A shaft 12 feet square at the top and narrowing downward was sunk to the

base. At the depth of 4 feet, in a very hard bed of earth and ashes

mixed, were found two much decayed human skeletons, both stretched

horizontally on their backs, heads south, and near their heads several

stone implements. From this point until a depth of 24 feet was reached

the shaft passed through very hard earth of a light-gray color,

apparently clay and ashes mixed, in which nothing of consequence was

found. When a depth of 24 feet was reached the material suddenly changed

to a much softer and darker earth, disclosing the casts and some decayed

fragments of timbers from 6 to 12 inches in diameter. Here were found

fragments of bark, ashes, and also numerous fragments of animal bones,

some of which had been split lengthwise. At the depth of 31 feet was a

human skeleton, lying prostrate, head north, which had evidently been

enclosed in a coffin or wrapping of elm bark. In contact with the head

was a thin sheet of hammered native copper. By enlarging the base of the

shaft until a space some 16 feet in diameter was opened, the character

and the contents of the base of the mound were more fully ascertained.

This brought to light the fact that the builders, after having first

smoothed, leveled, and packed the natural surface, carefully spread upon

the floor a layer of bark (chiefly elm), the inner side up, and upon

this a layer of fine white ashes, clear of charcoal, to the depth,

probably, of 5 or 6 inches, though pressed now to little more than 1

inch. On this the bodies were laid and presumably covered with bark.

The enlargement of the shaft also brought to view ten other skeletons,

all apparently adults, five on one side and five on the other side of

the central skeleton, and, like it, extended horizontally, with their

feet pointing toward the central one but not quite touching it. Like the

first, they had all been buried in bark coffins or wrappings. With each

skeleton on the east side was a fine, apparently unused lance-head about

3 inches long, and by the right side of the northern one a fish-dart,

three arrow-heads, and some fragments of _Unio_ shells and pottery. No

implements or ornaments were found with either of the five skeletons on

the west side, although careful search was made therefor. In addition to

the copper plate, a few shell beads and a large lance-head were found

with the central skeleton. As there were a number of holes resembling

post-holes, about the base, which were filled with rotten bark and

decayed vegetable matter, I am inclined to believe there was a vault

here similar to the lower vault in the Grave Creek mound, in which the

walls were of timbers set up endwise in the ground. But it is proper to

state that the assistant who opened the mound is rather disposed to

doubt the correctness of this explanation.

In order to show the character of the smaller burial mounds of this

region, I give descriptions of a few opened by Colonel Norris.

[Illustration: PL. V. PLAT OF ANCIENT WORKS, KANAWHA COUNTY, W. VA.]

One 20 feet in diameter and 7 feet high, with a beech tree 30 inches in

diameter growing on it, was opened by running a broad trench through it.

The material of which it was composed was yellow clay, evidently from an

excavation in the hillside near it. Stretched horizontally on the

natural surface of the ground, faces up and heads south, were seven

skeletons, six adults and one child, all charred. They were covered

several inches thick with ashes, charcoal, and fire-brands, evidently

the remains of a very heavy fire which must have been smothered before

it was fully burned out. Three coarse lance-heads were found among the

bones of the adults, and around the neck of the child three copper

beads, apparently of hammered native copper.

Another mound, 50 feet in diameter and 5 feet high, standing guard, as

it were, at the entrance of an inclosure, was opened, revealing the

following particulars: The top was strewn with fragments of flat rocks,

most of which were marked with one or more small, artificial, cup-shaped

depressions. Below these, to the depth, of 2 or 3 feet, the hard yellow

clay was mixed throughout with similar stones, charcoal, ashes, stone

chips, and fragments of rude pottery. Near the center and 3 feet from

the top of the mound were the much decayed remains of a human skeleton,

lying on its back, in a very rude stone-slab coffin. Beneath this were

other flat stones, and under them charcoal, ashes, and baked earth,

covering the decayed bones of some three or four skeletons which lay

upon the original surface of the ground. So far as could be ascertained,

the skeletons in this mound lay with their heads toward the east. No

relics of any kind worthy of notice were found with them.

Another mound of similar size, upon a dry terrace, was found to consist

chiefly of very hard clay, scattered through which were stone chips and

fragments of rude pottery. Near the natural surface of the ground a

layer of ashes and charcoal was encountered, in which were found the

remains of at least two skeletons.

A mound some 200 yards south of the inclosure, situated on a slope and

measuring 50 feet in diameter and 6 feet in height, gave a somewhat

different result. It consisted wholly of very hard clay down to the

natural surface of the hill-slope. But further excavation revealed a

vault or pit in the original earth 8 feet long, 3 feet wide, and 3 feet

deep at the upper end. In this was found a decayed skeleton, with the

head up hill or toward the north. Upon the breast was a sandstone

gorget, and upon it a leaf-shaped knife of black flint and a neatly

polished hematite celt. The bones of the right arm were found stretched

out at right angles to the body, along a line of ashes. Upon the bones

of the open hand were three piles (five in each) of small leaf-shaped

flint knives.

As the four small mounds just mentioned pertain to the Clifton groups,

in the Elk River Valley, we will call attention to one or two of the

Charleston group, for the purpose of affording the reader the means of

comparison.

Below the center of No. 7 (see Plate), sunk into the original earth, was

a vault about 8 feet long, 3 feet wide, and 3 feet deep. Lying extended

on the back in the bottom of this, amid the rotten fragments of a bark

coffin, was a decayed human skeleton, fully 7 feet long, with head west.

No evidence of fire was to be seen, nor were any stone implements

discovered, but lying in a circle just above the hips were fifty

circular pieces of white perforated shell, each about 1 inch in diameter

and an eighth of an inch thick. The bones of the left arm lay by the

side of the body, but those of the right arm, as in one of the mounds

heretofore mentioned, were stretched at right angles to the body,

reaching out to a small oven-shaped vault, the mortar or cement roof of

which was still unbroken. The capacity of this small circular vault was

probably two bushels, and the peculiar appearance of the dark-colored

deposit therein, and other indications, led to the belief that it had

been filled with corn (maize) in the ear. The absence of weapons would

indicate that the individual buried here was not a warrior, though a

person of some importance.

Mound No. 23 of this group presents some peculiarities worthy of notice.

It is 312 feet in circumference at the base and 25 feet high, covered

with a second growth of timber, some of the stumps of the former growth

yet remaining. It is unusually sharp and symmetrical. From the top down

the material was found to be a light-gray and apparently mixed earth, so

hard as to require the vigorous use of the pick to penetrate it. At the

depth of 15 feet the explorers began to find the casts and fragments of

poles or round timbers less than a foot in diameter. These casts and

rotten remains of wood and bark increased in abundance from this point

until the original surface of the ground was reached. By enlarging the

lower end of the shaft to 14 feet in diameter it was ascertained that

this rotten wood and bark were the remains of what had once been a

circular or polygonal, timber-sided, and conical-roofed vault. Many of

the timbers of the sides and roof, being considerably longer than

necessary, had been allowed to extend beyond the points of support often

8 or 10 feet, those on the sides beyond the crossing and those of the

roof downward beyond the wall. Upon the floor and amid the remains of

the timber were numerous human bones and also two whole skeletons, the

latter but slightly decayed, though badly crushed by the weight pressing

on them, but unaccompanied by an ornament or an implement of any kind. A

further excavation of about 4 feet below the floor, or what was supposed

to be the floor, of this vault, and below the original surface of the

ground, brought to light six circular, oven-shaped vaults, each about 3

feet in diameter and the same in depth. As these six were so placed as

to form a semicircle, it is presumed there are others under that portion

of the mound not reached by the excavation. All were filled with dry,

dark dust or decayed substances, supposed to be the remains of Indian

corn in the ear, as it was similar to that heretofore mentioned. In the

center of the circle indicated by the positions of these minor vaults,

and the supposed center of the base of the mound (the shaft not being

exactly central), and but 2 feet below the floor of the main vault, and

in a fine mortar or cement, were found two cavities resembling in form

the bottle or gourd shaped vessel so frequently met with in the mounds

of southeastern Missouri and northeastern Arkansas. Unfortunately the

further investigation of this work was stopped at this stage of progress

by cold weather.

In another mound of this group the burial was in a box-shaped stone

vault, not of slabs in the usual method, but built up of rough, angular

stones.

[Illustration: FIG. 24.--Mound with so-called "altar," Kanawha County,

West Virginia.]

Mound 31 of this group seems to furnish a connecting link between the

West Virginia and the Ohio mounds. It is sharp in outline, has a steep

slope, and is flattened on the top; is 318 feet in circumference at the

base and about 25 feet high. It was opened by digging a shaft 10 feet in

diameter from the center of the top to the base. After passing through

the top layer of surface soil, some 2 feet thick, a layer of clay and

ashes 1 foot thick was encountered. Here, near the center of the shaft,

were two skeletons, lying horizontally, one immediately over the other,

the upper and larger one with the face down and the lower with the face

up. There were no indications of fire about them. Immediately over the

heads were one celt and three lance-heads. At the depth of 13 feet and a

little north of the center of the mound were two very large skeletons,

in a sitting posture, with their extended legs interlocked to the knees.

Their arms were extended and their hands slightly elevated, as if

together holding up a sandstone mortar which was between their faces.

This stone is somewhat hemispherical, about 2 feet in diameter across

the top, which is hollowed in the shape of a shallow basin or mortar. It

had been subjected to the action of fire until burned to a bright red.

The cavity was filled with white ashes, containing small fragments of

bones burned to cinders. Immediately over this, and of sufficient size

to cover it, was a slab of bluish-gray limestone about 3 inches thick,

which had small cup-shaped excavations on the under side. This bore no

marks of fire. Near the hands of the eastern skeleton were a small

hematite celt and a lance-head, and upon the left wrist of the other two

copper bracelets. At the depth of 25 feet, and on the natural surface,

was found what in an Ohio mound would have been designated an "altar."

This was not thoroughly traced throughout, but was about 12 feet long

and over 8 feet wide, of the form shown in Fig. 24.

It consisted of a layer of well-prepared mortar, apparently clay,

slightly mixed with ashes. This was not more than 6 or 8 inches thick in

the center of the basin-shaped depression, where it was about 1 foot

lower than at the other margin. It was burned to a brick-red and covered

with a compact layer of very fine white ashes, scattered thickly,

through which were small water-worn bowlders, bearing evidences of

having undergone an intense heat. Mingled with this mass were a few

thoroughly charred human bones. The material of the shaft, after the

first 3 feet at the top, consisted almost wholly of finely packed ashes,

which appeared to have been deposited at intervals of considerable

length and not at one time.

It is evident from this description, which is abridged from the report

of the assistant, that we have here a true representation of the

so-called "altars" of the Ohio mounds. But, contrary to the usual

custom, as shown by an examination of the Ohio works, this mound appears

to have been used by the people who erected it as a burial place, for

the mode of construction and the material used for the body of it forbid

the supposition that the lower burial was by a different people from

those who formed the clay structure at the base.

It is proper to state that around and near the inclosure (No. 7 of Plate

V) were a number of stone graves of the ordinary box shape, constructed

in the usual way, of stone slabs.

At this place was also discovered a pit or cache resembling those found

at Madisonville, Ohio. A more thorough examination will probably bring

to light others.

The descriptions of other burial mounds of this region, differing

slightly in minor details from those mentioned, might be presented, but

the foregoing will suffice to give the types and show the character of

the structures of this kind in this section. The details given will, I

think, satisfy any one that the authors of these structures were also

the authors of the Ohio works, or that they belonged to tribes so

closely related that we may justly consider them as one people.

I have been and am still disposed to connect the mound-builders of the

Kanawha valley with those of western North Carolina, but our

explorations in the two sections have convinced me of their close

relation to the people whose mysterious monuments dot the hills and

valleys of Ohio. That they were related in some way to the

mound-builders of North Carolina and East Tennessee is more than

probable, but the key to unlock this mystery, if it exists anywhere, is

most likely to be found in the history, traditions, and works of the

Cherokees, and the traditions relating to the Tallegwi.

As a result of my examination and discussion of the burial mounds of

Wisconsin, I reached the conclusion that they were built by the Indian

tribes found inhabiting that section at the advent of the whites, or by

their ancestors. The data, of which but a comparatively small portion

is given, seem to justify this conclusion. But the case is somewhat

different in reference to the works of the Ohio district. Although the

data obtained here point with satisfactory certainty to the conclusion

that Indians were the authors of these works, it cannot be claimed that

all or even the larger portion of them were built by Indians inhabiting

the district when first visited by the whites, or by their ancestors.

[Illustration: PL. VI. ENLARGED PLAN OF PART OF THE WORKS SHOWN IN PL.

V.]

Hence the mystery which enshrouds them is deeper and much more difficult

to penetrate than that which hangs about the antiquities of some of the

other districts; in fact, they present probably the most difficult

problem for solution in this respect of any ancient works of our

country. That some of the burial mounds, graves, and other works are to

be attributed to Indians who entered this district after the Europeans

had planted colonies in Canada and along the Atlantic coast is probably

true, but that much the greater portion of the typical works belong to a

more distant period must be conceded. It is a singular fact that in the

latter half of the seventeenth century, when European explorers began to

penetrate into this region, what is now the State of Ohio was

uninhabited.

The Miami confederacy, inhabiting the southern shore of Lake

Michigan, extended southeasterly to the Wabash. The Illinois

confederacy extended down the eastern shore of the Mississippi

to about where Memphis now stands. The Cherokees occupied the

slopes and valleys of the mountains about the borders of what

is now East Tennessee, North Carolina, and Georgia. The great

basin bounded north by Lake Erie, the Miamis, and the Illinois,

west by the Mississippi, east by the Alleghanies, and south by

the headwaters of the streams that flow into the Gulf of

Mexico, seems to have been uninhabited except by bands of

Shawnees, and scarcely visited except by war parties of the

Five Nations.[35]

With the exception of some slight notices of the Erie or Cat Nation

dwelling south of Lake Erie, the mere mention of the Tongarias (possibly

but another name for the Eries, with whom Colden identifies them),

located somewhere on the Ohio, and the tradition regarding the Tallegwi,

the only history which remains to us regarding this region previous to

the close of the seventeenth century, is to be gathered from the ancient

monuments which dot its surface. Even conjecture can find but few

pointers on this desert field to give direction to its flight. But it

does not necessarily follow, because we are unable to determine the

direction in which the goal we are seeking lies, that we cannot tell

some of the directions in which it does not lie, and thus narrow the

field of our investigation. I will therefore venture to offer the

following suggestions:

As the evidence in regard to the antiquities of the northwestern, the

southern, and the Appalachian districts points so decidedly to the

Indians as the authors, I think we may assume that the works of Ohio are

attributable to the same race. As they bear a strong resemblance in

several respects to the West Virginia and North Carolina works, and as

the geographical positions of the defensive works indicate pressure

from the north and north-west, we are perhaps justified in excluding

from consideration all tribes known to have had their principal seats

north of the Ohio in historic times, except the Eries, which form an

uncertain and so far indeterminable factor in the problem.

The data so far obtained seem to me to indicate the following as the

most promising lines of research: The possible identity or relation of

the Tallegwi and the Cherokees; the possibility of this region having

been the ancient home of the Shawnees or their ancestors (though I

believe the testimony of the mounds is most decidedly against this and

the following supposition); and the theory that the builders of these

works were driven southward and were merged into the Chahta-Muscogee

family.

Be our conclusion on this question what it may, one important result of

the explorations in this northern section of the United States is the

conviction that there was during the mound-building age a powerful tribe

or association of closely allied tribes occupying the valley of the

Ohio, whose chief seats were in the Kanawha, Scioto, and Little Miami

Valleys. We might suppose that one strong tribe had occupied

successively these various points, yet the slight though persistent

differences in methods and customs indicated by the works seem to favor

the other view. Moreover, the data furnished by the burial mounds lead

to the conclusion that all the works of these localities are relatively

contemporaneous. Not that those of either section are all of the same

age, perhaps by some two or three or possibly more centuries, but that

those of one section, as a whole, are relatively of the same age as

those of the other sections. Nevertheless a somewhat careful study of

all the data bearing on this subject leads me to the conclusion that the

Cherokees are the modern representatives of the Tallegwi, and that most

of the typical works of Ohio and West Virginia owe their origin to this

people.

In each section there are some indications that the authors of these

works followed the custom of erecting burial mounds down to the time the

Europeans appeared on the continent. These evidences have not been given

here, as it is not my intention to discuss them in this paper.

In Ohio there are undoubted evidences of one, if not two, waves of

population subsequent to the occupancy of that region by the builders of

the chief works. But these were of comparatively short duration, and

were evidently Indian hordes pressed westward and southward by the

Iroquois tribes and the advance of the whites.

THE APPALACHIAN DISTRICT.

This district, as already defined, includes East Tennessee, western

North Carolina, southwestern Virginia, and the southeastern part of

Kentucky. It is probable that northeastern Georgia and the northwestern

part of South Carolina should be included, but the investigations in

most of the sections named have not been sufficiently thorough to

enable us to fix with any degree of certainty the boundaries of the

district.

Although there is uncertainty in reference to the area occupied by the

people who left behind them the antiquities found in this region, there

can be no doubt that here we find a class of burial mounds differing in

several important respects from any we have so far noticed.

Some of the most important mounds of this class found in this district

were discovered in Caldwell County, North Carolina, and opened in 1882

by Mr. J. P. Rogan, one of the Bureau assistants, aided by Dr. J. M.

Spainhour, a resident of the county.

As Mr. Rogan's descriptions are somewhat full, I give them substantially

as found in his report:

_The T. F. Nelson mound._--This mound, so insignificant in appearance as

scarcely to attract any notice, was located on the farm of Rev. T. F.

Nelson, in Caldwell County, North Carolina, on the bottom land of the

Yadkin, about 100 yards from the river-bank. It was almost a true circle

in outline, 38 feet in diameter, but not exceeding at any point 18

inches in height. The thorough excavation made revealed the fact that

the builders of the mound had first dug a circular pit, with

perpendicular margin, to the depth of 3 feet, and 38 feet in diameter,

then deposited their dead in the manner hereafter shown, and afterwards

covered them over, raising a slight mound above the pit.

A plan of the pit, drawn at the time (after the removal of the dirt),

showing the stone graves and skeletons, is given in Fig. 25.

The walled graves or vaults and altar-shaped mass were built of water

worn bowlders and clay or earth merely sufficient to hold them in place.

No. 1, a stone grave or vault standing exactly in the center of the pit.

In this case a small circular hole, a little over 3 feet in diameter and

extending down 3 feet below the bottom of the large pit, had been dug,

the body or skeleton placed perpendicularly upon its feet, and the wall

built up around it from the bottom of the hole, converging, after a

height of 4 feet was reached, so as to be covered at the top by a single

soapstone rock of moderate size. On the top of the head of the skeleton

and immediately under the capstone of the vault were found several

plates of silver mica, which had evidently been cut with some rude

implement. Although the bones were much decayed, yet they were retained

in position by the dirt which filled the vault, an indication that the

flesh had been removed before burial and the vault filled with dirt as

it was built up.

[Illustration: FIG. 25.--Appearance of T. F. Nelson mound after

excavation.]

Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, although walled around in a similar

manner, were in a sitting posture on the bottom of the pit. In the grave

of No. 2 was found a polished celt, in that of No. 3 a single discoidal

stone, in that of No. 6 two polished celts, and immediately over No. 9 a

pitted stone.

Nos. 11, 12, and 13 are three skeletons in a squatting posture, with no

wall around them and unaccompanied by relics of any kind.

Nos. 14 and 15 are two uninclosed skeletons, lying horizontally at full

length. With the former some pieces of broken soapstone pipes were

found, and with the latter one polished celt.

No. 16, an uninclosed "squatter," of unusually large size, not less than

7 feet high when living. Near the mouth was an uninjured soapstone pipe.

The legs were extended in a southwest direction, upon a bed of burnt

earth.

The faces of all the squatting skeletons were turned away from the

standing central one.

At A was found a considerable quantity of black paint in little lumps,

which appear to have been molded in the hull of some nut. At B was a

cubical mass of water-worn bowlders, built up solidly and symmetrically,

24 inches long, 18 inches wide, and 18 inches high, but with no bones,

specimens of art, coal, ashes, or indications of fire on or around it.

Many of the stones of the vaults and the earth immediately around them,

on the contrary, bore unmistakable evidences of fire; in fact, the heat

in some cases left its mark on the bones of the inclosed skeletons,

another indication that the flesh had been removed before burial here,

either by previous burial or otherwise.

Scattered through the dirt which filled the pit were small pieces of

pottery and charcoal. The bottom, and sides of the pit were so

distinctly marked that they could be traced without difficulty.

This mound stood about 75 yards south of the triangular burial pit

described below.

[Illustration: FIG. 26.--Burials in the T. F. Nelson triangle, Caldwell

County, North Carolina.]

_The T. F. Nelson triangle._--This is the name applied by Mr. Rogan to

an ancient triangular burying ground found on the same farm as the mound

just described and about 75 yards north of it.

Burial Mounds of the Northern Sections of the United States · 第 5 / 12 段