CHAPTER X

THE FIRST YEAR AFTER THE ANNEXATION

The task of constituting the new Administration and of reducing the

country to order was rendered especially difficult by the rigid economy

at first contemplated by the Government of India. In the discussions

during the Viceroy’s visit it is understood that frugality was declared

essential. With the loyalty which in him, as in Sir Arthur Phayre,

rose almost to a passion, Sir Charles Bernard did his utmost to carry

out the wishes of Government. Beyond doubt or dispute, a burden far

greater than any man should be asked to bear was placed upon the

Chief Commissioner’s shoulders. Yet the Titan never showed signs of

weariness. There were to be no Divisional Commissioners; district

officers were to work under the Chief Commissioner’s orders. The

provision for police, especially military police, was quite inadequate.

The Secretariat staff was plainly insufficient. No one but Sir Charles

Bernard, with his immense power of work, his loyal enthusiasm, his

marvellous memory and mastery of detail, could have attempted the

task. And the effort was beyond even those exceptional powers. In

the first year of the occupation Sir Charles Bernard, for some time

single-handed, organized and directed the administration of the new

Province, doing the work of three ordinary men, dealing as far as

possible immediately in police matters with the Inspector-General, in

forest matters with the Conservator, keeping close touch and on the

most friendly terms with the military authorities, keeping also in

personal contact with every district officer, guiding, encouraging,

seldom admonishing. Throughout this year of labour and anxiety he was

hardly a week free from severe and painful illness. Almost from the

beginning he was the target of malicious and venomous attack. With an

inadequate though loyal and efficient staff in the districts; with

scanty funds doled out by the Imperial Government, which then, as

ever, treated Burma with unsympathetic parsimony; under the depressing

effects of illness, the object of ignorant and unscrupulous detraction,

the work done by Sir Charles Bernard in that first year, when order

began to be evolved out of chaos, has never been properly appreciated

in public. But no civil officer who served in Upper Burma in that year

fails to recognize the heroic work done by his Chief, or to remember

the support and encouragement received from him in times of trouble,

doubt, and confusion. No military officer of standing forgets the

loyal co-operation of the civil power as represented by the Chief

Commissioner. Sir Charles Bernard could not remain in Burma to complete

his work. He laid a sound basis for the restoration of order and

the building up of the fabric of settled government. The report of

the year’s work issued at the end of 1886 was a record of which no

Administration need have been ashamed.

As might have been foreseen from the first, it was soon found

impossible for the Chief Commissioner directly to control the

affairs of every District. Upper Burma was therefore partitioned

into Divisions, and Commissioners were appointed. In June, Mr. H.

St. G. Tucker, C.S., became Commissioner of the Eastern Division,

with headquarters at Ningyan (Pyinmana). This division was more

remote from Mandalay than any part of the Province as yet sought to

be administered; there was no communication with it by water, and

neither road nor rail was yet in being. In August and September three

other divisions were constituted. Mr. G. D. Burgess, C.S., became

Commissioner of the Northern Division; Mr. F. W. R. Fryer,[136] C.S.,

with a great reputation from the Punjab, assumed charge of the Central

Division, both for a time residing at Mandalay; Mr. J. J. Digges La

Touche,[137] C.S., from the North-West Provinces, was posted to the

Southern Division, with headquarters at Minbu. With some adjustment

of local limits, these Divisions still subsist. Their names have

been changed, not, I think, for the better, and in most cases the

headquarters have been shifted. The appointment of these officers

afforded the Chief Commissioner appreciable relief.

Having taken over an area twice as large as Lower Burma, Sir Charles

Bernard was confronted with the task of finding officers to administer

it. Obviously the existing staff could not be stretched to cover the

new Province and provide equipment for the old Province as well. For

the Commission civilians were sent from other provinces, military

civilians were recruited, and appointments were offered to men in

various departments or not yet in Government service. In each of these

alternatives there were advantages and disadvantages. Civilians from

other provinces, though versed in the art of administration, were

ignorant of the language and customs of Burma. Military civilians,

excellent material, needed some training in civil work. Officers of

other departments and non-officials recruited in the Province knew the

language and the people, but had no acquaintance with administrative

methods. The last-mentioned defect is probably regarded by many as

imaginary. While for other arts and professions a laborious education

is necessary, we all know that government and administration are gifts

of the gods and come by nature. We are all familiar with brilliant

amateurs in administration, who know their work far better than those

trained to the business from their youth. The Commission was thus a

composite body, probably not so supremely excellent as that which

undertook the settlement of the Punjab under John and Henry Lawrence,

but full of ability and zeal. The Civil Service, the Army, and what

were then called the Uncovenanted Services, furnished officers of

conspicuous merit, who in the years immediately succeeding the

annexation and in later times did invaluable work. Without making

invidious distinctions or offering presumptuous criticisms, I may

mention of the early new-comers Mr. H. P. Todd-Naylor,[138] Mr. J.

George Scott,[139] Mr. H. A. Browning,[140] Mr. B. S. Carey,[141] and

Mr. H. M. S. Matthews.[142]

The officering of the civil police was one of even greater difficulty,

the pay and prospects being far less attractive. Some officers were

drafted from other Provinces. Many adventurous young gentlemen flocked

to Mandalay, eager to take part in the settlement of a new Province.

Of these some were appointed to be inspectors, some to be even head

constables, with a prospect of obtaining gazetted rank in the course

of time. Most of them did excellent work, fully justifying their

selection. From time to time some were transferred to the Commission.

The majority had a hard and disappointing life, waiting long for the

realization of their dreams. The story of the Burma Civil Police is one

of hope deferred, and of weary plodding through many dismal years. It

is greatly to the credit of its officers that they did well under such

depressing conditions.

In the first year, at least, the bulk of the actual work of pacification

was done by the army of occupation. Sir George White was in command,

brave among the brave, cheeriest of companions, loyalest of friends,

the warrior whom every man in arms should wish to be. Chief of his

Staff was Colonel Prothero,[143] who worked all day and night without

turning a hair, whose gay serenity nothing could ruffle, whose motto

might have been:

“Still to be neat, still to be dressed

As always going to a feast.”

In the course of the summer, Sir Herbert Macpherson, V.C.,[144] came

over to exercise general control. After his lamented death, the

Commander-in-Chief in India himself, Sir Frederick Roberts, spent some

months in Burma, occupying the summer-house in the Palace garden where

the King surrendered, giving to civil and military administration the

support of his authority, the strength of his wise counsel. Gradually,

as the area of settled government extended, the country was covered

with a network of small military posts, more than a hundred being in

existence at the end of the year.

In these months came the first two military police battalions, raised

by Mr. Loch and Mr. Gastrell.[145] The Mandalay battalion, which I

knew best, attracted the flower of the Punjab. Under Mr. Gastrell’s

excellent command it became a thoroughly efficient force, conspicuous

among the large body of military police which garrisoned the country

in subsequent years. These military police played an important part

in the pacification. Their behaviour was most praiseworthy. Several

battalions later on were converted into regular regiments of the Indian

Army, called at first Burma Regiments.

For civil administration the Province was parcelled out into Districts,

at first twelve, afterwards seventeen in number, each in charge of a

Deputy Commissioner, with such Assistants as could be provided. In

some cases military commandants of outposts were invested with civil

powers, and did much useful work in a civil capacity. Every effort

was made to enlist local Burman officials under Government, and many

became My̆o-ôks and rendered valuable service. But it was impossible

to induce higher officials to leave Mandalay, and to take part in the

settlement of out-districts. The effort was made and failed. One of

Sir Charles Bernard’s first acts was the preparation and promulgation

of a set of instructions to civil officers, an admirable compilation

embracing in a small compass all the rules necessary at the outset

for the guidance of his subordinates. That was all the law we had in

Upper Burma till the end of November, 1886. As an instance of the care

taken to prevent hasty and harsh measures, it may be mentioned that

all capital sentences had to be referred to the Chief Commissioner for

confirmation. When Commissioners were appointed, the duty of confirming

these sentences was delegated to them.

The chaos to which the country was reduced, and the confusion which

prevailed under the Burmese Government, rendered the task of

settlement extraordinarily difficult. The country was overrun with

dacoit bands, ranging in numbers from five to five hundred. The names

of the leaders, Hla U, Bo[146] Cho, Bo Swè, Ôktama, Shwe Yan, became

household words. For some of the dacoit movements there was no doubt a

slight political move. A few scions of the royal stock who had escaped

the massacres of 1879 set up as pretenders to sovereignty, while here

and there men of humble origin assumed the style of royalty and raised

the standard of revolt. But as a rule, from the deeds and aspirations

of these robber bands genuine patriotism was conspicuously absent.

Most of the gangs consisted of dacoits pure and simple, whose sole

object was plunder and rapine, who held the countryside in terror, and

committed indescribable atrocities on their own people. Where-ever

there was an appearance of organized resistance, Buddhist monks were

among the chiefs. No political movement of importance has been without

a monk as the leading spirit.

The story of the pacification has been told fully, vividly, and

accurately by Sir Charles Crosthwaite.[147] It is not my purpose to

attempt to tell the story again. In the first year the work proceeded

slowly, but within limits effectually. Many dacoit leaders were killed

or captured, and the elements of regular administration were introduced

into several districts. Revenue, of no enormous amount, it is true,

was collected; the country was covered with telegraph lines; useful

public works were undertaken. The early months were clouded by the loss

in action of Robert Phayre, a promising civilian;[148] the autumn was

saddened, for me most of all, by the death from fever, in Kyauksè, of

Robert Pilcher. A master of their language, and sincerely in sympathy

with them, Pilcher was exceedingly popular with the Burmese. The first

time I ever saw a man literally beat his breast for grief was when I

told the good old Taungtaya-ngasè Bo[149] the sad tidings of his death.

Since then I have seen men and boys beat their breasts and shed real

tears at the recital of the tale of Hassan and Hussein[150] at the

Mohurram. Pilcher was a scholar with a touch of genius; his early death

was a loss to the State.

[Illustration: A BURMESE FAMILY.]

Among the homely virtues of the Burmese must be counted respect

for parents. This is inculcated in the Sacred Books, and forms a

really pleasing phase of family life. Two nephews of the Taung-gwin

Mingyi, one of the Council of Ministers, were giving trouble in the

Ava district. It was suggested to the Mingyi that he should use his

influence to induce them to surrender and make peace with Government.

“Certainly,” said the Mingyi; “I will send for their parents and put

them in my dungeon and afflict them till their sons come in.” It was

not possible to approve this crude proposal, but the Mingyi was told

that he might ask the parents to stay with him, and talk kindly to them

about their erring children. The young men submitted in a week, and

gave no further trouble. In Sagaing a famous Bo, Min O, was captured.

His life was forfeit for many crimes; but he was an old man, and two

of his sons were at large, leading dacoit bands. Word was sent to them

that if they did not surrender, their father would be hanged; but if

they gave themselves up, his life would be spared. Both came in. It

will no doubt surprise some people to learn that the promise to spare

Min O’s life was kept.

In the early days of April, 1886, there seemed to be a lull in the

storm. The time of the Burmese New Year approached, always a time of

some anxiety, when, if ever, disturbance may be expected. Perhaps this

had not yet been realized. The exact moment on which the New Year

began was calculated by the Pônnas,[151] who, besides officiating

at weddings, were also the royal astrologers.[152] The time was to

be announced by the firing of a cannon from the Palace enclosure.

On that April morning the astrologers assembled in the courtyard of

the Palace. The head seer drew a line in the dust, planted a small

stick, and declared that when the shadow of the stick reached the

line the auspicious moment would have come. At the precise instant I

made a preconcerted sign, and the cannon was fired. It might have

been arranged as the signal of revolt throughout the country. On that

day all the principal military posts in Upper Burma were attacked,

doubtless in pursuance of a definite plan. Next morning my servant

woke me rather early with the intimation that “the enemy were at the

gate.” At dawn there had been a serious attack on the city of Mandalay,

swarming with troops, by a band of some twenty or thirty rebels

acting in concert with a few confederates within the walls. Inside

the city two unlucky medical subordinates were killed, and within and

without incendiary fires were lighted. The fire spread even to the

Palace enclosure, and we were in some anxiety for the main buildings,

which, once alight, would have burned like matchwood. To the roof of

the Hlutdaw mounted the faithful Thwethaukgyi[153] Tun Baw and his

subordinates, with chatties[154] of water and bamboo poles, to quench

and beat out flying sparks. Luckily the fire in the enclosure was

mastered, and we returned, grimy and thirsty, relieved to find our

quarters still standing. As the Palace was crowded with military and

civil officers and their establishments, and contained all the records,

its destruction would have been very inconvenient.

The fortnight which followed was the longest fortnight of my life. It

was crowded with incident, attacks and risings, above all, incendiary

fires. Since those days I have ceased to take interest in fires. On the

Queen’s Tower[155] stood a sentinel, day and night, to sound the alarm.

The easiest way to the tower was through my bedroom. Nightly I went to

sleep in expectation of being aroused by the fire-bugle and the tramp

of men, and I was hardly ever disappointed. Every night we climbed

the wooden tower, and saw the blaze of conflagration in town or city.

Once I asked the sentry if he had heard any sound of firing. “Well,

sir, I thought I did hear one of them there brinjals,”[156] was the

unexpected answer. Once, again, fire broke out within the Palace fence,

but did not spread. This also was well, as close to our quarters were

considerable quantities of gunpowder and dynamite. With the early rains

at the end of April fires ceased, and Mandalay enjoyed comparative rest.

It was certain that some of the Burmese officials in Mandalay were

fomenting seditious movements in the country. Suspicion fell upon the

Shwehlan Myowun[157] and the Hlethin Atwinwun.[158] The Myowun was

removed to India in virtue of a warrant issued under the invaluable

Regulation III. of 1818. He was taken from his house by Mr. J. G.

Scott,[159] who had joined the Commission and was on general duty in

Mandalay. Their next meeting was at a pwè in Mandalay, on a memorable

night in 1897, long after the Myowun had been allowed to return.[160]

The Hlethin Atwinwun, most plausible and bland of miscreants, believed

to have been deeply involved in the massacre of Princes, from whose

hands one expected to see blood still dripping, was moved to visit

Calcutta of his own accord in response to a general invitation given

to Burmese Ministers by Lord Dufferin. He stayed in Calcutta for some

years, much against his will, but solely under pressure of peaceful

persuasion. He returned much chastened, and lived on good terms with

the officers of Government till his death early last year.

In accordance with precedent not always observed, King Mindôn had

moved his capital from Amarapura to Mandalay in the late fifties,

transferring thither many of the inhabitants and all the entourage of

the Court. The site was not in all respects well chosen. Much of the

town was below the level of the river in high flood, and had to be

protected by an embankment. In the rains of 1886 the Irrawaddy rose

to an abnormal height, causing grave anxiety for the safety of the

bund.[161] One night in August the disaster came. The embankment was

breached, and the low-lying parts of the town, as far as the great

bazaar (zegyo), were inundated. It was a night of peril and excitement,

which taxed to the utmost the energies of the officers in charge of

Mandalay, Captain Adamson, Mr. Carter, and Mr. Fforde. Till the river

began to fall the town remained under water, and we all went about the

streets in boats and launches. As the Burman is an amphibious being,

and the people in the area menaced by the flood had ample warning, the

loss of life was comparatively small. Searching inquiry established the

conclusion that twelve persons were drowned. An even more melancholy

loss of life occurred in connection with the distribution of rice to

people rendered destitute by the flood. In a crowd in a narrow passage

someone fell; the throng pushed forward unknowing, and many people were

trampled to death before the press could be stayed.

One of the objects to which from the beginning the Chief Commissioner

devoted the full force of his energy and influence was the continuation

of the railway from Toungoo to Mandalay. By dint of constant and

indefatigable pressure on the higher powers, and by steadfast

resistance to the suggestion that a trunk road should first be made,

he succeeded in obtaining sanction for this essential work. The survey

was actually begun in the rains of 1886; construction was started

early in November of that year; and in February, 1889, less than three

years after the proclamation of annexation, the line was opened to

traffic throughout its whole length. To those who have experienced the

delay usually attending the grant of sanction to important and costly

proposals, the most remarkable feature of this record is that leave

should have been obtained in less than a year from the occupation of

Mandalay. The construction of the line afforded work to great numbers

of Burmans and others, and proved one of the most pacifying influences

in the eastern districts. There were no engineering difficulties, and

the climate enabled work to be carried on continuously throughout the

year. The opening of the railway was hailed with joy by the Burmans,

who expressed their appreciation in characteristic fashion, greeting

passing trains with shouts of delight and crowding to travel in the

mi-yahta.[162] It should never be forgotten that to Sir Charles

Bernard alone the Province owes the inception of this work, as indeed

in earlier days to his far-seeing policy it owed the construction of

the railway from Rangoon to Pegu, and thence to Toungoo. Apparently

Sir Charles Bernard furnished an exception to the rule that Indian

civilians are persons of narrow horizon.

Among the measures taken at an early stage to facilitate the

pacification of Upper Burma was the disarmament of the people. Orders

to effect this were issued by Sir Charles Bernard, and some progress

was made. It was, however, under Sir Charles Crosthwaite’s rule that,

in the face of much opposition, the whole Province was effectually

disarmed. No measure has had more excellent results in the prevention

of serious disturbances. Though from time to time dacoits and robbers

have become possessed of firearms, the thoroughness of the disarmament

is proved by the inability of rebels in recent years to obtain guns

and powder. The Arms Act has been very strictly enforced in Burma, the

number of firearms in each district being strictly limited, with the

most beneficial effect.

In the time of King Mindôn and King Thebaw many foreigners, mostly

French and Italian, flocked to Mandalay and obtained various

appointments in the King’s service. The downfall of the Burmese

kingdom deprived these gentlemen of their employment. All had claims

against the Burmese Government for arrears of pay, for goods sold, or

for work done. Our Government naturally accepted responsibility for

the lawful debts of its predecessor. The claims of foreign creditors

were investigated as quickly as possible, and those established were

discharged. Besides these, there were literally hundreds of other

demands for payment of sums alleged to be due from the late Government.

These claims were laboriously investigated and reinvestigated, and

finally adjudicated upon by the Government of India. Substantial

payments were made in settlement of debts sufficiently proved.

In those early days for most officers, military and civil, in Mandalay

life was a ceaseless round of strenuous labour. For me it was intensely

exciting. All day and often far into the night my time was fully

occupied. The enthralling interest of seeing from within and from

the centre the making of a new Province, of taking a humble share in

the work, was a privilege which falls to few men in a generation.

The receipt of reports from districts, the issue of the Chief

Commissioner’s orders, daily contact with men of distinction in arms or

civil affairs, the early morning ride with my Chief or with a comrade,

sometimes even with the Commander-in-Chief, Sir Frederick Roberts, of

whose kindness I have the pleasantest recollection, opportunities for

the study of Burmese life and character, filled to overflowing the

swiftly passing weeks. Bustle and excitement and good fellowship formed

an exhilarating combination. All the holiday I had that year was a run

down to Rangoon for a day to see my wife and family off to England.

But who wanted holidays at such a time, when his work was far more

interesting and stimulating than other people’s play? With Stevenson we

might say that we had “the profit of industry with the pleasures of a

pastime.”

It should hardly be necessary to say that in those early months the

outskirts and fringes, the Shan States and the Chin and Kachin Hills,

were untouched. It has been suggested that in dealing with the Shan

country there was undue delay. Anyone who realizes how much there was

to do in the plains, and how impossible it was to do everything at

once, recognizes the futility of the suggestion. The Chins were left

severely alone. The only attempt made this year to penetrate into the

Kachin Hills was the luckless expedition to Pônkan,[163] which returned

to Bhamo _re infecta_, to the extreme wrath of Sir Charles Bernard and

Sir George White.

The Shan States occupied the whole of the east of Burma, stretching

even beyond the Mèkong River. They constituted an integral part of the

Burmese Empire, but were administered by their own hereditary chiefs,

puny folk who grovelled before the pinchbeck Majesty of Burma, and

were on a footing quite inferior to that of native rulers in India.

The first of the Shan chiefs to open communication with us was the

Sawbwa[164] of Hsipaw, or, as the Burmese called it, Thibaw, the State

from which the late King derived his title. This enlightened chief had

a romantic history which will bear retelling. Some years before, having

quarrelled with the King, he fled for his life to Lower Burma. With

a few attendants he took up his residence in Kemmendine, a suburb of

Rangoon. Presently he came to believe, very likely with good reason,

that at the King’s instigation two of his servants were plotting his

death. Accustomed in his State to exercise the power of life and death,

he tried them in his own mind, found them guilty, and executed them

with his own hand, shooting them both. He was tried by the Recorder

of Rangoon (Mr. C. F. Egerton Allen[165]) and a jury, convicted,

and sentenced to death. The capital sentence was at once commuted

to transportation for life, and the chief began to serve his term

in the Rangoon jail, where he was at first set to do the usual hard

labour required of prisoners. Mr. Crosthwaite, who was acting as Chief

Commissioner, found him in this sad condition, and ordered material

alleviation of his lot. The Sawbwa’s faithful Mahadevi,[166] who had

accompanied her husband, besieged the Chief Commissioner with petitions

for his release. Before long Mr. Crosthwaite yielded to her importunity

and set free the Sawbwa on condition that he never returned to British

territory. He went to the independent State of Karenni. At or about the

time of the occupation of Mandalay he made his way back to Thibaw, and

after a brief struggle regained possession of his State.

Quite early in 1886 the Sawbwa wrote to me, as Secretary to the

Administration, saying that he had received much kindness from the

British Government, and desired to be on terms of friendship with us.

It has always seemed to me that this was a very magnanimous act. I

agree that it also showed much wisdom. The Sawbwa was a man of great

intelligence. He had seen and experienced the power of the British

Government. No doubt he realized that he was dealing with a Government

immeasurably stronger than that which it had displaced, and he saw

his interest in being on good terms with it. I think, too, that he

had a shining vision of becoming an independent Sovereign in alliance

with India. After all these deductions are made, it implied true

greatness of soul for a semi-civilized chief to remember the clemency

which had spared his life, to forget the dock and the prison cell and

work-yard. The correspondence begun by the Sawbwa was continued on

cordial terms. Early in 1887, in spite of the passionate entreaties

of his advisers, who were filled with gloomy forebodings, Kun Saing

came down to Mandalay. This again showed courage and foresight. There

was not a British officer or soldier in the length and breadth of the

Shan States. Mandalay was full of troops. Though he brought a fairly

large retinue, the Sawbwa knew that he was placing himself entirely

in our power. His confidence was more than justified. He was received

with some ceremony, Mr. J. E. Bridges, C.S., and I, as representatives

of Government, meeting him at Aung-bin-le with a squadron of cavalry

and a military band. Under this escort the Sawbwa made a triumphant

entry into Mandalay, and was allowed even to ride through the Palace

grounds. In the King’s time he might sooner have hoped to fly over

them. Sir Frederick Roberts and Sir Charles Bernard were among the many

spectators of the procession. Accompanied by the Mahadevi, the Sawbwa

was suitably lodged in a Win[167] outside the city walls. The ladies

in his train were somewhat scandalized at being photographed by an

enthusiastic amateur before they had time to change out of riding kit.

The Sawbwa’s amáts[168] continued in a state of alarm all the time they

were in Mandalay. Their terror rose almost to frenzy when one day the

Chief was taken for a picnic on the river in an Indian Marine vessel.

Even the Chief was somewhat relieved when he landed safe and sound on

the Hard.

The Sawbwa had the luck to be in Mandalay at the celebration of Queen

Victoria’s first Jubilee. Partly in honour of that auspicious occasion,

partly in recognition of his confidence and loyalty, the tribute of

Thibaw was remitted for ten years, and three small adjacent States,

Maing-lôn, Thônzè, and Maing-tôn, to which very shadowy claims had been

preferred, were added to the Sawbwa’s territory. Sir Charles Bernard’s

action in making over these States has been criticized. Viewing the

case calmly after the lapse of years, I humbly think that his decision

was wise. The suggestion of the risk of creating a powerful Shan State

strong enough to be a menace to Government was plainly ridiculous. If

all the Shan States were united under one Chief, he would not have as

much power as the ruler of a second-class native State in India. Thibaw

with its added sub-States could never be in a position to cause the

Government of Burma a moment’s anxiety. On the other hand, a large and

comparatively wealthy State is more easily managed and likely to be

administered better than a lot of small tracts.

[Illustration: THE SAWBWA OF THIBAW.]

Although Kun Saing was not an ideal ruler; although from time to time

complaints were made against him; although, I believe unjustly, even

his loyalty was doubted, he was an enlightened and intelligent chief of

some subtlety. Twice in later years he visited England, where he had

the honour of being received by Her Majesty Queen Victoria. The story,

from first to last, has a ring of the Old Testament. The place most

of all admired by the Sawbwa was the Crystal Palace (hman-nan-daw).

Towards the end of his life, when the first signs of unrest in the East

became dimly apparent, he is said to have contracted a secret marriage

with the Pakangyi Supaya,[169] King Thebaw’s sister. Not that he

meditated treason; but if anything should happen, he meant to be on the

right side.

Two of Kun Saing’s sons were partly educated in England. The elder,

Saw Hkè, succeeded his father, and is now the polished, courtly Chief

of Thibaw. The story of Saw Lu, the younger son, is pathetic and

instructive. When still a boy he was sent to England, and was for a

time at Rugby. He was a studious and ambitious youth, whose desire

was to be, not a King, but a doctor. Most unwisely, merely to see how

he was getting on, his father recalled him, and he was turned loose

in Thibaw at the age of about sixteen. The temptations besetting the

Chief’s young son in his father’s capital were too strong for him,

and he fell from grace. The cup of his iniquity brimmed over when he

eloped with a young girl who had been selected as the Sawbwa’s Abishag.

The fugitives were brought back, and the boy was cast into prison.

“Is this your British justice?” he indignantly asked the political

officer who came to condole with him. Presently he was released, and

came to see me in Rangoon. “I don’t know what to do,” he said; “I

have apologized to the governor, but he won’t forgive me.” He was an

exceedingly good-looking, nice-mannered youth, like a pleasant English

public-school boy. He was not allowed to return to England. Over his

subsequent history it is kinder to draw a veil. The moral of this story

is that if a Burman or Shan, especially a Chief’s son, is to come to

England, he should be sent while still young, and should be kept at a

good public school and at the University until his character has been

formed. He should on no account be brought back midway in the course of

his education.

Even more deeply learned in Shan than in Burmese, Pilcher would have

been the first civil officer in the Shan States. After his death, I

was designated by Sir Charles Bernard for that post. When the time

came, another officer was selected. Speaking seriously and without

reserve, I have no doubt that this was for the advantage of the Shan

country. No one could have been more conspicuously successful than

Mr. Hildebrand[170] and Mr. Scott;[171] no one is likely to have

done nearly so well. In view of the original intention, in the cold

weather of 1886 I was given a holiday from office-work, and sent as

civil officer with a column under Colonel E. Stedman[172] to Thônzè.

Through this State ran the trade route to the Northern Shan States,

Thibaw, Theinni, and Taungbaing. Along this road came caravans of

bullocks laden with letpet.[173] Owing to dissensions in Thônzè, the

trade was stopped. The object of our expedition, the first sent into

the Shan country, was to obtain information and to open the road for

traders. Early in November, when the season should have been settled,

on a fine Sunday afternoon, I rode out to join the rearguard at Tônbo.

Next morning we were to catch up the main column at Zibingale. From

Tônbo to Zibingale we climbed the hill in a torrent of rain, letting

our ponies loose to scramble up the steep and rocky ascent, while the

Gurkhas chaffed one another and laughed at the weather. At Zibingale

we stayed under canvas in the rain for three days and three nights,

quite comfortable in our tents, but rather aggrieved at having to wade

knee-deep in mud to mess.

The Madrasi garrison of the post was prostrate with fever almost to a

man; of our own small force about a quarter fell sick. By judicious

doses of quinine, I saved my servants and myself, so that we all came

through unscathed. After three days the rain ceased and we began our

march in cool November sunshine. On that delightful plateau, some three

thousand feet above the sea, the winter climate is perfect. We rode

through forest paths and fairy glades, wild roses clustering in the

hedges. At Pyintha and Singaing, we first saw the bazaar, held every

five days, a custom peculiar to the Shan States and Further East.

Buyers and sellers came from all the countryside, often from distant

places. It is much like market-day in a country town in England. The

market at Singaing and at Pyinulwin was of some interest, and attracted

strange folk from the hills. It was not to be compared with the great

bazaars held at Kēngtūng, Namkham, or even Mogôk, thronged with many

varieties of races in rich diversities of attire. To us, the people

most novel and attractive were the Shans, men swaggering in baggy

trousers and large flapping straw hats brigand-like, but formidable

only in appearance; girls with russet-rosy cheeks, shy and gentle.

Pyin-u-lwin, a charmingly situated village of some five-and-twenty

houses, with a market-place and a gambling ring, won our hearts. Though

we did not actually discover Pyin-u-lwin, we were among its earliest

visitors. We were received with all kindness and hospitality. Several

of us were housed in the village monastery, where we were heartily

welcomed by the monk. He was still there when I left Burma twenty-four

years later. With Captain E. W. Dun, our Intelligence Officer, I

inspected a curious magnetic rock in the neighbouring jungle. Some

years afterwards it was described as a new discovery by a geologist of

note. It has been lost again, but will doubtless be found some day.

Soon after our return, on Colonel Stedman’s recommendation, a military

post was established at Pyin-u-lwin, and called May-my̆o, after Colonel

May, of the Bengal army, a Mutiny veteran, the first Commandant.

May-my̆o is now the summer residence of the Burma Government and the

headquarters of the Burma division, a flourishing hill-station with a

population of about 12,000. Without pretension to the picturesque, it

is a place of great charm and quiet beauty, with no palm-trees and few

pagodas, conspicuously un-Oriental, more like a corner of Surrey than

of Burma.[174]

From Pyin-u-lwin we marched to Thônzè, through a desolate country,

overgrown with elephant-grass, but with many signs of past prosperity.

At the ruined town of Thônzè, now no more than a straggling village,

we halted and tried to open communication with Hein Sè,[175] a bandit

who claimed to be Chief of the State. I promised him a safe-conduct and

liberty to depart if we could not come to terms, and to encourage him,

I offered to let him keep my messenger as a hostage for his safety.

This offer was made with the knowledge and consent of the messenger,

a little Shan chiefling known as the Tabet Myosa. Him we had found,

practically destitute, in Mandalay, where he had been detained by the

King. As a matter of grace, he was given an allowance of Rs. 10[176] a

month. He accompanied me on this tour, and pluckily undertook to carry

my letter to Hein Sè. As he was leaving, he turned at the tent-door,

and said: “But you will let him come back, won’t you?” Accepting my

assurance, he went off. I know that he discharged his mission, as I

received a reply. But his courage was not put to the extreme test. Hein

Sè behaved like a gentleman, treated the envoy kindly, and sent him

back in safety. He himself declined my invitation. The future history

of Tabet may be told here. A few months later, when Mr. Hildebrand

and Mr. Scott went to the Shan States, I sent the Myosa with them. He

made himself useful, and showed nerve and ability. When, owing to the

persistent recalcitrance of its ruler, who fled across the Salween

and stayed there, the large State of Yatsauk was in need of a chief,

Tabet was chosen. He ruled Yatsauk with loyalty and intelligence, and

handed down the succession to his son. His fortune, probably his merit,

was better than that of another Shan chiefling of similar status, the

Maingkaing Myosa, who also received from Government 13s. 4d. a month,

and received no more.

The rest of this tour was without incident. We explained to the people

of Thônzè the beneficent intentions of Government, and gave a practical

example of the good manners of a British military force. The Gurkhas

of the column, then as ever, were specially popular with the people to

whom doubtless they are akin.

In February, 1887, Mandalay was not behind the rest of India in

celebrating the Jubilee of Her Majesty Queen Victoria. The ceremonies

were designedly arranged so as to give the people an opportunity of

demonstrating their loyalty and devotion to the Crown by revels which

they themselves appreciated. For a week pwès[177] and other Burmese

festivities went on day and night. On the first day came all the

members of the royal family, all the high officials, and a crowd of

others, in their gayest and richest attire. In the principal ballet

appeared, probably for the last time, the famous singer and dancer,

Yindaw Ma Le, the favourite of Princes, undisputed _prima donna_ of the

Burmese operatic stage, who ten years before had been sent to Rangoon

by Mindôn Min to dance at the Proclamation rejoicings. Twenty years

later her successor, Ma Twe Le, also a lady of supreme grace and

serpentine charm,[178] had the honour of dancing before Their Royal

Highnesses the Prince and Princess of Wales.

One of the relaxations of those early days was to see the working of

the Elephant Kheddah at Amarapura. The Kheddah establishment, inherited

from the King and maintained for some time, consisted of a number

of tame elephants, thoroughly well trained, with Burmese riders and

hunters. The tame elephants, some with riders, some guided only by

their own sagacity, plunged into a jungle teeming with herds of their

wild brethren. By artful strategy a wild elephant would be detached

from his fellows, lured into the midst of the tame herd, and gradually

drawn to the Kheddah enclosure. This was a quadrangle, entered only by

a funnel-shaped passage, surrounded by a strong outer wall of brick

and by an inner stockade of stout teak posts set at intervals, with

a space between the stockade and the wall. By his clever, perfidious

friends, the captive was cunningly edged and hustled towards the

passage till finally he was thrust into its mouth. Then the gate was

securely fastened and the quarry was alone at the mercy of his captors.

The hunters teased him with blunt spears and sticks, not doing him any

real harm, but annoying him exceedingly, escaping his charge by darting

between the posts of the palisade, set wide enough apart to admit a

man but not an elephant. This was a sport of some danger, requiring

nerve and agility. When the poor beast was thoroughly tired, he was

noosed and tied up in the Kheddah, and the process of training began.

Spectators sat in crowds on the wall to watch this pastime. I do not

think it occurred to any of us that it was somewhat cruel.

In March, 1887, Sir Charles Bernard left Burma. He was entertained by

the Headquarters Mess at a farewell dinner, where Sir George White[179]

proposed his health in moving and eloquent terms, quoting most

appropriately the famous lines:

“Him who cares not to be great,

But as he saves or serves the State.

Not once or twice in our rough island story,

The path of duty was the way to glory:

He that walks it, only thirsting

For the right, and learns to deaden

Love of self, before his journey closes,

He shall find the stubborn thistle bursting

Into glossy purples, which outredden

All voluptuous garden-roses.”

We escorted our guest to the steamer, and there bade farewell to our

Chief and our friend.

A Civil Servant in Burma · 第 10 / 17 章