It is indeed vain for us to hope for evidence of the same definite kind

as that which establishes beyond question the presence of the Northmen

on the sites of their long-settled colonies in Greenland. Their visits

to the Canadian seaboard were transitory; and any attempt at settlement

there failed. Yet without the definite memorials of the old Norse

colonists recovered in the present century on the sites of their

Greenland settlements, it would probably have proved vain to identify

them now. The coast of Nova Scotia is indented with inlets, and

estuaries of creeks and rivers, suggesting some vague resemblance to the

Hóp, or creek of the old Sagas. Whether any one of them presents

adequate features for identification with the descriptions furnished in

their accounts has yet to be ascertained. But there is every motive to

stimulate us to a careful survey of the coast in search of any probable

site of the Vinland of the old Northmen. Slight as are the details

available for such a purpose, they are not without some specific

definiteness, which the Rhode Island antiquaries turned to account, not

without a warning to us in their too confident assumption of results.

Dr. E. B. Tylor, in his address to the section of anthropology at the

Montreal meeting of the British Association, after referring to the

Icelandic records of the explorations of the hardy sea-rovers from

Greenland, as too consistent to be refused belief as to the main facts,

thus proceeded: “They sailed some way down the American coast. But where

are we to look for the most southerly points which the Sagas mention as

reached in Vineland? Where was Keel-ness where Thorvald’s ship ran

aground, and Cross-ness where he was buried when he died by the

Skræling’s arrow? Rafn, in the _Antiquitates Americanæ_, confidently

maps out these places about the promontory of Cape Cod, in

Massachusetts, and this has been repeated since from book to book. I

must plead guilty to having cited Rafn’s map before now, but when with

reference to the present meeting I consulted our learned editor of

Scandinavian records at Oxford, Mr. Gudbrand Vigfusson, and afterwards

went through the original passages in the Sagas with Mr. York Powell, I

am bound to say that the voyages of the Northmen ought to be reduced to

more moderate limits. It appears that they crossed from Greenland to

Labrador (Helluland), and thence sailing more or less south and west, in

two stretches of two days each, they came to a place near where wild

grapes grew, whence they called the country Vineland. This would,

therefore, seem to have been somewhere about the Gulf of St. Lawrence,

and it would be an interesting object for a yachting cruise to try down

from the east coast of Labrador a fair four days’ sail of a Viking ship,

and identify, if possible, the sound between the island and the ness,

the river running out of the lake into the sea, the long stretches of

sand, and the other local features mentioned in the Sagas.” A fresh

stimulus is thus furnished to Canadian yachtsmen to combine historical

exploration with a summer’s coasting trip, and go in search of the lost

Vinland. The description of the locality that furnished the data from

which the members of the Rhode Island Historical Society satisfied

themselves as to the identity of their more southern site on the

Pacasset river, has to be kept in view in any renewed inquiry. At the

same time it must not be overlooked that the oldest and most trustworthy

narrative, in the Saga of Eric the Red, with the credited, and probably

genuine story of the voyage of Karlsefne, are expanded, in the

Grænlendingathàttr, into five voyages, with their incidents recast with

modifications and additions. The expedition of Leif Ericson, and his

accidental discovery of Vinland, and the subsequent attempt at

colonisation of Karlsefne, in company with Thorvald and Freydisa, are

the only adventures accredited by the oldest tradition. In the latter

narrative it is stated that “they sailed for a long time, until they

came at last to a river which flowed down from the land into a lake, and

so into the sea. There were great bars at the mouth of the river, so

that it could only be entered at the height of the flood tide. Karlsefn

and his men sailed into the mouth of the river, and called it Hóp,”

_i.e._ a land-locked bay. “They found self-sown wheat fields wherever

there were hollows, and where there was hilly ground there were vines.”

Subsequent descriptions are obviously based on this account. But to

whatever extent the description of the locality where Thorvald, the

brother of Leif Ericson, was killed by a Skræling may have been

suggested by that narrative, the localities are different. It was

apparently in the spring of A.D. 1004 that Karlsefne set out on his

colonising expedition. The voyagers sailed along Furdustrandir, a long,

low sandy coast, till they came to where the land was indented with

creeks and inlets. There they steered into the Straumsfjord, to a spot

where Karlsefne and his companions spent the winter of A.D. 1005; and

where, therefore, we may assume the observations to have been made that

determined the length of the day in Vinland at the winter solstice. The

narrative of noteworthy incidents is accompanied with topographical

details that have to be kept in view in any attempt at recovering traces

of the locality. There, if it could be identified, we have to look for a

promontory answering to the Krossanes, or promontory of the crosses: the

spot where Thorvald was buried; and as would seem to be implied, where a

cross was set up at the grave mound. The style of such a sepulchral

memorial of the Northmen at a little later date is very familiar to us.

The discovery on some hitherto unheeded spot of the Nova-Scotian coast

of a bautastein, graven like those recovered on the sites of the old

Greenland colony, would be an invaluable historical record. It might be

expected to read somewhat in this fashion: _Leif sunr Erikr rautha

raisti krus thana eftir Thorvald brothur sina_. But there is slight

ground for imagining that the transient visitors from Greenland to the

Canadian shores left any more lasting memorial of the tragic event that

reappears in successive versions of the narrative of their presence

there, than a wooden grave-post, or uninscribed headstone.

One other element in the characteristic features of the strange land

visited by the Greenland explorers is the native population, and this

has a specific interest in other respects, in addition to its bearing on

the determination of a Nova-Scotian site for “Vineland the Good.” They

are designated Skrælings (Skrælingjar), and as in this the Greenland

voyagers applied the same name to the natives of Vinland as to the

Greenland Eskimo, it has been assumed that both were of the same race.

But the term “skræling” is still used in Norway to express the idea of

decrepitude, or physical inferiority; and probably was used with no more

definite significance than our own word “savage.” The account given in

the Saga of the approach of the Skrælings would sufficiently accord with

that of a Micmac flotilla of canoes. Their first appearance is thus

described: “While looking about one morning, they observed a great

number of canoes. On exhibiting friendly signals the canoes approached

nearer to them, and the natives in them looked with astonishment at

those they met there. These people were sallow-coloured and ill-looking,

had ugly heads of hair, large eyes and broad cheeks.” The term

_skræling_ has usually been interpreted “dwarf,” and so seemed to

confirm the idea of the natives having been Eskimo; but, as already

stated, the word, as still used in Norway, might mean no more than the

inferiority of any savage race. As to the description of their features

and complexion, that would apply equally well to the red Indian or the

Eskimo, and so far as the eyes are spoken of, rather to the former than

the latter. More importance may be attached to the term _hudhkeipr_

applied to their canoes, which is more applicable to the kayak, or

skin-boat, than to the birch-bark canoe of the Indian; but the word was

probably loosely used as applicable to any savage substitute for a keel,

or built boat.

This question of the identification of the Skrælings, or natives,

whether of Nova Scotia or New England, is one of considerable

ethnographic significance. The speculations relative to the possible

relationship of the Eskimo to the post-glacial cave-dwellers of the

Dordogne valley, and their consequent direct descent from palæolithic

European man, confer a value on any definite evidence bearing on their

movements in intermediate centuries. On the other hand, the approximate

correspondence of the Huron-Iroquois of Canada and the state of New York

to the Eskimo in the dolichocephalic type of skull common to both, gives

an interest to any evidence of the early presence of the latter to the

south of the St. Lawrence. In their western migrations the Eskimo

attract the attention of the ethnographer as the one definite ethnic

link between America and Asia. They are met with, as detached and

wandering tribes, across the whole continent, from Greenland to Behring

Strait. Nevertheless, they appear to be the occupants of a diminishing

rather than an expanding area. This would accord with the idea of their

area extending over the Canadian maritime provinces, and along the New

England coast, in the eleventh century; and possibly as indicating the

early home, from which they were being driven northward by the

Huron-Iroquois or other assailants, rather than implying an overflow

from their Arctic habitat. Seal hunting on the coast of Newfoundland,

and fishing on its banks and along the shores of Nova Scotia, would even

now involve no radical change in the habits of the Eskimo. It was with

this hyperborean race that the Scandinavian colonists of Greenland came

in contact 800 years ago, and by them that they were exterminated at a

later date. If it could be proved that the Skrælings of the eleventh

century, found by the Northmen on the American mainland, were Eskimo, it

would furnish the most conclusive evidence that the red Indians—whether

Micmac, Millicet, or Hurons,—are recent intruders there.

In any process of aggression of the native American race on the older

area of the Eskimo, some intermixture of blood would naturally follow.

The slaughter of the males in battle, and the capture of women and

children, everywhere leads to a like result; and this seems the simplest

solution of the problem of the southern brachycephalic, and the northern

dolichocephalic type of head among native American races. When the sites

of the ancient colonies of Greenland were rediscovered and visited by

the Danes, they imagined they could recognise in the physiognomy of some

of the Eskimo who still people the shores of Davis Straits, traces of

admixture between the old native and the Scandinavian or Icelandic

blood. Of the Greenland colonies the Eskimo had perpetuated many

traditions, referring to the colonists under the native name of

_Kablunet_. But of the language that had been spoken among them for

centuries, the fact is highly significant that the word _Kona_, used by

them as a synonym for woman, is the only clearly recognised trace. This

is worthy of note, in considering the distinctive character of the

Eskimo language, and its comparison with the Indian languages of the

North American continent. It has the feature common to nearly all the

native languages of the continent north of the Mexican Gulf in the

composite character of its words; so that an Eskimo verb may furnish the

equivalent to a whole sentence in other tongues. But what is specially

noteworthy is that, while the Huron-Iroquois, the Algonkin, and other

Indian families of languages have multiplied widely dissimilar dialects,

Dr. Henry Rink has shown that the Eskimo dialects of Greenland or

Labrador differ slightly from those of Behring Strait; and the congeners

of the American Eskimo, who have overflowed into the Aleutian Islands,

and taken possession of the north-eastern region of Asia, perpetuate

there nearly allied dialects of the parent tongue.[8] The Alaskan and

the Tshugazzi peninsulas are in part peopled by Eskimo; the Konegan of

Kudjak Island belong to the same stock; and all the dialects spoken in

the Aleutian Islands, the supposed highway from Asia to America, betray

in like manner the closest affinities to the Arctic Mongolidæ of the New

World. They thus appear not only to be contributions from the New World

to the Old, but to be of recent introduction there. If the cave-dwellers

of Europe’s palæolithic era found their way as has been suggested, in

some vastly remote age, either by an eastern or a western route to the

later home of the Arctic Eskimo, it is in comparatively modern centuries

that the tide of migration has set westward across the Behring Strait,

and by the Aleutian Islands, into Asia.

The reference to the Skrælings in the first friendly intercourse of

Thorfinn Karlsefne and his companions with the natives, and their

subsequent hostile attitude, ending in the death of Thorvald Ericson,

has given occasion to this digression. But the question thus suggested

is one of no secondary interest. If we could certainly determine their

ethnical character the fact would be of great significance; and coupled

with any well-grounded determination of the locality where the fatal

incident occurred, would have important bearings on American ethnology.

The description of the sallow, or more correctly, swarthy coloured,

natives with large eyes, broad cheek-bones, shaggy hair, and forbidding

countenances is furnished in the Saga, and then the narrative thus

proceeds: “After the Skrælings had gazed at them for a while, they rowed

away again to the south-west past the cape. Karlsefne and his company

had erected their dwelling-houses a little above the bay, and there they

spent the winter. No snow fell, and the cattle found their food in the

open field. One morning early, in the beginning of 1008, they descried a

number of canoes coming from the south-west past the cape. Karlsefne

having held up the white shield as a friendly signal, they drew nigh and

immediately commenced bartering. These people chose in preference red

cloth, and gave furs and squirrel skins in exchange. They would fain

also have bought swords and spears, but these Karlsefne and Snorre

prohibited their people from selling to them. In exchange for a skin

entirely gray the Skrælings took a piece of cloth of a span in breadth,

and bound it round their heads. Their barter was carried on in this way

for some time. The Northmen then found that their cloth was beginning to

grow scarce, whereupon they cut it up in smaller pieces, not broader

than a finger’s breadth, yet the Skrælings gave as much for these

smaller pieces as they had formerly given for the larger ones, or even

more. Karlsefne also caused the women to bear out milk soup, and the

Skrælings relishing the taste of it, they desired to buy it in

preference to everything else, so they wound up their traffic by

carrying away their bargains in their bellies. Whilst this traffic was

going on it happened that a bull, which Karlsefne had brought along with

him, came out of the wood and bellowed loudly. At this the Skrælings got

terrified and rushed to their canoes, and rowed away southwards. About

this time Gudrida, Karlsefne’s wife, gave birth to a son, who received

the name of Snorre. In the beginning of the following winter the

Skrælings came again in much greater numbers; they showed symptoms of

hostility, setting up loud yells. Karlsefne caused the red shield to be

borne against them, whereupon they advanced against each other, and a

battle commenced. There was a galling discharge of missiles. The

Skrælings had a sort of war sling. They elevated on a pole a

tremendously large ball, almost the size of a sheep’s stomach, and of a

bluish colour; this they swung from the pole over Karlsefne’s people,

and it descended with a fearful crash. This struck terror into the

Northmen, and they fled along the river.”

It was thus apparent that in spite of the attractions of the forest-clad

land, with its tempting vines, there was little prospect of peaceful

possession. The experience of these first colonisers differed in no

degree from that of the later pioneers of Nova Scotia or New England.

Freydisa, the natural daughter of Eric, whom Thorvald had wedded, is

described as taunting the men for their cowardice in giving way before

such miserable caitiffs as the Skrælings or savage natives, and vowing,

if she had only a weapon, she would show better fight. “She accordingly

followed them into the wood. There she encountered a dead body. It was

Thorbrand Snorrason. A flat stone was sticking fast in his head. His

naked sword lay by his side. This she took up, and prepared to defend

herself. She uncovered her breasts and dashed them against the naked

sword. At this sight the Skrælings became terrified, and ran off to

their canoes. Karlsefne and the rest now came up to her and praised her

courage. But Karlsefne and his people became aware that, although the

country held out many advantages, still the life that they would have to

lead here would be one of constant alarm from the hostile attacks of the

natives. They therefore made preparations for departure with the

resolution of returning to their own country.” To us the attractions of

a Nova-Scotian settlement might seem worth encountering a good many such

assaults rather than retreat to the ice-bound shores of Greenland. But

it was “their own country”; their relatives were there. Nor to the hardy

Northmen did its climate, or that of Iceland, present the forbidding

aspect which it would to us. So they returned to Brattalid, carrying

back with them an evil report of the land; and, as it seems, also

bringing with them specimens of its natives. For, on their homeward

voyage, they proceeded round Kialarnes, and then were driven to the

nort-west. “The land lay to larboard of them. There were thick forests

in all directions as far as they could see, with scarcely any open

space. They considered the hills at Hope and those which they now saw as

forming part of one continuous range. They spent the third winter at

Streamfirth. Karlsefne’s son Snorre was now three years of age. When

they sailed from Vinland they had southerly wind, and came to Markland,

where they met with five Skrælings. They caught two of them (two boys),

whom they carried away along with them, and taught them the Norse

language, and baptized them; these children said that their mother was

called Vethilldi and their father Uvaege. They said that the Skrælings

were ruled by chieftains (kings), one of whom was called Avalldamon, and

the other Valdidida; that there were no houses in the country, but that

the people dwelled in holes and caverns.”

Thus ended the abortive enterprise of Thorfinn and his company to found,

in the eleventh century, a colony of Northmen on the American mainland.

The account the survivors brought back told indeed of umbrageous

woodland and the tempting vine. But the forest was haunted by the fierce

Skrælings, and its coasts open to assault from their canoes. To the race

that wrested Normandy from the Carlovingian Frank, and established its

jarldoms in Orkney, Caithness, and Northumbria, such a foe might well be

deemed contemptible. But the degenerate Franks, and the Angles of

Northumbria, tempted the Norse marauder with costly spoils; and only

after repeated successful expeditions awakened the desire to settle in

the land and make there new homes. Alike to explorers seeking for

themselves a home, and to adventurers coveting the victors’ spoils, the

Vinland of the Northmen offered no adequate temptation, and so its

traditions faded out of memory, or were recalled only as the legend of a

fabulous age. At the meeting of the British Association at Montreal in

1884 Mr. R. G. Halliburton read a paper entitled “A Search in British

North America for lost Colonies of Northmen and Portuguese.” Documents

were quoted by him showing that from A.D. 1500 to 1570 commissions were

regularly issued to the Corte Reals and their successors. Cape Breton

was colonised by them in 1521; and when Portugal became annexed to Spain

in 1680, and Terra Nova passed with it to her rule, she sent colonists

to settle there. The site which they occupied, Mr. Halliburton traced to

Spanish Harbour (Sydney), Cape Breton, and this he claimed to be the

earliest European settlement in North America. For, as for the

Northmen’s reputed explorations and attempt at settlement, his verdict

is thus briefly summed up: “When we can discover Greenland’s verdant

mountains we can also hope to find the vine-clad hills of Vineland the

Good.” That, however, is too summary a dismissal of evidence which, if

vague, is to every appearance based on authorities as seemingly

authentic and trustworthy as those on which many details of the history

of early centuries rest. It would manifestly be unwise to discountenance

further inquiry by any such sweeping scepticism, or to discourage the

hope that local research may yet be rewarded by evidence confirmatory of

the reputed visit of Thorfinn and his fellow-explorers to some

recognisable point on the Nova-Scotian coast.

The diligent research of scholars familiar with the Old Norse, in which

the Sagas are written, is now clearing this inquiry into reputed

pre-Columbian discovery and colonisation of much misapprehension. The

extravagant assumptions alike of earlier Danish and New England

antiquaries in dealing with the question were provocative of an undue

bias of critical scepticism. The American historian Bancroft gave form

to this tendency when he affirmed that “the story of the colonisation of

America by Northmen rests on narratives mythological in form and obscure

in meaning; ancient, yet not contemporary.” If the historian had adduced

in evidence of this the story of the Eyrbyggja Saga, and the later

amplifications of reputed voyages to “White Man’s Land,” and to

“Newland,” his language would have been pardonable. Of the later

fictitious Sagas are the Landvætta-sögur; Stories of the

guardian-spirits of the land; and the Saga of Halfdan Eysteinsson, from

which we learn that “Raknar brought the deserts of Heluland under his

rule, and destroyed all the giants there”; or again we have the Saga of

“Barthar Snæfellsass,” or the Snow-fell God, and the King Dumbr of

Dumbshaf. But all such mythical Sagas belong to later Icelandic and

Norwegian literature, and have no claim to historical value.

The genuine documentary evidence of Vinland is recoverable from

manuscripts of earlier date, and a widely different character. Had

Bancroft been familiar with the early Icelandic Sagas he could never

have spoken of them as mythological. They are, on the contrary,

distinguished by their presentation of events in an extremely simple and

literal manner; equally free from rhetorical embellishment and the

extravagances of the romancer. But the occupation of the new-found land

was brief; and as the tale of its explorers faded from the memory of

younger generations, fancy toyed with the legend of a sunny land of the

Vine, with its self-sown fields of ripened grain. At a later date

Greenland itself vanished from the ken of living men; and romance

sported with the fancies suggested by its name as a fertile oasis of

green pastures walled in by the ice and snows of its Arctic zone.

The first authentic reference, now recoverable, to Vinland the Good has

already been referred to. It occurs in a passage in the _Iselandinga

Vók_, by Ari Thorgilsson, the oldest Icelandic historiographer. Ari,

surnamed froði, or the learned, was born A.D. 1067, and survived till

1148. The earliest manuscript of the Saga of Eric the Red dates as late

as A.D. 1330. It is contained in the Arna Magnæan Codex, commonly known

as _Hauks Vók_. Hauk Erlendsson, to whom the preservation of this copy

of the original Saga is due, and by whom part of it appears to have been

written, has appended to the manuscript a genealogy, in which he traces

his descent from the son of Karlsefne, born in Vinland. Two versions of

the narrative have been preserved, differing only in slight details; and

of those Reeves says: “They afford the most graphic and succinct

exposition of the discovery; and, supported as they are throughout by

contemporary history, appear in every respect most worthy of

credence.”[9] The simple, unadorned narrative bears out the idea that it

is a manuscript of information derived from the statements of the actual

explorers. The later story of Barni Herjulfson,—an obvious

amplification of the original narrative, with a change of names, and

many spurious additions,—occurs in the Flatey Book, a manuscript

written before the close of the fourteenth century, when the Northmen of

the Scandinavian fatherland were reawakening to an interest in the

memories or traditions of early voyages to strange lands beyond the

Atlantic Ocean, and fashioning them into legend and romance.

The poet, William Morris, represents the Vikings of the fourteenth

century following the old leadings of Leif Ericson in search of the

earthly paradise:—

That desired gate

To immortality and blessed rest

Within the landless waters of the West.

The time chosen is that of England’s Edward III., and, still more, of

England’s Chaucer. But in reality all memory of the land which lay

beyond the waters of the Atlantic had faded as utterly from the minds of

Europe’s mariners, in that fourteenth century, as in the older days when

Plato restored a lost Atlantis to give local habitation to his ideal

Republic. When the idea revived in the closing years of the fifteenth

century, not as a philosophic dream, but as a legitimate induction of

science, the reception which it met with from the embodied wisdom of

that age, curiously illustrates the common experience of the pioneers in

every path of novel discovery.

The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studies · 第 6 / 39 段