Mr. Leigh, and Mr. Frost, both witnesses for the prisoners,

testified, that the barber's boy came up to the people, and

pointing at the centry, said, here 's the son of a b--ch that

knocked me down; upon which one of the witnesses said, the people

cried kill him - Both said, that the centry ran to the custom-

house steps, knocked at the door, but could not get in - neither

of them mention'd any thing thrown at him, nor any attack upon him

- he prim'd and loaded his gun and levelled it; told the people to

stand off, and called to the main-guard; upon which Capt. Preston

and his party came down - Mr. Bulkly, summoned also by the

prisoners, testified that he thought the centry was in danger, by

the number of people about him, and the noise; and mentioned no

other reason for his thinking so - he said that a person told

Capt. Preston, that they were killing the centry - This person was

probably one Thomas Greenwood, a servant in the custom-house; for

he himself declared before the magistrates, that he was in the

custom-house, and went from thence to the main-guard, and told one

of the Soldiers, if they did not go down to the centry, he was

afraid they would hurt him, tho' he had not seen any person insult

him - This man, at the same time depos'd, that he saw two or three

snow balls fall near the steps of the custom-house, but saw no

person throw any stones; tho' he had placed himself in the most

convenient room in the house for observation - Mr. Harrison Gray

mention'd the people round the centry, making use of opprobrious

language, and threatening; but said nothing of their attacking

him, or throwing anything at him - Mr. Hinckley declared, that the

people went to the centry, and at last some of them cried kill

him, but did not see any attempt to hurt him - Mr. Cornwall swore,

that he saw snow balls and 2 or 3 oyster shells thrown at the

centry, but did not think they hit him - he heard several young

gentlemen perswading the people to go off, and believed they all

would have gone off, if the Soldiers had not come down - Mr.

Helyer declared, that he came into King-street, and saw the centry

and twenty or thirty persons - some boys at their diversion - The

centry wav'd his gun in a way that had a tendency to exasperate

the people - Mr. Brewer saw the centry with his bayonet breast

high - a number of boys, twenty or more round him, talking but

doing nothing. Mr. Bailey was standing with the centry on the

custom-house steps - saw 20 or 30 boys of about 14 years old -

they were throwing pieces of ice at him, large and hard enough to

hurt him, but did not know whether they hit him. This must appear

very strange as he was so near him - his standing with him on the

steps, would lead one to think he was an acquaintance of the

centry; which is confirmed by another circumstance, for he said

that when the party came down, one of the Soldiers put his bayonet

to his breast, and the centry told him not to hurt him - Mr.

Simpson swore, that the centry knock'd at the customhouse door -

that a person came to the door and spoke to him, upon which he

turn'd and loaded his gun - There was one witness, and I think but

one, who mention'd pieces of sea-coal thrown at the centry; and

that was Andrew a Negro - A fellow of a lively imagination indeed!

- One, who I believe could tell as good a story even to my lord of

H. and give his lordship as circumstantial an account of "the

unhappy transaction", as some, who have already had the honor of

doing it, & who may think themselves to be Andrew's betters - he

is remarkable for telling romantick stories in the circles of his

acquaintance - And whether his fancy had beguil'd his own

judgment, or whether he had a mind to try his success at painting

upon so serious an occasion, or lastly, whether he was resolv'd to

do his utmost to save the prisoners, I pretend not to say; but he

certainly made some folks believe, that the ashes made of sea-coal

burnt with great savings in the adjacent offices, were like the

cinders thrown out of a blacksmith's shop -Andrew's evidence, if

not his judgment, was greatly rely'd upon; and the more, because

his master, who is in truth an honest man, came into court and

swore to his character; and further said, that Andrew had told

him, that He really believ'd the inhabitants were to blame - It

is, I am apt to think, in general true, that no man knows so

little of the real character of his servant, as the master himself

does: It is well known, that the Negroes of this town have been

familiar with the soldiers; and that some of them have been

tamper'd with to cut their master's throats: I hope Andrew is not

one of these. His character for integrity and even for learning,

for he can both read & write, has been upon this occasion wrought

to so high a pitch, that I am loth even to hint any thing that may

tend to depreciate it; otherwise, I should say, that there are

some, whose kitchens Andrew has frequented, who will not give him

quite so exalted a character, as others, who had not known him,

thought he deserved. - Several others, witnesses for the prisoners

testified to the same purpose; that the people encroach'd upon the

centry; that he loaded his gun and threatned to fire upon them;

and that they in return dared him to fire, and throw'd a few snow

balls. Mr. Hall said, that he presented his gun at the people, and

they threw snow balls and some oyster-shells at him; and they hit

his gun two or three times - Mr. Payne who saw the centry when he

was alone, and until the party came up and fired, "perceived

nothing but the talk, that he thought would have induced him or

any of the Soldiers to fire": Words are not an assault, and could

not warrant him to fire: Mr. Knox and others saw nothing thrown at

him nor any attack made on him: Mr.-----and some others said, they

saw snow balls and other things thrown at him; but it appears very

probable, from the course of the evidence, that if any thing was

thrown at him, it was not till he had loaded his gun, threatened

to fire, & waved it in such a manner as tended to exasperate

people; and as Mr. Knox tho't, had snapped his gun. The first

assault was made by the centry himself, when upon a foolish

provocation in words only, he struck the barber's boy: He renewed

the assault, when he loaded his gun and presented it upon the

people, threatning to fire upon them: In doing this, he put his

Majesty's subjects in terror of their lives, against the law of

the land; and they would have been justified in seizing him at

least - If he had thought himself in danger, instead of threatning

the lives of others, he must first, according to the law of the

land, have retreated if he could, and even from his post: Other

doctrine, I know, has been strongly inculcated of late, by those

who would set up, or tamely yield to, an uncontroulable military

power; but I trust in God, it will never be established here: It

never can, while the people entertain a just idea of the nature of

civil government, and are upon their guard against the daring

encroachments of arbitrary, despotic power. The people were

inclin'd to disperse, and did disperse, in the beginning of this

childish dispute; as appeared by the evidence of Mr. Parker: And

notwithstanding the mutual animosity, if the reader pleases, which

afterwards arose between the centry and them, they would have

finally dispers'd, in the opinion of another witness, if the party

had not come down from the main-guard.

VINDEX.

Jan. i.

TO STEPHEN SAYRE.

[MS., Samuel Adams Papers, Lenox Library.]

BOSTON Jany 12 1771

SIR

I wrote you p Capt Hall who saild about ten days ago, & then

inclosd, some papers publishd in the Boston Gazette upon the

Subject of the late Trial of the Soldiers. I now send you

duplicates, together with others on the same Subject since

publishd. I perceive that Mr Hutchinson is appointed Govr here,1 &

it is said he is to have an independent Salary! Is not this

perfect Despotism? What can the people of Britain mean, by

suffering their great men to enslave their fellow Subjects? Can

they think that the plan is confind to America? They will surely

find themselves mistaken. I am in haste.

1 "I find by the prints that the Commissions have been published

at Boston,14th Inst constituting Lt Gov. Hutch. Governor, and

Secrety Oliver Lt Gov. of Massachusetts." - Literary Diary of Ezra

Stiles [March 22, 1771], vol. 1., p. 97. "Govr Thomas Hutchinson and

Lieut. Govr Andrew Oliver, Esq's., commissions published ; Judges in

their robes, and all the Bar in their habbits, Walked in procession."

[March 14, 1771], The Diaries of Benjamin Lynde, and of Benjamin

Lynde, Jr., p. 201.

ARTICLE SIGNED "VINDEX."

[Boston Gazette, January 14, 1771.]

To the PRINTERS.

I Have in my last, consider'd the situation and behavior of the

centry, and the people that were round him, immediately before the

coming down of the Soldiers from the main-guard. Some of the

witnesses, sworn in open court, who I believe, are allow'd to be

of equal credit with any of the rest, and were present thro' the

whole bloody scene, declared, that they perceived nothing thrown

at the centry - Nothing but the number of people and the noise

they made, that led them to apprehend he was in danger - Nothing

but the talk, that induc'd them to think he would fire: Others

indeed saw snow balls, and other things thrown at him, after he

presented his gun, and wav'd it in an exasperating manner,

and threatened to fire: - One in particular, declared, that he saw

balls of ice thrown, large & hard enough to hurt any man: It is

strange, if he thought the centry in danger, that he should stand

so near him, as by his own testimony it is evident he did, till

the Soldiers came down: I think, upon the whole, we may fairly

conclude, that but few of these things were thrown at him; and

that they were in consequence of his loading his gun, & presenting

it at the people: It was the opinion of one of the witnesses for the

prisoners, that the people would have dispersed, if the soldiers had

not come down: It was then unfortunate, that the soldiers were so

suddenly order'd down. Whether it was regular, for a captain to take a

corporal's command, or was ever done before in the army, I leave

others to say, who are better acquainted with the art military,

than I pretend to be: If not, it may be difficult to account for

Capt. Preston's great readiness to undertake so disagreable and

dangerous a task.

In the publick Advertiser, printed in London, the 28th of April

last, I have seen a paper called, the Case of Capt. Thomas

Preston: It was published in his name, tho' not wholly his own

draft; as he declared to a committee of this town, who waited upon

him for an explanation of some passages in it,1 which were

notoriously false, and grosly reflecting upon some of the

magistrates, as well as the people of the town and province. I may

hereafter particularly consider this paper, which has had its run

thro' Britain and America; and point out

the many "faults of partiality" which are contain'd in it: The

only reason why I have not already done it, was, because I agreed

in the general sentiment of the inhabitants of this town, that

nothing of this kind should be publish'd, at so critical a

juncture, lest it might be tho't to prejudice the minds of Jurors

on a trial for life.2- It may be perhaps more easy, and of full

as much importance to the publick, to ascertain the person, who

several times alter'd the state of the case; and, as Capt. Preston

himself declared, even after it finally came out of his hands, as

it would be, to ascertain the person in a red cloke; which the

writer in Draper's paper has been so often in vain called upon to

do, in fulfillment of his voluntary promise. - In this paper,

Capt. Preston, or his friend in his behalf, says, "he sent a non-

commission'd officer and twelve men, and very soon follow'd

himself:" The witnesses in court, on both sides declared, that

Capt. Preston himself came down with the party. Again he says, he

followed, "lest the officer and soldiers should be thrown off

their guard, and commit some rash act": But, did he restrain them

from commiting so rash an act, as firing upon the multitude? - He

surely must have observ'd the violent temper which the soldiers

discover'd, as "they rushed thro' the people" according to his own

account; "upon the trot, in a threatning manner, damning the

people and pushing them with their bayonets", as Mr. Knox and

others swore in court: He knew their guns were charg'd with ball;

he declar'd it at the time, and on the spot, as Mr. Palmes testified:

Should he not then, at the very instant, when he must if ever, have

been apprehensive, that they would commit some rash act, at least

have caution'd them, not to fire, till he himself should give the

orders? Instead of this, by his own, or his friend's account,

publish'd as his own, we find no such prudent directions to the men

under his command; who by the rules of the army, would have been

liable to suffer death, if they had disobey'd! What single step did

he take, to prevent their committing a rash act, for the sake of which

alone, he tells us, he followed down? Not one according to the state

of his case, till after they began to fire: "Upon my asking the men,

says he, why they fired without orders, they said, they heard the

word, fire, and suppos'd it come from me": It seems, it was the

apprehension of the Soldiers, that he order'd them to fire; and we

must suppose, that the Soldiers were particularly attentive to their

commanding officer: But he adds, "I assured them my words were,

don't fire"; from hence it is plain that he gave them some order.

I am no Soldier, and never desire to be one: But I appeal to those

who are, whether the words, "don't fire," are words of command in

the British army; and whether there is not some other word which

Soldiers are taught to understand, more proper to be given on such

an occasion, or, as I chuse to express it, in the heat of action,

which would have prevented such rashness, and even put it out of

their power to have fired, at least to have done any mischief.

These words, I well remember, it was said were made use of in

command, at another time, and by another officer of the same

regiment; when one of the soldiers, thro' mistake, fired upon the

march, in the street, and very nearly effected the death; not to

say, the murder of a worthy citizen: The soldier was soon jostled

from the reach of civil power; which was a mighty easy thing to be

done, as was found by experience, at a time when the first

magistrate of the province had publickly declared, that he had no

authority over the King's troops, which has since been repeated:

The good men of the county however, found a bill of indictment

against the officer who commanded the party: But when the matter

came upon trial before the superior court, altho' some positively

swore that he gave the word, fire, yet because the soldiers swore

that his words were don't fire, a doubt arose; and a doubt you

know, must turn in favor of the accused party; for the good old

maxim is, whether founded in the law of Moses, the common law, the

law of nature and reason, or the safety of human societies, better

ten villains escape than one honest, harmless man be hang'd-

Whether the officer would have so luckily escaped, upon a trial

before a court martial, for giving a word of command,

unintelligible in a military sense, I very much doubt.. - Capt.

Preston further said, that "his intention was not to act

offensively, nor even the contrary part, without compulsion": That

is, when he should think himself compelled, he was to act defensively;

and in what way could he or his soldiers act upon the defence, with

muskets charg'd with ball, but by discharging them upon the people,

which he must have concluded would have kill'd some of them? No

matter, the people were the agressors; and besides, "the King's money

was to be protected" as well as the centinel - Here I will acquit

Capt. Preston, as a man of too much honor to suggest a known falshood:

It has been the constant practice of a certain set of men, meanly to

insinuate, that the Americans in their exertions against lawless

power, have always had something dishonorable in view: At present, it

is the plundering the King's chest; altho' even Greenwood himself, an

hired servant in the custom-house, a dependent upon dependents, if

he is to be believed, depos'd before the magistrate, that amidst

the whole volley, as some would have it, of snow balls, oyster

shells, ice, and as Andrew said, sea coal, thrown at the centinel,

"not a single Pane of the custom-house windows were broken; nor

did he see any person attempt to get into the house, or break even

a square of glass " - The soldiers acted defensively, and it seems

as tho' Preston thought they were at length compelled to do it;

for if it was done against his orders, or barely without his

orders, with what propriety could he say to the person of the

first character in the province, "I did it to save my men," - A

precise answer indeed, to the question put to him; and therefore,

I should have thought, not "unsatisfactory," or "imperfect ", as

it was afterwards affirmed to have been.

Such were the effects of Capt. Preston's sending the non-

commission'd officer and the soldiers to protect the centinel and

the King's money; and of his following very soon after, to prevent

their committing a rash act: But if Capt. Preston had a right to

go to the protection of any man whom he thought in danger, had he or

his party a right to engage in an affray, and carry into an incensed

mob, as he calls it, weapons which could not be used without killing,

and there make use of them as he should judge necessary? Ought he not

to have called upon a civil officer, and put himself, and his men, if

required, under his direction, before he went upon so desperate a

design? Or, does the law of the land, invest every, or any military

officer, even of the highest rank, with the right, above all other

citizens, of making himself a party in a riot, under a pretence of

suppressing it; of carrying with him soldiers arm'd with weapons of

death, and making use of them at discretion, without even the presence

of a civil officer - This is a point of too much importance to be

yielded; for the lives of subjects are not to depend, upon the

judgment or discretion, much less upon the will and pleasure, or

wanton humour of his Majesty's military servants.

I am sensible, I have heretofore taken up too much room in your

useful paper: I shall avoid it at present; and the rather, to

afford you the opportunity of inserting an address "to the

PROTESTANTS of the three Kingdoms, and the COLONIES"; being the

preface to a late publication in London, containing a series of

important letters of the Earl of Hillsborough, the Marquiss of

Rockingham, and others, from a gentleman whose signature is Pliny,

junior.

VINDEX

1 See above, page 14

.

2 See above, page 102.

ARTICLE SIGNED "VINDEX."

[Boston Gazette, January 21, 1771.]

To the PRINTERS.

As the lives of five of his Majesty's subjects were unfairly lost

on the evening of the 5th of March last, it follows that some

persons must have been in fault:

The unhappy sufferers, for ought that has ever appeared, were in

the peace of God and the King; let their memories then, so far at

least as respects this matter, remain unreproach'd. It appeared by

the evidence in court, that all the prisoners were present in king

street; that they all discharg'd their musquets but one, and his

flush'd in the pan; and that the deceas'd were all kill'd by

musquet balls. Six of the prisoners were acquitted by the jury,

and two were found guilty of manslaughter. In ordinary cases, the

publick ought to rest satisfied, with the verdict of a jury; a

method of trial, which an Englishman glories in as his greatest

security: It is a method peculiar to the English; and as a great

writer observes, has been a probable means of their having

supported their liberties thro' so many ages past: Among the most

substantial advantages arising from trials by juries, there is

this incidental one, in this province especially; that by our

laws, no man being oblig'd to serve as a juryman more than once in

three years, it falls upon the freemen as it were by rotation; by

this means, the people in general are in their turns called to

that important trust; by attending in courts of law and justice,

it is to be presum'd that their minds are there impress'd with a

sense of justice; and that they gain that general idea of right or

law, which it is necessary that all men in a free country should

have. "It is an admirable institution, by which every citizen may

be plac'd in a situation, that enables him to contribute to the

great end of society, the distributing justice; and it every where

diffuses a spirit of true patriotism, which is zealously employed

for the publick welfare." I am not about to arraign the late

jurors before the bar of the publick: They are accountable to God

and their own consciences, and in their day of trial, may God send

them good deliverance. But in times when politicks run high, we

find by the experience of past ages, it is difficult to ascertain

the truth even in a court of law: At such times, witnesses will

appear to contradict each other in the most essential points of

fact; and a cool conscientious spectator is apt to shudder for

fear of perjury: If the jurors are strangers to the characters of

the several witnesses, it may be too late for them to make the

enquiry, when they are upon their seats: The credibility of a

witness perhaps cannot be impeac'd in court, unless he has been

convicted of perjury: But an immoral man, for instance one who

will commonly prophane the name of his maker, certainly cannot be

esteemed of equal credit by a jury, with one who fears to take

that sacred name in vain: It is impossible he should in the mind

of any man: Therefore, when witnesses substantially differ in

their relation of the same facts, unless the jury are acquainted

with their different characters, they must be left to meer chance

to determine which to believe; the consequence of which, may be

fatal to the life of the prisoner, or to the justice of the cause,

or perhaps both. It was for this reason, that I was concern'd,

when the council for the crown objected the notoriety of the

immoral character of a witness, that he was stopped by one of the

council on the other side. In a court of justice, it is beneath

any character to aim at victory and triumph: Truth, and truth

alone is to be sought after.

While the soldiers were passing from the main guard to the custom-

house, it did not appear by any of the witnesses, that they were

molested by the people; if we except what was mention'd, as having

been said by Mr. Car, one of the deceased persons: His doctor

testified, that he told him, the "people pelted them as they went

along". - The declaration of a dying man commonly carries much

weight, and oftentimes, possibly more than it ought: This man's

declaration was not made upon oath, nor in the presence of a

magistrate: The doctor had a curiosity, as most had, to know how

matters were, and enquired of his patient who he thought could

inform him; it may be, not expecting to be called to relate it

before a court, nine months afterwards, when he might have nothing

but memory to recur to: No one disputes the doctor's understanding

or integrity: I have before said, that others were ready to

testify, that Car gave them a very different account from that

which he gave to his doctor: It ought to be remembered, that the

unhappy man was laboring under the pains and anxiety occasioned by

a mortal wound; and might not be able at all times to attend duly

to such questions as were asked him: What makes it highly probable

that he must have been mistaken, is, that among the many

witnesses, not one on either side, mention'd their seeing the

least ill usage offer'd to the soldiers as they pass'd from the

main guard; not even Mr. Gridley, whose declared intention was, at

the request of some gentlemen, with whom he had been in company,

to

It is agreed by the witnesses for the prisoners, who mention'd

their seeing the soldiers upon their first coming down, that they

loaded their guns, levelled them at the people & began to insult &

abuse them, (as indeed they did upon their march); before any just

provocation had been offer'd to them. - Mr. Hinckley saw the party

come down - they loaded - push'd their bayonets and pricked the

people - Mr. Wilkinson also saw the party come down; did not see

anything thrown at them, tho' he stood at two or three yards

distance - Mr. Murray said they came down and cried make way -

Andrew declared, that the party planted themselves at the custom-

house - the people gave three cheers - he heard one of the

soldiers say, damn you stand back - one of them had like to have

prick'd a man as he was passing by, and swore by God he would stab

him - several persons were talking with the captain, and a number

pressing on to hear what they said; one of the persons talking

with the officer said "he is going to fire"; the people shouted

and said, he dare not fire; and then they began to throw snow

balls. Even by Andrews account, the people were rather curious to

know what the soldiers design'd to do, than intent upon doing

them any hurt, untill they were assaulted by them; which I am apt to

think is true; because Newtown Prince, another Negro, of whom for my

own part I conceive a better opinion than of Andrew, declared, that

the Soldiers planted themselves in a circle - their guns breast high

-and, the people crowded on, to speak with Capt. Preston - and

further, several of the witnesses swore that they themselves talked

with the Captain, and one of them caution'd him against firing

- Capt. Preston himself also in his printed state of his case says,

that he reasoned with "some well behav'd persons": To show that "as

he was advanced before the muzzels of their pieces, he must fall a

sacrifice if they fired " -and that his ordering them to fire "upon

the half cock and charged bayonets would prove him no officer"; all

which might be true, and yet in my humble opinion not quite so

"satisfactory" as the answer which he afterwards gave to the

Lieutenant Governor; for he might, I suppose, in an instant shift his

station, and the soldiers, by a proper word of Command, might

discharge their musquets without his falling a sacrifice or forfeiting

the character of a soldier - Such a manner of reasoning upon their

question, whether he intended to order the men to fire, was evasive;

and may serve to show Captain Preston's opinion, that however well

behav'd these gentlemen were, they were no Soldiers.

I shall now take notice of what the witnesses for the crown testified

concerning the behavior of the Soldiers, upon their first arrival at

the custom-house. Mr. Austin saw the party come down; the captain was

with them; McCauley, one of the prisoners, loaded his gun, push'd at

him with his bayonet and damn'd him - He did not observe the people

press on - Mr. Bridgham declared, that about a dozen surrounded the

Soldiers and struck their guns with their sticks: But he also said the

Soldiers were loading at the same time - He further added, that he did

not apprehend himself or the Soldiers in any danger by any thing he

saw, from whence it may be suppos'd, that as the people struck their

guns only, when they might as easily have have knocked them down,

their intention was not to hurt them, but rather to prevent their

loading - Mr. Brewer saw the party come down - told Captain Preston

that every body was about dispersing; in which he agreed with another

witness, who was of the opinion that the people would have dispers'd

if the Soldiers had not come down; Mr. Brewer added, that Killroi, one

of the prisoners, struck him with his bayonet before they formed, and

that he saw no blows and nothing thrown before the firing - Mr. Bailey

testified, that when the party came down, Carrol one of the prisoners

put his bayonet to his breast. Mr. Wilkinson stood at about two yards

distance from the Soldiers all the while they were there - He saw no

ice nor snow balls thrown; in which he agreed with Mr. Austin - Mr.

Fosdick testified, that he was push'd as the party came down - that

afterwards they wounded him in the breast - two different bayonets

were thrust into his arm - all this while there had been no blows that

he saw, nor did he know the cause of their firing - Mr. Palmes saw

Capt. Preston at the head of the Soldiers who were drawn up with their

guns breast high and their bayonets fixed; and Preston told him they

were loaded with powder and ball - I think I have mentioned all the

witnesses, who testified in court to what they saw upon the first

arrival of the party at the customhouse: And by their testimonies the

reader will judge, whether the Soldiers had just provocation to fire

upon the people; or whether they were in danger of their lives or had

any reason to think they were: On the contrary, whether they did not

themselves first assault the people as they were coming from the main

guard; and afterwards, by levelling their guns loaded with ball in an

exasperating manner at the people; pushing their bayonets at some of

them, wounding others and threatning all, even before any injury had

been offer'd to them.

The Writings of Samuel Adams - Volume 2 · 第 9 / 30 段