CHAPTER VII

THE TAKING OF MANDALAY

Mr. Burgess having gone to act as Commissioner, I was recalled to the

Secretariat in some haste, in my former capacity as Junior Secretary.

It was in the midst of the excitement of a probable rupture with Upper

Burma. Our relations with the Court of Mandalay had long ceased to be

cordial. So long ago as 1879 our representative had been withdrawn,

and such communications as were necessary with the Burmese Government

had been conducted by letter. In the absence of the Resident matters

gradually drifted from bad to worse. British subjects, travellers

and traders from Lower Burma, were subjected to insult and violence

by local officials, and representations to the central authority

demanding redress were generally fruitless. In contravention of the

express terms of the Treaty of 1867, monopolies were created to

the detriment of trade both in Upper and Lower Burma. Owing to the

weakness and corruption of the Burmese Government, society became

thoroughly disorganized, so that turbulent tracts on the frontier

became a standing menace to the peace of our districts. At the same

time, the Burmese Government showed a marked and persistent anxiety

to enter into alliances with foreign Powers, in such a manner and to

such an extent as to give ground for apprehension that grave political

trouble might result. While the Indian Government was unrepresented in

Mandalay, representatives of France and Italy were welcomed, and two

separate embassies were sent to Europe, one under the guise of a merely

commercial mission, for the purpose of contracting new and if possible

close alliances with European Powers. Neither of these missions visited

England or showed any desire to win the friendship of representatives

of the British Government at the Courts to which the Burmese envoys

were accredited. Throughout the reign of King Mindôn, young scions of

families of leading men about the Court were sent to England, France,

and Italy to study the language and manners of European countries. In

the reign of his successor this policy was continued, with the studied

omission of England.[73]

Having no Resident, we had to find means of keeping ourselves informed

of events in Mandalay. One of our correspondents was Mr. A. E.

Rawlings, the Postmaster, who for a moderate subsidy wrote periodical

news-letters to the Secretary. He sent much useful and interesting

matter. There was also another correspondent whose reports were

extraordinarily accurate and instructive, and from whose keen vision no

secret transaction was hidden.

It has always seemed to me that the proximate cause of the annexation

of Upper Burma was the patriotic and enlightened Minister known as

the Kinwun Mingyi. Some years before, this gentleman had travelled

in Europe as head of a commercial mission, and had been received

with great distinction. His progress was a triumph; insignia of

Continental orders, illuminated addresses of English manufacturing

towns, were showered upon him as if he had been Minister of the Great

Mogul. To us who realize the insignificance of the King of Burma as

a potentate, these proceedings savour of the ridiculous. During this

visit the Kinwun Mingyi obtained some superficial knowledge of European

politics and of the relations between the Great Powers. Many years

later, when there was no longer a British Resident at Mandalay, and

when the path seemed clear of obstacles, the Mingyi conceived the

ingenious plan of contracting political relations and making treaties

with several States, such as France, Germany, and Italy. The subtle

intention was to play off one against another, so that, while none

would have predominant influence, all would be interested in opposing

and thwarting the ambitious designs of Great Britain. There was some

statesmanship in the project, but not quite enough; and with the best

intentions the Mingyi compassed the downfall of the dynasty of which he

was a devoted servant. By the autumn of 1885 negotiations with France

had made good progress. A French Consul was appointed to Mandalay, and

plans for the foundation of a French bank were initiated. A treaty was

provisionally concluded, though never formally ratified. The ostensible

cause of the rupture with the Burmese Court was the imposition of

an enormous fine on the Bombay Burma Trading Corporation, a British

company carrying on extensive operations in Upper Burma forests.

Probably in any case the British Government would have intervened, on

account of the treatment received by the Corporation. But the ultimate

cause of intervention was the apprehension lest France or some other

European Power should establish a preponderant influence in Upper

Burma, and create a situation which would render our position in Lower

Burma intolerable.

When I got back to Rangoon, the preliminary correspondence with India

and Mandalay was starting. It was all desperately urgent and deadly

secret, and the Chief Commissioner and his Secretary were more than

fully occupied. The Burmese answer to our first representation was

deliberately curt and discourteous. Under the orders of the Government

of India an ultimatum was therefore sent to the King of Burma. He

was required to suspend the execution of the decree against the

Corporation, to receive at Mandalay an envoy from the Viceroy with

a view to the settlement of the matter in issue, and for the future

to permit the residence at the capital of an agent of the Indian

Government, who should be received and treated with the respect due

to the Government which he represented. It was further intimated that

the Burmese Government would be required to regulate its external

relations in accordance with advice of the Government of India, and to

afford facilities for opening up British trade with China.[74]

The ultimatum was despatched on the 22nd of October, 1885. It was taken

by Captain Cooper, of the Irrawaddy Flotilla Company, on the steamer

_Ashley Eden_, which went specially to Mandalay for the purpose. An

answer was required by the 10th of November. In default of receiving a

reply Captain Cooper was instructed to leave Mandalay on a fixed date.

The mission was of a hazardous nature. Captain Cooper discharged it

with intrepidity and skill. He remained with his steamer fires banked,

and he returned bearing the haughty and uncompromising answer of the

Burmese Government. As he passed down the river he ran the gauntlet

of the fire of forts on the bank. Such was the Burmese notion of the

courtesy due to envoys. The answer was received in Rangoon on the 9th

of November. Two days earlier the King of Burma issued a proclamation

calling on his subjects to rally round him to resist the unjust demands

of the British Government, and expressing his determination to efface

these heretic foreigners and conquer and annex their country.[75]

When the ultimatum was considered by the Burmese Court and Government,

there seems to have been a division of counsel. The two highest

officers of State were two Mingyis, the virtuous and temperate Kinwun,

the corrupt and blood-thirsty Taingda. The Queen, Sûpăya-lât, was

certainly present when the situation was discussed. The Kinwun advised

moderation and diplomacy; the Taingda was for blood and fury. The

Queen’s voice was for resistance. She had the unexampled impertinence

to tell the Kinwun Mingyi, a man of mature and reverend years, her

father’s trusted Councillor, that when she had beaten the English she

would dress him in a tamein[76] and send him to live among the women.

The counsels of unreason prevailed. The proclamation was issued, and

futile resistance was undertaken.

Meanwhile, in anticipation of an unfavourable reply to the ultimatum,

preparations for the advance on Mandalay had been rapidly made. The

speed with which the expedition was organized and set in motion was

almost incredible. The first orders for the mobilization of troops

were issued by Government of India on or about the 19th of October;

the expeditionary force crossed the frontier on the 14th of November,

1885. The force was of all arms, including some Madras Cavalry and

some mounted infantry. Except the detachment of the Rangoon Volunteer

Rifles, which patriotically volunteered for active service, all the

troops were sent from India. For the promptitude of the despatch from

Rangoon, the chief credit is due to Mr. Bernard himself, who placed

all the resources of his position and all his personal energy and

experience at the disposal of the military authorities. Every day saw

him on the river-bank supervising and urging on the preparations.

Much praise is due also to the Irrawaddy Flotilla Company, which

made every vessel of their fleet available and carried the whole

expedition. Of course, this was not all pure patriotism on the part

of the Company; but the service rendered by them was of inestimable

value, and contributed largely to the brilliant success of the

operations. The command of the force was entrusted to Major-General

Harry Prendergast, V.C.,[77] a most gallant and distinguished officer,

who had already served in Burma, and was thus specially qualified for

the appointment. Already, in the pursuit of intelligence, he had even

penetrated into Upper Burma in peaceful guise. In command of brigades

were Brigadier-General G. S. White, V.C.,[78] Brigadier-General Norman,

and Brigadier-General Forde; while the staff included Major W. P.

Symons,[79] then at the beginning of a glorious career. The troops were

specially enjoined to treat the people of the country with kindness

and consideration. One precept directed that in addressing a Burman

the soldier should say “Kinbya,” not “Hey, Johnny!” A book of Burmese

phrases, laboriously compiled by a gentleman unacquainted with the

language, was profusely distributed. It is pleasant to be able to

record, with perfect honesty, that never did army of occupation behave

with more restraint and moderation, or more readily win the esteem and

respect of a subject people.

The Chief Civil and Political Officer with the expedition was Colonel

E. B. Sladen[80] of the Burma Commission. Four young officers Mr.

R. Phayre, C.S.,[81] Mr. A. S. Fleming, C.S., Captain G. S. Eyre,

of the Commission, and Mr. G. G. Collins accompanied the force as

civil officers. Mr. R. C. Stevenson, also of the police, one of the

foremost Burmese scholars, was attached to General Prendergast as chief

interpreter.

On the 14th November the frontier was crossed, on the 17th Minhla,

on the 23rd Pagan, on the 25th Myingyan were successively occupied.

Except at Minhla, where the fort which still stands on the river-bank

was not taken without a brisk fight, scarcely any resistance was

encountered. And as the flotilla moved up the river, even in Mandalay

the determination to resist began to fail. Just before the expedition

reached Ava the Kinwun Mingyi arrived, and after some negotiation

arranged the unconditional surrender of the capital and of the Royal

Family. On the 26th and 27th November the forts at Ava and Sagaing

were given up, and the troops at Ava laid down their arms. On the

28th the flotilla moored off the town, and General Prendergast

occupied Mandalay. The city and the palace were surrounded, while

Colonel Sladen, with the cool courage which was his best distinction,

entered the palace alone, and remained there for a day and a night,

settling the details of the King’s surrender. Next day, in a little

summer-house in the palace garden, King Thebaw gave himself up to the

victorious General, and the dynasty of Alaungpăyá ruled no more. After

all, it was a mushroom growth, having held sway for little more than

130 years.[82] The King and his two Queens, with their mother and her

eldest daughter, were driven through the streets of Mandalay in little

bullock-drawn carriages, the only vehicles available. They were placed

on board the steamer _Thooreah_, and conveyed to Rangoon. The flimsy

little summer-house fell into decay, and no longer exists. The tablet

which marks its site, and commemorates the most striking event in its

history, will doubtless remain as long as the British flag flies over

Mandalay.

The first report of the King’s surrender reached Rangoon in a

non-official telegram. By luck or good management we were enabled to

telegraph the tidings simultaneously to the Secretary of State, and to

save his Lordship from the shock of receiving the first intimation of

the fall of Mandalay from his morning paper. Of course, the telegraph

line was interrupted. This message came from Tha-yet-my̆o, brought

thither by the King’s steamer.

As the junior officer in the Secretariat, I was told off to board the

_Thooreah_ on her arrival. I was thus the first officer in Rangoon to

see the ex-King and his Queens. King Thebaw was in appearance a Burman

of very ordinary type. He looked neither dissipated nor cruel; nor did

he show any emotion or feeling of his melancholy position. His somewhat

heavy features were unmistakably those of the House of Alaungpăyá.

Both he and his elder sister (who died not long ago) closely resembled

the familiar picture of Mindôn Min. Queen Sūpăyá-lāt’s features were

more finely marked than is usual with Burmese ladies. She bore no

appearance of special depravity, but she certainly looked a little

shrew. The legend of Sūpăyá-lāt is that she was a monster of cruelty

and wickedness, and that she was mainly responsible for all acts of

State during her husband’s reign. From all that I heard in Mandalay,

where I had many sources of information, for the most part unfriendly

to the ex-Queen, I believe that both her wickedness and her influence

have been much exaggerated. She seems to have been of a jealous

temper, and to have checked any inclination on the part of her husband

to follow the footsteps of Mindôn Min. Doubtless it went hard with any

maid who attracted the King’s attention. On one of the golden doors of

the palace used to be shown bloodstains, marks of a little hand, signs

of the tragic end of a Princess who had incurred the Queen’s wrath.

(I am aware of the learned explanation of these marks, but the legend

is far more interesting.) Beyond this there is no credible evidence

of her cruelty, nor is it well established that she ruled the State.

Clearly she wielded some influence; but apart from the story of her

speech to the Kinwun Mingyi, the most arrogant action imputed to her

was that she used to have her meals before the King. Of course, this

was very unusual and unseemly for a Burmese woman of any class. It

hardly shows that she was paramount in the direction of the kingdom.

The royal exiles were transferred to the R.I.M.S. _Clive_, and, after

remaining for a few days in Rangoon, were taken to Madras. They were

finally transferred to Ratnagiri in the Bombay Presidency, where

King Thebaw and Sūpăyá-lāt still live. The poor little second Queen,

of whom nothing, good or bad, has ever been heard, died last year.

An irresponsible journalist lately suggested that Ratnagiri was an

unsuitable place of abode for these fallen dignitaries. It is one of

the best places that could be chosen. They and their family have been

quite healthy. As they cannot be allowed to return to Burma, they are

likely to be as contented there as elsewhere. Two of the Ministers

and a few retainers were with difficulty persuaded to accompany their

fallen master. The Ministers speedily returned to Mandalay. So did most

of the retainers after one little Chin maid had given some trouble by

running up a tree and declining to come down, because Sūpăyá-lāt, whose

temper misfortune may have sharpened, had smacked her.

The rapidity with which the conquest of the Burmese King was effected

must always be a subject of astonishment. Many times in the previous

wars Burmese soldiers had offered stout resistance, fighting fiercely

behind stockades. That the martial spirit still survived was abundantly

shown afterwards in the years of desultory fighting described in Sir

Charles Crosthwaite’s classic history of the pacification of Burma.

The truth is, the central Government was rotten at the core, corrupt

and inefficient and singularly impecunious. The balance found in the

Treasury at Mandalay was about £5,000, not a very large sum to finance

a war. There was no organized Burmese army, with captains versed in the

art of war, capable of meeting in the field disciplined troops under

trained leaders. But the main cause of the downfall of the Burmese

kingdom, with hardly a blow struck in its defence, was no doubt the

speed with which preparations for the advance were made, and the skill,

swiftness, and resolution with which General Prendergast directed the

progress to Mandalay. If a little more time had been allowed to the

Burmese, the ascent would have been more arduous, though not less

effectual. The celerity with which the operations were carried out is

probably paralleled in history only by the advance of the Balkan armies

towards Constantinople.

While opposition to the main force was feeble and faint-hearted, at the

outset of hostilities reprisals were taken on Englishmen employed in

the forests or on the river. It was, indeed, only by the humanity or

prudence of some local officials that any of these isolated Englishmen

escaped. A Thandawzin[83] was sent to deal with Bombay-Burma men on

the Chindwin. Four of them were barbarously murdered. The murderer

was Thandawzin So Bôn, who disappeared immediately. I sought him

diligently, but in vain, for nearly twenty-five years. If he still

lives, this record of his name may yet bring to him the reward of his

crime. Four other forest men were saved by the intervention of the

Wun[84] of Mingin.

Upper Burma had long been the refuge of persons who had pressing

reasons for leaving Lower Burma; in fact, as one departmental Report

said, it was a “perfect Arcadia.” Not only thieves, robbers, dacoits,

and murderers, but the bailiff who had lost at Komi the proceeds of

Court sales, the Postmaster who was short in his collections, the clerk

who had stolen witnesses’ subsistence money, all found an asylum across

the border. Demands for extradition were made, but practically never

with any effect. The Wun of Mingin was among many who felt it necessary

to take measures for their security if, as seemed likely, Upper

Burma came under British rule. Long years ago, this astute man had

been Akunwun[85] of the rich district of Rangoon or Hanthawaddy. One

morning, having packed on elephants the contents of the Treasury, some

lakhs of rupees, he fled with his plunder across the frontier. There,

with his wicked prize, he was a man of importance, obtained office,

and in process of time was placed in charge of Mingin on the Chindwin

River. Partly moved by humanity, for he was as kindly a man as ever

scooped a Treasury, partly, I surmise, because he was shrewd enough

to foresee the downfall of the Burmese Government, he protected the

Bombay-Burma men who fell into his hands, saved them from ill-usage and

death, and made them over to a small British force which early visited

the Chindwin. The Wun’s humanity was suitably rewarded. His delinquency

was condoned and he became a My̆o-ôk. Though he was believed always

to be tainted with the corrupt habits of Upper Burma, he served us

moderately well. The fact that he had saved the lives of our countrymen

was never forgotten and would have covered many sins. Finally, he died

in his bed, up to the day of his death in receipt of a pension from

Government. I knew very well both him and his wife, who had accompanied

him in his flight from Rangoon. Naturally, we did not in plain words

discuss that incident. But reference to early days was sometimes

made, and the old lady admitted that the Wun had been frivolous and

light-hearted in his youth. When I knew him, he was grave and reverend.

This is not the only instance in which persons guilty of past offences

in Lower Burma purged their guilt by good service in troubled times and

were received back into Government employ. I found it convenient to

keep in mind their histories.

Another case of the cruel treatment of Europeans was the seizure

of a Flotilla steamer at Moda, between Mandalay and Bhamo, and the

imprisonment and ill-treatment of crew and officers. Daily was Captain

Redman led out as if to execution. He, too, escaped by some friendly

intervention, or the hesitation of his captors to proceed to the last

extremity. He was, however, very badly used. The two local officers

responsible for these barbarities were brought down to Mandalay, fined

and imprisoned, and publicly whipped by the Chief Commissioner’s order.

A Civil Servant in Burma · 第 7 / 17 章