CHAPTER IX

OF ELEPHANTS

"The torn boughs trailing o'er the tusks aslant,

The saplings reeling in the path he trod,

Declare his might,--our lord the elephant,

Chief of the ways of God.

"The black bulk heaving where the oxen pant,

The bowed head toiling where the guns careen,

Declare our might,--our slave the elephant,

The servant of the Queen."

R. K.

[Illustration: FROM THE SANCHI TOPE]

The Elephant has always been one of the wonders of the world, amazing in

his aspect and full of delightful and surprising qualities. Nor does

familiarity lessen his hold upon the imagination of mankind. Next after the

cow he seems to be of all the beasts the Hindu favourite. At the present

moment the most carefully-kept studs of Elephants are in the hands of Hindu

Rajas, and the Muhammadan Nawāb prefers the horse. This is an ancient

predilection on the part of the Hindu. While other animals represented in

Hindu Art are merely decorative and conventional, or awkward and

ill-understood, there is invariably a strong feeling for nature in Hindu

elephant sculptures and paintings. The contrast may be noticed in most old

temples, but especially in the sculptured gates or tori of the Sanchi tope

in Central India, where all kinds of animals are shown, but the elephant

alone is carved with complete knowledge, and unvarying truth of action.

The grave beast is as great a favourite of the poet as of the artist. The

back view of the elephant as he shuffles along, is like nothing so much as

that of the stout and elderly "long-shore" fisherman and sailor of our

English watering-places, whose capacious nether garments, alone among human

habiliments, have the horizontally creased bagginess peculiar to the

elephant. Dickens said long ago that the elephant employs the worst tailor

in all the world. But these wrinkled columns suggest feminine grace to the

Oriental poet, and "elephant-gaited" is the supreme and also the invariable

expression for the voluptuous movements of women: "A voice as sweet as that

of the Koil, and a gait as voluptuous as that of the elephant: An eye like

the antelope's, a waist like the lion's, and a gait like the elephant's,"

are specimens of an endless series of descriptions of female beauty. Nor

are these expressions confined to ancient poetry, for they are as current

to-day as ever they were. Walking behind elephants and women, I have

occasionally seen a hint of the poet's meaning, but only a hint; and one

is driven to the conclusion that the simile, like many more in Oriental

verse, is mainly conventional. The beast gets along so quietly he might

almost be said to glide, but his movements have little of the fine rhythmic

swing and poise one sees in the noble gait of a well-formed Hindu woman.

[Illustration: GANÉSHA (FROM AN ANCIENT HINDU SCULPTURE)]

As furnishing a head to Ganésa, Ganésh, or Ganpati, the wise and humorous

god who is invoked at the beginning of all enterprises, whose auspicious

image is placed over most Hindu doorways, and whose mystic sign (familiarly

spoken of as a Ganésh) stands on the first page of Hindu ledgers and

day-books, the elephant has an immense hold on the affections of the

people. His sign 卍 is the _svastika_, the cross fylfot of our Western

heraldry and the hermetic cross of Freemasonry, traceable from Troy town to

China. The traveller and the pilgrim look to Ganésha for protection, the

merchant for fortune, the student for advancement, and the housewife for

luck.

[Illustration: SHIV OR MAHADEO, WITH THE INFANT GANÉSH (FROM AN INDIAN

LITHOGRAPH)]

The popular version of the origin of Ganésha is that during one of the

absences of the great Lord Shiva, Parbati his wife, taking a bath, rubbed

some tiny pellets off her skin and amused herself by moulding them into the

form of a child, till at last she breathed life into it. Shiva returned and

was outraged to find a baby where no baby should be, so he promptly cut off

its head with his sharp war-quoit. Then Parbati explained and Shiva said in

effect: "Dear me! this is very sad, why did not you speak sooner?" Then,

catching sight of an elephant standing near, he cut off its head and

clapped it on the decapitated baby. "Now, it's all right!" said he, "I was

always rather hasty." And, to make amends, he ordained that in every

enterprise Ganésa's name should be the first called upon. So the elephant's

head grew on the God-like body, that is to say, on the corpulent body of a

well-fed Baniya, who in his four hands bears suitable emblems,--a disc or

war-quoit, sometimes interpreted as a cake, an elephant goad, a

sacrificial shell, and a lotus. His seat is a lotus, and his steed or vâhan

a rat. In this state he sits over thousands of Hindu doors. His effigy is

modelled in clay and gaily painted for most Hindu households in Western

India, and on his great feast-day, after four days' worship, thousands of

such effigies are borne with shouting and rejoicing to be thrown into the

sea or the nearest water. If Ganésha stood he would be the very image of

many fat, rupee-worshipping Baniyas, to be seen all over India,--even

as--with some irreverence--I have ventured to draw him. But he never

stands, though a fat man is often spoken of as a "cow-dung Ganésh."

Although at first sight merely monstrous to Western eyes, this quaint

personage grows in interest as one learns his attributes and becomes

familiar with his character and person. He seems, as he sits meditatively

poising his heavy head, to be the Nick Bottom of the Hindu Pantheon, with a

touch of the jovial humour immemorially associated with fat men. Like

Falstaff, he appears to chuckle over his bulk and to say, "I cannot tell

whether it is the weight of my head or of my belly (in Southern India he is

familiarly known as the belly God) that prevents my rising, but here I sit

and survey mankind with cheery geniality." Campbell in his "Pleasures of

Hope" speaks of "Ganésa sublime," which to those who know him for what he

is,--the sagacious and respectable "God of getting on"--is a deliciously

incongruous epithet and a false quantity besides.

[Illustration: IF GANÉSHA STOOD]

He is mixed up in countryside stories with mere human creatures in a

friendly fashion which shows that he is a popular favourite. Thus, once

upon a time Shiva and Parbati were strolling about on the earth, and they

visited a temple of Shiva, in the precincts of which sat a poor beggar-man

asking for alms. Parbati said to her awful husband, "It is really too bad

that this man, who has been begging here for years in your name, should not

be better provided for. I call it discreditable." They passed, wrangling,

into the court of the temple till Shiva impatiently cried: "Ho! Ganésha."

The voice of Ganésha came from the inside--"Ho!" "Let something be done for

the tiresome beggar-man your mother has been bothering me about!" "Very

good; I will see that he has a lakh of rupees within the next three days."

"That will do," said the great Mahadeo, and he passed away with his

quarrelsome wife. Now, while they were talking, a Hindu Baniya (dealer and

money-lender) was standing hidden behind the pillars, and though nearly

frightened to death, he cast about in his greedy mind how to secure that

lakh of rupees. So he went to the unconscious beggar, sitting in the outer

court, and asked about his earnings. "My earnings are nothing," said the

beggar, "sometimes a copper or two, sometimes only cowries, sometimes a

handful of rice or pulse;--nothing." Pretending to be interested in the

matter from mere curiosity, the usurer offered five rupees for all the

beggar earned during the next three days. Startled by this large sum, the

beggar held back, protesting the Baniya would be a loser, whereupon more

were offered. The talk went on in the dawdling inconclusive way that only

those who have tried to strike a bargain in India can understand, till

finally the beggar insisted on consulting his wife. As frequently happens

in Indian stories, as in Indian life, she was a very clever woman: "Depend

upon it that usurer is after no good; offered you fifty rupees, did he?

Then it's worth more than fifty times as much. God knows how, but that's

not our affair. Go back and don't give over bargaining even if you go as

high as half a lakh of rupees."

The beggar went back and the bargain began again, and was finally closed at

half a lakh of rupees, which were duly brought to the wondering mendicant.

The usurer hung round the temple, anxious to see how Ganésha would bestow

the lakh of rupees on the beggar-man. At last he heard the approach of the

Gods, and as they passed the beggar, the mother of Death and Life asked

Shiva if anything had been done for him. Again Ganésha was summoned, and as

Shiva spoke, the great stone threshold of the temple rose from its place

and jammed the trembling usurer's leg against the wall. Said Ganésha--"It

is all right! the beggar has received half of the promised lakh of rupees,

and I've got the man who owes him the other half fast by the leg here, and

he will not be released till he has paid the uttermost farthing."

Then that covetous one's liver was turned to water, for he knew that he who

owes to the Gods must pay.

When a native storyteller repeats a triviality of this kind, one seems to

see the belly-god asleep in the dusk of the temple and to hear the rustle

of his dry trunk uncoiling as he awakes, the jovial carelessness of his

voice echoing in the carved vaults and roof, and his chuckle of

satisfaction as the usurer is caught.

There is no trace of the humorous and friendly vulgarity by which Ganésha

the elephant-headed and Hanumān, the monkey god, are distinguished among

the Gods of the Vedas, where the clouds sail high; while the comparative

rarity of their sculptures in the older temples shows that they had at

first but a small share in official mythology.

Here it may be worth while to say of the popular impression that the Vedas

are text-books of Hinduism, that it is incorrect. Most educated Hindus talk

of the Vedas, and modern Hindu reformers, like Rammohun Roy, Keshub Chandra

Sen, and Dayanand Saraswati, insisted that the Vedas contain the elements

of all the religion the world can want; but to whip a dead horse with deep

emotion and lively faith does not necessarily bring it to life again, and

the Vedas have been dead for centuries. Their literary resurrection is part

of the revival of Oriental Scholarship brought about by European Scholars

such as Colebrooke and his many successors. It has been said by a competent

authority that nine hundred and ninety-nine of every thousand Hindus know

nothing about them, and that they are not Hindu in any real sense.

In the earliest myths the elephant is said to take the place of thunder and

lightning, and is one of the steeds of Indra, but while horses and cows

are perpetually referred to, mentions of the elephant are comparatively

rare. The Solar Garuda still survives--(the Brahminy kite is called a

garuda in Southern India),--and he carries an elephant in his beak as in

the Hindu epics. The ancient fantasy that four elephants support the four

corners of the earth is still alive, and they are thus represented in

mystic diagrams printed and painted on calico for Hindu Jogis. Pictures and

sculptures of the goddess Lakshmi show her seated while elephants pour

water over her head from vases upheld in their trunks. It seems fair to

conclude that though the elephant was a favourite of the earlier poets, he

came late to his present high place in the celestial company through the

side door of popular liking. It is also possible that he was admitted late

because he was unknown to the earliest writers.

Buddhism, now dead and done with as far as India proper is concerned,--and

so overgrown with fungous growth of idolatry and demonolatry in other lands

as to be almost unrecognisable,--has its elephant legends. The elephant

takes the place of the dove in the Annunciation to Maya Devi of the coming

of the Bodisát. She lies asleep and the creature appears to her in many

sculptures at Amravati and Southern India, but, hitherto, only once in the

extensive series from the North-West frontier where the Buddhist legend is

told with more than a mere touch of the classic Art of Europe. Another

incident of the legend is the miracle of the subjugation of the elephant,

made _mast_ or frenzied by Devaditta, the envious schismatic, and sent to

meet and murder the Lord Buddha. They met as the conspirator hoped, but

instead of trampling the master underfoot, the creature stood still and

worshipped as Buddha touched its forehead. Later stories tell of an

elephant's body hurled an immense distance by the Lord Buddha, but they

belong to a cycle of incrustations of dead matter.

An ancient use of the elephant has come to light in the copperplate and

other inscriptions which are all that is left to record early Hindu

dynasties. Grants of land, wells, and buildings made for religious purposes

were set forth in poetical terms in inscriptions which are often of great

length. Frequently, in fixing a boundary an elephant was turned loose and

the course the wise beast took was accepted as the limit of the grant. How

he went north by such and such a stream, then turned north-east towards a

clump of mango trees and so forth, is elaborately described; the notion

evidently being that the elephant was heaven-directed. But one can see the

astute attendant Brahmans from here, skilled in directing the heavenly

intuitions of both men and beasts to their own profit. The praises of kings

as rehearsed on these documents are monuments of hyperbole. Rutting

elephants, fighting elephants, thousands of elephants, millions of

elephants, billions of elephants frenzied with blood and irresistible in

strength, are as naught to these monarchs of the prime, who also are

represented as miracles of benevolence and virtue. No superlative is too

strong for these absurd rigmaroles, among which antiquarians grope in

search of a fact, a name, or a date. There are many lies in history, but

Hindu writers are remarkable for having deliberately and of set principle

ignored all the facts of life. All is done, however, with such an air of

conviction and pious purpose that we must use Dr. Johnson's kindly

discrimination and say they are not inexcusable, but consecrated liars.

I know a Jemadar of Mahouts, _i.e._ a head elephant keeper, who says there

is a tradition among men of his craft that elephants first came to India

from the farthest East,--"from China and beyond." This notion was supported

by quotations from elephant words of command, some of which "are not Indian

talk and must be Chinese" (or Burmese). An elephant driver's philology may

not command much respect, but the notion is worth mentioning. The Sanscrit

word _hāthi_, the "handed" one (Lord Tennyson, following Lucretius, says,

"serpent handed"), in popular use is less used by mahouts than the Pali,

_gaj_, frequently compounded with weapons, flowers, etc., to make a name,

as _Katár-gaj_--dagger elephant; _Moti-gaj_--pearl elephant. The Persian

word _pil_ is also used,--the chess bishop is a _pilah_ or elephant, and an

elephant stable is a _pil-khana_. No beast has so many pretty names; Pearl,

Diamond, Necklace of Beauty, Lightning, Lily, Rose, Jasmine, Lotus, Silver

Star, Garland of Flowers, Golden One, Black Snake, are a few, and the

heroes and heroines of poetry also lend their names to my lord the

elephant, and testify to the esteem in which he is held. For female

elephants the word _piyāri_, love or darling, is frequently added to some

pretty female name, as _Radha piyāri_; (Radha is Krishna's wife). Mahouts

also claim that he is the only animal in man's service who is told in so

many words to eat and sleep. As a matter of fact, although there may be a

word of command for sleep, it can be of little use, for no creature sleeps

so little or so lightly,--seldom for more than four hours out of the

twenty-four.

A popular and ancient name for a king is _Gajpati_, Elephant Lord. The

beast is a pageant in himself, and when arrayed as only the Oriental knows

how, he is splendid in colour and majestic in mass. The finest part of the

ceremonial at the Delhi Imperial assemblage, was the great fleet of

elephants riding at anchor, so to speak, among the serried waves of troops

and people. When the tremendous _feu-de-joie_ that followed the

proclamation was fired, there was a movement of alarm among these mighty

creatures. "That startled them," we said, but did not guess the truth, that

several people were killed in the crush that followed the slight stir we

saw in the distant host as when a breeze stirs the growing corn. Kings are

not now the only lords of elephants, for a significant sign of the

prosperity of the country is the possession of elephants by men whose

fathers never owned them, and whose rank would be better represented by the

word Squire than Lord. Many merchants and traders can now better afford the

glory of elephants than real kings. There is a Raja in the hills,--a very

small Raja,--with a very small income, exactly four-fifths of which are

spent in maintaining an elephant, the awe and admiration of his little

handful of subjects. They all spend much of their large staple of leisure

over the elephant, and rightly too, for he is a more imposing symbol than a

crown and sceptre or a diamond plume, and when their Raja rides forth, they

follow him with pride and shouting.

Though essentially amiable, the elephant was often made to serve as public

executioner by native princes in the ante-British days. Sometimes the

victim was bound hand and foot, then the living log was chained with a

fathom long chain to the hind foot of an elephant which was swiftly hurried

through the city for all to see the battering out of his life. It is only a

year or two since the executioner elephant of a Hill State, which was known

to have killed a large number of persons in his official capacity, died

from cold while crossing a mountain pass. The Raja to whom he belonged

towards the close of his career was more than half mad and led his little

court a terrible life. He used to appear in durbar saying: "I have been

dreaming of such an one, let him be slain." A respectable old gentleman

whose forehead was disfigured by a scar, told a friend of mine how it was

once his fate to be dreamed of and ordered for execution, and how he was

only saved at the last moment by a friendly Wăzir or Minister suggesting to

the Raja that if the poor man paid a fine of a thousand rupees and was

branded on the brow, he would probably take care in the future not to

interfere with His Highness's dreams, whereas if he were killed outright

his ghost would surely reappear. This argument prevailed for once. It was

the Raja's pleasure to officiate as mahout on these occasions. The bound

victim was handed to the elephant, who at the word of command seized him

with his trunk and whirled him right and left against his fore-legs with

the familiar action, peculiar to elephants, of swishing the dust from each

wisp of provender before putting it into the mouth. Then he was thrown on

the ground and kicked from fore to hind feet to and fro, then his arms were

wrenched from his body. Then the great feet came down upon him in turn, and

at a final word he was knelt upon; the now lifeless body being crushed to a

shapeless mass. And all was done with a slow deliberation of ordered

movement that must have been terrible to see. Dr. Wolff describes another

hill Raja as a most stupid and ignorant man, and "the most horrid brute

that ever lived. His great delight was to ride upon an elephant, which was

made to tread upon a little child, so as to crush it to death."

Yet cruelty ought not to be a tradition of the Himálaya, for the only

Oriental I have seen shed a tear for an animal was a Wăzir or Minister of

that same Hill State, which need not be named here. Once at a

halting-place far in the hills, leaning on a rail with a friend, we watched

the sunset. At a little distance a pony was grazing on a tiny green meadow

terrace above the road. As we looked we saw with amazement that the pony

was disappearing, hind-quarters first, until it sank completely out of

sight; nor, from our point of view, was there any apparent solution of

continuity in the green carpet on which but now it stood. One of those

absurd occurrences that incline you to pinch yourself to feel if you are

awake,--it was in reality quite simple. The meadow was the roof of some

long disused huts, and the rotten timbers supporting the soil had given

way, letting the surprised pony down into a sort of cellar. The beast was

the property of a Wăzir returning with his retinue from a visit to Simla,

and his grief was quaintly demonstrative. Weeping hard, he laid alongside

the chasm trying to embrace his steed, nearly tumbling in himself, and

while we were busy with ropes and timbers hauling the creature up and

contriving that he should emerge on the side towards the hill, the good

Wăzir distractedly hovered round, wringing his hands, and doing less than

nothing in the work of rescue. The pony was never in danger, was no whit

the worse, but its master's tears were real and his words of sympathy were

sincere.

The real character of the elephant has been studied exhaustively and

described once for all by Mr. G. P. Sanderson in his admirable book,

_Thirteen years among the wild beasts of India_. Mr. Sanderson is not only

a master of Indian woodcraft and a Nimrod of varied experiences, but a most

sympathetic observer of animal life and character, and yet as acute and

discriminating as a Judge on the Bench. He has disposed of the wonderful

stories of cunning and devotion attributed to the elephant, such as the

douche of dirty water thrown over the spiteful ninth-part man who pricked

the creature's trunk with his needle, and the artilleryman snatched from

under the wheel of a gun. Mr. Sanderson also says that "the natives of

India never speak of the elephant as a peculiarly intelligent animal, and

it does not figure in their ancient literature for its wisdom, as do the

fox, the crow, and the monkey." My experience is that the popular estimate

of the elephant's character and intelligence is a high one; and with regard

to the neglect of the animal by ancient writers as a type of wisdom we

should remember that Oriental poetry and legend have adopted from the

earliest times a series of similitudes to which they adhere with mechanical

fidelity. There is a polity of animals, so to speak. The jackal is cunning

and clever; the tiger is fierce and deadly, but may be most ignominiously

deceived and played with by clever jackals and old women; the crow is sly

and ready; the parrot is wise, a tale-bearer, and full of resource; the

monkey is intelligent and kin to man; the serpent, when he is not a prince

bewitched, is secret, malignant, and powerful; the dove is gentle; the deer

and the antelope are tender and affectionate, pious Brahmans of the

jungle--and so forth and so following; but the elephant invariably appears

as the image of power and might in war. Kings are elephants and so are

great warriors. Ticketed, as it were, with this lordly label, the poet and

the storyteller of the prime, whose means were simple and whose

discriminations were broad, would hesitate to notice in the elephant homely

qualities already assigned to the jackal, the crow, and the monkey.

The permanent retention of the elephant as the type of martial prowess is

another illustration of the merely literary and unobservant quality of

much of the work for which our admiration is challenged by scholars. The

real fact of the animal's nature is gentleness. His trunk might be packed

full of the jewels of which he is said to carry a priceless sample in his

head, so careful is he to guard it from danger. Nor is he cautious without

a cause. He cannot live without his trunk, and though guarded by a pair of

ivory bayonets, it is as vulnerable as a garden slug. It is admitted in a

saying still current that "the mad elephant destroys its own army." If, for

mad, we say frightened, we reach the main truth of elephant warfare from

the time of Porus to that Mohurrum fête day when Raja Sahib drove his

elephants with iron-clad brows against the gates of Arcot, and Clive's

bullets sent them raging back to trample on their own masters.

Mr. Sanderson speaks of mahouts as "rascals more often than not," and as

"invariably superstitious and ignorant." They tell and believe of the

beasts in their charge more wonderful stories of intelligence than any in

our children's books. These stories have spread and are so firmly credited

that I venture to question his assertion that natives of India never speak

of the animal as peculiarly intelligent. A mahout told me and a group of

native friends, of an elephant that cherished a grudge against his driver,

who, being aware of this, kept carefully out of the animal's reach, and on

the march spread his sleeping-blanket at what he thought a safe distance.

But one night the elephant chewed the end of a long bamboo till the fibres

were loose and brush-like, and, pushing it "gently, gently, slowly,

slowly," towards his sleeping enemy, whose long hair was loose, twisted the

bamboo so that its fibres were firmly entangled, and before he could awake

pulled the poor wretch within reach of the quick kicking feet, which

promptly made an end of him.

All my friends believed this terrible tale, and so did I,--for the moment;

and that is quite enough for all artistic and Oriental purposes.

They also gave credit to a calculating elephant who was allowed a ration of

twelve flap-jacks of wheaten meal for his supper. But the mahout had a

large family and appropriated one of the cakes. The wise elephant turned

the pile over and laid out the eleven cakes in a row, trumpeting loudly

when the master came by; so that mahout was beaten with shoes.

Another tale, for which I do not claim implicit belief, tells of an

elephant who with his mahout was engaged to root up bushes in a tea garden.

The mahout, like more of his class, was in the habit of going on periodical

drinking bouts. Once he asked for ten days' leave to attend a funeral,

assuring the Planter that he could instruct his beast to work faithfully

under the goad of a substitute who was there and then introduced, while the

elephant was formally charged to behave well and work hard during his

master's ten days of absence. But the funeral was a very thirsty one, and

on the eleventh day the mahout had not returned. The substitute came

rushing up to the Planter's bungalow, crying that the elephant refused to

work. The British Planter said he would see about that, took his whip, and

went to reason with him, but presently came back at his highest speed,

followed by the angry beast with uplifted trunk. The coolies ran away in

fright, and for two days my lord the elephant roamed round the deserted

gardens at his leisure. On the thirteenth day the mahout returned and was

received with gladness by the animal, who forthwith set about his work

with a will; but they say the Planter, being a bloated capitalist, refused

to retain a creature which could go on strike to such purpose as to shut up

the whole concern.

Mahouts also believe that when a wild elephant is coming downhill and

cannot reach forward with his trunk to sound a dangerous foot-hold, he

breaks a sapling and, holding it like an alpen-stock, probes and feels his

way. Colonel Lewin tells me of a belief in the Chittagong Hill tracts, that

wild elephants assemble together to dance! Further, that once he came with

his men on a large cleared place in the forest, the floor beaten hard and

smooth, like that of a native hut. "This," said the men, in perfect good

faith, "is an elephant nautch-khana"--ballroom. It is a common remark that

stout people are often light dancers, and sometimes most eligible partners.

The elephant, in spite of his bulk, is both on land and water a very

buoyant person, quick on his feet and, in his deliberate way, as clever a

kicker as a mule, which is saying a great deal. There is therefore no

reason why he should not dance, and I confess to a deep envy of the Assam

coolie, who said he had been a hidden unbidden guest at an elephant ball.

Elephants are easily taught to dance by American and European circus

trainers; and it is recorded by an American trainer that elephants off

duty, left entirely to themselves, have been seen to rehearse the lessons

they have learned. Let us believe, then, until some dismal authority

forbids us, that the elephant _beau monde_ meets by the bright Indian

moonlight in the ballrooms they clear in the depths of the forest, and

dance mammoth quadrilles and reels to the sighing of the wind through the

trees and their own trumpeting, shrill and sudden as the Highlander's hoch!

It is firmly believed that dead elephants are buried by their kind. Mr.

Sanderson admits that he is unable to account for the total absence of

their remains in the jungle, and so gives us leave to share for once in an

Orient mystery, dim and inscrutable. The free-thinking native who solves it

by boldly claiming that the great beasts, left to themselves, do not die at

all, does not diminish the marvel, which still remains to delight all those

who love to wonder.

It is natural that a creature so highly esteemed should be made to reflect

the popular conception of Hindu character in its weaknesses and failings as

well as in its placid and gentle strength. He is believed with little cause

to be keenly sensitive; they say he breaks his heart like a proud Rajput,

and dies at will of resentment or grief. So do some Orientals. He is said

to have a memory for insult or injury as tenacious as that of a usurer for

a debt, and soon or late he will be even with his oppressor. He can be

taught to master his natural timidity, and when properly led he will face

the tiger in his lair, but he is not ashamed to fly before a little dog. In

sickness he comes very close to the human, for the mahouts say he resigns

himself like a native when stricken with fever; when he lies down they give

him up, for he gives up all hope of himself, and against a despair of that

bulk there is no argument. He is liable to sudden bursts of rage, and can

sulk in ill-temper for days at a time. When downright mad nothing can stand

before him. Death in Hindu poetry and talk is a mad elephant, for who shall

stay him? Love and lust are also mad elephants, blind, unreasoning, and

cruel.

"There are many footsteps in the footprint of the elephant," for elephant

lords have many followers. In most native forts and palaces there are

elephant paths and high-arched elephant gates, slopes or stairways of wide

tread, down which the State elephants march, taking the women of the Zenana

or their lords for an airing. The milky way in the heavens is sometimes

called the elephant's path. Silver ingots of a certain shape are

"elephant's feet" and among silversmiths the name is used to discriminate a

quality of silver.

[Illustration: AN ELEPHANT GOAD (ANKUS)]

In Assam, where they are familiar with elephants, they say, "The elephant

brings forth one at a birth, the pig ten." "A small elephant is still

larger than a big buffalo," and "Bamboos are tied with bamboos and

elephants are caught by elephants," are also sayings from that region.

Where the Englishman would say the back of a job was broken, or "All is

over but the shouting," an Oriental often says, "The elephant is out, only

the tail remains." "Teeth for use and teeth for show," carries an

understood allusion to the elephant, who has tremendous molars hidden in

his head as well as handsome external tusks. Sometimes for state occasions

an animal with poor or elementary tusks is fitted with a jury pair, a feat

of dentistry of which mahouts are proud. To the over-bold who would meddle

with the great it is said: "Would you snatch sugar-cane from an elephant?"

"The dog may bark but the elephant moves on" is sometimes said to indicate

the superiority of the great to popular clamour, but the best form of the

phrase is, "Though the dog may bark the caravan (_kafila_) moves on." For

the elephant hates and fears dogs as much as some great men of to-day hate

noisy newspapers, and with better reason. Nature, in furnishing the beast

with a soft and tender trunk, has bound him down to keep the peace with all

creation. That in spite of this disability he can be brought to face the

tiger shows convincingly the docility and superiority of his nature. Yet

though the beast is counted lordly, he still has a master, so they say

again, "The elephant's god is his goad." Big things and men are naturally

called elephantine. Maharaja Ranjit Singh used to speak of the fine English

cart-horses sent out to him as a gift from the English Government as his

"elephant horses," and he tied them up and fed them to death in the native

fashion with great pride and satisfaction. "When the handed one puts forth

his handiness, a man is but a fly before him," is a clumsy paraphrase of a

saying that plays with the word _hāthi_. "The poor have no friends, but

elephants wait at the rich man's door," is one of the rare complaints of

Indian lowliness. It is doubtful whether any other races in the world are

more free from envy. The beggar cries, "God will give you an elephant to

ride on, I'll take a farthing to-day." When English girls marry, their

parents say they are sorely grieved to lose them; but Indian fathers are

frank, and acknowledge at once the trouble and cost of daughters and

elephants in "The daughter is best at her father-in-law's house, as the

elephant is best at the Raja's."

A man's saying is "A man at sixty is a young elephant, a woman at twenty is

growing old." There is a fine braggadocio in this, but the honest truth is

that the Indian woman has not a fair chance, being deliberately sacrificed

by the custom of too early marriage. English poets write prettily of Hindu

maidens, but there are no Hindu maidens in any true sense. A brutal saying

like this drives home the fact that millions of girls, bright and charming

as any in the world, are deprived of that period of spring-time freedom and

lightness of heart which is their birthright. Nor is there any excuse for

this deprivation, for it has been demonstrated that the Indian woman comes

no earlier to maturity than her sister in the West. And the Hindu man at

sixty is like a young elephant in nothing save bulk.

* * * * *

The docility of the elephant is never more evident than when he is dressed

for parade on an occasion of state. It is a long and tiresome business to

clothe the creature in the ornaments and housings with which luxuriant

Oriental taste loves to bedizen him. You may make a four-post bedstead very

splendid in a cinque-cento or a Louis Quatorze manner; a horse can carry a

great load of finery; even men and women, duchesses, actresses, kings and

queens, stagger proudly under fine trappings, but the elephant is made for

display as a mountain range for sunset effect. Sir Henry Cole, in years

gone by, used to contemplate the vast brick walls built by Captain Fowke

for the 1862 Exhibition, and say, "That is a surface which invites

decoration." The façade of the nude elephant is no less noble and no less

urgent in its appeal to the eye. But the great beast, shifting uneasily on

his feet, does not always take kindly to his trappings, and is much less

steady than a brick wall.

[Illustration: UNDRESS]

[Illustration: A PAINTED ELEPHANT]

Yet at the worst there is little more difficulty in decking the elephant

than in dressing a fidgety child for church. First he must be washed,

sometimes at a well-brink, where, if properly taught, he draws his own

water, but an irrigation cut or tank is generally preferred, where the

great baby is made to lie down, to raise his head or leg at a word, while

the mahout, often assisted by his son, who assumes tremendous airs of

authority if he is very young, climbs about his huge bulk and scrubs him

with brick-bats. A brick flesh-rubber is in common use for men's feet, and

seems to suit the elephant perfectly. But the creature is generally

inattentive during the process, he "plays with the soap" so to speak, blows

clouds of vapour from his trunk, lifts up the wrong leg, rolls over at the

wrong minute, and is scolded like a child, with now and then, from a hasty

mahout as from an irritable nursemaid, a blow. When the washing is finished

he slings his nurses up to his neck with his trunk, or gives them a "leg

up" behind in the friendly fashion peculiar to him, and shuffles back to

the serai or yard to be dressed. If the occasion be a very grand one, a day

or two will be consumed in preparations. First the forehead, trunk, and

ears are painted in bold patterns in colour. This is a work of art, for the

designs are often good, and the whole serai, excepting always the elephant

himself, is deeply interested. His mind and trunk wander; he trifles with

the colour pots; so with each stroke comes an order to stand still. Some

mahouts are quite skilful in this pattern work. Then the howdah pad is

girthed on with cotton ropes riding over flaps of leather to prevent the

chafing to which the sensitive skin is liable. The howdah itself, a

cumbrous frame of wood covered with beaten silver plates, is slung and

tied with a purchase on the tail-root, and heavy cloths broidered in raised

work of gold and silver thread are attached, hanging like altar cloths down

the sides. A frontlet of gold and silver diaper with fringes of fish-shaped

ornaments in thin beaten silver, necklaces of large silver hawk-bells and

chain work, with embossed heart-shaped pendants as big as the open hand,

and hanging ornaments of chains of silver cartouches, are adjusted. A

cresting of silver ornaments like small vases or fluted soup tureens,

exaggerations of the knobs along a horse's crest, descend from the rear of

the howdah to the tail, anklets of silver are sometimes fitted round the

huge legs, and a bell is always slung at his side. The pillars of the

howdah canopies, and then the canopies themselves with their finials, are

fitted as the beast kneels. A long business, because in India things are

apt to be missing when they are wanted, and though much of this brave

upholstery fits at the first attempt, there are always, even in the

best-regulated elephant stables, little deficiencies to be supplied: and

many odd bits of string are used. From the right distance, however, they do

not show, and if they should catch the eye, why, "the screw was lost or

worn out," or, "it was always so," or, "the smith or the tailor has been

told a dozen times about it"--and a deprecating smile ends the matter.

At last my lord the elephant is ready, but even now is apt to get into

trouble. His natural habit is to fling dust, leaves, and fodder stalks on

his back, just as it is the natural inclination of the smartly-dressed

little boy to go straightway and make a mud pie. So he must be looked after

while the mahout puts on a coat and turban, and, armed with his _ankus_ or

goad hook, of gilded steel, and a fly flap of yak tail in a silver handle,

is ready to mount. "_Mâil, Mâil Barchhi gaj Bahadur!_" "Go on, go on, my

Lord the Spear!" and they join the retinue of spear-men, mace and staff

bearers, and other attendants waiting for the Raja. And frequently you will

see in the midst of the blaze of colour and silver and gold one of the

mahout's little boys leaning with folded arms and legs crossed at ease

against the fore-leg of the foremost elephant. He is as near nude as may

be, but from the complacent grin on the unkempt little monkey's face you

might fancy he considered himself the most important figure in the show.

Nor would he be ignominiously sent away, save by some officious underling.

Urbane old Wazirs would glance at him with an amiable smile, though they

did not confess aloud that his was an auspicious intrusion: as of the black

spot in the splendour of the poppy:--a "_năzăr wăttu_" or averter of the

evil eye, the Nemesis always waiting for those who do not acknowledge by

some lowly touch of imperfectness that "the glories of our birth and state

are shadows, not substantial things."

It is not now thought a great feat to send elephants down to the sea in

ships. They are engirdled with slings as they stand, little dreaming that

presently they will be snatched up, swung aloft, and lowered deep into a

dark hold.

[Illustration: WAITING FOR THE RAJA]

Some of the earlier cargoes were not so easily managed. A distinguished

officer told me of his troubles with a batch of elephants he took from

Calcutta to Chittagong, and how they very nearly wrecked a ship. The first

to be shipped was awkwardly handled, caught the hatchway with his tusks and

trunk, slung himself askew, and struggled and fought hard. But at last

all the forty were stowed, and the steamer went down the Hooghly, anchoring

for the night in an oil-still sea off Saugor Point. Now the elephant is the

most restless creature alive, always in motion; a fact which native

observation has noted in the saying, "An elephant's shoulder is never

still." At first they said it was a ground swell that made the ship roll so

much, but soon the Captain came in dire alarm to the officer in charge of

the freight. The elephants had found that by swaying to and fro all

together, a rocking motion was produced which seemed to please them

immensely. So the great heads and bodies rolled and swung in unison, till

the ship, which had no other cargo and rode light, was in imminent danger

of rolling clean over. The mahouts were hurried down into the hold, and

each, seated on his beast, made him "break step" so to speak. There they

had to stay for a long time. An unforeseen difficulty was found in carrying

fodder along the central avenue. The elephants would allow a laden coolie

to proceed a little way, and then, with the quiet mischief of their kind,

one would lay him by the heels with his trunk while the others snatched his

bundles of grass. So they made a gangway over their backs along which the

coolies crawled. The worst was when the elephant first shipped died in his

place, of vexation, mahouts would say, who believe the creatures only die

when they are so inclined. He was the farthest from the hatchway, and in

the awful heat of the Bay of Bengal he had to be taken to pieces and passed

through the line of his brethren, up and over the side in ships' buckets!

Arrived in port there was no wharf, and the animals had to swim and wade a

mile of water from the anchorage to the shore. The first was slung down,

his mahout on his neck, to the water, as it seemed from the deck, a lascar

clinging to the chain to let go the swivel. He let go too soon, the

elephant fell with a mighty splash, losing his mahout, while the suddenly

released chain shot the astonished lascar like a bolt from a catapult some

fifty yards away.

[Illustration: IN ROYAL STATE]

It is not, however, trials of this kind that make the English transport

officer, struggling across creation with mules, oxen, and elephants, gray

before his time, but the number of reports and dockets he has to write.

That dead elephant's tusks were a congenial subject to Commissariat clerks,

and they "had the honour to inquire" in many letters.

We have turned from the elephant as he appears to the Oriental, to the

creature as he really is, and it may be interesting to hear the account of

him that the paternal Government of India has to give. For that Government

is itself elephantine in its nature, capable of supporting great weights,

but prone also to busy itself in infinite details with restless and

inquisitive trunk. The proper treatment of the animal in health and disease

is set forth in a manual by the late Mr. Steel, a high veterinary

authority, while the Commissariat and other departments concerned with the

large property of the State in elephants are carefully instructed in their

management. It is officially stated that--"all who have had to deal with

elephants agree that their good qualities cannot be exaggerated; that their

vices are few and only occur in exceptional animals; that they are neither

treacherous nor retentive of injury; and that they are obedient, gentle,

and patient beyond measure." This is higher and more sympathetic praise

than is usually tied up in the pink tape of Secretariats, and it is all

true. The next sentence, however, of the official characterisation

declares that in many things the elephant is "a decidedly stupid animal!"

It was ever hard to find wit and virtue combined, but it may be doubted

whether the sentence is quite just. Intelligence among animals is a matter

of delicate and difficult comparison. Simplicity of character were a better

word than stupidity. A stupid creature refuses to learn and to obey. The

elephant under sympathetic treatment always tries to obey, and can be

taught to perform acts foreign to all we know of its nature. This entitles

it to a higher place on the strictly limited scale of animal intelligence

than the word "stupid" indicates. Its inquisitiveness is confined to

objects within elephant range, and its sympathies, like those of all purely

vegetarian animals which have to spend a large proportion of their time in

eating, are narrow. Of a dog, on the other hand, it was once delightfully

remarked in the American tongue, "Don't say that before Snap. Snap don't

know he's only a dog; he thinks he's folks!" No mahout would begin to think

of his placid self-contained charge along this line. They all seem to

regard elephant character as a thing apart, and with a respect which a

stupid animal could not command,--even from mahouts.

As to the strength of the beast and the best way of turning it to account,

there is less room for controversy. On a march, weight-carrying is the work

an elephant can best perform, for though he can pull strenuously and well,

his frame is not suited for long spells of draught work. His chest is

relatively small and weak; so sometimes he is made to pull with ropes tied

to the tusks, and sometimes from his waist, if an elephant can be said to

have a waist--but the mighty forehead would, to an amateur, appear to be

the best hitching point.

The normal load for continuous travel of a fair-sized elephant is 800

pounds, so the animal is equal to eight ponies, small mules, or asses; to

five stout pack-mules or bullocks, and to three and one-third of a camel.

Under such a load the elephant travels at a fair speed, keeping well up

with an ordinary army or baggage train, requiring no made road, few guards,

and occupying less depth in column than other animals. He is invaluable in

jungle country and all roadless regions where heavy loads are to be moved.

In Burmah and on the east and south-east frontier elephants are absolutely

necessary for military supply. When once a good road is made, the beast is,

of course, easily beaten by wheeled carriage.

He shines most as a special Providence when the cattle of a baggage train

or the horses of a battery are stalled in a bog or struggling helplessly at

a steep place. An elephant's tusks and trunk serve at once as lever,

screw-jack, dog-hooks, and crane, quickly setting overturned carts and

gun-carriages right, lifting them by main force or dragging them in narrow

winding defiles where a long team cannot act; while his head, protected by

a pad, is a ram of immense force and superior handiness.

I write "he" mechanically, but it ought to be said that in consequence of

the liability of the male to occasional fits of ill-temper from functional

causes, it has been decreed that only females are to enter Government

service, and they should not be less than twenty or more than thirty years

of age, capable of carrying 1200 pounds for a first-class elephant (eight

feet high and over) and 960 pounds for a second-class animal (under eight

feet in height), exclusive of gear. No recruit under seven feet should be

admitted. Male animals are preferred by Native Princes on account of their

larger size and prouder bearing, and among about two thousand elephants

owned by the British Government a few males are kept for State and parade

purposes. An elephant at twenty-five years of age may be compared to a

human being of eighteen. He attains his full strength and vigour at about

thirty-five, and has been known to live a hundred and twenty years.

[Illustration: ELEPHANT PILING TIMBER (BURMAH)]

A born forester, it is in jungle-work that the labouring elephant outside

Government service is seen at his best. The tea-planters of Assam and

Ceylon find him useful in forest clearing and as a pack animal. They even

yoke him to the plough. He is the leading hand in the teak trade of

Burmah,--unrivalled in the heavy toil of the timber-yard, where he piles

logs with wonderful neatness and quickness. Small timbers are carried on

the tusks, clipped over and held fast by the trunk. A log with a thick butt

is seized with judicious appreciation of balance, while long and heavy

baulks are levered and pushed into place.

[Illustration: ELEPHANT LIFTING TEAK LOGS (BURMAH)]

As to its keep, the elephant is a chargeable beast; costing from £4 to £8 a

month when rations of rice or wheaten flour cakes are given, as they should

be, with fodder-stalks and leaves of various kinds. Rum, brandy, or arrack,

mixed with ginger, cloves, pepper, and treacle, and made into a paste with

flour, provide the elephant with a sort of tipsy-cake that cheers and

comforts him when suffering from fatigue or cold. In the matter of food and

stimulants, however, mahouts have no conscience, and steal without a qualm.

Ages of slack-handed usage have settled that the servant of the elephant

and three generations of his family shall live on the beast he is paid to

cherish. Allowances are given for flour, fire-wood, oil, and spices, but

the elephant only gets a share in them, and not always that. So the worst

ailment he has to face is semi-starvation, the lot of most elephants in

captivity. The beast is in truth a noble anachronism, belonging to a young

world time of denser foliage than this dried-up age which packs hay in

trusses and treasures ensilage in pits. But the thievish mahout is

responsible for the worst of his belly-pinch. Yet elephant men are usually

spoken of as models of devotion to their beasts. "They love 'em, sir," said

an English officer to me once. But that does not prevent their showing an

indifference to their comfort, characteristic of all Orientals, whose talk

often drips with sentiment, while their practice is of dry brutality. The

acknowledged authorities on the subject, Mr. Sanderson and the late Mr. J.

H. Steel, agree that mahouts invariably make the animals' comfort

subservient to their own. Even the best of them will seldom take the

trouble to put their beasts under the shadow of a tree at mid-day. They

also have the cruel Indian trick of securing the animals fore and aft in

the most irksome manner possible. A rope or chain fastened to one foot and

to a peg in the ground is sufficient restraint for most elephants, and

allows them to turn to and from the sun and wind as they find agreeable.

Mahouts think nothing of securing an animal so that one side is exposed day

and night to wind or rain. The practice of tight tying up is particularly

repugnant to those who have a sympathetic knowledge of the restless,

swaying, Johnsonian habit rooted in the beast's nature. The native servant

himself keenly appreciates his liberty and is the most elusive creature

alive, perpetually slinking from his duty into the jungles of the bazar.

But when he ruleth he is a terrible despot.

Outside India it is believed that elephants are dying out of the land. The

example of America, where the men and creatures natural to the soil have

been exterminated to make room for a too triumphant civilisation, has

taught the world a lesson of anxiety. But animal lovers may rest content,

for the elephants of India, like the people, are increasing in numbers.

They are carefully protected in their natural haunts, whence English

officers of experience draw supplies for use with as much system and

regularity as sheep are drafted from the hillside flock. The details of the

Government kheddah or capturing arrangements are full of interest,--sport

in its finest sense; nor is it easy to say whether the skill in woodcraft

of the English directors, or the courage, endurance, and patience of the

natives employed, are most admirable. Like a strong ass between two

burdens, the British Government has been beaten with many staves, and also

with fools' truncheons of pantomime paper, but, at least, it has tried to

husband the resources of the country.

The thoughtful Germans are said to meditate the re-capture and

domestication in their new Equatorial realm of the African elephant, free

since the days of Hannibal. It is to be hoped this is true, for there is

naught sillier under the sun than the slaughter which has hitherto been all

that civilisation had to bestow on these blameless Ethiopians.

Beast and Man in India A Popular Sketch of Indian Animals in their Relations with the People · 第 9 / 18 章