I turned to the girl and asked:

"How do you like living here?"

"It's nice."

"She is practically born here," the mother explained.

"Then you went to school here," I asked.

"Oh, no--no--" all three, father, mother and daughter protested in

chorus. "We would not place our child with _them_," the mother said

indignantly, while the father, who was so shocked that he stopped eating

his pudding, said:

"One is willing to sacrifice his own life, but one has no right to do so

with one's child."

After luncheon Mr. Marcel delivered himself of the following lecture.

"That's the big mistake of the people outside. They don't seem to

realise that in an orphan home you have the scum of the population. The

very fact that their parents died young and poor is a proof of the bad

root they grow from. Most of the time the father or mother or both have

been drunkards, sick and idle. Idleness is a disease and an hereditary

one. Why are they poor? because they are degenerates. A healthy man is

never poor. Why are they sick? Because they are careless and dirty. Why

do they die young if it is not because they are degenerates and careless

and dirty? We get their children. They all have bad habits, bad

characters, are insolent and indolent, and they all long for the street,

the free street. This desire for the free street is terrible. We have

here a splendid garden--have a look through the window, sir--a splendid

garden is it not? It's my greatest pleasure! They want the gutter. We

have a tremendous work to do, and I am happy to be partially

successful. We break them of their evil habits, curb their insolence and

teach them order and submission, order and submission, order and

submission," he repeated.

The heavy meal soon told on the gentleman and his speech lost its

clarity and his tongue stuck in his mouth. He was soon dozing in his

chair and I was saved from the awkward position by Mrs. Marcel who gave

me the freedom of the place, while explaining that Mr. Marcel was

working very hard and was always tired at that hour.

I went down to the garden. There wasn't a child there. One of the

teachers sat on a bench reading a paper.

"Excuse me, madame, but why don't the children use the garden?"

"They are not allowed, sir."

I soon saw them pass out from the refectory to the classroom, like

little mourners coming from the cemetery where their parents were

buried. There are one hundred children, all girls, between the ages of

seven and fourteen. _In five hours' time I did not hear one laugh, did

not see one smile._ All have but one hope. To reach the age of fourteen

and then be placed. It matters not where nor to what work! The main

thing is to get out of the "box" as the children call it. But only six

out of ten reach the age of fourteen. The hospital is the anteroom of

the grave.

When I spoke of the great proportion of sick among the children and of

the pallor of all, the superintendent explained:

"You must not forget that these are not normal children. They are the

offspring of degenerates--of the poor."

In all the world, in all the charitable institutions, poverty is a

crime. Thus are the children, the orphans, treated like little would-be

criminals and every move is regarded with suspicion. Not half of the

money given for their food is spent on food and not a half that is given

for their clothing is spent for them. The whole institution is a shame

and the man who thought he was performing a good deed when he left a

bequest to shelter the children of the poor is cursed instead of being

blessed.

And the devil sits on the stove and says: "This is the best place that

man ever built for me."

This was a model Orphan Home. I have since visited other places and

found everywhere the same situation, with little variations. The

conditions in a Paris house are no better than those in Chicago, and the

children are not more unhappy in Montreal than in Berlin. The children

of the poor, the orphans, are everywhere little criminals that Mr. Levy,

Monsieur Albert, Mr. Marcel or Herr Grun has to "tame and teach

submission." The wish of all the children is to get rid in some way of

the "box." (This word is used by all the orphans all over the world to

designate their home. It is characteristic and shows how suffering is

international and conveys to all the same designation of a certain

evil.) The girls by getting married or becoming servants. Oh! They don't

intend to stay married to the man the institution procures for them.

Generally it is an old widower who applies for one, to "make happy a

poor orphan." She will not stay with him and her vow is worth

nothing--is a subterfuge to escape. And if she goes as a servant it is

also only to get out into the world where she will soon fall a victim to

the first snare, on account of her inexperience and broken spirit, and

her fear of returning to the "box."

Never has the orphan house been described as well as Marguerite Audoux

has done it in her "Marie Claire." There, too, you see what the children

miss--bread and love--and that what they most want is freedom. The day

one of the girls goes away all the others are sad--sad to live between

those four walls. The friendship of the cook is one's greatest asset.

One can get an extra piece of meat or an apple or a slice of bread. All

the while tens of thousands of dollars are given, gardens are made where

the children must not enter and food is prepared which the children do

not eat. Holidays are celebrated and the children are tortured to learn

some platitude which they must recite to please the ladies and gentlemen

who come to honour the house with their presence. But down in their

souls the children hate the whole game. They are not fooled--they know.

And one girl confided to me the following:

"There are busts in clay and marble and paintings of all that have

started and contributed to this institution. In the centre hall is a

white stone plate with the names engraved in gold. Well, every morning I

walk up to each and every one and tell him my opinion of his deed. I can

hardly keep my fist back from the bust of the one who founded this

'box.' And to the plate, that plate with names engraved in gold--morning

and night I say, 'Damn you all.' It's my prayer."

This voices the feeling of all the children.

My visit to the Orphan Asylum was due to the following fact.

Mrs. D., a widow, had two children, two girls, one seven and one ten.

When her husband died she placed both children in the Orphan Home. After

a few months the younger one died there and Mrs. D. took the other one

home. All the charitable institutions did their utmost to get the child

back to the institution, but in vain. The mother maintained that the

death of her child was due to the negligence of the people in charge

there. She said this openly, although she needed assistance. The child,

too, would not return, and whenever the name of the institution was

mentioned would cling to the mother's apron. The office was afraid that

the reputation of the institution would be damaged and so they used

every effort to combat the mother's decision. The whole officialdom was

very nice and gentle to the widow. Help was freely given, and they even

spoke of buying her a candy store, on condition that she free herself of

the child. When this course did not produce the desired effect the

Manager explained to her that the child would stand in the way of her

remarriage, that she was young and had a right to live, etc., etc. When

he wanted, the silken gentleman knew how to use unctuous language. But

the mother instinct was stronger than the desire for money, for

happiness--stronger than hunger.

Finally supplies were cut off. It was expected that hunger, "King

Hunger," would settle everything. And "King Hunger" did settle it. Two

months later two lines in a newspaper spoke about his success. She was

found dead with her child lying near her. The gas-jet was open and the

coroner is investigating whether it was an accident or suicide.

I give only the outlines of this miserable affair. It did not go as

smoothly as it appears on paper. The visits of the mother, the change of

tactics, the cries of the child whenever some one approached her. The

horror of it all! And the talk of the people at the office. From the

Manager to the janitor--cold-blooded murderers. And the threats and

taunts and insults. And to-day, when I look back at it all, I think of

my visit to this and all the other orphan houses, and I am of the

opinion that this mother did not do a bad thing. She had more courage

than many others. If they all knew, as this mother did, and if they all

were as sincere and truthful to their children, Death would always be

preferable to the wreck of what remains. Then, and only then, would the

eyes of the world be opened. Then would everything be clear--clear--that

no man could with one hand ruin health and spirit, through factory and

workshop and adulterated food, dark and dirty tenement houses and Wall

Street speculation, and with another hand give donations of a few

dollars to palliate the evil he had created.

Or is this perhaps a new interpretation of Christ's words: "Let not thy

left hand know what thy right hand doeth"?

Crimes of Charity · 第 69 / 85 题