THE BEGINNING OF A GREAT WORK.
The beginning of a work among these images of God cut in ebony is found
in the following resolutions looking to the protection of the interests
of the colored man by the civil government. It is nothing against a
system that it was badly managed or fell into bad hands, or else our
venerated Constitution is involved. That General Conference (1864) in
its report on freedmen, said:
“(1) _Resolved_, That in the events which have thrown the
thousands of freed people upon the benevolence of the humane and
loyal people of the North, we recognize a providential call to
the Christian public for contributions for their physical relief
and mental and moral elevation and especially to the Church of
Christ for the means of their evangelization.
“(2) _Resolved_, That the best interests of the freedmen of the
country demand legislation that shall foster and protect this
people, and we do hereby respectfully but _earnestly urge_ upon
Congress the importance of establishing, as soon as practicable,
a Bureau of Freedmen’s Affairs, as contemplated in the bills now
pending.”
What did this mean? If it meant anything, the Church meant to practice,
at its earliest convenience, the doctrine it had been preaching for the
last eighty years and more,—that the poor enslaved colored man should be
properly trained to enjoy this life and that which is to come. It meant
that just as soon as the alarms of war had sufficiently subsided and God
opened the way, or signified that an entrance could be gained, to go at
once up and down through the Southland carrying the gospel of free
salvation to the downtrodden, poverty-stricken, and demoralized colored
man. While but few, if any, believe the only mission of the Methodist
Episcopal Church in the South was to the poor colored man, but few will
doubt that, had it no other call to go into the South, that were enough.
But few rational Christians believe the Church had no call into the
South.
That the Church was needed there, no one will question when the
condition of the colored man at that time is considered, as well as the
relation the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, sustained to the colored
man before and during the war, and that other significant fact that the
colored man, as such, was, and for that matter is, peculiarly either a
Baptist or a Methodist. From the beginning Methodism took hold of him,
and he learned that, wherever found, a true Methodist was his friend.
This in itself is sufficient explanation of the peculiarity referred to
above. What was the condition of the colored man at the close of the
war? When the black smoke of battle arose from a hundred battlefields
the entire colored population—four and a half millions—came forth
ignorant, superstitious, degraded, and poverty-stricken. The only beam
of hope rested entirely on the education of the race. The emancipation
was followed by the enfranchisement of these ignorant and superstitious
people. The cry of opposition was heard vociferously in the South, while
in some places in the North leading newspapers and men expressed doubts
as to the wisdom of the thing. Who, under the then existing
circumstances, doubted the earnestness of those who cried out as they
saw the colored men clothed with freedom and franchise, yet slaves to
superstition and ignorance:
“A poor, blind Samson is in our land,
Bound hand and foot, and prone upon his back;
But who knows that, in some drunken revel,
He may rise and grasp the pillars
Of our temple’s liberties, shake the foundations
Till all beneath its broken columns lie in ruins?”
Amid the religious training received from that part of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, that trained them at all, did not appear
anything different from the system of slavery in vogue, save the promise
of an eternal Sabbath. It is true a colored membership was reported by
the Methodist Episcopal Church, South; but this did not mean that the
colored people within that Church were permitted to worship God in their
own congregations, or that there were any colored pastors or
class-leaders among that membership. If slavery had continued, the
condition of the colored man religiously could never have become better.
Just how—unless force of circumstances played a part in the drama—a
brotherly feeling could have arisen or existed in the bosom of the poor
colored man under that _régime_, we can not, for the life of us,
surmise. But all that was ended with the war, and still there was but
little, if any, change. The withdrawals at first opportunity of colored
people from the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, meant something. The
Methodist Episcopal Church, South, was then, at any rate, unwilling to
educate the colored man. In proof of the last assertion, we turn to page
148 of Dr. A. G. Haygood’s book, “Our Brother in Black.” The following,
published in 1881 by this leading philosopher and clergyman in the
Methodist Episocopal Church, South, is as significant as sound. He says:
“If the work of educating the Negroes of the South is ever to be
carried on satisfactorily, if ever the best results are to be
accomplished, then _Southern white people must take part in the
work of teaching Negro schools_. There have been some very sad
and hurtful mistakes in the relations assumed by most of us of
the South to this whole matter, and especially in the fact that,
with very rare exceptions, our people have steadfastly refused
to teach Negro children, especially since they were made free,
for love or money. They have recoiled from Negro schools as if
there were personal degradation in teaching them. Perhaps the
state of things that existed at the South for a full decade
after the war, and for which Southern people were not alone
responsible—a state of things that made it impracticable for
Southern white men and women to teach Negro schools—was
inevitable. But so it was; they could not do it without ‘losing
caste.’ As I am trying to state facts honestly, I should add,
the prevailing sentiment of the South would not even now look
favorably upon such teachers; but I must say we are growing in
sense as well as grace on this subject.”
Without further comment, the above corroborates the statement that the
condition of the freedmen in the South directly after the war,
temporally, spiritually, morally, and intellectually, was a loud enough
call, and the mission of enough importance to warrant the action of the
General Conference of 1864 in its action that virtually announced the
intention of the Methodist Episcopal Church to go into the South. The
fact that conferences had been opened in the South for colored people
was sufficient proof.
THE CHURCH IN THE SOUTH.
When the General Conference of 1868 met in the city of Chicago, Ill.,
for its twentieth session, among other things it took up the subject of
the relation of the Church to the colored man. There were present at
that General Conference two hundred and forty-three delegates. When the
General Conference of 1864 authorized the formation of mission
conferences in the South for colored people, as a Church, it “had been
practically excluded for twenty years” from Alabama, North and South
Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas,
and Texas, while a generation had grown up under the immediate care, as
if were, of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. It is true that the
Methodist Episcopal Church had held on in some sort in the city of
Baltimore—this being her strongest fort—while through some parts of
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Kentucky, and Missouri it had a foothold.
Our Church in 1863, in the last-named States, claimed 332 effective
preachers, 84,673 members, and 919 church-buildings. By the next year,
when the General Conference of 1864 met for its nineteenth session in
Philadelphia, it claimed in the above-named five slave States 309
effective preachers, 87,072 members—15,898 being colored—and 982
churches, being an increase in these five States of 2,399 members, not
including probationers, and a decrease of 23 effective preachers, and an
increase of 63 church-buildings. Thus it may be seen that a wise
Providence proclaimed the mission of our Church; and there was then, as
we see now, no mistake made on the part of our Church when it heard and
obeyed the commission in this case, “Go ye into all the world, and
preach the gospel to every creature.” The crowning act touching the
subject we discuss was given by the General Conference of 1864 in these
words: “We are not aware of any legal obstacle to the reception of
colored preachers into our annual conferences.” Touching the work done
by the last General Conference, and showing somewhat of the results
attained, the Bishops’ Address to the Twentieth General Conference
contained the following:
“They [the Delaware and Washington colored conferences] now
contain one hundred and one ministers and twenty-six thousand
four hundred and eighty-seven members and probationers. The
creation of these conferences was hailed by our colored
ministers and membership with great joy, and has, we believe,
been productive of much good. The ministers are becoming
familiar with the mode of conducting business, and many of them
are rapidly improving. At their recent sessions they elected
representatives to this body according to the form of the
Discipline for electing delegates. Whether these representatives
should be admitted, you alone have authority to decide. In our
judgment, the success of this work demands all the encouragement
which the General Conference can properly give.”
The regular and natural succession of action touching the relation of
the Church toward the colored man seems to declare, to our mind at any
rate, that it has the divine sanction. The submission of the above
resolution brought at once before the General Conference of 1868 the
question of the advisability of admitting—not colored testimony, or
testimony from people of color—but colored delegates to equality in the
General Conference of one of the largest denominations in the world. The
Christ-like spirit of the bishops in presenting the matter, supported by
their modest indorsement of it, was manly. They said: “In our judgment,
the success of this work demands all the encouragement which the General
Conference can properly give.” It may have been that it was not
thoroughly settled in the minds of all the delegates of that General
Conference. The result, however, was satisfactory, in that James Davis
and Benjamin Brown were seated as delegates, and thereby the equal
rights of our colored members were not only recognized, but everything
looking to their elevation, done by the Church, was stamped with
approval. The adjournment of that General Conference did not take place
until provision for other conferences for our people, at their own
request, was made. The year preceding that General Conference a colored
presiding elder had been appointed over a district in Kentucky; nine
mission conferences had been organized in our Southern field; colored
preachers had been received into the Kentucky and Missouri Annual
Conferences. Notwithstanding this, wherever a mission conference was
organized a new inspiration seemed to overshadow the entire work. The
provision above referred to was as follows:
“‘_Resolved_, 1. That the bishops who may preside in the
Kentucky Conference during the next four years, are hereby
authorized to organize the colored ministers within the bounds
of said conference into a separate annual conference, if said
ministers request it; and if, in the judgment of the bishops,
the interest of the work requires it, to be called the ——
Conference: _Provided_, that nothing in this resolution shall be
construed to impair the existing constitutional rights of our
colored members on the one hand, or, on the other, to forbid the
transfer of white ministers to said conference, whenever it may
be deemed desirable or expedient.’
“So soon as this resolution was taken up, a motion was made to
lay it upon the table, which was lost.
“A motion to amend by inserting, ‘_Provided_, that colored
members may remain in the Kentucky Conference,’ was laid on the
table.
“A motion to strike out the words ‘the interest of the work,’
and insert ‘the unity and success of the Church,’ was laid on
the table; and the resolution was adopted as matured by the
Committee on Boundaries.”
The motions subsequently made show at once the animus of the white
brethren of that conference at that time. While many were anxious to
have restrictions, others objected to it _in toto_. But, as in the
General Conference, so it has been in nearly every annual conference,
that a wide difference of opinion on the color-line question existed. It
is well that it was so.
Following hard upon the above action in the interest of the colored man,
this General Conference paid special attention to its work so grandly
begun in the sunny South. While the discussion of the status of the
colored delegates elicited much animation, the restrictions were removed
from the conferences of the Church in the South, irrespective of color,
by a vote of 197 to 15. All our benevolent societies were instructed to
redouble their diligence to meet the exigencies of the case; our Book
Concerns were to publish one or more papers adapted to the new order of
things within the South; transfers, if needed, were to be sent into this
fruitful field; training-schools and theological schools were ordered
for the special training of the colored people of the South within our
Church and without, if accepted. The bishops were requested to give the
colored work special episcopal supervision. As a finale of the action of
that General Conference, an “enabling act” for the establishment of the
third annual conference among our colored members was passed, with the
provision that in every case the _rights_ of every preacher were to be
fully and carefully, as well as impartially, considered. The white
preachers and teachers who were sent by the Church into the South to
carry out this plan of work were, in too many cases, not only subjected
to insult, but cruel scourgings and false imprisonment, as if ostracism
was not cruel and wicked punishment enough. But many of those thus
treated were men and women of God, and therefore consistent but firm and
true heroes and heroines.
Dr. Walden (now bishop), in an address, Aug. 13, 1883, at the
anniversary of the Freedmen’s Aid Society, spoke of this work. The
following needs no comment, as he speaks of the period in our work in
the South at which we now are, and we insert it here as a retrospect:
“Two courses were open—one to delay employing colored preachers
until they could be educated, the other to put these untutored
men to work at once. No people ever needed the gospel more than
did the freed people. Standing in the midst of new relations,
the possessors of a new-found freedom for which they had never
been trained, they needed both the restraints and the
inspiration of the gospel. The Wesleyan prescience of our Church
recognized this need, and at the same time the fact that these
unlearned preachers, if divinely called, could so tell the story
of the Cross as to benefit their people. The lives of many of
these men had been an unbroken period of slave-toil; but the
sequel proves that they knew enough of the saving power of
Christ and the fullness of his love to instruct their hearers in
the way of life, and we now see that their relation to this work
was not unlike to that of the first of Wesley’s lay preachers to
their work among their own classes in England.
“With this illustration before us of the general principle
that a people may and must be instrumental in their own
evangelization, let us study some of the results of our
itinerant system among the freedmen—of our itinerancy and its
auxiliary agencies. All understand our itinerancy to be the
general superintendency and the pastorate; by auxiliary
agencies I mean our sub-pastorate, in which the class-leaders
stand, our Church literature, and our Sunday-schools. The mere
suggestion of the fact leads you at once to see that the real
function of each and all of these is to re-enforce both the
general and the particular work committed to the itinerancy or
three fold pastorate—the bishops, presiding elders, and
pastors of our Church. The very fact of taking this
comprehensive system to a people who had no system, of
beginning at once to build them up into it, could not be
without producing some marked and favorable results. I mention
the more obvious of these:
“(_a_) The freedmen who were recognized as having a call to
preach could do little more than exhort, but they were put into
the pastoral relation; a great Church committed to them a new
and solemn trust, and laid upon them grave responsibilities;
they were under the leadership of the superintendents of the
missions—good, prudent, self-sacrificing men—men who in their
devotion to duty represented the highest life of their Church.
Such things could not be without affecting these untutored
preachers. Crude as all they did may have been at first, their
pastorate benefited the people they served, and was to
themselves a means of training, of real and rapid progress; and
there are still in the effective ranks of the conferences which
came from such beginnings many pious, able, and successful
preachers, who were thus transferred from the cotton and rice
fields and sugar plantations to, and trained in, our itinerant
ministry.
“(_b_) As the work progressed, these colored men acquired by
observation and experience, and such study as was possible with
them, a wider knowledge of their work; and in due course the
bishops began to appoint some of them as presiding elders,
investing them with all the honors and responsibilities of this
important office. It should also be stated that the Church that
acted thus through her bishops was constantly displaying to them
an encouraging interest in them by furnishing means to aid in
the support of their Church work.
“(_c_) In the annual conferences they were and are brought under
the presidency of our bishops—the most efficient presiding
officers in this or any other country, a fact that became most
obvious at the Ecumenical Methodist Conference. The very methods
of business in our annual conferences, and the promptness with
which it is dispatched under this presidency, have had such
influence on the older conferences that the advantages of like
administration to the colored conferences are obvious. The
influence of the conference session ought also to be named, as
these annual meetings of the preachers have all along affected
most favorably the character of Methodism. These colored
preachers have been coming together, as do their brethren in
older conferences, to report and review the year’s work, to pass
upon the character of each one, to consider the various
connectional and benevolent causes, to attend to all the
business that is usually presented, and to enjoy the social
privileges and religious services to which all our preachers
look forward with deep interest. Every such session tends to
make them wiser and more effective in their work.
“(_d_) Under our system of study for probationers and deacons,
the colored preachers are steadily improving, and their
conferences are becoming more careful as to the qualifications
of those who are received into the ministry. I well remember the
class taken on trial in the South Carolina Conference in 1867;
near a dozen of them were then uncouth and ill-clad men, who
seemed to have come direct from the plantations; little or
nothing was said as to even elementary education; they were
taken as they were, and sent out to do work for the Master, who
ordaineth strength even out of the mouths of babes. But it is
radically different in that conference now; at its session, last
January, I heard the report of examinations, and learned thereby
that the standard of qualification is applied more rigidly each
succeeding year. I rejoiced in this as a fact common to all
these colored conferences; and yet I also rejoiced to remember
that when the exigencies required it, our Church dared to send
out the earlier members of that and other conferences,
illiterate as they were, to the work of winning souls.
“(_e_) These early colored preachers, coming as they did from a
condition in which there was no home, in the better sense of
that word, soon came to know something of the importance that
our Church attaches to Sunday-schools. They were organized,
often in the crudest form; but they have been improved, and now
nearly two thousand are reported in the twelve conferences. This
work is important there, not only because it is in behalf of the
youth and children, but also because there has been, and is, a
relatively great demand for such work in the South. It is a fact
that the ratio between the number of Sunday-school scholars and
Church members of any and all Protestant denominations in the
South is far below what it is in the North. The schools
organized in our “new Southern field” have been aided with
papers published by our Church, and especially adapted to the
condition of the scholars. All the teachers employed by the
Freedmen’s Aid Society have done good and faithful service in
these Sunday-schools. Through them the Church has been, and is,
furnishing moral and mental instruction to about one hundred
thousand of the youth and children, that will be of incalculable
value to them, and through them to the Church and the nation.
“(_f_) The Methodist newspapers published in the South—within
this new field—by our Church, in order to furnish a literature
specially adapted to the condition and needs of the people, have
been potent for good. We may not be able to estimate the force
of the fact that papers have been provided for them which they
in a special sense regarded as their own. It was no mean fact
with them that a part of the capital of the Book Concern was
being employed to publish papers which, by their very location,
must chiefly be for them. And the presence of a depository of
books at Atlanta tended to impress the lesson, taught in so many
ways, that our Church was ready and anxious to help them in
their every effort to reach the plane of a higher and better
life.
“Other facts might be named to show how every thing that is
forceful in our itinerancy and its auxiliary agencies has been
constantly, wisely, and effectively employed to reach,
evangelize and elevate these colored people. It has been more
than a formal recognition of Christian equality; it has been the
continuous presence and power of educational relations as well
as educational agencies among them. The Church, during these
years, has recognized the divine call into her ministry of more
than a thousand of these men, thereby reposing a confidence and
conferring an honor that has been a special inspiration to them,
and, in good degree, to their people. Ministerial position and
pastoral duties, prerogatives and responsibilities, shared in
common with the largest corps of preachers in our country, have
been made realities to them. When that whole people shall come
to the plane and glory of a true manhood and womanhood, it will
be known that the impartial planting of our system of itinerancy
among them was one of the early and potent means of their
elevation.
“3. The aim of the Methodist Episcopal Church is to enlist every
local society in the support of her benevolent enterprises. She
would give to every person converted at her altars the
opportunity to do work for the Master. For this reason, all her
pastors are charged with the duty of presenting to their
congregations the claims of the Missionary, Church Extension,
Freedmen’s Aid, Sunday-school, Tract, and Educational causes,
and of affording to all the opportunity to contribute thereto
according to their ability. Into each sphere of work represented
by these causes, the Church has been led by a marked providence,
and her efforts in them have been attended with her Lord’s
signal favor. The presentation of these causes in the relation
they hold to the world’s evangelization, the end for which
Christ established his Church, teaches with special emphasis the
magnitude of her mission, and indicates the certainty of
ultimate success. How the faith of God’s people has enlarged
under the inspiration of this widening work! These causes have
been presented more or less fully to our new societies in the
South.
“The colored preachers and people have taken a ready interest in
the Missionary Society because it carried the gospel to them.
The preachers were not learned, and the people were poor; but
what if the earlier missionary sermons were crude presentations
of a world-wide cause? what if but a few pennies were collected
in a charge? the people were thus coming into contact with the
genius of the gospel, and beginning to have some part in the
movement that is conquering the world. Among the many wise
things done during the administration of the revered Dr. Durbin
as missionary secretary, the one of all others that has affected
and will continue to affect our Church the most, was providing
for the organization of the Sunday-schools into missionary
societies; wise and potential, because thus, in a practical and
methodical way, the idea of the world’s evangelization is fixed
in the thought of the youth and children, by far the greatest
idea touching the human race that can be given to the human
mind.
“The colored preachers have been learning this fundamental idea
of the missionary cause and the purpose of each of the other
benevolences of our Church, and in their own way it may be
presenting them to their people; but the result has been a
measure of enlightenment in these directions, an increasing
knowledge of the far-reaching plans of the Church to which they
belong, a clearer consciousness that by being brought within her
pale they have part in one of the great aggressive Christian
movements of the age. Standing as they do in the dawn of a new
day, this conscious identification with all the benevolent plans
of the Church that brought them the gospel can not do less than
enlarge their views of Christian duty, and inspire them with
zeal for and devotion to causes grand in themselves and glorious
in their results.
“4. The preaching that is distinctively Methodistic has had its
influence in this as in other fields. While we hold the
fundamental truths of Christianity in common with other
evangelical Churches—points of agreement, each of which is
infinitely more important than all the questions in regard to
which there is a difference—all do not place the same emphasis
we do on some of these truths. Our preachers in the ‘new
Southern field,’ as elsewhere, have given special prominence to
the willingness and power of Jesus to save every one who comes
to him; the universal call and the gracious ability of every one
to come; the radical character of the change wrought in
conversion—a new life through divine power; the adoption into
the divine family, and that adoption clearly, satisfactorily
attested through the witness of the Holy Spirit; the complete
cleansing power of the blood of Christ, and the keeping power of
the promised grace. Need I say in this presence that the
emphasis given to these Scriptural doctrines by our ministry has
molded the experience of Methodists in every society, and made
the meeting for testimony, whether love-feast or class-meeting,
a part of our Church life? The preaching of these doctrines in
the earnest Methodist way among the colored people, the building
up of a Church among them under the molding and inspiring effect
of such truths, the leading of the members up to a clear,
well-defined religious experience, is giving them a Church life,
the advantage of which is best known from what Methodism has
done for other peoples. Already the advance of Christian
morality, the growing habits of industry and economy, the
increasing spirit of benevolence and liberality, the new
home-life where home was so recently unknown—the fruits of an
evangelical gospel faithfully preached—show what we have done,
and are the promise and pledge of a pure, strong, and active
Church in every part of our new Southern field in the near
future.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------