CHAPTER VI

POVERTY AND ITS PSYCHICAL RESULTS

In the story of Buddha it is related that it was the shock of learning

of the existence of four great evils which aroused his desire to save

mankind. These evils were Old Age, Sickness, Death, and Poverty.

Theologians and the sentimentalists are unanimous in their praise of

poverty,--the theologians because they seek their treasure in heaven,

and the sentimentalists because they are incorrigible dodgers of

reality, because they cannot endure the existence of evil. But Buddha

knew better, and the common sense of mankind has shown itself in the

desperate struggle to reach riches.

We have spoken of the part played by the physical disadvantages of

poverty in causing the nervousness of the housewife. It is not alleged

or affirmed that all poor housewives suffer from the neurosis,--that

would be nonsense. But poor food, poor housing, poor clothing, the lack

of vacations, the insufficient convalescence from illness and childbirth

are not blessings nor do they have anything but a bad effect, an effect

traceable in the conditions we are studying.

Furthermore, the woman who does all her own housework, including the

cooking, scrubbing, washing, ironing, and the multitudinous details of

housekeeping, in addition to the bearing and rearing of children, does

more than any human being should do. It is very well to say, "See what

the women of a past generation did," but could we look at the thing

objectively, we would see that they were little better than slaves. That

is the long and short of it,--the Emancipation Proclamation did not

include them.

Aside from the physical effects of poverty on the housewife, there are

factors of psychical importance that call for a hearing. After all, what

is poverty in one age is riches in another; what is poverty for one man

is wealth to his neighbor. More than that, what a man considers riches

in anticipation is poverty in realization. Here again we deal with the

mounting of desire.

The philosophical, contented woman, satisfied with her life even though

it is poor, is exempted from one great factor making for breakdown.

Contentment is the great shield of the nervous system, the great bulwark

against fatigue and obsession. But contentment leads away from

achievement, which springs from discontent, from yearning desire.

Whether civilization in the sense of our achievements is worth the price

paid is a matter upon which the present writer will not presume to pass

judgment. Whether it is or not, Mankind is committed to struggle onward,

regardless of the result to his peace of mind.

There are two principal psychical injuries with poverty--fear and

worry--and we must pass to their consideration as factors in the

neuroses of some women.

Worry is chronic fear directed against a life situation, usually

anticipated. Man the foreseeing must worry or he dies,--dies of

starvation, disease, disaster. It is true that worry may be excessive

and directed either against imaginary or inevitable ills; ills that

never come, ills that must come, like old age and death.

Men in comfortable places cry "Why worry?" meaning of course that the

most of worry is about ills that are never realized. That is true, but

the person living just on the brink of disaster, ruined or made

dependent on charity by unemployment, a long illness, or any failure of

power and strength, cannot be as philosophical as the man fortified by a

nice bank account or dividend-paying investments. These well-to-do

advisers of the poor remind one of the heroes of ancient fables who,

having magic weapons and impenetrable armor, showed no fear in battle.

One wonders how much courage they would have had if armed as their

foemen were.

For the poor housewife who sees no escape from poverty, whose husband is

either a workman or a struggling business man always on the edge of

failure, life often seems like a wall closing in, a losing battle

without end.

Especially in the middle-aged, in those approaching fifty, does this

happen. Aside from the condition produced by "change of life", the

so-called involution period, there is a reaction of the "time of life"

that is found very commonly. For old age is no longer far off on the

horizon; it is close at hand, around the corner, and the looking-glass

proclaims its coming. The woman wonders whether her husband will long be

able to keep up,--and then "what will become of us?"

To be thrown on the benevolence of children is a sad ending to

independent natures, to people of experience. Crudely put, those who

have been dependents are now sustainers; those who have been led now

guide; the inferiors are the superiors. This is not cynicism, for with

the best intentions in the world, if the children are also poor, the

care of the parents is a burden that they cannot help showing, sooner or

later.

Looking forward to such an ending to the hard work and struggle of a

lifetime is part of the worry of poverty, to be classed with the fear of

sickness and unemployment.

We may loudly proclaim that one honest man is as good as another, that

character is the measure of worth, that success cannot be measured by

money. These things are true; the difficulty is not to make people

believe it, it is to make people _feel_ it. Deeply ingrained in poverty

is not alone to be deprived of things desired; more important is the

feeling of inferiority that goes with the condition. Only in the

Bohemia of the novelists do the poor feel equal to the rich.

One of the fundamental strivings of the human being is the enlargement

of the self-feeling, which fundamentally is the wish to be superior, to

have the admiration and homage of others. All daydreaming builds this

air castle; all ambition has this as its goal. No matter how we disguise

it to ourselves and others, the main ends of purpose are power and

place. True, we may wish for power and place so as to help others; we

may wish them as the result of constructive work and achievement, but

the enlargement of self-feeling is the end result of the striving.

To be poor is to be inferior in feeling and applies equally to men and

women. Man is a competitive-social animal and competes in everything,

from the cleverness and beauty of his children to the excellence of his

taste in hats. Money has the advantage of being the symbol of value, of

being concrete and definite, and of having the inestimable property of

purchasing power.

Now woman is as competitive as her mate. A housewife vies with her

neighboring housewives in her clothes, her good looks, her youth, her

husband, her children, her home, her housekeeping, her money,--vies with

her in folly as well as in wisdom. How much of the extravagance of women

(and here is a difficulty to be dealt with later) arises from rivalry

only the tongues of women could tell, but it is safe to say that the

greater part of it has this origin.

Jealousy and envy are harsh words, yet they stand for traits having a

great psychological value. Part of the impetus for effort rises from

these feelings, and an incredibly large part. Many a man who bends

unremitting in his effort has in mind some man of whose success he is

envious, or whose efforts he watches with a jealousy hidden almost from

himself.

Upon women these feelings play with devastating force. One may be

satisfied with what he has until some one else he knows gets more; that

is to say, the causes of most of the dissatisfaction and discontent of

the world are envy and jealousy. In many cases it may be a righteous

sort of jealousy or envy. A woman, especially because she is a rival of

her fellow-woman mainly in small things, becomes acutely miserable when

she is outstripped by her neighbor and especially if she is passed by

her relatives and intimate friends.

Poverty is especially hard on those intensely ambitious for their

children. "They must have the education I did not have; they must have a

good time in life which I never had; I don't want them to be poor all

their lives like we are." Here is the woman who works herself to the

bone, yet is content and well save for her fatigue, if her children

respond to her efforts by success in study and by ambitious efforts of

their own. But if the struggling mother is so unfortunate as to have

drawn in Nature's lottery an unappreciative or a weak-minded child, then

the breakdown is tragic.

A poor man is much more apt to be philosophical about poverty for his

children than his wife is. He is willing to do what he can for them, but

he is more apt to realize what mother love is blind to,--that the

average child is unappreciative of the parents' efforts and takes them

for granted. The man is more apt to think and say, "Let them stand on

their own feet and make their own way; it will do them good." The mother

usually longs to spare her children struggle, the father rarely shares

this desire except in a mild way.

It may be that there was a time when classes were more fixed, that

poverty had less of humiliation and blocked desire than it has at

present. That society of all grades is restless with the desire for

luxury seems without doubt. How profoundly the psychology of the masses

is being altered by education, by the newspaper, the magazine, the

movie, the automobile, the fashion changes that make a dress obsolete in

a season and above all the department store and the alluring

advertisement, no one can hope to even estimate. Modern capitalism reaps

great wealth by developing the luxurious, the spendthrift tastes of the

poor. It would be a peculiar poetic justice that will make that

development into the basis of revolution.

The women of the poor are perhaps even more restless than the men. In

fact, it is the women that set the pace in these matters. This is

because to woman has fallen the spending of the family funds, a fact of

great importance in bringing about discord in the house. As the shopper

the poor woman now sees the beautiful things that her ancestors knew

nothing of, since there were no department stores in those days. To-day

desires are awakened that cannot be fulfilled; she sees other women

buying what she can only long for, and an active discontent with her lot

appears.

Unphilosophical this, and severely to be deprecated as unworthy of

woman. This has been done so often and so effectively(?) by divines,

reformers, press, that a mere physician begs leave to remark that it is

a natural sequence of the publicity luxury to-day has. _The most

successful commercial minds of America are in a conspiracy against the

poor Housewife to make her discontented with her lot by increasing her

desires_; they are on the job day and night and invade every corner of

her world; well, they have succeeded. The divines, etc., who thunder

against luxury have no word to say against the department store and the

advertising manager.

The Nervous Housewife · 第 6 / 13 章