AUTHOR’S CHARACTER.

“----Secum meditari ingenium est _boûm_.”

_Virgil._

“Cows, of all animals, have the greatest propensity for

rumination. For the most part, they are gentle, quiet,

affectionate, unpretending, useful animals; all they require

is kindness, and kindness they will return. Yet they have

their antipathies and their whims, (red shawls are their

abomination,) but, on the whole, they are inoffensive

ruminators--not obtrusive, (except when they take a fancy

to _gore_.) Their caresses are rough as their tongues; yet

their roughest _licks_ are meant in kindness. They never

bite--their teeth are ground down. They are neither snappish

nor carnivorous. They are remarkably fond of salt, and are

quick to detect its presence. Although timid and yielding in

general, they will fight any one, or any thing, in defense

of their young.”

_Baron Munchausen._

The last quoted author has described with remarkable correctness, in

his remarks upon the cow, the character of a being, of whose existence

he could not have dreamed--even of myself. Yes, even such I conceive

to be my character--the coat fits, and I will put it on--“under such

a shape I write.” Being in external appearance, a hale, stout, fat

old bachelor of fifty, fond of the arm-chair and the comfortable

dressing-gown, of easy fortune, retired habits, and few friends,

I am, in soul, thought and disposition, and to all intents and

purposes, _a gentle old cow_. Nor is there any thing humiliating in

the confession. I esteem the character--I admire it. Would to heaven

that in these _matter-of-fact, dollar-and-cent_ days, there were more

men of my nature! I injure no man; but if any man injures me, I have

horns and can gore him, a tail and can lash him. In consideration

of the unsullied purity of my character in my manly state, I have

ventured to conceive that I am, in the bovine genus, that most amiable

non-descript, an old maid. Still, I am no Io--nor Io turned old

maid. I never was handsome enough to warm the soul of Jove, nor mad

enough to swim the Bosphorus. I am not, never was, and never will be,

Oestrus-driven. The many-eyed shepherd, Argus, if ordered to watch

_me_, would have needed only one of his hundred eyes--he might have

seen me, even with “half an eye,” quietly grazing, all the morning

of my life, in the flowery meads of Literature, Moral Philosophy and

Metaphysics--ever and anon, quenching my thirst with a draft from the

pure stream of Helicon--and now, in the afternoon of life, reclined

upon the grass, under the shade of a branching, verdant oak, placidly,

philosophically, philanthropically, and withal meekly chewing the stock

which I formerly stored.

----“Lacte alimentum cognoscimus.”

Were it not presumptuous, I would hope that my production might prove

the pure, unadulterated, untainted “milk of human kindness.”

The Yale Literary Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, June 1836) · 第 24 / 30 题