CHAPTER III

OF MONKEYS

"His hide was very mangy, and his face was very red,

And ever and anon he scratched with energy his head.

His manners were not always nice, but how my spirit cried

To be an artless _Bandar_ loose upon the mountain side!"

R. K.

[Illustration: MONKEY GOD]

Some of the respect in which these animals are held by Hindus is a

reflection of the popularity of Hanumān, or (in Southern India) of Mâruti,

the monkey general of the great Hindu epic--the devoted henchman of Ram

Chandra, and a marvel of valour and address combined with gentleness. He

has now become a god, and is one of the most widely worshipped of Hindu

deities. Pictures and rude images are to be seen of him everywhere, but he

is not represented in the more ancient Hindu sculptures. A notion exists

among Hindus that the English may be his descendants through a female

servant of the demon king, who had charge of Sita in captivity, and who

treated the prisoner so well that Rama blessed her, prophesying that she

should become the mother of a race that would possess the land, and whom

Hanumān took to wife. This can scarcely be made out from the poem, but the

tradition exists. Others, again, say that the English came from the "monkey

army," which unlovely phrase is occasionally used to describe the British

nation.

But, while the enthusiastic cult of Hanumān as a divinity is a

comparatively modern development of Hinduism, the fondness of Hindus for

monkeys is of very ancient date. Ælian describes the offerings of rice

which are still customary, and at sacred places, as Benares, Ajodhia, and

Muttra, they are regularly fed, and it is regarded as an abominable act of

sacrilege to kill one. A large temple at Benares under the invocation of

Durga (Devi, Kali, etc.) has swarms of monkeys attached to it, but they do

not appear, as might be expected, to be usually attendant on shrines of the

Monkey God himself. They naturally cluster round groves frequented by

devotees of various kinds for the sake of scraps of food which they are

sure to receive there, and because they are safe from molestation.

Muhammadan saints as well as Hindu _sâdhus_ show kindness to these

creatures, and it is quite intelligible that their gambols should serve to

amuse the large and languid leisure of professional holiness.

[Illustration: LANGŪRS AT HOME]

The brown _macacus rhesus_ is the commonest type and most frequently seen

both in the hills and plains. Ælian in his description mixes up the Macaque

with the true Hanumān, the tall, long-tailed, black-faced, white-whiskered

_langūr_ (_Presbytes illiger_), clad in an overcoat of silver gray. The

latter has a face that reminds one of Mr. Joel Harris's "Uncle Remus," and

is, in his way, a king of the jungle, nor is he so frequently met with in

confinement as his brown brother. In some parts of India troops of langūrs

come bounding with a mighty air of interest and curiosity to see the

railway trains pass, their long tails uplifted like notes of interrogation;

but frequently, when fairly perched on wall or tree alongside, they seem to

forget all about it, and avert their heads as you go by with an affectation

of languid indifference. This may be a mark of the superiority of the

monkey mind, or a sign that some threads were dropped when its fabric was

woven. The black gibbon or _hooluck_ (_hylobates hooluck_) is better known

in Bengal and Assam, and is well adapted for captivity, if a pair can be

secured, and the keeper does not object to a gentle, mournful, and timid

animal, the spirit of the complaining dove in the form of a black djinn or

demon with a voice like a pack of hounds in full cry. The hooluck is

monogamous, and seems to have few of the vulgar monkey vices, but is a

depressing companion. In Assam, too, is found a dainty little monkey

familiarly known as "the shame-faced one"--a gentle, bashful, large-eyed

creature, with a quaint trick of hiding its face in its hands and hanging

its head like a timid child. It has a peculiarly soft and lustrous pelage

of fine colour and texture.

Under a benign rule of protection the monkey increases rapidly, and, being

a daring and mischievous pilferer, becomes a serious nuisance. One may hold

a creature sacred and yet be thoroughly alive to all the faults of its

character, and the monkey in ordinary talk is used pretty much as it is in

Europe to point morals against wanton mischief, helplessness, and evil

behaviour generally. Nor is it only in field and garden that its

depredations are felt. Indian shops have no doors or windows, but are like

large cupboards open to the street, in which food grains and other articles

are exposed for sale; and in towns where Hindus preponderate and a busy

current of trade has not swept the streets, bulls, calves, parakeets,

sparrows, and monkeys take tolls which the dealer would fain prevent, but

that he is few and fat, while the depredators are many and active. A stout

grocer nodding among his store baskets, while a monkey, intently watching

the sleeper's face, rapidly stuffs his cheek pouches with grain, is a

common sight, as well as a comical one. Of late years the tradesmen who

form the bulk of the members of our municipalities have felt that there

are too many Hanumāns abroad, and have ventured on proceedings that would

not have been tolerated in the days of complete Brahmanical ascendency.

Numbers of the marauders have been caught, caged, and despatched on bullock

carts to places many miles distant. There they have been let loose, but, as

the empty carts returned, the monkeys, quick to perceive and defeat the

plan of their enemies, bounded gaily alongside, and trooped in through the

city gates with the air of a holiday party returning from a picnic. From

some river-side towns boat-loads have been taken across the Ganges; but

they dislike being marooned, and when they have failed to board the

returning boats, have found others to carry them back. Railways, which have

done much for Indian progress, offer facilities for deportation which

monkey-ridden municipalities have been glad to seize. The stationmaster at

Saharunpore was recently troubled by a telegram advising him of the

despatch of cars laden with monkeys, which he was requested to send out to

be freed on the adjacent Sewalik hills. But the cages were broken in

unloading the freight and the crowd got loose. Saharunpore is an Indian

Crewe or Swindon in a small way, with a railway establishment, a Government

Botanical garden and large private fruit gardens. The exiles invaded the

busy workshops and lost their tempers, monkey fashion, among the driving

bands and machinery, nor were they easily driven out. A large male was seen

pulling the point-levers of a siding with the sudden petulance of his kind;

and another established himself between the double roofs of one of the

inspection carriages used by railway officers on tour as houses, stealing

from the pantry such trifles as legs of mutton, corkscrews, lamp glasses

and dusters,--articles for which a monkey can have but little use. The bulk

of the company trooped into the gardens of the town, where the proprietors,

being mainly Muhammadans with no respect for Hanumān, took measures of

their own against the invasion.

An amusing case of monkey plunder occurred some years ago at Simla. The

chief confectioner of the place had prepared a magnificent bride-cake,

which was safely put by in a room that, like most Simla rooms, looked on

the steep hillside. It is of little use, however, locking a door when the

window is left open. So when they came to fetch the cake, the last piece of

it was being handed out of the window by a chain of monkeys who had

whitened the hillside with its fragments. A theft of this kind is mainly

mischievous, for the wild monkey dislikes food mixed with butter, nor does

he greatly care for sugar. A bride-cake, too, looks (and is to my humble

taste) about as edible as a plaster cast, and one can scarcely understand

how they discovered it was meant to be eaten. The creature has a passion

for picking things to pieces. A flower or a fragile toy will amuse a monkey

for a long time. If a bird falls into its hands it will not be released

till it is plucked of every feather. If the bird resents the process, the

monkey with an unconcerned air rubs its head vigorously on the ground. It

would not be difficult to train a monkey to pluck fowls for use in the

kitchen. It is often said that the monkey kills snakes by grinding the head

on a stone, occasionally spitting on it, nor is the feat incredible to one

who has observed the constant habit of rubbing things on the ground and

holding them up for inspection. Yet in spite of this belief, a popular

saying, expressing a dilemma or an opportunity that cannot be turned to

profit, is--"Like a snake in a monkey's hand." He is afraid of it, but he

will not let go. Natives also say that monkeys rob birds' nests and destroy

eggs and young in pure malice. The fastidiousness of the wild monkey's

taste is curious, considering the precarious existence it leads. Daily for

some months my family and myself were interested in a troop of wild

monkeys, which we regularly fed, trying them with very various food. Once

we gave them biscuits which, from lying in a dealer's shop, had acquired

that peculiarly stale, tinny flavour which Anglo-Indians know too well.

They had been accustomed to eat the same kind of biscuit when fresh, and

scrambled as usual for the fragments, but after the first bite they made

comical mouths of dislike, spat out vigorously, rubbed the biscuit on their

sides, on the ground, examined it carefully, and seemed to conclude,--"Yes,

it's the same as yesterday," tried again, and then chattered and grinned in

wrath and disgust. But they soon learned to discriminate by smell merely.

Like the over-wise crow, which is apt to outwit itself by futile cunning,

the monkey is most ingeniously suspicious. Our friends grew bold with

encouragement, but their manners were never friendly; with the exception of

one which had evidently escaped from confinement. We managed to entrap the

creature, and having removed its hateful collar, set it free again. My

daughter could coax this experienced person into a room and it would open

her hand to take grain, keeping a sharp look-out on the open door. All the

rest were keenly suspicious, and irritable. They seemed to circumvent each

morsel and, having won it, defied us with angry eyes to take it back

again, regarding our free gift as a triumph of their own finesse. This is

natural enough when we consider that for generations the monkey folk have

been chased from field and garden plot with shouting. They were in no fear

for their lives, and had learned the very human satisfaction of defying an

enemy from a safe distance.

This shallow cunning has deeply impressed the minds of the people. They say

it is absolutely impossible to poison a monkey. For ages this belief has

been rooted in the minds of Orientals. Al Masudi, who compiled his Arabic

encyclopædia--"meadows of gold and mines of gems"--in the tenth century,

wrote that most Chinese and Hindu kings keep wise but dumb monkeys as

tasters for their tables, relying implicitly on their judgment of what is

poisoned and what is wholesome. A native gentleman told me of a cultivator

in the hills whose crops and garden were so seriously injured that he

determined to get rid of his enemies. So he daily set out platters of

boiled rice which they greedily ate. When they had learned the habit of

coming in crowds, he one day set out rice poisoned with a tasteless drug.

He heard a great chatter and whining round his treacherous platters, and

saw a council sitting round the untasted food in earnest debate. Presently

they rose and scampered away, but soon returned, each bearing twigs and

leaves of a plant which their instinct taught them was an antidote to the

poison. With these they stirred and mixed the rice, which they afterwards

ate with their usual relish, returning the next morning for more,

absolutely unharmed. This story is also told, _mutatis mutandis_, of an

attempt made by a Sikh noble, Sirdar Lehna Singh Majithia, to poison

troublesome monkeys at the sacred town of Hurdwar. When you believe that

monkeys are capable of speech and only refrain from speaking for fear that

they would be made to work, it is easy to credit them with a knowledge of

chemistry. Belief in their ability to speak is widely current in India, and

the notion is not unknown in the West.

But while native credulity will swallow the impossible with ease, native

observation is not without keenness. The inability of the monkey to make

for itself a shelter against the heavy rains of the country is noted in

proverbs. It is really curious that in the Simla region, where are many

built-out roads forming dry refuges of quite natural aspect, they are never

resorted to. Troops of monkeys will sit shivering for hours in driving

storms within a few yards of covered spaces, which seem as if specially

provided for their shelter and comfort.

Their daily life is interesting to watch. The scheme seems to be

patriarchal with a touch of military organisation, for they move and

plunder in a sort of formation, and the patriarch is at once

commander-in-chief and effective fighting force. Its main fact is the

tyranny of the leading male of each troop, who grows to a great size, with

immensely powerful shoulders. He develops large canine teeth, which some

observant Hindu draughtsmen take care to grace their pictures of Hanumān

withal. These are used unsparingly on the younger male members of the

troop, in fighting for his place of power, and on disobedient females. "The

demon" was the familiar name we gave to a leader with whom we were well

acquainted. He seemed to be always angry and was easily moved to a paroxysm

of rage, when he used worse language than any permitted to man, for there

was a savage force and variety in his grunting fury which made one

thankful he was untranslatable. He took the lion's share of everything,

especially resenting that the rising bachelors of the troop should have a

chance. Mothers and babies were merely cuffed aside from a morsel, but

there was ruthless war between him and all who might become his rivals. No

more perfect picture of headlong, desperate terror can be imagined than a

young man-monkey plunging and bounding in reckless flight down the

hillside, pursued as he screams by a livid and grunting elder. Natives may

well call the monkey sire _Maharaja_, for he is the very type and

incarnation of savage and sensual despotism. They are right, too, in making

their Hanumān red, for the old male's face is of the dusky red you see in

some elderly, over-fed, human faces.

Like human Maharajas, they have their tragedies and mayhap their romances.

One morning there came a monkey chieftain, weak and limping, having

evidently been worsted in a severe fight with another of his own kind. One

hand hung powerless, his face and eyes bore terrible traces of battle, and

he hirpled slowly along with a pathetic air of suffering, supporting

himself on the shoulder of a female,--a wife, the only member of his clan

who had remained faithful to him after his defeat. We threw them bread and

raisins, and the wounded warrior carefully stowed the greater part away in

his cheek pouch. The faithful wife, seeing her opportunity, sprang on him,

holding fast his one sound hand, and opening his mouth she deftly scooped

out the store of raisins. Then she sat and ate them very calmly at a safe

distance, while he mowed and chattered in impotent rage. He knew that

without her help he could not reach home, and was fain to wait with what

patience he might till the raisins were finished. It was a sad sight, but,

like more sad sights, touched with the light of comedy. This was probably

her first chance of disobedience or of self-assertion in her whole life,

and I am afraid she thoroughly enjoyed it. Then she led him away,--possibly

to teach him more salutary lessons of this modern and "advanced" sort, so

that at the last he would go to another life with a meek and chastened

soul.

Monkey mothers are tender to their little ones, with a care that endears

them to the child-loving Oriental. The babies are quaint little mites with

the brown hair that afterwards stands up crest-wise, parted in the middle

of their brows; their wistful faces are full of wrinkles, and their mild

hazel eyes have a quick glancing timidity, that well suits their pathetic,

lost, kitten-like cry. Yet even in the forest there are frisky matrons. I

have seen a mother monkey, disturbed in her gambols on the ground by the

whining of a tiny baby left half-way up an adjacent tree, suddenly break

off, and hastily shinning up the tree, snatch up the baby, hurry to the

very topmost branch, where she plumped it down as who should

say,--"Tiresome little wretch!" and then come down to resume her play. Thus

is a mischievous midshipman mast-headed, and thus is the British baby sent

up to the nursery while mamma amuses herself. Natives say that when monkey

babies die the mothers often go mad, and that in the excess of their

affection they occasionally squeeze their offspring to death. It is at

least certain that a mother monkey will carry with her for weeks the dried

and dead body of her little one, nursing and petting it as if it were

alive. In defence of the little ones the sires will fight savagely, as is

their duty. I knew a fat fox terrier, the dream of whose life was to catch

a monkey. Once it came true, and for half a minute, said a man who saw, he

held a baby monkey. I was indoors at the time, but as the dog passed me to

take refuge under a chair, I knew from his solemn silence that something

had happened. The leader monkey had fallen upon him and inflicted three

frightful bites--more like deep knife-cuts than the work of teeth--which

seemed likely to prove fatal; but first-rate surgical skill was available,

and Bob was saved to carefully avoid monkeys in future.

A quaint episode of our acquaintanceship with monkey folk was the arrival

during one of our levees of one of the wandering performers who lead about

tame monkeys with a goat that serves them as charger. The wild monkeys drew

off at first suspiciously, but when the man sat down to his performance and

made their tame brethren dance, put on strange raiment, and mount the goat,

they crept closer with horrified curiosity and evident disgust. The tame

monkeys off duty regarded their free kinsmen with listless indifference,

and the artiste at work never seemed to glance at them, though they watched

him with jealous and angry eyes, much, I imagine, as labourers on strike

watch blacklegs.

There is a belief that during severe winters wild monkeys, instead of

furtively hanging about the grocers' shops and watching their chance to

steal, come into Simla streets in bands and stand whining like beggars

asking for alms. But there is only native authority for this story. It is

just possible they may have been so hard pressed as to seek human help, but

it is an immense step for such wild and distrustful creatures to take. Some

shopkeepers habitually feed them, and they may have whined at a place where

they missed their daily dole.

A wistful, watchful melancholy seems to be the normal mood of the mature

monkey, broken by sudden flashes of interest which change as suddenly into

indifference or abstraction. Few animals seem to spend so much time in

sitting and looking about them, while only the birds can command more lofty

posts of observation. Among men, some sailors and many Orientals have a

similar faculty of tranquil outlooking. But the sudden flash of interest in

a triviality and its abrupt cessation remind one more of lunacy than of

sane humanity. Their life is hard and hungry, and as the creatures lope

disconsolately along in the rain, or crouch on branches with dripping backs

set against the tree trunk as a shelter from the driving storm, they have

the air of being very sorry for themselves. Consumption is not unknown

among them, and a monkey's cough, heard through the drip of the forest on a

wet night, is a dismal sound. But when the sun shines the younger ones play

like schoolboys. They have a game like the English boys' cock of the

dung-hill or king of the castle, but instead of pushing each other from the

top of a knoll or dust-heap, the castle is a pendent branch of a tree. The

game is to keep a place on the bough, which swings with their weight as

with a cluster of fruit while the players struggle to dislodge one another,

each, as he drops, running round and climbing up again to begin anew. This

sport is kept up for an hour at a time with keen enjoyment, and when one is

nimble as a monkey it must be splendid fun.

[Illustration: YOUNG MONKEYS AT PLAY]

The way of a ship on the sea may be strange, but the path of a monkey

through tree-land is no less surprising. At one moment a creature is in

tranquil meditation on the creation of the world or the origin of evil, at

the next it has thrown itself backward apparently into illimitable space,

but at the right instant a bough is seized and the animal swings to

another and another with infallible certainty. The larger langūr does not

seem to play concerted games, and his movements have a bolder sweep and

abandonment. He travels on a more lofty story of the tree-terraces,

progressing through the pines in a succession of leaping feats, performed

with the ease, deliberation, and precision of perfect gymnastic art. The

scenery which nature has assigned to this performance gives an impression

of freedom which makes the thought of confinement infamous.

On the plains life would appear to be easier, for there is an almost

constant succession of fruits and edible leaves in the jungles, and the

crops are more accessible. Thievish monkeys sometimes haunt the

halting-places of travellers. A friend of mine halted at a _parao_ or stage

where was a grove of mango-trees affording grateful shade to travellers,

and while resting, he watched a little comedy. Apart from the others, a

Hindu was preparing his evening meal. In one pot over the fire a stew of

pulse was boiling, while he kneaded dough and baked the invariable wheaten

flap-jacks. As each cake is taken from the iron griddle plate it is stuck

edgewise in the hot embers till all are ready, when they are piled

together. This was done, and the Hindu turned to set the ghi pot and

drinking vessels in order and to hail his companion to come to dinner.

While his back was turned, a big monkey dropped from the boughs overhead,

seized the pile of cakes, and was off in a flash. Now the baking of bread

is a semi-ritualistic business, involving a good deal of labour, and it was

a very angry Hindu who received in his face one of the hot flap-jacks

dropped by the monkey clutching his prize with awkward fingers above. Then

the other man came and swore too, but the monkey swore the worst, irritated

by the heat of his plunder, which, however, he was determined not to let

go. The watchman of the stage assured my friend that this trick was a

frequent occurrence, for that particular monkey was "as cunning as a

_baniya_ (or tradesman) and as daring as a _thug_ (highway robber)--a very

demon of a monkey." Yet it had never occurred to him or to the robbed

travellers to take measures against it.

It may be that "advanced India" will in time give up the protection of the

monkey, but there are hitherto no signs of a change in popular feeling. In

April 1886, in the highly civilised and cosmopolitan city of Bombay, a

Hindu of good position was in danger of losing every social privilege of

his caste and of undergoing an ostracism more complete than any imagined by

Athenian citizen or Irish Land-leaguer, because he was said to have allowed

a European officer of police to shoot a troublesome monkey from the window

of his house. The officer had been invited by the people to rid them of the

creature, and its death was frankly acknowledged as a relief, but the

letter of the law forbade the murder. Officers of government are careful

not to wound the feelings of the people with reference both to monkeys and

peacocks, a delicacy which does not always restrain the hungry low-caste

man.

A collector and magistrate of a district in Hindustan proper had been out

shooting, and was returning to camp. On a tree on the other side of the

Ganges Canal, along which he was walking, sat a monkey. The animal seemed

almost out of range, and my friend idly pointed his gun and fired in its

direction with intent to startle it, but, to his dismay, the monkey fell

and lay dead. Fortunately no one was near, and at night this worshipful

magistrate, whose word was law for leagues round, stole out alone with a

lantern, taking a long round to the nearest bridge, to look for his victim.

It was not easily found, and never, even on the judicial bench, did he so

keenly realise the feelings of a murderer trying to hide the evidences of

his guilt. He succeeded in disposing of the body, and returned to camp

determined never to point a gun at a monkey again. Another friend of mine

had for neighbour a Hindu devotee of great repute and sanctity, whose hut,

besides being a resort of gamblers and bad characters, had a large retinue

of monkeys that were fed by visitors. The animals wrought great havoc in my

friend's garden, whereupon in his irritation he threatened to shoot them.

The Sâdhu took the will for the deed, and fulminated a curse against the

Englishman as terrible as that which the Archbishop of Rheims inflicted on

the jackdaw. He was filled with a holy joy when my friend fell ill, and

desponded when he recovered.

St. Francis de Sales wrote:--"I am despised and I grow angry;--so does the

peacock or the monkey." This is more like an Oriental than a Western word.

The irritable monkey is ready to be angry at anything. The Oriental,

however, considers the monkey--apart from his sacred affinity with Hanumān,

a type, not so much of petulance, as of untrustworthiness. "What is a

monkey's friendship worth?" he asks, and he says in scorn of a trivial and

foolish person--"a tailless monkey." "A cocoa-nut in a monkey's hand,"

stands for ill-bestowed gifts or gear and for ineptitude, for the creature

cannot get at the kernel, having neither strength nor wit to break the

shell. "A flower in a monkey's hand" is a common Malay expression to a

similar purpose. "One monkey does not tell another monkey that his buttocks

are red" is a homely word with obvious uses. There are ten things, says a

proverb, which may not be depended upon--"A courtesan, a monkey, fire,

water, a procuress, an army, a distiller, a tailor, a parrot, and a

goldsmith." The selection is significant, and--in India--just. In the

stables of the wealthy a monkey is often kept to attract to itself stray

influences of the evil eye, that ever-present bogy of the East. So there is

a saying,--"What goes wrong in the stable falls on the monkey's head." This

can be used in daily life by those frequent persons who habitually fancy

themselves wrongly accused. It is unlucky to utter the word monkey in the

morning, but lucky to see one before breakfast. "Speak of a monkey or an

owl in the morning and you'll get no breakfast."

In the Rāmāyana of Tūlsi Dass, (a relatively modern version of the great

epic poem in which the Hindus delight) a method of catching monkeys by

means of a bait of grain in a narrow-mouthed jar is spoken of as an example

of the metaphysical principle of illusion which makes so great a figure in

Hindu cobweb philosophy. The monkey is supposed to fill his fist so full

that he is unable to withdraw it, and has not the wit to let go his spoil

and release himself. This is quite reasonable enough for a metaphysical

illustration. A more practical form of illusion is to put some grain in a

clear glass bottle and hand it to a monkey. It tries to seize the grain,

then, concluding the distance was not properly judged, it takes a careful

sight along the bottle, and, with a diverting air of great astuteness,

passes a slow hand down and gives a sudden clutch. After one or two

attempts it loses temper and interest. Similarly, the illusion of a mirror

puzzles a young dog when he is first introduced to it, and, according to

his character and temper, interests and excites him, but after a short time

he gives it up and waits for more facts, like the philosopher he is. A

foolish cock-sparrow, on the other hand, will nearly kill himself in

fighting his reflection.

Does the survival of respect for monkeys, amounting at times to a definite

acknowledgment of kinship, indicate the early arrival of Hindu philosophers

at the latest conclusion of European Evolutionists? Modern Hindu students

of the Vedas and other ancient records draw from those vague depths

material to support such theories as the Hindu discovery of America and the

founding of the ruined cities of its central region; with the use of

balloons, railways, and contrivances like the electric telegraph. A slender

verbal hint suffices to give a complacent sense of having once at least

marched in the foremost files of time. But they would be on more plausible,

if not more solid ground in essaying to show that the Hindu respect for

life, the admission of the essential unity of the life-spark, whether in

man or moss, and the special regard for the ancestral monkey, its

deification, and the traditions of its aptitude for speech, labour, and

war, were proofs that the philosophy of the East has for ages sat in

tranquil occupation of a peak of discovery to which the vanguard of Western

science has but now attained.

Beast and Man in India A Popular Sketch of Indian Animals in their Relations with the People · 第 3 / 18 章