lies San Remo, scarcely visible; and over it the

great sea rises ever so far into the sky, until the white sails hang in

air, and cloud and sea-line melt into each other indistinguishably.

Spanish chestnuts surround the monastery with bright blue gentians,

hepaticas, forget-me-nots, and primroses about their roots. The house

itself is perched on a knoll with ample prospect to the sea and to the

mountains, very near to heaven, within a theatre of noble

contemplations and soul-stirring thoughts. If Mentone spoke to me of

the poetry of Greek pastoral life, this convent speaks of mediæval

monasticism—of solitude with God, above, beneath, and all around, of

silence and repose from agitating cares, of continuity in prayer, and

changelessness of daily life. Some precepts of the _Imitatio_ came into

my mind: 'Be never wholly idle; read or write, pray or meditate, or

work with diligence for the common needs.' 'Praiseworthy is it for the

religious man to go abroad but seldom, and to seem to shun, and keep

his eyes from men.' 'Sweet is the cell when it is often sought, but if

we gad about, it wearies us by its 99seclusion.' Then I thought of the

monks so living in this solitude; their cell windows looking across the

valley to the sea, through summer and winter, under sun and stars. Then

would they read or write, what long melodious hours! or would they

pray, what stations on the pine-clad hills! or would they toil, what

terraces to build and plant with corn, what flowers to tend, what cows

to milk and pasture, what wood to cut, what fir-cones to gather for the

winter fire! or should they yearn for silence, silence from their

comrades of the solitude, what whispering galleries of God, where never

human voice breaks loudly, but winds and streams and lonely birds

disturb the awful stillness! In such a hermitage as this, only more

wild, lived S. Francis of Assisi, among the Apennines.[7] It was there

that he learned the tongues of beasts and birds, and preached them

sermons. Stretched for hours motionless on the bare rocks, coloured

like them and rough like them in his brown peasant's serge, he prayed

and meditated, saw the vision of Christ crucified, and planned his

order to regenerate a vicious age. So still he lay, so long, so like a

stone, so gentle were his eyes, so kind and low his voice, that the

mice nibbled breadcrumbs from his wallet, lizards ran over him, and

larks sang to him in the air. There, too, in those long, solitary

vigils, the Spirit of God came upon him, and the spirit of Nature was

even as God's Spirit, and he sang: 'Laudato sia Dio mio Signore, con

tutte le creature, specialmente messer lo frate sole; per suor luna, e

per le stelle; per frate vento e per l'aire, e nuvolo, e sereno e ogni

tempo.' Half the value of this hymn would be lost were we to forget how

it was written, in what solitudes and mountains far from men, or to

ticket it with some abstract word like Pantheism. Pantheism it is not;

but an acknowledgment of that brotherhood, beneath the love of God, by

which the sun 100and moon and stars, and wind and air and cloud, and

clearness and all weather, and all creatures, are bound together with

the soul of man.

[7] Dante, Par. xi. 106.

Few, of course, were like S. Francis. Probably no monk of San Romolo

was inspired with his enthusiasm for humanity, or had his revelation of

the Divine Spirit inherent in the world. Still fewer can have felt the

æsthetic charm of Nature but most vaguely. It was as much as they could

boast, if they kept steadily to the rule of their order, and attended

to the concerns each of his own soul. A terrible selfishness, if

rightly considered; but one which accorded with the delusion that this

world is a cave of care, the other world a place of torture or undying

bliss, death the prime object of our meditation, and lifelong

abandonment of our fellow-men the highest mode of existence. Why, then,

should monks, so persuaded of the riddle of the earth, have placed

themselves in scenes so beautiful? Why rose the Camaldolis and

Chartreuses over Europe? white convents on the brows of lofty hills,

among the rustling boughs of Vallombrosas, in the grassy meadows of

Engelbergs,—always the eyries of Nature's lovers, men smitten with the

loveliness of earth? There is surely some meaning in these poetic

stations.

Here is a sentence of the _Imitatio_ which throws some light upon the

hymn of S. Francis and the sites of Benedictine monasteries, by

explaining the value of natural beauty for monks who spent their life

in studying death: 'If thy heart were right, then would every creature

be to thee a mirror of life, and a book of holy doctrine. There is no

creature so small and vile that does not show forth the goodness of

God.' With this sentence bound about their foreheads, walked Fra

Angelico and S. Francis. To men like them the mountain valleys and the

skies, and all that they contained, were full of deep significance.

Though they reasoned '_de conditione 101humanæ miseriæ_,' and '_de

contemptu mundi_,' yet the whole world was a pageant of God's glory, a

testimony to His goodness. Their chastened senses, pure hearts, and

simple wills were as wings by which they soared above the things of

earth, and sent the music of their souls aloft with every other

creature in the symphony of praise. To them, as to Blake, the sun was

no mere blazing disc or ball, but 'an innumerable company of the

heavenly host singing, "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty."' To

them the winds were brothers, and the streams were sisters—brethren in

common dependence upon God their Father, brethren in common

consecration to His service, brethren by blood, brethren by vows of

holiness. Unquestioning faith rendered this world no puzzle; they

overlooked the things of sense because the spiritual things were ever

present, and as clear as day. Yet did they not forget that spiritual

things are symbolised by things of sense; and so the smallest herb of

grass was vital to their tranquil contemplations. We who have lost

sight of the invisible world, who set our affections more on things of

earth, fancy that because these monks despised the world, and did not

write about its landscapes, therefore they were dead to its beauty.

This is mere vanity: the mountains, stars, seas, fields, and living

things were only swallowed up in the one thought of God, and made

subordinate to the awfulness of human destinies. We to whom hills are

hills, and seas are seas, and stars are ponderable quantities, speak,

write, and reason of them as of objects interesting in themselves. The

monks were less ostensibly concerned about such things, because they

only found in them the vestibules and symbols of a hidden mystery.

The contrast between the Greek and mediæval modes of regarding Nature

is not a little remarkable. Both Greeks and monks, judged by

nineteenth-century standards, were 102unobservant of natural beauties.

They make but brief and general remarks upon landscapes and the like.

The ποντίων τε κυμάτων άνήριθμον γέλασμα is very rare. But the Greeks

stopped at the threshold of Nature; the forces they found there, the

gods, were inherent in Nature, and distinct. They did not, like the

monks, place one spiritual power, omnipotent and omnipresent, above

all, and see in Nature lessons of Divine government. We ourselves

having somewhat overstrained the latter point of view, are now apt to

return vaguely to Greek fancies. Perhaps, too, we talk so much about

scenery because it is scenery to us, and the life has gone out of it.

I cannot leave the Cornice without one word about a place which lies

between Mentone and San Remo. Bordighera has a beauty which is quite

distinct from both. Palms are its chief characteristics. They lean

against the garden walls, and feather the wells outside the town, where

women come with brazen pitchers to draw water. In some of the marshy

tangles of the plain, they spring from a thick undergrowth of spiky

leaves, and rear their tall aë;rial arms against the deep blue

background of the sea or darker purple of the distant hills. White

pigeons fly about among their branches, and the air is loud with

cooings and with rustlings, and the hoarser croaking of innumerable

frogs. Then, in the olive-groves that stretch along the level shore,

are labyrinths of rare and curious plants, painted tulips and white

periwinkles, flinging their light of blossoms and dark glossy leaves

down the swift channels of the brawling streams. On each side of the

rivulets they grow, like sister cataracts of flowers instead of spray.

At night fresh stars come out along the coast, beneath the stars of

heaven; for you can see the lamps of Ventimiglia and Mentone and

Monaco, and, far away, the lighthouses upon the promontories of Antibes

and the Estrelles. At dawn, a vision of Corsica grows from the sea. The

island lies eighty miles away, but 103one can trace the dark strip of

irregular peaks glowing amid the gold and purple of the rising sun. If

the air is clear and bright, the snows and overvaulting clouds which

crown its mountains shine all day, and glitter like an apparition in

the bright blue sky. 'Phantom fair,' half raised above the sea, it

stands, as unreal and transparent as the moon when seen in April

sunlight, yet not to be confounded with the shape of any cloud. If

Mentone speaks of Greek legends, and San Romolo restores the monastic

past, we feel ourselves at Bordighera transported to the East; and

lying under its tall palms can fancy ourselves at Tyre or Daphne, or in

the gardens of a Moslem prince.

Note.—Dec. 1873. My old impressions are renewed and confirmed by a

third visit, after seven years, to this coast. For purely idyllic

loveliness, the Cornice is surpassed by nothing in the South. A very

few spots in Sicily, the road between Castellammare and Amalfi, and the

island of Corfu, are its only rivals in this style of scenery. From

Cannes to Sestri is one continuous line of exquisitely modulated

landscape beauty, which can only be fully appreciated by travellers in

carriage or on foot.

104

AJACCIO

It generally happens that visitors to Ajaccio pass over from the

Cornice coast, leaving Nice at night, and waking about sunrise to find

themselves beneath the frowning mountains of Corsica. The difference

between the scenery of the island and the shores which they have left

is very striking. Instead of the rocky mountains of the Cornice,

intolerably dry and barren at their summits, but covered at their base

with villages and ancient towns and olive-fields, Corsica presents a

scene of solitary and peculiar grandeur. The highest mountain-tops are

covered with snow, and beneath the snow-level to the sea they are as

green as Irish or as English hills, but nearly uninhabited and

uncultivated. Valleys of almost Alpine verdure are succeeded by tracts

of chestnut wood and scattered pines, or deep and flowery brushwood—the

'maquis' of Corsica, which yields shelter to its traditional outlaws

and bandits. Yet upon these hillsides there are hardly any signs of

life; the whole country seems abandoned to primeval wildness and the

majesty of desolation. Nothing can possibly be more unlike the smiling

Riviera, every square mile of which is cultivated like a garden, and

every valley and bay dotted over with white villages. After steaming

for a few hours along this savage coast, the rocks which guard the

entrance to the bay of Ajaccio, murderous-looking teeth and needles

ominously christened Sanguinari, are passed, and we enter the splendid

land-locked harbour, on the northern shore of which 105Ajaccio is

built. About three centuries ago the town, which used to occupy the

extreme or eastern end of the bay, was removed to a more healthy point

upon the northern coast, so that Ajaccio is quite a modern city.

Visitors who expect to find in it the picturesqueness of Genoa or San

Remo, or even of Mentone, will be sadly disappointed. It is simply a

healthy, well-appointed town of recent date, the chief merits of which

are, that it has wide streets, and is free, externally at least, from

the filth and rubbish of most southern seaports.

But if Ajaccio itself is not picturesque, the scenery which it

commands, and in the heart of which it lies, is of the most

magnificent. The bay of Ajaccio resembles a vast Italian lake—a Lago

Maggiore, with greater space between the mountains and the shore. From

the snow-peaks of the interior, huge granite crystals clothed in white,

to the southern extremity of the bay, peak succeeds peak and ridge

rises behind ridge in a line of wonderful variety and beauty. The

atmospheric changes of light and shadow, cloud and colour, on this

upland country, are as subtle and as various as those which lend their

beauty to the scenery of the lakes, while the sea below is blue and

rarely troubled. One could never get tired with looking at this view.

Morning and evening add new charms to its sublimity and beauty. In the

early morning Monte d'Oro sparkles like a Monte Rosa with its fresh

snow, and the whole inferior range puts on the crystal blueness of dawn

among the Alps. In the evening, violet and purple tints and the golden

glow of Italian sunset lend a different lustre to the fairyland. In

fact, the beauties of Switzerland and Italy are curiously blended in

this landscape.

In soil and vegetation the country round Ajaccio differs much from the

Cornice. There are very few olive-trees, nor is the cultivated ground

backed up so immediately by stony mountains; but between the seashore

and the hills there is 106plenty of space for pasture-land, and

orchards of apricot and peach-trees, and orange gardens. This

undulating champaign, green with meadows and watered with clear

streams, is very refreshing to the eyes of Northern people, who may

have wearied of the bareness and greyness of Nice or Mentone. It is

traversed by excellent roads, recently constructed on a plan of the

French Government, which intersect the country in all directions, and

offer an infinite variety of rides or drives to visitors. The broken

granite of which these roads are made is very pleasant for riding over.

Most of the hills through which they strike, after starting from

Ajaccio, are clothed with a thick brushwood of box, ilex, lentisk,

arbutus, and laurustinus, which stretches down irregularly into

vineyards, olive-gardens, and meadows. It is, indeed, the native growth

of the island; for wherever a piece of ground is left untilled, the

macchi grow up, and the scent of their multitudinous aromatic blossoms

is so strong that it may be smelt miles out at sea. Napoleon, at S.

Helena, referred to this fragrance when he said that he should know

Corsica blindfold by the smell of its soil. Occasional woods of holm

oak make darker patches on the landscape, and a few pines fringe the

side of enclosure walls or towers. The prickly pear runs riot in and

out among the hedges and upon the walls, diversifying the colours of

the landscape with its strange grey-green masses and unwieldy fans. In

spring, when peach and almond trees are in blossom, and when the

roadside is starred with asphodels, this country is most beautiful in

its gladness. The macchi blaze with cistus flowers of red and silver.

Golden broom mixes with the dark purple of the great French lavender,

and over the whole mass of blossom wave plumes of Mediterranean heath

and sweet-scented yellow coronilla. Under the stems of the ilex peep

cyclamens, pink and sweet; the hedgerows are a tangle of vetches,

convolvuluses, 107lupines, orchises, and alliums, with here and there a

purple iris. It would be difficult to describe all the rare and lovely

plants which are found here in a profusion that surpasses even the

flower-gardens of the Cornice, and reminds one of the most favoured

Alpine valleys in their early spring.

Since the French occupied Corsica they have done much for the island by

improving its harbours and making good roads, and endeavouring to

mitigate the ferocity of the people. But they have many things to

contend against, and Corsica is still behind the other provinces of

France. The people are idle, haughty, umbrageous, fiery, quarrelsome,

fond of gipsy life, and retentive through generations of old feuds and

prejudices to an almost inconceivable extent. Then the nature of the

country itself offers serious obstacles to its proper colonisation and

cultivation. The savage state of the island and its internal feuds have

disposed the Corsicans to quit the seaboard for their mountain villages

and fortresses, so that the great plains at the foot of the hills are

unwholesome for want of tillage and drainage. Again, the mountains

themselves have in many parts been stripped of their forests, and

converted into mere wildernesses of macchi stretching up and down their

slopes for miles and miles of useless desolation. Another impediment to

proper cultivation is found in the old habit of what is called free

pasturage. The highland shepherds are allowed by the national custom to

drive down their flocks and herds to the lowlands during the winter, so

that fences are broken, young crops are browsed over and trampled down,

and agriculture becomes a mere impossibility. The last and chief

difficulty against which the French have had to contend, and up to this

time with apparent success, is brigandage. The Corsican system of

brigandage is so very different from that of the Italians, Sicilians,

and Greeks, that 108a word may be said about its peculiar character. In

the first place, it has nothing at all to do with robbery and thieving.

The Corsican bandit took to a free life among the macchi, not for the

sake of supporting himself by lawless depredation, but because he had

put himself under a legal and social ban by murdering some one in

obedience to the strict code of honour of his country. His victim may

have been the hereditary foe of his house for generations, or else the

newly made enemy of yesterday. But in either case, if he had killed him

fairly, after a due notification of his intention to do so, he was held

to have fulfilled a duty rather than to have committed a crime. He then

betook himself to the dense tangles of evergreens which I have

described, where he lived upon the charity of countryfolk and

shepherds. In the eyes of those simple people it was a sacred duty to

relieve the necessities of the outlaws, and to guard them from the

bloodhounds of justice. There was scarcely a respectable family in

Corsica who had not one or more of its members thus _alla campagna_, as

it was euphemistically styled. The Corsicans themselves have attributed

this miserable state of things to two principal causes. The first of

these was the ancient bad government of the island: under its Genoese

rulers no justice was administered, and private vengeance for homicide

or insult became a necessary consequence among the haughty and warlike

families of the mountain villages. Secondly, the Corsicans have been

from time immemorial accustomed to wear arms in everyday life. They

used to sit at their house doors and pace the streets with musket,

pistol, dagger, and cartouch-box on their persons; and on the most

trivial occasion of merriment or enthusiasm they would discharge their

firearms. This habit gave a bloody termination to many quarrels, which

might have ended more peaceably had the parties been unarmed; and so

the seeds of _vendetta_ were constantly being 109sown. Statistics

published by the French Government present a hideous picture of the

state of bloodshed in Corsica even during this century. In one period

of thirty years (between 1821 and 1850) there were 4319 murders in the

island. Almost every man was watching for his neighbour's life, or

seeking how to save his own; and agriculture and commerce were

neglected for this grisly game of hide-and-seek. In 1853 the French

began to take strong measures, and, under the Prefect Thuillier, they

hunted the bandits from the macchi, killing between 200 and 300 of

them. At the same time an edict was promulgated against bearing arms.

It is forbidden to sell the old Corsican stiletto in the shops, and no

one may carry a gun, even for sporting purposes, unless he obtains a

special licence. These licences, moreover, are only granted for short

and precisely measured periods.

In order to appreciate the stern and gloomy character of the Corsicans,

it is necessary to leave the smiling gardens of Ajaccio, and to visit

some of the more distant mountain villages—Vico, Cavro, Bastelica, or

Bocognano, any of which may easily be reached from the capital.

Immediately after quitting the seaboard, we enter a country austere in

its simplicity, solemn without relief, yet dignified by its majesty and

by the sense of freedom it inspires. As we approach the mountains, the

macchi become taller, feathering man-high above the road, and

stretching far away upon the hills. Gigantic masses of granite, shaped

like buttresses and bastions, seem to guard the approaches to these

hills; while, looking backward over the green plain, the sea lies

smiling in a haze of blue among the rocky horns and misty headlands of

the coast. There is a stateliness about the abrupt inclination of these

granite slopes, rising from their frowning portals by sharp _arêtes_ to

the snows piled on their summits, which contrasts in a strange way with

the softness and beauty 110of the mingling sea and plain beneath. In no

landscape are more various qualities combined; in none are they so

harmonised as to produce so strong a sense of majestic freedom and

severe power. Suppose that we are on the road to Corte, and have now

reached Bocognano, the first considerable village since we left

Ajaccio. Bocognano might be chosen as typical of Corsican

hill-villages, with its narrow street, and tall tower-like houses of

five or six stories high, faced with rough granite, and pierced with

the smallest windows and very narrow doorways. These buildings have a

mournful and desolate appearance. There is none of the grandeur of

antiquity about them; no sculptured arms or castellated turrets, or

balconies or spacious staircases, such as are common in the poorest

towns of Italy. The signs of warlike occupation which they offer, and

their sinister aspect of vigilance, are thoroughly prosaic. They seem

to suggest a state of society in which feud and violence were

systematised into routine. There is no relief to the savage austerity

of their forbidding aspect; no signs of wealth or household comfort; no

trace of art, no liveliness and gracefulness of architecture. Perched

upon their coigns of vantage, these villages seem always menacing, as

if Saracen pirates, or Genoese marauders, or bandits bent on vengeance,

were still for ever on the watch. Forests of immensely old

chestnut-trees surround Bocognano on every side, so that you step from

the village streets into the shade of woods that seem to have remained

untouched for centuries. The country-people support themselves almost

entirely upon the fruit of these chestnuts; and there is a large

department of Corsica called Castagniccia, from the prevalence of these

trees and the sustenance which the inhabitants derive from them. Close

by the village brawls a torrent, such as one may see in the Monte Rosa

valleys or the Apennines, but very rarely in Switzerland. It is of a

pure green colour, 111absolutely like Indian jade, foaming round the

granite boulders, and gliding over smooth slabs of polished stone, and

eddying into still, deep pools fringed with fern. Monte d'Oro, one of

the largest mountains of Corsica, soars above, and from his snows the

purest water, undefiled by glacier mud or the _débris_ of avalanches,

melts away. Following the stream, we rise through the macchi and the

chestnut woods, which grow more sparely by degrees, until we reach the

zone of beeches. Here the scene seems suddenly transferred to the

Pyrenees; for the road is carried along abrupt slopes, thickly set with

gigantic beech-trees, overgrown with pink and silver lichens. In the

early spring their last year's leaves are still crisp with hoar-frost;

one morning's journey has brought us from the summer of Ajaccio to

winter on these heights, where no flowers are visible but the pale

hellebore and tiny lilac crocuses. Snow-drifts stretch by the roadside,

and one by one the pioneers of the vast pine-woods of the interior

appear. A great portion of the pine-forest (_Pinus larix_, or Corsican

pine, not larch) between Bocognano and Corte had recently been burned

by accident when we passed by. Nothing could be more forlorn than the

black leafless stems and branches emerging from the snow. Some of these

trees were mast-high, and some mere saplings. Corte itself is built

among the mountain fastnesses of the interior. The snows and granite

cliffs of Monte Rotondo overhang it to the north-west, while two fair

valleys lead downward from its eyrie to the eastern coast. The rock on

which it stands rises to a sharp point, sloping southward, and

commanding the valleys of the Golo and the Tavignano. Remembering that

Corte was the old capital of Corsica, and the centre of General Paoli's

government, we are led to compare the town with Innsprück, Meran, or

Grenoble. In point of scenery and situation it is hardly second to any

of these mountain-girdled cities; but its 112poverty and bareness are

scarcely less striking than those of Bocognano.

The whole Corsican character, with its stern love of justice, its

furious revengefulness and wild passion for freedom, seems to be

illustrated by the peculiar elements of grandeur and desolation in this

landscape. When we traverse the forest of Vico or the rocky

pasture-lands of Niolo, the history of the Corsican national heroes,

Giudice della Rocca and Sampiero, becomes intelligible, nor do we fail

to understand some of the mysterious attraction which led the more

daring spirits of the island to prefer a free life among the macchi and

pine-woods to placid lawful occupations in farms and villages. The

lives of the two men whom I have mentioned are so prominent in Corsican

history, and are so often still upon the lips of the common people,

that it may be well to sketch their outlines in the foreground of the

Salvator Rosa landscape just described. Giudice was the governor of

Corsica, as lieutenant for the Pisans, at the end of the thirteenth

century. At that time the island belonged to the republic of Pisa, but

the Genoese were encroaching on them by land and sea, and the whole

life of their brave champion was spent in a desperate struggle with the

invaders, until at last he died, old, blind, and in prison, at the

command of his savage foes. Giudice was the title which the Pisans

usually conferred upon their governor, and Della Rocca deserved it by

right of his own inexorable love of justice. Indeed, justice seems to

have been with him a passion, swallowing up all other feelings of his

nature. All the stories which are told of him turn upon this point in

his character; and though they may not be strictly true, they

illustrate the stern virtues for which he was celebrated among the

Corsicans, and show what kind of men this harsh and gloomy nation loved

to celebrate as heroes. This is not the place either to criticise these

legends or to recount them at 113full length. The most famous and the

most characteristic may, however, be briefly told. On one occasion,

after a victory over the Genoese, he sent a message that the captives

in his hands should be released if their wives and sisters came to sue

for them. The Genoese ladies embarked, and arrived in Corsica, and to

Giudice's nephew was intrusted the duty of fulfilling his uncle's

promise. In the course of executing his commission, the youth was so

smitten with the beauty of one of the women that he dishonoured her.

Thereupon Giudice had him at once put to death. Another story shows the

Spartan justice of this hero in a less savage light. He was passing by

a cowherd's cottage, when he heard some young calves bleating. On

inquiring what distressed them, he was told that the calves had not

enough milk to drink after the farm people had been served. Then

Giudice made it a law that the calves throughout the land should take

their fill before the cows were milked.

Sampiero belongs to a later period of Corsican history. After a long

course of misgovernment the Genoese rule had become unbearable. There

was no pretence of administering justice, and private vengeance had

full sway in the island. The sufferings of the nation were so great

that the time had come for a new judge or saviour to rise among them.

Sampiero was the son of obscure parents who lived at Bastelica. But his

abilities very soon declared themselves, and made a way for him in the

world. He spent his youth in the armies of the Medici and of the French

Francis, gaining great renown as a brave soldier. Bayard became his

friend, and Francis made him captain of his Corsican bands. But

Sampiero did not forget the wrongs of his native land while thus on

foreign service. He resolved, if possible, to undermine the power of

Genoa, and spent the whole of his manhood and old age in one long

struggle with their great captain, Stephen Doria. Of 114his stern

patriotism and Roman severity of virtue the following story is a

terrible illustration. Sampiero, though a man of mean birth, had

married an heiress of the noble Corsican house of the Ornani. His wife,

Vannina, was a woman of timid and flexible nature, who, though devoted

to her husband, fell into the snares of his enemies. During his absence

on an embassy to Algiers the Genoese induced her to leave her home at

Marseilles and to seek refuge in their city, persuading her that this

step would secure the safety of her child. She was starting on her

journey when a friend of Sampiero arrested her, and brought her back to

Aix, in Provence. Sampiero, when he heard of these events, hurried to

France, and was received by a relative of his, who hinted that he had

known of Vannina's projected flight. 'E tu hai taciuto?' was Sampiero's

only answer, accompanied by a stroke of his poignard that killed the

lukewarm cousin. Sampiero now brought his wife from Aix to Marseilles,

preserving the most absolute silence on the way, and there, on entering

his house, he killed her with his own hand. It is said that he loved

Vannina passionately; and when she was dead, he caused her to be buried

with magnificence in the church of S. Francis. Like Giudice, Sampiero

fell at last a prey to treachery. The murder of Vannina had made the

Ornani his deadly foes. In order to avenge her blood, they played into

the hands of the Genoese, and laid a plot by which the noblest of the

Corsicans was brought to death. First, they gained over to their scheme

a monk of Bastelica, called Ambrogio, and Sampiero's own squire and

shield-bearer, Vittolo. By means of these men, in whom he trusted, he

was drawn defenceless and unattended into a deeply wooded ravine near

Cavro, not very far from his birthplace, where the Ornani and their

Genoese troops surrounded him. Sampiero fired his pistols in vain, for

Vittolo had loaded them with the shot downwards. Then he drew 115his

sword, and began to lay about him, when the same Vittolo, the Judas,

stabbed him from behind, and the old lion fell dead by his friend's

hand. Sampiero was sixty-nine when he died, in the year 1567. It is

satisfactory to know that the Corsicans have called traitors and foes

to their country Vittoli for ever. These two examples of Corsican

patriots are enough; we need not add to theirs the history of Paoli—a

milder and more humane, but scarcely less heroic leader. Paoli,

however, in the hour of Corsica's extremest peril, retired to England,

and died in philosophic exile. Neither Giudice nor Sampiero would have

acted thus. The more forlorn the hope, the more they struggled.

Among the old Corsican customs which are fast dying out, but which

still linger in the remote valleys of Niolo and Vico, is the _vócero_,

or funeral chant, improvised by women at funerals over the bodies of

the dead. Nothing illustrates the ferocious temper and savage passions

of the race better than these _vóceri_, many of which have been written

down and preserved. Most of them are songs of vengeance and

imprecation, mingled with hyperbolical laments and utterances of

extravagant grief, poured forth by wives and sisters at the side of

murdered husbands and brothers. The women who sing them seem to have

lost all milk of human kindness, and to have exchanged the virtues of

their sex for Spartan fortitude and the rage of furies. While we read

their turbid lines we are carried in imagination to one of the

cheerless houses of Bastelica or Bocognano, overshadowed by its

mournful chestnut-tree, on which the blood of the murdered man is yet

red. The _gridata_, or wake, is assembled in a dark room. On the wooden

board, called _tola_, the corpse lies stretched; and round it are

women, veiled in the blue-black mantle of Corsican costume, moaning and

rocking themselves upon their chairs. The _pasto_ or _conforto_, food

supplied for mourners, 116stands upon a side table, and round the room

are men with savage eyes and bristling beards, armed to the teeth, keen

for vengeance. The dead man's musket and pocket-pistol lie beside him,

and his bloody shirt is hung up at his head. Suddenly, the silence,

hitherto only disturbed by suppressed groans and muttered curses, is

broken by a sharp cry. A woman rises: it is the sister of the dead man;

she seizes his shirt, and holding it aloft with Mænad gestures and

frantic screams, gives rhythmic utterance to her grief and rage. 'I was

spinning, when I heard a great noise: it was a gunshot, which went into

my heart, and seemed a voice that cried, "Run, thy brother is dying." I

ran into the room above; I took the blow into my breast; I said, "Now

he is dead, there is nothing to give me comfort. Who will undertake thy

vengeance? When I show thy shirt, who will vow to let his beard grow

till the murderer is slain? Who is there left to do it? A mother near

her death? A sister? Of all our race there is only left a woman,

without kin, poor, orphan, and a girl. Yet, O my brother! never fear.

For thy vengeance thy sister is enough!

'"Ma per fà la to bindetta,

Sta siguru, basta anch ella!

Give me the pistol; I will shoulder the gun; I will away to the hills.

My brother, heart of thy sister, thou shalt be avenged!"' A _vócero_

declaimed upon the bier of Giammatteo and Pasquale, two cousins, by the

sister of the former, is still fiercer and more energetic in its

malediction. This Erinnys of revenge prays Christ and all the saints to

extirpate the murderer's whole race, to shrivel it up till it passes

from the earth. Then, with a sudden and vehement transition to the

pathos of her own sorrow, she exclaims:—

'Halla mai bista nissunu

Tumbà l'omi pe li canti?'

117

It appears from these words that Giammatteo's enemies had killed him

because they were jealous of his skill in singing. Shortly after, she

curses the curate of the village, a kinsman of the murderer, for

refusing to toll the funeral bells; and at last, all other threads of

rage and sorrow being twined and knotted into one, she gives loose to

her raging thirst for blood: 'If only I had a son, to train like a

sleuth-hound, that he might track the murderer! Oh, if I had a son! Oh,

if I had a lad!' Her words seem to choke her, and she swoons, and

remains for a short time insensible. When the Bacchante of revenge

awakes, it is with milder feelings in her heart: 'O brother mine,

Matteo! art thou sleeping? Here I will rest with thee and weep till

daybreak.' It is rare to find in literature so crude and intense an

expression of fiery hatred as these untranslatable _vóceri_ present.

The emotion is so simple and so strong that it becomes sublime by mere

force, and affects us with a strange pathos when contrasted with the

tender affection conveyed in such terms of endearment as 'my dove,' 'my

flower,' 'my pheasant,' 'my bright painted orange,' addressed to the

dead. In the _vóceri_ it often happens that there are several

interlocutors: one friend questions and another answers; or a kinswoman

of the murderer attempts to justify the deed, and is overwhelmed with

deadly imprecations. Passionate appeals are made to the corpse: 'Arise!

Do you not hear the women cry? Stand up. Show your wounds, and let the

fountains of your blood flow! Alas! he is dead; he sleeps; he cannot

hear!' Then they turn again to tears and curses, feeling that no help

or comfort can come from the clay-cold form. The intensity of grief

finds strange language for its utterance. A girl, mourning over her

father, cries:—

'Mi l'hannu crucifissatu

Cume Ghiesu Cristu in croce.'

118

Once only, in Viale's collection, does any friend of the dead remember

mercy. It is an old woman, who points to the crucifix above the bier.

But all the _vóceri_ are not so murderous. Several are composed for

girls who died unwedded and before their time, by their mothers or

companions. The language of these laments is far more tender and

ornate. They praise the gentle virtues and beauty of the girl, her

piety and helpful household ways. The most affecting of these dirges is

that which celebrates the death of Romana, daughter of Dariola Danesi.

Here is a pretty picture of the girl: 'Among the best and fairest

maidens you were like a rose among flowers, like the moon among stars;

so far more lovely were you than the loveliest. The youths in your

presence were like lighted torches, but full of reverence; you were

courteous to all, but with none familiar. In church they gazed at you,

but you looked at none of them; and after mass you said, "Mother, let

us go." Oh! who will console me for your loss? Why did the Lord so much

desire you? But now you rest in heaven, all joy and smiles; for the

world was not worthy of so fair a face. Oh, how far more beautiful will

Paradise be now!' Then follows a piteous picture of the old bereaved

mother, to whom a year will seem a thousand years, who will wander

among relatives without affection, neighbours without love; and who,

when sickness comes, will have no one to give her a drop of water, or

to wipe the sweat from her brow, or to hold her hand in death. Yet all

that is left for her is to wait and pray for the end, that she may join

again her darling.

But it is time to return to Ajaccio itself. At present the attractions

and ornaments of the town consist of a good public library, Cardinal

Fesch's large but indifferent collection of pictures, two monuments

erected to Napoleon, and Napoleon's house. It will always be the chief

pride of Ajaccio that she 119gave birth to the great emperor. Close to

the harbour, in a public square by the sea-beach, stands an equestrian

statue of the conqueror, surrounded by his four brothers on foot. They

are all attired in Roman fashion, and are turned seaward, to the west,

as if to symbolise the emigration of this family to subdue Europe.

There is something ludicrous and forlorn in the stiffness of the

group—something even pathetic, when we think how Napoleon gazed seaward

from another island, no longer on horseback, no longer laurel-crowned,

an unthroned, unseated conqueror, on S. Helena. His father's house

stands close by. An old Italian waiting-woman, who had been long in the

service of the Murats, keeps it and shows it. She has the manners of a

lady, and can tell many stories of the various members of the

Buonaparte family. Those who fancy that Napoleon was born in a mean

dwelling of poor parents will be surprised to find so much space and

elegance in these apartments. Of course his family was not rich by

comparison with the riches of French or English nobles. But for

Corsicans they were well-to-do, and their house has an air of antique

dignity. The chairs of the entrance-saloon have been literally stripped

of their coverings by enthusiastic visitors; the horse-hair stuffing

underneath protrudes itself with a sort of comic pride, as if

protesting that it came to be so tattered in an honourable service.

Some of the furniture seems new; but many old presses, inlaid with

marbles, agates, and lapis-lazuli, such as Italian families preserve

for generations, have an air of respectable antiquity about them. Nor

is there any doubt that the young Napoleon led his minuets beneath the

stiff girandoles of the formal dancing-room. There, too, in a dark back

chamber, is the bed in which he was born. At its foot is a photograph

of the Prince Imperial sent by the Empress Eugénie, who, when she

visited the room, wept much 120_pianse molto_ (to use the old lady's

phrase)—at seeing the place where such lofty destinies began. On the

wall of the same room is a portrait of Napoleon himself as the young

general of the republic—with the citizen's unkempt hair, the fierce

fire of the Revolution in his eyes, a frown upon his forehead, lips

compressed, and quivering nostrils; also one of his mother, the

pastille of a handsome woman, with Napoleonic eyes and brows and nose,

but with a vacant simpering mouth. Perhaps the provincial artist knew

not how to seize the expression of this feature, the most difficult to

draw. For we cannot fancy that Letizia had lips without the firmness or

the fulness of a majestic nature.

The whole first story of this house belonged to the Buonaparte family.

The windows look out partly on a little court and partly on narrow

streets. It was, no doubt, the memory of this home that made Napoleon,

when emperor, design schemes for the good of Corsica—schemes that might

have brought him more honour than many conquests, but which he had no

time or leisure to carry out. On S. Helena his mind often reverted to

them, and he would speak of the gummy odours of the macchi wafted from

the hillsides to the seashore.

121

MONTE GENEROSO

The long hot days of Italian summer were settling down on plain and

country when, in the last week of May, we travelled northward from

Florence and Bologna seeking coolness. That was very hard to find in

Lombardy. The days were long and sultry, the nights short, without a

respite from the heat. Milan seemed a furnace, though in the Duomo and

the narrow shady streets there was a twilight darkness which at least

looked cool. Long may it be before the northern spirit of improvement

has taught the Italians to despise the wisdom of their forefathers, who

built those sombre streets of palaces with overhanging eaves, that,

almost meeting, form a shelter from the fiercest sun. The lake country

was even worse than the towns; the sunlight lay all day asleep upon the

shining waters, and no breeze came to stir their surface or to lift the

tepid veil of haze, through which the stony mountains, with their yet

unmelted patches of winter snow, glared as if in mockery of coolness.

Then we heard of a new inn, which had just been built by an

enterprising Italian doctor below the very top of Monte Generoso. There

was a picture of it in the hotel at Cadenabbia, but this gave but

little idea of any particular beauty. A big square house, with many

windows, and the usual ladies on mules, and guides with alpenstocks,

advancing towards it, and some round bushes growing near, was all it

showed. Yet there hung the real Monte Generoso above our heads, and we

122thought it must be cooler on its height than by the lake-shore. To

find coolness was the great point with us just then. Moreover, some one

talked of the wonderful plants that grew among its rocks, and of its

grassy slopes enamelled with such flowers as make our cottage gardens

at home gay in summer, not to speak of others rarer and peculiar to the

region of the Southern Alps. Indeed, the Generoso has a name for

flowers, and it deserves it, as we presently found.

This mountain is fitted by its position for commanding one of the

finest views in the whole range of the Lombard Alps. A glance at the

map shows that. Standing out pre-eminent among the chain of lower hills

to which it belongs, the lakes of Lugano and Como with their long arms

enclose it on three sides, while on the fourth the plain of Lombardy

with its many cities, its rich pasture-lands and cornfields intersected

by winding river-courses and straight interminable roads, advances to

its very foot. No place could be better chosen for surveying that

contrasted scene of plain and mountain, which forms the great

attraction of the outlying buttresses of the central Alpine mass. The

superiority of the Monte Generoso to any of the similar eminences on

the northern outskirts of Switzerland is great. In richness of colour,

in picturesqueness of suggestion, in sublimity and breadth of prospect,

its advantages are incontestable. The reasons for this superiority are

obvious. On the Italian side the transition from mountain to plain is

far more abrupt; the atmosphere being clearer, a larger sweep of

distance is within our vision; again, the sunlight blazes all day long

upon the very front and forehead of the distant Alpine chain, instead

of merely slanting along it, as it does upon the northern side.

From Mendrisio, the village at the foot of the mountain, an easy

mule-path leads to the hotel, winding first through 123English-looking

hollow lanes with real hedges, which are rare in this country, and

English primroses beneath them. Then comes a forest region of luxuriant

chestnut-trees, giants with pink boles just bursting into late leafage,

yellow and tender, but too thin as yet for shade. A little higher up,

the chestnuts are displaced by wild laburnums bending under their

weight of flowers. The graceful branches meet above our heads, sweeping

their long tassels against our faces as we ride beneath them, while the

air for a good mile is full of fragrance. It is strange to be reminded

in this blooming labyrinth of the dusty suburb roads and villa gardens

of London. The laburnum is pleasant enough in S. John's Wood or the

Regent's Park in May—a tame domesticated thing of brightness amid smoke

and dust. But it is another joy to see it flourishing in its own home,

clothing acres of the mountain-side in a very splendour of

spring-colour, mingling its paler blossoms with the golden broom of our

own hills, and with the silver of the hawthorn and wild cherry. Deep

beds of lilies-of-the-valley grow everywhere beneath the trees; and in

the meadows purple columbines, white asphodels, the Alpine spiræa,

tall, with feathery leaves, blue scabious, golden hawkweeds, turkscap

lilies, and, better than all, the exquisite narcissus poeticus, with

its crimson-tipped cup, and the pure pale lilies of San Bruno, are

crowded in a maze of dazzling brightness. Higher up the laburnums

disappear, and flaunting crimson peonies gleam here and there upon the

rocks, until at length the gentians and white ranunculuses of the

higher Alps displace the less hardy flowers of Italy.

About an hour below the summit of the mountain we came upon the inn, a

large clean building, with scanty furniture and snowy wooden floors,

guiltless of carpets. It is big enough to hold about a hundred guests;

and Doctor Pasta, who built it, a native of Mendrisio, was gifted

either 124with much faith or with a real prophetic instinct.[8] Anyhow

he deserves commendation for his spirit of enterprise. As yet the house

is little known to English travellers: it is mostly frequented by

Italians from Milan, Novara, and other cities of the plain, who call it

the Italian Righi, and come to it, as cockneys go to Richmond, for

noisy picnic excursions, or at most for a few weeks' _villeggiatura_ in

the summer heats. When we were there in May the season had scarcely

begun, and the only inmates besides ourselves were a large party from

Milan, ladies and gentlemen in holiday guise, who came, stayed one

night, climbed the peak at sunrise, and departed amid jokes and

shouting and half-childish play, very unlike the doings of a similar

party in sober England. After that the stillness of nature descended on

the mountain, and the sun shone day after day upon that great view

which seemed created only for ourselves. And what a view it was! The

plain stretching up to the high horizon, where a misty range of pink

cirrus-clouds alone marked the line where earth ended and the sky

began, was islanded with cities and villages innumerable, basking in

the hazy shimmering heat. Milan, seen through the doctor's telescope,

displayed its Duomo perfect as a microscopic shell, with all its

exquisite fretwork, and Napoleon's arch of triumph surmounted by the

four tiny horses, as in a fairy's dream. Far off, long silver lines

marked the lazy course of Po and Ticino, while little lakes like Varese

and the lower end of Maggiore spread themselves out, connecting the

mountains with the plain.

[8] It is but just to Doctor Pasta to remark that the above sentence

was written more than ten years ago. Since then he has enlarged and

improved his house in many ways, furnished it more luxuriously, made

paths through the beechwoods round it, and brought excellent water at

a great cost from a spring near the summit of the mountain. A more

charming residence from early spring to late autumn can scarcely be

discovered.

125Five minutes' walk from the hotel brought us to a ridge where the

precipice fell suddenly and almost sheer over one arm of Lugano Lake.

Sullenly outstretched asleep it lay beneath us, coloured with the tints

of fluor-spar, or with the changeful green and azure of a peacock's

breast. The depth appeared immeasurable. San Salvadore had receded into

insignificance: the houses and churches and villas of Lugano bordered

the lake-shore with an uneven line of whiteness. And over all there

rested a blue mist of twilight and of haze, contrasting with the

clearness of the peaks above. It was sunset when we first came here;

and, wave beyond wave, the purple Italian hills tossed their crested

summits to the foot of a range of stormy clouds that shrouded the high

Alps. Behind the clouds was sunset, clear and golden; but the mountains

had put on their mantle for the night, and the hem of their garment was

all we were to see. And yet—over the edge of the topmost ridge of

cloud, what was that long hard line of black, too solid and immovable

for cloud, rising into four sharp needles clear and well defined?

Surely it must be the familiar outline of Monte Rosa itself, the form

which every one who loves the Alps knows well by heart, which

picture-lovers know from Ruskin's woodcut in the 'Modern Painters.' For

a moment only the vision stayed: then clouds swept over it again, and

from the place where the empress of the Alps had been, a pillar of mist

shaped like an angel's wing, purple and tipped with gold, shot up

against the pale green sky. That cloud-world was a pageant in itself,

as grand and more gorgeous perhaps than the mountains would have been.

Deep down through the hollows of the Simplon a thunderstorm was

driving; and we saw forked flashes once and again, as in a distant

world, lighting up the valleys for a moment, and leaving the darkness

blacker behind them as the storm blurred out the landscape forty miles

away. 126Darkness was coming to us too, though our sky was clear and

the stars were shining brightly. At our feet the earth was folding

itself to sleep; the plain was wholly lost; little islands of white

mist had formed themselves, and settled down upon the lakes and on

their marshy estuaries; the birds were hushed; the gentian-cups were

filling to the brim with dew. Night had descended on the mountain and

the plain; the show was over.

The dawn was whitening in the east next morning, when we again

scrambled through the dwarf beechwood to the precipice above the lake.

Like an ink-blot it lay, unruffled, slumbering sadly. Broad sheets of

vapour brooded on the plain, telling of miasma and fever, of which we

on the mountain, in the pure cool air, knew nothing. The Alps were all

there now—cold, unreal, stretching like a phantom line of snowy peaks,

from the sharp pyramids of Monte Viso and the Grivola in the west to

the distant Bernina and the Ortler in the east. Supreme among them

towered Monte Rosa—queenly, triumphant, gazing down in proud

pre-eminence, as she does when seen from any point of the Italian

plain. There is no mountain like her. Mont Blanc himself is scarcely so

regal; and she seems to know it, for even the clouds sweep humbled

round her base, girdling her at most, but leaving her crown clear and

free. Now, however, there were no clouds to be seen in all the sky. The

mountains had a strange unshriven look, as if waiting to be blessed.

Above them, in the cold grey air, hung a low black arch of shadow, the

shadow of the bulk of the huge earth, which still concealed the sun.

Slowly, slowly this dark line sank lower, till, one by one, at last,

the peaks caught first a pale pink flush; then a sudden golden glory

flashed from one to the other, as they leapt joyfully into life. It is

a supreme moment this first burst of life and light over the sleeping

world, as one can 127only see it on rare days and in rare places like

the Monte Generoso. The earth—enough of it at least for us to picture

to ourselves the whole—lies at our feet; and we feel as the Saviour

might have felt, when from the top of that high mountain He beheld the

kingdoms of the world and all the glory of them. Strangely and solemnly

may we image to our fancy the lives that are being lived down in those

cities of the plain: how many are waking at this very moment to toil

and a painful weariness, to sorrow, or to 'that unrest which men

miscall delight;' while we upon our mountain buttress, suspended in

mid-heaven and for a while removed from daily cares, are drinking in

the beauty of the world that God has made so fair and wonderful. From

this same eyrie, only a few years ago, the hostile armies of France,

Italy, and Austria might have been watched moving in dim masses across

the plains, for the possession of which they were to clash in mortal

fight at Solferino and Magenta. All is peaceful now. It is hard to

picture the waving cornfields trodden down, the burning villages and

ransacked vineyards, all the horrors of real war to which that fertile

plain has been so often the prey. But now these memories of

Old, unhappy, far-off things,

And battles long ago,

do but add a calm and beauty to the radiant scene that lies before us.

And the thoughts which it suggests, the images with which it stores our

mind, are not without their noblest uses. The glory of the world sinks

deeper into our shallow souls than we well know; and the spirit of its

splendour is always ready to revisit us on dark and dreary days at home

with an unspeakable refreshment. Even as I write, I seem to see the

golden glow sweeping in broad waves over the purple hills nearer and

nearer, till the lake brightens at our 128feet, and the windows of

Lugano flash with sunlight, and little boats creep forth across the

water like spiders on a pond, leaving an arrowy track of light upon the

green behind them, while Monte Salvadore with its tiny chapel and a

patch of the further landscape are still kept in darkness by the shadow

of the Generoso itself. The birds wake into song as the sun's light

comes; cuckoo answers cuckoo from ridge to ridge; dogs bark; and even

the sounds of human life rise up to us: children's voices and the

murmurs of the market-place ascending faintly from the many villages

hidden among the chestnut-trees beneath our feet; while the creaking of

a cart we can but just see slowly crawling along the straight road by

the lake, is heard at intervals.

The full beauty of the sunrise is but brief. Already the low lakelike

mists we saw last night have risen and spread, and shaken themselves

out into masses of summer clouds, which, floating upward, threaten to

envelop us upon our vantage-ground. Meanwhile they form a changeful sea

below, blotting out the plain, surging up into the valleys with the

movement of a billowy tide, attacking the lower heights like the

advance-guard of a besieging army, but daring not as yet to invade the

cold and solemn solitudes of the snowy Alps. These, too, in time, when

the sun's heat has grown strongest, will be folded in their midday pall

of sheltering vapour.

The very summit of Monte Generoso must not be left without a word of

notice. The path to it is as easy as the Bheep-walks on an English

down, though cut along grass-slopes descending at a perilously sharp

angle. At the top the view is much the same, as far as the grand

features go, as that which is commanded from the cliff by the hotel.

But the rocks here are crowded with rare Alpine flowers—delicate golden

auriculas with powdery leaves and 129stems, pale yellow cowslips,

imperial purple saxifrages, soldanellas at the edge of lingering

patches of the winter snow, blue gentians, crocuses, and the frail,

rosy-tipped ranunculus, called glacialis. Their blooming time is brief.

When summer comes the mountain will be bare and burned, like all

Italian hills. The Generoso is a very dry mountain, silent and solemn

from its want of streams. There is no sound of falling waters on its

crags; no musical rivulets flow down its sides, led carefully along the

slopes, as in Switzerland, by the peasants, to keep their hay-crops

green and gladden the thirsty turf throughout the heat and drought of

summer. The soil is a Jurassic limestone: the rain penetrates the

porous rock, and sinks through cracks and fissures, to reappear above

the base of the mountain in a full-grown stream. This is a defect in

the Generoso, as much to be regretted as the want of shade upon its

higher pastures. Here, as elsewhere in Piedmont, the forests are cut

for charcoal; the beech-scrub, which covers large tracts of the hills,

never having the chance of growing into trees much higher than a man.

It is this which makes an Italian mountain at a distance look woolly,

like a sheep's back. Among the brushwood, however, lilies-of-the-valley

and Solomon's seals delight to grow; and the league-long beds of wild

strawberries prove that when the laburnums have faded, the mountain

will become a garden of feasting.

It was on the crest of Monte Generoso, late one afternoon in May, that

we saw a sight of great beauty. The sun had yet about an hour before it

sank behind the peaks of Monte Rosa, and the sky was clear, except for

a few white clouds that floated across the plain of Lombardy. Then as

we sat upon the crags, tufted with soldanellas and auriculas, we could

see a fleecy vapour gliding upward from the hollows of the mountain,

very thin and pale, yet dense enough to blot the 130landscape to the

south and east from sight. It rose 314with an imperceptible motion, as

the Oceanides might have soared from the sea to comfort Prometheus in

the tragedy of Æschylus. Already the sun had touched its upper edge

with gold, and we were expecting to be enveloped in a mist; when

suddenly upon the outspread sheet before us there appeared two forms,

larger than life, yet not gigantic, surrounded with haloes of such

tempered iridescence as the moon half hidden by a summer cloud is wont

to make. They were the glorified figures of ourselves; and what we did,

the phantoms mocked, rising or bowing, or spreading wide their arms.

Some scarce-felt breeze prevented the vapour from passing across the

ridge to westward, though it still rose from beneath, and kept fading

away into thin air above our heads. Therefore the vision lasted as long

as the sun stayed yet above the Alps; and the images with their

aureoles shrank and dilated with the undulations of the mist. I could

not but think of that old formula for an anthropomorphic Deity—'the

Brocken-spectre of the human spirit projected on the mists of the

Non-ego.' Even like those cloud-phantoms are the gods made in the image

of man, who have been worshipped through successive ages of the world,

gods dowered with like passions to those of the races who have crouched

before them, gods cruel and malignant and lustful, jealous and noble

and just, radiant or gloomy, the counterparts of men upon a vast and

shadowy scale. But here another question rose. If the gods that men

have made and ignorantly worshipped be really but glorified copies of

their own souls, where is the sun in this parallel? Without the sun's

rays the mists of Monte Generoso could have shown, no shadowy forms.

Without some other power than the mind of man, could men have fashioned

for themselves 131those ideals that they named their gods? Unseen by

Greek, or Norseman, or Hindoo, the potent force by which alone they

could externalise their image, existed outside them, independent of

their thought. Nor does the trite epigram touch the surface of the real

mystery. The sun, the human beings on the mountain, and the mists are

all parts of one material universe: the transient phenomenon we

witnessed was but the effect of a chance combination. Is, then, the

anthropomorphic God as momentary and as accidental in the system of the

world as that vapoury spectre? The God in whom we live and move and

have our being must be far more all-pervasive, more incognisable by the

souls of men, who doubt not for one moment of His presence and His

power. Except for purposes of rhetoric the metaphor that seemed so

clever fails. Nor, when once such thoughts have been stirred in us by

such a sight, can we do better than repeat Goethe's sublime profession

of a philosophic mysticism. This translation I made one morning on the

Pasterze Gletscher beneath the spires of the Gross Glockner:—

To Him who from eternity, self-stirred,

Himself hath made by His creative word!

To Him, supreme, who causeth Faith to be,

Trust, Hope, Love, Power, and endless Energy!

To Him, who, seek to name Him as we will,

Unknown within Himself abideth still!

Strain ear and eye, till sight and sense be dim;

Thou'lt find but faint similitudes of Him:

Yea, and thy spirit in her flight of flame

Still strives to gauge the symbol and the name:

Charmed and compelled thou climb'st from height to height,

And round thy path the world shines wondrous bright;

Time, Space, and Size, and Distance cease to be,

And every step is fresh infinity.

132

What were the God who sat outside to scan

The spheres that 'neath His finger circling ran?

God dwells within, and moves the world and moulds,

Himself and Nature in one form enfolds:

Thus all that lives in Him and breathes and is,

Shall ne'er His puissance, ne'er His spirit miss.

The soul of man, too, is an universe:

Whence follows it that race with race concurs

In naming all it knows of good and true

God,—yea, its own God; and with homage due

Surrenders to His sway both earth and heaven;

Fears Him, and loves, where place for love is given.

133

LOMBARD VIGNETTES

ON THE SUPERGA

This is the chord of Lombard colouring in May. Lowest in the scale:

bright green of varied tints, the meadow-grasses mingling with willows

and acacias, harmonised by air and distance. Next, opaque blue—the blue

of something between amethyst and lapis-lazuli—that belongs alone to

the basements of Italian mountains. Higher, the roseate whiteness of

ridged snow on Alps or Apennines. Highest, the blue of the sky,

ascending from pale turquoise to transparent sapphire filled with

light. A mediæval mystic might have likened this chord to the spiritual

world. For the lowest region is that of natural life, of plant and bird

and beast, and unregenerate man; it is the place of faun and nymph and

satyr, the plain where wars are fought and cities built, and work is

done. Thence we climb to purified humanity, the mountains of purgation,

the solitude and simplicity of contemplative life not yet made perfect

by freedom from the flesh. Higher comes that thin white belt, where are

the resting places of angelic feet, the points whence purged souls take

their flight toward infinity. Above all is heaven, the hierarchies

ascending row on row to reach the light of God.

This fancy occurred to me as I climbed the slope of the Superga, gazing

over acacia hedges and poplars to the mountains bare in morning light.

The occasional occurrence of 134bars across this chord—poplars

shivering in sun and breeze, stationary cypresses as black as night,

and tall campanili with the hot red shafts of glowing brick—adds just

enough of composition to the landscape. Without too much straining of

the allegory, the mystic might have recognised in these aspiring bars

the upward effort of souls rooted in the common life of earth.

The panorama, unrolling as we ascend, is enough to overpower a lover of

beauty. There is nothing equal to it for space and breadth and majesty.

Monte Rosa, the masses of Mont Blanc blent with the Grand Paradis, the

airy pyramid of Monte Viso, these are the battlements of that vast

Alpine rampart, in which the vale of Susa opens like a gate. To west

and south sweep the Maritime Alps and the Apennines. Beneath, glides

the infant Po; and where he leads our eyes, the plain is only limited

by pearly mist.

A BRONZE BUST OF CALIGULA AT TURIN

The Albertina bronze is one of the most precious portraits of

antiquity, not merely because it confirms the testimony of the green

basalt bust in the Capitol, but also because it supplies an even more

emphatic and impressive illustration to the narrative of Suetonius.

Caligula is here represented as young and singularly beautiful. It is

indeed an ideal Roman head, with the powerful square modelling, the

crisp short hair, low forehead and regular firm features, proper to the

noblest Roman type. The head is thrown backward from the throat; and

there is a something of menace or defiance or suffering in the

suggestion of brusque movement given to the sinews of the neck. This

attitude, together with the tension of the forehead, and the fixed

expression of pain and strain communicated by the 135lines of the

mouth—strong muscles of the upper lip and abruptly chiselled under

lip—in relation to the small eyes, deep set beneath their cavernous and

level brows, renders the whole face a monument of spiritual anguish. I

remember that the green basalt bust of the Capitol has the same anxious

forehead, the same troubled and overburdened eyes; but the agony of

this fretful mouth, comparable to nothing but the mouth of Pandolfo

Sigismondo Malatesta, and, like that, on the verge of breaking into the

spasms of delirium, is quite peculiar to the Albertina bronze. It is

just this which tha portrait of the Capitol lacks for the completion of

Caligula. The man who could be so represented in art had nothing wholly

vulgar in him. The brutality of Caracalla, the overblown sensuality of

Nero, the effeminacy of Commodus or Heliogabalus, are all absent here.

This face idealises the torture of a morbid soul. It is withal so truly

beautiful that it might easily be made the poem of high suffering or

noble passion. If the bronze were plastic, I see how a great sculptor,

by but few strokes, could convert it into an agonising Stephen or

Sebastian. As it is, the unimaginable touch of disease, the unrest of

madness, made Caligula the genius of insatiable appetite; and his

martyrdom was the torment of lust and ennui and everlasting agitation.

The accident of empire tantalised him with vain hopes of satisfying the

Charybdis of his soul's sick cravings. From point to point he passed of

empty pleasure and unsatisfying cruelty, for ever hungry; until the

malady of his spirit, unrestrained by any limitations, and with the

right medium for its development, became unique—the tragic type of

pathological desire. What more than all things must have plagued a man

with that face was probably the unavoidable meanness of his career.

When we study the chapters of Suetonius, we are forced to feel that,

though the situation and the madness of Caligula 136were dramatically

impressive, his crimes were trivial and, small. In spite of the vast

scale on which he worked his devilish will, his life presents a total

picture of sordid vice, differing only from pot-house dissipation and

schoolboy cruelty in point of size. And this of a truth is the Nemesis

of evil. After a time, mere tyrannous caprice must become commonplace

and cloying, tedious to the tyrant, and uninteresting to the student of

humanity: nor can I believe that Caligula failed to perceive this to

his own infinite disgust.

Suetonius asserts that he was hideously ugly. How are we to square this

testimony with the witness of the bronze before us? What changed the

face, so beautiful and terrible in youth, to ugliness that shrank from

sight in manhood? Did the murderers find it blurred in its fine

lineaments, furrowed with lines of care, hollowed with the soul's

hunger? Unless a life of vice and madness had succeeded in making

Caligula's face what the faces of some maniacs are—the bloated ruin of

what was once a living witness to the soul within—I could fancy that

death may have sanctified it with even more beauty than this bust of

the self-tormented young man shows. Have we not all seen the anguish of

thought-fretted faces smoothed out by the hands of the Deliverer?

FERRARI AT VERCELLI

It is possible that many visitors to the Cathedral of Como have carried

away the memory of stately women with abundant yellow hair and

draperies of green and crimson, in a picture they connect thereafter

with Gaudenzio Ferrari. And when they come to Milan, they are probably

both impressed and disappointed by a Martyrdom of S. Catherine in the

Brera, bearing the same artist's name. If they wish to understand this

painter, they must seek him at Varallo, at 137Saronno, and at Vercelli.

In the Church of S. Cristoforo in Vercelli, Gaudenzio Ferrari at the

full height of his powers ghowed what he could do to justify Lomazzo's

title chosen for him of the Eagle. He has indeed the strong wing and

the swiftness of the king of birds. And yet the works of few really

great painters—and among the really great we place Ferrari—leave upon

the mind a more distressing sense of imperfection. Extraordinary

fertility of fancy, vehement dramatic passion, sincere study of nature,

and great command of technical resources are here (as elsewhere in

Ferrari's frescoes) neutralised by an incurable defect of the combining

and harmonising faculty, so essential to a masterpiece. There is stuff

enough of thought and vigour and imagination to make a dozen artists.

And yet we turn away disappointed from the crowded, dazzling,

stupefying wilderness of forma and faces on these mighty walls.

All that Ferrari derived from actual life—the heads of single figures,

the powerful movement of men and women in excited action, the

monumental pose of two praying nuns—is admirably rendered. His angels

too, in S. Cristoforo as elsewhere, are quite original; not only in

their type of beauty, which is terrestrial and peculiar to Ferrari,

without a touch of Correggio's sensuality; but also in the intensity of

their emotion, the realisation of their vitality. Those which hover

round the Cross in the fresco of the 'Crucifixion' are as passionate as

any angels of the Giottesque masters in Assisi. Those again which crowd

the Stable of Bethlehem in the 'Nativity' yield no point of idyllic

charm to Gozzoli's in the Riccardi Chapel.

The 'Crucifixion' and the 'Assumption of Madonna' are very tall and

narrow compositions, audacious in their attempt to fill almost

unmanageable space with a connected action. Of the two frescoes the

'Crucifixion,' which has points of 138strong similarity to the same

subject at Varallo, is by far the best. Ferrari never painted anything

at once truer to life and nobler in tragic style than the fainting

Virgin. Her face expresses the very acme of martyrdom—not exaggerated

nor spasmodic, but real and sublime—in the suffering of a stately

matron. In points like this Ferrari cannot be surpassed. Raphael could

scarcely have done better; besides, there is an air of sincerity, a

stamp of popular truth, in this episode, which lies beyond Raphael's

sphere. It reminds us rather of Tintoretto.

After the 'Crucifixion,' I place the 'Adoration of the Magi,' full of

fine mundane motives and gorgeous costumes; then the 'Sposalizio'

(whose marriage, I am not certain), the only grandly composed picture

of the series, and marked by noble heads; then the 'Adoration of the

Shepherds,' with two lovely angels holding the bambino. The 'Assumption

of the Magdalen'—for which fresco there is a valuable cartoon in the

Albertina Collection at Turin—must have been a fine picture; but it is

ruined now. An oil altar-piece in the choir of the same church struck

me less than the frescoes. It represents Madonna and a crowd of saints

under an orchard of apple-trees, with cherubs curiously flung about

almost at random in the air. The motive of the orchard is prettily

conceived and carried out with spirit.

What Ferrari possessed was rapidity of movement, fulness and richness

of reality, exuberance of invention, excellent portraiture, dramatic

vehemence, and an almost unrivalled sympathy with the swift and

passionate world of angels. What he lacked was power of composition,

simplicity of total effect, harmony in colouring, control over his own

luxuriance, the sense of tranquillity. He seems to have sought grandeur

in size and multitude, richness, éclat, contrast. Being the 139disciple

of Lionardo and Raphael, his defects are truly singular. As a composer,

the old leaven of Giovenone remained in him; but he felt the dramatic

tendencies of a later age, and in occasional episodes he realised them

with a force and _furia_ granted to very few of the Italian painters.

LANINI AT VERCELLI

The Casa Mariano is a palace which belonged to a family of that name.

Like many houses of the sort in Italy, it fell to vile uses; and its

hall of audience was turned into a lumber-room. The Operai of Vercelli,

I was told, bought the palace a few years ago, restored the noble hall,

and devoted a smaller room to a collection of pictures valuable for

students of the early Vercellese style of painting. Of these there is

no need to speak. The great hall is the gem of the Casa Mariano. It has

a coved roof, with a large flat oblong space in the centre of the

ceiling. The whole of this vault and the lunettes beneath were painted

by Lanini; so runs the tradition of the fresco-painter's name; and

though much injured by centuries of outrage, and somewhat marred by

recent restoration, these frescoes form a precious monument of Lombard

art. The object of the painter's design seems to have been the

glorification of Music. In the central compartment of the roof is an

assembly of the gods, obviously borrowed from Raphael's 'Marriage of

Cupid and Psyche' in the Farnesina at Rome. The fusion of Roman

composition with Lombard execution constitutes the chief charm of this

singular work, and makes it, so far as I am aware, unique. Single

figures of the goddesses, and the whole movement of the scene upon

Olympus, are transcribed without attempt at concealment. And yet the

fresco is not a barefaced copy. 140The manner of feeling and of

execution is quite different from that of Raphael's school. The poetry

and sentiment are genuinely Lombard. None of Raphael's pupils could

have carried out his design with a delicacy of emotion and a technical

skill in colouring so consummate. What, we think, as we gaze upward,

would the Master have given for such a craftsman? The hardness,

coarseness, and animal crudity of the Roman School are absent: so also

is their vigour. But where the grace of form and colour is so soft and

sweet, where the high-bred calm of good company is so sympathetically

rendered, where the atmosphere of amorous languor and of melody is so

artistically diffused, we cannot miss the powerful modelling and rather

vulgar _tours de force_ of Giulio Romano. The scale of tone is silvery

golden. There are no hard blues, no coarse red flesh-tints, no black

shadows. Mellow lights, the morning hues of primrose, or of palest

amber, pervade the whole society. It is a court of gentle and

harmonious souls; and though this style of beauty might cloy, at first

sight there is something ravishing in those yellow-haired white-limbed,

blooming deities. No movement of lascivious grace as in Correggio, no

perturbation of the senses as in some of the Venetians, disturbs the

rhythm of their music; nor is the pleasure of the flesh, though felt by

the painter and communicated to the spectator, an interruption to their

divine calm. The white, saffron-haired goddesses are grouped together

like stars seen in the topaz light of evening, like daffodils half

smothered in snowdrops, and among them, Diana, with the crescent on her

forehead, is the fairest. Her dream-like beauty need fear no comparison

with the Diana of the Camera di S. Paolo. Apollo and Bacchus are

scarcely less lovely in their bloom of earliest manhood; honey-pale, as

Greeks would say; like statues of living electron; realising Simaetha's

picture of her lover and his friend:—

141

Τοίς δ΄ ήν ξανθοτέρα μέν ελιχρύσοιο γενειάς

στήθεα δε στίλβοντα πολύ πλέον η΅ τυ Σελάνα.[9]

[9] 'The down upon their cheeks and chin was yellower than

helichrysus, and their breasts gleamed whiter far than thou, O Moon.'

It was thus that the almost childlike spirit of the Milanese painters

felt the antique: how differently from their Roman brethren! It was

thus that they interpreted the lines of their own poets:—

E i tuoi capei più volte ho somigliati

Di Cerere a le paglie secche o bionde

Dintorno crespi al tuo capo legati.[10]

[10] 'Thy tresses have I oftentimes compared to Ceres' yellow autumn

sheaves, wreathed in curled bands around thy head.'

Yet the painter of this hall—whether we are to call him Lanini or

another—was not a composer. Where he has not robbed the motives and the

distribution of the figures from Raphael, he has nothing left but grace

of detail. The intellectual feebleness of his style may be seen in many

figures of women playing upon instruments of music, ranged around the

walls. One girl at the organ is graceful; another with a tambourine has

a sort of Bassarid beauty. But the group of Apollo, Pegasus, and a Muse

upon Parnassus, is a failure in its meaningless frigidity, while few of

these subordinate compositions show power of conception or vigour of

design.

Lanini, like Sodoma, was a native of Vercelli; and though he was

Ferrari's pupil, there is more in him of Luini or of Sodoma than of his

master. He does not rise at any point to the height of these three

great masters, but he shares some of Luini's and Sodoma's fine

qualities, without having any of Ferrari's force. A visit to the

mangled remnants of his frescoes in S. Caterina will repay the student

of art. This was once, apparently, a double church, or a church with

the hall and chapel of a _confraternita_ appended to it. One 142portion

of the building was painted with the history of the Saint; and very

lovely must this work have been, to judge by the fragments which have

recently been rescued from whitewash, damp, and ruthless mutilation.

What wonderful Lombard faces, half obliterated on the broken wall and

mouldering plaster, smile upon us like drowned memories swimming up

from the depths of oblivion! Wherever three or four are grouped

together, we find an exquisite little picture—an old woman and two

young women in a doorway, for example, telling no story, but touching

us with simple harmony of form. Nothing further is needed to render

their grace intelligible. Indeed, knowing the faults of the school, we

may seek some consolation by telling ourselves that these incomplete

fragments yield Lanini's best. In the coved compartments of the roof,

above the windows, ran a row of dancing boys; and these are still most

beautifully modelled, though the pallor of recent whitewash is upon

them. All the boys have blonde hair. They are naked, with scrolls or

ribbons wreathed around them, adding to the airiness of their continual

dance. Some of the loveliest are in a room used to stow away the lumber

of the church—old boards and curtains, broken lanterns, candle-ends in

tin sconces, the musty apparatus of festival adornments, and in the

midst of all a battered, weather-beaten bier.

THE PIAZZA OF PIACENZA

The great feature of Piacenza is its famous piazza—romantically,

picturesquely perfect square, surpassing the most daring attempts of

the scene-painter, and realising a poet's dreams. The space is

considerable, and many streets converge upon it at irregular angles.

Its finest architectural feature is the antique Palace of the Commune:

Gothic 143arcades of stone below, surmounted by a brick building with

wonderfully delicate and varied terra-cotta work in the round-arched

windows. Before this façade, on the marble pavement, prance the bronze

equestrian statues of two Farnesi—insignificant men, exaggerated

horses, flying drapery—as _barocco_ as it is possible to be in style,

but so splendidly toned with verdigris, so superb in their _bravura_

attitude, and so happily placed in the line of two streets lending far

vistas from the square into the town beyond, that it is difficult to

criticise them seriously. They form, indeed, an important element in

the pictorial effect, and enhance the terra-cotta work of the façade by

the contrast of their colour.

The time to see this square is in evening twilight—that wonderful hour

after sunset—when the people are strolling on the pavement, polished to

a mirror by the pacing of successive centuries, and when the cavalry

soldiers group themselves at the angles under the lamp-posts or beneath

the dimly lighted Gothic arches of the Palace. This is the magical

mellow hour to be sought by lovers of the picturesque in all the towns

of Italy, the hour which, by its tender blendings of sallow western

lights with glimmering lamps, casts the veil of half shadow over any

crudeness and restores the injuries of Time; the hour when all the

tints of these old buildings are intensified, etherealised, and

harmonised by one pervasive glow. When I last saw Piacenza, it had been

raining all day; and ere sundown a clearing had come from the Alps,

followed by fresh threatenings of thunderstorms. The air was very

liquid. There was a tract of yellow sunset sky to westward, a faint new

moon half swathed in mist above, and over all the north a huge towered

thundercloud kept flashing distant lightnings. The pallid primrose of

the West, forced down and reflected back from that vast bank of

tempest, gave unearthly beauty to the hues of church and

144palace—tender half-tones of violet and russet paling into greys and

yellows on what in daylight seemed but dull red brick. Even the

uncompromising façade of S. Francesco helped; and the Dukes were like

statues of the 'Gran Commendatore,' waiting for Don Giovanni's

invitation.

MASOLINO AT CASTIGLIONE D'OLONA

Through the loveliest Arcadian scenery of woods and fields and rushing

waters the road leads downward from Varese to Castiglione. The

Collegiate Church stands on a leafy hill above the town, with fair

prospect over groves and waterfalls and distant mountains. Here in the

choir is a series of frescoes by Masolino da Panicale, the master of

Masaccio, who painted them about the year 1428. 'Masolinus de Florentia

pinxit' decides their authorship. The histories of the Virgin, S.

Stephen and S. Lawrence, are represented: but the injuries of time and

neglect have been so great that it is difficult to judge them fairly.

All we feel for certain is that Masolino had not yet escaped from the

traditional Giottesque mannerism. Only a group of Jews stoning Stephen,

and Lawrence before the tribunal, remind us by dramatic energy of the

Brancacci Chapel.

The Baptistery frescoes, dealing with the legend of S. John, show a

remarkable advance; and they are luckily in better preservation. A

soldier lifting his two-handed sword to strike off the Baptist's head

is a vigorous figure, full of Florentine realism. Also in the Baptism

in Jordan we are reminded of Masaccio by an excellent group of

bathers—one man taking off his hose, another putting them on again, a

third standing naked with his back turned, and a fourth shivering

half-dressed with a look of curious sadness on his face. The nude has

been carefully studied and well realised. 145The finest composition of

this series is a large panel representing a double action—Salome at

Herod's table begging for the Baptist's head, and then presenting it to

her mother Herodias. The costumes are quattrocento Florentine, exactly

rendered. Salome is a graceful slender creature; the two women who

regard her offering to Herodias with mingled curiosity and horror, are

well conceived. The background consists of a mountain landscape in

Masaccio's simple manner, a rich Renaissance villa, and an open loggia.

The architecture perspective is scientifically accurate, and a frieze

of boys with garlands on the villa is in the best manner of Florentine

sculpture. On the mountain side, diminished in scale, is a group of

elders, burying the body of S. John. These are massed together and

robed in the style of Masaccio, and have his virile dignity of form and

action. Indeed this interesting wall-painting furnishes an epitome of

Florentine art, in its intentions and achievements, during the first

half of the fifteenth century. The colour is strong and brilliant, and

the execution solid.

The margin of the Salome panel has been used for scratching the

Chronicle of Castiglione. I read one date, 1568, several of the next

century, the record of a duel between two gentlemen, and many

inscriptions to this effect, 'Erodiana Regina,' 'Omnia praetereunt,'

&c. A dirty one-eyed fellow keeps the place. In my presence he swept

the frescoes over with a scratchy broom, flaying their upper surface in

profound unconsciousness of mischief. The armour of the executioner has

had its steel colours almost rubbed off by this infernal process. Damp

and cobwebs are far kinder.

146

THE CERTOSA

The Certosa of Pavia leaves upon the mind an impression of bewildering

sumptuousness: nowhere else are costly materials so combined with a

lavish expenditure of the rarest art. Those who have only once been

driven round together with the crew of sightseers, can carry little

away but the memory of lapis-lazuli and bronze-work, inlaid agates and

labyrinthine sculpture, cloisters tenantless in silence, fair painted

faces smiling from dark corners on the senseless crowd, trim gardens

with rows of pink primroses in spring, and of begonia in autumn,

blooming beneath colonnades of glowing terra-cotta. The striking

contrast between the Gothic of the interior and the Renaissance façade,

each in its own kind perfect, will also be remembered; and thoughts of

the two great houses, Visconti and Sforza, to whose pride of power it

is a monument, may be blended with the recollection of art-treasures

alien to their spirit.

Two great artists, Ambrogio Borgognone and Antonio Amadeo, are the

presiding genii of the Certosa. To minute criticism, based upon the

accurate investigation of records and the comparison of styles, must be

left the task of separating their work from that of numerous

collaborators. But it is none the less certain that the keynote of the

whole music is struck by them, Amadeo, the master of the Colleoni

chapel at Bergamo, was both sculptor and architect. If the façade of

the Certosa be not absolutely his creation, he had a hand in the

distribution of its masses and the detail of its ornaments. The only

fault in this otherwise faultless product of the purest quattrocento

inspiration, is that the façade is a frontispiece, with hardly any

structural relation to the church it masks: and this, though serious

from the point of view of 147architecture, is no abatement of its

sculpturesque and picturesque refinement. At first sight it seems a

wilderness of loveliest reliefs and statues—of angel faces, fluttering

raiment, flowing hair, love-laden youths, and stationary figures of

grave saints, mid wayward tangles of acanthus and wild vine and

cupid-laden foliage; but the subordination of these decorative details

to the main design, clear, rhythmical, and lucid, like a chaunt of

Pergolese or Stradella, will enrapture one who has the sense for unity

evoked from divers elements, for thought subduing all caprices to the

harmony of beauty. It is not possible elsewhere in Italy to find the

instinct of the earlier Renaissance, so amorous in its expenditure of

rare material, so lavish in its bestowal of the costliest workmanship

on ornamental episodes, brought into truer keeping with a pure and

simple structural effect.

All the great sculptor-architects of Lombardy worked in succession on

this miracle of beauty; and this may account for the sustained

perfection of style, which nowhere suffers from the languor of

exhaustion in the artist or from repetition of motives. It remains the

triumph of North Italian genius, exhibiting qualities of tenderness and

self-abandonment to inspiration, which we lack in the severer

masterpieces of the Tuscan school.

To Borgognone is assigned the painting of the roof in nave and

choir—exceeding rich, varied, and withal in sympathy with stately

Gothic style. Borgognone again is said to have designed the saints and

martyrs worked in _tarsia_ for the choir-stalls. His frescoes are in

some parts well preserved, as in the lovely little Madonna at the end

of the south chapel, while the great fresco above the window in the

south transept has an historical value that renders it interesting in

spite of partial decay. Borgognone's oil pictures throughout the church

prove, if such proof were needed after 148inspection of the altar-piece

in our National Gallery, that he was one of the most powerful and

original painters of Italy, blending the repose of the earlier masters

and their consummate workmanship with a profound sensibility to the

finest shades of feeling and the rarest forms of natural beauty. He

selected an exquisite type of face for his young men and women; on his

old men he bestowed singular gravity and dignity. His saints are a

society of strong, pure, restful, earnest souls, in whom the passion of

deepest emotion is transfigured by habitual calm. The brown and golden

harmonies he loved, are gained without sacrifice of lustre: there is a

self-restraint in his colouring which corresponds to the reserve of his

emotion; and though a regret sometimes rises in our mind that he should

have modelled the light and shade upon his faces with a brusque,

unpleasing hardness, their pallor dwells within our memory as something

delicately sought if not consummately attained. In a word, Borgognone

was a true Lombard of the best time. The very imperfection of his

flesh-painting repeats in colour what the greatest Lombard sculptors

sought in stone—a sharpness of relief that passes over into angularity.

This brusqueness was the counterpoise to tenderness of feeling and

intensity of fancy in these northern artists. Of all Borgognone's

pictures in the Certosa I should select the altar-piece of S. Siro with

S. Lawrence and S. Stephen and two Fathers of the Church, for its

fusion of this master's qualities.

The Certosa is a wilderness of lovely workmanship. From Borgognone's

majesty we pass into the quiet region of Luini's Christian grace, or

mark the influence of Lionardo on that rare Assumption of Madonna by

his pupil, Andrea Solari. Like everything touched by the Lionardesque

spirit, this great picture was left unfinished: yet Northern Italy has

nothing finer to show than the landscape, outspread in its

149immeasurable purity of calm, behind the grouped Apostles and the

ascendant Mother of Heaven. The feeling of that happy region between

the Alps and Lombardy, where there are many waters—_et tacitos sine

labe laous sine murmure rivos_—and where the last spurs of the

mountains sink in undulations to the plain, has passed into this azure

vista, just as all Umbria is suggested in a twilight background of

young Raphael or Perugino.

The portraits of the Dukes of Milan and their families carry us into a

very different realm of feeling. Medallions above the doors of sacristy

and chancel, stately figures reared aloft beneath gigantic canopies,

men and women slumbering with folded hands upon their marble biers—we

read in all those sculptured forms a strange record of human

restlessness, resolved into the quiet of the tomb. The iniquities of

Gian Galeazzo Visconti, _il gran Biscione_, the blood-thirst of Gian

Maria, the dark designs of Filippo and his secret vices, Francesco

Sforza's treason, Galeazzo Maria's vanities and lusts; their tyrants'

dread of thunder and the knife; their awful deaths by pestilence and

the assassin's poignard; their selfishness, oppression, cruelty and

fraud; the murders of their kinsmen; their labyrinthine plots and acts

of broken faith;—all is tranquil now, and we can say to each what

Bosola found for the Duchess of Malfi ere her execution:—

Much you had of land and rent;

Your length in clay's now competent:

A long war disturbed your mind;

Here your perfect peace is signed!

Some of these faces are commonplace, with _bourgeois_ cunning written

on the heavy features; one is bluff, another stolid, a third bloated, a

fourth stately. The sculptors have dealt fairly with all, and not one

has the lineaments of utter baseness. To Cristoforo Solari's statues of

Lodovico Sforza and 150his wife, Beatrice d'Este, the palm of

excellence in art and of historical interest must be awarded. Sculpture

has rarely been more dignified and true to life than here. The woman

with her short clustering curls, the man with his strong face, are

resting after that long fever which brought woe to Italy, to Europe a

new age, and to the boasted minion of Fortune a slow death in the

prison palace of Loches. Attired in ducal robes, they lie in state; and

the sculptor has carved the lashes on their eyelids, heavy with death's

marmoreal sleep. He at least has passed no judgment on their crimes.

Let us too bow and leave their memories to the historian's pen, their

spirits to God's mercy.

After all wanderings in this Temple of Art, we return to Antonio

Amadeo, to his long-haired seraphs playing on the lutes of Paradise, to

his angels of the Passion with their fluttering robes and arms

outspread in agony, to his saints and satyrs mingled on pilasters of

the marble doorways, his delicate _Lavabo_ decorations, and his hymns

of piety expressed in noble forms of weeping women and dead Christs.

Wherever we may pass, this master-spirit of the Lombard style enthralls

attention. His curious treatment of drapery as though it ¦were made of

crumpled paper, and his trick of enhancing relief by sharp angles and

attenuated limbs, do not detract from his peculiar charm. That is his

way, very different from Donatello's, of attaining to the maximum of

life and lightness in the stubborn vehicle of stone. Nor do all the

riches of the choir—those multitudes of singing angels, those

Ascensions and Assumptions, and innumerable basreliefs of gleaming

marble moulded into softest wax by mastery of art—distract our eyes

from the single round medallion, not larger than a common plate,

inscribed by him upon the front of the high altar. Perhaps, if one who

loved Amadeo were bidden to point out his masterpiece, he would lead

the way at 151once to this. The space is small: yet it includes the

whole tragedy of the Passion. Christ is lying dead among the women on

his mother's lap, and there are pitying angels in the air above. One

woman lifts his arm, another makes her breast a pillow for his head.

Their agony is hushed, but felt in every limb and feature; and the

extremity of suffering is seen in each articulation of the worn and

wounded form just taken from the cross. It would be too painful, were

not the harmony of art so rare, the interlacing of those many figures

in a simple round so exquisite. The noblest tranquillity and the most

passionate emotion are here fused in a manner of adorable naturalness.

From the church it is delightful to escape into the cloisters, flooded

with sunlight, where the swallows skim, and the brown hawks circle, and

the mason bees are at work upon their cells among the carvings. The

arcades of the two cloisters are the final triumph of Lombard

terra-cotta. The memory fails before such infinite invention, such

facility and felicity of execution. Wreaths of cupids gliding round the

arches among grape-bunches and bird-haunted foliage of vine; rows of

angels, like rising and setting planets, some smiling and some grave,

ascending and descending by the Gothic curves; saints stationary on

their pedestals, and faces leaning from the rounds above; crowds of

cherubs, and courses of stars, and acanthus leaves in woven lines, and

ribands incessantly inscribed with Ave Maria! Then, over all, the rich

red light and purple shadows of the brick, than which no substance

sympathises more completely with the sky of solid blue above, the broad

plain space of waving summer grass beneath our feet.

It is now late afternoon, and when evening comes, the train will take

us back to Milan. There is yet a little while to rest tired eyes and

strained spirits among the willows and 152the poplars by the monastery

wall. Through that grey-green leafage, young with early spring, the

pinnacles of the Certosa leap like flames into the sky. The rice-fields

are under water, far and wide, shining like burnished gold beneath the

level light now near to sun-down. Frogs are croaking; those persistent

frogs, whom the Muses have ordained to sing for aye, in spite of Bion

and all tuneful poets dead. We sit and watch the water-snakes, the busy

rats, the hundred creatures swarming in the fat well-watered soil.

Nightingales here and there, new-comers, tune their timid April song:

but, strangest of all sounds in such a place, my comrade from the

Grisons jodels forth an Alpine cowherd's melody. _Auf den Alpen droben

ist ein herrliches Leben!_

Did the echoes of Gian Galeazzo's convent ever wake to such a tune as

this before?

SAN MAURIZIO

The student of art in Italy, after mastering the characters of

different styles and epochs, finds a final satisfaction in the

contemplation of buildings designed and decorated by one master, or by

groups of artists interpreting the spirit of a single period. Such

supreme monuments of the national genius are not very common, and they

are therefore the more precious. Giotto's Chapel at Padua; the Villa

Farnesina at Rome, built by Peruzzi and painted in fresco by Raphael

and Sodoma; the Palazzo del Te at Mantua, Giulio Romano's masterpiece;

the Scuola di San Rocco, illustrating the Venetian Renaissance at its

climax, might be cited among the most splendid of these achievements.

In the church of the Monastero Maggiore at Milan, dedicated to S.

Maurizio, Lombard architecture and fresco-painting may be studied in

this rare combination. The monastery itself, one of the 153oldest in

Milan, formed a retreat for cloistered virgins following the rule of S.

Benedict. It may have been founded as early as the tenth century; but

its church was rebuilt in the first two decades of the sixteenth,

between 1503 and 1519, and was immediately afterwards decorated with

frescoes by Luini and his pupils. Gian Giacomo Dolcebono, architect and

sculptor, called by his fellow-craftsmen _magistro di taliare pietre_,

gave the design, at once simple and harmonious, which was carried out

with hardly any deviation from his plan. The church is a long

parallelogram, divided into two unequal portions, the first and smaller

for the public, the second for the nuns. The walls are pierced with

rounded and pilastered windows, ten on each side, four of which belong

to the outer and six to the inner section. The dividing wall or septum

rises to the point from which the groinings of the roof spring; and

round three sides of the whole building, north, east, and south, runs a

gallery for the use of the convent. The altars of the inner and outer

church are placed against the septum, back to back, with certain

differences of structure that need not be described. Simple and severe,

S. Maurizio owes its architectural beauty wholly and entirely to purity

of line and perfection of proportion. There is a prevailing spirit of

repose, a sense of space, fair, lightsome, and adapted to serene moods

of the meditative fancy in this building, which is singularly at

variance with the religious mysticism and imaginative grandeur of a

Gothic edifice. The principal beauty of the church, however, is its

tone of colour. Every square inch is covered with fresco or rich

woodwork, mellowed by time into that harmony of tints which blends the

work of greater and lesser artists in one golden hue of brown. Round

the arcades of the convent-loggia run delicate arabesques with faces of

fair female saints—Catherine, Agnes, Lucy, Agatha,—gem-like or

star-like, gazing from their gallery 154upon the church below. The

Luinesque smile is on their lips and in their eyes, quiet, refined, as

though the emblems of their martyrdom brought back no thought of pain

to break the Paradise of rest in which they dwell. There are twenty-six

in all, a sisterhood of stainless souls, the lilies of Love's garden

planted round Christ's throne. Soldier saints are mingled with them in

still smaller rounds above the windows, chosen to illustrate the

virtues of an order which renounced the world. To decide whose hand

produced these masterpieces of Lombard suavity and grace, or whether

more than one, would not be easy. Near the altar we can perhaps trace

the style of Bartolommeo Suardi in an Annunciation painted on the

spandrils—that heroic style, large and noble, known to us by the

chivalrous S. Martin and the glorified Madonna of the Brera frescoes.

It is not impossible that the male saints of the loggia may be also

his, though a tenderer touch, a something more nearly Lionardesque in

its quietude, must be discerned in Lucy and her sisters. The whole of

the altar in this inner church belongs to Luini. Were it not for

darkness and decay, we should pronounce this series of the Passion in

nine great compositions, with saints and martyrs and torch-bearing

genii, to be one of his most ambitious and successful efforts. As it

is, we can but judge in part; the adolescent beauty of Sebastian, the

grave compassion of S. Rocco, the classical perfection of the cupid

with lighted tapers, the gracious majesty of women smiling on us

sideways from their Lombard eyelids—these remain to haunt our memory,

emerging from the shadows of the vault above.

The inner church, as is fitting, excludes all worldly elements. We are

in the presence of Christ's agony, relieved and tempered by the

sunlight of those beauteous female faces. All is solemn here, still as

the convent, pure as the meditations 155of a novice. We pass the

septum, and find ourselves in the outer church appropriated to the

laity. Above the high altar the whole wall is covered with Luini's

loveliest work, in excellent light and far from ill preserved. The

space divides into eight compartments. A Pietà, an Assumption, Saints

and Founders of the church, group themselves under the influence of

Luini's harmonising colour into one symphonious whole. But the places

of distinction are reserved for two great benefactors of the convent,

Alessandro de' Bentivogli and his wife, Ippolita Sforza. When the

Bentivogli were expelled from Bologna by the Papal forces, Alessandro

settled at Milan, where he dwelt, honoured by the Sforzas and allied to

them by marriage, till his death in 1532. He was buried in the

monastery by the side of his sister Alessandra, a nun of the order.

Luini has painted the illustrious exile in his habit as he lived. He is

kneeling, as though in ever-during adoration of the altar mystery,

attired in a long black senatorial robe trimmed with furs. In his left

hand he holds a book; and above his pale, serenely noble face is a

little black berretta. Saints attend him, as though attesting to his

act of faith. Opposite kneels Ippolita, his wife, the brilliant queen

of fashion, the witty leader of society, to whom Bandello dedicated his

Novelle, and whom he praised as both incomparably beautiful and

singularly learned. Her queenly form is clothed from head to foot in

white brocade, slashed and trimmed with gold lace, and on her forehead

is a golden circlet. She has the proud port of a princess, the beauty

of a woman past her prime but stately, the indescribable dignity of

attitude which no one but Luini could have rendered so majestically

sweet. In her hand is a book; and she, like Alessandro, has her saintly

sponsors, Agnes and Catherine and S. Scolastica.

Few pictures bring the splendid Milanese Court so vividly 156before us

as these portraits of the Bentivogli: they are, moreover, very precious

for the light they throw on what Luini could achieve in the secular

style so rarely touched by him. Great, however, as are these frescoes,

they are far surpassed both in value and interest by his paintings in

the side chapel of S. Catherine. Here more than anywhere else, more

even than at Saronno or Lugano, do we feel the true distinction of

Luini—his unrivalled excellence as a colourist, his power over pathos,

the refinement of his feeling, and the peculiar beauty of his favourite

types. The chapel was decorated at the expense of a Milanese advocate,

Francesco Besozzi, who died in 1529. It is he who is kneeling,

grey-haired and bareheaded, under the protection of S. Catherine of

Alexandria, intently gazing at Christ unbound from the scourging

pillar. On the other side stand S. Lawrence and S. Stephen, pointing to

the Christ and looking at us, as though their lips were framed to say:

'Behold and see if there be any sorrow like unto his sorrow.' Even the

soldiers who have done their cruel work, seem softened. They untie the

cords tenderly, and support the fainting form, too weak to stand alone.

What sadness in the lovely faces of S. Catherine and Lawrence! What

divine anguish in the loosened limbs and bending body of Christ; what

piety in the adoring old man! All the moods proper to this supreme

tragedy of the faith are touched as in some tenor song with low

accompaniment of viols; for it was Luini's special province to feel

profoundly and to express musically. The very depth of the Passion is

there; and yet there is no discord.

Just in proportion to this unique faculty for yielding a melodious

representation of the most intense moments of stationary emotion, was

his inability to deal with a dramatic subject. The first episode of S.

Catherine's execution, when the wheel was broken and the executioners

struck by lightning, 157is painted in this chapel without energy and

with a lack of composition that betrays the master's indifference to

his subject. Far different is the second episode when Catherine is

about to be beheaded. The executioner has raised his sword to strike.

She, robed in brocade of black and gold, so cut as to display the curve

of neck and back, while the bosom is covered, leans her head above her

praying hands, and waits the blow in sweetest resignation. Two soldiers

stand at some distance in a landscape of hill and meadow; and far up

are seen the angels carrying her body to its tomb upon Mount Sinai. I

cannot find words or summon courage to describe the beauty of this

picture; its atmosphere of holy peace, the dignity of its composition,

the golden richness of its colouring. The most tragic situation has

here again been alchemised by Luini's magic into a pure idyll, without

the loss of power, without the sacrifice of edification.

S. Catherine in this incomparable fresco is a portrait, the history of

which so strikingly illustrates the relation of the arts to religion on

the one hand, and to life on the other, in the age of the Renaissance,

that it cannot be omitted. At the end of his fourth Novella, having

related the life of the Contessa di Cellant, Bandello says: 'And so the

poor woman was beheaded; such was the end of her unbridled desires; and

he who would fain see her painted to the life, let him go to the Church

of the Monistero Maggiore, and there will he behold her portrait.' The

Contessa di Cellant was the only child of a rich usurer who lived at

Casal Monferrato. Her mother was a Greek; and she was a girl of such

exquisite beauty, that, in spite of her low origin, she became the wife

of the noble Ermes Visconti in her sixteenth year. He took her to live

with him at Milan, where she frequented the house of the Bentivogli,

but none other. Her husband told Bandello that he knew her temper

better than to let her visit 158with the freedom of the Milanese

ladies. Upon his death, while she was little more than twenty, she

retired to Casale and led a gay life among many lovers. One of these,

the Count of Cellant in the Val d'Aosta, became her second husband,

conquered by her extraordinary loveliness. They could not, however,

agree together. She left him, and established herself at Pavia. Rich

with her father's wealth and still of most seductive beauty, she now

abandoned herself to a life of profligacy. Three among her lovers must

be named: Ardizzino Valperga, Count of Masino; Roberto Sanseverino, of

the princely Naples family; and Don Pietro di Cardona, a Sicilian. With

each of the two first she quarrelled, and separately besought each to

murder the other. They were friends and frustrated her plans by

communicating them to one another. The third loved her with the insane

passion of a very young man. What she desired, he promised to do

blindly; and she bade him murder his two predecessors in her favour. At

this time she was living at Milan, where the Duke of Bourbon was acting

as viceroy for the Emperor. Don Pietro took twenty-five armed men of

his household, and waylaid the Count of Masino, as he was returning

with his brother and eight or nine servants, late one night from

supper. Both the brothers and the greater part of their suite were

killed: but Don Pietro was caught. He revealed the atrocity of his

mistress; and she was sent to prison. Incapable of proving her

innocence, and prevented from escaping, in spite of 15,000 golden

crowns with which she hoped to bribe her jailors, she was finally

beheaded. Thus did a vulgar and infamous Messalina, distinguished only

by rare beauty, furnish Luini with a S. Catherine for this masterpiece

of pious art! The thing seems scarcely credible. Yet Bandello lived in

Milan while the Church of S. Maurizio was being painted; nor does he

show the slightest sign of 159disgust at the discord between the

Contessa's life and her artistic presentation in the person of a royal

martyr.

A HUMANIST'S MONUMENT

In the Sculpture Gallery of the Brera is preserved a fair white marble

tomb, carved by that excellent Lombard sculptor, Agostino Busti. The

epitaph runs as follows:—

En Virtutem Mortis nesciam.

Vivet Lancinus Curtius

Sæcula per omnia

Quascunque lustrans oras,

Tantum possunt Camoenæ.

'Look here on Virtue that knows nought of Death! Lancinus Curtius shall

live through all the centuries, and visit every shore of earth. Such

power have the Muses.' The timeworn poet reclines, as though sleeping

or resting, ready to be waked; his head is covered with flowing hair,

and crowned with laurel; it leans upon his left hand. On either side of

his couch stand cupids or genii with torches turned to earth. Above is

a group of the three Graces, flanked by winged Pegasi. Higher up are

throned two Victories with palms, and at the top a naked Fame. We need

not ask who was Lancinus Curtius. He is forgotten, and his virtue has

not saved him from oblivion; though he strove in his lifetime, _pro

virili parte_, for the palm that Busti carved upon his grave. Yet his

monument teaches in short compass a deep lesson; and his epitaph sums

up the dream which lured the men of Italy in the Renaissance to their

doom. We see before us sculptured in this marble the ideal of the

humanistic poet-scholar's life: Love, Grace, the Muse, and Nakedness,

and Glory. There is not a single intrusive thought derived from

Christianity. The end for which the man lived was 160Pagan. His hope

was earthly fame. Yet his name survives, if this indeed be a survival,

not in those winged verses which were to carry him abroad across the

earth, but in the marble of a cunning craftsman, scanned now and then

by a wandering scholar's eye in the half-darkness of a vault.

THE MONUMENT OF GASTON DE FOIX IN THE BRERA

The hero of Ravenna lies stretched upon his back in the hollow of a

bier covered with laced drapery; and his head rests on richly

ornamented cushions. These decorative accessories, together with the

minute work of his scabbard, wrought in the fanciful mannerism of the

_cinquecento_, serve to enhance the statuesque simplicity of the young

soldier's effigy. The contrast between so much of richness in the

merely subordinate details, and this sublime severity of treatment in

the person of the hero, is truly and touchingly dramatic. There is a

smile as of content in death, upon his face; and the features are

exceedingly beautiful—with the beauty of a boy, almost of a woman. The

heavy hair is cut straight above the forehead and straight over the

shoulders, falling in massive clusters. A delicately sculptured laurel

branch is woven into a victor's crown, and laid lightly on the tresses

it scarcely seems to clasp. So fragile is this wreath that it does not

break the pure outline of the boy-conqueror's head. The armour is quite

plain. So is the surcoat. Upon the swelling bust, that seems fit

harbour for a hero's heart, there lies the collar of an order composed

of cockle-shells; and this is all the ornament given to the figure. The

hands are clasped across a sword laid flat upon the breast, and placed

between the legs. Upon the chin is a little tuft of hair, parted, and

curling either way; for the victor of Ravenna, like the Hermes of

Homer, was πρωτον ϋπμνήτμς, 'a 161youth of princely blood, whose beard

hath just begun to grow, for whom the season of bloom is in its prime

of grace.' The whole statue is the idealisation of _virtù_—that quality

so highly prized by the Italians and the ancients, so well fitted for

commemoration in the arts. It is the apotheosis of human life resolved

into undying memory because of one great deed. It is the supreme

portrait in modern times of a young hero, chiselled by artists

belonging to a race no longer heroic, but capable of comprehending and

expressing the æsthetic charm of heroism. Standing before it, we may

say of Gaston what Arrian wrote to Hadrian of Achilles:—'That he was a

hero, if hero ever lived, I cannot doubt; for his birth and blood were

noble, and he was beautiful, and his spirit was mighty, and he passed

in youth's prime away from men.' Italian sculpture, under the condition

of the _cinquecento_, had indeed no more congenial theme than this of

bravery and beauty, youth and fame, immortal honour and untimely death;

nor could any sculptor of death have poetised the theme more thoroughly

than Agostino Busti, whose simple instinct, unlike that of

Michelangelo, led him to subordinate his own imagination to the pathos

of reality.

SARONNO

The church of Saronno is a pretty building with a Bramantesque cupola,

standing among meadows at some distance from the little town. It is the

object of a special cult, which draws pilgrims from the neighbouring

country-side; but the concourse is not large enough to load the

sanctuary with unnecessary wealth. Everything is very quiet in the holy

place, and the offerings of the pious seem to have been only just

enough to keep the building and its treasures of art in repair. The

church consists of a nave, a 162central cupola, a vestibule leading to

the choir, the choir itself, and a small tribune behind the choir. No

other single building in North Italy can boast so much that is

first-rate of the work of Luini and Gandenzio Ferrari.

The cupola is raised on a sort of drum composed of twelve pieces,

perforated with round windows and supported on four massive piers. On

the level of the eye are frescoes by Luini of S. Rocco, S. Sebastian,

S. Christopher, and S. Antony—by no means in his best style, and

inferior to all his other paintings in this church. The Sebastian, for

example, shows an effort to vary the traditional treatment of this

saint. He is tied in a sprawling attitude to a tree; and little of

Luini's special pathos or sense of beauty—the melody of idyllic grace

made spiritual—appears in him. These four saints are on the piers.

Above are frescoes from the early Bible history by Lanini, painted in

continuation of Ferrari's medallions from the story of Adam expelled

from Paradise, which fill the space beneath the cupola, leading the eye

upward to Ferrari's masterpiece.

The dome itself is crowded with a host of angels singing and playing

upon instruments of music. At each of the twelve angles of the drum

stands a coryphaeus of this celestial choir, full length, with waving

drapery. Higher up, the golden-haired, broad-winged, divine creatures

are massed together, filling every square inch of the vault with

colour. Yet there is no confusion. The simplicity of the selected

motive and the necessities of the place acted like a check on Ferrari,

who, in spite of his dramatic impulse, could not tell a story

coherently or fill a canvas with harmonised variety. There is no trace

of his violence here. Though the motion of music runs through the whole

multitude like a breeze, though the joy expressed is a real _tripudio

celeste_, not one of all these angels flings his arms abroad or makes a

movement 163that disturbs the rhythm. We feel that they are keeping

time and resting quietly, each in his appointed seat, as though the

sphere was circling with them round the throne of God, who is their

centre and their source of gladness. Unlike Correggio and his

imitators, Ferrari has introduced no clouds, and has in no case made

the legs of his angels prominent. It is a mass of noble faces and

voluminously robed figures, emerging each above the other like flowers

in a vase. Bach too has specific character, while all are robust and

full of life, intent upon the service set them. Their instruments of

music are all the lutes and viols, flutes, cymbals, drums, fifes,

citherns, organs, and harps that Ferrari's day could show. The scale of

colour, as usual with Ferrari, is a little heavy; nor are the tints

satisfactorily harmonised. But the vigour and invention of the whole

work would atone for minor defects of far greater consequence.

It is natural, beneath this dome, to turn aside and think one moment of

Correggio at Parma. Before the _macchinisti_ of the seventeenth century

had vulgarised the motive, Correggio's bold attempt to paint heaven in

flight from earth—earth left behind in the persons of the Apostles

standing round the empty tomb, heaven soaring upward with a spiral

vortex into the abyss of light above—had an originality which set at

nought all criticism. There is such ecstasy of jubilation, such

rapturous rapidity of flight, that we who strain our eyes from below,

feel we are in the darkness of the grave which Mary left. A kind of

controlling rhythm for the composition is gained by placing Gabriel,

Madonna, and Christ at three points in the swirl of angels.

Nevertheless, composition—the presiding all-controlling intellect—is

just what makes itself felt by absence; and Correggio's special

qualities of light and colour have now so far vanished from the cupola

of the Duomo that the, constructive poverty is not disguised. Here

164if anywhere in painting, we may apply Goethe's words—_Gefühl ist

Alles._

If then we return to Ferrari's angels at Saronno, we find that the

painter of Varallo chose a safer though a far more modest theme. Nor

did he expose himself to that most cruel of all degradations which the

ethereal genius of Correggio has suffered from incompetent imitators.

To daub a tawdry and superficial reproduction of those Parmese

frescoes, to fill the cupolas of Italy with veritable _guazzetti di

rane_, was comparatively easy; and between our intelligence and what

remains of that stupendous masterpiece of boldness, crowd a thousand

memories of such ineptitude. On the other hand, nothing but solid work

and conscientious inspiration could enable any workman, however able,

to follow Ferrari in the path struck out by him at Saronno. His cupola

has had no imitator; and its only rival is the noble pendant painted at

Varallo by his own hand, of angels in adoring anguish round the Cross.

In the ante-choir of the sanctuary are Luini's priceless frescoes of

the 'Marriage of the Virgin,' and the 'Dispute with the Doctors.'[11]

Their execution is flawless, and they are perfectly preserved. If

criticism before such admirable examples of so excellent a master be

permissible, it may be questioned whether the figures are not too

crowded, whether the groups are sufficiently varied and connected by

rhythmic lines. Yet the concords of yellow and orange with blue in the

'Sposalizio,' and the blendings of dull violet and red in the

'Disputa,' make up for much of stiffness. Here, as in the Chapel of S.

Catherine at Milan, we feel that Luini was the greatest colourist among

_frescanti._ In the 'Sposalizio' the female heads are singularly noble

and idyllically graceful. Some of the young men too have Luini's

special grace and abundance of golden hair. In 165the 'Disputa' the

gravity and dignity of old men are above all things striking.

[11] Both these and the large frescoes in the choir have been

chromolithographed by the Arundel Society.

Passing into the choir, we find on either hand the 'Adoration of the

Magi' and the 'Purification of the Virgin,' two of Luini's divinest

frescoes. Above them in lunettes are four Evangelists and four Latin

Fathers, with four Sibyls. Time and neglect have done no damage here:

and here, again, perforce we notice perfect mastery of colour in

fresco. The blues detach themselves too much, perhaps, from the rest of

the colouring; and that is all a devil's advocate could say. It is

possible that the absence of blue makes the S. Catherine frescoes in

the Monastero Maggiore at Milan surpass all other works of Luini. But

nowhere else has he shown more beauty and variety in detail than here.

The group of women led by Joseph, the shepherd carrying the lamb upon

his shoulder, the girl with a basket of white doves, the child with an

apple on the altar-steps, the lovely youth in the foreground heedless

of the scene; all these are idyllic incidents treated with the purest,

the serenest, the most spontaneous, the truest, most instinctive sense

of beauty. The landscape includes a view of Saronno, and an episodical

picture of the 'Flight into Egypt' where a white-robed angel leads the

way. All these lovely things are in the 'Purification,' which is dated

_Bernardinus Lovinus pinxit_, MDXXV.

The fresco of the 'Magi' is less notable in detail, and in general

effect is more spoiled by obtrusive blues. There is, however, one young

man of wholly Lionardesque loveliness, whose divine innocence of

adolescence, unalloyed by serious thought, unstirred by passions,

almost forces a comparison with Sodoma. The only painter who approaches

Luini in what may be called the Lombard, to distinguish it from the

Venetian idyll, is Sodoma; and the work of his which comes nearest to

Luini's masterpieces is the legend of S. Benedict, at 166Monte Oliveto,

near Siena. Yet Sodoma had not all Luini's innocence or _naïveté._ If

he added something slightly humorous which has an indefinite charm, he

lacked that freshness as of 'cool, meek-blooded flowers' and boyish

voices, which fascinates us in Luini. Sodoma was closer to the earth,

and feared not to impregnate what he saw of beauty with the fiercer

passions of his nature. If Luini had felt passion, who shall say? It

appears nowhere in his work, where life is toned to a religious

joyousness. When Shelley compared the poetry of the Theocritean

amourists to the perfume of the tuberose, and that of the earlier Greek

poets to 'a meadow-gale of June, which mingles the fragrance of all the

flowers of the field,' he supplied us with critical images which may

not unfairly be used to point the distinction between Sodoma at Monte

Oliveto and Luini at Saronno.

THE CASTELLO OF FERRARA

Is it possible that the patron saints of cities should mould the temper

of the people to their own likeness? S. George, the chivalrous, is

champion of Ferrara. His is the marble group above the Cathedral porch,

so feudal in its medieval pomp. He and S. Michael are painted in fresco

over the south portcullis of the Castle. His lustrous armour gleams

with Giorgionesque brilliancy from Dossi's masterpiece in the

Pinacoteca. That Ferrara, the only place in Italy where chivalry struck

any root, should have had S. George for patron, is at any rate

significant.

The best preserved relic of princely feudal life in Italy is this

Castello of the Este family, with its sombre moat, chained drawbridges,

doleful dungeons, and unnumbered tragedies, each one of which may be

compared with Parisina's history. I do not want to dwell on these

things now. It is enough to 167remember the Castello, built of ruddiest

brick, time-mellowed with how many centuries of sun and soft sea-air,

as it appeared upon the close of one tempestuous day. Just before

evening the rain-clouds parted and the sun flamed out across the misty

Lombard plain. The Castello burned like a hero's funeral pyre, and

round its high-built turrets swallows circled in the warm blue air. On

the moat slept shadows, mixed with flowers of sunset, tossed from

pinnacle and gable. Then the sky changed. A roof of thunder-cloud

spread overhead with the rapidity of tempest. The dying sun gathered

his last strength against it, fretting those steel-blue arches with

crimson; and all the fierce light, thrown from vault to vault of cloud,

was reflected back as from a shield, and cast in blots and patches on

the buildings. The Castle towered up rosy-red and shadowy sombre,

enshrined, embosomed in those purple clouds; and momently ran lightning

forks like rapiers through the growing mass. Everything around,

meanwhile, was quiet in the grass-grown streets. The only sound was a

high, clear boy's voice chanting an opera tune.

PETRARCH'S TOMB AT ARQUA

The drive from Este along the skirts of the Euganean Hills to Arqua

takes one through a country which is tenderly beautiful, because of its

contrast between little peaked mountains and the plain. It is not a

grand landscape. It lacks all that makes the skirts of Alps and

Apennines sublime. Its charm is a certain mystery and repose—an

undefined sense of the neighbouring Adriatic, a pervading consciousness

of Venice unseen, but felt from far away. From the terraces of Arqua

the eye ranges across olive-trees, laurels, and pomegranates on the

southern slopes, to the misty level land that melts into the sea, with

churches and tall campanili like 168gigantic galleys setting sail for

fairyland over 'the foam of perilous seas forlorn.' Let a blue-black

shadow from a thunder-cloud be cast upon this plain, and let one ray of

sunlight strike a solitary bell-tower;—it burns with palest flame of

rose against the steely dark, and in its slender shaft and shell-like

tint of pink all Venice is foreseen.

The village church of Arqua stands upon one of these terraces, with a

full stream of clearest water flowing by. On the little square before

the church-door, where the peasants congregate at mass-time—open to the

skies with all their stars and storms, girdled by the hills, and within

hearing of the vocal stream—is Petrarch's sepulchre. Fit resting-place

for what remains to earth of such a poet's clay! It is as though

archangels, flying, had carried the marble chest and set it down here

on the hillside, to be a sign and sanctuary for after-men. A simple

rectilinear coffin, of smooth Verona _mandorlato_, raised on four thick

columns, and closed by a heavy cippus-cover. Without emblems,

allegories, or lamenting genii, this tomb of the great poet, the great

awakener of Europe from mental lethargy, encircled by the hills,

beneath the canopy of heaven, is impressive beyond the power of words.

Bending here, we feel that Petrarch's own winged thoughts and fancies,

eternal and aë;rial, 'forms more real than living man, nurslings of

immortality,' have congregated to be the ever-ministering and

irremovable attendants on the shrine of one who, while he lived, was

purest spirit in a veil of flesh.

ON A MOUNTAIN

Milan is shining in sunset on those purple fields; and a score of

cities flash back the last red light, which shows each inequality and

undulation of Lombardy outspread four thousand feet beneath. Both

ranges, Alps and Apennines, 169are clear to view; and all the silvery

lakes are over-canopied and brought into one picture by flame-litten

mists. Monte Rosa lifts her crown of peaks above a belt of clouds into

light of living fire. The Mischabelhörner and the Dom rest stationary

angel-wings upon the rampart, which at this moment is the wall of

heaven. The pyramid of distant Monte Viso burns like solid amethyst

far, far away. Mont Cervin beckons to his brother, the gigantic

Finsteraarhorn, across tracts of liquid ether. Bells are rising from

the villages, now wrapped in gloom, between me and the glimmering lake.

A hush of evening silence falls upon the ridges, cliffs, and forests of

this billowy hill, ascending into wave-like crests, and toppling with

awful chasms over the dark waters of Lugano. It is good to be alone

here at this hour. Yet I must rise and go—passing through meadows,

where white lilies sleep in silvery drifts, and asphodel is pale with

spires of faintest rose, and narcissus dreams of his own beauty,

loading the air with fragrance sweet as some love-music of Mozart.

These fields want only the white figure of Persephone to make them

poems: and in this twilight one might fancy that the queen had left her

throne by Pluto's side, to mourn for her dead youth among the flowers

uplifted between earth and heaven. Nay, they are poems now, these

fields; with that unchanging background of history, romance, and human

life—the Lombard plain, against whose violet breadth the blossoms bend

their faint heads to the evening air. Downward we hurry, on pathways

where the beeches meet, by silent farms, by meadows honey-scented, deep

in dew. The columbine stands tall and still on those green slopes of

shadowy grass. The nightingale sings now, and now is hushed again.

Streams murmur through the darkness, where the growth of trees, heavy

with honeysuckle and wild rose, is thickest. Fireflies begin to flit

above the growing 170corn. At last the plain is reached, and all the

skies are tremulous with starlight. Alas, that we should vibrate so

obscurely to these harmonies of earth and heaven! The inner finer sense

of them seems somehow unattainable—that spiritual touch of soul evoking

soul from nature, which should transfigure our dull mood of self into

impersonal delight. Man needs to be a mytho-poet at some moments, or,

better still, to be a mystic steeped through half-unconsciousness in

the vast wonder of the world. Gold and untouched to poetry or piety by

scenes that ought to blend the spirit in ourselves with spirit in the

world without, we can but wonder how this phantom show of mystery and

beauty will pass away from us—how soon—and we be where, see what, use

all our sensibilities on aught or nought?

SIC GENIUS

In the picture-gallery at Modena there is a masterpiece of Dosso Dossi.

The frame is old and richly carved; and the painting, bordered by its

beautiful dull gold, shines with the lustre of an emerald. In his happy

moods Dosso set colour upon canvas, as no other painter out of Venice

ever did; and here he is at his happiest. The picture is the portrait

of a jester, dressed in courtly clothes and with a feathered cap upon

his head. He holds a lamb in his arms, and carries the legend, _Sic

Genius_. Behind him is a landscape of exquisite brilliancy and depth.

His face is young and handsome. Dosso has made it one most wonderful

laugh. Even so perhaps laughed Yorick. Nowhere else have I seen a laugh

thus painted: not violent, not loud, although the lips are opened to

show teeth of dazzling whiteness;—but fine and delicate, playing over

the whole face like a ripple sent up from the depths of the soul

within. Who was he? What 171does the lamb mean? How should the legend

be interpreted? We cannot answer these questions. He may have been the

court-fool of Ferrara; and his genius, the spiritual essence of the

man, may have inclined him to laugh at all things. That at least is the

value he now has for us. He is the portrait of perpetual irony, the

spirit of the golden Sixteenth Century which delicately laughed at the

whole world of thoughts and things, the quintessence of the poetry of

Ariosto, the wit of Berni, all condensed into one incarnation and

immortalised by truthfullest art. With the Gaul, the Spaniard, and the

German at her gates, and in her cities, and encamped upon her fields,

Italy still laughed; and when the voice of conscience sounding through

Savonarola asked her why, she only smiled—_Sic Genius_.

One evening in May we rowed from Venice to Torcello, and at sunset

broke bread and drank wine together among the rank grasses just outside

that ancient church. It was pleasant to sit in the so-called chair of

Attila and feel the placid stillness of the place. Then there came

lounging by a sturdy young fellow in brown country clothes, with a

marvellous old wide-awake upon his head, and across his shoulders a

bunch of massive church-keys. In strange contrast to his uncouth garb

he flirted a pink Japanese fan, gracefully disposing it to cool his

sunburned olive cheeks. This made us look at him. He was not ugly. Nay,

there was something of attractive in his face—the smooth-curved chin,

the shrewd yet sleepy eyes, and finely cut thin lips—a curious mixture

of audacity and meekness blent upon his features. Yet this impression

was but the prelude to his smile. When that first dawned, some breath

of humour seeming to stir in him unbidden, the true meaning was given

to his face. Each feature helped to make a smile that was the very

soul's life of the man expressed. I broadened, showing 172brilliant

teeth, and grew into a noiseless laugh; and then I saw before me

Dosso's jester, the type of Shakspere's fools, the life of that wild

irony, now rude, now fine, which once delighted Courts. The laughter of

the whole world and of all the centuries was silent in his face. What

he said need not be repeated. The charm was less in his words than in

his personality; for Momus-philosophy lay deep in every look and

gesture of the man. The place lent itself to irony: parties of

Americans and English parsons, the former agape for any rubbishy old

things, the latter learned in the lore of obsolete Church-furniture,

had thronged Torcello; and now they were all gone, and the sun had set

behind the Alps, while an irreverent stranger drank his wine in

Attila's chair, and nature's jester smiled—_Sic Genius_.

When I slept that night I dreamed of an altar-piece in the Temple of

Folly. The goddess sat enthroned beneath a canopy hung with bells and

corals. On her lap was a beautiful winged smiling genius, who

flourished two bright torches. On her left hand stood the man of Modena

with his white lamb, a new S. John. On her right stood the man of

Torcello with his keys, a new S. Peter. Both were laughing after their

all-absorbent, divine, noiseless fashion; and under both was written,

_Sic Genius_. Are not all things, even profanity, permissible in

dreams?

173

COMO AND IL MEDEGHINO

To which of the Italian lakes should the palm of beauty be accorded?

This question may not unfrequently have moved the idle minds of

travellers, wandering through that loveliest region from Orta to

Garda—from little Orta, with her gemlike island, rosy granite crags,

and chestnut-covered swards above the Colma; to Garda, bluest of all

waters, surveyed in majestic length from Desenzano or poetic Sirmione,

a silvery sleeping haze of hill and cloud and heaven and clear waves

bathed in modulated azure. And between these extreme points what varied

lovelinesses lie in broad Maggiore, winding Como, Varese with the

laughing face upturned to heaven, Lugano overshadowed by the crested

crags of Monte Generoso, and Iseo far withdrawn among the rocky Alps!

He who loves immense space, cloud shadows slowly sailing over purple

slopes, island gardens, distant glimpses of snow-capped mountains,

breadth, air, immensity, and flooding sunlight, will choose Maggiore.

But scarcely has he cast his vote for this, the Juno of the divine

rivals, when he remembers the triple lovelinesses of the Larian

Aphrodite, disclosed in all their placid grace from Villa

Serbelloni;—the green blue of the waters, clear as glass, opaque

through depth; the _millefleurs_ roses clambering into cypresses by

Cadenabbia; the laburnums hanging their yellow clusters from the clefts

of Sasso Eancio; the oleander arcades of Varenna; the wild white

limestone crags of San Martiuo, which he has climbed to feast his eyes

174with the perspective, magical, serene, Lionardesquely perfect, of

the distant gates of Adda. Then while this modern Paris is yet

doubting, perhaps a thought may cross his mind of sterner, solitary

Lake Iseo—the Pallas of the three. She offers her own attractions. The

sublimity of Monte Adamello, dominating Lovere and all the lowland like

Hesiod's hill of Virtue reared aloft above the plain of common life,

has charms to tempt heroic lovers. Nor can Varese be neglected. In some

picturesque respects, Varese is the most perfect of the lakes. Those

long lines of swelling hills that lead into the level, yield an

infinite series of placid foregrounds, pleasant to the eye by contrast

with the dominant snow-summits, from Monte Viso to Monte Leone: the sky

is limitless to southward; the low horizons are broken by bell-towers

and farmhouses; while armaments of clouds are ever rolling in the

interval of Alps and plain.

Of a truth, to decide which is the queen of the Italian lakes, is but

an _infinita quæstio_; and the mere raising of it is folly. Still each

lover of the beautiful may give his vote; and mine, like that of

shepherd Paris, is already given to the Larian goddess. Words fail in

attempting to set forth charms which have to be enjoyed, or can at best

but lightly be touched with most consummate tact, even as great poets

have already touched on Como Lake—from Virgil with his 'Lari maxume,'

to Tennyson and the Italian Manzoni. The threshold of the shrine is,

however, less consecrated ground; and the Cathedral of Como may form a

vestibule to the temple where silence is more golden than the speech of

a describer.

The Cathedral of Como is perhaps the most perfect building in Italy for

illustrating the fusion of Gothic and Renaissance styles, both of a

good type and exquisite in their sobriety. The Gothic ends with the

nave. The noble transepts and the choir, each terminating in a rounded

tribune of the same 175dimensions, are carried out in a simple and

decorous Bramantesque manner. The transition from the one style to the

other is managed so felicitously, and the sympathies between them are

so well developed, that there is no discord. What we here call Gothic,

is conceived in a truly southern spirit, without fantastic

efflorescence or imaginative complexity of multiplied parts; while the

Renaissance manner, as applied by Tommaso Rodari, has not yet stiffened

into the lifeless neo-Latinism of the later _cinquecento_: it is still

distinguished by delicate inventiveness, and beautiful subordination of

decorative detail to architectural effect. Under these happy conditions

we feel that the Gothic of the nave, with its superior severity and

sombreness, dilates into the lucid harmonies of choir and transepts

like a flower unfolding. In the one the mind is tuned to inner

meditation and religious awe; in the other the worshipper passes into a

temple of the clear explicit faith—as an initiated neophyte might be

received into the meaning of the mysteries.

After the collapse of the Roman Empire the district of Como seems to

have maintained more vividly than the rest of Northern Italy some

memory of classic art. _Magistri Comacini_ is a title frequently

inscribed upon deeds and charters of the earlier middle ages, as

synonymous with sculptors and architects. This fact may help to account

for the purity and beauty of the Duomo. It is the work of a race in

which the tradition of delicate artistic invention had never been

wholly interrupted. To Tommaso Rodari and his brothers, Bernardino and

Jacopo, the world owes this sympathetic fusion of the Gothic and the

Bramantesque styles; and theirs too is the sculpture with which the

Duomo is so richly decorated. They were natives of Maroggia, a village

near Mendrisio, beneath the crests of Monte Generoso, close to

Campione, which sent so many able craftsmen out into the 176world

between the years 1300 and 1500. Indeed the name of Campionesi would

probably have been given to the Rodari, had they left their native

province for service in Eastern Lombardy. The body of the Duomo had

been finished when Tommaso Rodari was appointed master of the fabric in

1487. To complete the work by the addition of a tribune was his duty.

He prepared a wooden model and exposed it, after the fashion of those

times, for criticism in his _bottega_; and the usual difference of

opinion arose among the citizens of Como concerning its merits.

Cristoforo Solaro, surnamed Il Gobbo, was called in to advise. It may

be remembered that when Michelangelo first placed his Pietà in S.

Peter's, rumour gave it to this celebrated Lombard sculptor, and the

Florentine was constrained to set his own signature upon the marble.

The same Solaro carved the monument of Beatrice Sforza in the Certosa

of Pavia. He was indeed in all points competent to criticise or to

confirm the design of his fellow-craftsman. Il Gobbo disapproved of the

proportions chosen by Rodari, and ordered a new model to be made; but

after much discussion, and some concessions on the part of Rodari, who

is said to have increased the number of the windows and lightened the

orders of his model, the work was finally entrusted to the master of

Maroggia.

Not less creditable than the general design of the tribune is the

sculpture executed by the brothers. The north side door is a

master-work of early Renaissance chiselling, combining mixed Christian

and classical motives with a wealth of floral ornament. Inside, over

the same door, is a procession of children seeming to represent the

Triumph of Bacchus, with perhaps some Christian symbolism. Opposite,

above the south door, is a frieze of fighting Tritons—horsed sea

deities pounding one another with bunches of fish and splashing the

water, in Mantegna's spirit. The doorways of the façade are

177decorated with the same rare workmanship; and the canopies,

supported by naked fauns and slender twisted figures, under which the

two Plinies are seated, may be reckoned among the supreme achievements

of delicate Renaissance sculpture. The Plinies are not like the work of

the same master. They are older, stiffer, and more Gothic. The chief

interest attaching to them is that they are habited and seated after

the fashion of Humanists. This consecration of the two Pagan saints

beside the portals of the Christian temple is truly characteristic of

the fifteenth century in Italy. Beneath, are little basreliefs

representing scenes from their respective lives, in the style of carved

predellas on the altars of saints.

The whole church is peopled with detached statues, among which a

Sebastian in the Chapel of the Madonna must be mentioned as singularly

beautiful. It is a finely modelled figure, with the full life and

exuberant adolescence of Venetian inspiration. A peculiar feature of

the external architecture is the series of Atlantes, bearing on their

shoulders urns, heads of lions, and other devices, and standing on

brackets round the upper cornice just below the roof. They are of all

sorts; young and old, male and female; classically nude, and boldly

outlined. These water-conduits, the work of Bernardo Bianco and

Francesco Rusca, illustrate the departure of the earlier Renaissance

from the Gothic style. They are gargoyles; but they have lost the

grotesque element. At the same time the sculptor, while discarding

Gothic tradition, has not betaken himself yet to a servile imitation of

the antique. He has used invention, and substituted for grinning

dragons' heads something wild and bizarre of his own in harmony with

classic taste.

The pictures in the chapels, chiefly by Luini and Ferrari—an idyllic

Nativity, with faun-like shepherds and choirs of angels—a sumptuous

adoration of the Magi—a jewelled 178Sposalizio with abundance of golden

hair flowing over draperies of green and crimson—will interest those

who are as yet unfamiliar with Lombard painting. Yet their

architectural setting, perhaps, is superior to their intrinsic merit as

works of art; and their chief value consists in adding rare dim flakes

of colour to the cool light of the lovely church. More curious, because

less easily matched, is the gilded woodwork above the altar of S.

Abondio, attributed to a German carver, but executed for the most part

in the purest Luinesque manner. The pose of the enthroned Madonna, the

type and gesture of S. Catherine, and the treatment of the Pietà above,

are thoroughly Lombard, showing how Luini's ideal of beauty could be

expressed in carving. Some of the choicest figures in the Monastero

Maggiore at Milan seem to have descended from the walls and stepped

into their tabernacles on this altar. Yet the style is not maintained

consistently. In the reliefs illustrating the life of S. Abondio we

miss Luini's childlike grace, and find instead a something that reminds

us of Donatello—a seeking after the classical in dress, carriage, and

grouping of accessory figures. It may have been that the carver,

recognising Luini's defective composition, and finding nothing in that

master's manner adapted to the spirit of relief, had the good taste to

render what was Luinesquely lovely in his female figures, and to fall

back on a severer model for his basreliefs.

The building-fund for the Duomo was raised in Como and its districts.

Boxes were placed in all the churches to receive the alms of those who

wished to aid the work. The clergy begged in Lent, and preached the

duty of contributing on special days. Presents of lime and bricks and

other materials were thankfully received. Bishops, canons, and

municipal magistrates were expected to make costly gifts on taking

office. Notaries, under penalty of paying 100 soldi if they

179neglected their engagement, were obliged to persuade testators, _cum

bonis modis dulciter_, to inscribe the Duomo on their wills. Fines for

various offences were voted to the building by the city. Each new

burgher paid a certain sum; while guilds and farmers of the taxes

bought monopolies and privileges at the price of yearly subsidies. A

lottery was finally established for the benefit of the fabric. Of

course each payment to the good work carried with it spiritual

privileges; and so willingly did the people respond to the call of the

Church, that during the sixteenth century the sums subscribed amounted

to 200,000 golden crowns. Among the most munificent donators are

mentioned the Marchese Giacomo Gallio, who bequeathed 290,000 lire, and

a Benzi, who gave 10,000 ducats.

While the people of Como were thus straining every nerve to complete a

pious work, which at the same time is one of the most perfect

masterpieces of Italian art, their lovely lake was turned into a

pirate's stronghold, and its green waves stained with slaughter of

conflicting navies. So curious is this episode in the history of the

Larian lake that it is worth while to treat of it at some length.

Moreover, the lives of few captains of adventure offer matter more rich

in picturesque details and more illustrative of their times than that

of Gian Giacomo de' Medici, the Larian corsair, long known and still

remembered as Il Medeghino. He was born in Milan in 1498, at the

beginning of that darkest and most disastrous period of Italian

history, when the old fabric of social and political existence went to

ruin under the impact of conflicting foreign armies. He lived on until

the year 1555, witnessing and taking part in the dismemberment of the

Milanese Duchy, playing a game of hazard at high stakes for his own

profit with the two last Sforzas, the Empire, the French, and the

Swiss. At the beginning of the century, 180while he was still a youth,

the rich valley of the Valtelline, with Bormio and Chiavenna, had been

assigned to the Grisons. The Swiss Cantons at the same time had

possessed themselves of Lugano and Bellinzona. By these two acts of

robbery the mountaineers tore a portion of its fairest territory from

the Duchy; and whoever ruled in Milan, whether a Sforza, or a Spanish

viceroy, or a French general, was impatient to recover the lost jewel

of the ducal crown. So much has to be premised, because the scene of

our hero's romantic adventures was laid upon the borderland between the

Duchy and the Cantons. Intriguing at one time with the Duke of Milan,

at another with his foes the French or Spaniards, Il Medeghino found

free scope for his peculiar genius in a guerilla warfare, carried on

with the avowed purpose of restoring the Valtelline to Milan. To steer

a plain course through that chaos of politics, in which the modern

student, aided by the calm clear lights of history and meditation,

cannot find a clue, was of course impossible for an adventurer whose

one aim was to gratify his passions and exalt himself at the expense of

others. It is therefore of little use to seek motives of statecraft or

of patriotism in the conduct of Il Medeghino. He was a man shaped

according to Machiavelli's standard of political morality—self-reliant,

using craft and force with cold indifference to moral ends, bent only

upon wringing for himself the largest share of this world's power for

men who, like himself, identified virtue with unflinching and

immitigable egotism.

Il Medeghino's father was Bernardo de' Medici, a Lombard, who neither

claimed nor could have proved cousinship with the great Medicean family

of Florence. His mother was Cecilia Serbelloni. The boy was educated in

the fashionable humanistic studies, nourishing his young imagination

with the tales of Roman heroes. The first exploit by which he 181proved

his _virtù_, was the murder of a man he hated, at the age of sixteen.

This 'virile act of vengeance,' as it was called, brought him into

trouble, and forced him to choose the congenial profession of arms. At

a time when violence and vigour passed for manliness, a spirited

assassination formed the best of introductions to the captains of mixed

mercenary troops. Il Medeghino rose in favour with his generals, helped

to reinstate Francesco Sforza in his capital, and, returning himself to

Milan, inflicted severe vengeance on the enemies who had driven him to

exile. It was his ambition, at this early period of his life, to be

made governor of the Castle of Musso, on the Lake of Como. While

fighting in the neighbourhood, he had observed the unrivalled

capacities for defence presented by its site; and some pre-vision of

his future destinies now urged him to acquire it, as the basis for the

free marauding life he planned. The headland of Musso lies about

halfway between Gravedona and Menaggio, on the right shore of the Lake

of Como. Planted on a pedestal of rock, and surmounted by a sheer

cliff, there then stood a very ancient tower, commanding this

promontory on the side of the land. Between it and the water the

Visconti, in more recent days, had built a square fort; and the

headland had been further strengthened by the addition of connecting

walls and bastions pierced for cannon. Combining precipitous cliffs,

strong towers, and easy access from the lake below, this fortress of

Musso was exactly the fit station for a pirate. So long as he kept the

command of the lake, he had little to fear from land attacks, and had a

splendid basis for aggressive operations. Il Medeghino made his request

to the Duke of Milan; but the foxlike Sforza would not grant him a

plain answer. At length he hinted that if his suitor chose to rid him

of a troublesome subject, the noble and popular Astore Yisconti, he

should receive 182Musso for payment. Crimes of bloodshed and treason

sat lightly on the adventurer's conscience. In a short time he

compassed the young Visconti's death, and claimed his reward. The Duke

despatched him thereupon to Musso, with open letters to the governor,

commanding him to yield the castle to the bearer. Private advice, also

entrusted to Il Medeghino, bade the governor, on the contrary, cut the

bearer's throat. The young man, who had the sense to read the Duke's

letter, destroyed the secret document, and presented the other, or, as

one version of the story goes, forged a ducal order in his own

favour.[12] At any rate, the castle was placed in his hands; and

affecting to know nothing of the Duke's intended treachery, Il

Medeghino took possession of it as a trusted servant of the ducal

crown.

[12] I cannot see clearly through these transactions, the muddy waters

of decadent Italian plot and counterplot being inscrutable to senses

assisted by nothing more luminous than mere tradition.

As soon as he was settled in his castle, the freebooter devoted all his

energies to rendering it still more impregnable by strengthening the

walls and breaking the cliffs into more horrid precipices. In this work

he was assisted by his numerous friends and followers; for Musso

rapidly became, like ancient Rome, an asylum for the ruffians and

outlaws of neighbouring provinces. It is even said that his sisters,

Clarina and Margherita, rendered efficient aid with manual labour. The

mention of Clarina's name justifies a parenthetical side-glance at Il

Medeghino's pedigree, which will serve to illustrate the exceptional

conditions of Italian society during this age. She was married to the

Count Giberto Borromeo, and became the mother of the pious Carlo

Borromeo, whose shrine is still adored at Milan in the Duomo. Il

Medeghino's brother, Giovan Angelo, rose to the Papacy, assuming the

title of Pius IV. Thus this murderous 183marauder was the brother of a

Pope and the uncle of a Saint; and these three persons of one family

embraced the various degrees and typified the several characters which

flourished with peculiar lustre in Renaissance Italy—the captain of

adventure soaked in blood, the churchman unrivalled for intrigue, and

the saint aflame with holiest enthusiasm. Il Medeghino was short of

stature, but well made and powerful; broad-chested; with a penetrating

voice and winning countenance. He dressed simply, like one of his own

soldiers; slept but little; was insensible to carnal pleasure; and

though he knew how to win the affection of his men by jovial speech, he

maintained strict discipline in his little army. In all points he was

an ideal bandit chief, never happy unless fighting or planning

campaigns, inflexible of purpose, bold and cunning in the execution of

his schemes, cruel to his enemies, generous to his followers,

sacrificing all considerations, human and divine, to the one aim of his

life, self-aggrandisement by force and intrigue. He knew well how to

make himself both feared and respected. One instance of his dealing

will suffice. A gentleman of Bellano, Polidoro Boldoni, in return to

his advances, coldly replied that he cared for neither amity nor

relationship with thieves and robbers; whereupon Il Medeghino

extirpated his family, almost to a man.

Soon after his settlement in Musso, Il Medeghino, wishing to secure the

gratitude of the Duke, his master, began war with the Grisons. From

Coire, from the Engadine, and from Davos, the Alpine pikemen were now

pouring down to swell the troops of Francis I.; and their road lay

through the Lake of Como. Il Medeghino burned all the boats upon the

lake, except those which he took into his own service, and thus made

himself master of the water passage. He then swept the 'length of

lordly Lario' from Colico to Lecco, harrying 184the villages upon the

shore, and cutting off the bands of journeying Switzers at his

pleasure. Not content with this guerilla, he made a descent upon the

territory of the Trepievi, and pushed far up towards Chiavenna, forcing

the Grisons to recall their troops from the Milanese. These acts of

prowess convinced the Duke that he had found a strong ally in the

pirate chief. "When Francis I. continued his attacks upon the Duchy,

and the Grisons still adhered to their French paymaster, the Sforza

formally invested Gian Giacomo de' Medici with the perpetual

governorship of Musso, the Lake of Como, and as much as he could wrest

from the Grisons above the lake. Furnished now with a just title for

his depredations, Il Medeghino undertook the siege of Chiavenna. That

town is the key to the valleys of the Splügen and Bregaglia. Strongly

fortified and well situated for defence, the burghers of the Grisons

well knew that upon its possession depended their power in the Italian

valleys. To take it by assault was impossible, Il Medeghino used craft,

entered the castle, and soon had the city at his disposition. Nor did

he lose time in sweeping Val Bregaglia. The news of this conquest

recalled the Switzers from the Duchy; and as they hurried homeward just

before the battle of Pavia, it may be affirmed that Gian Giacomo de'

Medici was instrumental in the defeat and capture of the French King.

The mountaineers had no great difficulty in dislodging their pirate

enemy from Chiavenna, the Valtelline, and Val Bregaglia. But he

retained his hold on the Trepievi, occupied the Valsassina, took

Porlezza, and established himself still more strongly in Musso as the

corsair monarch of the lake.

The tyranny of the Sforzas in Milan was fast going to pieces between

France and Spain; and in 1526 the Marquis of Pescara occupied the

capital in the name of Charles V. The Duke, meanwhile, remained a

prisoner in his Castello. 185Il Medeghino was now without a master; for

he refused to acknowledge the Spaniards, preferring to watch events and

build his own power on the ruins of the dukedom. At the head of 4,000

men, recruited from the lakes and neighbouring valleys, he swept the

country far and wide, and occupied the rich champaign of the Brianza.

He was now lord of the lakes of Como and Lugano, and absolute in Lecco

and the adjoining valleys. The town of Como itself alone belonged to

the Spaniards; and even Como was blockaded by the navy of the corsair.

Il Medeghino had a force of seven big ships, with three sails and

forty-eight oars, bristling with guns and carrying marines. His

flagship was a large brigantine, manned by picked rowers, from the mast

of which floated the red banner with the golden palle of the Medicean

arms. Besides these larger vessels, he commanded a flotilla of

countless small boats. It is clear that to reckon with him was a

necessity. If he could not be put down with force, he might be bought

over by concessions. The Spaniards adopted the second course, and Il

Medeghino, judging that the cause of the Sforza family was desperate,

determined in 1528 to attach himself to the Empire. Charles V. invested

him with the Castle of Musso and the larger part of Como Lake,

including the town of Lecco. He now assumed the titles of Marquis of

Musso and Count of Lecco: and in order to prove his sovereignty before

the world, he coined money with his own name and devices.

It will be observed that Gian Giacomo de' Medici had hitherto acted

with a single-hearted view to his own interests. At the age of thirty

he had raised himself from nothing to a principality, which, though

petty, might compare with many of some name in Italy—with Carpi, for

example, or Mirandola, or Camerino. Nor did he mean to remain quiet in

the prime of life. He regarded Como Lake as the mere basis for more

186arduous undertakings. Therefore, when the whirligig of events

restored Francesco Sforza to his duchy in 1529, Il Medeghino refused to

obey his old lord. Pretending to move under the Duke's orders, but

really acting for himself alone, he proceeded to attack his ancient

enemies, the Grisons. By fraud and force he worked his way into their

territory, seized Morbegno, and overran the Valtelline. He was

destined, however, to receive a serious check. Twelve thousand Switzers

rose against him on the one hand, on the other the Duke of Milan sent a

force by land and water to subdue his rebel subject, while Alessandro

Gonzaga marched upon his castles in the Brianza. He was thus assailed

by formidable forces from three quarters, converging upon the Lake of

Como, and driving him to his chosen element, the water. Hastily

quitting the Valtelline, he fell back to the Castle of Mandello on the

lake, collected his navy, and engaged the ducal ships in a battle off

Menaggio. In this battle he was worsted. But he did not lose his

courage. From Bellagio, from Varenna, from Bellano he drove forth his

enemies, rolled the cannon of the Switzers into the lake, regained

Lecco, defeated the troops of Alessandro Gonzaga, and took the Duke of

Mantua prisoner. Had he but held Como, it is probable that he might

have obtained such terms at this time as would have consolidated his

tyranny. The town of Como, however, now belonged to the Duke of Milan,

and formed an excellent basis for operations against the pirate.

Overmatched, with an exhausted treasury and broken forces, Il Medeghino

was at last compelled to give in. Yet he retired with all the honours

of war. In exchange for Musso and the lake, the Duke agreed to give him

35,000 golden crowns, together with the feud and marquisate of

Marignano. A free pardon was promised not only to himself and his

brothers, but to all his followers; and the Duke further undertook to

transport his 187artillery and munitions of war at his own expense to

Marignano. Having concluded this treaty under the auspices of Charles

V. and his lieutenant, Il Medeghino, in March 1532, set sail from

Musso, and turned his back upon the lake for ever. The Switzers

immediately destroyed the towers, forts, walls, and bastions of the

Musso promontory, leaving in the midst of their ruins the little chapel

of S. Eufemia.

Gian Giacomo de' Medici, henceforth known to Europe as the Marquis of

Marignano, now took service under Spain; and through the favour of

Anton de Leyva, Viceroy for the Duchy, rose to the rank of Field

Marshal. When the Marquis del Vasto succeeded to the Spanish

governorship of Milan in 1536, he determined to gratify an old grudge

against the ex-pirate, and, having invited him to a banquet, made him

prisoner. II Medeghino was not, however, destined to languish in a

dungeon. Princes and kings interested themselves in his fate. He was

released, and journeyed to the court of Charles V. in Spain. The

Emperor received him kindly, and employed him first in the Low

Countries, where he helped to repress the burghers of Ghent, and at the

siege of Landrecy commanded the Spanish artillery against other Italian

captains of adventure: for, Italy being now dismembered and enslaved,

her sons sought foreign service where they found best pay and widest

scope for martial science. Afterwards the Medici ruled Bohemia as

Spanish Viceroy; and then, as general of the league formed by the Duke

of Florence, the Emperor, and the Pope to repress the liberties of

Tuscany, distinguished himself in that cruel war of extermination,

which turned the fair Contado of Siena into a poisonous Maremma. To the

last Il Medeghino preserved the instincts and the passions of a brigand

chief. It was at this time that, acting for the Grand Duke of Tuscany,

he first claimed open kinship with the Medici of Florence. Heralds and

188genealogists produced a pedigree, which seemed to authorise this

pretension; he was recognised, together with his brother, Pius IV., as

an offshoot of the great house which had already given Dukes to

Florence, Kings to France, and two Popes to the Christian world. In the

midst of all this foreign service he never forgot his old dream of

conquering the Valtelline; and in 1547 he made proposals to the Emperor

for a new campaign against the Grisons. Charles V. did not choose to

engage in a war, the profits of which would have been inconsiderable

for the master of half the civilised world, and which might have proved

troublesome by stirring up the tameless Switzers. Il Medeghino was

obliged to abandon a project cherished from the earliest dawn of his

adventurous manhood.

When Gian Giacomo died in 1555, his brother Battista succeeded to his

claims upon Lecco and the Trepievi. His monument, magnificent with five

bronze figures, the masterpiece of Leone Lioni, from Menaggio,

Michelangelesque in style, and of consummate workmanship, still adorns

the Duomo of Milan. It stands close by the door that leads to the roof.

This mausoleum, erected to the memory of Gian Giacomo and his brother

Gabrio, is said to have cost 7800 golden crowns. On the occasion of the

pirate's funeral the Senate of Milan put on mourning, and the whole

city followed the great robber, the hero of Renaissance _virtù_, to the

grave.

Between the Cathedral of Como and the corsair Medeghino there is but a

slight link. Yet so extraordinary were the social circumstances of

Renaissance Italy, that almost at every turn, on her seaboard, in her

cities, from her hill-tops, we are compelled to blend our admiration

for the loveliest and purest works of art amid the choicest scenes of

nature with memories of execrable crimes and lawless characters.

Sometimes, as at Perugia, the _nexus_ is but local. At others, one

189single figure, like that of Cellini, unites both points of view in a

romance of unparalleled dramatic vividness. Or, again, beneath the

vaults of the Certosa, near Pavia, a masterpiece of the serenest beauty

carries our thoughts perforce back to the hideous cruelties and

snake-like frauds of its despotic founder. This is the excuse for

combining two such diverse subjects in one study.

190

BERGAMO AND BARTOLOMMEO COLLEONI

From the new town of commerce to the old town of history upon the hill,

the road is carried along a rampart lined, with horse-chestnut

trees—clumps of massy foliage, and snowy pyramids of bloom, expanded in

the rapture of a southern spring. Each pair of trees between their

stems and arch of intermingling leaves includes a space of plain,

checkered with cloud-shadows, melting blue and green in amethystine

haze. To right and left the last spurs of the Alps descend, jutting

like promontories, heaving like islands from the misty breadth below:

and here and there are towers, half-lost in airy azure; and cities

dwarfed to blots; and silvery lines where rivers flow; and distant,

vapour-drowned, dim crests of Apennines. The city walls above us wave

with snapdragons and iris among fig-trees sprouting from the riven

stones. There are terraces over-rioted with pergolas of vine, and

houses shooting forward into balconies and balustrades, from which a

Romeo might launch himself at daybreak, warned by the lark's song. A

sudden angle in the road is turned, and we pass from airspace and

freedom into the old town, beneath walls of dark brown masonry, where

wild valerians light their torches of red bloom in immemorial shade.

Squalor and splendour live here side by side. Grand Renaissance portals

grinning with Satyr masks are flanked by tawdry frescoes shamming

stonework, or by doorways where the withered bush hangs out a promise

of bad wine. 191The Cappella Colleoni is our destination, that

masterpiece of the sculptor-architect's craft, with its variegated

marbles,—rosy and white and creamy yellow and jet-black,—in patterns,

basreliefs, pilasters, statuettes, encrusted on the fanciful domed

shrine. Upon the façade are mingled, in the true Renaissance spirit of

genial acceptance, motives Christian and Pagan with supreme

impartiality. Medallions of emperors and gods alternate with virtues,

angels and cupids in a maze of loveliest arabesque; and round the base

of the building are told two stories—the one of Adam from his creation

to his fall, the other of Hercules and his labours. Italian craftsmen

of the _quattrocento_ were not averse to setting thus together, in one

framework, the myths of our first parents and Alemena's son: partly

perhaps because both subjects gave scope to the free treatment of the

nude; but partly also, we may venture to surmise, because the heroism

of Hellas counterbalanced the sin of Eden. Here then we see how Adam

and Eve were made and tempted and expelled from Paradise and set to

labour, how Cain killed Abel, and Lamech slew a man to his hurt, and

Isaac was offered on the mountain. The tale of human sin and the

promise of redemption are epitomised in twelve of the sixteen

basreliefs. The remaining four show Hercules wrestling with Antæus,

taming the Nemean lion, extirpating the Hydra, and bending to his will

the bull of Crete. Labour, appointed for a punishment to Adam, becomes

a title to immortality for the hero. The dignity of man is reconquered

by prowess for the Greek, as it is repurchased for the Christian by

vicarious suffering. Many may think this interpretation of Amadeo's

basreliefs far-fetched; yet, such as it is, it agrees with the spirit

of Humanism, bent ever on harmonising the two great traditions of the

past. Of the workmanship little need be said, except that it is wholly

Lombard, distinguished from the similar work of Della 192Quercia at

Bologna and Siena by a more imperfect feeling for composition, and a

lack of monumental gravity, yet graceful, rich in motives, and instinct

with a certain wayward _improvvisatore_ charm.

This Chapel was built by the great Condottiere Bartolommeo Colleoni, to

be the monument of his puissance even in the grave. It had been the

Sacristy of S. Maria Maggiore, which, when the Consiglio della

Misericordia refused it to him for his half-proud, half-pious purpose,

he took and held by force. The structure, of costliest materials,

reared by Gian Antonio Amadeo, cost him 50,000 golden florins. An

equestrian statue of gilt wood, voted to him by the town of Bergamo,

surmounts his monument inside the Chapel. This was the work of two

German masters, called 'Sisto figlio di Enrico Syri da Norimberga' and

'Leonardo Tedesco.' The tomb itself is of marble, executed for the most

part in a Lombard style resembling Amadeo's, but scarcely worthy of his

genius. The whole effect is disappointing. Five figures representing

Mars, Hercules, and three sons-in-law of Colleoni, who surround the

sarcophagus of the buried general, are indeed almost grotesque. The

angularity and crumpled draperies of the Milanese manner, when so

exaggerated, produce an impression of caricature. Yet many subordinate

details—a row of _putti_ in a _cinquecento_ frieze, for instance—and

much of the low relief work—especially the Crucifixion with its

characteristic episodes of the fainting Maries and the soldiers casting

dice—are lovely in their unaffected Lombardism.

There is another portrait of Colleoni in a round above the great door,

executed with spirit, though in a _bravura_ style that curiously

anticipates the decline of Italian sculpture. Gaunt, hollow-eyed, with

prominent cheek bones and strong jaws, this animated, half-length

statue of the hero bears the 193stamp of a good likeness; but when or

by whom it was made, I do not know.

Far more noteworthy than Colleoni's own monument is that of his

daughter Medea. She died young in 1470, and her father caused her tomb,

carved of Carrara marble, to be placed in the Dominican Church of

Basella, which he had previously founded. It was not until 1842 that

this most precious masterpiece of Antonio Amadeo's skill was

transferred to Bergamo. _Hic jacet Medea virgo._ Her hands are clasped

across her breast. A robe of rich brocade, gathered to the waist and

girdled, lies in simple folds upon the bier. Her throat, exceedingly

long and slender, is circled with a string of pearls. Her face is not

beautiful, for the features, especially the nose, are large and

prominent; but it is pure and expressive of vivid individuality. The

hair curls in crisp short clusters, and the ear, fine and shaped almost

like a Faun's, reveals the scrupulous fidelity of the sculptor. Italian

art has, in truth, nothing more exquisite than this still sleeping

figure of the girl, who, when she lived, must certainly have been so

rare of type and lovable in personality. If Busti's Lancinus Curtius be

the portrait of a humanist, careworn with study, burdened by the laurel

leaves that were so dry and dusty—if Gaston de Foix in the Brera,

smiling at death and beautiful in the cropped bloom of youth, idealise

the hero of romance—if Michelangelo's Penseroso translate in marble the

dark broodings of a despot's soul—if Della Porta's Julia Farnese be the

Roman courtesan magnificently throned in nonchalance at a Pope's

footstool—if Verocchio's Colleoni on his horse at Venice impersonate

the pomp and circumstance of scientific war—surely this Medea exhales

the flower-like graces, the sweet sanctities of human life, that even

in that turbid age were found among high-bred Italian ladies. Such

power have mighty sculptors, even in our 194modern world, to make the

mute stone speak in poems and clasp the soul's life of a century in

some five or six transcendent forms.

The Colleoni, or Coglioni, family were of considerable antiquity and

well-authenticated nobility in the town of Bergamo. Two lions' heads

conjoined formed one of their canting ensigns; another was borrowed

from the vulgar meaning of their name. Many members of the house held

important office during the three centuries preceding the birth of the

famous general, Bartolommeo. He was born in the year 1400 at Solza, in

the Bergamasque Contado. His father Paolo, or Pùho as he was commonly

called, was poor and exiled from the city, together with the rest of

the Guelf nobles, by the Visconti. Being a man of daring spirit, and

little inclined to languish in a foreign state as the dependent on some

patron, Pùho formed the bold design of seizing the Castle of Trezzo.

This he achieved in 1405 by fraud, and afterwards held it as his own by

force. Partly with the view of establishing himself more firmly in his

acquired lordship, and partly out of family affection, Pùho associated

four of his first-cousins in the government of Trezzo. They repaid his

kindness with an act of treason and cruelty, only too characteristic of

those times in Italy. One day while he was playing at draughts in a

room of the Castle, they assaulted him and killed him, seized his wife

and the boy Bartolommeo, and flung them into prison. The murdered Pùho

had another son, Antonio, who escaped and took refuge with Giorgio

Benzone, the tyrant of Crema. After a short time the Colleoni brothers

found means to assassinate him also; therefore Bartolommeo alone, a

child of whom no heed was taken, remained to be his father's avenger.

He and his mother lived together in great indigence at Solza, until the

lad felt strong enough to enter the service of one of the numerous

195petty Lombard princes, and to make himself if possible a captain of

adventure. His name alone was a sufficient introduction, and the Duchy

of Milan, dismembered upon the death of Gian Maria Visconti, was in

such a state that all the minor despots were increasing their forces

and preparing to defend by arms the fragments they had seized from the

Visconti heritage. Bartolommeo therefore had no difficulty in

recommending himself to Filippo d'Arcello, sometime general in the pay

of the Milanese, but now the new lord of Piacenza. With this master he

remained as page for two or three years, learning the use of arms,

riding, and training himself in the physical exercises which were

indispensable to a young Italian soldier. Meanwhile Filippo Maria

Visconti reacquired his hereditary dominions; and at the age of twenty,

Bartolommeo found it prudent to seek a patron stronger than d'Arcello.

The two great Condottieri, Sforza Attendolo and Braccio, divided the

military glories of Italy at this period; and any youth who sought to

rise in his profession, had to enrol himself under the banners of the

one or the other. Bartolommeo chose Braccio for his master, and was

enrolled among his men as a simple trooper, or _ragazzo_, with no

better prospects than he could make for himself by the help of his

talents and his borrowed horse and armour. Braccio at this time was in

Apulia, prosecuting the war of the Neapolitan Succession disputed

between Alfonso of Aragon and Louis of Anjou under the weak sovereignty

of Queen Joan. On which side of a quarrel a Condottiere fought mattered

but little: so great was the confusion of Italian politics, and so

complete was the egotism of these fraudful, violent, and treacherous

party leaders. Yet it may be mentioned that Braccio had espoused

Alfonso's cause. Bartolommeo Colleoni early distinguished himself among

the ranks of the Bracceschi. But he soon perceived that he could

196better his position by deserting to another camp. Accordingly he

offered his services to Jacopo Caldora, one of Joan's generals, and

received from him a commission of twenty men-at-arms. It may here be

parenthetically said that the rank and pay of an Italian captain varied

with the number of the men he brought into the field. His title

'Condofctiere' was derived from the circumstance that he was said to

have received a _Condotta di venti cavalli_, and so forth. Each

_cavallo_ was equal to one mounted man-at-arms and two attendants, who

were also called _ragazzi_. It was his business to provide the

stipulated number of men, to keep them in good discipline, and to

satisfy their just demands. Therefore an Italian army at this epoch

consisted of numerous small armies varying in size, each held together

by personal engagements to a captain, and all dependent on the will of

a general-in-chief, who had made a bargain with some prince or republic

for supplying a fixed contingent of fighting-men. The _Condottiere_ was

in other words a contractor or _impresario_, undertaking to do a

certain piece of work for a certain price, and to furnish the requisite

forces for the business in good working order. It will be readily seen

upon this system how important were the personal qualities of the

captain, and what great advantages those Condottieri had, who, like the

petty princes of Romagna and the March, the Montefeltri, Ordelaffi,

Malatesti, Manfredi, Orsini, and Vitelli, could rely upon a race of

hardy vassals for their recruits. It 239is not necessary to follow

Colleoni's fortunes in the Regno, at Aquila, Ancona, and Bologna. He

continued in the service of Caldora, who was now General of the Church,

and had his _Condotta_ gradually increased. Meanwhile his cousins, the

murderers of his father, began to dread his rising power, and

determined, if possible, to ruin him. He was not a man to be easily

assassinated; so they sent a hired ruffian 197to Caldora's camp to say

that Bartolommeo had taken his name by fraud, and that he was himself

the real son of Pùho Colleoni. Bartolommeo defied the liar to a duel;

and this would have taken place before the army, had not two witnesses

appeared, who knew the fathers of both Colleoni and the _bravo_, and

who gave such evidence that the captains of the army were enabled to

ascertain the truth. The impostor was stripped and drummed out of the

camp.

At the conclusion of a peace between the Pope and the Bolognese,

Bartolommeo found himself without occupation. He now offered himself to

the Venetians, and began to fight again under the great Carmagnola

against Filippo Visconti. His engagement allowed him forty men, which,

after the judicial murder of Carmagnola at Venice in 1432, were

increased to eighty. Erasmo da Narni, better known as Gattamelata, was

now his general-in-chief—a man who had risen from the lowest fortunes

to one of the most splendid military positions in Italy. Colleoni spent

the next years of his life, until 1443, in Lombardy, manoeuvring

against Il Piccinino, and gradually rising in the Venetian service,

until his Condotta reached the number of 800 men. Upon Gattamelata's

death at Padua in 1440, Colleoni became the most important of the

generals who had fought with Caldora in the March. The lordships of

Romano in the Bergamasque and of Covo and Antegnate in the Cremonese

had been assigned to him; and he was in a position to make independent

engagements with princes. What distinguished him as a general, was a

combination of caution with audacity. He united the brilliant system of

his master Braccio with the more prudent tactics of the Sforzeschi; and

thus, though he often surprised his foes by daring stratagems and

vigorous assaults, he rarely met with any serious check. He was a

captain who could be relied upon for boldly seizing an advantage, no

less 198than for using a success with discretion. Moreover he had

acquired an almost unique reputation for honesty in dealing with his

masters, and for justice combined with humane indulgence to his men.

His company was popular, and he could always bring capital troops into

the field.

In the year 1443 Colleoni quitted the Venetian service on account of a

quarrel with Gherardo Dandolo, the Provoditore of the Republic. He now

took a commission from Filippo Maria Visconti, who received him at

Milan with great honour, bestowed on him the Castello Adorno at Pavia,

and sent him into the March of Ancona upon a military expedition. Of

all Italian tyrants this Visconti was the most difficult to serve.

Constitutionally timid, surrounded with a crowd of spies and base

informers, shrinking from the sight of men in the recesses of his

palace, and controlling the complicated affairs of his Duchy by means

of correspondents and intelligencers, this last scion of the Milanese

despots lived like a spider in an inscrutable network of suspicion and

intrigue. His policy was one of endless plot and counterplot. He

trusted no man; his servants were paid to act as spies on one another;

his bodyguard consisted of mutually hostile mercenaries; his captains

in the field were watched and thwarted by commissioners appointed to

check them at the point of successful ambition or magnificent victory.

The historian has a hard task when he tries to fathom the Visconti's

schemes, or to understand his motives. Half the Duke's time seems to

have been spent in unravelling the webs that he had woven, in undoing

his own work, and weakening the hands of his chosen ministers.

Conscious that his power was artificial, that the least breath might

blow him back into the nothingness from which he had arisen on the

wrecks of his father's tyranny, he dreaded the personal eminence of his

generals above all things. His chief object was to establish a system

of checks, by means 199of which no one whom he employed should at any

moment be great enough to threaten him. The most formidable of these

military adventurers, Francesco Sforza, had been secured by marriage

with Bianca Maria Visconti, his master's only daughter, in 1441; but

the Duke did not even trust his son-in-law. The last six years of his

life were spent in scheming to deprive Sforza of his lordships; and the

war in the March, on which he employed Colleoni, had the object of

ruining the principality acquired by this daring captain from Pope

Eugenius IV. in 1443.

Colleoni was by no means deficient in those foxlike qualities which

were necessary to save the lion from the toils spread for him by

Italian intriguers. He had already shown that he knew how to push his

own interests, by changing sides and taking service with the highest

bidder, as occasion prompted. Nor, though his character for probity and

loyalty stood exceptionally high among the men of his profession, was

he the slave to any questionable claims of honour or of duty. In that

age of confused politics and extinguished patriotism, there was not

indeed much scope for scrupulous honesty. But Filippo Maria Visconti

proved more than a match for him in craft. While Colleoni was engaged

in pacifying the revolted population of Bologna, the Duke yielded to

the suggestion of his parasites at Milan, who whispered that the

general was becoming dangerously powerful. He recalled him, and threw

him without trial into the dungeons of the Forni at Monza. Here

Colleoni remained a prisoner more than a year, until the Duke's death

in 1447, when he made his escape, and profited by the disturbance of

the Duchy to reacquire his lordships in the Bergamasque territory. The

true motive for his imprisonment remains still buried in obscure

conjecture. Probably it was not even known to the Visconti, who acted

on this, as on so many other occasions, 200by a mere spasm of

suspicious jealousy, for which he could have given no account.

From the year 1447 to the year 1455, it is difficult to follow

Colleoni's movements, or to trace his policy. First, we find him

employed by the Milanese Republic, during its brief space of

independence; then he is engaged by the Venetians, with a commission

for 1500 horse; next, he is in the service of Francesco Sforza; once

more in that of the Venetians, and yet again in that of the Duke of

Milan. His biographer relates with pride that, during this period, he

was three times successful against French troops in Piedmont and

Lombardy. It appears that he made short engagements, and changed his

paymasters according to convenience. But all this time he rose in

personal importance, acquired fresh lordships in the Bergamasque, and

accumulated wealth. He reached the highest point of his prosperity in

1455, when the Republic of S. Mark elected him General-in-Chief of

their armies, with the fullest powers, and with a stipend of 100,000

florins. For nearly twenty-one years, until the day of his death, in

1475, Colleoni held this honourable and lucrative office. In his will

he charged the Signory of Venice that they should never again commit

into the hands of a single captain such unlimited control over their

military resources. It was indeed no slight tribute to Colleoni's

reputation for integrity, that the jealous Republic, which had

signified its sense of Carmagnola's untrustworthiness by capital

punishment, should have left him so long in the undisturbed disposal of

their army. The Standard and the Bâton of S. Mark were conveyed to

Colleoni by two ambassadors, and presented to him at Brescia on June

24, 1455. Three years later he made a triumphal entry into Venice, and

received the same ensigns of military authority from the hands of the

new Doge, Pasquale Malipiero. On this occasion his staff consisted of

201some two hundred officers, splendidly armed, and followed by a train

of serving-men. Noblemen from Bergamo, Brescia, and other cities of the

Venetian territory, swelled the cortege. When they embarked on the

lagoons, they found the water covered with boats and gondolas, bearing

the population of Venice in gala attire, to greet the illustrious guest

with instruments of music. Three great galleys of the Republic, called

Bucentaurs, issued from the crowd of smaller craft. On the first was

the Doge in his state robes, attended by the government in office, or

the Signoria of S. Mark. On the second were members of the Senate and

minor magistrates. The third carried the ambassadors of foreign powers.

Colleoni was received into the first state-galley, and placed by the

side of the Doge. The oarsmen soon cleared the space between the land

and Venice, passed the small canals, and swept majestically up the

Canalozzo among the plaudits of the crowds assembled on both sides to

cheer their General. Thus they reached the piazzetta, where Colleoni

alighted between the two great pillars, and, conducted by the Doge in

person, walked to the Church of S. Mark. Here, after Mass had been

said, and a sermon had been preached, kneeling before the high altar he

received the truncheon from the Doge's hands. The words of his

commission ran as follows:—

'By authority and decree of this most excellent City of Venice, of us

the Prince, and of the Senate, you are to be Commander and Captain

General of all our forces and armaments on terra firma. Take from our

hands this truncheon, with good augury and fortune, as sign and warrant

of your power. Be it your care and effort, with dignity and splendour

to maintain and to defend the Majesty, the Loyalty, and the Principles

of this Empire. Neither provoking, not yet provoked, unless at our

command, shall you break into open 202warfare with our enemies. Free

jurisdiction and lordship over each one of our soldiers, except in

cases of treason, we hereby commit to you.'

After the ceremony of his reception, Colleoni was conducted with no

less pomp to his lodgings, and the next ten days were spent in

festivities of all sorts.

The commandership-in-chief of the Venetian forces was perhaps the

highest military post in Italy. It placed Colleoni on the pinnacle of

his profession, and made his camp the favourite school of young

soldiers. Among his pupils or lieutenants we read of Ercole d'Este, the

future Duke of Ferrara; Alessandro Sforza, lord of Pesaro; Boniface,

Marquis of Montferrat; Cicco and Pino Ordelaffi, princes of Forli;

Astorre Manfredi, the lord of Faenza; three Counts of Mirandola; two

princes of Carpi; Deifobo, the Count of Anguillara; Giovanni Antonio

Caldora, lord of Jesi in the March; and many others of less name.

Honours came thick upon him. When one of the many ineffectual leagues

against the infidel was formed in 1468, during the pontificate of Paul

II., he was named Captain-General for the Crusade. Pius II. designed

him for the leader of the expedition he had planned against the impious

and savage despot, Sigismondo Malatesta. King René of Anjou, by special

patent, authorised him to bear his name and arms, and made him a member

of his family. The Duke of Burgundy, by a similar heraldic fiction,

conferred upon him his name and armorial bearings. This will explain

why Colleoni is often styled 'di Andegavia e Borgogna.' In the case of

René, the honour was but a barren show. But the patent of Charles the

Bold had more significance. In 1473 he entertained the project of

employing the great Italian General against his Swiss foes; nor does it

seem reasonable to reject a statement made by Colleoni's biographer, to

the effect that a secret compact had been 203drawn up between him and

the Duke of Burgundy, for the conquest and partition of the Duchy of

Milan. The Venetians, in whose service Colleoni still remained, when

they became aware of this project, met it with peaceful but

irresistible opposition.

Colleoni had been engaged continually since his earliest boyhood in the

trade of war. It was not therefore possible that he should have gained

a great degree of literary culture. Yet the fashion of the times made

it necessary that a man in his position should seek the society of

scholars. Accordingly his court and camp were crowded with students, in

whose wordy disputations he is said to have delighted. It will be

remembered that his contemporaries, Alfonso the Magnanimous, Francesco

Sforza, Federigo of Urbino, and Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta, piqued

themselves at least as much upon their patronage of letters, as upon

their prowess in the field.

Colleoni's court, like that of Urbino, was a model of good manners. As

became a soldier, he was temperate in food and moderate in slumber. It

was recorded of him that he had never sat more than one hour at meat in

his own house, and that he never overslept the sunrise. After dinner he

would converse with his friends, using commonly his native dialect of

Bergamo, and entertaining the company now with stories of adventure,

and now with pithy sayings. In another essential point he resembled his

illustrious contemporary, the Duke of Urbino; for he was sincerely

pious in an age which, however it preserved the decencies of ceremonial

religion, was profoundly corrupt at heart. His principal lordships in

the Bergamasque territory owed to his munificence their fairest

churches and charitable institutions. At Martinengo, for example, he

rebuilt and re-endowed two monasteries, the one dedicated to S. Chiara,

the other to S. Francis. In Bergamo itself he founded an establishment

named' La Pieta,' for 204the good purpose of dowering and marrying poor

girls. This house he endowed with a yearly income of 3000 ducats. The

Sulphur baths of Trescorio, at some distance from the city, were

improved and opened to poor patients by a hospital which he provided.

At Rumano he raised a church to S. Peter, and erected buildings of

public utility, which on his death he bequeathed to the society of the

Misericordia in that town. All the places of his jurisdiction owed to

him such benefits as good water, new walls, and irrigation works. In

addition to these munificent foundations must be mentioned the Basella,

or Monastery of Dominican friars, which he established not far from

Bergamo, upon the river Serio, in memory of his beloved daughter Medea.

Last, not least, was the Chapel of S. John the Baptist, attached to the

Church of S. Maria Maggiore, which he endowed with fitting maintenance

for two priests and deacons.

The one defect acknowledged by his biographer was his partiality for

women. Early in life he married Tisbe, of the noble house of the

Brescian Martinenghi, who bore him one daughter, Caterina, wedded to

Gasparre Martinengo. Two illegitimate daughters, Ursina and Isotta,

were recognised and treated by him as legitimate. The first he gave in

marriage to Gherardo Martinengo, and the second to Jacopo of the same

family. Two other natural children, Doratina and Ricardona, were

mentioned in his will: he left them four thousand ducats a piece for

dowry. Medea, the child of his old age (for she was born to him when he

was sixty), died before her father, and was buried, as we have seen, in

the Chapel of Basella.

Throughout his life he was distinguished for great physical strength

and agility. When he first joined the troop of Braccio, he could race,

with his corselet on, against the swiftest runner of the army; and when

he was stripped, few 205horses could beat him in speed. Far on into old

age he was in the habit of taking long walks every morning for the sake

of exercise, and delighted in feats of arms and jousting matches. 'He

was tall, straight, and full of flesh, well proportioned, and

excellently made in all his limbs. His complexion inclined somewhat to

brown, but was coloured with sanguine and lively carnation. His eyes

were black; in look and sharpness of light, they were vivid, piercing,

and terrible. The outlines of his nose and all his countenance

expressed a certain manly nobleness, combined with goodness and

prudence.' Such is the portrait drawn of Colleoni by his biographer;

and it well accords with the famous bronze statue of the general at

Venice.

Colleoni lived with a magnificence that suited his rank. His favourite

place of abode was Malpaga, a castle built by him at the distance of

about an hour's drive from Bergamo. The place is worth a visit, though

its courts and gates and galleries have now been turned into a monster

farm, and the southern rooms, where Colleoni entertained his guests,

are given over to the silkworms. Half a dozen families, employed upon a

vast estate of the Martinengo family, occupy the still substantial

house and stables. The moat is planted with mulberry-trees; the upper

rooms are used as granaries for golden maize; cows, pigs, and horses

litter in the spacious yard. Yet the walls of the inner court and of

the ancient state rooms are brilliant with frescoes, executed by some

good Venetian hand, which represent the chief events of Colleoni's

life—his battles, his reception by the Signory of Venice, his

tournaments and hawking parties, and the great series of entertainments

with which he welcomed Christiern of Denmark. This king had made his

pilgrimage to Rome and was returning westward, when the fame of

Colleoni and his princely state at Malpaga induced him to turn aside

and spend 206some days as the general's guest. In order to do him

honour, Colleoni left his castle at the king's disposal and established

himself with all his staff and servants in a camp at some distance from

Malpaga. The camp was duly furnished with tents and trenches,

stockades, artillery, and all the other furniture of war. On the king's

approach, Colleoni issued with trumpets blowing and banners flying to

greet his guest, gratifying him thus with a spectacle of the pomp and

circumstance of war as carried on in Italy. The visit was further

enlivened by sham fights, feats of arms, and trials of strength. When

it ended, Colleoni presented the king with one of his own suits of

armour, and gave to each of his servants a complete livery of red and

white, his colours. Among the frescoes at Malpaga none are more

interesting, and none, thanks to the silkworms rather than to any other

cause, are fortunately in a better state of preservation, than those

which represent this episode in the history of the Castle.

Colleoni died in the year 1475, at the age of seventy-five. Since he

left no male representative, he constituted the Republic of S. Mark his

heir-in-chief, after properly providing for his daughters and his

numerous foundations. The Venetians received under this testament a sum

of 100,000 ducats, together with all arrears of pay due to him, and

10,000 ducats owed him by the Duke of Ferrara. It set forth the

testator's intention that this money should be employed in defence of

the Christian faith against the Turk. One condition was attached to the

bequest. The legatees were to erect a statue to Colleoni on the Piazza

of S. Mark. This, however, involved some difficulty; for the proud

Republic had never accorded a similar honour, nor did they choose to

encumber their splendid square with a monument. They evaded the

condition by assigning the Campo in front of the Scuola di S. Marco,

where also stands the Church of S. Zanipolo, 207to the purpose. Here

accordingly the finest bronze equestrian statue in Italy, if we except

the Marcus Aurelius of the Capitol, was reared upon its marble pedestal

by Andrea Verocchio and Alessandro Leopardi.

Colleoni's liberal expenditure of wealth found its reward in the

immortality conferred by art. While the names of Braccio, his master in

the art of war, and of Piccinino, his great adversary, are familiar to

few but professed students, no one who has visited either Bergamo or

Venice can fail to have learned something about the founder of the

Chapel of S. John and the original of Leopardi's bronze. The annals of

sculpture assign to Verocchio, of Florence, the principal share in this

statue: but Verocchio died before it was cast; and even granting that

he designed the model, its execution must be attributed to his

collaborator, the Venetian Leopardi. For my own part, I am loth to

admit that the chief credit of this masterpiece belongs to a man whose

undisputed work at Florence shows but little of its living spirit and

splendour of suggested motion. That the Tuscan science of Verocchio

secured conscientious modelling for man and horse may be assumed; but I

am fain to believe that the concentrated fire which animates them both

is due in no small measure to the handling of his northern

fellow-craftsman.

While immersed in the dreary records of crimes, treasons, cruelties,

and base ambitions, which constitute the bulk of fifteenth-century

Italian history, it is refreshing to meet with a character so frank and

manly, so simply pious and comparatively free from stain, as Colleoni.

The only general of his day who can bear comparison with him for purity

of public life and decency in conduct, was Federigo di Montefeltro.

Even here, the comparison redounds to Colleoni's credit; for he, unlike

the Duke of Urbino, rose to eminence by his own exertion in a

profession fraught with peril to men 208of ambition and energy.

Federigo started with a principality sufficient to satisfy his just

desires for power. Nothing but his own sense of right and prudence

restrained Colleoni upon the path which brought Francesco Sforza to a

duchy by dishonourable dealings, and Carmagnola to the scaffold by

questionable practice against his masters.

209

CREMA AND THE CRUCIFIX

Few people visit Crema. It is a little country town of Lombardy,

between Cremona and Treviglio, with no historic memories but very misty

ones belonging to the days of the Visconti dynasty. On every side

around the city walls stretch smiling vineyards and rich meadows, where

the elms are married to the mulberry-trees by long festoons of foliage

hiding purple grapes, where the sunflowers droop their heavy golden

heads among tall stems of millet and gigantic maize, and here and there

a rice-crop ripens in the marshy loam. In vintage time the carts, drawn

by their white oxen, come creaking townward in the evening, laden with

blue bunches. Down the long straight roads, between rows of poplars,

they creep on; and on the shafts beneath the pyramid of fruit lie

contadini stained with lees of wine. Far off across that 'waveless sea'

of Lombardy, which has been the battlefield of countless generations,

rise the dim grey Alps, or else pearled domes of thunder-clouds in

gleaming masses over some tall solitary tower. Such backgrounds, full

of peace, suggestive of almost infinite distance, and dignified with

colours of incomparable depth and breadth, the Venetian painters loved.

No landscape in Europe is more wonderful than this—thrice wonderful in

the vastness of its arching heavens, in the stillness of its level

plain, and in the bulwark of huge crested mountains, reared afar like

bastions against the northern sky. 210The little town is all alive in

this September weather. At every corner of the street, under rustling

abeles and thick-foliaged planes, at the doors of palaces and in the

yards of inns, men, naked from the thighs downward, are treading the

red must into vats and tuns; while their mild-eyed oxen lie beneath

them in the road, peaceably chewing the cud between one journey to the

vineyard and another. It must not be imagined that the scene of Alma

Tadema's 'Roman Vintage,' or what we fondly picture to our fancy of the

Athenian Lenaea, is repeated in the streets of Crema. This modern

treading of the wine-press is a very prosaic affair. The town reeks

with a sour smell of old casks and crushed grape-skins, and the men and

women at work bear no resemblance whatever to Bacchus and his crew. Yet

even as it is, the Lombard vintage, beneath floods of sunlight and a

pure blue sky, is beautiful; and he who would fain make acquaintance

with Crema, should time his entry into the old town, if possible, on

some still golden afternoon of autumn. It is then, if ever, that he

will learn to love the glowing brickwork of its churches and the quaint

terra-cotta traceries that form its chief artistic charm.

How the unique brick architecture of the Lombard cities took its

origin—whether from the precepts of Byzantine aliens in the earliest

middle ages, or from the native instincts of a mixed race composed of

Gallic, Ligurian, Roman, and Teutonic elements, under the leadership of

Longobardic rulers—is a question for antiquarians to decide. There can,

however, be no doubt that the monuments of the Lombard style, as they

now exist, are no less genuinely local, no less characteristic of the

country they adorn, no less indigenous to the soil they sprang from,

than the Attic colonnades of Mnesicles and Ictinus. What the marble

quarries of Pentelicus were to the Athenian builders, the clay beneath

their 211feet was to those Lombard craftsmen. From it they fashioned

structures as enduring, towers as majestic, and cathedral aisles as

solemn, as were ever wrought from chiselled stone. There is a true

sympathy between those buildings and the Lombard landscape, which by

itself might suffice to prove the originality of their almost unknown

architects. The rich colour of the baked clay—finely modulated from a

purplish red, through russet, crimson, pink, and orange, to pale yellow

and dull grey—harmonises with the brilliant greenery of Lombard

vegetation and with the deep azure of the distant Alpine range. Reared

aloft above the flat expanse of plain, those square _torroni_, tapering

into octagons and crowned with slender cones, break the long sweeping

lines and infinite horizons with a contrast that affords relief, and

yields a resting-place to tired eyes; while, far away, seen haply from

some bridge above Ticino, or some high-built palace loggia, they gleam

like columns of pale rosy fire against the front of mustering

storm-clouds blue with rain. In that happy orchard of Italy, a pergola

of vines in leaf, a clump of green acacias, and a campanile soaring

above its church roof, brought into chance combination with the reaches

of the plain and the dim mountain range, make up a picture eloquent in

its suggestive beauty.

Those ancient builders wrought cunningly with their material. The

bricks are fashioned and fixed to last for all time. Exposed to the icy

winds of a Lombard winter, to the fierce fire of a Lombard summer, and

to the moist vapours of a Lombard autumn; neglected by unheeding

generations; with flowers clustering in their crannies, and birds

nesting in their eaves, and mason-bees filling the delicate network of

their traceries—they still present angles as sharp as when they were

but finished, and joints as nice as when the mortar dried in the first

months of their building. This immunity 212from age and injury they owe

partly to the imperishable nature of baked clay; partly to the care of

the artists who selected and mingled the right sorts of earth, burned

them with scrupulous attention, and fitted them together with a

patience born of loving service. Each member of the edifice was

designed with a view to its ultimate place. The proper curve was

ascertained for cylindrical columns and for rounded arches. Larger

bricks were moulded for the supporting walls, and lesser pieces were

adapted to the airy vaults and lanterns. In the brickfield and the kiln

the whole church was planned and wrought out in its details, before the

hands that made a unity of all these scattered elements were set to the

work of raising it in air. When they came to put the puzzle together,

they laid each brick against its neighbour, filling up the almost

imperceptible interstices with liquid cement composed of quicklime and

fine sand in water. After five centuries the seams between the layers

of bricks that make the bell-tower of S. Gottardo at Milan, yield no

point of vantage to the penknife or the chisel.

Nor was it in their welding of the bricks alone that these craftsmen

showed their science. They were wont to enrich the surface with marble,

sparingly but effectively employed—as in those slender detached

columns, which add such beauty to the octagon of S. Gottardo, or in the

string-courses of strange beasts and reptiles that adorn the church

fronts of Pavia. They called to their aid the _mandorlato_ of Verona,

supporting their porch pillars on the backs of couchant lions,

inserting polished slabs on their façades, and building huge sarcophagi

into their cloister alleys. Between terra-cotta and this marble of

Verona there exists a deep and delicate affinity. It took the name of

_mandorlato_, I suppose, from a resemblance to almond blossoms. But it

is far from having the simple beauty of a single hue. Like all noble

veined stones, 213it passes by a series of modulations and gradations

through a gamut of associated rather than contrasted tints. Not the

pink of the almond blossom only, but the creamy whiteness of the almond

kernel, and the dull yellow of the almond nut may be found in it; and

yet these colours are so blent and blurred to all-pervading mellowness,

that nowhere is there any shock of contrast or violence of a

preponderating tone. The veins which run in labyrinths of crossing,

curving, and contorted lines all over its smooth surface add, no doubt,

to this effect of unity. The polish, lastly, which it takes, makes the

_mandorlato_ shine like a smile upon the sober face of the brickwork:

for, serviceable as terra-cotta is for nearly all artistic purposes, it

cannot reflect light or gain the illumination which comes from surface

brightness.

What the clay can do almost better than any crystalline material, may

be seen in the mouldings so characteristic of Lombard architecture.

Geometrical patterns of the rarest and most fanciful device; scrolls of

acanthus foliage, and traceries of tendrils; Cupids swinging in

festoons of vines; angels joining hands in dance, with fluttering

skirts and windy hair, and mouths that symbol singing; grave faces of

old men and beautiful profiles of maidens leaning from medallions;

wide-winged genii filling the spandrils of cloister arches, and cherubs

clustered in the rondure of rose-windows—ornaments like these, wrought

from the plastic clay, and adapted with true taste to the requirements

of the architecture, are familiar to every one who has studied the

church front of Crema, the cloisters of the Certosa, the courts of the

Ospedale Maggiore at Milan, or the public palace of Cremona.

If the _mandorlato_ gives a smile to those majestic Lombard buildings,

the terra-cotta decorations add the element of life and movement. The

thought of the artist in its first 214freshness and vivacity is felt in

them. They have all the spontaneity of improvisation, the seductive

melody of unpremeditated music. Moulding the supple earth with 'hand

obedient to the brain,' the _plasticatore_ has impressed his most

fugitive dreams of beauty on it without effort; and what it cost him

but a few fatigueless hours to fashion, the steady heat of the furnace

has gifted with imperishable life. Such work, no doubt, has the defects

of its qualities. As there are few difficulties to overcome, it suffers

from a fatal facility—_nec pluteum coedit nec demorsos sapit ungues_.

It is therefore apt to be unequal, touching at times the highest point

of inspiration, as in the angels of Guccio at Perugia, and sinking not

unfrequently into the commonplace of easygoing triviality, as in the

common floral traceries of Milanese windows. But it is never laboured,

never pedantic, never dulled by the painful effort to subdue an

obstinate material to the artist's will. If marble is required to

develop the strength of the few supreme sculptors, terra-cotta saves

intact the fancies of a crowd of lesser men.

When we reflect that all the force, solemnity, and beauty of the

Lombard buildings was evoked from clay, we learn from them this lesson:

that the thought of man needs neither precious material nor yet

stubborn substance for the production of enduring masterpieces. The red

earth was enough for God when He made man in His own image; and mud

dried in the sun suffices for the artist, who is next to God in his

creative faculty—since _non merita nome di creatore se non Iddio ed il

poeta_. After all, what is more everlasting than terra-cotta? The

hobnails of the boys who ran across the brickfields in the Roman town

of Silchester, may still be seen, mingled with the impress of the feet

of dogs and hoofs of goats, in the tiles discovered there. Such traces

might serve as a metaphor for the footfall of artistic genius, when

215the form-giver has stamped his thought upon the moist clay, and fire

has made that imprint permanent.

Of all these Lombard edifices, none is more beautiful than the

Cathedral of Crema, with its delicately finished campanile, built of

choicely tinted yellow bricks, and ending in a lantern of the

gracefullest, most airily capricious fancy. This bell-tower does not

display the gigantic force of Cremona's famous torrazzo, shooting 396

feet into blue ether from the city square; nor can it rival the octagon

of S. Gottardo for warmth of hue. Yet it has a character of elegance,

combined with boldness of invention, that justifies the citizens of

Crema in their pride. It is unique; and he who has not seen it does not

know the whole resources of the Lombard style. The façade of the

Cathedral displays that peculiar blending of Byzantine or Romanesque

round arches with Gothic details in the windows, and with the acute

angle of the central pitch, which forms the characteristic quality of

the late _trecento_ Lombard manner. In its combination of purity and

richness it corresponds to the best age of decorated work in English

Gothic. What, however, strikes a Northern observer is the strange

detachment of this elaborate façade from the main structure of the

church. Like a frontispiece cut out of cardboard and pierced with

ornamental openings, it shoots far above the low roof of the nave; so

that at night the moon, rising above the southern aisle, shines through

its topmost window, and casts the shadow of its tracery upon the

pavement of the square. This is a constructive blemish to which the

Italians in no part of the peninsula were sensitive. They seem to have

regarded their church fronts as independent of the edifice, capable of

separate treatment, and worthy in themselves of being made the subject

of decorative skill.

In the so-called Santuario of Crema—a circular church dedicated to S.

Maria della Croce, outside the walls—the 216Lombard style has been

adapted to the manner of the Mid-Renaissance. This church was raised in

the last years of the fifteenth century by Gian Battista Battagli, an

architect of Lodi, who followed the pure rules of taste, bequeathed to

North Italian builders by Bramante. The beauty of the edifice is due

entirely to its tranquil dignity and harmony of parts, the lightness of

its circling loggia, and the just proportion maintained between the

central structure and the four projecting porticoes. The sharp angles

of these vestibules afford a contrast to the simplicity of the main

building, while their clustered cupolas assist the general effect of

roundness aimed at by the architect. Such a church as this proves how

much may be achieved by the happy distribution of architectural masses.

It was the triumph of the best Renaissance style to attain lucidity of

treatment, and to produce beauty by geometrical proportion. When Leo

Battista Alberti complained to his friend, Matteo di Bastia, that a

slight alteration of the curves in his design for S. Francesco at

Rimini would 'spoil his music,' _ciò che tu muti discorda tutta quella

musica_, this is what he meant. The melody of lines and the harmony of

parts made a symphony to his eyes no less agreeable than a concert of

tuned lutes and voices to his ears; and to this concord he was so

sensitive that any deviation was a discord.

After visiting the churches of Crema and sauntering about the streets

awhile, there is nothing left to do but to take refuge in the old

Albergo del Pozzo. This is one of those queer Italian inns, which carry

you away at once into a scene of Goldoni. It is part of some palace,

where nobles housed their _bravi_ in the sixteenth century, and which

the lesser people of to-day have turned into a dozen habitations. Its

great stone staircase leads to a saloon upon which the various

bedchambers open; and round its courtyard runs an open 217balcony, and

from the court grows up a fig-tree poking ripe fruit against a bedroom

window. Oleanders in tubs and red salvias in pots, and kitchen herbs in

boxes, flourish on the pavement, where the ostler comes to wash his

carriages, and where the barber shaves the poodle of the house.

Visitors to the Albergo del Pozzo are invariably asked if they have

seen the Museo; and when they answer in the negative, they are

conducted with some ceremony to a large room on the ground-floor of the

inn, looking out upon the courtyard and the fig-tree. It was here that

I gained the acquaintance of Signor Folcioni, and became possessor of

an object that has made the memory of Crema doubly interesting to me

ever since.

When we entered the Museo, we found a little old man, gentle, grave,

and unobtrusive, varnishing the ugly portrait of some Signor of the

_cinquecento_. Round the walls hung pictures, of mediocre value, in

dingy frames; but all of them bore sounding titles. Titians, Lionardos,

Guido Renis, and Luinis, looked down and waited for a purchaser. In

truth this museum was a _bric-à-brac_ shop of a sort that is common

enough in Italy, where treasures of old lace, glass, armour, furniture,

and tapestry, may still be met with. Signor Folcioni began by pointing

out the merits of his pictures; and after making due allowance for his

zeal as amateur and dealer, it was possible to join in some of his

eulogiums. A would-be Titian, for instance, bought in Verona from a

noble house in ruins, showed Venetian wealth of colour in its gemmy

greens and lucid crimsons shining from a background deep and glowing.

Then he led us to a walnut-wood bureau of late Renaissance work,

profusely carved with nymphs and Cupids, and armed men, among festoons

of fruits embossed in high relief. Deeply drilled worm-holes set a seal

of antiquity upon the blooming faces and luxuriant garlandslike 218the

touch of Time who 'delves the parallels in beauty's brow.' On the

shelves of an ebony cabinet close by he showed us a row of cups cut out

of rock-crystal and mounted in gilt silver, with heaps of engraved

gems, old snuff-boxes, coins, medals, sprays of coral, and all the

indescribable lumber that one age flings aside as worthless for the

next to pick up from the dust-heap and regard as precious. Surely the

genius of culture in our century might be compared to a chiffonnier of

Paris, who, when the night has fallen, goes into the streets, bag on

back and lantern in hand, to rake up the waifs and strays a day of

whirling life has left him.

The next curiosity was an ivory carving of S. Anthony preaching to the

fishes, so fine and small you held it on your palm, and used a lens to

look at it. Yet there stood the Santo gesticulating, and there were the

fishes in rows—the little fishes first, and then the middle-sized, and

last of all the great big fishes almost out at sea, with their heads

above the water and their mouths wide open, just as the _Fioretti di

San Francesco_ describes them. After this came some original drawings

of doubtful interest, and then a case of fifty-two _nielli_. These were

of unquestionable value; for has not Cicognara engraved them on a page

of his classic monograph? The thin silver plates, over which once

passed the burin of Maso Finiguerra, cutting lines finer than hairs,

and setting here a shadow in dull acid-eaten grey, and there a high

light of exquisite polish, were far more delicate than any proofs

impressed from them. These frail masterpieces of Florentine art—the

first beginnings of line engraving—we held in our hands while Signor

Folcioni read out Cicognara's commentary in a slow impressive voice,

breaking off now and then to point at the originals before us.

The sun had set, and the room was almost dark, when he laid his book

down, and said: 'I have not much left to show—yet stay! 219Here are

still some little things of interest.' He then opened the door into his

bedroom, and took down from a nail above his bed a wooden Crucifix. Few

things have fascinated me more than this Crucifix—produced without

parade, half negligently, from the dregs of his collection by a dealer

in old curiosities at Crema. The cross was, or is—for it is lying on

the table now before me—twenty-one inches in length, made of strong

wood, covered with coarse yellow parchment, and shod at the four ends

with brass. The Christ is roughly hewn in reddish wood, coloured

scarlet, where the blood streams from the five wounds. Over the head an

oval medallion, nailed into the cross, serves as framework to a

miniature of the Madonna, softly smiling with a Correggiesque simper.

The whole Crucifix is not a work of art, but such as may be found in

every convent. Its date cannot be earlier than the beginning of the

eighteenth century. As I held it in my hand, I thought—perhaps this has

been carried to the bedside of the sick and dying; preachers have

brandished it from the pulpit over conscience-stricken congregations;

monks have knelt before it on the brick floor of their cells, and

novices have kissed it in the vain desire to drown their yearnings

after the relinquished world; perhaps it has attended criminals to the

scaffold, and heard the secrets of repentant murderers; but why should

it be shown me as a thing of rarity? These thoughts passed through my

mind, while Signor Folcioni quietly remarked: 'I bought this Cross from

the Frati when their convent was dissolved in Crema.' Then he bade me

turn it round, and showed a little steel knob fixed into the back

between the arms. This was a spring. He pressed it, and the upper and

lower parts of the cross came asunder; and holding the top like a

handle, I drew out as from a scabbard a sharp steel blade, concealed in

the thickness of the wood, behind the very body of the agonising

Christ. What 220had been a crucifix became a deadly poniard in my

grasp, and the rust upon it in the twilight looked like blood. 'I have

often wondered,' said Signor Folcioni, 'that the Frati cared to sell me

this.'

There is no need to raise the question of the genuineness of this

strange relic, though I confess to having had my doubts about it, or to

wonder for what nefarious purposes the impious weapon was

designed—whether the blade was inserted by some rascal monk who never

told the tale, or whether it was used on secret service by the friars.

On its surface the infernal engine carries a dark certainty of treason,

sacrilege, and violence. Yet it would be wrong to incriminate the Order

of S. Francis by any suspicion, and idle to seek the actual history of

this mysterious weapon. A writer of fiction could indeed produce some

dark tale in the style of De Stendhal's 'Nouvelles,' and christen it

'The Crucifix of Crema.' And how delighted would Webster have been if

he had chanced to hear of such a sword-sheath! He might have placed it

in the hands of Bosola for the keener torment of his Duchess. Flamineo

might have used it; or the disguised friars, who made the deathbed of

Bracciano hideous, might have plunged it in the Duke's heart after

mocking his eyes with the figure of the suffering Christ. To imagine

such an instrument of moral terror mingled with material violence, lay

within the scope of Webster's sinister and powerful genius. But unless

he had seen it with his eyes, what poet would have ventured to devise

the thing and display it even in the dumb show of a tragedy? Fact is

more wonderful than romance. No apocalypse of Antichrist matches what

is told of Roderigo Borgia; and the crucifix of Crema exceeds the

sombre fantasy of Webster.

Whatever may be the truth about this cross, it has at any rate the

value of a symbol or a metaphor. The idea which it 221materialises, the

historical events of which it is a sign, may well arrest attention. A

sword concealed in the crucifix—what emblem brings more forcibly to

mind than this that two-edged glaive of persecution which Dominic

unsheathed to mow down the populations of Provence and to make Spain

destitute of men? Looking upon the crucifix of Crema, we may seem to

see pestilence-stricken multitudes of Moors and Jews dying on the

coasts of Africa and Italy. The Spaniards enter Mexico; and this is the

cross they carry in their hands. They take possession of Peru; and

while the gentle people of the Incas come to kiss the bleeding brows of

Christ, they plunge this dagger in their sides. What, again, was the

temporal power of the Papacy but a sword embedded in a cross? Each Papa

Rè, when he ascended the Holy Chair, was forced to take the crucifix of

Crema and to bear it till his death. A long procession of war-loving

Pontiffs, levying armies and paying captains with the pence of S.

Peter, in order to keep by arms the lands they had acquired by fraud,

defiles before our eyes. First goes the terrible Sixtus IV., who died

of grief when news was brought him that the Italian princes had made

peace. He it was who sanctioned the conspiracy to murder the Medici in

church, at the moment of the elevation of the Host. The brigands hired

to do this work refused at the last moment. The sacrilege appalled

them. 'Then,' says the chronicler, 'was found a priest, who, being used

to churches, had no scruple.' The poignard this priest carried was this

crucifix of Crema. After Sixtus came the blood-stained Borgia; and

after him Julius II., whom the Romans in triumphal songs proclaimed a

second Mars, and who turned, as Michelangelo expressed it, the chalices

of Rome into swords and helms. Leo X., who dismembered Italy for his

brother and nephew; and Clement VII., who broke the neck of Florence

and delivered the Eternal City to the spoiler, 222follow. Of the

antinomy between the Vicariate of Christ and an earthly kingdom,

incarnated by these and other Holy Fathers, what symbol could be found

more fitting than a dagger with a crucifix for case and covering?

It is not easy to think or write of these matters without rhetoric.

When I laid my head upon my pillow that night in the Albergo del Pozzo

at Crema, it was full of such thoughts; and when at last sleep came, it

brought with it a dream begotten doubtless by the perturbation of my

fancy. For I thought that a brown Franciscan, with hollow cheeks, and

eyes aflame beneath his heavy cowl, sat by my bedside, and, as he

raised the crucifix in his lean quivering hands, whispered a tale of

deadly passion and of dastardly revenge. His confession carried me away

to a convent garden of Palermo; and there was love in the story, and

hate that is stronger than love, and, for the ending of the whole

matter, remorse which dies not even in the grave. Each new possessor of

the crucifix of Crema, he told me, was forced to hear from him in

dreams his dreadful history. But, since it was a dream and nothing

more, why should I repeat it? I have wandered far enough already from

the vintage and the sunny churches of the little Lombard town.

223

CHERUBINO AT THE SCALA THEATRE

I

It was a gala night. The opera-house of Milan was one blaze of light

and colour. Royalty in field-marshal's uniform and diamonds, attended

by decorated generals and radiant ladies of the court, occupied the

great box opposite the stage. The tiers from pit to gallery were filled

with brilliantly dressed women. From the third row, where we were

fortunately placed, the curves of that most beautiful of theatres

presented to my gaze a series of retreating and approaching lines,

composed of noble faces, waving feathers, sparkling jewels, sculptured

shoulders, uniforms, robes of costly stuffs and every conceivable

bright colour. Light poured from the huge lustre in the centre of the

roof, ran along the crimson velvet cushions of the boxes, and flashed

upon the gilded frame of the proscenium—satyrs and acanthus scrolls

carved in the manner of a century ago. Pit and orchestra scarcely

contained the crowd of men who stood in lively conversation, their

backs turned to the stage, their lorgnettes raised from time to time to

sweep the boxes. This surging sea of faces and sober costumes enhanced

by contrast the glitter, variety, and luminous tranquillity of the

theatre above it.

No one took much thought of the coming spectacle, till the conductor's

rap was heard upon his desk, and the orchestra broke into the overture

to Mozart's _Nozze_. Before they were half through, it was clear that

we should not enjoy that 224evening the delight of perfect music added

to the enchantment of so brilliant a scene. The execution of the

overture was not exactly bad. But it lacked absolute precision, the

complete subordination of all details to the whole. In rendering German

music Italians often fail through want of discipline, or through

imperfect sympathy with a style they will not take the pains to master.

Nor, when the curtain lifted and the play began, was the vocalisation

found in all parts satisfactory. The Contessa had a meagre _mezza

voce_. Susanna, though she did not sing false, hovered on the verge of

discords, owing to the weakness of an organ which had to be strained in

order to make any effect on that enormous stage. On the other hand, the

part of Almaviva was played with dramatic fire, and Figaro showed a

truly Southern sense of comic fun. The scenes were splendidly mounted,

and something of a princely grandeur—the largeness of a noble train of

life—was added to the drama by the vast proportions of the theatre. It

was a performance which, in spite of drawbacks, yielded pleasure.

And yet it might have left me frigid but for the artist who played

Cherubino. This was no other than Pauline Lucca, in the prime of youth

and petulance. From her first appearance to the last note she sang, she

occupied the stage. The opera seemed to have been written for her. The

mediocrity of the troupe threw her commanding merits—the richness of

her voice, the purity of her intonation, her vivid conception of

character, her indescribable brusquerie of movement and emotion—into

that relief which a sapphire gains from a setting of pearls. I can see

her now, after the lapse of nearly twenty years, as she stood there

singing in blue doublet and white mantle, with the slouched Spanish hat

and plume of ostrich feathers, a tiny rapier at her side, and blue

rosettes upon her white silk shoes! 225The _Nozze di Figaro_ was

followed by a Ballo. This had for its theme the favourite legend of a

female devil sent from the infernal regions to ruin a young man.

Instead of performing the part assigned her, Satanella falls in love

with the hero, sacrifices herself, and is claimed at last by the powers

of goodness. _Quia multum amavit_, her lost soul is saved. If the opera

left much to be desired, the Ballo was perfection. That vast stage of

the Scala Theatre had almost overwhelmed the actors of the play. Now,

thrown open to its inmost depths, crowded with glittering moving

figures, it became a fairyland of fantastic loveliness. Italians

possess the art of interpreting a serious dramatic action by pantomime.

A Ballo with them is no mere affair of dancing—fine dresses, evolutions

performed by brigades of pink-legged women with a fixed smile on their

faces. It takes the rank of high expressive art. And the motive of this

Ballo was consistently worked out in an intelligible sequence of

well-ordered scenes. To moralise upon its meaning would be out of

place. It had a conflict of passions, a rhythmical progression of

emotions, a tragic climax in the triumph of good over evil.

II

At the end of the performance there were five persons in our box—the

beautiful Miranda, and her husband, a celebrated English man of

letters; a German professor of biology; a young Milanese gentleman,

whom we called Edoardo; and myself. Edoardo and the professor had

joined us just before the ballet. I had occupied a seat behind Miranda

and my friend the critic from the commencement. We had indeed dined

together first at their hotel, the Rebecchino; and they now proposed

that we should all adjourn together there on 226foot for supper. From

the Scala Theatre to the Rebecchino is a walk of some three minutes.

When we were seated at the supper-table and had talked some while upon

indifferent topics, the enthusiasm roused in me by Pauline Lucca burst

out. I broke a moment's silence by exclaiming, 'What a wonder-world

music creates! I have lived this evening in a sphere of intellectual

enjoyment raised to rapture. I never lived so fast before!' 'Do you

really think so?' said Miranda. She had just finished a _beccafico_,

and seemed disposed for conversation. 'Do you really think so? For my

part, music is in a wholly different region from experience, thought,

or feeling. What does it communicate to you?' And she hummed to herself

the _motif_ of Cherubino's 'Non so più cosa son cosa faccio.'—'What

does it teach me?' I broke in upon the melody. 'Why, to-night, when I

heard the music, and saw her there, and felt the movement of the play,

it seemed to me that a new existence was revealed. For the first time I

understood what love might be in one most richly gifted for emotion.'

Miranda bent her eyes on the table-cloth and played with her wineglass.

'I don't follow you at all. I enjoyed myself to-night. The opera,

indeed, might have been better rendered. The ballet, I admit, was

splendid. But when I remember the music—even the best of it—even

Pauline Lucca's part'—here she looked up, and shot me a quick glance

across the table—'I have mere music in my ears. Nothing more. Mere

music!' The professor of biology, who was gifted with, a sense of music

and had studied it scientifically, had now crunched his last leaf of

salad. Wiping his lips with his napkin, he joined our _tête-à-tête_.

'Gracious madam, I agree with you. He who seeks from music more than

music gives, is on the quest—how shall I put it?—of the Holy Grail.'

'And what,' I struck in, 'is this minimum or maximum that 227music

gives?' 'Dear young friend,' replied the professor, 'music gives

melodies, harmonies, the many beautiful forms to which sound shall be

fashioned. Just as in the case of shells and fossils, lovely in

themselves, interesting for their history and classification, so is it

with music. You must not seek an intellectual meaning. No; there is no

_Inhalt_ in music' And he hummed contentedly the air of 'Voi che

sapete.' While he was humming, Miranda whispered to me across the

table, 'Separate the Lucca from the music.' 'But,' I answered rather

hotly, for I was nettled by Miranda's argument _ad hominem_, 'But it is

not possible in an opera to divide the music from the words, the

scenery, the play, the actor. Mozart, when he wrote the score to Da

Ponte's libretto, was excited to production by the situations. He did

not conceive his melodies out of connection with a certain cast of

characters, a given ethical environment.' 'I do not know, my dear young

friend,' responded the professor, 'whether you have read Mozart's Life

and letters. It is clearly shown in them how he composed airs at times

and seasons when he had no words to deal with. These he afterwards used

as occasion served. Whence I conclude that music was for him a free and

lovely play of tone. The words of our excellent Da Ponte were a

scaffolding to introduce his musical creations to the public. But

without that carpenter's work, the melodies of Cherubino are

_Selbst-ständig_, sufficient in themselves to vindicate their place in

art. Do I interpret your meaning, gracious lady?' This he said bending

to Miranda. 'Yes,' she replied. But she still played with her

wineglass, and did not look as though she were quite satisfied. I

meanwhile continued: 'Of course I have read Mozart's Life, and know how

he went to work. But Mozart was a man of feeling, of experience, of

ardent passions. How can you prove to me that the melodies he gave to

Cherubino had not been evolved 228from situations similar to those in

which Cherubino finds himself? How can you prove he did not feel a

natural appropriateness in the _motifs_ he selected from his memory for

Cherubino? How can you be certain that the part itself did not

stimulate his musical faculty to fresh and still more appropriate

creativeness? And if we must fall back on documents, do you remember

what he said himself about the love-music in _Die Entführung?_ I think

he tells us that he meant it to express his own feeling for the woman

who had just become his wife.' Miranda looked up as though she were

almost half-persuaded. Yet she hummed again 'Non so più,' then said to

herself, 'Yes, it is wiser to believe with the professor that these are

sequences of sounds, and nothing more.' Then she sighed. In the pause

which followed, her husband, the famous critic, filled his glass,

stretched his legs out, and began: 'You have embarked, I see, upon the

ocean of æsthetics. For my part, to-night I was thinking how much

better fitted for the stage Beaumarchais' play was than this musical

mongrel—this operatic adaptation. The wit, observe, is lost. And

Cherubino—that sparkling little _enfant terrible_—becomes a sentimental

fellow—a something I don't know what—between a girl and a boy—a medley

of romance and impudence—anyhow a being quite unlike the sharply

outlined playwright's page. I confess I am not a musician; the drama is

my business, and I judge things by their fitness for the stage. My wife

agrees with me to differ. She likes music, I like plays. To-night she

was better pleased than I was; for she got good music tolerably well

rendered, while I got nothing but a mangled comedy.'

We bore the critic's monologue with patience. But once again the

spirit, seeking after something which neither Miranda, nor her husband,

nor the professor could be got to recognise, moved within me. I cried

out at a venture, 229'People who go to an opera must forget music pure

and simple, must forget the drama pure and simple. You must welcome a

third species of art, in which the play, the music, the singers with

their voices, the orchestra with its instruments—Pauline Lucca, if you

like, with her fascination' (and here I shot a side-glance at Miranda),

'are so blent as to create a world beyond the scope of poetry or music

or acting taken by themselves. I give Mozart credit for having had

insight into this new world, for having brought it near to us. And I

hold that every fresh representation of his work is a fresh revelation

of its possibilities.'

To this the critic answered, 'You now seem to me to be confounding the

limits of the several arts.' 'What!' I continued, 'is the drama but

emotion presented in its most external forms as action? And what is

music but emotion, in its most genuine essence, expressed by sound?

Where then can a more complete artistic harmony be found than in the

opera?'

'The opera,' replied our host, 'is a hybrid. You will probably learn to

dislike artistic hybrids, if you have the taste and sense I give you

credit for. My own opinion has been already expressed. In the _Nozze_,

Beaumarchais' _Mariage de Figaro_ is simply spoiled. My friend the

professor declares Mozart's music to be sufficient by itself, and the

libretto to be a sort of machinery for its display. Miranda, I think,

agrees with him. You plead eloquently for the hybrid. You have a right

to your own view. These things are matters, in the final resort, of

individual taste rather than of demonstrable principles. But I repeat

that you are very young.' The critic drained his Lambrusco, and smiled

at me.

'Yes, he is young,' added Miranda. 'He must learn to distinguish

between music, his own imagination, and a pretty woman. At present he

mixes them all up together. It is a 230sort of transcendental omelette.

But I think the pretty woman has more to do with it than metaphysics!'

All this while Edoardo had bestowed devout attention on his supper. But

it appeared that the drift of our discourse had not been lost by him.

'Well,' he said, 'you finely fibred people dissect and analyse. I am

content with the _spettacolo_. That pleases. What does a man want more?

The _Nozze_ is a comedy of life and manners. The music is adorable.

To-night the women were not bad to look at—the Lucca was divine; the

scenes—ingenious. I thought but little. I came away delighted. You

could have a better play, Caro Signore!' (with a bow to our host).

'That is granted. You might have better music, Cara Signora!' (with a

bow to Miranda). 'That too is granted. But when the play and the music

come together—how shall I say?—the music helps the play, and the play

helps the music; and we—well we, I suppose, must help both!'

Edoardo's little speech was so ingenuous, and, what is more, so true to

his Italian temperament, that it made us all laugh and leave the

argument just where we found it. The bottles of Lambrusco supplied us

each with one more glass; and while we were drinking them, Miranda,

woman-like, taking the last word, but contradicting herself, softly

hummed 'Non so più cosa son,' and 'Ah!' she said, 'I shall dream of

love to-night!'

We rose and said good-night. But when I had reached my bedroom in the

Hôtel de la Ville, I sat down, obstinate and unconvinced, and penned

this rhapsody, which I have lately found among papers of nearly twenty

years ago. I give it as it stands.

231

III

Mozart has written the two melodramas of love—the one a melo-tragedy,

the other a melo-comedy. But in really noble art, Comedy and Tragedy

have faces of equal serenity and beauty. In the Vatican there are

marble busts of the two Muses, differing chiefly in their head-dresses:

that of Tragedy is an elaborately built-up structure of fillets and

flowing hair, piled high above the forehead and descending in long

curls upon the shoulders; while Comedy wears a similar adornment, with

the addition of a wreath of vine-leaves and grape-bunches. The

expression of the sister goddesses is no less finely discriminated.

Over the mouth of Comedy plays a subtle smile, and her eyes are relaxed

in a half-merriment. A shadow rests upon the slightly heavier brows of

Tragedy, and her lips, though not compressed, are graver. So delicately

did the Greek artist indicate the division between two branches of one

dramatic art. And since all great art is classical, Mozart's two

melodramas, _Don Giovanni_ and the _Nozze di Figaro_, though the one is

tragic and the other comic, are twin-sisters, similar in form and

feature.

The central figure of the melo-tragedy is Don Juan, the hero of

unlimited desire, pursuing the unattainable through tortuous

interminable labyrinths, eager in appetite yet never satisfied, 'for

ever following and for ever foiled.' He is the incarnation of lust that

has become a habit of the soul—rebellious, licentious, selfish, even

cruel. His nature, originally noble and brave, has assumed the

qualities peculiar to lust—rebellion, license, cruelty, defiant

egotism. Yet, such as he is, doomed to punishment and execration, Don

Juan remains a fit subject for poetry and music, because he is

complete, because he is impelled by some demonic influence, spurred on

by yearnings after an unsearchable delight. In 232his death, the spirit

of chivalry survives, metamorphosed, it is true, into the spirit of

revolt, yet still tragic, such as might animate the desperate sinner of

a haughty breed.

The central figure of the melo-comedy is Cherubino, the genius of love,

no less insatiable, but undetermined to virtue or to vice. This is the

point of Cherubino, that the ethical capacities in him are still

potential. His passion still hovers on the borderland of good and bad.

And this undetermined passion is beautiful because of extreme

freshness; of infinite, immeasurable expansibility. Cherubino is the

epitome of all that belongs to the amorous temperament in a state of

still ascendant adolescence. He is about sixteen years of age—a boy

yesterday, a man to-morrow—to-day both and neither—something beyond

boyhood, but not yet limited by man's responsibility and man's

absorbing passions. He partakes of both ages in the primal awakening to

self-consciousness. Desire, which in Don Juan has become a fiend,

hovers before him like a fairy. His are the sixteen years, not of a

Northern climate, but of Spain or Italy, where manhood appears in a

flash, and overtakes the child with sudden sunrise of new faculties.

_Nondum amabam, sed amare amabam, quaerebam quod amarem, amans

amare_—'I loved not yet, but was in love with loving; I sought what I

should love, being in love with loving.' That sentence, penned by S.

Augustine and consecrated by Shelley, describes the mood of Cherubino.

He loves at every moment of his life, with every pulse of his being.

His object is not a beloved being, but love itself—the satisfaction of

an irresistible desire, the paradise of bliss which merely loving has

become for him. What love means he hardly knows. He only knows that he

must love. And women love him—half as a plaything to be trifled with,

half as a young god to be wounded by. This rising of the star of love

as it ascends into the heaven of youthful fancy, is revealed 233in the

melodies Mozart has written for him. How shall we describe their

potency? Who shall translate those curiously perfect words to which

tone and rhythm have been indissolubly wedded? _E pur mi piace languir

cosi.... E se non ho chi m' oda, parlo d'amor con me._

But if this be so, it may be asked, Who shall be found worthy to act

Cherubino on the stage? You cannot have seen and heard Pauline Lucca,

or you would not ask this question.

Cherubino is by no means the most important person in the plot of the

_Nozze_. But he strikes the keynote of the opera. His love is the

standard by which we measure the sad, retrospective, stately love of

the Countess, who tries to win back an alienated husband. By Cherubino

we measure the libertine love of the Count, who is a kind of Don Juan

without cruelty, and the humorous love of Figaro and his sprightly

bride Susanna. Each of these characters typifies one of the many

species of love. But Cherubino anticipates and harmonises all. They are

conscious, experienced, world-worn, disillusioned, trivial. He is all

love, foreseen, foreshadowed in a dream of life to be; all love,

diffused through brain and heart and nerves like electricity; all love,

merging the moods of ecstasy, melancholy, triumph, regret, jealousy,

joy, expectation, in a hazy sheen, as of some Venetian sunrise. What

will Cherubino be after three years? A Romeo, a Lovelace, a Lothario, a

Juan? a disillusioned rake, a sentimentalist, an effete fop, a romantic

lover? He may become any one of these, for he contains the

possibilities of all. As yet, he is the dear glad angel of the May of

love, the nightingale of orient emotion. This moment in the unfolding

of character Mozart has arrested and eternalised for us in Cherubino's

melodies; for it is the privilege of art to render things most fugitive

and evanescent fixed imperishably in immortal form.

234

IV

This is indeed a rhapsodical production. Miranda was probably right.

Had it not been for Pauline Lucca, I might not have philosophised the

_Nozze_ thus. Yet, in the main, I believe that my instinct was well

grounded. Music, especially when wedded to words, more especially when

those words are dramatic, cannot separate itself from emotion. It will

not do to tell us that a melody is a certain sequence of sounds; that

the composer chose it for its beauty of rhythm, form, and tune, and

only used the words to get it vocalised. We are forced to go farther

back, and ask ourselves, What suggested it in the first place to the

composer? why did he use it precisely in connection with this dramatic

situation? How can we answer these questions except by supposing that

music was for him the utterance through art of some emotion? The final

fact of human nature is emotion, crystallising itself in thought and

language, externalising itself in action and art. 'What,' said Novalis,

'are thoughts but pale dead feelings?' Admitting this even in part, we

cannot deny to music an emotional content of some kind. I would go

farther, and assert that, while a merely mechanical musician may set

inappropriate melodies to words, and render music inexpressive of

character, what constitutes a musical dramatist is the conscious

intention of fitting to the words of his libretto such melody as shall

interpret character, and the power to do this with effect.

That the Cherubino of Mozart's _Nozze_ is quite different from

Beaumarchais' Cherubin does not affect this question. He is a new

creation, just because Mozart could not, or would not, conceive the

character of the page in Beaumarchais' sprightly superficial spirit. He

used the part to utter something unutterable except by music about the

soul of 235the still adolescent lover. The libretto-part and the

melodies, taken together, constitute a new romantic ideal, consistent

with experience, but realised with the intensity and universality

whereby art is distinguished from life. Don Juan was a myth before

Mozart touched him with the magic wand of music. Cherubino became a

myth by the same Prospero's spell. Both characters have the

universality, the symbolic potency, which belongs to legendary beings.

That there remains a discrepancy between the boy-page and the music

made for him, can be conceded without danger to my theory; for the

music made for Cherubino is meant to interpret his psychical condition,

and is independent of his boyishness of conduct.

This further explains why there may be so many renderings of

Cherubino's melodies. Mozart idealised an infinite emotion. The singer

is forced to define; the actor also is forced to define. Each

introduces his own limit on the feeling. When the actor and the singer

meet together in one personality, this definition of emotion becomes of

necessity doubly specific. The condition of all music is that it

depends in a great measure on the temperament of the interpreter for

its momentary shade of expression, and this dependence is of course

exaggerated when the music is dramatic. Furthermore, the subjectivity

of the audience enters into the problem as still another element of

definition. It may therefore be fairly said that, in estimating any

impression produced by Cherubino's music, the original character of the

page, transplanted from French comedy to Italian opera, Mozart's

conception of that character, Mozart's specific quality of emotion and

specific style of musical utterance, together with the contralto's

interpretation of the character and rendering of the music, according

to her intellectual capacity, artistic skill, and timbre of voice, have

236collaborated with the individuality of the hearer. Some of the

constituents of the ever-varying product—a product which is new each

time the part is played—are fixed. Da Ponte's Cherubino and Mozart's

melodies remain unalterable. All the rest is undecided; the singer and

the listener change on each occasion.

To assert that the musician Mozart meant nothing by his music, to

assert that he only cared about it _quâ_ music, is the same as to say

that the painter Tintoretto, when he put the Crucifixion upon canvas,

the sculptor Michelangelo, when he carved Christ upon the lap of Mary,

meant nothing, and only cared about the beauty of their forms and

colours. Those who take up this position prove, not that the artist has

no meaning to convey, but that for them the artist's nature is

unintelligible, and his meaning is conveyed in an unknown tongue. It

seems superfluous to guard against misinterpretation by saying that to

expect clear definition from music—the definition which belongs to

poetry—would be absurd. The sphere of music is in sensuous perception;

the sphere of poetry is in intelligence. Music, dealing with pure

sound, must always be vaguer in significance than poetry, dealing with

words. Nevertheless, its effect upon the sentient subject may be more

intense and penetrating for this very reason. We cannot fail to

understand what words are intended to convey; we may very easily

interpret in a hundred different ways the message of sound. But this is

not because words are wider in their reach and more alive; rather

because they are more limited, more stereotyped, more dead. They

symbolise something precise and unmistakable; but this precision is

itself attenuation of the something symbolised. The exact value of the

counter is better understood when it is a word than when it is a chord,

because all that a word conveys has already become a thought, while all

that musical 237sounds convey remains within the region of emotion

which has not been intellectualised. Poetry touches emotion through the

thinking faculty. If music reaches the thinking faculty at all, it is

through fibres of emotion. But emotion, when it has become thought, has

already lost a portion of its force, and has taken to itself a

something alien to its nature. Therefore the message of music can never

rightly be translated into words. It is the very largeness and

vividness of the sphere of simple feeling which makes its symbolical

counterpart in sound so seeming vague. But in spite of this

incontestable defect of seeming vagueness, emotion expressed by music

is nearer to our sentient self, if we have ears to take it in, than the

same emotion limited by language. It is intenser, it is more immediate,

as compensation for being less intelligible, less unmistakable in

meaning. It is an infinite, an indistinct, where each consciousness

defines and sets a limitary form.

V

A train of thought which begins with the concrete not unfrequently

finds itself finishing, almost against its will, in abstractions. This

is the point to which the performance of Cherubino's part by Pauline

Lucca at the Scala twenty years ago has led me—that I have to settle

with myself what I mean by art in general, and what I take to be the

proper function of music as one of the fine arts.

'Art,' said Goethe, 'is but form-giving.' We might vary this

definition, and say, 'Art is a method of expression or presentation.'

Then comes the question: If art gives form, if it is a method of

expression or presentation, to what does it give form, what does it

express or present? The answer certainly must be: Art gives form to

human consciousness; expresses or presents the feeling or the thought

of man. 238Whatever else art may do by the way, in the communication of

innocent pleasures, in the adornment of life and the softening of

manners, in the creation of beautiful shapes and sounds, this, at all

events, is its prime function.

While investing thought, the spiritual subject-matter of all art, with

form, or finding for it proper modes of presentation, each of the arts

employs a special medium, obeying the laws of beauty proper to that

medium. The vehicles of the arts, roughly speaking, are material

substances (like stone, wood, metal), pigments, sounds, and words. The

masterly handling of these vehicles and the realisation of their

characteristic types of beauty have come to be regarded as the

craftsman's paramount concern. And in a certain sense this is a right

conclusion; for dexterity in the manipulation of the chosen vehicle and

power to create a beautiful object, distinguish the successful artist

from the man who may have had like thoughts and feelings. This

dexterity, this power, are the properties of the artist _quâ_ artist.

Yet we must not forget that the form created by the artist for the

expression of a thought or feeling is not the final end of art itself.

That form, after all, is but the mode of presentation through which the

spiritual content manifests itself. Beauty, in like manner, is not the

final end of art, but is the indispensable condition under which the

artistic manifestation of the spiritual content must he made. It is the

business of art to create an ideal world, in which perception, emotion,

understanding, action, all elements of human life sublimed by thought,

shall reappear in concrete forms as beauty. This being so, the logical

criticism of art demands that we should not only estimate the technical

skill of artists and their faculty for presenting beauty to the

æsthetic sense, but that we should also ask ourselves what portion of

the human spirit he has chosen to invest with form, and how he has

conceived his subject. It is not necessary that the ideas embodied in a

work of art should be the artist's own. They may be common to the race

and age: as, for instance, the conception of sovereign deity expressed

in the Olympian Zeus of Pheidias, or the conception of divine maternity

expressed in Raphael's 'Madonna di San Sisto.' Still the personality of

the artist, his own intellectual and moral nature, his peculiar way of

thinking and feeling, his individual attitude towards the material

given to him in ideas of human consciousness, will modify his choice of

subject and of form, and will determine his specific type of beauty. To

take an example: supposing that an idea, common to his race and age, is

given to the artist for treatment; this will be the final end of the

work of art which he produces. But his personal qualities and technical

performance determine the degree of success or failure to which he

attains in presenting that idea and in expressing it with beauty.

Signorelli fails where Perugino excels, in giving adequate and lovely

form to the religious sentiment. Michelangelo is sure of the sublime,

and Raphael of the beautiful.

Art is thus the presentation of the human spirit by the artist to his

fellow-men. The subject-matter of the arts is commensurate with what

man thinks and feels and does. It is as deep as religion, as wide as

life. But what distinguishes art from religion or from life is, that

this subject-matter must assume beautiful form, and must be presented

directly or indirectly to the senses. Art is not the school or the

cathedral, but the playground, the paradise of humanity. It does not

teach, it does not preach. Nothing abstract enters into art's domain.

Truth and goodness are transmuted into beauty there, just as in science

beauty and goodness assume the shape of truth, and in religion truth

and beauty become goodness. The rigid definitions, the unmistakable

laws of science, are not to be found in art. Whatever art has touched

240acquires a concrete sensuous embodiment, and thus ideas presented to

the mind in art have lost a portion of their pure thought-essence. It

is on this account that the religious conceptions of the Greeks were so

admirably fitted for the art of sculpture, and certain portions of the

mediæval Christian mythology lent themselves so well to painting. For

the same reason the metaphysics of ecclesiastical dogma defy the

artist's plastic faculty. Art, in a word, is a middle term between

reason and the senses. Its secondary aim, after the prime end of

presenting the human spirit in beautiful form has been accomplished, is

to give tranquil and innocent enjoyment.

From what has gone before it will be seen that no human being can make

or mould a beautiful form without incorporating in that form some

portion of the human mind, however crude, however elementary. In other

words, there is no work of art without a theme, without a motive,

without a subject. The presentation of that theme, that motive, that

subject, is the final end of art. The art is good or bad according as

the subject has been well or ill presented, consistently with the laws

of beauty special to the art itself. Thus we obtain two standards for

æsthetic criticism. We judge a statue, for example, both by the

sculptor's intellectual grasp upon his subject, and also by his

technical skill and sense of beauty. In a picture of the Last Judgment

by Fra Angelico we say that the bliss of the righteous has been more

successfully treated than the torments of the wicked, because the

former has been better understood, although the painter's skill in each

is equal. In the Perseus of Cellini we admire the sculptor's spirit,

finish of execution, and originality of design, while we deplore that

want of sympathy with the heroic character which makes his type of

physical beauty slightly vulgar and his facial expression vacuous.

241If the phrase 'Art for art's sake' has any meaning, this meaning is

simply that the artist, having chosen a theme, thinks exclusively in

working at it of technical dexterity or the quality of beauty. There

are many inducements for the artist thus to narrow his function, and

for the critic to assist him by applying the canons of a soulless

connoisseurship to his work; for the conception of the subject is but

the starting-point in art-production, and the artist's difficulties and

triumphs as a craftsman lie in the region of technicalities. He knows,

moreover, that, however deep or noble his idea may be, his work of art

will be worthless if it fail in skill or be devoid of beauty. What

converts a thought into a statue or a picture, is the form found for

it; and so the form itself seems all-important. The artist, therefore,

too easily imagines that he may neglect his theme; that a fine piece of

colouring, a well-balanced composition, or, as Cellini put it, 'un bel

corpo ignudo,' is enough. And this is especially easy in an age which

reflects much upon the arts, and pursues them with enthusiasm, while

its deeper thoughts and feelings are not of the kind which translate

themselves readily into artistic form. But, after all, a fine piece of

colouring, a well-balanced composition, a sonorous stanza, a learned

essay in counterpoint, are not enough. They are all excellent good

things, yielding delight to the artistic sense and instruction to the

student. Yet when we think of the really great statues, pictures,

poems, music of the world, we find that these are really great because

of something more—and that more is their theme, their presentation of a

noble portion of the human soul. Artists and art-students may be

satisfied with perfect specimens of a craftsman's skill, independent of

his theme; but the mass of men will not be satisfied; and it is as

wrong to suppose that art exists for artists and art-students, as to

talk of art for art's sake. Art exists for 242humanity. Art transmutes

thought and feeling into terms of beautiful form. Art is great and

lasting in proportion as it appeals to the human consciousness at

large, presenting to it portions of itself in adequate and lovely form.

VI

It was necessary in the first place firmly to apprehend the truth that

the final end of all art is the presentation of a spiritual content; it

is necessary in the next place to remove confusions by considering the

special circumstances of the several arts.

Each art has its own vehicle of presentation. What it can present and

how it must present it, depends upon the nature of this vehicle. Thus,

though architecture, sculpture, painting, music, poetry, meet upon the

common ground of spiritualised experience—though the works of art

produced by the architect, sculptor, painter, musician, poet, emanate

from the spiritual nature of the race, are coloured by the spiritual

nature of the men who make them, and express what is spiritual in

humanity under concrete forms invented for them by the artist—yet it is

certain that all of these arts do not deal exactly with the same

portions of this common material in the same way or with the same

results. Each has its own department. Each exhibits qualities of

strength and weakness special to itself. To define these several

departments, to explain the relation of these several vehicles of

presentation to the common subject-matter, is the next step in

criticism.

Of the fine arts, architecture alone subserves utility. We build for

use. But the geometrical proportions which the architect observes,

contain the element of beauty and powerfully influence the soul. Into

the language of arch and aisle and colonnade, of cupola and façade and

pediment, of spire 243and vault, the architect translates emotion,

vague perhaps but deep, mute but unmistakable. When we say that a

building is sublime or graceful, frivolous or stern, we mean that

sublimity or grace, frivolity or sternness, is inherent in it. The

emotions connected with these qualities are inspired in us when we

contemplate it, and are presented to us by its form. Whether the

architect deliberately aimed at the sublime or graceful—whether the

dignified serenity of the Athenian genius sought to express itself in

the Parthenon, and the mysticism of mediæval Christianity in the gloom

of Chartres Cathedral—whether it was Renaissance paganism which gave

its mundane pomp and glory to S. Peter's, and the refined selfishness

of royalty its specious splendour to the palace of Versailles—need not

be curiously questioned. The fact that we are impelled to raise these

points, that architecture more almost than any art connects itself

indissolubly with the life, the character, the moral being of a nation

and an epoch, proves that we are justified in bringing it beneath our

general definition of the arts. In a great measure because it subserves

utility, and is therefore dependent upon the necessities of life, does

architecture present to us through form the human spirit. Comparing the

palace built by Giulio Romano for the Dukes of Mantua with the

contemporary castle of a German prince, we cannot fail at once to

comprehend the difference of spiritual conditions, as these displayed

themselves in daily life, which then separated Italy from the Teutonic

nations. But this is not all. Spiritual quality in the architect

himself finds clear expression in his work. Coldness combined with

violence marks Brunelleschi's churches; a certain suavity and well-bred

taste the work of Bramante; while Michelangelo exhibits wayward energy

in his Library of S. Lorenzo, and Amadeo self-abandonment to fancy in

his Lombard chapels. I have chosen examples from 244one nation and one

epoch in order that the point I seek to make, the demonstration of a

spiritual quality in buildings, may be fairly stated.

Sculpture and painting distinguish themselves from the other fine arts

by the imitation of concrete existences in nature. They copy the bodies

of men and animals, the aspects of the world around us, and the

handiwork of men. Yet, in so far as they are rightly arts, they do not

make imitation an object in itself. The grapes of Zeuxis at which birds

pecked, the painted dog at which a cat's hair bristles—if such grapes

or such a dog were ever put on canvas—are but evidences of the artist's

skill, not of his faculty as artist. These two plastic, or, as I prefer

to call them, figurative arts, use their imitation of the external

world for the expression, the presentation of internal, spiritual

things. The human form is for them the outward symbol of the inner

human spirit, and their power of presenting spirit is limited by the

means at their disposal.

Sculpture employs stone, wood, clay, the precious metals, to model

forms, detached and independent, or raised upon a flat surface in

relief. Its domain is the whole range of human character and

consciousness, in so far as these can be indicated by fixed facial

expression, by physical type, and by attitude. If we dwell for an

instant on the greatest historical epoch of sculpture, we shall

understand the domain of this art in its range and limitation. At a

certain point of Greek development the Hellenic Pantheon began to be

translated by the sculptors into statues; and when the genius of the

Greeks expired in Rome, the cycle of their psychological conceptions

had been exhaustively presented through this medium. During that long

period of time, the most delicate gradations of human personality,

divinised, idealised, were 245presented to the contemplation of the

consciousness which gave them being, in appropriate types. Strength and

swiftness, massive force and airy lightness, contemplative repose and

active energy, voluptuous softness and refined grace, intellectual

sublimity and lascivious seductiveness—the whole rhythm of qualities

which can be typified by bodily form—were analysed, selected, combined

in various degrees, to incarnate the religious conceptions of Zeus,

Aphrodite, Herakles, Dionysus, Pallas, Fauns and Satyrs, Nymphs of

woods and waves, Tritons, the genius of Death, heroes and hunters,

lawgivers and poets, presiding deities of minor functions, man's

lustful appetites and sensual needs. All that men think, or do, or are,

or wish for, or imagine in this world, had found exact corporeal

equivalents. Not physiognomy alone, but all the portions of the body

upon which the habits of the animating soul are wont to stamp

themselves, were studied and employed as symbolism. Uranian Aphrodite

was distinguished from her Pandemic sister by chastened lust-repelling

loveliness. The muscles of Herakles were more ponderous than the tense

sinews of Achilles. The Hermes of the palæstra bore a torso of majestic

depth; the Hermes, who carried messages from heaven, had limbs alert

for movement. The brows of Zeus inspired awe; the breasts of Dionysus

breathed delight.

A race accustomed, as the Greeks were, to read this symbolism,

accustomed, as the Greeks were, to note the individuality of naked

form, had no difficulty in interpreting the language of sculpture. Nor

is there now much difficulty in the task. Our surest guide to the

subject of a basrelief or statue is study of the physical type

considered as symbolical of spiritual quality. From the fragment of a

torso the true critic can say whether it belongs to the athletic or the

erotic species. A limb of Bacchus differs from a limb of Poseidon.

246The whole psychological conception of Aphrodite Pandemos enters into

every muscle, every joint, no less than into her physiognomy, her hair,

her attitude.

There is, however, a limit to the domain of sculpture. This art deals

most successfully with personified generalities. It is also strong in

the presentation of incarnate character. But when it attempts to tell a

story, we often seek in vain its meaning. Battles of Amazons or

Centaurs upon basreliefs, indeed, are unmistakable. The subject is

indicated here by some external sign. The group of Laocoon appeals at

once to a reader of Virgil, and the divine vengeance of Leto's children

upon Niobe is manifest in the Uffizzi marbles. But who are the several

heroes of the Æginetan pediment, and what was the subject of the

Pheidian statues on the Parthenon? Do the three graceful figures of a

basrelief which exists at Naples and in the Villa Albani, represent

Orpheus, Hermes, and Eurydice, or Antiope and her two sons? Was the

winged and sworded genius upon the Ephesus column meant for a genius of

Death or a genius of Love?

This dimness of significance indicates the limitation of sculpture, and

inclines some of those who feel its charm to assert that the sculptor

seeks to convey no intellectual meaning, that he is satisfied with the

creation of beautiful form. There is sense in this revolt against the

faith which holds that art is nothing but a mode of spiritual

presentation. Truly the artist aims at producing beauty, is satisfied

if he conveys delight. But it is impossible to escape from the

certainty that, while he is creating forms of beauty, he means

something; and that something, that theme for which he finds the form,

is part of the world's spiritual heritage. Only the crudest works of

plastic art, capricci and arabesques, have no intellectual content; and

even these are good in so far as they convey the playfulness of fancy.

247Painting employs colours upon surfaces—walls, panels, canvas. What

has been said about sculpture will apply in a great measure to this

art. The human form, the world around us, the works of man's hands, are

represented in painting, not for their own sake merely, but with a view

to bringing thought, feeling, action, home to the consciousness of the

spectator from the artist's consciousness on which they have been

impressed. Painting can tell a story better than sculpture, can

represent more complicated feelings, can suggest thoughts of a subtler

intricacy. Through colour, it can play, like music, directly on

powerful but vague emotion. It is deficient in fulness and roundness of

concrete reality. A statue stands before us, the soul incarnate in

ideal form, fixed and frozen for eternity. The picture is a reflection

cast upon a magic glass; not less permanent, but reduced to a shadow of

reality. To follow these distinctions farther would be alien from the

present purpose. It is enough to repeat that, within their several

spheres, according to their several strengths and weaknesses, both

sculpture and painting present the spirit to us only as the spirit

shows itself immersed in things of sense. The light of a lamp enclosed

within an alabaster vase is still lamplight, though shorn of lustre and

toned to coloured softness. Even thus the spirit, immersed in things of

sense presented to us by the figurative arts, is still spirit, though

diminished in its intellectual clearness and invested with hues not its

own. To fashion that alabaster form of art with utmost skill, to make

it beautiful, to render it transparent, is the artist's function. But

he will have failed of the highest if the light within burns dim, or if

he gives the world a lamp in which no spiritual flame is lighted.

Music transports us to a different region. It imitates nothing. It uses

pure sound, and sound of the most wholly 248artificial kind—so

artificial that the musical sounds of one race are unmusical, and

therefore unintelligible, to another. Like architecture, music relies

upon mathematical proportions. Unlike architecture, music serves no

utility. It is the purest art of pleasure—the truest paradise and

playground of the spirit. It has less power than painting, even less

power than sculpture, to tell a story or to communicate an idea. For we

must remember that when music is married to words, the words, and not

the music, reach our thinking faculty. And yet, in spite of all, music

presents man's spirit to itself through form. The domain of the spirit

over which music reigns, is emotion—not defined emotion, not feeling

even so defined as jealousy or anger—but those broad bases of man's

being out of which emotions spring, defining themselves through action

into this or that set type of feeling. Architecture, we have noticed,

is so connected with specific modes of human existence, that from its

main examples we can reconstruct the life of men who used it. Sculpture

and painting, by limiting their presentation to the imitation of

external things, have all the help which experience and, association

render. The mere artificiality of music's vehicle separates it from

life and makes its message untranslatable. Yet, as I have already

pointed out, this very disability under which it labours is the secret

of its extraordinary potency. Nothing intervenes between the musical

work of art and the fibres of the sentient being it immediately

thrills. We do not seek to say what music means. We feel the music. And

if a man should pretend that the music has not passed beyond his ears,

has communicated nothing but a musical delight, he simply tells us that

he has not felt music. The ancients on this point were wiser than some

moderns when, without pretending to assign an intellectual significance

to music, they held it for an axiom that one type of music bred one

type of character, 249another type another. A change in the music of a

state, wrote Plato, will be followed by changes in its constitution. It

is of the utmost importance, said Aristotle, to provide in education

for the use of the ennobling and the fortifying moods. These

philosophers knew that music creates a spiritual world, in which the

spirit cannot live and move without contracting habits of emotion. In

this vagueness of significance but intensity of feeling lies the magic

of music. A melody occurs to the composer, which he certainly connects

with no act of the reason, which he is probably unconscious of

connecting with any movement of his feeling, but which nevertheless is

the form in sound of an emotional mood. When he reflects upon the

melody secreted thus impromptu, he is aware, as we learn from his own

lips, that this work has correspondence with emotion. Beethoven calls

one symphony Heroic, another Pastoral; of the opening of another he

says, 'Fate knocks at the door.' Mozart sets comic words to the

mass-music of a friend, in order to mark his sense of its inaptitude

for religious sentiment. All composers use phrases like Maestoso,

Pomposo, Allegro, Lagrimoso, Con Fuoco, to express the general

complexion of the mood their music ought to represent.

Before passing to poetry, it may be well to turn aside and consider two

subordinate arts, which deserve a place in any system of æsthetics.

These are dancing and acting. Dancing uses the living human form, and

presents feeling or action, the passions and the deeds of men, in

artificially educated movements of the body. The element of beauty it

possesses, independently of the beauty of the dancer, is rhythm. Acting

or the art of mimicry presents the same subject-matter, no longer under

the conditions of fixed rhythm but as an ideal reproduction of reality.

The actor is 250what he represents, and the element of beauty in his

art is perfection of realisation. It is his duty as an artist to show

us Orestes or Othello, not perhaps exactly as Othello and Orestes were,

but as the essence of their tragedies, ideally incorporate in action,

ought to be. The actor can do this in dumb show. Some of the greatest

actors of the ancient world were mimes. But he usually interprets a

poet's thought, and attempts to present an artistic conception in a

secondary form of art, which has for its advantage his own personality

in play.

The last of the fine arts is literature; or, in the narrower sphere of

which it will be well to speak here only, is poetry. Poetry employs

words in fixed rhythms, which we call metres. Only a small portion of

its effect is derived from the beauty of its sound. It appeals to the

sense of hearing far less immediately than music does. It makes no

appeal to the eyesight, and takes no help from the beauty of colour. It

produces no tangible object. But language being the storehouse of all

human experience, language being the medium whereby spirit communicates

with spirit in affairs of life, the vehicle which transmits to us the

thoughts and feelings of the past, and on which we rely for continuing

our present to the future, it follows that, of all the arts, poetry

soars highest, flies widest, and is most at home in the region of the

spirit. What poetry lacks of sensuous fulness, it more than balances by

intellectual intensity. Its significance is unmistakable, because it

employs the very material men use in their exchange of thoughts and

correspondence of emotions. To the bounds of its empire there is no

end. It embraces in its own more abstract being all the arts. By words

it does the work in turn of architecture, sculpture, painting, music.

It is the metaphysic of the fine arts. Philosophy finds place in

251poetry; and life itself, refined to its last utterance, hangs

trembling on this thread which joins our earth to heaven, this bridge

between experience and the realms where unattainable and imperceptible

will have no meaning.

If we are right in defining art as the manifestation of the human

spirit to man by man in beautiful form, poetry, more incontestably than

any other art, fulfils this definition and enables us to gauge its

accuracy. For words are the spirit, manifested to itself in symbols

with no sensual alloy. Poetry is therefore the presentation, through

words, of life and all that life implies. Perception, emotion, thought,

action, find in descriptive, lyrical, reflective, dramatic, and epical

poetry their immediate apocalypse. In poetry we are no longer puzzled

with problems as to whether art has or has not of necessity a spiritual

content. There cannot be any poetry whatsoever without a spiritual

meaning of some sort: good or bad, moral, immoral, or non-moral,

obscure or lucid, noble or ignoble, slight or weighty—such distinctions

do not signify. In poetry we are not met by questions whether the poet

intended to convey a meaning when he made it. Quite meaningless poetry

(as some critics would fain find melody quite meaningless, or a statue

meaningless, or a Venetian picture meaningless) is a contradiction in

terms. In poetry, life, or a portion of life, lives again, resuscitated

and presented to our mental faculty through art. The best poetry is

that which reproduces the most of life, or its intensest moments.

Therefore the extensive species of the drama and the epic, the

intensive species of the lyric, have been ever held in highest esteem.

Only a half-crazy critic flaunts the paradox that poetry is excellent

in so far as it assimilates the vagueness of music, or estimates a poet

by his power of translating sense upon the borderland of nonsense into

melodious words. Where poetry falls short in the comparison with other

arts, is 252in the quality of form-giving, in the quality of sensuous

concreteness. Poetry can only present forms to the mental eye and to

the intellectual sense, stimulate the physical senses by indirect

suggestion. Therefore dramatic poetry, the most complicated kind of

poetry, relies upon the actor; and lyrical poetry, the intensest kind

of poetry, seeks the aid of music. But these comparative deficiencies

are overbalanced, for all the highest purposes of art, by the width and

depth, the intelligibility and power, the flexibility and multitudinous

associations, of language. The other arts are limited in what they

utter. There is nothing which has entered into the life of man which

poetry cannot express. Poetry says everything in man's own language to

the mind. The other arts appeal imperatively, each in its own region,

to man's senses; and the mind receives art's message by the help of

symbols from the world of sense. Poetry lacks this immediate appeal to

sense. But the elixir which it offers to the mind, its quintessence

extracted from all things of sense, reacts through intellectual

perception upon all the faculties that make men what they are.

VII

I used a metaphor in one of the foregoing paragraphs to indicate the

presence of the vital spirit, the essential element of thought or

feeling, in the work of art. I said it radiated through the form, as

lamplight through an alabaster vase. Now the skill of the artist is

displayed in modelling that vase, in giving it shape, rich and rare,

and fashioning its curves with subtlest workmanship. In so far as he is

a craftsman, the artist's pains must be bestowed upon this precious

vessel of the animating theme. In so far as he has power over beauty,

he must exert it in this plastic act. It is here that he displays

dexterity; here that he creates; here that he 253separates himself from

other men who think and feel. The poet, more perhaps than any other

artist, needs to keep this steadily in view; for words being our daily

vehicle of utterance, it may well chance that the alabaster vase of

language should be hastily or trivially modelled. This is the true

reason why 'neither gods nor men nor the columns either suffer

mediocrity in singers.' Upon the poet it is specially incumbent to see

that he has something rare to say and some rich mode of saying it. The

figurative arts need hardly be so cautioned. They run their risk in

quite a different direction. For sculptor and for painter, the danger

is lest he should think that alabaster vase his final task. He may too

easily be satisfied with moulding a beautiful but empty form.

The last word on the topic of the arts is given in one sentence. Let us

remember that every work of art enshrines a spiritual subject, and that

the artist's power is shown in finding for that subject a form of ideal

loveliness. Many kindred points remain to be discussed; as what we mean

by beauty, which is a condition indispensable to noble art; and what

are the relations of the arts to ethics. These questions cannot now be

raised. It is enough in one essay to have tried to vindicate the

spirituality of art in general.

254

A VENETIAN MEDLEY

I.—FIRST IMPRESSIONS AND FAMILIARITY

It is easy to feel and to say something obvious about Venice. The

influence of this sea-city is unique, immediate, and unmistakable. But

to express the sober truth of those impressions which remain when the

first astonishment of the Venetian revelation has subsided, when the

spirit of the place has been harmonised through familiarity with our

habitual mood, is difficult.

Venice inspires at first an almost Corybantic rapture. From our

earliest visits, if these have been measured by days rather than weeks,

we carry away with us the memory of sunsets emblazoned in gold and

crimson upon cloud and water; of violet domes and bell-towers etched

against the orange of a western sky; of moonlight silvering

breeze-rippled breadths of liquid blue; of distant islands shimmering

in sun-litten haze; of music and black gliding boats; of labyrinthine

darkness made for mysteries of love and crime; of statue-fretted palace

fronts; of brazen clangour and a moving crowd; of pictures by earth's

proudest painters, cased in gold on walls of council chambers where

Venice sat enthroned a queen, where nobles swept the floors with robes

of Tyrian brocade. These reminiscences will be attended by an

ever-present sense of loneliness and silence in the world around; the

sadness of a limitless horizon, the solemnity of an unbroken arch of

heaven, the calm and greyness of evening on the lagoons, the 255pathos

of a marble city crumbling to its grave in mud and brine.

These first impressions of Venice are true. Indeed they are inevitable.

They abide, and form a glowing background for all subsequent pictures,

toned more austerely, and painted in more lasting hues of truth upon

the brain. Those have never felt Venice at all who have not known this

primal rapture, or who perhaps expected more of colour, more of

melodrama, from a scene which nature and the art of man have made the

richest in these qualities. Yet the mood engendered by this first

experience is not destined to be permanent. It contains an element of

unrest and unreality which vanishes upon familiarity. From the blare of

that triumphal bourdon of brass instruments emerge the delicate voices

of violin and clarinette. To the contrasted passions of our earliest

love succeed a multitude of sweet and fanciful emotions. It is my

present purpose to recapture some of the impressions made by Venice in

more tranquil moods. Memory might be compared to a kaleidoscope. Far

away from Venice I raise the wonder-working tube, allow the glittering

fragments to settle as they please, and with words attempt to render

something of the patterns I behold.

II.—A LODGING IN SAN VIO

I have escaped from the hotels with their bustle of tourists and

crowded _tables-d'hôte_. My garden stretches down to the Grand Canal,

closed at the end with a pavilion, where I lounge and smoke and watch

the cornice of the Prefettura fretted with gold in sunset light. My

sitting-room and bed-room face the southern sun. There is a canal

below, crowded with gondolas, and across its bridge the good folk of

San Vio come and go the whole day long—men in blue shirts with

256enormous hats, and jackets slung on their left shoulder; women in

kerchiefs of orange and crimson. Barelegged boys sit upon the parapet,

dangling their feet above the rising tide. A hawker passes, balancing a

basket full of live and crawling crabs. Barges filled with Brenta water

or Mirano wine take up their station at the neighbouring steps, and

then ensues a mighty splashing and hurrying to and fro of men with tubs

upon their heads. The brawny fellows in the wine-barge are red from

brows to breast with drippings of the vat. And now there is a bustle in

the quarter. A _barca_ has arrived from S. Erasmo, the island of the

market-gardens. It is piled with gourds and pumpkins, cabbages and

tomatoes, pomegranates and pears—a pyramid of gold and green and

scarlet. Brown men lift the fruit aloft, and women bending from the

pathway bargain for it. A clatter of chaffering tongues, a ring of

coppers, a Babel of hoarse sea-voices, proclaim the sharpness of the

struggle. When the quarter has been served, the boat sheers off

diminished in its burden. Boys and girls are left seasoning their

polenta with a slice of _zucca_, while the mothers of a score of

families go pattering up yonder courtyard with the material for their

husbands' supper in their handkerchiefs. Across the canal, or more

correctly the _Rio_, opens a wide grass-grown court. It is lined on the

right hand by a row of poor dwellings, swarming with gondoliers'

children. A garden wall runs along the other side, over which I can see

pomegranate-trees in fruit and pergolas of vines. Far beyond are more

low houses, and then the sky, swept with sea-breezes, and the masts of

an ocean-going ship against the dome and turrets of Palladio's

Redentore.

This is my home. By day it is as lively as a scene in _Masaniello_. By

night, after nine o'clock, the whole stir of the quarter has subsided.

Far away I hear the bell of some church tell the hours. But no noise

disturbs my rest, unless 257perhaps a belated gondolier moors his boat

beneath the window. My one maid, Catina, sings at her work the whole

day through. My gondolier, Francesco, acts as valet. He wakes me in the

morning, opens the shutters, brings sea-water for my bath, and takes

his orders for the day. 'Will it do for Chioggia, Francesco?'

'Sissignore! The Signorino has set off in his _sandolo_ already with

Antonio. The Signora is to go with us in the gondola.' 'Then get three

more men, Francesco, and see that all of them can sing.'

III.—TO CHIOGGIA WITH OAR AND SAIL

The _sandolo_ is a boat shaped like the gondola, but smaller and

lighter, without benches, and without the high steel prow or _ferro_

which distinguishes the gondola. The gunwale is only just raised above

the water, over which the little craft skims with a rapid bounding

motion, affording an agreeable variation from the stately swanlike

movement of the gondola. In one of these boats—called by him the

_Fisolo_ or Seamew—my friend Eustace had started with Antonio,

intending to row the whole way to Chioggia, or, if the breeze favoured,

to hoist a sail and help himself along. After breakfast, when the crew

for my gondola had been assembled, Francesco and I followed with the

Signora. It was one of those perfect mornings which occur as a respite

from broken weather, when the air is windless and the light falls soft

through haze on the horizon. As we broke into the lagoon behind the

Redentore, the islands in front of us, S. Spirito, Poveglia, Malamocco,

seemed as though they were just lifted from the sea-line. The

Euganeans, far away to westward, were bathed in mist, and almost blent

with the blue sky. Our four rowers put their backs into their work; and

soon we reached the port of Malamocco, where a breeze from the

258Adriatic caught us sideways for a while. This is the largest of the

breaches in the Lidi, or raised sand-reefs, which protect Venice from

the sea: it affords an entrance to vessels of draught like the steamers

of the Peninsular and Oriental Company. We crossed the dancing wavelets

of the port; but when we passed under the lee of Pelestrina, the breeze

failed, and the lagoon was once again a sheet of undulating glass. At

S. Pietro on this island a halt was made to give the oarsmen wine, and

here we saw the women at their cottage doorways making lace. The old

lace industry of Venice has recently been revived. From Burano and

Pelestrina cargoes of hand-made imitations of the ancient fabrics are

sent at intervals to Jesurun's magazine at S. Marco. He is the chief

_impresario_ of the trade, employing hundreds of hands, and speculating

for a handsome profit in the foreign market on the price he gives his

workwomen.

Now we are well lost in the lagoons—Venice no longer visible behind;

the Alps and Euganeans shrouded in a noonday haze; the lowlands at the

mouth of Brenta marked by clumps of trees ephemerally faint in silver

silhouette against the filmy, shimmering horizon. Form and colour have

disappeared in light-irradiated vapour of an opal hue. And yet

instinctively we know that we are not at sea; the different quality of

the water, the piles emerging here and there above the surface, the

suggestion of coast-lines scarcely felt in this infinity of lustre, all

remind us that our voyage is confined to the charmed limits of an

inland lake. At length the jutting headland of Pelestrina was reached.

We broke across the Porto di Chioggia, and saw Chioggia itself ahead—a

huddled mass of houses low upon the water. One by one, as we rowed

steadily, the fishing-boats passed by, emerging from their harbour for

a twelve hours' cruise upon the open sea. In a long line they came,

with variegated sails of orange, red, and 259saffron, curiously

chequered at the corners, and cantled with devices in contrasted tints.

A little land-breeze carried them forward. The lagoon reflected their

deep colours till they reached the port. Then, slightly swerving

eastward on their course, but still in single file, they took the sea

and scattered, like beautiful bright-plumaged birds, who from a

streamlet float into a lake, and find their way at large according as

each wills.

The Signorino and Antonio, though want of wind obliged them to row the

whole way from Venice, had reached Chioggia an hour before, and stood

waiting to receive us on the quay. It is a quaint town this Chioggia,

which has always lived a separate life from that of Venice. Language

and race and customs have held the two populations apart from those

distant years when Genoa and the Republic of S. Mark fought their duel

to the death out in the Chioggian harbours, down to these days, when

your Venetian gondolier will tell you that the Chioggoto loves his pipe

more than his _donna_ or his wife. The main canal is lined with

substantial palaces, attesting to old wealth and comfort. But from

Chioggia, even more than from Venice, the tide of modern luxury and

traffic has retreated. The place is left to fishing folk and builders

of the fishing craft, whose wharves still form the liveliest quarter.

Wandering about its wide deserted courts and _calli_, we feel the

spirit of the decadent Venetian nobility. Passages from Goldoni's and

Casanova's Memoirs occur to our memory. It seems easy to realise what

they wrote about the dishevelled gaiety and lawless license of Chioggia

in the days of powder, sword-knot, and _soprani_. Baffo walks beside us

in hypocritical composure of bag-wig and senatorial dignity, whispering

unmentionable sonnets in his dialect of _Xe_ and _Ga_. Somehow or

another that last dotage of S. Mark's decrepitude is more recoverable

by our fancy than the heroism of Pisani in the fourteenth century.

260From his prison in blockaded Venice the great admiral was sent forth

on a forlorn hope, and blocked victorious Doria here with boats on

which the nobles of the Golden Book had spent their fortunes. Pietro

Doria boasted that with his own hands he would bridle the bronze horses

of S. Mark. But now he found himself between the navy of Carlo Zeno in

the Adriatic and the flotilla led by Vittore Pisani across the lagoon.

It was in vain that the Republic of S. George strained every nerve to

send him succour from the Ligurian sea; in vain that the lords of Padua

kept opening communications with him from the mainland. From the 1st of

January 1380 till the 21st of June the Venetians pressed the blockade

ever closer, grappling their foemen in a grip that if relaxed one

moment would have hurled him at their throats. The long and breathless

struggle ended in the capitulation at Chioggia of what remained of

Doria's forty-eight galleys and fourteen thousand men.

These great deeds are far away and hazy. The brief sentences of

mediæval annalists bring them less near to us than the _chroniques

scandaleuses_ of good-for-nothing scoundrels, whose vulgar adventures

might be revived at the present hour with scarce a change of setting.

Such is the force of _intimité_ in literature. And yet Baffo and

Casanova are as much of the past as Doria and Pisani. It is only

perhaps that the survival of decadence in all we see around us, forms a

fitting framework for our recollections of their vividly described

corruption.

Not far from the landing-place a balustraded bridge of ample breadth

and large bravura manner spans the main canal. Like everything at

Chioggia, it is dirty and has fallen from its first estate. Yet neither

time nor injury can obliterate style or wholly degrade marble. Hard by

the bridge there are two rival inns. At one of these we ordered a

seadinner—crabs, 261cuttlefishes, soles, and turbots—which we ate at a

table in the open air. Nothing divided us from the street except a row

of Japanese privet-bushes in hooped tubs. Our banquet soon assumed a

somewhat unpleasant similitude to that of Dives; for the Chioggoti, in

all stages of decrepitude and squalor, crowded round to beg for

scraps—indescribable old women, enveloped in their own petticoats

thrown over their heads; girls hooded with sombre black mantles; old

men wrinkled beyond recognition by their nearest relatives; jabbering,

half-naked boys; slow, slouching fishermen with clay pipes in their

mouths and philosophical acceptance on their sober foreheads.

That afternoon the gondola and sandolo were lashed together side by

side. Two sails were raised, and in this lazy fashion we stole

homewards, faster or slower according as the breeze freshened or

slackened, landing now and then on islands, sauntering along the

sea-walls which bulwark Venice from the Adriatic, and singing—those at

least of us who had the power to sing. Four of our Venetians had

trained voices and memories of inexhaustible music. Over the level

water, with the ripple plashing at our keel, their songs went abroad,

and mingled with the failing day. The barcaroles and serenades peculiar

to Venice were, of course, in harmony with the occasion. But some

transcripts from classical operas were even more attractive, through

the dignity with which these men invested them. By the peculiarity of

their treatment the _recitativo_ of the stage assumed a solemn

movement, marked in rhythm, which removed it from the commonplace into

antiquity, and made me understand how cultivated music may pass back by

natural, unconscious transition into the realm of popular melody.

The sun sank, not splendidly, but quietly in banks of clouds above the

Alps. Stars came out, uncertainly at first, 262and then in strength,

reflected on the sea. The men of the Dogana watch-boat challenged us

and let us pass. Madonna's lamp was twinkling from her shrine upon the

harbour-pile. The city grew before us. Stealing into Venice in that

calm—stealing silently and shadowlike, with scarce a ruffle of the

water, the masses of the town emerging out of darkness into twilight,

till San Giorgio's gun boomed with a flash athwart our stern, and the

gas-lamps of the Piazzetta swam into sight; all this was like a long

enchanted chapter of romance. And now the music of our men had sunk to

one faint whistling from Eustace of tunes in harmony with whispers at

the prow.

Then came the steps of the Palazzo Venier and the deep-scented darkness

of the garden. As we passed through to supper, I plucked a spray of

yellow Banksia rose, and put it in my buttonhole. The dew was on its

burnished leaves, and evening had drawn forth its perfume.

IV.—MORNING RAMBLES

A story is told of Poussin, the French painter, that when he was asked

why he would not stay in Venice, he replied, 'If I stay here, I shall

become a colourist!' A somewhat similar tale is reported of a

fashionable English decorator. While on a visit to friends in Venice,

he avoided every building which contains a Tintoretto, averring that

the sight of Tintoretto's pictures would injure his carefully trained

taste. It is probable that neither anecdote is strictly true. Yet there

is a certain epigrammatic point in both; and I have often speculated

whether even Venice could have so warped the genius of Poussin as to

shed one ray of splendour on his canvases, or whether even Tintoretto

could have so 263sublimed the prophet of Queen Anne as to make him add

dramatic passion to a London drawing-room. Anyhow, it is exceedingly

difficult to escape from colour in the air of Venice, or from

Tintoretto in her buildings. Long, delightful mornings may be spent in

the enjoyment of the one and the pursuit of the other by folk who have

no classical or pseudo-mediæval theories to oppress them.

Tintoretto's house, though changed, can still be visited. It formed

part of the Fondamenta dei Mori, so called from having been the quarter

assigned to Moorish traders in Venice. A spirited carving of a turbaned

Moor leading a camel charged with merchandise, remains above the

waterline of a neighbouring building; and all about the crumbling walls

sprout flowering weeds—samphire and snapdragon and the spiked

campanula, which shoots a spire of sea-blue stars from chinks of

Istrian stone.

The house stands opposite the Church of Santa Maria dell' Orto, where

Tintoretto was buried, and where four of his chief masterpieces are to

be seen. This church, swept and garnished, is a triumph of modern

Italian restoration. They have contrived to make it as commonplace as

human ingenuity could manage. Yet no malice of ignorant industry can

obscure the treasures it contains—the pictures of Cima, Gian Bellini,

Palma, and the four Tintorettos, which form its crowning glory. Here

the master may be studied in four of his chief moods: as the painter of

tragic passion and movement, in the huge 'Last Judgment;' as the

painter of impossibilities, in the 'Vision of Moses upon Sinai;' as the

painter of purity and tranquil pathos, in the 'Miracle of S. Agnes;' as

the painter of Biblical history brought home to daily life, in the

'Presentation of the Virgin.' Without leaving the Madonna dell' Orto, a

student can explore his genius in all its depth and breadth; comprehend

the enthusiasm he 264excites in those who seek, as the essentials of

art, imaginative boldness and sincerity; understand what is meant by

adversaries who maintain that, after all, Tintoretto was but an

inspired Gustave Doré. Between that quiet canvas of the 'Presentation,'

so modest in its cool greys and subdued gold, and the tumult of flying,

running ascending figures in the 'Judgment,' what an interval there is!

How strangely the white lamb-like maiden, kneeling beside her lamb in

the picture of S. Agnes, contrasts with the dusky gorgeousness of the

Hebrew women despoiling themselves of jewels for the golden calf!

Comparing these several manifestations of creative power, we feel

ourselves in the grasp of a painter who was essentially a poet, one for

whom his art was the medium for expressing before all things thought

and passion. Each picture is executed in the manner suited to its tone

of feeling, the key of its conception.

Elsewhere than in the Madonna dell' Orto there are more distinguished

single examples of Tintoretto's realising faculty. The 'Last Supper' in

San Giorgio, for instance, and the 'Adoration of the Shepherds' in the

Scuola di San Rocco illustrate his unique power of presenting sacred

history in a novel, romantic framework of familiar things. The

commonplace circumstances of ordinary life have been employed to

portray in the one case a lyric of mysterious splendour; in the other,

an idyll of infinite sweetness. Divinity shines through the rafters of

that upper chamber, where round a low large table the Apostles are

assembled in a group translated from the social customs of the

painter's days. Divinity is shed upon the straw-spread manger, where

Christ lies sleeping in the loft, with shepherds crowding through the

room beneath.

A studied contrast between the simplicity and repose of the central

figure and the tumult of passions in the multitude 265around, may be

observed in the 'Miracle of S. Agnes.' It is this which gives dramatic

vigour to the composition. But the same effect is carried to its

highest fulfilment, with even a loftier beauty, in the episode of

Christ before the judgment-seat of Pilate, at San Rocco. Of all

Tintoretto's religious pictures, that is the most profoundly felt, the

most majestic. No other artist succeeded as he has here succeeded in

presenting to us God incarnate. For this Christ is not merely the just

man, innocent, silent before his accusers. The stationary, white-draped

figure, raised high above the agitated crowd, with tranquil forehead

slightly bent, facing his perplexed and fussy judge, is more than man.

We cannot say perhaps precisely why he is divine. But Tintoretto has

made us feel that he is. In other words, his treatment of the high

theme chosen by him has been adequate.

We must seek the Scuola di San Rocco for examples of Tintoretto's

liveliest imagination. Without ceasing to be Italian in his attention

to harmony and grace, he far exceeded the masters of his nation in the

power of suggesting what is weird, mysterious, upon the borderland of

the grotesque. And of this quality there are three remarkable instances

in the Scuola. No one but Tintoretto could have evoked the fiend in his

'Temptation of Christ.' It is an indescribable hermaphroditic genius,

the genius of carnal fascination, with outspread downy rose-plumed

wings, and flaming bracelets on the full but sinewy arms, who kneels

and lifts aloft great stones, smiling entreatingly to the sad, grey

Christ seated beneath a rugged pent-house of the desert. No one again

but Tintoretto could have dashed the hot lights of that fiery sunset in

such quivering flakes upon the golden flesh of Eve, half hidden among

laurels, as she stretches forth the fruit of the Fall to shrinking

Adam. No one but Tintoretto, till we come to Blake, could have imagined

yonder Jonah, summoned 266by the beck of God from the whale's belly.

The monstrous fish rolls over in the ocean, blowing portentous vapour

from his trump-shaped nostril. The prophet's beard descends upon his

naked breast in hoary ringlets to the girdle. He has forgotten the past

peril of the deep, although the whale's jaws yawn around him. Between

him and the outstretched finger of Jehovah calling him again to life,

there runs a spark of unseen spiritual electricity.

To comprehend Tintoretto's touch upon the pastoral idyll we must turn

our steps to San Giorgio again, and pace those meadows by the running

river in company with his Manna-Gatherers. Or we may seek the

Accademia, and notice how he here has varied the 'Temptation of Adam by

Eve,' choosing a less tragic motive of seduction than the one so

powerfully rendered at San Rocco. Or in the Ducal Palace we may take

our station, hour by hour, before the 'Marriage of Bacchus and

Ariadne.' It is well to leave the very highest achievements of art

untouched by criticism, undescribed. And in this picture we have the

most perfect of all modern attempts to realise an antique myth—more

perfect than Raphael's 'Galatea,' or Titian's 'Meeting of Bacchus with

Ariadne,' or Botticelli's 'Birth of Venus from the Sea.' It may suffice

to marvel at the slight effect which melodies so powerful and so direct

as these produce upon the ordinary public. Sitting, as is my wont, one

Sunday morning, opposite the 'Bacchus,' four Germans with a cicerone

sauntered by. The subject was explained to them. They waited an

appreciable space of time. Then the youngest opened his lips and spake:

'Bacchus war der Wein-Gott.' And they all moved heavily away. _Bos

locutus est_. 'Bacchus was the wine-god!' This, apparently, is what a

picture tells to one man. To another it presents divine harmonies,

perceptible indeed in nature, but here by the painter-poet for the

first time brought 267together and cadenced in a work of art. For

another it is perhaps the hieroglyph of pent-up passions and desired

impossibilities. For yet another it may only mean the unapproachable

inimitable triumph of consummate craft.

Tintoretto, to be rightly understood, must be sought all over Venice—in

the church as well as the Scuola di San Rocco; in the 'Temptation of S.

Anthony' at S. Trovaso no less than in the Temptations of Eve and

Christ; in the decorative pomp of the Sala del Senato, and in the

Paradisal vision of the Sala del Gran Consiglio. Yet, after all, there

is one of his most characteristic moods, to appreciate which fully we

return to the Madonna dell' Orto. I have called him 'the painter of

impossibilities.' At rare moments he rendered them possible by sheer

imaginative force. If we wish to realise this phase of his creative

power, and to measure our own subordination to his genius in its most

hazardous enterprise, we must spend much time in the choir of this

church. Lovers of art who mistrust this play of the audacious

fancy—aiming at sublimity in supersensual regions, sometimes attaining

to it by stupendous effort or authentic revelation, not seldom sinking

to the verge of bathos, and demanding the assistance of interpretative

sympathy in the spectator—such men will not take the point of view

required of them by Tintoretto in his boldest flights, in the 'Worship

of the Golden Calf' and in the 'Destruction of the World by Water.' It

is for them to ponder well the flying archangel with the scales of

judgment in his hand, and the seraph-charioted Jehovah enveloping Moses

upon Sinai in lightnings.

The gondola has had a long rest. Were Francesco but a little more

impatient, he might be wondering what had become of the padrone. I bid

him turn, and we are soon gliding into the Sacca della Misericordia.

This is a protected float, where the wood which comes from Cadore and

the hills of the 268Ampezzo is stored in spring. Yonder square white

house, standing out to sea, fronting Murano and the Alps, they call the

Oasa degli Spiriti. No one cares to inhabit it; for here, in old days,

it was the wont of the Venetians to lay their dead for a night's rest

before their final journey to the graveyard of S. Michele. So many

generations of dead folk had made that house their inn, that it is now

no fitting home for living men. San Michele is the island close before

Murano, where the Lombardi built one of their most romantically

graceful churches of pale Istrian stone, and where the Campo Santo has

for centuries received the dead into its oozy clay. The cemetery is at

present undergoing restoration. Its state of squalor and abandonment to

cynical disorder makes one feel how fitting for Italians would be the

custom of cremation. An island in the lagoons devoted to funeral pyres

is a solemn and ennobling conception. This graveyard, with its ruinous

walls, its mangy riot of unwholesome weeds, its corpses festering in

slime beneath neglected slabs in hollow chambers, and the mephitic wash

of poisoned waters that surround it, inspires the horror of disgust.

The morning has not lost its freshness. Antelao and Tofana, guarding

the vale above Cortina, show faint streaks of snow upon their amethyst.

Little clouds hang in the still autumn sky. There are men dredging for

shrimps and crabs through shoals uncovered by the ebb. Nothing can be

lovelier, more resting to eyes tired with pictures than this tranquil,

sunny expanse of the lagoon. As we round the point of the Bersaglio,

new landscapes of island and Alp and low-lying mainland move into sight

at every slow stroke of the oar. A luggage-train comes lumbering along

the railway bridge, puffing white smoke into the placid blue. Then we

strike down Cannaregio, and I muse upon processions of kings and

generals and noble strangers, entering Venice by 269this water-path

from Mestre, before the Austrians built their causeway for the trains.

Some of the rare scraps of fresco upon house fronts, still to be seen

in Venice, are left in Cannaregio. They are chiaroscuro allegories in a

bold bravura manner of the sixteenth century. From these and from a few

rosy fragments on the Fondaco dei Tedeschi, the Fabbriche Nuove, and

precious fading figures in a certain courtyard near San Stefano, we

form some notion how Venice looked when all her palaces were painted.

Pictures by Gentile Bellini, Mansueti, and Carpaccio help the fancy in

this work of restoration. And here and there, in back canals, we come

across coloured sections of old buildings, capped by true Venetian

chimneys, which for a moment seem to realise our dream.

A morning with Tintoretto might well be followed by a morning with

Carpaccio or Bellini. But space is wanting in these pages. Nor would it

suit the manner of this medley to hunt the Lombardi through palaces and

churches, pointing out their singularities of violet and yellow

panellings in marble, the dignity of their wide-opened arches, or the

delicacy of their shallow chiselled traceries in cream-white Istrian

stone. It is enough to indicate the goal of many a pleasant pilgrimage:

warrior angels of Vivarini and Basaiti hidden in a dark chapel of the

Frari; Fra Francesco's fantastic orchard of fruits and flowers in

distant S. Francesco della Vigna; the golden Gian Bellini in S.

Zaccaria; Palma's majestic S. Barbara in S. Maria Formosa; San Giobbe's

wealth of sculptured frieze and floral scroll; the Ponte di Paradiso,

with its Gothic arch; the painted plates in the Museo Civico; and

palace after palace, loved for some quaint piece of tracery, some

moulding full of mediæval symbolism, some fierce impossible Renaissance

freak of fancy.

Bather than prolong this list, I will tell a story which drew 270me one

day past the Public Gardens to the metropolitan Church of Venice, San

Pietro di Castello. The novella is related by Bandello. It has, as will

be noticed, points of similarity to that of 'Romeo and Juliet.'

V.—A VENETIAN NOVELLA

At the time when Carpaccio and Gentile Bellini were painting those

handsome youths in tight jackets, parti-coloured hose, and little round

caps placed awry upon their shocks of well-combed hair, there lived in

Venice two noblemen, Messer Pietro and Messer Paolo, whose palaces

fronted each other on the Grand Canal. Messer Paolo was a widower, with

one married daughter, and an only son of twenty years or thereabouts,

named Gerardo. Messer Pietro's wife was still living; and this couple

had but one child, a daughter, called Elena, of exceeding beauty, aged

fourteen. Gerardo, as is the wont of gallants, was paying his addresses

to a certain lady; and nearly every day he had to cross the Grand Canal

in his gondola, and to pass beneath the house of Elena on his way to

visit his Dulcinea; for this lady lived some distance up a little canal

on which the western side of Messer Pietro's palace looked.

Now it so happened that at the very time when the story opens, Messer

Pietro's wife fell ill and died, and Elena was left alone at home with

her father and her old nurse. Across the little canal of which I spoke

there dwelt another nobleman, with four daughters, between the years of

seventeen and twenty-one. Messer Pietro, desiring to provide amusement

for poor little Elena, besought this gentleman that his daughters might

come on feast-days to play with her. For you must know that, except on

festivals of the Church, the custom of Venice required that gentlewomen

should remain 271closely shut within the private apartments of their

dwellings. His request was readily granted; and on the next feast-day

the five girls began to play at ball together for forfeits in the great

saloon, which opened with its row of Gothic arches and balustraded

balcony upon the Grand Canal. The four sisters, meanwhile, had other

thoughts than for the game. One or other of them, and sometimes three

together, would let the ball drop, and run to the balcony to gaze upon

their gallants, passing up and down in gondolas below; and then they

would drop flowers or ribands for tokens. Which negligence of theirs

annoyed Elena much; for she thought only of the game. Wherefore she

scolded them in childish wise, and one of them made answer, 'Elena, if

you only knew how pleasant it is to play as we are playing on this

balcony, you would not care so much for ball and forfeits!'

On one of those feast-days the four sisters were prevented from keeping

their little friend company. Elena, with nothing to do, and feeling

melancholy, leaned upon the window-sill which overlooked the narrow

canal. And it chanced that just then Gerardo, on his way to Dulcinea,

went by; and Elena looked down at him, as she had seen those sisters

look at passers-by. Gerardo caught her eye, and glances passed between

them, and Gerardo's gondolier, bending from the poop, said to his

master, 'O master! methinks that gentle maiden is better worth your

wooing than Dulcinea.' Gerardo pretended to pay no heed to these words;

but after rowing a little way, he bade the man turn, and they went

slowly back beneath the window. This time Elena, thinking to play the

game which her four friends had played, took from her hair a clove

carnation and let it fall close to Gerardo on the cushion of the

gondola. He raised the flower and put it to his lips, acknowledging the

courtesy with a grave bow. But the perfume of the clove and the beauty

of Elena in that moment 272took possession of his heart together, and

straightway he forgot Dulcinea.

As yet he knew not who Elena was. Nor is this wonderful; for the

daughters of Venetian nobles were but rarely seen or spoken of. But the

thought of her haunted him awake and sleeping; and every feast-day,

when there was the chance of seeing her, he rowed his gondola beneath

her windows. And there she appeared to him in company with her four

friends; the five girls clustering together like sister roses beneath

the pointed windows of the Gothic balcony. Elena, on her side, had no

thought of love; for of love she had heard no one speak. But she took

pleasure in the game those friends had taught her, of leaning from the

balcony to watch Gerardo. He meanwhile grew love-sick and impatient,

wondering how he might declare his passion. Until one day it happened

that, talking through a lane or _calle_ which skirted Messer Pietro'a

palace, he caught sight of Elena's nurse, who was knocking at the door,

returning from some shopping she had made. This nurse had been his own

nurse in childhood; therefore he remembered her, and cried aloud,

'Nurse, Nurse!' But the old woman did not hear him, and passed into the

house and shut the door behind her. Whereupon Gerardo, greatly moved,

still called to her, and when he reached the door, began to knock upon

it violently. And whether it was the agitation of finding himself at

last so near the wish of his heart, or whether the pains of waiting for

his love had weakened him, I know not; but, while he knocked, his

senses left him, and he fell fainting in the doorway. Then the nurse

recognised the youth to whom she had given suck, and brought him into

the courtyard by the help of handmaidens, and Elena came down and gazed

upon him. The house was now full of bustle, and Messer Pietro heard the

noise, and seeing the son of his neighbour in so piteous a plight, he

caused Gerardo 273to be laid upon a bed. But for all they could do with

him, he recovered not from his swoon. And after a while force was that

they should place him in a gondola and ferry him across to his father's

house. The nurse went with him, and informed Messer Paolo of what had

happened. Doctors were sent for, and the whole family gathered round

Gerardo's bed. After a while he revived a little; and thinking himself

still upon the doorstep of Pietro's palace, called again, 'Nurse,

Nurse!' She was near at hand, and would have spoken to him. But while

he summoned his senses to his aid, he became gradually aware of his own

kinsfolk and dissembled the secret of his grief. They beholding him in

better cheer, departed on their several ways, and the nurse still sat

alone beside him. Then he explained to her what he had at heart, and

how he was in love with a maiden whom he had seen on feast-days in the

house of Messer Pietro. But still he knew not Elena's name; and she,

thinking it impossible that such a child had inspired this passion,

began to marvel which of the four sisters it was Gerardo loved. Then

they appointed the next Sunday, when all the five girls should be

together, for Gerardo by some sign, as he passed beneath the window, to

make known to the old nurse his lady.

Elena, meanwhile, who had watched Gerardo lying still and pale in swoon

beneath her on the pavement of the palace, felt the stirring of a new

unknown emotion in her soul. When Sunday came, she devised excuses for

keeping her four friends away, bethinking her that she might see him

once again alone, and not betray the agitation which she dreaded. This

ill suited the schemes of the nurse, who nevertheless was forced to be

content. But after dinner, seeing how restless was the girl, and how

she came and went, and ran a thousand times to the balcony, the nurse

began to wonder whether Elena herself were not in love with some one.

So she feigned to 274sleep, but placed herself within sight of the

window. And soon Gerardo came by in his gondola; and Elena, who was

prepared, threw to him her nosegay. The watchful nurse had risen, and

peeping behind the girl's shoulder, saw at a glance how matters stood.

Thereupon she began to scold her charge, and say, 'Is this a fair and

comely thing, to stand all day at balconies and throw flowers at

passers-by? Woe to you if your father should come to know of this! He

would make you wish yourself among the dead!' Elena, sore troubled at

her nurse's rebuke, turned and threw her arms about her neck, and

called her 'Nanna!' as the wont is of Venetian children. Then she told

the old woman how she had learned that game from the four sisters, and

how she thought it was not different, but far more pleasant, than the

game of forfeits; whereupon her nurse spoke gravely, explaining what

love is, and how that love should lead to marriage, and bidding her

search her own heart if haply she could choose Gerardo for her husband.

There was no reason, as she knew, why Messer Paolo's son should not

mate with Messer Pietro's daughter. But being a romantic creature, as

many women are, she resolved to bring the match about in secret.

Elena took little time to reflect, but told her nurse that she was

willing, if Gerardo willed it too, to have him for her husband. Then

went the nurse and made the young man know how matters stood, and

arranged with him a day, when Messer Pietro should be in the Council of

the Pregadi, and the servants of the palace otherwise employed, for him

to come and meet his Elena. A glad man was Gerardo, nor did he wait to

think how better it would be to ask the hand of Elena in marriage from

her father. But when the day arrived, he sought the nurse, and she took

him to a chamber in the palace, where there stood an image of the

Blessed Virgin. Elena was there, pale and timid; and when the lovers

clasped 275hands, neither found many words to say. But the nurse bade

them take heart, and leading them before Our Lady, joined their hands,

and made Gerardo place his ring on his bride's finger. After this

fashion were Gerardo and Elena wedded. And for some while, by the

assistance of the nurse, they dwelt together in much love and solace,

meeting often as occasion offered.

Messer Paolo, who knew nothing of these things, took thought meanwhile

for his son's career. It was the season when the Signiory of Venice

sends a fleet of galleys to Beirut with merchandise; and the noblemen

may bid for the hiring of a ship, and charge it with wares, and send

whomsoever they list as factor in their interest. One of these galleys,

then, Messer Paolo engaged, and told his son that he had appointed him

to journey with it and increase their wealth. 'On thy return, my son,'

he said, 'we will bethink us of a wife for thee.' Gerardo, when he

heard these words, was sore troubled, and first he told his father

roundly that he would not go, and flew off in the twilight to pour out

his perplexities to Elena. But she, who was prudent and of gentle soul,

besought him to obey his father in this thing, to the end, moreover,

that, having done his will and increased his wealth, he might

afterwards unfold the story of their secret marriage. To these good

counsels, though loth, Gerardo consented. His father was overjoyed at

his son's repentance. The galley was straightway laden with

merchandise, and Gerardo set forth on his voyage.

The trip to Beirut and back lasted usually six months or at the most

seven. Now when Gerardo had been some six months away, Messer Pietro,

noticing how fair his daughter was, and how she had grown into

womanhood, looked about him for a husband for her. When he had found a

youth suitable in birth and wealth and years, he called for Elena,

276and told her that the day had been appointed for her marriage. She,

alas! knew not what to answer. She feared to tell her father that she

was already married, for she knew not whether this would please

Gerardo. For the same reason she dreaded to throw herself upon the

kindness of Messer Paolo. Nor was her nurse of any help in counsel; for

the old woman repented her of what she had done, and had good cause to

believe that, even if the marriage with Gerardo were accepted by the

two fathers, they would punish her for her own part in the affair.

Therefore she bade Elena wait on fortune, and hinted to her that, if

the worst came to the worst, no one need know she had been wedded with

the ring to Gerardo. Such weddings, you must know, were binding; but

till they had been blessed by the Church, they had not taken the force

of a religious sacrament. And this is still the case in Italy among the

common folk, who will say of a man, 'Si, è ammogliato; ma il matrimonio

non è stato benedetto.' 'Yes, he has taken a wife, but the marriage has

not yet been blessed.'

So the days flew by in doubt and sore distress for Elena. Then on the

night before her wedding, she felt that she could bear this life no

longer. But having no poison, and being afraid to pierce her bosom with

a knife, she lay down on her bed alone, and tried to die by holding in

her breath. A mortal swoon came over her; her senses fled; the life in

her remained suspended. And when her nurse came next morning to call

her, she found poor Elena cold as a corpse. Messer Pietro and all the

household rushed, at the nurse's cries, into the room, and they all saw

Elena stretched dead upon her bed undressed. Physicians were called,

who made theories to explain the cause of death. But all believed that

she was really dead, beyond all help of art or medicine. Nothing

remained but to carry her to church for burial instead of marriage.

Therefore, that very evening, a funeral procession 277was formed, which

moved by torchlight up the Grand Canal, along the Riva, past the blank

walls of the Arsenal, to the Campo before San Pietro in Castello. Elena

lay beneath the black felze in one gondola, with a priest beside her

praying, and other boats followed bearing mourners. Then they laid her

in a marble chest outside the church, and all departed, still with

torches burning, to their homes.

Now it so fell out that upon that very evening Gerardo's galley had

returned from Syria, and was anchoring within the port of Lido, which

looks across to the island of Castello. It was the gentle custom of

Venice at that time that, when a ship arrived from sea, the friends of

those on board at once came out to welcome them, and take and give the

news. Therefore many noble youths and other citizens were on the deck

of Gerardo's galley, making merry with him over the safe conduct of his

voyage. Of one of these he asked, 'Whose is yonder funeral procession

returning from San Pietro?' The young man made answer, 'Alas, for poor

Elena, Messer Pietro's daughter! She should have been married this day.

But death took her, and to-night they buried her in the marble monument

outside the church.' A woeful man was Gerardo, hearing suddenly this

news, and knowing what his dear wife must have suffered ere she died.

Yet he restrained himself, daring not to disclose his anguish, and

waited till his friends had left the galley. Then he called to him the

captain of the oarsmen, who was his friend, and unfolded to him all the

story of his love and sorrow, and said that he must go that night and

see his wife once more, if even he should have to break her tomb. The

captain tried to dissuade him, but in vain. Seeing him so obstinate, he

resolved not to desert Gerardo. The two men took one of the galley's

boats, and rowed together toward San Pietro. It was past midnight when

they reached the Campo and broke the marble sepulchre 278asunder.

Pushing back its lid, Gerardo descended into the grave and abandoned

himself upon the body of his Elena. One who had seen them at that

moment could not well have said which of the two was dead and which was

living—Elena or her husband. Meantime the captain of the oarsmen,

fearing lest the watch (set by the Masters of the Night to keep the

peace of Venice) might arrive, was calling on Gerardo to come back.

Gerardo heeded him no whit. But at the last, compelled by his

entreaties, and as it were astonied, he arose, bearing his wife's

corpse in his arms, and carried her clasped against his bosom to the

boat, and laid her therein, and sat down by her side and kissed her

frequently, and suffered not his friend's remonstrances. Force was for

the captain, having brought himself into this scrape, that he should

now seek refuge by the nearest way from justice. Therefore he hoved

gently from the bank, and plied his oar, and brought the gondola apace

into the open waters. Gerardo still clasped Elena, dying husband by

dead wife. But the sea-breeze freshened towards daybreak; and the

captain, looking down upon that pair, and bringing to their faces the

light of his boat's lantern, judged their case not desperate at all. On

Elena's cheek there was a flush of life less deadly even than the

pallor of Gerardo's forehead. Thereupon the good man called aloud, and

Gerardo started from his grief; and both together they chafed the hands

and feet of Elena; and, the sea-breeze aiding with its saltness, they

awoke in her the spark of life.

Dimly burned the spark. But Gerardo, being aware of it, became a man

again. Then, having taken counsel with the captain, both resolved to

bear her to that brave man's mother's house. A bed was soon made ready,

and food was brought; and after due time, she lifted up her face and

knew Gerardo. The peril of the grave was past, but thought had now to

be 279taken for the future. Therefore Gerardo, leaving his wife to the

captain's mother, rowed back to the galley and prepared to meet his

father. With good store of merchandise and with great gains from his

traffic, he arrived in that old palace on the Grand Canal. Then having

opened to Messer Paolo the matters of his journey, and shown him how he

had fared, and set before him tables of disbursements and receipts, he

seized the moment of his father's gladness. 'Father,' he said, and as

he spoke he knelt upon his knees, 'Father, I bring you not good store

of merchandise and bags of gold alone; I bring you also a wedded wife,

whom I have saved this night from death.' And when the old man's

surprise was quieted, he told him the whole story. Now Messer Paolo,

desiring no better than that his son should wed the heiress of his

neighbour, and knowing well that Messer Pietro would make great joy

receiving back his daughter from the grave, bade Gerardo in haste take

rich apparel and clothe Elena therewith, and fetch her home. These

things were swiftly done; and after evenfall Messer Pietro was bidden

to grave business in his neighbour's palace. With heavy heart he came,

from a house of mourning to a house of gladness. But there, at the

banquet-table's head he saw his dead child Elena alive, and at her side

a husband. And when the whole truth had been declared, he not only

kissed and embraced the pair who knelt before him, but of his goodness

forgave the nurse, who in her turn came trembling to his feet. Then

fell there joy and bliss in overmeasure that night upon both palaces of

the Canal Grande. And with the morrow the Church blessed the spousals

which long since had been on both sides vowed and consummated.

280

VI.—ON THE LAGOONS

The mornings are spent in study, sometimes among pictures, sometimes in

the Marcian Library, or again in those vast convent chambers of the

Frari, where the archives of Venice load innumerable shelves. The

afternoons invite us to a further flight upon the water. Both sandolo

and gondola await our choice, and we may sail or row, according as the

wind and inclination tempt us.

Yonder lies San Lazzaro, with the neat red buildings of the Armenian

convent. The last oleander blossoms shine rosy pink above its walls

against the pure blue sky as we glide into the little harbour. Boats

piled with coal-black grapes block the landing-place, for the Padri are

gathering their vintage from the Lido, and their presses run with new

wine. Eustace and I have not come to revive memories of Byron—that

curious patron saint of the Armenian colony—or to inspect the

printing-press, which issues books of little value for our studies. It

is enough to pace the terrace, and linger half an hour beneath the low

broad arches of the alleys pleached with vines, through which the domes

and towers of Venice rise more beautiful by distance.

Malamocco lies considerably farther, and needs a full hour of stout

rowing to reach it. Alighting there, we cross the narrow strip of land,

and find ourselves upon the huge sea-wall—block piled on block—of

Istrian stone in tiers and ranks, with cunning breathing-places for the

waves to wreak their fury on and foam their force away in fretful

waste. The very existence of Venice may be said to depend sometimes on

these _murazzi_, which were finished at an immense cost by the Republic

in the days of its decadence. The enormous monoliths which compose them

had to be brought across the 281Adriatic in sailing vessels. Of all the

Lidi, that of Malamocco is the weakest; and here, if anywhere, the sea

might effect an entrance into the lagoon. Our gondoliers told us of

some places where the _murazzi_ were broken in a gale, or _sciroccale_,

not very long ago. Lying awake in Venice, when the wind blows hard, one

hears the sea thundering upon its sandy barrier, and blesses God for

the _murazzi_. On such a night it happened once to me to dream a dream

of Venice overwhelmed by water. I saw the billows roll across the

smooth lagoon like a gigantic Eager. The Ducal Palace crumbled, and San

Marco's domes went down. The Campanile rocked and shivered like a reed.

And all along the Grand Canal the palaces swayed helpless, tottering to

their fall, while boats piled high with men and women strove to stem

the tide, and save themselves from those impending ruins. It was a mad

dream, born of the sea's roar and Tintoretto's painting. But this

afternoon no such visions are suggested. The sea sleeps, and in the

moist autumn air we break tall branches of the seeded yellowing

samphire from hollows of the rocks, and bear them homeward in a wayward

bouquet mixed with cobs of Indian-corn.

Fusina is another point for these excursions. It lies at the mouth of

the Canal di Brenta, where the mainland ends in marsh and meadows,

intersected by broad renes. In spring the ditches bloom with

fleurs-de-lys; in autumn they take sober colouring from lilac daisies

and the delicate sea-lavender. Scores of tiny plants are turning

scarlet on the brown moist earth; and when the sun goes down behind the

Euganean hills, his crimson canopy of cloud, reflected on these

shallows, muddy shoals, and wilderness of matted weeds, converts the

common earth into a fairyland of fabulous dyes. Purple, violet, and

rose are spread around us. In front stretches the lagoon, tinted with a

pale light from the east, and beyond this 282pallid mirror shines

Venice—a long low broken line, touched with the softest roseate flush.

Ere we reach the Giudecca on our homeward way, sunset has faded. The

western skies have clad themselves in green, barred with dark

fire-rimmed clouds. The Euganean hills stand like stupendous pyramids,

Egyptian, solemn, against a lemon space on the horizon. The far reaches

of the lagoons, the Alps, and islands assume those tones of glowing

lilac which are the supreme beauty of Venetian evening. Then, at last,

we see the first lamps glitter 288on the Zattere. The quiet of the

night has come.

Words cannot be formed to express the endless varieties of Venetian

sunset. The most magnificent follow after wet stormy days, when the

west breaks suddenly into a labyrinth of fire, when chasms of clear

turquoise heavens emerge, and horns of flame are flashed to the zenith,

and unexpected splendours scale the fretted clouds, step over step,

stealing along the purple caverns till the whole dome throbs. Or,

again, after a fair day, a change of weather approaches, and high,

infinitely high, the skies are woven over with a web of

half-transparent cirrus-clouds. These in the afterglow blush crimson,

and through their rifts the depth of heaven is of a hard and gemlike

blue, and all the water turns to rose beneath them. I remember one such

evening on the way back from Torcello. We were well out at sea between

Mazzorbo and Murano. The ruddy arches overhead were reflected without

interruption in the waveless ruddy lake below. Our black boat was the

only dark spot in this sphere of splendour. We seemed to hang

suspended; and such as this, I fancied, must be the feeling of an

insect caught in the heart of a fiery-petalled rose. Yet not these

melodramatic sunsets alone are beautiful. Even more exquisite, perhaps,

are the lagoons, painted in monochrome of greys, with just one touch of

pink upon a western cloud, scattered in ripples 283here and there on

the waves below, reminding us that day has passed and evening come. And

beautiful again are the calm settings of fair weather, when sea and sky

alike are cheerful, and the topmost blades of the lagoon grass, peeping

from the shallows, glance like emeralds upon the surface. There is no

deep stirring of the spirit in a symphony of light and colour; but

purity, peace, and freshness make their way into our hearts.

VII.—AT THE LIDO

Of all these afternoon excursions, that to the Lido is most frequent.

It has two points for approach. The more distant is the little station

of San Nicoletto, at the mouth of the Porto. With an ebb-tide, the

water of the lagoon runs past the mulberry gardens of this hamlet like

a river. There is here a grove of acacia-trees, shadowy and dreamy,

above deep grass, which even an Italian summer does not wither. The

Riva is fairly broad, forming a promenade, where one may conjure up the

personages of a century ago. For San Nicoletto used to be a fashionable

resort before the other points of Lido had been occupied by

pleasure-seekers. An artist even now will select its old-world quiet,

leafy shade, and prospect through the islands of Vignole and Sant'

Erasmo to snow-touched peaks of Antelao and Tofana, rather than the

glare and bustle and extended view of Venice which its rival Sant'

Elisabetta offers.

But when we want a plunge into the Adriatic, or a stroll along smooth

sands, or a breath of genuine sea-breeze, or a handful of horned

poppies from the dunes, or a lazy half-hour's contemplation of a

limitless horizon flecked with russet sails, then we seek Sant'

Elisabetta. Our boat is left at the landing-place. We saunter across

the island and back again. 284Antonio and Francesco wait and order

wine, which we drink with them in the shade of the little _osteria's_

wall.

A certain afternoon in May I well remember, for this visit to the Lido

was marked by one of those apparitions which are as rare as they are

welcome to the artist's soul. I have always held that in our modern

life the only real equivalent for the antique mythopoeic sense—that

sense which enabled the Hellenic race to figure for themselves the

powers of earth and air, streams and forests, and the presiding genii

of places, under the forms of living human beings, is supplied by the

appearance at some felicitous moment of a man or woman who impersonates

for our imagination the essence of the beauty that environs us. It

seems, at such a fortunate moment, as though we had been waiting for

this revelation, although perchance the want of it had not been

previously felt. Our sensations and perceptions test themselves at the

touchstone of this living individuality. The keynote of the whole music

dimly sounding in our ears is struck. A melody emerges, clear in form

and excellent in rhythm. The landscapes we have painted on our brain,

no longer lack their central figure. The life proper to the complex

conditions we have studied is discovered, and every detail, judged by

this standard of vitality, falls into its right relations.

I had been musing long that day and earnestly upon the mystery of the

lagoons, their opaline transparencies of air and water, their fretful

risings and sudden subsidence into calm, the treacherousness of their

shoals, the sparkle and the splendour of their sunlight. I had asked

myself how would a Greek sculptor have personified the elemental deity

of these salt-water lakes, so different in quality from the Ægean or

Ionian sea? What would he find distinctive of their spirit? The Tritons

of these shallows must be of other form and lineage than the

fierce-eyed youth who blows his conch upon 285the curled crest of a

wave, crying aloud to his comrades, as he bears the nymph away to

caverns where the billows plunge in tideless instability.

We had picked up shells and looked for sea-horses on the Adriatic

shore. Then we returned to give our boatmen wine beneath the vine-clad

_pergola_. Four other men were there, drinking, and eating from a dish

of fried fish set upon the coarse white linen cloth. Two of them soon

rose and went away. Of the two who stayed, one was a large, middle-aged

man; the other was still young. He was tall and sinewy, but slender,

for these Venetians are rarely massive in their strength. Each limb is

equally developed by the exercise of rowing upright, bending all the

muscles to their stroke. Their bodies are elastically supple, with free

sway from the hips and a mercurial poise upon the ankle. Stefano showed

these qualities almost in exaggeration. The type in him was refined to

its artistic perfection. Moreover, he was rarely in repose, but moved

with a singular brusque grace. A black broad-brimmed hat was thrown

back upon his matted _zazzera_ of dark hair tipped with dusky brown.

This shock of hair, cut in flakes, and falling wilfully, reminded me of

the lagoon grass when it darkens in autumn upon uncovered shoals, and

sunset gilds its sombre edges. Fiery grey eyes beneath it gazed

intensely, with compulsive effluence of electricity. It was the wild

glance of a Triton. Short blonde moustache, dazzling teeth, skin

bronzed, but showing white and healthful through open front and sleeves

of lilac shirt. The dashing sparkle of this animate splendour, who

looked to me as though the sea-waves and the sun had made him in some

hour of secret and unquiet rapture, was somehow emphasised by a curious

dint dividing his square chin—a cleft that harmonised with smile on lip

and steady flame in eyes. I hardly know what effect it would have upon

a reader to compare eyes to 286opals. Yet Stefano's eyes, as they met

mine, had the vitreous intensity of opals, as though the colour of

Venetian waters were vitalised in them. This noticeable being had a

rough, hoarse voice, which, to develop the parallel with a sea-god,

might have screamed in storm or whispered raucous messages from crests

of tossing billows.

I felt, as I looked, that here, for me at least, the mythopoem of the

lagoons was humanised; the spirit of the saltwater lakes had appeared

to me; the final touch of life emergent from nature had been given. I

was satisfied; for I had seen a poem.

Then we rose, and wandered through the Jews' cemetery. It is a quiet

place, where the flat grave-stones, inscribed in Hebrew and Italian,

lie deep in Lido sand, waved over with wild grass and poppies. I would

fain believe that no neglect, but rather the fashion of this folk, had

left the monuments of generations to be thus resumed by nature. Yet,

knowing nothing of the history of this burial-ground, I dare not affirm

so much. There is one outlying piece of the cemetery which seems to

contradict my charitable interpretation. It is not far from San

Nicoletto. No enclosure marks it from the unconsecrated dunes.

Acacia-trees sprout amid the monuments, and break the tablets with

their thorny shoots upthrusting from the soil. Where patriarchs and

rabbis sleep for centuries, the fishers of the sea now wander, and

defile these habitations of the dead:

Corruption most abhorred

Mingling itself with their renownèd ashes.

Some of the grave-stones have been used to fence the towing-path; and

one I saw, well carved with letters legible of Hebrew on fair Istrian

marble, which roofed an open drain leading from the stable of a

Christian dog.

287

VIII.—A VENETIAN RESTAURANT

At the end of a long glorious day, unhappy is that mortal whom the

Hermes of a cosmopolitan hotel, white-chokered and white-waistcoated,

marshals to the Hades of the _table-d'hôte_. The world has often been

compared to an inn; but on my way down to this common meal I have, not

unfrequently, felt fain to reverse the simile. From their separate

stations, at the appointed hour, the guests like ghosts flit to a

gloomy gas-lit chamber. They are of various speech and race,

preoccupied with divers interests and cares. Necessity and the waiter

drive them all to a sepulchral syssition, whereof the cook too

frequently deserves that old Greek comic epithet—αδου μάγειρος —cook of

the Inferno. And just as we are told that in Charon's boat we shall not

be allowed to pick our society, so here we must accept what fellowship

the fates provide. An English spinster retailing paradoxes culled

to-day from Ruskin's handbooks; an American citizen describing his

jaunt in a gondóla from the railway station; a German shopkeeper

descanting in one breath on Baur's Bock and the beauties of the

Marcusplatz; an intelligent æsthete bent on working into clearness his

own views of Carpaccio's genius: all these in turn, or all together,

must be suffered gladly through well-nigh two long hours. Uncomforted

in soul we rise from the expensive banquet; and how often rise from it

unfed!

Far other be the doom of my own friends—of pious bards and genial

companions, lovers of natural and lovely things! Nor for these do I

desire a seat at Florian's marble tables, or a perch in Quadri's

window, though the former supply dainty food, and the latter command a

bird's-eye view of the Piazza. Rather would I lead them to a certain

humble tavern on the Zattere. It is a quaint, low-built, unpretending

little place, near a bridge, with a garden hard by which sends a

cataract of honeysuckles sunward over a too-jealous wall. In front lies

a Mediterranean steamer, which all day long has been discharging cargo.

Gazing westward up Giudecca, masts and funnels bar the sunset and the

Paduan hills; and from a little front room of the _trattoria_ the view

is so marine that one keeps fancying oneself in some ship's cabin.

Sea-captains sit and smoke beside their glass of grog in the pavilion

and the _caffé_. But we do not seek their company at dinner-time. Our

way lies under yonder arch, and up the narrow alley into a paved court.

Here are oleanders in pots, and plants of Japanese spindle-wood in

tubs; and from the walls beneath the window hang cages of all sorts of

birds—a talking parrot, a whistling blackbird, goldfinches, canaries,

linnets. Athos, the fat dog, who goes to market daily in a _barchetta_

with his master, snuffs around. 'Where are Porthos and Aramis, my

friend?' Athos does not take the joke; he only wags his stump of tail

and pokes his nose into my hand. What a Tartufe's nose it is! Its

bridge displays the full parade of leather-bound brass-nailed muzzle.

But beneath, this muzzle is a patent sham. The frame does not even

pretend to close on Athos' jaw, and the wise dog wears it like a

decoration. A little farther we meet that ancient grey cat, who has no

discoverable name, but is famous for the sprightliness and grace with

which she bears her eighteen years. Not far from the cat one is sure to

find Carlo—the bird-like, bright-faced, close-cropped Venetian urchin,

whose duty it is to trot backwards and forwards between the cellar and

the dining-tables. At the end of the court we walk into the kitchen,

where the black-capped little _padrone_ and the gigantic white-capped

chef are in close consultation. Here we have the privilege of

inspecting the larder—fish of various sorts, meat, vegetables,

289several kinds of birds, pigeons, tordi, beccafichi, geese, wild

ducks, chickens, woodcock, &c., according to the season. We select our

dinner, and retire to eat it either in the court among the birds

beneath the vines, or in the low dark room which occupies one side of

it. Artists of many nationalities and divers ages frequent this house;

and the talk arising from the several little tables, turns upon points

of interest and beauty in the life and landscape of Venice. There can

be no difference of opinion about the excellence of the _cuisine_, or

about the reasonable charges of this _trattoria_. A soup of lentils,

followed by boiled turbot or fried soles, beefsteak or mutton cutlets,

tordi or beccafichi, with a salad, the whole enlivened with good red

wine or Florio's Sicilian Marsala from the cask, costs about four

francs. Gas is unknown in the establishment. There is no noise, no

bustle, no brutality of waiters, no _ahurissement_ of tourists. And

when dinner is done, we can sit awhile over our cigarette and coffee,

talking until the night invites us to a stroll along the Zattere or a

_giro_ in the gondola.

IX.—NIGHT IN VENICE

Night in Venice! Night is nowhere else so wonderful, unless it be in

winter among the high Alps. But the nights of Venice and the nights of

the mountains are too different in kind to be compared.

There is the ever-recurring miracle of the full moon rising, before day

is dead, behind San Giorgio, spreading a path of gold on the lagoon

which black boats traverse with the glow-worm lamp upon their prow;

ascending the cloudless sky and silvering the domes of the Salute;

pouring vitreous sheen upon the red lights of the Piazzetta; flooding

the Grand Canal, and lifting the Rialto higher in ethereal whiteness;

piercing 290but penetrating not the murky labyrinth of _rio_ linked

with _rio_, through which we wind in light and shadow, to reach once

more the level glories and the luminous expanse of heaven beyond the

Misericordia.

This is the melodrama of Venetian moonlight; and if a single impression

of the night has to be retained from one visit to Venice, those are

fortunate who chance upon a full moon of fair weather. Yet I know not

whether some quieter and soberer effects are not more thrilling.

To-night, for example, the waning moon will rise late through veils of

_scirocco_. Over the bridges of San Cristoforo and San Gregorio,

through the deserted Calle di Mezzo, my friend and I walk in darkness,

pass the marble basements of the Salute, and push our way along its

Riva to the point of the Dogana. We are out at sea alone, between the

Canalozzo and the Giudecca. A moist wind ruffles the water and cools

our forehead. It is so dark that we can only see San Giorgio by the

light reflected on it from the Piazzetta. The same light climbs the

Campanile of S. Mark, and shows the golden angel in a mystery of gloom.

The only noise that reaches us is a confused hum from the Piazza.

Sitting and musing there, the blackness of the water whispers in our

ears a tale of death. And now we hear a plash of oars, and gliding

through the darkness comes a single boat. One man leaps upon the

landing-place without a word and disappears. There is another wrapped

in a military cloak asleep. I see his face beneath me, pale and quiet.

The _barcaruolo_ turns the point in silence. From the darkness they

came; into the darkness they have gone. It is only an ordinary incident

of coastguard service. But the spirit of the night has made a poem of

it.

Even tempestuous and rainy weather, though melancholy enough, is never

sordid here. There is no noise from carriage traffic in Venice, and the

sea-wind preserves the purity and 291transparency of the atmosphere. It

had been raining all day, but at evening came a partial clearing. I

went down to the Molo, where the large reach of the lagoon was all

moon-silvered, and San Giorgio Maggiore dark against the bluish sky,

and Santa Maria della Salute domed with moon-irradiated pearl, and the

wet slabs of the Riva shimmering in moonlight, the whole misty sky,

with its clouds and stellar spaces, drenched in moonlight, nothing but

moonlight sensible except the tawny flare of gas-lamps and the orange

lights of gondolas afloat upon the waters. On such a night the very

spirit of Venice is abroad. We feel why she is called Bride of the Sea.

Take yet another night. There had been a representation of Verdi's

'Forza del Destino' at the Teatro Malibran. After midnight we walked

homeward through the Merceria, crossed the Piazza, and dived into the

narrow _calle_ which leads to the _traghetto_ of the Salute. It was a

warm moist starless night, and there seemed no air to breathe in those

narrow alleys. The gondolier was half asleep. Eustace called him as we

jumped into his boat, and rang our _soldi_ on the gunwale. Then he

arose and turned the _ferro_ round, and stood across towards the

Salute. Silently, insensibly, from the oppression of confinement in the

airless streets to the liberty and immensity of the water and the night

we passed. It was but two minutes ere we touched the shore and said

good-night, and went our way and left the ferryman. But in that brief

passage he had opened our souls to everlasting things—the freshness,

and the darkness, and the kindness of the brooding, all-enfolding night

above the sea.

292

THE GONDOLIER'S WEDDING

The night before the wedding we had a supper-party in my rooms. We were

twelve in all. My friend Eustace brought his gondolier Antonio with

fair-haired, dark-eyed wife, and little Attilio, their eldest child. My

own gondolier, Francesco, came with his wife and two children. Then

there was the handsome, languid Luigi, who, in his best clothes, or out

of them, is fit for any drawing-room. Two gondoliers, in dark blue

shirts, completed the list of guests, if we exclude the maid Catina,

who came and went about the table, laughing and joining in the songs,

and sitting down at intervals to take her share of wine. The big room

looking across the garden to the Grand Canal had been prepared for

supper; and the company were to be received in the smaller, which has a

fine open space in front of it to southwards. But as the guests

arrived, they seemed to find the kitchen and the cooking that was going

on quite irresistible. Catina, it seems, had lost her head with so many

cuttlefishes, _orai_, cakes, and fowls, and cutlets to reduce to order.

There was, therefore, a great bustle below stairs; and I could hear

plainly that all my guests were lending their making, or their marring,

hands to the preparation of the supper. That the company should cook

their own food on the way to the dining-room, seemed a quite novel

arrangement, but one that promised well for their contentment with the

banquet. Nobody could be dissatisfied with what was everybody's affair.

When seven o'clock struck, Eustace and I, who had been 293entertaining

the children in their mothers' absence, heard the sound of steps upon

the stairs. The guests arrived, bringing their own _risotto_ with them.

Welcome was short, if hearty. We sat down in carefully appointed order,

and fell into such conversation as the quarter of San Vio and our

several interests supplied. From time to time one of the matrons left

the table and descended to the kitchen, when a finishing stroke was

needed for roast pullet or stewed veal. The excuses they made their

host for supposed failure in the dishes, lent a certain grace and comic

charm to the commonplace of festivity. The entertainment was theirs as

much as mine; and they all seemed to enjoy what took the form by

degrees of curiously complicated hospitality. I do not think a

well-ordered supper at any _trattoria_, such as at first suggested

itself to my imagination, would have given any of us an equal pleasure

or an equal sense of freedom. The three children had become the guests

of the whole party. Little Attilio, propped upon an air-cushion, which

puzzled him exceedingly, ate through his supper and drank his wine with

solid satisfaction, opening the large brown eyes beneath those tufts of

clustering fair hair which promise much beauty for him in his manhood.

Francesco's boy, who is older and begins to know the world, sat with a

semi-suppressed grin upon his face, as though the humour of the

situation was not wholly hidden from him. Little Teresa, too, was

happy, except when her mother, a severe Pomona, with enormous earrings

and splendid _fazzoletto_ of crimson and orange dyes, pounced down upon

her for some supposed infraction of good manners—_creanza_, as they

vividly express it here. Only Luigi looked a trifle bored. But Luigi

has been a soldier, and has now attained the supercilious superiority

of young-manhood, which smokes its cigar of an evening in the piazza

and knows the merits of the different cafés.

294The great business of the evening began when the eating was over,

and the decanters filled with new wine of Mirano circulated freely. The

four best singers of the party drew together; and the rest prepared

themselves to make suggestions, hum tunes, and join with fitful effect

in choruses. Antonio, who is a powerful young fellow, with bronzed

cheeks and a perfect tempest of coal-black hair in flakes upon his

forehead, has a most extraordinary soprano—sound as a bell, strong as a

trumpet, well trained, and true to the least shade in intonation.

Piero, whose rugged Neptunian features, sea-wrinkled, tell of a rough

water-life, boasts a bass of resonant, almost pathetic quality.

Francesco has a _mezzo voce_, which might, by a stretch of politeness,

be called baritone. Piero's comrade, whose name concerns us not, has

another of these nondescript voices. They sat together with their

glasses and cigars before them, sketching part-songs in outline,

striking the keynote—now higher and now lower—till they saw their

subject well in view. Then they burst into full singing, Antonio

leading with a metal note that thrilled one's ears, but still was

musical. Complicated contrapuntal pieces, such as we should call

madrigals, with ever-recurring refrains of 'Venezia, gemma Triatica,

sposa del mar,' descending probably from ancient days, followed each

other in quick succession. Barcaroles, serenades, love-songs, and

invitations to the water were interwoven for relief. One of these

romantic pieces had a beautiful burden, 'Dormi, o bella, o fingi di

dormir,' of which the melody was fully worthy. But the most successful

of all the tunes were two with a sad motive. The one repeated

incessantly 'Ohimé! mia madre morî;' the other was a girl's love

lament: 'Perchè tradirmi, perchè lasciarmi! prima d'amarmi non eri

cosî!' Even the children joined in these; and Catina, who took the solo

part in the second, was inspired to a great dramatic effort. All these

were purely popular 295songs. The people of Venice, however, are

passionate for operas. Therefore we had duets and solos from 'Ernani,'

the 'Ballo in Maschera,' and the 'Forza del Destino,' and one comic

chorus from 'Boccaccio,' which seemed to make them wild with pleasure.

To my mind, the best of these more formal pieces was a duet between

Attila and Italia from some opera unknown to me, which Antonio and

Piero performed with incomparable spirit. It was noticeable how,

descending to the people, sung by them for love at sea, or on

excursions to the villages round Mestre, these operatic reminiscences

had lost something of their theatrical formality, and assumed instead

the serious gravity, the quaint movement, and marked emphasis which

belong to popular music in Northern and Central Italy. An antique

character was communicated even to the recitative of Verdi by slight,

almost indefinable, changes of rhythm and accent. There was no end to

the singing. 'Siamo appassionati per il canto,' frequently repeated,

was proved true by the profusion and variety of songs produced from

inexhaustible memories, lightly tried over, brilliantly performed,

rapidly succeeding each other. Nor were gestures wanting—lifted arms,

hands stretched to hands, flashing eyes, hair tossed from the

forehead—unconscious and appropriate action—which showed how the spirit

of the music and words alike possessed the men. One by one the children

fell asleep. Little Attilio and Teresa were tucked up beneath my Scotch

shawl at two ends of a great sofa; and not even his father's clarion

voice, in the character of Italia defying Attila to harm 'le mie

superbe città,' could wake the little boy up. The night wore on. It was

past one. Eustace and I had promised to be in the church of the Gesuati

at six next morning. We therefore gave the guests a gentle hint, which

they as gently took. With exquisite, because perfectly unaffected,

breeding they sank for a few moments into common conversation, 296then

wrapped the children up, and took their leave. It was an uncomfortable,

warm, wet night of sullen _scirocco_.

The next day, which was Sunday, Francesco called me at five. There was

no visible sunrise that cheerless damp October morning. Grey dawn stole

somehow imperceptibly between the veil of clouds and leaden waters, as

my friend and I, well sheltered by our _felze_, passed into the

Giudecca, and took our station before the church of the Gesuati. A few

women from the neighbouring streets and courts crossed the bridges in

draggled petticoats on their way to first mass. A few men, shouldering

their jackets, lounged along the Zattere, opened the great green doors,

and entered. Then suddenly Antonio cried out that the bridal party was

on its way, not as we had expected, in boats, but on foot. We left our

gondola, and fell into the ranks, after shaking hands with Francesco,

who is the elder brother of the bride. There was nothing very

noticeable in her appearance, except her large dark eyes. Otherwise

both face and figure were of a common type; and her bridal dress of

sprigged grey silk, large veil and orange blossoms, reduced her to the

level of a _bourgeoise_. It was much the same with the bridegroom. His

features, indeed, proved him a true Venetian gondolier; for the skin

was strained over the cheekbones, and the muscles of the throat beneath

the jaws stood out like cords, and the bright blue eyes were deep-set

beneath a spare brown forehead. But he had provided a complete suit of

black for the occasion, and wore a shirt of worked cambric, which

disguised what is really splendid in the physique of these oarsmen, at

once slender and sinewy. Both bride and bridegroom looked uncomfortable

in their clothes. The light that fell upon them in the church was dull

and leaden. The ceremony, which was very hurriedly performed by an

unctuous priest, did not appear to impress either of them. Nobody in

the bridal party, 297crowding together on both sides of the altar,

looked as though the service was of the slightest interest and moment.

Indeed, this was hardly to be wondered at; for the priest, so far as I

could understand his gabble, took the larger portion for read, after

muttering the first words of the rubric. A little carven image of an

acolyte—a weird boy who seemed to move by springs, whose hair had all

the semblance of painted wood, and whose complexion was white and red

like a clown's—did not make matters more intelligible by spasmodically

clattering responses.

After the ceremony we heard mass and contributed to three distinct

offertories. Considering how much account even two _soldi_ are to these

poor people, I was really angry when I heard the copper shower. Every

member of the party had his or her pennies ready, and dropped them into

the boxes. Whether it was the effect of the bad morning, or the

ugliness of a very ill-designed _barocco_ building, or the fault of the

fat oily priest, I know not. But the _sposalizio_ struck me as tame and

cheerless, the mass as irreverent and vulgarly conducted. At the same

time there is something too impressive in the mass for any perfunctory

performance to divest its symbolism of sublimity. A Protestant

Communion Service lends itself more easily to degradation by

unworthiness in the minister.

We walked down the church in double file, led by the bride and

bridegroom, who had knelt during the ceremony with the best

man—_compare_, as he is called—at a narrow _prie-dieu_ before the

altar. The _compare_ is a person of distinction at these weddings. He

has to present the bride with a great pyramid of artificial flowers,

which is placed before her at the marriage-feast, a packet of candles,

and a box of bonbons. The comfits, when the box is opened, are found to

include two magnificent sugar babies lying in their cradles. I was told

that a _compare_, who does the thing handsomely, must be 298prepared to

spend about a hundred francs upon these presents, in addition to the

wine and cigars with which he treats his friends. On this occasion the

women were agreed that he had done his duty well. He was a fat, wealthy

little man, who lived by letting market-boats for hire on the Rialto.

From the church to the bride's house was a walk of some three minutes.

On the way we were introduced to the father of the bride—a very

magnificent personage, with points of strong resemblance to Vittorio

Emmanuele. He wore an enormous broad-brimmed hat and emerald-green

earrings, and looked considerably younger than his eldest son,

Francesco. Throughout the _nozze_ he took the lead in a grand imperious

fashion of his own. Wherever he went, he seemed to fill the place, and

was fully aware of his own importance. In Florence I think he would

have got the nickname of _Tacchin_, or turkey-cock. Here at Venice the

sons and daughters call their parent briefly _Vecchio_. I heard him so

addressed with a certain amount of awe, expecting an explosion of

bubbly-jock displeasure. But he took it, as though it was natural,

without disturbance. The other _Vecchio_, father of the bridegroom,

struck me as more sympathetic. He was a gentle old man, proud of his

many prosperous, laborious sons. They, like the rest of the gentlemen,

were gondoliers. Both the _Vecchi_, indeed, continue to ply their

trade, day and night, at the _traghetto_.

_Traghetti_ are stations for gondolas at different points of the

canals. As their name implies, it is the first duty of the gondoliers

upon them to ferry people across. This they do for the fixed fee of

five centimes. The _traghetti_ are in fact Venetian cab-stands. And, of

course, like London cabs, the gondolas may be taken off them for trips.

The municipality, however, makes it a condition, under penalty of fine

to the _traghetto_, that each station should always be provided with

two boats for the service of the ferry. When vacancies occur 299on the

_traghetti_, a gondolier who owns or hires a boat makes application to

the municipality, receives a number, and is inscribed as plying at a

certain station. He has now entered a sort of guild, which is presided

over by a _Capo-traghetto_, elected by the rest for the protection of

their interests, the settlement of disputes, and the management of

their common funds. In the old acts of Venice this functionary is

styled _Gastaldo di traghetto_. The members have to contribute

something yearly to the guild. This payment varies upon different

stations, according to the greater or less amount of the tax levied by

the municipality on the _traghetto_. The highest subscription I have

heard of is twenty-five francs; the lowest, seven. There is one

_traghetto_, known by the name of Madonna del Giglio or Zobenigo, which

possesses near its _pergola_ of vines a nice old brown Venetian

picture. Some stranger offered a considerable sum for this. But the

guild refused to part with it.

As may be imagined, the _traghetti_ vary greatly in the amount and

quality of their custom. By far the best are those in the neighbourhood

of the hotels upon the Grand Canal. At any one of these a gondolier

during the season is sure of picking up some foreigner or other who

will pay him handsomely for comparatively light service. A _traghetto_

on the Giudecca, on the contrary, depends upon Venetian traffic. The

work is more monotonous, and the pay is reduced to its tariffed

minimum. So far as I can gather, an industrious gondolier, with a good

boat, belonging to a good _traghetto_, may make as much as ten or

fifteen francs in a single day. But this cannot be relied on. They

therefore prefer a fixed appointment with a private family, for which

they receive by tariff five francs a day, or by arrangement for long

periods perhaps four francs a day, with certain perquisites and small

advantages. It is great luck to get such an engagement for 300the

winter. The heaviest anxieties which beset a gondolier are then

disposed of. Having entered private service, they are not allowed to

ply their trade on the _traghetto_, except by stipulation with their

masters. Then they may take their place one night out of every six in

the rank and file. The gondoliers have two proverbs, which show how

desirable it is, while taking a fixed engagement, to keep their hold on

the _traghetto_. One is to this effect: _il traghetto è un buon

padrone_. The other satirises the meanness of the poverty-stricken

Venetian nobility: _pompa di servitù, misera insegna_. When they

combine the _traghetto_ with private service, the municipality insists

on their retaining the number painted on their gondola; and against

this their employers frequently object. It is therefore a great point

for a gondolier to make such an arrangement with his master as will

leave him free to show his number. The reason for this regulation is

obvious. Gondoliers are known more by their numbers and their

_traghetti_ than their names. They tell me that though there are

upwards of a thousand registered in Venice, each man of the trade knows

the whole confraternity by face and number. Taking all things into

consideration, I think four francs a day the whole year round are very

good earnings for a gondolier. On this he will marry and rear a family,

and put a little money by. A young unmarried man, working at two and a

half or three francs a day, is proportionately well-to-do. If he is

economical, he ought upon these wages to save enough in two or three

years to buy himself a gondola. A boy from fifteen to nineteen is

called a _mezz' uomo_, and gets about one franc a day. A new gondola

with all its fittings is worth about a thousand francs. It does not

last in good condition more than six or seven years. At the end of that

time the hull will fetch eighty francs. A new hull can be had for three

hundred francs. The old fittings—brass 301sea-horses or _cavalli_,

steel prow or _ferro_, covered cabin or _felze_, cushions and

leather-covered back-board or _stramazetto_, maybe transferred to it.

When a man wants to start a gondola, he will begin by buying one

already half past service—a _gondola da traghetto_ or _di mezza età_.

This should cost him something over two hundred francs. Little by

little, he accumulates the needful fittings; and when his first

purchase is worn out, he hopes to set up with a well-appointed

equipage. He thus gradually works his way from the rough trade which

involves hard work and poor earnings to that more profitable industry

which cannot be carried on without a smart boat. The gondola is a

source of continual expense for repairs. Its oars have to be replaced.

It has to be washed with sponges, blacked, and varnished. Its bottom

needs frequent cleaning. Weeds adhere to it in the warm brackish water,

growing rapidly through the summer months, and demanding to be scrubbed

off once in every four weeks. The gondolier has no place where he can

do this for himself. He therefore takes his boat to a wharf, or

_squero_, as the place is called. At these _squeri_ gondolas are built

as well as cleaned. The fee for a thorough setting to rights of the

boat is five francs. It must be done upon a fine day. Thus in addition

to the cost, the owner loses a good day's work.

These details will serve to give some notion of the sort of people with

whom Eustace and I spent our day. The bride's house is in an excellent

position on an open canal leading from the Canalozzo to the Giudecca.

She had arrived before us, and received her friends in the middle of

the room. Each of us in turn kissed her cheek and murmured our

congratulations. We found the large living-room of the house arranged

with chairs all round the walls, and the company were marshalled in

some order of precedence, my friend and I taking place near the bride.

On either hand airy bedrooms opened 302out, and two large doors, wide

open, gave a view from where we sat of a good-sized kitchen. This

arrangement of the house was not only comfortable, but pretty; for the

bright copper pans and pipkins ranged on shelves along the kitchen

walls had a very cheerful effect. The walls were whitewashed, but

literally covered with all sorts of pictures. A great plaster cast from

some antique, an Atys, Adonis, or Paris, looked down from a bracket

placed between the windows. There was enough furniture, solid and well

kept, in all the rooms. Among the pictures were full-length portraits

in oils of two celebrated gondoliers—one in antique costume, the other

painted a few years since. The original of the latter soon came and

stood before it. He had won regatta prizes; and the flags of four

discordant colours were painted round him by the artist, who had

evidently cared more to commemorate the triumphs of his sitter and to

strike a likeness than to secure the tone of his own picture. This

champion turned out a fine fellow—Corradini—with one of the brightest

little gondoliers of thirteen for his son.

After the company were seated, lemonade and cakes were handed round

amid a hubbub of chattering women. Then followed cups of black coffee

and more cakes. Then a glass of Cyprus and more cakes. Then a glass of

curaçoa and more cakes. Finally, a glass of noyau and still more cakes.

It was only a little after seven in the morning. Yet politeness

compelled us to consume these delicacies. I tried to shirk my duty; but

this discretion was taken by my hosts for well-bred modesty; and

instead of being let off, I had the richest piece of pastry and the

largest maccaroon available pressed so kindly on me, that, had they

been poisoned, I would not have refused to eat them. The conversation

grew more, and more animated, the women gathering together in their

dresses of bright blue and scarlet, the men lighting 303cigars and

puffing out a few quiet words. It struck me as a drawback that these

picturesque people had put on Sunday-clothes to look as much like

shopkeepers as possible. But they did not all of them succeed. Two

handsome women, who handed the cups round—one a brunette, the other a

blonde—wore skirts of brilliant blue, with a sort of white jacket, and

white kerchief folded heavily about their shoulders. The brunette had a

great string of coral, the blonde of amber, round her throat. Gold

earrings and the long gold chains Venetian women wear, of all patterns

and degrees of value, abounded. Nobody appeared without them; but I

could not see any of an antique make. The men seemed to be contented

with rings—huge, heavy rings of solid gold, worked with a rough flower

pattern. One young fellow had three upon his fingers. This circumstance

led me to speculate whether a certain portion at least of this display

of jewellery around me had not been borrowed for the occasion.

Eustace and I were treated quite like friends. They called us _I

Signori_. But this was only, I think, because our English names are

quite unmanageable. The women fluttered about us and kept asking

whether we really liked it all? whether we should come to the _pranzo_?

whether it was true we danced? It seemed to give them unaffected

pleasure to be kind to us; and when we rose to go away, the whole

company crowded round, shaking hands and saying: 'Si divertirà bene

stasera!' Nobody resented our presence; what was better, no one put

himself out for us. 'Vogliono veder il nostro costume,' I heard one

woman say.

We got home soon after eight, and, as our ancestors would have said,

settled our stomachs with a dish of tea. It makes me shudder now to

think of the mixed liquids and miscellaneous cakes we had consumed at

that unwonted hour.

At half-past three, Eustace and I again prepared ourselves 304for

action. His gondola was in attendance, covered with the _felze_, to

take us to the house of the _sposa_. We found the canal crowded with

poor people of the quarter—men, women, and children lining the walls

along its side, and clustering like bees upon the bridges. The water

itself was almost choked with gondolas. Evidently the folk of San Vio

thought our wedding procession would be a most exciting pageant. We

entered the house, and were again greeted by the bride and bridegroom,

who consigned each of us to the control of a fair tyrant. This is the

most fitting way of describing our introduction to our partners of the

evening; for we were no sooner presented, than the ladies swooped upon

us like their prey, placing their shawls upon our left arms, while they

seized and clung to what was left available of us for locomotion. There

was considerable giggling and tittering throughout the company when

Signora Fenzo, the young and comely wife of a gondolier, thus took

possession of Eustace, and Signora dell' Acqua, the widow of another

gondolier, appropriated me. The affair had been arranged beforehand,

and their friends had probably chaffed them with the difficulty of

managing two mad Englishmen. However, they proved equal to the

occasion, and the difficulties were entirely on our side. Signora Fenzo

was a handsome brunette, quiet in her manners, who meant business. I

envied Eustace his subjection to such a reasonable being. Signora dell'

Acqua, though a widow, was by no means disconsolate; and I soon

perceived that it would require all the address and diplomacy I

possessed, to make anything out of her society. She laughed

incessantly; darted in the most diverse directions, dragging me along

with her; exhibited me in triumph to her cronies; made eyes at me over

a fan, repeated my clumsiest remarks, as though they gave her

indescribable amusement; and all the while jabbered Venetian at express

rate, without the 305slightest regard for my incapacity to follow her

vagaries. The _Vecchio_ marshalled us in order. First went the _sposa_

and _comare_ with the mothers of bride and bridegroom. Then followed

the _sposo_ and the bridesmaid. After them I was made to lead my fair

tormentor. As we descended the staircase there arose a hubbub of

excitement from the crowd on the canals. The gondolas moved turbidly

upon the face of the waters. The bridegroom kept muttering to himself,

'How we shall be criticised! They will tell each other who was decently

dressed, and who stepped awkwardly into the boats, and what the price

of my boots was!' Such exclamations, murmured at intervals, and

followed by chest-drawn sighs, expressed a deep preoccupation. With

regard to his boots, he need have had no anxiety. They were of the

shiniest patent leather, much too tight, and without a speck of dust

upon them. But his nervousness infected me with a cruel dread. All

those eyes were going to watch how we comported ourselves in jumping

from the landing-steps into the boat! If this operation, upon a

ceremonious occasion, has terrors even for a gondolier, how formidable

it ought to be to me! And here is the Signora dell' Acqua's white

cachemire shawl dangling on one arm, and the Signora herself

languishingly clinging to the other; and the gondolas are fretting in a

fury of excitement, like corks, upon the churned green water! The

moment was terrible. The _sposa_ and her three companions had been

safely stowed away beneath their _felze_. The _sposo_ had successfully

handed the bridesmaid into the second gondola. I had to perform the

same office for my partner. Off she went, like a bird, from the bank. I

seized a happy moment, followed, bowed, and found myself to my

contentment gracefully ensconced in a corner opposite the widow. Seven

more gondolas were packed. The procession moved. We glided down the

little channel, broke 306away into the Grand Canal, crossed it, and

dived into a labyrinth from which we finally emerged before our

destination, the Trattoria di San Gallo. The perils of the landing were

soon over; and, with the rest of the guests, my mercurial companion and

I slowly ascended a long flight of stairs leading to a vast upper

chamber. Here we were to dine.

It had been the gallery of some palazzo in old days, was above one

hundred feet in length, fairly broad, with a roof of wooden rafters and

large windows opening on a courtyard garden. I could see the tops of

three cypress-trees cutting the grey sky upon a level with us. A long

table occupied the centre of this room. It had been laid for upwards of

forty persons, and we filled it. There was plenty of light from great

glass lustres blazing with gas. When the ladies had arranged their

dresses, and the gentlemen had exchanged a few polite remarks, we all

sat down to dinner—I next my inexorable widow, Eustace beside his calm

and comely partner. The first impression was one of disappointment. It

looked so like a public dinner of middle-class people. There was no

local character in costume or customs. Men and women sat politely

bored, expectant, trifling with their napkins, yawning, muttering

nothings about the weather or their neighbours. The frozen

commonplaceness of the scene was made for me still more oppressive by

Signora dell' Acqua. She was evidently satirical, and could not be

happy unless continually laughing at or with somebody. 'What a stick

the woman will think me!' I kept saying to myself. 'How shall I ever

invent jokes in this strange land? I cannot even flirt with her in

Venetian! And here I have condemned myself—and her too, poor thing—to

sit through at least three hours of mortal dulness!' Yet the widow was

by no means unattractive. Dressed in black, she had contrived by an

artful arrangement of lace and jewellery to give an air of lightness to

her 307costume. She had a pretty little pale face, a _minois

chiffonné_, with slightly turned-up nose, large laughing brown eyes, a

dazzling set of teeth, and a tempestuously frizzled mop of powdered

hair. When I managed to get a side-look at her quietly, without being

giggled at or driven half mad by unintelligible incitements to a

jocularity I could not feel, it struck me that, if we once found a

common term of communication we should become good friends. But for the

moment that _modus vivendi_ seemed unattainable. She had not recovered

from the first excitement of her capture of me. She was still showing

me off and trying to stir me up. The arrival of the soup gave me a

momentary relief; and soon the serious business of the afternoon began.

I may add that before dinner was over, the Signora dell' Acqua and I

were fast friends. I had discovered the way of making jokes, and she

had become intelligible. I found her a very nice, though flighty,

little woman; and I believe she thought me gifted with the faculty of

uttering eccentric epigrams in a grotesque tongue. Some of my remarks

were flung about the table, and had the same success as uncouth Lombard

carvings have with connoisseurs in _naïvetés_ of art. By that time we

had come to be _compare_ and _comare_ to each other—the sequel of some

clumsy piece of jocularity.

It was a heavy entertainment, copious in quantity, excellent in

quality, plainly but well cooked. I remarked there was no fish. The

widow replied that everybody present ate fish to satiety at home. They

did not join a marriage feast at the San Gallo, and pay their nine

francs, for that! It should be observed that each guest paid for his

own entertainment. This appears to be the custom. Therefore attendance

is complimentary, and the married couple are not at ruinous charges for

the banquet. A curious feature in the whole proceeding had its origin

in this custom. I noticed that before 308each cover lay an empty plate,

and that my partner began with the first course to heap upon it what

she had not eaten. She also took large helpings, and kept advising me

to do the same. I said: 'No; I only take what I want to eat; if I fill

that plate in front of me as you are doing, it will be great waste.'

This remark elicited shrieks of laughter from all who heard it; and

when the hubbub had subsided, I perceived an apparently official

personage bearing down upon Eustace, who was in the same perplexity. It

was then circumstantially explained to us that the empty plates were

put there in order that we might lay aside what we could not

conveniently eat, and take it home with us. At the end of the dinner

the widow (whom I must now call my _comare_) had accumulated two whole

chickens, half a turkey, and a large assortment of mixed eatables. I

performed my duty and won her regard by placing delicacies at her

disposition.

Crudely stated, this proceeding moves disgust. But that is only because

one has not thought the matter out. In the performance there was

nothing coarse or nasty. These good folk had made a contract at so much

a head—so many fowls, so many pounds of beef, &c, to be supplied; and

what they had fairly bought, they clearly had a right to. No one, so

far as I could notice, tried to take more than his proper share;

except, indeed, Eustace and myself. In our first eagerness to conform

to custom, we both overshot the mark, and grabbed at disproportionate

helpings. The waiters politely observed that we were taking what was

meant for two; and as the courses followed in interminable sequence, we

soon acquired the tact of what was due to us.

Meanwhile the room grew warm. The gentlemen threw off their coats—a

pleasant liberty of which I availed myself, and was immediately more at

ease. The ladies divested themselves of their shoes (strange to

relate!) and sat in comfort 309with their stockinged feet upon the

_scagliola_ pavement. I observed that some cavaliers by special

permission were allowed to remove their partners' slippers. This was

not my lucky fate. My _comare_ had not advanced to that point of

intimacy. Healths began to be drunk. The conversation took a lively

turn; and women went fluttering round the table, visiting their

friends, to sip out of their glass, and ask each other how they were

getting on. It was not long before the stiff veneer of _bourgeoisie_

which bored me had worn off. The people emerged in their true selves:

natural, gentle, sparkling with enjoyment, playful. Playful is, I

think, the best word to describe them. They played with infinite grace

and innocence, like kittens, from the old men of sixty to the little

boys of thirteen. Very little wine was drunk. Each guest had a litre

placed before him. Many did not finish theirs; and for very few was it

replenished. When at last the dessert arrived, and the bride's comfits

had been handed round, they began to sing. It was very pretty to see a

party of three or four friends gathering round some popular beauty, and

paying her compliments in verse—they grouped behind her chair, she

sitting back in it and laughing up to them, and joining in the chorus.

The words, 'Brunetta mia simpatica, ti amo sempre più,' sung after this

fashion to Eustace's handsome partner, who puffed delicate whiffs from

a Russian cigarette, and smiled her thanks, had a peculiar

appropriateness. All the ladies, it may be observed in passing, had by

this time lit their cigarettes. The men were smoking Toscani, Sellas,

or Cavours, and the little boys were dancing round the table breathing

smoke from their pert nostrils.

The dinner, in fact, was over. Other relatives of the guests arrived,

and then we saw how some of the reserved dishes were to be bestowed. A

side-table was spread at the end of the gallery, and these late-comers

were regaled with plenty by 310their friends. Meanwhile, the big table

at which we had dined was taken to pieces and removed. The _scagliola_

floor was swept by the waiters. Musicians came streaming in and took

their places. The ladies resumed their shoes. Every one prepared to

dance.

My friend and I were now at liberty to chat with the men. He knew some

of them by sight, and claimed acquaintance with others. There was

plenty of talk about different boats, gondolas, and sandolos and topos,

remarks upon the past season, and inquiries as to chances of

engagements in the future. One young fellow told us how he had been

drawn for the army, and should be obliged to give up his trade just

when he had begun to make it answer. He had got a new gondola, and this

would have to be hung up during the years of his service. The

warehousing of a boat in these circumstances costs nearly one hundred

francs a year, which is a serious tax upon the pockets of a private in

the line. Many questions were put in turn to us, but all of the same

tenor. 'Had we really enjoyed the _pranzo_? Now, really, were we

amusing ourselves? And did we think the custom of the wedding _un bel

costume_?' We could give an unequivocally hearty response to all these

interrogations. The men seemed pleased. Their interest in our enjoyment

was unaffected. It is noticeable how often the word _divertimento_ is

heard upon the lips of the Italians. They have a notion that it is the

function in life of the _Signori_ to amuse themselves.

The ball opened, and now we were much besought by the ladies. I had to

deny myself with a whole series of comical excuses. Eustace performed

his duty after a stiff English fashion—once with his pretty partner of

the _pranzo_, and once again with a fat gondolier. The band played

waltzes and polkas, chiefly upon patriotic airs—the Marcia Reale,

Garibaldi's Hymn, &c. Men danced with men, women with 311women, little

boys and girls together. The gallery whirled with a laughing crowd.

There was plenty of excitement and enjoyment—not an unseemly or

extravagant word or gesture. My _comare_ careered about with a light

mænadic impetuosity, which made me regret my inability to accept her

pressing invitations. She pursued me into every corner of the room, but

when at last I dropped excuses and told her that my real reason for not

dancing was that it would hurt my health, she waived her claims at once

with an _Ah, poverino!_

Some time after midnight we felt that we had had enough of

_divertimento_. Francesco helped us to slip out unobserved. With many

silent good wishes we left the innocent playful people who had been so

kind to us. The stars were shining from a watery sky as we passed into

the piazza beneath the Campanile and the pinnacles of S. Mark. The Riva

was almost empty, and the little waves fretted the boats moored to the

piazzetta, as a warm moist breeze went fluttering by. We smoked a last

cigar, crossed our _traghetto_, and were soon sound asleep at the end

of a long pleasant day. The ball, we heard next morning, finished about

four.

Since that evening I have had plenty of opportunities for seeing my

friends the gondoliers, both in their own homes and in my apartment.

Several have entertained me at their mid-day meal of fried fish and

amber-coloured polenta. These repasts were always cooked with

scrupulous cleanliness, and served upon a table covered with coarse

linen. The polenta is turned out upon a wooden platter, and cut with a

string called _lassa_. You take a large slice of it on the palm of the

left hand, and break it with the fingers of the right. Wholesome red

wine of the Paduan district and good white bread were never wanting.

The rooms in which we met to eat looked out on narrow lanes or over

pergolas of yellowing vines. Their whitewashed walls were hung with

photographs 312of friends and foreigners, many of them souvenirs from

English or American employers. The men, in broad black hats and lilac

shirts, sat round the table, girt with the red waist-wrapper, or

_fascia_, which marks the ancient faction of the Castellani. The other

faction, called Nicolotti, are distinguished by a black _assisa_. The

quarters of the town are divided unequally and irregularly into these

two parties. What was once a formidable rivalry between two sections of

the Venetian populace, still survives in challenges to trials of

strength and skill upon the water. The women, in their many-coloured

kerchiefs, stirred polenta at the smoke-blackened chimney, whose huge

pent-house roof projects two feet or more across the hearth. When they

had served the table they took their seat on low stools, knitted

stockings, or drank out of glasses handed across the shoulder to them

by their lords. Some of these women were clearly notable housewives,

and I have no reason to suppose that they do not take their full share

of the housework. Boys and girls came in and out, and got a portion of

the dinner to consume where they thought best. Children went tottering

about upon the red-brick floor, the playthings of those hulking

fellows, who handled them very gently and spoke kindly in a sort of

confidential whisper to their ears. These little ears were mostly

pierced for earrings, and the light blue eyes of the urchins peeped

maliciously beneath shocks of yellow hair. A dog was often of the

party. He ate fish like his masters, and was made to beg for it by

sitting up and rowing with his paws. _Voga, Azzò, voga!_ The Anzolo who

talked thus to his little brown Spitz-dog has the hoarse voice of a

Triton and the movement of an animated sea-wave. Azzo performed his

trick, swallowed his fish-bones, and the fiery Anzolo looked round

approvingly.

On all these occasions I have found these gondoliers the 313same

sympathetic, industrious, cheery affectionate folk. They live in many

respects a hard and precarious life. The winter in particular is a time

of anxiety, and sometimes of privation, even to the well-to-do among

them. Work then is scarce, and what there is, is rendered disagreeable

to them by the cold. Yet they take their chance with facile temper, and

are not soured by hardships. The amenities of the Venetian sea and air,

the healthiness of the lagoons, the cheerful bustle of the poorer

quarters, the brilliancy of this Southern sunlight, and the beauty

which is everywhere apparent, must be reckoned as important factors in

the formation of their character. And of that character, as I have

said, the final note is playfulness. In spite of difficulties, their

life has never been stern enough to sadden them. Bare necessities are

marvellously cheap, and the pinch of real bad weather—such frost as

locked the lagoons in ice two years ago, or such south-western gales as

flooded the basement floors of all the houses on the Zattere—is rare

and does not last long. On the other hand, their life has never been so

lazy as to reduce them to the savagery of the traditional Neapolitan

lazzaroni. They have had to work daily for small earnings, but under

favourable conditions, and their labour has been lightened by much

good-fellowship among themselves, by the amusements of their _feste_

and their singing clubs.

Of course it is not easy for a stranger in a very different social

position to feel that he has been admitted to their confidence.

Italians have an ineradicable habit of making themselves externally

agreeable, of bending in all indifferent matters to the whims and

wishes of superiors, and of saying what they think _Signori_ like. This

habit, while it smoothes the surface of existence, raises up a barrier

of compliment and partial insincerity, against which the more downright

natures of us Northern folk break in vain efforts. Our advances are met

with an imperceptible but impermeable resistance by the very people who

are bent on making the world pleasant to us. It is the very reverse of

that dour opposition which a Lowland Scot or a North English peasant

offers to familiarity; but it is hardly less insurmountable. The

treatment, again, which Venetians of the lower class have received

through centuries from their own nobility, makes attempts at

fraternisation on the part of gentlemen unintelligible to them. The

best way, here and elsewhere, of overcoming these obstacles is to have

some bond of work or interest in common—of service on the one side

rendered, and goodwill on the other honestly displayed. The men of whom

I have been speaking will, I am convinced, not shirk their share of

duty or make unreasonable claims upon the generosity of their

employers.

315

A CINQUE CENTO BRUTUS

I.—THE SESTIERE DI SAN POLO

There is a quarter of Venice not much visited by tourists, lying as it

does outside their beat, away from the Rialto, at a considerable

distance from the Frari and San Rocco, in what might almost pass for a

city separated by a hundred miles from the Piazza. This is the quarter

of San Polo, one corner of which, somewhere between the back of the

Palazzo Foscari and the Campo di San Polo, was the scene of a memorable

act of vengeance in the year 1546. Here Lorenzino de' Medici, the

murderer of his cousin Alessandro, was at last tracked down and put to

death by paid cut-throats. How they succeeded in their purpose, we know

in every detail from the narrative dictated by the chief assassin. His

story so curiously illustrates the conditions of life in Italy three

centuries ago, that I have thought it worthy of abridgment. But, in

order to make it intelligible, and to paint the manners of the times

more fully, I must first relate the series of events which led to

Lorenzino's murder of his cousin Alessandro, and from that to his own

subsequent assassination. Lorenzino de' Medici, the Florentine Brutus

of the sixteenth century, is the hero of the tragedy. Some of his

relatives, however, must first appear upon the scene before he enters

with a patriot's knife concealed beneath a court-fool's bauble.

316

II.—THE MURDER OF IPPOLITO DE' MEDICI

After the final extinction of the Florentine Republic, the hopes of the

Medici, who now aspired to the dukedom of Tuscany, rested on three

bastards—Alessandro, the reputed child of Lorenzo, Duke of Urbino;

Ippolito, the natural son of Giuliano, Duke of Nemours; and Giulio, the

offspring of an elder Giuliano, who was at this time Pope, with the

title of Clement VII. Clement had seen Rome sacked in 1527 by a horde

of freebooters fighting under the Imperial standard, and had used the

remnant of these troops, commanded by the Prince of Orange, to crush

his native city in the memorable siege of 1529-30. He now determined to

rule Florence from the Papal chair by the help of the two bastard

cousins I have named. Alessandro was created Duke of Cività di Penna,

and sent to take the first place in the city. Ippolito was made a

cardinal; since the Medici had learned that Rome was the real basis of

their power, and it was undoubtedly in Clement's policy to advance this

scion of his house to the Papacy. The sole surviving representative of

the great Lorenzo de' Medici's legitimate blood was Catherine, daughter

of the Duke of Urbino by Madeleine de la Tour d'Auvergne. She was

pledged in marriage to the Duke of Orleans, who was afterwards Henry

II. of France. A natural daughter of the Emperor Charles V. was

provided for her putative half-brother Alessandro. By means of these

alliances the succession of Ippolito to the Papal chair would have been

secured, and the strength of the Medici would have been confirmed in

Tuscany, but for the disasters which have now to be related.

Between the cousins Alessandro and Ippolito there was no love lost. As

boys, they had both played the part of princes in Florence under the

guardianship of the Cardinal Passerini 317da Cortona. The higher rank

had then been given to Ippolito, who bore the title of Magnifico, and

seemed thus designated for the lordship of the city. Ippolito, though

only half a Medici, was of more authentic lineage than Alessandro; for

no proof positive could be adduced that the latter was even a spurious

child of the Duke of Urbino. He bore obvious witness to his mother's

blood upon his mulatto's face; but this mother was the wife of a groom,

and it was certain that in the court of Urbino she had not been chary

of her favours. The old magnificence of taste, the patronage of art and

letters, and the preference for liberal studies which distinguished

Casa Medici, survived in Ippolito; whereas Alessandro manifested only

the brutal lusts of a debauched tyrant. It was therefore with great

reluctance that, moved by reasons of state and domestic policy,

Ippolito saw himself compelled to accept the scarlet hat. Alessandro

having been recognised as a son of the Duke of Urbino, had become

half-brother to the future Queen of France. To treat him as the head of

the family was a necessity thrust, in the extremity of the Medicean

fortunes, upon Clement. Ippolito, who more entirely represented the

spirit of the house, was driven to assume the position of a cadet, with

all the uncertainties of an ecclesiastical career.

In these circumstances Ippolito had not strength of character to

sacrifice himself for the consolidation of the Medicean power, which

could only have been effected by maintaining a close bond of union

between its members. The death of Clement in 1534 obscured his

prospects in the Church. He was still too young to intrigue for the

tiara. The new Pope, Alessandro Farnese, soon after his election,

displayed a vigour which was unexpected from his age, together with a

nepotism which his previous character had scarcely warranted. The

Cardinal de' Medici felt himself excluded and oppressed. He joined the

party of those 318numerous Florentine exiles, headed by Filippo

Strozzi, and the Cardinals Salviati and Ridolfi, all of whom were

connected by marriage with the legitimate Medici, and who unanimously

hated and were jealous of the Duke of Cività di Penna. On the score of

policy it is difficult to condemn this step. Alessandro's hold upon

Florence was still precarious, nor had he yet married Margaret of

Austria. Perhaps Ippolito was right in thinking he had less to gain

from his cousin than from the anti-Medicean faction and the princes of

the Church who favoured it. But he did not play his cards well. He

quarrelled with the new Pope, Paul III., and by his vacillations led

the Florentine exiles to suspect he might betray them.

In the summer of 1535 Ippolito was at Itri, a little town not far from

Gaeta and Terracina, within easy reach of Fondi, where dwelt the

beautiful Giulia Gonzaga. To this lady the Cardinal paid assiduous

court, passing his time with her in the romantic scenery of that

world-famous Capuan coast. On the 5th of August his seneschal, Giovann'

Andrea, of Borgo San Sepolcro, brought him a bowl of chicken-broth,

after drinking which he exclaimed to one of his attendants, 'I have

been poisoned, and the man who did it is Giovann' Andrea.' The

seneschal was taken and tortured, and confessed that he had mixed a

poison with the broth. Four days afterwards the Cardinal died, and a

post-mortem examination showed that the omentum had been eaten by some

corrosive substance. Giovann' Andrea was sent in chains to Rome; but in

spite of his confession, more than once repeated, the court released

him. He immediately took refuge with Alessandro de' Medici in Florence,

whence he repaired to Borgo San Sepolcro, and was, at the close of a

few months, there murdered by the people of the place. From these

circumstances it was conjectured, not without good reason, that

Alessandro had procured his cousin's death; and a certain 319Captain

Pignatta, of low birth in Florence, a bravo and a coward, was believed

to have brought the poison to Itri from the Duke. The Medicean

courtiers at Florence did not disguise their satisfaction; and one of

them exclaimed, with reference to the event, 'We know how to brush

flies from our noses!'

III.—THE MURDER OF ALESSANDRO DE' MEDICI

Having removed his cousin and rival from the scene, Alessandro de'

Medici plunged with even greater effrontery into the cruelties and

debaucheries which made him odious in Florence. It seemed as though

fortune meant to smile on him; for in this same year (1535) Charles V.

decided at Naples in his favour against the Florentine exiles, who were

pleading their own cause and that of the city injured by his tyrannies;

and in February of the following year he married Margaret of Austria,

the Emperor's natural daughter. Francesco Guicciardini, the first

statesman and historian of his age, had undertaken his defence, and was

ready to support him by advice and countenance in the conduct of his

government. Within the lute of this prosperity, however, there was one

little rift. For some months past he had closely attached to his person

a certain kinsman, Lorenzo de' Medici, who was descended in the fourth

generation from Lorenzo, the brother of Cosimo Pater Patriæ. This

Lorenzo, or Lorenzino, or Lorenzaccio, as his most intimate

acquaintances called him, was destined to murder Alessandro; and it is

worthy of notice that the Duke had received frequent warnings of his

fate. A Perugian page, for instance, who suffered from some infirmity,

saw in a dream that Lorenzino would kill his master. Astrologers

predicted that the Duke must die by having his throat cut. One of them

is said to have named Lorenzo de' Medici 320as the assassin; and

another described him so accurately that there was no mistaking the

man. Moreover, Madonna Lucrezia Salviati wrote to the Duke from Rome

that he should beware of a certain person, indicating Lorenzino; and

her daughter, Madonna Maria, told him to his face she hated the young

man, 'because I know he means to murder you, and murder you he will.'

Nor was this all. The Duke's favourite body-servants mistrusted

Lorenzino. On one occasion, when Alessandro and Lorenzino, attended by

a certain Giomo, were escalading a wall at night, as was their wont

upon illicit love-adventures, Giomo whispered to his master: 'Ah, my

lord, do let me cut the rope, and rid ourselves of him!' To which the

Duke replied: 'No, I do not want this; but if he could, I know he'd

twist it round my neck.'

In spite, then, of these warnings and the want of confidence he felt,

the Duke continually lived with Lorenzino, employing him as pander in

his intrigues, and preferring his society to that of simpler men. When

he rode abroad, he took this evil friend upon his crupper; although he

knew for certain that Lorenzino had stolen a tight-fitting vest of mail

he used to wear, and, while his arms were round his waist, was always

meditating how to stick a poignard in his body. He trusted, so it

seems, to his own great strength and to the other's physical weakness.

At this point, since Lorenzino is the principal actor in the two-act

drama which follows, it will be well to introduce him to the reader in

the words of Varchi, who was personally acquainted with him. Born at

Florence in 1514, he was left early by his father's death to the sole

care of his mother, Maria Soderini, 'a lady of rare prudence and

goodness, who attended with the utmost pains and diligence to his

education. No sooner, however, had he acquired the rudiments of humane

learning, which, being of very quick parts, he imbibed 321with

incredible facility, than he began to display a restless mind,

insatiable and appetitive of vice. Soon afterwards, under the rule and

discipline of Filippo Strozzi, he made open sport of all things human

and divine; and preferring the society of low persons, who not only

flattered him but were congenial to his tastes, he gave free rein to

his desires, especially in affairs of love, without regard for sex or

age or quality, and in his secret soul, while he lavished feigned

caresses upon every one he saw, felt no esteem for any living being. He

thirsted strangely for glory, and omitted no point of deed or word that

might, he thought, procure him the reputation of a man of spirit or of

wit. He was lean of person, somewhat slightly built, and on this

account people called him Lorenzino. He never laughed, but had a

sneering smile; and although he was rather distinguished by grace than

beauty, his countenance being dark and melancholy, still in the flower

of his age he was beloved beyond all measure by Pope Clement; in spite

of which he had it in his mind (according to what he said himself after

killing the Duke Alessandro) to have murdered him. He brought Francesco

di Raffaello de' Medici, the Pope's rival, who was a young man of

excellent attainments and the highest hope, to such extremity that he

lost his wits, and became the sport of the whole court at Rome, and was

sent back, as a lesser evil, as a confirmed madman to Florence.' Varchi

proceeds to relate how Lorenzino fell into disfavour with the Pope and

the Romans by chopping the heads off statues from the arch of

Constantine and other monuments; for which act of vandalism Molsa

impeached him in the Roman Academy, and a price was set upon his head.

Having returned to Florence, he proceeded to court Duke Alessandro,

into whose confidence he wormed himself, pretending to play the spy

upon the exiles, and affecting a personal timidity which put the Prince

off his guard. 322Alessandro called him 'the philosopher,' because he

conversed in solitude with his own thoughts and seemed indifferent to

wealth and office. But all this while Lorenzino was plotting how to

murder him.

Giovio's account of this strange intimacy may be added, since it

completes the picture I have drawn from Varchi:—'Lorenzo made himself

the accomplice and instrument of those amorous amusements for which the

Duke had an insatiable appetite, with the object of deceiving him. He

was singularly well furnished with all the scoundrelly arts and trained

devices of the pander's trade; composed fine verses to incite to lust;

wrote and represented comedies in Italian; and pretended to take

pleasure only in such tricks and studies. Therefore he never carried

arms like other courtiers, and feigned to be afraid of blood, a man who

sought tranquillity at any price. Besides, he bore a pallid countenance

and melancholy brow, walking alone, talking very little and with few

persons. He haunted solitary places apart from the city, and showed

such plain signs of hypochondria that some began covertly to pass jokes

on him. Certain others, who were more acute, suspected that he was

harbouring and devising in his mind some terrible enterprise.' The

Prologue to Lorenzino's own comedy of 'Aridosiso' brings the sardonic,

sneering, ironical man vividly before us. He calls himself 'un certo

omiciatto, che non è nessun di voi che veggendolo non l'avesse a noia,

pensando che egli abbia fatto una commedia;' and begs the audience to

damn his play to save him the tedium of writing another. Criticised by

the light of his subsequent actions, this prologue may even be

understood to contain a covert promise of the murder he was meditating.

'In this way,' writes Varchi, 'the Duke had taken such familiarity with

Lorenzo, that, not content with making use of him as a ruffian in his

dealings with women, whether 323religious or secular, maidens or wives

or widows, noble or plebeian, young or elderly, as it might happen, he

applied to him to procure for his pleasure a half-sister of Lorenzo's

own mother, a young lady of marvellous beauty, but not less chaste than

beautiful, who was the wife of Lionardo Ginori, and lived not far from

the back entrance to the palace of the Medici.' Lorenzino undertook

this odious commission, seeing an opportunity to work his designs

against the Duke. But first he had to form an accomplice, since he

could not hope to carry out the murder without help. A bravo, called

Michele del Tavolaccino, but better known by the nickname of

Scoronconcolo, struck him as a fitting instrument. He had procured this

man's pardon for a homicide, and it appears that the fellow retained a

certain sense of gratitude. Lorenzino began by telling the man there

was a courtier who put insults upon him, and Scoronconcolo professed

his readiness to kill the knave. 'Sia chi si voglia; io l'ammazzerò, se

fosse Cristo.' Up to the last minute the name of Alessandro was not

mentioned. Having thus secured his assistant, Lorenzino chose a night

when he knew that Alessandro Vitelli, captain of the Duke's guard,

would be from home. Then, after supper, he whispered in Alessandro's

ear that at last he had seduced his aunt with an offer of money, and

that she would come to his, Lorenzo's chamber at the service of the

Duke that night. Only the Duke must appear at the rendezvous alone, and

when he had arrived, the lady should be fetched. 'Certain it is,' says

Varchi, 'that the Duke, having donned a cloak of satin in the

Neapolitan style, lined with sable, when he went to take his gloves,

and there were some of mail and some of perfumed leather, hesitated

awhile and said: "Which shall I choose, those of war, or those of

love-making?"' He took the latter and went out with only four

attendants, three of whom he dismissed upon the Piazza di San Marco,

while 324one was stationed just opposite Lorenzo's house, with strict

orders not to stir if he should see folk enter or issue thence. But

this fellow, called the Hungarian, after waiting a great while,

returned to the Duke's chamber, and there went to sleep.

Meanwhile Lorenzino received Alessandro in his bedroom, where there was

a good fire. The Duke unbuckled his sword, which Lorenzino took, and

having entangled the belt with the hilt, so that it should not readily

be drawn, laid it on the pillow. The Duke had flung himself already on

the bed, and hid himself among the curtains—doing this, it is supposed,

to save himself from the trouble of paying compliments to the lady when

she should arrive. For Caterina Ginori had the fame of a fair speaker,

and Alessandro was aware of his own incapacity to play the part of a

respectful lover. Nothing could more strongly point the man's brutality

than this act, which contributed in no small measure to his ruin.

Lorenzino left the Duke upon the bed, and went at once for

Scoronconcolo. He told him that the enemy was caught, and bade him only

mind the work he had to do. 'That will I do,' the bravo answered, 'even

though it were the Duke himself.' 'You've hit the mark,' said Lorenzino

with a face of joy; 'he cannot slip through our fingers. Come!' So they

mounted to the bedroom, and Lorenzino, knowing where the Duke was laid,

cried: 'Sir, are you asleep?' and therewith ran him through the back.

Alessandro was sleeping, or pretending to sleep, face downwards, and

the sword passed through his kidneys and diaphragm. But it did not kill

him. He slipped from the bed, and seized a stool to parry the next

blow. Scoronconcolo now stabbed him in the face, while Lorenzino forced

him back upon the bed; and then began a hideous struggle. In order to

prevent his cries, Lorenzino doubled his fist into the Duke's mouth.

Alessandro seized 325the thumb between his teeth, and held it in a vice

until he died. This disabled Lorenzino, who still lay upon his victim's

body, and Scoronconcolo could not strike for fear of wounding his

master. Between the writhing couple he made, however, several passes

with his sword, which only pierced the mattress. Then he drew a knife

and drove it into the Duke's throat, and bored about till he had

severed veins and windpipe.

IV.—THE FLIGHT OF LORENZINO DE' MEDICI

Alessandro was dead. His body fell to earth. The two murderers,

drenched with blood, lifted it up, and placed it on the bed, wrapped in

the curtains, as they had found him first. Then Lorenzino went to the

window, which looked out upon the Via Larga, and opened it to rest and

breathe a little air. After this he called for Scoronconcolo's boy, Il

Freccia, and bade him look upon the dead man. Il Freccia recognised the

Duke. But why Lorenzino did this, no one knew. It seemed, as Varchi

says, that, having planned the murder with great ability, and executed

it with daring, his good sense and good luck forsook him. He made no

use of the crime he had committed; and from that day forward till his

own assassination, nothing prospered with him. Indeed, the murder of

Alessandro appears to have been almost motiveless, considered from the

point of view of practical politics. Varchi assumes that Lorenzino's

burning desire of glory prompted the deed; and when he had acquired the

notoriety he sought, there was an end to his ambition. This view is

confirmed by the Apology he wrote and published for his act. It remains

one of the most pregnant, bold, and brilliant pieces of writing which

we possess in favour of tyrannicide from that epoch of insolent crime

and audacious rhetoric. So energetic is the style, and so biting the

invective of this masterpiece, in which the author 326stabs a second

time his victim, that both Giordani and Leopardi affirmed it to be the

only true monument of eloquence in the Italian language. If thirst for

glory was Lorenzino's principal incentive, immediate glory was his

guerdon. He escaped that same night with Scoronconcolo and Freccia to

Bologna, where he stayed to dress his thumb, and then passed forward to

Venice. Filippo Strozzi there welcomed him as the new Brutus, gave him

money, and promised to marry his two sons to the two sisters of the

tyrant-killer. Poems were written and published by the most famous men

of letters, including Benedetto Varchi and Francesco Maria Molsa, in

praise of the Tuscan Brutus, the liberator of his country from a

tyrant. A bronze medal was struck bearing his name, with a profile

copied from Michelangelo's bust of Brutus. On the obverse are two

daggers and a cup, and the date viii. id. Jan.

The immediate consequence of Alessandro's murder was the elevation of

Cosimo, son of Giovanni delle Bande Nere, and second cousin of

Lorenzino, to the duchy. At the ceremony of his investiture with the

ducal honours, Cosimo solemnly undertook to revenge Alessandro's

murder. In the following March he buried his predecessor with pomp in

San Lorenzo. The body was placed beside the bones of the Duke of Urbino

in the marble chest of Michelangelo, and here not many years ago it was

discovered. Soon afterwards Lorenzino was declared a rebel. His

portrait was painted according to old Tuscan precedent, head downwards,

and suspended by one foot, upon the wall of the fort built by

Alessandro. His house was cut in twain from roof to pavement, and a

narrow lane was driven through it, which received the title of

Traitor's Alley, _Chiasso del Traditore_. The price of four thousand

golden florins was put upon his head, together with the further sum of

one hundred florins per 327annum in perpetuity to be paid to the

murderer and his direct heirs in succession, by the Otto di Balia.

Moreover, the man who killed Lorenzino was to enjoy all civic

privileges; exemption from all taxes, ordinary and extraordinary; the

right of carrying arms, together with two attendants, in the city and

the whole domain of Florence; and the further prerogative of restoring

ten outlaws at his choice. If Lorenzino could be captured and brought

alive to Florence, the whole of this reward would be doubled.

This decree was promulgated in April 1537, and thenceforward Lorenzino

de' Medici lived a doomed man. The assassin, who had been proclaimed a

Brutus by Tuscan exiles and humanistic enthusiasts, was regarded as a

Judas by the common people. Ballads were written on him with the title

of the 'Piteous and sore lament made unto himself by Lorenzino de'

Medici, who murdered the most illustrious Duke Alessandro.' He had

become a wild beast, whom it was honourable to hunt down, a pest which

it was righteous to extirpate. Yet fate delayed nine years to overtake

him. What remains to be told about his story must be extracted from the

narrative of the bravo who succeeded, with the aid of an accomplice, in

despatching him at Venice.[13] So far as possible, I shall use the

man's own words, translating them literally, and omitting only

unimportant details. The narrative throws brilliant light upon the

manners and movements of professional cut-throats at that period in

Italy. It seems to have been taken down from the hero Francesco, or

Cecco, Bibboni's lips; and there is no doubt that we possess in it a

valuable historical document for the illustration of 328contemporary

customs. It offers in all points a curious parallel to Cellini's

account of his own homicides and hair-breadth escapes. Moreover, it is

confirmed in its minutest circumstances by the records of the criminal

courts of Venice in the sixteenth century. This I can attest from

recent examination of MSS. relating to the _Signori di Notte_ and the

_Esecutori contro la Bestemmia_, which are preserved among the Archives

at the Frari.

[13] Those who are interested in such matters may profitably compare

this description of a planned murder in the sixteenth century with the

account written by Ambrogio Tremazzi of the way in which he tracked

and slew Troilo Orsini in Paris in the year 1577. It is given by Gnoli

in his _Vittoria Accoramboni_, pp. 404-414.

V.—THE MURDER OF LORENZINO DE' MEDICI

'When I returned from Germany,' begins Bibboni, 'where I had been in

the pay of the Emperor, I found at Vicenza Bebo da Volterra, who was

staying in the house of M. Antonio da Roma, a nobleman of that city.

This gentleman employed him because of a great feud he had; and he was

mighty pleased, moreover, at my coming, and desired that I too should

take up my quarters in his palace.'

This paragraph strikes the keynote of the whole narrative, and

introduces us to the company we are about to keep. The noblemen of that

epoch, if they had private enemies, took into their service soldiers of

adventure, partly to protect their persons, but also to make war, when

occasion offered, on their foes. The _bravi_, as they were styled, had

quarters assigned them in the basement of the palace, where they might

be seen swaggering about the door or flaunting their gay clothes behind

the massive iron bars of the windows which opened on the streets. When

their master went abroad at night they followed him, and were always at

hand to perform secret services in love affairs, assassination, and

espial. For the rest, they haunted taverns, and kept up correspondence

with prostitutes. An Italian city had a whole population of such

fellows, the offscourings of armies, drawn from 329all nations, divided

by their allegiance of the time being into hostile camps, but united by

community of interest and occupation, and ready to combine against the

upper class, upon whose vices, enmities, and cowardice they throve.

Bibboni proceeds to say how another gentleman of Vicenza, M. Francesco

Manente, had at this time a feud with certain of the Guazzi and the

Laschi, which had lasted several years, and cost the lives of many

members of both parties and their following. M. Francesco being a

friend of M. Antonio, besought that gentleman to lend him Bibboni and

Bebo for a season; and the two _bravi_ went together with their new

master to Celsano, a village in the neighbourhood. 'There both parties

had estates, and all of them kept armed men in their houses, so that

not a day passed without feats of arms, and always there was some one

killed or wounded. One day, soon afterwards, the leaders of our party

resolved to attack the foe in their house, where we killed two, and the

rest, numbering five men, entrenched themselves in a ground-floor

apartment; whereupon we took possession of their harquebuses and other

arms, which forced them to abandon the villa and retire to Vicenza; and

within a short space of time this great feud was terminated by an ample

peace.' After this Bebo took service with the Rector of the University

in Padua, and was transferred by his new patron to Milan. Bibboni

remained at Vicenza with M. Galeazzo della Seta, who stood in great

fear of his life, notwithstanding the peace which had been concluded

between the two factions. At the end of ten months he returned to M.

Antonio da Roma and his six brothers, 'all of whom being very much

attached to me, they proposed that I should live my life with them, for

good or ill, and be treated as one of the family; upon the

understanding that if war broke out and I wanted to take part in it, I

should always have twenty-five crowns and arms 330and horse, with

welcome home, so long as I lived; and in case I did not care to join

the troops, the same provision for my maintenance.'

From these details we comprehend the sort of calling which a bravo of

Bibboni's species followed. Meanwhile Bebo was at Milan. 'There it

happened that M. Francesco Vinta, of Volterra, was on embassy from the

Duke of Florence. He saw Bebo, and asked him what he was doing in

Milan, and Bebo answered that he was a knight errant.' This phrase,

derived no doubt from the romantic epics then in vogue, was a pretty

euphemism for a rogue of Bebo's quality. The ambassador now began

cautiously to sound his man, who seems to have been outlawed from the

Tuscan duchy, telling him he knew a way by which he might return with

favour to his home, and at last disclosing the affair of Lorenzo. Bebo

was puzzled at first, but when he understood the matter, he professed

his willingness, took letters from the envoy to the Duke of Florence,

and, in a private audience with Cosimo, informed him that he was ready

to attempt Lorenzino's assassination. He added that 'he had a comrade

fit for such a job, whose fellow for the business could not easily be

found.'

Bebo now travelled to Vicenza, and opened the whole matter to Bibboni,

who weighed it well, and at last, being convinced that the Duke's

commission to his comrade was _bona fide_, determined to take his share

in the undertaking. The two agreed to have no accomplices. They went to

Venice, and 'I,' says Bibboni, 'being most intimately acquainted with

all that city, and provided there with many friends, soon quietly

contrived to know where Lorenzino lodged, and took a room in the

neighbourhood, and spent some days in seeing how we best might rule our

conduct.' Bibboni soon discovered that Lorenzino never left his palace;

and he therefore remained in much perplexity, until, by good 331luck,

Ruberto Strozzi arrived from France in Venice, bringing in his train a

Navarrese servant, who had the nickname of Spagnoletto. This fellow was

a great friend of the bravo. They met, and Bibboni told him that he

should like to go and kiss the hands of Messer Ruberto, whom he had

known in Rome. Strozzi inhabited the same palace as Lorenzino. 'When we

arrived there, both Messer Ruberto and Lorenzo were leaving the house,

and there were around them so many gentlemen and other persons, that I

could not present myself, and both straightway stepped into the

gondola. Then I, not having seen Lorenzo for a long while past, and

because he was very quietly attired, could not recognise the man

exactly, but only as it were between certainty and doubt. Wherefore I

said to Spagnoletto, "I think I know that gentleman, but don't remember

where I saw him." And Messer Ruberto was giving him his right hand.

Then Spagnoletto answered, "You know him well enough; he is Messer

Lorenzo. But see you tell this to nobody. He goes by the name of Messer

Dario, because he lives in great fear for his safety, and people don't

know that he is now in Venice." I answered that I marvelled much, and

if I could have helped him, would have done so willingly. Then I asked

where they were going, and he said, to dine with Messer Giovanni della

Casa, who was the Pope's Legate. I did not leave the man till I had

drawn from him all I required.'

Thus spoke the Italian Judas. The appearance of La Casa on the scene is

interesting. He was the celebrated author of the scandalous 'Capitolo

del Forno,' the author of many sublime and melancholy sonnets, who was

now at Venice, prosecuting a charge of heresy against Pier Paolo

Vergerio, and paying his addresses to a noble lady of the Quirini

family. It seems that on the territory of San Marco he made common

cause with the exiles from Florence, for he 332was himself by birth a

Florentine, and he had no objection to take Brutus-Lorenzino by the

hand.

After the noblemen had rowed off in their gondola to dine with the

Legate, Bibboni and his friend entered their palace, where he found

another old acquaintance, the house-steward, or _spenditore_ of

Lorenzo. From him he gathered much useful information. Pietro Strozzi,

it seems, had allowed the tyrannicide one thousand five hundred crowns

a year, with the keep of three brave and daring companions (_tre

compagni bravi e facinorosi_), and a palace worth fifty crowns on

lease. But Lorenzo had just taken another on the Campo di San Polo at

three hundred crowns a year, for which swagger (_altura_) Pietro

Strozzi had struck a thousand crowns off his allowance. Bibboni also

learned that he was keeping house with his uncle, Alessandro Soderini,

another Florentine outlaw, and that he was ardently in love with a

certain beautiful Barozza. This woman was apparently one of the grand

courtesans of Venice. He further ascertained the date when he was going

to move into the palace at San Polo, and, 'to put it briefly, knew

everything he did, and, as it were, how many times a day he spit.' Such

were the intelligences of the servants' hall, and of such value were

they to men of Bibboni's calling.

In the Carnival of 1546 Lorenzo meant to go masqued in the habit of a

gipsy woman to the square of San Spirito, where there was to be a

joust. Great crowds of people would assemble, and Bibboni hoped to do

his business there. The assassination, however, failed on this

occasion, and Lorenzo took up his abode in the palace he had hired upon

the Campo di San Polo. This Campo is one of the largest open places in

Venice, shaped irregularly, with a finely curving line upon the western

side, where two of the noblest private houses in the city are still

standing. Nearly opposite 333these, in the south-western angle, stands,

detached, the little old church of San Polo. One of its side entrances

opens upon the square; the other on a lane, which leads eventually to

the Frari. There is nothing in Bibboni's narrative to make it clear

where Lorenzo hired his dwelling. But it would seem from certain things

which he says later on, that in order to enter the church his victim

had to cross the square. Meanwhile Bibboni took the precaution of

making friends with a shoemaker, whose shop commanded the whole Campo,

including Lorenzo's palace. In this shop he began to spend much of his

time; 'and oftentimes I feigned to be asleep; but God knows whether I

was sleeping, for my mind, at any rate, was wide-awake.'

A second convenient occasion for murdering Lorenzo soon seemed to

offer. He was bidden to dine with Monsignor della Casa; and Bibboni,

putting a bold face on, entered the Legate's palace, having left Bebo

below in the loggia, fully resolved to do the business. 'But we found,'

he says, 'that, they had gone to dine at Murano, so that we remained

with our tabors in their bag.' The island of Murano at that period was

a favourite resort of the Venetian nobles, especially of the more

literary and artistic, who kept country-houses there, where they

enjoyed the fresh air of the lagoons and the quiet of their gardens.

The third occasion, after all these weeks of watching, brought success

to Bibboni's schemes. He had observed how Lorenzo occasionally so far

broke his rules of caution as to go on foot, past the church of San

Polo, to visit the beautiful Barozza; and he resolved, if possible, to

catch him on one of these journeys. 'It so chanced on the 28th of

February, which was the second Sunday of Lent, that having gone, as was

my wont, to pry out whether Lorenzo would give orders for going abroad

that day, I entered the shoemaker's 334shop, and stayed awhile, until

Lorenzo came to the window with a napkin round his neck for he was

combing his hair—and at the same moment I saw a certain Giovan Battista

Martelli, who kept his sword for the defence of Lorenzo's person, enter

and come forth again. Concluding that they would probably go abroad, I

went home to get ready and procure the necessary weapons, and there I

found Bebo asleep in bed, and made him get up at once, and we came to

our accustomed post of observation, by the church of San Polo, where

our men would have to pass.' Bibboni now retired to his friend the

shoemaker's, and Bebo took up his station at one of the side-doors of

San Polo; 'and, as good luck would have it, Giovan Battista Martelli

came forth, and walked a piece in front, and then Lorenzo came, and

then Alessandro Soderini, going the one behind the other, like storks,

and Lorenzo, on entering the church, and lifting up the curtain of the

door, was seen from the opposite door by Bebo, who at the same time

noticed how I had left the shop, and so we met upon the street as we

had agreed, and he told me that Lorenzo was inside the church.'

To any one who knows the Campo di San Polo, it will be apparent that

Lorenzo had crossed from the western side of the piazza and entered the

church by what is technically called its northern door. Bebo, stationed

at the southern door, could see him when he pushed the heavy _stoia_ or

leather curtain aside, and at the same time could observe Bibboni's

movements in the cobbler's shop. Meanwhile Lorenzo walked across the

church and came to the same door where Bebo had been standing. 'I saw

him issue from the church and take the main street; then came

Alessandro Soderini, and I walked last of all; and when we reached the

point we had determined on, I jumped in front of Alessandro with the

poignard in my hand, crying, "Hold hard, Alessandro, and 335get along

with you in God's name, for we are not here for you!" He then threw

himself around my waist, and grasped my arms, and kept on calling out.

Seeing how wrong I had been to try to spare his life, I wrenched myself

as well as I could from his grip, and with my lifted poignard struck

him, as God willed, above the eyebrow, and a little blood trickled from

the wound. He, in high fury, gave me such a thrust that I fell

backward, and the ground besides was slippery from having rained a

little. Then Alessandro drew his sword, which he carried in its

scabbard, and thrust at me in front, and struck me on the corslet,

which for my good fortune was of double mail. Before I could get ready

I received three passes, which, had I worn a doublet instead of that

mailed corslet, would certainly have run me through. At the fourth pass

I had regained my strength and spirit, and closed with him, and stabbed

him four times in the head, and being so close he could not use his

sword, but tried to parry with his hand and hilt, and I, as God willed,

struck him at the wrist below the sleeve of mail, and cut his hand off

clean, and gave him then one last stroke on his head. Thereupon he

begged for God's sake spare his life, and I, in trouble about Bebo,

left him in the arms of a Venetian nobleman, who held him back from

jumping into the canal.'

Who this Venetian nobleman, found unexpectedly upon the scene, was,

does not appear. Nor, what is still more curious, do we hear anything

of that Martelli, the bravo, 'who kept his sword for the defence of

Lorenzo's person.' The one had arrived accidentally, it seems. The

other must have been a coward and escaped from the scuffle.

'When I turned,' proceeds Bibboni, 'I found Lorenzo on his knees. He

raised himself, and I, in anger, gave him a great cut across the head,

which split it in two pieces, and laid him at my feet, and he never

rose again.'

336

VI.—THE ESCAPE OF THE BRAVI

Bebo, meanwhile, had made off from the scene of action. And Bibboni,

taking to his heels, came up with him in the little square of San

Marcello. They now ran for their lives till they reached the traghetto

di San Spirito, where they threw their poignards into the water,

remembering that no man might carry these in Venice under penalty of

the galleys. Bibboni's white hose were drenched with blood. He

therefore agreed to separate from Bebo, having named a rendezvous. Left

alone, his ill luck brought him face to face with twenty constables

(_sbirri_). 'In a moment I conceived that they knew everything, and

were come to capture me, and of a truth I saw that it was over with me.

As swiftly as I could I quickened pace and got into a church, near to

which was the house of a Compagnia, and the one opened into the other,

and knelt down and prayed, commending myself with fervour to God for my

deliverance and safety. Yet while I prayed, I kept my eyes well open

and saw the whole band pass the church, except one man who entered, and

I strained my sight so that I seemed to see behind as well as in front,

and then it was I longed for my poignard, for I should not have heeded

being in a church.' But the constable, it soon appeared, was not

looking for Bibboni. So he gathered up his courage, and ran for the

Church of San Spirito, where the Padre Andrea Volterrano was preaching

to a great congregation. He hoped to go in by one door and out by the

other, but the crowd prevented him, and he had to turn back and face

the _sbirrí_. One of them followed him, having probably caught sight of

the blood upon his hose. Then Bibboni resolved to have done with the

fellow, and rushed at him, and flung him down with his head upon the

pavement, and ran like mad and came at last, all out of breath, to San

Marco.

337It seems clear that before Bibboni separated from Bebo they had

crossed the water, for the Sestiere di San Polo is separated from the

Sestiere di San Marco by the Grand Canal. And this they must have done

at the traghetto di San Spirito. Neither the church nor the traghetto

are now in existence, and this part of the story is therefore

obscure.[14] Having reached San Marco, he took a gondola at the Ponte

della Paglia, where tourists are now wont to stand and contemplate the

Ducal Palace and the Bridge of Sighs. First, he sought the house of a

woman of the town who was his friend; then changed purpose, and rowed

to the palace of the Count Salici da Collalto. 'He was a great friend

and intimate of ours, because Bebo and I had done him many and great

services in times passed. There I knocked; and Bebo opened the door,

and when he saw me dabbled with blood, he marvelled that I had not come

to grief and fallen into the hands of justice, and, indeed, had feared

as much because I had remained so long away.' It appears, therefore,

that the Palazzo Collalto was their rendezvous. 'The Count was from

home; but being known to all his people, I played the master and went

into the kitchen to the fire, and with soap and water turned my hose,

which had been white, to a grey colour.' This is a very delicate way of

saying that he washed out the blood of Alessandro and Lorenzo!

[14] So far as I can discover, the only church of San Spirito in

Venice was a building on the island of San Spirito, erected by

Sansavino, which belonged to the Sestiere di S. Croce, and which was

suppressed in 1656. Its plate and the fine pictures which Titian

painted there were transferred at that date to S.M. della Salute. I

cannot help inferring that either Bibboni's memory failed him, or that

his words were wrongly understood by printer or amanuensis. If for S.

Spirito we substitute S. Stefano, the account would be intelligible.

Soon after the Count returned, and 'lavished caresses' upon Bebo and

his precious comrade. They did not tell 338him what they had achieved

that morning, but put him off with a story of having settled a _sbirro_

in a quarrel about a girl. Then the Count invited them to dinner; and

being himself bound to entertain the first physician of Venice,

requested them to take it in an upper chamber. He and his secretary

served them with their own hands at table. When the physician arrived,

the Count went downstairs; and at this moment a messenger came from

Lorenzo's mother, begging the doctor to go at once to San Polo, for

that her son had been murdered and Soderini wounded to the death. It

was now no longer possible to conceal their doings from the Count, who

told them to pluck up courage and abide in patience. He had himself to

dine and take his siesta, and then to attend a meeting of the Council.

About the hour of vespers, Bibboni determined to seek better refuge.

Followed at a discreet distance by Bebo, he first called at their

lodgings and ordered supper. Two priests came in and fell into

conversation with them. But something in the behaviour of one of these

good men roused his suspicions. So they left the house, took a gondola,

and told the man to row hard to S. Maria Zobenigo. On the way he bade

him put them on shore, paid him well, and ordered him to wait for them.

They landed near the palace of the Spanish embassy; and here Bibboni

meant to seek sanctuary. For it must be remembered that the houses of

ambassadors, no less than of princes of the Church, were inviolable.

They offered the most convenient harbouring-places to rascals. Charles

V., moreover, was deeply interested in the vengeance taken on

Alessandro de' Medici's murderer, for his own natural daughter was

Alessandro's widow and Duchess of Florence. In the palace they were met

with much courtesy by about forty Spaniards, who showed considerable

curiosity, and told them that Lorenzo and Alessandro Soderini had been

murdered 339that morning by two men whose description answered to their

appearance. Bibboni put their questions by and asked to see the

ambassador. He was not at home. In that case, said Bibboni, take us to

the secretary. Attended by some thirty Spaniards, 'with great joy and

gladness,' they were shown into the secretary's chamber. He sent the

rest of the folk away, 'and locked the door well, and then embraced and

kissed us before we had said a word, and afterwards bade us talk freely

without any fear.' When Bibboni had told the whole story, he was again

embraced and kissed by the secretary, who thereupon left them and went

to the private apartment of the ambassador. Shortly after he returned

and led them by a winding staircase into the presence of his master.

The ambassador greeted them with great honour, told them he would

strain all the power of the empire to hand them in safety over to Duke

Cosimo, and that he had already sent a courier to the Emperor with the

good news.

So they remained in hiding in the Spanish embassy; and in ten days'

time commands were received from Charles himself that everything should

be done to convey them safely to Florence. The difficulty was how to

smuggle them out of Venice, where the police of the Republic were on

watch, and Florentine outlaws were mounting guard on sea and shore to

catch them. The ambassador began by spreading reports on the Rialto

every morning of their having been seen at Padua, at Verona, in Friuli.

He then hired a palace at Malghera, near Mestre, and went out daily

with fifty Spaniards, and took carriage or amused himself with horse

exercise and shooting. The Florentines, who were on watch, could only

discover from his people that he did this for amusement. When he

thought that he had put them sufficiently off their guard, the

ambassador one day took Bibboni and Bebo out by Canaregio and Mestre to

Malghera, concealed in his own gondola, with 340the whole train of

Spaniards in attendance. And though, on landing, the Florentines

challenged them, they durst not interfere with an ambassador or come to

battle with his men. So Bebo and Bibboni were hustled into a coach, and

afterwards provided with two comrades and four horses. They rode for

ninety miles without stopping to sleep, and on the day following this

long journey reached Trento, having probably threaded the mountain

valleys above Bassano, for Bibboni speaks of a certain village where

the people talked half German. The Imperial Ambassador at Trento

forwarded them next day to Mantua; from Mantua they came to Piacenza;

thence, passing through the valley of the Taro, crossing the Apennines

at Cisa, descending on Pontremoli, and reaching Pisa at night, the

fourteenth day after their escape from Venice.

When they arrived at Pisa, Duke Cosimo was supping. So they went to an

inn, and next morning presented themselves to his Grace. Cosimo

received them kindly, assured them of his gratitude, confirmed them in

the enjoyment of their rewards and privileges, and swore that they

might rest secure of his protection in all parts of his dominion. We

may imagine how the men caroused together after this reception. As

Bibboni adds, 'We were now able for the whole time of life left us to

live splendidly, without a thought or care.' The last words of his

narrative are these: 'Bebo from Pisa, at what date I know not, went

home to Volterra, his native town, and there finished his days; while I

abode in Florence, where I have had no further wish to hear of wars,

but to live my life in holy peace.'

So ends the story of the two _bravi_. We have reason to believe, from

some contemporary documents which Cantù has brought to light, that

Bibboni exaggerated his own part in the affair. Luca Martelli, writing

to Varchi, says that it 341was Bebo who clove Lorenzo's skull with a

cutlass. He adds this curious detail, that the weapons of both men were

poisoned, and that the wound inflicted by Bibboni on Soderini's hand

was a slight one. Yet, the poignard being poisoned, Soderini died of

it. In other respects Martelli's brief account agrees with that given

by Bibboni, who probably did no more, his comrade being dead, than

claim for himself, at some expense of truth, the lion's share of their

heroic action.

VII.—LORENZINO BRUTUS

It remains to ask ourselves, What opinion can be justly formed of

Lorenzino's character and motives? When he murdered his cousin, was he

really actuated by the patriotic desire to rid his country of a

monster? Did he imitate the Roman Brutus in the noble spirit of his

predecessors, Olgiati and Boscoli, martyrs to the creed of tyrannicide?

Or must this crowning action of a fretful life be explained, like his

previous mutilation of the statues on the Arch of Constantine, by a

wild thirst for notoriety? Did he hope that the exiles would return to

Florence, and that he would enjoy an honourable life, an immortality of

glorious renown? Did envy for his cousin's greatness and resentment of

his undisguised contempt—the passions of one who had been used for vile

ends—conscious of self-degradation and the loss of honour, yet mindful

of his intellectual superiority—did these emotions take fire in him and

mingle with a scholar's reminiscences of antique heroism, prompting him

to plan a deed which should at least assume the show of patriotic zeal,

and prove indubitable courage in its perpetrator? Did he, again,

perhaps imagine, being next in blood to Alessandro and direct heir to

the ducal crown by the Imperial Settlement of 1530, that the city would

elect her liberator for her ruler?

342Alfieri and Niccolini, having taken, as it were, a brief in favour

of tyrannicide, praised Lorenzino as a hero. De Musset, who wrote a

considerable drama on his story, painted him as a _roué_ corrupted by

society, enfeebled by circumstance, soured by commerce with an

uncongenial world, who hides at the bottom of his mixed nature enough

of real nobility to make him the leader of a forlorn hope for the

liberties of Florence. This is the most favourable construction we can

put upon Lorenzo's conduct. Yet some facts of the case warn us to

suspend our judgment. He seems to have formed no plan for the

liberation of his fellow-citizens. He gave no pledge of self-devotion

by avowing his deed and abiding by its issues. He showed none of the

qualities of a leader, whether in the cause of freedom or of his own

dynastic interests, after the murder. He escaped as soon as he was

able, as secretly as he could manage, leaving the city in confusion,

and exposing himself to the obvious charge of abominable treason. So

far as the Florentines knew, his assassination of their Duke was but a

piece of private spite, executed with infernal craft. It is true that

when he seized the pen in exile, he did his best to claim the guerdon

of a patriot, and to throw the blame of failure on the Florentines. In

his Apology, and in a letter written to Francesco de' Medici, he taunts

them with lacking the spirit to extinguish tyranny when he had slain

the tyrant. He summons plausible excuses to his aid—the impossibility

of taking persons of importance into his confidence, the loss of blood

he suffered from his wound, the uselessness of rousing citizens whom

events proved over-indolent for action. He declares that he has nothing

to regret. Having proved by deeds his will to serve his country, he has

saved his life in order to spend it for her when occasion offered. But

these arguments, invented after the catastrophe, these words, so

bravely penned when action ought to have 343confirmed his resolution,

do not meet the case. It was no deed of a true hero to assassinate a

despot, knowing or half knowing that the despot's subjects would

immediately elect another. Their languor could not, except

rhetorically, be advanced in defence of his own flight.

The historian is driven to seek both the explanation and palliation of

Lorenzo's failure in the temper of his times. There was enough daring

left in Florence to carry through a plan of brilliant treason, modelled

on an antique Roman tragedy. But there was not moral force in the

protagonist to render that act salutary, not public energy sufficient

in his fellow-citizens to accomplish his drama of deliverance. Lorenzo

was corrupt. Florence was flaccid. Evil manners had emasculated the

hero. In the state the last spark of independence had expired with

Ferrucci.

Still I have not without forethought dubbed this man a Cinque Cento

Brutus. Like much of the art and literature of his century, his action

may be regarded as a _bizarre_ imitation of the antique manner. Without

the force and purpose of a Roman, Lorenzo set himself to copy

Plutarch's men—just as sculptors carved Neptunes and Apollos without

the dignity and serenity of the classic style. The antique faith was

wanting to both murderer and craftsman in those days. Even as

Renaissance work in art is too often aimless, decorative, vacant of

intention, so Lorenzino's Brutus tragedy seems but the snapping of a

pistol in void air. He had the audacity but not the ethical consistency

of his crime. He played the part of Brutus like a Roscius, perfect in

its histrionic details. And it doubtless gave to this skilful actor a

supreme satisfaction—salving over many wounds of vanity, quenching the

poignant thirst for things impossible and draughts of fame—that he

could play it on no mimic stage, but on the theatre of Europe. The

weakness of his conduct was the central 344weakness of his age and

country. Italy herself lacked moral purpose, sense of righteous

necessity, that consecration of self to a noble cause, which could

alone have justified Lorenzo's perfidy. Confused memories of Judith,

Jael, Brutus, and other classical tyrannicides, exalted his

imagination. Longing for violent emotions, jaded with pleasure which

had palled, discontented with his wasted life, jealous of his brutal

cousin, appetitive to the last of glory, he conceived his scheme.

Having conceived, he executed it with that which never failed in Cinque

Cento Italy—the artistic spirit of perfection. When it was over, he

shrugged his shoulders, wrote his magnificent Apology with a style of

adamant upon a plate of steel, and left it for the outlaws of Filippo

Strozzi's faction to deal with the crisis he had brought about. For

some years he dragged out an ignoble life in obscurity, and died at

last, as Varchi puts it, more by his own carelessness than by the

watchful animosity of others. Over the wild, turbid, clever,

incomprehensible, inconstant hero-artist's grave we write our

_Requiescat_. Clio, as she takes the pen in hand to record this prayer,

smiles disdainfully and turns to graver business.

345

TWO DRAMATISTS OF THE LAST CENTURY

There are few contrasts more striking than that which is presented by

the memoirs of Goldoni and Alfieri. Both of these men bore names highly

distinguished in the history of Italian literature. Both of them were

framed by nature with strongly marked characters, and fitted to perform

a special work in the world. Both have left behind them records of

their lives and literary labours, singularly illustrative of their

peculiar differences. There is no instance in which we see more clearly

the philosophical value of autobiographies, than in these vivid

pictures which the great Italian tragedian and comic author have

delineated. Some of the most interesting works of Lionardo da Vinci,

Giorgione, Albert Dürer, Rembrandt, Rubens, and Andrea del Sarto, are

their portraits painted by themselves. These pictures exhibit not only

the lineaments of the masters, but also their art. The hand which drew

them was the hand which drew the 'Last Supper,' or the 'Madonna of the

Tribune:' colour, method, chiaroscuro, all that makes up manner in

painting, may be studied on the same canvas as that which faithfully

represents the features of the man whose genius gave his style its

special character. We seem to understand the clear calm majesty of

Lionardo's manner, the silver-grey harmonies and smooth facility of

Andrea's Madonnas, the better for looking at their faces drawn by their

own hands at Florence. And if this be the case with a dumb picture, how

far higher must be the 346interest and importance of the written life

of a known author! Not only do we recognise in its composition the

style and temper and habits of thought which are familiar to us in his

other writings; but we also hear from his own lips how these were

formed, how his tastes took their peculiar direction, what

circumstances acted on his character, what hopes he had, and where he

failed. Even should his autobiography not bear the marks of uniform

candour, it probably reveals more of the actual truth, more of the

man's real nature in its height and depth, than any memoir written by

friend or foe. Its unconscious admissions, its general spirit, and the

inferences which we draw from its perusal, are far more valuable than

any mere statement of facts or external analysis, however scientific.

When we become acquainted with the series of events which led to the

conception or attended the production of some masterpiece of

literature, a new light is thrown upon its beauties, fresh life bursts

forth from every chapter, and we seem to have a nearer and more

personal interest in its success. What a powerful sensation, for

instance, is that which we experience when, after studying the 'Decline

and Fall of the Roman Empire,' Gibbon tells us how the thought of

writing it came to him upon the Capitol, among the ruins of dead Rome,

and within hearing of the mutter of the monks of Ara Coeli, and how he

finished it one night by Lake Geneva, and laid his pen down and walked

forth and saw the stars above his terrace at Lausanne!

The memoirs of Alfieri and Goldoni are not deficient in any of the

characteristics of good autobiography. They seem to bear upon their

face the stamp of truthfulness, they illustrate their authors' lives

with marvellous lucidity, and they are full of interest as stories. But

it is to the contrast which they present that our attention should be

chiefly drawn. Other biographies may be as interesting and amusing.

None 347show in a more marked manner two distinct natures endowed with

genius for one art, and yet designed in every possible particular for

different branches of that art. Alfieri embodies Tragedy; Goldoni is

the spirit of Comedy. They are both Italians: their tragedies and

comedies are by no means cosmopolitan; but this national identity of

character only renders more remarkable the individual divergences by

which they were impelled into their different paths. Thalia seems to

have made the one, body, soul, and spirit; and Melpomene the other;

each goddess launched her favourite into circumstances suited to the

evolution of his genius, and presided over his development, so that at

his death she might exclaim,—Behold the living model of my Art!

Goldoni was born at Venice in the year 1707; he had already reached

celebrity when Alfieri saw the light for the first time, in 1749, at

Asti. Goldoni's grandfather was a native of Modena, who had settled in

Venice, and there lived with the prodigality of a rich and ostentatious

'bourgeois.' 'Amid riot and luxury did I enter the world,' says the

poet, after enumerating the banquets and theatrical displays with which

the old Goldoni entertained his guests in his Venetian palace and

country-house. Venice at that date was certainly the proper birthplace

for a comic poet. The splendour of the Renaissance had thoroughly

habituated her nobles to pleasures of the sense, and had enervated

their proud, maritime character, while the great name of the republic

robbed them of the caution for which they used to be conspicuous. Yet

the real strength of Venice was almost spent, and nothing remained but

outward insolence and prestige. Everything was gay about Goldoni in his

earliest childhood. Puppet-shows were built to amuse him by his

grandfather. 'My mother,' he says, 'took charge of my education, and my

father of my amusements.'

348Let us turn to the opening scene in Alfieri's life, and mark the

difference. A father above sixty, 'noble, wealthy, and respectable,'

who died before his son had reached the age of one year old. A mother

devoted to religion, the widow of one marquis, and after the death of a

second husband, Alfieri's father, married for the third time to a

nobleman of ancient birth. These were Alfieri's parents. He was born in

a solemn palazzo in the country town of Asti, and at the age of five

already longed for death as an escape from disease and other earthly

troubles. So noble and so wealthy was the youthful poet that an abbé

was engaged to carry out his education, but not to teach him more than

a count should know. Except this worthy man he had no companions

whatever. Strange ideas possessed the boy. He ruminated on his

melancholy, and when eight years old attempted suicide. At this age he

was sent to the academy at Turin, attended, as befitted a lad of his

rank, by a man-servant, who was to remain and wait on him at school.

Alfieri stayed here several years without revisiting his home,

tyrannised over by the valet who added to his grandeur, constantly

subject to sickness, and kept in almost total ignorance by his

incompetent preceptors. The gloom and pride and stoicism of his

temperament were augmented by this unnatural discipline. His spirit did

not break, but took a haughtier and more disdainful tone. He became

familiar with misfortunes. He learned to brood over and intensify his

passions. Every circumstance of his life seemed strung up to a tragic

pitch. This at least is the impression which remains upon our mind

after reading in his memoirs the narrative of what must in many of its

details have been a common schoolboy's life at that time.

Meanwhile, what had become of young Goldoni? His boyhood was as

thoroughly plebeian, various, and comic as Alfieri's had been

patrician, monotonous, and tragical. 349Instead of one place of

residence, we read of twenty. Scrape succeeds to scrape, adventure to

adventure. Knowledge of the world, and some book learning also, flow in

upon the boy, and are eagerly caught up by him and heterogeneously

amalgamated in his mind. Alfieri learned nothing, wrote nothing, in his

youth, and heard his parents say—'A nobleman need never strive to be a

doctor of the faculties.' Goldoni had a little medicine and much law

thrust upon him. At eight he wrote a comedy, and ere long began to read

the plays of Plautus, Terence, Aristophanes, and Machiavelli. Between

the nature of the two poets there was a marked and characteristic

difference as to their mode of labour and of acquiring knowledge. Both

of them loved fame, and wrought for it; but Alfieri did so from a sense

of pride and a determination to excel; while Goldoni loved the

approbation of his fellows, sought their compliments, and basked in the

sunshine of smiles. Alfieri wrote with labour. Each tragedy he composed

went through a triple process of composition, and received frequent

polishing when finished. Goldoni dashed off his pieces with the

greatest ease on every possible subject. He once produced sixteen

comedies in one theatrical season. Alfieri's were like lion's

whelps—brought forth with difficulty, and at long intervals; Goldoni's,

like the brood of a hare—many, frequent, and as agile as their parent.

Alfieri amassed knowledge scrupulously, but with infinite toil. He

mastered Greek and Hebrew when he was past forty. Goldoni never gave

himself the least trouble to learn anything, but trusted to the ready

wit, good memory, and natural powers, which helped him in a hundred

strange emergencies. Power of will and pride sustained the one;

facility and a good-humoured vanity the other. This contrast was

apparent at a very early age. We have seen how Alfieri passed his time

at Turin, in a kind of aristocratic prison of educational ignorance.

350Goldoni's grandfather died when he was five years old, and left his

family in great embarrassment. The poet's father went off to practise

medicine at Perugia. His son followed him, acquired the rudiments of

knowledge in that town, and then proceeded to study philosophy alone at

Rimini. There was no man-servant or academy in his case. He was far too

plebeian and too free. The boy lodged with a merchant, and got some

smattering of Thomas Aquinas and the Peripatetics into his small brain,

while he contrived to form a friendship with an acting company. They

were on the wing for Venice in a coasting boat, which would touch at

Chiozza, where Goldoni's mother then resided. The boy pleased them.

Would he like the voyage? This offer seemed too tempting, and away he

rushed, concealed himself on board, and made one of a merry motley

shipload. 'Twelve persons, actors as well as actresses, a prompter, a

machinist, a storekeeper, eight domestics, four chambermaids, two

nurses, children of every age, cats, dogs, monkeys, parrots, birds,

pigeons, and a lamb; it was another Noah's ark.' The young poet felt at

home; how could a comic poet feel otherwise? They laughed, they sang,

they danced; they ate and drank, and played at cards. 'Macaroni! Every

one fell on it, and three dishes were devoured. We had also alamode

beef, cold fowl, a loin of veal, a dessert, and excellent wine. What a

charming dinner! No cheer like a good appetite.' Their harmony,

however, was disturbed. The 'première amoureuse,' who, in spite of her

rank and title, was ugly and cross, and required to be coaxed with cups

of chocolate, lost her cat. She tried to kill the whole boat-load of

beasts—cats, dogs, monkeys, parrots, pigeons, even the lamb stood in

danger of her wrath. A regular quarrel ensued, was somehow set at

peace, and all began to laugh again. This is a sample of Goldoni's

youth. Comic pleasures, comic dangers; nothing 351deep or lasting, but

light and shadow cheerfully distributed, clouds lowering with storm, a

distant growl of thunder, then a gleam of light and sunshine breaking

overhead. He gets articled to an attorney at Venice, then goes to study

law at Pavia; studies society instead, and flirts, and finally is

expelled for writing satires. Then he takes a turn at medicine with his

father in Friuli, and acts as clerk to the criminal chancellor at

Chiozza.

Every employment seems easy to him, but he really cares for none but

literature. He spends all his spare time in reading and in amusements,

and begins to write a tragic opera. This proves, however, eminently

unsuccessful, and he burns it in a comic fit of anger. One laughable

love-affair in which he engaged at Udine exhibits his adventures in

their truly comic aspect. It reminds us of the scene in 'Don Giovanni,'

where Leporello personates the Don and deceives Donna Elvira. Goldoni

had often noticed a beautiful young lady at church and on the public

drives: she was attended by a waiting-maid, who soon perceived that her

mistress had excited the young man's admiration, and who promised to

befriend him in his suit. Goldoni was told to repair at night to the

palace of his mistress, and to pour his passion forth beneath her

window. Impatiently he waited for the trysting hour, conned his

love-sentences, and gloried in the romance of the adventure. When night

came, he found the window, and a veiled figure of a lady in the

moonlight, whom he supposed at once to be his mistress. Her he

eloquently addressed in the true style of Romeo's rapture, and she

answered him. Night after night this happened, but sometimes he was a

little troubled by a sound of ill-suppressed laughter interrupting the

_tête-à-tête_. Meanwhile Teresa, the waiting-maid, received from his

hands costly presents for her mistress, and made him promises on her

part in exchange. As she proved 352unable to fulfil them, Goldoni grew

suspicious, and at last discovered that the veiled figure to whom he

had poured out his tale of love was none other than Teresa, and that

the laughter had proceeded from her mistress, whom the faithless

waiting-maid regaled at her lover's expense. Thus ended this ridiculous

matter. Goldoni was not, however, cured by his experience. One other

love-affair rendered Udine too hot to hold him, and in consequence of a

third he had to fly from Venice just when he was beginning to flourish

there. At length he married comfortably and suitably, settling down

into a quiet life with a woman whom, if he did not love her with

passion, he at least respected and admired. Goldoni, in fact, had no

real passion in his nature.

Alfieri, on the other hand, was given over to volcanic ebullitions of

the most ungovernable hate and affection, joy and sorrow. The chains of

love which Goldoni courted so willingly, Alfieri regarded with the

greatest shyness. But while Goldoni healed his heart of all its bruises

in a week or so, the tragic poet bore about him wounds that would not

close. He enumerates three serious passions which possessed his whole

nature, and at times deprived him almost of his reason. A Dutch lady

first won his heart, and when he had to leave her, Alfieri suffered so

intensely that he never opened his lips during the course of a long

journey through Germany, Switzerland, and Piedmont. Fevers, and

suicides attempted but interrupted, marked the termination of this

tragic amour. His second passion had for its object an English lady,

with whose injured husband he fought a duel, although his collarbone

was broken at the time. The lady proved unworthy of Alfieri as well as

of her husband, and the poet left her in a most deplorable state of

hopelessness and intellectual prostration. At last he formed a

permanent affection for the wife of Prince Charles Edward, the Countess

of Albany, in close 353friendship with whom he lived after her

husband's death. The society of this lady gave him perfect happiness;

but it was founded on her lofty beauty, the pathos of her situation,

and her intellectual qualities. Melpomene presided at this union, while

Thalia blessed the nuptials of Goldoni. How characteristic also were

the adventures which these two pairs of lovers encountered! Goldoni

once carried his wife upon his back across two rivers in their flight

from the Spanish to the Austrian camp at Rimini, laughing and groaning,

and perceiving the humour of his situation all the time. Alfieri, on an

occasion of even greater difficulty, was stopped with his illustrious

friend at the gates of Paris in 1792. They were flying in post-chaises,

with their servants and their baggage, from the devoted city, when a

troop of _sansculottes_ rushed on them, surged around the carriage,

called them aristocrats, and tried to drag them off to prison. Alfieri,

with his tall gaunt figure, pallid face, and red voluminous hair,

stormed, raged, and raised his deep bass voice above the tumult. For

half an hour he fought with them, then made his coachmen gallop through

the gates, and scarcely halted till they got to Gravelines. By this

prompt movement they escaped arrest and death at Paris. These two

scenes would make agreeable companion pictures: Goldoni staggering

beneath his wife across the muddy bed of an Italian stream—the smiling

writer of agreeable plays, with his half-tearful helpmate ludicrous in

her disasters; Alfieri mad with rage among Parisian Mænads, his

princess quaking in her carriage, the air hoarse with cries, and death

and safety trembling in the balance. It is no wonder that the one man

wrote 'La Donna di Garbo' and the 'Cortese Veneziano,' while the other

was inditing essays on Tyranny and dramas of 'Antigone,' 'Timoleon,'

and 'Brutus.'

The difference between the men is seen no less remarkably 354in regard

to courage. Alfieri was a reckless rider, and astonished even English

huntsmen by his desperate leaps. In one of them he fell and broke his

collar-bone, but not the less he held his tryst with a fair lady,

climbed her park gates, and fought a duel with her husband. Goldoni was

a pantaloon for cowardice. In the room of an inn at Desenzano which he

occupied together with a female fellow-traveller, an attempt was made

to rob them by a thief at night. All Goldoni was able to do consisted

in crying out for help, and the lady called him 'M. l'Abbé' ever after

for his want of pluck. Goldoni must have been by far the more agreeable

of the two. In all his changes from town to town of Italy he found

amusement and brought gaiety. The sights, the theatres, the society

aroused his curiosity. He trembled with excitement at the performance

of his pieces, made friends with the actors, taught them, and wrote

parts to suit their qualities. At Pisa he attended as a stranger the

meeting of the Arcadian Academy, and at its close attracted all

attention to himself by his clever improvisation. He was in truth a

ready-witted man, pliable, full of resource, bred half a valet, half a

Roman _græculus_. Alfieri saw more of Europe than Goldoni. France,

Germany, Holland, Switzerland, England, Spain, all parts of Italy he

visited with restless haste. From land to land he flew, seeking no

society, enjoying nothing, dashing from one inn door to another with

his servants and his carriages, and thinking chiefly of the splendid

stud of horses which he took about with him upon his travels. He was a

lonely, stiff, self-engrossed, indomitable man. He could not rest at

home: he could not bear to be the vassal of a king and breathe the air

of courts. So he lived always on the wing, and ended by exiling himself

from Sardinia in order to escape the trammels of paternal government.

As for his tragedies, he wrote them to win laurels 355from posterity.

He never cared to see them acted; he bullied even his printers and

correctors; he cast a glove down in defiance of his critics. Goldoni

sought the smallest meed of approbation. It pleased him hugely in his

old age to be Italian master to a French princess. Alfieri openly

despised the public. Goldoni wrote because he liked to write; Alfieri,

for the sake of proving his superior powers. Against Alfieri's hatred

of Turin and its trivial solemnities, we have to set Goldoni's love of

Venice and its petty pleasures. He would willingly have drunk chocolate

and played at dominoes or picquet all his life on the Piazza di San

Marco, when Alfieri was crossing the sierras on his Andalusian horse,

and devouring a frugal meal of rice in solitude. Goldoni glided through

life an easy man, with genial, venial thoughts; with a clear, gay,

gentle temper; a true sense of what is good and just; and a heart that

loved diffusively, if not too warmly. Many were the checks and

obstacles thrown on his path; but round them or above them he passed

nimbly, without scar or scathe. Poverty went close behind him, but he

kept her off, and never felt the pinch of need. Alfieri strained and

strove against the barriers of fate; a sombre, rugged man, proud,

candid, and self-confident, who broke or bent all opposition; now

moving solemnly with tragic pomp, now dashing passionately forward by

the might of will. Goldoni drew his inspirations from the moment and

surrounding circumstances. Alfieri pursued an ideal, slowly formed, but

strongly fashioned and resolutely followed. Of wealth he had plenty and

to spare, but he disregarded it, and was a Stoic in his mode of life.

He was an unworldly man, and hated worldliness. Goldoni, but for his

authorship, would certainly have grown a prosperous advocate, and died

of gout in Venice. Goldoni liked smart clothes; Alfieri went always in

black. Goldoni's fits of spleen—for he _was_ melancholy now and

then—lasted 356a day or two, and disappeared before a change of place.

Alfieri dragged his discontent about with him all over Europe, and let

it interrupt his work and mar his intellect for many months together.

Alfieri was a patriot, and hated France. Goldoni never speaks of

politics, and praises Paris as a heaven on earth. The genial moralising

of the latter appears childish by the side of Alfieri's terse

philosophy and pregnant remarks on the development of character. What

suits the page of Plautus would look poor in 'Oedipus' or 'Agamemnon.'

Goldoni's memoirs are diffuse and flippant in their light French dress.

They seem written to please. Alfieri's Italian style marches with

dignity and Latin terseness. He rarely condescends to smile. He writes

to instruct the world and to satisfy himself. Grim humour sometimes

flashes out, as when he tells the story of the Order of Homer, which he

founded. How different from Goldoni's naïve account of his little

ovation in the theatre at Paris!

But it would be idle to carry on this comparison, already tedious. The

life of Goldoni was one long scene of shifts and jests, of frequent

triumphs and some failures, of lessons hard at times, but kindly.

Passions and _ennui_, flashes of heroic patriotism, constant suffering

and stoical endurance, art and love idealised, fill up the life of

Alfieri. Goldoni clung much to his fellow-men, and shared their pains

and pleasures. Alfieri spent many of his years in almost absolute

solitude. On the whole character and deeds of the one man was stamped

Comedy: the other was own son of Tragedy.

If, after reading the autobiographies of Alfieri and Goldoni, we turn

to the perusal of their plays, we shall perceive that there is no

better commentary on the works of an artist than his life, and no

better life than one written by himself. The old style of criticism,

which strove to separate an author's productions from his life, and

even from the age in 357which he lived, to set up an arbitrary canon of

taste, and to select one or two great painters or poets as ideals

because they seemed to illustrate that canon, has passed away. We are

beginning to feel that art is a part of history and of physiology. That

is to say, the artist's work can only be rightly understood by studying

his age and temperament. Goldoni's versatility and want of depth

induced him to write sparkling comedies. The merry life men passed at

Venice in its years of decadence proved favourable to his genius.

Alfieri's melancholy and passionate qualities, fostered in solitude,

and aggravated by a tyranny he could not bear, led him irresistibly to

tragic composition. Though a noble, his nobility only added to his

pride, and insensibly his intellect had been imbued with the democratic

sentiments which were destined to shake Europe in his lifetime. This,

in itself, was a tragic circumstance, bringing him into close sympathy

with the Brutus, the Prometheus, the Timoleon of ancient history.

Goldoni's _bourgeoisie_, in the atmosphere of which he was born and

bred, was essentially comic. The true comedy of manners, which is quite

distinct from Shakspere's fancy or from Aristophanic satire, is always

laid in middle life. Though Goldoni tried to write tragedies, they were

unimpassioned, dull, and tame. He lacked altogether the fire,

high-wrought nobility of sentiment, and sense of form essential for

tragic art. On the other hand, Alfieri composed some comedies before

his death which were devoid of humour, grace, and lightness. A strange

elephantine eccentricity is their utmost claim to comic character.

Indeed, the temper of Alfieri, ever in extremes, led him even to

exaggerate the qualities of tragedy. He carried its severity to a pitch

of dulness and monotony. His chiaroscuro was too strong; virtue and

villany appearing in pure black and white upon his pages. His hatred of

tyrants induced him to transgress 358the rules of probability, so that

it has been well said that if his wicked kings had really had such

words of scorn and hatred thrown at them by their victims, they were

greatly to be pitied. On the other hand, his pithy laconisms have often

a splendidly tragical effect. There is nothing in the modern drama more

rhetorically impressive, though spasmodic, than the well-known dialogue

between Antigone and Creon:—

'_Cr_. Scegliesti?

'_Ant_. Ho scelto.

'_Cr_. Emon?

'_Ant_. Morte.

'_Cr_. L'avrai!'

Goldoni's comedies, again, have not enough of serious thought or of

true creative imagination to be works of high art. They lean too much

to the side of farce; they have none of the tragic salt which gives a

dignity to Tartuffe. They are, in a word, almost too enethistically

comic.

The contrast between these authors might lead us to raise the question

long ago discussed by Socrates at Agathon's banquet—Can the same man

write both comedies and tragedies? We in England are accustomed to read

the serious and comic plays of Shakspere, Fletcher, Jonson, and to

think that one poet could excel in either branch. The custom of the

Elizabethan theatre obliged this double authorship; yet it must be

confessed that Shakspere's comedies are not such comedies as Greek or

Romnan or French critics would admit. They are works of the purest

imagination, wholly free from the laws of this world; while the

tragedies of Fletcher have a melodramatic air equally at variance with

the classical Melpomene. It may very seriously be doubted whether the

same mind could produce, with equal power, a comedy like the

359'Cortese Veneziano' and a tragedy like Alfieri's 'Brutus.' At any

rate, returning to our old position, we find in these two men the very

opposite conditions of dramatic genius. They are, as it were, specimens

prepared by Nature for the instruction of those who analyse genius in

its relations to temperament, to life, and to external circumstances.

VOLUME II.

1

RAVENNA

The Emperor Augustus chose Ravenna for one of his two naval stations,

and in course of time a new city arose by the sea-shore, which received

the name of Portus Classis. Between this harbour and the mother city a

third town sprang up, and was called Cæsarea. Time and neglect, the

ravages of war, and the encroaching powers of Nature have destroyed

these settlements, and nothing now remains of the three cities but

Ravenna. It would seem that in classical times Ravenna stood, like

modern Venice, in the centre of a huge lagune, the fresh waters of the

Ronco and the Po mixing with the salt waves of the Adriatic round its

very walls. The houses of the city were built on piles; canals instead

of streets formed the means of communication, and these were always

filled with water artificially conducted from the southern estuary of

the Po. Round Ravenna extended a vast morass, for the most part under

shallow water, but rising at intervals into low islands like the Lido

or Murano or Torcello which surround Venice. These islands were

celebrated for their fertility: the 2vines and fig-trees and

pomegranates, springing from a fat and fruitful soil, watered with

constant moisture, and fostered by a mild sea-wind and liberal

sunshine, yielded crops that for luxuriance and quality surpassed the

harvests of any orchards on the mainland. All the conditions of life in

old Ravenna seem to have resembled those of modern Venice; the people

went about in gondolas, and in the early morning barges laden with

fresh fruit or meat and vegetables flocked from all quarters to the

city of the sea.[15] Water also had to be procured from the

neighbouring shore, for, as Martial says, a well at Ravenna was more

valuable than a vineyard. Again, between the city and the mainland ran

a long low causeway all across the lagune like that on which the trains

now glide into Venice. Strange to say, the air of Ravenna was

remarkably salubrious: this fact, and the ease of life that prevailed

there, and the security afforded by the situation of the town, rendered

it a most desirable retreat for the monarchs of Italy during those

troublous times in which the empire nodded to its fall. Honorius

retired to its lagunes for safety; Odoacer, who dethroned the last

Cæsar of the West, succeeded him; and was in turn, supplanted by

Theodoric the Ostrogoth. Ravenna, as we see it now, recalls the

peaceful and half-Roman rule of the great Gothic king. His palace, his

churches, and the mausoleums in which his daughter Amalasuntha laid the

hero's bones, have survived the sieges of Belisarius and Astolphus, the

conquest of Pepin, the bloody quarrels of Iconoclasts with the children

of the Roman Church, the mediæval wars of Italy, the victory of Gaston

de Foix, and still stand gorgeous with marbles and mosaics in spite of

time and the decay of all around them.

[15] We may compare with Venice what is known about the ancient

Hellenic city of Sybaris. Sybaris and Ravenna were the Greek and Roman

Venice of antiquity.

3As early as the sixth century, the sea had already retreated to such a

distance from Ravenna that orchards and gardens were cultivated on the

spot where once the galleys of the Cæsars rode at anchor. Groves of

pines sprang up along the shore, and in their lofty tops the music of

the wind moved like the ghost of waves and breakers plunging upon

distant sands. This Pinetum stretches along the shore of the Adriatic

for about forty miles, forming a belt of variable width between the

great marsh and the tumbling sea. From a distance the bare stems and

velvet crowns of the pine-trees stand up like palms that cover an oasis

on Arabian sands; but at a nearer view the trunks detach themselves

from an inferior forest-growth of juniper and thorn and ash and oak,

the tall roofs of the stately firs shooting their breadth of sheltering

greenery above the lower and less sturdy brushwood. It is hardly

possible to imagine a more beautiful and impressive scene than that

presented by these long alleys of imperial pines. They grow so thickly

one behind another, that we might compare them to the pipes of a great

organ, or the pillars of a Gothic church, or the basaltic columns of

the Giant's Causeway. Their tops are evergreen and laden with the heavy

cones, from which Ravenna draws considerable wealth. Scores of peasants

are quartered on the outskirts of the forest, whose business it is to

scale the pines and rob them of their fruit at certain seasons of the

year. Afterwards they dry the fir-cones in the sun, until the nuts

which they contain fall out. The empty husks are sold for firewood, and

the kernels in their stony shells reserved for exportation. You may see

the peasants, men, women, and boys, sorting them by millions, drying

and sifting them upon the open spaces of the wood, and packing them in

sacks to send abroad through Italy. The _pinocchi_ or kernels of the

stone-pine are largely used in cookery, and those of Ravenna are prized

for their good 4quality and aromatic flavour. When roasted or pounded,

they taste like a softer and more mealy kind of almonds. The task of

gathering this harvest is not a little dangerous. Men have to cut

notches in the straight shafts, and having climbed, often to the height

of eighty feet, to lean upon the branches, and detach the fir-cones

with a pole—and this for every tree. Some lives, they say, are yearly

lost in the business.

As may be imagined, the spaces of this great forest form the haunt of

innumerable living creatures. Lizards run about by myriads in the

grass. Doves coo among the branches of the pines, and nightingales pour

their full-throated music all day and night from thickets of

white-thorn and acacia. The air is sweet with aromatic scents: the

resin of the pine and juniper, the mayflowers and acacia-blossoms, the

violets that spring by thousands in the moss, the wild roses and faint

honeysuckles which throw fragrant arms from bough to bough of ash or

maple, join to make one most delicious perfume. And though the air upon

the neighbouring marsh is poisonous, here it is dry, and spreads a

genial health. The sea-wind murmuring through these thickets at

nightfall or misty sunrise, conveys no fever to the peasants stretched

among their flowers. They watch the red rays of sunset flaming through

the columns of the leafy hall, and flaring on its fretted rafters of

entangled boughs; they see the stars come out, and Hesper gleam, an eye

of brightness, among dewy branches; the moon walks silver-footed on the

velvet tree-tops, while they sleep beside the camp-fires; fresh morning

wakes them to the sound of birds and scent of thyme and twinkling of

dewdrops on the grass around. Meanwhile ague, fever, and death have

been stalking all night long about the plain, within a few yards of

their couch, and not one pestilential breath has reached the charmed

precincts of the forest.

You may ride or drive for miles along green aisles between 5the pines

in perfect solitude; and yet the creatures of the wood, the sunlight

and the birds, the flowers and tall majestic columns at your side,

prevent all sense of loneliness or fear. Huge oxen haunt the

wilderness—grey creatures, with mild eyes and spreading horns and

stealthy tread. Some are patriarchs of the forest, the fathers and the

mothers of many generations who have been carried from their sides to

serve in ploughs or waggons on the Lombard plain. Others are yearling

calves, intractable and ignorant of labour. In order to subdue them to

the yoke, it is requisite to take them very early from their native

glades, or else they chafe and pine away with weariness. Then there is

a sullen canal, which flows through the forest from the marshes to the

sea; it is alive with frogs and newts and snakes. You may see these

serpents basking on the surface among thickets of the flowering rush,

or coiled about the lily leaves and flowers—lithe monsters, slippery

and speckled, the tyrants of the fen.

It is said that when Dante was living at Ravenna he would spend whole

days alone among the forest glades, thinking of Florence and her civil

wars, and meditating cantos of his poem. Nor have the influences of the

pine-wood failed to leave their trace upon his verse. The charm of its

summer solitude seems to have sunk into his soul; for when he describes

the whispering of winds and singing birds among the boughs of his

terrestrial paradise, he says:—

Non però dal lor esser dritto sparte

Tanto, che gli augelletti per le cime

Lasciasser d' operare ogni lor arte:

Ma con piena letizia l' aure prime,

Cantando, ricevano intra le foglie,

Che tenevan bordone alle sue rime

Tal, qual di ramo in ramo si raccoglie

Per la pineta in sul lito di Chiassi

Quand' Eolo Scirocco fuor discioglie.

6With these verses in our minds, while wandering down the grassy

aisles, beside the waters of the solitary place, we seem to meet that

lady singing as she went, and plucking flower by flower, 'like

Proserpine when Ceres lost a daughter, and she lost her spring.' There,

too, the vision of the griffin and the car, of singing maidens, and of

Beatrice descending to the sound of Benedictus and of falling flowers,

her flaming robe and mantle green as grass, and veil of white, and

olive crown, all flashed upon the poet's inner eye, and he remembered

how he bowed before her when a boy. There is yet another passage in

which it is difficult to believe that Dante had not the pine-forest in

his mind. When Virgil and the poet were waiting in anxiety before the

gates of Dis, when the Furies on the wall were tearing their breasts

and crying, 'Venga Medusa, e si 'l farem di smalto,' suddenly across

the hideous river came a sound like that which whirlwinds make among

the shattered branches and bruised stems of forest-trees; and Dante,

looking out with fear upon the foam and spray and vapour of the flood,

saw thousands of the damned flying before the face of one who forded

Styx with feet unwet. 'Like frogs,' he says, 'they fled, who scurry

through the water at the sight of their foe, the serpent, till each

squats and hides himself close to the ground.' The picture of the storm

among the trees might well have occurred to Dante's mind beneath the

roof of pine-boughs. Nor is there any place in which the simile of the

frogs and water-snake attains such dignity and grandeur. I must confess

that till I saw the ponds and marshes of Ravenna, I used to fancy that

the comparison was somewhat below the greatness of the subject; but

there so grave a note of solemnity and desolation is struck, the scale

of Nature is so large, and the serpents coiling in and out among the

lily leaves and flowers are so much in their right place, that they

suggest a scene by no means unworthy of Dante's conception.

7Nor is Dante the only singer who has invested this wood with poetical

associations. It is well known that Boccaccio laid his story of

'Honoria' in the pine-forest, and every student of English literature

must be familiar with the noble tale in verse which Dryden has founded

on this part of the 'Decameron.' We all of us have followed Theodore,

and watched with him the tempest swelling in the grove, and seen the

hapless ghost pursued by demon hounds and hunter down the glades. This

story should be read while storms are gathering upon the distant sea,

or thunderclouds descending from the Apennines, and when the pines

begin to rock and surge beneath the stress of labouring winds. Then

runs the sudden flash of lightning like a rapier through the boughs,

the rain streams hissing down, and the thunder 'breaks like a whole sea

overhead.'

With the Pinetum the name of Byron will be for ever associated. During

his two years' residence in Ravenna he used to haunt its wilderness,

riding alone or in the company of friends. The inscription placed above

the entrance to the house he occupied alludes to it as one of the

objects which principally attracted the poet to the neighbourhood of

Ravenna: 'Impaziente di visitare l' antica selva, che inspirò già il

Divino e Giovanni Boccaccio.' We know, however, that a more powerful

attraction, in the person of the Countess Guiccioli, maintained his

fidelity to 'that place of old renown, once in the Adrian Sea,

Ravenna.'

Between the Bosco, as the people of Ravenna call this pine-wood, and

the city, the marsh stretches for a distance of about three miles. It

is a plain intersected by dykes and ditches, and mapped out into

innumerable rice-fields. For more than half a year it lies under water,

and during the other months exhales a pestilential vapour, which

renders it as uninhabitable as the Roman Campagna; yet in springtime

8this dreary flat is even beautiful. The young blades of the rice shoot

up above the water, delicately green and tender. The ditches are lined

with flowering rush and golden flags, while white and yellow lilies

sleep in myriads upon the silent pools. Tamarisks wave their pink and

silver tresses by the road, and wherever a plot of mossy earth emerges

from the marsh, it gleams with purple orchises and flaming marigolds;

but the soil beneath is so treacherous and spongy, that these splendid

blossoms grow like flowers in dreams or fairy stories. You try in vain

to pick them; they elude your grasp, and flourish in security beyond

the reach of arm or stick.

Such is the sight of the old town of Classis. Not a vestige of the

Roman city remains, not a dwelling or a ruined tower, nothing but the

ancient church of S. Apollinare in Classe. Of all desolate buildings

this is the most desolate. Not even the deserted grandeur of S. Paolo

beyond the walls of Rome can equal it. Its bare round campanile gazes

at the sky, which here vaults only sea and plain—a perfect dome,

star-spangled like the roof of Galla Placidia's tomb. Ravenna lies low

to west, the pine-wood stretches away in long monotony to east. There

is nothing else to be seen except the spreading marsh, bounded by dim

snowy Alps and purple Apennines, so very far away that the level rack

of summer clouds seem more attainable and real. What sunsets and

sunrises that tower must see; what glaring lurid afterglows in August,

when the red light scowls upon the pestilential fen; what sheets of

sullen vapour rolling over it in autumn; what breathless heats, and

rainclouds big with thunder; what silences; what unimpeded blasts of

winter winds! One old monk tends this deserted spot. He has the huge

church, with its echoing aisles and marble columns and giddy bell-tower

and cloistered corridors, all to himself. At rare intervals, priests

from Ravenna come to sing some special mass at these 9cold altars;

pious folk make vows to pray upon their mouldy steps and kiss the

relics which are shown on great occasions. But no one stays; they

hurry, after muttering their prayers, from the fever-stricken spot,

reserving their domestic pieties and customary devotions for the

brighter and newer chapels of the fashionable churches in Ravenna. So

the old monk is left alone to sweep the marsh water from his church

floor, and to keep the green moss from growing too thickly on its

monuments. A clammy conferva covers everything except the mosaics upon

tribune, roof, and clerestory, which defy the course of age. Christ on

His throne _sedet aternumque sedebit: _ the saints around him glitter

with their pitiless uncompromising eyes and wooden gestures, as if

twelve centuries had not passed over them, and they were nightmares

only dreamed last night, and rooted in a sick man's memory. For those

gaunt and solemn forms there is no change of life or end of days. No

fever touches them; no dampness of the wind and rain loosens their firm

cement. They stare with senseless faces in bitter mockery of men who

live and die and moulder away beneath. Their poor old guardian told us

it was a weary life. He has had the fever three times, and does not

hope to survive many more Septembers. The very water that he drinks is

brought him from Ravenna; for the vast fen, though it pours its

overflow upon the church floor, and spreads like a lake around, is

death to drink. The monk had a gentle woman's voice and mild brown

eyes. What terrible crime had consigned him to this living tomb? For

what past sorrow is he weary of his life? What anguish of remorse has

driven him to such a solitude? Yet he looked simple and placid; his

melancholy was subdued and calm, as if life were over for him, and he

were waiting for death to come with a friend's greeting upon noiseless

wings some summer night across the fen-lands in a cloud of soft

destructive fever-mist.

10Another monument upon the plain is worthy of a visit. It is the

so-called Colonna dei Francesi, a _cinquecento_ pillar of Ionic design,

erected on the spot where Gaston de Foix expired victorious after one

of the bloodiest battles ever fought. The Ronco, a straight sluggish

stream, flows by the lonely spot; mason bees have covered with

laborious stucco-work the scrolls and leafage of its ornaments,

confounding epitaphs and trophies under their mud houses. A few

cypress-trees stand round it, and the dogs and chickens of a

neighbouring farmyard make it their rendezvous. Those mason bees are

like posterity, which settles down upon the ruins of a Baalbec or a

Luxor, setting up its tents, and filling the fair spaces of Hellenic or

Egyptian temples with clay hovels. Nothing differs but the scale; and

while the bees content themselves with filling up and covering, man

destroys the silent places of the past which he appropriates.

In Ravenna itself, perhaps what strikes us most is the abrupt

transition everywhere discernible from monuments of vast antiquity to

buildings of quite modern date. There seems to be no interval between

the marbles and mosaics of Justinian or Theodoric and the insignificant

frippery of the last century. The churches of Ravenna—S. Vitale, S.

Apollinare, and the rest—are too well known, and have been too often

described by enthusiastic antiquaries, to need a detailed notice in

this place. Every one is aware that the ecclesiastical customs and

architecture of the early Church can be studied in greater perfection

here than elsewhere. Not even the basilicas and mosaics of Rome, nor

those of Palermo and Monreale, are equal for historical interest to

those of Ravenna. Yet there is not one single church which remains

entirely unaltered and unspoiled. The imagination has to supply the

atrium or outer portico from one building, the vaulted baptistery with

its marble font from another, the pulpits and ambones from a 11third

the tribune from a fourth, the round brick bell-tower from a fifth, and

then to cover all the concave roofs and chapel walls with grave and

glittering mosaics.

There is nothing more beautiful in decorative art than the mosaics of

such tiny buildings as the tomb of Galla Placidia or the chapel of the

Bishop's Palace. They are like jewelled and enamelled cases; not an

inch of wall can be seen which is not covered with elaborate patterns

of the brightest colours. Tall date-palms spring from the floor with

fruit and birds among their branches, and between them stand the

pillars and apostles of the Church. In the spandrels and lunettes above

the arches and the windows angels fly with white extended wings. On

every vacant place are scrolls and arabesques of foliage,—birds and

beasts, doves drinking from the vase, and peacocks spreading gorgeous

plumes—a maze of green and gold and blue. Overhead, the vault is

powdered with stars gleaming upon the deepest azure, and in the midst

is set an aureole embracing the majestic head of Christ, or else the

symbol of the sacred fish, or the hand of the Creator pointing from a

cloud. In Galla Placidia's tomb these storied vaults spring above the

sarcophagi of empresses and emperors, each lying in the place where he

was laid more than twelve centuries ago. The light which struggles

through the narrow windows serves to harmonise the brilliant hues and

make a gorgeous gloom.

Besides these more general and decorative subjects, many of the

churches are adorned with historical mosaics, setting forth the Bible

narrative or incidents from the life of Christian emperors and kings.

In S. Apollinare Nuovo there is a most interesting treble series of

such mosaics extending over both walls of the nave. On the left hand,

as we enter, we see the town of Classis; on the right the palace of

Theodoric, its doors and loggie rich with curtains, and its friezes

blazing with 12coloured ornaments. From the city gate of Classis

virgins issue, and proceed in a long line until they reach Madonna

seated on a throne, with Christ upon her knees, and the three kings in

adoration at her feet. From Theodoric's palace door a similar

procession of saints and martyrs carry us to Christ surrounded by

archangels. Above this double row of saints and virgins stand the

fathers and prophets of the Church, and highest underneath the roof are

pictures from the life of our Lord. It will be remembered in connection

with these subjects that the women sat upon the left and the men upon

the right side of the church. Above the tribune, at the east end of the

church, it was customary to represent the Creative Hand, or the

monogram of the Saviour, or the head of Christ with the letters A and

[Greek Ô]. Moses and Elijah frequently stand on either side to

symbolise the transfiguration, while the saints and bishops specially

connected with the church appeared upon a lower row. Then on the side

walls were depicted such subjects as Justinian and Theodora among their

courtiers, or the grant of the privileges of the church to its first

founder from imperial patrons, with symbols of the old Hebraic

ritual—Abel's lamb, the sacrifice of Isaac, Melchisedec's offering of

bread and wine,—which were regarded as the types of Christian

ceremonies. The baptistery was adorned with appropriate mosaics

representing Christ's baptism in Jordan.

Generally speaking, one is struck with the dignity of these designs,

and especially with the combined majesty and sweetness of the face of

Christ. The sense for harmony of hue displayed in their composition is

marvellous. It would be curious to trace in detail the remnants of

classical treatment which may be discerned—Jordan, for instance, pours

his water from an urn like a river-god crowned with sedge—or to show

what points of ecclesiastical tradition are established these ancient

monuments. We find Mariolatry already imminent, 13the names of the

three kings, Kaspar, Melchior, and Balthazar, the four evangelists as

we now recognise them, and many of the rites and vestments which

Ritualists of all denominations regard with superstitious reverence.

There are two sepulchral monuments in Ravenna which cannot be passed

over unnoticed. The one is that of Theodoric the Goth, crowned by its

semisphere of solid stone, a mighty tomb, well worthy of the conqueror

and king. It stands in a green field, surrounded by acacias, where the

nightingales sing ceaselessly in May. The mason bees have covered it,

and the water has invaded its sepulchral vaults. In spite of many

trials, it seems that human art is unable to pump out the pond and

clear the frogs and efts from the chamber where the great Goth was laid

by Amalasuntha.

The other is Dante's temple, with its basrelief and withered garlands.

The story of his burial, and of the discovery of his real tomb, is

fresh in the memory of every one. But the 'little cupola, more neat

than solemn,' of which Lord Byron speaks, will continue to be the goal

of many a pilgrimage. For myself—though I remember Chateaubriand's

bareheaded genuflection on its threshold, Alfieri's passionate

prostration at the altar-tomb, and Byron's offering of poems on the

poet's shrine—I confess that a single canto of the 'Inferno,' a single

passage of the 'Vita Nuova,' seems more full of soul-stirring

associations than the place where, centuries ago, the mighty dust was

laid. It is the spirit that lives and makes alive. And Dante's spirit

seems more present with us under the pine-branches of the Bosco than

beside his real or fancied tomb. 'He is risen,'—'Lo, I am with you

alway'—these are the words that ought to haunt us in a burying-ground.

There is something affected and self-conscious in overpowering grief or

enthusiasm or humiliation at a tomb.

14

RIMINI

SIGISMONDO PANDOLFO MALATESTA AND LEO BATTISTA ALBERTI

Rimini is a city of about 18,000 souls, famous for its Stabilmento de'

Bagni and its antiquities, seated upon the coast of the Adriatic, a

little to the south-east of the world-historical Rubicon. It is our

duty to mention the baths first among its claims to distinction, since

the prosperity and cheerfulness of the little town depend on them in a

great measure. But visitors from the north will fly from these, to

marvel at the bridge which Augustus built and Tiberius completed, and

which still spans the Marecchia with five gigantic arches of white

Istrian limestone, as solidly as if it had not borne the tramplings of

at least three conquests. The triumphal arch, too, erected in honour of

Augustus, is a notable monument of Roman architecture. Broad,

ponderous, substantial, tufted here and there with flowering weeds, and

surmounted with mediaeval machicolations, proving it to have sometimes

stood for city gate or fortress, it contrasts most favourably with the

slight and somewhat gimcrack arch of Trajan in the sister city of

Ancona. Yet these remains of the imperial pontifices, mighty and

interesting as they are, sink into comparative insignificance beside

the one great wonder of Rimini, the cathedral remodelled for Sigismondo

Pandolfo Malatesta by Leo Battista Alberti in 1450. This strange

church, one of 15the earliest extant buildings in which the Neopaganism

of the Renaissance showed itself in full force, brings together before

our memory two men who might be chosen as typical in their contrasted

characters of the transitional age which gave them birth.

No one with any tincture of literary knowledge is ignorant of the fame

at least of the great Malatesta family—the house of the Wrongheads, as

they were rightly called by some prevision of their future part in

Lombard history. The readers of the twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth

cantos of the 'Inferno' have all heard of

E il mastin vecchio e il nuovo da Verucchio

Che fecer di Montagna il mal governo,

while the story of Francesca da Polenta, who was wedded to the

hunchback Giovanni Malatesta and murdered by him with her lover Paolo,

is known not merely to students of Dante, but to readers of Byron and

Leigh Hunt, to admirers of Flaxman, Ary Scheffer, Doré—to all, in fact,

who have of art and letters any love.

The history of these Malatesti, from their first establishment under

Otho III. as lieutenants for the Empire in the Marches of Ancona, down

to their final subjugation by the Papacy in the age of the Renaissance,

is made up of all the vicissitudes which could befall a mediaeval

Italian despotism. Acquiring an unlawful right over the towns of

Rimini, Cesena, Sogliano, Ghiacciuolo, they ruled their petty

principalities like tyrants by the help of the Guelf and Ghibelline

factions, inclining to the one or the other as it suited their humour

or their interest, wrangling among themselves, transmitting the

succession of their dynasty through bastards and by deeds of force,

quarrelling with their neighbours the Counts of Urbino, alternately

defying and submitting to the 16Papal legates in Romagna, serving as

condottieri in the wars of the Visconti and the state of Venice, and by

their restlessness and genius for military intrigues contributing in no

slight measure to the general disturbance of Italy. The Malatesti were

a race of strongly marked character: more, perhaps, than any other

house of Italian tyrants, they combined for generations those qualities

of the fox and the lion, which Machiavelli thought indispensable to a

successful despot. Son after son, brother with brother, they continued

to be fierce and valiant soldiers, cruel in peace, hardy in war, but

treasonable and suspicious in all transactions that could not be

settled by the sword. Want of union, with them as with the Baglioni and

many other of the minor noble families in Italy, prevented their

founding a substantial dynasty. Their power, based on force, was

maintained by craft and crime, and transmitted through tortuous

channels by intrigue. While false in their dealings with the world at

large, they were diabolical in the perfidy with which they treated one

another. No feudal custom, no standard of hereditary right, ruled the

succession in their family. Therefore the ablest Malatesta for the

moment clutched what he could of the domains that owned his house for

masters. Partitions among sons or brothers, mutually hostile and

suspicious, weakened the whole stock. Yet they were great enough to

hold their own for centuries among the many tyrants who infested

Lombardy. That the other princely families of Romagna, Emilia, and the

March were in the same state of internal discord and dismemberment, was

probably one reason why the Malatesti stood their ground so firmly as

they did.

So far as Rimini is concerned, the house of Malatesta culminated in

Sigismondo Pandolfo, son of Gian Galeazzo Visconti's general, the

perfidious Pandolfo. It was he who built the Rocca, or castle of the

despots, which stands a little 17way outside the town, commanding a

fair view of Apennine tossed hill-tops and broad Lombard plain, and who

remodelled the Cathedral of S. Francis on a plan suggested by the

greatest genius of the age. Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta was one of

the strangest products of the earlier Renaissance. To enumerate the

crimes which he committed within the sphere of his own family,

mysterious and inhuman outrages which render the tale of the Cenci

credible, would violate the decencies of literature. A thoroughly

bestial nature gains thus much with posterity that its worst qualities

must be passed by in silence. It is enough to mention that he murdered

three wives in succession,[16] Bussoni di Carmagnuola, Guinipera

d'Este, and Polissena Sforza, on various pretexts of infidelity, and

carved horns upon his own tomb with this fantastic legend underneath:—

Porto le corna ch' ognuno le vede,

E tal le porta che non se lo crede.

[16] His first wife was a daughter of the great general of the

Venetians against Francesco Sforza. Whether Sigismondo murdered her,

as Sansovino seems to imply in his _Famiglie Illustri_, or whether he

only repudiated her after her father's execution on the Piazza di San

Marco, admits of doubt. About the question of Sigismondo's marriage

with Isotta there is also some uncertainty. At any rate she had been

some time his mistress before she became his wife.

He died in wedlock with the beautiful and learned Isotta degli Atti,

who had for some time been his mistress. But, like most of the

Malatesti, he left no legitimate offspring. Throughout his life he was

distinguished for bravery and cunning, for endurance of fatigue and

rapidity of action, for an almost fretful rashness in the execution of

his schemes, and for a character terrible in its violence. He was

acknowledged as a great general; yet nothing succeeded with him. The

long warfare which he carried on against the Duke of 18Montefeltro

ended in his discomfiture. Having begun by defying the Holy See, he was

impeached at Rome for heresy, parricide, incest, adultery, rape, and

sacrilege, burned in effigy by Pope Pius II., and finally restored to

the bosom of the Church, after suffering the despoliation of almost all

his territories, in 1463. The occasion on which this fierce and

turbulent despiser of laws human and divine was forced to kneel as a

penitent before the Papal legate in the gorgeous temple dedicated to

his own pride, in order that the ban of excommunication might be

removed from Rimini, was one of those petty triumphs, interesting

chiefly for their picturesqueness, by which the Popes confirmed their

questionable rights over the cities of Romagna. Sigismondo, shorn of

his sovereignty, took the command of the Venetian troops against the

Turks in the Morea, and returned in 1465, crowned with laurels, to die

at Rimini in the scene of his old splendour.

A very characteristic incident belongs to this last act of his life.

Dissolute, treacherous, and inhuman as he was, the tyrant of Rimini had

always encouraged literature, and delighted in the society of artists.

He who could brook no contradiction from a prince or soldier, allowed

the pedantic scholars of the sixteenth century to dictate to him in

matters of taste, and sat with exemplary humility at the feet of

Latinists like Porcellio, Basinio, and Trebanio. Valturio, the

engineer, and Alberti, the architect, were his familiar friends; and

the best hours of his life were spent in conversation with these men.

Now that he found himself upon the sacred soil of Greece, he was

determined not to return to Italy empty-handed. Should he bring

manuscripts or marbles, precious vases or inscriptions in half-legible

Greek character? These relics were greedily sought for by the

potentates of Italian cities; and no doubt Sigismondo enriched his

library with some such treasures. But he obtained 19a nobler

prize—nothing less than the body of a saint of scholarship, the

authentic bones of the great Platonist, Gemisthus Pletho.[17] These he

exhumed from their Greek grave and caused them to be deposited in a

stone sarcophagus outside the cathedral of his building in Rimini. The

Venetians, when they stole the body of S. Mark from Alexandria, were

scarcely more pleased than was Sigismondo with the acquisition of this

Father of the Neopagan faith. Upon the tomb we still may read this

legend: 'Jemisthii Bizantii philosopher sua temp principis reliquum

Sig. Pan. Mal. Pan. F. belli Pelop adversus Turcor regem Imp ob

ingentem eruditorum quo flagrat amorem huc afferendum introque

mittendum curavit MCCCCLXVI.' Of the Latinity of the inscription much

cannot be said; but it means that 'Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta,

having served as general against the Turks in the Morea, induced by the

great love with which he burns for all learned men, brought and placed

here the remains of Gemisthus of Byzantium, the prince of the

philosophers of his day.'

[17] For the place occupied in the evolution of Italian scholarship by

this Greek sage, see my 'Revival of Learning,' _Renaissance in Italy_,

part 2.

Sigismondo's portrait, engraved on medals, and sculptured upon every

frieze and point of vantage in the Cathedral of Rimini, well denotes

the man. His face is seen in profile. The head, which is low and flat

above the forehead, rising swiftly backward from the crown, carries a

thick bushy shock of hair curling at the ends, such as the Italians

call a _zazzera_. The eye is deeply sunk, with long venomous flat

eyelids, like those which Leonardo gives to his most wicked faces. The

nose is long and crooked, curved like a vulture's over a petulant

mouth, with lips deliberately pressed together, as though it were

necessary to control some nervous twitching. The 20cheek is broad, and

its bone is strongly marked. Looking at these features in repose, we

cannot but picture to our fancy what expression they might assume under

a sudden fit of fury, when the sinews of the face were contracted with

quivering spasms, and the lips writhed in sympathy with knit forehead

and wrinkled eyelids.

Allusion has been made to the Cathedral of S. Francis at Rimini, as the

great ornament of the town, and the chief monument of Sigismondo's

fame. It is here that all the Malatesti lie. Here too is the chapel

consecrated to Isotta, 'Divæ Isottæ Sacrum;' and the tombs of the

Malatesta ladies, 'Malatestorum domûs heroidum sepulchrum;' and

Sigismondo's own grave with the cuckold's horns and scornful epitaph.

Nothing but the fact that the church is duly dedicated to S. Francis,

and that its outer shell of classic marble encases an old Gothic

edifice, remains to remind us that it is a Christian place of

worship.[18] It has no sanctity, no spirit of piety. The pride of the

tyrant whose legend—'Sigismundus Pandulphus Malatesta Pan. F. Fecit

Anno Gratiæ MCCCCL'—occupies every arch and stringcourse of the

architecture, and whose coat-of-arms and portrait in medallion, with

his cipher and his emblems of an elephant and a rose, are wrought in

every piece of sculptured work throughout the building, seems so to

fill this house of prayer that there is no room left for God. Yet the

Cathedral of Rimini remains a monument of first-rate importance for all

students who seek to penetrate the revived Paganism of the fifteenth

century. It serves also to bring a far more interesting 21Italian of

that period than the tyrant of Rimini himself, before our notice.

[18] The account of this church given by Æneas Sylvius Piccolomini

(Pii Secundi, Comment., ii. 92) deserves quotation: 'Ædificavit tamen

nobile templum Arimini in honorem divi Francisci, verum ita gentilibus

operibus implevit, ut non tam Christianorum quam infidelium dæmones

adorantium templum esse videatur.'

In the execution of his design, Sigismondo received the assistance of

one of the most remarkable men of this or any other age. Leo Battista

Alberti, a scion of the noble Florentine house of that name, born

during the exile of his parents, and educated in the Venetian

territory, was endowed by nature with aptitudes, faculties, and

sensibilities so varied, as to deserve the name of universal genius.

Italy in the Renaissance period was rich in natures of this sort, to

whom nothing that is strange or beautiful seemed unfamiliar, and who,

gifted with a kind of divination, penetrated the secrets of the world

by sympathy. To Pico della Mirandola, Lionardo da Vinci, and Michel

Agnolo Buonarroti may be added Leo Battista Alberti. That he achieved

less than his great compeers, and that he now exists as the shadow of a

mighty name, was the effect of circumstances. He came half a century

too early into the world, and worked as a pioneer rather than a settler

of the realm which Lionardo ruled as his demesne. Very early in his

boyhood Alberti showed the versatility of his talents. The use of arms,

the management of horses, music, painting, modelling for sculpture,

mathematics, classical and modern literature, physical science as then

comprehended, and all the bodily exercises proper to the estate of a

young nobleman, were at his command. His biographer asserts that he was

never idle, never subject to ennui or fatigue. He used to say that

books at times gave him the same pleasure as brilliant jewels or

perfumed flowers: hunger and sleep could not keep him from them then.

At other times the letters on the page appeared to him like twining and

contorted scorpions, so that he preferred to gaze on anything but

written scrolls. He would then turn to music or painting, or to the

physical sports in which he excelled. The 22language in which this

alternation of passion and disgust for study is expressed, bears on it

the stamp of Alberti's peculiar temperament, his fervid and imaginative

genius, instinct with subtle sympathies and strange repugnances. Flying

from his study, he would then betake himself to the open air. No one

surpassed him in running, in wrestling, in the force with which he cast

his javelin or discharged his arrows. So sure was his aim and so

skilful his cast, that he could fling a farthing from the pavement of

the square, and make it ring against a church roof far above. When he

chose to jump, he put his feet together and bounded over the shoulders

of men standing erect upon the ground. On horseback he maintained

perfect equilibrium, and seemed incapable of fatigue. The most restive

and vicious animals trembled under him and became like lambs. There was

a kind of magnetism in the man. We read, besides these feats of

strength and skill, that he took pleasure in climbing mountains, for no

other purpose apparently than for the joy of being close to nature.

In this, as in many other of his instincts, Alberti was before his age.

To care for the beauties of landscape unadorned by art, and to

sympathise with sublime or rugged scenery, was not in the spirit of the

Renaissance. Humanity occupied the attention of poets and painters; and

the age was yet far distant when the pantheistic feeling for the world

should produce the art of Wordsworth and of Turner. Yet a few great

natures even then began to comprehend the charm and mystery which the

Greeks had imaged in their Pan, the sense of an all-pervasive spirit in

wild places, the feeling of a hidden want, the invisible tie which

makes man a part of rocks and woods and streams around him. Petrarch

had already ascended the summit of Mont Ventoux, to meditate, with an

exaltation of the soul he scarcely understood, upon the scene spread at

his feet and above his head. Æneas 23Sylvius Piccolomini delighted in

wild places for no mere pleasure of the chase, but for the joy he took

in communing with nature. How S. Francis found God in the sun and the

air, the water and the stars, we know by his celebrated hymn; and of

Dante's acute observation, every canto of the 'Divine Comedy' is

witness.

Leo Alberti was touched in spirit by even a deeper and a stranger

pathos than any of these men: 'In the early spring, when he beheld the

meadows and hills covered with flowers, and saw the trees and plants of

all kinds bearing promise of fruit, his heart became exceeding

sorrowful; and when in autumn he looked on fields heavy with harvest

and orchards apple-laden, he felt such grief that many even saw him

weep for the sadness of his soul.' It would seem that he scarcely

understood the source of this sweet trouble: for at such times he

compared the sloth and inutility of men with the industry and fertility

of nature; as though this were the secret of his melancholy. A poet of

our century has noted the same stirring of the spirit, and has striven

to account for it:—

Tears from the depth of some divine despair

Rise in the heart, and gather to the eyes,

In looking on the happy autumn fields,

And thinking of the days that are no more.

Both Alberti and Tennyson have connected the _mal du pays_ of the human

soul for that ancient country of its birth, the mild Saturnian earth

from which we sprang, with a sense of loss. It is the waste of human

energy that affects Alberti; the waste of human life touches the modern

poet. Yet both perhaps have scarcely interpreted their own spirit; for

is not the true source of tears deeper and more secret? Man is a child

of nature in the simplest sense; and the stirrings of the secular

breasts that gave him suck, and on which he even now must hang, have

potent influences over his emotions. 24Of Alberti's extraordinary

sensitiveness to all such impressions many curious tales are told. The

sight of refulgent jewels, of flowers, and of fair landscapes, had the

same effect upon his nerves as the sound of the Dorian mood upon the

youths whom Pythagoras cured of passion by music. He found in them an

anodyne for pain, a restoration from sickness. Like Walt Whitman, who

adheres to nature by closer and more vital sympathy than any other poet

of the modern world, Alberti felt the charm of excellent old age no

less than that of florid youth. 'On old men gifted with a noble

presence and hale and vigorous, he gazed again and again, and said that

he revered in them the delights of nature (_naturæ delitias_).' Beasts

and birds and all living creatures moved him to admiration for the

grace with which they had been gifted, each in his own kind. It is even

said that he composed a funeral oration for a dog which he had loved

and which died.

To this sensibility for all fair things in nature, Alberti added the

charm of a singularly sweet temper and graceful conversation. The

activity of his mind, which was always being exercised on subjects of

grave speculation, removed him from the noise and bustle of commonplace

society. He was somewhat silent, inclined to solitude, and of a pensive

countenance; yet no man found him difficult of access: his courtesy was

exquisite, and among familiar friends he was noted for the flashes of a

delicate and subtle wit. Collections were made of his apophthegms by

friends, and some are recorded by his anonymous biographer.[19] Their

finer perfume, as almost always happens with good sayings which do not

certain the 25full pith of a proverb, but owe their force, in part at

least, to the personality of their author, and to the happy moment of

their production, has evanesced. Here, however, is one which seems

still to bear the impress of Alberti's genius: 'Gold is the soul of

labour, and labour the slave of pleasure.' Of women he used to say that

their inconstancy was an antidote to their falseness; for if a woman

could but persevere in what she undertook, all the fair works of men

would be ruined. One of his strongest moral sentences is aimed at envy,

from which he suffered much in his own life, and against which he

guarded with a curious amount of caution. His own family grudged the

distinction which his talents gained for him, and a dark story is told

of a secret attempt made by them to assassinate him through his

servants. Alberti met these ignoble jealousies with a stately calm and

a sweet dignity of demeanour, never condescending to accuse his

relatives, never seeking to retaliate, but acting always for the honour

of his illustrious house. In the same spirit of generosity he refused

to enter into wordy warfare with detractors and calumniators, sparing

the reputation even of his worst enemy when chance had placed him in

his power. This moderation both of speech and conduct was especially

distinguished in an age which tolerated the fierce invectives of

Filelfo, and applauded the vindictive courage of Cellini. To money

Alberti showed a calm indifference. He committed his property to his

friends and shared with them in common. Nor was he less careless about

vulgar fame, spending far more pains in the invention of machinery and

the discovery of laws, than in their publication to the world. His

service was to knowledge, not to glory. Self-control was another of his

eminent qualities. With the natural impetuosity of a large heart, and

the vivacity of a trained athlete, he yet never allowed himself to be

subdued by anger or by sensual impulses, but took pains 26to preserve

his character unstained and dignified before the eyes of men. A story

is told of him which may remind us of Goethe's determination to

overcome his giddiness. In his youth his head was singularly sensitive

to changes of temperature; but by gradual habituation he brought

himself at last to endure the extremes of heat and cold bareheaded. In

like manner he had a constitutional disgust for onions and honey; so

powerful, that the very sight of these things made him sick. Yet by

constantly viewing and touching what was disagreeable, he conquered

these dislikes; and proved that men have a complete mastery over what

is merely instinctive in their nature. His courage corresponded to his

splendid physical development. When a boy of fifteen, he severely

wounded himself in the foot. The gash had to be probed and then sewn

up. Alberti not only bore the pain of this operation without a groan,

but helped the surgeon with his own hands; and effected a cure of the

fever which succeeded by the solace of singing to his cithern. For

music he had a genius of the rarest order; and in painting he is said

to have achieved success. Nothing, however, remains of his work and

from what Vasari says of it, we may fairly conclude that he gave less

care to the execution of finished pictures, than to drawings subsidiary

to architectural and mechanical designs. His biographer relates that

when he had completed a painting, he called children and asked them

what it meant. If they did not know, he reckoned it a failure. He was

also in the habit of painting from memory. While at Venice, he put on

canvas the faces of friends at Florence whom he had not seen for

months. That the art of painting was subservient in his estimation to

mechanics, is indicated by what we hear about the camera, in which he

showed landscapes by day and the revolutions of the stars by night, so

lively drawn that the spectators were affected with amazement. The

semi-scientific 27impulse to extend man's mastery over nature, the

magician's desire to penetrate secrets, which so powerfully influenced

the development of Lionardo's genius, seems to have overcome the purely

æsthetic instincts of Alberti, so that he became in the end neither a

great artist like Raphael, nor a great discoverer like Galileo, but

rather a clairvoyant to whom the miracles of nature and of art lie

open.

[19] Almost all the facts of Alberti's life are to be found in the

Latin biography included in Muratori. It has been conjectured, and not

without plausibility, by the last editor of Alberti's complete works,

Bonucci, that this Latin life was penned by Alberti himself.

After the first period of youth was over, Leo Battista Alberti devoted

his great faculties and all his wealth of genius to the study of the

law—then, as now, the quicksand of the noblest natures. The industry

with which he applied himself to the civil and ecclesiastical codes

broke his health. For recreation he composed a Latin comedy called

'Philodoxeos,' which imposed upon the judgment of scholars, and was

ascribed as a genuine antique to Lepidus, the comic poet. Feeling

stronger, Alberti returned at the age of twenty to his law studies, and

pursued them in the teeth of disadvantages. His health was still

uncertain, and the fortune of an exile reduced him to the utmost want.

It was no wonder that under these untoward circumstances even his

Herculean strength gave way. Emaciated and exhausted, he lost the

clearness of his eyesight, and became subject to arterial disturbances,

which filled his ears with painful sounds. This nervous illness is not

dissimilar to that which Rousseau describes in the confessions of his

youth. In vain, however, his physicians warned Alberti of impending

peril. A man of so much stanchness, accustomed to control his nature

with an iron will, is not ready to accept advice. Alberti persevered in

his studies, until at last the very seat of intellect was invaded. His

memory began to fail him for names, while he still retained with

wonderful accuracy whatever he had seen with his eyes. It was now

impossible to think of law as a profession. Yet since he could not live

without severe mental exercise, he had 28recourse to studies which tax

the verbal memory less than the intuitive faculties of the reason.

Physics and mathematics became his chief resource; and he devoted his

energies to literature. His 'Treatise on the Family' may be numbered

among the best of those compositions on social and speculative subjects

in which the Italians of the Renaissance sought to rival Cicero. His

essays on the arts are mentioned by Vasari with sincere approbation.

Comedies, interludes, orations, dialogues, and poems flowed with

abundance from his facile pen. Some were written in Latin, which he

commanded more than fairly; some in the Tuscan tongue, of which owing

to the long exile of his family in Lombardy, he is said to have been

less a master. It was owing to this youthful illness, from which

apparently his constitution never wholly recovered, that Alberti's

genius was directed to architecture.

Through his friendship with Flavio Biondo, the famous Roman antiquary,

Alberti received an introduction to Nicholas V. at the time when this,

the first great Pope of the Renaissance, was engaged in rebuilding the

palaces and fortifications of Rome. Nicholas discerned the genius of

the man, and employed him as his chief counsellor in all matters of

architecture. When the Pope died, he was able, while reciting his long

Latin will upon his deathbed, to boast that he had restored the Holy

See to its due dignity, and the Eternal City to the splendour worthy of

the seat of Christendom. The accomplishment of the second part of his

work he owed to the genius of Alberti. After doing thus much for Rome

under Thomas of Sarzana, and before beginning to beautify Florence at

the instance of the Rucellai family, Alberti entered the service of the

Malatesta, and undertook to remodel the Cathedral of S. Francis at

Rimini. He found it a plain Gothic structure with apse and side

chapels. Such churches are common enough in Italy, where pointed

architecture never 29developed its true character of complexity and

richness, but was doomed to the vast vacuity exemplified in S. Petronio

of Bologna. He left it a strange medley of mediæval and Renaissance

work, a symbol of that dissolving scene in the world's pantomime, when

the spirit of classic art, as yet but little comprehended, was

encroaching on the early Christian taste. Perhaps the mixture of styles

so startling in S. Francesco ought not to be laid to the charge of

Alberti, who had to execute the task of turning a Gothic into a classic

building. All that he could do was to alter the whole exterior of the

church, by affixing a screen-work of Roman arches and Corinthian

pilasters, so as to hide the old design and yet to leave the main

features of the fabric, the windows and doors especially, _in statu

quo_. With the interior he dealt upon the same general principle, by

not disturbing its structure, while he covered every available square

inch of surface with decorations alien to the Gothic manner.

Externally, S. Francesco is perhaps the most original and graceful of

the many attempts made by Italian builders to fuse the mediæval and the

classic styles. For Alberti attempted nothing less. A century elapsed

before Palladio, approaching the problem from a different point of

view, restored the antique in its purity, and erected in the Palazzo

della Ragione of Vicenza an almost unique specimen of resuscitated

Roman art.

Internally, the beauty of the church is wholly due to its exquisite

wall-ornaments. These consist for the most part of low reliefs in a

soft white stone, many of them thrown out upon a blue ground in the

style of Della Robbia. Allegorical figures designed with the purity of

outline we admire in Botticelli, draperies that Burne-Jones might copy,

troops of singing boys in the manner of Donatello, great angels traced

upon the stone so delicately that they seem to be rather drawn than

sculptured, statuettes in niches, personifications of all arts and

30sciences alternating with half-bestial shapes of satyrs and

sea-children:—such are the forms which fill the spaces of the chapel

walls, and climb the pilasters, and fret the arches, in such abundance

that had the whole church been finished as it was designed, it would

have presented one splendid though bizarre effect of incrustation.

Heavy screens of Verona marble, emblazoned in open arabesques with the

ciphers of Sigismondo and Isotta, with coats-of-arms, emblems, and

medallion portraits, shut the chapels from the nave. Who produced all

this sculpture it is difficult to say. Some of it is very good: much is

indifferent. We may hazard the opinion that, besides Bernardo

Ciuffagni, of whom Vasari speaks, some pupils of Donatello and

Benedetto da Majano worked at it. The influence of the sculptors of

Florence is everywhere perceptible.

Whatever be the merit of these reliefs, there is no doubt that they

fairly represent one of the most interesting moments in the history of

modern art. Gothic inspiration had failed; the early Tuscan style of

the Pisani had been worked out; Michelangelo was yet far distant, and

the abundance of classic models had not overwhelmed originality. The

sculptors of the school of Ghiberti and Donatello, who are represented

in this church, were essentially pictorial, preferring low to high

relief, and relief in general to detached figures. Their style, like

the style of Boiardo in poetry, of Botticelli in painting, is specific

to Italy in the middle of the fifteenth century. Mediæval standards of

taste were giving way to classical, Christian sentiment to Pagan; yet

the imitation of the antique had not been carried so far as to efface

the spontaneity of the artist, and enough remained of Christian feeling

to tinge the fancy with a grave and sweet romance. The sculptor had the

skill and mastery to express his slightest shade of thought with

freedom, spirit, and precision. Yet 31his work showed no sign of

conventionality, no adherence to prescribed rules. Every outline, every

fold of drapery, every attitude was pregnant, to the artist's own mind

at any rate, with meaning. In spite of its symbolism, what he wrought

was never mechanically figurative, but gifted with the independence of

its own beauty, vital with an inbreathed spirit of life. It was a happy

moment, when art had reached consciousness, and the artist had not yet

become self-conscious. The hand and the brain then really worked

together for the procreation of new forms of grace, not for the

repetition of old models, or for the invention of the strange and

startling. 'Delicate, sweet, and captivating,' are good adjectives to

express the effect produced upon the mind by the contemplation even of

the average work of this period.

To study the flowing lines of the great angels traced upon the walls of

the Chapel of S. Sigismund in the Cathedral of Rimini, to follow the

undulations of their drapery that seems to float, to feel the dignified

urbanity of all their gestures, is like listening to one of those clear

early Italian compositions for the voice, which surpasses in suavity of

tone and grace of movement all that Music in her full-grown vigour has

produced. There is indeed something infinitely charming in the

crepuscular moments of the human mind. Whether it be the rathe

loveliness of an art still immature, or the beauty of art upon the

wane—whether, in fact, the twilight be of morning or of evening, we

find in the masterpieces of such periods a placid calm and chastened

pathos, as of a spirit self-withdrawn from vulgar cares, which in the

full light of meridian splendour is lacking. In the Church of S.

Francesco at Rimini the tempered clearness of the dawn is just about to

broaden into day.

32

MAY IN UMBRIA

FROM ROME TO TERNI

We left Rome in clear sunset light. The Alban Hills defined themselves

like a cameo of amethyst upon a pale blue distance; and over the Sabine

Mountains soared immeasurable moulded domes of alabaster thunderclouds,

casting deep shadows, purple and violet, across the slopes of Tivoli.

To westward the whole sky was lucid, like some half-transparent topaz,

flooded with slowly yellowing sunbeams. The Campagna has often been

called a garden of wild-flowers. Just now poppy and aster, gladiolus

and thistle, embroider it with patterns infinite and intricate beyond

the power of art. They have already mown the hay in part; and the

billowy tracts of greyish green, where no flowers are now in bloom,

supply a restful groundwork to those brilliant patches of diapered

_fioriture_. These are like praying-carpets spread for devotees upon

the pavement of a mosque whose roof is heaven. In the level light the

scythes of the mowers flash as we move past. From their bronzed

foreheads the men toss masses of dark curls. Their muscular flanks and

shoulders sway sideways from firm yet pliant reins. On one hill,

fronting the sunset, there stands a herd of some thirty huge grey oxen,

feeding and raising their heads to look at us, with just a flush of

crimson on their horns and dewlaps. This is the scale of Mason's and

33of Costa's colouring. This is the breadth and magnitude of Rome.

Thus, through dells of ilex and oak, yielding now a glimpse of Tiber

and S. Peter's, now opening on a purple section of the distant Sabine

Hills, we came to Monte Rotondo. The sun sank; and from the flames

where he had perished, Hesper and the thin moon, very white and keen,

grew slowly into sight. Now we follow the Tiber, a swollen, hurrying,

turbid river, in which the mellowing Western sky reflects itself. This

changeful mirror of swift waters spreads a dazzling foreground to

valley, hill, and lustrous heaven. There is orange on the far horizon,

and a green ocean above, in which sea-monsters fashioned from the

clouds are floating. Yonder swims an elf with luminous hair astride

upon a sea-horse, and followed by a dolphin plunging through the fiery

waves. The orange deepens into dying red. The green divides into

daffodil and beryl. The blue above grows fainter, and the moon and

stars shine stronger.

Through these celestial changes we glide into a landscape fit for

Francia and the early Umbrian painters. Low hills to right and left;

suavely modelled heights in the far distance; a very quiet width of

plain, with slender trees ascending into the pellucid air; and down in

the mystery of the middle distance a glimpse of heaven-reflecting

water. The magic of the moon and stars lends enchantment to this scene.

No painting could convey their influences. Sometimes both luminaries

tremble, all dispersed and broken, on the swirling river. Sometimes

they sleep above the calm cool reaches of a rush-grown mere. And here

and there a ruined turret, with a broken window and a tuft of shrubs

upon the rifted battlement, gives value to the fading pallor of the

West. The last phase in the sunset is a change to blue-grey monochrome,

faintly silvered with starlight; hills, Tiber, fields and woods, 34all

floating in aë;rial twilight. There is no definition of outline now.

The daffodil of the horizon has faded into scarcely perceptible pale

greenish yellow.

We have passed Stimigliano. Through the mystery of darkness we hurry

past the bridges of Augustus and the lights of Narni.

THE CASCADES OF TERNI

The Velino is a river of considerable volume which rises in the highest

region of the Abruzzi, threads the upland valley of Rieti, and

precipitates itself by an artificial channel over cliffs about seven

hundred feet in height into the Nera. The water is densely charged with

particles of lime. This calcareous matter not only tends continually to

choke its bed, but clothes the precipices over which the torrent

thunders with fantastic drapery of stalactite; and, carried on the wind

in foam, incrusts the forests that surround the falls with fine white

dust. These famous cascades are undoubtedly the most sublime and

beautiful which Europe boasts; and their situation is worthy of so

great a natural wonder. We reach them through a noble mid-Italian

landscape, where the mountain forms are austere and boldly modelled,

but the vegetation, both wild and cultivated, has something of the

South-Italian richness. The hillsides are a labyrinth of box and

arbutus, with coronilla in golden bloom. The turf is starred with

cyclamens and orchises. Climbing the staircase paths beside the falls

in morning sunlight, or stationed on the points of vantage that command

their successive cataracts, we enjoyed a spectacle which might be

compared in its effect upon the mind to the impression left by a

symphony or a tumultuous lyric. The turbulence and splendour, the

swiftness and resonance, the veiling of the scene in smoke of shattered

water-masses, the withdrawal of these veils according as the 35volume

of the river slightly shifted in its fall, the rainbows shimmering on

the silver spray, the shivering of poplars hung above impendent

precipices, the stationary grandeur of the mountains keeping watch

around, the hurry and the incoherence of the cataracts, the immobility

of force and changeful changelessness in nature, were all for me the

elements of one stupendous poem. It was like an ode of Shelley

translated into symbolism, more vivid through inarticulate appeal to

primitive emotion than any words could be.

MONTEFALCO

The rich land of the Clitumnus is divided into meadows by transparent

watercourses, gliding with a glassy current over swaying reeds. Through

this we pass, and leave Bevagna to the right, and ascend one of those

long gradual roads which climb the hills where all the cities of the

Umbrians perch. The view expands, revealing Spello, Assisi, Perugia on

its mountain buttress, and the far reaches northward of the Tiber

valley. Then Trevi and Spoleto came into sight, and the severe

hill-country above Gubbio in part disclosed itself. Over Spoleto the

fierce witch-haunted heights of Norcia rose forbidding. This is the

kind of panorama that dilates the soul. It is so large, so dignified,

so beautiful in tranquil form. The opulent abundance of the plain

contrasts with the severity of mountain ranges desolately grand; and

the name of each of all those cities thrills the heart with memories.

The main object of a visit to Montefalco is to inspect its many

excellent frescoes; painted histories of S. Francis and S. Jerome, by

Benozzo Gozzoli; saints, angels, and Scripture episodes by the gentle

Tiberio d'Assisi. Full justice had been done to these, when a little

boy, seeing us lingering outside 36the church of S. Chiara, asked

whether we should not like to view the body of the saint. This

privilege could be purchased at the price of a small fee. It was only

necessary to call the guardian of her shrine at the high altar.

Indolent, and in compliant mood, with languid curiosity and half an

hour to spare, we assented. A handsome young man appeared, who

conducted us with decent gravity into a little darkened chamber behind

the altar. There he lighted wax tapers, opened sliding doors in what

looked like a long coffin, and drew curtains. Before us in the dim

light there lay a woman covered with a black nun's dress. Only her

hands, and the exquisitely beautiful pale contour of her face

(forehead, nose, mouth, and chin, modelled in purest outline, as though

the injury of death had never touched her) were visible. Her closed

eyes seemed to sleep. She had the perfect peace of Luini's S. Catherine

borne by the angels to her grave on Sinai. I have rarely seen anything

which surprised and touched me more. The religious earnestness of the

young custode, the hushed adoration of the country-folk who had

silently assembled round us, intensified the sympathy-inspiring beauty

of the slumbering girl. Could Julia, daughter of Claudius, have been

fairer than this maiden, when the Lombard workmen found her in her

Latin tomb, and brought her to be worshipped on the Capitol? S.

Chiara's shrine was hung round with her relics; and among these the

heart extracted from her body was suspended. Upon it, apparently

wrought into the very substance of the mummied flesh, were impressed a

figure of the crucified Christ, the scourge, and the five stigmata. The

guardian's faith in this miraculous witness to her sainthood, the

gentle piety of the men and women who knelt before it, checked all

expressions of incredulity. We abandoned ourselves to the genius of the

place; forgot even to ask what Santa Chiara was sleeping 37here; and

withdrew, toned to a not unpleasing melancholy. The world-famous S.

Clair, the spiritual sister of S. Francis, lies in Assisi. I have often

asked myself, Who, then, was this nun? What history had she? And I

think now of this girl as of a damsel of romance, a Sleeping Beauty in

the wood of time, secluded from intrusive elements of fact, and folded

in the love and faith of her own simple worshippers. Among the hollows

of Arcadia, how many rustic shrines in ancient days held saints of

Hellas, apocryphal, perhaps, like this, but hallowed by tradition and

enduring homage![20]

[20] There is in reality no doubt or problem about this Saint Clair.

She was born in 1275, and joined the Augustinian Sisterhood, dying

young, in 1308, as Abbess of her convent. Continual and impassioned

meditation on the Passion of our Lord impressed her heart with the

signs of His suffering which have been described above. I owe this

note to the kindness of an anonymous correspondent, whom I here thank.

FOLIGNO

In the landscape of Raphael's votive picture, known as the Madonna di

Foligno, there is a town with a few towers, placed upon a broad plain

at the edge of some blue hills. Allowing for that license as to details

which imaginative masters permitted themselves in matters of

subordinate importance, Raphael's sketch is still true to Foligno. The

place has not materially changed since the beginning of the sixteenth

century. Indeed, relatively to the state of Italy at large, it is still

the same as in the days of ancient Rome. Foligno forms a station of

commanding interest between Rome and the Adriatic upon the great

Flaminian Way. At Foligno the passes of the Apennines debouch into the

Umbrian plain, which slopes gradually toward the valley of the Tiber,

and from it the valley of the Nera is reached by an 38easy ascent

beneath the walls of Spoleto. An army advancing from the north by the

Metaurus and the Furlo Pass must find itself at Foligno; and the level

champaign round the city is well adapted to the maintenance and

exercises of a garrison. In the days of the Republic and the Empire,

the value of this position was well understood; but Foligno's

importance, as the key to the Flaminian Way, was eclipsed by two

flourishing cities in its immediate vicinity, Hispellum and Mevania,

the modern Spello and Bevagna. We might hazard a conjecture that the

Lombards, when they ruled the Duchy of Spoleto, following their usual

policy of opposing new military centres to the ancient Roman municipia,

encouraged Fulginium at the expense of her two neighbours. But of this

there is no certainty to build upon. All that can be affirmed with

accuracy is that in the Middle Ages, while Spello and Bevagna declined

into the inferiority of dependent burghs, Foligno grew in power and

became the chief commune of this part of Umbria. It was famous during

the last centuries of struggle between the Italian burghers and their

native despots, for peculiar ferocity in civil strife. Some of the

bloodiest pages in mediæval Italian history are those which relate the

vicissitudes of the Trinci family, the exhaustion of Foligno by

internal discord, and its final submission to the Papal power. Since

railways have been carried from Rome through Narni and Spoleto to

Ancona and Perugia, Foligno has gained considerably in commercial and

military status. It is the point of intersection for three lines; the

Italian government has made it a great cavalry depôt, and there are

signs of reviving traffic in its decayed streets. Whether the presence

of a large garrison has already modified the population, or whether we

may ascribe something to the absence of Roman municipal institutions in

the far past, and to the savagery of the mediæval period, it is

difficult to say. Yet 39the impression left by Foligno upon the mind is

different from that of Assisi, Spello, and Montefalco, which are

distinguished for a certain grace and gentleness in their inhabitants.

My window in the city wall looks southward across the plain to Spoleto,

with Montefalco perched aloft upon the right, and Trevi on its

mountain-bracket to the left. From the topmost peaks of the Sabine

Apennines, gradual tender sloping lines descend to find their quiet in

the valley of Clitumnus. The space between me and that distance is

infinitely rich with every sort of greenery, dotted here and there with

towers and relics of baronial houses. The little town is in commotion;

for the working men of Foligno and its neighbourhood have resolved to

spend their earnings on a splendid festa—horse-races, and two nights of

fireworks. The acacias and paulownias on the ramparts are in full bloom

of creamy white and lilac. In the glare of Bengal lights these trees,

with all their pendulous blossoms, surpassed the most fantastic of

artificial decorations. The rockets sent aloft into the sky amid that

solemn Umbrian landscape were nowise out of harmony with nature. I

never sympathised with critics who resent the intrusion of fireworks

upon scenes of natural beauty. The Giessbach, lighted up at so much per

head on stated evenings, with a band playing and a crowd of cockneys

staring, presents perhaps an incongruous spectacle. But where, as here

at Foligno, a whole city has made itself a festival, where there are

multitudes of citizens and soldiers and country-people slowly moving

and gravely admiring, with the decency and order characteristic of an

Italian crowd, I have nothing but a sense of satisfaction.

It is sometimes the traveller's good fortune in some remote place to

meet with an inhabitant who incarnates and interprets for him the

_genius loci_ as he has conceived it. Though 40his own subjectivity

will assuredly play a considerable part in such an encounter,

transferring to his chance acquaintance qualities he may not possess,

and connecting this personality in some purely imaginative manner with

thoughts derived from study, or impressions made by nature; yet the

stranger will henceforth become the meeting-point of many memories, the

central figure in a composition which derives from him its vividness.

Unconsciously and innocently he has lent himself to the creation of a

picture, and round him, as around the hero of a myth, have gathered

thoughts and sentiments of which he had himself no knowledge. On one of

these nights I had been threading the aisles of acacia-trees, now

glaring red, now azure, as the Bengal lights kept changing. My mind

instinctively went back to scenes of treachery and bloodshed in the

olden time, when Gorrado Trinci paraded the mangled remnants of three

hundred of his victims, heaped on mule-back, through Foligno, for a

warning to the citizens. As the procession moved along the ramparts, I

found myself in contest with a young man, who readily fell into

conversation. He was very tall, with enormous breadth of shoulders, and

long sinewy arms, like Michelangelo's favourite models. His head was

small, curled over with crisp black hair. Low forehead, and thick level

eyebrows absolutely meeting over intensely bright fierce eyes. The nose

descending straight from the brows, as in a statue of Hadrian's age.

The mouth full-lipped, petulant, and passionate above a firm round

chin. He was dressed in the shirt, white trousers, and loose white

jacket of a contadino; but he did not move with a peasant's slouch,

rather with the elasticity and alertness of an untamed panther. He told

me that he was just about to join a cavalry regiment; and I could well

imagine, when military dignity was added to that gait, how grandly he

would go. This young man, of whom I heard nothing more after 41our

half-hour's conversation among the crackling fireworks and roaring

cannon, left upon my mind an indescribable impression of

dangerousness—of 'something fierce and terrible, eligible to burst

forth.' Of men like this, then, were formed the Companies of Adventure

who flooded Italy with villany, ambition, and lawlessness in the

fifteenth century. Gattamelata, who began life as a baker's boy at

Narni and ended it with a bronze statue by Donatello on the public

square in Padua, was of this breed. Like this were the Trinci and their

bands of murderers. Like this were the bravi who hunted Lorenzaccio to

death at Venice. Like this was Pietro Paolo Baglioni, whose fault, in

the eyes of Machiavelli, was that he could not succeed in being

'perfettamente tristo.' Beautiful, but inhuman; passionate, but cold;

powerful, but rendered impotent for firm and lofty deeds by immorality

and treason; how many centuries of men like this once wasted Italy and

plunged her into servitude! Yet what material is here, under sterner

discipline, and with a nobler national ideal, for the formation of

heroic armies. Of such stuff, doubtless, were the Roman legionaries.

When will the Italians learn to use these men as Fabius or as Cæsar,

not as the Vitelli and the Trinci used them? In such meditations,

deeply stirred by the meeting of my own reflections with one who seemed

to represent for me in life and blood the spirit of the place which had

provoked them, I said farewell to Cavallucci, and returned to my

bedroom on the city wall. The last rockets had whizzed and the last

cannons had thundered ere I fell asleep.

SPELLO

Spello contains some not inconsiderable antiquities—the remains of a

Roman theatre, a Roman gate with the heads of two men and a woman

leaning over it, and some fragments 42of Roman sculpture scattered

through its buildings. The churches, especially those of S.M. Maggiore

and S. Francesco, are worth a visit for the sake of Pinturicchio.

Nowhere, except in the Piccolomini Library at Siena, can that master's

work in fresco be better studied than here. The satisfaction with which

he executed the wall paintings in S. Maria Maggiore is testified by his

own portrait introduced upon a panel in the decoration of the Virgin's

chamber. The scrupulously rendered details of books, chairs, window

seats, &c., which he here has copied, remind one of Carpaccio's study

of S. Benedict at Venice. It is all sweet, tender, delicate, and

carefully finished; but without depth, not even the depth of Perugino's

feeling. In S. Francesco, Pinturicchio, with the same meticulous

refinement, painted a letter addressed to him by Gentile Baglioni. It

lies on a stool before Madonna and her court of saints. Nicety of

execution, technical mastery of fresco as a medium for Dutch

detail-painting, prettiness of composition, and cheerfulness of

colouring, are noticeable throughout his work here rather than either

thought or sentiment. S. Maria Maggiore can boast a fresco of Madonna

between a young episcopal saint and Catherine of Alexandria from the

hand of Perugino. The rich yellow harmony of its tones, and the

graceful dignity of its emotion, conveyed no less by a certain

Raphaelesque pose and outline than by suavity of facial expression,

enable us to measure the distance between this painter and his

quasi-pupil Pinturicchio.

We did not, however, drive to Spello to inspect either Roman

antiquities or frescoes, but to see an inscription on the city walls

about Orlando. It is a rude Latin elegiac couplet, saying that, 'from

the sign below, men may conjecture the mighty members of Roland, nephew

of Charles; his deeds are written in history.' Three agreeable old

gentlemen of Spello, 43who attended us with much politeness, and were

greatly interested in my researches, pointed out a mark waist-high upon

the wall, where Orlando's knee is reported to have reached. But I could

not learn anything about a phallic monolith, which is said by Guerin or

Panizzi to have been identified with the Roland myth at Spello. Such a

column either never existed here, or had been removed before the memory

of the present generation.

EASTER MORNING AT ASSISI

We are in the lower church of S. Francesco. High mass is being sung,

with orchestra and organ and a choir of many voices. Candles are

lighted on the altar, over-canopied with Giotto's allegories. From the

low southern windows slants the sun, in narrow bands, upon the

many-coloured gloom and embrowned glory of these painted aisles. Women

in bright kerchiefs kneel upon the stones, and shaggy men from the

mountains stand or lean against the wooden benches. There is no moving

from point to point. Where we have taken our station, at the

north-western angle of the transept, there we stay till mass be over.

The whole low-vaulted building glows duskily; the frescoed roof, the

stained windows, the figure-crowded pavements blending their rich but

subdued colours, like hues upon some marvellous moth's wings, or like a

deep-toned rainbow mist discerned in twilight dreams, or like such

tapestry as Eastern queens, in ancient days, wrought for the pavilion

of an empress. Forth from this maze of mingling tints, indefinite in

shade and sunbeams, lean earnest, saintly faces—ineffably pure—adoring,

pitying, pleading; raising their eyes in ecstasy to heaven, or turning

them in ruth toward earth. Men and women of whom the world was not

worthy—at the hands of those old painters they have received 44the

divine grace, the dovelike simplicity, whereof Italians in the

fourteenth century possessed the irrecoverable secret. Each face is a

poem; the counterpart in painting to a chapter from the Fioretti di San

Francesco. Over the whole scene—in the architecture, in the frescoes,

in the coloured windows, in the gloom, on the people, in the incense,

from the chiming bells, through the music—broods one spirit: the spirit

of him who was 'the co-espoused, co-transforate with Christ;' the

ardent, the radiant, the beautiful in soul; the suffering, the strong,

the simple, the victorious over self and sin; the celestial who

trampled upon earth and rose on wings of ecstasy to heaven; the

Christ-inebriated saint of visions supersensual and life beyond the

grave. Far down below the feet of those who worship God through him, S.

Francis sleeps; but his soul, the incorruptible part of him, the

message he gave the world, is in the spaces round us. This is his

temple. He fills it like an unseen god. Not as Phoebus or Athene, from

their marble pedestals; but as an abiding spirit, felt everywhere,

nowhere seized, absorbing in itself all mysteries, all myths, all

burning exaltations, all abasements, all love, self-sacrifice, pain,

yearning, which the thought of Christ, sweeping the centuries, hath

wrought for men. Let, therefore, choir and congregation raise their

voices on the tide of prayers and praises; for this is Easter

morning—Christ is risen! Our sister, Death of the Body, for whom S.

Francis thanked God in his hymn, is reconciled to us this day, and

takes us by the hand, and leads us to the gate whence floods of

heavenly glory issue from the faces of a multitude of saints. Pray, ye

poor people; chant and pray. If all be but a dream, to wake from this

were loss for you indeed!

45

PERUSIA AUGUSTA

The piazza in front of the Prefettura is my favourite resort on these

nights of full moon. The evening twilight is made up partly of sunset

fading over Thrasymene and Tuscany; partly of moonrise from the

mountains of Gubbio and the passes toward Ancona. The hills are capped

with snow, although the season is so forward. Below our parapets the

bulk of S. Domenico, with its gaunt perforated tower, and the finer

group of S. Pietro, flaunting the arrowy 'Pennacchio di Perugia,' jut

out upon the spine of hill which dominates the valley of the Tiber. As

the night gloom deepens, and the moon ascends the sky, these buildings

seem to form the sombre foreground to some French etching. Beyond them

spreads the misty moon-irradiated plain of Umbria. Over all rise

shadowy Apennines, with dim suggestions of Assisi, Spello, Foligno,

Montefalco, and Spoleto on their basements. Little thin whiffs of

breezes, very slight and searching, flit across, and shiver as they

pass from Apennine to plain. The slowly moving population—women in

veils, men winter-mantled—pass to and fro between the buildings and the

grey immensity of sky. Bells ring. The bugles of the soldiers blow

retreat in convents turned to barracks. Young men roam the streets

beneath, singing May songs. Far, far away upon the plain, red through

the vitreous moonlight ringed with thundery gauze, fires of unnamed

castelli smoulder. As we lean from ledges eighty feet in height, gas

vies with moon in chequering illuminations on the ancient walls;

Etruscan mouldings, Roman letters, high-piled hovels, suburban

world-old dwellings plastered like martins' nests against the masonry.

Sunlight adds more of detail to this scene. To the right of Subasio,

where the passes go from Foligno towards Urbino and Ancona, heavy

masses of thundercloud hang every day; 46but the plain and

hill-buttresses are clear in transparent blueness. First comes Assisi,

with S.M. degli Angeli below; then Spello; then Foligno; then Trevi;

and, far away, Spoleto; with, reared against those misty battlements,

the village height of Montefalco—the 'ringhiera dell' Umbria,' as they

call it in this country. By daylight, the snow on yonder peaks is

clearly visible, where the Monti della Sibilla tower up above the

sources of the Nera and Velino from frigid wastes of Norcia. The lower

ranges seem as though painted, in films of airiest and palest azure,

upon china; and then comes the broad green champaign, flecked with

villages and farms. Just at the basement of Perugia winds Tiber,

through sallows and grey poplar-trees, spanned by ancient arches of red

brick, and guarded here and there by castellated towers. The mills

beneath their dams and weirs are just as Raphael drew them; and the

feeling of air and space reminds one, on each coign of vantage, of some

Umbrian picture. Every hedgerow is hoary with May-bloom and

honeysuckle. The oaks hang out their golden-dusted tassels. Wayside

shrines are decked with laburnum boughs and iris blossoms plucked from

the copse-woods, where spires of purple and pink orchis variegate the

thin, fine grass. The land waves far and wide with young corn, emerald

green beneath the olive-trees, which take upon their under-foliage

tints reflected from this verdure or red tones from the naked earth. A

fine race of _contadini_, with large, heroically graceful forms, and

beautiful dark eyes and noble faces, move about this garden, intent on

ancient, easy tillage of the kind Saturnian soil.

LA MAGIONE

On the road from Perugia to Cortona, the first stage ends at La

Magione, a high hill-village commanding the passage from the Umbrian

champaign to the lake of Thrasymene. 47It has a grim square fortalice

above it, now in ruins, and a stately castle to the south-east, built

about the time of Braccio. Here took place that famous diet of Cesare

Borgia's enemies, when the son of Alexander VI. was threatening Bologna

with his arms, and bidding fair to make himself supreme tyrant of Italy

in 1502. It was the policy of Cesare to fortify himself by reducing the

fiefs of the Church to submission, and by rooting out the dynasties

which had acquired a sort of tyranny in Papal cities. The Varani of

Camerino and the Manfredi of Faenza had been already extirpated. There

was only too good reason to believe that the turn of the Vitelli at

Città di Castello, of the Baglioni at Perugia, and of the Bentivogli at

Bologna would come next. Pandolfo Petrucci at Siena, surrounded on all

sides by Cesare's conquests, and specially menaced by the fortification

of Piombino, felt himself in danger. The great house of the Orsini, who

swayed a large part of the Patrimony of S. Peter's, and were closely

allied to the Vitelli, had even graver cause for anxiety. But such was

the system of Italian warfare, that nearly all these noble families

lived by the profession of arms, and most of them were in the pay of

Cesare. When, therefore, the conspirators met at La Magione, they were

plotting against a man whose money they had taken, and whom they had

hitherto aided in his career of fraud and spoliation.

The diet consisted of the Cardinal Orsini, an avowed antagonist of

Alexander VI.; his brother Paolo, the chieftain of the clan; Vitellozzo

Vitelli, lord of Città di Castello; Gian-Paolo Baglioni, made

undisputed master of Perugia by the recent failure of his cousin

Grifonetto's treason; Oliverotto, who had just acquired the March of

Fermo by the murder of his uncle Giovanni da Fogliani; Ermes

Bentivoglio, the heir of Bologna; and Antonio da Venafro, the secretary

of Pandolfo Petrueci. These men vowed hostility on the basis of

48common injuries and common fear against the Borgia. But they were for

the most part stained themselves with crime, and dared not trust each

other, and could not gain the confidence of any respectable power in

Italy except the exiled Duke of Urbino. Procrastination was the first

weapon used by the wily Cesare, who trusted that time would sow among

his rebel captains suspicion and dissension. He next made overtures to

the leaders separately, and so far succeeded in his perfidious policy

as to draw Vitellozzo Vitelli, Oliverotto da Fermo, Paolo Orsini, and

Francesco Orsini, Duke of Gravina, into his nets at Sinigaglia. Under

pretext of fair conference and equitable settlement of disputed claims,

he possessed himself of their persons, and had them strangled—two upon

December 31, and two upon January 18, 1503. Of all Cesare's actions,

this was the most splendid for its successful combination of sagacity

and policy in the hour of peril, of persuasive diplomacy, and of

ruthless decision when the time to strike his blow arrived.

CORTONA

After leaving La Magione, the road descends upon the lake of Thrasymene

through oak-woods full of nightingales. The lake lay basking,

leaden-coloured, smooth and waveless, under a misty, rain-charged,

sun-irradiated sky. At Passignano, close beside its shore, we stopped

for mid-day. This is a little fishing village of very poor people, who

live entirely by labour on the waters. They showed us huge eels coiled

in tanks, and some fine specimens of the silver carp—Reina del Lago. It

was off one of the eels that we made our lunch; and taken, as he was,

alive from his cool lodging, he furnished a series of dishes fit for a

king.

Climbing the hill of Cortona seemed a quite interminable 49business. It

poured a deluge. Our horses were tired, and one lean donkey, who, after

much trouble, was produced from a farmhouse and yoked in front of them,

rendered but little assistance.

Next day we duly saw the Muse and Lamp in the Museo, the Fra Angelicos,

and all the Signorellis. One cannot help thinking that too much fuss is

made nowadays about works of art—running after them for their own

sakes, exaggerating their importance, and detaching them as objects of

study, instead of taking them with sympathy and carelessness as

pleasant or instructive adjuncts to our actual life. Artists,

historians of art, and critics are forced to isolate pictures; and it

is of profit to their souls to do so. But simple folk, who have no

aesthetic vocation, whether creative or critical, suffer more than is

good for them by compliance with mere fashion. Sooner or later we shall

return to the spirit of the ages which produced these pictures, and

which regarded them with less of an industrious bewilderment than they

evoke at present.

I am far indeed from wishing to decry art, the study of art, or the

benefits to be derived from its intelligent enjoyment. I only mean to

suggest that we go the wrong way to work at present in this matter.

Picture and sculpture galleries accustom us to the separation of art

from life. Our methods of studying art, making a beginning of art-study

while traveling, tend to perpetuate this separation. It is only on

reflection, after long experience, that we come to perceive that the

most fruitful moments in our art education have been casual and

unsought, in quaint nooks and unexpected places, where nature, art, and

life are happily blent.

The Palace of the Commune at Cortona is interesting because of the

shields of Florentine governors, sculptured on blocks of grey stone,

and inserted in its outer walls—Peruzzi, 50Albizzi, Strozzi, Salviati,

among the more ancient—de' Medici at a later epoch. The revolutions in

the Republic of Florence may be read by a herald from these

coats-of-arms and the dates beneath them.

The landscape of this Tuscan highland satisfies me more and more with

sense of breadth and beauty. From S. Margherita above the town the

prospect is immense and wonderful and wild—up into those brown,

forbidding mountains; down to the vast plain; and over to the cities of

Chiusi, Montepulciano, and Foiano. The jewel of the view is Trasimeno,

a silvery shield encased with serried hills, and set upon one corner of

the scene, like a precious thing apart and meant for separate

contemplation. There is something in the singularity and circumscribed

completeness of the mountain-girded lake, diminished by distance, which

would have attracted Lionardo da Vinci's pencil, had he seen it.

Cortona seems desperately poor, and the beggars are intolerable. One

little blind boy, led by his brother, both frightfully ugly and ragged

urchins, pursued us all over the city, incessantly whining 'Signore

Padrone!' It was only on the threshold of the inn that I ventured to

give them a few coppers, for I knew well that any public beneficence

would raise the whole swarm of the begging population round us. Sitting

later in the day upon the piazza of S. Domenico, I saw the same blind

boy taken by his brother to play. The game consists, in the little

creature throwing his arms about the trunk of a big tree, and running

round and round it, clasping it. This seemed to make him quite

inexpressibly happy. His face lit up and beamed with that inner

beatitude blind people show—a kind of rapture shining over it, as

though nothing could be more altogether delightful. This little boy had

the smallpox at eight months, and has never been able to see since. He

looks sturdy, and may 51live to be of any age—doomed always, is that

possible, to beg?

CHIUSI

What more enjoyable dinner can be imagined than a flask of excellent

Montepulciano, a well-cooked steak, and a little goat's cheese in the

inn of the Leone d'Oro at Chiusi? The windows are open, and the sun is

setting. Monte Cetona bounds the view to the right, and the wooded

hills of Città della Pieve to the left. The deep green dimpled valley

goes stretching away toward Orvieto; and at its end a purple mountain

mass, distinct and solitary, which may peradventure be Soracte! The

near country is broken into undulating hills, forested with fine olives

and oaks; and the composition of the landscape, with its crowning

villages, is worthy of a background to an Umbrian picture. The breadth

and depth and quiet which those painters loved, the space of lucid sky,

the suggestion of winding waters in verdant fields, all are here. The

evening is beautiful—golden light streaming softly from behind us on

this prospect, and gradually mellowing to violet and blue with stars

above.

At Chiusi we visited several Etruscan tombs, and saw their red and

black scrawled pictures. One of the sepulchres was a well-jointed vault

of stone with no wall-paintings. The rest had been scooped out of the

living tufa. This was the excuse for some pleasant hours spent in

walking and driving through the country. Chiusi means for me the

mingling of grey olives and green oaks in limpid sunlight; deep leafy

lanes; warm sandstone banks; copses with nightingales and cyclamens and

cuckoos; glimpses of a silvery lake; blue shadowy distances; the

bristling ridge of Monte Cetona; the conical towers, Becca di Questo

and Becca di Quello, over against each other on the borders; ways

winding among 52hedgerows like some bit of England in June, but not so

full of flowers. It means all this, I fear, for me far more than

theories about Lars Porsenna and Etruscan ethnology.

GUBBIO

Gubbio ranks among the most ancient of Italian hill-towns. With its

back set firm against the spine of central Apennines, and piled, house

over house, upon the rising slope, it commands a rich tract of upland

champaign, bounded southward toward Perugia and Foligno by peaked and

rolling ridges. This amphitheatre, which forms its source of wealth and

independence, is admirably protected by a chain of natural defences;

and Gubbio wears a singularly old-world aspect of antiquity and

isolation. Houses climb right to the crests of gaunt bare peaks; and

the brown mediæval walls with square towers which protected them upon

the mountain side, following the inequalities of the ground, are still

a marked feature in the landscape. It is a town of steep streets and

staircases, with quaintly framed prospects, and solemn vistas opening

at every turn across the lowland. One of these views might be selected

for especial notice. In front, irregular buildings losing themselves in

country as they straggle by the roadside; then the open post-road with

a cypress to the right; afterwards, the rich green fields, and on a bit

of rising ground an ancient farmhouse with its brown dependencies;

lastly, the blue hills above Fossato, and far away a wrack of tumbling

clouds. All this enclosed by the heavy archway of the Porta Romana,

where sunlight and shadow chequer the mellow tones of a dim fresco,

indistinct with age, but beautiful.

Gubbio has not greatly altered since the middle ages. But poor people

are now living in the palaces of noblemen and merchants. These new

inhabitants have walled up the fair 53arched windows and slender

portals of the ancient dwellers, spoiling the beauty of the streets

without materially changing the architectural masses. In that witching

hour when the Italian sunset has faded, and a solemn grey replaces the

glowing tones of daffodil and rose, it is not difficult, here dreaming

by oneself alone, to picture the old noble life—the ladies moving along

those open loggias, the young men in plumed caps and curling hair with

one foot on those doorsteps, the knights in armour and the sumpter

mules and red-robed Cardinals defiling through those gates into the

courts within. The modern bricks and mortar with which that picturesque

scene has been overlaid, the ugly oblong windows and bright green

shutters which now interrupt the flowing lines of arch and gallery;

these disappear beneath the fine remembered touch of a sonnet sung by

Folgore, when still the Parties had their day, and this deserted city

was the centre of great aims and throbbing aspirations.

The names of the chief buildings in Gubbio are strongly suggestive of

the middle ages. They abut upon a Piazza de' Signori. One of them, the

Palazzo del Municipio, is a shapeless unfinished block of masonry. It

is here that the Eugubine tables, plates of brass with Umbrian and

Roman incised characters, are shown. The Palazzo de' Consoli has higher

architectural qualities, and is indeed unique among Italian palaces for

the combination of massiveness with lightness in a situation of

unprecedented boldness. Rising from enormous substructures mortised

into the solid hillside, it rears its vast rectangular bulk to a giddy

height above the town; airy loggias imposed on great forbidding masses

of brown stone, shooting aloft into a light aë;rial tower. The empty

halls inside are of fair proportions and a noble size, and the views

from the open colonnades in all directions fascinate. But the final

impression made by the building is one of square, 54tranquil, massive

strength—perpetuity embodied in masonry—force suggesting facility by

daring and successful addition of elegance to hugeness. Vast as it is,

this pile is not forbidding, as a similarly weighty structure in the

North would be. The fine quality of the stone and the delicate though

simple mouldings of the windows give it an Italian grace.

These public palaces belong to the age of the Communes, when Gubbio was

a free town, with a policy of its own, and an important part to play in

the internecine struggles of Pope and Empire, Guelf and Ghibelline. The

ruined, deserted, degraded Palazzo Ducale reminds us of the advent of

the despots. It has been stripped of all its tarsia-work and sculpture.

Only here and there a Fe.D., with the cupping-glass of Federigo di

Montefeltro, remains to show that Gubbio once became the fairest fief

of the Urbino duchy. S. Ubaldo, who gave his name to this duke's son,

was the patron of Gubbio, and to him the cathedral is dedicated—one low

enormous vault, like a cellar or feudal banqueting hall, roofed with a

succession of solid Gothic arches. This strange old church, and the

House of Canons, buttressed on the hill beside it, have suffered less

from modernisation than most buildings in Gubbio. The latter, in

particular, helps one to understand what this city of grave palazzi

must have been, and how the mere opening of old doors and windows would

restore it to its primitive appearance. The House of the Canons has, in

fact, not yet been given over to the use of middle-class and

proletariate.

At the end of a day in Gubbio, it is pleasant to take our ease in the

primitive hostelry, at the back of which foams a mountain-torrent,

rushing downward from the Apennines. The Gubbio wine is very fragrant,

and of a rich ruby colour. Those to whom the tints of wine and jewels

give a pleasure not entirely childish, will take delight in its

specific blending 55of tawny hues with rose. They serve the table

still, at Gubbio, after the antique Italian fashion, covering it with a

cream-coloured linen cloth bordered with coarse lace—the creases of the

press, the scent of old herbs from the wardrobe, are still upon it—and

the board is set with shallow dishes of warm, white earthenware,

basket-worked in open lattice at the edge, which contain little

separate messes of meat, vegetables, cheese, and comfits. The wine

stands in strange, slender phials of smooth glass, with stoppers; and

the amber-coloured bread lies in fair round loaves upon the cloth.

Dining thus is like sitting down to the supper at Emmaus, in some

picture of Gian Bellini or of Masolino. The very bareness of the

room—its open rafters, plastered walls, primitive settees, and

red-brick floor, on which a dog sits waiting for a bone—enhances the

impression of artistic delicacy in the table.

FROM GUBBIO TO FANO

The road from Gubbio, immediately after leaving the city, enters a

narrow Alpine ravine, where a thin stream dashes over dark, red rocks,

and pendent saxifrages wave to the winds. The carriage in which we

travelled at the end of May, one morning, had two horses, which our

driver soon supplemented with a couple of white oxen. Slowly and

toilsomely we ascended between the flanks of barren hills—gaunt masses

of crimson and grey crag, clothed at their summits with short turf and

scanty pasture. The pass leads first to the little town of Scheggia,

and is called the Monte Calvo, or bald mountain. At Scheggia, it joins

the great Flaminian Way, or North road of the Roman armies. At the top

there is a fine view over the conical hills that dominate Gubbio, and,

far away, to noble mountains above the Furlo and the Foligno line of

railway to Ancona. Range rises over range, crossing 56at unexpected

angles, breaking into sudden precipices, and stretching out long,

exquisitely modelled outlines, as only Apennines can do, in silvery

sobriety of colours toned by clearest air. Every square piece of this

austere, wild landscape forms a varied picture, whereof the composition

is due to subtle arrangements of lines always delicate; and these lines

seem somehow to have been determined in their beauty by the vast

antiquity of the mountain system, as though they all had taken time to

choose their place and wear down into harmony. The effect of tempered

sadness was heightened for us by stormy lights and dun clouds, high in

air, rolling vapours and flying shadows, over all the prospect, tinted

in ethereal grisaille.

After Scheggia, one enters a land of meadow and oak-trees. This is the

sacred central tract of Jupiter Apenninus, whose fane—

Delubra Jovis saxoque minantes

Apenninigenis cultae pastoribus arae

—once rose behind us on the bald Iguvian summits. A second little pass

leads from this region to the Adriatic side of the Italian watershed,

and the road now follows the Barano downward toward the sea. The valley

is fairly green with woods, where mistletoe may here and there be seen

on boughs of oak, and rich with cornfields. Cagli is the chief town of

the district, and here they show one of the best pictures left to us by

Raphael's father, Giovanni Santi. It is a Madonna, attended by S.

Peter, S. Francis, S. Dominic, S. John, and two angels. One of the

angels is traditionally supposed to have been painted from the boy

Raphael, and the face has something which reminds us of his portraits.

The whole composition, excellent in modelling, harmonious in grouping,

soberly but strongly coloured, with a peculiar blending of dignity and

sweetness, grace and vigour, makes one wonder 57why Santi thought it

necessary to send his son from his own workshop to study under

Perugino. He was himself a master of his art, and this, perhaps the

most agreeable of his paintings, has a masculine sincerity which is

absent from at least the later works of Perugino.

Some miles beyond Cagli, the real pass of the Furlo begins. It owes its

name to a narrow tunnel bored by Vespasian in the solid rock, where

limestone crags descend on the Barano. The Romans called this gallery

Petra Pertusa, or Intercisa, or more familiarly Forulus, whence comes

the modern name. Indeed, the stations on the old Flaminian Way are

still well marked by Latin designations; for Cagli is the ancient

Calles, and Fossombrone is Forum Sempronii, and Fano the Fanum Fortunæ.

Vespasian commemorated this early achievement in engineering by an

inscription carved on the living stone, which still remains; and

Claudian, when he sang the journey of his Emperor Honorius from Rimini

to Rome, speaks thus of what was even then an object of astonishment to

travellers:—

Laetior hinc fano recipit fortuna vetusto,

Despiciturque vagus praerupta valle Metaurus,

Qua mons arte patens vivo se perforat arcu

Admittitque viam sectae per viscera rupis.

The Forulus itself may now be matched, on any Alpine pass, by several

tunnels of far mightier dimensions; for it is narrow, and does not

extend more than 126 feet in length. But it occupies a fine position at

the end of a really imposing ravine. The whole Furlo Pass might,

without too much exaggeration, be described as a kind of Cheddar on the

scale of the Via Mala. The limestone rocks, which rise on either hand

above the gorge to an enormous height, are noble in form and solemn,

like a succession of gigantic portals, with stupendous flanking

obelisks and pyramids. Some of these 58crag-masses rival the fantastic

cliffs of Capri, and all consist of that southern mountain limestone

which changes from pale yellow to blue grey and dusky orange. A river

roars precipitately through the pass, and the roadsides wave with many

sorts of campanulas—a profusion of azure and purple bells upon the hard

white stone. Of Roman remains there is still enough (in the way of

Roman bridges and bits of broken masonry) to please an antiquary's eye.

But the lover of nature will dwell chiefly on the picturesque qualities

of this historic gorge, so alien to the general character of Italian

scenery, and yet so remote from anything to which Swiss travelling

accustoms one.

The Furlo breaks out into a richer land of mighty oaks and waving

cornfields, a fat pastoral country, not unlike Devonshire in detail,

with green uplands, and wild-rose tangled hedgerows, and much running

water, and abundance of summer flowers. At a point above Fossombrone,

the Barano joins the Metauro, and here one has a glimpse of far-away

Urbino, high upon its mountain eyrie. It is so rare, in spite of

immemorial belief, to find in Italy a wilderness of wild flowers, that

I feel inclined to make a list of those I saw from our carriage windows

as we rolled down lazily along the road to Fossombrone. Broom, and

cytisus, and hawthorn mingled with roses, gladiolus, and sainfoin.

There were orchises, and clematis, and privet, and wild-vine, vetches

of all hues, red poppies, sky-blue cornflowers, and lilac pimpernel. In

the rougher hedges, dogwood, honeysuckle, pyracanth, and acacia made a

network of white bloom and blushes. Milk-worts of all bright and tender

tints combined with borage, iris, hawkweeds, harebells, crimson clover,

thyme, red snap-dragon, golden asters, and dreamy love-in-a-mist, to

weave a marvellous carpet such as the looms of Shiraz or of Cashmere

never spread. Rarely have I gazed on Flora in such riot, 59such

luxuriance, such self-abandonment to joy. The air was filled with

fragrances. Songs of cuckoos and nightingales echoed from the copses on

the hillsides. The sun was out, and dancing over all the landscape.

After all this, Fano was very restful in the quiet sunset. It has a

sandy stretch of shore, on which the long, green-yellow rollers of the

Adriatic broke into creamy foam, beneath the waning saffron light over

Pesaro and the rosy rising of a full moon. This Adriatic sea carries an

English mind home to many a little watering-place upon our coast. In

colour and the shape of waves it resembles our Channel.

The sea-shore is Fano's great attraction; but the town has many

churches, and some creditable pictures, as well as Roman antiquities.

Giovanni Santi may here be seen almost as well as at Cagli; and of

Perugino there is one truly magnificent altar-piece—lunette, great

centre panel, and predella—dusty in its present condition, but

splendidly painted, and happily not yet restored or cleaned. It is

worth journeying to Fano to see this. Still better would the journey be

worth the traveller's while if he could be sure to witness such a game

of _Pallone_ as we chanced upon in the Via dell' Arco di Augusto—lads

and grown-men, tightly girt, in shirt sleeves, driving the great ball

aloft into the air with cunning bias and calculation of projecting

house-eaves. I do not understand the game; but it was clearly played

something after the manner of our football, that is to say; with sides,

and front and back players so arranged as to cover the greatest number

of angles of incidence on either wall.

Fano still remembers that it is the Fane of Fortune. On the fountain in

the market-place stands a bronze Fortuna, slim and airy, offering her

veil to catch the wind. May she long shower health and prosperity upon

the modern watering-place of which she is the patron saint!

60

THE PALACE OF URBINO

I

At Rimini, one spring, the impulse came upon my wife and me to make our

way across San Marino to Urbino. In the Piazza, called apocryphally

after Julius Cæsar, I found a proper _vetturino_, with a good carriage

and two indefatigable horses. He was a splendid fellow, and bore a

great historic name, as I discovered when our bargain was completed.

'What are you called?' I asked him. '_Filippo Visconti, per servirla!_'

was the prompt reply. Brimming over with the darkest memories of the

Italian Renaissance, I hesitated when I heard this answer. The

associations seemed too ominous. And yet the man himself was so

attractive—tall, stalwart, and well looking—no feature of his face or

limb of his athletic form recalling the gross tyrant who concealed

worse than Caligula's ugliness from sight in secret chambers—that I

shook this preconception from my mind. As it turned out, Filippo

Visconti had nothing in common with his infamous namesake but the name.

On a long and trying journey, he showed neither sullen nor yet

ferocious tempers; nor, at the end of it, did he attempt by any

master-stroke of craft to wheedle from me more than his fair pay; but

took the meerschaum pipe I gave him for a keepsake, with the frank

goodwill of an accomplished gentleman. The only exhibition of his hot

Italian blood which I remember did his humanity credit. 61While we were

ascending a steep hillside, he jumped from his box to thrash a ruffian

by the roadside for brutal treatment to a little boy. He broke his

whip, it is true, in this encounter; risked a dangerous quarrel; and

left his carriage, with myself and wife inside it, to the mercy of his

horses in a somewhat perilous position. But when he came back, hot and

glowing, from this deed of justice, I could only applaud his zeal.

An Italian of this type, handsome as an antique statue, with the

refinement of a modern gentleman and that intelligence which is innate

in a race of immemorial culture, is a fascinating being. He may be

absolutely ignorant in all book-learning. He may be as ignorant as a

Bersagliere from Montalcino with whom I once conversed at Rimini, who

gravely said that he could walk in three months to North America, and

thought of doing it when his term of service was accomplished. But he

will display, as this young soldier did, a grace and ease of address

which are rare in London drawing-rooms; and by his shrewd remarks upon

the cities he has visited, will show that he possesses a fine natural

taste for things of beauty. The speech of such men, drawn from the

common stock of the Italian people, is seasoned with proverbial

sayings, the wisdom of centuries condensed in a few nervous words. When

emotion fires their brain, they break into spontaneous eloquence, or

suggest the motive of a poem by phrases pregnant with imagery.

For the first stage of the journey out of Rimini, Filippo's two horses

sufficed. The road led almost straight across the level between

quickset hedges in white bloom. But when we reached the long steep hill

which ascends to San Marino, the inevitable oxen were called out, and

we toiled upwards leisurely through cornfields bright with red anemones

and sweet narcissus. At this point pomegranate hedges replaced 62the

May-thorns of the plain. In course of time our _bovi_ brought us to the

Borgo, or lower town, whence there is a further ascent of seven hundred

feet to the topmost hawk's-nest or acropolis of the republic. These we

climbed on foot, watching the view expand around us and beneath. Crags

of limestone here break down abruptly to the rolling hills, which go to

lose themselves in field and shore. Misty reaches of the Adriatic close

the world to eastward. Cesena, Rimini, Verucchio, and countless

hill-set villages, each isolated on its tract of verdure conquered from

the stern grey soil, define the points where Montefeltri wrestled with

Malatestas in long bygone years. Around are marly mountain-flanks in

wrinkles and gnarled convolutions like some giant's brain, furrowed by

rivers crawling through dry wasteful beds of shingle. Interminable

ranges of gaunt Apennines stretch, tier by tier, beyond; and over all

this landscape, a grey-green mist of rising crops and new-fledged

oak-trees lies like a veil upon the nakedness of Nature's ruins.

Nothing in Europe conveys a more striking sense of geological antiquity

than such a prospect. The denudation and abrasion of innumerable ages,

wrought by slow persistent action of weather and water on an upheaved

mountain mass, are here made visible. Every wave in that vast sea of

hills, every furrow in their worn flanks, tells its tale of a

continuous corrosion still in progress. The dominant impression is one

of melancholy. We forget how Romans, countermarching Carthaginians,

trod the land beneath us. The marvel of San Marino, retaining

independence through the drums and tramplings of the last seven

centuries, is swallowed in a deeper sense of wonder. We turn

instinctively in thought to Leopardi's musings on man's destiny at war

with unknown nature-forces and malignant rulers of the universe.

63

Omai disprezza

Te, la natura, il brutto

Poter che, ascoso, a comun danno impera,

E l' infinita vanità del tutto.

And then, straining our eyes southward, we sweep the dim blue distance

for Recanati, and remember that the poet of modern despair and

discouragement was reared in even such a scene as this.

The town of San Marino is grey, narrow-streeted, simple; with a great,

new, decent, Greek-porticoed cathedral, dedicated to the eponymous

saint. A certain austerity defines it from more picturesque hill-cities

with a less uniform history. There is a marble statue of S. Marino in

the choir of his church; and in his cell is shown the stone bed and

pillow on which he took austere repose. One narrow window near the

saint's abode commands a proud but melancholy landscape of distant

hills and seaboard. To this, the great absorbing charm of San Marino,

our eyes instinctively, recurrently, take flight. It is a landscape

which by variety and beauty thralls attention, but which by its

interminable sameness might grow almost overpowering. There is no

relief. The gladness shed upon far humbler Northern lands in May is

ever absent here. The German word _Gemüthlichkeit_, the English phrase

'a home of ancient peace,' are here alike by art and nature

untranslated into visibilities. And yet (as we who gaze upon it thus

are fain to think) if peradventure the intolerable _ennui_ of this

panorama should drive a citizen of San Marino into out-lands, the same

view would haunt him whithersoever he went—the swallows of his native

eyrie would shrill through his sleep—he would yearn to breathe its fine

keen air in winter, and to watch its iris-hedges deck themselves with

blue in spring;—like Virgil's hero, dying, he would think of San

Marino: _Aspicit, et dulces moriens reminiscitur Argos_. Even 64a

passing stranger may feel the mingled fascination and oppression of

this prospect—the monotony which maddens, the charm which at a distance

grows upon the mind, environing it with memories.

Descending to the Borgo, we found that Filippo Visconti had ordered a

luncheon of excellent white bread, pigeons, and omelette, with the best

red muscat wine I ever drank, unless the sharp air of the hills

deceived my appetite. An Italian history of San Marino, including its

statutes, in three volumes, furnished intellectual food. But I confess

to having learned from these pages little else than this: first, that

the survival of the Commonwealth through all phases of European

politics had been semi-miraculous; secondly, that the most eminent San

Marinesi had been lawyers. It is possible on a hasty deduction from

these two propositions (to which, however, I am far from wishing to

commit myself), that the latter is a sufficient explanation of the

former.

From San Marino the road plunges at a break-neck pace. We are now in

the true Feltrian highlands, whence the Counts of Montefeltro issued in

the twelfth century. Yonder eyrie is San Leo, which formed the key of

entrance to the duchy of Urbino in campaigns fought many hundred years

ago. Perched on the crest of a precipitous rock, this fortress looks as

though it might defy all enemies but famine. And yet San Leo was taken

and re-taken by strategy and fraud, when Montefeltro, Borgia,

Malatesta, Rovere, contended for dominion in these valleys. Yonder is

Sta. Agata, the village to which Guidobaldo fled by night when

Valentino drove him from his dukedom. A little farther towers Carpegna,

where one branch of the Montefeltro house maintained a countship

through seven centuries, and only sold their fief to Rome in 1815.

Monte Coppiolo lies behind, Pietra Rubia in front: two other eagles'

nests of the same brood. What a road it is! 65It beats the tracks on

Exmoor. The uphill and downhill of Devonshire scorns compromise or

mitigation by _détour_ and zigzag. But here geography is on a scale so

far more vast, and the roadway is so far worse metalled than with us in

England—knotty masses of talc and nodes of sandstone cropping up at

dangerous turnings—that only Dante's words describe the journey:—

Vassi in Sanleo, e discendesi in Noli,

Montasi su Bismantova in cacume

Con esso i piè; ma qui convien ch' uom voli.

Of a truth, our horses seemed rather to fly than scramble up and down

these rugged precipices; Visconti cheerily animating them with the

brave spirit that was in him, and lending them his wary driver's help

of hand and voice at need.

We were soon upon a cornice-road between the mountains and the

Adriatic: following the curves of gulch and cleft ravine; winding round

ruined castles set on points of vantage; the sea-line high above their

grass-grown battlements, the shadow-dappled champaign girdling their

bastions mortised on the naked rock. Except for the blue lights across

the distance, and the ever-present sea, these earthy Apennines would be

too grim. Infinite air and this spare veil of spring-tide greenery on

field and forest soothe their sternness. Two rivers, swollen by late

rains, had to be forded. Through one of these, the Foglia, bare-legged

peasants led the way. The horses waded to their bellies in the tawny

water. Then more hills and vales; green nooks with rippling corn-crops;

secular oaks attired in golden leafage. The clear afternoon air rang

with the voices of a thousand larks overhead. The whole world seemed

quivering with light and delicate ethereal sound. And yet my mind

turned irresistibly to thoughts of war, violence, and pillage. How

often has this intermediate 66land been fought over by Montefeltro and

Brancaleoni, by Borgia and Malatesta, by Medici and Della Rovere! Its

_contadini_ are robust men, almost statuesque in build, and beautiful

of feature. No wonder that the Princes of Urbino, with such materials

to draw from, sold their service and their troops to Florence, Rome, S.

Mark, and Milan. The bearing of these peasants is still soldierly and

proud. Yet they are not sullen or forbidding like the Sicilians, whose

habits of life, for the rest, much resemble theirs. The villages, there

as here, are few and far between, perched high on rocks, from which the

folk descend to till the ground and reap the harvest. But the southern

_brusquerie_ and brutality are absent from this district. The men have

something of the dignity and slow-eyed mildness of their own huge oxen.

As evening fell, more solemn Apennines upreared themselves to

southward. The Monte d'Asdrubale, Monte Nerone, and Monte Catria hove

into sight. At last, when light was dim, a tower rose above the

neighbouring ridge, a broken outline of some city barred the sky-line.

Urbino stood before us. Our long day's march was at an end.

The sunset was almost spent, and a four days' moon hung above the

western Apennines, when we took our first view of the palace. It is a

fancy-thralling work of wonder seen in that dim twilight; like some

castle reared by Atlante's magic for imprisonment of Ruggiero, or

palace sought in fairyland by Astolf winding his enchanted horn. Where

shall we find its like, combining, as it does, the buttressed

battlemented bulk of mediæval strongholds with the airy balconies,

suspended gardens, and fantastic turrets of Italian pleasure-houses?

This unique blending of the feudal past with the Renaissance spirit of

the time when it was built, connects it with the art of Ariosto—or more

exactly with Boiardo's epic. Duke Federigo planned his palace at Urbino

just at the 67moment when the Count of Scandiano had began to chaunt

his lays of Roland in the Castle of Ferrara. Chivalry, transmuted by

the Italian genius into something fanciful and quaint, survived as a

frail work of art. The men-at-arms of the Condottieri still glittered

in gilded hauberks. Their helmets waved with plumes and bizarre crests.

Their surcoats blazed with heraldries; their velvet caps with medals

bearing legendary emblems. The pomp and circumstance of feudal war had

not yet yielded to the cannon of the Gascon or the Switzer's pike. The

fatal age of foreign invasions had not begun for Italy. Within a few

years Charles VIII.'s holiday excursion would reveal the internal

rottenness and weakness of her rival states, and the peninsula for half

a century to come would be drenched in the blood of Frenchmen, Germans,

Spaniards, fighting for her cities as their prey. But now Lorenzo de'

Medici was still alive. The famous policy which bears his name held

Italy suspended for a golden time in false tranquillity and

independence. The princes who shared his culture and his love of art

were gradually passing into modern noblemen, abandoning the savage

feuds and passions of more virile centuries, yielding to luxury and

scholarly enjoyments. The castles were becoming courts, and despotisms

won by force were settling into dynasties.

It was just at this epoch that Duke Federigo built his castle at

Urbino. One of the ablest and wealthiest Condottieri of his time, one

of the best instructed and humanest of Italian princes, he combined in

himself the qualities which mark that period of transition. And these

he impressed upon his dwelling-house, which looks backward to the

mediæval fortalice and forward to the modern palace. This makes it the

just embodiment in architecture of Italian romance, the perfect

analogue of the 'Orlando Innamorato.' By comparing 68it with the castle

of the Estes at Ferrara and the Palazzo del Te of the Gonzagas at

Mantua, we place it in its right position between mediæval and

Renaissance Italy, between the age when principalities arose upon the

ruins of commercial independence and the age when they became dynastic

under Spain.

The exigencies of the ground at his disposal forced Federigo to give

the building an irregular outline. The fine façade, with its embayed

_loggie_ and flanking turrets, is placed too close upon the city

ramparts for its due effect. We are obliged to cross the deep ravine

which separates it from a lower quarter of the town, and take our

station near the Oratory of S. Giovanni Battista, before we can

appreciate the beauty of its design, or the boldness of the group it

forms with the cathedral dome and tower and the square masses of

numerous out-buildings. Yet this peculiar position of the palace,

though baffling to a close observer of its details, is one of singular

advantage to the inhabitants. Set on the verge of Urbino's towering

eminence, it fronts a wave-tossed sea of vales and mountain summits

toward the rising and the setting sun. There is nothing but illimitable

air between the terraces and loggias of the Duchess's apartments and

the spreading pyramid of Monte Catria.

A nobler scene is nowhere swept from palace windows than this, which

Castiglione touched in a memorable passage at the end of his

'Cortegiano.' To one who in our day visits Urbino, it is singular how

the slight indications of this sketch, as in some silhouette, bring

back the antique life, and link the present with the past—a hint,

perhaps, for reticence in our descriptions. The gentlemen and ladies of

the court had spent a summer night in long debate on love, rising to

the height of mystical Platonic rapture on the lips of Bembo, when one

of them exclaimed, 'The day has broken!' 'He 69pointed to the light

which was beginning to enter by the fissures of the windows. Whereupon

we flung the casements wide upon that side of the palace which looks

toward the high peak of Monte Catria, and saw that a fair dawn of rosy

hue was born already in the eastern skies, and all the stars had

vanished except the sweet regent of the heaven of Venus, who holds the

borderlands of day and night; and from her sphere it seemed as though a

gentle wind were breathing, filling the air with eager freshness, and

waking among the numerous woods upon the neighbouring hills the

sweet-toned symphonies of joyous birds.'

II

The House of Montefeltro rose into importance early in the twelfth

century. Frederick Barbarossa erected their fief into a county in 1160.

Supported by imperial favour, they began to exercise an undefined

authority over the district, which they afterwards converted into a

duchy. But, though Ghibelline for several generations, the Montefeltri

were too near neighbours of the Papal power to free themselves from

ecclesiastical vassalage. Therefore in 1216 they sought and obtained

the title of Vicars of the Church. Urbino acknowledged them as

semi-despots in their double capacity of Imperial and Papal deputies.

Cagli and Gubbio followed in the fourteenth century. In the fifteenth,

Castel Durante was acquired from the Brancaleoni by warfare, and

Fossombrone from the Malatestas by purchase. Numerous fiefs and

villages fell into their hands upon the borders of Rimini in the course

of a continued struggle with the House of Malatesta: and when Fano and

Pesaro were added at the opening of the sixteenth century, the domain

over which they ruled was a compact territory, some forty miles square,

between the 70Adriatic and the Apennines. From the close of the

thirteenth century they bore the title of Counts of Urbino. The famous

Conte Guido, whom Dante placed among the fraudulent in hell, supported

the honours of the house and increased its power by his political

action, at this epoch. But it was not until the year 1443 that the

Montefeltri acquired their ducal title. This was conferred by Eugenius

IV. upon Oddantonio, over whose alleged crimes and indubitable

assassination a veil of mystery still hangs. He was the son of Count

Guidantonio, and at his death the Montefeltri of Urbino were extinct in

the legitimate line. A natural son of Guidantonio had been, however,

recognised in his father's lifetime, and married to Gentile, heiress of

Mercatello. This was Federigo, a youth of great promise, who succeeded

his half-brother in 1444 as Count of Urbino. It was not until 1474 that

the ducal title was revived for him.

Duke Frederick was a prince remarkable among Italian despots for

private virtues and sober use of his hereditary power. He spent his

youth at Mantua, in that famous school of Vittorino da Feltre, where

the sons and daughters of the first Italian nobility received a model

education in humanities, good manners, and gentle physical

accomplishments. More than any of his fellow-students Frederick

profited by this rare scholar's discipline. On leaving school he

adopted the profession of arms, as it was then practised, and joined

the troop of the Condottiere Niccolò Piccinino. Young men of his own

rank, especially the younger sons and bastards of ruling families,

sought military service under captains of adventure. If they succeeded

they were sure to make money. The coffers of the Church and the

republics lay open to their not too scrupulous hands; the wealth of

Milan and Naples was squandered on them in retaining-fees and salaries

for active service. There was always the further possibility of

71placing a coronet upon their brows before they died, if haply they

should wrest a town from their employers, or obtain the cession of a

province from a needy Pope. The neighbours of the Montefeltri in

Umbria, Romagna, and the Marches of Ancona were all of them

Condottieri. Malatestas of Rimini and Pesaro, Vitelli of Città di

Castello, Varani of Camerino, Baglioni of Perugia, to mention only a

few of the most eminent nobles, enrolled themselves under the banners

of plebeian adventurers like Piccinino and Sforza Attendolo. Though

their family connections gave them a certain advantage, the system was

essentially democratic. Gattamelata and Carmagnola sprang from

obscurity by personal address and courage to the command of armies.

Colleoni fought his way up from the grooms to princely station and the

_bâton_ of S. Mark. Francesco Sforza, whose father had begun life as a

tiller of the soil, seized the ducal crown of Milan, and founded a

house which ranked among the first in Europe.

It is not needful to follow Duke Frederick in his military career. We

may briefly remark that when he succeeded to Urbino by his brother's

death in 1444, he undertook generalship on a grand scale. His own

dominions supplied him with some of the best troops in Italy. He was

careful to secure the goodwill of his subjects by attending personally

to their interests, relieving them of imposts, and executing equal

justice. He gained the then unique reputation of an honest prince,

paternally disposed toward his dependents. Men flocked to his standards

willingly, and he was able to bring an important contingent into any

army. These advantages secured for him alliances with Francesco Sforza,

and brought him successively into connection with Milan, Venice,

Florence, the Church of Naples. As a tactician in the field he held

high rank among the generals of the age, and so considerable were his

engagements that he acquired great 72wealth in the exercise of his

profession. We find him at one time receiving 8000 ducats a month as

war-pay from Naples, with a peace pension of 6000. While

Captain-General of the League, he drew for his own use in war 45,000

ducats of annual pay. Retaining-fees and pensions in the name of past

services swelled his income, the exact extent of which has not, so far

as I am aware, been estimated, but which must have made him one of the

richest of Italian princes. All this wealth he spent upon his duchy,

fortifying and beautifying its cities, drawing youths of promise to his

court, maintaining a great train of life, and keeping his vassals in

good-humour by the lightness of a rule which contrasted favourably with

the exactions of needier despots.

While fighting for the masters who offered him _condotta_ in the

complicated wars of Italy, Duke Frederick used his arms, when occasion

served, in his own quarrels. Many years of his life were spent in a

prolonged struggle with his neighbour Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta,

the bizarre and brilliant tyrant of Rimini, who committed the fatal

error of embroiling himself beyond all hope of pardon with the Church,

and who died discomfited in the duel with his warier antagonist. Urbino

profited by each mistake of Sigismondo, and the history of this long

desultory strife with Rimini is a history of gradual aggrandisement and

consolidation for the Montefeltrian duchy.

In 1459 Duke Frederick married his second wife, Battista, daughter of

Alessandro Sforza, Lord of Pesaro. Their portraits, painted by Piero

della Francesca, are to be seen in the Uffizzi at Florence. Some years

earlier, Frederick lost his right eye and had the bridge of his nose

broken in a jousting match outside the town-gate of Urbino. After this

accident, he preferred to be represented in profile—the profile so well

known to students of Italian art on medals and basreliefs. It 73was not

without medical aid and vows fulfilled by a mother's self-sacrifice to

death, if we may trust the diarists of Urbino, that the ducal couple

got an heir. In 1472, however, a son was born to them, whom they

christened Guido Paolo Ubaldo. He proved a youth of excellent parts and

noble nature—apt at study, perfect in all chivalrous accomplishments.

But he inherited some fatal physical debility, and his life was marred

with a constitutional disease, which then received the name of gout,

and which deprived him of the free use of his limbs. After his father's

death in 1482, Naples, Florence, and Milan continued Frederick's war

engagements to Guidobaldo. The prince was but a boy of ten. Therefore

these important _condotte_ must be regarded as compliments and pledges

for the future. They prove to what a pitch Duke Frederick had raised

the credit of his state and war establishment. Seven years later,

Guidobaldo married Elisabetta, daughter of Francesco Gonzaga, Marquis

of Mantua. This union, though a happy one, was never blessed with

children; and in the certainty of barrenness, the young Duke thought it

prudent to adopt a nephew as heir to his dominions. He had several

sisters, one of whom, Giovanna, had been married to a nephew of Sixtus

IV., Giovanni della Rovere, Lord of Sinigaglia and Prefect of Rome.

They had a son, Francesco Maria, who, after his adoption by Guidobaldo,

spent his boyhood at Urbino.

The last years of the fifteenth century were marked by the sudden rise

of Cesare Borgia to a power which threatened the liberties of Italy.

Acting as General for the Church, he carried his arms against the petty

tyrants of Romagna, whom he dispossessed and extirpated. His next move

was upon Camerino and Urbino. He first acquired Camerino, having lulled

Guidobaldo into false security by treacherous professions of goodwill.

Suddenly the Duke received intelligence that 74the Borgia was marching

on him over Cagli. This was in the middle of June 1502. It is difficult

to comprehend the state of weakness in which Guidobaldo was surprised,

or the panic which then seized him. He made no efforts to rouse his

subjects to resistance, but fled by night with his nephew through rough

mountain roads, leaving his capital and palace to the marauder. Cesare

Borgia took possession without striking a blow, and removed the

treasures of Urbino to the Vatican. His occupation of the duchy was not

undisturbed, however; for the people rose in several places against

him, proving that Guidobaldo had yielded too hastily to alarm. By this

time the fugitive was safe in Mantua, whence he returned, and for a

short time succeeded in establishing himself again at Urbino. But he

could not hold his own against the Borgias, and in December, by a

treaty, he resigned his claims and retired to Venice, where he lived

upon the bounty of S. Mark. It must be said, in justice to the Duke,

that his constitutional debility rendered him unfit for active

operations in the field. Perhaps he could not have done better than

thus to bend beneath the storm.

The sudden death of Alexander VI. and the election of a Della Rovere to

the Papacy in 1503 changed Guidobaldo's prospects. Julius II. was the

sworn foe of the Borgias and the close kinsman of Urbino's heir. It was

therefore easy for the Duke to walk into his empty palace on the hill,

and to reinstate himself in the domains from which he had so recently

been ousted. The rest of his life was spent in the retirement of his

court, surrounded with the finest scholars and the noblest gentlemen of

Italy. The ill-health which debarred him from the active pleasures and

employments of his station, was borne with uniform sweetness of temper

and philosophy.

When he died, in 1508, his nephew, Francesco Maria della 75Rovere,

succeeded to the duchy, and once more made the palace of Urbino the

resort of men-at-arms and captains. He was a prince of very violent

temper: of its extravagance history has recorded three remarkable

examples. He murdered the Cardinal of Pavia with his own hand in the

streets of Ravenna; stabbed a lover of his sister to death at Urbino;

and in a council of war knocked Francesco Guicciardini down with a blow

of his fist. When the history of Italy came to be written, Guicciardini

was probably mindful of that insult, for he painted Francesco Maria's

character and conduct in dark colours. At the same time this Duke of

Urbino passed for one of the first generals of the age. The greatest

stain upon his memory is his behaviour in the year 1527, when, by

dilatory conduct of the campaign in Lombardy, he suffered the passage

of Frundsberg's army unopposed, and afterwards hesitated to relieve

Rome from the horrors of the sack. He was the last Italian Condottiere

of the antique type; and the vices which Machiavelli exposed in that

bad system of mercenary warfare were illustrated on these occasions.

During his lifetime, the conditions of Italy were so changed by Charles

V.'s imperial settlement in 1530, that the occupation of Condottiere

ceased to have any meaning. Strozzi and Farnesi, who afterwards

followed this profession, enlisted in the ranks of France or Spain, and

won their laurels in Northern Europe.

While Leo X. held the Papal chair, the duchy of Urbino was for a while

wrested from the house of Della Rovere, and conferred upon Lorenzo de'

Medici. Francesco Maria made a better fight for his heritage than

Guidobaldo had done. Yet he could not successfully resist the power of

Rome. The Pope was ready to spend enormous sums of money on this petty

war; the Duke's purse was shorter, and the mercenary troops he was

obliged to use, proved worthless in the field. Spaniards, for the most

part, pitted against Spaniards, they 76suffered the campaigns to

degenerate into a guerilla warfare of pillage and reprisals. In 1517

the duchy was formally ceded to Lorenzo. But this Medici did not live

long to enjoy it, and his only child Catherine, the future Queen of

France, never exercised the rights which had devolved upon her by

inheritance. The shifting scene of Italy beheld Francesco Maria

reinstated in Urbino after Leo's death in 1522.

This Duke married Leonora Gonzaga, a princess of the House of Mantua.

Their portraits, painted by Titian, adorn the Venetian room of the

Uffizzi. Of their son, Guidobaldo II., little need be said. He was

twice married, first to Giulia Varano, Duchess by inheritance of

Camerino; secondly, to Vittoria Farnese, daughter of the Duke of Parma.

Guidobaldo spent a lifetime in petty quarrels with his subjects, whom

he treated badly, attempting to draw from their pockets the wealth

which his father and the Montefeltri had won in military service. He

intervened at an awkward period of Italian politics. The old Italy of

despots, commonwealths, and Condottieri, in which his predecessors

played substantial parts, was at an end. The new Italy of Popes and

Austro-Spanish dynasties had hardly settled into shape. Between these

epochs, Guidobaldo II., of whom we have a dim and hazy presentation on

the page of history, seems somehow to have fallen flat. As a sign of

altered circumstances, he removed his court to Pesaro, and built the

great palace of the Della Roveres upon the public square.

Guidobaldaccio, as he was called, died in 1574, leaving an only son,

Francesco Maria II., whose life and character illustrate the new age

which had begun for Italy. He was educated in Spain at the court of

Philip II., where he spent more than two years. When he returned, his

Spanish haughtiness, punctilious attention to etiquette, and

superstitious piety attracted observation. The violent temper of the

Della Roveres, 77which Francesco Maria I. displayed in acts of

homicide, and which had helped to win his bad name for Guidobaldaccio,

took the form of sullenness in the last Duke. The finest episode in his

life was the part he played in the battle of Lepanto, under his old

comrade, Don John of Austria. His father forced him to an uncongenial

marriage with Lucrezia d'Este, Princess of Ferrara. She left him, and

took refuge in her native city, then honoured by the presence of Tasso

and Guarini. He bore her departure with philosophical composure,

recording the event in his diary as something to be dryly grateful for.

Left alone, the Duke abandoned himself to solitude, religious

exercises, hunting, and the economy of his impoverished dominions. He

became that curious creature, a man of narrow nature and mediocre

capacity, who, dedicated to the cult of self, is fain to pass for saint

and sage in easy circumstances. He married, for the second time, a

lady, Livia della Rovere, who belonged to his own family, but had been

born in private station. She brought him one son, the Prince

Federigo-Ubaldo. This youth might have sustained the ducal honours of

Urbino, but for his sage-saint father's want of wisdom. The boy was a

spoiled child in infancy. Inflated with Spanish vanity from the cradle,

taught to regard his subjects as dependents on a despot's will,

abandoned to the caprices of his own ungovernable temper, without

substantial aid from the paternal piety or stoicism, he rapidly became

a most intolerable princeling. His father married him, while yet a boy,

to Claudia de' Medici, and virtually abdicated in his favour. Left to

his own devices, Federigo chose companions from the troupes of players

whom he drew from Venice. He filled his palaces with harlots, and

degraded himself upon the stage in parts of mean buffoonery. The

resources of the duchy were racked to support these parasites. Spanish

rules of etiquette and ceremony were outraged by 78their orgies. His

bride brought him one daughter, Vittoria, who afterwards became the

wife of Ferdinand, Grand Duke of Tuscany. Then in the midst of his low

dissipation and offences against ducal dignity, he died of apoplexy at

the early age of eighteen—the victim, in the severe judgment of

history, of his father's selfishness and want of practical ability.

This happened in 1623. Francesco Maria was stunned by the blow. His

withdrawal from the duties of the sovereignty in favour of such a son

had proved a constitutional unfitness for the duties of his station.

The life he loved was one of seclusion in a round of pious exercises,

petty studies, peddling economies, and mechanical amusements. A

powerful and grasping Pope was on the throne of Rome. Urban at this

juncture pressed Francesco Maria hard; and in 1624 the last Duke of

Urbino devolved his lordships to the Holy See. He survived the formal

act of abdication seven years; when he died, the Pontiff added his

duchy to the Papal States, which thenceforth stretched from Naples to

the bounds of Venice on the Po.

III

Duke Frederick began the palace at Urbino in 1454, when he was still

only Count. The architect was Luziano of Lauranna, a Dalmatian; and the

beautiful white limestone, hard as marble, used in the construction,

was brought from the Dalmatian coast. This stone, like the Istrian

stone of Venetian buildings, takes and retains the chisel mark with

wonderful precision. It looks as though, when fresh, it must have had

the pliancy of clay, so delicately are the finest curves in scroll or

foliage scooped from its substance. And yet it preserves each cusp and

angle of the most elaborate pattern with the crispness and the

sharpness of a crystal. 79When wrought by a clever craftsman, its

surface has neither the waxiness of Parian, nor the brittle edge of

Carrara marble; and it resists weather better than marble of the

choicest quality. This may be observed in many monuments of Venice,

where the stone has been long exposed to sea-air. These qualities of

the Dalmatian limestone, no less than its agreeable creamy hue and

smooth dull polish, adapt it to decoration in low relief. The most

attractive details in the palace at Urbino are friezes carved of this

material in choice designs of early Renaissance dignity and grace. One

chimney-piece in the Sala degli Angeli deserves especial comment. A

frieze of dancing Cupids, with gilt hair and wings, their naked bodies

left white on a ground of ultramarine, is supported by broad flat

pilasters. These are engraved with children holding pots of flowers;

roses on one side, carnations on the other. Above the frieze another

pair of angels, one at each end, hold lighted torches; and the

pyramidal cap of the chimney is carved with two more, flying, and

supporting the eagle of the Montefeltri on a raised medallion.

Throughout the palace we notice emblems appropriate to the Houses of

Montefeltro and Della Rovere: their arms, three golden bends upon a

field of azure: the Imperial eagle, granted when Montefeltro was made a

fief of the Empire: the Garter of England, worn by the Dukes Federigo

and Guidobaldo: the ermine of Naples: the _ventosa_, or cupping-glass,

adopted for a private badge by Frederick: the golden oak-tree on an

azure field of Della Rovere: the palm-tree, bent beneath a block of

stone, with its accompanying motto, _Inclinata Resurgam_: the cipher,

FE DX. Profile medallions of Federigo and Guidobaldo, wrought in the

lowest possible relief, adorn the staircases. Round the great courtyard

runs a frieze of military engines and ensigns, trophies, machines, and

implements of war, alluding to Duke Frederick's 80profession of

Condottiere. The doorways are enriched with scrolls of heavy-headed

flowers, acanthus foliage, honeysuckles, ivy-berries, birds and boys

and sphinxes, in all the riot of Renaissance fancy.

This profusion of sculptured _rilievo_ is nearly all that remains to

show how rich the palace was in things of beauty. Castiglione, writing

in the reign of Guidobaldo, says that 'in the opinion of many it is the

fairest to be found in Italy; and the Duke filled it so well with all

things fitting its magnificence, that it seemed less like a palace than

a city. Not only did he collect articles of common use, vessels of

silver, and trappings for chambers of rare cloths of gold and silk, and

suchlike furniture, but he added multitudes of bronze and marble

statues, exquisite pictures, and instruments of music of all sorts.

There was nothing but was of the finest and most excellent quality to

be seen there. Moreover, he gathered together at a vast cost a large

number of the best and rarest books in Greek, Latin, and Hebrew, all of

which he adorned with gold and silver, esteeming them the chiefest

treasure of his spacious palace.' When Cesare Borgia entered Urbino as

conqueror in 1502, he is said to have carried off loot to the value of

150,000 ducats, or perhaps about a quarter of a million sterling.

Vespasiano, the Florentine bookseller, has left us a minute account of

the formation of the famous library of manuscripts, which he valued at

considerably over 30,000 ducats. Yet wandering now through these

deserted halls, we seek in vain for furniture or tapestry or works of

art. The books have been removed to Rome. The pictures are gone, no man

knows whither. The plate has long been melted down. The instruments of

music are broken. If frescoes adorned the corridors, they have been

whitewashed; the ladies' chambers have been stripped of their rich

arras. Only here and there we find a raftered ceiling, painted in

fading 81colours, which, taken with the stonework of the chimney, and

some fragments of inlaid panel-work on door or window, enables us to

reconstruct the former richness of these princely rooms.

Exception must be made in favour of two apartments between the towers

upon the southern facade. These were apparently the private rooms of

the Duke and Duchess, and they are still approached by a great winding

staircase in one of the _torricini_. Adorned in indestructible or

irremovable materials, they retain some traces of their ancient

splendour. On the first floor, opening on the vaulted loggia, we find a

little chapel encrusted with lovely work in stucco and marble; friezes

of bulls, sphinxes, sea-horses, and foliage; with a low relief of

Madonna and Child in the manner of Mino da Fiesole. Close by is a small

study with inscriptions to the Muses and Apollo. The cabinet connecting

these two cells has a Latin legend, to say that Religion here dwells

near the temple of the liberal arts:

Bina vides parvo discrimine juncta sacella,

Altera pars Musis altera sacra Deo est.

On the floor above, corresponding in position to this apartment, is a

second, of even greater interest, since it was arranged by the Duke

Frederick for his own retreat. The study is panelled in tarsia of

beautiful design and execution. Three of the larger compartments show

Faith, Hope, and Charity; figures not unworthy of a Botticelli or a

Filippino Lippi. The occupations of the Duke are represented on a

smaller scale by armour, _bâtons_ of command, scientific instruments,

lutes, viols, and books, some open and some shut. The Bible, Homer,

Virgil, Seneca, Tacitus, and Cicero, are lettered; apparently to

indicate his favourite authors. The Duke himself, arrayed in his state

robes, occupies a fourth 82great panel; and the whole of this elaborate

composition is harmonised by emblems, badges, and occasional devices of

birds, articles of furniture, and so forth. The tarsia, or inlaid wood

of different kinds and colours, is among the best in this kind of art

to be found in Italy, though perhaps it hardly deserves to rank with

the celebrated choir-stalls of Bergamo and Monte Oliveto. Hard by is a

chapel, adorned, like the lower one, with excellent reliefs. The loggia

to which these rooms have access looks across the Apennines, and down

on what was once a private garden. It is now enclosed and paved for the

exercise of prisoners who are confined in one part of the desecrated

palace!

A portion of the pile is devoted to more worthy purposes; for the

Academy of Raphael here holds its sittings, and preserves a collection

of curiosities and books illustrative of the great painter's life and

works. They have recently placed in a tiny oratory, scooped by

Guidobaldo II. from the thickness of the wall, a cast of Raphael's

skull, which will be studied with interest and veneration. It has the

fineness of modelling combined with shapeliness of form and smallness

of scale which is said to have characterised Mozart and Shelley.

The impression left upon the mind after traversing this palace in its

length and breadth is one of weariness and disappointment. How shall we

reconstruct the long-past life which filled its rooms with sound, the

splendour of its pageants, the thrill of tragedies enacted here? It is

not difficult to crowd its doors and vacant spaces with liveried

servants, slim pages in tight hose, whose well-combed hair escapes from

tiny caps upon their silken shoulders. We may even replace the

tapestries of Troy which hung one hall, and build again the sideboards

with their embossed gilded plate. But are these chambers really those

where Emilia Pia held debate on love with Bembo and Castiglione; where

Bibbiena's 83witticisms and Fra Serafino's pranks raised smiles on

courtly lips; where Bernardo Accolti, 'the Unique,' declaimed his

verses to applauding crowds? Is it possible that into yonder hall,

where now the lion of S. Mark looks down alone on staring desolation,

strode the Borgia in all his panoply of war, a gilded glittering

dragon, and from the dais tore the Montefeltri's throne, and from the

arras stripped their ensigns, replacing these with his own Bull and

Valentinus Dux? Here Tasso tuned his lyre for Francesco Maria's

wedding-feast, and read 'Aminta' to Lucrezia d'Este. Here Guidobaldo

listened to the jests and whispered scandals of the Aretine. Here

Titian set his easel up to paint; here the boy Raphael, cap in hand,

took signed and sealed credentials from his Duchess to the Gonfalonier

of Florence. Somewhere in these huge chambers, the courtiers sat before

a torch-lit stage, when Bibbiena's 'Calandria' and Caetiglione's

'Tirsi,' with their miracles of masques and mummers, whiled the night

away. Somewhere, we know not where, Giuliano de' Medici made love in

these bare rooms to that mysterious mother of ill-fated Cardinal

Ippolito; somewhere, in some darker nook, the bastard Alessandro sprang

to his strange-fortuned life of tyranny and license, which

Brutus-Lorenzino cut short with a traitor's poignard-thrust in Via

Larga. How many men, illustrious for arts and letters, memorable by

their virtues or their crimes, have trod these silent corridors, from

the great Pope Julius down to James III., self-titled King of England,

who tarried here with Clementina Sobieski through some twelve months of

his ex-royal exile! The memories of all this folk, flown guests and

masters of the still-abiding palace-chambers, haunt us as we hurry

through. They are but filmy shadows. We cannot grasp them, localise

them, people surrounding emptiness with more than withering cobweb

forms.

84Death takes a stronger hold on us than bygone life. Therefore,

returning to the vast Throne-room, we animate it with one scene it

witnessed on an April night in 1508. Duke Guidobaldo had died at

Fossombrone, repeating to his friends around his bed these lines of

Virgil:

Me circum limus niger et deformis arundo

Cocyti tardaque palus inamabilis unda

Alligat, et novies Styx interfusa coercet.

His body had been carried on the shoulders of servants through those

mountain ways at night, amid the lamentations of gathering multitudes

and the baying of dogs from hill-set farms alarmed by flaring

flambeaux. Now it is laid in state in the great hall. The dais and the

throne are draped in black. The arms and _bâtons_ of his father hang

about the doorways. His own ensigns are displayed in groups and

trophies, with the banners of S. Mark, the Montefeltrian eagle, and the

cross keys of S. Peter. The hall itself is vacant, save for the

high-reared catafalque of sable velvet and gold damask, surrounded with

wax candles burning steadily. Round it passes a ceaseless stream of

people, coming and going, gazing at their Duke. He is attired in

crimson hose and doublet of black damask. Black velvet slippers are on

his feet, and his ducal cap is of black velvet. The mantle of the

Garter, made of dark-blue Alexandrine velvet, hooded with crimson,

lined with white silk damask, and embroidered with the badge, drapes

the stiff sleeping form.

It is easier to conjure up the past of this great palace, strolling

round it in free air and twilight; perhaps because the landscape and

the life still moving on the city streets bring its exterior into

harmony with real existence. The southern façade, with its vaulted

balconies and flanking towers, takes the fancy, fascinates the eye, and

lends itself as a fit stage for 85puppets of the musing mind. Once more

imagination plants trim orange-trees in giant jars of Gubbio ware upon

the pavement where the garden of the Duchess lay—the pavement paced in

these bad days by convicts in grey canvas jackets—that pavement where

Monsignor Bombo courted 'dear dead women' with Platonic phrase,

smothering the Menta of his natural man in lettuce culled from Academe

and thyme of Mount Hymettus. In yonder loggia, lifted above the garden

and the court, two lovers are in earnest converse. They lean beneath

the coffered arch, against the marble of the balustrade, he fingering

his dagger under the dark velvet doublet, she playing with a clove

carnation, deep as her own shame. The man is Giannandrea,

broad-shouldered bravo of Verona, Duke Guidobaldo's favourite and

carpet-count. The lady is Madonna Maria, daughter of Rome's Prefect,

widow of Venanzio Varano, whom the Borgia strangled. On their discourse

a tale will hang of woman's frailty and man's boldness—Camerino's

Duchess yielding to a low-born suitor's stalwart charms. And more will

follow, when that lady's brother, furious Francesco Maria della Rovere,

shall stab the bravo in torch-litten palace rooms with twenty poignard

strokes 'twixt waist and throat, and their Pandarus shall be sent down

to his account by a varlet's _coltellata_ through the midriff.

Imagination shifts the scene, and shows in that same loggia Rome's

warlike Pope, attended by his cardinals and all Urbino's chivalry. The

snowy beard of Julius flows down upon his breast, where jewels clasp

the crimson mantle, as in Raphael's picture. His eyes are bright with

wine; for he has come to gaze on sunset from the banquet-chamber, and

to watch the line of lamps which soon will leap along that palace

cornice in his honour. Behind him lies Bologna humbled. The Pope

returns, a conqueror, to Rome. Yet once again imagination is at work. A

gaunt, bald man, close-habited in Spanish black, his spare, 86fine

features carved in purest ivory, leans from that balcony. Gazing with

hollow eyes, he tracks the swallows in their flight, and notes that

winter is at hand. This is the last Duke of Urbino, Francesco Maria

II., he whose young wife deserted him, who made for himself alone a

hermit-pedant's round of petty cares and niggard avarice and

mean-brained superstition. He drew a second consort from the convent,

and raised up seed unto his line by forethought, but beheld his

princeling fade untimely in the bloom of boyhood. Nothing is left but

solitude. To the mortmain of the Church reverts Urbino's lordship, and

even now he meditates the terms of devolution. Jesuits cluster in the

rooms behind, with comfort for the ducal soul and calculations for the

interests of Holy See.

A farewell to these memories of Urbino's dukedom should be taken in the

crypt of the cathedral, where Francesco Maria II., the last Duke,

buried his only son and all his temporal hopes. The place is scarcely

solemn. Its dreary _barocco_ emblems mar the dignity of death. A bulky

_Pietà_ by Gian Bologna, with Madonna's face unfinished, towers up and

crowds the narrow cell. Religion has evanished from this late

Renaissance art, nor has the afterglow of Guido Reni's hectic piety yet

overflushed it. Chilled by the stifling humid sense of an extinct race

here entombed in its last representative, we gladly emerge from the

sepulchral vault into the air of day.

Filippo Visconti, with a smile on his handsome face, is waiting for us

at the inn. His horses, sleek, well fed, and rested, toss their heads

impatiently. We take our seats in the carriage, open wide beneath a

sparkling sky, whirl past the palace and its ghost-like recollections,

and are halfway on the road to Fossombrone in a cloud of dust and whirr

of wheels before we think of looking back to greet Urbino. There is

just time. The last decisive turning lies in front. We stand

87bareheaded to salute the grey mass of buildings ridged along the sky.

Then the open road invites us with its varied scenery and movement.

From the shadowy past we drive into the world of human things, for ever

changefully unchanged, unrestfully the same. This interchange between

dead memories and present life is the delight of travel.

88

VITTORIA ACCORAMBONI

AND THE TRAGEDY OF WEBSTER

I

During the pontificate of Gregory XIII. (1572-85), Papal authority in

Rome reached its lowest point of weakness, and the ancient splendour of

the Papal court was well-nigh eclipsed. Art and learning had died out.

The traditions of the days of Leo, Julius, and Paul III. were

forgotten. It seemed as though the genius of the Renaissance had

migrated across the Alps. All the powers of the Papacy were directed to

the suppression of heresies and to the re-establishment of spiritual

supremacy over the intellect of Europe. Meanwhile society in Rome

returned to mediæval barbarism. The veneer of classical refinement and

humanistic urbanity, which for a time had hidden the natural savagery

of the Roman nobles, wore away. The Holy City became a den of bandits;

the territory of the Church supplied a battle-ground for senseless

party strife, which the weak old man who wore the triple crown was

quite unable to control. It is related how a robber chieftain,

Marianazzo, refused the offer of a general pardon from the Pope,

alleging that the profession of brigand was far more lucrative, and

offered greater security of life, than any trade within the walls of

Rome. The Campagna, the ruined citadels about the basements of the

Sabine and Ciminian hills, the 89quarters of the aristocracy within the

city, swarmed with bravos, who were protected by great nobles and fed

by decent citizens for the advantages to be derived from the assistance

of abandoned and courageous ruffians. Life, indeed, had become

impossible without fixed compact with the powers of lawlessness. There

was hardly a family in Rome which did not number some notorious

criminal among the outlaws. Murder, sacrilege, the love of adventure,

thirst for plunder, poverty, hostility to the ascendant faction of the

moment, were common causes of voluntary or involuntary outlawry; nor

did public opinion regard a bandit's calling as other than honourable.

It may readily be imagined that in such a state of society the

grisliest tragedies were common enough in Rome. The history of some of

these has been preserved to us in documents digested from public trials

and personal observation by contemporary writers. That of the Cenci, in

which a notorious act of parricide furnished the plot of a popular

novella, is well known. And such a tragedy, even more rife in

characteristic incidents, and more distinguished by the quality of its

_dramatis personæ_, is that of Vittoria Accoramboni.

Vittoria was born in 1557, of a noble but impoverished family, at

Gubbio, among the hills of Umbria. Her biographers are rapturous in

their praises of her beauty, grace, and exceeding charm of manner. Not

only was her person most lovely, but her mind shone at first with all

the amiable lustre of a modest, innocent, and winning youth. Her

father, Claudio Accoramboni, removed to Rome, where his numerous

children were brought up under the care of their mother, Tarquinia, an

ambitious and unscrupulous woman, bent on rehabilitating the decayed

honours of their house. Here Vittoria in early girlhood soon became the

fashion. She exercised an irresistible influence over all who saw her,

and many were the 90offers of marriage she refused. At length a suitor

appeared whose condition and connection with the Roman ecclesiastical

nobility rendered him acceptable in the eyes of the Accoramboni.

Francesco Peretti was welcomed as the successful candidate for

Vittoria's hand. His mother, Camilla, was sister to Felice, Cardinal of

Montalto; and her son, Francesco Mignucci, had changed his surname in

compliment to this illustrious relative. The Peretti were of humble

origin. The cardinal himself had tended swine in his native village;

but, supported by an invincible belief in his own destinies, and gifted

with a powerful intellect and determined character, he passed through

all grades of the Franciscan Order to its generalship, received the

bishoprics of Fermo and S. Agata, and lastly, in the year 1570, assumed

the scarlet with the title of Cardinal Montalto. He was now upon the

high way to the Papacy, amassing money by incessant care, studying the

humours of surrounding factions, effacing his own personality, and by

mixing but little in the intrigues of the court, winning the reputation

of a prudent, inoffensive old man. These were his tactics for securing

the Papal throne; nor were his expectations frustrated; for in 1585 he

was chosen Pope, the parties of the Medici and the Farnesi agreeing to

accept him as a compromise. When Sixtus V. was once firmly seated on S.

Peter's chair, he showed himself in his true colours. An implacable

administrator of severest justice, a rigorous economist, an

iconoclastic foe to paganism, the first act of his reign was to declare

a war of extirpation against the bandits who had reduced Rome in his

predecessor's rule to anarchy.

It was the nephew, then, of this man, whom historians have judged the

greatest personage of his own times, that Vittoria Accoramboni married

on the 28th of June 1573. For a short while the young couple lived

happily together. According to some accounts of their married life, the

bride secured 91the favour of her powerful uncle-in-law, who indulged

her costly fancies to the full. It is, however, more probable that the

Cardinal Montalto treated her follies with a grudging parsimony; for we

soon find the Peretti household hopelessly involved in debt. Discord,

too, arose between Vittoria and her husband on the score of a certain

levity in her behaviour; and it was rumoured that even during the brief

space of their union she had proved a faithless wife. Yet she contrived

to keep Francesco's confidence, and it is certain that her family

profited by their connection with the Peretti. Of her six brothers,

Mario, the eldest, was a favourite courtier of the great Cardinal

d'Este. Ottavio was in orders, and through Montalto's influence

obtained the See of Fossombrone. The same eminent protector placed

Scipione in the service of the Cardinal Sforza. Camillo, famous for his

beauty and his courage, followed the fortunes of Filibert of Savoy, and

died in France. Flaminio was still a boy, dependent, as the sequel of

this story shows, upon his sister's destiny. Of Marcello, the second in

age and most important in the action of this tragedy, it is needful to

speak with more particularity. He was young, and, like the rest of his

breed, singularly handsome—so handsome, indeed, that he is said to have

gained an infamous ascendency over the great Duke of Bracciano, whose

privy chamberlain he had become. Marcello was an outlaw for the murder

of Matteo Pallavicino, the brother of the Cardinal of that name. This

did not, however, prevent the chief of the Orsini house from making him

his favourite and confidential friend. Marcello, who seems to have

realised in actual life the worst vices of those Roman courtiers

described for us by Aretino, very soon conceived the plan of exalting

his own fortunes by trading on his sister's beauty. He worked upon the

Duke of Bracciano's mind so cleverly, that he brought this haughty

prince to the point of an 92insane passion for Peretti's young wife;

and meanwhile so contrived to inflame the ambition of Vittoria and her

mother, Tarquinia, that both were prepared to dare the worst of crimes

in expectation of a dukedom. The game was a difficult one to play. Not

only had Francesco Peretti first to be murdered, but the inequality of

birth and wealth and station between Vittoria and the Duke of Bracciano

rendered a marriage almost impossible. It was also an affair of

delicacy to stimulate without satisfying the Duke's passion. Yet

Marcello did not despair. The stakes were high enough to justify great

risks; and all he put in peril was his sister's honour, the fame of the

Accoramboni, and the favour of Montalto. Vittoria, for her part,

trusted in her power to ensnare and secure the noble prey both had in

view.

Paolo Giordano Orsini, born about the year 1537, was reigning Duke of

Bracciano. Among Italian princes he ranked at least upon a par with the

Dukes of Urbino, and his family, by its alliances, was more illustrious

than any of that time in Italy. He was a man of gigantic stature,

prodigious corpulence, and marked personal daring; agreeable in

manners, but subject to uncontrollable fits of passion, and incapable

of self-restraint when crossed in any whim or fancy. Upon the habit of

his body it is needful to insist, in order that the part he played in

this tragedy of intrigue, crime, and passion may be well defined. He

found it difficult to procure a charger equal to his weight, and he was

so fat that a special dispensation relieved him from the duty of

genuflexion in the Papal presence. Though lord of a large territory,

yielding princely revenues, he laboured under heavy debts; for no great

noble of the period lived more splendidly, with less regard for his

finances. In the politics of that age and country, Paolo Giordano

leaned toward France. Yet he was 93a grandee of Spain, and had played a

distinguished part in the battle of Lepanto. Now the Duke of Bracciano

was a widower. He had been married in 1553 to Isabella de' Medici,

daughter of the Grand Duke Cosimo, sister of Francesco, Bianca

Capello's lover, and of the Cardinal Ferdinando. Suspicion of adultery

with Troilo Orsini had fallen on Isabella, and her husband, with the

full concurrence of her brothers, removed her in 1576 from this

world.[21] No one thought the worse of Bracciano for this murder of his

wife. In those days of abandoned vice and intricate villany, certain

points of honour were maintained with scrupulous fidelity. A wife's

adultery was enough to justify the most savage and licentious husband

in an act of semi-judicial vengeance; and the shame she brought upon

his head was shared by the members of her own house, so that they stood

by, consenting to her death. Isabella, it may be said, left one son,

Virginio, who became in due time Duke of Bracciano.

[21] The balance of probability leans against Isabella in this affair.

At the licentious court of the Medici she lived with unpardonable

freedom. Troilo Orsini was himself assassinated in Paris by

Bracciano's orders a few years afterwards.

It appears that in the year 1581, four years after Vittoria's marriage,

the Duke of Bracciano had satisfied Marcello of his intention to make

her his wife, and of his willingness to countenance Francesco Peretti's

murder. Marcello, feeling sure of his game, introduced the Duke in

private to his sister, and induced her to overcome any natural

repugnance she may have felt for the unwieldy and gross lover. Having

reached this point, it was imperative to push matters quickly on toward

matrimony.

But how should the unfortunate Francesco be entrapped? They caught him

in a snare of peculiar atrocity, by working on the kindly feelings

which his love for Vittoria had caused 94him to extend to all the

Acooramboni. Marcello, the outlaw, was her favourite brother, and

Marcello at that time lay in hiding, under the suspicion of more than

ordinary crime, beyond the walls of Rome. Late in the evening of the

18th of April, while the Peretti family were retiring to bed, a

messenger from Marcello arrived, entreating Francesco to repair at once

to Monte Cavallo. Marcello had affairs of the utmost importance to

communicate, and begged his brother-in-law not to fail him at a

grievous pinch. The letter containing this request was borne by one

Dominico d'Aquaviva, _alias_ Il Mancino, a confederate of Vittoria's

waiting-maid. This fellow, like Marcello, was an outlaw; but when he

ventured into Rome he frequented Peretti's house, and had made himself

familiar with its master as a trusty bravo. Neither in the message,

therefore, nor in the messenger was there much to rouse suspicion. The

time, indeed, was oddly chosen, and Marcello had never made a similar

appeal on any previous occasion. Yet his necessities might surely have

obliged him to demand some more than ordinary favour from a brother.

Francesco immediately made himself ready to set out, armed only with

his sword and attended by a single servant. It was in vain that his

wife and his mother reminded him of the dangers of the night, the

loneliness of Monte Cavallo, its ruinous palaces and robber-haunted

caves. He was resolved to undertake the adventure, and went forth,

never to return. As he ascended the hill, he fell to earth, shot with

three harquebuses. His body was afterwards found on Monte Cavallo,

stabbed through and through, without a trace that could identify the

murderers. Only, in the course of subsequent investigations, Il Mancino

(on the 24th of February 1582) made the following statements:—That

Vittoria's mother, assisted by the waiting woman, had planned the trap;

that Marchionne of Gubbio and Paolo Barca of Bracciano, 95two of the

Duke's men, had despatched the victim. Marcello himself, it seems, had

come from Bracciano to conduct the whole affair. Suspicion fell

immediately upon Vittoria and her kindred, together with the Duke of

Bracciano; nor was this diminished when the Accoramboni, fearing the

pursuit of justice, took refuge in a villa of the Duke's at Magnanapoli

a few days after the murder.

A cardinal's nephew, even in those troublous times, was not killed

without some noise being made about the matter. Accordingly Pope

Gregory XIII. began to take measures for discovering the authors of the

crime. Strange to say, however, the Cardinal Montalto, notwithstanding

the great love he was known to bear his nephew, begged that the

investigation might be dropped. The coolness with which he first

received the news of Francesco Peretti's death, the dissimulation with

which he met the Pope's expression of sympathy in a full consistory,

his reserve in greeting friends on ceremonial visits of condolence,

and, more than all, the self-restraint he showed in the presence of the

Duke of Bracciano, impressed the society of Rome with the belief that

he was of a singularly moderate and patient temper. It was thought that

the man who could so tamely submit to his nephew's murder, and suspend

the arm of justice when already raised for vengeance, must prove a mild

and indulgent ruler. When, therefore, in the fifth year after this

event, Montalto was elected Pope, men ascribed his elevation in no

small measure to his conduct at the present crisis. Some, indeed,

attributed his extraordinary moderation and self-control to the right

cause. _'Veramente costui è un gran frate!_' was Gregory's remark at

the close of the consistory when Montalto begged him to let the matter

of Peretti's murder rest. '_Of a truth, that fellow is a consummate

hypocrite!_' How accurate this judgment was, appeared when Sixtus V.

assumed the reins of 96power. The same man who, as monk and cardinal,

had smiled on Bracciano, though he knew him to be his nephew's

assassin, now, as Pontiff and sovereign, bade the chief of the Orsini

purge his palace and dominions of the scoundrels he was wont to

harbour, adding significantly, that if Felice Peretti forgave what had

been done against him in a private station, he would exact uttermost

vengeance for disobedience to the will of Sixtus. The Duke of Bracciano

judged it best, after that warning, to withdraw from Rome.

Francesco Peretti had been murdered on the 16th of April 1581. Sixtus

V. was proclaimed on the 24th of April 1585. In this interval Vittoria

underwent a series of extraordinary perils and adventures. First of

all, she had been secretly married to the Duke in his gardens of

Magnanapoli at the end of April 1581. That is to say, Marcello and she

secured their prize, as well as they were able, the moment after

Francesco had been removed by murder. But no sooner had the marriage

become known, than the Pope, moved by the scandal it created, no less

than by the urgent instance of the Orsini and Medici, declared it void.

After some while spent in vain resistance, Bracciano submitted, and

sent Vittoria back to her father's house. By an order issued under

Gregory's own hand, she was next removed to the prison of Corte

Savella, thence to the monastery of S. Cecilia in Trastevere, and

finally to the Castle of S. Angelo. Here, at the end of December 1581,

she was put on trial for the murder of her first husband. In prison she

seems to have borne herself bravely, arraying her beautiful person in

delicate attire, entertaining visitors, exacting from her friends the

honours due to a duchess, and sustaining the frequent examinations to

which she was submitted with a bold, proud front. In the middle of the

month of July her constancy was sorely tried by the receipt of a letter

in the Duke's own handwriting, formally renouncing 97his marriage. It

was only by a lucky accident that she was prevented on this occasion

from committing suicide. The Papal court meanwhile kept urging her

either to retire to a monastery or to accept another husband. She

firmly refused to embrace the religious life, and declared that she was

already lawfully united to a living husband, the Duke of Bracciano. It

seemed impossible to deal with her; and at last, on the 8th of

November, she was released from prison under the condition of

retirement to Gubbio. The Duke had lulled his enemies to rest by the

pretence of yielding to their wishes. But Marcello was continually

beside him at Bracciano, where we read of a mysterious Greek

enchantress whom he hired to brew love-philters for the furtherance of

his ambitious plots. Whether Bracciano was stimulated by the brother's

arguments or by the witch's potions need not be too curiously

questioned. But it seems in any case certain that absence inflamed his

passion instead of cooling it.

Accordingly, in September 1583, under the excuse of a pilgrimage to

Loreto, he contrived to meet Vittoria at Trevi, whence he carried her

in triumph to Bracciano. Here he openly acknowledged her as his wife,

installing her with all the splendour due to a sovereign duchess. On

the 10th of October following, he once more performed the marriage

ceremony in the principal church of his fief; and in the January of

1584 he brought her openly to Rome. This act of contumacy to the Pope,

both as feudal superior and as supreme Pontiff, roused all the former

opposition to his marriage. Once more it was declared invalid. Once

more the Duke pretended to give way. But at this juncture Gregory died;

and while the conclave was sitting for the election of the new Pope, he

resolved to take the law into his own hands, and to ratify his union

with Vittoria by a third and public marriage in Rome. On the morning of

the 9824th of April 1585, their nuptials were accordingly once more

solemnised in the Orsini palace. Just one hour after the ceremony, as

appears from the marriage register, the news arrived of Cardinal

Montalto's election to the Papacy, Vittoria lost no time in paying her

respects to Camilla, sister of the new Pope, her former mother-in-law.

The Duke visited Sixtus V. in state to compliment him on his elevation.

But the reception which both received proved that Rome was no safe

place for them to live in. They consequently made up their minds for

flight.

A chronic illness from which Bracciano had lately suffered furnished a

sufficient pretext. This seems to have been something of the nature of

a cancerous ulcer, which had to be treated by the application of raw

meat to open sores. Such details are only excusable in the present

narrative on the ground that Bracciano's disease considerably affects

our moral judgment of the woman who could marry a man thus physically

tainted, and with her husband's blood upon his hands. At any rate, the

Duke's _lupa_ justified his trying what change of air, together with

the sulphur waters of Abano, would do for him.

The Duke and Duchess arrived in safety at Venice, where they had

engaged the Dandolo palace on the Zuecca. There they only stayed a few

days, removing to Padua, where they had hired palaces of the Foscari in

the Arena and a house called De' Cavalli. At Salò, also, on the Lake of

Garda, they provided themselves with fit dwellings for their princely

state and their large retinues, intending to divide their time between

the pleasures which the capital of luxury afforded and the simpler

enjoyments of the most beautiful of the Italian lakes. But _la gioia

dei profani è un fumo passaggier_. Paolo Giordano Orsini, Duke of

Bracciano, died suddenly at Salò on the 10th of November 1585, leaving

the young and beautiful 99Vittoria helpless among enemies. What was the

cause of his death? It is not possible to give a clear and certain

answer. We have seen that he suffered from a horrible and voracious

disease, which after his removal from Rome seems to have made progress.

Yet though this malady may well have cut his life short, suspicion of

poison was not, in the circumstances, quite unreasonable. The Grand

Duke of Tuscany, the Pope, and the Orsini family were all interested in

his death. Anyhow, he had time to make a will in Vittoria's favour,

leaving her large sums of money, jewels, goods, and houses—enough, in

fact, to support her ducal dignity with splendour. His hereditary fiefs

and honours passed by right to his only son, Virginio.

Vittoria, accompanied by her brother, Marcello, and the whole court of

Bracciano, repaired at once to Padua, where she was soon after joined

by Flaminio, and by the Prince Lodovico Orsini. Lodovico Orsini assumed

the duty of settling Vittoria's affairs under her dead husband's will.

In life he had been the Duke's ally as well as relative. His family

pride was deeply wounded by what seemed to him an ignoble, as it was

certainly an unequal, marriage. He now showed himself the relentless

enemy of the Duchess. Disputes arose between them as to certain

details, which seem to have been legally decided in the widow's favour.

On the night of the 22nd of December, however, forty men disguised in

black and fantastically tricked out to elude detection, surrounded her

palace. Through the long galleries and chambers hung with arras, eight

of them went, bearing torches, in search of Vittoria and her brothers.

Marcello escaped, having fled the house under suspicion of the murder

of one of his own followers. Flaminio, the innocent and young, was

playing on his lute and singing _Miserere_ in the great hall of the

palace. The murderers surprised him with a shot from one of their

100harquebuses. He ran, wounded in the shoulder, to his sister's room.

She, it is said, was telling her beads before retiring for the night.

When three of the assassins entered, she knelt before the crucifix, and

there they stabbed her in the left breast, turning the poignard in the

wound, and asking her with savage insults if her heart was pierced. Her

last words were, 'Jesus, I pardon you.' Then they turned to Flaminio,

and left him pierced with seventy-four stiletto wounds.

The authorities of Padua identified the bodies of Vittoria and

Flaminio, and sent at once for further instructions to Venice.

Meanwhile it appears that both corpses were laid out in one open coffin

for the people to contemplate. The palace and the church of the

Eremitani, to which they had been removed, were crowded all through the

following day with a vast concourse of the Paduans. Vittoria's

wonderful dead body, pale yet sweet to look upon, the golden hair

flowing around her marble shoulders, the red wound in her breast

uncovered, the stately limbs arrayed in satin as she died, maddened the

populace with its surpassing loveliness. '_Dentibus fremebant_,' says

the chronicler, when they beheld that gracious lady stiff in death. And

of a truth, if her corpse was actually exposed in the chapel of the

Eremitani, as we have some right to assume, the spectacle must have

been impressive. Those grim gaunt frescoes of Mantegna looked down on

her as she lay stretched upon her bier, solemn and calm, and, but for

pallor, beautiful as though in life. No wonder that the folk forgot her

first husband's murder, her less than comely marriage to the second. It

was enough for them that this flower of surpassing loveliness had been

cropped by villains in its bloom. Gathering in knots around the torches

placed beside the corpse, they vowed vengeance against the Orsini; for

suspicion, not unnaturally, fell on Prince Lodovico.

101The Prince was arrested and interrogated before the court of Padua.

He entered their hall attended by forty armed men, responded haughtily

to their questions, and demanded free passage for his courier to

Virginio Orsini, then at Florence. To this demand the court acceded;

but the precaution of waylaying the courier and searching his person

was very wisely taken. Besides some formal dispatches which announced

Vittoria's assassination, they found in this man's boot a compromising

letter, declaring Virginio a party to the crime, and asserting that

Lodovico had with his own poignard killed their victim. Padua placed

itself in a state of defence, and prepared to besiege the palace of

Prince Lodovico, who also got himself in readiness for battle. Engines,

culverins, and firebrands were directed against the barricades which he

had raised. The militia was called out and the Brenta was strongly

guarded. Meanwhile the Senate of S. Mark had dispatched the Avogadore,

Aloisio Bragadin, with full power to the scene of action. Lodovico

Orsini, it may be mentioned, was in their service; and had not this

affair intervened, he would in a few weeks have entered on his duties

as Governor for Venice of Corfu.

The bombardment of Orsini's palace began on Christmas Day. Three of the

Prince's men were killed in the first assault; and since the artillery

brought to bear upon him threatened speedy ruin to the house and its

inhabitants, he made up his mind to surrender. 'The Prince Luigi,'

writes one-chronicler of these events, 'walked attired in brown, his

poignard at his side, and his cloak slung elegantly under his arm. The

weapon being taken from him, he leaned upon a balustrade, and began to

trim his nails with a little pair of scissors he happened to find

there.' On the 27th he was strangled in prison by order of the Venetian

Republic. His body was carried to be buried, according to his own will,

in 102the church of S. Maria dell' Orto at Venice. Two of his followers

were hung next day. Fifteen were executed on the following Monday; two

of these were quartered alive; one of them, the Conte Paganello, who

confessed to having slain Vittoria, had his left side probed with his

own cruel dagger. Eight were condemned to the galleys, six to prison,

and eleven were acquitted. Thus ended this terrible affair, which

brought, it is said, good credit and renown to the lords of Venice

through all nations of the civilised world. It only remains to be added

that Marcello Accoramboni was surrendered to the Pope's vengeance and

beheaded at Ancona, where also his mysterious accomplice, the Greek

sorceress, perished.

II

This story of Vittoria Accoramboni's life and tragic ending is drawn,

in its main details, from a narrative published by Henri Beyle in his

'Chroniques et Novelles.'[22] He professes to have translated it

literally from a manuscript communicated to him by a nobleman of

Mantua; and there are strong internal evidences of the truth of this

assertion. Such compositions are frequent in Italian libraries, nor is

it rare for one of them to pass into the common market—as Mr.

Browning's famous purchase of the tale on which he based his 'Ring and

the Book' sufficiently proves. These pamphlets were produced, in the

first instance, to gratify the curiosity of the educated public in an

age which had no newspapers, and also to preserve the memory of famous

trials. How far the strict truth was represented, or whether, as in the

case of Beatrice Cenci, the pathetic aspect of the tragedy was unduly

dwelt on, depended, 103of course, upon the mental bias of the scribe,

upon his opportunities of obtaining exact information, and upon the

taste of the audience for whom he wrote. Therefore, in treating such

documents as historical data, we must be upon our guard. Professor

Gnoli, who has recently investigated the whole of Vittoria's eventful

story by the light of contemporary documents, informs us that several

narratives exist in manuscript, all dealing more or less accurately

with the details of the tragedy. One of these was published in Italian

at Brescia in 1586. A Frenchman, De Rosset, printed the same story in

its main outlines at Lyons in 1621. Our own dramatist, John Webster,

made it the subject of a tragedy, which he gave to the press in 1612.

What were his sources of information we do not know for certain. But it

is clear that he was well acquainted with the history. He has changed

some of the names and redistributed some of the chief parts. Vittoria's

first husband, for example, becomes Camillo; her mother, named Cornelia

instead of Tarquinia, is so far from abetting Peretti's murder and

countenancing her daughter's shame, that she acts the _rôle_ of a

domestic Cassandra. Flaminio and not Marcello is made the main

instrument of Vittoria's crime and elevation. The Cardinal Montalto is

called Monticelso, and his papal title is Paul IV. instead of Sixtus V.

These are details of comparative indifference, in which a playwright

may fairly use his liberty of art. On the other hand, Webster shows a

curious knowledge of the picturesque circumstances of the tale. The

garden in which Vittoria meets Bracciano is the villa of Magnanapoli;

Zanche, the Moorish slave, combines Vittoria's waiting-woman, Caterina,

and the Greek sorceress who so mysteriously dogged Marcello's footsteps

to the death. The suspicion of Bracciano's murder is used to introduce

a quaint episode of Italian poisoning.

[22] I have amplified and corrected this chronicle by the light of

Professor Gnoli's monograph, _Vittoria Accoramboni_, published by Le

Monnier at Florence in 1870.

104Webster exercised the dramatist's privilege of connecting various

threads of action in one plot, disregarding chronology, and hazarding

an ethical solution of motives which mere fidelity to fact hardly

warrants. He shows us Vittoria married to Camillo, a low-born and

witless fool, whose only merit consists in being nephew to the Cardinal

Monticelso, afterwards Pope Paul IV.[23] Paulo Giordano Ursini, Duke of

Brachiano, loves Vittoria, and she suggests to him that, for the

furtherance of their amours, his wife, the Duchess Isabella, sister to

Francesco de' Medici, Grand Duke of Florence, should be murdered at the

same time as her own husband, Camillo. Brachiano is struck by this

plan, and with the help of Vittoria's brother, Flamineo, he puts it at

once into execution. Flamineo hires a doctor who poisons Brachiano's

portrait, so that Isabella dies after kissing it. He also with his own

hands twists Camillo's neck during a vaulting-match, making it appear

that he came by his death accidentally. Suspicion of the murder

attaches, however, to Vittoria. She is tried for her life before

Monticelso and De' Medici; acquitted, and relegated to a house of

Convertites or female reformatory. Brachiano, on the accession of

Monticelso to the Papal throne, resolves to leave Rome with Vittoria.

They escape, together with her mother Cornelia, and her brothers

Flamineo and Marcello, to Padua; and it is here that the last scenes of

the tragedy are laid.

[23] In dealing with Webster's tragedy, I have adhered to his use and

spelling of names.

The use Webster made of Lodovico Orsini deserves particular attention.

He introduces this personage in the very first scene as a spendthrift,

who, having run through his fortune, has been outlawed. Count Lodovico,

as he is always called, has no relationship with the Orsini, but is

attached to the service of Francesco de' Medici, and is an old lover of

the 105Duchess Isabella. When, therefore, the Grand Duke meditates

vengeance on Brachiano, he finds a fitting instrument in the desperate

Lodovico. Together, in disguise, they repair to Padua. Lodovico poisons

the Duke of Brachiano's helmet, and has the satisfaction of ending his

last struggles by the halter. Afterwards, with companions, habited as a

masquer, he enters Vittoria's palace and puts her to death together

with her brother Flamineo. Just when the deed of vengeance has been

completed, young Giovanni Orsini, heir of Brachiano, enters and orders

the summary execution of Lodovico for this deed of violence. Webster's

invention in this plot is confined to the fantastic incidents attending

on the deaths of Isabella, Camillo, and Brachiano, and to the murder of

Marcello by his brother Flamineo, with the further consequence of

Cornelia's madness and death. He has heightened our interest in

Isabella, at the expense of Brachiano's character, by making her an

innocent and loving wife instead of an adulteress. He has ascribed

different motives from the real ones to Lodovico in order to bring this

personage into rank with the chief actors, though this has been

achieved with only moderate success. Vittoria is abandoned to the

darkest interpretation. She is a woman who rises to eminence by crime,

as an unfaithful wife, the murderess of her husband, and an impudent

defier of justice. Her brother, Flamineo, becomes under Webster's

treatment one of those worst human infamies—a court dependent; ruffian,

buffoon, pimp, murderer by turns. Furthermore, and without any adequate

object beyond that of completing this study of a type he loved, Webster

makes him murder his own brother Marcello by treason. The part assigned

to Marcello, it should be said, is a genial and happy one; and

Cornelia, the mother of the Accoramboni, is a dignified character,

pathetic in her suffering. Webster, it may be added, treats the

Cardinal Monticelso as 106allied in some special way to the Medici. Yet

certain traits in his character, especially his avoidance of bloodshed

and the tameness of his temper after Camillo has been murdered, seem to

have been studied from the historical Sixtus.

III

The character of the 'White Devil, or Vittoria Corombona,' is perhaps

the most masterly creation of Webster's genius. Though her history is a

true one in its leading incidents, the poet, while portraying a real

personage, has conceived an original individuality. It is impossible to

know for certain how far the actual Vittoria was guilty of her first

husband's murder. Her personality fails to detach itself from the

romance of her biography by any salient qualities. But Webster, with

true playwright's instinct, casts aside historical doubts, and

delineates in his heroine a woman of a very marked and terrible nature.

Hard as adamant, uncompromising, ruthless, Vittoria follows ambition as

the loadstar of her life. It is the ambition to reign as Duchess, far

more than any passion for a paramour, which makes her plot Camillo's

and Isabella's murders, and throws her before marriage into Brachiano's

arms. Added to this ambition, she is possessed with the cold demon of

her own imperial and victorious beauty. She has the courage of her

criminality in the fullest sense; and much of the fascination with

which Webster has invested her, depends upon her dreadful daring. Her

portrait is drawn with full and firm touches. Although she appears but

five times on the scene, she fills it from the first line of the drama

to the last. Each appearance adds effectively to the total impression.

We see her first during a criminal interview with Brachiano, contrived

by her brother 107Flamineo. The plot of the tragedy is developed in

this scene; Vittoria suggesting, under the metaphor of a dream, that

her lover should compass the deaths of his duchess and her husband. The

dream is told with deadly energy and ghastly picturesqueness. The cruel

sneer at its conclusion, murmured by a voluptuous woman in the ears of

an impassioned paramour, chills us with the sense of concentrated vice.

Her next appearance is before the court, on trial for her husband's

murder. The scene is celebrated, and has been much disputed by critics.

Relying on her own dauntlessness, on her beauty, and on the protection

of Brachiano, Vittoria hardly takes the trouble to plead innocence or

to rebut charges. She stands defiant, arrogant, vigilant, on guard;

flinging the lie in the teeth of her arraigners; quick to seize the

slightest sign of feebleness in their attack; protesting her

guiltlessness so loudly that she shouts truth down by brazen strength

of lung; retiring at the close with taunts; blazing throughout with the

intolerable lustre of some baleful planet. When she enters for the

third time, it is to quarrel with her paramour. He has been stung to

jealousy by a feigned love-letter. She knows that she has given him no

cause; it is her game to lure him by fidelity to marriage. Therefore

she resolves to make his mistake the instrument of her exaltation.

Beginning with torrents of abuse, hurling reproaches at him for her own

dishonour and the murder of his wife, working herself by studied

degrees into a tempest of ungovernable rage, she flings herself upon

the bed, refuses his caresses, spurns and tramples on him, till she has

brought Brachiano, terrified, humbled, fascinated, to her feet. Then

she gradually relents beneath his passionate protestations and repeated

promises of marriage. At this point she speaks but little. We only feel

her melting humour in the air, and long to see the scene played by such

an actress as Madame 108Bernhardt. When Vittoria next appears, it is as

Duchess by the deathbed of the Duke, her husband. Her attendance here

is necessary, but it contributes little to the development of her

character. We have learned to know her, and expect neither womanish

tears nor signs of affection at a crisis which touches her heart less

than her self-love. Webster, among his other excellent qualities, knew

how to support character by reticence. Vittoria's silence in this act

is significant; and when she retires exclaiming, 'O me! this place is

hell!' we know that it is the outcry, not of a woman who has lost what

made life dear, but of one who sees the fruits of crime imperilled by a

fatal accident. The last scene of the play is devoted to Vittoria. It

begins with a notable altercation between her and Flamineo. She calls

him 'ruffian' and 'villain,' refusing him the reward of his vile

service. This quarrel emerges in one of Webster's grotesque

contrivances to prolong a poignant situation. Flamineo quits the stage

and reappears with pistols. He affects a kind of madness; and after

threatening Vittoria, who never flinches, he proposes they should end

their lives by suicide. She humours him, but manages to get the first

shot. Flamineo falls, wounded apparently to death. Then Vittoria turns

and tramples on him with her feet and tongue, taunting him in his death

agony with the enumeration of his crimes. Her malice and her energy are

equally infernal. Soon, however, it appears that the whole device was

but a trick of Flamineo's to test his sister. The pistol was not

loaded. He now produces a pair which are properly charged, and proceeds

in good earnest to the assassination of Vittoria. But at this critical

moment Lodovico and his masquers appear; brother and sister both die

unrepentant, defiant to the end. Vittoria's customary pride and her

familiar sneers impress her speech in these last moments with a 109

trenchant truth to nature:

_You_ my death's-man!

Methinks thou dost not look horrid enough,

Thou hast too good a face to be a hangman:

If thou be, do thy office in right form;

Fall down upon thy knees, and ask forgiveness!

I will be waited on in death; my servant

Shall never go before me.

Yes, I shall welcome death

As princes do some great ambassadors:

I'll meet thy weapon half-way.

'Twas a manly blow!

The next thou giv'st, murder some sucking infant;

And then thou wilt be famous.

So firmly has Webster wrought the character of this white devil, that

we seem to see her before us as in a picture. 'Beautiful as the

leprosy, dazzling as the lightning,' to use a phrase of her

enthusiastic admirer Hazlitt, she takes her station like a lady in some

portrait by Paris Bordone, with gleaming golden hair twisted into

snakelike braids about her temples, with skin white as cream, bright

cheeks, dark dauntless eyes, and on her bosom, where it has been chafed

by jewelled chains, a flush of rose. She is luxurious, but not so

abandoned to the pleasures of the sense as to forget the purpose of her

will and brain. Crime and peril add zest to her enjoyment. When

arraigned in open court before the judgment-seat of deadly and

unscrupulous foes, she conceals the consciousness of guilt, and stands

erect, with fierce front, unabashed, relying on the splendour of her

irresistible beauty and the subtlety of her piercing wit. Chafing with

rage, the blood mounts and adds a lustre to her cheek. It is no flush

of modesty, but of rebellious indignation. The Cardinal, who hates her,

brands her emotion with the name of shame. She 110rebukes him, hurling

a jibe at his own mother. And when they point with spiteful eagerness

to the jewels blazing on her breast, to the silks and satins that she

rustles in, her husband lying murdered, she retorts:

Had I foreknown his death, as you suggest,

I would have bespoke my mourning.

She is condemned, but not vanquished, and leaves the court with a

stinging sarcasm. They send her to a house of Convertites:

_V.C_. A house of Convertites! what's that?

_M_. A house of penitent whores.

_V.C_. Do the noblemen of Rome

Erect it for their wives, that I am sent

To lodge there?

Charles Lamb was certainly in error? when he described Vittoria's

attitude as one of 'innocence-resembling boldness.' In the trial scene,

no less than in the scenes of altercation with Brachiano and Flamineo,

Webster clearly intended her to pass for a magnificent vixen, a

beautiful and queenly termagant. Her boldness is the audacity of

impudence, which does not condescend to entertain the thought of guilt.

Her egotism is so hard and so profound that the very victims whom she

sacrifices to ambition seem in her sight justly punished. Of Camillo

and Isabella, her husband and his wife, she says to Brachiano:

And both were struck dead by that sacred yew,

In that base shallow grave that was their due.

IV

It is tempting to pass from this analysis of Vittoria's life to a

consideration of Webster's drama as a whole, 111especially in a book

dedicated to Italian byways. For that mysterious man of genius had

explored the dark and devious paths of Renaissance vice, and had

penetrated the secrets of Italian wickedness with truly appalling

lucidity. His tragedies, though worthless as historical documents, have

singular value as commentaries upon history, as revelations to us of

the spirit of the sixteenth century in its deepest gloom.

Webster's plays, owing to the condensation of their thought and the

compression of their style, are not easy to read for the first time. He

crowds so many fantastic incidents into one action, and burdens his

discourse with so much profoundly studied matter, that we rise from the

perusal of his works with a blurred impression of the fables, a deep

sense of the poet's power and personality, and an ineffaceable

recollection of one or two resplendent scenes. His Roman history-play

of 'Appius and Virginia' proves that he understood the value of a

simple plot, and that he was able, when he chose, to work one out with

conscientious calmness. But the two Italian dramas upon which his fame

is justly founded, by right of which he stands alone among the

playwrights of all literatures, are marked by a peculiar and wayward

mannerism. Each part is etched with equal effort after luminous effect

upon a background of lurid darkness; and the whole play is made up of

these parts, without due concentration on a master-motive. The

characters are definite in outline, but, taken together in the conduct

of a single plot, they seem to stand apart, like figures in a _tableau

vivant_; nor do they act and react each upon the other in the play of

interpenetrative passions. That this mannerism was deliberately chosen,

we have a right to believe. 'Willingly, and not ignorantly, in this

kind have I faulted,' is the answer Webster gives to such as may object

that he has not constructed his plays upon the classic model. He seems

to have had a certain sombre richness of tone and 112intricacy of

design in view, combining sensational effect and sententious pregnancy

of diction in works of laboured art, which, when adequately represented

to the ear and eye upon the stage, might at a touch obtain the

animation they now lack for chamber-students.

When familiarity has brought us acquainted with his style, when we have

disentangled the main characters and circumstances from their adjuncts,

we perceive that he treats poignant and tremendous situations with a

concentrated vigour special to his genius; that he has studied each

word and trait of character, and that he has prepared by gradual

approaches and degrees of horror for the culmination of his tragedies.

The sentences which seem at first sight copied from a commonplace book,

are found to be appropriate. Brief lightning flashes of acute

perception illuminate the midnight darkness of his all but unimaginably

depraved characters. Sharp unexpected touches evoke humanity in the

_fantoccini_ of his wayward art. No dramatist has shown more consummate

ability in heightening terrific effects, in laying bare the innermost

mysteries of crime, remorse, and pain, combined to make men miserable.

It has been said of Webster that, feeling himself deficient in the

first poetic qualities, he concentrated his powers upon one point, and

achieved success by sheer force of self-cultivation. There is perhaps

some truth in this. At any rate, his genius was of a narrow and

peculiar order, and he knew well how to make the most of its

limitations. Yet we must not forget that he felt a natural bias toward

the dreadful stuff with which he deals. The mystery of iniquity had an

irresistible attraction for his mind. He was drawn to comprehend and

reproduce abnormal elements of spiritual anguish. The materials with

which he builds his tragedies are sought for in the ruined places of

lost souls, in the agonies of madness and despair, 113in the sarcasms

of criminal and reckless atheism, in slow tortures, griefs beyond

endurance, the tempests of remorseful death, the spasms of fratricidal

bloodshed. He is often melodramatic in the means employed to bring

these psychological conditions home to us. He makes too free use of

poisoned engines, daggers, pistols, disguised murderers, and so forth.

Yet his firm grasp upon the essential qualities of diseased and guilty

human nature saves him, even at his wildest, from the unrealities and

extravagances into which less potent artists of the _drame

sanglant_—Marston, for example—blundered.

With Webster, the tendency to brood on horrors was no result of

calculation. It belonged to his idiosyncrasy. He seems to have been

suckled from birth at the breast of that _Mater Tenebrarum_, our Lady

of Darkness, whom De Quincey in one of his 'Suspiria de Profundis'

describes among the Semnai Theai, the august goddesses, the mysterious

foster-nurses of suffering humanity. He cannot say the simplest thing

without giving it a ghastly or sinister turn. If one of his characters

draws a metaphor from pie-crust, he must needs use language of the

churchyard:

You speak as if a man

Should know what fowl is coffined in a baked meat

Afore you cut it open.

Hideous similes are heaped together in illustration of the commonest

circumstances:

Places at court are but like beds in the hospital, where this man's

head lies at that man's foot, and so lower and lower.

When knaves come to preferment, they rise as gallowses are raised in

the Low Countries, one upon another's shoulders.

I would sooner eat a dead pigeon taken from the soles of the feet of

one sick of the plague than kiss one of you fasting.

114

A soldier is twitted with serving his master:

As witches do their serviceable spirits,

Even with thy prodigal blood.

An adulterous couple get this curse:

Like mistletoe on sear elms spent by weather,

Let him cleave to her, and both rot together.

A bravo is asked:

Dost thou imagine thou canst slide on blood,

And not be tainted with a shameful fall?

Or, like the black and melancholic yew-tree,

Dost think to root thyself in dead men's graves,

And yet to prosper?

It is dangerous to extract philosophy of life from any dramatist. Yet

Webster so often returns to dark and doleful meditations, that we may

fairly class him among constitutional pessimists. Men, according to the

grimness of his melancholy, are:

Only like dead walls or vaulted graves,

That, ruined, yield no echo.

O this gloomy world!

In what a shadow or deep pit of darkness

Doth womanish and fearful mankind live!

We are merely the stars' tennis-balls, struck and banded

Which way please them.

Pleasure of life! what is't? only the good hours of an ague.

A Duchess is 'brought to mortification,' before her strangling by the

executioner, in this high fantastical oration:

Thou art a box of worm-seed, at best but a salvatory of green mummy.

What's this flesh? A little crudded milk, fantastical puff-paste, &c.

&c.

115

Man's life in its totality is summed up with monastic cynicism in these

lyric verses:

Of what is't fools make such vain keeping?

Sin their conception, their birth weeping,

Their life a general mist of error,

Their death a hideous storm of terror.

The greatness of the world passes by with all its glory:

Vain the ambition of kings,

Who seek by trophies and dead things

To leave a living name behind,

And weave but nets to catch the wind.

It would be easy to surfeit criticism with similar examples; where

Webster is writing in sarcastic, meditative, or deliberately

terror-stirring moods. The same dark dye of his imagination shows

itself even more significantly in circumstances where, in the work of

any other artist, it would inevitably mar the harmony of the picture. A

lady, to select one instance, encourages her lover to embrace her at

the moment of his happiness. She cries:

Sir, be confident!

What is't distracts you? This is flesh and blood, sir;

'Tis not the figure cut in alabaster,

Kneels at my husband's tomb.

Yet so sustained is Webster's symphony of sombre tints, that we do not

feel this sepulchral language, this 'talk fit for a charnel' (to use

one of his own phrases), to be out of keeping. It sounds like a

presentiment of coming woes, which, as the drama grows to its

conclusion, gather and darken on the wretched victims of his bloody

plot.

It was with profound sagacity, or led by some deep-rooted instinct,

that Webster sought the fables of his two great tragedies, 'The White

Devil' and 'The Duchess of Malfi,' in 116Italian annals. Whether he had

visited Italy in his youth, we cannot say; for next to nothing is known

about Webster's life. But that he had gazed long and earnestly into the

mirror held up by that enchantress of the nations in his age, is

certain. Aghast and fascinated by the sins he saw there flaunting in

the light of day—sins on whose pernicious glamour Ascham, Greene, and

Howell have insisted with impressive vehemence—Webster discerned in

them the stuff he needed for philosophy and art. Withdrawing from that

contemplation, he was like a spirit 'loosed out of hell to speak of

horrors.' Deeper than any poet of the time, deeper than any even of the

Italians, he read the riddle of the sphinx of crime. He found there

something akin to his own imaginative mood, something which he alone

could fully comprehend and interpret. From the superficial narratives

of writers like Bandello he extracted a spiritual essence which was, if

not the literal, at least the ideal, truth involved in them.

The enormous and unnatural vices, the domestic crimes of cruelty,

adultery, and bloodshed, the political scheming and the subtle arts of

vengeance, the ecclesiastical tyranny and craft, the cynical scepticism

and lustre of luxurious godlessness, which made Italy in the midst of

her refinement blaze like 'a bright and ominous star' before the

nations; these were the very elements in which the genius of

Webster—salamander-like in flame—could live and flourish. Only the

incidents of Italian history, or of French history in its Italianated

epoch, were capable of supplying him with the proper type of plot. It

was in Italy alone, or in an Italianated country, such as England for a

brief space in the reign of the first Stuart threatened to become, that

the well-nigh diabolical wickedness of his characters might have been

realised. An audience familiar with Italian novels through Belleforest

117and Painter, inflamed by the long struggle of the Reformation

against the scarlet abominations of the Papal See, outraged in their

moral sense by the political paradoxes of Machiavelli, horror-stricken

at the still recent misdoings of Borgias and Medici and Farnesi,

alarmed by that Italian policy which had conceived the massacre of S.

Bartholomew in France, and infuriated by that ecclesiastical hypocrisy

which triumphed in the same; such an audience were at the right point

of sympathy with a poet who undertook to lay the springs of Southern

villany before them bare in a dramatic action. But, as the old proverb

puts it, 'Inglese Italianato è un diavolo incarnato.' 'An Englishman

assuming the Italian habit is a devil in the flesh.' The Italians were

depraved, but spiritually feeble. The English playwright, when he

brought them on the stage, arrayed with intellectual power and gleaming

with the lurid splendour of a Northern fancy, made them tenfold darker

and more terrible. To the subtlety and vices of the South he added the

melancholy, meditation, and sinister insanity of his own climate. He

deepened the complexion of crime and intensified lawlessness by robbing

the Italian character of levity. Sin, in his conception of that

character, was complicated with the sense of sin, as it never had been

in a Florentine or a Neapolitan. He had not grasped the meaning of the

Machiavellian conscience, in its cold serenity and disengagement from

the dread of moral consequence. Not only are his villains stealthy,

frigid, quick to evil, merciless, and void of honour; but they brood

upon their crimes and analyse their motives. In the midst of their

audacity they are dogged by dread of coming retribution. At the crisis

of their destiny they look back upon their better days with

intellectual remorse. In the execution of their bloodiest schemes they

groan beneath the chains of guilt they wear, and quake before the

phantoms of their haunted brains. 118Thus passion and reflection,

superstition and profanity, deliberate atrocity and fear of judgment,

are united in the same nature; and to make the complex still more

strange, the play-wright has gifted these tremendous personalities with

his own wild humour and imaginative irony. The result is almost

monstrous, such an ideal of character as makes earth hell. And yet it

is not without justification. To the Italian text has been added the

Teutonic commentary, and both are fused by a dramatic genius into one

living whole.

One of these men is Flamineo, the brother of Vittoria Corombona, upon

whose part the action of the 'White Devil' depends. He has been bred in

arts and letters at the university of Padua; but being poor and of

luxurious appetites, he chooses the path of crime in courts for his

advancement. A duke adopts him for his minion, and Flamineo acts the

pander to this great man's lust. He contrives the death of his

brother-in-law, suborns a doctor to poison the Duke's wife, and

arranges secret meetings between his sister and the paramour who is to

make her fortune and his own. His mother appears like a warning Até to

prevent her daughter's crime. In his rage he cries:

What fury raised _thee_ up? Away, away!

And when she pleads the honour of their house he answers:

Shall I,

Having a path so open and so free

To my preferment, still retain your milk

In my pale forehead?

Later on, when it is necessary to remove another victim, he runs his

own brother through the body and drives his mother to madness. Yet, in

the midst of these crimes, we are unable to regard him as a simple

cut-throat. His irony and reckless 119courting of damnation open-eyed

to get his gust of life in this world, make him no common villain. He

can be brave as well as fierce. When the Duke insults him he bandies

taunt for taunt:

_Brach_. No, you pander?

_Flam_. What, me, my lord?

Am I your dog?

_B_. A bloodhound; do you brave, do you stand me?

_F_. Stand you! let those that have diseases run;

I need no plasters.

_B_. Would you be kicked?

_F_. Would you have your neck broke?

I tell you, duke, I am not in Russia;

My shins must be kept whole.

_B_. Do you know me?

_F_. Oh, my lord, methodically:

As in this world there are degrees of evils,

So in this world there are degrees of devils.

You're a great duke, I your poor secretary.

When the Duke dies and his prey escapes him, the rage of disappointment

breaks into this fierce apostrophe:

I cannot conjure; but if prayers or oaths.

Will get the speech of him, though forty devils

Wait on him in his livery of flames,

I'll speak to him and shake him by the hand,

Though I be blasted.

As crimes thicken round him, and he still despairs of the reward for

which he sold himself, conscience awakes:

I have lived

Riotously ill, like some that live in court,

And sometimes when my face was full of smiles Have felt the

maze of conscience in my breast.

The scholar's scepticism, which lies at the root of his perversity,

finds utterance in this meditation upon death:

120

Whither shall I go now? O Lucian, thy ridiculous purgatory! to find

Alexander the Great cobbling shoes, Pompey tagging points, and Julius

Cæsar making hair-buttons!

Whether I resolve to fire, earth, water, air, or all the elements

by scruples, I know not, nor greatly care.

At the last moment he yet can say:

We cease to grieve, cease to be Fortune's slaves,

Nay, cease to die, by dying.

And again, with the very yielding of his spirit:

My life was a black charnel.

It will be seen that in no sense does Flamineo resemble Iago. He is not

a traitor working by craft and calculating ability to well-considered

ends. He is the desperado frantically clutching at an uncertain and

impossible satisfaction. Webster conceives him as a self-abandoned

atheist, who, maddened by poverty and tainted by vicious living, takes

a fury to his heart, and, because the goodness of the world has been

for ever lost to him, recklessly seeks the bad.

Bosola, in the 'Duchess of Malfi,' is of the same stamp. He too has

been a scholar. He is sent to the galleys 'for a notorious murder,' and

on his release he enters the service of two brothers, the Duke of

Calabria and the Cardinal of Aragon, who place him as their

intelligencer at the court of their sister.

_Bos_. It seems you would create me

One of your familiars.

_Ferd_. Familiar! what's that?

_Bos_. Why, a very quaint invisible devil in flesh,

An intelligencer.

_Ferd_. Such a kind of thriving thing

I would wish thee; and ere long thou may'st arrive

At a higher place by it.

121

Lured by hope of preferment, Bosola undertakes the office of spy,

tormentor, and at last of executioner. For:

Discontent and want

Is the best clay to mould a villain of.

But his true self, though subdued to be what he quaintly styles 'the

devil's quilted anvil,' on which 'all sins are fashioned and the blows

never heard,' continually rebels against this destiny. Compared with

Flamineo, he is less unnaturally criminal. His melancholy is more

fantastic, his despair more noble. Throughout the course of craft and

cruelty on which he is goaded by a relentless taskmaster, his nature,

hardened as it is, revolts.

At the end, when Bosola presents the body of the murdered Duchess to

her brother, Webster has wrought a scene of tragic savagery that

surpasses almost any other that the English stage can show. The sight,

of his dead sister maddens Ferdinand, who, feeling the eclipse of

reason gradually absorb his faculties, turns round with frenzied hatred

on the accomplice of his fratricide. Bosola demands the price of guilt.

Ferdinand spurns him with the concentrated eloquence of despair and the

extravagance of approaching insanity. The murderer taunts his master

coldly and laconically, like a man whose life is wrecked, who has waded

through blood to his reward, and who at the last moment discovers the

sacrifice of his conscience and masculine freedom to be fruitless.

Remorse, frustrated hopes, and thirst for vengeance convert Bosola from

this hour forward into an instrument of retribution. The Duke and his

brother the Cardinal are both brought to bloody deaths by the hand

which they had used to assassinate their sister.

It is fitting that something should be said about Webster's conception

of the Italian despot. Brachiano and Ferdinand, 122the employers of

Flamineo and Bosola, are tyrants such as Savonarola described, and as

we read of in the chronicles of petty Southern cities. Nothing is

suffered to stand between their lust and its accomplishment. They

override the law by violence, or pervert its action to their own

advantage:

The law to him

Is like a foul black cobweb to a spider;

He makes it his dwelling and a prison

To entangle those shall feed him.

They are eaten up with parasites, accomplices, and all the creatures of

their crimes:

He and his brother are like plum-trees that grow crooked over standing

pools; they are rich and over-laden with fruit, but none but crows,

pies, and caterpillars feed on them.

In their lives they are without a friend; for society in guilt brings

nought of comfort, and honours are but emptiness:

Glories, like glow-worms, afar off shine bright;

But looked to near, have neither heat nor light.

Their plots and counterplots drive repose far from them:

There's but three furies found in spacious hell;

But in a great man's breast three thousand dwell.

Fearful shapes afflict their fancy; shadows of ancestral crime or

ghosts of their own raising:

For these many years

None of our family dies, but there is seen

The shape of an old woman; which is given

By tradition to us to have been murdered

By her nephews for her riches.

Apparitions haunt them:

How tedious is a guilty conscience!

When I look into the fish-ponds in my garden,

Methinks I see a thing armed with a rake

That seems to strike at me.

123Continually scheming against the objects of their avarice and

hatred, preparing poisons or suborning bravoes, they know that these

same arts will be employed against them. The wine-cup hides arsenic;

the headpiece is smeared with antimony; there is a dagger behind every

arras, and each shadow is a murderer's. When death comes, they meet it

trembling. What irony Webster has condensed in Brachiano's outcry:

On pain of death, let no man name death to me;

It is a word infinitely horrible.

And how solemn are the following reflections on the death of princes:

O thou soft natural death, that art joint-twin

To sweetest slumber! no rough-bearded comet

Stares on thy mild departure; the dull owl

Beats not against thy casement, the hoarse wolf

Scents not thy carrion: pity winds thy corse,

Whilst horror waits on princes.

After their death, this is their epitaph:

These wretched eminent things

Leave no more fame behind'em than should one

Fall in a frost and leave his print in snow.

Of Webster's despots, the finest in conception and the firmest in

execution is Ferdinand of Aragon. Jealousy of his sister and avarice

take possession of him and torment him like furies. The flash of

repentance over her strangled body is also the first flash of insanity.

He survives to present the spectacle of a crazed lunatic, and to be run

through the body by his paid assassin. In the Cardinal of Aragon,

Webster paints a profligate Churchman, no less voluptuous,

blood-guilty, and the rest of it, than his brother the Duke of

Calabria. It seems to have been the poet's purpose in each 124of his

Italian tragedies to unmask Rome as the Papal city really was. In the

lawless desperado, the intemperate tyrant, and the godless

ecclesiastic, he portrayed the three curses from which Italian society

was actually suffering.

It has been needful to dwell upon the gloomy and fantastic side of

Webster's genius. But it must not be thought that he could touch no

finer chord. Indeed, it might be said that in the domain of pathos he

is even more powerful than in that of horror. His mastery in this

region is displayed in the creation of that dignified and beautiful

woman, the Duchess of Malfi, who, with nothing in her nature, had she

but lived prosperously, to divide her from the sisterhood of gentle

ladies, walks, shrined in love and purity and conscious rectitude, amid

the snares and pitfalls of her persecutors, to die at last the victim

of a brother's fevered avarice and a desperado's egotistical ambition.

The apparatus of infernal cruelty, the dead man's hand, the semblances

of murdered sons and husband, the masque of madmen, the dirge and

doleful emblems of the tomb with which she is environed in her prison

by the torturers who seek to goad her into lunacy, are insufficient to

disturb the tranquillity and tenderness of her nature. When the rope is

being fastened to her throat, she does not spend her breath in

recriminations, but turns to the waiting-woman and says:

Farewell, Cariola!

I pray thee look thou givest my little boy

Some syrup for his cold, and let the girl

Say her prayers ere she sleep.

In the preceding scenes we have had enough, nay, over-much, of madness,

despair, and wrestling with doom. This is the calm that comes when

death is present, when the tortured soul lays down its burden of the

flesh with gladness. But Webster has not spared another touch of

thrilling pathos. 125The death-struggle is over; the fratricide has

rushed away, a maddened man; the murderer is gazing with remorse upon

the beautiful dead body of his lady, wishing he had the world wherewith

to buy her back to life again; when suddenly she murmurs 'Mercy!' Our

interest, already overstrained, revives with momentary hope. But the

guardians of the grave will not be exorcised; and 'Mercy!' is the last

groan of the injured Duchess.

Webster showed great skill in his delineation of the Duchess. He had to

paint a woman in a hazardous situation: a sovereign stooping in her

widowhood to wed a servant; a lady living with the mystery of this

unequal marriage round her like a veil. He dowered her with no salient

qualities of intellect or heart or will; but he sustained our sympathy

with her, and made us comprehend her. To the last she is a Duchess; and

when she has divested state and bowed her head to enter the low gate of

heaven—too low for coronets—her poet shows us, in the lines already

quoted, that the woman still survives.

The same pathos surrounds the melancholy portrait of Isabella in

'Vittoria Corombona.' But Isabella, in that play, serves chiefly to

enhance the tyranny of her triumphant rival. The main difficulty under

which these scenes of rarest pathos would labour, were they brought

upon the stage, is their simplicity in contrast with the ghastly and

contorted horrors that envelop them. A dialogue abounding in the

passages I have already quoted—a dialogue which bandies 'O you

screech-owl!' and 'Thou foul black cloud!'—in which a sister's

admonition to her brother to think twice of suicide assumes a form so

weird as this:

I prithee, yet remember,

Millions are now in graves, which at last day

Like mandrakes shall rise shrieking.—

126

such a dialogue could not be rendered save by actors strung up to a

pitch of almost frenzied tension. To do full justice to what in

Webster's style would be spasmodic were it not so weighty, and at the

same time to maintain the purity of outline and melodious rhythm of

such characters as Isabella, demands no common histrionic power.

In attempting to define Webster's touch upon Italian tragic story, I

have been led perforce to concentrate attention on what is painful and

shocking to our sense of harmony in art. He was a vigorous and

profoundly imaginative playwright. But his most enthusiastic admirers

will hardly contend that good taste or moderation determined the

movement of his genius. Nor, though his insight into the essential

dreadfulness of Italian tragedy was so deep, is it possible to maintain

that his portraiture of Italian life was true to its more superficial

aspects. What place would there be for a Correggio or a Raphael in such

a world as Webster's? Yet we know that the art of Raphael and Correggio

is in exact harmony with the Italian temperament of the same epoch

which gave birth to Cesare Borgia and Bianca Gapello. The comparatively

slighter sketch of Iachimo in 'Cymbeline' represents the Italian as he

felt and lived, better than the laboured portrait of Flamineo.

Webster's Italian tragedies are consequently true, not so much to the

actual conditions of Italy, as to the moral impression made by those

conditions on a Northern imagination.

127

AUTUMN WANDERINGS

I.—ITALIAM PETIMUS

_Italiam Petimus!_ We left our upland home before daybreak on a clear

October morning. There had been a hard frost, spangling the meadows

with rime-crystals, which twinkled where the sun's rays touched them.

Men and women were mowing the frozen grass with thin short Alpine

scythes; and as the swathes fell, they gave a crisp, an almost tinkling

sound. Down into the gorge, surnamed of Avalanche, our horses plunged;

and there we lost the sunshine till we reached the Bear's Walk, opening

upon the vales of Albula, and Julier, and Schyn. But up above, shone

morning light upon fresh snow, and steep torrent-cloven slopes

reddening with a hundred fading plants; now and then it caught the

grey-green icicles that hung from cliffs where summer streams had

dripped. There is no colour lovelier than the blue of an autumn sky in

the high Alps, defining ridges powdered with light snow, and melting

imperceptibly downward into the warm yellow of the larches and the

crimson of the bilberry. Wiesen was radiantly beautiful: those aë;rial

ranges of the hills that separate Albula from Julier soared

crystal-clear above their forests; and for a foreground, on the green

fields starred with lilac crocuses, careered a group of children on

their sledges. Then came the row of giant peaks—Pitz d'Aela,

Tinzenhorn, and Michelhorn, above the deep ravine 128of Albula—all seen

across wide undulating golden swards, close-shaven and awaiting winter.

Carnations hung from cottage windows in full bloom, casting sharp

angular black shadows on white walls.

_Italiam petimus!_ We have climbed the valley of the Julier, following

its green, transparent torrent. A night has come and gone at Mühlen.

The stream still leads us up, diminishing in volume as we rise, up

through the fleecy mists that roll asunder for the sun, disclosing

far-off snowy ridges and blocks of granite mountains. The lifeless,

soundless waste of rock, where only thin winds whistle out of silence

and fade suddenly into still air, is passed. Then comes the descent,

with its forests of larch and cembra, golden and dark green upon a

ground of grey, and in front the serried shafts of the Bernina, and

here and there a glimpse of emerald lake at turnings of the road.

Autumn is the season for this landscape. Through the fading of

innumerable leaflets, the yellowing of larches, and something vaporous

in the low sun, it gains a colour not unlike that of the lands we seek.

By the side of the lake at Silvaplana the light was strong and warm,

but mellow. Pearly clouds hung over the Maloja, and floating overhead

cast shadows on the opaque water, which may literally be compared to

chrysoprase. The breadth of golden, brown, and russet tints upon the

valley at this moment adds softness to its lines of level strength.

Devotees of the Engadine contend that it possesses an austere charm

beyond the common beauty of Swiss landscape; but this charm is only

perfected in autumn. The fresh snow on the heights that guard it helps.

And then there are the forests of dark pines upon those many knolls and

undulating mountain-flanks beside the lakes. Sitting and dreaming there

in noonday sun, I kept repeating to myself _Italiam petimus!_

129A hurricane blew upward from the pass as we left Silvaplana,

ruffling the lake with gusts of the Italian wind. By Silz Maria we came

in sight of a dozen Italian workmen, arm linked in arm in two rows,

tramping in rhythmic stride, and singing as they went. Two of them were

such nobly built young men, that for a moment the beauty of the

landscape faded from my sight, and I was saddened. They moved to their

singing, like some of Mason's or Frederick Walker's figures, with the

free grace of living statues, and laughed as we drove by. And yet, with

all their beauty, industry, sobriety, intelligence, these Italians of

the northern valleys serve the sterner people of the Grisons like

negroes, doing their roughest work at scanty wages.

So we came to the vast Alpine wall, and stood on a bare granite slab,

and looked over into Italy, as men might lean from the battlements of a

fortress. Behind lies the Alpine valley, grim, declining slowly

northward, with wind-lashed lakes and glaciers sprawling from

storm-broken pyramids of gneiss. Below spread the unfathomable depths

that lead to Lombardy, flooded with sunlight, filled with swirling

vapour, but never wholly hidden from our sight. For the blast kept

shifting the cloud-masses, and the sun streamed through in spears and

bands of sheeny rays. Over the parapet our horses dropped, down through

sable spruce and amber larch, down between tangles of rowan and

autumnal underwood. Ever as we sank, the mountains rose—those sharp

embattled precipices, toppling spires, impendent chasms blurred with

mist, that make the entrance into Italy sublime. Nowhere do the Alps

exhibit their full stature, their commanding puissance, with such

majesty as in the gates of Italy; and of all those gates I think there

is none to compare with Maloja, none certainly to rival it in

abruptness of initiation into the Italian secret. Below Vico Soprano we

pass 130already into the violets and blues of Titian's landscape. Then

come the purple boulders among chestnut trees; then the double

dolomite-like peak of Pitz Badin and Promontogno.

It is sad that words can do even less than painting could to bring this

window-scene at Promontogno before another eye. The casement just

frames it. In the foreground are meadow slopes, thinly, capriciously

planted with chestnut trees and walnuts, each standing with its shadow

cast upon the sward. A little farther falls the torrent, foaming down

between black jaws of rain-stained granite, with the wooden buildings

of a rustic mill set on a ledge of rock. Suddenly above this landscape

soars the valley, clothing its steep sides on either hand with pines;

and there are emerald isles of pasture on the wooded flanks; and then

cliffs, where the red-stemmed larches glow; and at the summit, shooting

into ether with a swathe of mist around their basement, soar the double

peaks, the one a pyramid, the other a bold broken crystal not unlike

the Finsteraarhorn seen from Furka. These are connected by a snowy

saddle, and snow is lying on their inaccessible crags in powdery

drifts. Sunlight pours between them into the ravine. The green and

golden forests now join from either side, and now recede, according as

the sinuous valley brings their lines together or disparts them. There

is a sound of cow-bells on the meadows; and the roar of the stream is

dulled or quickened as the gusts of this October wind sweep by or

slacken. _Italiam petimus!_

_Tangimus Italiam!_ Chiavenna is a worthy key to this great gate

Italian. We walked at night in the open galleries of the cathedral

cloister—white, smoothly curving, well-proportioned loggie, enclosing a

green space, whence soars the campanile to the stars. The moon had

sunk, but her 131light still silvered the mountains that stand at watch

round Chiavenna; and the castle rock was flat and black against that

dreamy background. Jupiter, who walked so lately for us on the long

ridge of the Jacobshorn above our pines, had now an ample space of sky

over Lombardy to light his lamp in. Why is it, we asked each other, as

we smoked our pipes and strolled, my friend and I;—why is it that

Italian beauty does not leave the spirit so untroubled as an Alpine

scene? Why do we here desire the flower of some emergent feeling to

grow from the air, or from the soil, or from humanity to greet us? This

sense of want evoked by Southern beauty is perhaps the antique

mythopœic yearning. But in our perplexed life it takes another form,

and seems the longing for emotion, ever fleeting, ever new, unrealised,

unreal, insatiable.

II.—OVER THE APENNINES

At Parma we slept in the Albergo della Croce Bianca, which is more a

bric-à-brac shop than an inn; and slept but badly, for the good folk of

Parma twanged guitars and exercised their hoarse male voices all night

in the street below. We were glad when Christian called us, at 5 A.M.,

for an early start across the Apennines. This was the day of a right

Roman journey. In thirteen and a half hours, leaving Parma at 6, and

arriving in Sarzana at 7.30, we flung ourselves across the spine of

Italy, from the plains of Eridanus to the seashore of Etruscan Luna. I

had secured a carriage and extra post-horses the night before;

therefore we found no obstacles upon the road, but eager drivers, quick

relays, obsequious postmasters, change, speed, perpetual movement. The

road itself is a noble one, and nobly entertained in all things but

accommodation for travellers. At Berceto, near the 132summit of the

pass, we stopped just half an hour, to lunch off a mouldy hen and six

eggs; but that was all the halt we made.

As we drove out of Parma, striking across the plain to the _ghiara_ of

the Taro, the sun rose over the austere autumnal landscape, with its

withered vines and crimson haws. Christian, the mountaineer, who at

home had never seen the sun rise from a flat horizon, stooped from the

box to call attention to this daily recurring miracle, which on the

plain of Lombardy is no less wonderful than on a rolling sea. From the

village of Fornovo, where the Italian League was camped awaiting

Charles VIII. upon that memorable July morn in 1495, the road strikes

suddenly aside, gains a spur of the descending Apennines, and keeps

this vantage till the pass of La Cisa is reached. Many windings are

occasioned by thus adhering to arêtes, but the total result is a

gradual ascent with free prospect over plain and mountain. The

Apennines, built up upon a smaller scale than the Alps, perplexed in

detail and entangled with cross sections and convergent systems, lend

themselves to this plan of carrying highroads along their ridges

instead of following the valley.

What is beautiful in the landscape of that northern watershed is the

subtlety, delicacy, variety, and intricacy of the mountain outlines.

There is drawing wherever the eye falls. Each section of the vast

expanse is a picture of tossed crests and complicated undulations. And

over the whole sea of stationary billows, light is shed like an

ethereal raiment, with spare colour—blue and grey, and parsimonious

green—in the near foreground. The detail is somewhat dry and

monotonous; for these so finely moulded hills are made up of washed

earth, the immemorial wrecks of earlier mountain ranges. Brown

villages, not unlike those of Midland England, low houses built of

stone and tiled with stone, and 133square-towered churches, occur at

rare intervals in cultivated hollows, where there are fields and fruit

trees. Water is nowhere visible except in the wasteful river-beds. As

we rise, we break into a wilder country, forested with oak, where oxen

and goats are browsing. The turf is starred with lilac gentian and

crocus bells, but sparely. Then comes the highest village, Berceto,

with keen Alpine air. After that, broad rolling downs of yellowing

grass and russet beech-scrub lead onward to the pass La Cisa. The sense

of breadth in composition is continually satisfied through this ascent

by the fine-drawn lines, faint tints, and immense air-spaces of Italian

landscape. Each little piece reminds one of England; but the

geographical scale is enormously more grandiose, and the effect of

majesty proportionately greater.

From La Cisa the road descends suddenly; for the southern escarpment of

the Apennine, as of the Alpine, barrier is pitched at a far steeper

angle than the northern. Yet there is no view of the sea. That is

excluded by the lower hills which hem the Magra. The upper valley is

beautiful, with verdant lawns and purple hillsides breaking down into

thick chestnut woods, through which we wound at a rapid pace for nearly

an hour. The leaves were still green, mellowing to golden; but the

fruit was ripe and heavy, ready at all points to fall. In the still

October air the husks above our heads would loosen, and the brown nuts

rustle through the foliage, and with a dull short thud, like drops of

thunder-rain, break down upon the sod. At the foot of this rich forest,

wedged in between huge buttresses, we found Pontremoli, and changed our

horses here for the last time. It was Sunday, and the little town was

alive with country-folk; tall stalwart fellows wearing peacock's

feathers in their black slouched hats, and nut-brown maids.

From this point the valley of the Magra is exceeding rich 134with fruit

trees, vines, and olives. The tendrils of the vine are yellow now, and

in some places hued like generous wine; through their thick leaves the

sun shot crimson. In one cool garden, as the day grew dusk, I noticed

quince trees laden with pale fruit entangled with pomegranates—green

spheres and ruddy amid burnished leaves. By the roadside too were many

berries of bright hues; the glowing red of haws and hips, the amber of

the pyracanthus, the rose tints of the spindle-wood. These make autumn

even lovelier than spring. And then there was a wood of chestnuts

carpeted with pale pinkling, a place to dream of in the twilight. But

the main motive of this landscape was the indescribable Carrara range,

an island of pure form and shooting peaks, solid marble, crystalline in

shape and texture, faintly blue against the blue sky, from which they

were but scarce divided. These mountains close the valley to

south-east, and seem as though they belonged to another and more

celestial region.

Soon the sunlight was gone, and moonrise came to close the day, as we

rolled onward to Sarzana, through arundo donax and vine-girdled olive

trees and villages, where contadini lounged upon the bridges. There was

a stream of sound in our ears, and in my brain a rhythmic dance of

beauties caught through the long-drawn glorious golden autumn-day.

III.—FOSDINOVO

The hamlet and the castle of Fosdinovo stand upon a mountain-spur above

Sarzana, commanding the valley of the Magra and the plains of Luni.

This is an ancient fief of the Malaspina House, and is still in the

possession of the Marquis of that name.

The road to Fosdinovo strikes across the level through an avenue of

plane trees, shedding their discoloured leaves. It 135then takes to the

open fields, bordered with tall reeds waving from the foss on either

hand, where grapes are hanging to the vines. The country-folk allow

their vines to climb into the olives, and these golden festoons are a

great ornament to the grey branches. The berries on the trees are still

quite green, and it is a good olive season. Leaving the main road, we

pass a villa of the Malaspini, shrouded in immense thickets of sweet

bay and ilex, forming a grove for the Nymphs or Pan. Here may you see

just such clean stems and lucid foliage as Gian Bellini painted, inch

by inch, in his Peter Martyr picture. The place is neglected now; the

semicircular seats of white Carrara marble are stained with green

mosses, the altars chipped, the fountains choked with bay leaves; and

the rose trees, escaped from what were once trim garden alleys, have

gone wandering a-riot into country hedges. There is no demarcation

between the great man's villa and the neighbouring farms. From this

point the path rises, and the barren hillside is a-bloom with

late-flowering myrtles. Why did the Greeks consecrate these myrtle-rods

to Death as well as Love? Electra complained that her father's tomb had

not received the honour of the myrtle branch; and the Athenians

wreathed their swords with myrtle in memory of Harmodius. Thinking of

these matters, I cannot but remember lines of Greek, which have

themselves the rectitude and elasticity of myrtle wands:

καί προσπεσών εκλυσ΄ ε΄ρημίας τυχών

σπονδάς τε λύσας ασκόν ον Φέρω ξένοις

εσπεισα τύμβω δ΄άμφεθηκα μυρσίνας

As we approach Fosdinovo, the hills above us gain sublimity; the

prospect over plain and sea—the fields where Luna was, the widening bay

of Spezzia—grows ever grander. The castle is a ruin, still capable of

partial habitation, and now undergoing repair—the state in which a ruin

looks most sordid and forlorn. How strange it is, too, that, to enforce

136this sense of desolation, sad dishevelled weeds cling ever to such

antique masonry! Here are the henbane, the sow-thistle, the wild

cucumber. At Avignon, at Orvieto, at Dolce Acqua, at Les Baux, we never

missed them. And they have the dusty courtyards, the massive portals,

where portcullises still threaten, of Fosdinovo to themselves. Over the

gate, and here and there on corbels, are carved the arms of Malaspina—a

barren thorn-tree, gnarled with the geometrical precision of heraldic

irony.

Leaning from the narrow windows of this castle, with the spacious view

to westward, I thought of Dante. For Dante in this castle was the guest

of Moroello Malaspina, what time he was yet finishing the 'Inferno.'

There is a little old neglected garden, full to south, enclosed upon a

rampart which commands the Borgo, where we found frail canker-roses and

yellow amaryllis. Here, perhaps, he may have sat with ladies—for this

was the Marchesa's pleasaunce; or may have watched through a short

summer's night, until he saw that _tremolar della marina_, portending

dawn, which afterwards he painted in the 'Purgatory.'

From Fosdinovo one can trace the Magra work its way out seaward, not

into the plain where once the _candentia moenia Lunae_ flashed sunrise

from their battlements, but close beside the little hills which back

the southern arm of the Spezzian gulf. At the extreme end of that

promontory, called Del Corvo, stood the Benedictine convent of S.

Croce; and it was here in 1309, if we may trust to tradition, that

Dante, before his projected journey into France, appeared and left the

first part of his poem with the Prior. Fra Ilario, such was the good

father's name, received commission to transmit the 'Inferno' to

Uguccione della Faggiuola; and he subsequently recorded the fact of

Dante's visit in a letter which, though its genuineness has been called

in question, is far too interesting 137to be left without allusion. The

writer says that on occasion of a journey into lands beyond the

Riviera, Dante visited this convent, appearing silent and unknown among

the monks. To the Prior's question what he wanted, he gazed upon the

brotherhood, and only answered, 'Peace!' Afterwards, in private

conversation, he communicated his name and spoke about his poem. A

portion of the 'Divine Comedy' composed in the Italian tongue aroused

Ilario's wonder, and led him to inquire why his guest had not followed

the usual course of learned poets by committing his thoughts to Latin.

Dante replied that he had first intended to write in that language, and

that he had gone so far as to begin the poem in Virgilian hexameters.

Reflection upon the altered conditions of society in that age led him,

however, to reconsider the matter; and he was resolved to tune another

lyre, 'suited to the sense of modern men.' 'For,' said he, 'it is idle

to set solid food before the lips of sucklings.'

If we can trust Fra Ilario's letter as a genuine record, which is

unhappily a matter of some doubt, we have in this narration not only a

picturesque, almost a melodramatically picturesque glimpse of the

poet's apparition to those quiet monks in their seagirt house of peace,

but also an interesting record of the destiny which presided over the

first great work of literary art in a distinctly modern language.

IV.—LA SPEZZIA

While we were at Fosdinovo the sky filmed over, and there came a halo

round the sun. This portended change; and by evening, after we had

reached La Spezzia, earth, sea, and air were conscious of a coming

tempest. At night I went down to the shore, and paced the sea-wall they

have lately built 138along the Rada. The moon was up, but overdriven

with dry smoky clouds, now thickening to blackness over the whole bay,

now leaving intervals through which the light poured fitfully and

fretfully upon the wrinkled waves; and ever and anon they shuddered

with electric gleams which were not actual lightning. Heaven seemed to

be descending on the sea; one might have fancied that some powerful

charms were drawing down the moon with influence malign upon those

still resisting billows. For not as yet the gulf was troubled to its

depth, and not as yet the breakers dashed in foam against the

moonlight-smitten promontories. There was but an uneasy murmuring of

wave to wave; a whispering of wind, that stooped its wing and hissed

along the surface, and withdrew into the mystery of clouds again; a

momentary chafing of churned water round the harbour piers, subsiding

into silence petulant and sullen. I leaned against an iron stanchion

and longed for the sea's message. But nothing came to me, and the

drowned secret of Shelley's death those waves which were his grave

revealed not.

Howler and scooper of storms! capricious and dainty sea!

Meanwhile the incantation swelled in shrillness, the electric shudders

deepened. Alone in this elemental overture to tempest I took no note of

time, but felt, through self-abandonment to the symphonic influence,

how sea and air, and clouds akin to both, were dealing with each other

complainingly, and in compliance to some maker of unrest within them. A

touch upon my shoulder broke this trance; I turned and saw a boy beside

me in a coastguard's uniform. Francesco was on patrol that night; but

my English accent soon assured him that I was no _contrabbandiere_, and

he too leaned against the stanchion and told me his short story. He was

in his nineteenth year, and came from Florence, where his people live

in the 139Borgo Ognissanti. He had all the brightness of the Tuscan

folk, a sort of innocent malice mixed with _espieglerie_. It was

diverting to see the airs he gave himself on the strength of his new

military dignity, his gun, and uniform, and night duty on the shore. I

could not help humming to myself _Non più andrai_; for Francesco was a

sort of Tuscan Cherubino. We talked about picture galleries and

libraries in Florence, and I had to hear his favourite passages from

the Italian poets. And then there came the plots of Jules Verne's

stories and marvellous narrations about _l' uomo cavallo, l' uomo

volante, l' uomo pesce_. The last of these personages turned out to be

Paolo Boÿnton (so pronounced), who had swam the Arno in his diving

dress, passing the several bridges, and when he came to the great weir

'allora tutti stare con bocca aperta.' Meanwhile the storm grew

serious, and our conversation changed. Francesco told me about the

terrible sun-stricken sand shores of the Riviera, burning in summer

noon, over which the coast-guard has to tramp, their perils from

falling stones in storm, and the trains that come rushing from those

narrow tunnels on the midnight line of march. It is a hard life; and

the thirst for adventure which drove this boy—'il più matto di tutta la

famiglia'—to adopt it, seems well-nigh quenched. And still, with a

return to Giulio Verne, he talked enthusiastically of deserting, of

getting on board a merchant ship, and working his way to southern

islands where wonders are.

A furious blast swept the whole sky for a moment almost clear. The

moonlight fell, with racing cloud-shadows, upon sea and hills, the

lights of Lerici, the great _fanali_ at the entrance of the gulf, and

Francesco's upturned handsome face. Then all again was whirled in mist

and foam; one breaker smote the sea wall in a surge of froth, another

plunged upon its heels; with inconceivable swiftness came 140rain;

lightning deluged the expanse of surf, and showed the windy trees bent

landward by the squall. It was long past midnight now, and the storm

was on us for the space of three days.

V.—PORTO VENERE

For the next three days the wind went worrying on, and a line of surf

leapt on the sea-wall always to the same height. The hills all around

were inky black and weary.

At night the wild libeccio still rose, with floods of rain and

lightning poured upon the waste. I thought of the Florentine patrol. Is

he out in it, and where?

At last there came a lull. When we rose on the fourth morning, the sky

was sulky, spent and sleepy after storm—the air as soft and tepid as

boiled milk or steaming flannel. We drove along the shore to Porto

Venere, passing the arsenals and dockyards, which have changed the face

of Spezzia since Shelley knew it. This side of the gulf is not so rich

in vegetation as the other, probably because it lies open to the winds

from the Carrara mountains. The chestnuts come down to the shore in

many places, bringing with them the wild mountain-side. To make up for

this lack of luxuriance, the coast is furrowed with a succession of

tiny harbours, where the fishing-boats rest at anchor. There are many

villages upon the spurs of hills, and on the headlands naval stations,

hospitals, lazzaretti, and prisons. A prickly bindweed (the _Smilax

Sarsaparilla_) forms a feature in the near landscape, with its creamy

odoriferous blossoms, coral berries, and glossy thorned leaves.

A turn of the road brought Porto Venere in sight, and on its grey walls

flashed a gleam of watery sunlight. The village consists of one long

narrow street, the houses on the left side 141hanging sheer above the

sea. Their doors at the back open on to cliffs which drop about fifty

feet upon the water. A line of ancient walls, with mediaeval

battlements and shells of chambers suspended midway between earth and

sky, runs up the rock behind the town; and this wall is pierced with a

deep gateway above which the inn is piled. We had our lunch in a room

opening upon the town-gate, adorned with a deep-cut Pisan arch

enclosing images and frescoes—a curious episode in a place devoted to

the jollity of smugglers and seafaring folk. The whole house was such

as Tintoretto loved to paint—huge wooden rafters; open chimneys with

pent-house canopies of stone, where the cauldrons hung above logs of

chestnut; rude low tables spread with coarse linen embroidered at the

edges, and laden with plates of fishes, fruit, quaint glass,

big-bellied jugs of earthenware, and flasks of yellow wine. The people

of the place were lounging round in lazy attitudes. There were odd

nooks and corners everywhere; unexpected staircases with windows

slanting through the thickness of the town-wall; pictures of saints;

high-zoned serving women, on whose broad shoulders lay big coral beads;

smoke-blackened roofs, and balconies that opened on the sea. The house

was inexhaustible in motives for pictures.

We walked up the street, attended by a rabble rout of boys—_diavoli

scatenati_—clean, grinning, white-teethed, who kept incessantly

shouting, 'Soldo, soldo!' I do not know why these sea-urchins are so

far more irrepressible than their land brethren. But it is always thus

in Italy. They take an imperturbable delight in noise and mere

annoyance. I shall never forget the sea-roar of Porto Venere, with that

shrill obligate, 'Soldo, soldo, soldo!' rattling like a dropping fire

from lungs of brass.

At the end of Porto Venere is a withered and abandoned city, climbing

the cliffs of S. Pietro; and on the headland 142stands the ruined

church, built by Pisans with alternate rows of white and black marble,

upon the site of an old temple of Venus. This is a modest and pure

piece of Gothic architecture, fair in desolation, refined and

dignified, and not unworthy in its grace of the dead Cyprian goddess.

Through its broken lancets the sea-wind whistles and the vast reaches

of the Tyrrhene gulf are seen. Samphire sprouts between the blocks of

marble, and in sheltered nooks the caper hangs her beautiful purpureal

snowy bloom.

The headland is a bold block of white limestone stained with red. It

has the pitch of Exmoor stooping to the sea near Lynton. To north, as

one looks along the coast, the line is broken by Porto Fino's

amethystine promontory; and in the vaporous distance we could trace the

Riviera mountains, shadowy and blue. The sea came roaring, rolling in

with tawny breakers; but, far out, it sparkled in pure azure, and the

cloud-shadows over it were violet. Where Corsica should have been seen,

soared banks of fleecy, broad-domed alabaster clouds.

This point, once dedicated to Venus, now to Peter—both, be it

remembered, fishers of men—is one of the most singular in Europe. The

island of Palmaria, rich in veined marbles, shelters the port; so that

outside the sea rages, while underneath the town, reached by a narrow

strait, there is a windless calm. It was not without reason that our

Lady of Beauty took this fair gulf to herself; and now that she has

long been dispossessed, her memory lingers yet in names. For Porto

Venere remembers her, and Lerici is only Eryx. There is a grotto here,

where an inscription tells us that Byron once 'tempted the Ligurian

waves.' It is just such a natural sea-cave as might have inspired

Euripides when he described the refuge of Orestes in 'Iphigenia.'

143

VI.—LERICI

Libeccio at last had swept the sky clear. The gulf was ridged with

foam-fleeced breakers, and the water churned into green, tawny wastes.

But overhead there flew the softest clouds, all silvery, dispersed in

flocks. It is the day for pilgrimage to what was Shelley's home.

After following the shore a little way, the road to Lerici breaks into

the low hills which part La Spezzia from Sarzana. The soil is red, and

overgrown with arbutus and pinaster, like the country around Cannes.

Through the scattered trees it winds gently upwards, with frequent

views across the gulf, and then descends into a land rich with olives—a

genuine Riviera landscape, where the mountain-slopes are hoary, and

spikelets of innumerable light-flashing leaves twinkle against a blue

sea, misty-deep. The walls here are not unfrequently adorned with

basreliefs of Carrara marble—saints and madonnas very delicately

wrought, as though they were love-labours of sculptors who had passed a

summer on this shore. San Terenzio is soon discovered low upon the

sands to the right, nestling under little cliffs; and then the

high-built castle of Lerici comes in sight, looking across, the bay to

Porto Venere—one Aphrodite calling to the other, with the foam between.

The village is piled around its cove with tall and picturesquely

coloured houses; the molo and the fishing-boats lie just beneath the

castle. There is one point of the descending carriage road where all

this gracefulness is seen, framed by the boughs of olive branches,

swaying, wind-ruffled, laughing the many-twinkling smiles of ocean back

from their grey leaves. Here _Erycina ridens_ is at home. And, as we

stayed to dwell upon the beauty of the scene, came women from the bay

below—barefooted, straight as willow wands, with 144burnished copper

bowls upon their heads. These women have the port of goddesses,

deep-bosomed, with the length of thigh and springing ankles that

betoken strength no less than elasticity and grace. The hair of some of

them was golden, rippling in little curls around brown brows and

glowing eyes. Pale lilac blent with orange on their dress, and coral

beads hung from their ears.

At Lerici we took a boat and pushed into the rolling breakers.

Christian now felt the movement of the sea for the first time. This was

rather a rude trial, for the grey-maned monsters played, as it seemed,

at will with our cockle-shell, tumbling in dolphin curves to reach the

shore. Our boatmen knew all about Shelley and the Casa Magni. It is not

at Lerici, but close to San Terenzio, upon the south side of the

village. Looking across the bay from the molo, one could clearly see

its square white mass, tiled roof, and terrace built on rude arcades

with a broad orange awning. Trelawny's description hardly prepares one

for so considerable a place. I think the English exiles of that period

must have been exacting if the Casa Magni seemed to them no better than

a bathing-house.

We left our boat at the jetty, and walked through some gardens to the

villa. There we were kindly entertained by the present occupiers, who,

when I asked them whether such visits as ours were not a great

annoyance, gently but feelingly replied: 'It is not so bad now as it

used to be.' The English gentleman who rents the Casa Magni has known

it uninterruptedly since Shelley's death, and has used it for

_villeggiatura_ during the last thirty years. We found him in the

central sitting-room, which readers of Trelawny's 'Recollections' have

so often pictured to themselves. The large oval table, the settees

round the walls, and some of the pictures are still unchanged. As we

sat talking, I laughed to think of 145that luncheon party, when Shelley

lost his clothes, and came naked, dripping with sea-water, into the

room, protected by the skirts of the sympathising waiting-maid. And

then I wondered where they found him on the night when he stood

screaming in his sleep, after the vision of his veiled self, with its

question, '_Siete soddisfatto_?'

There were great ilexes behind the house in Shelley's time, which have

been cut down, and near these he is said to have sat and written the

'Triumph of Life.' Some new houses, too, have been built between the

villa and the town; otherwise the place is unaltered. Only an awning

has been added to protect the terrace from the sun. I walked out on

this terrace, where Shelley used to listen to Jane's singing. The sea

was fretting at its base, just as Mrs. Shelley says it did when the Don

Juan disappeared.

From San Terenzio we walked back to Lerici through olive woods,

attended by a memory which toned the almost overpowering beauty of the

place to sadness.

VII.—VIAREGGIO

The same memory drew us, a few days later, to the spot where Shelley's

body was burned. Viareggio is fast becoming a fashionable

watering-place for the people of Florence and Lucca, who seek fresher

air and simpler living than Livorno offers. It has the usual new inns

and improvised lodging-houses of such places, built on the outskirts of

a little fishing village, with a boundless stretch of noble sands.

There is a wooden pier on which we walked, watching the long roll of

waves, foam-flaked, and quivering with moonlight. The Apennines faded

into the grey sky beyond, and the sea-wind was good to breathe. There

is a feeling of 'immensity, liberty, action' here, which is not common

in Italy. It 146reminds us of England; and to-night the Mediterranean

had the rough force of a tidal sea.

Morning revealed beauty enough in Viareggio to surprise even one who

expects from Italy all forms of loveliness. The sand-dunes stretch for

miles between the sea and a low wood of stone pines, with the Carrara

hills descending from their glittering pinnacles by long lines to the

headlands of the Spezzian Gulf. The immeasurable distance was all

painted in sky-blue and amethyst; then came the golden green of the

dwarf firs; and then dry yellow in the grasses of the dunes; and then

the many-tinted sea, with surf tossed up against the furthest cliffs.

It is a wonderful and tragic view, to which no painter but the Roman

Costa has done justice; and he, it may be said, has made this landscape

of the Carrarese his own. The space between sand and pine-wood was

covered with faint, yellow, evening primroses. They flickered like

little harmless flames in sun and shadow, and the spires of the Carrara

range were giant flames transformed to marble. The memory of that day

described by Trelawny in a passage of immortal English prose, when he

and Byron and Leigh Hunt stood beside the funeral pyre, and libations

were poured, and the 'Cor Cordium' was found inviolate among the ashes,

turned all my thoughts to flame beneath the gentle autumn sky.

Still haunted by these memories, we took the carriage road to Pisa,

over which Shelley's friends had hurried to and fro through those last

days. It passes an immense forest of stone-pines—aisles and avenues;

undergrowth of ilex, laurustinus, gorse, and myrtle; the crowded

cyclamens, the solemn silence of the trees; the winds hushed in their

velvet roof and stationary domes of verdure.

147

PARMA

Parma is perhaps the brightest _Residenzstadt_ of the second class in

Italy. Built on a sunny and fertile tract of the Lombard plain, within

view of the Alps, and close beneath the shelter of the Apennines, it

shines like a well-set gem with stately towers and cheerful squares in

the midst of verdure. The cities of Lombardy are all like large country

houses: walking out of their gates, you seem to be stepping from a door

or window that opens on a trim and beautiful garden, where

mulberry-tree is married to mulberry by festoons of vines, and where

the maize and sunflower stand together in rows between patches of flax

and hemp. But it is not in order to survey the union of well-ordered

husbandry with the civilities of ancient city-life that we break the

journey at Parma between Milan and Bologna. We are attracted rather by

the fame of one great painter, whose work, though it may be studied

piecemeal in many galleries of Europe, in Parma has a fulness,

largeness, and mastery that can nowhere else be found. In Parma alone

Correggio challenges comparison with Raphael, with Tintoret, with all

the supreme decorative painters who have deigned to make their art the

handmaid of architecture. Yet even in the cathedral and the church of

S. Giovanni, where Correggio's frescoes cover cupola and chapel wall,

we could scarcely comprehend his greatness now—so cruelly have time and

neglect dealt with those delicate dream-shadows of celestial

fairyland—were it not for an interpreter, who consecrated a lifetime to

the task of translating 148his master's poetry of fresco into the prose

of engraving. That man was Paolo Toschi—a name to be ever venerated by

all lovers of the arts; since without his guidance we should hardly

know what to seek for in the ruined splendours of the domes of Parma,

or even seeking, how to find the object of our search. Toschi's labour

was more effectual than that of a restorer however skilful, more loving

than that of a follower however faithful. He respected Correggio's

handiwork with religious scrupulousness, adding not a line or tone or

touch of colour to the fading frescoes; but he lived among them, aloft

on scaffoldings, and face to face with the originals which he designed

to reproduce. By long and close familiarity, by obstinate and patient

interrogation, he divined Correggio's secret, and was able at last to

see clearly through the mist of cobweb and mildew and altar smoke, and

through the still more cruel travesty of so-called restoration. What he

discovered, he faithfully committed first to paper in water colours,

and then to copperplate with the burin, so that we enjoy the privilege

of seeing Correggio's masterpieces as Toschi saw them, with the eyes of

genius and of love and of long scientific study. It is not too much to

say that some of Correggio's most charming compositions—for example,

the dispute of S. Augustine and S. John—have been resuscitated from the

grave by Toschi's skill. The original offers nothing but a mouldering

surface from which the painter's work has dropped in scales. The

engraving presents a design which we doubt not was Correggio's, for it

corresponds in all particulars to the style and spirit of the master.

To be critical in dealing with so successful an achievement of

restoration and translation is difficult. Yet it may be admitted once

and for all that Toschi has not unfrequently enfeebled his original.

Under his touch Correggio loses somewhat of his sensuous audacity, his

dithyrambic ecstasy, and approaches 149the ordinary standard of

prettiness and graceful beauty. The Diana of the Camera di S. Paolo,

for instance, has the strong calm splendour of a goddess: the same

Diana in Toschi's engraving seems about to smile with girlish joy. In a

word, the engraver was a man of a more common stamp—more timid and more

conventional than the painter. But this is after all a trifling

deduction from the value of his work.

Our debt to Paolo Toschi is such that it would be ungrateful not to

seek some details of his life. The few that can be gathered even at

Parma are brief and bald enough. The newspaper articles and funeral

panegyrics which refer to him are as barren as all such occasional

notices in Italy have always been; the panegyrist seeming more anxious

about his own style than eager to communicate information. Yet a bare

outline of Toschi's biography may be supplied. He was born at Parma in

1788. His father was cashier of the post-office, and his mother's name

was Anna Maria Brest. Early in his youth he studied painting at Parma

under Biagio Martini; and in 1809 he went to Paris, where he learned

the art of engraving from Bervic and of etching from Oortman. In Paris

he contracted an intimate friendship with the painter Gérard. But after

ten years he returned to Parma, where he established a company and

school of engravers in concert with his friend Antonio Isac. Maria

Louisa, the then Duchess, under whose patronage the arts flourished at

Parma (witness Bodoni's exquisite typography), soon recognised his

merit, and appointed him Director of the Ducal Academy. He then formed

the project of engraving a series of the whole of Correggio's frescoes.

The undertaking was a vast one. Both the cupolas of S. John and the

cathedral, together with the vault of the apse of S. Giovanni[24] and

various portions of the 150side aisles, and the so-called Camera di S.

Paolo, are covered by frescoes of Correggio and his pupil Parmegiano.

These frescoes have suffered so much from neglect and time, and from

unintelligent restoration, that it is difficult in many cases to

determine their true character. Yet Toschi did not content himself with

selections, or shrink from the task of deciphering and engraving the

whole. He formed a school of disciples, among whom were Carlo Raimondi

of Milan, Antonio Costa of Venice, Edward Eichens of Berlin, Aloisio

Juvara of Naples, Antonio Dalcò, Giuseppe Magnani, and Lodovico Bisola

of Parma, and employed them as assistants in his work. Death overtook

him in 1854, before it was finished, and now the water-colour drawings

which are exhibited in the Gallery of Parma prove to what extent the

achievement fell short of his design. Enough, however, was accomplished

to place the chief masterpieces of Correggio beyond the possibility of

utter oblivion.

[24] The fresco of the Coronation of the Virgin upon the semi-dome of

S. Giovanni is the work of a copyist, Cesare Aretusi. But part of the

original fresco, which was removed in 1684, exists in a good state of

preservation at the end of the long gallery of the library.

To the piety of his pupil Carlo Raimondi, the bearer of a name

illustrious in the annals of engraving, we owe a striking portrait of

Toschi. The master is represented on his seat upon the scaffold in the

dizzy half-light of the dome. The shadowy forms of saints and angels

are around him. He has raised his eyes from his cartoon to study one of

these. In his right hand is the opera-glass with which he scrutinises

the details of distant groups. The upturned face, with its expression

of contemplative intelligence, is like that of an astronomer accustomed

to commerce with things above the sphere of common life, and ready to

give account of all that he has gathered from his observation of a

world not ours. In truth the world created by Correggio and interpreted

by Toschi is very far removed from that of actual existence. No painter

151has infused a more distinct individuality into his work, realising

by imaginative force and powerful projection an order of beauty

peculiar to himself, before which it is impossible to remain quite

indifferent. We must either admire the manner of Correggio, or else

shrink from it with the distaste which sensual art is apt to stir in

natures of a severe or simple type.

What, then, is the Correggiosity of Correggio? In other words, what is

the characteristic which, proceeding from the personality of the

artist, is impressed on all his work? The answer to this question,

though by no means simple, may perhaps be won by a process of gradual

analysis. The first thing that strikes us in the art of Correggio is,

that he has aimed at the realistic representation of pure unrealities.

His saints and angels are beings the like of whom we have hardly seen

upon the earth. Yet they are displayed before us with all the movement

and the vivid truth of nature. Next we feel that what constitutes the

superhuman, visionary quality of these creatures, is their uniform

beauty of a merely sensuous type. They are all created for pleasure,

not for thought or passion or activity or heroism. The uses of their

brains, their limbs, their every feature, end in enjoyment; innocent

and radiant wantonness is the condition of their whole existence.

Correggio conceived the universe under the one mood of sensuous joy:

his world was bathed in luxurious light; its inhabitants were capable

of little beyond a soft voluptuousness. Over the domain of tragedy he

had no sway, and very rarely did he attempt to enter on it: nothing,

for example, can be feebler than his endeavour to express anguish in

the distorted features of Madonna, S. John, and the Magdalen, who are

bending over the dead body of a Christ extended in the attitude of

languid repose. In like manner he could not deal with subjects which

demand a pregnancy of intellectual meaning. He paints the three Fates

like young and joyous Bacchantes, 152places rose-garlands and thyrsi in

their hands instead of the distaff and the thread of human destinies,

and they might figure appropriately upon the panels of a

banquet-chamber in Pompeii. In this respect Correggio might be termed

the Rossini of painting. The melodies of the 'Stabat Mater'—_Fac ut

portem_ or _Quis est homo_—are the exact analogues in music of

Correggio's voluptuous renderings of grave or mysterious motives. Nor,

again, did he possess that severe and lofty art of composition which

subordinates the fancy to the reason, and which seeks for the highest

intellectual beauty in a kind of architectural harmony supreme above

the melodies of gracefulness in detail. The Florentines and those who

shared their spirit—Michelangelo and Lionardo and Raphael—deriving this

principle of design from the geometrical art of the Middle Ages,

converted it to the noblest uses in their vast well-ordered

compositions. But Correggio ignored the laws of scientific

construction. It was enough for him to produce a splendid and brilliant

effect by the life and movement of his figures, and by the intoxicating

beauty of his forms. His type of beauty, too, is by no means elevated.

Lionardo painted souls whereof the features and the limbs are but an

index. The charm of Michelangelo's ideal is like a flower upon a tree

of rugged strength. Raphael aims at the loveliness which cannot be

disjoined from goodness. But Correggio is contented with bodies

'delicate and desirable.' His angels are genii disimprisoned from the

perfumed chalices of flowers, houris of an erotic paradise, elemental

spirits of nature wantoning in Eden in her prime. To accuse the painter

of conscious immorality or of what is stigmatised as sensuality, would

be as ridiculous as to class his seraphic beings among the products of

the Christian imagination. They belong to the generation of the fauns;

like fauns, they combine a certain savage wildness, a dithyrambic

ecstasy of inspiration, a delight in rapid movement 153as they revel

amid clouds or flowers, with the permanent and all-pervading sweetness

of the master's style. When infantine or childlike, these celestial

sylphs are scarcely to be distinguished for any noble quality of beauty

from Murillo's cherubs, and are far less divine than the choir of

children who attend Madonna in Titian's 'Assumption.' But in their

boyhood and their prime of youth, they acquire a fulness of sensuous

vitality and a radiance that are peculiar to Correggio. The lily-bearer

who helps to support S. Thomas beneath the dome of the cathedral at

Parma, the groups of seraphs who crowd behind the Incoronata of S.

Giovanni, and the two wild-eyed open-mouthed S. Johns stationed at each

side of the celestial throne, are among the most splendid instances of

the adolescent loveliness conceived by Correggio. Where the painter

found their models may be questioned but not answered; for he has made

them of a different fashion from the race of mortals: no court of Roman

emperor or Turkish sultan, though stocked with the flowers of Bithynian

and Circassian youth, have seen their like. Mozart's Cherubino seems to

have sat for all of them. At any rate they incarnate the very spirit of

the songs he sings.

As a consequence of this predilection for sensuous and voluptuous

forms, Correggio had no power of imagining grandly or severely.

Satisfied with material realism in his treatment even of sublime

mysteries, he converts the hosts of heaven into a 'fricassee of frogs,'

according to the old epigram. His apostles, gazing after the Virgin who

has left the earth, are thrown into attitudes so violent and so

dramatically foreshortened, that seen from below upon the pavement of

the cathedral, little of their form is distinguishable except legs and

arms in vehement commotion. Very different is Titian's conception of

this scene. To express the spiritual meaning, the emotion of Madonna's

transit, with all the pomp which 154colour and splendid composition can

convey, is Titian's sole care; whereas Correggio appears to have been

satisfied with realising the tumult of heaven rushing to meet earth,

and earth straining upwards to ascend to heaven in violent commotion—a

very orgasm of frenetic rapture. The essence of the event is forgotten:

its external manifestation alone is presented to the eye; and only the

accessories of beardless angels and cloud-encumbered cherubs are really

beautiful amid a surge of limbs in restless movement. More dignified,

because designed with more repose, is the Apocalypse of S. John painted

upon the cupola of S. Giovanni. The apostles throned on clouds, with

which the dome is filled, gaze upward to one point. Their attitudes are

noble; their form is heroic; in their eyes there is the strange

ecstatic look by which Correggio interpreted his sense of supernatural

vision: it is a gaze not of contemplation or deep thought, but of wild

half-savage joy, as if these saints also had become the elemental genii

of cloud and air, spirits emergent from ether, the salamanders of an

empyrean intolerable to mortal sense. The point on which their eyes

converge, the culmination of their vision, is the figure of Christ.

Here all the weakness of Correggio's method is revealed. He had

undertaken to realise by no ideal allegorical suggestion, by no

symbolism of architectural grouping, but by actual prosaic measurement,

by corporeal form in subjection to the laws of perspective and

foreshortening, things which in their very essence admit of only a

figurative revelation. Therefore his Christ, the centre of all those

earnest eyes, is contracted to a shape in which humanity itself is

mean, a sprawling figure which irresistibly reminds one of a frog. The

clouds on which the saints repose are opaque and solid; cherubs in

countless multitudes, a swarm of merry children, crawl about upon these

feather-beds of vapour, creep between the legs of the apostles, and

155play at bopeep behind their shoulders. There is no propriety in

their appearance there. They take no interest in the beatific vision.

They play no part in the celestial symphony; nor are they capable of

more than merely infantine enjoyment. Correggio has sprinkled them

lavishly like living flowers about his cloudland, because he could not

sustain a grave and solemn strain of music, but was forced by his

temperament to overlay the melody with roulades. Gazing at these

frescoes, the thought came to me that Correggio was like a man

listening to sweetest flute-playing, and translating phrase after

phrase as they passed through his fancy into laughing faces, breezy

tresses, and rolling mists. Sometimes a grander cadence reached his

ear; and then S. Peter with the keys, or S. Augustine of the mighty

brow, or the inspired eyes of S. John, took form beneath his pencil.

But the light airs returned, and rose and lily faces bloomed again for

him among the clouds. It is not therefore in dignity or sublimity that

Correggio excels, but in artless grace and melodious tenderness. The

Madonna della Scala clasping her baby with a caress which the little

child returns, S. Catherine leaning in a rapture of ecstatic love to

wed the infant Christ, S. Sebastian in the bloom of almost boyish

beauty, are the so-called sacred subjects to which the painter was

adequate, and which he has treated with the voluptuous tenderness we

find in his pictures of Leda and Danae and Io. Could these saints and

martyrs descend from Correggio's canvas, and take flesh, and breathe,

and begin to live; of what high action, of what grave passion, of what

exemplary conduct in any walk of life would they be capable? That is

the question which they irresistibly suggest; and we are forced to

answer, None! The moral and religious world did not exist for

Correggio. His art was but a way of seeing carnal beauty in a dream

that had no true relation to reality.

156Correggio's sensibility to light and colour was exactly on a par

with his feeling for form. He belongs to the poets of chiaroscuro and

the poets of colouring; but in both regions he maintains the

individuality so strongly expressed in his choice of purely sensuous

beauty. Tintoretto makes use of light and shade for investing his great

compositions with dramatic intensity. Rembrandt interprets sombre and

fantastic moods of the mind by golden gloom and silvery irradiation,

translating thought into the language of penumbral mystery. Lionardo

studies the laws of light scientifically, so that the proper roundness

and effect of distance should be accurately rendered, and all the

subtleties of nature's smiles be mimicked. Correggio is content with

fixing on his canvas the ανη΄ριθμον γέλασμα, the many-twinkling

laughter of light in motion, rained down through fleecy clouds or

trembling foliage, melting into half-shadows, bathing and illuminating

every object with a soft caress. There are no tragic contrasts of

splendour sharply defined on blackness, no mysteries of half-felt and

pervasive twilight, no studied accuracies of noonday clearness in his

work. Light and shadow are woven together on his figures like an

impalpable Coan gauze, aë;rial and transparent, enhancing the

palpitations of voluptuous movement which he loved. His colouring, in

like manner, has none of the superb and mundane pomp which the

Venetians affected; it does not glow or burn or beat the fire of gems

into our brain; joyous and wanton, it seems to be exactly such a

beauty-bloom as sense requires for its satiety. There is nothing in his

hues to provoke deep passion or to stimulate the yearnings of the soul:

the pure blushes of the dawn and the crimson pyres of sunset are

nowhere in the world that he has painted. But that chord of jocund

colour which may fitly be married to the smiles of light, the blues

which are found in laughing eyes, the pinks that tinge the 157cheeks of

early youth, and the warm yet silvery tones of healthy flesh, mingle as

in a marvellous pearl-shell on his pictures. Both chiaroscuro and

colouring have this supreme purpose in art, to effect the sense like

music, and like music to create a mood in the soul of the spectator.

Now the mood which Correggio stimulates is one of natural and

thoughtless pleasure. To feel his influence, and at the same moment to

be the subject of strong passion, or fierce lust, or heroic resolve, or

profound contemplation, or pensive melancholy, is impossible.

Wantonness, innocent because unconscious of sin, immoral because

incapable of any serious purpose, is the quality which prevails in all

that he has painted. The pantomimes of a Mohammedan paradise might be

put upon the stage after patterns supplied by this least spiritual of

painters.

It follows from this analysis that the Correggiosity of Correggio, that

which sharply distinguished him from all previous artists, was the

faculty of painting a purely voluptuous dream of beautiful beings in

perpetual movement, beneath the laughter of morning light, in a world

of never-failing April hues. When he attempts to depart from the

fairyland of which he was the Prospero, and to match himself with the

masters of sublime thought or earnest passion, he proves his weakness.

But within his own magic circle he reigns supreme, no other artist

having blended the witcheries of colouring, chiaroscuro, and faunlike

loveliness of form into a harmony so perfect in its sensuous charm.

Bewitched by the strains of the siren, we pardon affectations of

expression, emptiness of meaning, feebleness of composition,

exaggerated and melodramatic attitudes. There is what Goethe called a

demonic influence in the art of Correggio: 'In poetry,' said Goethe to

Eckermann, 'especially in that which is unconscious, before which

reason and understanding fall short, and 158which therefore produces

effects so far surpassing all conception, there is always something

demonic.' It is not to be wondered that Correggio, possessed of this

demonic power in the highest degree, and working to a purely sensuous

end, should have exercised a fatal influence over art. His successors,

attracted by an intoxicating loveliness which they could not analyse,

which had nothing in common with the reason or the understanding, but

was like a glamour cast upon the soul in its most secret sensibilities,

threw themselves blindly into the imitation of Correggio's faults. His

affectation, his want of earnest thought, his neglect of composition,

his sensuous realism, his all-pervading sweetness, his infantine

prettiness, his substitution of thaumaturgical effects for

conscientious labour, admitted only too easy imitation, and were but

too congenial with the spirit of the late Renaissance. Cupolas through

the length and breadth of Italy began to be covered with clouds and

simpering cherubs in the convulsions of artificial ecstasy. The

attenuated elegance of Parmigiano, the attitudinising of Anselmi's

saints and angels, and a general sacrifice of what is solid and

enduring to sentimental gewgaws on the part of all painters who had

submitted to the magic of Correggio, proved how easy it was to go

astray with the great master. Meanwhile no one could approach him in

that which was truly his own—the delineation of a transient moment in

the life of sensuous beauty, the painting of a smile on Nature's face,

when light and colour tremble in harmony with the movement of joyous

living creatures. Another demonic nature of a far more powerful type

contributed his share to the ruin of art in Italy. Michelangelo's

constrained attitudes and muscular anatomy were imitated by painters

and sculptors, who thought that the grand style lay in the presentation

of theatrical athletes, but who could not seize the secret whereby the

great master made even the bodies of men 159and women—colossal trunks

and writhen limbs—interpret the meanings of his deep and melancholy

soul.

It is a sad law of progress in art, that when the æsthetic impulse is

on the wane, artists should perforce select to follow the weakness

rather than the vigour, of their predecessors. While painting was in

the ascendant, Raphael could take the best of Perugino and discard the

worst; in its decadence Parmigiano reproduces the affectations of

Correggio, and Bernini carries the exaggerations of Michelangelo to

absurdity. All arts describe a parabola. The force which produces them

causes them to rise throughout their growth up to a certain point, and

then to descend more gradually in a long and slanting line of regular

declension. There is no real break of continuity. The end is the result

of simple exhaustion. Thus the last of our Elizabethan dramatists,

Shirley and Crowne and Killigrew, pushed to its ultimate conclusion the

principle inherent in Marlowe, not attempting to break new ground, nor

imitating the excellences so much as the defects of their forerunners.

Thus too the Pointed style of architecture in England gave birth first

to what is called the Decorated, next to the Perpendicular, and finally

expired in the Tudor. Each step was a step of progress—at first for the

better—at last for the worse—but logical, continuous, necessitated.[25]

[25] See the chapter on Euripides in my _Studies of Greek Poets_,

First Series, for a further development of this view of artistic

evolution.

It is difficult to leave Correggio without at least posing the question

of the difference between moralised and merely sensual art. Is all art

excellent in itself and good in its effect that is beautiful and

earnest? There is no doubt that Correggio's work is in a way most

beautiful; and it bears unmistakable signs of the master having given

himself with single-hearted devotion to the expression of that phase of

160loveliness which he could apprehend. In so far we must admit that

his art is both excellent and solid. Yet we are unable to conceive that

any human being could be made better—stronger for endurance, more

fitted for the uses of the world, more sensitive to what is noble in

nature—by its contemplation. At the best Correggio does but please us

in our lighter moments, and we are apt to feel that the pleasure he has

given is of an enervating kind. To expect obvious morality of any

artist is confessedly absurd. It is not the artist's province to

preach, or even to teach, except by remote suggestion. Yet the mind of

the artist may be highly moralised, and then he takes rank not merely

with the ministers to refined pleasure, but also with the educators of

the world. He may, for example, be penetrated with a just sense of

humanity like Shakspere, or with a sublime temperance like Sophocles,

instinct with prophetic intuition like Michelangelo, or with passionate

experience like Beethoven. The mere sight of the work of Pheidias is

like breathing pure health-giving air. Milton and Dante were steeped in

religious patriotism; Goethe was pervaded with philosophy, and Balzac

with scientific curiosity. Ariosto, Cervantes, and even Boccaccio are

masters in the mysteries of common life. In all these cases the tone of

the artist's mind is felt throughout his work: what he paints, or

sings, or writes, conveys a lesson while it pleases. On the other hand,

depravity in an artist or a poet percolates through work which has in

it nothing positive of evil, and a very miasma of poisonous influence

may rise from the apparently innocuous creations of a tainted soul. Now

Correggio is moralised in neither way—neither as a good nor as a bad

man, neither as an acute thinker nor as a deliberate voluptuary. He is

simply sensuous. On his own ground he is even very fresh and healthy:

his delineation of youthful 161maternity, for example, is as true as it

is beautiful; and his sympathy with the gleefulness of children is

devoid of affectation. We have then only to ask ourselves whether the

defect in him of all thought and feeling which is not at once capable

of graceful fleshly incarnation, be sufficient to lower him in the

scale of artists. This question must of course be answered according to

our definition of the purposes of art. There is no doubt that the most

highly organised art—that which absorbs the most numerous human

qualities and effects a harmony between the most complex elements—is

the noblest. Therefore the artist who combines moral elevation and

power of thought with a due appreciation of sensual beauty, is more

elevated and more beneficial than one whose domain is simply that of

carnal loveliness. Correggio, if this be so, must take a comparatively

low rank. Just as we welcome the beautiful athlete for the radiant life

that is in him, but bow before the personality of Sophocles, whose

perfect form enshrined a noble and highly educated soul, so we

gratefully accept Correggio for his grace, while we approach the

consummate art of Michelangelo with reverent awe. It is necessary in

æsthetics as elsewhere to recognise a hierarchy of excellence, the

grades of which are determined by the greater or less comprehensiveness

of the artist's nature expressed in his work. At the same time, the

calibre of the artist's genius must be estimated; for eminent greatness

even of a narrow kind will always command our admiration: and the

amount of his originality has also to be taken into account. What is

unique has, for that reason alone, a claim on our consideration. Judged

in this way, Correggio deserves a place, say, in the sweet planet

Venus, above the moon and above Mercury, among the artists who have not

advanced beyond the contemplations which find their proper outcome in

love. Yet, 162even thus, he aids the culture of humanity. 'We should

take care,' said Goethe, apropos of Byron, to Eckermann, 'not to be

always looking for culture in the decidedly pure and moral. Everything

that is great promotes cultivation as soon as we are aware of it.'

163

CANOSSA

Italy is less the land of what is venerable in antiquity, than of

beauty, by divine right young eternally in spite of age. This is due

partly to her history and art and literature, partly to the temper of

the races who have made her what she is, and partly to her natural

advantages. Her oldest architectural remains, the temples of Paestum

and Girgenti, or the gates of Perugia and Volterra, are so adapted to

Italian landscape and so graceful in their massive strength, that we

forget the centuries which have passed over them. We leap as by a

single bound from the times of Roman greatness to the new birth of

humanity in the fourteenth century, forgetting the many years during

which Italy, like the rest of Europe, was buried in what our ancestors

called Gothic barbarism. The illumination cast upon the classic period

by the literature of Rome and by the memory of her great men is so

vivid, that we feel the days of the Republic and the Empire to be near

us; while the Italian Renaissance is so truly a revival of that former

splendour, a resumption of the music interrupted for a season, that it

is extremely difficult to form any conception of the five long

centuries which elapsed between the Lombard invasion in 568 and the

accession of Hildebrand to the Pontificate in 1073. So true is it that

nothing lives and has reality for us but what is spiritual,

intellectual, self-possessed in personality and consciousness. When the

Egyptian priest said to Solon, 'You Greeks are always children,' he

intended a gentle sarcasm, but he implied a compliment; for the

164quality of imperishable youth belonged to the Hellenic spirit, and

has become the heritage of every race which partook of it. And this

spirit in no common degree has been shared by the Italians of the

earlier and the later classic epoch. The land is full of monuments

pertaining to those two brilliant periods; and whenever the voice of

poet has spoken or the hand of artist has been at work, that spirit, as

distinguished from the spirit of mediaevalism, has found expression.

Yet it must be remembered that during the five centuries above

mentioned Italy was given over to Lombards, Franks, and Germans. Feudal

institutions, alien to the social and political ideals of the classic

world, took a tolerably firm hold on the country. The Latin element

remained silent, passive, in abeyance, undergoing an important

transformation. It was in the course of those five hundred years that

the Italians as a modern people, separable from their Roman ancestors,

were formed. At the close of this obscure passage in Italian history,

their communes, the foundation of Italy's future independence, and the

source of her peculiar national development, appeared in all the vigour

and audacity of youth. At its close the Italian genius presented Europe

with its greatest triumph of constructive ability, the Papacy. At its

close again the series of supreme artistic achievements, starting with

the architecture of churches and public palaces, passing on to

sculpture and painting, and culminating in music, which only ended with

the temporary extinction of national vitality in the seventeenth

century, was simultaneously begun in all the provinces of the

peninsula.

So important were these five centuries of incubation for Italy, and so

little is there left of them to arrest the attention of the student,

dazzled as he is by the ever-living glories of Greece, Rome, and the

Renaissance, that a visit to the ruins of Canossa is almost a duty.

There, in spite of himself, by 165the very isolation and forlorn

abandonment of what was once so formidable a seat of feudal despotism

and ecclesiastical tyranny, he is forced to confront the obscure but

mighty spirit of the middle ages. There, if anywhere, the men of those

iron-hearted times anterior to the Crusades will acquire distinctness

for his imagination, when he recalls the three main actors in the drama

enacted on the summit of Canossa's rock in the bitter winter of 1077.

Canossa lies almost due south of Reggio d'Emilia, upon the slopes of

the Apennines. Starting from Reggio, the carriage-road keeps to the

plain for some while in a westerly direction, and then bends away

towards the mountains. As we approach their spurs, the ground begins to

rise. The rich Lombard tilth of maize and vine gives place to

English-looking hedgerows, lined with oaks, and studded with handsome

dark tufts of green hellebore. The hills descend in melancholy

earth-heaps on the plain, crowned here and there with ruined castles.

Four of these mediaeval strongholds, called Bianello, Montevetro,

Monteluzzo, and Montezano, give the name of Quattro Castelli to the

commune. The most important of them, Bianello, which, next to Canossa,

was the strongest fortress possessed by the Countess Matilda and her

ancestors, still presents a considerable mass of masonry, roofed and

habitable. The group formed a kind of advance-guard for Canossa against

attack from Lombardy. After passing Quattro Castelli we enter the

hills, climbing gently upwards between barren slopes of ashy grey

earth—the _débris_ of most ancient Apennines—crested at favourable

points with lonely towers. In truth the whole country bristles with

ruined forts, making it clear that during the middle ages Canossa was

but the centre of a great military system, the core and kernel of a

fortified position which covered an area to be measured by scores of

square miles, 166reaching far into the mountains, and buttressed on the

plain. As yet, however, after nearly two hours' driving, Canossa has

not come in sight. At last a turn in the road discloses an opening in

the valley of the Enza to the left: up this lateral gorge we see first

the Castle of Rossena on its knoll of solid red rock, flaming in the

sunlight; and then, further withdrawn, detached from all surrounding

objects, and reared aloft as though to sweep the sea of waved and

broken hills around it, a sharp horn of hard white stone. That is

Canossa—the _alba Canossa_, the _candida petra_ of its rhyming

chronicler. There is no mistaking the commanding value of its

situation. At the same time the brilliant whiteness of Canossa's rocky

hill, contrasted with the red gleam of Rossena, and outlined against

the prevailing dulness of these earthy Apennines, secures a picturesque

individuality concordant with its unique history and unrivalled

strength.

There is still a journey of two hours before the castle can be reached:

and this may be performed on foot or horseback. The path winds upward

over broken ground; following the _arête_ of curiously jumbled and

thwarted hill-slopes; passing beneath the battlements of Rossena,

whence the unfortunate Everelina threw herself in order to escape the

savage love of her lord and jailor; and then skirting those horrid

earthen _balze_ which are so common and so unattractive a feature of

Apennine scenery. The most hideous _balze_ to be found in the length

and breadth of Italy are probably those of Volterra, from which the

citizens themselves recoil with a kind of terror, and which lure

melancholy men by intolerable fascination on to suicide. For ever

crumbling, altering with frost and rain, discharging gloomy glaciers of

slow-crawling mud, and scarring the hillside with tracts of barrenness,

these earth-precipices are among the most ruinous and discomfortable

failures of nature. They have not even so much of 167wildness or

grandeur as forms, the saving merit of nearly all wasteful things in

the world, and can only be classed with the desolate _ghiare_ of

Italian river-beds.

Such as they are, these _balze_ form an appropriate preface to the

gloomy and repellent isolation of Canossa. The rock towers from a

narrow platform to the height of rather more than 160 feet from its

base. The top is fairly level, forming an irregular triangle, of which

the greatest length is about 260 feet, and the width about 100 feet.

Scarcely a vestige of any building can be traced either upon the

platform or the summit, with the exception of a broken wall and windows

supposed to belong to the end of the sixteenth century. The ancient

castle, with its triple circuit of walls, enclosing barracks for the

garrison, lodgings for the lord and his retainers, a stately church, a

sumptuous monastery, storehouses, stables, workshops, and all the

various buildings of a fortified stronghold, have utterly disappeared.

The very passage of approach cannot be ascertained; for it is doubtful

whether the present irregular path that scales the western face of the

rock be really the remains of some old staircase, corresponding to that

by which Mont S. Michel in Normandy is ascended. One thing is tolerably

certain—that the three walls of which we hear so much from the

chroniclers, and which played so picturesque a part in the drama of

Henry IV.'s penance, surrounded the cliff at its base, and embraced a

large acreage of ground. The citadel itself must have been but the

acropolis or keep of an extensive fortress.

There has been plenty of time since the year 1255, when the people of

Reggio sacked and destroyed Canossa, for Nature to resume her

undisputed sway by obliterating the handiwork of men; and at present

Nature forms the chief charm of Canossa. Lying one afternoon of May on

the crisp short grass at the edge of a precipice purple with iris in

full 168blossom, I surveyed, from what were once the battlements of

Matilda's castle, a prospect than which there is none more

spirit-stirring by reason of its beauty and its manifold associations

in Europe. The lower castle-crowded hills have sunk. Reggio lies at our

feet, shut in between the crests of Monte Carboniano and Monte delle

Celle. Beyond Reggio stretches Lombardy—the fairest and most memorable

battlefield of nations, the richest and most highly cultivated garden

of civilised industry. Nearly all the Lombard cities may be seen, some

of them faint like bluish films of vapour, some clear with dome and

spire. There is Modena and her Ghirlandina. Carpi, Parma, Mirandola,

Verona, Mantua, lie well defined and russet on the flat green map; and

there flashes a bend of lordly Po; and there the Euganeans rise like

islands, telling us where Padua and Ferrara nestle in the amethystine

haze Beyond and above all to the northward sweep the Alps, tossing

their silvery crests up into the cloudless sky from the violet mist

that girds their flanks and drowns their basements. Monte Adamello and

the Ortler, the cleft of the Brenner, and the sharp peaks of the

Venetian Alps are all distinctly visible. An eagle flying straight from

our eyrie might traverse Lombardy and light among the snow-fields of

the Valtelline between sunrise and sundown. Nor is the prospect tame to

southward. Here the Apennines roll, billow above billow, in majestic

desolation, soaring to snow summits in the Pellegrino region. As our

eye attempts to thread that labyrinth of hill and vale, we tell

ourselves that those roads wind to Tuscany, and yonder stretches

Garfagnana, where Ariosto lived and mused in honourable exile from the

world he loved.

It was by one of the mountain passes that lead from Lucca northward

that the first founder of Canossa is said to have travelled early in

the tenth century. Sigifredo, if the tradition may be trusted, was very

wealthy; and with his money he 169bought lands and signorial rights at

Reggio, bequeathing to his children, when he died about 945, a

patrimony which they developed into a petty kingdom. Azzo, his second

son, fortified Canossa, and made it his principal place of residence.

When Lothair, King of Italy, died in 950, leaving his beautiful widow

to the ill-treatment of his successor, Berenger, Adelaide found a

protector in this Azzo. She had been imprisoned on the Lake of Garda;

but managing to escape in man's clothes to Mantua, she thence sent news

of her misfortunes to Canossa. Azzo lost no time in riding with his

knights to her relief, and brought her back in safety to his mountain

fastness. It is related that Azzo was afterwards instrumental in

calling Otho into Italy and procuring his marriage with Adelaide, in

consequence of which events Italy became a fief of the Empire. Owing to

the part he played at this time, the Lord of Canossa was recognised as

one of the most powerful vassals of the German Emperor in Lombardy.

Honours were heaped upon him; and he grew so rich and formidable that

Berenger, the titular King of Italy, laid siege to his fortress of

Canossa. The memory of this siege, which lasted for three years and a

half, is said still to linger in the popular traditions of the place.

When Azzo died at the end of the tenth century, he left to his son

Tedaldo the title of Count of Reggio and Modena; and this title was

soon after raised to that of Marquis. The Marches governed as Vicar of

the Empire by Tedaldo included Reggio, Modena, Ferrara, Brescia, and

probably Mantua. They stretched, in fact, across the north of Italy,

forming a quadrilateral between the Alps and Apennines. Like his

father, Tedaldo adhered consistently to the Imperial party; and when he

died and was buried at Canossa, he in his turn bequeathed to his son

Bonifazio a power and jurisdiction increased by his own abilities.

Bonifazio held the state of a sovereign at Canossa, adding the duchy of

Tuscany to his 170father's fiefs, and meeting the allied forces of the

Lombard barons in the field of Coviolo like an independent potentate.

His power and splendour were great enough to rouse the jealousy of the

Emperor; but Henry III. seems to have thought it more prudent to

propitiate this proud vassal, and to secure his kindness, than to

attempt his humiliation. Bonifazio married Beatrice, daughter of

Frederick, Duke of Lorraine—her whose marble sarcophagus in the Campo

Santo at Pisa is said to have inspired Niccola Pisano with his new

style of sculpture. Their only child, Matilda, was born, probably at

Lucca, in 1046; and six years after her birth, Bonifazio, who had

swayed his subjects like an iron-handed tyrant, was murdered. To the

great House of Canossa, the rulers of one-third of Italy, there now

remained only two women, Bonifazio's widow Beatrice, and his daughter

Matilda. Beatrice married Godfrey, Duke of Lorraine, who was recognised

by Henry IV. as her husband and as feudatory of the Empire in the full

place of Boniface. He died about 1070; and in this year Matilda was

married by proxy to his son, Godfrey the Hunchback, whom, however, she

did not see till the year 1072. The marriage was not a happy one; and

the question has even been disputed among Matilda's biographers whether

it was ever consummated. At any rate it did not last long; for Godfrey

was killed at Antwerp in 1076. In this year Matilda also lost her

mother, Beatrice, who died at Pisa, and was buried in the cathedral.

By this rapid enumeration of events it will be seen how the power and

honours of the House of Canossa, including Tuscany, Spoleto, and the

fairest portions of Lombardy, had devolved upon a single woman of the

age of thirty at the moment when the fierce quarrel between Pope and

Emperor began in the year 1076. Matilda was destined to play a great, a

striking, and a tragic part in the opening drama of Italian 171history.

Her decided character and uncompromising course of action have won for

her the name of 'la gran donna d'Italia,' and have caused her memory to

be blessed or execrated, according as the temporal pretensions and

spiritual tyranny of the Papacy may have found supporters or opponents

in posterity. She was reared from childhood in habits of austerity and

unquestioning piety. Submission to the Church became for her not merely

a rule of conduct, but a passionate enthusiasm. She identified herself

with the cause of four successive Popes, protected her idol, the

terrible and iron-hearted Hildebrand, in the time of his adversity;

remained faithful to his principles after his death; and having served

the Holy See with all her force and all that she possessed through all

her lifetime, she bequeathed her vast dominions to it on her deathbed.

Like some of the greatest mediaeval characters—like Hildebrand

himself—Matilda was so thoroughly of one piece, that she towers above

the mists of ages with the massive grandeur of an incarnated idea. She

is for us the living statue of a single thought, an undivided impulse,

the more than woman born to represent her age. Nor was it without

reason that Dante symbolised in her the love of Holy Church; though

students of the 'Purgatory' will hardly recognise the lovely maiden,

singing and plucking flowers beside the stream of Lethe, in the stern

and warlike chatelaine of Canossa. Unfortunately we know but little of

Matilda's personal appearance. Her health was not strong; and it is

said to have been weakened, especially in her last illness, by ascetic

observances. Yet she headed her own troops, armed with sword and

cuirass, avoiding neither peril nor fatigue in the quarrels of her

master Gregory. Up to the year 1622 two strong suits of mail were

preserved at Quattro Castelli, which were said to have been worn by her

in battle, and which were afterwards sold on the market-place at

Reggio. This habit of 172donning armour does not, however, prove that

Matilda was exceptionally vigorous; for in those savage times she could

hardly have played the part of heroine without participating personally

in the dangers of warfare.

No less monumental in the plastic unity of his character was the monk

Hildebrand, who for twenty years before his elevation to the Papacy had

been the maker of Popes and the creator of the policy of Rome. When he

was himself elected in the year 1073, and had assumed the name of

Gregory VII., he immediately began to put in practice the plans for

Church aggrandisement he had slowly matured during the previous quarter

of a century. To free the Church from its subservience to the Empire,

to assert the Pope's right to ratify the election of the Emperor and to

exercise the right of jurisdiction over him, to place ecclesiastical

appointments in the sole power of the Roman See, and to render the

celibacy of the clergy obligatory, were the points he had resolved to

carry. Taken singly and together, these chief aims of Hildebrand's

policy had but one object—the magnification of the Church at the

expense both of the people and of secular authorities, and the further

separation of the Church from the ties and sympathies of common life

that bound it to humanity. To accuse Hildebrand of personal ambition

would be but shallow criticism, though it is clear that his inflexible

and puissant nature found a savage selfish pleasure in trampling upon

power and humbling pride at warfare with his own. Yet his was in no

sense an egotistic purpose like that which moved the Popes of the

Renaissance to dismember Italy for their bastards. Hildebrand, like

Matilda, was himself the creature of a great idea. These two potent

personalities completely understood each other, and worked towards a

single end. Tho mythopoeic fancy might conceive of them as the male and

female manifestations of one dominant faculty, the spirit of

ecclesiastical 173dominion incarnate in a man and woman of almost

super-human mould.

Opposed to them, as the third actor in the drama of Canossa, was a man

of feebler mould. Henry IV., King of Italy, but not yet crowned

Emperor, had none of his opponents' unity of purpose or monumental

dignity of character. At war with his German feudatories, browbeaten by

rebellious sons, unfaithful and cruel to his wife, vacillating in the

measures he adopted to meet his divers difficulties, at one time

tormented by his conscience into cowardly submission, and at another

treasonably neglectful of the most solemn obligations, Henry was no

match for the stern wills against which he was destined to break in

unavailing passion. Early disagreements with Gregory had culminated in

his excommunication. The German nobles abandoned his cause; and Henry

found it expedient to summon a council in Augsburg for the settlement

of matters in dispute between the Empire and the Papacy. Gregory

expressed his willingness to attend this council, and set forth from

Rome accompanied by the Countess Matilda in December 1076. He did not,

however, travel further than Vercelli, for news here reached him that

Henry was about to enter Italy at the head of a powerful army. Matilda

hereupon persuaded the Holy Father to place himself in safety among her

strongholds of Canossa. Thither accordingly Gregory retired before the

ending of that year; and bitter were the sarcasms uttered by the

imperial partisans in Italy upon this protection offered by a fair

countess to the monk who had been made a Pope. The foul calumnies of

that bygone age would be unworthy of even so much as this notice, if we

did not trace in them the ineradicable Italian tendency to cynical

insinuation—a tendency which has involved the history of the

Renaissance Popes in an almost impenetrable mist of lies and

exaggerations. 173Henry was in truth upon his road to Italy, but with a

very different attendance from that which Gregory expected. Accompanied

by Bertha, his wife, and his boy son Conrad, the Emperor elect left

Spires in the condition of a fugitive, crossed Burgundy, spent

Christmas at Besançon, and journeyed to the foot of Mont Cenis. It is

said that he was followed by a single male servant of mean birth; and

if the tale of his adventures during the passage of the Alps can be

credited, history presents fewer spectacles more picturesque than the

straits to which this representative of the Cæsars, this supreme chief

of feudal civility, this ruler destined still to be the leader of

mighty armies and the father of a line of monarchs, was exposed.

Concealing his real name and state, he induced some shepherds to lead

him and his escort through the thick snows to the summit of Mont Cenis;

and by the help of these men the imperial party were afterwards let

down the snow-slopes on the further side by means of ropes. Bertha and

her women were sewn up in hides and dragged across the frozen surface

of the winter drifts. It was a year memorable for its severity. Heavy

snow had fallen in October, which continued ice-bound and unyielding

till the following April.

No sooner had Henry reached Turin, than he set forward again in the

direction of Canossa. The fame of his arrival had preceded him, and he

found that his party was far stronger in Italy than he had ventured to

expect. Proximity to the Church of Rome divests its fulminations of

half their terrors. The Italian bishops and barons, less superstitious

than the Germans, and with greater reason to resent the domineering

graspingness of Gregory, were ready to espouse the Emperor's cause.

Henry gathered a formidable force as he marched onward across Lombardy;

and some of the most illustrious prelates and nobles of the South were

in his suite. 175A more determined leader than Henry proved himself to

be, might possibly have forced Gregory to some accommodation, in spite

of the strength of Canossa and the Pope's invincible obstinacy, by

proper use of these supporters. Meanwhile the adherents of the Church

were mustered in Matilda's fortress; among whom may be mentioned Azzo,

the progenitor of Este and Brunswick; Hugh, Abbot of Clugny; and the

princely family of Piedmont. 'I am become a second Rome,' exclaims

Canossa, in the language of Matilda's rhyming chronicler; 'all honours

are mine; I hold at once both Pope and King, the princes of Italy and

those of Gaul, those of Rome, and those from far beyond the Alps.' The

stage was ready; the audience had assembled; and now the three great

actors were about to meet. Immediately upon his arrival at Canossa,

Henry sent for his cousin, the Countess Matilda, and besought her to

intercede for him with Gregory. He was prepared to make any concessions

or to undergo any humiliations, if only the ban of excommunication

might be removed; nor, cowed as he was by his own superstitious

conscience, and by the memory of the opposition he had met with from

his German vassals, does he seem to have once thought of meeting force

with force, and of returning to his northern kingdom triumphant in the

overthrow of Gregory's pride. Matilda undertook to plead his cause

before the Pontiff. But Gregory was not to be moved so soon to mercy.

'If Henry has in truth repented,' he replied, 'let him lay down crown

and sceptre, and declare himself unworthy of the name of king.' The

only point conceded to the suppliant was that he should be admitted in

the garb of a penitent within the precincts of the castle. Leaving his

retinue outside the walls, Henry entered the first series of outworks,

and was thence conducted to the second, so that between him and the

citadel itself there still remained the third of the surrounding

bastions. Here he was bidden to 176wait the Pope's pleasure; and here,

in the midst of that bitter winter weather, while the fierce winds of

the Apennines were sweeping sleet upon him in their passage from Monte

Pellegrino to the plain, he knelt barefoot, clothed in sackcloth,

fasting from dawn till eve, for three whole days. On the morning of the

fourth day, judging that Gregory was inexorable, and that his suit

would not be granted, Henry retired to the Chapel of S. Nicholas, which

stood within this second precinct. There he called to his aid the Abbot

of Clugny and the Countess, both of whom were his relations, and who,

much as they might sympathise with Gregory, could hardly be supposed to

look with satisfaction on their royal kinsman's outrage. The Abbot told

Henry that nothing in the world could move the Pope; but Matilda, when

in turn he fell before her knees and wept, engaged to do for him the

utmost. She probably knew that the moment for unbending had arrived,

and that her imperious guest could not with either decency or prudence

prolong the outrage offered to the civil chief of Christendom. It was

the 25th of January when the Emperor elect was brought, half dead with

cold and misery, into the Pope's presence. There he prostrated himself

in the dust, crying aloud for pardon. It is said that Gregory first

placed his foot upon Henry's neck, uttering these words of Scripture:

'Super aspidem et basiliscum ambulabis, et conculcabis leonem et

draconem,' and that then he raised him from the earth and formally

pronounced his pardon. The prelates and nobles who took part in this

scene were compelled to guarantee with their own oaths the vows of

obedience pronounced by Henry; so that in the very act of

reconciliation a new insult was offered to him. After this Gregory said

mass, and permitted Henry to communicate; and at the close of the day a

banquet was served, at which the King sat down to meat with the Pope

and the Countess.

177It is probable that, while Henry's penance was performed in the

castle courts beneath the rock, his reception by the Pope, and all that

subsequently happened, took place in the citadel itself. But of this we

have no positive information. Indeed the silence of the chronicles as

to the topography of Canossa is peculiarly unfortunate for lovers of

the picturesque in historic detail, now that there is no possibility of

tracing the outlines of the ancient building. Had the author of the

'Vita Mathildis' (Muratori, vol. v.) foreseen that his beloved Canossa

would one day be nothing but a mass of native rock, he would

undoubtedly have been more explicit on these points; and much that is

vague about an event only paralleled by our Henry II.'s penance before

Becket's shrine at Canterbury, might now be clear.

Very little remains to be told about Canossa. During the same year,

1077, Matilda made the celebrated donation of her fiefs to Holy Church.

This was accepted by Gregory in the name of S. Peter, and it was

confirmed by a second deed during the pontificate of Urban IV. in 1102.

Though Matilda subsequently married Guelfo d'Este, son of the Duke of

Bavaria, she was speedily divorced from him; nor was there any heir to

a marriage ridiculous by reason of disparity of age, the bridegroom

being but eighteen, while the bride was forty-three in the year of her

second nuptials. During one of Henry's descents into Italy, he made an

unsuccessful attack upon Canossa, assailing it at the head of a

considerable force one October morning in 1092. Matilda's biographer

informs us that the mists of autumn veiled his beloved fortress from

the eyes of the beleaguerers. They had not even the satisfaction of

beholding the unvanquished citadel; and, what was more, the banner of

the Emperor was seized and dedicated as a trophy in the Church of S.

Apollonio. In the following year the Countess opened her gates of

Canossa to an illustrious 178fugitive, Adelaide, the wife of her old

foeman, Henry, who had escaped with difficulty from the insults and the

cruelty of her husband. After Henry's death, his son, the Emperor Henry

V., paid Matilda a visit in her castle of Bianello, addressed her by

the name of mother, and conferred upon her the vice-regency of Liguria.

At the age of sixty-nine she died, in 1115, at Bondeno de' Roncori, and

was buried, not among her kinsmen at Canossa, but in an abbey of S.

Benedict near Mantua. With her expired the main line of the noble house

she represented; though Canossa, now made a fief of the Empire in spite

of Matilda's donation, was given to a family which claimed descent from

Bonifazio's brother Conrad—a young man killed in the battle of Coviolo.

This family, in its turn, was extinguished in the year 1570; but a

junior branch still exists at Verona. It will be remembered that

Michelangelo Buonarroti claimed kinship with the Count of Canossa; and

a letter from the Count is extant acknowledging the validity of his

pretension.

As far back as 1255 the people of Reggio destroyed the castle; nor did

the nobles of Canossa distinguish themselves in subsequent history

among those families who based their despotisms on the _débris_ of the

Imperial power in Lombardy. It seemed destined that Canossa and all

belonging to it should remain as a mere name and memory of the outgrown

middle ages. Estensi, Carraresi, Visconti, Bentivogli, and Gonzaghi

belong to a later period of Lombard history, and mark the dawn of the

Renaissance.

As I lay and mused that afternoon of May upon the short grass, cropped

by two grey goats, whom a little boy was tending, it occurred to me to

ask the woman who had served me as guide, whether any legend remained

in the country concerning the Countess Matilda. She had often,

probably, been asked this question by other travellers. Therefore she

179was more than usually ready with an answer, which, as far as I could

understand her dialect, was this. Matilda was a great and potent witch,

whose summons the devil was bound to obey. One day she aspired, alone

of all her sex, to say mass; but when the moment came for sacring the

elements, a thunderbolt fell from the clear sky, and reduced her to

ashes.[26] That the most single-hearted handmaid of the Holy Church,

whose life was one long devotion to its ordinances, should survive in

this grotesque myth, might serve to point a satire upon the vanity of

earthly fame. The legend in its very extravagance is a fanciful

distortion of the truth.

[26] I find that this story is common in the country round Canossa. It

is mentioned by Professor A. Ferretti in his monograph entitled

_Canossa, Studi e Ricerche_, Reggio, 1876, a work to which I am

indebted, and which will repay careful study.

180

FORNOVO

In the town of Parma there is one surpassingly strange relic of the

past. The palace of the Farnesi, like many a haunt of upstart tyranny

and beggared pride on these Italian plains, rises misshapen and

disconsolate above the stream that bears the city's name. The squalor

of this grey-brown edifice of formless brick, left naked like the

palace of the same Farnesi at Piacenza, has something even horrid in it

now that only vague memory survives of its former uses. The princely

_sprezzatura_ of its ancient occupants, careless of these unfinished

courts and unroofed galleries amid the splendour of their purfled silks

and the glitter of their torchlight pageantry, has yielded to sullen

cynicism—the cynicism of arrested ruin and unreverend age. All that was

satisfying to the senses and distracting to the eyesight in their

transitory pomp has passed away, leaving a sinister and naked shell.

Remembrance can but summon up the crimes, the madness, the trivialities

of those dead palace-builders. An atmosphere of evil clings to the

dilapidated walls, as though the tainted spirit of the infamous Pier

Luigi still possessed the spot, on which his toadstool brood of

princelings sprouted in the mud of their misdeeds. Enclosed in this

huge labyrinth of brickwork is the relic of which I spoke. It is the

once world-famous Teatro Farnese, raised in the year 1618 by Ranunzio

Farnese for the marriage of Odoardo Farnese with Margaret of Austria.

Giambattista Aleotti, a native of pageant-loving Ferrara, traced the

stately curves and noble orders of 181the galleries, designed the

columns that support the raftered roof, marked out the orchestra,

arranged the stage, and breathed into the whole the spirit of

Palladio's most heroic neo-Latin style. Vast, built of wood,

dishevelled, with broken statues and blurred coats of arms, with its

empty scene, its uncurling frescoes, its hangings all in rags, its

cobwebs of two centuries, its dust and mildew and discoloured gold—this

theatre, a sham in its best days, and now that ugliest of things, a

sham unmasked and naked to the light of day, is yet sublime, because of

its proportioned harmony, because of its grand Roman manner. The sight

and feeling of it fasten upon the mind and abide in the memory like a

nightmare,—like one of Piranesi's weirdest and most passion-haunted

etchings for the _Carceri_. Idling there at noon in the twilight of the

dust-bedarkened windows, we fill the tiers of those high galleries with

ladies, the space below with grooms and pages; the stage is ablaze with

torches, and an Italian Masque, such as our Marlowe dreamed of, fills

the scene. But it is impossible to dower these fancies with even such

life as in healthier, happier ruins phantasy may lend to imagination's

figments. This theatre is like a maniac's skull, empty of all but

unrealities and mockeries of things that are. The ghosts we raise here

could never have been living men and women: _questi sciaurati non fur

mai vivi._ So clinging is the sense of instability that appertains to

every fragment of that dry-rot tyranny which seized by evil fortune in

the sunset of her golden day on Italy.

In this theatre I mused one morning after visiting Fornovo; and the

thoughts suggested by the battlefield found their proper atmosphere in

the dilapidated place. What, indeed, is the Teatro Farnese but a symbol

of those hollow principalities which the despot and the stranger built

in Italy after the fatal date of 1494, when national enthusiasm and

political energy 182were expiring in a blaze of art, and when the

Italians as a people had ceased to be; but when the phantom of their

former life, surviving in high works of beauty, was still superb by

reason of imperishable style! How much in Italy of the Renaissance was,

like this plank-built plastered theatre, a glorious sham! The sham was

seen through then; and now it stands unmasked: and yet, strange to say,

so perfect is its form that we respect the sham and yield our spirits

to the incantation of its music.

The battle of Fornovo, as modern battles go, was a paltry affair; and

even at the time it seemed sufficiently without result. Yet the

trumpets which rang on July 6, 1495, for the onset, sounded the

_réveil_ of the modern world; and in the inconclusive termination of

the struggle of that day, the Italians were already judged and

sentenced as a nation. The armies who met that morning represented

Italy and France,—Italy, the Sibyl of Renaissance; France, the Sibyl of

Revolution. At the fall of evening Europe was already looking

northward; and the last years of the fifteenth century were opening an

act which closed in blood at Paris on the ending of the eighteenth.

If it were not for thoughts like these, no one, I suppose, would take

the trouble to drive for two hours out of Parma to the little village

of Fornovo—a score of bare grey hovels on the margin of a pebbly

river-bed beneath the Apennines. The fields on either side, as far as

eye can see, are beautiful indeed in May sunlight, painted here with

flax, like shallow sheets of water reflecting a pale sky, and there

with clover red as blood. Scarce unfolded leaves sparkle like flamelets

of bright green upon the knotted vines, and the young corn is bending

all one way beneath a western breeze. But not less beautiful than this

is the whole broad plain of Lombardy; nor are the nightingales louder

here than in the acacia trees around Pavia. As we drive, the fields

become less fertile, and the hills 183encroach upon the level, sending

down their spurs upon that waveless plain like blunt rocks jutting out

into a tranquil sea. When we reach the bed of the Taro, these hills

begin to narrow on either hand, and the road rises. Soon they open out

again with gradual curving lines, forming a kind of amphitheatre filled

up from flank to flank with the _ghiara_ or pebbly bottom of the Taro.

The Taro is not less wasteful than any other of the brotherhood of

streams that pour from Alp or Apennine to swell the Po. It wanders, an

impatient rivulet, through a wilderness of boulders, uncertain of its

aim, shifting its course with the season of the year, unless the jaws

of some deep-cloven gully hold it tight and show how insignificant it

is. As we advance, the hills approach again; between their skirts there

is nothing but the river-bed; and now on rising ground above the

stream, at the point of juncture between the Ceno and the Taro, we find

Fornovo. Beyond the village the valley broadens out once more,

disclosing Apennines capped with winter snow. To the right descends the

Ceno. To the left foams the Taro, following whose rocky channel we

should come at last to Pontremoli and the Tyrrhenian sea beside

Sarzana. On a May-day of sunshine like the present, the Taro is a

gentle stream. A waggon drawn by two white oxen has just entered its

channel, guided by a contadino with goat-skin leggings, wielding a long

goad. The patient creatures stem the water, which rises to the

peasant's thighs and ripples round the creaking wheels. Swaying to and

fro, as the shingles shift upon the river-bed, they make their way

across; and now they have emerged upon the stones; and now we lose them

in a flood of sunlight.

It was by this pass that Charles VIII. in 1495 returned from Tuscany,

when the army of the League was drawn up waiting to intercept and crush

him in the mousetrap of Fornovo. No road remained for Charles and his

troops but 184the rocky bed of the Taro, running, as I have described

it, between the spurs of steep hills. It is true that the valley of the

Baganza leads, from a little higher up among the mountains, into

Lombardy. But this pass runs straight to Parma; and to follow it would

have brought the French upon the walls of a strong city. Charles could

not do otherwise than descend upon the village of Fornovo, and cut his

way thence in the teeth of the Italian army over stream and boulder

between the gorges of throttling mountain. The failure of the Italians

to achieve what here upon the ground appears so simple, delivered Italy

hand-bound to strangers. Had they but succeeded in arresting Charles

and destroying his forces at Fornovo, it is just possible that

then—even then, at the eleventh hour—Italy might have gained the sense

of national coherence, or at least have proved herself capable of

holding by her leagues the foreigner at bay. As it was, the battle of

Fornovo, in spite of Venetian bonfires and Mantuan Madonnas of Victory,

made her conscious of incompetence and convicted her of cowardice.

After Fornovo, her sons scarcely dared to hold their heads up in the

field against invaders; and the battles fought upon her soil were duels

among aliens for the prize of Italy.

In order to comprehend the battle of Fornovo in its bearings on Italian

history, we must go back to the year 1492, and understand the

conditions of the various States of Italy at that date. On April 8 in

that year, Lorenzo de' Medici, who had succeeded in maintaining a

political equilibrium in the peninsula, expired, and was succeeded by

his son Piero, a vain and foolhardy young man, from whom no guidance

could be expected. On July 25, Innocent VIII. died, and was succeeded

by the very worst Pope who has ever occupied S. Peter's chair, Roderigo

Borgia, Alexander VI. It was felt at once that the old order of things

had somehow ended, and that a new era, 185the destinies of which as yet

remained incalculable, was opening for Italy. The chief Italian powers,

hitherto kept in equipoise by the diplomacy of Lorenzo de' Medici, were

these—the Duchy of Milan, the Republic of Venice, the Republic of

Florence, the Papacy, and the kingdom of Naples. Minor States, such as

the Republics of Genoa and Siena, the Duchies of Urbino and Ferrara,

the Marquisate of Mantua, the petty tyrannies of Romagna, and the

wealthy city of Bologna, were sufficiently important to affect the

balance of power, and to produce new combinations. For the present

purpose it is, however, enough to consider the five great Powers.

After the peace of Constance, which freed the Lombard Communes from

Imperial interference in the year 1183, Milan, by her geographical

position, rose rapidly to be the first city of North Italy. Without

narrating the changes by which she lost her freedom as a Commune, it is

enough to state that, earliest of all Italian cities, Milan passed into

the hands of a single family. The Visconti managed to convert this

flourishing commonwealth, with all its dependencies, into their private

property, ruling it exclusively for their own profit, using its

municipal institutions as the machinery of administration, and

employing the taxes which they raised upon its wealth for purely

selfish ends. When the line of the Visconti ended in the year 1447,

their tyranny was continued by Francesco Sforza, the son of a poor

soldier of adventure, who had raised himself by his military genius,

and had married Bianca, the illegitimate daughter of the last Visconti.

On the death of Francesco Sforza in 1466, he left two sons, Galeazzo

Maria and Lodovico, surnamed Il Moro, both of whom were destined to

play a prominent part in history. Galeazzo Maria, dissolute, vicious,

and cruel to the core, was murdered by his injured subjects in the year

1476. His son, Giovanni Galeazzo, aged eight, would in course of time

have succeeded to the Duchy, 186had it not been for the ambition of his

uncle Lodovico. Lodovico contrived to name himself as Regent for his

nephew, whom he kept, long after he had come of age, in a kind of

honourable prison. Virtual master in Milan, but without a legal title

to the throne, unrecognised in his authority by the Italian powers, and

holding it from day to day by craft and fraud, Lodovico at last found

his situation untenable; and it was this difficulty of an usurper to

maintain himself in his despotism which, as we shall see, brought the

French into Italy.

Venice, the neighbour and constant foe of Milan, had become a close

oligarchy by a process of gradual constitutional development, which

threw her government into the hands of a few nobles. She was

practically ruled by the hereditary members of the Grand Council. Ever

since the year 1453, when Constantinople fell beneath the Turk, the

Venetians had been more and more straitened in their Oriental commerce,

and were thrown back upon the policy of territorial aggrandisement in

Italy, from which they had hitherto refrained as alien to the

temperament of the Republic. At the end of the fifteenth century Venice

therefore became an object of envy and terror to the Italian States.

They envied her because she alone was tranquil, wealthy, powerful, and

free. They feared her because they had good reason to suspect her of

encroachment; and it was foreseen that if she got the upper hand in

Italy, all Italy would be the property of the families inscribed upon

the Golden Book. It was thus alone that the Italians comprehended

government. The principle of representation being utterly unknown, and

the privileged burghers in each city being regarded as absolute and

lawful owners of the city and of everything belonging to it, the

conquest of a town by a republic implied the political extinction of

that town and the disfranchisement of its inhabitants in favour of the

conquerors.

187Florence at this epoch still called itself a Republic; and of all

Italian commonwealths it was by far the most democratic. Its history,

unlike that of Venice, had been the history of continual and brusque

changes, resulting in the destruction of the old nobility, in the

equalisation of the burghers, and in the formation of a new aristocracy

of wealth. Prom this class of _bourgeois_ nobles sprang the Medici,

who, by careful manipulation of the State machinery, by the creation of

a powerful party devoted to their interests, by flattery of the people,

by corruption, by taxation, and by constant scheming, raised themselves

to the first place in the commonwealth, and became its virtual masters.

In the year 1492 Lorenzo de' Medici, the most remarkable chief of this

despotic family, died, bequeathing his supremacy in the Republic to a

son of marked incompetence.

Since the Pontificate of Nicholas V. the See of Rome had entered upon a

new period of existence. The Popes no longer dreaded to reside in Rome,

but were bent upon making the metropolis of Christendom both splendid

as a seat of art and learning, and also potent as the capital of a

secular kingdom. Though their fiefs in Romagna and the March were still

held but loosely, though their provinces swarmed with petty despots who

defied the Papal authority, and though the princely Roman houses of

Colonna and Orsini were still strong enough to terrorise the Holy

Father in the Vatican, it was now clear that the Papal See must in the

end get the better of its adversaries, and consolidate itself into a

first-rate Power. The internal spirit of the Papacy at this time

corresponded to its external policy. It was thoroughly secularised by a

series of worldly and vicious pontiffs, who had clean forgotten what

their title, Vicar of Christ, implied. They consistently used their

religious prestige to enforce their secular authority, while by their

temporal power they 188caused their religious claims to be respected.

Corrupt and shameless, they indulged themselves in every vice, openly

acknowledged their children, and turned Italy upside down in order to

establish favourites and bastards in the principalities they seized as

spoils of war.

The kingdom of Naples differed from any other state of Italy. Subject

continually to foreign rulers since the decay of the Greek Empire,

governed in succession by the Normans, the Hohenstauffens, and the

House of Anjou, it had never enjoyed the real independence, or the free

institutions, of the northern provinces; nor had it been Italianised in

the same sense as the rest of the peninsula. Despotism, which assumed

so many forms in Italy, was here neither the tyranny of a noble house,

nor the masked autocracy of a burgher, nor yet the forceful sway of a

condottiere. It had a dynastic character, resembling the monarchy of

one of the great European nations, but modified by the peculiar

conditions of Italian statecraft. Owing to this dynastic and

monarchical complexion of the Neapolitan kingdom, semi-feudal customs

flourished in the south far more than in the north of Italy. The barons

were more powerful; and the destinies of the Regno often turned upon

their feuds and quarrels with the Crown. At the same time the

Neapolitan despots shared the uneasy circumstances of all Italian

potentates, owing to the uncertainty of their tenure, both as

conquerors and aliens, and also as the nominal vassals of the Holy See.

The rights of suzerainty which the Normans had yielded to the Papacy

over their southern conquests, and which the Popes had arbitrarily

exercised in favour of the Angevine princes, proved a constant source

of peril to the rest of Italy by rendering the succession to the crown

of Naples doubtful. On the extinction of the Angevine line, however,

the throne was occupied by a prince who had no valid title but that of

the 189sword to its possession. Alfonso of Aragon conquered Naples in

1442, and neglecting his hereditary dominion, settled in his Italian

capital. Possessed with the enthusiasm for literature which was then

the ruling passion of the Italians, and very liberal to men of

learning, Alfonso won for himself the surname of Magnanimous. On his

death, in 1458, he bequeathed his Spanish kingdom, together with Sicily

and Sardinia, to his brother, and left the fruits of his Italian

conquest to his bastard, Ferdinand. This Ferdinand, whose birth was

buried in profound obscurity, was the reigning sovereign in the year

1492. Of a cruel and sombre temperament, traitorous and tyrannical,

Ferdinand was hated by his subjects as much as Alfonso had been loved.

He possessed, however, to a remarkable degree, the qualities which at

that epoch constituted a consummate statesman; and though the history

of his reign is the history of plots and conspiracies, of judicial

murders and forcible assassinations, of famines produced by iniquitous

taxation, and of every kind of diabolical tyranny, Ferdinand contrived

to hold his own, in the teeth of a rebellious baronage or a maddened

population. His political sagacity amounted almost to a prophetic

instinct in the last years of his life, when he became aware that the

old order was breaking up in Italy, and had cause to dread that Charles

VIII. of France would prove his title to the kingdom of Naples by force

of arms.[27]

[27] Charles claimed under the will of René of Anjou, who in turn

claimed under the will of Joan II.

Such were the component parts of the Italian body politic, with the

addition of numerous petty principalities and powers, adhering more or

less consistently to one or other of the greater States. The whole

complex machine was bound together by no sense of common interest,

animated by no common purpose, amenable to no central authority. Even

190such community of feeling as one spoken language gives, was lacking.

And yet Italy distinguished herself clearly from the rest of Europe,

not merely as a geographical fact, but also as a people intellectually

and spiritually one. The rapid rise of humanism had aided in producing

this national self-consciousness. Every State and every city was

absorbed in the recovery of culture and in the development of art and

literature. Far in advance of the other European nations, the Italians

regarded the rest of the world as barbarous, priding themselves the

while, in spite of mutual jealousies and hatreds, on their Italic

civilisation. They were enormously wealthy. The resources of the Papal

treasury, the private fortunes of the Florentine bankers, the riches of

the Venetian merchants might have purchased all that France or Germany

possessed of value. The single Duchy of Milan yielded to its masters

700,000 golden florins of revenue, according to the computation of De

Comines. In default of a confederative system, the several States were

held in equilibrium by diplomacy. By far the most important people,

next to the despots and the captains of adventure, were ambassadors and

orators. War itself had become a matter of arrangement, bargain, and

diplomacy. The game of stratagem was played by generals who had been

friends yesterday and might be friends again to-morrow, with troops who

felt no loyalty whatever for the standards under which they listed. To

avoid slaughter and to achieve the ends of warfare by parade and

demonstration was the interest of every one concerned. Looking back

upon Italy of the fifteenth century, taking account of her religious

deadness and moral corruption, estimating the absence of political

vigour in the republics and the noxious tyranny of the despots,

analysing her lack of national spirit, and comparing her splendid life

of cultivated ease with the want of martial energy, we can see but too

plainly that 191contact with a simpler and stronger people could not

but produce a terrible catastrophe. The Italians themselves, however,

were far from comprehending this. Centuries of undisturbed internal

intrigue had accustomed them to play the game of forfeits with each

other, and nothing warned them that the time was come at which

diplomacy, finesse, and craft would stand them in ill stead against

rapacious conquerors.

The storm which began to gather over Italy in the year 1492 had its

first beginning in the North. Lodovico Sforza's position in the Duchy

of Milan was becoming every day more difficult, when a slight and to

all appearances insignificant incident converted his apprehension of

danger into panic. It was customary for the States of Italy to

congratulate a new Pope on his election by their ambassadors; and this

ceremony had now to be performed for Roderigo Borgia. Lodovico proposed

that his envoys should go to Rome together with those of Venice,

Naples, and Florence; but Piero de' Medici, whose vanity made him wish

to send an embassy in his own name, contrived that Lodovico's proposal

should be rejected both by Florence and the King of Naples. So strained

was the situation of Italian affairs that Lodovico saw in this repulse

a menace to his own usurped authority. Feeling himself isolated among

the princes of his country, rebuffed by the Medici, and coldly treated

by the King of Naples, he turned in his anxiety to France, and advised

the young king, Charles VIII., to make good his claim upon the Regno.

It was a bold move to bring the foreigner thus into Italy; and even

Lodovico, who prided himself upon his sagacity, could not see how

things would end. He thought his situation so hazardous, however, that

any change must be for the better. Moreover, a French invasion of

Naples would tie the hands of his natural foe, King Ferdinand, whose

granddaughter, 192Isabella of Aragon, had married Giovanni Galeazzo

Sforza, and was now the rightful Duchess of Milan. When the Florentine

ambassador at Milan asked him how he had the courage to expose Italy to

such peril, his reply betrayed the egotism of his policy: 'You talk to

me of Italy; but when have I looked Italy in the face? No one ever gave

a thought to my affairs. I have, therefore, had to give them such

security as I could.'

Charles VIII. was young, light-brained, romantic, and ruled by

_parvenus_, who had an interest in disturbing the old order of the

monarchy. He lent a willing ear to Lodovico's invitation, backed as

this was by the eloquence and passion of numerous Italian refugees and

exiles. Against the advice of his more prudent counsellors, he taxed

all the resources of his kingdom, and concluded treaties on

disadvantageous terms with England, Germany, and Spain, in order that

he might be able to concentrate all his attention upon the Italian

expedition. At the end of the year 1493, it was known that the invasion

was resolved upon. Gentile Becchi, the Florentine envoy at the Court of

France, wrote to Piero de' Medici: 'If the King succeeds, it is all

over with Italy—_tutta a bordello._' The extraordinary selfishness of

the several Italian States at this critical moment deserves to be

noticed. The Venetians, as Paolo Antonio Soderini described them to

Piero de' Medici, 'are of opinion that to keep quiet, and to see other

potentates of Italy spending and suffering, cannot but be to their

advantage. They trust no one, and feel sure they have enough money to

be able at any moment to raise sufficient troops, and so to guide

events according to their inclinations.' As the invasion was directed

against Naples, Ferdinand of Aragon displayed the acutest sense of the

situation. 'Frenchmen,' he exclaimed, in what appears like a prophetic

passion when contrasted with the cold indifference of others no less

193really menaced, 'have never come into Italy without inflicting ruin;

and this invasion, if rightly considered, cannot but bring universal

ruin, although it seems to menace us alone.' In his agony Ferdinand

applied to Alexander VI. But the Pope looked coldly upon him, because

the King of Naples, with rare perspicacity, had predicted that his

elevation to the Papacy would prove disastrous to Christendom.

Alexander preferred to ally himself with Venice and Milan. Upon this

Ferdinand wrote as follows: 'It seems fated that the Popes should leave

no peace in Italy. We are compelled to fight; but the Duke of Bari

(_i.e._ Lodovico Sforza) should think what may ensue from the tumult he

is stirring up. He who raises this wind will not be able to lay the

tempest when he likes. Let him look to the past, and he will see how

every time that our internal quarrels have brought Powers from beyond

the Alps into Italy, these have oppressed and lorded over her.'

Terribly verified as these words were destined to be,—and they were no

less prophetic in their political sagacity than Savonarola's prediction

of the Sword and bloody Scourge,—it was now too late to avert the

coming ruin. On March 1, 1494, Charles was with his army at Lyons.

Early in September he had crossed the pass of Mont Genêvre and taken up

his quarters in the town of Asti. There is no need to describe in

detail the holiday march of the French troops through Lombardy,

Tuscany, and Rome, until, without having struck a blow of consequence,

the gates of Naples opened to receive the conqueror upon February 22,

1495. Philippe de Comines, who parted from the King at Asti and passed

the winter as his envoy at Venice, has more than once recorded his

belief that nothing but the direct interposition of Providence could

have brought so mad an expedition to so successful a conclusion. 'Dieu

monstroit conduire l'entreprise,' 194No sooner, however, was Charles

installed in Naples than the States of Italy began to combine against

him. Lodovico Sforza had availed himself of the general confusion

consequent upon the first appearance of the French, to poison his

nephew. He was, therefore, now the titular, as well as virtual, Lord of

Milan. So far, he had achieved what he desired, and had no further need

of Charles. The overtures he now made to the Venetians and the Pope

terminated in a League between these Powers for the expulsion of the

French from Italy. Germany and Spain entered into the same alliance;

and De Comines, finding himself treated with marked coldness by the

Signory of Venice, despatched a courier to warn Charles in Naples of

the coming danger. After a stay of only fifty days in his new capital,

the French King hurried northward. Moving quickly through the Papal

States and Tuscany, he engaged his troops in the passes of the

Apennines near Pontremoli, and on July 5, 1495, took up his quarters in

the village of Fornovo. De Comines reckons that his whole fighting

force at this time did not exceed 9,000 men, with fourteen pieces of

artillery. Against him at the opening of the valley was the army of the

League, numbering some 35,000 men, of whom three-fourths were supplied

by Venice, the rest by Lodovico Sforza and the German Emperor.

Francesco Gonzaga, Marquis of Mantua, was the general of the Venetian

forces; and on him, therefore, fell the real responsibility of the

battle.

De Comines remarks on the imprudence of the allies, who allowed Charles

to advance as far as Fornovo, when it was their obvious policy to have

established themselves in the village and so have caught the French

troops in a trap. It was a Sunday when the French marched down upon

Fornovo. Before them spread the plain of Lombardy, and beyond it the

white crests of the Alps. 'We were,' says De Comines, 195'in a valley

between two little mountain flanks, and in that valley ran a river

which could easily be forded on foot, except when it is swelled with

sudden rains. The whole valley was a bed of gravel and big stones, very

difficult for horses, about a quarter of a league in breadth, and on

the right bank lodged our enemies.' Any one who has visited Fornovo can

understand the situation of the two armies. Charles occupied the

village on the right bank of the Taro. On the same bank, extending

downward toward the plain, lay the host of the allies; and in order

that Charles should escape them, it was necessary that he should cross

the Taro, just below its junction with the Ceno, and reach Lombardy by

marching in a parallel line with his foes.

All through the night of Sunday it thundered and rained incessantly; so

that on the Monday morning the Taro was considerably swollen. At seven

o'clock the King sent for De Comines, who found him already armed and

mounted on the finest horse he had ever seen. The name of this charger

was _Savoy_. He was black, one-eyed, and of middling height; and to his

great courage, as we shall see, Charles owed life upon that day. The

French army, ready for the march, now took to the gravelly bed of the

Taro, passing the river at a distance of about a quarter of a league

from the allies. As the French left Fornovo, the light cavalry of their

enemies entered the village and began to attack the baggage. At the

same time the Marquis of Mantua, with the flower of his men-at-arms,

crossed the Taro and harassed the rear of the French host; while raids

from the right bank to the left were constantly being made by

sharpshooters and flying squadrons. 'At this moment,' says De Comines,

'not a single man of us could have escaped if our ranks had once been

broken.' The French army was divided into three main bodies. The

vanguard consisted of some 350 men-at-arms, 1963000 Switzers, 300

archers of the Guard, a few mounted crossbow-men, and the artillery.

Next came the Battle, and after this the rearguard. At the time when

the Marquis of Mantua made his attack, the French rearguard had not yet

crossed the river. Charles quitted the van, put himself at the head of

his chivalry, and charged the Italian horsemen, driving them back, some

to the village and others to their camp. De Comines observes, that had

the Italian knights been supported in this passage of arms by the light

cavalry of the Venetian force, called Stradiots, the French must have

been outnumbered, thrown into confusion, and defeated. As it was, these

Stradiots were engaged in plundering the baggage of the French; and the

Italians, accustomed to bloodless encounters, did not venture, in spite

of their immense superiority of numbers, to renew the charge. In the

pursuit of Gonzaga's horsemen Charles outstripped his staff, and was

left almost alone to grapple with a little band of mounted foemen. It

was here that his noble horse, Savoy, saved his person by plunging and

charging till assistance came up from the French, and enabled the King

to regain his van.

It is incredible, considering the nature of the ground and the number

of the troops engaged, that the allies should not have returned to the

attack and have made the passage of the French into the plain

impossible. De Comines, however, assures us that the actual engagement

only lasted a quarter of an hour, and the pursuit of the Italians three

quarters of an hour. After they had once resolved to fly, they threw

away their lances and betook themselves to Reggio and Parma. So

complete was their discomfiture, that De Comines gravely blames the

want of military genius and adventure in the French host. If, instead

of advancing along the left bank of the Taro and there taking up his

quarters for the 197night, Charles had recrossed the stream and pursued

the army of the allies, he would have had the whole of Lombardy at his

discretion. As it was, the French army encamped not far from the scene

of the action in great discomfort and anxiety. De Comines had to

bivouac in a vineyard, without even a mantle to wrap round him, having

lent his cloak to the King in the morning; and as it had been pouring

all day, the ground could not have afforded very luxurious quarters.

The same extraordinary luck which had attended the French in their

whole expedition, now favoured their retreat; and the same

pusillanimity which the allies had shown at Fornovo, prevented them

from re-forming and engaging with the army of Charles upon the plain.

One hour before daybreak on Tuesday morning, the French broke up their

camp and succeeded in clearing the valley. That night they lodged at

Fiorenzuola, the next at Piacenza, and so on; till on the eighth day

they arrived at Asti without having been so much as incommoded by the

army of the allies in their rear.

Although the field of Fornovo was in reality so disgraceful to the

Italians, they reckoned it a victory upon the technical pretence that

the camp and baggage of the French had been seized. Illuminations and

rejoicings made the piazza of S. Mark in Venice gay, and Francesco da

Gonzaga had the glorious Madonna della Vittoria painted for him by

Mantegna, in commemoration of what ought only to have been remembered

with shame.

A fitting conclusion to this sketch, connecting its close with the

commencement, may be found in some remarks upon the manner of warfare

to which the Italians of the Renaissance had become accustomed, and

which proved so futile on the field of Fornovo. During the middle ages,

and in the days of the Communes, the whole male population of 198Italy

had fought light-armed on foot. Merchant and artisan left the

counting-house and the workshop, took shield and pike, and sallied

forth to attack the barons in their castles, or to meet the Emperor's

troops upon the field. It was with this national militia that the

citizens of Florence freed their _Contado_ of the nobles, and the

burghers of Lombardy gained the battle of Legnano. In course of time,

by a process of change which it is not very easy to trace, heavily

armed cavalry began to take the place of infantry in mediæval warfare.

Men-at-arms, as they were called, encased from head to foot in iron,

and mounted upon chargers no less solidly caparisoned, drove the

foot-soldiers before them at the points of their long lances. Nowhere

in Italy do they seem to have met with the fierce resistance which the

bears of the Swiss Oberland and the bulls of Uri offered to the knights

of Burgundy. No Tuscan Arnold von Winkelried clasped a dozen lances to

his bosom that the foeman's ranks might thus be broken at the cost of

his own life; nor did it occur to the Italian burghers to meet the

charge of the horsemen with squares protected by bristling spears. They

seem, on the contrary, to have abandoned military service with the

readiness of men whose energies were already absorbed in the affairs of

peace. To become a practised and efficient man-at-arms required long

training and a life's devotion. So much time the burghers of the free

towns could not spare to military service, while the petty nobles were

only too glad to devote themselves to so honourable a calling. Thus it

came to pass that a class of professional fighting-men was gradually

formed in Italy, whose services the burghers and the princes bought,

and by whom the wars of the peninsula were regularly farmed by

contract. Wealth and luxury in the great cities continued to increase;

and as the burghers grew more comfortable, they 199were less inclined

to take the field in their own persons, and more disposed to vote large

sums of money for the purchase of necessary aid. At the same time this

system suited the despots, since it spared them the peril of arming

their own subjects, while they taxed them to pay the services of

foreign captains. War thus became a commerce. Romagna, the Marches of

Ancona, and other parts of the Papal dominions, supplied a number of

petty nobles whose whole business in life it was to form companies of

trained horsemen, and with these bands to hire themselves out to the

republics and the despots. Gain was the sole purpose of these captains.

They sold their service to the highest bidder, fighting irrespectively

of principle or patriotism, and passing with the coldest equanimity

from the camp of one master to that of his worst foe. It was impossible

that true military spirit should survive this prostitution of the art

of war. A species of mock warfare prevailed in Italy. Battles were

fought with a view to booty more than victory; prisoners were taken for

the sake of ransom; bloodshed was carefully avoided, for the men who

fought on either side in any pitched field had been comrades with their

present foemen in the last encounter, and who could tell how soon the

general of the one host might not need his rival's troops to recruit

his own ranks? Like every genuine institution of the Italian

Renaissance, warfare was thus a work of fine art, a masterpiece of

intellectual subtlety; and like the Renaissance itself, this peculiar

form of warfare was essentially transitional. The cannon and the musket

were already in use; and it only required one blast of gunpowder to

turn the sham-fight of courtly, traitorous, finessing captains of

adventure into something terribly more real. To men like the Marquis of

Mantua war had been a highly profitable game of skill; to men like the

Maréchal de Gié it 200was a murderous horseplay; and this difference

the Italians were not slow to perceive. When they cast away their

lances at Fornovo, and fled—in spite of their superior numbers—never to

return, one fair-seeming sham of the fifteenth century became a vision

of the past.

201

FLORENCE AND THE MEDICI

Di Firenze in prima si divisono intra loro i nobili, dipoi i nobili e

il popolo, e in ultimo il popolo e la plebe; e molte volte occorse che

una di queste parti rimasa superiore, si divise in due.—MACHIAVELLI.

I

Florence, like all Italian cities, owed her independence to the duel of

the Papacy and Empire. The transference of the imperial authority

beyond the Alps had enabled the burghs of Lombardy and Tuscany to

establish a form of self-government. This government was based upon the

old municipal organisation of duumvirs and decemvirs. It was, in fact,

nothing more or less than a survival from the ancient Roman system. The

proof of this was, that while vindicating their rights as towns, the

free cities never questioned the validity of the imperial title. Even

after the peace of Constance in 1183, when Frederick Barbarossa

acknowledged their autonomy, they received within their walls a supreme

magistrate, with power of life and death and ultimate appeal in all

decisive questions, whose title of Potestà indicated that he

represented the imperial power—Potestas. It was not by the assertion of

any right, so much as by the growth of custom, and by the weakness of

the Emperors, that in course of time each city became a sovereign

State. The theoretical supremacy of the Empire prevented any other

authority from taking the first place in Italy. On the other hand, the

202practical inefficiency of the Emperors to play their part encouraged

the establishment of numerous minor powers amenable to no controlling

discipline.

The free cities derived their strength from industry, and had nothing

in common with the nobles of the surrounding country. Broadly speaking,

the population of the towns included what remained in Italy of the old

Roman people. This Roman stock was nowhere stronger than in Florence

and Venice—Florence defended from barbarian incursions by her mountains

and marshes, Venice by the isolation of her lagoons. The nobles, on the

contrary, were mostly of foreign origin—Germans, Franks, and Lombards,

who had established themselves as feudal lords in castles apart from

the cities. The force which the burghs acquired as industrial

communities was soon turned against these nobles. The larger cities,

like Milan and Florence, began to make war upon the lords of castles,

and to absorb into their own territory the small towns and villages

around them. Thus in the social economy of the Italians there were two

antagonistic elements ready to range themselves beneath any banners

that should give the form of legitimate warfare to their mutual

hostility. It was the policy of the Church in the twelfth century to

support the cause of the cities, using them as a weapon against the

Empire, and stimulating the growing ambition of the burghers. In this

way Italy came to be divided into the two world-famous factions known

as Guelf and Ghibelline. The struggle between Guelf and Ghibelline was

the struggle of the Papacy for the depression of the Empire, the

struggle of the great burghs face to face with feudalism, the struggle

of the old Italie stock enclosed in cities with the foreign nobles

established in fortresses. When the Church had finally triumphed by the

extirpation of the House of Hohenstaufen, this conflict of Guelf and

Ghibelline was really ended. Until 203the reign of Charles V. no

Emperor interfered to any purpose in Italian affairs. At the same time

the Popes ceased to wield a formidable power. Having won the battle by

calling in the French, they suffered the consequences of this policy by

losing their hold on Italy during the long period of their exile at

Avignon. The Italians, left without either Pope or Emperor, were free

to pursue their course of internal development, and to prosecute their

quarrels among themselves. But though the names of Guelf and Ghibelline

lost their old significance after the year 1266 (the date of King

Manfred's death), these two factions had so divided Italy that they

continued to play a prominent part in her annals. Guelf still meant

constitutional autonomy, meant the burgher as against the noble, meant

industry as opposed to feudal lordship. Ghibelline meant the rule of

the few over the many, meant tyranny, meant the interest of the noble

as against the merchant and the citizen. These broad distinctions must

be borne in mind, if we seek to understand how it was that a city like

Florence continued to be governed by parties, the European force of

which had passed away.

II

Florence first rose into importance during the papacy of Innocent III.

Up to this date she had been a town of second-rate distinction even in

Tuscany. Pisa was more powerful by arms and commerce. Lucca was the old

seat of the dukes and marquises of Tuscany. But between the years 1200

and 1250 Florence assumed the place she was to hold thenceforward, by

heading the league of Tuscan cities formed to support the Guelf party

against the Ghibellines. Formally adopting the Guelf cause, the

Florentines made themselves the champions of municipal liberty in

Central 204Italy; and while they declared war against the Ghibelline

cities, they endeavoured to stamp out the very name of noble in their

State. It is not needful to describe the varying fortunes of the Guelfs

and Ghibellines, the burghers and the nobles, during the thirteenth and

the first half of the fourteenth centuries. Suffice it to say that

through all the vicissitudes of that stormy period the name Guelf

became more and more associated with republican freedom in Florence. At

last, after the final triumph of that party in 1253, the Guelfs

remained victors in the city. Associating the glory of their

independence with Guelf principles, the citizens of Florence

perpetuated within their State a faction that, in its turn, was

destined to prove perilous to liberty.

When it became clear that the republic was to rule itself henceforth

untrammelled by imperial interference, the people divided themselves

into six districts, and chose for each district two Ancients, who

administered the government in concert with the Potestà and the Captain

of the People. The Ancients were a relic of the old Roman municipal

organisation. The Potestà who was invariably a noble foreigner selected

by the people, represented the extinct imperial right, and exercised

the power of life and death within the city. The Captain of the People,

who was also a foreigner, headed the burghers in their military

capacity, for at that period the troops were levied from the citizens

themselves in twenty companies. The body of the citizens, or the

_popolo_, were ultimately sovereigns in the State. Assembled under the

banners of their several companies, they formed a _parlamento_ for

delegating their own power to each successive government. Their

representatives, again, arranged in two councils, called the Council of

the People and the Council of the Commune, under the presidency of the

Captain of the People and the Potestà, ratified the measures which had

previously been proposed and carried by 205the executive authority or

Signoria. Under this simple State system the Florentines placed

themselves at the head of the Tuscan League, fought the battles of the

Church, asserted their sovereignty by issuing the golden florin of the

republic, and flourished until 1266.

III

In that year an important change was effected in the Constitution. The

whole population of Florence consisted, on the one hand, of nobles or

Grandi, as they were called in Tuscany, and on the other hand of

working people. The latter, divided into traders and handicraftsmen,

were distributed in guilds called Arti; and at that time there were

seven Greater and five Lesser Arti, the most influential of all being

the Guild of the Wool Merchants. These guilds had their halls for

meeting, their colleges of chief officers, their heads, called Consoli

or Priors, and their flags. In 1266 it was decided that the

administration of the commonwealth should be placed simply and wholly

in the hands of the Arti, and the Priors of these industrial companies

became the lords or Signory of Florence. No inhabitant of the city who

had not enrolled himself as a craftsman in one of the guilds could

exercise any function of burghership. To be _scioperato_, or without

industry, was to be without power, without rank or place of honour in

the State. The revolution which placed the Arts at the head of the

republic had the practical effect of excluding the Grandi altogether

from the government. Violent efforts were made by these noble families,

potent through their territorial possessions and foreign connections,

and trained from boyhood in the use of arms, to recover the place from

which the new laws thrust them: but their menacing attitude, instead of

intimidating the burghers, roused their anger and drove them to the

passing of still more stringent laws. In 1293, after the 206Ghibellines

had been defeated in the great battle of Campaldino, a series of severe

enactments, called the Ordinances of Justice, were decreed against the

unruly Grandi. All civic rights were taken from them; the severest

penalties were attached to their slightest infringement of municipal

law; their titles to land were limited; the privilege of living within

the city walls was allowed them only under galling restrictions; and,

last not least, a supreme magistrate, named the Gonfalonier of Justice,

was created for the special purpose of watching them and carrying out

the penal code against them. Henceforward Florence was governed

exclusively by merchants and artisans. The Grandi hastened to enrol

themselves in the guilds, exchanging their former titles and dignities

for the solid privilege of burghership. The exact parallel to this

industrial constitution for a commonwealth, carrying on wars with

emperors and princes, holding haughty captains in its pay, and

dictating laws to subject cities, cannot, I think, be elsewhere found

in history. It is as unique as the Florence of Dante and Giotto is

unique. While the people was guarding itself thus stringently against

the Grandi, a separate body was created for the special purpose of

extirpating the Ghibellines. A permanent committee of vigilance, called

the College or the Captains of the Guelf Party, was established. It was

their function to administer the forfeited possessions of Ghibelline

rebels, to hunt out suspected citizens, to prosecute them for

Ghibellinism, to judge them, and to punish them as traitors to the

commonwealth. This body, like a little State within the State, proved

formidable to the republic itself through the unlimited and undefined

sway it exercised over burghers whom it chose to tax with treason. In

course of time it became the oligarchical element within the Florentine

democracy, and threatened to change the free constitution of the city

into a government conducted by a few powerful families.

207 There is no need to dwell in detail on the internal difficulties of

Florence during the first half of the fourteenth century. Two main

circumstances, however, require to be briefly noticed. These are (i)

the contest of the Blacks and Whites, so famous through the part played

in it by Dante; and (ii) the tyranny of the Duke of Athens, Walter de

Brienne. The feuds of the Blacks and Whites broke up the city into

factions, and produced such anarchy that at last it was found necessary

to place the republic under the protection of foreign potentates.

Charles of Valois was first chosen, and after him the Duke of Athens,

who took up his residence in the city. Entrusted with dictatorial

authority, he used his power to form a military despotism. Though his

reign of violence lasted rather less than a year, it bore important

fruits; for the tyrant, seeking to support himself upon the favour of

the common people, gave political power to the Lesser Arts at the

expense of the Greater, and confused the old State-system by enlarging

the democracy. The net result of these events for Florence was, first,

that the city became habituated to rancorous party-strife, involving

exiles and proscriptions; and, secondly, that it lost its primitive

social hierarchy of classes.

IV

After the Guelfs had conquered the Ghibellines, and the people had

absorbed the Grandi in their guilds, the next chapter in the troubled

history of Florence was the division of the Popolo against itself.

Civil strife now declared itself as a conflict between labour and

capital. The members of the Lesser Arts, craftsmen who plied trades

subordinate to those of the Greater Arts, rose up against their social

and political superiors, demanding a larger share in the government, a

more equal distribution of profits, higher wages, and privileges

208that should place them on an absolute equality with the wealthy

merchants. It was in the year 1378 that the proletariate broke out into

rebellion. Previous events had prepared the way for this revolt. First

of all, the republic had been democratised through the destruction of

the Grandi and through the popular policy pursued to gain his own ends

by the Duke of Athens. Secondly, society had been shaken to its very

foundation by the great plague of 1348. Both Boccaccio and Matteo

Villani draw lively pictures of the relaxed morality and loss of order

consequent upon this terrible disaster; nor had thirty years sufficed

to restore their relative position to grades and ranks confounded by an

overwhelming calamity. We may therefore reckon the great plague of 1348

among the causes which produced the anarchy of 1378. Rising in a mass

to claim their privileges, the artisans ejected the Signory from the

Public Palace, and for awhile Florence was at the mercy of the mob. It

is worthy of notice that the Medici, whose name is scarcely known

before this epoch, now came for one moment to the front. Salvestro de'

Medici was Gonfalonier of Justice at the time when the tumult first

broke out. He followed the faction of the handicraftsmen, and became

the hero of the day. I cannot discover that he did more than extend a

sort of passive protection to their cause. Yet there is no doubt that

the attachment of the working classes to the House of Medici dates from

this period. The rebellion of 1378 is known in Florentine history as

the Tumult of the Ciompi. The name Ciompi strictly means the

Wool-Carders. One set of operatives in the city, and that the largest,

gave its title to the whole body of the labourers. For some months

these craftsmen governed the republic, appointing their own Signory and

passing laws in their own interest; but, as is usual, the proletariate

found itself incapable of sustained government. The ambition and

209discontent of the Ciompi foamed themselves away, and industrious

working men began to see that trade was languishing and credit on the

wane. By their own act at last they restored the government to the

Priors of the Greater Arti. Still the movement had not been without

grave consequences. It completed the levelling of classes, which had

been steadily advancing from the first in Florence. After the Ciompi

riot there was no longer not only any distinction between noble and

burgher, but the distinction between greater and lesser guilds was

practically swept away. The classes, parties, and degrees in the

republic were so broken up, ground down, and mingled, that thenceforth

the true source of power in the State was wealth combined with personal

ability. In other words, the proper political conditions had been

formed for unscrupulous adventurers. Florence had become a democracy

without social organisation, which might fall a prey to oligarchs or

despots. What remained of deeply rooted feuds or factions—animosities

against the Grandi, hatred for the Ghibellines, jealousy of labour and

capital—offered so many points of leverage for stirring the passions of

the people and for covering personal ambition with a cloak of public

zeal. The time was come for the Albizzi to attempt an oligarchy, and

for the Medici to begin the enslavement of the State.

V

The Constitution of Florence offered many points of weakness to the

attacks of such intriguers. In the first place it was in its origin not

a political but an industrial organisation—a simple group of guilds

invested with the sovereign authority. Its two most powerful engines,

the Gonfalonier of Justice and the Guelf College, had been formed, not

with a view to the preservation of the government, but with the

210purpose of quelling the nobles and excluding a detested faction. It

had no permanent head, like the Doge of Venice; no fixed senate like

the Venetian Grand Council; its chief magistrates, the Signory, were

elected for short periods of two months, and their mode of election was

open to the gravest criticism. Supposed to be chosen by lot, they were

really selected from lists drawn up by the factions in power from time

to time. These factions contrived to exclude the names of all but their

adherents from the bags, or _borse_, in which the burghers eligible for

election had to be inscribed. Furthermore, it was not possible for this

shifting Signory to conduct affairs requiring sustained effort and

secret deliberation; therefore recourse was being continually had to

dictatorial Commissions. The people, summoned in parliament upon the

Great Square, were asked to confer plenipotentiary authority upon a

committee called _Balia_, who proceeded to do what they chose in the

State, and who retained power after the emergency for which they were

created passed away. The same instability in the supreme magistracy led

to the appointment of special commissioners for war, and special

councils, or _Pratiche_, for the management of each department. Such

supplementary commissions not only proved the weakness of the central

authority, but they were always liable to be made the instruments of

party warfare. The Guelf College was another and a different source of

danger to the State. Not acting under the control of the Signory, but

using its own initiative, this powerful body could proscribe and punish

burghers on the mere suspicion of Ghibellinism. Though the Ghibelline

faction had become an empty name, the Guelf College excluded from the

franchise all and every whom they chose on any pretext to admonish.

Under this mild phrase, _to admonish_, was concealed a cruel exercise

of tyranny—it meant to warn a man that he was suspected of treason, and

that he had better relinquish the 211exercise of his burghership. By

free use of this engine of Admonition, the Guelf College rendered their

enemies voiceless in the State, and were able to pack the Signory and

the councils with their own creatures. Another important defect in the

Florentine Constitution was the method of imposing taxes. This was done

by no regular system. The party in power made what estimate it chose of

a man's capacity to bear taxation, and called upon him for

extraordinary loans. In this way citizens were frequently driven into

bankruptcy and exile; and since to be a debtor to the State deprived a

burgher of his civic rights, severe taxation was one of the best ways

of silencing and neutralising a dissentient.

I have enumerated these several causes of weakness in the Florentine

State-system, partly because they show how irregularly the Constitution

had been formed by the patching and extension of a simple industrial

machine to suit the needs of a great commonwealth; partly because it

was through these defects that the democracy merged gradually into a

despotism. The art of the Medici consisted in a scientific

comprehension of these very imperfections, a methodic use of them for

their own purposes, and a steady opposition to any attempts made to

substitute a stricter system. The Florentines had determined to be an

industrial community, governing themselves on the co-operative

principle, dividing profits, sharing losses, and exposing their

magistrates to rigid scrutiny. All this in theory was excellent. Had

they remained an unambitious and peaceful commonwealth, engaged in the

wool and silk trade, it might have answered. Modern Europe might have

admired the model of a communistic and commercial democracy. But when

they engaged in aggressive wars, and sought to enslave sister-cities

like Pisa and Lucca, it was soon found that their simple trading

constitution would not serve. They 212had to piece it out with

subordinate machinery, cumbrous, difficult to manage, ill-adapted to

the original structure. Each limb of this subordinate machinery,

moreover, was a _point d'appui_ for insidious and self-seeking party

leaders.

Florence, in the middle of the fourteenth century, was a vast beehive

of industry. Distinctions of rank among burghers, qualified to vote and

hold office, were theoretically unknown. Highly educated men, of more

than princely wealth, spent their time in shops and counting-houses,

and trained their sons to follow trades. Military service at this

period was abandoned by the citizens; they preferred to pay mercenary

troops for the conduct of their wars. Nor was there, as in Venice, any

outlet for their energies upon the seas. Florence had no navy, no great

port—she only kept a small fleet for the protection of her commerce.

Thus the vigour of the commonwealth was concentrated on itself; while

the influence of the citizens, through their affiliated trading-houses,

correspondents, and agents, extended like a network over Europe. In a

community of this kind it was natural that wealth—rank and titles being

absent—should alone confer distinction. Accordingly we find that out of

the very bosom of the people a new plutocratic aristocracy begins to

rise. The Grandi are no more; but certain families achieve distinction

by their riches, their numbers, their high spirit, and their ancient

place of honour in the State. These nobles of the purse obtained the

name of _Popolani Nobili_; and it was they who now began to play at

high stakes for the supreme power. In all the subsequent vicissitudes

of Florence every change takes place by intrigue and by clever

manipulation of the political machine. Recourse is rarely had to

violence of any kind, and the leaders of revolutions are men of the

yard-measure, never of the sword. The despotism to which the republic

eventually succumbed was no less commercial than the democracy had

213been. Florence in the days of her slavery remained a _Popolo_.

VI

The opening of the second half of the fourteenth century had been

signalised by the feuds of two great houses, both risen from the

people. These were the Albizzi and the Ricci. At this epoch there had

been a formal closing of the lists of burghers;—henceforth no new

families who might settle in the city could claim the franchise, vote

in the assemblies, or hold magistracies. The Guelf College used their

old engine of admonition to persecute _novi homines_, whom they dreaded

as opponents. At the head of this formidable organisation the Albizzi

placed themselves, and worked it with such skill that they succeeded in

driving the Ricci out of all participation in the government. The

tumult of the Ciompi formed but an episode in their career toward

oligarchy; indeed, that revolution only rendered the political material

of the Florentine republic more plastic in the hands of intriguers, by

removing the last vestiges of class distinctions and by confusing the

old parties of the State.

When the Florentines in 1387 engaged in their long duel with Gian

Galeazzo Visconti, the difficulty of conducting this war without some

permanent central authority still further confirmed the power of the

rising oligarchs. The Albizzi became daily more autocratic, until in

1393 their chief, Maso degli Albizzi, a man of strong will and prudent

policy, was chosen Gonfalonier of Justice. Assuming the sway of a

dictator he revised the list of burghers capable of holding office,

struck out the private opponents of his house, and excluded all names

but those of powerful families who were well affected towards an

aristocratic government. The great house of the Alberti were exiled in

a body, declared rebels, and 214deprived of their possessions, for no

reason except that they seemed dangerous to the Albizzi. It was in vain

that the people murmured against these arbitrary acts. The new rulers

were omnipotent in the Signory, which they packed with their own men,

in the great guilds, and in the Guelf College. All the machinery

invented by the industrial community for its self-management and

self-defence was controlled and manipulated by a close body of

aristocrats, with the Albizzi at their head. It seemed as though

Florence, without any visible alteration in her forms of government,

was rapidly becoming an oligarchy even less open than the Venetian

republic. Meanwhile the affairs of the State were most flourishing. The

strong-handed masters of the city not only held the Duke of Milan in

check, and prevented him from turning Italy into a kingdom; they

furthermore acquired the cities of Pisa, Livorno, Arezzo,

Montepulciano, and Cortona, for Florence, making her the mistress of

all Tuscany, with the exception of Siena, Lucca, and Volterra. Maso

degli Albizzi was the ruling spirit of the commonwealth, spending the

enormous sum of 11,500,000 golden florins on war, raising sumptuous

edifices, protecting the arts, and acting in general like a powerful

and irresponsible prince.

In spite of public prosperity there were signs, however, that this rule

of a few families could not last. Their government was only maintained

by continual revision of the lists of burghers, by elimination of the

disaffected, and by unremitting personal industry. They introduced no

new machinery into the Constitution whereby the people might be

deprived of its titular sovereignty, or their own dictatorship might be

continued with a semblance of legality. Again, they neglected to win

over the new nobles (_nobili popolani_) in a body to their cause; and

thus they were surrounded by rivals ready to spring upon them when a

false step should be made. The 215Albizzi oligarchy was a masterpiece

of art, without any force to sustain it but the craft and energy of its

constructors. It had not grown up, like the Venetian oligarchy, by the

gradual assimilation to itself of all the vigour in the State. It was

bound, sooner or later, to yield to the renascent impulse of democracy

inherent in Florentine institutions.

VII

Maso degli Albizzi died in 1417. He was succeeded in the government by

his old friend, Niccolo da Uzzano, a man of great eloquence and wisdom,

whose single word swayed the councils of the people as he listed.

Together with him acted Maso's son, Rinaldo, a youth of even more

brilliant talents than his father, frank, noble, and high-spirited, but

far less cautious.

The oligarchy, which these two men undertook to manage, had accumulated

against itself the discontent of overtaxed, disfranchised, jealous

burghers. The times, too, were bad. Pursuing the policy of Maso, the

Albizzi engaged the city in a tedious and unsuccessful war with Filippo

Maria Visconti, which cost 350,000 golden florins, and brought no

credit. In order to meet extraordinary expenses they raised new public

loans, thereby depreciating the value of the old Florentine funds. What

was worse, they imposed forced subsidies with grievous inequality upon

the burghers, passing over their friends and adherents, and burdening

their opponents with more than could be borne. This imprudent financial

policy began the ruin of the Albizzi. It caused a clamour in the city

for a new system of more just taxation, which was too powerful to be

resisted. The voice of the people made itself loudly heard; and with

the people on this occasion sided Giovanni de' Medici. This was in

1427.

216It is here that the Medici appear upon that memorable scene where in

the future they are to play the first part. Giovanni de' Medici did not

belong to the same branch of his family as the Salvestro who favoured

the people at the time of the Ciompi Tumult. But he adopted the same

popular policy. To his sons Cosimo and Lorenzo he bequeathed on his

deathbed the rule that they should invariably adhere to the cause of

the multitude, found their influence on that, and avoid the arts of

factious and ambitious leaders. In his own life he had pursued this

course of conduct, acquiring a reputation for civic moderation and

impartiality that endeared him to the people and stood his children in

good stead. Early in his youth Giovanni found himself almost destitute

by reason of the imposts charged upon him by the oligarchs. He

possessed, however, the genius for money-making to a rare degree, and

passed his manhood as a banker, amassing the largest fortune of any

private citizen in Italy. In his old age he devoted himself to the

organisation of his colossal trading business, and abstained, as far as

possible, from political intrigues. Men observed that they rarely met

him in the Public Palace or on the Great Square.

Cosimo de' Medici was thirty years old when his father Giovanni died,

in 1429. During his youth he had devoted all his time and energy to

business, mastering the complicated affairs of Giovanni's

banking-house, and travelling far and wide through Europe to extend its

connections. This education made him a consummate financier; and those

who knew him best were convinced that his ambition was set on great

things. However quietly he might begin, it was clear that he intended

to match himself, as a leader of the plebeians, against the Albizzi.

The foundations he prepared for future action were equally

characteristic of the man, of Florence, and of the age. Commanding the

enormous capital of the Medicean bank he 217contrived, at any sacrifice

of temporary convenience, to lend money to the State for war expenses,

engrossing in his own hands a large portion of the public debt of

Florence. At the same time his agencies in various European capitals

enabled him to keep his own wealth floating far beyond the reach of

foes within the city. A few years of this system ended in so complete a

confusion between Cosimo's trade and the finances of Florence that the

bankruptcy of the Medici, however caused, would have compromised the

credit of the State and the fortunes of the fund-holders. Cosimo, in a

word, made himself necessary to Florence by the wise use of his riches.

Furthermore, he kept his eye upon the list of burghers, lending money

to needy citizens, putting good things in the way of struggling

traders, building up the fortunes of men who were disposed to favour

his party in the State, ruining his opponents by the legitimate process

of commercial competition, and, when occasion offered, introducing new

voters into the Florentine Council by paying off the debts of those who

were disqualified by poverty from using the franchise. While his

capital was continually increasing he lived frugally, and employed his

wealth solely for the consolidation of his political influence. By

these arts Cosimo became formidable to the oligarchs and beloved by the

people. His supporters were numerous, and held together by the bonds of

immediate necessity or personal cupidity. The plebeians and the

merchants were all on his side. The Grandi and the Ammoniti, excluded

from the State by the practices of the Albizzi, had more to hope from

the Medicean party than from the few families who still contrived to

hold the reins of government. It was clear that a conflict to the death

must soon commence between the oligarchy and this new faction.

218

VIII

At last, in 1433, war was declared. The first blow was struck by

Rinaldo degli Albizzi, who put himself in the wrong by attacking a

citizen indispensable to the people at large, and guilty of no

unconstitutional act. On September 7th of that year, a year decisive

for the future destinies of Florence, he summoned Cosimo to the Public

Palace, which he had previously occupied with troops at his command.

There he declared him a rebel to the State, and had him imprisoned in a

little square room in the central tower. The tocsin was sounded; the

people were assembled in parliament upon the piazza. The Albizzi held

the main streets with armed men, and forced the Florentines to place

plenipotentiary power for the administration of the commonwealth at

this crisis in the hands of a Balia, or committee selected by

themselves. It was always thus that acts of high tyranny were effected

in Florence. A show of legality was secured by gaining the compulsory

sanction of the people, driven by soldiery into the public square, and

hastily ordered to recognise the authority of their oppressors.

The bill of indictment against the Medici accused them of sedition in

the year 1378—that is, in the year of the Ciompi Tumult—and of

treasonable practice during the whole course of the Albizzi

administration. It also strove to fix upon them the odium of the

unsuccessful war against the town of Lucca. As soon as the Albizzi had

unmasked their batteries, Lorenzo de' Medici managed to escape from the

city, and took with him his brother Cosimo's children to Venice. Cosimo

remained shut up within the little room called Barberia in Arnolfo's

tower. From that high eagle's nest the sight can range Valdarno far and

wide. Florence with her towers and domes lies below; and the blue peaks

of Carrara close a prospect 219westward than which, with its

villa-jewelled slopes and fertile gardens, there is nought more

beautiful upon the face of earth. The prisoner can have paid but little

heed to this fair landscape. He heard the frequent ringing of the great

bell that called the Florentines to council, the tramp of armed men on

the piazza, the coming and going of the burghers in the palace halls

beneath. On all sides lurked anxiety and fear of death. Each mouthful

he tasted might be poisoned. For many days he partook of only bread and

water, till his gaoler restored his confidence by sharing all his

meals. In this peril he abode twenty-four days. The Albizzi, in concert

with the Balia they had formed, were consulting what they might venture

to do with him. Some voted for his execution. Others feared the popular

favour, and thought that if they killed Cosimo this act would ruin

their own power. The nobler natures among them determined to proceed by

constitutional measures. At last, upon September 29th, it was settled

that Cosimo should be exiled to Padua for ten years. The Medici were

declared Grandi, by way of excluding them from political rights. But

their property remained untouched; and on October 3rd, Cosimo was

released.

On the same day Cosimo took his departure. His journey northward

resembled a triumphant progress. He left Florence a simple burgher; he

entered Venice a powerful prince. Though the Albizzi seemed to have

gained the day, they had really cut away the ground beneath their feet.

They committed the fatal mistake of doing both too much and too

little—too much because they declared war against an innocent man, and

roused the sympathies of the whole people in his behalf; too little,

because they had not the nerve to complete their act by killing him

outright and extirpating his party. Machiavelli, in one of his

profoundest and most cynical critiques, remarks that few men know how

to be thoroughly 220bad with honour to themselves. Their will is evil;

but the grain of good in them—some fear of public opinion, some

repugnance to committing a signal crime—paralyses their arm at the

moment when it ought to have been raised to strike. He instances Gian

Paolo Baglioni's omission to murder Julius II., when that Pope placed

himself within his clutches at Perugia. He might also have instanced

Rinaldo degli Albizzi's refusal to push things to extremities by

murdering Cosimo. It was the combination of despotic violence in the

exile of Cosimo with constitutional moderation in the preservation of

his life, that betrayed the weakness of the oligarchs and restored

confidence to the Medicean party.

IX

In the course of the year 1434 this party began to hold up its head.

Powerful as the Albizzi were, they only retained the government by

artifice; and now they had done a deed which put at nought their former

arts and intrigues. A Signory favourable to the Medici came into

office, and on September 26th, 1434, Rinaldo in his turn was summoned

to the palace and declared a rebel. He strove to raise the forces of

his party, and entered the piazza at the head of eight hundred men. The

menacing attitude of the people, however, made resistance perilous.

Rinaldo disbanded his troops, and placed himself under the protection

of Pope Eugenius IV., who was then resident in Florence. This act of

submission proved that Rinaldo had not the courage or the cruelty to

try the chance of civil war. Whatever his motives may have been, he

lost his hold upon the State beyond recovery. On September 29th, a new

parliament was summoned; on October 2nd, Cosimo was recalled from exile

and the Albizzi were banished. The intercession of the Pope procured

for 221them nothing but the liberty to leave Florence unmolested.

Einaldo turned his back upon the city he had governed, never to set

foot in it again. On October 6th, Cosimo, having passed through Padua,

Ferrara, and Modena like a conqueror, reentered the town amid the

plaudits of the people, and took up his dwelling as an honoured guest

in the Palace of the Republic. The subsequent history of Florence is

the history of his family. In after years the Medici loved to remember

this return of Cosimo. His triumphal reception was painted in fresco on

the walls of their villa at Cajano under the transparent allegory of

Cicero's entrance into Rome.

X

By their brief exile the Medici had gained the credit of injured

innocence, the fame of martyrdom in the popular cause. Their foes had

struck the first blow, and in striking at them had seemed to aim

against the liberties of the republic. The mere failure of their

adversaries to hold the power they had acquired, handed over this power

to the Medici; and the reprisals which the Medici began to take had the

show of justice, not of personal hatred, or petty vengeance. Cosimo was

a true Florentine. He disliked violence, because he knew that blood

spilt cries for blood. His passions, too, were cool and temperate. No

gust of anger, no intoxication of success, destroyed his balance. His

one object, the consolidation of power for his family on the basis of

popular favour, was kept steadily in view; and he would do nothing that

might compromise that end. Yet he was neither generous nor merciful. We

therefore find that from the first moment of his return to Florence he

instituted a system of pitiless and unforgiving persecution against his

old opponents. The Albizzi were banished, root and branch, 222with all

their followers, consigned to lonely and often to unwholesome stations

through the length and breadth of Italy. If they broke the bonds

assigned them, they were forthwith declared traitors and their property

was confiscated. After a long series of years, by merely keeping in

force the first sentence pronounced upon them, Cosimo had the cruel

satisfaction of seeing the whole of that proud oligarchy die out by

slow degrees in the insufferable tedium of solitude and exile. Even the

high-souled Palla degli Strozzi, who had striven to remain neutral, and

whose wealth and talents were devoted to the revival of classical

studies, was proscribed because to Cosimo he seemed too powerful.

Separated from his children, he died in banishment at Padua. In this

way the return of the Medici involved the loss to Florence of some

noble citizens, who might perchance have checked the Medicean tyranny

if they had stayed to guide the State. The plebeians, raised to wealth

and influence by Cosimo before his exile, now took the lead in the

republic. He used these men as catspaws, rarely putting himself forward

or allowing his own name to appear, but pulling the wires of government

in privacy by means of intermediate agents. The Medicean party was

called at first _Puccini_ from a certain Puccio, whose name was better

known in caucus or committee than that of his real master.

To rule through these creatures of his own making taxed all the

ingenuity of Cosimo; but his profound and subtle intellect was suited

to the task, and he found unlimited pleasure in the exercise of his

consummate craft. We have already seen to what extent he used his

riches for the acquisition of political influence. Now that he had come

to power, he continued the same method, packing the Signory and the

Councils with men whom he could hold by debt between his thumb and

finger. His command of the public moneys 223enabled him to wink at

peculation in State offices; it was part of his system to bind

magistrates and secretaries to his interest by their consciousness of

guilt condoned but not forgotten. Not a few, moreover, owed their

living to the appointments he procured for them. While he thus

controlled the wheel-work of the commonwealth by means of organised

corruption, he borrowed the arts of his old enemies to oppress

dissentient citizens. If a man took an independent line in voting, and

refused allegiance to the Medicean party, he was marked out for

persecution. No violence was used; but he found himself hampered in his

commerce—money, plentiful for others, became scarce for him; his

competitors in trade were subsidised to undersell him. And while the

avenues of industry were closed, his fortune was taxed above its value,

until he had to sell at a loss in order to discharge his public

obligations. In the first twenty years of the Medicean rule, seventy

families had to pay 4,875,000 golden florins of extraordinary imposts,

fixed by arbitrary assessment.

The more patriotic members of his party looked with dread and loathing

on this system of corruption and exclusion. To their remonstrances

Cosimo replied in four memorable sayings: 'Better the State spoiled

than the State not ours.' 'Governments cannot be carried on with

paternosters.' 'An ell of scarlet makes a burgher.' 'I aim at finite

ends.' These maxims represent the whole man,—first, in his egotism,

eager to gain Florence for his family, at any risk of her ruin;

secondly, in his cynical acceptance of base means to selfish ends;

thirdly, in his bourgeois belief that money makes a man, and fine

clothes suffice for a citizen; fourthly, in his worldly ambition bent

on positive success. It was, in fact, his policy to reduce Florence to

the condition of a rotten borough: nor did this policy fail. One

notable sign of the influence he exercised was the change which now

came over the foreign 224relations of the republic. Up to the date of

his dictatorship Florence had uniformly fought the battle of freedom in

Italy. It was the chief merit of the Albizzi oligarchy that they

continued the traditions of the mediæval State, and by their vigorous

action checked the growth of the Visconti. Though they engrossed the

government they never forgot that they were first of all things

Florentines, and only in the second place men who owed their power and

influence to office. In a word, they acted like patriotic Tories, like

republican patricians. Therefore they would not ally themselves with

tyrants or countenance the enslavement of free cities by armed despots.

Their subjugation of the Tuscan burghs to Florence was itself part of a

grand republican policy. Cosimo changed all this. When the Visconti

dynasty ended by the death of Filippo Maria in 1447, there was a chance

of restoring the independence of Lombardy. Milan in effect declared

herself a republic, and by the aid of Florence she might at this moment

have maintained her liberty. Cosimo, however, entered into treaty with

Francesco Sforza, supplied him with money, guaranteed him against

Florentine interference, and saw with satisfaction how he reduced the

duchy to his military tyranny. The Medici were conscious that they,

selfishly, had most to gain by supporting despots who in time of need

might help them to confirm their own authority. With the same end in

view, when the legitimate line of the Bentivogli was extinguished,

Cosimo hunted out a bastard pretender of that family, presented him to

the chiefs of the Bentivogli faction, and had him placed upon the seat

of his supposed ancestors at Bologna. This young man, a certain Santi

da Cascese, presumed to be the son of Ercole de' Bentivogli, was an

artisan in a wool factory when Cosimo set eyes upon him. At first Santi

refused the dangerous honour of governing a proud republic; but the

intrigues of Cosimo prevailed, 225and the obscure craftsman ended his

days a powerful prince.

By the arts I have attempted to describe, Cosimo in the course of his

long life absorbed the forces of the republic into himself. While he

shunned the external signs of despotic power he made himself the master

of the State. His complexion was of a pale olive; his stature short;

abstemious and simple in his habits, affable in conversation, sparing

of speech, he knew how to combine that burgher-like civility for which

the Romans praised Augustus, with the reality of a despotism all the

more difficult to combat because it seemed nowhere and was everywhere.

When he died, at the age of seventy-five, in 1464, the people whom he

had enslaved, but whom he had neither injured nor insulted, honoured

him with the title of _Pater Patriæ_. This was inscribed upon his tomb

in S. Lorenzo. He left to posterity the fame of a great and generous

patron,[28] the infamy of a cynical, self-seeking, bourgeois tyrant.

Such combinations of contradictory qualities were common enough at the

time of the Renaissance. Did not Machiavelli spend his days in

tavern-brawls and low amours, his nights among the mighty spirits of

the dead, with whom, when he had changed his country suit of homespun

for the habit of the Court, he found himself an honoured equal?

[28] For an estimate of Cosimo's services to art and literature, his

collection of libraries, his great buildings, his generosity to

scholars, and his promotion of Greek studies, I may refer to my

_Renaissance in Italy_: 'The Revival of Learning,' chap. iv.

XI

Cosimo had shown consummate skill by governing Florence through a party

created and raised to influence by himself. The jealousy of these

adherents formed the chief 226difficulty with which his son Piero had

to contend. Unless the Medici could manage to kick down the ladder

whereby they had risen, they ran the risk of losing all. As on a former

occasion, so now they profited by the mistakes of their antagonists.

Three chief men of their own party, Diotisalvi Neroni, Agnolo

Acciaiuoli, and Luca Pitti, determined to shake off the yoke of their

masters, and to repay the Medici for what they owed by leading them to

ruin. Niccolo Soderini, a patriot, indignant at the slow enslavement of

his country, joined them. At first they strove to undermine the credit

of the Medici with the Florentines by inducing Piero to call in the

moneys placed at interest by his father in the hands of private

citizens. This act was unpopular; but it did not suffice to move a

revolution. To proceed by constitutional measures against the Medici

was judged impolitic. Therefore the conspirators decided to take, if

possible, Piero's life. The plot failed, chiefly owing to the coolness

and the cunning of the young Lorenzo, Piero's eldest son. Public

sympathy was strongly excited against the aggressors. Neroni,

Acciaiuoli, and Soderini were exiled. Pitti was allowed to stay,

dishonoured, powerless, and penniless, in Florence. Meanwhile, the

failure of their foes had only served to strengthen the position of the

Medici. The ladder had saved them the trouble of kicking it down.

The congratulations addressed on this occasion to Piero and Lorenzo by

the ruling powers of Italy show that the Medici were already regarded

as princes outside Florence. Lorenzo and Giuliano, the two sons of

Piero, travelled abroad to the Courts of Milan and Ferrara with the

style and state of more than simple citizens. At home they occupied the

first place on all occasions of public ceremony, receiving royal

visitors on terms of equality, and performing the hospitalities of the

republic like men who had been born to represent its 227dignities.

Lorenzo's marriage to Clarice Orsini, of the noble Roman house, was

another sign that the Medici were advancing on the way toward

despotism. Cosimo had avoided foreign alliances for his children. His

descendants now judged themselves firmly planted enough to risk the

odium of a princely match for the sake of the support outside the city

they might win.

XII

Piero de' Medici died in December 1469. His son Lorenzo was then barely

twenty-two years of age. The chiefs of the Medicean party, all-powerful

in the State, held a council, in which they resolved to place him in

the same position as his father and grandfather. This resolve seems to

have been formed after mature deliberation, on the ground that the

existing conditions of Italian politics rendered it impossible to

conduct the government without a presidential head. Florence, though

still a democracy, required a permanent chief to treat on an equality

with the princes of the leading cities. Here we may note the prudence

of Cosimo's foreign policy. When he helped to establish despots in

Milan and Bologna he was rendering the presidency of his own family in

Florence necessary.

Lorenzo, having received this invitation, called attention to his youth

and inexperience. Yet he did not refuse it; and, after a graceful

display of diffidence, he accepted the charge, entering thus upon that

famous political career, in the course of which he not only established

and maintained a balance of power in Italy, with Florence for the

central city, but also contrived to remodel the government of the

republic in the interest of his own family and to strengthen the Medici

by relations with the Papal See.

The extraordinary versatility of this man's intellectual 228and social

gifts, his participation in all the literary and philosophical

interests of his century, his large and liberal patronage of art, and

the gaiety with which he joined the people of Florence in their

pastimes—Mayday games and Carnival festivities—strengthened his hold

upon the city in an age devoted to culture and refined pleasure.

Whatever was most brilliant in the spirit of the Italian Benaissance

seemed to be incarnate in Lorenzo. Not merely as a patron and a

dilettante, but as a poet and a critic, a philosopher and scholar, he

proved himself adequate to the varied intellectual ambitions of his

country. Penetrated with the passion for erudition which distinguished

Florence in the fifteenth century, familiar with her painters and her

sculptors, deeply read in the works of her great poets, he conceived

the ideal of infusing the spirit of antique civility into modern life,

and of effecting for society what the artists were performing in their

own sphere. To preserve the native character of the Florentine genius,

while he added the grace of classic form, was the aim to which his

tastes and instincts led him. At the same time, while he made himself

the master of Florentine revels and the Augustus of Renaissance

literature, he took care that beneath his carnival masks and ball-dress

should be concealed the chains which he was forging for the republic.

What he lacked, with so much mental brilliancy, was moral greatness.

The age he lived in was an age of selfish despots, treacherous

generals, godless priests. It was an age of intellectual vigour and

artistic creativeness; but it was also an age of mean ambition, sordid

policy, and vitiated principles. Lorenzo remained true in all respects

to the genius of this age: true to its enthusiasm for antique culture,

true to its passion for art, true to its refined love of pleasure; but

true also to its petty political intrigues, to its 229cynical

selfishness, to its lack of heroism. For Florence he looked no higher

and saw no further than Cosimo had done. If culture was his pastime,

the enslavement of the city by bribery and corruption was the hard work

of his manhood. As is the case with much Renaissance art, his life was

worth more for its decorative detail than for its constructive design.

In richness, versatility, variety, and exquisiteness of execution, it

left little to be desired; yet, viewed at a distance, and as a whole,

it does not inspire us with a sense of architectonic majesty.

XIII

Lorenzo's chief difficulties arose from the necessity under which, like

Cosimo, he laboured of governing the city through its old institutions

by means of a party. To keep the members of this party in good temper,

and to gain their approval for the alterations he effected in the State

machinery of Florence, was the problem of his life. The successful

solution of this problem was easier now, after two generations of the

Medicean ascendency, than it had been at first. Meanwhile the people

were maintained in good humour by public shows, ease, plenty, and a

general laxity of discipline. The splendour of Lorenzo's foreign

alliances and the consideration he received from all the Courts of

Italy contributed in no small measure to his popularity and security at

home. By using his authority over Florence to inspire respect abroad,

and by using his foreign credit to impose upon the burghers, Lorenzo

displayed the tact of a true Italian diplomatist. His genius for

statecraft, as then understood, was indeed of a rare order, equally

adapted to the conduct of a complicated foreign policy and to the

control of a suspicious and variable Commonwealth. In one point alone

he was inferior to his grandfather. He neglected 230commerce, and

allowed his banking business to fall into disorder so hopeless that in

course of time he ceased to be solvent. Meanwhile his personal

expenses, both as a prince in his own palace, and as the representative

of majesty in Florence, continually increased. The bankruptcy of the

Medici, it had long been foreseen, would involve the public finances in

serious confusion. And now, in order to retrieve his fortunes, Lorenzo

was not only obliged to repudiate his debts to the exchequer, but had

also to gain complete disposal of the State purse. It was this

necessity that drove him to effect the constitutional revolution of

1480, by which he substituted a Privy Council of seventy members for

the old Councils of the State, absorbing the chief functions of the

commonwealth into this single body, whom he practically nominated at

pleasure. The same want of money led to the great scandal of his

reign—the plundering of the Monte delle Doti, or State Insurance Office

Fund for securing dowers to the children of its creditors.

XIV

While tracing the salient points of Lorenzo de' Medici's administration

I have omitted to mention the important events which followed shortly

after his accession to power in 1469. What happened between that date

and 1480 was not only decisive for the future fortunes of the Casa

Medici, but it was also eminently characteristic of the perils and the

difficulties which beset Italian despots. The year 1471 was signalised

by a visit by the Duke Galeazzo Maria Sforza of Milan, and his wife

Bona of Savoy, to the Medici in Florence. They came attended by their

whole Court—body guards on horse and foot, ushers, pages, falconers,

grooms, kennel-varlets, and huntsmen. Omitting the mere baggage

service, 231their train counted two thousand horses. To mention this

incident would be superfluous, had not so acute an observer as

Machiavelli marked it out as a turning-point in Florentine history.

Now, for the first time, the democratic commonwealth saw its streets

filled with a mob of courtiers. Masques, balls, and tournaments

succeeded each other with magnificent variety; and all the arts of

Florence were pressed into the service of these festivals. Machiavelli

says that the burghers lost the last remnant of their old austerity of

manners, and became, like the degenerate Romans, ready to obey the

masters who provided them with brilliant spectacles. They gazed with

admiration on the pomp of Italian princes, their dissolute and godless

living, their luxury and prodigal expenditure; and when the Medici

affected similar habits in the next generation, the people had no

courage to resist the invasion of their pleasant vices.

In the same year, 1471, Volterra was reconquered for the Florentines by

Frederick of Urbino. The honours of this victory, disgraced by a brutal

sack of the conquered city, in violation of its articles of

capitulation, were reserved for Lorenzo, who returned in triumph to

Florence. More than ever he assumed the prince, and in his person

undertook to represent the State.

In the same year, 1471, Francesco della Rovere was raised to the Papacy

with the memorable name of Sixtus IV. Sixtus was a man of violent

temper and fierce passions, restless and impatiently ambitious, bent on

the aggrandisement of the beautiful and wanton youths, his nephews. Of

these the most aspiring was Girolamo Riario, for whom Sixtus bought the

town of Imola from Taddeo Manfredi, in order that he might possess the

title of count and the nucleus of a tyranny in the Romagna. This

purchase thwarted the plans of Lorenzo, who wished to secure the same

advantages for 232Florence. Smarting with the sense of disappointment,

he forbade the Roman banker, Francesco Pazzi, to guarantee the

purchase-money. By this act Lorenzo made two mortal foes—the Pope and

Francesco Pazzi. Francesco was a thin, pale, atrabilious fanatic, all

nerve and passion, with a monomaniac intensity of purpose, and a will

inflamed and guided by imagination—a man formed by nature for

conspiracy, such a man, in fact, as Shakspere drew in Cassius. Maddened

by Lorenzo's prohibition, he conceived the notion of overthrowing the

Medici in Florence by a violent blow. Girolamo Riario entered into his

views. So did Francesco Salviati, Archbishop of Pisa, who had private

reasons for hostility. These men found no difficulty in winning over

Sixtus to their plot; nor is it possible to purge the Pope of

participation in what followed. I need not describe by what means

Francesco drew the other members of his family into the scheme, and how

he secured the assistance of armed cut-throats. Suffice it to say that

the chief conspirators, with the exception of the Count Girolamo,

betook themselves to Florence, and there, after the failure of other

attempts, decided to murder Lorenzo and his brother Giuliano in the

cathedral on Sunday, April 26th, 1478. The moment when the priest at

the high altar finished the mass, was fixed for the assassination.

Everything was ready. The conspirators, by Judas kisses and

embracements, had discovered that the young men wore no protective

armour under their silken doublets. Pacing the aisle behind the choir,

they feared no treason. And now the lives of both might easily have

been secured, if at the last moment the courage of the hired assassins

had not failed them. Murder, they said, was well enough; but they could

not bring themselves to stab men before the newly consecrated body of

Christ. In this extremity a priest was found who, 'being accustomed to

233churches,' had no scruples. He and another reprobate were told off

to Lorenzo. Francesco de' Pazzi himself undertook Giuliano. The moment

for attack arrived. Francesco plunged his dagger into the heart of

Giuliano. Then, not satisfied with this death-blow, he struck again,

and in his heat of passion wounded his own thigh. Lorenzo escaped with

a flesh-wound from the poniard of the priest, and rushed into the

sacristy, where his friend Poliziano shut and held the brazen door. The

plot had failed; for Giuliano, of the two brothers, was the one whom

the conspirators would the more willingly have spared. The whole church

was in an uproar. The city rose in tumult. Rage and horror took

possession of the people. They flew to the Palazzo Pubblico and to the

houses of the Pazzi, hunted the conspirators from place to place, hung

the archbishop by the neck from the palace windows, and, as they found

fresh victims for their fury, strung them one by one in a ghastly row

at his side above the Square. About one hundred in all were killed.

None who had joined in the plot escaped; for Lorenzo had long arms, and

one man, who fled to Constantinople, was delivered over to his agents

by the Sultan. Out of the whole Pazzi family only Guglielmo, the

husband of Bianca de' Medici, was spared. When the tumult was over,

Andrea del Castagno painted the portraits of the traitors

head-downwards upon the walls of the Bargello Palace, in order that all

men might know what fate awaited the foes of the Medici and of the

State of Florence.[29] Meanwhile a bastard son of Giuliano's was

received into the Medicean household, to perpetuate his lineage. This

child, named Giulio, was destined to be famous in the annals of Italy

and Florence under the title of Pope Clement VII.

[29] Giottino had painted the Duke of Athens, in like manner, on the

same walls.

234

XV

As is usual when such plots miss their mark, the passions excited

redounded to the profit of the injured party. The commonwealth felt

that the blow struck at Lorenzo had been aimed at their majesty.

Sixtus, on the other hand, could not contain his rage at the failure of

so ably planned a _coup de main_. Ignoring that he had sanctioned the

treason, that a priest had put his hand to the dagger, that the impious

deed had been attempted in a church before the very Sacrament of

Christ, whose vicar on earth he was, the Pope now excommunicated the

republic. The reason he alleged was, that the Florentines had dared to

hang an archbishop.

Thus began a war to the death between Sixtus and Florence. The Pope

inflamed the whole of Italy, and carried on a ruinous campaign in

Tuscany. It seemed as though the republic might lose her subject

cities, always ready to revolt when danger threatened the sovereign

State. Lorenzo's position became critical. Sixtus made no secret of the

hatred he bore him personally, declaring that he fought less with

Florence than with the Medici. To support the odium of this long war

and this heavy interdict alone, was more than he could do. His allies

forsook him. Naples was enlisted on the Pope's side. Milan and the

other States of Lombardy were occupied with their own affairs, and held

aloof. In this extremity he saw that nothing but a bold step could save

him. The league formed by Sixtus must be broken up at any risk, and, if

possible, by his own ability. On December 6th, 1479, Lorenzo left

Florence, unarmed and unattended, took ship at Leghorn, and proceeded

to the court of the enemy, King Ferdinand, at Naples. Ferdinand was a

cruel and treacherous sovereign, who had murdered his guest, Jacopo

Piccinino, at a banquet given in 235his honour. But Ferdinand was the

son of Alfonso, who, by address and eloquence, had gained a kingdom

from his foe and jailor, Filippo Maria Visconti. Lorenzo calculated

that he too, following Alfonso's policy, might prove to Ferdinand how

little there was to gain from an alliance with Rome, how much Naples

and Florence, firmly united together for offence and defence, might

effect in Italy.

Only a student of those perilous times can appreciate the courage and

the genius, the audacity combined with diplomatic penetration,

displayed by Lorenzo at this crisis. He calmly walked into the lion's

den, trusting he could tame the lion and teach it, and all in a few

days. Nor did his expectation fail. Though Lorenzo was rather ugly than

handsome, with a dark skin, heavy brows, powerful jaws, and nose sharp

in the bridge and broad at the nostrils, without grace of carriage or

melody of voice, he possessed what makes up for personal defects—the

winning charm of eloquence in conversation, a subtle wit, profound

knowledge of men, and tact allied to sympathy, which placed him always

at the centre of the situation. Ferdinand received him kindly. The

Neapolitan nobles admired his courage and were fascinated by his social

talents. On March 1st, 1480, he left Naples again, having won over the

King by his arguments. When he reached Florence he was able to declare

that he brought home a treaty of peace and alliance signed by the most

powerful foe of the republic. The success of this bold enterprise

endeared Lorenzo more than ever to his countrymen. In the same year

they concluded a treaty with Sixtus, who was forced against his will to

lay down arms by the capture of Otranto and the extreme peril of

Turkish invasion. After the year 1480 Lorenzo remained sole master in

Florence, the arbiter and peacemaker of the rest of Italy.

236

XVI

The conjuration of the Pazzi was only one in a long series of similar

conspiracies. Italian despots gained their power by violence and

wielded it with craft. Violence and craft were therefore used against

them. When the study of the classics had penetrated the nation with

antique ideas of heroism, tyrannicide became a virtue. Princes were

murdered with frightful frequency. Thus Gian Maria Visconti was put to

death at Milan in 1412; Galeazzo Maria Sforza in 1484; the Chiarelli of

Fabriano were massacred in 1435; the Baglioni of Perugia in 1500;

Girolamo Gentile planned the assassination of Galeazzo Sforza at Genoa

in 1476; Niccolo d'Este conspired against his uncle Ercole in 1476;

Stefano Porcari attempted the life of Nicholas V. at Rome in 1453;

Lodovico Sforza narrowly escaped a violent death in 1453. I might

multiply these instances beyond satiety. As it is, I have selected but

a few examples falling, all but one, within the second half of the

fifteenth century. Nearly all these attempts upon the lives of princes

were made in church during the celebration of sacred offices. There was

no superfluity of naughtiness, no wilful sacrilege, in this choice of

an occasion. It only testified to the continual suspicion and guarded

watchfulness maintained by tyrants. To strike at them except in church

was almost impossible. Meanwhile the fate of the tyrannicides was

uniform. Successful or not, they perished. Yet so grievous was the

pressure of Italian despotism, so glorious was the ideal of Greek and

Roman heroism, so passionate the temper of the people, that to kill a

prince at any cost to self appeared the crown of manliness. This

bloodshed exercised a delirious fascination: pure and base, personal

and patriotic motives combined to add intensity of fixed and fiery

purpose to the murderous impulse. Those 237then who, like the Medici,

aspired to tyranny and sought to found a dynasty of princes, entered

the arena against a host of unknown and unseen gladiators.

XVII

On his deathbed, in 1492, Lorenzo lay between two men—Angelo Poliziano

and Girolamo Savonarola. Poliziano incarnated the genial, radiant,

godless spirit of fifteenth-century humanism. Savonarola represented

the conscience of Italy, self-convicted, amid all her greatness, of

crimes that called for punishment. It is said that when Lorenzo asked

the monk for absolution, Savonarola bade him first restore freedom to

Florence. Lorenzo, turned his face to the wall and was silent. How

indeed could he make this city in a moment free, after sixty years of

slow and systematic corruption? Savonarola left him, and he died

unshriven. This legend is doubtful, though it rests on excellent if

somewhat partial authority. It has, at any rate, the value of a mythus,

since it epitomises the attitude assumed by the great preacher to the

prince. Florence enslaved, the soul of Lorenzo cannot lay its burden

down, but must go with all its sins upon it to the throne of God.

The year 1492 was a memorable year for Italy. In this year Lorenzo's

death removed the keystone of the arch that had sustained the fabric of

Italian federation. In this year Roderigo Borgia was elected Pope. In

this year Columbus discovered America; Vasco de Gama soon after opened

a new way to the Indies, and thus the commerce of the world passed from

Italy to other nations. In this year the conquest of Granada gave unity

to the Spanish nation. In this year France, through the lifelong craft

of Louis XI., was for the first time united under a young hot-headed

sovereign. On 238every side of the political horizon storms threatened.

It was clear that a new chapter of European history had been opened.

Then Savonarola raised his voice, and cried that the crimes of Italy,

the abominations of the Church, would speedily be punished. Events led

rapidly to the fulfilment of this prophecy. Lorenzo's successor, Piero

de' Medici, was a vain, irresolute, and hasty princeling, fond of

display, proud of his skill in fencing and football-playing, with too

much of the Orsini blood in his hot veins, with too little of the

Medicean craft in his weak head. The Italian despots felt they could

not trust Piero, and this want of confidence was probably the first

motive that impelled Lodovico Sforza to call Charles VIII. into Italy

in 1494.

It will not be necessary to dwell upon this invasion of the French,

except in so far as it affected Florence. Charles passed rapidly

through Lombardy, engaged his army in the passes of the Apennines, and

debouched upon the coast where the Magra divided Tuscany from Liguria.

Here the fortresses of Sarzana and Pietra Santa, between the marble

bulwark of Carrara and the Tuscan sea, stopped his further progress.

The keys were held by the Florentines. To force these strong positions

and to pass beyond them seemed impossible. It might have been

impossible if Piero de' Medici had possessed a firmer will. As it was,

he rode off to the French camp, delivered up the forts to Charles,

bound the King by no engagements, and returned not otherwise than proud

of his folly to Florence. A terrible reception awaited him. The

Florentines, in their fury, had risen and sacked the Medicean palace.

It was as much as Piero, with his brothers, could do to escape beyond

the hills to Venice. The despotism of the Medici, so carefully built

up, so artfully sustained and strengthened, was overthrown in a single

day.

239

XVIII

Before considering what happened in Florence after the expulsion of the

Medici, it will be well to pause a moment and review the state in which

Lorenzo had left his family. Piero, his eldest son, recognised as chief

of the republic after his father's death, was married to Alfonsina

Orsini, and was in his twenty-second year. Giovanni, his second son, a

youth of seventeen, had just been made cardinal. This honour, of vast

importance for the Casa Medici in the future, he owed to his sister

Maddalena's marriage to Franceschetto Cybo, son of Innocent VIII. The

third of Lorenzo's sons, named Giuliano, was a boy of thirteen. Giulio,

the bastard son of the elder Giuliano, was fourteen. These four princes

formed the efficient strength of the Medici, the hope of the house; and

for each of them, with the exception of Piero, who died in exile, and

of whom no more notice need be taken, a brilliant destiny was still in

store. In the year 1495, however, they now wandered, homeless and

helpless, through the cities of Italy, each of which was shaken to its

foundations by the French invasion.

XIX

Florence, left without the Medici, deprived of Pisa and other subject

cities by the passage of the French army, with no leader but the monk

Savonarola, now sought to reconstitute her liberties. During the

domination of the Albizzi and the Medici the old order of the

commonwealth had been completely broken up. The Arti had lost their

primitive importance. The distinctions between the Grandi and the

Popolani had practically passed away. In a democracy that has submitted

to a lengthened course of tyranny, such extinction of its old life is

inevitable. Yet the passion for liberty was still 240powerful; and the

busy brains of the Florentines were stored with experience gained from

their previous vicissitudes, from \ the study of antique history, and

from the observation of existing constitutions in the towns of Italy.

They now determined to reorganise the State upon the model of the

Venetian republic. The Signory was to remain, with its old institution

of Priors, Gonfalonier, and College, elected for brief periods. These

magistrates were to take the initiative in debate, to propose measures,

and to consider plans of action. The real power of the State, for

voting supplies and ratifying the measures of the Signory, was vested

in a senate of one thousand members, called the Grand Council, from

whom a smaller body of forty, acting as intermediates between the

Council and the Signory, were elected. It is said that the plan of this

constitution originated with Savonarola; nor is there any doubt that he

used all his influence in the pulpit of the Duomo to render it

acceptable to the people. Whoever may have been responsible for its

formation, the new government was carried in 1495, and a large hall for

the assembly of the Grand Council was opened in the Public Palace.

Savonarola, meanwhile, had become the ruling spirit of Florence. He

gained his great power as a preacher: he used it like a monk. The

motive principle of his action was the passion for reform. To bring the

Church back to its pristine state of purity, without altering its

doctrine or suggesting any new form of creed; to purge Italy of ungodly

customs; to overthrow the tyrants who encouraged evil living, and to

place the power of the State in the hands of sober citizens: these were

his objects. Though he set himself in bold opposition to the reigning

Pope, he had no desire to destroy the spiritual supremacy of S. Peter's

see. Though he burned with an enthusiastic zeal for liberty, and

displayed rare genius for administration, he had no ambition to rule

Florence like a 241dictator. Savonarola was neither a reformer in the

northern sense of the word, nor yet a political demagogue. His sole

wish was to see purity of manners and freedom of self-government

re-established. With this end in view he bade the Florentines elect

Christ as their supreme chief; and they did so. For the same end he

abstained from appearing in the State Councils, and left the

Constitution to work by its own laws. His personal influence he

reserved for the pulpit; and here he was omnipotent. The people

believed in him as a prophet. They turned to him as the man who knew

what he wanted—as the voice of liberty, the soul of the new régime, the

genius who could breathe into the commonwealth a breath of fresh

vitality. When, therefore, Savonarola preached a reform of manners, he

was at once obeyed. Strict laws were passed enforcing sobriety,

condemning trades of pleasure, reducing the gay customs of Florence to

puritanical austerity.

Great stress has been laid upon this reaction of the monk-led populace

against the vices of the past. Yet the historian is bound to pronounce

that the reform effected by Savonarola was rather picturesque than

vital. Like all violent revivals of pietism, it produced a no less

violent reaction. The parties within the city who resented the

interference of a preaching friar, joined with the Pope in Rome, who

hated a contumacious schismatic in Savonarola. Assailed by these two

forces at the same moment, and driven upon perilous ground by his own

febrile enthusiasm, Savonarola succumbed. He was imprisoned, tortured,

and burned upon the public square in 1498.

What Savonarola really achieved for Florence was not a permanent reform

of morality, but a resuscitation of the spirit of freedom. His

followers, called in contempt _I Piagnoni_, or the Weepers, formed the

path of the commonwealth in future; and the memory of their martyr

served as a common bond of sympathy to unite them in times of trial. It

was a necessary 242consequence of the peculiar part he played that the

city was henceforth divided into factions representing mutually

antagonistic principles. These factions were not created by Savonarola;

but his extraordinary influence accentuated, as it were, the humours

that lay dormant in the State. Families favourable to the Medici took

the name of _Palleschi_. Men who chafed against puritanical reform, and

who were eager for any government that should secure them their old

licence, were known as _Compagnacci_. Meanwhile the oligarchs, who

disliked a democratic Constitution, and thought it possible to found an

aristocracy without the intervention of the Medici, came to be known as

_Gli Ottimati_. Florence held within itself, from this epoch forward to

the final extinction of liberty, four great parties: the _Piagnoni_,

passionate for political freedom and austerity of life; the

_Palleschi_, favourable to the Medicean cause, and regretful of

Lorenzo's pleasant rule; the _Compagnacci_, intolerant of the reformed

republic, neither hostile nor loyal to the Medici, but desirous of

personal licence; the _Ottimati_, astute and selfish, watching their

own advantage, ever-mindful to form a narrow government of privileged

families, disinclined to the Medici, except when they thought the

Medici might be employed as instruments in their intrigues.

XX

During the short period of Savonarola's ascendency, Florence was in

form at least a Theocracy, without any titular head but Christ; and as

long as the enthusiasm inspired by the monk lasted, as long as his

personal influence endured, the Constitution of the Grand Council

worked well. After his death it was found that the machinery was too

cumbrous. While adopting the Venetian form of government, the

Florentines had omitted one essential element—the Doge. By 243referring

measures of immediate necessity to the Grand Council, the republic lost

precious time. Dangerous publicity, moreover, was incurred; and so

large a body often came to no firm resolution. There was no permanent

authority in the State; no security that what had been deliberated

would be carried out with energy; no titular chief, who could transact

affairs with foreign potentates and their ambassadors. Accordingly, in

1502, it was decreed that the Gonfalonier should hold office for

life—should be in fact a Doge. To this important post of permanent

president Piero Soderini was appointed; and in his hands were placed

the chief affairs of the republic.

At this point Florence, after all her vicissitudes, had won her way to

something really similar to the Venetian Constitution. Yet the

similarity existed more in form than in fact. The government of

burghers in a Grand Council, with a Senate of forty, and a Gonfalonier

for life, had not grown up gradually and absorbed into itself the vital

forces of the commonwealth. It was a creation of inventive

intelligence, not of national development, in Florence. It had against

it the jealousy of the Ottimati, who felt themselves overshadowed by

the Gonfalonier; the hatred of the Palleschi, who yearned for the

Medici; the discontent of the working classes, who thought the presence

of a Court in Florence would improve trade; last, but not least, the

disaffection of the Compagnacci, who felt they could not flourish to

their heart's content in a free commonwealth. Moreover, though the name

of liberty was on every lip, though the Florentines talked, wrote, and

speculated more about constitutional independence than they had ever

done, the true energy of free institutions had passed from the city.

The corrupt government of Cosimo and Lorenzo bore its natural fruit

now. Egotistic ambition and avarice supplanted patriotism and industry.

It is necessary 244to comprehend these circumstances, in order that the

next revolution may be clearly understood.

XXI

During the ten years which elapsed between 1502 and 1512, Piero

Soderini administered Florence with an outward show of great

prosperity. He regained Pisa, and maintained an honourable foreign

policy in the midst of the wars stirred up by the League of Cambray.

Meanwhile the young princes of the House of Medici had grown to manhood

in exile. The Cardinal Giovanni was thirty-seven in 1512. His brother

Giuliano was thirty-three. Both of these men were better fitted than

their brother Piero to fight the battles of the family. Giovanni, in

particular, had inherited no small portion of the Medicean craft.

During the troubled reign of Julius II. he kept very quiet, cementing

his connections with powerful men in Rome, but making no effort to

regain his hold on Florence. Now the moment for striking a decisive

blow had come. After the battle of Ravenna in 1512, the French were

driven out of Italy, and the Sforzas returned to Milan; the Spanish

troops, under the Viceroy Cardona, remained masters of the country.

Following the camp of these Spaniards, Giovanni de' Medici entered

Tuscany in August, and caused the restoration of the Medici to be

announced in Florence. The people, assembled by Soderini, resolved to

resist to the uttermost. No foreign army should force them to receive

the masters whom they had expelled. Yet their courage failed on August

29th, when news reached them of the capture and the sack of Prato.

Prato is a sunny little city a few miles distant from the walls of

Florence, famous for the beauty of its women, the richness of its

gardens, and the grace of its buildings. Into this gem of cities the

savage soldiery of Spain marched in the bright 245autumnal weather, and

turned the paradise into a hell. It is even now impossible to read of

what they did in Prato without shuddering.[30] Cruelty and lust, sordid

greed for gold, and cold delight in bloodshed, could go no further.

Giovanni de' Medici, by nature mild and voluptuous, averse to violence

of all kinds, had to smile approval, while the Spanish Viceroy knocked

thus with mailed hand for him at the door of Florence. The Florentines

were paralysed with terror. They deposed Soderini and received the

Medici. Giovanni and Giuliano entered their devastated palace in the

Via Larga, abolished the Grand Council, and dealt with the republic as

they listed.

[30] See _Archivio Storico_.

XXII

There was no longer any medium in Florence possible between either

tyranny or some such government as the Medici had now destroyed. The

State was too rotten to recover even the modified despotism of

Lorenzo's days. Each transformation had impaired some portion of its

framework, broken down some of its traditions, and sowed new seeds of

egotism in citizens who saw all things round them change but

self-advantage. Therefore Giovanni and Giuliano felt themselves secure

in flattering the popular vanity by an empty parade of the old

institutions. They restored the Signory and the Gonfalonier, elected

for intervals of two months by officers appointed for this purpose by

the Medici. Florence had the show of a free government. But the Medici

managed all things; and soldiers, commanded by their creature, Paolo

Vettori, held the Palace and the Public Square. The tyranny thus

established was less secure, inasmuch as it openly rested upon

violence, than Lorenzo's power had been; nor were there signs wanting

that the burghers could ill brook their 246servitude. The conspiracy of

Pietro Paolo Boscoli and Agostino Capponi proved that the Medicean

brothers ran daily risk of life. Indeed, it is not likely that they

would have succeeded in maintaining their authority—for they were poor

and ill-supported by friends outside the city—except for one most lucky

circumstance: that was the election of Giovanni de' Medici to the

Papacy in 1513.

The creation of Leo X. spread satisfaction throughout Italy.

Politicians trusted that he would display some portion of his father's

ability, and restore peace to the nation. Men of arts and letters

expected everything from a Medicean Pope, who had already acquired the

reputation of polite culture and open-handed generosity. They at any

rate were not deceived. Leo's first words on taking his place in the

Vatican were addressed to his brother Giuliano: 'Let us enjoy the

Papacy, now that God has given it to us;' and his notion of enjoyment

was to surround himself with court-poets, jesters, and musicians, to

adorn his Roman palaces with frescoes, to collect statues and

inscriptions, to listen to Latin speeches, and to pass judgment upon

scholarly compositions. Any one and every one who gave him sensual or

intellectual pleasure, found his purse always open. He lived in the

utmost magnificence, and made Rome the Paris of the Renaissance for

brilliance, immorality, and self-indulgent ease. The politicians had

less reason to be satisfied. Instead of uniting the Italians and

keeping the great Powers of Europe in check, Leo carried on a series of

disastrous petty wars, chiefly with the purpose of establishing the

Medici as princes. He squandered the revenues of the Church, and left

enormous debts behind him—an exchequer ruined and a foreign policy so

confused that peace for Italy could only be obtained by servitude.

Florence shared in the general rejoicing which greeted Leo's accession

to the Papacy. He was the first Florentine 247citizen who had received

the tiara, and the popular vanity was flattered by this honour to the

republic. Political theorists, meanwhile, began to speculate what

greatness Florence, in combination with Rome, might rise to. The Pope

was young; he ruled a large territory, reduced to order by his warlike

predecessors. It seemed as though the republic, swayed by him, might

make herself the first city in Italy, and restore the glories of her

Guelf ascendency upon the platform of Renaissance statecraft. There was

now no overt opposition to the Medici in Florence. How to govern the

city from Rome, and how to advance the fortunes of his brother Giuliano

and his nephew Lorenzo (Piero's son, a young man of twenty-one),

occupied the Pope's most serious attention. For Lorenzo Leo obtained

the Duchy of Urbino and the hand of a French princess. Giuliano was

named Gonfalonier of the Church. He also received the French title of

Duke of Nemours and the hand of Filiberta, Princess of Savoy. Leo

entertained a further project of acquiring the crown of Southern Italy

for his brother, and thus of uniting Rome, Florence, and Naples under

the headship of his house. Nor were the Medicean interests neglected in

the Church. Giulio, the Pope's bastard cousin, was made cardinal. He

remained in Rome, acting as vice-chancellor and doing the hard work of

the Papal Government for the pleasure-loving pontiff.

To Lorenzo, Duke of Urbino, the titular head of the family, was

committed the government of Florence. During their exile, wandering

from court to court in Italy, the Medici had forgotten what it was to

be burghers, and had acquired the manners of princes. Leo alone

retained enough of caution to warn his nephew that the Florentines must

still be treated as free people. He confirmed the constitution of the

Signory and the Privy Council of seventy established by his father,

bidding Lorenzo, while he ruled this sham republic, to avoid 248the

outer signs of tyranny. The young duke at first behaved with

moderation, but he could not cast aside his habits of a great lord.

Florence now for the first time saw a regular court established in her

midst, with a prince, who, though he bore a foreign title, was in fact

her master. The joyous days of Lorenzo the Magnificent returned.

Masquerades and triumphs filled the public squares. Two clubs of

pleasure, called the Diamond and the Branch—badges adopted by the

Medici to signify their firmness in disaster and their power of

self-recovery—were formed to lead the revels. The best sculptors and

painters devoted their genius to the invention of costumes and cars.

The city affected to believe that the age of gold had come again.

XXIII

Fortune had been very favourable to the Medici. They had returned as

princes to Florence. Giovanni was Pope. Giuliano was Gonfalonier of the

Church. Giulio was Cardinal and Archbishop of Florence. Lorenzo ruled

the city like a sovereign. But this prosperity was no less brief than

it was brilliant. A few years sufficed to sweep off all the chiefs of

the great house. Giuliano died in 1516, leaving only a bastard son

Ippolito. Lorenzo died in 1519, leaving a bastard son Alessandro, and a

daughter, six days old, who lived to be the Queen of France. Leo died

in 1521. There remained now no legitimate male descendants from the

stock of Cosimo. The honours and pretensions of the Medici devolved

upon three bastards—on the Cardinal Giulio, and the two boys,

Alessandro and Ippolito. Of these, Alessandro was a mulatto, his mother

having been a Moorish slave in the Palace of Urbino; and whether his

father was Giulio, or Giuliano, or a base groom, was not known for

certain. To such extremities were the Medici 249reduced. In order to

keep their house alive, they were obliged to adopt this foundling. It

is true that the younger branch of the family, descended from Lorenzo,

the brother of Cosimo, still flourished. At this epoch it was

represented by Giovanni, the great general known as the Invincible,

whose bust so strikingly resembles that of Napoleon. But between this

line of the Medici and the elder branch there had never been true

cordiality. The Cardinal mistrusted Giovanni. It may, moreover, be

added, that Giovanni was himself doomed to death in the year 1526.

Giulio de' Medici was left in 1521 to administer the State of Florence

single-handed. He was archbishop, and he resided in the city, holding

it with the grasp of an absolute ruler. Yet he felt his position

insecure. The republic had no longer any forms of self-government; nor

was there a magistracy to whom the despot could delegate his power in

his absence. Giulio's ambition was fixed upon the Papal crown. The

bastards he was rearing were but children. Florence had therefore to be

furnished with some political machinery that should work of itself. The

Cardinal did not wish to give freedom to the city, but clockwork. He

was in the perilous situation of having to rule a commonwealth without

life, without elasticity, without capacity of self-movement, yet full

of such material as, left alone, might ferment, and breed a revolution.

In this perplexity, he had recourse to advisers. The most experienced

politicians, philosophical theorists, practical diplomatists, and

students of antique history were requested to furnish him with plans

for a new constitution, just as you ask an architect to give you the

plan of a new house. This was the field-day of the doctrinaires. Now

was seen how much political sagacity the Florentines had gained while

they were losing liberty. We possess these several drafts of

constitutions. Some recommend tyranny; some 250incline to aristocracy,

or what Italians called _Governo Stretto_; some to democracy, or

_Governo Largo_; some to an eclectic compound of the other forms, or

_Governo Misto_. More consummate masterpieces of constructive ingenuity

can hardly be imagined. What is omitted in all, is just what no

doctrinaire, no nostrum can communicate—the breath of life, the

principle of organic growth. Things had come, indeed, to a melancholy

pass for Florence when her tyrant, in order to confirm his hold upon

her, had to devise these springs and irons to support her tottering

limbs.

XXIV

While the archbishop and the doctors were debating, a plot was hatching

in the Rucellai Gardens. It was here that the Florentine Academy now

held their meetings. For this society Machiavelli wrote his 'Treatise

on the Art of War,' and his 'Discourses upon Livy.' The former was an

exposition of Machiavelli's scheme for creating a national militia, as

the only safeguard for Italy, exposed at this period to the invasions

of great foreign armies. The latter is one of the three or four

masterpieces produced by the Florentine school of critical historians.

Stimulated by the daring speculations of Machiavelli, and fired to

enthusiasm by their study of antiquity, the younger academicians formed

a conspiracy for murdering Giulio de' Medici, and restoring the

republic on a Roman model. An intercepted letter betrayed their plans.

Two of the conspirators were taken and beheaded. Others escaped. But

the discovery of this conjuration put a stop to Giulio's scheme of

reforming the State. Henceforth he ruled Florence like a despot, mild

in manners, cautious in the exercise of arbitrary power, but firm in

his autocracy. The Condottiere. Alessandro Vitelli, with a company of

soldiers, was 251taken into service for the protection of his person

and the intimidation of the citizens.

In 1523, the Pope, Adrian VI., expired after a short papacy, from which

he gained no honour and Italy no profit. Giulio hurried to Rome, and,

by the clever use of his large influence, caused himself to be elected

with the title of Clement VII. In Florence he left Silvio Passerini,

Cardinal of Cortona, as his vicegerent and the guardian of the two boys

Alessandro and Ippolito. The discipline of many years had accustomed

the Florentines to a government of priests. Still the burghers, mindful

of their ancient liberties, were galled by the yoke of a Cortonese,

sprung up from one of their subject cities; nor could they bear the

bastards who were being reared to rule them. Foreigners threw it in

their teeth that Florence, the city glorious of art and freedom, was

become a stable for mules—_stalla da muli_, in the expressive language

of popular sarcasm. Bastardy, it may be said in passing, carried with

it small dishonour among the Italians. The Estensi were all

illegitimate; the Aragonese house in Naples sprang from Alfonso's

natural son; and children of Popes ranked among the princes. Yet the

uncertainty of Alessandro's birth and the base condition of his mother

made the prospect of this tyrant peculiarly odious; while the primacy

of a foreign cardinal in the midst of citizens whose spirit was still

unbroken, embittered the cup of humiliation. The Casa Medici held its

authority by a slender thread, and depended more upon the disunion of

the burghers than on any power of its own. It could always reckon on

the favour of the lower populace, who gained profit and amusement from

the presence of a court. The Ottimati again hoped more from a weak

despotism than from a commonwealth, where their privileges would have

been merged in the mass of the Grand Council. Thus the sympathies of

the plebeians and the selfishness of 252the rich patricians prevented

the republic from asserting itself. On this meagre basis of personal

cupidity the Medici sustained themselves. What made the situation still

more delicate, and at the same time protracted the feeble rule of

Clement, was that neither the Florentines nor the Medici had any army.

Face to face with a potentate so considerable as the Pope, a free State

could not be established without military force. On the other hand, the

Medici, supported by a mere handful of mercenaries, had no power to

resist a popular rising if any external event should inspire the middle

classes with a hope of liberty.

XXV

Clement assumed the tiara at a moment of great difficulty. Leo had

ruined the finance of Rome. France and Spain were still contending for

the possession of Italy. While acting as Vice-Chancellor, Giulio de'

Medici had seemed to hold the reins with a firm grasp, and men expected

that he would prove a powerful Pope; but in those days he had Leo to

help him; and Leo, though indolent, was an abler man than his cousin.

He planned, and Giulio executed. Obliged to act now for himself,

Clement revealed the weakness of his nature. That weakness was

irresolution, craft without wisdom, diplomacy without knowledge of men.

He raised the storm, and showed himself incapable of guiding it. This

is not the place to tell by what a series of crooked schemes and cross

purposes he brought upon himself the ruin of the Church and Rome, to

relate his disagreement with the Emperor, or to describe again the sack

of the Eternal City by the rabble of the Constable de Bourbon's army.

That wreck of Rome in 1527 was the closing scene of the Italian

Renaissance—the 253last of the Apocalyptic tragedies foretold by

Savonarola—the death of the old age.

When the Florentines knew what was happening in Rome, they rose and

forced the Cardinal Passerini to depart with the Medicean bastards from

the city. The youth demanded arms for the defence of the town, and they

received them. The whole male population was enrolled in a militia. The

Grand Council was reformed, and the republic was restored upon the

basis of 1495. Niccolo Capponi was elected Gonfalonier. The name of

Christ was again registered as chief of the commonwealth—to such an

extent did the memory of Savonarola still sway the popular imagination.

The new State hastened to form an alliance with France, and Malatesta

Baglioni was chosen as military Commander-in-Chief. Meanwhile the city

armed itself for siege—Michel Angelo Buonarroti and Francesco da San

Gallo undertaking the construction of new forts and ramparts. These

measures were adopted with sudden decision, because it was soon known

that Clement had made peace with the Emperor, and that the army which

had sacked Rome was going to be marched on Florence.

XXVI

In the month of August 1529 the Prince of Orange assembled his forces

at Terni, and thence advanced by easy stages into Tuscany. As he

approached, the Florentines laid waste their suburbs, and threw down

their wreath of towers, in order that the enemy might have no

harbourage or points of vantage for attack. Their troops were

concentrated within the city, where a new Gonfalonier, Francesco

Carducci, furiously opposed to the Medici, and attached to the Piagnoni

party, now ruled. On September 4th the Prince of Orange appeared before

the walls, and opened the memorable siege. 254It lasted eight months,

at the end of which time, betrayed by their generals, divided among

themselves, and worn out with delays, the Florentines capitulated.

Florence was paid as compensation for the insult offered to the pontiff

in the sack of Rome.

The long yoke of the Medici had undermined the character of the

Florentines. This, their last glorious struggle for liberty, was but a

flash in the pan—a final flare-up of the dying lamp. The city was not

satisfied with slavery; but it had no capacity for united action. The

Ottimati were egotistic and jealous of the people. The Palleschi

desired to restore the Medici at any price—some of them frankly wishing

for a principality, others trusting that the old quasi-republican

government might still be reinstated. The Red Republicans, styled

Libertini and Arrabbiati, clung together in blind hatred of the

Medicean party; but they had no further policy to guide them. The

Piagnoni, or Frateschi, stuck to the memory of Savonarola, and believed

that angels would descend to guard the battlements when human help had

failed. These enthusiasts still formed the true nerve of the nation—the

class that might have saved the State, if salvation had been possible.

Even as it was, the energy of their fanaticism prolonged the siege

until resistance seemed no longer physically possible. The hero

developed by the crisis was Francesco Ferrucci, a plebeian who had

passed his youth in manual labour, and who now displayed rare military

genius. He fell fighting outside the walls of Florence. Had he

commanded the troops from the beginning, and remained inside the city,

it is just possible that the fate of the war might have been less

disastrous. As it was, Malatesta Baglioni, the Commander-in-Chief,

turned out an arrant scoundrel. He held secret correspondence with

Clement and the Prince of Orange. It was he who finally sold Florence

255to her foes, 'putting on his head,' as the Doge of Venice said

before the Senate, 'the cap of the biggest traitor upon record.'

XXVII

What remains of Florentine history may be briefly told. Clement, now

the undisputed arbiter of power and honour in the city, chose

Alessandro de' Medici to be prince. Alessandro was created Duke of

Cività di Penna, and married to a natural daughter of Charles V.

Ippolito was made a cardinal. Ippolito would have preferred a secular

to a priestly kingdom; nor did he conceal his jealousy for his cousin.

Therefore Alessandro had him poisoned. Alessandro in his turn was

murdered by his kinsman, Lorenzino de' Medici. Lorenzino paid the usual

penalty of tyrannicide some years later. When Alessandro was killed in

1539, Clement had himself been dead five years. Thus the whole

posterity of Cosimo de' Medici, with the exception of Catherine, Queen

of France, was utterly extinguished. But the Medici had struck root so

firmly in the State, and had so remodelled it upon the type of tyranny,

that the Florentines were no longer able to do without them. The chiefs

of the Ottimati selected Cosimo, the representative of Giovanni the

Invincible, for their prince, and thus the line of the elder Lorenzo

came at last to power. This Cosimo was a boy of eighteen, fond of

field-sports, and unused to party intrigues. When Francesco

Guicciardini offered him a privy purse of one hundred and twenty

thousand ducats annually, together with the presidency of Florence,

this wily politician hoped that he would rule the State through Cosimo,

and realise at last that dream of the Ottimati, a _Governo Stretto_ or

_di Pochi_. He was notably mistaken in his calculations. The first days

of Cosimo's administration showed that he possessed the craft of his

family and the vigour of his 256immediate progenitors, and that he

meant to be sole master in Florence. He it was who obtained the title

of Grand Duke of Tuscany from the Pope—a title confirmed by the

Emperor, fortified by Austrian alliances, and transmitted through his

heirs to the present century.

XXVIII

In this sketch of Florentine history, I have purposely omitted all

details that did not bear upon the constitutional history of the

republic, or on the growth of the Medici as despots; because I wanted

to present a picture of the process whereby that family contrived to

fasten itself upon the freest and most cultivated State in Italy. This

success the Medici owed mainly to their own obstinacy, and to the

weakness of republican institutions in Florence. Their power was

founded upon wealth in the first instance, and upon the ingenuity with

which they turned the favour of the proletariate to use. It was

confirmed by the mistakes and failures of their enemies, by Rinaldo

degli Albizzi's attack on Cosimo, by the conspiracy of Neroni and Pitti

against Piero, and by Francesco de' Pazzi's attempt to assassinate

Lorenzo. It was still further strengthened by the Medicean sympathy for

arts and letters—a sympathy which placed both Cosimo and Lorenzo at the

head of the Renaissance movement, and made them worthy to represent

Florence, the city of genius, in the fifteenth century. While thus

founding and cementing their dynastic influence upon the basis of a

widespread popularity, the Medici employed persistent cunning in the

enfeeblement of the Republic. It was their policy not to plant

themselves by force or acts of overt tyranny, but to corrupt ambitious

citizens, to secure the patronage of public officers, and to render the

spontaneous working of the State machinery impossible. By 257pursuing

this policy over a long series of years they made the revival of

liberty in 1494, and again in 1527, ineffectual. While exiled from

Florence, they never lost the hope of returning as masters, so long as

the passions they had excited, and they alone could gratify, remained

in full activity. These passions were avarice and egotism, the greed of

the grasping Ottimati, the jealousy of the nobles, the self-indulgence

of the proletariate. Yet it is probable they might have failed to

recover Florence, on one or other of these two occasions, but for the

accident which placed Giovanni de' Medici on the Papal chair, and

enabled him to put Giulio in the way of the same dignity. From the

accession of Leo in 1513 to the year 1527 the Medici ruled Florence

from Rome, and brought the power of the Church into the service of

their despotism. After that date they were still further aided by the

imperial policy of Charles V., who chose to govern Italy through

subject princes, bound to himself by domestic alliances and powerful

interests. One of these was Cosimo, the first Grand Duke of Tuscany.

258

THE DEBT OF ENGLISH TO ITALIAN LITERATURE

To an Englishman one of the chief interests of the study of Italian

literature is derived from the fact that, between England and Italy, an

almost uninterrupted current of intellectual intercourse has been

maintained throughout the last five centuries. The English have never,

indeed, at any time been slavish imitators of the Italians; but Italy

has formed the dreamland of the English fancy, inspiring poets with

their most delightful thoughts, supplying them with subjects, and

implanting in their minds that sentiment of Southern beauty which,

engrafted on our more passionately imaginative Northern nature, has

borne rich fruit in the works of Chaucer, Spenser, Marlowe, Shakspere,

Milton, and the poets of this century.

It is not strange that Italy should thus in matters of culture have

been the guide and mistress of England. Italy, of all the European

nations, was the first to produce high art and literature in the dawn

of modern civilisation. Italy was the first to display refinement in

domestic life, polish of manners, civilities of intercourse. In Italy

the commerce of courts first developed a society of men and women,

educated by the same traditions of humanistic culture. In Italy the

principles of government were first discussed and reduced to theory. In

Italy the zeal for the classics took its origin; and 259scholarship, to

which we owe our mental training, was at first the possession of none

almost but Italians. It therefore followed that during the age of the

Renaissance any man of taste or genius, who desired to share the newly

discovered privileges of learning, had to seek Italy. Every one who

wished to be initiated into the secrets of science or philosophy, had

to converse with Italians in person or through books. Every one who was

eager to polish his native language, and to render it the proper

vehicle of poetic thought, had to consult the masterpieces of Italian

literature. To Italians the courtier, the diplomatist, the artist, the

student of statecraft and of military tactics, the political theorist,

the merchant, the man of laws, the man of arms, and the churchman

turned for precedents and precepts. The nations of the North, still

torpid and somnolent in their semi-barbarism, needed the magnetic touch

of Italy before they could awake to intellectual life. Nor was this

all. Long before the thirst for culture possessed the English mind,

Italy had appropriated and assimilated all that Latin literature

contained of strong or splendid to arouse the thought and fancy of the

modern world; Greek, too, was rapidly becoming the possession of the

scholars of Florence and Rome; so that English men of letters found the

spirit of the ancients infused into a modern literature; models of

correct and elegant composition existed for them in a language easy,

harmonious, and not dissimilar in usage to their own.

The importance of this service, rendered by Italians to the rest of

Europe, cannot be exaggerated. By exploring, digesting, and reproducing

the classics, Italy made the labour of scholarship comparatively light

for the Northern nations, and extended to us the privilege of culture

without the peril of losing originality in the enthusiasm for

erudition. Our great poets could handle lightly, and yet profitably,

those 260masterpieces of Greece and Rome, beneath the weight of which,

when first discovered, the genius of the Italians had wavered. To the

originality of Shakspere an accession of wealth without weakness was

brought by the perusal of Italian works, in which the spirit of the

antique was seen as in a modern mirror. Then, in addition to this

benefit of instruction, Italy gave to England a gift of pure beauty,

the influence of which, in refining our national taste, harmonising the

roughness of our manners and our language, and stimulating our

imagination, has been incalculable. It was a not unfrequent custom for

young men of ability to study at the Italian universities, or at least

to undertake a journey to the principal Italian cities. From their

sojourn in that land of loveliness and intellectual life they returned

with their Northern brains most powerfully stimulated. To produce, by

masterpieces of the imagination, some work of style that should remain

as a memento of that glorious country, and should vie on English soil

with the art of Italy, was their generous ambition. Consequently the

substance of the stories versified by our poets, the forms of our

metres, and the cadences of our prose periods reveal a close attention

to Italian originals.

This debt of England to Italy in the matter of our literature began

with Chaucer. Truly original and national as was the framework of the

'Canterbury Tales,' we can hardly doubt but that Chaucer was determined

in the form adopted for his poem by the example of Boccaccio. The

subject-matter, also, of many of his tales was taken from Boccaccio's

prose or verse. For example, the story of Patient Grizzel is founded

upon one of the legends of the 'Decameron,' while the Knight's Tale is

almost translated from the 'Teseide' of Boccaccio, and Troilus and

Creseide is derived from the 'Filostrato' of the same author. The

Franklin's Tale and the Reeve's Tale 261are also based either on

stories of Boccaccio or else on French 'Fabliaux,' to which Chaucer, as

well as Boccaccio, had access. I do not wish to lay too much stress

upon Chaucer's direct obligations to Boccaccio, because it is

incontestable that the French 'Fabliaux,' which supplied them both with

subjects, were the common property of the mediæval nations. But his

indirect debt in all that concerns elegant handling of material, and in

the fusion of the romantic with the classic spirit, which forms the

chief charm of such tales as the Palamon and Arcite, can hardly be

exaggerated. Lastly, the seven-lined stanza, called _rime royal_, which

Chaucer used with so much effect in narrative poetry, was probably

borrowed from the earlier Florentine 'Ballata,' the last line rhyming

with its predecessor being substituted for the recurrent refrain.

Indeed, the stanza itself, as used by our earliest poets, may be found

in Guido Cavalcanti's 'Ballatetta,' beginning, _Posso degli occhi

miei_.

Between Chaucer and Surrey the Muse of England fell asleep; but when in

the latter half of the reign of Henry VIII. she awoke again, it was as

a conscious pupil of the Italian that she attempted new strains and

essayed fresh metres. 'In the latter end of Henry VIII.'s reign,' says

Puttenham, 'sprang up a new company of courtly makers, of whom Sir T.

Wyatt the elder, and Henry Earl of Surrey, were the two chieftains,

who, having travelled into Italy, and there tasted the sweet and

stately measures and style of the Italian poesy, as novices newly crept

out of the schools of Dante, Ariosto, and Petrarch, they greatly

polished our rude and homely manner of vulgar poesy, from that it had

been before, and for that cause may justly be said the first reformers

of our English metre and style.' The chief point in which Surrey

imitated his 'master, Francis Petrarcha,' was in the use of the sonnet.

He introduced this elaborate form of poetry into 262our literature; and

how it has thriven with us, the masterpieces of Spenser, Shakspere,

Milton, Wordsworth, Keats, Rossetti attest. As practised by Dante and

Petrarch, the sonnet is a poem of fourteen lines, divided into two

quatrains and two triplets, so arranged that the two quatrains repeat

one pair of rhymes, while the two triplets repeat another pair. Thus an

Italian sonnet of the strictest form is composed upon four rhymes,

interlaced with great art. But much divergence from this rigid scheme

of rhyming was admitted even by Petrarch, who not unfrequently divided

the six final lines of the sonnet into three couplets, interwoven in

such a way that the two last lines never rhymed.[31]

[31] The order of rhymes runs thus: _a, b, b, a, a, b, b, a, c, d, c,

d, c, d_; or in the terzets, _c, d, e, c, d, e_, or _c, d, e, d, c,

e_, and so forth.

It has been necessary to say thus much about the structure of the

Italian sonnet, in order to make clear the task which lay before Surrey

and Wyatt, when they sought to transplant it into English. Surrey did

not adhere to the strict fashion of Petrarch: his sonnets consist

either of three regular quatrains concluded with a couplet, or else of

twelve lines rhyming alternately and concluded with a couplet. Wyatt

attempted to follow the order and interlacement of the Italian rhymes

more closely, but he too concluded his sonnet with a couplet. This

introduction of the final couplet was a violation of the Italian rule,

which may be fairly considered as prejudicial to the harmony of the

whole structure, and which has insensibly caused the English sonnet to

terminate in an epigram. The famous sonnet of Surrey on his love,

Geraldine, is an excellent example of the metrical structure as adapted

to the supposed necessities of English rhyming, and as afterwards

adhered to by Shakspere in his long series of love-poems. Surrey, while

adopting the form of the sonnet, kept quite clear of the Petrarchist's

mannerism. His language is simple and direct: 263there is no

subtilising upon far-fetched conceits, no wire-drawing of exquisite

sentimentalism, although he celebrates in this, as in his other

sonnets, a lady for whom he appears to have entertained no more than a

Platonic or imaginary passion. Surrey was a great experimentalist in

metre. Besides the sonnet, he introduced into England blank verse,

which he borrowed from the Italian _versi sciolti_, fixing that

decasyllable iambic rhythm for English versification in which our

greatest poetical triumphs have been achieved.

Before quitting the subject of the sonnet it would, however, be well to

mention the changes which were wrought in its structure by early poets

desirous of emulating the Italians. Shakspere, as already hinted,

adhered to the simple form introduced by Surrey: his stanzas invariably

consist of three separate quatrains followed by a couplet. But Sir

Philip Sidney, whose familiarity with Italian literature was intimate,

and who had resided long in Italy, perceived that without a greater

complexity and interweaving of rhymes the beauty of the poem was

considerably impaired. He therefore combined the rhymes of the two

quatrains, as the Italians had done, leaving himself free to follow the

Italian fashion in the conclusion, or else to wind up after English

usage with a couplet. Spenser and Drummond follow the rule of Sidney;

Drayton and Daniel, that of Surrey and Shakspere. It was not until

Milton that an English poet preserved the form of the Italian sonnet in

its strictness; but, after Milton, the greatest

sonnet-writers—Wordsworth, Keats, and Rossetti—have aimed at producing

stanzas as regular as those of Petrarch.

The great age of our literature—the age of Elizabeth—was essentially

one of Italian influence. In Italy the Renaissance had reached its

height: England, feeling the new life which had been infused into arts

and letters, turned instinctively to 264Italy, and adopted her canons

of taste. 'Euphues' has a distinct connection with the Italian

discourses of polite culture. Sidney's 'Arcadia' is a copy of what

Boccaccio had attempted in his classical romances, and Sanazzaro in his

pastorals.[32] Spenser approached the subject of the 'Faery Queen' with

his head full of Ariosto and the romantic poets of Italy. His sonnets

are Italian; his odes embody the Platonic philosophy of the

Italians.[33] The extent of Spenser's deference to the Italians in

matters of poetic art may be gathered from this passage in the

dedication to Sir Walter Raleigh of the 'Faery Queen:'

I have followed all the antique poets historical: first Homer, who in

the persons of Agamemnon and Ulysses hath ensampled a good governor and

a virtuous man, the one in his Ilias, the other in his Odysseis; then

Virgil, whose like intention was to do in the person of Æneas; after

him Ariosto comprised them both in his Orlando; and lately Tasso

dissevered them again, and formed both parts in two persons, namely,

that part which they in Philosophy call Ethice, or virtues of a private

man, coloured in his Rinaldo, the other named Politico in his Goffredo.

[32] It has extraordinary interest for the student of our literary

development, inasmuch as it is full of experiments in metres, which

have never thriven on English soil. Not to mention the attempt to

write in asclepiads and other classical rhythms, we might point to

Sidney's _terza rima_, poems with _sdrucciolo_ or treble rhymes. This

peculiar and painful form he borrowed from Ariosto and Sanazzaro; but

even in Italian it cannot be handled without sacrifice of variety,

without impeding the metrical movement and marring the sense.

[33] The stately structure of the _Prothalamion_ and _Epithalamion_ is

a rebuilding of the Italian Canzone. His Eclogues, with their

allegories, repeat the manner of Petrarch's minor Latin poems.

From this it is clear that, to the mind of Spenser, both Ariosto and

Tasso were authorities of hardly less gravity than Homer and Virgil.

Raleigh, in the splendid sonnet with which he responds to this

dedication, enhances the fame of Spenser by affecting to believe that

the great Italian, Petrarch, will be 265jealous of him in the grave. To

such an extent were the thoughts of the English poets occupied with

their Italian masters in the art of song.

It was at this time, again, that English literature was enriched by

translations of Ariosto and Tasso—the one from the pen of Sir John

Harrington, the other from that of Fairfax. Both were produced in the

metre of the original—the octave stanza, which, however, did not at

that period take root in England. At the same period the works of many

of the Italian novelists, especially Bandello and Cinthio and

Boccaccio, were translated into English; Painter's 'Palace of Pleasure'

being a treasure-house of Italian works of fiction. Thomas Hoby

translated Castiglione's 'Courtier' in 1561. As a proof of the extent

to which Italian books were read in England at the end of the sixteenth

century, we may take a stray sentence from a letter of Harvey, in which

he disparages the works of Robert Greene:—'Even Guicciardine's silver

histories and Ariosto's golden cantos grow out of request: and the

Countess of Pembroke's "Arcadia" is not green enough for queasy

stomachs; but they must have seen Greene's "Arcadia," and I believe

most eagerly longed for Greene's "Faery Queen."'

Still more may be gathered on the same topic from the indignant protest

uttered by Roger Ascham in his 'Schoolmaster' (pp. 78-91, date 1570)

against the prevalence of Italian customs, the habit of Italian travel,

and the reading of Italian books translated into English. Selections of

Italian stories rendered into English were extremely popular; and

Greene's tales, which had such vogue that Nash says of them, 'glad was

that printer that might be so blest to pay him dear for the very dregs

of his wit,' were all modelled on the Italian. The education of a young

man of good family was not thought complete unless he had spent some

time in Italy, studied its 266literature, admired its arts, and caught

at least some tincture of its manners. Our rude ancestors brought back

with them from these journeys many Southern vices, together with the

culture they had gone to seek. The contrast between the plain dealing

of the North and the refined Machiavellism of the South, between

Protestant earnestness in religion and Popish scepticism, between the

homely virtues of England and the courtly libertinism of Venice or

Florence, blunted the moral sense, while it stimulated the intellectual

activity of the English travellers, and too often communicated a fatal

shock to their principles. _Inglese Italianato è un diavolo incarnato_

passed into a proverb: we find it on the lips of Parker, of Howell, of

Sidney, of Greene, and of Ascham; while Italy itself was styled by

severe moralists the court of Circe. In James Howell's 'Instructions

for forreine travell' we find this pregnant sentence: 'And being now in

Italy, that great limbique of working braines, he must be very

circumspect in his carriage, for she is able to turne a Saint into a

devill, and deprave the best natures, if one will abandon himselfe, and

become a prey to dissolut courses and wantonesse.' Italy, in truth, had

already become corrupt, and the fruit of her contact with the nations

of the North was seen in the lives of such scholars as Robert Greene,

who confessed that he returned from his travels instructed 'in all the

villanies under the sun.' Many of the scandals of the Court of James

might be ascribed to this aping of Southern manners.

Yet, together with the evil of depraved morality, the advantage of

improved culture was imported from Italy into England; and the

constitution of the English genius was young and healthy enough to

purge off the mischief, while it assimilated what was beneficial. This

is very manifest in the history of our drama, which, taking it

altogether, is at the same time the purest and the most varied that

exists in literature; 267while it may be affirmed without exaggeration

that one of the main impulses to free dramatic composition in England

was communicated by the attraction everything Italian possessed for the

English fancy. It was in the drama that the English displayed the

richness and the splendour of the Renaissance, which had blazed so

gorgeously and at times so balefully below the Alps. The Italy of the

Renaissance fascinated our dramatists with a strange wild glamour—the

contrast of external pageant and internal tragedy, the alternations of

radiance and gloom, the terrible examples of bloodshed, treason, and

heroism emergent from ghastly crimes. Our drama began with a

translation of Ariosto's 'Suppositi' and ended with Davenant's 'Just

Italian.' In the very dawn of tragic composition Greene versified a

portion of the 'Orlando Furioso,' and Marlowe devoted one of his most

brilliant studies to the villanies of a Maltese Jew. Of Shakspere's

plays five are incontestably Italian: several of the rest are furnished

with Italian names to suit the popular taste. Ben Jonson laid the scene

of his most subtle comedy of manners, 'Volpone,' in Venice, and

sketched the first cast of 'Every Man in his Humour' for Italian

characters. Tourneur, Ford, and Webster were so dazzled by the tragic

lustre of the wickedness of Italy that their finest dramas, without

exception, are minute and carefully studied psychological analyses of

great Italian tales of crime. The same, in a less degree, is true of

Middleton and Dekker. Massinger makes a story of the Sforza family the

subject of one of his best plays. Beaumont and Fletcher draw the

subjects of comedies and tragedies alike from the Italian novelists.

Fletcher in his 'Faithful Shepherdess' transfers the pastoral style of

Tasso and Guarini to the North. So close is the connection between our

tragedy and Italian novels that Marston and Ford think fit to introduce

passages of Italian dialogue into the plays of 'Giovanni 268and

Annabella' and 'Antonio and Mellida.' But the best proof of the extent

to which Italian life and literature had influenced our dramatists, may

be easily obtained by taking down Halliwell's 'Dictionary of Old

Plays,' and noticing that about every third drama has an Italian title.

Meanwhile the poems composed by the chief dramatists—Shakspere's 'Venus

and Adonis,' Marlowe's 'Hero and Leander,' Marston's 'Pygmalion,' and

Beaumont's 'Hermaphrodite'—are all of them conceived in the Italian

style, by men who had either studied Southern literature, or had

submitted to its powerful æsthetic influences. The Masques, moreover,

of Jonson, of Lyly, of Fletcher, and of Chapman are exact reproductions

upon the English court theatres of such festival pageants as were

presented to the Medici at Florence or to the Este family at

Ferrara.[34] Throughout our drama the influence of Italy, direct or

indirect, either as supplying our playwrights with subjects or as

stimulating their imagination, may thus be traced. Yet the Elizabethan

drama is in the highest sense original. As a work of art pregnant with

deepest wisdom, and splendidly illustrative of the age which gave it

birth, it far transcends anything that Italy produced in the same

department. Our poets have a more masculine judgment, more fiery fancy,

nobler sentiment, than the Italians of any age but that of Dante. What

Italy gave, was the impulse toward creation, not patterns to be

imitated—the excitement of the imagination by a spectacle of so much

grandeur, not rules and precepts for production—the keen sense of

tragic beauty, not any tradition of accomplished art.

[34] Marlowe makes Gaveston talk of 'Italian masques.' At the same

time, in the prologue to _Tamburlaine_, he shows that he was conscious

of the new and nobler direction followed by the drama in England.

The Elizabethan period of our literature was, in fact, the period

during which we derived most from the Italian nation.

269The study of the Italian language went hand in hand with the study

of Greek and Latin, so that the three together contributed to form the

English taste. Between us and the ancient world stood the genius of

Italy as an interpreter. Nor was this connection broken until far on

into the reign of Charles II. What Milton owed to Italy is clear not

only from his Italian sonnets, but also from the frequent mention of

Dante and Petrarch in his prose works, from his allusions to Boiardo

and Ariosto in the 'Paradise Lost,' and from the hints which he

probably derived from Pulci, Tasso and Andreini. It would, indeed, be

easy throughout his works to trace a continuous vein of Italian

influence in detail. But, more than this, Milton's poetical taste in

general seems to have been formed and ripened by familiarity with the

harmonies of the Italian language. In his Tractate on Education

addressed to Mr. Hartlib, he recommends that boys should be instructed

in the Italian pronunciation of vowel sounds, in order to give

sonorousness and dignity to elocution. This slight indication supplies

us with a key to the method of melodious structure employed by Milton

in his blank verse. Those who have carefully studied the harmonies of

the 'Paradise Lost,' know how all-important are the assonances of the

vowel sounds of _o_ and _a_ in its most musical passages. It is just

this attention to the liquid and sonorous recurrences of open vowels

that we should expect from a poet who proposed to assimilate his

diction to that of the Italians.

After the age of Milton the connection between Italy and England is

interrupted. In the seventeenth century Italy herself had sunk into

comparative stupor, and her literature was trivial. France not only

swayed the political destinies of Europe, but also took the lead in

intellectual culture. Consequently, our poets turned from Italy to

France, and the French spirit pervaded English literature throughout

the 270period of the Restoration and the reigns of William and Queen

Anne. Yet during this prolonged reaction against the earlier movement

of English literature, as manifested in Elizabethanism, the influence

of Italy was not wholly extinct. Dryden's 'Tales from Boccaccio' are no

insignificant contribution to our poetry, and his 'Palamon and Arcite,'

through Chaucer, returns to the same source. But when, at the beginning

of this century, the Elizabethan tradition was revived, then the

Italian influence reappeared more vigorous than ever. The metre of 'Don

Juan,' first practised by Frere and then adopted by Lord Byron, is

Pulci's octave stanza; the manner is that of Berni, Folengo, and the

Abbé Casti, fused and heightened by the brilliance of Byron's genius

into a new form. The subject of Shelley's strongest work of art is

Beatrice Cenci. Rogers's poem is styled 'Italy.' Byron's dramas are

chiefly Italian. Leigh Hunt repeats the tale of Francesca da Rimini.

Keats versifies Boccaccio's 'Isabella.' Passing to contemporary poets,

Rossetti has acclimatised in English the metres and the manner of the

earliest Italian lyrists. Swinburne dedicates his noblest song to the

spirit of liberty in Italy. Even George Eliot and Tennyson have each of

them turned stories of Boccaccio into verse. The best of Mrs.

Browning's poems, 'Casa Guidi Windows' and 'Aurora Leigh,' are steeped

in Italian thought and Italian imagery. Browning's longest poem is a

tale of Italian crime; his finest studies in the 'Men and Women' are

portraits of Italian character of the Renaissance period. But there is

more than any mere enumeration of poets and their work can set forth,

in the connection between Italy and England. That connection, so far as

the poetical imagination is concerned, is vital. As poets in the truest

sense of the word, we English live and breathe through sympathy with

the Italians. The magnetic touch which is required to inflame the

imagination of the 271North, is derived from Italy. The nightingales of

English song who make our oak and beech copses resonant in spring with

purest melody, are migratory birds, who have charged their souls in the

South with the spirit of beauty, and who return to warble native

wood-notes in a tongue which is their own.

What has hitherto been said about the debt of the English poets to

Italy, may seem to imply that our literature can be regarded as to some

extent a parasite on that of the Italians. Against such a conclusion no

protest too energetic could be uttered. What we have derived directly

from the Italian poets are, first, some metres—especially the sonnet

and the octave stanza, though the latter has never taken firm root in

England. 'Terza rima,' attempted by Shelley, Byron, Morris, and Mrs.

Browning, has not yet become acclimatised. Blank verse, although

originally remodelled by Surrey upon the _versi sciolti_ of the

Italians, has departed widely from Italian precedent, first by its

decasyllabic structure, whereas Italian verse consists of

hendecasyllables; and, secondly, by its greater force, plasticity, and

freedom. The Spenserian stanza, again, is a new and original metre

peculiar to our literature; though it is possible that but for the

complex structures of Italian lyric verse, it might not have been

fashioned for the 'Faery Queen.' Lastly, the so-called heroic couplet

is native to England; at any rate, it is in no way related to Italian

metre. Therefore the only true Italian exotic adopted without

modification into our literature is the sonnet.

In the next place, we owe to the Italians the subject-matter of many of

our most famous dramas and our most delightful tales in verse. But the

English treatment of these histories and fables has been uniformly

independent and original. Comparing Shakspere's 'Romeo and Juliet' with

Bandello's tale, Webster's 'Duchess of Malfy' with the version 272given

from the Italian in Painter's 'Palace of Pleasure,' and Chaucer's

Knight's Tale with the 'Teseide' of Boccaccio, we perceive at once that

the English poets have used their Italian models merely as outlines to

be filled in with freedom, as the canvas to be embroidered with a

tapestry of vivid groups. Nothing is more manifest than the superiority

of the English genius over the Italian in all dramatic qualities of

intense passion, profound analysis, and living portrayal of character

in action. The mere rough detail of Shakspere's 'Othello' is to be

found in Cinthio's Collection of Novelle; but let an unprejudiced

reader peruse the original, and he will be no more deeply affected by

it than by any touching story of treachery, jealousy, and hapless

innocence. The wily subtleties of Iago, the soldierly frankness of

Cassio, the turbulent and volcanic passions of Othello, the charm of

Desdemona, and the whole tissue of vivid incidents which make 'Othello'

one of the most tremendous extant tragedies of characters in combat,

are Shakspere's, and only Shakspere's. This instance, indeed, enables

us exactly to indicate what the English owed to Italy and what was

essentially their own. From that Southern land of Circe about which

they dreamed, and which now and then they visited, came to their

imaginations a spirit-stirring breath of inspiration. It was to them

the country of marvels, of mysterious crimes, of luxurious gardens and

splendid skies, where love was more passionate and life more

picturesque, and hate more bloody and treachery more black, than in our

Northern climes. Italy was a spacious grove of wizardry, which mighty

poets, on the quest of fanciful adventure, trod with fascinated senses

and quickened pulses. But the strong brain which converted what they

heard and read and saw of that charmed land into the stuff of golden

romance or sable tragedy, was their own.

English literature has been defined a literature of genius.

273Our greatest work in art has been achieved not so much by

inspiration, subordinate to sentiments of exquisite good taste or

guided by observance of classical models, as by audacious sallies of

pure inventive power. This is true as a judgment of that constellation

which we call our drama, of the meteor Byron, of Milton and Dryden, who

are the Jupiter and Mars of our poetic system, and of the stars which

stud our literary firmament under the names of Shelley, Keats,

Wordsworth, Chatterton, Scott, Coleridge, Clough, Blake, Browning,

Swinburne, Tennyson. There are only a very few of the English poets,

Pope and Gray, for example, in whom the free instincts of genius are

kept systematically in check by the laws of the reflective

understanding. Now Italian literature is in this respect all unlike our

own. It began, indeed, with Dante, as a literature pre-eminently of

genius; but the spirit of scholarship assumed the sway as early as the

days of Petrarch and Boccaccio, and after them Italian has been

consistently a literature of taste. By this I mean that even the

greatest Italian poets have sought to render their style correct, have

endeavoured to subordinate their inspiration to what they considered

the rules of sound criticism, and have paid serious attention to their

manner as independent of the matter they wished to express. The passion

for antiquity, so early developed in Italy, delivered the later Italian

poets bound hand and foot into the hands of Horace. Poliziano was

content to reproduce the classic authors in a mosaic work of exquisite

translations. Tasso was essentially a man of talent, producing work of

chastened beauty by diligent attention to the rule and method of his

art. Even Ariosto submitted the liberty of his swift spirit to canons

of prescribed elegance. While our English poets have conceived and

executed without regard for the opinion of the learned and without

obedience to the usages of language—Shakspere, for example,

274producing tragedies which set Aristotle at defiance, and Milton

engrafting Latinisms on the native idiom—the Italian poets thought and

wrote with the fear of Academies before their eyes, and studied before

all things to maintain the purity of the Tuscan tongue. The consequence

is that the Italian and English literatures are eminent for very

different excellences. All that is forcible in the dramatic

presentation of life and character and action, all that is audacious in

imagination and capricious in fancy, whatever strength style can gain

from the sallies of original and untrammelled eloquence, whatever

beauty is derived from spontaneity and native grace, belong in abundant

richness to the English. On the other hand, the Italian poets present

us with masterpieces of correct and studied diction, with carefully

elaborated machinery, and with a style maintained at a uniform level of

dignified correctness. The weakness of the English proceeds from

inequality and extravagance; it is the weakness of self-confident

vigour, intolerant of rule, rejoicing in its own exuberant resources.

The weakness of the Italian is due to timidity and moderation; it is

the weakness that springs not so much from a lack of native strength as

from the over-anxious expenditure of strength upon the attainment of

finish, polish, and correctness. Hence the two nations have everything

to learn from one another. Modern Italian poets may seek by contact

with Shakspere and Milton to gain a freedom from the trammels imposed

upon them by the slavish followers of Petrarch; while the attentive

perusal of Tasso should be recommended to all English people who have

no ready access to the masterpieces of Greek and Latin literature.

Another point of view may be gained by noticing the pre-dominant tone

of the two literatures. Whenever English poetry is really great, it

approximates to the tragic and the stately; whereas the Italians are

peculiarly felicitous in the 275smooth and pleasant style, which

combines pathos with amusement, and which does not trespass beyond the

region of beauty into the domain of sublimity or terror. Italian poetry

is analogous to Italian painting and Italian music: it bathes the soul

in a plenitude of charms, investing even the most solemn subjects with

loveliness. Rembrandt and Albert Dürer depict the tragedies of the

Sacred History with a serious and awful reality: Italian painters, with

a few rare but illustrious exceptions, shrink from approaching them

from any point of view but that of harmonious melancholy. Even so the

English poets stir the soul to its very depths by their profound and

earnest delineations of the stern and bitter truths of the world:

Italian poets environ all things with the golden haze of an artistic

harmony; so that the soul is agitated by no pain at strife with the

persuasions of pure beauty.

276

POPULAR SONGS OF TUSCANY

It is a noticeable fact about the popular songs of Tuscany that they

are almost exclusively devoted to love. The Italians in general have no

ballad literature resembling that of our Border or that of Spain. The

tragic histories of their noble families, the great deeds of their

national heroes, and the sufferings of their country during centuries

of warfare, have left but few traces in their rustic poetry. It is true

that some districts are less utterly barren than others in these

records of the past. The Sicilian people's poetry, for example,

preserves a memory of the famous Vespers; and one or two terrible

stories of domestic tragedy, like the tale of Rosmunda in 'La Donna

Lombarda,' the romance of the Baronessa di Carini, and the so-called

Caso di Sciacca, may still be heard upon the lips of the people. But

these exceptions are insignificant in comparison with the vast mass of

songs which deal with love; and I cannot find that Tuscany, where the

language of this minstrelsy is purest, and where the artistic instincts

of the race are strongest, has anything at all approaching to our

ballads.[35] Though the Tuscan contadini are always singing, it rarely

happens that

277

The plaintive numbers flow

For old, unhappy, far-off things,

And battles long ago.

On the contrary, we may be sure, when we hear their voices ringing

through the olive-groves or macchi, that they are chanting

Some more humble lay,

Familiar matter of to-day,—

Some natural sorrow, loss, or pain,

That has been, and may be again;

or else, since their melodies are by no means uniformly sad, some ditty

of the joyousness of springtime or the ecstasy of love.

[35] This sentence requires some qualification. In his _Poesia

Popolare Italiana_, 1878, Professor d'Ancona prints a Pisan, a

Venetian, and two Lombard versions of our Border ballad 'Where hae ye

been, Lord Randal, my son,' so close in general type and minor details

to the English, German, Swedish, and Finnish versions of this

Volkslied as to suggest a very ancient community of origin. It remains

as yet, however, an isolated fact in the history of Italian popular

poetry.

This defect of anything corresponding to our ballads of 'Chevy Chase,'

or 'Sir Patrick Spens,' or 'Gil Morrice,' in a poetry which is still so

vital with the life of past centuries, is all the more remarkable

because Italian history is distinguished above that of other nations by

tragic episodes peculiarly suited to poetic treatment. Many of these

received commemoration in the fourteenth century from Dante; others

were embodied in the _novelle_ of Boccaccio and Cinthio and Bandello,

whence they passed into the dramas of Shakspere, Webster, Ford, and

their contemporaries. But scarcely an echo can be traced through all

the volumes of the recently collected popular songs. We must seek for

an explanation of this fact partly in the conditions of Italian life,

and partly in the nature of the Italian imagination. Nowhere in Italy

do we observe that intimate connection between the people at large and

the great nobles which generates the sympathy of clanship. Politics in

most parts of the peninsula fell at a very early period into the hands

either of irresponsible princes, 278who ruled like despots, or else of

burghers, who administered the state within the walls of their Palazzo

Pubblico. The people remained passive spectators of contemporary

history. The loyalty of subjects to their sovereign which animates the

Spanish ballads, the loyalty of retainers to their chief which gives

life to the tragic ballads of the Border, did not exist in Italy.

Country-folk felt no interest in the doings of Visconti or Medici or

Malatesti sufficient to arouse the enthusiasm of local bards or to call

forth the celebration of their princely tragedies in verse. Amid the

miseries of foreign wars and home oppression, it seemed better to

demand from verse and song some mitigation of the woes of life, some

expression of personal emotion, than to record the disasters which to

us at a distance appear poetic in their grandeur.

These conditions of popular life, although unfavourable to the

production of ballad poetry, would not, however, have been sufficient

by themselves to check its growth, if the Italians had been strongly

impelled to literature of this type by their nature. The real reason

why their _Volkslieder_ are amorous and personal is to be found in the

quality of their imagination. The Italian genius is not creatively

imaginative in the highest sense. The Italians have never, either in

the ancient or the modern age, produced a great drama or a national

epic, the 'Æneid' and the 'Divine Comedy' being obviously of different

species from the 'Iliad' or the 'Nibelungen Lied.' Modern Italians,

again, are distinguished from the French, the Germans, and the English

in being the conscious inheritors of an older, august, and strictly

classical civilisation. The great memories of Rome weigh down their

faculties of invention. It would also seem as though they shrank in

their poetry from the representation of what is tragic and

spirit-stirring. They incline to what is cheerful, brilliant, or

pathetic. The dramatic element in 279human life, external to the

personality of the poet, which exercised so strong a fascination over

our ballad-bards and playwrights, has but little attraction for the

Italian. When he sings, he seeks to express his own individual

emotions—his love, his joy, his jealousy, his anger, his despair. The

language which he uses is at the same time direct in its intensity, and

hyperbolical in its display of fancy; but it lacks those imaginative

touches which exalt the poetry of personal passion into a sublimer

region. Again, the Italians are deficient in a sense of the

supernatural. The wraiths that cannot rest because their love is still

unsatisfied, the voices which cry by night over field and fell, the

water-spirits and forest fairies, the second-sight of coming woes, the

presentiment of death, the warnings and the charms and spells, which

fill the popular poetry of all Northern nations, are absent in Italian

songs. In the whole of Tigri's collection I only remember one mention

of a ghost. It is not that the Italians are deficient in superstitions

of all kinds. Every one has heard of their belief in the evil eye, for

instance. But they do not connect this kind of fetichism with their

poetry; and even their greatest poets, with the exception of Dante,

have shown no capacity or no inclination for enhancing the imaginative

effect of their creations by an appeal to the instinct of mysterious

awe.

The truth is that the Italians as a race are distinguished as much by a

firm grasp upon the practical realities of existence as by powerful

emotions. They have but little of that dreamy _Schwärmerei_ with which

the people of the North are largely gifted. The true sphere of their

genius is painting. What appeals to the imagination through the eyes,

they have expressed far better than any other modern nation. But their

poetry, like their music, is deficient in tragic sublimity and in the

higher qualities of imaginative creation.

280It may seem paradoxical to say this of the nation which produced

Dante. But we must remember not to judge races by single and

exceptional men of genius. Petrarch, the Troubadour of exquisite

emotions, Boccaccio, who touches all the keys of life so lightly,

Ariosto, with the smile of everlasting April on his lips, and Tasso,

excellent alone when he confines himself to pathos or the picturesque,

are no exceptions to what I have just said. Yet these poets pursued

their art with conscious purpose. The tragic splendour of Greece, the

majesty of Rome, were not unknown to them. Far more is it true that

popular poetry in Italy, proceeding from the hearts of uncultivated

peasants and expressing the national character in its simplicity,

displays none of the stuff from which the greatest works of art in

verse, epics and dramas, can be wrought. But within its own sphere of

personal emotion, this popular poetry is exquisitely melodious,

inexhaustibly rich, unique in modern literature for the direct

expression which it has given to every shade of passion.

Signor Tigri's collection,[36] to which I shall confine my attention in

this paper, consists of eleven hundred and eighty-five _rispetti_, with

the addition of four hundred and sixty-one _stornelli_. Rispetto, it

may be said in passing, is the name commonly given throughout Italy to

short poems, varying from six to twelve lines, constructed on the

principle of the octave stanza. That is to say, the first part of the

rispetto consists of four or six lines with alternate rhymes, while one

or more couplets, called the _ripresa_, complete the poem.[37] The

281stornello, or ritournelle, never exceeds three lines, and owes its

name to the return which it makes at the end of the last line to the

rhyme given by the emphatic word of the first. Browning, in his poem of

'Fra Lippo Lippi,' has accustomed English ears to one common species of

the stornello,[38] which sets out with the name of a flower, and rhymes

with it, as thus:

Fior di narciso.

Prigionero d'amore mi son reso,

Nel rimirare il tuo leggiadro viso.

[36] _Canti Popolari Toscani_, raccolti e annotati da Giuseppe Tigri.

Volume unico. Firenze: G. Barbèra, 1869.

[37] This is a description of the Tuscan rispetto. In Sicily the

stanza generally consists of eight lines rhyming alternately

throughout, while in the North of Italy it is normally a simple

quatrain. The same poetical material assumes in Northern, Central, and

Southern Italy these diverge but associated forms.

[38] This song, called Ciure (Sicilian for _fiore_) in Sicily, is said

by Signor Pitré to be in disrepute there. He once asked an old dame of

Palermo to repeat him some of these ditties. Her answer was, 'You must

get them from light women; I do not know any. They sing them in bad

houses and prisons, where, God be praised, I have never been.' In

Tuscany there does not appear to be so marked a distinction between

the flower song and the rispetto.

The divisions of those two sorts of songs, to which Tigri gives names

like The Beauty of Women, The Beauty of Men, Falling in Love,

Serenades, Happy Love, Unhappy Love, Parting, Absence, Letters, Return

to Home, Anger and Jealousy, Promises, Entreaties and Reproaches,

Indifference, Treachery and Abandonment, prove with what fulness the

various phases of the tender passion are treated. Through the whole

fifteen hundred the one theme of Love is never relinquished. Only two

persons, 'I' and 'thou,' appear upon the scene; yet so fresh and so

various are the moods of feeling, that one can read them from first to

last without too much satiety.

To seek for the authors of these ditties would be useless. Some of them

may be as old as the fourteenth century; others may have been made

yesterday. Some are the native product of the Tuscan mountain villages,

especially of the regions round Pistoja and Siena, where on the spurs

of the 282Apennines the purest Italian is vernacular. Some, again, are

importations from other provinces, especially from Sicily and Naples,

caught up by the peasants of Tuscany and adapted to their taste and

style; for nothing travels faster than a _Volkslied_. Born some morning

in a noisy street of Naples, or on the solitary slopes of Radicofani,

before the week is out, a hundred voices are repeating it. Waggoners

and pedlars carry it across the hills to distant towns. It floats with

the fishermen from bay to bay, and marches with the conscript to his

barrack in a far-off province. Who was the first to give it shape and

form? No one asks, and no one cares. A student well acquainted with the

habits of the people in these matters says, 'If they knew the author of

a ditty, they would not learn it, far less if they discovered that it

was a scholar's.' If the cadence takes their ear, they consecrate the

song at once by placing it upon the honoured list of 'ancient lays.'

Passing from lip to lip and from district to district, it receives

additions and alterations, and becomes the property of a score of

provinces. Meanwhile the poet from whose soul it blossomed that first

morning like a flower, remains contented with obscurity. The wind has

carried from his lips the thistledown of song, and sown it on a hundred

hills and meadows, far and wide. After such wise is the birth of all

truly popular compositions. Who knows, for instance, the veritable

author of many of those mighty German chorals which sprang into being

at the period of the Reformation? The first inspiration was given,

probably, to a single mind; but the melody, as it has reached us, is

the product of a thousand. This accounts for the variations which in

different dialects and districts the same song presents. Meanwhile, it

is sometimes possible to trace the authorship of a ballad with marked

local character to an improvisatore famous in his village, or to one of

those professional 283rhymesters whom the country-folk employ in the

composition of love-letters to their sweethearts at a distance.[39]

Tommaseo, in the preface to his 'Canti Popolari,' mentions in

particular a Beatrice di Pian degli Ontani, whose poetry was famous

through the mountains of Pistoja; and Tigri records by name a little

girl called Cherubina, who made rispetti by the dozen as she watched

her sheep upon the hills. One of the songs in his collection (p. 181)

contains a direct reference to the village letter-writer:—

Salutatemi, bella, lo scrivano;

Non lo conosco e non so chi si sia.

A me mi pare un poeta sovrano,

Tanto gli è sperto nella poesia.[40]

[39] Much light has lately been thrown on the popular poetry of Italy;

and it appears that contemporary improvisatori trust more to their

richly stocked memories and to their power of recombination than to

original or novel inspiration. It is in Sicily that the vein of truly

creative lyric utterance is said to flow most freely and most

copiously at the present time.

[40] 'Remember me, fair one, to the scrivener. I do not know him or

who he is, but he seems to me a sovereign poet, so cunning is he in

his use of verse.'

While I am writing thus about the production and dissemination of these

love-songs, I cannot help remembering three days and nights which I

once spent at sea between Genoa and Palermo, in the company of some

conscripts who were going to join their regiment in Sicily. They were

lads from the Milanese and Liguria, and they spent a great portion of

their time in composing and singing poetry. One of them had a fine

baritone voice; and when the sun had set, his comrades gathered round

him and begged him to sing to them 'Con quella patetica tua voce.' Then

followed hours of singing, the low monotonous melodies of his ditties

harmonising wonderfully with the tranquillity of night, so clear 284and

calm that the sky and all its stars were mirrored on the sea, through

which we moved as if in a dream. Sometimes the songs provoked

conversation, which, as is usual in Italy, turned mostly upon 'le

bellezze delle donne.' I remember that once an animated discussion

about the relative merits of blondes and brunettes nearly ended in a

quarrel, when the youngest of the whole band, a boy of about seventeen,

put a stop to the dispute by theatrically raising his eyes and arms to

heaven and crying, 'Tu sei innamorato d' una grande Diana cacciatrice

nera, ed io d' una bella Venere bionda.' Though they were but village

lads, they supported their several opinions with arguments not unworthy

of Firenzuola, and showed the greatest delicacy of feeling in the

treatment of a subject which could scarcely have failed to reveal any

latent coarseness.

The purity of all the Italian love-songs collected by Tigri is very

remarkable.[41] Although the passion expressed in them is Oriental in

its vehemence, not a word falls which could offend a virgin's ear. The

one desire of lovers is lifelong union in marriage. The _damo_—for so a

sweetheart is termed in Tuscany—trembles until he has gained the

approval of his future mother-in-law, and forbids the girl he is

courting to leave her house to talk to him at night:—

Dice che tu tî affacci alia finestra;

Ma non tî dice che tu vada fuora,

Perchè, la notte, è cosa disonesta.

285

All the language of his love is respectful. _Signore_, or master of my

soul, _madonna, anima mia, dolce mio ben, nobil persona,_ are the terms

of adoration with which he approaches his mistress. The elevation of

feeling and perfect breeding which Manzoni has so well delineated in

the loves of Renzo and Lucia are traditional among Italian

country-folk. They are conscious that true gentleness is no matter of

birth or fortune:—

E tu non mi lasciar per poverezza,

Chè povertà non guasta gentilezza.[42]

This in itself constitutes an important element of culture, and

explains to some extent the high romantic qualities of their

impassioned poetry. The beauty of their land reveals still more. 'O

fortunatos nimium sua si bona norint!' Virgil's exclamation is as true

now as it was when he sang the labours of Italian country-folk some

nineteen centuries ago. To a traveller from the north there is a pathos

even in the contrast between the country in which these children of a

happier climate toil, and those bleak, winter-beaten fields where our

own peasants pass their lives. The cold nights and warm days of Tuscan

springtime are like a Swiss summer. They make rich pasture and a hardy

race of men. Tracts of corn and oats and rye alternate with patches of

flax 286in full flower, with meadows yellow with buttercups or pink

with ragged robin; the young vines, running from bough to bough of elm

and mulberry, are just coming into leaf. The poplars are fresh with

bright green foliage. On the verge of this blooming plain stand ancient

cities ringed with hills, some rising to snowy Apennines, some covered

with white convents and sparkling with villas. Cypresses shoot, black

and spirelike, amid grey clouds of olive-boughs upon the slopes; and

above, where vegetation borders on the barren rock, are masses of ilex

and arbutus interspersed with chestnut-trees not yet in leaf. Men and

women are everywhere at work, ploughing with great white oxen, or

tilling the soil with spades six feet in length—Sabellian ligones. The

songs of nightingales among acacia-trees, and the sharp scream of

swallows wheeling in air, mingle with the monotonous chant that always

rises from the country-people at their toil. Here and there on points

of vantage, where the hill-slopes sink into the plain, cluster white

villages with flower-like campanili. It is there that the veglia, or

evening rendezvous of lovers, the serenades and balls and feste, of

which one hears so much in the popular minstrelsy, take place. Of

course it would not be difficult to paint the darker shades of this

picture. Autumn comes, when the contadini of Lucca and Siena and

Pistoja go forth to work in the unwholesome marshes of the Maremma, or

of Corsica and Sardinia. Dismal superstitions and hereditary hatreds

cast their blight over a life externally so fair. The bad government of

centuries has perverted in many ways the instincts of a people

naturally mild and cheerful and peace-loving. But as far as nature can

make men happy, these husbandmen are surely to be reckoned fortunate,

and in their songs we find little to remind us of what is otherwise

than sunny in their lot.

[41] It must be remarked that Tigri draws a strong contrast in this

respect between the songs of the mountain districts which he has

printed and those of the towns, and that Pitrè, in his edition of

Sicilian _Volkslieder_, expressly alludes to the coarseness of a whole

class which he had omitted. The MSS. of Sicilian and Tuscan songs,

dating from the fifteenth century and earlier, yield a fair proportion

of decidedly obscene compositions. Yet the fact stated above is

integrally correct. When acclimatised in the large towns, the rustic

Muse not unfrequently assumes a garb of grossness. At home, among the

fields and on the mountains, she remains chaste and romantic.

[42] In a rispetto, of which I subjoin a translation, sung by a poor

lad to a mistress of higher rank, love itself is pleaded as the sign

of a gentle soul:—

My state is poor: I am not meet

To court so nobly born a love;

For poverty hath tied my feet,

Trying to climb too far above.

Yet am I gentle, loving thee;

Nor need thou shun my poverty.

A translator of these _Volkslieder_ has to contend with difficulties

287of no ordinary kind. The freshness of their phrases, the spontaneity

of their sentiments, and the melody of their unstudied cadences, are

inimitable. So again is the peculiar effect of their frequent

transitions from the most fanciful imagery to the language of prose. No

mere student can hope to rival, far less to reproduce, in a foreign

tongue, the charm of verse which sprang untaught from the hearts of

simple folk, which lives unwritten on the lips of lovers, and which

should never be dissociated from singing.[43] There are, besides,

peculiarities in the very structure of the popular rispetto. The

constant repetition of the same phrase with slight variations,

especially in the closing lines of the _ripresa_ of the Tuscan

rispetto, gives an antique force and flavour to these ditties, like

that which we appreciate in our own ballads, but which may easily, in

the translation, degenerate into weakness and insipidity. The Tuscan

rhymester, again, allows himself the utmost licence. It is usual to

find mere assonances like _bene_ and _piacere, oro_ and _volo, ala_ and

_alata_, in the place of rhymes; while such remote resemblances of

sound as _colli_ and _poggi_, _lascia_ and _piazza_, are far from

uncommon. To match these rhymes by joining 'home' and 'alone,' 'time'

and 'shine,' &c, would of course be a matter of no difficulty; but it

has seemed to me on the whole best to preserve, with some exceptions,

such accuracy as the English ear requires. I fear, however, that, after

all, these wild-flowers of song, transplanted to another climate and

placed in a hothouse, will appear but pale and hectic by the side of

their robuster brethren of the Tuscan hills.

[43] When the Cherubina, of whom mention has been made above, was

asked by Signor Tigri to dictate some of her rispetti, she answered,

'O signore! ne dico tanti quando li canto! . . . ma ora . . .

bisognerebbe averli tutti in visione; se no, proprio non vengono.'

In the following serenade many of the peculiarities which 288I have

just noticed occur. I have also adhered to the irregularity of rhyme

which may be usually observed about the middle of the poem (p. 103):—

Sleeping or waking, thou sweet face,

Lift up thy fair and tender brow:

List to thy love in this still place;

He calls thee to thy window now:

But bids thee not the house to quit,

Since in the night this were not meet.

Come to thy window, stay within;

I stand without, and sing and sing:

Come to thy window, stay at home;

I stand without, and make my moan.

Here is a serenade of a more impassioned character (p. 99):—

I come to visit thee, my beauteous queen,

Thee and the house where thou art harboured:

All the long way upon my knees, my queen,

I kiss the earth where'er thy footsteps tread.

I kiss the earth, and gaze upon the wall,

Whereby thou goest, maid imperial!

I kiss the earth, and gaze upon the house,

Whereby thou farest, queen most beauteous!

In the next the lover, who has passed the whole night beneath his

sweetheart's window, takes leave at the break of day. The feeling of

the half-hour before dawn, when the sound of bells rises to meet the

growing light, and both form a prelude to the glare and noise of day,

is expressed with much unconscious poetry (p. 105):—

I see the dawn e'en now begin to peer:

Therefore I take my leave, and cease to sing,

See how the windows open far and near,

And hear the bells of morning, how they ring!

Through heaven and earth the sounds of ringing swell;

Therefore, bright jasmine flower, sweet maid, farewell!

Through heaven and Rome the sound of ringing goes;

Farewell, bright jasmine flower, sweet maiden rose!

289

The next is more quaint (p. 99):—

I come by night, I come, my soul aflame;

I come in this fair hour of your sweet sleep;

And should I wake you up, it were a shame.

I cannot sleep, and lo! I break your sleep.

To wake you were a shame from your deep rest;

Love never sleeps, nor they whom Love hath blest.

A very great many rispetti are simple panegyrics of the beloved, to

find similitude for whose beauty heaven and earth are ransacked. The

compliment of the first line in the following song is perfect (p. 23):—

Beauty was born with you, fair maid:

The sun and moon inclined to you;

On you the snow her whiteness laid

The rose her rich and radiant hue:

Saint Magdalen her hair unbound,

And Cupid taught you how to wound—

How to wound hearts Dan Cupid taught:

Your beauty drives me love-distraught.

The lady in the next was December's child (p. 25):—

O beauty, born in winter's night,

Born in the month of spotless snow:

Your face is like a rose so bright;

Your mother may be proud of you!

She may be proud, lady of love,

Such sunlight shines her house above:

She may be proud, lady of heaven,

Such sunlight to her home is given.

The sea wind is the source of beauty to another (p. 16):—

Nay, marvel not you are so fair;

For you beside the sea were born:

The sea-waves keep you fresh and fair,

Like roses on their leafy thorn.

290 If roses grow on the rose-bush,

Your roses through midwinter blush;

If roses bloom on the rose-bed,

Your face can show both white and red.

The eyes of a fourth are compared, after quite a new and original

fashion, to stars (p. 210):—

The moon hath risen her plaint to lay

Before the face of Love Divine.

Saying in heaven she will not stay,

Since you have stolen what made her shine:

Aloud she wails with sorrow wan,—

She told her stars and two are gone:

They are not there; you have them now;

They are the eyes in your bright brow.

Nor are girls less ready to praise their lovers, but that they do not

dwell so much on physical perfection. Here is a pleasant greeting (p.

124):—

O welcome, welcome, lily white,

Thou fairest youth of all the valley!

When I'm with you, my soul is light;

I chase away dull melancholy.

I chase all sadness from my heart:

Then welcome, dearest that thou art!

I chase all sadness from my side:

Then welcome, O my love, my pride!

I chase all sadness far away:

Then welcome, welcome, love, to-day!

The image of a lily is very prettily treated in the next (p 79):—

I planted a lily yestreen at my window;

I set it yestreen, and to-day it sprang up:

When I opened the latch and leaned out of my window,

It shadowed my face with its beautiful cup.

O lily, my lily, how tall you are grown!

Remember how dearly I loved you, my own.

O lily, my lily, you'll grow to the sky!

Remember I love you for ever and aye.

291

The same thought of love growing like a flower receives another turn

(p. 69):—

On yonder hill I saw a flower;

And, could it thence be hither borne,

I'd plant it here within my bower,

And water it both eve and morn.

Small water wants the stem so straight;

'Tis a love-lily stout as fate.

Small water wants the root so strong:

'Tis a love-lily lasting long.

Small water wants the flower so sheen:

'Tis a love-lily ever green.

Envious tongues have told a girl that her complexion is not good. She

replies, with imagery like that of Virgil's 'Alba ligustra cadunt,

vaccinia nigra leguntur' (p. 31):—

Think it no grief that I am brown,

For all brunettes are born to reign:

White is the snow, yet trodden down;

Black pepper kings need not disdain:

White snow lies mounded on the vales

Black pepper's weighed in brazen scales.

Another song runs on the same subject (p. 38):—

The whole world tells me that I'm brown,

The brown earth gives us goodly corn:

The clove-pink too, however brown,

Yet proudly in the hand 'tis borne.

They say my love is black, but he

Shines like an angel-form to me:

They say my love is dark as night;

To me he seems a shape of light.

The freshness of the following spring song recalls the ballads of the

Val de Vire in Normandy (p. 85):—

It was the morning of the first of May,

Into the close I went to pluck a flower;

And there I found a bird of woodland gay,

Who whiled with songs of love the silent hour.

292 O bird, who fliest from fair Florence, how

Dear love begins, I prithee teach me now!—

Love it begins with music and with song,

And ends with sorrow and with sighs ere long.

Love at first sight is described (p. 79):—

The very moment that we met,

That moment love began to beat:

One glance of love we gave, and swore

Never to part for evermore;

We swore together, sighing deep,

Never to part till Death's long sleep.

Here too is a memory of the first days of love (p. 79):—

If I remember, it was May

When love began between us two:

The roses in the close were gay,

The cherries blackened on the bough.

O cherries black and pears so green!

Of maidens fair you are the queen.

Fruit of black cherry and sweet pear!

Of sweethearts you're the queen, I swear.

The troth is plighted with such promises as these (p. 230):—

Or ere I leave you, love divine,

Dead tongues shall stir and utter speech,

And running rivers flow with wine,

And fishes swim upon the beach;

Or ere I leave or shun you, these

Lemons shall grow on orange-trees.

The girl confesses her love after this fashion (p. 86):—

Passing across the billowy sea,

I let, alas, my poor heart fall;

I bade the sailors bring it me;

They said they had not seen it fall.

I asked the sailors, one and two;

They said that I had given it you.

I asked the sailors, two and three;

They said that I had given it thee.

293

It is not uncommon to speak of love as a sea. Here is a curious play

upon this image (p. 227):—

Ho, Cupid! Sailor Cupid, ho!

Lend me awhile that bark of thine;

For on the billows I will go,

To find my love who once was mine:

And if I find her, she shall wear

A chain around her neck so fair,

Around her neck a glittering bond,

Four stars, a lily, a diamond.

It is also possible that the same thought may occur in the second line

of the next ditty (p. 120):—

Beneath the earth I'll make a way

To pass the sea and come to you.

People will think I'm gone away;

But, dear, I shall be seeing you.

People will say that I am dead;

But we'll pluck roses white and red:

People will think I'm lost for aye;

But we'll pluck roses, you and I.

All the little daily incidents are beautified by love. Here is a lover

who thanks the mason for making his window so close upon the road that

he can see his sweetheart as she passes (p. 118):—

Blest be the mason's hand who built

This house of mine by the roadside,

And made my window low and wide

For me to watch my love go by.

And if I knew when she went by,

My window should be fairly gilt;

And if I knew what time she went,

My window should be flower-besprent.

Here is a conceit which reminds one of the pretty epistle of

Philostratus, in which the footsteps of the beloved are called

_ερηρεισμένα Φιλήματα_ (p. 117):—

294 What time I see you passing by;

I sit and count the steps you take:

You take the steps; I sit and sigh:

Step after step, my sighs awake.

Tell me, dear love, which more abound,

My sighs or your steps on the ground?

Tell me, dear love, which are the most,

Your light steps or the sighs they cost?

A girl complains that she cannot see her lover's house (p. 117):—

I lean upon the lattice, and look forth

To see the house where my lover dwells.

There grows an envious tree that spoils my mirth:

Cursed be the man who set it on these hills!

But when those jealous boughs are all unclad,

I then shall see the cottage of my lad:

When once that tree is rooted from the hills,

I'll see the house wherein my lover dwells.

In the same mood a girl who has just parted from her sweetheart is

angry with the hill beyond which he is travelling (p. 167):—

I see and see, yet see not what I would:

I see the leaves atremble on the tree:

I saw my love where on the hill he stood,

Yet see him not drop downward to the lea.

O traitor hill, what will you do?

I ask him, live or dead, from you.

O traitor hill, what shall it be?

I ask him, live or dead, from thee.

All the songs of love in absence are very quaint. Here is one which

calls our nursery rhymes to mind (p. 119):—

I would I were a bird so free,

That I had wings to fly away:

Unto that window I would flee,

Where stands my love and grinds all day.

295 Grind, miller, grind; the water's deep!

I cannot grind; love makes me weep.

Grind, miller, grind; the waters flow!

I cannot grind; love wastes me so.

The next begins after the same fashion, but breaks into a very shower

of benedictions (p. 118):—

Would God I were a swallow free,

That I had wings to fly away:

Upon the miller's door I'd be,

Where stands my love and grinds all day:

Upon the door, upon the sill,

Where stays my love;—God bless him still!

God bless my love, and blessed be

His house, and bless my house for me;

Yea, blest be both, and ever blest

My lover's house, and all the rest!

The girl alone at home in her garden sees a wood-dove flying by and

calls to it (p. 179):—

O dove, who fliest far to yonder hill,

Dear dove, who in the rock hast made thy nest,

Let me a feather from thy pinion pull,

For I will write to him who loves me best.

And when I've written it and made it clear,

I'll give thee back thy feather, dove so dear:

And when I've written it and sealed it, then

I'll give thee back thy feather love-laden.

A swallow is asked to lend the same kind service (p. 179):—

O swallow, swallow, flying through the air,

Turn, turn, I prithee, from thy flight above!

Give me one feather from thy wing so fair,

For I will write a letter to my love.

When I have written it and made it clear,

I'll give thee back thy feather, swallow dear;

When I have written it on paper white,

I'll make, I swear, thy missing feather right;

When once 'tis written on fair leaves of gold,

I'll give thee back thy wing and flight so bold.

296

Long before Tennyson's song in the 'Princess,' it would seem that

swallows were favourite messengers of love. In the next song which I

translate, the repetition of one thought with delicate variation is

full of character (p. 178):—

O swallow, flying over hill and plain,

If thou shouldst find my love, oh bid him come!

And tell him, on these mountains I remain

Even as a lamb who cannot find her home:

And tell him, I am left all, all alone,

Even as a tree whose flowers are overblown:

And tell him, I am left without a mate

Even as a tree whose boughs are desolate:

And tell him, I am left uncomforted

Even as the grass upon the meadows dead.

The following is spoken by a girl who has been watching the lads of the

village returning from their autumn service in the plain, and whose

damo comes the last of all (p. 240):—

O dear my love, you come too late!

What found you by the way to do?

I saw your comrades pass the gate,

But yet not you, dear heart, not you!

If but a little more you'd stayed,

With sighs you would have found me dead;

If but a while you'd keep me crying,

With sighs you would have found me dying.

The _amantium iræ_ find a place too in these rustic ditties. A girl

explains to her sweetheart (p. 240):—

'Twas told me and vouchsafed for true,

Your kin are wroth as wroth can be;

For loving me they swear at you,

They swear at you because of me;

Your father, mother, all your folk,

Because you love me, chafe and choke!

Then set your kith and kin at ease;

Set them at ease and let me die:

Set the whole clan of them at ease;

Set them at ease and see me die!

297

Another suspects that her damo has paid his suit to a rival (p. 200):—

On Sunday morning well I knew

Where gaily dressed you turned your feet;

And there were many saw it too,

And came to tell me through the street:

And when they spoke, I smiled, ah me!

But in my room wept privately;

And when they spoke, I sang for pride,

But in my room alone I sighed.

Then come reconciliations (p. 223):—

Let us make peace, my love, my bliss!

For cruel strife can last no more.

If you say nay, yet I say yes:

'Twixt me and you there is no war.

Princes and mighty lords make peace;

And so may lovers twain, I wis:

Princes and soldiers sign a truce;

And so may two sweethearts like us:

Princes and potentates agree;

And so may friends like you and me.

There is much character about the following, which is spoken by the

damo (p. 223):—

As yonder mountain height I trod,

I chanced to think of your dear name;

I knelt with clasped hands on the sod,

And thought of my neglect with shame:

I knelt upon the stone, and swore

Our love should bloom as heretofore.

Sometimes the language of affection takes a more imaginative tone, as

in the following (p. 232):—

Dearest, what time you mount to heaven above,

I'll meet you holding in my hand my heart:

You to your breast shall clasp me full of love,

And I will lead you to our Lord apart.

298 Our Lord, when he our love so true hath known,

Shall make of our two hearts one heart alone;

One heart shall make of our two hearts, to rest

In heaven amid the splendours of the blest.

This was the woman's. Here is the man's (p. 113):—

If I were master of all loveliness,

I'd make thee still more lovely than thou art:

If I were master of all wealthiness,

Much gold and silver should be thine, sweetheart:

If I were master of the house of hell,

I'd bar the brazen gates in thy sweet face;

Or ruled the place where purging spirits dwell,

I'd free thee from that punishment apace.

Were I in paradise and thou shouldst come,

I'd stand aside, my love, to make thee room;

Were I in paradise, well seated there,

I'd quit my place to give it thee, my fair!

Sometimes, but very rarely, weird images are sought to clothe passion,

as in the following (p. 136):—

Down into hell I went and thence returned:

Ah me! alas! the people that were there!

I found a room where many candles burned,

And saw within my love that languished there.

When as she saw me, she was glad of cheer,

And at the last she said: Sweet soul of mine;

Dost thou recall the time long past, so dear,

When thou didst say to me, Sweet soul of mine?

Now kiss me on the mouth, my dearest, here;

Kiss me that I for once may cease to pine!

So sweet, ah me, is thy dear mouth, so dear,

That of thy mercy prithee sweeten mine!

Now, love, that thou hast kissed me, now, I say,

Look not to leave this place again for aye.

Or again in this (p. 232):—

Methinks I hear, I hear a voice that cries:

Beyond the hill it floats upon the air.

It is my lover come to bid me rise,

If I am fain forthwith toward heaven to fare.

299 But I have answered him, and said him No!

I've given my paradise, my heaven, for you:

Till we together go to paradise,

I'll stay on earth and love your beauteous eyes.

But it is not with such remote and eerie thoughts that the rustic muse

of Italy can deal successfully. Far better is the following

half-playful description of love-sadness (p. 71):—

Ah me, alas! who know not how to sigh!

Of sighs I now full well have learned the art:

Sighing at table when to eat I try,

Sighing within my little room apart,

Sighing when jests and laughter round me fly,

Sighing with her and her who know my heart:

I sigh at first, and then I go on sighing;

'Tis for your eyes that I am ever sighing:

I sigh at first, and sigh the whole year through;

And 'tis your eyes that keep me sighing so.

The next two rispetti, delicious in their naïveté, might seem to have

been extracted from the libretto of an opera, but that they lack the

sympathising chorus, who should have stood at hand, ready to chime in

with 'he,' 'she,' and 'they,' to the 'I,' 'you,' and 'we' of the lovers

(p. 123):—

Ah, when will dawn that glorious day

When you will softly mount my stair?

My kin shall bring you on the way;

I shall be first to greet you there.

Ah, when will dawn that day of bliss

When we before the priest say Yes?

Ah, when will dawn that blissful day

When I shall softly mount your stair,

Your brothers meet me on the way,

And one by one I greet them there?

When comes the day, my staff, my strength,

To call your mother mine at length?

When will the day come, love of mine,

I shall be yours and you be mine?

300Hitherto the songs have told only of happy love, or of love

returned. Some of the best, however, are unhappy. Here is one, for

instance, steeped in gloom (p. 142):—

They have this custom in fair Naples town;

They never mourn a man when he is dead:

The mother weeps when she has reared a son

To be a serf and slave by love misled;

The mother weeps when she a son hath born

To be the serf and slave of galley scorn;

The mother weeps when she a son gives suck

To be the serf and slave of city luck.

The following contains a fine wild image, wrought out with strange

passion in detail (p. 300):—

I'll spread a table brave for revelry,

And to the feast will bid sad lovers all.

For meat I'll give them my heart's misery;

For drink I'll give these briny tears that fall.

Sorrows and sighs shall be the varletry,

To serve the lovers at this festival:

The table shall be death, black death profound;

Weep, stones, and utter sighs, ye walls around!

The table shall be death, yea, sacred death;

Weep, stones, and sigh as one that sorroweth!

Nor is the next a whit less in the vein of mad Jeronimo (p. 304):—

High up, high up, a house I'll rear,

High up, high up, on yonder height;

At every window set a snare,

With treason, to betray the night;

With treason, to betray the stars,

Since I'm betrayed by my false feres;

With treason, to betray the day,

Since Love betrayed me, well away!

The vengeance of an Italian reveals itself in the energetic song which

I quote next (p. 303):—

301

I have a sword; 'twould cut a brazen bell,

Tough steel 'twould cut, if there were any need:

I've had it tempered in the streams of hell

By masters mighty in the mystic rede:

I've had it tempered by the light of stars;

Then let him come whose skin is stout as Mars;

I've had it tempered to a trenchant blade;

Then let him come who stole from me my maid.

More mild, but brimful of the bitterness of a soul to whom the whole

world has become but ashes in the death of love, is tho following

lament (p. 143):—

Call me the lovely Golden Locks no more,

But call me Sad Maid of the golden hair.

If there be wretched women, sure I think

I too may rank among the most forlorn.

I fling a palm into the sea; 'twill sink:

Others throw lead, and it is lightly borne.

What have I done, dear Lord, the world to cross?

Gold in my hand forthwith is turned to dross.

How have I made, dear Lord, dame Fortune wroth?

Gold in my hand forthwith is turned to froth.

What have I done, dear Lord, to fret the folk?

Gold in my hand forthwith is turned to smoke.

Here is pathos (p. 172):—

The wood-dove who hath lost her mate,

She lives a dolorous life, I ween;

She seeks a stream and bathes in it,

And drinks that water foul and green:

With other birds she will not mate,

Nor haunt, I wis, the flowery treen;

She bathes her wings and strikes her breast;

Her mate is lost: oh, sore unrest!

And here is fanciful despair (p. 168):—

I'll build a house of sobs and sighs,

With tears the lime I'll slack;

And there I'll dwell with weeping eyes

Until my love come back:

302 And there I'll stay with eyes that burn

Until I see my love return.

The house of love has been deserted, and the lover comes to moan

beneath its silent eaves (p. 171):—

Dark house and window desolate!

Where is the sun which shone so fair?

'Twas here we danced and laughed at fate:

Now the stones weep; I see them there.

They weep, and feel a grievous chill:

Dark house and widowed window-sill!

And what can be more piteous than this prayer? (p. 809):—

Love, if you love me, delve a tomb,

And lay me there the earth beneath;

After a year, come see my bones,

And make them dice to play therewith.

But when you're tired of that game,

Then throw those dice into the flame;

But when you're tired of gaming free,

Then throw those dice into the sea.

The simpler expression of sorrow to the death is, as usual, more

impressive. A girl speaks thus within sight of the grave (p. 808):—

Yes, I shall die: what wilt thou gain?

The cross before my bier will go;

And thou wilt hear the bells complain,

The _Misereres_ loud and low.

Midmost the church thou'lt see me lie

With folded hands and frozen eye;

Then say at last, I do repent!—

Nought else remains when fires are spent.

Here is a rustic Œnone (p. 307):—

Fell death, that fliest fraught with woe!

Thy gloomy snares the world ensphere:

Where no man calls, thou lov'st to go;

But when we call, thou wilt not hear.

Fell death, false death of treachery,

Thou makest all content but me.

303

Another is less reproachful, but scarcely less sad (p. 308):—

Strew me with blossoms when I die,

Nor lay me 'neath the earth below;

Beyond those walls, there let me lie,

Where oftentimes we used to go.

There lay me to the wind and rain;

Dying for you, I feel no pain:

There lay me to the sun above;

Dying for you, I die of love.

Yet another of these pitiful love-wailings displays much poetry of

expression (p. 271):—

I dug the sea, and delved the barren sand:

I wrote with dust and gave it to the wind:

Of melting snow, false Love, was made thy band,

Which suddenly the day's bright beams unbind.

Now am I ware, and know my own mistake—

How false are all the promises you make;

Now am I ware, and know the fact, ah me!

That who confides in you, deceived will be.

It would scarcely be well to pause upon these very doleful ditties.

Take, then, the following little serenade, in which the lover on his

way to visit his mistress has unconsciously fallen on the same thought

as Bion (p. 85):—

Yestreen I went my love to greet,

By yonder village path below:

Night in a coppice found my feet;

I called the moon her light to show—

O moon, who needs no flame to fire thy face,

Look forth and lend me light a little space!

Enough has been quoted to illustrate the character of the Tuscan

popular poetry. These village rispetti bear the same relation to the

canzoniere of Petrarch as the 'savage drupe' to the 'suave plum.' They

are, as it were, the wild stock of that highly artificial flower of

art. Herein lies, perhaps, 304their chief importance. As in our ballad

literature we may discern the stuff of the Elizabethan drama

undeveloped, so in the Tuscan people's songs we can trace the crude

form of that poetic instinct which produced the sonnets to Laura. It is

also very probable that some such rustic minstrelsy preceded the Idylls

of Theocritus and the Bucolics of Virgil; for coincidences of thought

and imagery, which can scarcely be referred to any conscious study of

the ancients, are not a few. Popular poetry has this great value for

the student of literature: it enables him to trace those forms of fancy

and of feeling which are native to the people, and which must

ultimately determine the character of national art, however much that

may be modified by culture.

305

POPULAR ITALIAN POETRY OF THE RENAISSANCE

The semi-popular poetry of the Italians in the fifteenth century formed

an important branch of their national literature, and flourished

independently of the courtly and scholastic studies which gave a

special character to the golden age of the revival. While the latter

tended to separate the people from the cultivated classes, the former

established a new link of connection between them, different indeed

from that which existed when smiths and carters repeated the Canzoni of

Dante by heart in the fourteenth century, but still sufficiently real

to exercise a weighty influence over the national development. Scholars

like Angelo Poliziano, princes like Lorenzo de' Medici, men of letters

like Feo Belcari and Benivieni, borrowed from the people forms of

poetry, which they handled with refined taste, and appropriated to the

uses of polite literature. The most important of these forms, native to

the people but assimilated by the learned classes, were the Miracle

Play or 'Sacra Rappresentazione;' the 'Ballata' or lyric to be sung

while dancing; the 'Canto Carnascialesco' or Carnival Chorus; the

'Rispetto' or short love-ditty; the 'Lauda' or hymn; the 'Maggio' or

May-song; and the 'Madrigale' or little part-song.

At Florence, where even under the despotism of the Medici a show of

republican life still lingered, all classes joined in the amusements of

carnival and spring time; and 306this poetry of the dance, the pageant,

and the villa flourished side by side with the more serious efforts of

the humanistic muse. It is not my purpose in this place to inquire into

the origins of each lyrical type, to discuss the alterations they may

have undergone at the hands of educated versifiers, or to define their

several characteristics; but only to offer translations of such as seem

to me best suited to represent the genius of the people and the age.

In the composition of the poetry in question, Angelo Poliziano was

indubitably the most successful. This giant of learning, who filled the

lecture-rooms of Florence with students of all nations, and whose

critical and rhetorical labours marked an epoch in the history of

scholarship, was by temperament a poet, and a poet of the people.

Nothing was easier for him than to throw aside his professor's mantle,

and to improvise 'Ballate' for the girls to sing as they danced their

'Carola' upon the Piazza di Santa Trinità in summer evenings. The

peculiarity of this lyric is that it starts with a couplet, which also

serves as refrain, supplying the rhyme to each successive stanza. The

stanza itself is identical with our rime royal, if we count the couplet

in the place of the seventh line. The form is in itself so graceful and

is so beautifully treated by Poliziano that I cannot content myself

with fewer than four of his _Ballate_.[44] The first is written on the

world-old theme of 'Gather ye rosebuds while ye may.'

I went a roaming, maidens, one bright day,

In a green garden in mid month of May.

Violets and lilies grew on every side

Mid the green grass, and young flowers wonderful,

Golden and white and red and azure-eyed;

307 Toward which I stretched my hands, eager to pull

Plenty to make my fair curls beautiful,

To crown my rippling curls with garlands gay.

I went a roaming, maidens, one bright day,

In a green garden in mid month of May.

But when my lap was full of flowers I spied

Roses at last, roses of every hue;

Therefore I ran to pluck their ruddy pride,

Because their perfume was so sweet and true

That all my soul went forth with pleasure new,

With yearning and desire too soft to say.

I went a roaming, maidens, one bright day,

In a green garden in mid month of May.

I gazed and gazed. Hard task it were to tell

How lovely were the roses in that hour:

One was but peeping from her verdant shell,

And some were faded, some were scarce in flower:

Then Love said: Go, pluck from the blooming bower

Those that thou seest ripe upon the spray.

I went a roaming, maidens, one bright day,

In a green garden in mid month of May.

For when the full rose quits her tender sheath,

When she is sweetest and most fair to see,

Then is the time to place her in thy wreath,

Before her beauty and her freshness flee.

Gather ye therefore roses with great glee,

Sweet girls, or ere their perfume pass away.

I went a roaming, maidens, one bright day,

In a green garden in mid month of May.

[44] I need hardly guard myself against being supposed to mean that

the form of _Ballata_ in question was the only one of its kind in

Italy.

The next Ballata is less simple, but is composed with the same

intention. It may here be parenthetically mentioned that the courtly

poet, when he applied himself to this species of composition, invented

a certain rusticity of incident, scarcely in keeping with the spirit of

his art. It was in fact a conventional 308feature of this species of

verse that the scene should be laid in the country, where the burgher,

on a visit to his villa, is supposed to meet with a rustic beauty who

captivates his eyes and heart. Guido Cavalcanti, in his celebrated

Ballata, 'In un boschetto trovai pastorella,' struck the keynote of

this music, which, it may be reasonably conjectured, was imported into

Italy through Provençal literature from the pastorals of Northern

France. The lady so quaintly imaged by a bird in the following Ballata

of Poliziano is supposed to have been Monna Ippolita Leoncina of Prato,

white-throated, golden-haired, and dressed in crimson silk.

I found myself one day all, all alone,

For pastime in a field with blossoms strewn.

I do not think the world a field could show

With herbs of perfume so surpassing rare;

But when I passed beyond the green hedge-row,

A thousand flowers around me flourished fair,

White, pied and crimson, in the summer air;

Among the which I heard a sweet bird's tone.

I found myself one day all, all alone,

For pastime in a field with blossoms strewn.

Her song it was so tender and so clear

That all the world listened with love; then I

With stealthy feet a-tiptoe drawing near,

Her golden head and golden wings could spy,

Her plumes that flashed like rubies 'neath the sky,

Her crystal beak and throat and bosom's zone.

I found myself one day all, all alone,

For pastime in a field with blossoms strewn.

Fain would I snare her, smit with mighty love;

But arrow-like she soared, and through the air

Fled to her nest upon the boughs above;

309 Wherefore to follow her is all my care,

For haply I might lure her by some snare

Forth from the woodland wild where she is flown.

I found myself one day all, all alone,

For pastime in a field with blossoms strewn.

Yea, I might spread some net or woven wile;

But since of singing she doth take such pleasure,

Without or other art or other guile

I seek to win her with a tuneful measure;

Therefore in singing spend I all my leisure,

To make by singing this sweet bird my own.

I found myself one day all, all alone,

For pastime in a field with blossoms strewn.

The same lady is more directly celebrated in the next Ballata, where

Poliziano calls her by her name, Ippolita. I have taken the liberty of

substituting Myrrha for this somewhat unmanageable word.

He who knows not what thing is Paradise,

Let him look fixedly on Myrrha's eyes.

From Myrrha's eyes there flieth, girt with fire,

An angel of our lord, a laughing boy,

Who lights in frozen hearts a flaming pyre,

And with such sweetness doth the soul destroy,

That while it dies, it murmurs forth its joy;

Oh blessed am I to dwell in Paradise!

He who knows not what thing is Paradise,

Let him look fixedly on Myrrha's eyes.

From Myrrha's eyes a virtue still doth move,

So swift and with so fierce and strong a flight,

That it is like the lightning of high Jove,

Riving of iron and adamant the might;

Nathless the wound doth carry such delight

That he who suffers dwells in Paradise.

He who knows not what thing is Paradise,

Let him look fixedly on Myrrha's eyes.

310 From Myrrha's eyes a lovely messenger

Of joy so grave, so virtuous, doth flee,

That all proud souls are bound to bend to her;

So sweet her countenance, it turns the key

Of hard hearts locked in cold security:

Forth flies the prisoned soul to Paradise.

He who knows not what thing is Paradise,

Let him look fixedly on Myrrha's eyes.

In Myrrha's eyes beauty doth make her throne,

And sweetly smile and sweetly speak her mind:

Such grace in her fair eyes a man hath known

As in the whole wide world he scarce may find:

Yet if she slay him with a glance too kind,

He lives again beneath her gazing eyes.

He who knows not what thing is Paradise,

Let him look fixedly on Myrrha's eyes.

The fourth Ballata sets forth the fifteenth-century Italian code of

love, the code of the Novelle, very different in its avowed laxity from

the high ideal of the trecentisti poets.

I ask no pardon if I follow Love;

Since every gentle heart is thrall thereof.

From those who feel the fire I feel, what use

Is there in asking pardon? These are so

Gentle, kind-hearted, tender, piteous,

That they will have compassion, well I know.

From such as never felt that honeyed woe,

I seek no pardon: nought they know of Love.

I ask no pardon if I follow Love;

Since every gentle heart is thrall thereof.

Honour, pure love, and perfect gentleness,

Weighed in the scales of equity refined,

Are but one thing: beauty is nought or less,

311 Placed in a dame of proud and scornful mind.

Who can rebuke me then if I am kind

So far as honesty comports and Love?

I ask no pardon if I follow Love;

Since every gentle heart is thrall thereof.

Let him rebuke me whose hard heart of stone

Ne'er felt of Love the summer in his vein!

I pray to Love that who hath never known

Love's power, may ne'er be blessed with Love's great gain;

But he who serves our lord with might and main,

May dwell for ever in the fire of Love!

I ask no pardon if I follow Love;

Since every gentle heart is thrall thereof.

Let him rebuke me without cause who will;

For if he be not gentle, I fear nought:

My heart obedient to the same love still

Hath little heed of light words envy-fraught:

So long as life remains, it is my thought

To keep the laws of this so gentle Love.

I ask no pardon if I follow Love;

Since every gentle heart is thrall thereof.

This Ballata is put into a woman's mouth. Another, ascribed to Lorenzo

de' Medici, expresses the sadness of a man who has lost the favour of

his lady. It illustrates the well-known use of the word _Signore_ for

mistress in Florentine poetry.

312 How can I sing light-souled and fancy-free,

When my loved lord no longer smiles on me?

Dances and songs and merry wakes I leave

To lovers fair, more fortunate and gay;

Since to my heart so many sorrows cleave

That only doleful tears are mine for aye:

Who hath heart's ease, may carol, dance, and play

While I am fain to weep continually.

How can I sing light-souled and fancy-free,

When my loved lord no longer smiles on me?

I too had heart's ease once, for so Love willed,

When my lord loved me with love strong and great:

But envious fortune my life's music stilled,

And turned to sadness all my gleeful state.

Ah me! Death surely were less desolate

Than thus to live and love-neglected be!

How can I sing light-souled and fancy-free,

When my loved lord no longer smiles on me?

One only comfort soothes my heart's despair,

And mid this sorrow lends my soul some cheer;

Unto my lord I ever yielded fair

Service of faith untainted pure and clear;

If then I die thus guiltless, on my bier

It may be she will shed one tear for me.

How can I sing light-souled and fancy-free,

When my loved lord no longer smiles on me?

The Florentine _Rispetto_ was written for the most part in octave

stanzas, detached or continuous. The octave stanza in Italian

literature was an emphatically popular form; and it is still largely

used in many parts of the peninsula for the lyrical expression of

emotion.[45] Poliziano did no more than treat it with his own facility,

sacrificing the unstudied raciness of his popular models to literary

elegance.

[45] See my _Sketches in Italy and Greece_, p. 114.

Here are a few of these detached stanzas or _Rispetti Spicciolati_:—

Upon that day when first I saw thy face,

I vowed with loyal love to worship thee.

Move, and I move; stay, and I keep my place:

Whate'er thou dost, will I do equally.

313 In joy of thine I find most perfect grace,

And in thy sadness dwells my misery:

Laugh, and I laugh; weep, and I too will weep.

Thus Love commands, whose laws I loving keep.

Nay, be not over-proud of thy great grace,

Lady! for brief time is thy thief and mine.

White will he turn those golden curls, that lace

Thy forehead and thy neck so marble-fine.

Lo! while the flower still flourisheth apace,

Pluck it: for beauty but awhile doth shine.

Fair is the rose at dawn; but long ere night

Her freshness fades, her pride hath vanished quite.

Fire, fire! Ho, water! for my heart's afire!

Ho, neighbours! help me, or by God I die!

See, with his standard, that great lord, Desire!

He sets my heart aflame: in vain I cry.

Too late, alas! The flames mount high and higher.

Alack, good friends! I faint, I fail, I die.

Ho! water, neighbours mine! no more delay I

My heart's a cinder if you do but stay.

Lo, may I prove to Christ a renegade,

And, dog-like, die in pagan Barbary;

Nor may God's mercy on my soul be laid,

If ere for aught I shall abandon thee:

Before all-seeing God this prayer be made—

When I desert thee, may death feed on me:

Now if thy hard heart scorn these vows, be sure

That without faith none may abide secure.

I ask not, Love, for any other pain

To make thy cruel foe and mine repent,

Only that thou shouldst yield her to the strain

Of these my arms, alone, for chastisement;

Then would I clasp her so with might and main,

That she should learn to pity and relent,

And, in revenge for scorn and proud despite,

A thousand times I'd kiss her forehead white.

314 Not always do fierce tempests vex the sea,

Nor always clinging clouds offend the sky;

Cold snows before the sunbeams haste to flee,

Disclosing flowers that 'neath their whiteness lie;

The saints each one doth wait his day to see,

And time makes all things change; so, therefore, I

Ween that 'tis wise to wait my turn, and say,

That who subdues himself, deserves to sway.

It will be observed that the tone of these poems is not passionate nor

elevated. Love, as understood in Florence of the fifteenth century, was

neither; nor was Poliziano the man to have revived Platonic mysteries

or chivalrous enthusiasms. When the octave stanzas, written with this

amorous intention, were strung together into a continuous poem, this

form of verse took the title of _Rispetto Gontinuato_. In the

collection of Poliziano's poems there are several examples of the long

Rispetto, carelessly enough composed, as may be gathered from the

recurrence of the same stanzas in several poems. All repeat the old

arguments, the old enticements to a less than lawful love. The one

which I have chosen for translation, styled _Serenata ovvero Lettera in

Istrambotti_, might be selected as an epitome of Florentine convention

in the matter of love-making.

O thou of fairest fairs the first and queen,

Most courteous, kind, and honourable dame,

Thine ear unto thy servant's singing lean,

Who loves thee more than health, or wealth, or fame;

For thou his shining planet still hast been,

And day and night he calls on thy fair name:

First wishing thee all good the world can give,

Next praying in thy gentle thoughts to live.

He humbly prayeth that thou shouldst be kind

To think upon his pure and perfect faith,

And that such mercy in thy heart and mind

Should reign, as so much beauty argueth:

315 A thousand, thousand hints, or he were blind,

Of thy great courtesy he reckoneth:

Wherefore thy loyal subject now doth sue

Such guerdon only as shall prove them true.

He knows himself unmeet for love from thee,

Unmeet for merely gazing on thine eyes;

Seeing thy comely squires so plenteous be,

That there is none but 'neath thy beauty sighs:

Yet since thou seekest fame and bravery,

Nor carest aught for gauds that others prize,

And since he strives to honour thee alway,

He still hath hope to gain thy heart one day.

Virtue that dwells untold, unknown, unseen,

Still findeth none to love or value it;

Wherefore his faith, that hath so perfect been,

Not being known, can profit him no whit:

He would find pity in thine eyes, I ween,

If thou shouldst deign to make some proof of it;

The rest may flatter, gape, and stand agaze;

Him only faith above the crowd doth raise.

Suppose that he might meet thee once alone,

Face unto face, without or jealousy,

Or doubt or fear from false misgiving grown,

And tell his tale of grievous pain to thee,

Sure from thy breast he'd draw full many a moan.

And make thy fair eyes weep right plenteously:

Yea, if he had but skill his heart to show,

He scarce could fail to win thee by its woe.

Now art thou in thy beauty's blooming hour;

Thy youth is yet in pure perfection's prime:

Make it thy pride to yield thy fragile flower,

Or look to find it paled by envious time:

For none to stay the flight of years hath power,

And who culls roses caught by frosty rime?

Give therefore to thy lover, give, for they

Too late repent who act not while they may.

316 Time flies: and lo! thou let'st it idly fly:

There is not in the world a thing more dear;

And if thou wait to see sweet May pass by,

Where find'st thou roses in the later year?

He never can, who lets occasion die:

Now that thou canst, stay not for doubt or fear;

But by the forelock take the flying hour,

Ere change begins, and clouds above thee lower.

Too long 'twixt yea and nay he hath been wrung;

Whether he sleep or wake he little knows,

Or free or in the bands of bondage strung:

Nay, lady, strike, and let thy lover loose!

What joy hast thou to keep a captive hung?

Kill him at once, or cut the cruel noose:

No more, I prithee, stay; but take thy part:

Either relax the bow, or speed the dart.

Thou feedest him on words and windiness,

On smiles, and signs, and bladders light as air;

Saying, thou fain wouldst comfort his distress,

But dar'st not, canst not: nay, dear lady fair,

All things are possible beneath the stress

Of will, that flames above the soul's despair!

Dally no longer: up, set to thy hand;

Or see his love unclothed and naked stand.

For he hath sworn, and by this oath will bide,

E'en though his life be lost in the endeavour,

To leave no way, nor art, nor wile untried,

Until he pluck the fruit he sighs for ever:

And, though he still would spare thy honest pride,

The knot that binds him he must loose or sever;

Thou too, O lady, shouldst make sharp thy knife,

If thou art fain to end this amorous strife.

Lo! if thou lingerest still in dubious dread,

Lest thou shouldst lose fair fame of honesty,

Here hast thou need of wile and warihead,

To test thy lover's strength in screening thee;

317 Indulge him, if thou find him well bestead,

Knowing that smothered love flames outwardly:

Therefore, seek means, search out some privy way;

Keep not the steed too long at idle play.

Or if thou heedest what those friars teach,

I cannot fail, lady, to call thee fool:

Well may they blame our private sins and preach;

But ill their acts match with their spoken rule;

The same pitch clings to all men, one and each.

There, I have spoken: set the world to school

With this true proverb, too, be well acquainted

The devil's ne'er so black as he is painted.

Nor did our good Lord give such grace to thee

That thou shouldst keep it buried in thy breast,

But to reward thy servant's constancy,

Whose love and loyal faith thou hast repressed:

Think it no sin to be some trifle free,

Because thou livest at a lord's behest;

For if he take enough to feed his fill,

To cast the rest away were surely ill.

They find most favour in the sight of heaven

Who to the poor and hungry are most kind;

A hundred-fold shall thus to thee be given

By God, who loves the free and generous mind;

Thrice strike thy breast, with pure contrition riven,

Crying: I sinned; my sin hath made me blind!—

He wants not much: enough if he be able

To pick up crumbs that fall beneath thy table.

Wherefore, O lady, break the ice at length;

Make thou, too, trial of love's fruits and flowers:

When in thine arms thou feel'st thy lover's strength,

Thou wilt repent of all these wasted hours;

Husbands, they know not love, its breadth and length,

Seeing their hearts are not on fire like ours:

Things longed for give most pleasure; this I tell thee:

If still thou doubtest let the proof compel thee.

318 What I have spoken is pure gospel sooth;

I have told all my mind, withholding nought:

And well, I ween, thou canst unhusk the truth,

And through the riddle read the hidden thought:

Perchance if heaven still smile upon my youth,

Some good effect for me may yet be wrought:

Then fare thee well; too many words offend:

She who is wise is quick to comprehend.

The levity of these love-declarations and the fluency of their vows

show them to be 'false as dicers' oaths,' mere verses of the moment,

made to please a facile mistress. One long poem, which cannot be styled

a Rispetto, but is rather a Canzone of the legitimate type, stands out

with distinctness from the rest of Poliziano's love-verses. It was

written by him for Giuliano de' Medici, in praise of the fair

Simonetta. The following version attempts to repeat its metrical

effects in some measure:—

My task it is, since thus Love wills, who strains

And forces all the world beneath his sway,

In lowly verse to say

The great delight that in my bosom reigns.

For if perchance I took but little pains

To tell some part of all the joy I find,

I might be deem'd unkind

By one who knew my heart's deep happiness.

He feels but little bliss who hides his bliss;

Small joy hath he whose joy is never sung;

And he who curbs his tongue

Through cowardice, knows but of love the name.

Wherefore to succour and augment the fame

Of that pure, virtuous, wise, and lovely may,

Who like the star of day

Shines mid the stars, or like the rising sun,

Forth from my burning heart the words shall run.

Far, far be envy, far be jealous fear,

With discord dark and drear,

And all the choir that is of love the foe.—

The season had returned when soft winds blow,

319 The season friendly to young lovers coy,

Which bids them clothe their joy

In divers garbs and many a masked disguise.

Then I to track the game 'neath April skies

Went forth in raiment strange apparellèd,

And by kind fate was led

Unto the spot where stayed my soul's desire.

The beauteous nymph who feeds my soul with fire,

I found in gentle, pure, and prudent mood,

In graceful attitude,

Loving and courteous, holy, wise, benign.

So sweet, so tender was her face divine,

So gladsome, that in those celestial eyes

Shone perfect paradise,

Yea, all the good that we poor mortals crave.

Around her was a band so nobly brave

Of beauteous dames, that as I gazed at these

Methought heaven's goddesses

That day for once had deigned to visit earth.

But she who gives my soul sorrow and mirth,

Seemed Pallas in her gait, and in her face

Venus; for every grace

And beauty of the world in her combined.

Merely to think, far more to tell my mind

Of that most wondrous sight, confoundeth me,

For mid the maidens she

Who most resembled her was found most rare.

Call ye another first among the fair;

Not first, but sole before my lady set:

Lily and violet

And all the flowers below the rose must bow.

Down from her royal head and lustrous brow

The golden curls fell sportively unpent,

While through the choir she went

With feet well lessoned to the rhythmic sound.

Her eyes, though scarcely raised above the ground,

Sent me by stealth a ray divinely fair;

But still her jealous hair

Broke the bright beam, and veiled her from my gaze.

She, born and nursed in heaven for angels' praise,

320 No sooner saw this wrong, than back she drew,

With hand of purest hue,

Her truant curls with kind and gentle mien.

Then from her eyes a soul so fiery keen,

So sweet a soul of love she cast on mine,

That scarce can I divine

How then I 'scaped from burning utterly.

These are the first fair signs of love to be,

That bound my heart with adamant, and these

The matchless courtesies

Which, dreamlike, still before mine eyes must hover.

This is the honeyed food she gave her lover,

To make him, so it pleased her, half-divine;

Nectar is not so fine,

Nor ambrosy, the fabled feast of Jove.

Then, yielding proofs more clear and strong of love,

As though to show the faith within her heart,

She moved, with subtle art,

Her feet accordant to the amorous air.

But while I gaze and pray to God that ne'er

Might cease that happy dance angelical,

O harsh, unkind recall!

Back to the banquet was she beckonèd.

She, with her face at first with pallor spread,

Then tinted with a blush of coral dye,

'The ball is best!' did cry,

Gentle in tone and smiling as she spake.

But from her eyes celestial forth did break

Favour at parting; and I well could see

Young love confusedly

Enclosed within the furtive fervent gaze,

Heating his arrows at their beauteous rays,

For war with Pallas and with Dian cold.

Fairer than mortal mould,

She moved majestic with celestial gait;

And with her hand her robe in royal state

Raised, as she went with pride ineffable.

Of me I cannot tell,

Whether alive or dead I there was left.

Nay, dead, methinks! since I of thee was reft,

321 Light of my life! and yet, perchance, alive—

Such virtue to revive

My lingering soul possessed thy beauteous face,

But if that powerful charm of thy great grace

Could then thy loyal lover so sustain,

Why comes there not again

More often or more soon the sweet delight?

Twice hath the wandering moon with borrowed light

Stored from her brother's rays her crescent horn,

Nor yet hath fortune borne

Me on the way to so much bliss again.

Earth smiles anew; fair spring renews her reign:

The grass and every shrub once more is green;

The amorous birds begin,

From winter loosed, to fill the field with song.

See how in loving pairs the cattle throng;

The bull, the ram, their amorous jousts enjoy:

Thou maiden, I a boy,

Shall we prove traitors to love's law for aye?

Shall we these years that are so fair let fly?

Wilt thou not put thy flower of youth to use?

Or with thy beauty choose

To make him blest who loves thee best of all?

Haply I am some hind who guards the stall,

Or of vile lineage, or with years outworn,

Poor, or a cripple born,

Or faint of spirit that you spurn me so?

Nay, but my race is noble and doth grow

With honour to our land, with pomp and power;

My youth is yet in flower,

And it may chance some maiden sighs for me.

My lot it is to deal right royally

With all the goods that fortune spreads around,

For still they more abound,

Shaken from her full lap, the more I waste.

My strength is such as whoso tries shall taste;

Circled with friends, with favours crowned am I:

Yet though I rank so high

Among the blest, as men may reckon bliss,

Still without thee, my hope, my happiness,

322 It seems a sad, and bitter thing to live!

Then stint me not, but give

That joy which holds all joys enclosed in one.

Let me pluck fruits at last, not flowers alone!

With much that is frigid, artificial, and tedious in this old-fashioned

love-song, there is a curious monotony of sweetness which commends it

to our ears; and he who reads it may remember the profile portrait of

Simonetta from the hand of Piero della Francesca in the Pitti Palace at

Florence.

It is worth comparing Poliziano's treatment of popular or semi-popular

verse-forms with his imitations of Petrarch's manner. For this purpose

I have chosen a _Canzone_, clearly written in competition with the

celebrated 'Chiare, fresche e dolci acque,' of Laura's lover. While

closely modelled upon Petrarch's form and similar in motive, this

Canzone preserves Poliziano's special qualities of fluency and

emptiness of content.

Hills, valleys, caves and fells,

With flowers and leaves and herbage spread;

Green meadows; shadowy groves where light is low;

Lawns watered with the rills

That cruel Love hath made me shed,

Cast from these cloudy eyes so dark with woe;

Thou stream that still dost know

What fell pangs pierce my heart,

So dost thou murmur back my moan;

Lone bird that chauntest tone for tone,

While in our descant drear Love sings his part:

Nymphs, woodland wanderers, wind and air;

List to the sound out-poured from my despair!

Seven times and once more seven

The roseate dawn her beauteous brow

Enwreathed with orient jewels hath displayed;

Cynthia once more in heaven

Hath orbed her horns with silver now;

While in sea waves her brother's light was laid;

Since this high mountain glade

323 Felt the white footsteps fall

Of that proud lady, who to spring

Converts whatever woodland thing

She may o'ershadow, touch, or heed at all.

Here bloom the flowers, the grasses spring

From her bright eyes, and drink what mine must bring.

Yea, nourished with my tears

Is every little leaf I see,

And the stream rolls therewith a prouder wave.

Ah me! through what long years

Will she withhold her face from me,

Which stills the stormy skies howe'er they rave?

Speak! or in grove or cave

If one hath seen her stray,

Plucking amid those grasses green

Wreaths for her royal brows serene,

Flowers white and blue and red and golden gay!

Nay, prithee, speak, if pity dwell

Among these woods, within this leafy dell!

O Love! 'twas here we saw,

Beneath the new-fledged leaves that spring

From this old beech, her fair form lowly laid:—

The thought renews my awe!

How sweetly did her tresses fling

Waves of wreathed gold unto the winds that strayed

Fire, frost within me played,

While I beheld the bloom

Of laughing flowers—O day of bliss!—

Around those tresses meet and kiss,

And roses in her lap of Love the home!

Her grace, her port divinely fair,

Describe it, Love! myself I do not dare.

In mute intent surprise

I gazed, as when a hind is seen

To dote upon its image in a rill;

Drinking those love-lit eyes,

Those hands, that face, those words serene,

That song which with delight the heaven did fill,

That smile which thralls me still,

Which melteth stones unkind,

324 Which in this woodland wilderness

Tames every beast and stills the stress

Of hurrying waters. Would that I could find

Her footprints upon field or grove!

I should not then be envious of Jove.

Thou cool stream rippling by,

Where oft it pleased her to dip

Her naked foot, how blest art thou!

Ye branching trees on high,

That spread your gnarled roots on the lip

Of yonder hanging rock to drink heaven's dew!

She often leaned on you,

She who is my life's bliss!

Thou ancient beech with moss o'ergrown,

How do I envy thee thy throne,

Found worthy to receive such happiness!

Ye winds, how blissful must ye be,

Since ye have borne to heaven her harmony!

The winds that music bore,

And wafted it to God on high,

That Paradise might have the joy thereof.

Flowers here she plucked, and wore

Wild roses from the thorn hard by:

This air she lightened with her look of love:

This running stream above,

She bent her face!—Ah me!

Where am I? What sweet makes me swoon?

What calm is in the kiss of noon?

Who brought me here? Who speaks? What melody?

Whence came pure peace into my soul?

What joy hath rapt me from my own control?

Poliziano's refrain is always: 'Gather ye rosebuds while ye may. It is

spring-time now and youth. Winter and old age are coming!' A _Maggio_,

or May-day song, describing the games, dances, and jousting matches of

the Florentine lads upon the morning of the first of May, expresses

this facile philosophy of life with a quaintness that recalls Herrick.

It will be noticed that the Maggio is built, so far as rhymes go, on

the same system as Poliziano's Ballata. It has considerable

325historical interest, for the opening couplet is said to be Guido

Cavalcanti's, while the whole poem is claimed by Roscoe for Lorenzo de'

Medici, and by Carducci with better reason for Poliziano.

Welcome in the May

And the woodland garland gay!

Welcome in the jocund spring

Which bids all men lovers be!

Maidens, up with carolling,

With your sweethearts stout and free,

With roses and with blossoms ye

Who deck yourselves this first of May!

Up, and forth into the pure

Meadows, mid the trees and flowers!

Every beauty is secure

With so many bachelors:

Beasts and birds amid the bowers

Burn with love this first of May.

Maidens, who are young and fair,

Be not harsh, I counsel you;

For your youth cannot repair

Her prime of spring, as meadows do:

None be proud, but all be true

To men who love, this first of May.

Dance and carol every one

Of our band so bright and gay!

See your sweethearts how they run

Through the jousts for you to-day!

She who saith her lover nay,

Will deflower the sweets of May,

Lads in love take sword and shield

To make pretty girls their prize:

Yield ye, merry maidens, yield

To your lovers' vows and sighs:

Give his heart back ere it dies:

Wage not war this first of May.

326 He who steals another's heart,

Let him give his own heart too:

Who's the robber? 'Tis the smart

Little cherub Cupid, who

Homage comes to pay with you,

Damsels, to the first of May.

Love comes smiling; round his head

Lilies white and roses meet:

'Tis for you his flight is sped.

Fair one, haste our king to greet:

Who will fling him blossoms sweet

Soonest on this first of May?

Welcome, stranger! welcome, king!

Love, what hast thou to command?

That each girl with wreaths should ring

Her lover's hair with loving hand,

That girls small and great should band

In Love's ranks this first of May.

The _Canto Carnascialesco_, for the final development if not for the

invention of which all credit must be given to Lorenzo de' Medici, does

not greatly differ from the Maggio in structure. It admitted, however,

of great varieties, and was generally more complex in its interweaving

of rhymes. Yet the essential principle of an exordium which should also

serve for a refrain, was rarely, if ever, departed from. Two specimens

of the Carnival Song will serve to bring into close contrast two very

different aspects of Florentine history. The earlier was composed by

Lorenzo de' Medici at the height of his power and in the summer of

Italian independence. It was sung by masquers attired in classical

costume, to represent Bacchus and his crew.

Fair is youth and void of sorrow;

But it hourly flies away.—

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

327 This is Bacchus and the bright

Ariadne, lovers true!

They, in flying time's despite,

Each with each find pleasure new;

These their Nymphs, and all their crew

Keep perpetual holiday.—

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

These blithe Satyrs, wanton-eyed,

Of the Nymphs are paramours:

Through the caves and forests wide

They have snared them mid the flowers;

Warmed with Bacchus, in his bowers,

Now they dance and leap alway.—

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

These fair Nymphs, they are not loth

To entice their lovers' wiles.

None but thankless folk and rough

Can resist when Love beguiles.

Now enlaced, with wreathèd smiles,

All together dance and play.—

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

See this load behind them plodding

On the ass! Silenus he,

Old and drunken, merry, nodding,

Full of years and jollity;

Though he goes so swayingly,

Yet he laughs and quaffs alway.—

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

Midas treads a wearier measure:

All he touches turns to gold:

If there be no taste of pleasure,

What's the use of wealth untold?

328 What's the joy his fingers hold,

When he's forced to thirst for aye?—

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

Listen well to what we're saying;

Of to-morrow have no care!

Young and old together playing,

Boys and girls, be blithe as air!

Every sorry thought forswear!

Keep perpetual holiday.—-

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day;

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

Ladies and gay lovers young!

Long live Bacchus, live Desire!

Dance and play; let songs be sung;

Let sweet love your bosoms fire;

In the future come what may!—-

Youths and maids, enjoy to-day!

Nought ye know about to-morrow.

Fair is youth and void of sorrow;

But it hourly flies away.

The next, composed by Antonio Alamanni, after Lorenzo's death and the

ominous passage of Charles VIII., was sung by masquers habited as

skeletons. The car they rode on, was a Car of Death designed by Piero

di Cosimo, and their music was purposely gloomy. If in the jovial days

of the Medici the streets of Florence had rung to the thoughtless

refrain, 'Nought ye know about to-morrow,' they now re-echoed with a

cry of 'Penitence;' for times had strangely altered, and the heedless

past had brought forth a doleful present. The last stanza of Alamanni's

chorus is a somewhat clumsy attempt to adapt the too real moral of his

subject to the customary mood of the Carnival.

329

Sorrow, tears, and penitence

Are our doom of pain for aye;

This dead concourse riding by

Hath no cry but penitence!

E'en as you are, once were we:

You shall be as now we are:

We are dead men, as you see:

We shall see you dead men, where

Nought avails to take great care,

After sins, of penitence.

We too in the Carnival

Sang our love-songs through the town;

Thus from sin to sin we all

Headlong, heedless, tumbled down:—

Now we cry, the world around,

Penitence! oh, Penitence!

Senseless, blind, and stubborn fools!

Time steals all things as he rides:

Honours, glories, states, and schools,

Pass away, and nought abides;

Till the tomb our carcase hides,

And compels this penitence.

This sharp scythe you see us bear,

Brings the world at length to woe:

But from life to life we fare;

And that life is joy or woe:

All heaven's bliss on him doth flow

Who on earth does penitence.

Living here, we all must die;

Dying, every soul shall live:

For the King of kings on high

This fixed ordinance doth give:

Lo, you all are fugitive!

Penitence! Cry Penitence!

Torment great and grievous dole

Hath the thankless heart mid you;

But the man of piteous soul

330 Finds much honour in our crew:

Love for loving is the due

That prevents this penitence.

Sorrow, tears, and penitence

Are our doom of pain for aye:

This dead concourse riding by

Hath no cry but Penitence!

One song for dancing, composed less upon the type of the Ballata than

on that of the Carnival Song, may here be introduced, not only in

illustration of the varied forms assumed by this style of poetry, but

also because it is highly characteristic of Tuscan town-life. This poem

in the vulgar style has been ascribed to Lorenzo de' Medici, but

probably without due reason. It describes the manners and customs of

female street gossips.

Since you beg with such a grace,

How can I refuse a song,

Wholesome, honest, void of wrong,

On the follies of the place?

Courteously on you I call;

Listen well to what I sing:

For my roundelay to all

May perchance instruction bring,

And of life good lessoning.—

When in company you meet,

Or sit spinning, all the street

Clamours like a market-place.

Thirty of you there may be;

Twenty-nine are sure to buzz,

And the single silent she

Racks her brains about her coz:—

Mrs. Buzz and Mrs. Huzz,

Mind your work, my ditty saith;

Do not gossip till your breath

Fails and leaves you black of face!

331 Governments go out and in:—

You the truth must needs discover.

Is a girl about to win

A brave husband in her lover?—

Straight you set to talk him over:

'Is he wealthy?' 'Does his coat

Fit?' 'And has he got a vote?'

'Who's his father?' 'What's his race?'

Out of window one head pokes;

Twenty others do the same:—

Chatter, clatter!—creaks and croaks

All the year the same old game!—

'See my spinning!' cries one dame,

'Five long ells of cloth, I trow!'

Cries another, 'Mine must go,

Drat it, to the bleaching base!'

'Devil take the fowl!' says one:

'Mine are all bewitched, I guess;

Cocks and hens with vermin run,

Mangy, filthy, featherless.'

Says another: 'I confess

Every hair I drop, I keep—

Plague upon it, in a heap

Falling off to my disgrace!'

If you see a fellow walk

Up or down the street and back,

How you nod and wink and talk,

Hurry-skurry, cluck and clack!—

'What, I wonder, does he lack

Here about?'—'There's something wrong!'

Till the poor man's made a song

For the female populace.

It were well you gave no thought

To such idle company;

Shun these gossips, care for nought

But the business that you ply.

332 You who chatter, you who cry,

Heed my words; be wise, I pray:

Fewer, shorter stories say:

Bide at home, and mind your place.

Since you beg with such a grace,

How can I refuse a song,

Wholesome, honest, void of wrong,

On the follies of the place?

The _Madrigale_, intended to be sung in parts, was another species of

popular poetry cultivated by the greatest of Italian writers. Without

seeking examples from such men as Petrarch, Michelangelo, or Tasso, who

used it as a purely literary form, I will content myself with a few

Madrigals by anonymous composers, more truly popular in style, and more

immediately intended for music.[46] The similarity both of manner and

matter, between these little poems and the Ballate, is obvious. There

is the same affectation of rusticity in both.

[46] The originals will be found in Carducci's _Studi Letterari_, p.

273 _et seq._ I have preserved their rhyming structure.

_Cogliendo per un prato._

Plucking white lilies in a field I saw

Fair women, laden with young Love's delight:

Some sang, some danced; but all were fresh and bright.

Then by the margin of a fount they leaned,

And of those flowers made garlands for their hair—

Wreaths for their golden tresses quaint and rare.

Forth from the field I passed, and gazed upon

Their loveliness, and lost my heart to one.

_Togliendo l' una all' altra._

One from the other borrowing leaves and flowers,

I saw fair maidens 'neath the summer trees,

Weaving bright garlands with low love-ditties.

Mid that sweet sisterhood the loveliest

333 Turned her soft eyes to me, and whispered, 'Take!'

Love-lost I stood, and not a word I spake.

My heart she read, and her fair garland gave:

Therefore I am her servant to the grave.

_Appress' un fiume chiaro_.

Hard by a crystal stream

Girls and maids were dancing round

A lilac with fair blossoms crowned.

Mid these I spied out one

So tender-sweet, so love-laden,

She stole my heart with singing then:

Love in her face so lovely-kind

And eyes and hands my soul did bind.

_Di riva in riva_.

From lawn to lea Love led me down the valley,

Seeking my hawk, where 'neath a pleasant hill

I spied fair maidens bathing in a rill.

Lina was there all loveliness excelling;

The pleasure of her beauty made me sad,

And yet at sight of her my soul was glad.

Downward I cast mine eyes with modest seeming,

And all a tremble from the fountain fled:

For each was naked as her maidenhead.

Thence singing fared I through a flowery plain,

Where bye and bye I found my hawk again!

_Nel chiaro fiume_.

Down a fair streamlet crystal-clear and pleasant

I went a fishing all alone one day,

And spied three maidens bathing there at play.

Of love they told each other honeyed stories,

While with white hands they smote the stream, to wet

Their sunbright hair in the pure rivulet.

Gazing I crouched among thick flowering leafage,

Till one who spied a rustling branch on high,

Turned to her comrades with a sudden cry,

And 'Go! Nay, prithee go!' she called to me:

'To stay were surely but scant courtesy.'

334

_Quel sole che nutrica._

The sun which makes a lily bloom,

Leans down at times on her to gaze—

Fairer, he deems, than his fair rays:

Then, having looked a little while,

He turns and tells the saints in bliss

How marvellous her beauty is.

Thus up in heaven with flute and string

Thy loveliness the angels sing.

_Di novo è giunt'._

Lo: here hath come an errant knight

On a barbed charger clothed in mail:

His archers scatter iron hail.

At brow and breast his mace he aims;

Who therefore hath not arms of proof,

Let him live locked by door and roof;

Until Dame Summer on a day

That grisly knight return to slay.

Poliziano's treatment of the octave stanza for Rispetti was

comparatively popular. But in his poem of 'La Giostra,' written to

commemorate the victory of Giuliano de' Medici in a tournament and to

celebrate his mistress, he gave a new and richer form to the metre

which Boccaccio had already used for epic verse. The slight and

uninteresting framework of this poem, which opened a new sphere for

Italian literature, and prepared the way for Ariosto's golden cantos,

might be compared to one of those wire baskets which children steep in

alum water, and incrust with crystals, sparkling, artificial, beautiful

with colours not their own. The mind of Poliziano held, as it were, in

solution all the images and thoughts of antiquity, all the riches of

his native literature. In that vast reservoir of poems and mythologies

and phrases, so patiently accumulated, so tenaciously preserved, so

thoroughly assimilated, he plunged the trivial subject he had

335chosen, and triumphantly presented to the world the _spolia opima_

of scholarship and taste. What mattered it that the theme was slight?

The art was perfect, the result splendid. One canto of 125 stanzas

describes the youth of Giuliano, who sought to pass his life among the

woods, a hunter dead to love, but who was doomed to be ensnared by

Cupid. The chase, the beauty of Simonetta, the palace of Venus, these

are the three subjects of a book as long as the first Iliad. The second

canto begins with dreams and prophecies of glory to be won by Giuliano

in the tournament. But it stops abruptly. The tragic catastrophe of the

Pazzi Conjuration cut short Poliziano's panegyric by the murder of his

hero. Meanwhile the poet had achieved his purpose. His torso presented

to Italy a model of style, a piece of written art adequate to the great

painting of the Renaissance period, a double star of poetry which blent

the splendours of the ancient and the modern world. To render into

worthy English the harmonies of Poliziano is a difficult task. Yet this

must be attempted if an English reader is to gain any notion of the

scope and substance of the Italian poet's art. In the first part of the

poem we are placed, as it were, at the mid point between the

'Hippolytus' of Euripides and Shakspere's 'Venus and Adonis.' The cold

hunter Giuliano is to see Simonetta, and seeing, is to love her. This

is how he first discovers the triumphant beauty:[47]

White is the maid, and white the robe around her,

With buds and roses and thin grasses pied;

Enwreathèd folds of golden tresses crowned her,

Shadowing her forehead fair with modest pride:

336 The wild wood smiled; the thicket where he found her,

To ease his anguish, bloomed on every side:

Serene she sits, with gesture queenly mild,

And with her brow tempers the tempests wild.

[47] Stanza XLIII. All references are made to Carducci's excellent

edition, _Le Stanze, l'Orfeo e le Rime di Messer Angelo Ambrogini

Poliziano._ Firenze: G. Barbéra. 1863.

After three stanzas of this sort, in which the poet's style is more

apparent than the object he describes, occurs this charming picture:—

Reclined he found her on the swarded grass

In jocund mood; and garlands she had made

Of every flower that in the meadow was,

Or on her robe of many hues displayed;

But when she saw the youth before her pass,

Raising her timid head awhile she stayed;

Then with her white hand gathered up her dress,

And stood, lap-full of flowers, in loveliness.

Then through the dewy field with footstep slow

The lingering maid began to take her way,

Leaving her lover in great fear and woe,

For now he longs for nought but her alway:

The wretch, who cannot bear that she should go,

Strives with a whispered prayer her feet to stay;

And thus at last, all trembling, all afire,

In humble wise he breathes his soul's desire:

'Whoe'er thou art, maid among maidens queen,

Goddess, or nymph—nay, goddess seems most clear—

If goddess, sure my Dian I have seen;

If mortal, let thy proper self appear!

Beyond terrestrial beauty is thy mien;

I have no merit that I should be here!

What grace of heaven, what lucky star benign

Yields me the sight of beauty so divine?'

A conversation ensues, after which Giuliano departs utterly lovesick,

and Cupid takes wing exultingly for Cyprus, where his mother's palace

stands. In the following picture of the house of Venus, who shall say

how much of Ariosto's 337Alcina and Tasso's Armida is contained? Cupid

arrives, and the family of Love is filled with joy at Giuliano's

conquest. From the plan of the poem it is clear that its beauties are

chiefly those of detail. They are, however, very great. How perfect,

for example, is the richness combined with delicacy of the following

description of a country life:—

BOOK I. STANZAS 17-21.

How far more safe it is, how far more fair,

To chase the flying deer along the lea;

Through ancient woods to track their hidden lair,

Far from the town, with long-drawn subtlety:

To scan the vales, the hills, the limpid air,

The grass and flowers, clear ice, and streams so free;

To hear the birds wake from their winter trance,

The wind-stirred leaves and murmuring waters dance.

How sweet it were to watch the young goats hung

From toppling crags, cropping the tender shoot,

While in thick pleachèd shade the shepherd sung

His uncouth rural lay and woke his flute;

To mark, mid dewy grass, red apples flung,

And every bough thick set with ripening fruit,

The butting rams, kine lowing o'er the lea,

And cornfields waving like the windy sea.

Lo! how the rugged master of the herd

Before his flock unbars the wattled cote;

Then with his rod and many a rustic word

He rules their going: or 'tis sweet to note

The delver, when his toothèd rake hath stirred

The stubborn clod, his hoe the glebe hath smote;

Barefoot the country girl, with loosened zone,

Spins, while she keeps her geese 'neath yonder stone.

After such happy wise, in ancient years,

Dwelt the old nations in the age of gold;

Nor had the fount been stirred of mothers' tears

For sons in war's fell labour stark and cold;

338 Nor trusted they to ships the wild wind steers,

Nor yet had oxen groaning ploughed the wold;

Their houses were huge oaks, whose trunks had store

Of honey, and whose boughs thick acorns bore.

Nor yet, in that glad time, the accursèd thirst

Of cruel gold had fallen on this fair earth:

Joyous in liberty they lived at first;

Unploughed the fields sent forth their teeming birth;

Till fortune, envious of such concord, burst

The bond of law, and pity banned and worth;

Within their breasts sprang luxury and that rage

Which men call love in our degenerate age.

We need not be reminded that these stanzas are almost a cento from

Virgil, Hesiod, and Ovid. The merits of the translator, adapter, and

combiner, who knew so well how to cull their beauties and adorn them

with a perfect dress of modern diction, are so eminent that we cannot

deny him the title of a great poet. It is always in picture-painting

more than in dramatic presentation that Poliziano excels. Here is a

basrelief of Venus rising from the Ocean foam:—

STANZAS 99-107.

In Thetis' lap, upon the vexed Egean,

The seed deific from Olympus sown,

Beneath dim stars and cycling empyrean

Drifts like white foam across the salt waves blown;

Thence, born at last by movements hymenean,

Rises a maid more fair than man hath known;

Upon her shell the wanton breezes waft her;

She nears the shore, while heaven looks down with laughter

Seeing the carved work you would cry that real

Were shell and sea, and real the winds that blow;

The lightning of the goddess' eyes you feel,

The smiling heavens, the elemental glow:

339 White-vested Hours across the smooth sands steal,

With loosened curls that to the breezes flow;

Like, yet unlike, are all their beauteous faces,

E'en as befits a choir of sister Graces.

Well might you swear that on those waves were riding

The goddess with her right hand on her hair,

And with the other the sweet apple hiding;

And that beneath her feet, divinely fair,

Fresh flowers sprang forth, the barren sands dividing;

Then that, with glad smiles and enticements rare,

The three nymphs round their queen, embosoming her,

Threw the starred mantle soft as gossamer.

The one, with hands above her head upraised,

Upon her dewy tresses fits a wreath,

With ruddy gold and orient gems emblazed;

The second hangs pure pearls her ears beneath;

The third round shoulders white and breast hath placed

Such wealth of gleaming carcanets as sheathe

Their own fair bosoms, when the Graces sing

Among the gods with dance and carolling.

Thence might you see them rising toward the spheres,

Seated upon a cloud of silvery white;

The trembling of the cloven air appears

Wrought in the stone, and heaven serenely bright;

The gods drink in with open eyes and ears

Her beauty, and desire her bed's delight;

Each seems to marvel with a mute amaze—

Their brows and foreheads wrinkle as they gaze.

The next quotation shows Venus in the lap of Mars, and Visited by

Cupid:—

STANZAS 122—124.

Stretched on a couch, outside the coverlid,

Love found her, scarce unloosed from Mars' embrace;

He, lying back within her bosom, fed

His eager eyes on nought but her fair face;

340 Roses above them like a cloud were shed,

To reinforce them in the amorous chace;

While Venus, quick with longings unsuppressed,

A thousand times his eyes and forehead kissed.

Above, around, young Loves on every side

Played naked, darting birdlike to and fro;

And one, whose plumes a thousand colours dyed,

Fanned the shed roses as they lay arow;

One filled his quiver with fresh flowers, and hied

To pour them on the couch that lay below;

Another, poised upon his pinions, through

The falling shower soared shaking rosy dew:

For, as he quivered with his tremulous wing,

The wandering roses in their drift were stayed;—

Thus none was weary of glad gambolling;

Till Cupid came, with dazzling plumes displayed,

Breathless; and round his mother's neck did fling

His languid arms, and with his winnowing made

Her heart burn:—very glad and bright of face,

But, with his flight, too tired to speak apace.

These pictures have in them the very glow of Italian painting.

Sometimes we seem to see a quaint design of Piero di Cosimo, with

bright tints and multitudinous small figures in a spacious landscape.

Sometimes it is the languid grace of Botticelli, whose soul became

possessed of classic inspiration as it were in dreams, and who has

painted the birth of Venus almost exactly as Poliziano imagined it.

Again, we seize the broader beauties of the Venetian masters, or the

vehemence of Giulio Romano's pencil. To the last class belong the two

next extracts:—

STANZAS 104—107.

In the last square the great artificer

Had wrought himself crowned with Love's perfect palm;

Black from his forge and rough, he runs to her,

Leaving all labour for her bosom's calm:

341 Lips joined to lips with deep love-longing stir,

Fire in his heart, and in his spirit balm;

Far fiercer flames through breast and marrow fly

Than those which heat his forge in Sicily.

Jove, on the other side, becomes a bull,

Goodly and white, at Love's behest, and rears

His neck beneath his rich freight beautiful:

She turns toward the shore that disappears,

With frightened gesture; and the wonderful

Gold curls about her bosom and her ears

Float in the wind; her veil waves, backward borne;

This hand still clasps his back, and that his horn.

With naked feet close-tucked beneath her dress,

She seems to fear the sea that dares not rise:

So, imaged in a shape of drear distress,

In vain unto her comrades sweet she cries;

They left amid the meadow-flowers, no less

For lost Europa wail with weeping eyes:

Europa, sounds the shore, bring back our bliss

But the bull swims and turns her feet to kiss.

Here Jove is made a swan, a golden shower,

Or seems a serpent, or a shepherd-swain,

To work his amorous will in secret hour;

Here, like an eagle, soars he o'er the plain,

Love-led, and bears his Ganymede, the flower

Of beauty, mid celestial peers to reign;

The boy with cypress hath his fair locks crowned,

Naked, with ivy wreathed his waist around.

STANZAS 110—112.

Lo! here again fair Ariadne lies,

And to the deaf winds of false Theseus plains.

And of the air and slumber's treacheries;

Trembling with fear even as a reed that strain.

And quivers by the mere 'neath breezy skies:

Her very speechless attitude complains—

No beast there is so cruel as thou art,

No beast less loyal to my broken heart.

342 Throned on a car, with ivy crowned and vine,

Rides Bacchus, by two champing tigers driven:

Around him on the sand deep-soaked with brine

Satyrs and Bacchantes rush; the skies are riven

With shouts and laughter; Fauns quaff bubbling wine

From horns and cymbals; Nymphs, to madness driven,

Trip, skip, and stumble; mixed in wild enlacements,

Laughing they roll or meet for glad embracements.

Upon his ass Silenus, never sated,

With thick, black veins, wherethrough the must is soaking,

Nods his dull forehead with deep sleep belated;

His eyes are wine-inflamed, and red, and smoking:

Bold Mænads goad the ass so sorely weighted,

With stinging thyrsi; he sways feebly poking

The mane with bloated fingers; Fauns behind him,

E'en as he falls, upon the crupper bind him.

We almost seem to be looking at the frescoes in some Trasteverine

palace, or at the canvas of one of the sensual Genoese painters. The

description of the garden of Venus has the charm of somewhat artificial

elegance, the exotic grace of style, which attracts us in the earlier

Renaissance work:—

The leafy tresses of that timeless garden

Nor fragile brine nor fresh snow dares to whiten;

Frore winter never comes the rills to harden,

Nor winds the tender shrubs and herbs to frighten;

Glad Spring is always here, a laughing warden;

Nor do the seasons wane, but ever brighten;

Here to the breeze young May, her curls unbinding,

With thousand flowers her wreath is ever winding.

Indeed it may be said with truth that Poliziano's most eminent faculty

as a descriptive poet corresponded exactly to the genius of the

painters of his day. To produce pictures radiant with Renaissance

colouring, and vigorous with Renaissance passion, was the function of

his art, not to 343express profound thought or dramatic situations.

This remark might be extended with justice to Ariosto, and Tasso, and

Boiardo. The great narrative poets of the Renaissance in Italy were not

dramatists; nor were their poems epics: their forte lay in the

inexhaustible variety and beauty of their pictures.

Of Poliziano's plagiarism—if this be the right word to apply to the

process of assimilation and selection, by means of which the

poet-scholar of Florence taught the Italians how to use the riches of

the ancient languages and their own literature—here are some specimens.

In stanza 42 of the 'Giostra' he says of Simonetta:—

E 'n lei discerne un non so che divino.

Dante has the line:—

Vostri risplende un non so che divino.

In the 44th he speaks about the birds:—

E canta ogni augelletto in suo latino.

This comes from Cavalcanti's:—

E cantinne gli augelli.

Ciascuno in suo latino.

Stanza 45 is taken bodily from Claudian, Dante, and Cavalcanti. It

would seem as though Poliziano wished to show that the classic and

medieval literature of Italy was all one, and that a poet of the

Renaissance could carry on the continuous tradition in his own style.

A, line in stanza 54 seems perfectly original:—

E già dall'alte ville il fumo esala.

It comes straight from Virgil:—

Et jam summa pocul villarum culmina fumant.

344

In the next stanza the line—

Tal che 'l ciel tutto rasserenò d'intorno,

is Petrarch's. So in the 56th, is the phrase 'il dolce andar celeste.'

In stanza 57—

Par che 'l cor del petto se gli schianti,

belongs to Boccaccio. In stanza 60 the first line:—

La notte che le cose ci nasconde,

together with its rhyme, 'sotto le amate fronde,' is borrowed from the

23rd canto of the 'Paradiso.' In the second line, 'Stellato ammanto' is

Claudian's 'stellantes sinus' applied to the heaven. When we reach the

garden of Venus we find whole passages translated from Claudian's

'Marriage of Honorius,' and from the 'Metamorphoses' of Ovid.

Poliziano's second poem of importance, which indeed may historically be

said to take precedence of 'La Giostra,' was the so-called tragedy of

'Orfeo.' The English version of this lyrical drama must be reserved for

a separate study: yet it belongs to the subject of this, inasmuch as

the 'Orfeo' is a classical legend treated in a form already familiar to

the Italian people. Nearly all the popular kinds of poetry of which

specimens have been translated in this chapter, will be found combined

in its six short scenes.

345

ORFEO

The 'Orfeo' of Messer Angelo Poliziano ranks amongst the most important

poems of the fifteenth century. It was composed at Mantua in the short

space of two days, on the occasion of Cardinal Francesco Gonzaga's

visit to his native town in 1472. But, though so hastily put together,

the 'Orfeo' marks an epoch in the evolution of Italian poetry. It is

the earliest example of a secular drama, containing within the compass

of its brief scenes the germ of the opera, the tragedy, and the

pastoral play. In form it does not greatly differ from the 'Sacre

Rappresentazioni' of the fifteenth century, as those miracle plays were

handled by popular poets of the earlier Renaissance. But while the

traditional octave stanza is used for the main movement of the piece,

Poliziano has introduced episodes of _terza rima_, madrigals, a

carnival song, a _ballata_, and, above all, choral passages which have

in them the future melodrama of the musical Italian stage. The lyrical

treatment of the fable, its capacity for brilliant and varied scenic

effects, its combination of singing with action, and the whole artistic

keeping of the piece, which never passes into genuine tragedy, but

stays within the limits of romantic pathos, distinguish the 'Orfeo' as

a typical production of Italian genius. Thus, though little better than

an improvisation, it combines the many forms of verse developed by the

Tuscans at the close of the Middle Ages, and fixes the limits beyond

which their dramatic poets, with a few 346exceptions, were not destined

to advance. Nor was the choice of the fable without significance.

Quitting the Bible stories and the Legends of Saints, which supplied

the mediaeval playwright with material, Poliziano selects a classic

story: and this story might pass for an allegory of Italy, whose

intellectual development the scholar-poet ruled. Orpheus is the power

of poetry and art, softening stubborn nature, civilising men, and

prevailing over Hades for a season. He is the right hero of humanism,

the genius of the Renaissance, the tutelary god of Italy, who thought

she could resist the laws of fate by verse and elegant accomplishments.

To press this kind of allegory is unwise; for at a certain moment it

breaks in our hands. And yet in Eurydice the fancy might discover

Freedom, the true spouse of poetry and art; Orfeo's last resolve too

vividly depicts the vice of the Renaissance; and the Mænads are those

barbarous armies destined to lay waste the plains of Italy, inebriate

with wine and blood, obeying a new lord of life on whom the poet's harp

exerts no charm. But a truce to this spinning of pedantic cobwebs. Let

Mercury appear, and let the play begin.

_THE FABLE OF ORPHEUS_

MERCURY _announces the show_.

Ho, silence! Listen! There was once a hind,

Son of Apollo, Aristaeus hight,

Who loved with so untamed and fierce a mind

Eurydice, the wife of Orpheus wight,

That chasing her one day with will unkind

He wrought her cruel death in love's despite;

For, as she fled toward the mere hard by,

A serpent stung her, and she had to die.

347 Now Orpheus, singing, brought her back from hell,

But could not keep the law the fates ordain:

Poor wretch, he backward turned and broke the spell;

So that once more from him his love was ta'en.

Therefore he would no more with women dwell,

And in the end by women he was slain.

_Enter_ A SHEPHERD, _who says_—

Nay, listen, friends! Fair auspices are given,

Since Mercury to earth hath come from heaven.

SCENE I

MOPSUS, _an old shepherd_.

Say, hast thou seen a calf of mine, all white

Save for a spot of black upon her front,

Two feet, one flank, and one knee ruddy-bright?

ARISTAEUS, _a young shepherd_.

Friend Mopsus, to the margin of this fount

No herds have come to drink since break of day;

Yet may'st thou hear them low on yonder mount.

Go, Thyrsis, search the upland lawn, I pray!

Thou Mopsus shalt with me the while abide;

For I would have thee listen to my lay.

[_Exit_ THYRSIS.

'Twas yester morn where trees yon cavern hide,

I saw a nymph more fair than Dian, who

Had a young lusty lover at her side:

But when that more than woman met my view,

The heart within my bosom leapt outright,

And straight the madness of wild Love I knew.

Since then, dear Mopsus, I have no delight;

But weep and weep: of food and drink I tire,

And without slumber pass the weary night.

MOPSUS.

348 Friend Aristaeus, if this amorous fire

Thou dost not seek to quench as best may be,

Thy peace of soul will vanish in desire.

Thou know'st that love is no new thing to me:

I've proved how love grown old brings bitter pain:

Cure it at once, or hope no remedy;

For if thou find thee in Love's cruel chain,

Thy bees, thy blossoms will be out of mind,

Thy fields, thy vines, thy flocks, thy cotes, thy grain

ARISTAEUS.

Mopsus, thou speakest to the deaf and blind:

Waste not on me these wingèd words, I pray,

Lest they be scattered to the inconstant wind,

I love, and cannot wish to say love nay;

Nor seek to cure so charming a disease:

They praise Love best who most against him say.

Yet if thou fain wouldst give my heart some ease,

Forth from thy wallet take thy pipe, and we

Will sing awhile beneath the leafy trees;

For well my nymph is pleased with melody.

THE SONG.

Listen, ye wild woods, to my roundelay;

Since the fair nymph will hear not, though I pray.

The lovely nymph is deaf to my lament,

Nor heeds the music of this rustic reed;

Wherefore my flocks and herds are ill content,

Nor bathe their hoof where grows the water weed,

Nor touch the tender herbage on the mead;

So sad, because their shepherd grieves, are they.

Listen, ye wild woods, to my roundelay;

Since the fair nymph will hear not, though I pray.

The herds are sorry for their master's moan;

The nymph heeds not her lover though he die,

349 The lovely nymph, whose heart is made of stone—

Nay steel, nay adamant! She still doth fly

Far, far before me, when she sees me nigh,

Even as a lamb flies fern the wolf away.

Listen, ye wild woods, to my roundelay;

Since the fair nymph will hear not, though I pray.

Nay, tell her, pipe of mine, how swift doth flee

Beauty together with our years amain;

Tell her how time destroys all rarity,

Nor youth once lost can be renewed again;

Tell her to use the gifts that yet remain:

Roses and violets blossom not alway.

Listen, ye wild woods, to my roundelay;

Since the fair nymph will hear not, though I pray.

Carry, ye winds, these sweet words to her ears,

Unto the ears of my loved nymph, and tell

How many tears I shed, what bitter tears!

Beg her to pity one who loves so well:

Say that my life is frail and mutable,

And melts like rime before the rising day.

Listen, ye wild woods, to my roundelay;

Since the fair nymph will hear not, though I pray.

MOPSUS.

Less sweet, methinks the voice of waters falling

From cliffs that echo back their murmurous song;

Less sweet the summer sound of breezes calling

Through pine-tree tops sonorous all day long;

Than are thy rhymes, the soul of grief enthralling,

Thy rhymes o'er field and forest borne along:

If she but hear them, at thy feet she'll fawn.—

Lo, Thyrsis, hurrying homeward from the lawn!

[_Re-enters_ THYRSIS.

350

ARISTAEUS.

What of the calf? Say, hast thou seen her now?

THYRSIS, _the cowherd_.

I have, and I'd as lief her throat were cut!

She almost ripped my bowels up, I vow,

Running amuck with horns well set to butt:

Nathless I've locked her in the stall below:

She's blown with grass, I tell you, saucy slut!

ARISTAEUS.

Now, prithee, let me hear what made you stay

So long upon the upland lawns away?

THYRSIS.

Walking, I spied a gentle maiden there,

Who plucked wild flowers upon the mountain side:

I scarcely think that Venus is more fair,

Of sweeter grace, most modest in her pride:

She speaks, she sings, with voice so soft and rare,

That listening streams would backward roll their tide:

Her face is snow and roses; gold her head;

All, all alone she goes, white-raimented,

ARISTAEUS.

Stay, Mopsus! I must follow: for 'tis she

Of whom I lately spoke. So, friend, farewell!

MOPSUS.

Hold, Aristaeus, lest for her or thee

Thy boldness be the cause of mischief fell!

ARISTAEUS.

Nay, death this day must be my destiny,

Unless I try my fate and break the spell.

Stay therefore, Mopsus, by the fountain stay!

I'll follow her, meanwhile, yon mountain way.

[_Exit_ ARISTAEUS.

351

MOPSUS.

Thyrsis, what thinkest thou of thy loved lord?

See'st thou that all his senses are distraught?

Couldst thou not speak some seasonable word,

Tell him what shame this idle love hath wrought?

THYRSIS.

Free speech and servitude but ill accord,

Friend Mopsus, and the hind is folly-fraught

Who rates his lord! He's wiser far than I.

To tend these kine is all my mastery.

Sketches and Studies in Italy and Greece, Complete Series I, II, and III · 第 1 / 12 章