CHAPTER X.

OF MODERATION, OR THE TYPE OF GOVERNMENT BY LAW.

Sec. 1. Meaning of the terms Chasteness and Refinement.

Of objects which, in respect of the qualities hitherto considered,

appear to have equal claims to regard, we find, nevertheless, that

certain are preferred to others in consequence of an attractive power,

usually expressed by the terms "chasteness, refinement, or elegance,"

and it appears also that things which in other respects have little in

them of natural beauty, and are of forms altogether simple and adapted

to simple uses, are capable of much distinction and desirableness in

consequence of these qualities only. It is of importance to discover the

real nature of the ideas thus expressed.

Sec. 2. How referable to temporary fashions.

Something of the peculiar meaning of the words is referable to the

authority of fashion and the exclusiveness of pride, owing to which that

which is the mode of a particular time is submissively esteemed, and

that which by its costliness or its rarity is of difficult attainment,

or in any way appears to have been chosen as the best of many things,

(which is the original sense of the words elegant and exquisite,) is

esteemed for the witness it bears to the dignity of the chooser.

But neither of these ideas are in any way connected with eternal beauty,

neither do they at all account for that agreeableness of color and form

which is especially termed chasteness, and which it would seem to be a

characteristic of rightly trained mind in all things to prefer, and of

common minds to reject.

Sec. 3. How to the perception of completion.

Sec. 4. Finish, by great masters esteemed essential.

There is however another character of artificial productions, to which

these terms have partial reference, which it is of some importance to

note, that of finish, exactness, or refinement, which are commonly

desired in the works of men, owing both to their difficulty of

accomplishment and consequent expression of care and power (compare

Chapter on Ideas of Power, Part I. Sect, i.,) and from their greater

resemblance to the working of God, whose "absolute exactness," says

Hooker, "all things imitate, by tending to that which is most exquisite

in every particular." And there is not a greater sign of the

imperfection of general taste, than its capability of contentment with

forms and things which, professing completion, are yet not exact nor

complete, as in the vulgar with wax and clay and china figures, and in

bad sculptors with an unfinished and clay-like modelling of surface, and

curves and angles of no precision or delicacy; and in general, in all

common and unthinking persons with an imperfect rendering of that which

might be pure and fine, as church-wardens are content to lose the sharp

lines of stone carving under clogging obliterations of whitewash, and as

the modern Italians scrape away and polish white all the sharpness and

glory of the carvings on their old churches, as most miserably and

pitifully on St. Mark's at Venice, and the Baptisteries of Pistoja and

Pisa, and many others; so also the delight of vulgar painters in coarse

and slurred painting, merely for the sake of its coarseness,[29] as of

Spagnoletto, Salvator, or Murillo, opposed to the divine finish which

the greatest and mightiest of men disdained not, but rather wrought out

with painfulness and life spending; as Leonardo and Michael Angelo, (for

the latter, however many things he left unfinished, did finish, if at

all, with a refinement that the eye cannot follow, but the feeling only,

as in the Pieta of Genoa,) and Perugino always, even to the gilding of

single hairs among his angel tresses, and the young Raffaelle, when he

was heaven taught, and Angelico, and Pinturicchio, and John Bellini, and

all other such serious and loving men. Only it is to be observed that

this finish is not a part or constituent of beauty, but the full and

ultimate rendering of it, so that it is an idea only connected with the

works of men, for all the works of the Deity are finished with the same,

that is, infinite care and completion: and so what degrees of beauty

exist among them can in no way be dependent upon this source, inasmuch

as there are between them no degrees of care. And therefore, as there

certainly is admitted a difference of degree in what we call chasteness,

even in Divine work, (compare the hollyhock or the sunflower with the

vale lily,) we must seek for it some other explanation and source than

this.

Sec. 5. Moderation, its nature and value

And if, bringing down our ideas of it from complicated objects to simple

lines and colors, we analyze and regard them carefully, I think we shall

be able to trace them to an under-current of constantly agreeable

feeling, excited by the appearance in material things of a

self-restrained liberty, that is to say, by the image of that acting of

God with regard to all his creation, wherein, though free to operate in

whatever arbitrary, sudden, violent, or inconstant ways he will, he yet,

if we may reverently so speak, restrains in himself this his omnipotent

liberty, and works always in consistent modes, called by us laws. And

this restraint or moderation, according to the words of Hooker, ("that

which doth moderate the force and power, that which doth appoint the

form and measure of working, the same we term a law,") is in the Deity

not restraint, such as it is said of creatures, but, as again says

Hooker, "the very being of God is a law to his working," so that every

appearance of painfulness or want of power and freedom in material

things is wrong and ugly; for the right restraint, the image of Divine

operation, is both in them, and in men, a willing and not painful

stopping short of the utmost degree to which their power might reach,

and the appearance of fettering or confinement is the cause of ugliness

in the one, as the slightest painfulness or effort in restraint is a

sign of sin in the other.

Sec. 6. It is the girdle of beauty.

Sec. 7. How found in natural curves and colors.

Sec. 8. How difficult of attainment, yet essential to all good.

I have put this attribute of beauty last, because I consider it the

girdle and safeguard of all the rest, and in this respect the most

essential of all, for it is possible that a certain degree of beauty may

be attained even in the absence of one of its other constituents, as

sometimes in some measure without symmetry or without unity. But the

least appearance of violence or extravagance, of the want of moderation

and restraint, is, I think, destructive of all beauty whatsoever in

everything, color, form, motion, language, or thought, giving rise to

that which in color we call glaring, in form inelegant, in motion

ungraceful, in language coarse, in thought undisciplined, in all

unchastened; which qualities are in everything most painful, because the

signs of disobedient and irregular operation. And herein we at last find

the reason of that which has been so often noted respecting the subtilty

and almost invisibility of natural curves and colors, and why it is that

we look on those lines as least beautiful which fall into wide and far

license of curvature, and as most beautiful which approach nearest (so

that the curvilinear character be distinctly asserted) to the government

of the right line, as in the pure and severe curves of the draperies of

the religious painters; and thus in color it is not red, but rose-color

which is most beautiful, neither such actual green as we find in summer

foliage partly, and in our painting of it constantly; but such gray

green as that into which nature modifies her distant tints, or such pale

green and uncertain as we see in sunset sky, and in the clefts of the

glacier and the chrysoprase, and the sea-foam; and so of all colors, not

that they may not sometimes be deep and full, but that there is a solemn

moderation even in their very fulness, and a holy reference beyond and

out of their own nature to great harmonies by which they are governed,

and in obedience to which is their glory. Whereof the ignorance is shown

in all evil colorists by the violence and positiveness of their hues,

and by dulness and discordance consequent, for the very brilliancy and

real power of all color is dependent on the chastening of it, as of a

voice on its gentleness, and as of action on its calmness, and as all

moral vigor on self-command. And therefore as that virtue which men

last, and with most difficulty attain unto, and which many attain not at

all, and yet that which is essential to the conduct and almost to the

being of all other virtues, since neither imagination, nor invention,

nor industry, nor sensibility, nor energy, nor any other good having, is

of full avail without this of self-command, whereby works truly

masculine and mighty are produced, and by the signs of which they are

separated from that lower host of things brilliant, magnificent and

redundant, and farther yet from that of the loose, the lawless, the

exaggerated, the insolent, and the profane, I would have the necessity

of it foremost among all our inculcating, and the name of it largest

among all our inscribing, in so far that, over the doors of every school

of Art, I would have this one word, relieved out in deep letters of pure

gold,--Moderation.

FOOTNOTES

[29] It is to be carefully noted that when rude execution is

evidently not the result of imperfect feeling and desire (as in

these men above named, it is) but of thought; either impatient,

which there was necessity to note swiftly, or impetuous, which it

was well to note in mighty manner, as pre-eminently and in both

kinds the case with Tintoret, and often with Michael Angelo, and in

lower and more degraded modes with Rubens, and generally in the

sketches and first thoughts of great masters; there is received a

very noble pleasure, connected both with ideas of power (compare

again Part I. Sect. ii. Chap. I.) and with certain actions of the

imagination of which we shall speak presently. But this pleasure is

not received from the beauty of the work, for nothing can be

perfectly beautiful unless complete, but from its simplicity and

sufficiency to its immediate purpose, where the purpose is not of

beauty at all, as often in things rough-hewn, pre-eminently for

instance in the stones of the foundations of the Pitti and Strozzi

palaces, whose noble rudeness is to be opposed both to the useless

polish, and the barbarous rustications of modern times, (although

indeed this instance is not without exception to be received, for

the majesty of these rocky buildings depends also in some measure

upon the real beauty and finish of the natural curvilinear

fractures, opposed to the coarseness of human chiselling,) and

again, as it respects works of higher art, the pleasure of their

hasty or imperfect execution is not indicative of their beauty, but

of their majesty and fulness of thought and vastness of power. Shade

is only beautiful when it magnifies and sets forth the forms of fair

things, so negligence is only noble when it is, as Fuseli hath it,

"the shadow of energy." Which that it may be, secure the substance

and the shade will follow, but let the artist beware of stealing the

manner of giant intellects when he has not their intention, and of

assuming large modes of treatment when he has little thoughts to

treat. There is large difference between indolent impatience of

labor and intellectual impatience of delay, large difference between

leaving things unfinished because we have more to do, or because we

are satisfied with what we have done. Tintoret, who prayed hard, and

hardly obtained, that he might be permitted, the charge of his

colors only being borne, to paint a new built house from base to

battlement, was not one to shun labor, it is the pouring in upon him

of glorious thoughts in inexpressible multitude that his sweeping

hand follows so fast. It is as easy to know the slightness of

earnest haste from the slightness of blunt feeling, indolence, or

affectation, as it is to know the dust of a race, from the dust of

dissolution.

Modern Painters, Volume 2 (of 5) · 第 10 / 16 章