THE CONTENTS OF THE MANUSCRIPT.
On the date indicated in the report, then, the city of Liverpool and the
whole country were agitated by the news of a terrible murder. On the
road-side near Everton the dead body of a Mr. Henderson, an eminent
banker, had been found, not far from his own residence. The discovery
had been made at about eleven o'clock in the evening by some passers-by.
Upon examination a wound was found in the back of the head which had
been caused by a bullet. His watch and purse were still in their places,
but his pocket-book was gone. Clasped in one of the hands was a
newspaper, on the blank margin of which were some red letters, rudely
traced, and looking as though they had been written with blood. The
letters were these:
“DALTON SHOT ME BEC--”
It was evident that the writer intended to write the word “because,” and
give the reason why he had been shot, but that his strength had failed
in the middle of the word.
A closer search revealed some other things. One was a small stick, the
point of which was reddened with a substance which microscopic
examination afterward showed to be blood. The other was a scarf-pin made
of gold, the head of which consisted of a Maltese cross, of very rich
and elegant design. In the middle was black enamel inclosed by a richly
chased gold border, and at the intersection of the bars was a small
diamond of great splendor. If this cross belonged to the murderer it had
doubtless become loosened, and fallen out while he was stooping over his
victim, and the loss had not been noticed in the excitement of the
occasion.
At the coroner's inquest various important circumstances were brought to
light. The fact that his watch and purse remained made it plain that it
was not a case of common highway robbery, and the loss of the
pocket-book showed that the deed was prompted by a desire for something
more than ordinary plunder. Proceeding from this, various circumstances
arose which, in addition to the terrible accusation traced in blood,
tended to throw suspicion upon Frederick Dalton.
It came out that on the morning of that very day Mr. Henderson had
discovered a check for two thousand pounds that had been forged in his
name. Being a very choleric man, he felt more than the anger which is
natural under such circumstances, and vowed vengeance to the uttermost
upon the forger. That same morning Mr. Frederick Dalton came to see him,
and was shown into his private office. He had just arrived in the city,
and had come on purpose to pay this visit. The interview was a
protracted one, and the clerks outside heard the voice of Mr. Henderson
in a very high key, and in a strain of what sounded like angry menace
and denunciations of vengeance, though they could not make out any
words. At last the office door opened, and Dalton came out. He was very
pale, and much agitated. One of the clerks heard him say, in a low
voice,
“_Only one day--till this time to-morrow_.”
Whereupon Mr. Henderson roared out in a loud voice, which all the clerks
heard,
“_No, Sir! Not one day, not one hour, if I die for it!_”
Upon this Dalton walked away, looking paler and more agitated than ever.
In the course of the day Mr. Henderson told his confidential clerk that
the check had just been used by Dalton, who, however, denied that he was
the forger; that the visit of Dalton professed to be on behalf of the
guilty party, whom he wished to screen. Dalton had refused to give the
culprit's name, and offered to pay the amount of the check, or any
additional sum whatever, if no proceedings were taken. This, however,
Mr. Henderson refused, and in his indignation charged Dalton himself
with the crime. Under these circumstances the interview had terminated.
Thus the evidence against Dalton was the forged check, the clerks'
reports concerning the exciting interview with Mr. Henderson, the awful
accusation of the deceased himself, written in his own blood, together
with the Maltese cross, which was believed to belong to Dalton. The
arrest of Dalton had been made at the earliest possible moment; and at
the trial these were the things which were made use of against him by
the prosecution. By energetic efforts discovery was made of a jeweler
who recognized the Maltese cross as his own work, and swore that he had
made it for Frederick Dalton, in accordance with a special design
furnished him by that gentleman. The design had been kept in his
order-book ever since, and was produced by him in court. Thus the
testimony of the jeweler and the order-book served to fix the ownership
of the Maltese cross upon Dalton in such a way that it corroborated and
confirmed all the other testimony.
On the other hand, the defense of Dalton took up all these points. In
the first place, it was shown that in his case there was no conceivable
temptation that could have led to the commission of such a crime. He was
a man of great wealth, possessed of a fine estate, and free from all
pecuniary embarrassments. He was not what was called a sporting man,
and therefore could not have secretly accumulated debts while appearing
rich. It was shown, also, that his character was stainless; that he was
essentially a domestic man, living quietly at Dalton Hall with his wife
and child, and therefore, from his worldly means as well as from his
personal character and surroundings, it was morally impossible for him
to have forged the check.
With reference to the interview with Mr. Henderson, it was maintained
that it arose, as he himself said, from a desire to shield the real
culprit, whom he knew, and for whom he felt a strong and unusual regard.
Who this culprit was the defense did not assert, nor could they imagine,
though they tried every possible way of finding him out. Whoever he was,
he appeared to be the only one who could have had a motive strong enough
for the murder of Mr. Henderson. The unknown assassin had evidently done
the deed so as to obtain possession of the forged check, and prevent its
being used against him. In this he was unsuccessful, since the check had
already been intrusted to the hands of others; but the aim of the
assassin was sufficiently evident.
Again, as to the writing in blood, a vigorous effort was made to show
that this was a conspiracy against an innocent man. It was argued that
Mr. Henderson did not write it at all; and efforts were made to prove
that the wound in his head must have caused instantaneous death. He
himself, therefore, could not have written it, but it must have been the
work of some one who was plotting against Dalton, or who was eager to
divert suspicion from himself.
The testimony of the Maltese cross was met by counter-testimony to the
effect that Dalton had never worn such an ornament. His servants all
swore that they had never seen it before. Mr. Henderson's clerks also
swore that Mr. Dalton wore no pin at all on that morning of the
interview.
And, finally, an effort was made to prove an _alibi_. It was shown
that Dalton's occupation of his time during that evening could be
accounted for with the exception of one hour. Witnesses were produced
from the hotel where he put up who swore that he had been there until
eight o'clock in the evening, when he left, returning at nine. An hour,
therefore, remained to be accounted for. As to this hour--on the one
hand, it seemed hardly sufficient for the deed, but yet it was certainly
possible for him to have done it within that time; and thus it remained
for the defense to account for that hour. For this purpose a note was
produced, which was scribbled in pencil and addressed to John Wiggins,
Esq.
It was as follows:
“Dear Wiggins,--I have been here ever since eight, and am tired of
waiting. Come to my room as soon as you get back. I'll be there.
“Yours, F. DALTON.”
Mr. John Wiggins testified that he had made an appointment to meet
Dalton at the hour mentioned in the note, but had been detained on
business until late. He had found this on his return thrust under the
office door. On going to see him the following morning he had learned of
his arrest.
This note and the testimony of Wiggins were felt to bear strongly in
Dalton's favor. If the accused had really been waiting at the office,
as the note stated, then clearly he could not have followed on Mr.
Henderson's track to Everton. The force of this weighed more than any
thing else with the court; the summing up of the judge also bore
strongly toward an acquittal; and, consequently, Dalton was declared not
guilty.
But the acquittal on this first charge did not at all secure the escape
of Dalton from danger. Another charge, which had been interwoven with
the first, still impended over him, and no sooner was he declared free
of murder than he was arrested on the charge of forgery, and remanded to
prison to await his trial on that accusation.
Now during the whole course of the trial the public mind had been
intensely excited; all men were eager than vengeance should fall on some
one, and at the outset had made up their minds that Dalton was guilty.
The verdict of acquittal created deep and widespread dissatisfaction,
for it seemed as though justice had been cheated of a victim. When,
therefore, the trial for forgery came on, there weighed against Dalton
all the infamy that had been accumulating against him during the trial
for murder. Had this trial stood alone, the prisoner's counsel might
have successfully pleaded his high character, as well as his wealth,
against this charge, and shown that it was false because it was morally
impossible. But this was no longer of avail, and in the public mind
Frederick Dalton was deemed only a desperate murderer, whose good
reputation was merely the result of life-long hypocrisy, and whose
character was but an empty name.
And so in this trial it was shown that Dalton had first put forth the
forged check, and afterward learning that it was discovered prematurely,
had hurried to Liverpool so as to get it back from Mr. Henderson. His
asserted wealth was not believed in. Efforts were made to show that he
had been connected with men of desperate fortunes, and had himself been
perhaps betting heavily; and all this arts which ate usually employed by
unscrupulous or excited advocates to crush an accused man were freely
put forth. Experts were brought from London to examine Dalton's
handwriting, and compare it with that of the forged check; and these men
yielding to the common prejudice, gave it as their opinion that he was,
or _might have been_(!), the author of the forgery.
But all this was as nothing when compared with the injury which Dalton
himself did to his own cause by the course which he chose to adopt.
Contenting himself with the simple assertion of his innocence, he
refused to give the name of the guilty man, or to say any thing that
might lead to his discovery. Actuated by a lofty sense of honor, a
chivalrous sentiment of loyalty and friendship, he kept the secret with
obstinate fidelity; and the almost frantic appeals of his counsel, who
saw in the discovery of the real offender the only chance for the escape
of the accused, and who used every possible argument to shake his
resolve, availed not in the slightest degree to shake his firmness.
They employed detectives, and instituted inquiries in all directions in
the endeavor to find out who might be this friend for whom Dalton was
willing to risk honor and life; but their search was completely baffled.
Dalton's silence was therefore taken as an evidence of guilt, and his
refusal to confess on a friend was regarded as a silly attempt to excite
public sympathy. When the counsel ventured to bring this forward to the
jury, and tried to portray Dalton as a man who chose rather to suffer
than to say that which might bring a friend to destruction, it was
regarded as a wild, Quixotic, and maudlin piece of sentimentalism on the
part of said counsel, and was treated by the prosecution with
unspeakable scorn and ridicule. Under such circumstances the result was
inevitable: Frederick Dalton was declared guilty, and sentenced to
transportation for life.
Among the notes which had been written by Miss Plympton, Edith was very
forcibly struck by some which referred to John Wiggins.
“Who is this J.W.?” was written in one place. “How did F.D. become
acquainted with him?”
In another place, where Wiggins gave his testimony about the note, was
written: “Where was J.W. during that hour? Had he gone to Everton
himself?”
And again: “J.W. was the friend of F.D., and wished to save him. Might
he not have done more?”
Again: “Mark well! J.W. is a Liverpool man. H. was a Liverpool man. Had
F.D. ever heard of even the name of H. before the forgery? What was the
nature of the dealings between F.D. and J.W.?”
Again, when Dalton's silence was so sharply commented on and urged as
proof of his guilt, there occurred the following: “If F.D. was silent,
why did not J.W. open his mouth? Must he not have known at least
something? Could he not have set the authorities upon the track of the
real criminal, and thus have saved F.D.?”
Again: “The Maltese cross did not belong to Dalton. He had ordered it to
be made. For whom? Was it not for this same friend for whom he was now
suffering? Was not this friend the murderer? Has he not thrown suspicion
upon F.D. by that writing in blood? The same one who committed the
murder wrote the false charge, and left the Maltese cross.”
Other notes of similar character occurred in various places, but those
which impressed Edith most were the following:
“F.D. was evidently betrayed by his false friend. Was not that false
friend the real murderer? Did he not contrive to throw on F.D. the
suspicion of the murder? Might not the forgery itself from the very
beginning have been part of a plan to ruin F.D.? But why ruin him?
Evidently to gain some benefit. Now who has been more benefited by the
ruin of F.D.? Whoever he is, must he not he be the murderer and the
false friend?”
Again, a little further on: “Has any one gained any thing from the ruin
of F.D. but J.W.? Has not J.W. ever since had control of Dalton
property? Is he not rich now? Has not the ruin of F.D. made the fortune
of J.W.?”
Such was the substance of the papers which Edith perused. They were
voluminous, and she continued at her task all through that night, her
heart all the time filled with a thousand contending emotions.
Before her mind all the time there was the image of her father in the
judgment-hall. There he stood, the innocent man, betrayed by his
friend, and yet standing there in his simple faith and truth to save
that friend, obstinate in his self-sacrificing fidelity, true to faith
when the other had proved himself worthless, suffering what can only be
suffered by a generous nature as the hours and the days passed and the
end approached, and still the traitor allowed him to suffer. And there
was the hate and scorn of man, the clamor for vengeance from society,
the condemnation of the jury who had prejudged his case, the sneer of
the paid advocate, the scoff of the gaping crowd, to whom the plea of
_noblesse oblige_ and stainless honor and perfect truth seemed only
maudlin sentimentality and Quixotic extravagance.
All these thoughts were in Edith's mind as she read, and these feelings
swelled within her indignant heart as all the facts in that dread
tragedy were slowly revealed one by one. Coming to this task with a mind
convinced at the outset of her father's innocence, she met with not one
circumstance that could shake that conviction for a moment. In her own
strong feeling she was incapable of understanding how any one could
honestly think otherwise. The testimony of adverse witnesses seemed to
her perjury, the arguments of the lawyers fiendish malignity, the last
summing up of the judge bitter prejudice, and the verdict of the jury a
mockery of justice.
* * * * *