CHAPTER IV.

Superstition in Scotland. Holy wells. Belief in the Devil. Growth

of the rigid observance of the Sabbath. Efforts of kirk-sessions

and presbyteries to enforce Jewish strictness in regard to the

Sabbath. Illustrations of the effects of these efforts.

Although ever since the Reformation the clergy have done their best to

eradicate the pagan superstitions, which were alluded to in a previous

chapter, traces of these superstitions have survived down to the

present day in the Highlands. Even so late as the beginning of last

century, people in the Lewis continued to make offerings of mead, ale,

or gruel, to the God of the Sea. A man at midnight between Wednesday

and Thursday walked waist-deep into the sea, poured out the offering

and chanted the following prayer:

O god of the sea

Put weed in the drawing-wave

To enrich the ground

To shower on us food.

Those behind the offerer took up the chant and wafted it along the

midnight air.[10]

An interesting account of the surviving Highland superstitions will be

found in two recently published volumes by the late Rev. John Gregorson

Campbell, parish minister in the island of Tiree, who devoted himself

with unwearied enthusiasm to collect the fading customs and traditions

of the Hebrides and the Western Highlands.[11] In my early wanderings

over Skye I came upon many relics of the pagan period. At Kilbride, for

example, one is reminded of a pre-Protestant or even a pre-Christian

past by the tall rude standing stone known as the Clach na h-Annait, or

stone of Annat, a name which, by some Gaelic scholars, is thought to be

that of a pagan goddess, though by others it is regarded as a term of

the early Celtic Church, applied to a chapel where the patron-saint was

educated, or where his relics were kept. Near the obelisk is the Tobar

na h-Annait, or Annat’s well.

[Sidenote: FAIRIES IN SKYE]

The fairies once formed an active and important community among the

population of Strath. One of their chief abodes was underneath a large

green mound in the middle of the valley, called after them Sithein

(Sheean). Such fairy dwellings were looked upon with veneration;

and it was a popular belief that the ‘people of peace’ who lived in

them liked to have them kept scrupulously clean. Hence to remove the

droppings of any horses or cattle that had strayed upon the rich

green sward was believed to be a grateful deed to these beings, who

would manifest their thankfulness by some significant reward to the

thoughtful cotter who took the pains to do it. With the acknowledged

example of the fairies before them, I never could quite understand how

the West Highlanders could themselves live in such conditions of dirt

and untidiness as have been so long prevalent among them.

The top of the Sithein of Strath is crowned with a few gnarled,

stunted, storm-blasted black-thorns, like a group of shrivelled

carlines stretching out their arms towards the east. These trees, or

rather bushes, have undergone no appreciable change since I first saw

them half a century ago, and I was told by the minister that they had

not altered at all in his time, so that they must have stood, much as

they are now, for more than a hundred years. If one first comes upon

these weird forms in the mist of a stormy evening, when they seem to

remain motionless, though the wind howls down the valley of Strath

Suardil, one can easily realise how they might be connected in popular

belief with the mysterious beings of another world. The fairy cattle,

or red deer, live up in the corries of the Red Hills. On the top of one

of these eminences a carline lies buried under a cairn and the hill is

named after her, Beinn na Cailleach.

Near the house of Kilbride, a spring or well has been said, for more

than two hundred years, to contain a single live trout. It is mentioned

by Martin in his _Description of the Western Islands of Scotland_,

written at the end of the seventeenth century, where he states that

the fish had been seen for many years, and the natives, though they

often caught it in their wooden pails, were careful to preserve it from

being destroyed. The minister assured me that there was still a trout

in the well, whether the same as that spoken of by Martin, he could not

affirm. I must confess that I was never able to catch a sight of this

legendary fish.

[Sidenote: HOLY WELLS IN THE HIGHLANDS]

As in Ireland, springs or wells in the Highlands, not improbably famous

even in pagan times, have often been subsequently dedicated to Celtic

saints, and have long been credited with medicinal or miraculous

healing powers. There used to be a number of such wells in Skye, which

were visited by the sick and the maimed, who went round them three

times _deiseal_, that is, with the sun, or from east to west, and drank

of the water or bathed the injured limb with it. On retiring they

always left by the side of the spring, or on its overhanging tree, some

little offering, were it only a torn bit of rag. On the mainland some

of the holy wells, or saints’ wells, are still objects of pilgrimage

from a distance. Thus the well of St. Maree, or the Red Priest, on a

little islet in Loch Maree, still attracts its patients, and the trees

that overshadow it are hung with tags of rag and ribbon which they have

placed there as votive offerings. This tribute of recognition doubtless

dates back to pagan times. It was adopted by the Celtic and then by

the Roman Catholic Church, and in spite of the denunciations of the

reformers and their successors, it is rendered still by presbyterians,

who give it from the mere force of custom. Some years ago, while

boating along the coast south of the Sutors of Cromarty, I was struck

with the strange appearance of a tree that overhung the upper part of

the beach. From a distance it seemed to be decked with blossoms or

leaves of black, white, red, and other colours. On landing I found that

these were bits of rag hung up by the pilgrims who had come to drink

of the saint’s well that gushed forth under the shadow of the tree. In

the same region the well of Craiguck, parish of Avoch, has long been

a place of annual resort on the first Sunday of May, old style. The

water used to be taken in a cup and spilt three times on the ground

before being tasted, and thereafter a rag or ribbon was hung on the

bramble-bush above the spring.

In connection with this subject, it may be mentioned here that some

years before his death, the late Mr. Patrick Dudgeon, of Cargen in

Kirkcudbright, told me that he had cleared out one of these holy or

pilgrim wells on his property, which had fallen into disuse, though

still occasionally visited for curative purposes. Among the stuff which

had gathered on the bottom of the pool, a large number of copper coins

was found, extending in date from the reign of Victoria back to the

times of the Stuarts. The surfaces of the coins had in many cases

been dissolved to such an extent as to reduce the metal to little more

than the thinness of writing paper. Yet so persistent was the internal

structure superinduced by the act of minting that, even in this

attenuated condition, the obverse and reverse could still be deciphered.

[Sidenote: HIGHLAND SUPERSTITIONS]

Another superstitious belief of which I found lingering traces in Skye

was that of the water-horse (_Each Uisge_) and the water-bull (_Tarbh

Uisge_). These fabulous creatures were believed to inhabit some of the

lakes in the lonely moorland of the south of Strath. I could not find

anybody who had actually seen one, but the belief in their existence

was by no means confined to ‘the superstitious, idle-headed eld.’ I was

told that the water-horse had a special fondness for young women, and

would seize them and carry them off into the lake, whence they were

never more seen. No young woman in the parish would venture near one

of these sheets of water, except in daylight, and not without fear and

trembling even then.

Relics of old superstitions could be noticed, sometimes even among the

details of domestic management in the houses of intelligent people. At

Kilbride they would not make butter at a certain state of the moon. In

like manner they took care that the peats should only be cut when the

moon was on the wane. Though the reason alleged was that the moon must

influence the milk, just as much as it did the tides, there could be

little doubt that the habit was a relic of the same pagan belief which

survives in bowing to the new moon and turning a coin in her honour.

The prejudice against the sow as an unclean animal survived in full

vigour. Not only were no pigs kept at Kilbride, but, so far as I was

aware, no ham, pork, or bacon ever formed part of the commissariat of

the house.

While the reformed clergy endeavoured to uproot the ancient

superstitions, they at the same time were engaged in rivetting upon

the people other forms of superstition destined to exercise much more

pernicious effects than those they replaced. One of these was their

doctrine of the Devil and his doings, and another the enforcement of

the views which they gradually adopted as to Sabbath observance.

[Sidenote: THE SCOTTISH DEIL]

Much has been written on the subject of the Devil and his influence

in religion, mythology, superstition, and literature, as well as on

topographical features. The subject is discussed from a historical

point of view in the learned volumes of Professor Roskoff of Vienna;

but there is probably still room for a dissertation on the part which

the Devil has played in colouring the national imagination of Scotland.

As is well known, all over the country instances may be found where

remarkable natural features are assigned to his handiwork. Thus we have

‘Devil’s punchbowls’ among the hills and ‘Devil’s cauldrons’ in the

river-channels. Perched boulders are known as ‘Deil’s putting stanes,’

and natural heaps and hummocks of sand or gravel have been regarded

as ‘Deil’s spadefuls.’ Even among the smaller objects of nature a

connection with the enemy of mankind has suggested itself to the

popular mind. The common puff-ball is known as the ‘Deil’s snuff-box’;

some of the broad-leaved water-plants have been named ‘Deil’s spoons’;

the dragonfly is the ‘Deil’s darning-needle.’ Then the unlucky number

thirteen has been stigmatised as the ‘Deil’s dozen,’ and a perverse

unmanageable person as a ‘Deil’s buckie.’

In association with witches and warlocks Satan plays a leading part

in the legends, myths, and superstitions of the country. The general

popular estimation of him in Scotland has never been so admirably

expressed in words as by Burns, more particularly in his _Address to

the Deil_. But even in his day ocular proofs of the evil spirit’s

presence and activity were becoming scanty, and the poet had to rely

partly on the testimony of his ‘rev’rend grannie.’ In the interval

since that poem was written, now nearly a century and a quarter ago,

the belief in a personal devil, ready to present himself as a hairy

monster with a tail, cloven feet, and horns--‘Auld Hornie, Satan,

Nick, or Clootie’--has still further faded. The late Dr. Sloan of Ayr,

however, told me that in the year 1835, after he came out from making

the post-mortem examination of a poor miner who was taken out alive

from a coal-pit near the village of Dailly, after having been shut up

for three weeks without food, but who died three days after his rescue,

he was accosted by some of the older miners with the question, ‘Did ye

fin’ his feet?’ The doctor had to confess that he had not specially

looked at the man’s feet, whereat the miners went off with a knowing

expression on their faces, as much as to say, ‘We thought you had

not, for if you had, you would have found them to be cloven hoofs. We

believe that the body was not that of our John Brown, but the Devil

himself, who had come for some bad purpose of his own.’

[Sidenote: BELIEF IN THE DEIL]

Although even the most superstitious cotter in the loneliest uplands of

the country would hardly expect it to be possible now that the Devil

should waylay him at night, relics of this belief may be found in the

language of to-day, especially in the imprecations prompted by anger or

revenge. Various versions have been given of an illustrative incident

which I have been told really occurred at a slim wooden foot-bridge

over the river Irvine in Ayrshire. An ill-tempered man was crossing

the bridge, when a dog, coming the opposite way, brushed against his

leg. ‘Deil burst ye,’ exclaimed he. Immediately behind him came a

woman, and as they were nearly across the bridge a small boy, trying

to press past the man on the narrow pathway, was greeted with the same

angry imprecation. The little fellow drew back, but was encouraged by

the voice of the woman behind, who called out to him, ‘Never fear, my

wee man, come on here outowre. The Deil canna harm ye eenoo, for he’s

thrang on the ither side o’ the brig burstin’ a dog.’

Occasionally the apparition of a dark hairy body crowned with a pair

of horns has received a natural explanation, but not before revealing

the innate belief in the designs and power of the Prince of Darkness.

There used to be a goat in Greenock which occasionally escaped from its

enclosure, and prowled about the streets in the dark. On one of these

occasions, in the midst of its perambulations, it came to an outside

stair, which it thereupon ascended. At the top of the short flight of

steps stood the closed door of a room wherein an elderly couple were

asleep in bed. Nannie, being of an inquisitive turn, and having some

experience of gate-fastenings, easily succeeded in opening the door and

entering the room. The fire still gave a low ruddy light, and the goat

at once descried a tin pitcher, at the bottom of which there remained

some milk over from the frugal supper of the little household. The

animal had forced its nose so well down in order to lap the last drops,

that when it raised its head it brought up the pitcher firmly clasped

round it, and the handle fell with a thump against the metal. The crash

awoke the old woman, who in the dim light could see a pair of horns and

a hairy body. Thinking it was the arch enemy that had come for her, she

called out imploringly, ‘O tak’ John, tak’ John; I’m no ready yet.’

[Sidenote: HISTORY OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE]

The adjective ‘devilish’ has in recent times come to be used by many

in the humbler walks of life as almost synonymous with wonderful,

extraordinary, supernatural; as may be illustrated by the ejaculation

of a Paisley workman, who with a companion ascended to the top of

Goatfell in Arran. He had never conceived anything so impressive as the

panorama seen from that summit, with its foreground of serrated crests

and deep glens. After the first silence of amazement, he exclaimed to

his friend, ‘Man, Tam, the works o’ God’s deevilish.’

It is an interesting study to trace among the records of kirk-sessions

and presbyteries the gradual growth of strict Sabbath observance

until it became a kind of fetish. The first reformers enjoyed their

relaxation on Sunday, and for many years after the old system had

been displaced by the new, the youth of the country continued to play

their pastimes after church hours. Markets were still held on Sunday,

and in many places plays were performed, especially that of _Robin

Hood_. But after the establishment of the reformed religion in 1560

these amusements and employments came to be frowned upon more and

more by the clergy, who by persistent efforts succeeded in securing

a succession of Acts of Parliament which made Sabbath-breaking an

offence punishable by a civil magistrate. Delinquents were everywhere

brought up before kirk-sessions and subjected to church discipline,

while, if they proved impenitent sinners, they might be handed over to

the civil power for more condign treatment. Nevertheless, in spite of

the stringency of these regulations, the ecclesiastical authorities had

to undertake a long struggle before they finally uprooted the effects

of the usage of many centuries, and succeeded in impressing on the mind

of the general community the belief that what they called ‘violating

the Sabbath-day’ was an act of moral turpitude that could only be

expiated by exemplary punishment and public confession of penitence.

Under the head of this violation were included some of the most natural

and innocent habits. Men were warned that not only must they refrain

from all ordinary week-day work, but that they must not take a walk

on Sunday, either in town or country, save to and from church. They

must not sit at their doors, but remain within. They were expected to

maintain a solemn demeanour; laughing, whistling, or any other sign of

gaiety or frivolity being rigidly proscribed. They might not bathe,

or swim, or shave. They were forbidden to visit each other, to water

their gardens, to ride on horseback, or to travel in any other fashion.

They must attend each church service; if they failed to appear, they

were searched out by church officers deputed for the purpose, and were

subject to ecclesiastical censure. In short, the first day of the week

was one on which all mirth was expelled from the face and all joy from

the heart, and when a funereal gloom settled down upon everybody.

[Sidenote: SABBATH-BREAKING AS A CRIME]

Sabbath-breaking, as defined by this inquisitorial code of observance,

was exalted into a crime more heinous even than theft. Thus, an entry

in the Register of the Presbytery of Dingwall, of date 30th July, 1650,

records that the case of Alexander M‘Gorrie and his wife, within the

parish of Kilmorack, had been referred to the Presbytery for censure,

the charge being ‘profanation of the Sabbath by stealling imediatelie

efter the receaueing of the sacrament.’

The diligence with which the ecclesiastical authorities pursued their

quest after Sabbath-breakers is well illustrated by the Register of the

Kirk-Session of St. Andrews. During the latter half of the sixteenth

century infinite trouble appears to have been taken to establish what

the Session was pleased to term ‘the cumlye ordour of this citie.’ The

fleshers (butchers) proved especially incorrigible. Though they had

been often cited and admonished, they had ‘nocht obeyit the sam, bot

contemptuusly refusit to obey.’ At last these recalcitrant parishioners

were made the subject of a stringent decree whereby, if they did not

thereafter keep holy the Sabbath day, they, their wives, children, and

servants would be debarred from all benefit of the Kirk, and might

further be excommunicated. Nevertheless, even the vision of these dire

pains and penalties did not prevent an occasional transgression. Some

years later one of the fleshers was summoned for putting out skins upon

the causeway on Sunday--a practice which had formerly been general in

his craft. He admitted the accusation, but stated that the fault had

been committed, without his knowledge, by his servant. He was required

to dismiss that servant, and to undertake that none of his servants in

future should do the same, otherwise he would have to pay the penalty

himself. There is an interesting entry in the Register, showing how far

back the attractions of golf can be seen to have led men to neglect

their duties. On the 19th December, 1599, it is recorded that the

brethren ‘understanding perfytlie that divers personis of thair number

the tyme of sessioun passis to the fieldis, to the goufe and uthir

exercise, and hes no regard for keiping of the sessioun, for remeid

quhairof it is ordinit that quhatsumevir person or personis of the

session that heireftir beis fund playand, or passis to play at the

goufe or uthir pastymes the tyme of sessioun, sall pay ten s. for the

first fault, for the secund fault xxs., for the third fault public

repentance, and the fourt fault deprivation fra their offices.’

[Sidenote: GROWTH OF SABBATARIANISM]

It is curious to note that rigid enforcement of Sabbath observance was

not effected on the north side of the Highlands for somewhere about a

century and a half after it had been secured in the Lowlands on the

south side. The proximity of the wilder Celtic population, on the

one hand, and the existence of a considerable leaven of Episcopalian

Protestantism in the community, on the other, probably had a large

share in retarding the progress of the movement. The northern clergy

themselves were not averse to sharing in the innocent amusements of

their people. Marriages and funerals continued to be performed on

Sunday, and to be accompanied, even in the case of the lyke-wakes,

with festivities that sometimes reached a scandalous excess.

Against these customs, which had come down from Catholic times, the

kirk-sessions and presbyteries waged incessant war, but probably not

until the extinction of the rebellion of 1745 and the abolition of the

heritable jurisdictions, with the consequent freer commingling of the

north with the south of Scotland, did the Sabbatarian spirit which had

become rampant in the Lowlands reach the intensity with which it has

maintained its sway in the north for the last three or four generations.

It has been suggested that this increasing strictness of observance

arose from the desire of the clergy to obtain a greater hold on the

minds and consciences of the people. According to this view they are

believed to have found that the restoration of the Jewish Sabbath,

with its prohibitions and injunctions, would serve their purpose, and

‘being precluded by various circumstances of their situation from

having recourse to the expedients of the Catholic priests to gain

possession of the minds of the votaries, they have exerted all their

power by its means to attain this object.’ It has been further asserted

that ‘these are the reasons why we hear more of the heinous crime of

Sabbath-breaking than of all other vices together.’[12]

Obviously it was not in human nature to keep always within the strict

letter of such an artificial code of conduct. Joyousness of heart, so

long as it was unquenched, could not be restrained from smiles and

laughter, or from showing itself in song. The temptation to the young

and happy to escape from imprisonment within the four walls of a house

into the country, amongst birds and flowers and trees, must have been

often wholly irresistible. Lapses from the strict rules of conduct laid

down for observance were inevitable; and since, as Butler observed

nearly two centuries and a half ago,

In Gospel-walking times

The slightest sins are greatest crimes,

such lapses, when repeated, tended to harden the mind in transgression.

Sabbath-breaking being held up as so heinous a sin, the transition

came to be imperceptibly made to the breaking of the moral laws,

which according to the current dogmatic teaching did not seem to be

more imperatively binding. ‘Hence it is,’ as has been pointed out,

‘we continually find culprits at the gallows charging the sin of

Sabbath-breaking, as they call it, with the origin of their abandoned

course of life; and there can be no doubt that they are correct in so

doing.’[13]

This excessive zeal for a strict observance of Sunday has been regarded

as a special characteristic of Calvinistic communities. But it does

not seem to have reached anywhere else the height of intolerance which

it maintained, and to a great extent still maintains, in Scotland.

Doubtless the prevalent Sabbatarianism was in Sidney Smith’s mind when

he called Scotland ‘that garret of the earth--that knuckle-end of

England--that land of Calvin, oat-cakes, and sulphur.’ And it may have

been Byron’s recollections of sanctimonious Sundays in Scotland, as

well as in England, that inspired his exclamation:

‘Whet not your scythe, Suppressors of our vice!

Reforming Saints! too delicately nice!

By whose decrees, our sinful souls to save,

No Sunday tankards foam, no barbers shave;

And beer undrawn, and beards unmown, display

Your holy reverence for the Sabbath-day.’[14]

[Sidenote: SABBATARIAN CODE]

An octogenarian friend has told me that he believes he was the first

man in Edinburgh to make a practice of taking a Sunday walk. He

remembers that on some of these occasions he was accompanied by a

well-known professor in the University, who besought him not to get

back to the town until the church-goers had safely returned to their

houses from afternoon service, as he was afraid of the public odium he

might draw down not only on himself, but on the University. I myself

recollect when it was a common practice to pull down the window blinds

on Sunday, in order that the eyes of the inmates might be hindered from

beholding vanity, and that their minds might be kept from wandering

away from the solemn thoughts that should engage them. There was one

lady who carried her sanctimonious scruples so far that she always

rose a little earlier than usual on Sunday morning, and took care,

as her first duty, to carry a merry-hearted and loud-throated canary

down to the cellar that its carol might not disturb the quiet and

solemnity of the day. It was considered sinful to use any implement of

ordinary week-day work. Hence though a servant might perhaps scrape

away with her fingers the earth from the roots of potatoes in the

garden, if these were unexpectedly wanted for the Sunday dinner, on no

account could a spade or graip be used to dig them up expeditiously.

In the same spirit, a lad might be employed for half an hour on a

Sunday morning in laboriously carrying armfuls of turnips or other

vegetables for feeding the cattle, but he could not be allowed to use

a wheelbarrow with which he could have done the whole work in a few

minutes. As it was a heinous offence to write letters on Sunday, people

used to sit up till midnight; what would have been a sin before the

clock struck twelve, became quite legitimate thereafter.[15]

Happily this rigidity is gradually being relaxed, except perhaps in

parts of the Highlands. How it looks to an observer from outside may be

illustrated from some of my own personal experiences.

[Sidenote: A ROSS-SHIRE SABBATH]

In the summer of the year 1860, I found that the strict maintenance

of the Highland view of Sabbath observance might have had serious

consequences for myself. In company with my old chief, Sir Roderick

Murchison, I had walked on a Saturday from the head of Loch Torridon,

through the wild defile of Glen Torridon, to Loch Maree. Along the

mountain slopes that sweep upwards from the southern side of that

valley, I noticed so many features of interest, some of which, if

further and more closely examined, might help to clear up problems of

Highland geology for the solution of which we were seeking, that I felt

I must ascend these mountains and look at their crests and corries. But

we were pressed for time, and although next day was Sunday I determined

to devote it to the quest. The morning broke auspiciously, and ushered

in one of the most superb days which I have ever been fortunate enough

to meet with in the West Highlands. As it was desirable to save time

and fatigue by driving some six miles to the point of the road nearest

to the ground to be traversed, a request was made for a dog-cart. But

the answer came, that it was the Sabbath, and nobody would drive a

‘machine’ on the Lord’s Day. There was no objection, however, to allow

the use of a dog-cart, nor to charge for the same in the bill (for

Highland innkeepers, like Dryden’s Shimei, ‘never break the Sabbath

but for gain’); we must, however, do the driving ourselves. It was

accordingly arranged that Sir Roderick’s valet should drive me to

the place and return with the vehicle, leaving me to make my tramp

and find my way back to the inn on foot. The fresh buoyant air of the

mountains; the depth of the glens with their piles of old moraines;

the ruggedness and dislocation of the cliffs and slopes; the utter

solitude of the scene, broken only now and then by the bound of a group

of red deer, startled from a favourite corrie, or by the whirr of the

snowy ptarmigan; the ever-widening panorama of mountain-summit, gorge,

glen, and lake, as each peak was gained in succession; and then from

the highest crest of all, the vista of the blue Atlantic, with the

faint far hills of the Outer Hebrides and the nearer and darker spires

of Skye--all this, added to the absorbing interest of the geology,

filled up a day to the brim with that deep pleasure of which the memory

becomes a life-long possession. The sun had sunk beneath the western

hills before I began to retrace my steps, and night came down when

there still lay some miles of trackless mountain, glen, river, and bog

between me and the inn where my old chief was expecting me at dinner.

Fortunately, in the end the moon rose, and I arrived at the end of the

journey somewhere near midnight.

[Sidenote: A SUTHERLAND SABBATH]

The delay in my return gave Murchison not a little uneasiness. As hour

after hour passed, he grew so impatient that he began to insist on

some of the people of the inn turning out with lanterns as a search

party. His remonstrances, however, were met with a sullen indifference,

very unlike the usual attentiveness of the household. ‘It was the

Sabbath day,’ they said, ‘the gentleman shouldn’t have gone out to

walk on the Lord’s Day.’ In short, the gentleman, had he been lost,

would have deserved his fate, and would have furnished to the pulpits

of the district a new and pregnant illustration of the danger of

Sabbath-breaking!

Some fifteen years later, being in the east of Sutherland, I greatly

desired to visit the two remarkable cones of Ben Griam, which, rising

far over out of the desolate moorland, form such a prominent feature

in the landscape of that region. Had they stood within easy reach of

the little inn where I was staying, I would have walked over to them in

order to spend a quiet Sunday in examining them and in meditation over

the marvellous story of past time which they reveal. But the distance

being much more than a Sabbath day’s journey, I applied to my host for

a dog-cart to take me by road to the nearest point from which I could

strike across the moor on foot. He confessed that none of his servants

would drive me, and that he did not wish to shock the prejudices of his

neighbours in the parish, but that if I would wait until the people

were in the kirk, he would drive me himself. As we passed along the

lonely road he gave me his history, which had no ordinary interest.

Born in the district, he had gone south early in life, and eventually

became an engine-driver on one of the main railways. He was next

attracted, by the offer of better pay and prospects, to enter the

service of the Chemin de Fer du Nord and drove the first train between

Paris and Calais. He continued in the service of that railway for many

years, made his home in France, and finally retired with a pension

from the French Government. As he had no longer any daily occupation,

a longing for the old country came on him and grew so strong that he

in the end broke up his home in France and took the inn where I found

him. But he soon discovered that his long stay in a freer theological

atmosphere than that of Calvinistic Sutherland had taught him to look

on life from a very different point of view from that still maintained

by his fellow-countrymen. He found them, he said, narrow-minded,

prejudiced, and bigoted, disposed to look askance on him and what they

thought his laxity of belief, and to show in many little spiteful ways

the antagonism between them. The old home was no longer the place that

had dwelt all these long years treasured in his memory, and he seemed

disposed to regret that he had ever come back to it. That Sunday was

a day of sunshine, of white floating clouds, and of blue distances

stretching away from the purple moors to the sea on the one side and to

the inland mountains on the other--a day to be alone with Nature and

one’s own thoughts. My reverie on Ben Griam, which led me far into the

backward of time, was touched now and then with thoughts of the strange

fetichism of to-day that has turned the Sunday from a day of joyfulness

to one of gloom.

[Sidenote: HIGHLAND BIGOTRY]

That this relentless intolerance of any innocent and instructive

employments, other than that of church-going, still persists in certain

quarters with undiminished rigour was brought painfully to my notice

only six years ago in Skye. A reading party of bright young men from

one of the English Universities had settled down for steady work and

recreation at a well-known hotel, and the landlady, anxious to obtain

for them more space and quiet than they could find under her own

roof, arranged for the use of a large room in a house which had been

temporarily taken by a Free Church clergyman who had been displaced

during the progress of the controversy respecting the union of his

church with the United Presbyterians. On the first Sunday, the young

men spent the morning partly in reading and partly in examining under

the microscope some of the natural history specimens they had been

collecting during the week. The sight of these instruments, opened on

the Lord’s Day, was too much for the minister’s wife. Next morning

my hostess received a letter from her requesting that the young men

might be removed, bag and baggage, as she could not submit to such

profanation under her roof. She concluded by beseeching that the

innkeeper’s children might be sent to her as a consolation, ‘that she

might hear their innocent prattle.’ The landlady showed me this letter,

but was anxious that, at least while they were her guests, the students

should know nothing about it, as she would not like them to think that

this intolerance was a fair sample of Highland opinion.

[Sidenote: SABBATARIAN INCONSISTENCY]

I have sometimes been astonished to see how this superstitious

veneration for the Sabbath has blinded intelligent men and women,

otherwise liberal and enlightened in their views, to the real meaning

and use of the day. Having been taught from their youth to deem certain

things unlawful and reprehensible if done on that day, they studiously

refrain from these, but at the same time they unconsciously allow

themselves to say and do other things which on due reflection they

would admit to be no better than those which they condemn, if not

indeed much worse. I once spent a Sunday in a Highland Free Kirk manse,

and in the afternoon was entertained by the minister’s wife, who was

as kindly in disposition as she was narrow in her views. We discussed

the whole parish. Some Roman Catholics had come to the district, which

filled her mind with dismay. She was grieved, too, that a well-known

dignitary of the Church of England had called the day before on her

husband, a broad-minded and accomplished scholar, and had carried him

off to examine some ecclesiastical ruins in the neighbourhood. She

gave me an account of various marriages which were in contemplation,

and of the changes that were imminent in the tenancy of the farms.

At last I asked her to excuse me as I had some letters to write which

I was anxious should go by the early post in the morning. ‘What?’ she

exclaimed in surprise, ‘Do you mean to say that you write letters on

the Sabbath?’ I could not resist the temptation to assure her that I

thought writing to my friends and relatives on that day was at least as

allowable as to spend the afternoon over parish gossip.

A story is told of a young clergyman on the mainland who had not been

long placed in his charge when rumours began to circulate about his

orthodoxy. Some of his friends hearing these reports set themselves to

enquire into the grounds for them. But they could only elicit vague

hints and suggestions. At last they came upon an old woman who declared

roundly that the minister was ‘no soun’.’ ‘Not sound! what makes you

think that?’ ‘Weel then,’ she answered, ‘I maun tell ye. I wass seein’

him wi’ my ain een, standin’ at his window on the Lord’s Day, dandlin’

his bairn.’

[Sidenote: QUEEN VICTORIA AND SABBATARIANISM]

An incident which illustrates the strictness of Sabbath observance

in the North Highlands has been told me by a friend. During one of

her tours in the Highlands Queen Victoria visited Ross-shire. When

spending a Sunday at Loch Maree, the Royal party, tempted by the beauty

of the day, made an expedition by boat to one of the islands of the

loch. This ‘worldly acting’ upon the Lord’s day caused a great scandal

in the neighbourhood, and eventually the Free Church Presbytery took

up the matter and addressed a letter to the Queen ‘dealing with’ her

for her conduct. Our good Queen was naturally much disquieted that she

had unwittingly offended any section of her faithful subjects, and

consulted one of her chaplains, a distinguished minister of the Church

of Scotland, who was then at Balmoral, as to what she ought to do. He

counselled her not to take any notice of the letter, and allayed her

anxiety by recounting to her the following incident illustrative of the

attitude of mind of the Highlanders towards all departures, however

trivial, from their notions of strict Sabbath observance. The story

greatly amused the Queen, and at her request it had to be repeated to

other members of the royal household.

A Highland minister, after the services of the Sunday were over, was

noticed sauntering by himself in meditative mood along the hillside

above the manse. Next day he was waited on by one of the ruling elders,

who came to point out the sin of which he had been guilty, and the

evil effect which his lapse from right ways could not fail to have

in the parish. The clergyman took the rebuke in good part, but tried

to show the remonstrant that the action of which he complained was

innocent and lawful, and he was about to cite the famous example of a

Sabbath walk, with the plucking of the ears of corn, as set forth in

the Gospels, when he was interrupted with the remark: ‘Ou ay, sir, I

ken weel what you mean to say; but, for my pairt, I hae nefer thocht

the better o’ them for breakin’ the Sawbbath.’

A member of the Geological Survey was, not many years ago, storm-stayed

in a muirland tract of South Ayrshire upon a Saturday, and gladly

accepted the hospitality of a farmer for the night. Next morning he

asked the servant if she thought her master could oblige him with the

loan of a razor. In due time the razor arrived, but was found to be

so wofully blunt that the maid had to be summoned again to see if a

strop was available. She soon came back with this message, ‘Please, the

maister says this is the Sawbbath, and ye’re jist to put pith to the

razor. Ye canna get the strop.’

[Sidenote: FAST-DAY SUPERSTITION]

The late Lord Playfair, when he was Professor of Chemistry in the

University of Edinburgh, told me that, passing his nursery-door one

Sunday, he overheard the nurse stilling a child in this fashion:

‘Whisht, whisht, my bonnie lamb; it’s the Sawbbath, or I wud whustle ye

a sang, but I’ll sing ye a paraphrase.’

The sacredness of the Sabbath, by a natural transition, came to be

also attributed to the Fast Day, which heralded the half-yearly

Communion-Sunday. A Fife shepherd, who was in the Grassmarket of

Edinburgh on a week-day, found that his dog had strayed to some

distance, and was making off in a wrong direction. He begged an

acquaintance whom he had met to whistle for the animal. ‘Whustle on

your ain dowg,’ was the indignant reply. ‘Na, na, man,’ said the

perturbed drover. ‘I canna dae that, for you see it’s our Fast Day in

Kirkcaldy.’

Nobody has satirised the Scottish perversion of the day of rest with

more effective sarcasm than Lord Neaves in his _Lyric for Saturday

Night_:

We zealots made up of stiff clay,

The sour-looking children of sorrow,

While not over-jolly to-day,

Resolve to be wretched to-morrow.

We can’t for a certainty tell

What mirth may molest us on Monday;

But at least to begin the week well,

Let us all be unhappy on Sunday.

What though a good precept we strain

Till hateful and hurtful we make it!

What though, in thus pulling the rein,

We may draw it so tight as to break it!

Abroad we forbid folks to roam,

For fear they get social or frisky;

But of course they can sit still at home,

And get dismally drunk upon whisky.

A habit which has been followed for generations to the sound of the

‘drum ecclesiastic’ is not easily thrown off. The Sabbath look of

funereal sadness may still be seen on many a sturdy Presbyterian face.

But happily the gloomy intolerance is passing away. In no respect is

the freer air of the modern spirit more marked than in the relaxation

of the old discipline in regard to the keeping of the Sabbath in

lowland Scotland. A country walk on that day is no longer always

proclaimed to be a violation of one of the ten commandments, innocent

laughter is not everywhere denounced as a sin, nor does it appear

that the growth of Sunday cheerfulness leads to any depravation of

character, or to a less keen feeling for whatsoever is of good report.

There is now, however, a tendency for the pendulum to swing perhaps

too far on the other side. Welcome though the disappearance of the old

gloom may be, there would be a questionable gain if what should be a

day of quiet rest and refreshment were turned into one of frivolous

gaiety and dissipation.

[Sidenote: SINFULNESS OF DANCING]

In other directions a relaxation of the old rigour in regard to the

innocent enjoyments of life is to be welcomed. But these various

signs of greater charity and enlightenment have made much less rapid

progress in the Highlands and Islands. In these regions the influence

of the protestant clergy, as it was longer in bringing the people into

subjection, still maintains much of the vehemence which has elsewhere

died down. The intolerance appears to be decidedly more marked in the

Free Church communion than in that of the Establishment. One of the

latest examples of it which has come under my own observation was that

of a lady who went to a dance. For this enormity she was reprimanded by

the Free Church minister to whose congregation she belonged. Things at

last became so unpleasant that she left his ministrations and went to

the parish kirk.

Scottish Reminiscences · 第 4 / 15 章