Labour problems have always existed, but the development of

industrialism as we know it to-day is comparatively modern. It dates

from the introduction of machinery and mechanical transport, and

coincided in its beginnings with the vogue of the so-called

"Manchester School" in political and economic theory. The modern world

of industry has been built up by the enterprise of capitalists working

upon the basis of unrestricted competition. Joint-stock companies and

"trusts" are simply capitalistic combinations for the exploitation of

industrial opportunities upon a larger scale.

The economic theorists of the Manchester School regarded wages as

necessarily governed by the working of the "iron law" of supply and

demand. It was the "interest" of the employer to buy such labour as

was required at as cheap a rate as possible. It was assumed that in

this, as in other matters of "business," his procedure must be

determined wholly by self-interest, to the exclusion of "sentimental"

considerations. Individual employers might be better than their creed,

and in the smaller "concerns" the relations between employer and

employed were often humanized by personal knowledge and intercourse.

With the advent of the joint-stock company this no longer held good.

"A corporation has no bowels." Directors were not personally in

contact with their workpeople, and their main consideration was for

their shareholders. The whole tendency of the industrial order of

society as it developed was in the direction of the exploitation of

the workman in the interests of "capital."

It was not that members of the employing class were consciously

inhuman. It was simply that they were blinded to the human problems

which were involved. They had become accustomed to regard as natural

and inevitable a wage-slavery of the many to the few. Labour was a

commodity in the market. The workman was a unit of labour. Regarded

from the point of view of Capital he represented simply the

potentiality of so many foot-pounds of more or less intelligently-

directed energy _per diem_. His life as a human being, apart from the

economic value of his labour, was from the "business" point of view

irrelevant.

The system was based upon a lie. "Treat human beings as machines as

much as you will, the fact remains that they are incurably personal."

The wage-slaves of the modern world asserted their personality, and

the modern Socialist-Labour Movement is the result. The forces of

organized labour have won some notable victories. They are a

recognized power in the land. There are those who hope, and those who

fear, that they will in the end become socially and politically

omnipotent. It is now generally recognized that society prior to the

war was on the brink of a struggle between the classes of great

bitterness, and that the social condition of the country after the war

is likely to be fraught with formidable possibilities. There are many

observers who regard a social revolution, in one form or another, as

inevitable.

Much, no doubt, will depend upon the temper of the returning troops,

both officers and men. That men and officers have learnt to know and

to respect one another upon the battlefield is acknowledged, but those

who imagine that herein is contained a solution of social and labour

problems are likely to prove grievously disappointed. A great deal of

nonsense is being talked about the effects of "discipline" upon the

men. Military discipline has its admirers: but men of mature years and

civilian traditions who in the present conflict have served _in the

ranks_ of His Majesty's Army are not included among their number. They

have submitted to discipline for the period of their military service.

They are quite able to recognize that it is essential to the

efficiency of the army as a fighting machine. But they conceive

themselves to have been fighting for freedom: and their own freedom

and that of their children and of their class is included in their

eyes among the objects for which they fight. They will be more than

ever jealous, after the war, of their recovered liberties, and

determined to assert them. It is probable that one result of

demobilization will be an enormous accession of strength to the ranks

of the Socialist and Labour parties. The "class war" with which

society was threatened before the European War broke out is not likely

to be a less present danger when "that which now restraineth" is

removed by the conclusion of peace.

What in relation to these problems is the message of the Christian

Church? The distinctively Christian ethic is based not upon self-

assertion but upon self-sacrifice, not upon class distinctions but

upon brotherhood. "Let no man seek his own, but each his neighbour's

good." The principle is of corporate as well as of individual

application. In an ideally Christian society, the interests of

"Labour" would be the sole concern of "Capital," the interests of

"Capital" the sole concern of "Labour": and the message of the Church

to the contending parties should be, now as always, "Sirs, ye are

brethren."

Neither party, however, is likely at present to pay much heed to such

a message, which is apt to sound like an abstract and theoretical

truism remote from the actualities of life. In point of fact, the

large sections of the population who live permanently near or below

the poverty line are largely precluded by lack of leisure from

entering into the Christian heritage of the spiritual life, and are

too much obsessed by the daily struggle for material existence to have

patience with exhortations to regard with sympathy either the

temptations or the good intentions of the well-to-do. The latter in

turn are apt to resent any attempt to stir in them a social conscience

with regard to the problems of poverty or the fundamental causes of

labour "unrest," to regard the security of dividends as conveniently

guaranteed by the laws of GOD, and to hold, in a general way, that

everything has hitherto been ordered for the best in the best of all

possible worlds. The Church--and more particularly the Church of

England--is commonly regarded both by "Labour" and by "Capital" as

traditionally identified with the Conservative Party in politics. The

Church-going classes love to have it so, and the world of Labour not

unnaturally holds aloof.

It is nevertheless sufficiently obvious that the future of

civilization after the war will be largely in the hands (or at the

mercy) of organized Labour. And it is worth remembering that our

Saviour died not for the rich only, but for the poor, having moreover

Himself lived and worked as a labouring Man. There are those who

regard the spirit of idealism and world-wide brotherhood by which the

Labour Movement is inspired as the most profoundly Christian element

in the life of the modern world, and the existing cleavage between

Labour and the Church as a tragedy comparable only to the tragedy of

the war. It is the plain duty of a Christian man to do what in him

lies to remedy this cleavage, to think hard and honestly about social

problems from a Christian point of view, and to make it his business

to have an adequate understanding and sympathy with the real character

and motives of Labour aspirations and ideals.

CHAPTER VIII

CHRISTIANITY AND POLITICS

Politics at their worst are a discreditable struggle between parties

and groups for selfish, and sectional ends, full of dishonesty and

chicanery and corruption. It is often recognized at the present time

as desirable that none should be for party, but all for the state. The

Christian ideal goes further than this: it is that none should be for

party, but all for the Kingdom of GOD, and for the state only in so

far as the state is capable of being made the instrument of that

higher ideal. The Christian man is not to hold aloof from political

life, but to seek, so far as his personal effort and influence can be

made to tell, to Christianize the political struggle. In every

contested election he is bound to think out in the light of Christian

ideals the issues which are at stake, without either prejudice or

heat, and to register his vote in accordance with his conscience under

the most solemn sense of responsibility before GOD. He is bound, of

course, to be a reformer, standing for cleanness of methods, probity

of motives, honest thinking, class unselfishness, and the elimination

of abuses and malpractices. He will tend in most cases to be a cross-

bencher, in the sense of being independent of party caucuses and

concerned only for social and political righteousness.

A Christian man who has leisure and opportunity can render enormous

service by going into politics, more especially into municipal

politics, which are too often surrendered to the tender mercies of

corrupt, narrow-minded, or interested local wire-pullers. There is an

enormous field of unselfish social service and opportunity lying open

to Christian laymen in this connexion. There can be no truer form of

work for the Church of GOD than the work of a municipal councillor who

seeks not popularity but righteousness.

The carrying over of Christian ideals into national and international

politics is equally indispensable. In the sphere of international

affairs in particular, while other nations have, for the most part,

rendered official lip-service from time to time to ideals of

international morality, it has been reserved for Germany to declare

openly for the repudiation of "sentiment," and for a policy of

undisguised cynicism and _real-politik_. The doctrine that the state

as such is exempt from moral obligation towards its neighbours, and

that the whole political duty of man is exhausted in the service of

his country and the promotion of her purely selfish interests and

"will to power," has been exhibited in action by the Prussian

Government in such a fashion as to incur the moral reprobation of the

world. The cynical doctrines of _real-politik_, the belief that the

"interests" of the state are in politics and diplomacy paramount, and

that "the foreigner" is a natural enemy, the belief that in all

international relationships selfish and self-interested considerations

must really determine policy, are unfortunately by no means

unrepresented, though they are not unchallenged, in the political life

of other countries besides Germany. There are influential publicists

in England to-day the _principles_ of whose political thinking are

really Prussian. It remains to be seen whether, when the time comes

for peace to be made between the nations, the forces of international

idealism will prove strong enough to carry the day, or whether we

shall have a merely vindictive and "realist" peace which will contain

within itself the seeds of future wars. There can be no question but

that a Christian man is bound to stand both for the freedom of

oppressed nationalities and for the right of all peoples freely to

determine their own affairs, and also for the duty of nations as of

individuals to love their neighbours as themselves, and to seek

primarily not their own but each other's good. If these professions

are to be more than nominal they must mean a readiness for national

sacrifices and for national unselfishness in time of peace as in time

of war.

CHAPTER IX

CHRISTIANITY AND WAR

Christianity is opposed to war, in the sense that if men and nations

universally behaved as Christians, wars would cease. The ideal of the

Kingdom of GOD involves the reign upon earth of universal peace. War

is, therefore, in itself, an unchristian thing. It is, moreover, a

barbarous and irrational method of determining disputes, since the

factors which humanly speaking are decisive for success in war, viz.

the organized and unflinching use of superior physical force, are in

principle irrelevant to the rights or wrongs of the cause which may be

at stake. The victories of might and right do not invariably coincide.

It is not surprising, therefore, that a certain proportion of

Christians--the Quakers, for example, and many individuals who have

either been influenced by the teaching of Tolstoy, or else, thinking

the matter out for themselves, have arrived at similar conclusions to

those of Tolstoy and the Quakers--should hold that in the event of war

a man's loyalty to his earthly city must give way to his loyalty to

his heavenly King in this matter. Experience shows that there are men

who are prepared to suffer persecution, imprisonment, or death itself

rather than violate their principles by service in the armed forces of

the Crown.

There are obviously circumstances conceivable in which it would be the

duty of all Christians to become "Conscientious Objectors." Such

circumstances would arise in any case in which the state endeavoured

to compel men's services in a war which their conscience disapproved.

In the present European War it so happens that there are probably no

Englishmen who regard the German cause as righteous and the Allies'

cause as wrong. The problem of Conscientious Objection has, therefore,

only arisen in the case of those Christians who hold the abstract

doctrine of the absolute wrongness, in whatever circumstances, of all

war as such.

There are those who, though personally rejecting this doctrine,

consider that those who hold it are wrong only in that they are

spiritually in advance of their time. The majority, however, of

Christians have felt that the Pacifist or Quaker doctrine is not

merely impracticable under present conditions, but that it rests upon

a fallacious principle. For it appears to deny that physical force can

ever be rightfully employed as the instrument of a moral purpose. In

the last resort it is akin to the anti-sacramental doctrine which

regards what is material as essentially opposed to what is spiritual.

The questions at issue are not really to be solved by the quotation of

isolated texts or sayings of our Lord from the Gospels. What is really

in dispute is the question of the form which, in the context of a

given set of national and political circumstances, may rightfully be

given to the application of the Christian principle of universal,

righteous, and self-sacrificing Love. No one can dispute the fact that

in certain circumstances Christianity may demand the readiness to die

for others. Are there any circumstances in which Christianity may

demand the readiness to _slay_ for others, either personally, or

mediately through service in a military machine which as a whole is

the instrument of a national purpose only to be achieved through the

slaughter of those in the ranks of the opposing armies?

The majority of Christians have answered this question in the

affirmative. They have held that there are circumstances in which the

claims of Love are more genuinely and adequately acknowledged by

taking part in warfare than by abstaining from it. They have insisted

that there are circumstances in which it is no true act of love, even

towards the aggressor, or perhaps towards the aggressor least of all,

to permit him to achieve an evil purpose unchecked: that resistance,

even by force of arms, may be in the truest interests of the enemy

himself. They have maintained that it is possible to fight in a

Christian temper and spirit, without either personal malice or hatred

of the foe: that not all killing is murder, and that to rob a man of

physical life, as an incident in the assertion of the claims of

righteousness, is not, from the point of view of those who believe in

human immortality, to do him that ultimate and essential injury which

it might otherwise be held to be.

No one, however, who has had anything to do with modern war can doubt

that it is intrinsically beastly and devilish, or that it is apt to

arouse passions, in all but the saintliest of men, which are of an

extremely ugly kind. To affirm that it is possible, as a matter of

theory, to fight in a wholly Christian spirit and temper, is not to

assert that in actual practice more than a small minority of soldiers

succeed in doing so. It is possible to be devoutly thankful that when

the issue was posed by the conduct of the Germanic powers in the

August of 1914 the British Empire replied by entering upon war, to

hold that it was emphatically the right thing to do, and that it

represented a course of conduct more intrinsically Christian than

neutrality would have been. But it is not possible to maintain with

truth that the British nation as a whole has been fighting either in a

Christian temper or from Christian motives. It is undeniable that

uglier motives and passions have crept in. Sermons in Christian

pulpits upon such themes as the duty of forgiveness or the Christian

ideal of love towards the enemy have been neither frequent nor

popular. Undoubtedly the German Government in its general policy, and

particular units of the German Army and Navy upon many occasions, have

acted in such a way as to give provocation of the very strongest kind

to the unregenerate human impulses of hatred and of revenge. It is not

surprising, though it is regrettable, that under the influence of this

provocation many persons, otherwise Christian, have either frankly

abandoned the Christian doctrine of human brotherhood, or else have

denied that the Germans are to be regarded as human beings. On the

whole, and speaking very broadly, it may be said that the troops have

shown themselves more Christian in these respects than have the civil

population, though there are many exceptions upon both sides. It is to

be feared that the Church, in so far as she has been represented by

her clergy (though here, again, there are many exceptions), has been

too anxious to be identified with a merely Jingo patriotism to

exercise any very appreciable influence in restraint of unchristian

passions. It is to be hoped and anticipated that there will be a

strong reaction after the war both against militarism and the less

desirable aspects of the military mind, and also against the

belligerent temper and spirit--especially, perhaps, on the part of the

men who have themselves served and suffered in the field.

CHAPTER X

LOVE, COURTSHIP, AND MARRIAGE

No element in Christian practice has been more widely challenged in

modern times than the Christian ideal of marriage. Our Lord's standard

in these matters was simple and austere. "Whoso looketh on a woman to

lust after her hath committed adultery already in his heart."

"Whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of

fornication" (the exceptive clause is of disputed authenticity)

"causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is

divorced committeth adultery."

The _State_ in certain cases gives legal sanction to "adultery" in

this latter sense, and there is a vocal and probably increasing demand

that legal facilities for divorce upon various pretexts, with liberty

of remarriage, shall be further extended. The Divorce Law Reform Union

has announced its intention to promote in Parliament a Bill which, if

carried, would have the effect of reducing legal marriage to a

contract terminable after three years' voluntary separation by the

will of either party. Doubtless a robust opposition will be offered by

Christian people to the adoption of so lax a conception of marriage

even by the State. Experience in other countries seems to show that

unlimited facilities for divorce do not tend to the promotion either

of happiness or of morals. But it needs to be recognized that the

State, as such, is concerned only with the legal aspect of marriage as

a civil contract, and that it has to legislate for citizens not all of

whom profess Christian standards even in theory. The law of the State

may well diverge from that of the Church with regard to this matter,

though it does not follow that so lax a standard as that which is now

proposed would be in the best interests even of the State.

The Church regards Christian marriage as indissoluble. In cases of

adultery she counsels reconciliation, wherever possible, upon the

basis of repentance on the part of the guilty and forgiveness on the

part of the injured partner. If this is not possible the Church

sanctions, if need so require, separation, but not remarriage. There

are also unfortunately other cases in which the married relationship

proves so intolerable as to render a temporary or permanent separation

admissible as a last resort. The remarriage of either party during the

lifetime of the other is nevertheless held to be unchristian. With the

practical difficulties which beset the Church in the attempt to

maintain within the circle of her own membership a stricter standard

than that which is recognized by the Civil Law and by society at large

we are not here concerned. Our concern is with the Christian standard

as a positive ideal, on the effective maintenance of which, as

Christians believe, depends the stability of the home and the

Christian family, and the redemption of sex-relations from mere

animalism and grossness.

A Christian husband takes his wife in matrimony "for better for worse,

for richer for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to

cherish, till death them do part, according to GOD'S holy ordinance."

The step is irrevocable. The union is intended to be life-long. It

has, moreover, in view not only "the mutual society, help, and comfort

that the one ought to have of the other," but also "the procreation of

children, to be brought up in the fear and nurture of the Lord, and to

the praise of His holy Name." A few words may usefully be said under

these heads.

(i) Marriage ought to be based upon love; and love, though naturally

and normally involving the element of sexual attraction, ought to

include also other and deeper elements. A Christian man who has lived

a clean and disciplined life ought to be sufficiently master of his

passions to avoid mistaking a merely temporary infatuation for such a

genuine spiritual affinity as will survive the satisfaction of

immediate desires and prove the stable basis of a life-companionship.

Hasty marriages are a common and avoidable cause of subsequent

unhappiness. It is obviously undesirable that couples should enter

upon matrimony until there has been a sufficiently prolonged and

intimate acquaintance to enable them to become reasonably sure both of

themselves and of one another. In many cases there is much to be said

for regarding betrothals in the first instance as provisional. It is

better to break them off at the last moment than to marry the wrong

person.

The Victorian conventions with regard to all these matters were

thoroughly bad. Girls were brought up in carefully-guarded ignorance

of the implications of matrimony and shielded by perpetual chaperonage

from anything approaching comradeship with the opposite sex.

Eventually they were in many cases stampeded into a marriage which had

its origin either in a clandestine flirtation or in the designing

operations of some match-making relative, who made it her business

first to "throw the young people together" and then to suggest that

they were virtually committed to one another by the mere fact of

having met.

The reaction which has taken place against all this is upon the whole

salutary. The new social tradition which is growing up makes it

possible for the unmarried of both sexes to meet one another with

comparative freedom, and to establish relations of friendship, which

may subsequently ripen into love, unhampered by any such morbidly

exciting atmosphere of intrigue and suggestion on the part of

relatives and friends. But the new freedom of social intercourse, if

it is not in its turn to prove disastrous, demands on the part of the

young of both sexes a higher standard both of responsibility and self-

control, and of knowledge of what is implied in the fact of sex. The

experience of married life is, moreover, not likely to prove a

success, save in rare instances, unless there is between the parties a

real community of interests and tastes, unanimity, so far as may be,

of ideals and of religious convictions, and at least no very great

disparity of educational and intellectual equipment.

(ii) A Christian marriage includes among its purposes the procreation

of children. It is here most of all that unanimity of ideal and of

conviction between husband and wife is essential. A man and a woman

ought not to take one another in marriage without first being assured

of each other's mind upon this subject. "If marriage is to be a

success each must learn respect for the other's personality, real give

and take, and the horror of treating the other just as a means to his

own pleasure, whether spiritual, intellectual, or physical: and both

must think seriously of the responsibilities of parenthood. Husband

and wife must work out their ideals together, in perfect frankness and

sincerity, and it is impossible to have true and sacred ideals of

their joint physical life unless there is the same openness and

understanding and sympathy on this point as on all others." [Footnote:

_Ideals of Home_, by Gemma Bailey (National Mission Paper, No. 43).]

There must be mutual consideration and self-control: the need for

self-restraint and continence does not disappear with the entry upon

marital relations: it is if anything intensified.

There is a real problem here which needs to be thought out. To the

practice of "race-suicide," by which is meant the artificial

restriction of parentage by the use of mechanical or other

"preventives," Christian morality is violently opposed. On the other

hand, it may reasonably be held that people ought not to bring

children into the world in numbers which are wholly out of relation to

their capacity to feed, clothe, educate, and train them. "The enormous

families of which we hear in early Victorian times were not quite

ideal for the mother or the children, nor for the father if he were

not well off." [Footnote: _Ibid_] It may be found necessary in

practice to limit the size of the family either upon economic grounds

or (in particular instances) in the interest of the mother's health.

It is to be feared, however, that the modern tendency in both respects

is to shirk the responsibilities of parenthood on grounds which are

thoroughly selfish. The Victorian doctrine that "when GOD sends mouths

He sends food to fill them" may have been unduly happy-go-lucky. The

recent remark of an officer in a certain British regiment, that since

he and his wife had only L8000 a year between them, he felt that he

could not afford to have more than one child, was entirely shameless.

It would seem, moreover, that the comparative childlessness of modern

marriages is sometimes due not to the husband's reluctance, upon

economic grounds, to beget children, but to the wife's reluctance to

bear them, a reluctance which in some cases arises either from such

shrinking from the physical pain and sacrifice of motherhood as goes

beyond what is really justified, or from mere self-indulgent

absorption in social pursuits and pleasures. There ought to be in a

Christian marriage more of the true spirit of adventure and romance, a

greater readiness for sacrifice, a more willing acceptance of parental

responsibilities, and of the obligation of self-denial for the

children's sake. There can be no question but that modern families--

with the paradoxical exception of the families of the very poor--have

been tending to be smaller than they either need be or ought to be.

At the same time it is generally conceded that _some_ measure of

limitation is in most cases reasonable and necessary. The vitally

important thing is that such necessary and reasonable limitation

should be secured not by artificial evasion of the consequences of

intercourse, but by self-control and deliberate temporary abstinence

at certain periods from the intercourse of sex. [Footnote: It may be

suggested that in cases of genuine perplexity it is advisable to

consult, as occasion may require, either a medical man who is also a

Christian, or a wise--and preferably a married--spiritual guide.]

For the union of the sexes in marriage is according to the mind of the

Christian Church an essentially pure and holy thing. It is a sacrament

of the fusion of two personalities, whereby they are at once

individually and mutually enriched, and at the same time mystically

and spiritually knit together in such a way as to become in the sight

of GOD indissolubly one: the unity of husband and wife being

comparable, according to a famous saying of S. Paul, to the unity

which exists between Christ and His Church. Now, although, from this

point of view, the significance of married life is to a great extent

impoverished and frustrated, if intercourse is so regulated as to

render the marriage childless not in fact merely, but in intention,

yet it does not follow that procreation must be directly in view on

every individual occasion, since the mystical value of intercourse as

a spiritual sacrament of love may still exist in independence of such

intention. It is nevertheless, surely, clear that a Christian man and

his wife are morally precluded from coming together except with a deep

sense of the sacredness of what they do and of its intimate connexion

with the mysteries of life and birth, and a corresponding readiness,

in the event of conception taking place, to accept the ensuing

responsibility for the child as a sacred trust from GOD, "the Father

from whom all fatherhood in heaven and on earth is named." With the

use of "preventives" and other devices, which degrade into a mere

means of carnal satisfaction an act which is meant to bear a deeply

spiritual and religious meaning, the Christian interpretation of

marriage seems plainly and obviously incompatible.

A few words may be added with regard to the upbringing and education

of children. Here, again, there has been a reaction--which upon the

whole is good--from the unduly rigorous disciplinary methods of the

past. It may be doubted, however, whether the reaction has not in some

cases been carried too far. Children ought to be controlled and

disciplined by their parents, and no expenditure of care and thought

and tact is too great to devote to the rightful training of their

characters. But experience seems to show that parents sometimes fail

to recognize that their children grow up. It is important that in

proportion as they grow towards maturity of character and independence

of personality the strictness of parental discipline should be

gradually relaxed. At a certain stage the real influence of parents

upon their children will depend upon their refusal to assert direct

authority. Not a few of the minor tragedies of home life arise from

the ill-judged action of parents who treat as children sons and

daughters who are virtually grown up.

The problem of the religious education of children cannot here be

discussed in detail, but three or four leading principles may be

suggested.

(1) It ought not to be necessary to say that children should not be

taught to regard as true statements or doctrines which their parents

believe to be in fact false. This applies in particular to certain

views of the Bible. The ideal should be so to teach the child that in

later life he may have nothing to unlearn.

(2) When children are old enough to read they should be encouraged to

read the Gospels. They ought not, however, to read the Old Testament,

with the exception of certain Psalms and other specially selected

passages, until they are of an age to distinguish what is Christian

from what is Jewish, and to recognize the principle of religious

development.

(3) Children should be taught in the first instance the practice

rather than the theory of religion: devotions in which doctrine is

implicit, rather than doctrine as such. As their minds expand they

will ask the reasons for what they do and the meaning of the worship

in which they engage, and they will need to have suggested to them an

elementary, but not a stereotyped, theology. They should from the

beginning be encouraged to think and question freely on religious

subjects.

(4) They should occasionally accompany their parents to Church, and in

particular should from time to time be present when the latter receive

Holy Communion. They should have the service explained to them in a

simple fashion, and should be encouraged to look forward to the time

when they will be confirmed, and become communicants themselves.

PART III

THE MAINTENANCE OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE

CHAPTER I

HOW TO BEGIN

The practice of Christianity depends for its possibility upon the

existence and maintenance within the soul of an inward principle of

spiritual life towards GOD. The reason why so many nominal Christians

fail conspicuously to manifest the fruits of Christianity in their

lives is simply that they have no vital personal experience of the

power and efficacy of the life in Christ. They have never been

effectually gripped by the religion which they nominally profess. They

are not transformed, or in process of being transformed, by the Holy

Spirit's power.

The plain man, confronted by the Christian ideal, if he does not at

once dismiss it as impracticable, is apt to ask, or at least to

wonder, how he is to begin. It is a question to which no cut-and-dried

answer can be given. But at least no beginning is likely to lead to

very much in the way of fulfilment which does not sooner or later

involve something like personal "conversion" of heart. Conversions may

be sudden, or they may be gradual: but religion, if it is to be a

reality, means in the end the establishment of vital personal

relations with the living Christ. It means the acceptance of His

challenge, self-surrender to His appeal, the combination of an

acknowledged desire to serve Him with acknowledged impotence and

bankruptcy before GOD.

Sooner or later the Spirit convinces men of sin. Either a man,

essaying light-heartedly to follow Christ, discovers in the very

attempt his inability to do so, and is found traitor to his Master's

cause in the first encounter: or else, it may be, at the very outset,

the consciousness of what has been wrong in conduct and character and

motive in the past stands as a damning record between his soul and

GOD, and forbids him without repentance to take service in the

campaign of Christ at all. The consciousness of sin as a "horrid

impediment" in the soul is not, of course, true penitence until a man

has been brought to realize in the light of the Cross that the

difference between what he is and what he might have been is treachery

to Him whose man (in virtue of his baptism) he was meant to be, and

that by being what he is, and acting as he has acted, he has

consciously or unconsciously contributed to the wounds wherewith

Eternal Love is wounded in the house of His friends.

The measure of a man's penitence, whether early or late developed in

him, is very apt to be the measure of his spiritual insight and of his

spiritual sincerity. The familiar words of the hymn--

"They who fain would serve Thee best

Are conscious most of wrong within,"

are profoundly true to Christian experience. But repentance--which is

sorrow for sin in the light of the Cross--is abortive and merely

results in spiritual paralysis unless it issues in confession--that

is, frank and open acknowledgment before GOD, and if need be also

before His Church--and the seeking and finding of reconciliation and

forgiveness as the unmerited gift of GOD in Christ.

There are those in whose case the inward conviction of sin and the

realization of the need for pardon are the first impulses of awakening

spiritual life. There are others with whom it is not so. They are

conscious of the attractiveness of the Man Christ Jesus. They would

desire to be on His side and to be of the number of His disciples.

They are dimly aware, or at least they more than half suspect, that in

Him is to be found the satisfaction of a need for which their soul

cries out. With S. Peter they find themselves saying to Christ, "Lord,

to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life," But they

cannot as yet with any inward reality profess themselves conscience-

stricken with regard to the past. They are not aware of themselves as

conspicuous sinners, or indeed, it may be, as sinners at all. The

experience of penitence and of Divine forgiveness must come to them,

if it is to come at all, at a later stage. It is not by that postern

that they enter upon the Way of the Spirit.

But the Way is in either case the way of fellowship, and the Spirit is

the spirit of discipline. The newly found spiritual life, however

awakened, needs to be maintained and fostered by fellowship in the

Church, by regular habits of Christian devotion, by faithful communion

in the Sacrament of Life. Plainly, if a man is not already confirmed,

his first step must be to be prepared for confirmation: if he has been

confirmed, but has lapsed from communion, he must resume the

communicant life. He needs to claim the status and privilege of

effective membership in the Body of Christ, and to form for himself a

rule of inward life and discipline. Rules of devotional life must

necessarily vary in accordance with a man's surroundings and

opportunities, and perhaps in some of their details in accordance with

a man's temperament. But at least there ought to be a rule of regular

private prayer, a rule of regular communion, a rule of Bible-reading

or "meditation," and a rule of self-denial and orderliness in daily

personal life.

CHAPTER II

PRAYER

Prayer is a difficult matter, both in theory and in practice. But it

is essential to learn to pray.

It is important to recognize that the scope of Christian prayer is

much wider than mere intercession or petition. It is the communion of

the soul with GOD, and its purpose is union with the life of GOD in

identity of purpose with His will. The beginning of prayer is a

_sursum corda_, a lifting up of the heart to GOD. It is well to

remember that true prayer is never a solitary act, even when a man

prays in solitude. We pray not as individuals but as members of a

Family, and our prayer is spiritually united and knit together with

the common prayer-life of the universal Church, of which it forms a

part. We pray, moreover, not to wrest to our private ends the purposes

of GOD, not to induce Him, so to speak, to do our wills instead of

His, but to unite our wills with His will, as children who have

confidence in their Father. True prayer is offered in the Name of

Christ--that is, it is prayed in His Spirit, according to His mind and

will. It can never, therefore, be selfish or self-centred. The Lord's

Prayer is its model and its type. A few words may be said in

explanation of this prayer.

It begins with a recognition of the common Fatherhood of GOD. It is

only as members of His Family that we can approach Him: He is in no

sense our personal or private GOD, but the common Father of us all.

And our Father is "in heaven"--that is, supreme, eternal, the Lord and

Ruler of all things. His Name is holy, and to be hallowed: it is in

reverence and deepest worship that we bow before Him. He is King, and

we pray that His Kingship may be realized, in earth as it is in

heaven: and that His will may be done--that is the supreme desire of

our hearts, and the highest object of our petitions.

And therefore we are vowed to His service: and because we are sure

that He will supply whatever we really need to that end, we pray in

confidence for daily needs both spiritual and bodily--"Give us this

day our daily bread." And remembering that we are unprofitable and

faithless and disloyal servants we ask forgiveness for our sins, well

knowing that we can only be forgiven as we ourselves are ready to

forgive. And so looking to the future and mindful of our frailty we

pray that GOD will not lead us into "temptation" or trial, without at

the same time providing a way of deliverance from the assaults of

evil. The prayer customarily ends with an ascription of praise and

glory to GOD.

That is the type and model of Christian prayer: and prayer is truly

Christian just in so far as the spirit and temper of the Lord's Prayer

inspires it. We can only pray rightly in the Holy Spirit. "We know not

what to pray for as we ought: but the Spirit helpeth our infirmities."

As for the technique of prayer, a man, on kneeling or standing to

pray, will do well to spend a short time first in silence and

recollection, waiting in stillness upon GOD, remembering His presence,

His holiness, His love, and His responsiveness to His children's cry.

Let him next make an act of adoration, spoken or unspoken, and invoke

GOD the Holy Spirit to enable him to pray aright. Then let him pour

out before GOD all that is in his heart, his troubles, his anxieties,

his perplexities, his sins: let him ask for forgiveness: let him give

thanks: let him pray for the coming of GOD'S Kingdom, in its various

aspects: commending to GOD'S guidance and protection all right causes

and aspirations in the world, in things both social and political and

international, in things ecclesiastical, in things moral and religious

and missionary: let him add personal and private intercessions for

those near and dear to him and for those whom he meets in the daily

intercourse of life: and let him end as he began, in a few moments of

quiet waiting upon GOD.

That is the general scheme of a Christian's private prayers. They

should include in due proportion the several elements of adoration,

thanksgiving, penitence, petition, and intercession. They need not be

lengthy. "Use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think

that they shall be heard for their much speaking." It is quality and

not quantity of prayer that counts. And the prayers of a busy man must

necessarily be short.

But it is worth while taking time and trouble over the ordering of

one's prayers. A man's intercessions, in particular, are not likely in

practice to have the width, the range, and the variety which are

desirable, unless they are planned and ordered in accordance with a

coherent scheme which is thought out in advance. It is the part of

wisdom to keep a note-book, in which names and subjects for

intercessory prayer may be jotted down and distributed over the days

of the week for use in due rotation. Such schemes, however, if drawn

up and used, should be revised from time to time, and not suffered to

become a mechanical burden or a legal bondage. There should be freedom

and spontaneity in a Christian's prayers. It is well to have rules,

and to try not to be prevented by mere slackness from keeping them.

But it is important to see to it that the self-imposed rule is so

framed as to prove genuinely conducive to reality in prayer, and

suitably adapted to opportunity and circumstance: and it is very often

a good thing from time to time, in the interests of freedom, quite

deliberately to break one's rules.

With regard to forms and methods of prayer, it is desirable that men

should learn to pray freely in their own words, or even in no words at

all. Provided a man remembers reverence, he need not stand on ceremony

with GOD. But it is advisable also to use books and manuals of prayer

--at any rate in the first instance: to use them, but not to be tied to

them. Many such manuals have been compiled and published within recent

years: the majority of them are unsatisfactory in varying degrees. A

few, however, can confidently be recommended: especially _Prayers

for the City of God_, compiled by G. C. Binyon (Longmans); _Prayers

for Common Use_ (Universities Mission to Central Africa, Dartmouth

St., Westminster); and _Sursum Corda, a Handbook of Intercession and

Thanksgiving _, arranged by W. H. Frere and A. L. Illingworth (A. E.

Mowbray and Co., Ltd.).

Prayer need not be confined to stated hours and times. Interpreting

prayer at its widest, the ideal should be to "pray without ceasing."

It was said of an early Christian writer that his life was "one

continuous prayer": and it is well to form the habit of inwardly

lifting up the heart to GOD from time to time in the midst of daily

cares and business. Where Churches are kept open it is often possible

in passing to spare time to enter and kneel for two or three minutes

in quiet and recollection before GOD: but it is perfectly possible to

pray inwardly at any time and in any environment. Fixed times of

prayer, nevertheless, there must also be: and a man should at least

pray in the morning upon rising and in the evening before going to

bed. If a time can also be secured for midday prayer, so much the

better: but this is more difficult. To have formed a really fixed and

stable habit of daily prayer is an enormous step forwards in Christian

life. Much depends upon learning to rise regularly at a fixed hour

before breakfast: and this in turn depends upon a regularity in going

to bed, which under modern conditions of life it is not always easy to

achieve. If a man is obliged to be up so late at night that it is

morally certain that he will be too tired to pray with much reality

before turning in, he should endeavour, if it is at all possible, to

secure some time for prayer at an earlier stage in the evening.

Difficulties in the life of prayer beset everybody. Thoughts have a

way of wandering, the "saying" of prayers tends to become mechanical,

moods vary, and there are times in most men's lives when they feel it

almost impossible to pray with any sense of reality. A man should not

lightly be discouraged. He may be recommended to remind himself that

GOD knows all about it, and that the resolute offering of his will to

GOD at such times, in defiance of distraction and difficulty, has

special value. It is well to take God into one's confidence. "If GOD

bores you, tell Him that He does." He is no exacting tyrant, but a

Father caring for His sons. Those who care to do so may find _Prayer

and some of its Difficulties_, by the Rev. W. J. Carey (Mowbray &

Co.), a helpful book to read in this connexion.

A final word may be said with regard to a theoretical difficulty which

many people feel in connexion with the intercessory and petitionary

sides of prayer. Since GOD'S will, it may be argued, is presumably

going to be done in any case, and since He knows the real needs both

of ourselves and of our friends better than we do, what is the point

of praying for them? To many people it may be a sufficient practical

answer to refer to the example and precept of Christ, who both taught

and practised intercessory prayer. But it is possible to go a little

further, and to point out that it appears to be GOD'S will, not merely

that such and such a thing should be done, but that it should be done

in response to our human prayers. True it is that "your Father knoweth

what things ye have need of, before ye ask Him": but our Lord

emphasized this truth, not as a round for regarding prayer as futile

or unnecessary, but as a reason for praying. For prayer is an

expression of the filial spirit towards our Father, and the more

simply and naturally we approach GOD as children, making our petitions

before Him with childlike hearts, the more truly will our prayers be

in accordance with that spirit of sonship which is the mind of Christ.

At the same time, the knowledge that our Father is wiser as well as

greater than we will forbid us to clamour for what in wisdom is denied

us, and will in general govern the spirit and scope of our petitions.

Just as our Lord points out that an earthly father, if asked for

bread, will not give his child a stone, so conversely in the

experience of every Christian it often happens that in his blindness

he asks a stone, and is given bread. But no Christian will ask

deliberately and knowingly for stones.

CHAPTER III

SELF-EXAMINATION AND REPENTANCE

"The unexamined life," said Plato, "is not worth living." Similar

advice was given by Marcus Aurelius. The practice of self-examination,

therefore, is not distinctive of Christianity: it is an obvious

dictate of wisdom, wherever life and conduct are regarded seriously,

that a man should from time to time take stock of himself in the light

of his ideals and learn to know and recognize in detail where and how

he has fallen short, and what are the besetting sins and weaknesses

against which he must contend.

The Christian man will judge and try his life by the standards of

Christ, with growing sensitiveness of conscience as spiritual

experience deepens: not shrinking from the confession of sin and

failure, desiring not to be self-deceived, but to know and to

acknowledge the truth. There is nothing in this of priggishness or

unreality. It is a necessary discipline. The Christian life is meant

to bear the fruit of a character developing in growing likeness to the

character of Christ: but none is suddenly made perfect: the old Adam

dies hard: and the Christian by confession of repeated failure may at

least learn the lesson of humility and self-distrust.

The rightful complement of self-distrust is trust in GOD: the rightful

issue of self-examination and confession is the realization of divine

forgiveness, fresh courage, and a new start. The very core of the

Gospel is here. He who has bidden men forgive those who trespass

against them "unto seventy times seven" is not to be outdone in

generosity by man. But in order that sin may be forgiven it must be

acknowledged as sin against GOD and treachery to Christ, and repented

of with true sorrow of heart. Repentance is not mere self-contempt,

self-pity, or remorse. It is sorrow for sin, which has for its motive

the love of GOD and the realization that human sin meant and means in

the experience of GOD the Cross.

Nothing so deepens the religious life as true repentance, nor is there

anything so fatal to true religion as self-righteousness. "If we say

that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in

us." "To whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little." But the

first prerequisite of repentance is self-knowledge--a difficult

matter. Gross carnal offences, strong and flagrant sins, if such there

be, are obvious and upon the surface. The subtler sins of the spirit--

thoughtlessness, for example, or snobbishness or priggishness and

pride--though we are quick to remark upon them in others, are apt in

our own case to pass undetected. It is the Spirit who convinces men of

sin. Only as we are resolute to enter into "the mind of the Spirit"

can we hope to know ourselves as in the sight of GOD we really are.

The matter is complicated by the fact that those who, as things are,

most systematically practise self-examination and confession of sin

too often view the matter in a somewhat narrowly ecclesiastical

spirit, and make use of forms of self-examination which mix up real

and serious moral offences with "sins" which are merely ceremonial,

trivial, or imaginary, as though the two stood precisely upon the same

level. "One must abstain from sexual sin _and_ not go to dissenting

places of worship; one must not steal _and_ must be sure to abstain

from meat on Fridays." A man's own sense of reality should enable him

to guard against this sort of thing, and if fixed forms of self-

examination are used, to use them with discretion.

The forms most commonly suggested in manuals of devotion are based

upon the Ten Commandments. This is in accordance with the teaching of

the compilers of the English Prayer-book, who, after bidding intending

communicants to "search and examine" their "own consciences (and that

not lightly, and after the manner of dissemblers with GOD)," proceed

to lay down that "the way and means thereto is: First, to examine your

lives and conversations by the rule of God's commandments: and

whereinsoever ye shall perceive yourselves to have offended, either by

will, word or deed, there to bewail your own sinfulness, and to

confess yourselves to Almighty GOD, with full purpose of amendment of

life."

The Commandments are, however, as they stand, both negative in form

and Judaistic in character, and if used in this way as a "rule" of

Christian conduct must be spiritualized and reinterpreted in the light

of the Gospel. The second and fourth Commandments, in particular, are

in their literal significance obsolete for Christians: it is a false

Puritanism which would forbid sculpture and religious symbolism in the

adornment of a Christian church, nor is any one in the modern world

likely to confuse the symbol with the thing symbolized: while the

observance of the Sabbath is part of that older ceremonial "law" from

which S. Paul insisted that Christian converts should be free (Coloss.

ii. 16). There is, however, a spiritual idolatry which consists in

allowing any other object than the glory of GOD and the doing of His

will to have the primary place in the determination of conduct--there

are men who worship money, or comfort, or ambition, or their own

domestic happiness, or even themselves. And the Commandment about the

Sabbath, though it has no literal value to-day (and certainly no

direct bearing upon the sanction or significance of Sunday) may serve

to suggest the important principle that a man is responsible before

GOD for the use he makes of his time, and that it is a religious duty

(not confined to any particular day of the week) to distribute it in

due proportion, according to circumstance and opportunity, with proper

regard to the rightful claims of work, of worship, and of recreation

and rest. The remaining Commandments are capable of being similarly

interpreted as suggesting broad positive principles rather than as

merely prohibiting wrong actions of a particular and definite kind:

and so treated they form as convenient a framework as any other for a

scheme of questions for self-examination.

It is possible, however, that some men may prefer to use as their

basis some standard more distinctively Christian than the ancient law

of Judaism--for example, the Beatitudes (Matt. v. 1-12) or the "fruits

of the Spirit" (Gal. v. 22). A man will in any case do well either to

frame or to adapt his own scheme for self-examination, with special

regard paid to whatever he may discover by experience to be a

besetting sin or weakness, or a temptation to which he is particularly

exposed. It should be remembered that the measure of what is wrong in

a man's life is the measure of the contrast between his character and

that of Christ, and that the chief flaws in Christian character and

achievement (which are also those most likely to pass undetected) are

not uncommonly such as fall under the head of "sins of omission"

rather than of commission--the leaving undone of what ought to have

been done, the failure to exhibit positively in relation to GOD and

man the qualities of faith and hope and love. A man should ask himself

wherein he has chiefly failed, and come short of the glory of GOD:

whether he is loyally observing any self-imposed rule of life and

discipline, and fulfilling any resolutions which may have been made,

or any obligations which have been undertaken. Having made in this

manner an honest attempt to discover his own shortcomings and failures

before GOD, let him with equal honesty confess them, seek forgiveness,

and in the spirit of repentance and restored sonship start again.

The late Lieutenant Donald Hankey, better known as "A Student in

Arms," criticizes Churchmen of a certain type as being unwholesomely

preoccupied with the thought of their sins, and allowing their

consciences to become a burden to them. They should, he says, 'think

less of themselves, and trust the Holy Spirit more. The advice is

excellent: but morbid scrupulosity is not a common fault of English

laymen. The habit, as Mr. Chesterton expresses it, of "chopping up

life into small sins with a hatchet" is, of course, to be avoided: but

the purpose of self-examination and self-knowledge is not to encourage

morbid introspection, but by frank acknowledgment and repentance to

get rid of the past and with recovered hope and serenity to reach

forward towards the future. A man cannot "walk in the Spirit" unless

he is inwardly "right with GOD."

With regard to sacramental confession, the rule of the Church of

England is sane and clear. It may be expressed by saying that "none

_must_, but all _may_, and some _should_" make use of it. In the case

of a conscience seriously burdened in such a way that a man hesitates

to present himself for Holy Communion unabsolved, to go to confession

is obviously the right remedy. There are other cases in which men find

by experience that it helps them to be more honest and candid with

themselves, with GOD, and with the Church, if they go to confession

from time to time as a piece of self-discipline and a needed spiritual

tonic. Yet others discover that they flounder less in spiritual

things, and that their religious life is deepened and made stronger,

if they place themselves for a time under wise direction. Systematic

direction, of course, has obvious dangers. It may tend to destroy

independence of character. It may cause a man to become "priest-

ridden." But the dangers are not inevitable, and there are without

doubt cases in which it is of value. Much obviously depends upon the

wisdom and common sense of the director. The Prayer-book refers

penitents to a "discreet and learned" minister of GOD'S Word. If a man

proposes to practise habitual confession he will do well to assure

himself of the discretion and learning of the priest whose help he

seeks.

The method of making a sacramental confession is simple. Self-

examination is made beforehand, the results being, if need be, written

down, either in full, or in the form of notes to assist the memory. A

first confession should cover the whole life so far as remembered,

from childhood upwards: subsequent confessions the period since the

last was made. The confession should aim at completeness, an effort

being made to remember not only specific acts of wrongdoing, but

slight failings and weaknesses of character and the general lines and

tendencies of faulty spiritual development. Symptoms should, if

possible, be distinguished from causes, habits and tendencies and

besetting sins from isolated acts. Cases in which a sin has been

deliberate should be noted as such: but there should be no dwelling

upon extenuating circumstances or intermingling of claims to virtues

or graces of character with the admission of defects. No names may be

mentioned, nor may third persons be incriminated by any form of words

which would enable the confessor to recognize their identity. The

priest hears the confession sitting in a chair. The penitent kneels

beside him and confesses as follows:--"I confess to GOD Almighty, the

Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, before the whole company of

heaven, and before you, that I have sinned in thought, word, and deed,

by my own fault. Especially I accuse myself that (since my last

confession, which was...ago) I have committed the following sins....

[Here follows the confession in detail: after which]. ... For these

and all my other sins which I cannot now remember, I humbly ask pardon

of GOD, and of you, father, penance, counsel and absolution. Wherefore

I ask GOD to have mercy upon me, and you to pray for me to the Lord

our GOD. Amen."

The confessor then gives advice and counsel according to his wisdom,

commonly imposes a penance, and if assured of the sincerity of the

penitent, pronounces absolution according to the form prescribed in

the Prayer-book Office for the Visitation of the Sick.

CHAPTER IV

CORPORATE WORSHIP AND COMMUNION

The really essential thing is the Communion. There may be minor

outward differences as to the manner of its celebration: you shall

find in one parish a tradition of Puritan bareness, in another a full

and rich ceremonial symbolism, with lights and vestments. A man may

have his personal preferences, but it is a mistake to attach undue

importance either to the presence or to the absence of the external

adjuncts of worship. What matters is the Body and Blood of Christ.

A man must have his own regular rule with regard to Communion. To

communicate spasmodically or upon impulse at irregular intervals is

not the way to build up a stable Christian character. Where

circumstances make possible the leading of a fairly regular life and

give adequate opportunity for preparation beforehand, weekly communion

is the best rule. Where this is not possible, a fortnightly or even a

monthly rule may in particular cases be the best.

Preparation for Communion should be real, but need not be elaborate.

It should be made overnight, and should include a review of the period

since the last Communion was made, prayers for pardon and new

resolves, if possible a short meditation on the essential meaning of

the Sacrament, and the selection of some particular theme to be the

focus of intercession at the service itself.

At the actual service it is well to arrive early, with a few moments

to spare for quiet and recollected prayer before the Liturgy begins.

The first part of the service is preparatory. Any pauses or intervals

should be filled up by private prayers.[Footnote: Forms and

suggestions which, may be used by those who find them helpful are

provided for this purpose in any manual of devotion.] From the moment

of consecration until the end of the service the mind should be

concentrated as far as possible upon the thought of Christ's realized

Presence. A man should go up to the altar to receive Communion as one

desiring to meet his Lord and to be renewed in Him, returning

subsequently to his place to render thanks for so great a Gift. When

the service is over it is best not to hurry out of church, but to

linger for further thanksgiving and prayer as occasion serves.

It is an ancient rule or custom of the Church to receive Holy

Communion fasting, giving precedence to the food of the soul over that

of the body. To insist rigidly upon such a rule in any and every set

of circumstances is a piece of unintelligent and unchristian legalism:

but many persons are of opinion that to observe it wherever it is

reasonably possible to do so makes for reality. There is a real value

in the element of asceticism and self-discipline involved in the

effort to rise early and come fasting to church: and the fast may be

interpreted as a kind of outward sacrament of the inward reality of

spiritual preparation--a preparation of the body corresponding to the

preparation of the soul, It is, moreover, an advantage of the early

morning hour that the mind is undistracted by the occupations and

diversions of the day. For all these reasons the early morning

Communion is to be preferred to Communion at a later hour.

Whether a man is a weekly communicant or not, he should _in any case

be present as a worshipper_ at Holy Communion Sunday by Sunday, and

should regard attendance at the weekly Eucharist as the most essential

part of church-going. No one who makes it a rule of his life to be

present on Sundays and other festivals of the Church at Holy Communion

ever has cause to regret having done so.

A man who for any reason (_e.g._ by the nature of his employment) is

debarred from attending regularly on Sundays should, if possible,

secure an opportunity of regular attendance at Holy Communion on a

week-day. There are usually churches to be found, at least in the

towns, which have an early morning Eucharist daily throughout the

week: and advantage can also be taken of this if on any particular

occasion the regular Sunday Communion has been missed. If neither

Sunday nor week-day opportunities are available, the need should be

met by what is known as "spiritual communion": that is to say, a man

should read over the Liturgy in private, unite himself in spirit with

the Eucharist as celebrated in the particular church with which he

happens to be most familiar (as representing for him the worship of

the Church Universal), and pray that he may receive the spiritual

benefits of Communion though deprived for the time being of the actual

Sacrament. Apart from the "early service," which is now almost

universal, schemes of worship upon Sunday mornings vary in different

parishes. In some churches Matins and Litany are sung and a sermon

preached, a late Eucharist without music being commonly celebrated

about noon: in other parishes Matins is said quietly without music at

a comparatively early hour, and the Eucharist is solemnly sung, with a

sermon, as the principal service of the forenoon, usually without more

than a very limited number of communicants, partly because if the bulk

of the congregation communicate at a sung Eucharist the service

becomes intolerably long, and partly because the majority of those

desiring to receive Communion have done so fasting at an earlier hour.

In large towns a man can usually find churches of either type

according to his preference. In "single-church areas" he ought for the

sake of fellowship and good example to conform, as a rule, to what is

customary. It is desirable, in a general way, to be identified with

the corporate worship of the parish: but it is worth remarking that,

apart from the weight due to this general consideration, there is no

particular sacredness about the hour of eleven o'clock, and a man who

has communicated before breakfast, and perhaps contemplates

attendance, later on, at Evensong, may not unreasonably feel justified

in devoting the forenoon of Sunday (which is usually his solitary

morning's leisure in the week) to other purposes than those of

worship. If the preacher is worth listening to (which is not

invariably the case) it is a good thing to go and hear him: and it is

well, therefore, to attend one or other of the services (morning or

evening) at which a sermon is preached. But it is not essential to

attend both: and the question may be raised whether one sermon a

Sunday is not as much as most men can profitably digest. A sermon is

in any case (except at the Eucharist) a detachable appendix to a

Church service; and it is both possible and legitimate either to

attend the service and leave the church before the sermon, or to avoid

the service and come in time to hear the sermon, according to

preference or opportunity.

As regards external details of observance, kneeling, and not

squatting, should be the attitude adopted for prayer. It is customary

to turn eastwards for the Creed, and in some churches, though not in

others, to kneel at the reference to the Incarnation in the course of

the Nicene Creed. It is also a common practice in some churches to

genuflect (_i.e._ to drop for a moment upon one knee) on rising from

one's place to go up to the altar to communicate, in reverence for the

Blessed Sacrament. A man should adapt his personal usage in these

minor details to whatever appears to be customary in the particular

church in which he is worshipping.

It is often extremely difficult for the clergy to know personally the

men of their congregations, since it is rare in most neighbourhoods

for the men to be at home during the hours when it is possible for the

clergy to visit. In these circumstances a man ought to be willing to

take the initiative in making himself known to the clergy of his

parish, and to co-operate as far as possible in any effort which may

be made, through parochial Church Councils or otherwise, to develop

the spirit of fellowship in a congregation. There is very often about

Anglican Church worship a stiffness and frigidity which badly needs to

be broken down. Appropriated seats, where they exist, are a particular

curse, and anything which can be done in the way of abandoning chosen

seats, even if "bought and paid for," to strangers in the interests of

charity is a real piece of Christian service. A stranger ought not to

be made to feel uncomfortable, but to be welcomed in every possible

way. The ideal is that every church, in every part of it, should be

free and open at all times to all comers.

CHAPTER V

THE DEVOTIONAL USE OF THE BIBLE

It is to be feared that the habit of reading the Bible in private for

purposes of devotion has largely dropped out of modern usage, partly

by reason of the general stress and urgency of modern life, and partly

because men do not quite know what to make of the Bible when they read

it. They are aware of the existence of what are called "critical

questions," but they do not know precisely the kind of differences

which criticism has made. It is a pity to acquiesce in an attitude of

this kind, and it is greatly to be desired that the habit of reading

the Bible regularly and becoming familiar with its contents should be

revived.

There are two distinct methods of reading the Bible which are of

value. One is to take a particular book and to read it straight

through like a novel, in order to get the impression of the writer's

message as a whole. Advantage may be taken of occasional opportunities

of Sunday or week-day leisure for this purpose. If the book is studied

with the help of a good commentary, so much the better. A man who

would be ashamed to be wholly unfamiliar with modern or classical

literature ought to be equally ashamed to be wholly unfamiliar with

the literature of the Hebrews.

The second method of reading the Bible consists in the devotional

study of particular passages, sometimes called by the formidable name

of "meditation." The parts of the Bible best adapted for this purpose

are the Gospels, certain portions of the Epistles, many of the Psalms,

and portions of the greater Prophets. The essence of the method is to

read over a short passage quietly after prayer for spiritual guidance,

to browse over it for a few minutes and follow out any train of

thought which may be suggested by it, to apply its message in whatever

way may seem most real and practical to the spiritual problems of

immediate daily life, and to conclude with prayer and resolution for

the future. It is not practicable for the majority of men to make such

a "meditation" a matter of daily habit, though this may easily be

possible for people of leisure. But it may be suggested that it is

both practicable and abundantly worth while for ordinary people to

allot at least half an hour a week for such a purpose. Our fathers

unquestionably fed and nurtured their souls to an extraordinary degree

by spiritual reading. It ought to be possible for modern people, in

spite of modern distractions, to acquire and maintain the capacity to

do the same.

CHAPTER VI

ALMSGIVING AND FASTING

The two things were originally closely connected. Men fasted in order

to give to others the savings which resulted from a reduced

expenditure on personal needs. "Lent savings" represent a modern

revival of this idea. The essence of Christian almsgiving is that it

should be the expression of Christian charity or love: and love means

the willingness to serve others, at cost to self. Gifts and

subscriptions which represent merely the largess of a man's

superfluity and cost nothing in the way of personal self-denial are

not really in this sense almsgiving. The Gospel prefers the widow's

mite to the rich man's large but not really generous contribution, in

cases where the larger sum represents the lesser personal cost.

It was the rule of the ancient Jewish Law that a man should give away

a tenth part of what he possessed, but this ought not to be adopted

under modern conditions as a literal precept. The poor cannot afford

to spare so large a fraction of their incomes. The wealthy can in many

cases give away a much larger proportion without feeling particularly

stinted. It is the duty of every man whose income is above the line of

actual poverty (_i.e._ exceeds what is necessary for the literal

subsistence in food, shelter, and clothing of himself and those

dependent upon him for support) to consider with his own conscience

before GOD what proportion should be set aside for educational and

other purposes, and what proportion should be directly given away in

charity. Anonymous subscriptions are the best, and the amount

available for distribution should be carefully allocated as between

rival claims. Details, of course, must vary: but a certain proportion

should in any case be given for the purposes of directly religious

work at home and abroad. A man who really believes in the universality

of the Gospel will in particular subscribe to the full extent of his

capacity to foreign missions.

With regard to fasting it has been suggested in an earlier chapter of

this book that there should be some personal rule of self-denial in a

man's life. A table of fasts and days of abstinence is printed in the

Prayer-book, though the Church of England does not normally prescribe

in detail how such days are to be observed. It is worth remarking that

the spirit is not necessarily in contradiction to the letter; but

meticulous outward observances are not of the essence of Christianity,

nor is it desirable to obtrude such observances in an ostentatious

manner in mixed society. The rule of the Gospel with regard both to

almsgiving and to fasting is that such things should be done in

secret. It is usual, however, for Church people, at least in normal

circumstances, to pay some special regard to the observance of Lent,

and particularly of Holy Week, as a season of fasting and self-denial,

and also (with a less degree of strictness) to the four weeks of

Advent as leading up to Christmas. It is a good thing to enter into

the observance of these and other seasons of the Christian year so far

as circumstances permit: and at the least to make a point, if it is at

all possible, of reading during Lent and Advent a more or less serious

book of a religious or theological kind, or in other ways endeavouring

to deepen, by some special practice or observance, the inward

devotional life. The Sunday Collects, Epistles, and Gospels are of

course appointed with special reference to the significance of the

various seasons in the Church's year, and provide suitable passages

for private meditation at such times. Advantage may also be taken of

the special courses of sermons and additional services provided in

almost every parish during the seasons of Lent and Advent. Loyalty to

the Brotherhood in matters even of minor observance is a great

principle to be borne in mind in this connexion. There is usually a

method in the Church's madness, and her prescriptions and counsels are

the product of a very considerable empirical acquaintance with the

workings of the human soul.

THE END

Religious Reality: A Book for Men · 第 13 / 13 章