CHAPTER III.

The Local Application of Saline Solutions to the Peritoneal Surfaces of

the Intestine.

In the last chapter it has been shown that the subcutaneous and

intravenous injections of solutions of various saline purgatives

produce a characteristic purgative effect; and that similar injections

of calcium or magnesium chloride inhibit this action and bring the

intestines to rest.

I have found also that solutions of these salts have the same effect

when applied directly to the peritoneal surface of the intestine. Thus

if a solution of sodium citrate or sulphate,[31] for example, be poured

over the intestine those loops which are moistened by the solution will

become active within one minute. After a very short time the remaining

loops are also set in motion. These movements may be entirely inhibited

by pouring on the loops a solution of calcium or magnesium chloride.

The following description of these experiments is taken directly from

my paper which appeared two years ago.[32]

The intestines of a rabbit under the influence of morphine were

exposed. On a small group of coils there were poured 3 c.c. m/6 sodium

citrate solution. Almost immediately (within 1 minute) the loops became

very active. Strong contractions of the muscle coats took place. After

a few minutes the other loops were also set in movement, so that the

whole small intestine showed active peristalsis. The citrate solution

was then washed off by m/6 NaCl solution, and about 3 c.c. m/6 CaCl_{2}

solution poured on the loops. The peristaltic movements were promptly

suppressed, and the intestine remained quiet. By the further addition

of citrate solution, the coils were set in active movement once more,

and by the subsequent application of calcium chloride solution again

inhibited. This was repeated many times (sixteen) and apparently might

have been continued as long as the intestine remained alive.

The same results were obtained by using instead of the sodium citrate

solution, a solution of barium chloride, sodium sulphate, fluoride,

bromide, iodide, phosphate (Na_{3}PO_{4}), oxalate or tartrate. Local

application of solutions of any of these salts produces increased

peristaltic activity. Solutions of sodium chloride have a very slight

action of the same character. On the other hand, the intestinal

movements are equally inhibited by calcium chloride and magnesium

chloride, while strontium chloride has a similar but less powerful

inhibiting action.

In testing those salts with which it was necessary to use dilutions

greater than m/8, the dilution was made with a neutral fluid consisting

of sodium chloride and magnesium chloride. It was found that m/6 NaCl

solution increased to a very slight extent the peristaltic movements.

By adding to 10 c.c. m/6 NaCl, 0.5 c.c. m/6 MgCl_{2}, a fluid was

obtained which had apparently neither stimulating nor inhibiting

effects. In addition to solutions made up by dilution with this neutral

fluid, others were used in which the salt solutions were diluted with

distilled water. Practically the same results were obtained in both

cases. It was found that 1 c.c. m/320 BaCl_{2} solution applied locally

to the intestine is sufficient to cause strong peristaltic movements in

a rabbit. This quantity contains about 0.00076 gm. barium chloride.

In the case of sodium citrate, the concentration must be considerably

greater. No solution of this salt more dilute than m/80 is active in a

rabbit. Of all the purgative salts, barium chloride is by far the most

powerful. If a drop of m/8 BaCl_{2} be placed on the serous surface of

an intestinal loop, or if a small area be moistened with this solution

by means of a camel’s hair brush, the muscle beneath the moistened

area will almost immediately contract so that a ring-like constriction

of the intestine is formed. This often is so sharply marked that it

suggests the effect produced by tying a ligature around the intestine.

This constriction remains for a few moments, and then gradually moves

along the loop in the direction of the normal peristalsis. If the

solution be injected into the muscle of the intestine at any point

with a hypodermic needle, a similar sharp constriction takes place. If

also a few drops be injected directly into a branch of the superior

mesenteric artery, all that part of the loop supplied by the arterial

branch will contract violently. These statements are true also in the

case of sodium citrate, fluoride, sulphate, etc.; the action of these

salts, however, is less powerful.

It must be added here also that the actual passage of faeces may be

produced within an hour by the application of the purgative salts to

the serous surfaces of the intestine. This takes place most quickly

with barium chloride. It is possible to observe directly through the

semi-transparent walls of the intestine the rapid passage of faecal

masses from one loop to another.

The intestines of the rabbit are apparently much more sensitive to the

action of sodium citrate and sulphate than are those of the dog or

cat. Barium chloride, on the contrary, acts with equal strength in all

these animals. In a rabbit, the intestines are always set in active

peristaltic movement by contact with m/8 sodium citrate solution;

and even much more dilute solutions are, as a rule, effective. In a

cat, however, it was found that an m/8 solution of sodium citrate

has practically no effect, while a ⁵⁄₈m solution sets the intestine

in active motion. In a dog also m/8 sodium citrate solution is

usually ineffective. Similarly an m/8 sodium sulphate solution is

inactive in a dog while an m/2 solution of the same salt starts up

distinct peristalsis. In the cat and dog also the peristalsis may be

inhibited by calcium or magnesium chloride, as shown in the following

experiments. The intestines of a cat were exposed in the usual manner,

and an m/8 solution of sodium citrate was applied to the serous surface

of the loops. There was no increased movement. There were then poured

on the loops a few cubic centimetres of a mixture of 5 c.c. ⁵⁄₈m sodium

citrate and 5 c.c. ⁵⁄₈m CaCl_{2}. The loops remained motionless.

After waiting a considerable time (15 minutes), a ⁵⁄₈m solution of

sodium citrate alone was poured on the intestine. Almost immediately

they became very active; and the peristalsis continued until calcium

chloride was again applied. The loops then came to a standstill. The

difference in susceptibility to the action of citrate which exists

between rabbits on the one hand, and dogs and cats on the other, may

be in some way connected with their being herbivorous and carnivorous

animals respectively.

The action of the sodium citrate, sulphate, fluoride, etc., when

applied locally, may be inhibited by the administration of an

approximately equal quantity of calcium or magnesium chloride of

the same concentration. The counteraction of the effect of barium

chloride, however, requires a much greater concentration of calcium.

Using equal quantities of the two salts, the action of the barium is

usually not inhibited, a fact which I have previously stated. With

greater concentrations of the calcium chloride, the antagonistic

action, however, is clear. This is shown in the following experiment:

Applied locally to the intestine of a rabbit 1 c.c. m/320 BaCl_{2}

solution caused active peristaltic movements. The application of 1

c.c. m/320 CaCl_{2} solution exercised no inhibiting effect whatever.

The same quantity of m/40 CaCl_{2} was then poured on the loops, and

a slight but distinct quieting of the loops took place. The addition

of 1 c.c. m/6 CaCl_{2} caused the loops to become entirely motionless.

After waiting a considerable time, 1 c.c. m/8 BaCl_{2} was poured

on the intestine. Immediately violent peristaltic movements took

place. Several c.c. m/6 CaCl_{2} exercised practically no inhibiting

influence; while 2 c.c. ⁵⁄₈m CaCl_{2} solution suppressed the movements

entirely for a short time.

The question concerning the exact seat of action of the purgative

salts remains still unanswered. Whether, upon being absorbed into the

blood, they act on the central nervous system is not known. There is

no evidence to show that this is the case. It seems certain, on the

other hand, from the experiments here described, that they undoubtedly

have a peripheral action either on the peripheral nervous mechanism or

on the muscle cells themselves. It is impossible to prove that there

is no action on the central nervous system, and at present it seems

impossible to prove whether the peripheral action is directly on the

nerves or on the muscles. The existence in the walls of the intestine

of the ganglionic plexuses of Auerbach and Meissner must be taken

into consideration; and with the methods available there seems to be

no way of distinguishing the action on these plexuses and the direct

action on the muscle cells. The ultimate effect is on the muscles and

glands; and the fact that an entirely local ring-shaped constriction

can be brought about by the local application of a drop of one of the

salt solutions to the surface of the intestine would seem to indicate

that only a small group of the circular muscle fibres themselves is

affected. The fact that the nerve plexuses form a continuous network,

and are intimately related in their various parts, would suggest that

the occurrence of an action on these plexuses confined to so small an

area is improbable. The discussion of the exact location of the action

is, however, of relatively little importance, as compared with the

main facts shown by these experiments, namely, that _it is possible to

produce, by the local application of a purgative salt to the serous

surface of the intestine, a striking increase in peristalsis, and to

suppress these movements by a similar application of solutions of

calcium, magnesium, or strontium chloride_.

These experiments also seem to decide the question as to whether the

salt solutions act after being absorbed into the blood or only when

placed in the intestine. According to Hay[33] and others, the salt

which is absorbed into the circulation has no effect and the only

action is produced by that which remains in the intestine. This is

obviously not true since the solutions act much more rapidly and more

powerfully when applied to the outside of the intestine, _i.e._, to

the peritoneal surface. No action is observed until after an interval

of 10 to 15 minutes after the salt solution is placed in the lumen of

the intestine, while application of the same solution to the peritoneal

surface causes movements of the intestine within one minute.

FOOTNOTES:

[31] Pohl (Arch. f. exp. Path. u. Pharm., Bd. 34, S. 87) stated that

all sodium and ammonium salts increased the peristalsis when applied to

the peritoneal surface of the intestine.

[32] MACCALLUM, J. B.: Amer. Journ. Physiol., Vol. X, No. V, 1904, p.

259.

[33] _Loc. cit._

On the mechanism of the physiological action of the cathartics · 第 3 / 11 章